[Federal Register Volume 90, Number 162 (Monday, August 25, 2025)]
[Notices]
[Pages 41431-41436]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2025-16178]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-103746; File No. SR-NYSEAMER-2025-50]


Self-Regulatory Organizations; NYSE American LLC; Notice of 
Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Change To Amend Rule 904

August 20, 2025.
    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) \1\ of the Securities Exchange Act of 
1934 (``Act'') \2\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\3\ notice is hereby given 
that, on August 15, 2025, NYSE American LLC (``NYSE American'' or the 
``Exchange'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the 
``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in Items I and II 
below, which Items have been prepared by the self-regulatory 
organization. The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit 
comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 15 U.S.C. 78a.
    \3\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance 
of the Proposed Rule Change

    The Exchange proposes to amend Rule 904 (Position Limits) regarding 
the position limits for options on iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF 
(``IBIT''). The proposed rule change is available on the Exchange's 
website at www.nyse.com, at the principal office of the Exchange.

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and 
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, the self-regulatory organization 
included statements concerning the purpose of, and basis for, the 
proposed rule change and discussed any comments it received on the 
proposed rule change. The text of those statements may be examined at 
the places specified in Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared 
summaries, set forth in sections A, B, and C below, of the most 
significant parts of such statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and the 
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    The Exchange proposes to amend Rule 904 (Position Limits) regarding 
the position limits for options on IBIT. Specifically, the proposed 
rule change amends Rule 904, Commentary .07(f) to delete the 25,000-
contract position limit on IBIT options. As a result, the position 
limits for IBIT options would be determined in accordance with Rule 
904, Commentary .07(a)-(e) and be based on trading in IBIT during the 
most-recent six-month period.\4\ This is a competitive filing based on 
a substantially identical proposal submitted by Nasdaq ISE, LLC 
(``ISE'') and approved by the Securities and Exchange Commission 
(``Commission'').\5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ Pursuant to Rule 905(a)(i), the exercise limits for IBIT 
options are equivalent to the position limits prescribed for such 
options in current Rule 904. Therefore, currently, the exercise 
limit for IBIT options is 25,000 contracts. The proposed rule change 
would modify the exercise limit for IBIT options to be equivalent to 
the position limit prescribed in Rule 904, Commentary .07 (which may 
be 25,000, 50,000, 75,000, 200,000, or 250,000, depending on the 
six-month trading volume or the six-month trading volume and 
outstanding shares of IBIT). See Rule 904, Commentary .07(a)-(e).
    \5\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 103564 (July 29, 
2025), 90 FR 36229 (August 1, 2025) (SR-ISE-2024-62) (Order 
Approving a Proposed Rule Change, as Modified by Amendment Nos. 2 
and 3, Regarding Position and Exercise Limits for Options on the 
iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF) (``ISE Approval Order'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    IBIT is an Exchange-Traded Fund (``ETF'') that holds bitcoin and is 
listed on The Nasdaq Stock Market LLC.\6\ In September 2024, ISE 
received approval to list options on IBIT.\7\ On November 25, 2024, the 
Commission noticed the Exchange's filing and immediate effectiveness of 
a proposed rule change to list and trade IBIT options.\8\ The position 
and exercise limits for IBIT options are 25,000 contracts as set forth 
in Rule 904, Commentary .07(f), the lowest limit available in equity 
options.\9\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ Nasdaq received approval to list and trade Bitcoin-Based 
Commodity-Based Trust Shares in IBIT pursuant to Rule 5711(d) of 
Nasdaq. See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 99306 (January 10, 
2024), 89 FR 3008 (January 17, 2024) (SR-NASDAQ-2023-016) (Order 
Granting Accelerated Approval of Proposed Rule Changes, as Modified 
by Amendments Thereto, To List and Trade Bitcoin-Based Commodity-
Based Trust Shares and Trust Units). IBIT started trading on January 
11, 2024.
    \7\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 101128 (September 
20, 2024), 89 FR 78942 (September 26, 2024) (SR-ISE-2024-03) (Notice 
of Filing of Amendment Nos. 4 and 5 and Order Granting Accelerated 
Approval of a Proposed Rule Change, as Modified by Amendment Nos. 1, 
4, and 5, To Permit the Listing and Trading of Options on the 
iShares Bitcoin Trust) (``IBIT Options Approval Order''). ISE began 
trading IBIT options on November 19, 2024.
    \8\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 101737 (November 25, 
2024), 89 FR 95257 (December 2, 2024) (SR-NYSEAMER-2024-73).
    \9\ See Rule 904, Commentary .07(e) and Rule 905(a)(i).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Per the Commission ``rules regarding position and exercise limits 
are intended to prevent the establishment of options positions that can 
be used or might create incentives to manipulate or

