[Federal Register Volume 90, Number 106 (Wednesday, June 4, 2025)]
[Notices]
[Pages 23730-23734]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2025-10114]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-103150; File No. SR-PEARL-2025-24]


Self-Regulatory Organizations; MIAX PEARL, LLC; Notice of Filing 
and Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed Rule Change To Amend the MIAX 
Pearl Equities Fee Schedule To Amend the Fees for Ports

May 29, 2025.
    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 
(``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given that 
on May 22, 2025, MIAX PEARL, LLC (``MIAX Pearl'' or ``Exchange'') filed 
with the Securities and Exchange Commission (``Commission'') a proposed 
rule change as described in Items I, II, and III below, which Items 
have been prepared by the Exchange. The Commission is publishing this 
notice to solicit comments on the proposed rule change from interested 
persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance 
of the Proposed Rule Change

    The Exchange proposes to amend the fee schedule (the ``Fee 
Schedule'') applicable to the Exchange's equities trading platform 
(``MIAX Pearl Equities'' \3\) to amend the fees for three types of 
ports, FIX, MEO, and FXD, each of which are described below. 
Specifically, the Exchange proposes to eliminate the tiered pricing 
structure by no longer providing a certain number of FIX and MEO ports 
for free and subject each purchased FIX and MEO port to the same fee. 
Likewise, the Exchange proposes to no longer provide all FXD ports for 
free and subject each purchased FXD port to the same fee as the 
Exchange charges for each FIX and MEO port. As a result of these 
changes, the Exchange also proposes to amend the Fee Schedule to remove 
the defined term ``Waiver Period'' \4\ as there will no longer be any 
fees subject to a Waiver Period upon the effectiveness of this filing. 
As described more fully below, the proposed fees described herein for 
each FIX, MEO and FXD port are comparable to, or lower than, the fees 
charged by other exchanges for similar port connectivity.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ All references to the ``Exchange'' in this filing refer to 
MIAX Pearl Options. Any references to the equities trading facility 
of MIAX PEARL, LLC will specifically be referred to as ``MIAX Pearl 
Equities.''
    \4\ The term ``Waiver Period'' means, for each applicable fee, 
the period of time from the initial effective date of the MIAX Pearl 
Equities Fee Schedule until such time that MIAX Pearl has an 
effective fee filing establishing the applicable fee. MIAX Pearl 
Equities will issue a Regulatory Circular announcing the 
establishment of an applicable fee that was subject to a Waiver 
Period at least fifteen (15) days prior to the termination of the 
Waiver Period and effective date of any such applicable fee. See the 
Definitions section of the Fee Schedule.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The text of the proposed rule change is available on the Exchange's 
website at https://www.miaxglobal.com/markets/us-options/pearl-options/rule-filings at MIAX Pearl's principal office, and at the Commission's 
Public Reference Room.

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and 
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements 
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and 
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The 
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in 
Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in 
sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such 
statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and 
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    The Exchange proposes to amend the fees for three types of ports, 
FIX, MEO, and FXD, each of which are described below. Specifically, the 
Exchange proposes to eliminate the tiered pricing structure by no 
longer providing a certain number of FIX and MEO ports for free and 
subject each purchased FIX and MEO port to the same fee. Likewise, the 
Exchange also proposes to no longer provide all FXD ports for free and 
subject each purchased FXD port to the same fee as each FIX and MEO 
port. As a result of these changes, the Exchange also proposes to amend 
the Fee Schedule to remove the defined term ``Waiver Period'' as there 
will no longer be any fees subject to a Waiver Period upon the 
effectiveness of this filing. As described more fully below, the 
proposed fees described herein for each FIX, MEO and FXD port are 
comparable to, or lower than, the fees charged by other exchanges for 
similar port connectivity.
    The Exchange offers Equity Members \5\ three types of ports: (i) 
FIX ports; \6\ (ii)

[[Page 23731]]

