[Federal Register Volume 90, Number 155 (Thursday, August 14, 2025)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 39102-39106]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2025-15482]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2025-1733; Project Identifier MCAI-2025-00762-T; 
Amendment 39-23110; AD 2025-16-12]
RIN 2120-AA64


Airworthiness Directives; Airbus SAS Airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Final rule; request for comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA is adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for all 
Airbus SAS Model A319-151N, -153N, -171N, and -173N airplanes; Model 
A320-251N, -252N, -253N, -271N, -272N, and -273N airplanes; and Model 
A321-251N, -252N, -253N, -271N, -272N, -251NX, -252NX, -253NX, -271NX, 
-272NX, -253NY, and -271NY airplanes. This AD was prompted by 
occurrences of high-pressure bleed valve (HPV) butterfly seal retention 
clip rupture. This AD requires revising the existing airplane flight 
manual (AFM) and the existing FAA-approved minimum equipment list 
(MEL), allows replacement of each affected HPV as an optional 
terminating action, and

[[Page 39103]]

prohibits the installation of affected parts. The FAA is issuing this 
AD to address the unsafe condition on these products.

DATES: This AD is effective August 29, 2025.
    The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by 
reference of a certain publication listed in this AD as of August 29, 
2025.
    The FAA must receive comments on this AD by September 29, 2025.

ADDRESSES: You may send comments, using the procedures found in 14 CFR 
11.43 and 11.45, by any of the following methods:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to regulations.gov. Follow 
the instructions for submitting comments.
     Fax: 202-493-2251.
     Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket 
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New 
Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590.
     Hand Delivery: Deliver to Mail address above between 9 
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
    AD Docket: You may examine the AD docket at regulations.gov under 
Docket No. FAA-2025-1733; or in person at Docket Operations between 9 
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD 
docket contains this final rule, the mandatory continuing airworthiness 
information (MCAI), any comments received, and other information. The 
street address for Docket Operations is listed above.
    Material Incorporated by Reference:
     For European Union Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) material 
identified in this AD, contact EASA, Konrad-Adenauer-Ufer 3, 50668 
Cologne, Germany; telephone +49 221 8999 000; email [email protected]. 
You may find this material on the EASA website at ad.easa.europa.eu.
     You may view this material at the FAA, Airworthiness 
Products Section, Operational Safety Branch, 2200 South 216th St., Des 
Moines, WA. For information on the availability of this material at the 
FAA, call 206-231-3195. It is also available at regulations.gov under 
Docket No. FAA-2025-1733.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Frank Carreras, Aviation Safety 
Engineer, FAA, 2200 South 216th St., Des Moines, WA 98198; phone: 206-
231-3539; email: [email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Comments Invited

    The FAA invites you to send any written data, views, or arguments 
about this final rule. Send your comments using a method listed under 
the ADDRESSES section. Include ``Docket No. FAA-2025-1733; Project 
Identifier MCAI-2025-00762-T'' at the beginning of your comments. The 
most helpful comments reference a specific portion of the final rule, 
explain the reason for any recommended change, and include supporting 
data. The FAA will consider all comments received by the closing date 
and may amend this final rule because of those comments.
    Except for Confidential Business Information (CBI) as described in 
the following paragraph, and other information as described in 14 CFR 
11.35, the FAA will post all comments received, without change, to 
regulations.gov, including any personal information you provide. The 
agency will also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal 
contact received about this final rule.

Confidential Business Information

    CBI is commercial or financial information that is both customarily 
and actually treated as private by its owner. Under the Freedom of 
Information Act (FOIA) (5 U.S.C. 552), CBI is exempt from public 
disclosure. If your comments responsive to this AD contain commercial 
or financial information that is customarily treated as private, that 
you actually treat as private, and that is relevant or responsive to 
this AD, it is important that you clearly designate the submitted 
comments as CBI. Please mark each page of your submission containing 
CBI as ``PROPIN.'' The FAA will treat such marked submissions as 
confidential under the FOIA, and they will not be placed in the public 
docket of this AD. Submissions containing CBI should be sent to Frank 
Carreras, Aviation Safety Engineer, FAA, 2200 South 216th St., Des 
Moines, WA 98198; phone: 206-231-3539; email: [email protected]. 
Any commentary that the FAA receives which is not specifically 
designated as CBI will be placed in the public docket for this 
rulemaking.