[[Page 41432]]

disrupt the underlying market so as to benefit the options positions.'' 
\10\ For this reason, the Commission requires that ``position and 
exercise limits must be sufficient to prevent investors from disrupting 
the market for the underlying security by acquiring and exercising a 
number of options contracts disproportionate to the deliverable supply 
and average trading volume of the underlying security.'' \11\ Based on 
its review and analysis of IBIT data, the Commission concluded that the 
25,000-contract position limit for IBIT options satisfied these 
objectives.\12\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \10\ See IBIT Options Approval Order, 89 FR, at 78946.
    \11\ See id.
    \12\ See id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    While the Exchange proposed a 25,000-contract position limit in its 
rule filing to list and trade IBIT options, it nonetheless believes 
that evidence existed to support a much higher position limit. 
Specifically, when the Commission approved ISE's proposal to permit the 
listing and trading of IBIT options, it considered and reviewed ISE's 
data analysis that the exercisable risk associated with a position 
limit of 25,000 contracts represented only 0.4% of the outstanding 
shares of IBIT.\13\ The Commission stated that it also considered and 
reviewed ISE's statement that with a position limit of 25,000 contracts 
on the same side of the market for IBIT options and 611,040,000 shares 
of IBIT outstanding, 244 market participants would have to 
simultaneously exercise their positions to place IBIT under stress.\14\ 
Based on this review, the Commission concluded that the 25,000-contract 
position and exercise limit for IBIT options were designed to prevent 
investors from disrupting the market for the underlying security by 
acquiring and exercising a number of options contracts disproportionate 
to the deliverable supply and average trading volume of the underlying 
security, and to prevent the establishment of options positions that 
can be used or might create incentives to manipulate or disrupt the 
underlying market so as to benefit the options position.\15\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \13\ See id. (data as of August 12, 2024).
    \14\ See id.
    \15\ See id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    IBIT currently qualifies for a 250,000-limit on same-side contracts 
pursuant to Rule 904, Commentary .07(a)(i), which requires that trading 
volume for the underlying security in the most-recent six months be at 
least 100 million shares.\16\ As of November 25, 2024, the market 
capitalization for IBIT was $46,783,480,800 \17\ with an average daily 
volume (``ADV''), for the preceding three months prior to November 25, 
2024, of 39,421,877 shares. Therefore, IBIT is well-above the requisite 
100 million shares necessary to qualify for the 250,000-contract 
position and exercise limit. Also, as of November 25, 2024, there were 
19,787,762 bitcoins in circulation.\18\ At a price of $94,830 per 
bitcoin,\19\ that equates to a market capitalization of greater than 
$1.876 trillion. If a position limit of 250,000 contracts were 
considered, the exercisable risk would represent 2.89% \20\ of IBIT 
shares outstanding. Given IBIT's liquidity, the current 25,000-contract 
position and exercise limit on IBIT options is extremely conservative.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \16\ Rule 904, Commentary .07(a) provides that to be eligible 
for the 250,000-contract limit, either (i) the most recent six-month 
trading volume of the underlying security must have totaled at least 
100,000,000 shares or (ii) the most recent six-month trading volume 
of the underlying security must have totaled at least 75,000,000 
shares and the underlying must have at least 300,000,000 shares 
currently outstanding.
    \17\ The market capitalization was determined by multiplying a 
settlement price of ($54.02) by the number of shares outstanding 
(866,040,000). This figure was acquired as of November 25, 2024. See 
https://www.ishares.com/us/products/333011/ishares-bitcoin-trust-etf.
    \18\ See https://www.coingecko.com/en/coins/bitcoin.
    \19\ This is the approximate price of bitcoin from 4:00 p.m. ET 
on November 25, 2024.
    \20\ This percentage is arrived at with this equation: (250,000 
contract limit * 100 shares per option/866,040,000 shares 
outstanding).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    As noted above, position and exercise limits are designed to limit 
the number of options contracts traded on an exchange in an underlying 
security that an investor, acting alone or in concert with others 
directly or indirectly, may control. These limits, which are described 
in Rules 904 and 905, are intended to address potential manipulative 
schemes and adverse market impacts surrounding the use of options, such 
as disrupting the market in the security underlying the options. 
Position and exercise limits must balance concerns regarding mitigating 
potential manipulation and the cost of inhibiting potential hedging 
activity that could be used for legitimate economic purposes.
    To achieve this balance, the Exchange proposes to remove IBIT (and 
the associated 25,000-contract limit) from the table of position limits 
in Commentary .07(f), which would enable IBIT options to trade in the 
same manner as options on other ETFs not included in this 
Commentary.\21\ Specifically, this proposal would result in an 
increased position and exercise limit for IBIT options from 25,000 to 
250,000 same-side contacts, pursuant to Commentary .07(a)(i). In 
addition, like options on other ETFs not listed in Commentary .07(f), 
position limits for IBIT options would be subject to subsequent six-
month reviews to determine future position and exercise limits.\22\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \21\ See proposed Rule 904, Commentary .07(f). The Exchange 
notes that the ETFs included in Commentary .07(f) (other than 
certain ETFs like IBIT that hold bitcoin) have significantly higher 
position limits than are authorized by Rule, which increases were 
subject to Exchange rule filings.
    \22\ See Rule 904, Commentary .07(e) and Rule 905(a)(i).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    With respect to IBIT options, in its filing proposing to amend the 
position and exercise limits for IBIT options, ISE considered IBIT's 
market capitalization and ADV measured against those of other 
underlying securities, as well as the position limit of 250,000 
contracts in relation to the position limits of other options.\23\ In 
measuring IBIT against other securities, ISE aggregated market 
capitalization and volume data for securities that have defined 
position limits utilizing data from The Options Clearing Corporations 
(``OCC'').\24\ This pool of data took into consideration 3,897 options 
on single stock securities, excluding broad-based ETFs.\25\ Next, ISE 
aggregated the data based on market capitalization and ADV and grouped 
option symbols by position limit utilizing statistical thresholds for 
ADV, based on 90 days, and market capitalization that were one standard 
deviation above the mean for each position limit category (i.e., 
25,000, 50,000 to 65,000, 75,000, 100,000 to less than 250,000, and 
250,000).\26\ Rule 904 sets out position limits for various contracts. 
For example, on the Exchange, like ISE, a 25,000-contract position 
limit applies to options with an underlying security that does not meet 
the requirements for a higher options contract position limit.\27\ ISE 
performed an exercise to demonstrate the IBIT options position limit 
relative to other options symbols in terms of market capitalization and 
ADV. For reference, the market capitalization for IBIT was