MEO ports; \7\ and (iii) FXD ports.\8\ FIX ports allow Equity Members 
to send orders and other messages using the FIX Order Interface.\9\ The 
FIX Order Interface is a gateway connection to the Exchange and allows 
Equity Members to use the industry standard FIX protocol with MIAX 
Pearl Equities specific extensions for the transmission of orders and 
other messages to and from the Exchange.\10\ The FIX Order Interface 
validates incoming orders and forwards them to the appropriate matching 
engine. Executions and cancellation notifications are provided through 
each FIX Order Interface to Equity Members through their FIX ports.\11\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ The term ``Equity Member'' means a Member authorized by the 
Exchange to transact business on MIAX PEARL Equities. See Exchange 
Rule 1901.
    \6\ The term ``FIX Port'' means a FIX port that allows Equity 
Members to send orders and other messages using the FIX protocol 
(also referred to as the FIX Order Interface, defined herein). See 
the Definitions section of the Fee Schedule.
    \7\ See the Definitions section of the Fee Schedule.
    \8\ The term ``FIX Drop Port'' or ``FXD'' means a messaging 
interface that provides real-time order activities of firms' MEO and 
FOI orders. See the Definitions section of the Fee Schedule. 
Standard FIX Drop ports only send trade information and include 
Execution Reports and Trade Cancel/Correct messages. See MIAX Pearl 
Equities Exchange User Manual, updated January 2025, at page 10, 
available at https://www.miaxglobal.com/miax_pearl_equities_user_manual_jan_2025.pdf (the ``User Manual''). 
FIX Order by Order Drop ports send all order activities, including 
all Execution Reports, Trade Cancel/Correct messages, and optionally 
order rejects. Id. The term ``Equities Market Maker'' shall mean an 
Equity Member that acts as a Market Maker in equity securities, 
pursuant to Chapter XXVI of the Exchange's Rules. See Exchange Rule 
1901. The term ``Equities Order Entry Firm'', ``Order Entry Firm'', 
or ``OEF'', shall mean those Equity Members representing orders as 
agent on MIAX Pearl Equities and those non-Equity Market Maker 
Members conducting proprietary trading. Id.
    \9\ See the Definition section of the Fee Schedule.
    \10\ See MIAX Pearl Equities FAQ, modified February 2025, at 
page 8, available at https://www.miaxglobal.com/miax_pearl_equities_faq_feb_2025.pdf (the ``MIAX Pearl Equities 
FAQ'').
    \11\ See id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    MEO ports provide Equity Members with order entry capabilities to 
all Exchange matching engines using the Exchange's proprietary binary 
MEO Interface protocol. The MEO Interface will route an order to the 
appropriate matching engine based on the security. Equity Members have 
flexibility in setting up MEO ports to cater to their architecture.\12\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \12\ See MIAX Pearl Equities FAQ, supra note 10.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    FXD ports allow Equity Members and clearing firms to receive real-
time order activities of firms' orders over the MEO and FOI 
Interfaces.\13\ The Exchange offers two types of FXD ports: (1) 
Standard FIX Drop port; and (2) FIX Order by Order Drop port.\14\ 
Standard FIX Drop ports will only send trade information, including 
execution reports and trade cancel/correct messages. FIX Order by Order 
Drop ports will send all order activities including execution reports, 
trade cancel/correct messages, and optionally order rejects.\15\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \13\ See the Definitions section of the Fee Schedule.
    \14\ See MIAX Pearl Equities FAQ, supra note 10, at page 9.
    \15\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange currently provides the first five (5) FIX and MEO 
ports, respectively, for free and all FXD ports for free. The Exchange 
charges the following separate monthly fees for FIX and MEO ports: $450 
per port per month for the 6th port and for each port thereafter 
utilized by an Equity Member. FIX and MEO Ports are counted separately 
for the tiers in the monthly Port Fee Table in section 2)d) of the Fee 
Schedule. As a new exchange entrant, the Exchange chose to offer a 
limited number of FIX, MEO, and FXD ports for free to encourage market 
participants to trade on the Exchange and experience, among things, the 
quality of the Exchange's technology and trading functionality. This 
practice is not uncommon. New exchanges often do not charge fees or 
charge lower fees for certain products and services, such as ports, to 
attract order flow to an exchange, and later amend their fees to 
reflect the true value of those products or services, absorbing all 
