[Federal Register Volume 90, Number 103 (Friday, May 30, 2025)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 22883-22885]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2025-09729]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Highway Administration

23 CFR Part 970

[Docket Number FHWA-2025-0015]
RIN 2125-AG21


Rescinding Regulations Regarding Management Systems Pertaining to 
the National Park Service and the Park Roads and Parkways Program

AGENCY: Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), Department of 
Transportation (DOT)

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: FHWA proposes to rescind the regulations issued on February 
27, 2004, Federal Lands Highway Program; Management Systems Pertaining 
to the National Park Service and the Park Roads and Parkways Program.

DATES: Comments must be received on or before June 30, 2025.

ADDRESSES: Mail or hand deliver comments to the U.S. Department of 
Transportation, Dockets Management Facility, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, 
Washington, DC 20590, or submit electronically at www.regulations.gov. 
All comments should include the docket number that appears in the 
heading of this document. All comments received will be available for 
examination and copying at the above address from 9 a.m. to 5 p.m., 
E.T., Monday through Friday, except Federal

[[Page 22884]]

holidays. Those desiring notification of receipt of comments must 
include a self-addressed, stamped postcard or may print the 
acknowledgment page that appears after submitting comments 
electronically. Anyone is able to search the electronic form of all 
comments received into any of our dockets by the name of the individual 
submitting the comment (or signing the comment, if submitted on behalf 
of an association, business, labor union, etc.). You may review DOT's 
complete Privacy Act Statement in the Federal Register published on 
April 11, 2000 (Volume 65, Number 70, Pages 19477-78) or you may visit 
www.regulations.gov.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Corey Bobba, Office of Federal Lands, 
(202) 366-9489, [email protected]; or David Serody, Office of the 
Chief Counsel, (202) 366-4241, [email protected], Federal Highway 
Administration, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590. Office 
hours are from 8:00 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., E.T., Monday through Friday, 
except Federal holidays.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Electronic Access and Filing

    This document and all comments received may be viewed online at 
www.regulations.gov using the docket number listed above. Electronic 
retrieval assistance and guidelines are available on the website. It is 
available 24 hours each day, 365 days each year. An electronic copy of 
this document may also be downloaded from the Office of Federal 
Register's website at www.federalregister.gov and the U.S. Government 
Publishing Office's website at www.GovInfo.gov.

