[Federal Register Volume 90, Number 157 (Monday, August 18, 2025)]
[Notices]
[Pages 40055-40059]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2025-15636]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[C-533-941]
Certain Freight Rail Couplers and Parts Thereof From India:
Initiation of Countervailing Duty Investigation
AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
DATES: Applicable August 12, 2025.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Joshua Jacobson, AD/CVD Operations,
Office IV, Enforcement and Compliance,
[[Page 40056]]
International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401
Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-
0266.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
The Petition
On July 23, 2025, the U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce)
received a countervailing duty (CVD) petition concerning imports of
certain freight rail couplers and parts thereof (freight rail couplers)
from India filed in proper form on behalf of the Coalition of Freight
Coupler Producers (the petitioner).\1\ The CVD Petition was accompanied
by antidumping duty (AD) petitions concerning imports of freight rail
couplers from the Czech Republic and India.\2\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ See Petitioner's Letter, ``Petitions for the Imposition of
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Orders,'' dated July 23, 2025
(Petition). The members of the Coalition of Freight Coupler
Producers (Coalition) are McConway and Torley, LLC (McConway and
Torley), and the United Steel, Paper and Forestry, Rubber,
Manufacturing, Energy, Allied Industrial and Service Workers
International Union (USW).
\2\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Between July 28 and August 8, 2025, Commerce requested supplemental
information pertaining to certain aspects of the Petition in
supplemental questionnaires.\3\ Between July 30 and August 11, 2025,
the petitioner filed timely responses to these requests for additional
information.\4\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ See Commerce's Letters, ``Supplemental Questions,'' dated
July 28, 2025 (First General Issues Questionnaire), ``Supplemental
Questions,'' dated July 28, 2025 (First India CVD Questionnaire);
``Supplemental Questions,'' dated August 4, 2025 (Second General
Issues Questionnaire); and ``Supplemental Questions,'' dated August
8, 2025 (August 8, 2025, Supplemental Questionnaire).
\4\ See Petitioner's Letters, ``Response to Supplemental
Questions Regarding Volume I of the Petition,'' dated July 30, 2025
(First General Issues Supplement), ``Response to Supplemental
Questions Regarding Volume IV of the Petition,'' dated August 4,
2025 (India CVD Supplement), ``Response to the Second Supplemental
Questions Regarding Volume I of the Petition'', dated August 6, 2025
(Second General Issues Supplement), and ``Response to Second
Supplemental Questions Regarding Volume IV of the Petition,'' dated
August 11, 2025 (August 11, 2025, Supplement).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In accordance with section 702(b)(1) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended (the Act), the petitioner alleges that the Government of India
(GOI) is providing countervailable subsidies, within the meaning of
sections 701 and 771(5) of the Act, to producers of freight rail
couplers in India, and that such imports are materially injuring, or
threatening material injury to, the domestic industry producing rebar
in the United States. Consistent with section 702(b)(1) of the Act and
19 CFR 351.202(b), for those alleged programs on which we are
initiating a CVD investigation, the Petition was accompanied by
information reasonably available to the petitioner supporting its
allegations.
Commerce finds that the petitioner filed the Petition on behalf of
the domestic industry, because the petitioner is an interested party,
as defined in section 771(9)(F) of the Act.\5\ Commerce also finds that
the petitioner demonstrated sufficient industry support with respect to
the initiation of the requested CVD investigation.\6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ The members of the Coalition (McConway and Torley and the
USW) are interested parties as defined under sections 771(9)(C) and
(D) of the Act, respectively.
\6\ See section on ``Determination of Industry Support for the
Petition,'' infra.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Period of Investigation
Because the Petition was filed on July 23, 2025, the period of
investigation (POI) for the India CVD investigation is January 1, 2024,
through December 31, 2024.\7\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ See 19 CFR 351.204(b)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Scope of the Investigation
The product covered by this investigation is freight rail couplers
from India. For a full description of the scope of this investigation,
see the appendix to this notice.
