[Federal Register Volume 90, Number 101 (Wednesday, May 28, 2025)]
[Notices]
[Pages 22511-22513]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2025-09497]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management

[PO #4820000251; Order #02412-014-004-047181.0]


Notice of Availability of the Proposed Resource Management Plan 
Amendments and Final Environmental Impact Statement for the Proposed 
Greenlink North Transmission Project in White Pine, Eureka, Lander, 
Churchill, and Lyon Counties, Nevada

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Department of the Interior.

ACTION: Notice of availability.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In compliance with the National Environmental Policy Act of 
1969, as amended (NEPA), and the Federal Land Policy and Management Act 
of 1976, as amended (FLPMA), the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) and 
the United States Department of Agriculture-Forest Service (Forest 
Service) have prepared a proposed resource management plan (RMP) 
amendment and final environmental impact statement (EIS) for the 
Greenlink North Transmission Project.

DATES: This notice announces a 30-day protest period to the BLM on the 
proposed RMP amendment beginning with the date following the 
Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) publication of its notice of 
availability (NOA) of the proposed RMP amendment/final EIS in the 
Federal Register. The EPA usually publishes its NOAs on Fridays. 
Protests must be postmarked or electronically submitted on the BLM's 
ePlanning site during the 30-day protest period. The Forest Service 
will publish a legal notice in the newspaper of record to initiate the 
45-day objection period, anticipated to occur on the same day.

ADDRESSES: The proposed RMP amendment/final EIS and associated 
documents are available on the BLM ePlanning project website at https://eplanning.blm.gov/eplanning-ui/project/2017033/510. Documents 
pertinent to this proposal may also be examined at the BLM Nevada State 
Office, 1340 Financial Way, Reno, Nevada 89502; Forest Service, 
Humboldt-Toiyabe National Forest

[[Page 22512]]

Supervisor's Office, 1200 Franklin Way, Sparks, Nevada 89431; and 
Forest Service, Humboldt-Toiyabe National Forest, Austin Ranger 
District, 100 Midas Road, Austin, Nevada 89810.
    Instructions for filing a protest with the BLM for the Greenlink 
North Transmission Project can be found at: https://www.blm.gov/programs/planning-and-nepa/public-participation/filing-a-plan-protest 
and at 43 CFR 1610.5-2. Instructions for submitting an objection with 
the Forest Service can be found at: https://www.fs.usda.gov/project/htnf/?project=64198.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:  Brian Buttazoni, Project Manager, 
telephone (775) 861-6491; address 1340 Financial Boulevard, Reno, 
Nevada 89502; email [email protected]. Individuals in the 
United States who are deaf, deafblind, hard of hearing, or have a 
speech disability may dial 711 (TTY, TDD, or TeleBraille) to access 
telecommunications relay services for contacting Mr. Buttazoni. 
Individuals outside the United States should use the relay services 
offered within their country to make international calls to the point-
of-contact in the United States.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This notice announces the start of a 30-day 
BLM protest period of the proposed RMP amendment and the start of a 45-
day Forest Service, pre-decisional administrative review process, also 
known as an objection process, upon a legal notice being published in 
the Reno-Gazette Journal, the newspaper of record for the Humboldt-
Toiyabe National Forest (36 CFR part 218, subparts A and B).
    This document provides notice that the BLM Nevada State Director 
has prepared a proposed RMP amendment/final EIS for the Greenlink North 
Transmission Line Project. The RMP amendment would amend the existing 
2001 Consolidated Resource Management Plan in Carson City District, 
1986 Shoshone-Eureka Resource Management Plan/Record of Decision in 
Battle Mountain District, and 2008 Record of Decision/Resource 
Management Plan in Ely District. The proposed RMP amendment is being 
considered to allow the BLM to evaluate the establishment of a 198-
mile-long utility corridor that is up to 3,500-feet wide within greater 
sage-grouse habitat management areas and in proximity to lek buffers on 
BLM-administered lands. The originally proposed utility corridor width 
(3 miles) and length (235 miles) was reduced after scoping to be 
consistent with other national utility corridor widths, and to clarify 
the corridor would apply to BLM-administered lands only.
    The planning area is in White Pine, Eureka, Lander, Churchill, and 
Lyon counties, Nevada and encompasses approximately 83,400 acres of 
BLM-administered lands.
    A NOA for the draft EIS/proposed RMP amendment was published in the 
Federal Register on September 10, 2024 (89 FR 73429), providing the 
public with a 90-day comment period. The public comment period closed 
on December 11, 2024. The BLM received 28 public comment emails and 
letters containing a total of 355 substantive comments. The public 
comments focused on: biological resources; alternatives development; 
visual resources; cultural resources; impacts to general and special-
status wildlife species and their habitats; social and economic 
conditions; vegetation/riparian/noxious and invasive weeds/special 
status plant species; water resources; recreation; socioeconomic 
concerns; and Native American cultural/sacred sites.