I. General Discussion

    Through this proposed rule, FHWA proposes to rescind the rule 
issued on February 27, 2004, Federal Lands Highway Program; Management 
Systems Pertaining to the National Park Service and the Park Roads and 
Parkways Program, via 69 FR 9470, amending 23 CFR part 970. This rule 
provided for the development and implementation of safety, bridge, 
pavement, and congestion management systems for transportation 
facilities under National Park Service (NPS) jurisdiction and funded 
under the Federal Lands Highway Program (FLHP) as required by the 
Transportation Equity Act for the 21st Century (TEA-21) (Pub. L. 105-
178) (June 9, 1998). For the reasons explained below, FHWA has 
determined that this part is unnecessary and will rescind it in full.
    Section 1115(d)(1) of TEA-21 amended the version of 23 U.S.C. 204 
that existed at the time to add a paragraph (a)(6) stating: ``The 
Secretary and the Secretary of each appropriate Federal land management 
agency shall, to the extent appropriate, develop by rule safety, 
bridge, pavement, and congestion management systems for roads funded 
under the Federal lands highway program.'' The roads funded under the 
FLHP included Park Roads and Parkways (PRP). Through 23 CFR part 970, 
FHWA addressed the management systems for the NPS and the PRP program. 
See 69 FR at 9470.
    On July 6, 2012, Congress enacted the Moving Ahead for Progress in 
the 21st Century Act (Pub. L. 112-141). Section 1119(a) of MAP-21 
removed the FLHP under 23 U.S.C. 204, replacing that program with the 
Tribal Transportation Program (23 U.S.C. 202), the Federal Lands 
Transportation Program (23 U.S.C. 203), and the Federal Lands Access 
Program (23 U.S.C. 204). In doing so, Congress repealed the previous 
version of 23 U.S.C. 204(a)(6) and replaced it with a similar provision 
at 23 U.S.C. 201(c)(5), which has remained unchanged. Under that 
provision, FHWA ``and the Secretary of each appropriate Federal land 
management agency shall, to the extent appropriate, implement safety, 
bridge, pavement, and congestion management systems for facilities 
funded under the tribal transportation program and the Federal lands 
transportation program in support of asset management.''
    The FHWA first notes that the current regulations have become 
outdated due to subsequent statutory changes, and FHWA has issued more 
up-to-date guidance.\1\ For instance, the definition of the Parks roads 
and parkways program in Sec.  970.104 refers to the ``program that is 
authorized in 23 U.S.C. 204 with funds allocated to the NPS by [FHWA] 
for each fiscal year as provided in 23 U.S.C. 202(c) and 204.'' This 
refers to the requirements that existed prior to the enactment of MAP-
21, where Congress appropriated funds specifically for park roads and 
parkways as part of the FLHP under 23 U.S.C. 204, which FHWA then 
allocated pursuant to 23 U.S.C. 202(c).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ https://highways.dot.gov/federal-lands/transportation.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In considering the changes to be made to 23 CFR part 970, FHWA is 
guided by the Secretary of Transportation's new policy to reduce 
regulatory burdens wherever possible. Under that policy, unless a 
regulatory standard is required by statute, the Secretary proposes 
eliminating that requirement. In accordance with that policy, FHWA 
finds it significant that Congress, in enacting MAP-21, retained the 
same general requirements for asset management in 23 U.S.C. 201(c)(5) 
but replaced the phrase ``develop by rule'' with the word 
``implement.'' To the extent that FHWA and Federal land management 
agencies agree that safety, bridge, pavement, and congestion management 
systems are appropriate for certain facilities, FHWA believes such 
systems can be implemented without the need for regulations. The FHWA 
seeks comment on any reasons to rescind or not to rescind these 
regulations.

II. Rulemaking Analyses and Notices

A. Executive Orders 12866 (Regulatory Planning and Review), Executive 
Order 13563 (Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review), and DOT 
Regulatory Policies and Procedures

    This proposed rule does not meet the criteria of a ``significant 
regulatory action'' under Executive Order (E.O.) 12866, as amended by 
Executive Orders 14215 and 13563. Therefore, the Office of Management 
and Budget (OMB) has not reviewed this rule under those orders.
    This proposed rule would rescind outdated regulations regarding 
asset management. It could result in some cost savings for the NPS, but 
FHWA does not have the data to estimate the reduction in costs that 
would result from this NPRM. The Agency requests comment on any impacts 
that could result from removing the provisions identified in this NPRM.
    These changes would not adversely affect, in a material way, any 
sector of the economy. In addition, these changes would not interfere 
with any action taken or planned by another agency and would not 
materially alter the budgetary impact of any entitlements, grants, user 
fees, or loan programs. Consequently, a full regulatory evaluation is 
not required.

B. Executive Order 14192 (Unleashing Prosperity Through Deregulation)

    This proposed rule is not an E.O. 14192 regulatory action. This 
rulemaking would not adversely affect, in a material way, any sector of 
the economy. In addition, these changes would not interfere with any 
action taken or planned by another agency and would not materially 
alter the budgetary impacts of any entitlements, grants, user fees, or 
loan programs. Consequently, a full regulatory evaluation is not 
required.