costs to provide those products or services in the meantime. Allowing 
new exchange entrants time to build and sustain market share through 
various pricing incentives before increasing non-transaction fees 
encourages market entry and fee parity, which promotes competition 
among exchanges. It also enables new exchanges to mature their markets 
and allow market participants to trade on the new exchanges without 
fees serving as a potential barrier to attracting memberships and order 
flow.\16\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \16\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 90651 (December 11, 
2020), 85 FR 81971 (December 17, 2020) (SR-PEARL-2020-33). See also, 
e.g., Securities Exchange Act Release No. 94894 (May 11, 2022), 87 
FR 29987 (May 17, 2022) (SR-BOX-2022-17) (stating, ``[t]he Exchange 
established this lower (when compared to other options exchanges in 
the industry) Participant Fee in order to encourage market 
participants to become Participants of BOX. . .''). See also 
Securities Exchange Act Release No. 90076 (October 2, 2020), 85 FR 
63620 (October 8, 2020) (SR-MEMX-2020-10) (proposal to adopt the 
initial fee schedule and stating that ``[u]nder the initial proposed 
Fee Schedule, the Exchange proposes to make clear that it does not 
charge any fees for membership, market data products, physical 
connectivity or application sessions.''). MEMX's market share 
increased and then MEMX established numerous non-transaction fees, 
including fees for membership, market data, and connectivity. See 
Securities Exchange Act Release Nos. 93927 (January 7, 2022), 87 FR 
2191 (January 13, 2022) (SR-MEMX-2021-19) (establishing membership 
fees); 96430 (December 1, 2022), 87 FR 75083 (December 7, 2022) (SR-
MEMX-2022-32) and 95936 (September 27, 2022), 87 FR 59845 (October 
3, 2022) (SR-MEMX-2022-26) (establishing connectivity fees). See 
also, e.g., Securities Exchange Act Release No. 88211 (February 14, 
2020), 85 FR 9847 (February 20, 2020) (SR-NYSENAT-2020-05) 
(establishing market data fees for the NYSE National exchange after 
initially providing market data for free).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    MIAX Pearl Equities has been in operation for over four and a half 
years and the original tiered pricing scheme has outlived its utility. 
Therefore, similar to other exchanges, the Exchange now proposes to 
eliminate the tiered pricing structure by no longer providing the first 
five (5) FIX and MEO ports, respectively, for free and will now charge 
$450 per FIX and MEO port per month. The Exchange also proposes to no 
longer provide FXD ports for free and will now charge $450 per FXD port 
per month, which is the same rate the Exchange proposes to charge for 
each FIX and MEO port.\17\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \17\ Since the Exchange will no longer offer any ports for free, 
the Exchange proposes to remove the following sentence below the 
Port Fee Table in Section 2)d) of the Fee Schedule, ``MEO and FIX 
ports are counted separately for the tiers in the able.'' The 
purpose of this change is to remove rule text that will no longer 
apply. Since each FIX, MEO and FXD port will be charged the same 
rate of $450 per port per month, there are no longer any tiers to 
count for purposes of determining whether Equity Members receive 
certain ports for free.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    As a result of the above proposed changes, the Exchange will no 
longer offer any products or services that are subject to a fee waiver 
period. Therefore, the Exchange proposes to amend the Definitions 
section and Section 2)d) of the Fee Schedule to remove all references 
to the ``Waiver Period.'' The Exchange issued an alert and Regulatory 
Circular publicly announcing the proposed changes on April 9, 2025.\18\ 
The proposed changes subject to this proposal are immediately 
effective.\19\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \18\ See Fee Change Alert, MIAX Pearl Equities--May 1, 2025 Port 
Fee Changes (dated April 9, 2025), available at https://www.miaxglobal.com/alert/2025/04/09/miax-pearl-equities-may-1-2025-port-fee-changes and MIAX Pearl Equities Exchange Regulatory 
Circular 2025-05 (dated April 9, 2025), available at https://www.miaxglobal.com/sites/default/files/circular-files/MIAX_Pearl_Equities_RC_2025_05.pdf.
    \19\ The Exchange initially filed this proposal on April 30, 
2025. See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 103043 (May 14, 2025), 
90 FR 21520 (May 20, 2025) (SR-PEARL-2025-19). On May 22, 2025, the 
Exchange withdrew SR-PEARL-2025-19 and refiled this proposal.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