Comments on the Scope of the Investigation
On August 4, 2025, Commerce requested information and clarification
from the petitioner regarding the proposed scope to ensure that the
scope language in the Petition is an accurate reflection of the
products for which the domestic industry is seeking relief.\8\ On
August 6, 2025, the petitioner provided clarifications and revised the
scope.\9\ The description of the merchandise covered by this
investigation, as described in the appendix to this notice, reflects
these clarifications.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\8\ See Second General Issues Supplemental Questionnaire.
\9\ See Second General Issues Supplement at 1-3 and Exhibits II-
Supp-1 through II-Supp-3.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
As discussed in the Preamble to Commerce's regulations, we are
setting aside a period for interested parties to raise issues regarding
product coverage (i.e., scope).\10\ Commerce will consider all comments
received from interested parties and, if necessary, will consult with
interested parties prior to the issuance of the preliminary
determinations. If scope comments include factual information, all such
factual information should be limited to public information.\11\
Commerce requests that interested parties provide at the beginning of
their scope comments a public executive summary for each comment or
issue raised in their submission. Commerce further requests that
interested parties limit their public executive summary of each comment
or issue to no more than 450 words, not including citations. Commerce
intends to use the public executive summaries as the basis of the
comment summaries included in the analysis of scope comments. To
facilitate preparation of its questionnaires, Commerce requests that
scope comments be submitted by 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time (ET) on September
2, 2025, which is the next business day after 20 calendar days from the
signature date of this notice.\12\ Any rebuttal comments, which may
include factual information, and should also be limited to public
information, must be filed by 5:00 p.m. ET on September 12, 2025, which
is 10 calendar days from the initial comment deadline.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\10\ See Antidumping Duties; Countervailing Duties; Final Rule,
62 FR 27296, 27323 (May 19, 1997) (Preamble); see also 19 CFR
351.312.
\11\ See 19 CFR 351.102(b)(21) (defining ``factual
information'').
\12\ The deadline for scope comments falls on September 1, 2025,
which is a federal holiday. In accordance with 19 CFR 351.303(b)(1),
Commerce will accept scope comments filed by 5.00 p.m. ET on
September 2, 2025 (``For both electronically and manually filed
documents, if the applicable due date falls on a non-business day,
the Secretary will accept documents that are filed on the next
business day.'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Commerce requests that any factual information that parties
consider relevant to the scope of this investigation be submitted
during that time period. However, if a party subsequently finds that
additional factual information pertaining to the scope of the
investigation may be relevant, the party must contact Commerce and
request permission to submit the additional information. All scope
comments must be filed simultaneously on the records of the concurrent
AD and CVD investigations.
Filing Requirements
All submissions to Commerce must be filed electronically via
Enforcement and Compliance's Antidumping Duty and Countervailing Duty
Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS), unless an exception
applies.\13\ An electronically filed document must be
[[Page 40057]]
received successfully in its entirety by the time and date it is due.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\13\ See Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Proceedings:
Electronic Filing Procedures; Administrative Protective Order
Procedures, 76 FR 39263 (July 6, 2011); see also Enforcement and
Compliance; Change of Electronic Filing System Name, 79 FR 69046
(November 20, 2014), for details of Commerce's electronic filing
requirements, effective August 5, 2011. Information on using ACCESS
can be found at https://access.trade.gov/help.aspx and a handbook
can be found at https://access.trade.gov/help/Handbook_on_Electronic_Filing_Procedures.pdf.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Consultations
Pursuant to sections 702(b)(4)(A)(i) and (ii) of the Act, Commerce
notified the GOI of the receipt of the Petition and provided an
opportunity for consultations with respect to the Petition.\14\
Commerce held consultations with the GOI on August 4, 2025.\15\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\14\ See Commerce's Letter, ``Invitation for Consultations to
Discuss the Countervailing Duty Petition,'' dated July 23, 2025.