C. Regulatory Flexibility Act

    Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) (5 U.S.C. 601-612) (as 
amended

[[Page 22885]]

by the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996; 5 
U.S.C. 601 et seq.), agencies must prepare and make available for 
public comment a regulatory flexibility analysis that describes the 
effect of the rulemaking on small entities (i.e., small businesses, 
small organizations, and small government jurisdictions). No regulatory 
flexibility analysis is required, however, if the head of an agency or 
an appropriate designee certifies that the rulemaking will not have a 
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities. 
FHWA has concluded and hereby certifies that this proposed rule will 
not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small 
entities; therefore, an analysis is not included. This proposed rule 
would only remove regulations governing management systems that guide 
the NPS in developing transportation plans and making resource 
allocation decisions.

D. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act

    This proposed rule does not impose unfunded mandates as defined by 
the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (UMRA) (Pub. L. 104-4, 109 
Stat. 48) for State, local and Tribal governments, or the private 
sector of $100 million or more in any one year. Thus, the rulemaking is 
not subject to the requirements of sections 202 and 205 of the UMRA.

E. Executive Order 13132 (Federalism Assessment)

    This action has been analyzed in accordance with the principles and 
criteria contained in E.O. 13132. The FHWA has determined that this 
action does not have sufficient federalism implications to warrant the 
preparation of a federalism assessment. The FHWA has also determined 
that this action does not preempt any State law or State regulation or 
affect the States' ability to discharge traditional State governmental 
functions.

F. Paperwork Reduction Act

    In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 
3501-3520), an agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not 
required to respond to, a collection of information, unless the 
collection displays a currently valid Office of Management and Budget 
(OMB) control number. This proposed rule is deregulatory and so would 
not impose any additional information collection requirements.

G. National Environmental Policy Act

    FHWA has analyzed this proposed rule pursuant to the NEPA and has 
determined that it is categorically excluded under 23 CFR 
771.117(c)(2), which applies to the promulgation of rules, regulations, 
and directives. Categorically excluded actions meet the criteria for 
categorical exclusions under 23 CFR 771.117(a) and normally do not 
require any further NEPA approvals by FHWA. This proposed rule would 
remove requirements regarding safety, bridge, pavement, and congestion 
management systems that are currently outdated. FHWA does not 
anticipate any adverse environmental impacts from this proposed rule, 
and no unusual circumstances are present under 23 CFR 771.117(b).

H. Executive Order 13175 (Tribal Consultation)

    Executive Order 13175 requires Federal agencies to consult and 
coordinate with Tribes on a government-to-government basis on policies 
that have Tribal implications, including regulations, legislative 
comments or proposed legislation, and other policy statements or 
actions that have substantial direct effects on one or more Indian 
Tribes, on the relationship between the Federal Government and Indian 
Tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities between 
the Federal Government and Indian Tribes. FHWA has assessed the impact 
of this proposed rule on Indian tribes and determined that this 
proposed rule would not have tribal implications that require 
consultation under Executive Order 13175.

I. Regulation Identifier Number

    A RIN is assigned to each regulatory action listed in the Unified 
Agenda of Federal Regulations. The Regulatory Information Service 
Center publishes the Unified Agenda in the spring and fall of each 
year. The RIN contained in the heading of this document can be used to 
cross reference this action with the Unified Agenda.

J. Rulemaking Summary, 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(4)

    As required by 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(4), a summary of this rule can be 
found at regulations.gov, under the docket number.

List of Subjects in 23 CFR Part 970

    Bridges, Congestion management, Grant program--transportation, 
Highways and roads, Management systems, National parks, Pavement 
management, Public lands, Safety management, Transportation.

    Issued in Washington, DC, under authority delegated in 49 CFR 
1.85.
Gloria M. Shepherd,
Executive Director, Federal Highway Administration.

    For the reasons stated in the preamble, under the authority of 23 
U.S.C. 315, FHWA proposes to remove part 970.

PART 970--[REMOVED AND RESERVED]

0
1. Remove and reserve part 970, consisting of Sec. Sec.  970.100 
through 970.214.

[FR Doc. 2025-09729 Filed 5-27-25; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 4910-22-P