2. Statutory Basis
    The Exchange believes that the proposed fee changes are consistent 
with the provisions of Section 6(b) \20\ of the Act in general, and 
furthers the objectives of Section 6(b)(4) \21\ of the Act, in 
particular, in that they are designed to provide for the equitable 
allocation of reasonable dues, fees and

[[Page 23732]]

other charges among the Exchange's Equity Members and other persons 
using its facilities. Additionally, the Exchange believes that the 
proposal is consistent with the objectives of Section 6(b)(5) \22\ of 
the Act in that the changes are designed to promote just and equitable 
principles of trade, to foster cooperation and coordination with 
persons engaged in regulating, clearing, settling, processing 
information with respect to, and facilitating transactions in 
securities, remove impediments to a free and open market and national 
market system, and, in general, protect investors and the public 
interest, and, particularly, are not designed to permit unfair 
discrimination between customers, issuers, brokers, or dealers.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \20\ 15 U.S.C. 78f.
    \21\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4).
    \22\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

The Proposed Fees Are Reasonable and Comparable to the Port Fees 
Charged by Other Exchanges for Similar Ports
    The proposed port fees are comparable to those of other equities 
exchanges with similar market share. Based on publicly-available 
information, no single exchange had more than approximately 14-15% of 
the equities market share for the month of March 2025,\23\ and the 
Exchange compared the fees proposed herein to the fees charged by other 
equities exchanges with similar market share. A more detailed 
discussion of the comparison follows.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \23\ See the Market Share section of the Exchange's website, 
available at https://www.miaxglobal.com/company/data/market-share 
(last visited April 5, 2025).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

FIX and MEO Port Fees
    The proposed FIX and MEO port fees for Equity Members that utilize 
1 to 5 ports are the same as currently charged by the Exchange for 
Equity Members that utilize 6 or more FIX or MEO ports (with each type 
of port counted separately). The proposed fees are also lower than the 
port fees charged by the equities markets of Cboe BYX Exchange, Inc. 
(``BYX Equities''), Cboe EDGA Exchange, Inc. (``EDGA Equities''), NYSE 
Texas, Inc. (``NYSE Texas''), and Nasdaq BX, Inc. (``Nasdaq BX'') for 
their ports that provide similar functionality. Further, BYX Equities, 
EDGA Equities, NYSE Texas, and Nasdaq BX all have comparable market 
share to the Exchange, as summarized below. The Exchange also notes 
that it proposes to eliminate the tiered pricing structure and now 
charge a single flat fee per port for all ports, similar to each of the 
exchanges described below.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                              Equities market share    FIX port fees         MEO port fees
                 Exchange                       (March 2025)  (%)      (``logical'')   (``logical'' or ``OUCH'')
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
MIAX Pearl Equities.......................                      1.02             $450                       $450
BYX Equities..............................                      0.75          \d\ 550                    \e\ 550
EDGA Equities.............................                      0.69          \f\ 550                    \g\ 550
NYSE Texas................................                      0.31          \h\ 455                    \i\ 455
Nasdaq BX.................................                      0.27          \j\ 500                    \k\ 500
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\a\ BYX Equities, EDGA Equities and NYSE Texas use the term ``Logical'' when describing their ports with similar
  functionality as the Exchange's FIX Ports.
\b\ BYX Equities, EDGA Equities and NYSE Texas use the term ``Logical'' when describing their ports with similar
  functionality as the Exchange's MEO Ports.
\c\ Nasdaq BX uses the term/name ``OUCH'' when describing their ports with similar functionality as the
  Exchange's MEO Ports.
\d\ See BYX Equities Fee Schedule, Logical Port Fees section, available at BYX Equities Fee Schedule (last
  visited April 9, 2025).
\e\ See id.
\f\ See EDGA Equities Fee Schedule, Logical Port Fees section, available at EDGA Equities Fee Schedule (last
  visited April 9, 2025).
\g\ See id.
\h\ See NYSE Texas Fee Schedule, Section D.1 Port Charges--Logical Connections, available at https://www.nyse.com/publicdocs/nyse/markets/nyse-texas/NYSE_Texas_Fee_Schedule.pdf (last visited April 9, 2025).
\i\ See id.
\j\ See BX Equity Rules, Equity 7 Pricing Schedule, Section 115 Ports and other Services, available at https://listingcenter.nasdaq.com/rulebook/bx/rules/BX%20Equity%207 (last visited April 9, 2025).
\k\ See id.

