[Federal Register Volume 90, Number 118 (Monday, June 23, 2025)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 26453-26455]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2025-11437]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 751

[EPA-HQ-OPPT-2020-0642; FRL-8317.1-03-OCSPP]
RIN 2070-AK83


Extension of Postponement of Effectiveness for Certain Provisions 
of Trichloroethylene (TCE); Regulation Under the Toxic Substances 
Control Act (TSCA)

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notification; extension of postponement of effectiveness.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA or Agency) is 
extending the postponement of the effective date

[[Page 26454]]

of certain regulatory provisions of the final rule entitled 
``Trichloroethylene (TCE); Regulation Under the Toxic Substances 
Control Act (TSCA)'' for an additional 60 days. Specifically, this 
postponement applies to the conditions imposed on the uses with TSCA 
exemptions.

DATES: As of June 20, 2025, EPA further postpones until August 19, 
2025, the conditions imposed on each of the TSCA section 6(g) 
exemptions, as described in this document, in the final rule published 
on December 17, 2024, at 89 FR 102568.

ADDRESSES: The docket for this action, identified by docket 
identification (ID) number EPA-HQ-OPPT-2020-0642, is available online 
at https://www.regulations.gov. Additional information about dockets 
generally, along with instructions for visiting the docket in-person, 
is available at https://www.epa.gov/.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 
    For technical information: Gabriela Rossner, Existing Chemicals 
Risk Management Division, Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics, 
Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW, Washington, 
DC 20460-0001; telephone number: (202) 565-2426; email address: 
[email protected].
    For general information: The TSCA-Hotline, ABVI-Goodwill, 422 South 
Clinton Ave., Rochester, NY 14620; telephone number: (202) 554-1404; 
email address: [email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

I. Background

    On December 17, 2024, EPA issued a final risk-management rule under 
TSCA section 6(a) prohibiting all uses of trichloroethylene (TCE), most 
of which would be prohibited within one year, including TCE manufacture 
and processing for most commercial and all consumer products. (89 FR 
102568, December 17, 2024) (FRL-8317-02-OCSPP). The final rule included 
extended phaseouts or TSCA section 6(g) exemptions to permit several 
uses to continue under workplace restrictions for longer periods.
    The final rule was originally scheduled to become effective on 
January 16, 2025. EPA received petitions for an administrative stay of 
the effective date on behalf of Microporous, LLC (Microporous), which 
also separately sought partial reconsideration of the final rule, and 
Alliance for a Strong U.S. Battery Sector (Alliance) on January 10, 
2025. EPA denied these requests on January 15, 2025. Microporous and 
Alliance submitted renewed petitions to the Agency to stay the 
effective date of the rule, or, in the alternative, for an 
administrative stay of the final rule's workplace conditions for 
battery separator manufacturers, on January 20, 2025. PPG Industries, 
Inc. (PPG) also submitted a request for an administrative stay on 
January 21, 2025.
    EPA also received thirteen petitions for review of the final rule 
in various circuits of the U.S. Courts of Appeals. On January 13, 2025, 
petitioners Microporous and Alliance filed emergency motions for stay 
in the Fifth and Sixth Circuit Courts of Appeals of the final rule's 
effective date and workplace conditions for battery-separator 
manufacturers, as well as a temporary administrative stay of the final 
rule pending consideration of the emergency stay motion. The same day, 
the Fifth Circuit granted the motion for a temporary administrative 
stay of the final rule's effective date while the court considered the 
emergency stay motion.
    Shortly thereafter, the petitions for review were consolidated in 
the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit as USW v. U.S. EPA, 
Case No. 25-1055. On January 16, 2025, the Third Circuit issued an 
order leaving the temporary administrative stay of the effective date 
of the final rule in place pending briefing on whether the temporary 
stay should be lifted or converted to a permanent stay. On January 21, 
2025, petitioner PPG filed a new stay motion with the court, and 
Alliance and Microporous refiled their existing motions to stay the 
effective date. On January 24, 2025, EPA filed a motion requesting that 
the court extend all deadlines in the case for sixty days, including 
with respect to further stay briefing, which the court granted.
    EPA temporarily delayed the effective date of the final rule until 
March 21, 2025. (90 FR 8254, January 28, 2025 (FRL-12583-01-OA)). 
Although the final rule had yet to go into effect, it was incorporated 
into the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) on January 16, 2025. See 40 
CFR part 751, subpart D.
    On March 21, 2025, EPA signed a notice pursuant to section 705 of 
the Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C. 705, further postponing the 
effective date of the provisions applicable to the conditions of use 
subject to TSCA section 6(g) exemptions until June 20, 2025. 
Postponement of Effectiveness for Certain Provisions of 
Trichloroethylene (TCE); Regulation under the Toxic Substances Control 
Act (TSCA), 90 FR 14415, April 2, 2025 (FRL-8317.1-01-OCSPP) (``Initial 
Notice''). In that notice, EPA explained that Petitioners Alliance, 
Microporous, and PPG (``Industry Petitioners'') raised serious 
questions regarding the WCPP that warranted a delay of the effective 
date of those provisions.
    On March 28, 2025, the court lifted the administrative stay except 
as to the provisions that are subject to EPA's Initial Notice. The 
court also ordered EPA to file any response to the pending stay motions 
by May 27, 2025.
    On May 27, 2025, EPA moved to hold the case in abeyance because it 
intends to reconsider the final rule, including provisions subject to 
EPA's Initial Notice, through notice-and-comment rulemaking. For the 
same reason the Agency filed a response to Industry Petitioners stating 
it did not oppose a stay of the provisions subject to EPA's Initial 
Notice. The judicial proceedings are ongoing.

II. Statutory Authority

    As discussed in the Initial Notice, section 705 of the 
Administrative Procedure Act (APA) authorizes an agency to postpone the 
effective date of an agency action pending judicial review when the 
agency finds ``that justice so requires.'' 5 U.S.C. 705. Notice and 
comment is not required when an agency delays the effective date of a 
rule under APA section 705 because such a stay pending judicial review 
is not substantive rulemaking subject to APA section 553; it merely 
maintains the status quo to allow for judicial review. See Bauer v. 
DeVos, 325 F. Supp. 3d 74, 106-07 (D.D.C. 2018); Sierra Club v. 
Jackson, 833 F. Supp. 2d 11, 28 (D.D.C. 2012).

III. Postponement of Effective Date

    In light of the fact that the pending litigation is still ongoing 
and for the same reasons as set forth in the Initial Notice, EPA has 
determined that justice requires a 60-day extension of the postponement 
of the effective date (i.e., until August 19, 2025) of the conditions 
for each of the TSCA section 6(g) exemptions. See 40 CFR 751.325(a)(2). 
The extension of the postponement applies, for example, to the 
conditions imposed under the TSCA section 6(g) exemption for the use of 
TCE as a processing aid for specialty polymeric microporous sheet 
material manufacturing. 40 CFR 751.325(b)(6)(i) through (iv).
    The postponement will temporarily preserve the status quo while the 
Third Circuit litigation is pending. Nothing has materially changed 
since the Initial Notice that would affect EPA's analysis of whether 
justice requires a stay of these provisions. Therefore, per the reasons 
discussed in the Initial Notice,

[[Page 26455]]

EPA believes extending the postponement for 60 days is necessary.

    Authority: 5 U.S.C. 705 and 15 U.S.C. 2605(a).

Lee Zeldin,
Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2025-11437 Filed 6-20-25; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P