[[Page 41433]]

$46,783,480,800 \28\ with an ADV, for the preceding three months prior 
to November 25, 2024, of 39,421,877 shares. By comparison, ISE 
determined that if IBIT were compared to the 1,934 stocks underlying 
options that have position limits of 250,000 contracts (and less than 
500,000 contracts), IBIT would rank in the 88th percentile for market 
capitalization and the 99th percentile for ADV.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \23\ See ISE Approval Order, 90 FR, at 13233, 13235-37.
    \24\ The computations are based on OCC data from November 25, 
2024. Data displaying zero values in market capitalization or ADV 
were removed.
    \25\ IBIT has one asset and therefore is not comparable to a 
broad-based ETF where there are typically multiple components.
    \26\ The Exchange notes that position limits may also be higher 
due to corporate actions in the underlying equities, such as a stock 
split. See https://www.theocc.com/market-data/market-data-reports/series-and-trading-data/position-limits. As a result, ISE's pool of 
data considered higher position limits than 250,000 contracts, where 
applicable.
    \27\ See Rule 904, Commentary .07(e).
    \28\ The market capitalization was determined by multiplying a 
settlement price of ($54.02) by the number of shares outstanding 
(866,040,000). This figure was acquired as of November 25, 2024. See 
https://www.ishares.com/us/products/333011/ishares-bitcoin-trust-etf.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    ISE also analyzed a position limit of 250,000 contracts for IBIT by 
regressing the market capitalization figures and 90-day ADV of all non-
ETF equities, against their respective position limit figures. From 
this regression, ISE indicated it determined the implied coefficients 
to create a formulaic method for determining an appropriate position 
limit. In this case, the modeled position limit was 565,796 
contracts.\29\ Based on this analysis, the Exchange believes the 
proposed rule change that would result in a 250,000-contract position 
and exercise limit for IBIT is appropriate.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \29\ ISE stated it utilized this formula to arrive at the number 
of contracts: ((46,783,380,800 mkt cap * 0.0000002630 market cap 
coefficient) + (39,421,877 ADV * 0.0140402219 ADV coefficient)).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In addition, ISE reviewed IBIT's data relative to the market 
capitalization of the entire bitcoin market in terms of exercise risk 
and availability of deliverables. As noted above, as of November 25, 
2024, there were 19,787,762 bitcoins in circulation.\30\ ISE took a 
price of $94,830 per bitcoin,\31\ that equates to a market 
capitalization of greater than $1.876 trillion. If a position limit of 
250,000 contracts were considered, the exercisable risk would represent 
only 2.89% \32\ of the outstanding shares outstanding of IBIT. Since 
IBIT has a creation and redemption process managed through the issuer 
(whereby bitcoin is used to create IBIT shares), the position sought 
limit can be compared to the total market capitalization of the entire 
bitcoin market, and in that case, ISE determined that the exercisable 
risk for options on IBIT would represent less than 0.072% of all 
bitcoin outstanding.\33\ Assuming a scenario where all options on IBIT 
shares were exercised given a 250,000-contract position and exercise 
limit, this would have a virtually unnoticed impact on the entire 
bitcoin market. This ISE analysis demonstrates that a 250,000-contract 
position (and exercise) limit for IBIT options is appropriate given its 
liquidity.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \30\ See https://www.coingecko.com/en/coins/bitcoin.
    \31\ This is the approximate price of bitcoin from 4:00 p.m. ET 
on November 25, 2024.
    \32\ This percentage is arrived at with this equation: (250,000 
contract limit * 100 shares per option/866,040,000 shares 
outstanding).
    \33\ This number was arrived at with this calculation: ((250,000 
limit * 100 shares per option * $54.02 settle)/(19,787,762 Bitcoin 
outstanding * $94,830 Bitcoin price)).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Next, ISE reviewed a position (and exercise) limit of 250,000-
contracts for IBIT options by comparing it to position limits for 
derivative products regulated by the Commodity Futures Trading 
Commission (``CFTC''). While the CFTC, through the relevant Designated 