    A more detailed discussion of the comparison follows.
    BYX Equities and EDGA Equities. BYX Equities, with a market share 
of approximately 0.75%, and EDGA Equities, with a market share of 
approximately 0.69%, have comparable market share to the Exchange 
(approximately 1.02%), and charge higher fees ($550 per port per month 
compared to the Exchange's proposal of $450 per port per month) for 
each Logical Port than the Exchange proposes to charge for each FIX and 
MEO Port. The BYX Equities and EDGA Equities Logical Ports include, 
among other types, FIX \24\ and Binary Order Entry (``BOE'') \25\ 
ports, which are used for order entry for BYX Equities and EDGA 
Equities,\26\ similar to the Exchange's FIX and MEO ports.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \24\ FIX Ports are the industry standard order entry ports 
utilized by the Cboe family of exchanges, similar to the Exchange's 
FIX Ports. See, generally, Cboe Titanium U.S. Equities FIX 
Specification, Version 2.9.39 (March 31, 2025), available at Cboe 
FIX Specification (last visited April 9, 2025).
    \25\ BOE Ports are the proprietary order entry protocol for the 
Cboe family of exchanges, similar to the Exchange's MEO Ports. See, 
generally, Cboe Titanium Cboe U.S. Equities Binary Order Entry 
Specification, Version 2.4.43 (March 31, 2025), available at Cboe 
BOE Specification (last visited April 9, 2025).
    \26\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 100436 (June 26, 
2024), 89 FR 54947, footnote 4 (July 2, 2024) (SR-CboeBYX-2024-023).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    NYSE Texas. NYSE Texas, with a market share of approximately 0.31%, 
has a comparable market share to the Exchange (approximately 1.02%), 
and charges slightly higher fees ($455 per port per month compared to 
the Exchange's proposal of $450 per port per month) for each NYSE Texas 
Logical Port than the Exchange proposes to charge for each FIX and MEO 
port. The NYSE Texas Logical Ports include access to NYSE Texas via 
both FIX and binary protocols, which are used for order entry for NYSE 
Texas, similar to the Exchange's FIX and MEO ports. NYSE Texas assesses 
a Logical Port charge for each participant that connects to the 
exchange. Unlike the Exchange,\27\ NYSE Texas assesses a separate port 
charge for each port connected to the main trading system and for each 
back-up connection.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \27\ See Fee Schedule, Section 2)d).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Nasdaq BX. Nasdaq BX, with a market with a market share of 
approximately 0.27%, has a comparable market share to the Exchange 
(approximately 1.02%), and charges higher fees ($500 per port

[[Page 23733]]

per month compared to the Exchange's proposal of $450 per port per 
month) for each OUCH and FIX Trading Port. OUCH is Nasdaq BX's 
proprietary port for order entry and receiving status updates,\28\ 
while FIX is Nasdaq BX's standard format port for order entry,\29\ 
similar to the Exchange's MEO and FIX ports, respectively. Nasdaq BX's 
OUCH and FIX Ports can be used by Nasdaq BX market makers and order 
entry firms.\30\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \28\ See Nasdaq OUCH Overview, available at https://www.nasdaqtrader.com/Trader.aspx?id=OUCH (last visited April 14, 
2025).
    \29\ See Nasdaq FIX Overview, available at https://www.nasdaqtrader.com/Trader.aspx?id=FIX (last visited April 14, 
2025).
    \30\ See supra notes 28 and 29.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

