[Federal Register Volume 90, Number 147 (Monday, August 4, 2025)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 36409-36412]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2025-14688]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 110
[Docket Number USCG-2025-0579]
RIN 1625-AA01
Anchorage Ground; Neches River, Port Arthur, TX
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is proposing to establish an anchorage ground
on the Neches River near Port Arthur, TX. This action is necessary to
accommodate increased vessel traffic volume, improve navigational
safety for vessels transiting the Sabine-Neches Waterway and provide
for the overall safe and efficient flow of vessel traffic and commerce.
We invite your comments on this proposed rulemaking.
DATES: Comments and related material must be received by the Coast
Guard on or before September 3, 2025.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments identified by docket number USCG-
2025-0579 using the Federal Decision-Making Portal at https://www.regulations.gov. See the ``Public Participation and Request for
Comments'' portion of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section for further
instructions on submitting comments.
[[Page 36410]]
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions about this
proposed rulemaking, call or email Mr. Douglas G. Hendrix, Marine
Safety Unit (MSU) Port Arthur, U.S. Coast Guard; telephone 409-719-
5086, email [email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Table of Abbreviations
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
COTP Captain of the Port MSU Port Arthur
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking
Sec. Section
U.S.C. United States Code
II. Background, Purpose, and Legal Basis
The Sabine-Neches Waterway is the maritime ``highway'' that
supports the movement of more than 128 million tons of cargo each year.
This cargo includes natural gas, crude oil, gasoline, jet fuel,
chemicals, steel, lumber, grain and many other products. The waterway
is vital to the economy of southeast Texas and the United States. The
waterway consists of approximately 57 nautical miles of waterway
extending from offshore to the Port of Beaumont. The narrowest portion
of this waterway is 400-feet in width and approximately 25.5 nautical
miles (29.5 statute miles) in length.
The existing channel has not been improved since the mid-1960s
while ships have continued to increase in length, beam and draft.
Recent expansions in the oil and liquefied gas industries have resulted
in increases in the number of docks and vessels operating on the
Sabine-Neches Waterway. The combination of increased vessel traffic and
their dimensions requires the implementation of operating protocols in
order to ensure the safety of all vessel traffic on the waterway.
In 2011, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers signed the ``Chief's
Report'' on a proposed deepening of the Sabine-Neches Waterway. This
concluded a nearly 14-year assessment of plans submitted by the Sabine-
Neches Navigation District, the local non-federal sponsor for dredging
projects, to deepen the waterway from 40 feet to 48 feet. In addition
to deepening the channel, the design and assessment phase planned for
five anchorage basins for use by deep draft vessels.
In June 2014, the President of the United States signed the Water
Resources Reform and Development Act (WRRDA) into law--the final step
in the federal approval process. In 2018 federal funds were allocated
which permitted the beginning of the construction process and in late
2020 the dredging of Anchorage Basin 1 was completed.
The Coast Guard proposes to establish anchorage ground regulations
in order to facilitate use of navigable waterways by both commercial
and recreational vessels in Port Arthur, TX. This notice of proposed
rulemaking (NPRM) identifies the location of the first anchorage,
Anchorage 1, approved by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and the
Sabine Neches Navigation District (SNND), and solicits comments from
interested stakeholders to inform the development of anchorage
regulations.
The first anchorage, called Anchorage 1, is located in the river
oxbow located approximately 1.8 nautical miles west of the Rainbow
Bridge in Port Arthur, TX. Additional anchorage ground locations are
still under environmental review.
III. Discussion of Proposed Rule
The Coast Guard is proposing to establish new Anchorage Ground 1,
as designed and constructed as part of the Sabine-Neches Waterway
Deepening Project. Further, the proposed rule would establish usage
requirements to ensure the anchorage is available and used for its
intended purpose. Establishing this anchorage in the Code of Federal
Regulations (CFR) and defining it on navigation charts would remove
ambiguity as to the anchorage's location and intended usage.