Contract Markets, only regulates options positions based upon delta 
equivalents (creating a less stringent standard), ISE examined 
equivalent bitcoin futures position limits. In particular, ISE looked 
to the Chicago Mercantile Exchange (``CME'') bitcoin futures 
contract,\34\ which has a position limit of 2,000 futures (for the 
initial spot month).\35\ On October 22, 2024, CME bitcoin futures 
settled at $94,945.\36\ On October 22, 2024, IBIT settled at $54.02, 
which would equate to greater than 17,557,898 shares of IBIT if the CME 
notional position limit was utilized. Since substantial portions of any 
distributed options portfolio are likely to be out of the money on 
expiration, an options position limit equivalent to the CME position 
limit for bitcoin futures (considering that all options deltas are 
<=1.00) should be a bit higher than the CME implied limit of 177,004. 
Of note, unlike options contracts, CME position limits are calculated 
on a net futures-equivalent basis by contract and include contracts 
that aggregate into one or more base contracts according to an 
aggregation ratio(s).\37\ If a position exceeds position limits because 
of an option assignment, CME permits market participants to liquidate 
the excess position within one business day without being considered in 
violation of its rules. Additionally, if at the close of trading, a 
position that includes options exceeds position limits for futures 
contracts, when evaluated using the delta factors as of that day's 
close of trading but does not exceed the limits when evaluated using 
the previous day's delta factors, then the position shall not 
constitute a position limit violation. The Exchange believes ISE's 
comparison to CME's position limits on bitcoin futures demonstrates 
that a 250,000-contract limit for IBIT options is appropriate.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \34\ CME Bitcoin Futures are described in Chapter 350 of CME's 
Rulebook.
    \35\ See the Position Accountability and Reportable Level Table 
in the Interpretations & Special Notices Section of Chapter 5 of 
CME's Rulebook. Each CME bitcoin futures contract is valued at five 
bitcoins as defined by the CME CF Bitcoin Reference Rate (``BRR''). 
See CME Rule 35001.
    \36\ 2,000 futures at a 5-bitcoin multiplier (per the contract 
specifications) equates to $949,450,000 (2000 contracts * 5 BTC per 
contract * $94,945 price of November BTC future) of notional value.
    \37\ See https://www.cmegroup.com/education/courses/market-regulation/position-limits/position-limits-aggregation-of-contracts-and-table.htm.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Further, ISE analyzed a position and exercise limit of 250,000 for 
IBIT options against other options on ETFs with an underling commodity, 
namely SPDR Gold Shares (``GLD''), iShares Silver Trust (``SLV''), and 
ProShares Bitcoin ETF (``BITO'').\38\ GLD has a float of 306.1 million 
shares and a position limit of 250,000 contracts.\39\ SLV has a float 
of 520.7 million shares and a position limit of 250,000 contracts.\40\ 
BITO has a float of 107.65 million shares and a position limit of 
250,000 contracts.\41\ As previously noted, position and exercise 
limits are designed to limit the number of options contracts traded on 
the exchange in an underlying security that an investor, acting alone 
or in concert with others directly or indirectly, may control. A 
position limit exercise in GLD would represent 8.17% of the float of 
GLD; a position limit exercise in SLV would represent 4.8% of the float 
of SLV; and a position limit exercise in BITO would represent 23.22% of 
the float of BITO. In comparison, a 250,000-contract position limit in 
IBIT would represent only 2.89% of the float of IBIT. Consequently, a 
250,000-contract position and exercise limit in IBIT options is more 
conservative than the standard applied to GLD, SLV, and BITO, and thus 
appropriate.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \38\ GLD, SLV and BITO each hold one asset in trust similar to 
IBIT.
    \39\ See https://www.ssga.com/us/en/intermediary/etfs/spdr-gold-shares-gld.
    \40\ See https://www.ishares.com/us/products/239855/ishares-silver-trust-fund.
    \41\ See https://www.marketwatch.com/investing/fund/bito.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    ISE also noted that IBIT options began trading in penny increments 
as of January 2, 2025 pursuant to the Penny Interval Program.\42\ The 
Commission