Background

    EASA, which is the Technical Agent for the Member States of the 
European Union, has issued EASA AD 2025-0096, dated April 28, 2025 
(EASA AD 2025-0096) (also referred to as ``the MCAI''), to correct an 
unsafe condition for all Airbus SAS Model A319-151N, -153N, -171N, and 
-173N airplanes; Model A320-251N, -252N, -253N, -271N, -272N, and -273N 
airplanes; and Model A321-251N, -252N, -253N, -271N, -272N, -251NX, -
252NX, -253NX, -271NX, -272NX, -253NY, and -271NY airplanes. The MCAI 
states that occurrences were reported of HPV butterfly seal retention 
clip rupture, which causes the butterfly seals to no longer be retained 
in the butterfly groove. This may increase internal leakage, triggering 
an alert that the HPV has failed in the open condition. It may also 
release foreign object debris, which could damage the systems (e.g., 
engine bleed air system and pneumatic system) downstream from the HPV 
on the engine pylon and wing. This condition, if not detected and 
corrected, could lead to high pressure and temperatures in the duct 
downstream from the pressure regulating valve, which could result in 
duct burst, damage to several systems or the airframe, and consequent 
loss of control of the airplane.
    The FAA is issuing this AD to address the unsafe condition on these 
products.
    You may examine the MCAI in the AD docket at regulations.gov under 
Docket No. FAA-2025-1733.

Material Incorporated by Reference Under 1 CFR Part 51

    The FAA reviewed EASA AD 2025-0096, which specifies procedures for 
amending the existing AFM by incorporating a temporary revision, 
implementing a master MEL (MMEL) update, and repetitively replacing 
each affected HPV clip. EASA AD 2025-0096 includes an optional 
terminating action of replacing each affected HPV with a non-affected 
HPV and prohibits installing an affected HPV on any airplane. This 
material is reasonably available because the interested parties have 
access to it through their normal course of business or by the means 
identified in the ADDRESSES section.

FAA's Determination

    These products have been approved by the civil aviation authority 
of another country and are approved for operation in the United States. 
Pursuant to the FAA's bilateral agreement with this State of Design 
Authority, that authority has notified the FAA of the unsafe condition 
described in the MCAI referenced above. The FAA is issuing this AD 
after determining that the unsafe condition described previously is 
likely to exist or develop on other products of the same type design.

Requirements of This AD

    This AD requires accomplishing the actions specified in EASA AD 
2025-0096 described previously, except for any differences identified 
as exceptions in the regulatory text of this AD. See ``Differences 
Between this AD and the MCAI'' for a discussion of the general 
differences included in this AD.

[[Page 39104]]

Differences Between This AD and the MCAI

    Paragraph (4) of EASA AD 2025-0096 specifies repetitively replacing 
each affected HPV clip with another affected HPV clip at intervals not 
to exceed 4,000 flight hours or 2,000 flight cycles, whichever occurs 
later. The initial replacement must be done at the later time of either 
(1) before exceeding 4,000 flight hours or 2,000 flight cycles, 
whichever occurs first since the affected HPV clip was installed; or 
(2) within 2,500 flight hours or 1,250 flight cycles, whichever occurs 
first from the effective date of EASA AD 2025-0096. The FAA is 
considering requiring this repetitive replacement. However, the planned 
compliance time would allow enough time to give the public an 
opportunity to comment on the merits of the replacement and the unsafe 
condition is being addressed through the revision of the AFM and MEL. 
Therefore, this AD does not adopt the requirements of paragraph (4) of 
EASA AD 2025-0096. However, operators may still do these optional 
repetitive replacements.

