[Federal Register Volume 90, Number 94 (Friday, May 16, 2025)]
[Notices]
[Pages 21113-21115]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2025-08804]



[[Page 21113]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

National Highway Traffic Safety Administration

[Docket No. NHTSA-2024-0070]


Agency Information Collection Activities; Submission to the 
Office of Management and Budget for Review and Approval; Request for 
Comment; Crash Avoidance Warning System Human-Machine Interface 
Research

AGENCY: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), 
Department of Transportation (DOT).

ACTION: Notice and request for comments on a request for approval of a 
new information collection.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In compliance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (PRA), 
this notice announces that the Information Collection Request (ICR) 
summarized below will be submitted to the Office of Management and 
Budget (OMB) for review and approval. The ICR describes the nature of 
the information collection titled ``Crash Avoidance Warning System 
Human-Machine Interface Research'' and its expected burden. This ICR is 
to request approval to conduct 6 new voluntary information collections 
as part of a one-time research study of drivers' interactions with 
crash avoidance technology with different human-machine interface (HMI) 
characteristics. This research will inform NHTSA's vehicle safety 
efforts and decisions regarding rulemaking activities. A Federal 
Register Notice with a 60-day comment period soliciting comments on the 
following information collection was published on November 7, 2024. Two 
comments were received during the comment period: one in full support 
of the collection, the other acknowledging the exclusion of motorcycles 
and requesting future studies include non-4-wheeled vehicles. This 
notice includes a discussion of the comments and responses. No changes 
to the study nor burden calculations are necessary as a result of the 
comments.

DATES: Comments must be submitted on or before June 16, 2025.

ADDRESSES: Written comments and recommendations for the proposed 
information collection, including suggestions for reducing burden, 
should be submitted to the Office of Management and Budget at 
www.reginfo.gov/public/do/PRAMain. To find this particular information 
collection, select ``Currently under Review--Open for Public Comment'' 
or use the search function.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For additional information or access 
to background documents, contact Alexandria Rossi-Alvarez, Ph.D., 
Office of Vehicle Safety Research, Applied Crash Avoidance Research 
Division NSR-120, Vehicle Research & Test Center, 10820 State Route 
347, East Liberty, OH 43319; [email protected]; 937-666-3322.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Under the PRA (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), a 
Federal agency must receive approval from OMB before it collects 
certain information from the public, and a person is not required to 
respond to a collection of information by a Federal agency unless the 
collection displays a valid OMB control number. In compliance with 
these requirements, this notice announces that the following 
information collection request will be submitted to OMB.
    Title: Crash Avoidance Warning System Human-Machine Interface 
Research.
    OMB Control Number: New.
    Form Number: NHTSA Form 2006: Interest Response Form; NHTSA Form 
2007: Candidate Screening Questions; NHTSA Form 2008: Appointment 
Scheduling; NHTSA Form 2009: Participant Informed Consent Form; and 
NHTSA Form 2010: Post-Drive Questionnaire.
    Type of Request: New information collection.
    Type of Review Requested: Regular.
    Length of Approval Requested: Three years from date of approval.
    Summary of the Collection of Information: NHTSA is seeking approval 
for this new ICR to conduct 6 new voluntary information collections as 
part of a one-time research program examining drivers' interactions 
with crash avoidance technology with different HMI characteristics. 
This research will inform NHTSA's vehicle safety efforts and decisions 
regarding rulemaking activities.
    Crash avoidance warning systems aid vehicle drivers in avoiding 
crashes by presenting alerts and warnings to inform drivers of 
situations in which the system has determined, via sensor information, 
that a crash is possible or imminent, depending on the situation. These 
systems communicate the occurrence of such conditions to drivers via 
sensory modalities, such as visual or auditory signals or vibration of 
the seat or steering wheel. This research seeks to improve NHTSA's 
understanding of how crash avoidance warning system HMI characteristics 
affect system effectiveness and potential safety impacts.
    The objective of this research is to examine driver behavior while 
using crash avoidance warning systems and to assess effects of human-
machine interface characteristics on drivers' behavior and driver 
response in crash-imminent scenarios. The research will involve driver 
behavior observation while driving on a test track, public roads, or in 
a simulated environment (i.e., driving simulator). Data collection may 
also involve stationary laboratory measurements relating to crash 
avoidance warning signal characteristics, such as stationary laboratory 
measurements of individuals' visual angles when gazing at in-vehicle 
visual signals (e.g., instrument panel symbols) and displays. Test 
vehicles will be equipped, as needed, with instrumentation for 
recording driver eye glance behavior, vehicle control inputs (steering 
wheel, accelerator pedal, and brake pedal inputs), vehicle position and 
speed, and turn signal status. During dynamic testing, sensors will 
determine and record the distances between the test vehicle and 
surrounding vehicles, as appropriate.
    Description of the Need for the Information and Proposed Use of the 
Information: As driver assistance technologies advance, they have the 
potential to dramatically reduce the number of motor vehicle crashes 
and injuries, as well as the associated economic costs. The safety and 
effectiveness of the crash avoidance warning systems depend on drivers 
understanding the capabilities and constraints of the systems, and the 
meaning of visual and auditory alerts or warnings provided.
    Drivers successfully perceiving and understanding crash avoidance 
warnings is important for crash avoidance system effectiveness and 
crash mitigation. In particular, drivers must comprehend the situation 
and respond quickly when a crash avoidance warning system indicates an 
imminent collision is likely. This research aims to assess the effects 
of crash avoidance warning system HMI characteristics on driver 
behavior, on driver response in crash-imminent scenarios, and on crash 
avoidance success. The research will compare various crash avoidance 
warning system HMI characteristics and examine participants' responses 
to the alerts and/or warnings.
    60-Day Notice: A Federal Register notice with a 60-day comment 
period soliciting public comments on the following information 
collection was published on November 7, 2024 (89 FR 88342). NHTSA 
received two comments during the public comment period for the 60-day 
notice. Neither comment challenged the burden calculations.

