[Federal Register Volume 90, Number 123 (Monday, June 30, 2025)]
[Notices]
[Pages 27833-27835]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2025-12026]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Rural Utilities Service

[Docket #RUS-25-ELECTRIC-0001]


Notice of Availability of a Record of Decision Regarding Central 
Electric Power Cooperative, Inc. Financial Assistance

AGENCY: Rural Utilities Service, USDA.

ACTION: Notice of availability of a Record of Decision.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the Rural Utilities Service (RUS), 
an agency within the Department of Agriculture (USDA), has issued a 
Record of Decision (ROD) to meet its responsibilities in accordance 
with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA), Council on 
Environmental

[[Page 27834]]

Quality (CEQ) regulations for implementing the procedural provisions of 
NEPA, RUS Environmental Policies and Procedures, and other applicable 
environmental requirements related to providing financial assistance 
for Central Electric Power Cooperative, Inc. (Central Electric or the 
Applicant) proposed McClellanville 115 kilovolt (kV) transmission line 
(Project) in South Carolina. The Administrator of RUS has signed the 
ROD, which was effective upon signing. This ROD concludes RUS 
environmental review process in accordance with NEPA and RUS, 
Environmental Policies and Procedures. The ultimate decision as to loan 
approval depends on the conclusion of the environmental review process 
plus financial and engineering analyses. Issuance of the ROD allows 
these reviews to proceed. The ROD is not a decision on the Central 
Electric's loan application and is not an approval of the expenditure 
of federal funds.

DATES: The Administrator of the Rural Utilities Service signed the 
Record of Decision on June 13, 2025.

ADDRESSES: The ROD is available on the RUS website at: https://www.rd.usda.gov/resources/environmental-studies/impact-statement/mcclellanville-115kv-transmission-line-berkeley-charleston-and-georgetown-counties-sc.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For further information, or to request 
copies of the ROD, contact Suzanne Kopich, Environmental Protection 
Specialist, USDA, Rural Utilities Service, 1400 Independence Ave., SW, 
Mail Stop 1570, Washington, DC 20250, by phone at 202-961-8514, or 
email to: [email protected]