[[Page 41434]]

noted that evidence contained in both the Exchanges' Report and the 
Cornerstone analysis demonstrates that the Penny Pilot has benefitted 
investors and other market participants in the form of narrower 
spreads.\43\ The most actively traded options classes are included in 
the Penny Program based on certain objective criteria (trading volume 
thresholds and initial price tests). As noted in the Penny Approval 
Order, the Penny Program reflects a certain level of trading interest 
(either because the class is newly listed or a class that experience a 
significant growth in investor interest) to quote in finer trading 
increments, which in turn should benefit market participants by 
reducing the cost of trading such options.\44\ IBIT options are among a 
select group of products that have achieved a certain level of 
liquidity that have garnered it the ability to trade in finer 
increments. Failing to increase position and exercise limits for IBIT 
options, now that it is trading in finer increments, may artificially 
inhibit liquidity and create price inefficiency.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \42\ The Exchange may add to the Penny Program a newly listed 
option class provided that (i) it is among the 300 most actively 
traded multiply listed option classes, as ranked by National Cleared 
Volume at OCC, in its first full calendar month of trading and (ii) 
the underlying security is priced below $200 or the underlying index 
is at an index level below $200. Any option class added under this 
provision will be added on the first trading day of the month after 
it qualifies and will remain in the Penny Program for one full 
calendar year, after which it will be subject to the Annual Review 
described in Rule 960.1NY(d). The Exchange may add any option class 
to the Penny Program, provided that (i) it is among the 75 most 
actively traded multiply listed option classes, as ranked by 
National Cleared Volume at OCC, in the past six full calendar months 
of trading and (ii) the underlying security is priced below $200 or 
the underlying index is at an index level below $200. Any option 
class added under this provision will be added on the first trading 
day of the second full month after it qualifies and will remain in 
the Penny Program for the rest of the calendar year, after which it 
will be subject to the Annual Review as described in Rule 
960.1NY(d). See Rule 960.1NY(d).
    \43\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 88532 (April 1, 
2020), 67 FR 19545, 19548 (April 7, 2020) (File No. 4-443) (Joint 
Industry Plan; Order Approving Amendment No. 5 to the Plan for the 
Purpose of Developing and Implementing Procedures Designed To 
Facilitate the Listing and Trading of Standardized Options To Adopt 
a Penny Interval Program) (``Penny Approval Order'').
    \44\ Id. at 19548.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange believes the above information and analysis by ISE 
demonstrates that IBIT has more than sufficient liquidity to garner an 
increased position and exercise limit of 250,000 same-side contracts. 
The Exchange believes that any concerns related to manipulation and 
protection of investors are mollified by the significant liquidity 
provision in IBIT. The Exchange states that, as a general principle, 
increases in active trading volume and deep liquidity of the underlying 
securities do not lead to manipulation and/or disruption.
    The Exchange believes that allowing IBIT options to have increased 
position and exercise limits would lead to a more liquid and 
competitive market environment for such options, which will benefit 
customers that trade these options. Further, the reporting requirement 
for such options would remain unchanged. Thus, the Exchange will still 
require that each member that maintains positions in IBIT options on 
the same side of the market, for its own account or for the account of 
a customer, report certain information to the Exchange. This 
information includes, but would not be limited to, the options 
positions, whether such positions are hedged and, if so, a description 
of the hedge(s). Market Makers \45\ would continue to be exempt from 
this reporting requirement, however, the Exchange may access Market 
Maker position information.\46\ Moreover, the Exchange's requirement 
that members file reports with the Exchange for any customer who held 
aggregate large long or short positions on the same side of the market 
