[Federal Register Volume 90, Number 132 (Monday, July 14, 2025)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 31139-31140]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2025-13132]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

10 CFR Part 1003

[DOE-HQ-2025-0013]
RIN 1910-AA57


Revisions to the Office of Hearings and Appeals Procedural 
Regulations

AGENCY: Office of Hearings and Appeals, Department of Energy.

ACTION: Direct final rule; delay of effective date; response to 
comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of Energy (``DOE'') is publishing this 
document to respond to comments received on the direct final rule 
``Revisions to the Office of Hearings and Appeals Procedural 
Regulations,'' published on May 16, 2025. As a result, DOE delays the 
effective date of the direct final rule.

DATES: As of July 14, 2025, the effective date of the direct final rule 
published May 16, 2025, at 90 FR 20774, is delayed until August 13, 
2025.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Jeffrey Novak, U.S. Department of 
Energy, Office of the General Counsel, GC-1, 1000 Independence Avenue 
SW, Washington, DC 20585-0121; (202) 586-5281 or 
[email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. May 2025 Direct Final Rule

    On May 16, 2025, DOE published a direct final rule rescinding Sec.  
1003.13 of title 10, Code of Federal Regulations (``CFR''). 90 FR 20774 
(``May 2025 DFR'') This regulation contains a statement that encourages 
the use of alternative dispute resolution (``ADR'') for parties 
appearing before the OHA and advises that participation in ADR is 
voluntary. It does not confer any substantive right or obligation on 
the Agency or any party and is not required by statute.

II. Response to Comments

    DOE received three comments in response to the May 2025 DFR.

                              Table II.1--List of Commenters From the May 2025 DFR
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                      Comment No. in
               Commenter                   Reference in this rule       the docket          Commenter type
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Anonymous..............................  Anonymous.................                2  Individual.
Anonymous..............................  Anonymous.................                3  Individual.
Professor Bridget C.E. Dooling.........  Dooling...................                4  Individual.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

A. Response to Administrative Procedure Act Procedural Comment

    Dooling stated that the May 2025 DFR did not satisfy the good cause 
exemption from notice and comment rulemaking under the Administrative 
Procedure Act (``APA''). (Dooling, No. 4 at p. 3).
    In response, DOE notes that the APA requires that agencies provide 
all interested persons with fair notice and an opportunity to comment 
on the rulemaking. See 5 U.S.C. 553(b) & (c). The May 2025 DFR provided 
the public with fair notice of DOE's changes to its own administrative 
procedures regarding ADR for parties appearing before the OHA. See 90 
FR 20774, 20775 (discussing specific administrative changes encouraging 
ADR). DOE also requested comments on the May 2025 DFR, and stated, if 
the Department received significant adverse comments, the Department 
would withdraw the rule or issue a new final rule which responds to 
such comments. Id. at 90 FR 20774. Thus, DOE provided interested 
persons with fair notice and an opportunity to comment as required by 
the APA. As a result, there was no need for a good cause exemption from 
notice-and-comment rulemaking under 5 U.S.C. 553(b).
    Finally, contrary to the comment from Dooling (Dooling, No. 4 at p. 
4), Dooling cannot argue commenters were denied fair notice and an 
opportunity to comment solely based on how the notice was labeled. See 
Little Sisters of the Poor Saints Peter & Paul Home v. Pennsylvania, 
591 U.S. 657, 683 (2020) (holding that ``[f]ormal labels aside, the 
[interim final rules] contained all of the elements of a notice of 
proposed rulemaking as required by the APA''). Irrespective of its 
title, the May 2025 DFR contained the required elements of a proposed 
rulemaking under the APA.

B. Response to Other Comments

    DOE received two comments, which stated (1) that parties benefit 
from ADR and the rescission of this regulation would make parties less 
aware of this cost-saving service; and (2) that this regulation was 
required by the Administrative Dispute Resolutions Act (``ADRA''), 5 
U.S.C. 573. (Anonymous, No. 3 at p. 1; Anonymous, No. 2 at p. 1) In 
response to the first point, there is no evidence that parties decide 
to utilize ADR because of this regulation, and, therefore, there is no 
evidence that the rescission of this regulation will reduce the use of 
ADR in any meaningful way. The OHA will continue to advise parties as 
to the availability of ADR services when appropriate in order to 
promote cost-efficient methods of problem solving. In response to the 
second point, ADRA does not require the DOE to maintain specific 
regulations encouraging the use of ADR; rather it requires generally 
that agencies ``encourage and facilitate agency use of alternative 
means of dispute resolution.'' (5 U.S.C. 573(c)(1)) DOE will continue 
to encourage and facilitate the use of ADR when appropriate regardless 
of any specific regulation, and, thus, will adhere to the requirements 
of ADRA.

III. Conclusion

    For the reasons discussed in the preceding sections of this 
document, DOE is not withdrawing the May 2025 DFR, which rescinds the 
regulation encouraging the use of ADR by parties appearing before the 
OHA.
    DOE also notes, to the extent that 5 U.S.C. 553 applies to the 
delay of effective date, it is exempt from notice and comment because 
it constitutes a rule of procedure under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(A) and for 
which no notice or hearing is required by statute. Additionally, this 
action is not a ``substantive rule'' for which a 30-day delay in 
effective date is required under 5 U.S.C. 553(d).

Signing Authority

    This document of the Department of Energy was signed on July 9, 
2025, by Chris Wright, Secretary of Energy. That document with the 
original signature

[[Page 31140]]

and date is maintained by DOE. For administrative purposes only, and in 
compliance with requirements of the Office of the Federal Register, the 
undersigned DOE Federal Register Liaison Officer has been authorized to 
sign and submit the document in electronic format for publication, as 
an official document of the Department of Energy. This administrative 
process in no way alters the legal effect of this document upon 
publication in the Federal Register.

    Signed in Washington, DC, on July 10, 2025.
Treena V. Garrett,
Federal Register Liaison Officer, U.S. Department of Energy.
[FR Doc. 2025-13132 Filed 7-11-25; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450-01-P