\15\ See Memorandum, ``Consultations with the Government of
India,'' dated August 7, 2025; see also GOI's Letter, ``Pre-
initiation Comments and Consultations Note,'' dated August 5, 2025.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Determination of Industry Support for the Petition
Section 702(b)(1) of the Act requires that a petition be filed on
behalf of the domestic industry. Section 702(c)(4)(A) of the Act
provides that a petition meets this requirement if the domestic
producers or workers who support the petition account for: (i) at least
25 percent of the total production of the domestic like product; and
(ii) more than 50 percent of the production of the domestic like
product produced by that portion of the industry expressing support
for, or opposition to, the petition. Moreover, section 702(c)(4)(D) of
the Act provides that, if the petition does not establish support of
domestic producers or workers accounting for more than 50 percent of
the total production of the domestic like product, Commerce shall: (i)
poll the industry or rely on other information in order to determine if
there is support for the petition, as required by subparagraph (A); or
(ii) determine industry support using a statistically valid sampling
method to poll the ``industry.''
Section 771(4)(A) of the Act defines the ``industry'' as the
producers as a whole of a domestic like product. Thus, to determine
whether a petition has the requisite industry support, the statute
directs Commerce to look to producers and workers who produce the
domestic like product. The U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC),
which is responsible for determining whether ``the domestic industry''
has been injured, must also determine what constitutes a domestic like
product in order to define the industry. While both Commerce and the
ITC must apply the same statutory definition regarding the domestic
like product,\16\ they do so for different purposes and pursuant to a
separate and distinct authority. In addition, Commerce's determination
is subject to limitations of time and information. Although this may
result in different definitions of the like product, such differences
do not render the decision of either agency contrary to law.\17\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\16\ See section 771(10) of the Act.
\17\ See USEC, Inc. v. United States, 132 F. Supp. 2d 1, 8 (CIT
2001) (citing Algoma Steel Corp., Ltd. v. United States, 688 F.
Supp. 639, 644 (CIT 1988), aff'd Algoma Steel Corp., Ltd. v. United
States, 865 F.2d 240 (Fed. Cir. 1989)).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Section 771(10) of the Act defines the domestic like product as ``a
product which is like, or in the absence of like, most similar in
characteristics and uses with, the article subject to an investigation
under this title.'' Thus, the reference point from which the domestic
like product analysis begins is ``the article subject to an
investigation'' (i.e., the class or kind of merchandise to be
investigated, which normally will be the scope as defined in the
petition).
With regard to the domestic like product, the petitioner does not
offer a definition of the domestic like product distinct from the scope
of the investigation.\18\ Based on our analysis of the information
submitted on the record, we have determined that freight rail couplers,
as defined in the scope, constitute a single domestic like product, and
we have analyzed industry support in terms of that domestic like
product.\19\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\18\ For a discussion of the domestic like product analysis as
applied to this case and information regarding industry support, see
Checklist, ``Countervailing Duty Investigation Initiation Checklist:
Certain Freight Rail Couplers and Parts Thereof from India'' dated
concurrently with, and hereby adopted by, this notice, at Attachment
II, Analysis of Industry Support for the Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Petitions Covering Certain Freight Rail Couplers
and Parts Thereof from the Czech Republic and India (Attachment II).
This checklist is on file electronically via ACCESS.
\19\ For further discussion, see Attachment II of the India CVD
Initiation Checklist.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In determining whether the petitioner has standing under section
702(c)(4)(A) of the Act, we considered the industry support data
contained in the Petition with reference to the domestic like product
as defined in the ``Scope of the Investigation,'' in the appendix to
this notice. To establish industry support, the petitioner provided the
2024 production of the domestic like product for the U.S. producers
that support the Petition and compared this to total production of the
domestic like product by the U.S. freight rail couplers industry.\20\
We relied on data provided by the petitioner for purposes of measuring
industry support.\21\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\20\ Id.
\21\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Our review of the data provided in the Petition, the First General
Issues Supplement, and other information readily available to Commerce
indicates that the petitioner has established industry support for the
Petition.\22\ First, the Petition established support from domestic
producers (or workers) accounting for more than 50 percent of the total
production of the domestic like product and, as such, Commerce is not
required to take further action in order to evaluate industry support
(e.g., polling).\23\ Second, the domestic producers (or workers) have
met the statutory criteria for industry support under section
702(c)(4)(A)(i) of the Act because the domestic producers (or workers)
who support the Petition account for at least 25 percent of the total
production of the domestic like product.\24\ Finally, the domestic
producers (or workers) have met the statutory criteria for industry
support under section 702(c)(4)(A)(ii) of the Act because the domestic
producers (or workers) who support the Petition account for more than
50 percent of the production of the domestic like product produced by
that portion of the industry expressing support for, or opposition to,
the Petition.\25\ Accordingly, Commerce determines that the Petition
was filed on behalf of the domestic industry within the meaning of
section 702(b)(1) of the Act.\26\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\22\ Id.