Compliance With AFM and MEL Revisions

    EASA AD 2025-0096 requires operators to ``inform all flight crew'' 
of revisions to the AFM and MEL, and thereafter to ``operate the 
aeroplane accordingly.'' However, this AD does not specifically require 
those actions as those actions are already required by FAA regulations. 
FAA regulations require operators furnish to pilots any changes to the 
AFM (for example, 14 CFR 121.137), and to ensure the pilots are 
familiar with the AFM (for example, 14 CFR 91.505). As with any other 
flightcrew training requirement, training on the updated AFM content is 
tracked by the operators and recorded in each pilot's training record, 
which is available for the FAA to review. FAA regulations also require 
pilots to follow the procedures in the existing AFM including all 
updates. Section 91.9 requires that any person operating a civil 
aircraft must comply with the operating limitations specified in the 
AFM. Section 121.628 (a)(2) requires operators to provide pilots with 
access to all the information contained in the operator's MEL. 
Furthermore, 14 CFR 121.628 (a)(5) requires airplanes to be operated 
under all applicable conditions and limitations contained in the 
operator's MEL. Therefore, including a requirement in this AD to 
operate the airplane according to the revised AFM and MEL would be 
redundant and unnecessary.

Explanation of Required Compliance Information

    In the FAA's ongoing efforts to improve the efficiency of the AD 
process, the FAA developed a process to use some civil aviation 
authority (CAA) ADs as the primary source of information for compliance 
with requirements for corresponding FAA ADs. The FAA has been 
coordinating this process with manufacturers and CAAs. As a result, 
EASA AD 2025-0096 is incorporated by reference in this AD. This AD 
requires compliance with EASA AD 2025-0096 in its entirety through that 
incorporation, except for any differences identified as exceptions in 
the regulatory text of this AD. Using common terms that are the same as 
the heading of a particular section in EASA AD 2025-0096 does not mean 
that operators need comply only with that section. For example, where 
the AD requirement refers to ``all required actions and compliance 
times,'' compliance with this AD requirement is not limited to the 
section titled ``Required Action(s) and Compliance Time(s)'' in EASA AD 
2025-0096. Material required by EASA AD 2025-0096 for compliance will 
be available at regulations.gov under Docket No. FAA-2025-1733 after 
this AD is published.

Justification for Immediate Adoption and Determination of the Effective 
Date

    Section 553(b) of the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) (5 U.S.C. 
551 et seq.) authorizes agencies to dispense with notice and comment 
procedures for rules when the agency, for ``good cause,'' finds that 
those procedures are ``impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary to the 
public interest.'' Under this section, an agency, upon finding good 
cause, may issue a final rule without providing notice and seeking 
comment prior to issuance. Further, section 553(d) of the APA 
authorizes agencies to make rules effective in less than thirty days, 
upon a finding of good cause.
    An unsafe condition exists that requires the immediate adoption of 
this AD without providing an opportunity for public comments prior to 
adoption. The FAA has found that the risk to the flying public 
justifies forgoing notice and comment prior to adoption of this rule 
because a ruptured HPV butterfly seal retention clip allows the seals 
to move, partially or totally, from their original position, increasing 
internal leakage and leading to an HPV Fail Open alert triggering 
condition. This rupture and movement could lead to the release of 
foreign object debris and subsequent damage to downstream systems on 
the engine pylon and wing, including the pressure regulating valve. 
This could lead to high pressure and temperatures in the duct 
downstream from the pressure regulating valve and possible duct burst, 
damage to systems or the airframe, and loss of control of the airplane. 
Additionally, the compliance time in this AD is shorter than the time 
necessary for the public to comment and for publication of the final 
rule. Accordingly, notice and opportunity for prior public comment are 
impracticable and contrary to the public interest pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 
553(b).
    In addition, the FAA finds that good cause exists pursuant to 5 
U.S.C. 553(d) for making this amendment effective in less than 30 days, 
for the same reasons the FAA found good cause to forgo notice and 
comment.

Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA)

    The requirements of the RFA do not apply when an agency finds good 
cause pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 553 to adopt a rule without prior notice and 
comment. Because the FAA has determined that it has good cause to adopt 
this rule without notice and comment, RFA analysis is not required.

Costs of Compliance

    The FAA estimates that this AD affects 554 airplanes of U.S. 
registry. The FAA estimates the following costs to comply with this AD:

                                    Estimated Costs for AFM and MEL Revision
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                    Cost per       Cost on U.S.
                          Labor cost                              Parts cost        product         operators
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2 work-hours x $85 per hour = $170...........................              $0             $170          $94,180
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


[[Page 39105]]


                   Estimated Costs for HPV Replacement
------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                             Cost per
              Labor cost                   Parts cost        product
------------------------------------------------------------------------
32 work-hours x $85 per hour = $2,720.          $2,800           $5,520
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The FAA has included all known costs in its cost estimate. 
According to the manufacturer, however, some or all of the costs of 
this AD may be covered under warranty, thereby reducing the cost impact 
on affected operators

Authority for This Rulemaking

    Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to 
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the 
authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII: Aviation Programs, 
describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
    The FAA is issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in 
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General requirements. 
Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with promoting safe flight 
of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing regulations for 
practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator finds necessary 
for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within the scope of that 
authority because it addresses an unsafe condition that is likely to 
exist or develop on products identified in this rulemaking action.

Regulatory Findings

    This AD will not have federalism implications under Executive Order 
13132. This AD will not have a substantial direct effect on the States, 
on the relationship between the national government and the States, or 
on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various 
levels of government.
    For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this AD:
    (1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive 
Order 12866, and
    (2) Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by 
reference, Safety.

The Amendment

    Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the 
Administrator, the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.


Sec.  39.13  [Amended]

0
2. The FAA amends Sec.  39.13 by adding the following new airworthiness 
directive:

2025-16-12 Airbus SAS: Amendment 39-23110; Docket No. FAA-2025-1733; 
Project Identifier MCAI-2025-00762-T.

(a) Effective Date

    This airworthiness directive (AD) is effective August 29, 2025.

(b) Affected ADs

    None.

(c) Applicability

    This AD applies to all Airbus SAS airplanes identified in 
paragraphs (c)(1) through (3) of this AD, certificated in any 
category.
    (1) Model A319-151N, -153N, -171N, and -173N airplanes.
    (2) Model A320-251N, -252N, -253N, -271N, -272N, and -273N 
airplanes.
    (3) Model A321-251N, -252N, -253N, -271N, -272N, -251NX, -252NX, 
-253NX, -271NX, -272NX, -253NY, and -271NY airplanes.

(d) Subject

    Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 36, Pneumatic.

(e) Unsafe Condition

    This AD was prompted by occurrences of high-pressure bleed valve 
(HPV) butterfly seal retention clip rupture. The FAA is issuing this 
AD to address high pressure and temperatures in the duct downstream 
from the pressure regulating valve, which could lead to duct burst 
and result in damage to several systems or the airframe and 
consequent loss of control of the airplane.

(f) Compliance

    Comply with this AD within the compliance times specified, 
unless already done.

(g) Requirements

    Except as specified in paragraph (h) of this AD: Comply with all 
required actions and compliance times specified in, and in 
accordance with, European Union Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) AD 
2025-0096, dated April 28, 2025 (EASA AD 2025-0096).