FXD Port Fees
    The proposed FXD port fees are the same as currently charged by the 
Exchange for Equity Members that utilize the Exchange's FIX and MEO 
ports. The proposed FXD port fees are also lower than the port fees 
charged by BYX Equities and EDGA Equities for their ports that provide 
similar functionality. Further, BYX Equities and EDGA Equities have 
comparable market share to the Exchange, as summarized in the table 
below.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                  Equities market share    FXD port fees
           Exchange                 (March 2025)  (%)      (``Logical'')
------------------------------------------------------------------------
MIAX Pearl Equities...........                      1.02            $450
BYX Equities..................                      0.75         \l\ 550
EDGA Equities.................                      0.69         \m\ 550
------------------------------------------------------------------------
\l\ See BYX Equities Fee Schedule, Logical Port Fees section, available
  at BYX Equities Fee Schedule (last visited April 9, 2025).
\m\ See EDGA Equities Fee Schedule, Logical Port Fees section, available
  at EDGA Equities Fee Schedule (last visited April 9, 2025).

    A more detailed discussion of the comparison follows.
    BYX Equities and EDGA Equities. BYX Equities, with a market share 
of approximately 0.75%, and EDGA Equities, with a market share of 
approximately 0.69%, have comparable market share to the Exchange 
(approximately 1.02%), and charge higher fees for each Logical Ports 
(including drop copy) than the Exchange proposes to charge for each FXD 
port. Similar to the Exchange, BYX Equities and EDGA Equities offer two 
types of FIX Drop ports (Standard FIX Drop and Order by Order FIX 
Drop). Both port types do not accept orders. Their purpose is to 
provide real time information about order flow and may be configured to 
send order flow based on various combinations of information relating 
to specific member firms, clearing member participant identification 
(``MPIDs'') and/or sessions, similar to the Exchange's FXD ports.\31\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \31\ See supra notes 24 and 25.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Each of the above examples of other exchanges' port fees support 
the proposition that the Exchange's proposed Port fees are comparable 
to those of other exchanges and therefore reasonable.
The Proposed Fees Are Equitably Allocated
    Overall. The Exchange believes that its proposed fees are 
reasonable, equitable, and not unfairly discriminatory because they are 
designed to align fees with services provided. The Exchange believes 
that the proposed port fees are allocated fairly and equitably among 
all Equity Members as the proposed price is the same for each type of 
port that may be utilized.
    The Exchange believes that the proposed fees are equitably 
allocated because they will apply uniformly to all Equity Members that 
choose to utilize FIX, MEO and/or FXD ports. Any market participant 
that chooses to utilize a FIX, MEO and/or FXD port will be subject to 
the same fee for each port, regardless of what type of business they 
operate, and the decision to utilize one or more types of ports is 
based on objective differences in port usage among different Equity 
Members, which are still ultimately in the control of any particular 
Equity Member.
    As noted above, the proposed port fee pricing is comparable to, or 
lower than, the port fees charged by other exchanges for their ports 
that provide similar functionality.\32\ The Exchange also notes that 
its proposal to eliminate the tiered pricing structure for FIX and MEO 
ports to begin charging a single flat fee per port for all ports is 
also equitably allocated because each Equity Member will be subject to 
the same flat fee for each port they choose to utilize.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \32\ See BYX Equities Fee Schedule, Logical Port Fees section, 
available at BYX Equities Fee Schedule (last visited April 9, 2025) 
and EDGA Equities Fee Schedule, Logical Port Fees section, available 
at EDGA Equities Fee Schedule (last visited April 9, 2025).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    For all of the foregoing reasons, the Exchange believes that the 
proposed fees for the market data feeds are equitably allocated.
The Proposed Port Fees Are Not Unfairly Discriminatory
    The Exchange believes the proposed fees are not unfairly 
discriminatory because there is no difference in the application of any 
of the proposed port fees among Equity Members. The Exchange believes 
that the proposed fees are not unfairly discriminatory because they 
would apply to all Equity Members that choose to utilize FIX, MEO and/
or FXD ports. Any Equity Member that chooses to utilize the Exchange's 
ports will be subject to the same pricing, regardless of what type of 
business they operate. The Exchange also notes that its proposal to 
eliminate the tiered pricing structure for FIX and MEO ports to begin 
charging a single flat fee per port for all ports is not unfairly 
discriminatory because each Equity Member will be subject to the same 
flat fee for each port they choose to utilize.
    For all of the foregoing reasons, the Exchange believes that the 
proposed fees for the Exchange's market data feeds are not unfairly 
discriminatory.
* * * * *
    The Exchange believes its proposal to remove all references to the 
Waiver Period promotes just and equitable principles of trade and 
remove impediments to and perfect the mechanism of a free and open 
market and a national market system because the proposed changes will 
provide greater clarity to Equity Members and the public regarding the 
Exchange's Fee Schedule by remove references to fee waivers that will 
no longer apply upon the effectiveness of this rule filing. With this 
proposed rule change, the Exchange will no longer provide any products 
or services that would be subject to a fee waiver period. Removing such 
references from the Fee Schedule will remove impediments to a free and 
open market and national market system because they will attempt to 
avoid potential investor confusion and ensure