The proposed rule would limit usage of the anchorage to commercial
vessels greater than 450-feet in length calling on commercial
facilities on the Sabine-Neches Waterway. The placement of fixed
moorings, piles or stakes would be prohibited. This anchorage would not
be intended to be a long-term anchorage. Use of the anchorage would be
limited to periods of 48-hours or less unless otherwise authorized by
the Captain of the Port MSU Port Arthur (COTP). Additionally, use of
the anchorage would be prohibited when the COTP sets Port Condition
Zulu. These regulations are necessary to ensure that an adequate
anchorage area remains available for the efficient facilitation of
commerce. The regulatory text we are proposing appears at the end of
this document.
IV. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this proposed rule after considering numerous statutes
and Executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our
analyses based on a number of these statutes and Executive orders.
A. Regulatory Planning and Review
Executive Orders 12866 (Regulatory Planning and Review) and 13563
(Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review) direct agencies to assess
the costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize
net benefits. Executive Order 13563 emphasizes the importance of
quantifying both costs and benefits, of reducing costs, of harmonizing
rules, and of promoting flexibility.
The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has not designated this
proposed rule a ``significant regulatory action'' under section 3(f) of
Executive Order 12866. Accordingly, OMB has not reviewed it.
This regulatory action determination is based on the historical use
of this area for commercial ships and the nearby availability of space
for smaller, shallow draft vessels to anchor.
B. Impact on Small Entities
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980, 5 U.S.C. 601-612, as
amended, requires Federal agencies to consider the potential impact of
regulations on small entities during rulemaking. The term ``small
entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than
50,000. The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this
proposed rule would not have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
While some owners or operators of vessels intending to use the
anchorage may be small entities, for the reasons stated in section IV.A
above, this proposed rule would not have a significant economic impact
on any vessel owner or operator. The anchorage area is not a popular or
productive fishing location, nor is it frequented by recreational
vessels. Typical surface navigation will not be affected as this area
has been historically used as an anchorage area for deep draft ships.
If you think that your business, organization, or governmental
jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity and that this proposed rule
would have a significant economic impact on it, please submit a comment
(see ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it qualifies and how and to
what degree this rule would economically affect it.
Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small
entities in
[[Page 36411]]
understanding this proposed rule. If the proposed rule would affect
your small business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction and you
have questions concerning its provisions or options for compliance,
please call or email the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section. The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small
entities that question or complain about this proposed rule or any
policy or action of the Coast Guard.
C. Collection of Information
This proposed rule would not call for a new collection of
information under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-
3520).
D. Federalism and Indian Tribal Governments
A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132
(Federalism), if it has a substantial direct effect on the States, on
the relationship between the National Government and the States, or on
the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels
of government. We have analyzed this proposed rule under that Order and
have determined that it is consistent with the fundamental federalism
principles and preemption requirements described in Executive Order
13132.
Also, this proposed rule does not have tribal implications under
Executive Order 13175 (Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments) because it would not have a substantial direct effect on
one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes. If
you believe this proposed rule has implications for federalism or
Indian tribes, please call or email the person listed in the FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section.
E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this proposed rule would not
result in such an expenditure, we do discuss the potential effects of
this proposed rule elsewhere in this preamble.
F. Environment
We have analyzed this proposed rule under Department of Homeland
Security Directive 023-01, Rev. 1, associated implementing
instructions, and Environmental Planning COMDTINST 5090.1 (series),
which guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have made
a preliminary determination that this action is one of a category of
actions that do not individually or cumulatively have a significant
effect on the human environment. This proposed rule involves
establishing anchorage regulations for a newly constructed anchorage
area. Normally such actions are categorically excluded from further
review under paragraph L59(a) of Appendix A, Table 1 of DHS Instruction
Manual 023-01-001-01, Rev. 1. A preliminary Record of Environmental
Consideration supporting this determination is available in the docket.
For instructions on locating the docket, see the ADDRESSES section of
this preamble. We seek any comments or information that may lead to the
discovery of a significant environmental impact from this proposed
rule.