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The project proponent and USDA applicant, 
Central Electric, is a not-for-profit electric generation and 
transmission cooperative that is the wholesale power supplier to its 
member-owners, South Carolina's 20 retail electric cooperatives that 
includes Berkeley Electric. Organized in 1948, Central Electric designs 
and builds transmission lines that connect the state's bulk 
transmission system (the coordinated and integrated Central Electric/
South Carolina Public Service Authority [Santee Cooper] system) and the 
member-cooperative system substations. Central Electric, a South 
Carolina (SC) transmission cooperative, proposes to construct and 
maintain a new 115-kilovolt (kV) transmission line between the existing 
Jamestown substation and a new Berkeley Electric Cooperative, Inc. 
(Berkeley Electric) McClellanville Substation near the town of 
McClellanville, SC. The preferred transmission line route is referred 
to as the Jamestown corridor. The new transmission line would improve 
system reliability in the McClellanville Service Area, including 
reducing the number and duration of power outages that occur. The 
current level of system capacity cannot readily accommodate existing 
load demand nor future load growth in the McClellanville area. Studies 
of system reliability (studies included in the Environmental Impact 
Statement (EIS)) indicate that a new 115-kV transmission line and 
associated substation is needed to serve the long-term needs of this 
area of coastal South Carolina by increasing capacity to distribute 
electricity and enhance the reliability of the delivery system.
    RUS is authorized under the Rural Electrification Act of 1936, as 
amended (7 U.S.C. 901-918a.) to make loans and loan guarantees to 
finance the construction of electric distribution, transmission, and 
generation facilities, including system improvements and replacements 
required to furnish and improve electric service in rural areas, as 
well as demand-side management, electricity conservation programs, and 
on- and off-grid renewable electricity systems. Central Electric 
intends to request financial assistance from RUS for the Project. Along 
with other technical and financial considerations, completing the 
environmental review process is one of RUS's requirements in processing 
Central Electric's application.
    RUS is the lead Federal agency, as defined at 40 CFR 1501.7 (2020), 
for the preparation of the final Environmental Impact Statement (FEIS). 
Cooperating agencies for this Project include the United States Army 
Corps of Engineers (USACE) and the United States Forest Service (USFS). 
The USACE will review the Applicant's permit application, as required 
by Section 404 under the Clean Water Act. The USFS has been involved in 
interagency coordination as a cooperating agency for the Project 
because 13.5 miles (58%) of the proposed transmission line would cross 
National Forest Service (NFS) lands managed by the Francis Marion 
National Forest. The USFS would need to issue a special use 
authorization for the Project to occupy NFS lands and will use the 
final EIS analysis in its decision- making process to either approve or 
disapprove the Applicant's request for a Special Use Permit (SUP).
    RUS prepared a FEIS and published a notice of availability in the 
Federal Register on October 18, 2024, 89 FR 83833, to analyze the 
impacts of its respective Federal actions and the proposed Project in 
accordance with RUS Environmental Policies and Procedures (7 CFR part 
1970).
    RUS determined that its action regarding the proposed Project is an 
undertaking subject to review under Section 106 of the National 
Historic Preservation Act and its implementing regulation, ``Protection 
of Historic Properties'' (36 CFR part 800) and as part of its broad 
environmental review process, RUS must take into account the effect of 
the Project on historic properties. The National Historic Preservation 
Act (NHPA), Section 106 review is integrated with the NEPA review of 
cultural and historic resources in the FEIS in accordance with the 
guiding regulations of each law (40 CFR 1500-1508; 36 CFR part 800). 
Indian Tribes, including the Eastern Shawnee Tribe of Oklahoma, the 
Catawba Indian Nation, and Muscogee (Creek) Nation, and the town of 
McClellanville were invited to participate in the NHPA, Section 106 
review process, attend the public scoping and Draft EIS meetings, and 
provide relevant information for inclusion in the EIS. Only the Catawba 
Indian Nation chose to become a consulting party, and in the end, they 
did not comment on the EIS.
    There are two known cultural resources along the proposed 
transmission line: the NRHP-listed Old Georgetown Road and the NRHP-
eligible Honey Hill Fire Tower; and several unevaluated archaeological 
sites. The Project will have a direct, visual impact on the Old 
Georgetown Road and Honey Hill Fire Tower. Mitigation for this impact 
will be determined through the Section 106 consultation process under 
the Programmatic Agreement (PA) for the McClellanville 115 kV 
Transmission Line Project. Once the project right of way has been 
finalized, additional cultural resource surveys and studies will be 
conducted to identify any additional historic sites and potential 
impacts. In coordinating Section 106 compliance, RUS has developed a 
project-specific PA among RUS, USFS, and the South Carolina State 
Historic Preservation Office. Any historic sites will be spanned and 
protected during construction when feasible, as identified in the PA. 
The PA will have provisions for the treatment of any post-review 
structure discoveries.
    On May 29, 2014, RUS announced the issuance of a Draft EIS for the 
Project (79 FR 30805). A public meeting was held on June 3, 2014, at 
the St. James-Santee Elementary-Middle School in McClellanville to 
solicit comments on the Draft EIS. Based on public comments and because 
of updates to RUS environmental policies and

[[Page 27835]]

procedures, as well as the publication of a revised FMNF Land 
Management Plan, RUS and Central Electric determined that a 
Supplemental Draft EIS (SDEIS) would be necessary to evaluate other 
reasonable corridors, including two options that would originate from 
the Belle Island Substation, as evaluated in the Draft EIS, and new 
options originating from the Jamestown Substation and Charity 
Substation. In 2017, because of comments received from agencies and the 
general public, Central Electric commissioned, at the request of RUS, 
an independent engineering study to evaluate and supplement the 
previously developed studies and assess the merit of the proposed 
alternatives based on need, impacts, and cost; and to offer additional 
insight and information that may be relevant to assessing each 
potential solution.
    On August 30, 2019, RUS announced the availability of the SDEIS for 
the Project (84 FR 45720), which included new analysis of the Jamestown 
and Charity corridors and two of the original Belle Isle corridors 
(Options B and C). On September 17 and 19, 2019, RUS conducted public 
meetings at St. James-Santee Elementary-Middle School in McClellanville 
and at Jamestown Baptist Church Life Center, respectively.
    Following the October 18, 2024 issuance of the FEIS, a total of 
three public comments were received and were all minor in content.All 
public comments associated with the FEIS have been taken into 
consideration and addressed in the ROD. Based on consideration of the 
environmental impacts of the Project and comments received throughout 
the Agency and public review process, RUS has determined that the 
Proposed Action as described above best meets the purpose and need for 
the Project. RUS finds that the evaluation of reasonable alternatives 
is consistent with NEPA and RUS Environmental Policies and Procedures. 
Details regarding RUS regulatory decision and compliance with 
applicable regulations are included in the ROD.

Christopher McLean,
Assistant Administrator, Rural Utilities Service, USDA Rural 
Development.
[FR Doc. 2025-12026 Filed 6-27-25; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-15-P