\23\ Id.; see also section 702(c)(4)(D) of the Act.
\24\ See Attachment II of the India CVD Initiation Checklist.
\25\ Id.
\26\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Injury Test
Because India is a ``Subsidies Agreement Country'' within the
meaning of section 701(b) of the Act, section 701(a)(2) of the Act
applies to this investigation. Accordingly, the ITC must determine
whether imports of the subject merchandise from India materially
injure, or threaten material injury to, a U.S. industry.
Allegations and Evidence of Material Injury and Causation
The petitioner alleges that imports of subject merchandise are
benefiting from countervailable subsidies and that such imports are
causing, or threaten to cause, material injury to the U.S. industry
producing the domestic like product. In addition, the petitioner
alleges that subject imports exceed the negligibility threshold
provided for under section 771(24)(A) of the Act.\27\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\27\ For further information regarding negligibility and the
injury allegation, see India CVD Initiation Checklist at Attachment
III, Analysis of Allegations and Evidence of Material Injury and
Causation for the Antidumping Duty and Countervailing Duty Petitions
Covering Freight Rail Couplers from the Czech Republic and India
(Attachment III).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 40058]]
The petitioner contends that the industry's injured condition is
illustrated by the significant volume of subject imports; reduced
market share; underselling and price depression and/or suppression;
negative impact on financial performance; declines in the domestic
industry's production, capacity utilization, and U.S. shipments;
decrease in production related workers, total hours worked, and wages;
and lost sales and revenues.\28\ We assessed the allegations and
supporting evidence regarding material injury, threat of material
injury, causation, cumulation, as well as negligibility, and we have
determined that these allegations are properly supported by adequate
evidence and meet the statutory requirements for initiation.\29\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\28\ See Attachment III of the India CVD Initiation Checklist.
\29\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Initiation of CVD Investigation
Based upon the examination of the Petition and supplemental
responses, we find that they meet the requirements of section 702 of
the Act. Therefore, we are initiating a CVD investigation to determine
whether imports of freight rail couplers from India benefit from
countervailable subsidies conferred by the GOI. In accordance with
section 703(b)(1) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.205(b)(1), unless
postponed, we will make our preliminary determination no later than 65
days after the date of this initiation.
Based on our review of the Petition, we find that there is
sufficient information to initiate a CVD investigation on all programs
alleged by the petitioner. For a full discussion of the basis for our
decision to initiate on each program, see the India CVD Initiation
Checklist. A public version of the initiation checklist for this
investigation is available on ACCESS.
Respondent Selection
In the Petition, the petitioner identified five companies in India
as producers and/or exporters of freight rail couplers.\30\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\30\ See August 11, 2025, Supplement at Exhibit IV-2SUPP-5.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Commerce intends to follow its standard practice in CVD
investigations and calculate company-specific subsidy rates in this
investigation. In the event that Commerce determines that the number of
companies is large and it cannot individually examine each company
based on Commerce's resources, Commerce normally selects mandatory
respondents in CVD investigations using U.S. Customs and Border
Protection (CBP) entry data for U.S. imports under the appropriate
Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS) subheading(s)
listed in the ``Scope of the Investigation'' in the appendix. However,
for this investigation, the main HTSUS subheading under which the
subject merchandise entered during the POI (8607.30.1000) is a basket
category under which non-subject merchandise may also enter. Therefore,
instead of relying on CBP entry data in selecting respondents, we
intend to issue quantity and value (Q&V) questionnaires to each
potential respondent for which there is complete address information on
the record.