of 200 or more option contracts of any single class for the previous 
day will remain at this level.\47\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \45\ Per Rule 920NY(a), a Market Maker is an individual who is 
registered with the Exchange for the purpose of making transactions 
as a dealer-specialist.
    \46\ OCC through the Large option Position Reporting (``LOPR'') 
system acts as a centralized service provider for ATP Holder 
compliance with position reporting requirements by collecting data 
from each ATP Holder consolidating the information, and ultimately 
providing detailed listings of each ATP Holder's report to the 
Exchange, as well as Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, Inc. 
(``FINRA''), acting as its agent pursuant to a regulatory services 
agreement (``RSA'').
    \47\ See Rule 906. Reporting of Options Positions.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange also has no reason to believe that the growth in 
trading volume in IBIT options will not continue. Rather, the Exchange 
expects continued options volume growth in IBIT as opportunities for 
investors to participate in the options markets increase and evolve. 
The Exchange believes that the current position and exercise limits in 
IBIT options are restrictive and will hamper the listed options markets 
from being able to compete fairly and effectively with the over-the-
counter (``OTC'') markets. OTC transactions occur through bilateral 
agreements, the terms of which are not publicly disclosed to the 
marketplace. As such, OTC transactions do not contribute to the price 
discovery process on a public exchange or other lit markets. The 
Exchange believes that without the proposed changes to position and 
exercise limits for IBIT options, market participants will find the 
25,000-contract position and exercise limit an impediment to their 
business and investment objectives as well as an impediment to 
efficient pricing. As a result, market participants may find the less 
transparent OTC markets a more attractive alternative to achieve their 
investment and hedging objectives, leading to a retreat from the listed 
options markets, where trades are subject to reporting requirements and 
daily surveillance. The Exchange notes that, consistent with Rules 904 
and 905, the position (and exercise) limits for IBIT options would be 
reviewed on a six-month basis, as is done for other options
    The Exchange represents that its existing trading surveillances are 
adequate to monitor trading in IBIT options. Additionally, the Exchange 
is a member of the Intermarket Surveillance Group (``ISG'') under the 
ISG Agreement. ISG members work together to coordinate surveillance and 
investigative information sharing in the stock, options, and futures 
markets. In addition to the surveillance that is conducted by the 
Exchange's market surveillance staff, the Exchange would also be able 
to obtain information regarding trading in shares of IBIT on other 
exchanges through ISG. In addition, and as referenced above, the 
Exchange has a regulatory services agreement with FINRA, pursuant to 
which FINRA conducts certain surveillances on behalf of the Exchange. 
Further, pursuant to a multi-party 17d-2 joint plan, all options 
exchanges allocate regulatory responsibilities to FINRA to conduct 
certain options-related market surveillances.\48\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \48\ Section 19(g)(1) of the Act, among other things, requires 
every SRO registered as a national securities exchange or national 
securities association to comply with the Act, the rules and 
regulations thereunder, and the SRO's own rules, and, absent 
reasonable justification or excuse, enforce compliance by its 
members and persons associated with its members. See 15 U.S.C. 
78q(d)(1) and 17 CFR 240.17d-2. Section 17(d)(1) of the Act allows 
the Commission to relieve an SRO of certain responsibilities with 
respect to members of the SRO who are also members of another SRO. 
Specifically, Section 17(d)(1) allows the Commission to relieve an 
SRO of its responsibilities to: (i) receive regulatory reports from 
such members; (ii) examine such members for compliance with the Act 
and the rules and regulations thereunder, and the rules of the SRO; 
or (iii) carry out other specified regulatory responsibilities with 
respect to such members.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