[[Page 21114]]

    The National Association of Mutual Insurance Companies (NAMIC) 
commented, ``NAMIC strongly supports this effort by NHTSA. There is no 
question that the proposed collection of information is necessary for 
the proper performance of the functions of the agency, and that the 
information will have practical utility. We believe that the results of 
the information collection will help NHTSA better understand and ensure 
vehicle safety.'' Response: NHTSA appreciates the review, 
consideration, and support of the research. No changes to the 
collection were necessary as a result of the NAMIC comment.
    Zero Motorcycles, Inc. noted that the current information 
collection does not consider crash avoidance systems on motorcycles or 
``non-4+ wheeled'' vehicles. They stated that motorcycles offer these 
types of systems and that including them in a future study would be 
beneficial. Response: The scope of the current research effort is 
focused on light passenger vehicles. NHTSA continues to stay abreast of 
advancing motorcycle crash avoidance technologies and has other current 
research projects examining the performance of such technologies.
    Affected Public: Research participants will be volunteers from the 
Columbus, OH area who are licensed drivers aged 25-65 years 
(inclusive), drive at least 11,000 miles annually, are in good health, 
and do not require assistive devices to safely operate a vehicle and 
drive continuously for a period of up to 2 hours.
    Estimated Number of Respondents: Candidate participant recruitment 
information will be collected in an incremental fashion to permit the 
determination of which individuals meet the criteria for research 
participation. All interested candidates (estimate: 250 annually) will 
complete the Interest Response Form. A subset of individuals (estimate: 
125 annually) meeting the criteria for the Interest Response Form will 
be asked to complete Candidate Screening Questions. Those who complete 
and are eligible based on the Candidate Screening Questions will be 
contacted for Appointment Scheduling to be study participants, with a 
goal of 67 participants annually. These same 67 participants will also 
complete the Experimental Data Collection and the Post-Drive 
Questionnaire.
    Frequency: Once.
    This research will be conducted once in phases corresponding to the 
different crash avoidance warning system types to be examined (i.e., 
forward, lateral, and rear crash avoidance).
    Estimated Number of Responses: 643 responses.
    Estimated Annual Burden Hours: 239 hours.
    The annual estimated burden for the information collection is 239 
hours. This is the aggregate of the estimated annual burden for 6 
information collections that would be part of the one-time study. The 6 
information collections include: (1) Interest Response Form to be 
administered to up to 250 potential research respondents; (2) Candidate 
Screening Questions to be administered to up to 125 research 
participants; (3) Appointment Scheduling to be administered to up to 67 
research participants; (4) Participant Informed Consent Form to be 
administered to up to 67 research participants; (5) Experimental Data 
Collection; and (6) Post-Drive Questionnaire to be administered to up 
to 67 research participants.
    The study will begin with a screening process to identify eligible 
participants. As stated above, the research team intends to identify 
250 eligible participants to account for potential attrition to ensure 
that the target sample of 67 participants is achieved. Participant 
recruitment will be accomplished via online, print advertisements, and 
as needed, mailings to registered Ohio vehicle owners. Individuals 
interested in participation will respond to the recruitment 
advertisement by visiting a secure website containing a brief study 
description. The study description includes a web link that interested 
candidate participants can follow to begin the screening process. NHTSA 
estimates that the Interest Response Form takes, on average, 5 minutes 
to complete. Therefore, NHTSA estimates the annual burden for Interest 
Response Form to be 21 hours (5 minutes x 250 respondents).
    Individuals whose responses meet participation requirements will be 
selected to take the Candidate Screening Questions. The research team 
intends to identify 125 eligible participants to account for potential 
attrition to ensure that the target sample of 67 participants is 
achieved. Candidate participants are emailed a link to the 
electronically presented question set hosted on a secure website. NHTSA 
estimates that the Candidate Screening Questions takes, on average, 7 
minutes to complete. Therefore, NHTSA estimates the annual burden for 
Candidate Screening Questions to be 15 hours (7 minutes x 125 
respondents).
    Upon review of response data for the Candidate Screening Questions, 
candidates meeting the criteria will be contacted to schedule the study 
participation appointment. The research team intends to identify 67 
eligible candidates. NHTSA estimates that the Appointment Scheduling 
takes, on average, 2 minutes to complete. Therefore, NHTSA estimates 
the annual burden for Appointment Scheduling to be 2 hours (2 minutes x 
67 respondents).
    Each respondent will begin with a consenting process, which is 
completed on-site at the testing facility at the beginning of the study 
session. This consenting process includes an overview of the study and 
an explanation of the Informed Consent Form. This consenting process is 
expected to take 35 minutes. Therefore, NHTSA estimates the total 
burden for obtaining informed consent to be 39 hours (35 minutes x 67 
respondents).
    Following consent, the participant will receive instructions on the 
study protocol. For driving data collection, the participant will be 
shown the vehicle, seated in the driver seat, and an eye-tracking 
system calibration will be performed. Driving will then commence while 
data are recorded to document vehicle performance and driver behavior. 
For stationary measurements, the individual would be seated in a 
stationary vehicle and asked to look at and/or listen to different 
crash avoidance warnings and provide verbal feedback as appropriate. 
This Experimental Data Collection will be conducted once and take 
approximately 130 minutes. Therefore, NHTSA estimates that the total 
burden for the Experimental Data Collection to be 145 hours (130 
minutes x 67 respondents).
    At the end, participants will complete a Post-Drive Questionnaire, 
estimated to take approximately 15 minutes. The total burden for the 
Post-Drive Questionnaire is estimated to be 17 hours (15 minutes x 67 
respondents). The total annual burden for the entire study is estimated 
to be 239 hours.
    The estimated annual burden time is summarized in Table 1 below. 
The number of respondents and time to complete each question set are 
estimated as provided.