Commerce will post the Q&V questionnaires along with filing
instructions on Commerce's website at https://www.trade.gov/ec-adcvd-case-announcements. Producers/exporters of freight rail couplers in
India that do not receive Q&V questionnaires may still submit a
response to the Q&V questionnaire and can obtain a copy of the Q&V
questionnaire from Commerce's website. Responses to the Q&V
questionnaire must be submitted by the relevant producers/exporters no
later than 5:00 p.m. ET on August 26, 2025, which is two weeks from the
signature date of this notice. All Q&V questionnaire responses must be
filed electronically via ACCESS. An electronically filed document must
be received successfully, in its entirety, by ACCESS no later than 5:00
p.m. ET on the deadline noted above.
Interested parties must submit applications for disclosure under
administrative protective order (APO) in accordance with 19 CFR
351.305(b). Instructions for filing such applications may be found on
Commerce's website at https://www.trade.gov/administrative-protective-orders.
Distribution of a Copy of the Petition
In accordance with section 702(b)(4)(A) of the Act and 19 CFR
351.202(f), a copy of the public version of the Petition has been
provided to the GOI via ACCESS. To the extent practicable, we will
attempt to provide a copy of the public version of the Petition to each
exporter named in the Petition, as provided under 19 CFR 351.203(c)(2).
ITC Notification
Commerce will notify the ITC of its initiation, as required by
section 702(d) of the Act.
Preliminary Determination by the ITC
The ITC will preliminarily determine, within 45 days after the date
on which the Petition was filed, whether there is a reasonable
indication that imports of freight rail couplers from India are
materially injuring, or threatening material injury to, a U.S.
industry.\31\ A negative ITC determination will result in the
investigation being terminated.\32\ Otherwise, this CVD investigation
will proceed according to statutory and regulatory time limits.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\31\ See section 703(a)(1) of the Act.
\32\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Submission of Factual Information
Factual information is defined in 19 CFR 351.102(b)(21) as: (i)
evidence submitted in response to questionnaires; (ii) evidence
submitted in support of allegations; (iii) publicly available
information to value factors of production under 19 CFR 351.408(c) or
to measure the adequacy of remuneration under 19 CFR 351.511(a)(2);
(iv) evidence placed on the record by Commerce; and (v) evidence other
than factual information described in (i)-(iv). Section 351.301(b) of
Commerce's regulations requires any party, when submitting factual
information, to specify under which subsection of 19 CFR 351.102(b)(21)
the information is being submitted \33\ and, if the information is
submitted to rebut, clarify, or correct factual information already on
the record, to provide an explanation identifying the information
already on the record that the factual information seeks to rebut,
clarify, or correct.\34\ Time limits for the submission of factual
information are addressed in 19 CFR 351.301, which provides specific
time limits based on the type of factual information being submitted.
Interested parties should review the regulations prior to submitting
factual information in this investigation.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\33\ See 19 CFR 351.301(b).
\34\ See 19 CFR 351.301(b)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Extensions of Time Limits
Parties may request an extension of time limits before the
expiration of a time limit established under 19 CFR 351.301, or as
otherwise specified by Commerce. In general, an extension request will
be considered untimely if it is filed after the expiration of the time
limit established under 19 CFR 351.301, or as otherwise specified by
Commerce.\35\ For submissions that are due from multiple parties
simultaneously, an extension request will be considered untimely if it
is filed
[[Page 40059]]
after 10:00 a.m. ET on the due date. Under certain circumstances,
Commerce may elect to specify a different time limit by which extension
requests will be considered untimely for submissions which are due from
multiple parties simultaneously. In such a case, we will inform parties
in a letter or memorandum of the deadline (including a specified time)
by which extension requests must be filed to be considered timely. An
extension request must be made in a separate, standalone submission;
under limited circumstances we will grant untimely filed requests for
the extension of time limits, where we determine, based on 19 CFR
351.302, that extraordinary circumstances exist. Parties should review
Commerce's regulations concerning the extension of time limits and the
Time Limits Final Rule prior to submitting factual information in this
investigation.\36\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\35\ See 19 CFR 351.302.
\36\ See 19 CFR 351.301; see also Extension of Time Limits;
Final Rule, 78 FR 57790 (September 20, 2013) (Time Limits Final
Rule), available at https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2013-09-20/html/2013-22853.htm.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Certification Requirements
Any party submitting factual information in an AD or CVD proceeding
must certify to the accuracy and completeness of that information.\37\
Parties must use the certification formats provided in 19 CFR
351.303(g).\38\ Commerce intends to reject factual submissions if the
submitting party does not comply with the applicable certification
requirements.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\37\ See section 782(b) of the Act.