[[Page 23734]]

the Fee Schedule includes only terms that are applicable to its 
products and services.

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    In accordance with Section 6(b)(8) of the Act,\33\ the Exchange 
does not believe that the proposed rule change would impose any burden 
on competition that is not necessary or appropriate in furtherance of 
the purposes of the Act.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \33\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(8).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Intra-Market Competition
    The Exchange does not believe that the proposed port fees place 
certain market participants at a relative disadvantage to other market 
participants because, as noted above, the proposed fees are the same 
for each type of port and the proposed amounts are comparable to, or 
lower than, the port fees charged by other exchanges with comparable 
market share for their ports with similar functionality. Accordingly, 
the proposed fees do not favor certain categories of market 
participants in a manner that would impose a burden on competition. The 
Exchange believes that the proposed fees neither favor nor penalize one 
or more categories of market participants in a manner that would impose 
an undue burden on competition.
    The Exchange believes its proposal to remove all references to the 
Waiver Period will have no impact on competition as those changes are 
not designed to address any competitive issue but rather are designed 
to provide added clarity to the Fee Schedule since the Exchange will no 
longer offer any non-transaction fees for free. The proposed changes 
would apply uniformly to all market participants and do not favor 
certain categories of market participants in a manner that would impose 
an undue burden on competition.
Inter-Market Competition
    The Exchange does not believe the proposed fees place an undue 
burden on competition on other exchanges that is not necessary or 
appropriate. In particular, market participants are not forced to 
utilize a particular type of port and other exchanges, with comparable 
market share, offer ports with similar functionality for comparable 
pricing.
    In addition, the Exchange does not believe the proposal to remove 
all references to the Waiver Period will impose any burden on inter-
market competition as the proposal does not address any competitive 
issues and is intended to provide clarity to the Fee Schedule. The 
Exchange does not believe that the proposal will harm another 
exchange's ability to compete. Accordingly, the Exchange does not 
believe the proposal imposes any burden on competition that is not 
necessary or appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of the Act.

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed 
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others

    Written comments were neither solicited nor received.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for 
Commission Action

    The foregoing rule change has become effective pursuant to Section 
19(b)(3)(A)(ii) of the Act,\34\ and Rule 19b-4(f)(2) \35\ thereunder. 
At any time within 60 days of the filing of the proposed rule change, 
the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule change if it 
appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or appropriate 
in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or otherwise 
in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. If the Commission takes such 
action, the Commission shall institute proceedings to determine whether 
the proposed rule should be approved or disapproved.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \34\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(ii).
    \35\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views and 
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule 
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of 
the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's internet comment form (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
     Send an email to [email protected]. Please include 
file number SR-PEARL-2025-24 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities 
and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to file number SR-PEARL-2025-24. This file 
number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help 
the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently, 
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on 
the Commission's internet website (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all 
written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are 
filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to 
the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other 
than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the 
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for website viewing and 
printing in the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE, 
Washington, DC 20549, on official business days between the hours of 10 
a.m. and 3 p.m. Copies of the filing also will be available for 
inspection and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. Do not 
include personal identifiable information in submissions; you should 
submit only information that you wish to make available publicly. We 
may redact in part or withhold entirely from publication submitted 
material that is obscene or subject to copyright protection. All 
submissions should refer to file number SR-PEARL-2025-24 and should be 
submitted on or before June 25, 2025.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets, 
pursuant to delegated authority.\36\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \36\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

J. Matthew DeLesDernier,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2025-10114 Filed 6-3-25; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P