(h) Exceptions to EASA AD 2025-0096

    (1) Where EASA AD 2025-0096 refers to its effective date, this 
AD requires using the effective date of this AD.
    (2) Where paragraphs (1) and (3) of EASA AD 2025-0096 specify to 
``inform all flight crews, and, thereafter, operate the aeroplane 
accordingly,'' this AD does not require those actions as those 
actions are already required by existing FAA operating regulations 
(see 14 CFR 91.9, 91.505, 121.137, 121.628(a)(2) and 121.628(a)(5)).
    (3) Where paragraph (3) of EASA AD 2025-0096 specifies to 
``implement the instructions of the MMEL update, as applicable, 
depending on aeroplane configuration (see Note 1 of this AD), on the 
basis of which the operator's MEL must be amended'', this AD 
requires replacing that text with ``revise the operator's existing 
FAA-approved MEL by incorporating the applicable information 
identified in ``The MMEL update'' as defined in EASA AD 2024-0157''.
    (4) Where the service information required by EASA AD 2025-0096 
specifies discarding parts, this AD requires removing those parts 
from service.
    (5) This AD does not adopt the requirements specified in 
paragraph (4) of EASA AD 2025-0096.
    (6) This AD does not adopt the ``Remarks'' section of EASA AD 
2025-0096.

(i) Additional AD Provisions

    The following provisions also apply to this AD:
    (1) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs): The Manager, AIR-
520, Continued Operational Safety Branch, FAA, has the authority to 
approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the procedures found 
in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19, send your request 
to your principal inspector or responsible Flight Standards Office, 
as appropriate. If sending information directly to the manager of 
the Continued Operational Safety Branch, send it to the attention of 
the person identified in paragraph (j) of this AD and email to: 
[email protected]. Before using any approved AMOC, notify your 
appropriate principal inspector, or lacking a principal inspector, 
the manager of the responsible Flight Standards Office.
    (2) Contacting the Manufacturer: For any requirement in this AD 
to obtain instructions from a manufacturer, the instructions must be 
accomplished using a method approved by the Manager, AIR-520, 
Continued Operational Safety Branch, FAA; or EASA; or Airbus SAS's 
EASA Design Organization Approval (DOA). If approved by the DOA, the 
approval must include the DOA-authorized signature.
    (3) Required for Compliance (RC): Except as required by 
paragraph (i)(2) of this AD, if any material referenced in EASA AD 
2025-0096 contains paragraphs that are labeled as

[[Page 39106]]

RC, the instructions in RC paragraphs, including subparagraphs under 
an RC paragraph, must be done to comply with this AD; any 
paragraphs, including subparagraphs under those paragraphs, that are 
not identified as RC are recommended. The instructions in 
paragraphs, including subparagraphs under those paragraphs, not 
identified as RC may be deviated from using accepted methods in 
accordance with the operator's maintenance or inspection program 
without obtaining approval of an AMOC, provided the instructions 
identified as RC can be done and the airplane can be put back in an 
airworthy condition. Any substitutions or changes to instructions 
identified as RC require approval of an AMOC

(j) Additional Information

    For more information about this AD, contact Frank Carreras, 
Aviation Safety Engineer, FAA, 2200 South 216th St., Des Moines, WA 
98198; phone: 206-231-3539; email: [email protected].

(k) Material Incorporated by Reference

    (1) The Director of the Federal Register approved the 
incorporation by reference of the material listed in this paragraph 
under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.
    (2) You must use this material as applicable to do the actions 
required by this AD, unless this AD specifies otherwise.
    (i) European Union Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) AD 2025-0096, 
dated April 28, 2025.
    (ii) [Reserved]
    (3) For EASA material identified in this AD, contact EASA, 
Konrad-Adenauer-Ufer 3, 50668 Cologne, Germany; telephone +49 221 
8999 000; email [email protected]. You may find this material on 
the EASA website at ad.easa.europa.eu.
    (4) You may view this material at the FAA, Airworthiness 
Products Section, Operational Safety Branch, 2200 South 216th St., 
Des Moines, WA. For information on the availability of this material 
at the FAA, call 206-231-3195.
    (5) You may view this material at the National Archives and 
Records Administration (NARA). For information on the availability 
of this material at NARA, visit www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations or email [email protected].

    Issued on August 8, 2025.
Lona C. Saccomando,
Acting Deputy Director, Integrated Certificate Management Division, 
Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2025-15482 Filed 8-12-25; 2:00 pm]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P