2. Statutory Basis
    The Exchange believes that its proposal is consistent with Section 
6(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the ``Act''),\49\ in 
general, and furthers the objectives of Section 6(b)(5) of the Act,\50\ 
in particular, in that it is designed to prevent fraudulent and 
manipulative acts and practices, to promote just and equitable 
principles of trade, to remove impediments to and perfect the mechanism 
of a free and open market and a national market system, and, in

[[Page 41435]]

general, to protect investors and the public interest.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \49\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
    \50\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In particular, the Exchange believes the proposed rule change will 
remove impediments to and perfect the mechanism of free and open market 
and a national market system, and, in general, protect investors and 
the public interest, because it will provide market participants with 
the ability to more effectively execute their trading and hedging 
activities. Also, based on current trading volume, the resulting 
increase in the position (and exercise) limits for IBIT options may 
allow Market Makers to maintain their liquidity in these options in 
amounts commensurate with the continued high consumer demand in IBIT 
options. Subjecting IBIT options to the position limits in Rule 904, 
Commentary .07 and corresponding exercise limits in Rule 905 may also 
encourage other liquidity providers to continue to trade on the 
Exchange rather than shift their volume to OTC markets, which will 
enhance the process of price discovery conducted on the Exchange 
through increased order flow. The Exchange notes the proposed rule 
change would further allow institutional investors to utilize IBIT 
options for prudent risk management purposes.
    In support of the proposed rule change, the Exchange cites the in-
depth analysis ISE performed which, as noted above, considered, among 
other things: (1) IBIT's market capitalization and ADV, and a 250,000 
contract position and exercise limit in relation to the position limits 
of options on other securities; (2) market capitalization of the entire 
Bitcoin market in terms of exercise risk and availability of 
deliverables; and (3) comparing a 250,000 contract position limit to 
position limits for derivative products regulated by the CFTC. Based on 
the Exchange's review of these analyses, and consistent with the ISE 
Approval Order, the Exchange believes that subjecting IBIT options to 
the position (and exercise) limits set forth in Rule 904, Commentary 
.07 (which may go up to 250,000 contracts) is more than 
appropriate.\51\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \51\ See ISE Approval Order, 90 FR, at 36231 (concluding that, 
based on the Commission's review of the data and analysis provided 
by ISE, ``the proposed position and contract limits for IBIT options 
``are designed to prevent market participants from disrupting the 
market for the underlying securities by acquiring and exercising a 
number of options contracts disproportionate to the deliverable 
supply and average trading volume of the underlying security, and to 
prevent the establishment of options positions that can be used or 
might create incentives to manipulate or disrupt the underlying 
market so as to benefit the options position.'')
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will 
impose any burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate 
in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. The Exchange does not 
believe the proposed rule change will impose any burden on intramarket 
competition that is not necessary or appropriate in furtherance of the 
purposes of the Act because all market participants would be subject to 
the same position and exercise limits for IBIT options. The Exchange 
does not believe the proposed rule change will impose any burden on 
intermarket competition, and may benefit competition, as the proposed 
rule change is identical to ISE's recently-approved rule change.\52\ 
The Exchange believes that the proposed rule change will also provide 
additional opportunities for market participants to continue to 
efficiently achieve their investment and trading objectives for equity 
options on the Exchange.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \52\ See ISE Approval Order.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed 
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others