V. Public Participation and Request for Comments
We view public participation as essential to effective rulemaking
and will consider all comments and material received during the comment
period. Your comment can help shape the outcome of this rulemaking. If
you submit a comment, please include the docket number for this
rulemaking, indicate the specific section of this document to which
each comment applies, and provide a reason for each suggestion or
recommendation.
Submitting comments. We encourage you to submit comments through
the Federal Decision-Making Portal at https://www.regulations.gov. To
do so, go to https://www.regulations.gov, type USCG-2025-0579 in the
search box and click ``Search.'' Next, look for this document in the
Search Results column, and click on it. Then click on the Comment
option. If you cannot submit your material by using https://www.regulations.gov, call or email the person in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section of this proposed rule for alternate
instructions.
Viewing material in docket. To view documents mentioned in this
proposed rule as being available in the docket, find the docket as
described in the previous paragraph, and then select ``Supporting &
Related Material'' in the Document Type column. Public comments will
also be placed in our online docket and can be viewed by following
instructions on the https://www.regulations.gov Frequently Asked
Questions web page. Also, if you click on the Dockets tab and then the
proposed rule, you should see a ``Subscribe'' option for email alerts.
The option will notify you when comments are posted, or a final rule is
published.
We review all comments received, but we will only post comments
that address the topic of the proposed rule. We may choose not to post
off-topic, inappropriate, or duplicate comments that we receive.
Personal information. We accept anonymous comments. Comments we
post to https://www.regulations.gov will include any personal
information you have provided. For more about privacy and submissions
to the docket in response to this document, see DHS's eRulemaking
System of Records notice (85 FR 14226, March 11, 2020).
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 110
Anchorage grounds.
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard is
proposing to amend 33 CFR part 110 as follows:
PART 110--ANCHORAGE REGULATIONS
0
1. The authority citation for part 110 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 2071; 46 U.S.C. 70006, 70034; 33 CFR 1.05-
1; Department of Homeland Security Delegation No. 00170.1, Revision
No. 01.3.
0
2. Add Sec. 110.198 to subpart B to read as follows:
Sec. 110.198 Neches River, Port Arthur, TX.
(a) Anchorage Basin 1. The waters adjacent to the Neches River
encompassed by a line connecting the following points (NAD83):
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Latitude Longitude
------------------------------------------------------------------------
29 59'13.885'' 093 54'36.971''
29 59'22.667'' 093 54'32.087''
29 59'31.530'' 093 54'34.034''
29 59'32.525'' 093 54'31.358''
29 59'21.325'' 093 54'23.455''
29 59'17.148'' 093 54'19.485''
29 59'18.391'' 093 54'27.317''
29 59'12.547'' 093 54'28.540''
------------------------------------------------------------------------
(b) Regulations. (1) The anchorage grounds described in paragraph
(a) of this section are for short duration use by commercial vessels
greater than 450-feet in length calling on commercial facilities on the
Sabine-Neches Waterway.
(2) Except when stress of weather or adverse tides or currents make
sailing
[[Page 36412]]
impractical or hazardous, vessels shall not anchor in the anchorage
area for periods exceeding 48-hours unless expressly authorized by the
Captain of the Port MSU Port Arthur (COTP) to anchor for longer
periods.
(3) The anchor(s) of anchored vessels must be placed within the
anchorage area so that no portion of the hull or rigging shall at any
time extend outside the boundaries of the anchorage area.
(4) Any vessel anchored in this area shall be capable of moving and
when ordered to move by the Captain of the Port shall do so with
reasonable promptness.
(5) Fixed moorings, piles or stakes, and floats or buoys for
marking anchorages or moorings in place are prohibited.
(6) In an emergency the COTP may shift the position of any
unattended vessel moored in or near any anchorage.
Dated: July 22, 2025.
David C. Barata,
Rear Admiral, U.S. Coast Guard, Commander, U.S. Coast Guard Heartland
(Eighth) District.
[FR Doc. 2025-14688 Filed 8-1-25; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P