[[Page 21115]]



                                        Table 1--Annual Burden Estimates
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                                      Annual
                                             Annual      Frequency  of     Annual      Time per      estimated
         Information collection             number of      response      responses     response    burden hours
                                           respondents                                  (min)        (rounded)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Interest Response Form..................           250               1          250            5              21
Candidate Screening Questions...........           125               1          125            7              15
Appointment Scheduling..................            67               1           67            2               2
Participant Informed Consent Form.......            67               1           67           35              39
Experimental Data Collection............            67               1           67          130             145
Post-Drive Questionnaire................            67               1           67           15              17
                                         -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    Total Annual Burden.................  ............  ..............          643  ...........             239
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Estimated Total Annual Burden Cost: $0.
    There is no cost to respondents for this information collection. 
The costs associated with travel are minimal and expected to be offset 
by the compensation that will be provided to the research participants.
    Public Comments Invited: You are asked to comment on any aspects of 
this information collection, including (a) whether the proposed 
collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of 
the functions of the agency, including whether the information will 
have practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the agency's estimate of 
the burden of the proposed collection of information, including the 
validity of the methodology and assumptions used; (c) ways to enhance 
the quality, utility and clarity of the information to be collected; 
and (d) ways to minimize the burden of the collection of information on 
respondents, including the use of appropriate automated, electronic, 
mechanical, or other technological collection techniques or other forms 
of information technology, e.g., permitting electronic submission of 
responses.
    Authority: The Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995; 44 U.S.C. chapter 
35, as amended; 49 CFR 1.49; and DOT Order 1351.29A.

Cem Hatipoglu,
Associate Administrator, Vehicle Safety Research.
[FR Doc. 2025-08804 Filed 5-15-25; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-59-P