\38\ See Certification of Factual Information to Import
Administration During Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Proceedings, 78 FR 42678 (July 17, 2013) (Final Rule); see also
frequently asked questions regarding the Final Rule, available at
https://enforcement.trade.gov/tlei/notices/factual_info_final_rule_FAQ_07172013.pdf.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Notification to Interested Parties
Interested parties must submit applications for disclosure under
APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305. Parties wishing to participate
in this investigation should ensure that they meet the requirements of
19 CFR 351.103(d) (e.g., by filing the required letters of appearance).
Note that Commerce has amended certain of its requirements pertaining
to the service of documents in 19 CFR 351.303(f).\39\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\39\ See Administrative Protective Order, Service, and Other
Procedures in Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Proceedings, 88 FR
67069 (September 29, 2023).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
This notice is issued and published pursuant to sections 702 and
777(i) of the Act, and 19 CFR 351.203(c).
Dated: August 12, 2025.
Christopher Abbott,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy and Negotiations, performing the
non-exclusive functions and duties of the Assistant Secretary for
Enforcement and Compliance.
Appendix
Scope of the Investigation
The scope of this investigation covers certain freight railcar
couplers (also known as ``fits'' or ``assemblies'') and parts
thereof. Freight rail couplers are composed of two main parts,
namely knuckles and coupler bodies but may also include other items
(e.g., coupler locks, lock lift assemblies, knuckle pins, knuckle
throwers, and rotors). The parts covered by the investigation
include: (1) E coupler bodies; (2) E/F coupler bodies; (3) F coupler
bodies; (4) E knuckles; (5) F knuckles; as set forth by the
Association of American Railroads (AAR). The freight rail coupler
parts are included within the scope of the investigation when
imported individually.
Subject freight rail couplers and parts are included within the
scope whether finished or unfinished, whether imported individually
or with other subject or nonsubject parts, whether assembled or
unassembled, whether mounted or unmounted, or if joined with
nonsubject merchandise, such as other nonsubject parts or a
completed railcar. Finishing includes, but is not limited to, arc
washing, welding, grinding, shot blasting, heat treatment,
machining, and assembly of various parts. When a subject coupler or
subject parts are mounted on or to other nonsubject merchandise,
such as a railcar, only the coupler or subject parts are covered by
the scope.
The finished products covered by the scope of this investigation
meet or exceed the AAR specifications of M-211, ``Foundry and
Product Approval Requirements for the Manufacture of Couplers,
Coupler Yokes, Knuckles, Follower Blocks, and Coupler Parts,'' and/
or AAR M-215 ``Coupling Systems,'' or other equivalent domestic or
international standards (including any revisions to the
standard(s)).
The country of origin for subject couplers and parts thereof,
whether fully assembled, unfinished or finished, or attached to a
railcar, is the country where the subject coupler parts were cast or
forged. Subject merchandise includes coupler parts as defined above
that have been further processed or further assembled, including
those coupler parts attached to a railcar in third countries.
Further processing includes, but is not limited to, arc washing,
welding, grinding, shot blasting, heat treatment, painting, coating,
priming, machining, and assembly of various parts. The inclusion,
attachment, joining, or assembly of nonsubject parts with subject
parts or couplers either in the country of manufacture of the in-
scope product or in a third country does not remove the subject
parts or couplers from the scope.
The couplers that are the subject of this investigation are
classifiable in the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States
(HTSUS) statistical reporting numbers 8607.30.1010, 8607.30.1050,
and 8607.30.1090. Subject merchandise attached to finished railcars
may also enter under HTSUS statistical reporting numbers
7326.90.8688, 8606.10.0000, 8606.91.0000, 8606.92.0000,
8606.99.0130, or under subheading 8606.99.0160. Subject merchandise
may also be imported under HTSUS statistical reporting number
7325.99.5000. These HTSUS subheadings are provided for convenience
and customs purposes only; the written description of the scope of
this investigation is dispositive.
[FR Doc. 2025-15636 Filed 8-15-25; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P