Purpose and Need

    The BLM's purpose and need for this Federal action is to respond to 
the right-of-way (ROW) application submitted by NV Energy under Title V 
of FLPMA (43 U.S.C. 1761) on July 20, 2020 to construct, operate, 
maintain, and decommission a proposed system of new 525-kV, 345-kV, 
230-kV, and 120-kV electric transmission facilities on BLM-administered 
lands in White Pine, Eureka, Lander, Churchill, and Lyon counties, in 
compliance with FLPMA, BLM ROW regulations, NEPA, the BLM NEPA Handbook 
(BLM 2008), Department of the Interior NEPA regulations, and other 
applicable Federal laws and policies. In accordance with FLPMA, the BLM 
is authorized to grant ROWs on public lands for systems of generation, 
transmission, and distribution of electrical energy (43 U.S.C. 
1761(a)(4)). If approved, the ROW for the proposed project would 
implement support the direction in Executive Orders 14154, Unleashing 
American Energy, and 14156, Declaring a National Energy Emergency, and 
Secretary's Orders 3417, Addressing the National Energy Emergency, and 
3418, Unleashing American Energy.
    The Greenlink North Transmission Project as proposed would not 
conform to the RMPs in the BLM Carson City, Battle Mountain, and Ely 
District Offices as required by 43 CFR 1610.5-3(a). The BLM would need 
to amend these RMPs to bring the Greenlink North Transmission Project 
into conformance. In particular, the Proponent's proposed transmission 
line does not conform to the management objectives of the planning area 
for transmission lines greater than 100-kV. The purpose of the RMP 
amendment is to ensure that development of the Greenlink North 
Transmission Project conforms to the RMPs' provisions, as provided for 
in 43 CFR 1610.5-3(c), by providing for the designation of a utility 
corridor and modifying restrictions in greater sage-grouse habitat 
management areas and in proximity to leks.
    The Forest Service, Humboldt-Toiyabe National Forest also received 
an application from NV Energy for an approximately 10-mile segment of 
the project. The Forest Service's purpose and need is to respond to NV 
Energy's application for a Special Use Permit to construct, operate, 
maintain, and decommission the proposed 500-kV transmission line on 
National Forest System land in Lander County in compliance with FLPMA, 
the National Forest Management Act (16 U.S.C. 1601-1614), and the 
Toiyabe National Forest Land and Resource Management Plan (Forest 
Service 1986, as amended), which provides standards and guidelines for 
managing the National Forest.

Alternatives Including the Preferred Alternative

    The BLM has analyzed three action alternatives in detail, plus the 
no action alternative. The State Director and Forest Supervisor have 
identified NV Energy's proposed action with three modified segments 
crossing BLM and National Forest System land as the preferred 
alternative. The first modified segment realigns the proposed action 
south of the public purpose conveyance parcels that will be transferred 
to Churchill County resulting from the National Defense Authorization 
Act of 2023. This alternative segment would be approximately 8 miles 
long and slightly reduce the disturbance footprint of the 525-kV 
transmission line on BLM-administered lands. The second modified 
segment would realign the proposed action further away from the 
recently established Desatoya Wilderness Area. The third modified 
segment is the Forest Service preferred northern alternative route from 
the Lander Substation that would cross approximately 10 miles of the 
Humboldt-Toiyabe National Forest and approximately 9 miles of adjacent 
BLM-administered lands to the east. The route would parallel an 
existing 230-kV transmission line within the forest's existing utility 
corridor until reconnecting with the proposed action