    No written comments were solicited or received with respect to the 
proposed rule change.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for 
Commission Action

    The Exchange has filed the proposed rule change pursuant to Section 
19(b)(3)(A)(iii) of the Act \53\ and Rule 19b-4(f)(6) thereunder.\54\ 
Because the proposed rule change does not: (i) significantly affect the 
protection of investors or the public interest; (ii) impose any 
significant burden on competition; and (iii) become operative prior to 
30 days from the date on which it was filed, or such shorter time as 
the Commission may designate, if consistent with the protection of 
investors and the public interest, the proposed rule change has become 
effective pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A) of the Act and Rule 19b-
4(f)(6)(iii) thereunder.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \53\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(iii).
    \54\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    A proposed rule change filed under Rule 19b-4(f)(6) \55\ under the 
Act does not normally become operative prior to 30 days after the date 
of the filing. However, pursuant to Rule 19b-4(f)(6)(iii),\56\ the 
Commission may designate a shorter time if such action is consistent 
with the protection of investors and the public interest. The Exchange 
has requested that the Commission waive the 30-day operative delay so 
that the proposal may become operative immediately upon filing. The 
Commission previously approved the removal of the 25,000 contract 
position and exercise limits for IBIT, such that those funds will be 
subject to the position and exercise limits as determined for equity 
options for which no set limit has been otherwise established on that 
exchange.\57\ The Exchange is proposing similarly to remove of the 
25,000 contract position and exercise limit for IBIT, such that those 
funds will be subject to the position and exercise limits as determined 
by the position limit rules at Rule 904. The Exchange has provided 
information regarding IBIT, including, among other things, information 
regarding trading volume, and the market capitalization of IBIT and 
surveillance procedures that will apply. The Commission notes that the 
proposal raises no new or novel legal issues and would simply provide 
an additional venue for trading IBIT with position and exercise limits 
that may be higher than 25,000 contracts. Therefore, the Commission 
believes that waiver of the 30-day operative delay is consistent with 
the protection of investors and the public interest. Accordingly, the 
Commission hereby waives the 30-day operative delay and designates the 
proposed rule change as operative upon filing.\58\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \55\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6).
    \56\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6)(iii).
    \57\ See ISE Approval Order.
    \58\ For purposes only of waiving the 30-day operative delay, 
the Commission has also considered the proposed rule's impact on 
efficiency, competition, and capital formation. See 15 U.S.C. 
78c(f).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    At any time within 60 days of the filing of such proposed rule 
change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule 
change if it appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or 
appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or 
otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. If the Commission 
takes such action, the Commission shall institute proceedings under 
Section 19(b)(2)(B) \59\ of the Act to determine whether the proposed 
rule change should be approved or disapproved.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \59\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2)(B).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views and 
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule

[[Page 41436]]

change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of 
the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's internet comment form (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
     Send an email to [email protected]. Please include 
file number SR-NYSEAMER-2025-50 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities 
and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to file number SR-NYSEAMER-2025-50. This 
file number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To 
help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently, 
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on 
the Commission's internet website (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the filing will be available for inspection and 
copying at the principal office of the Exchange. Do not include 
personal identifiable information in submissions; you should submit 
only information that you wish to make available publicly. We may 
redact in part or withhold entirely from publication submitted material 
that is obscene or subject to copyright protection. All submissions 
should refer to file number SR-NYSEAMER-2025-50 and should be submitted 
on or before September 15, 2025.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets, 
pursuant to delegated authority.\60\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \60\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Sherry R. Haywood,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2025-16178 Filed 8-22-25; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P