[Federal Register Volume 90, Number 166 (Friday, August 29, 2025)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 42137-42138]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2025-16641]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

47 CFR Part 64

[GN Docket No. 25-133, CG Docket Nos. 21-402, 02-278, 17-59; DA 25-621; 
FR ID 309968]


Delete, Delete, Delete; Targeting and Eliminating Unlawful Text 
Messages; Rules and Regulations Implementing of the Telephone Consumer 
Protection Act of 1991; Advanced Methods To Target and Eliminate 
Unlawful Robocalls

AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In this document, the Federal Communications Commission 
(Commission) conforms the Commission's rules to a court decision 
nullifying the first full paragraph of the revised prior express 
written consent rule adopted in the Second Text Blocking Report and 
Order. The court issued its mandate on April 30, 2025, which vacated, 
as of that date, the rule change for the first full paragraph of the 
Prior Express Written Consent Requirements section that the Commission 
adopted in 2023 in Targeting and Eliminating Unlawful Text Messages; 
Rules and Regulations Implementing of the Telephone Consumer Protection 
Act of 1991; Advanced Methods to Target and Eliminate Unlawful 
Robocalls, and Second Report and Order, Second Further Notice of 
Proposed Rulemaking, and Waiver Order.

DATES: This rule is effective August 29, 2025.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mika Savir of the Consumer Policy 
Division, Consumer and Governmental Affairs Bureau, at 
[email protected] or (202) 418-0384.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a summary of the Commission's Order, 
in GN Docket No. 25-133, CG Docket Nos. 21-402, 02-278, and 17-59, DA 
25-621, adopted and released on July 14, 2025. The full text of this 
document is available online at https://docs.fcc.gov/public/attachments/DA-25-621A1.pdf. To request this document in accessible 
formats for people with disabilities (e.g., Braille, large print, 
electronic files, audio format) or to request reasonable accommodations 
(e.g., accessible format documents, sign language interpreters, CART), 
send an email to [email protected] or call the FCC's Consumer and 
Governmental Affairs Bureau at (202) 418-0530.

[[Page 42138]]

Congressional Review Act

    The Commission sent a copy of the Order to Congress and the 
Government Accountability Office pursuant to the Congressional Review 
Act, 5 U.S.C. 801(a)(1)(A).

Synopsis

    1. The United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit 
vacated and remanded the part of the Commission's order adopting the 
revised rule section 47 CFR 64.1200(f)(9) in Targeting and Eliminating 
Unlawful Text Messages; Rules and Regulations Implementing of the 
Telephone Consumer Protection Act of 1991; Advanced Methods to Target 
and Eliminate Unlawful Robocalls, CG Docket Nos. 21-402, 02-278, and 
17-59, Second Report and Order, Second Further Notice of Proposed 
Rulemaking in CG Docket Nos. 02-278 and 21-402, and Waiver Order in CG 
Docket No. 17-59, 89 FR 5117 (Jan. 26, 2024). Pursuant to F. R. App. P. 
41(b), the court issued its mandate on April 30, 2025, which vacated, 
as of that date, the rule change for the first full paragraph of Sec.  
64.1200(f)(9) that the Commission adopted in 2023. This action 
reinstates in the Commission's rules the prior version of Sec.  
64.1200(f)(9). Prior to the court's mandate, the Commission had 
postponed the effective date of the revised rule and the revised rule 
had not gone into effect.
    2. The Commission for good cause finds that notice and comment are 
unnecessary for this rule amendment under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B) because 
this ministerial order merely implements the mandate of the United 
States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, and the Commission 
lacks discretion to depart from this mandate. Because this Order is 
being adopted without notice and comment, the Regulatory Flexibility 
Act does not apply.

List of Subjects in 47 CFR Part 64

    Communications common carriers, Reporting and recordkeeping 
requirements, Telecommunications, Telephone.

Federal Communications Commission.
Robert Garza,
Legal Advisor, Consumer and Governmental Affairs Bureau.

Final Rules

    For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Federal 
Communications Commission amends 47 CFR part 64 as follows:

PART 64--MISCELLANEOUS RULES RELATING TO COMMON CARRIERS

0
1. The authority citation for part 64 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 47 U.S.C. 151, 152, 154, 201, 202, 217, 218, 220, 
222, 225, 226, 227, 227b, 228, 251(a), 251(e), 254(k), 255, 262, 
276, 403(b)(2)(B), (c), 616, 620, 716, 1401-1473, unless otherwise 
noted; Pub. L. 115-141, Div. P, sec. 503, 132 Stat. 348, 1091; Pub. 
L. 117-338, 136 Stat. 6156.

Subpart L--Restrictions on Telemarketing, Telephone Solicitation, 
and Facsimile Advertising

0
2. Amend Sec.  64.1200 by revising paragraph (f)(9) to read as follows:


Sec.  64.1200  Delivery restrictions.

* * * * *
    (f) * * *
    (9) The term prior express written consent means an agreement, in 
writing, bearing the signature of the person called that clearly 
authorizes the seller to deliver or cause to be delivered to the person 
called advertisements or telemarketing messages using an automatic 
telephone dialing system or an artificial or prerecorded voice, and the 
telephone number to which the signatory authorizes such advertisements 
or telemarketing messages to be delivered.
    (i) The written agreement shall include a clear and conspicuous 
disclosure informing the person signing that:
    (A) By executing the agreement, such person authorizes the seller 
to deliver or cause to be delivered to the signatory telemarketing 
calls using an automatic telephone dialing system or an artificial or 
prerecorded voice; and
    (B) The person is not required to sign the agreement (directly or 
indirectly), or agree to enter into such an agreement as a condition of 
purchasing any property, goods, or services.
    (ii) The term ``signature'' shall include an electronic or digital 
form of signature, to the extent that such form of signature is 
recognized as a valid signature under applicable federal law or state 
contract law.
* * * * *

[FR Doc. 2025-16641 Filed 8-28-25; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-P