[[Page 22513]]

route. The reconnection with the proposed action route 9 miles east of 
the Humboldt-Toiyabe National Forest provides the most technical 
feasibility to reduce the cost, line angles, and disturbances from the 
proposed 525-kV transmission line. The BLM further considered 18 
additional transmission alternatives but dismissed these alternatives 
from detailed analysis as explained in the proposed RMP amendment/final 
EIS.
    The preferred alternative was found to best meet the BLM's and 
Forest Service's purpose and need while addressing impacts to greater 
sage-grouse habitats primarily through co-location, which limits new 
disturbance to areas already impacted by two existing transmission 
lines, a 230-kV and 345-kV line. The Greenlink North Transmission 
Project would be co-located for approximately 198 miles of the 235-
mile-long transmission line.

Mitigation

    The preferred alternative for the portions of the project within 
and adjacent to greater sage-grouse habitats includes the requirement 
for NV Energy to install anti-perching/nesting deterrents on 
transmission poles to minimize potential predation by ravens.

Forest Service Administrative Review Process

    The U.S. Forest Service's decision will be subject to the pre-
decisional administrative review process at 36 CFR part 218, subparts A 
and B, also known as the objection process. The objection process 
provides an opportunity for members of the public who have participated 
in the planning process for the action to have any unresolved concerns 
reviewed by the U.S. Forest Service prior to a final decision by the 
Responsible Official. The legal notice announcing the opportunity to 
object will be published in the Reno-Gazette Journal, the newspaper of 
record for the Humboldt-Toiyabe National Forest. The opportunity to 
object ends 45-days following the publication of the legal notice in 
the newspaper of record. It is the objector's responsibility to ensure 
timely filing of a written objection. Only individuals and 
organizations who have submitted timely and specific written comments 
about this proposal during designated opportunities for public comment 
are eligible to file an objection in accordance with 36 CFR 218.5. 
Issues raised in objections must be based on previously submitted 
timely, specific written comments regarding the proposed project, 
unless the issue is based on new information arising after designated 
comment opportunities. The objection must contain the minimum content 
requirement specified in 36 CFR 218.8(d).

Protest of the Proposed RMP Amendments

    The BLM planning regulations state that any person who participated 
in the preparation of the RMP amendment and has an interest which will 
or might be adversely affected by approval of the proposed RMP 
amendment may protest its approval to the BLM Director. Protest on the 
proposed RMP amendment constitutes the final opportunity for 
administrative review of the proposed land use planning decisions prior 
to the BLM adopting an approved RMP amendment. Instructions for filing 
a protest regarding the proposed RMP amendment with the BLM Director 
may be found online at https://www.blm.gov/programs/planning-and-nepa/public-participation/filing-a-plan-protest and at 43 CFR 1610.5-2. All 
protests must be in writing and mailed to the appropriate address, as 
set forth in the ADDRESSES section earlier or submitted electronically 
through the BLM ePlanning project website as described previously. 
Protests submitted electronically by any means other than the ePlanning 
project website will be invalid unless a protest is also submitted as a 
hard copy. The BLM Director will render a written decision on each 
protest. The Director's decision is the final decision of the 
Department of the Interior. Responses to valid protest issues will be 
compiled and documented in a protest resolution report made available 
following the protest resolution online at: https://www.blm.gov/programs/planning-and-nepa/public-participation/protest-resolution-reports. Upon resolution of protests, the BLM will issue a record of 
decision and approved RMP amendment.
    Before including your phone number, email address, or other 
personal identifying information in your protest, you should be aware 
that your entire protest--including your personal identifying 
information--may be made publicly available at any time. While you can 
ask us in your protest to withhold your personal identifying 
information from public review, we cannot guarantee that we will be 
able to do so.

(Authority: 43 CFR 46.415(c), 43 CFR 1610.2, 43 CFR 1610.5)

Kimberly Prill,
State Director (Acting).
[FR Doc. 2025-09497 Filed 5-27-25; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4331-21-P