[Federal Register Volume 90, Number 91 (Tuesday, May 13, 2025)]
[Notices]
[Pages 20275-20278]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2025-08408]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A-570-051, C-570-052]
Certain Hardwood Plywood Products From the People's Republic of
China: Preliminary Results of Administrative Reviews of the Antidumping
and Countervailing Duty Orders, Preliminary Determinations of No
Shipments, and Partial Rescissions; 2023
AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) preliminarily finds
that there were no shipments of certain hardwood plywood products
(hardwood plywood) from the People's Republic of China (China) during
the period of review (POR) January 1, 2023, through December 31, 2023,
for certain companies under review. We are also rescinding these
reviews with respect to 64 companies in the antidumping duty (AD)
review, and five companies in the countervailing duty (CVD) review. We
invite interested parties to comment on these preliminary results.
DATES: Applicable May 13, 2025.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Rachel Jennings, AD/CVD Operations,
Office V, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue
NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-1110.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On January 4, 2018, Commerce published in the Federal Register the
AD and CVD orders on hardwood plywood from China.\1\ On January 2,
2024, Commerce published in the Federal Register a notice of
opportunity to request an administrative review of the Orders covering
entries of hardwood plywood from China from January 1, 2023, through
December 31, 2023.\2\ On March 5, 2024, based on timely requests for
administrative reviews, Commerce initiated the AD administrative review
with respect to 68 companies \3\ and initiated the CVD administrative
review with respect to nine companies.\4\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ See Certain Hardwood Plywood Products from the People's
Republic of China: Amended Final Determination of Sales at Less Than
Fair Value, and Antidumping Duty Order, 83 FR 504 (January 4, 2018);
see also Certain Hardwood Plywood Products from the People's
Republic of China: Countervailing Duty Order, 83 FR 513 (January 4,
2018) (collectively, Orders).
\2\ See Antidumping or Countervailing Duty Order, Finding, or
Suspended Investigation; Opportunity to Request Administrative
Review and Join Inquiry Service List, 89 FR 63 (January 2, 2024).
\3\ See Initiation of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Administrative Reviews, 89 FR 15827 (March 5, 2024).
\4\ Id. We note that Govina Investment Joint Stock Company
(Govina) and Greatwood Hung Yen Joint Stock Company (Greatwood Hung
Yen) were inadvertently listed on the same line in the CVD portion
of the initiation notice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
On March 26, 2024, and July 2, 2024, Commerce released entry data
from U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to interested parties for
comment in the AD and CVD proceedings.\5\ Subsequently, we notified
parties of our intent to rescind this administrative review with
respect to 64 of the 68 companies subject to the AD review, and one of
the nine companies subject to the CVD review, because they had no
suspended entries during the POR.\6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ See Memoranda, ``CBP Data Release,'' dated March 26, 2024
(AD); and ``CBP Data Release,'' dated July 2, 2024 (CVD).
\6\ See Memoranda, ``Notice of Intent to Rescind Review, In
Part,'' dated September 25, 2024 (AD), and ``Notice of Intent to
Rescind Review, In Part,'' dated October 11, 2024 (CVD)
(collectively, Intent to Rescind Memoranda).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
On April 4 and 18, 2024, in the AD review, we received timely no-
shipment certifications and separate rate applications (SRAs),
respectively, from four companies for which we did not state our intent
to rescind this review.\7\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ See Eagle Industries Company Limited (Eagle)'s Letters, ``No
Sales Certification,'' dated April 4, 2024, and ``Eagle Industries
SRA,'' dated April 11, 2024; see also Golden Bridge Industries Pte.
Ltd. (Golden Bridge)'s Letters, ``No Sales Certification,'' dated
April 4, 2024, and ``Golden Bridge SRA,'' dated April 11, 2024;
Greatwood Hung Yen's Letters, ``No Sales Certification,'' dated
April 4, 2024, and ``Greatwood Hung Yen SRA,'' dated April 18, 2024;
and Lechenwood Viet Nam Company Limited (Lechenwood)'s Letters, ``No
Sales Certification,'' dated April 4, 2024, and ``Lechenwood SRA,''
dated April 18, 2024.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
On July 22, 2024, Commerce tolled certain deadlines in these
administrative proceedings by seven days.\8\ On September 23, 2024, and
October 2, 2024, we issued memoranda extending the deadline for the
preliminary results of the AD and CVD reviews by 120 days.\9\ On
December 9, 2024, Commerce tolled certain deadlines in these
administrative proceedings by 90 days.\10\ The deadline for the
preliminary results of the AD and CVD reviews is now May 7, 2025. For
details regarding the events that occurred subsequent to the initiation
of the reviews, see the Preliminary Decision Memorandum.\11\ The
Preliminary Decision Memorandum is a public document and is made
available to the public via Enforcement and Compliance's Antidumping
and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS).
ACCESS is available to registered users at http://access.trade.gov. In
addition, a complete version of the Preliminary
[[Page 20276]]
Decision Memorandum is available at https://access.trade.gov/public/FRNoticesListLayout.aspx. A list of topics discussed in the Preliminary
Decision memorandum is included in Appendix III to this notice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\8\ See Memorandum, ``Tolling of Deadlines for Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Proceedings,'' dated July 22, 2024.
\9\ See Memoranda, ``Extension of Deadline for Preliminary
Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review,'' dated September
23, 2024; and ``Extension of Deadline for Preliminary Results of
Countervailing Duty Administrative Review,'' dated October 2, 2024.
\10\ See Memorandum, ``Tolling of Deadlines for Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Proceedings,'' dated December 9, 2024.
\11\ See Memorandum, ``Decision Memorandum for the Preliminary
Results of the Administrative Reviews of the Antidumping Duty Order
and Countervailing Duty Order on Certain Hardwood Plywood Products
from the People's Republic of China, Preliminary Determinations of
No Shipments, and Partial Rescissions; 2023,'' dated concurrently
with, and hereby adopted by, this notice (Preliminary Decision
Memorandum).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Scope of the Order
The merchandise covered by the scope of the Orders is hardwood
plywood from China. A complete description of the scope of the Orders
is contained in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum.
Rescission of Administrative Reviews, in Part
Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1), Commerce will rescind an
administrative review, in whole or in part, if the party that requested
a review withdraws the request within 90 days of the date of the
publication of the notice of initiation. On January 31, 2024, (1)
Govina Investment Joint Stock Company (Govina), (2) Groll Ply and
Cabinetry Co., Ltd. (Groll Ply), 3) Huong Son Wood Group Co., Ltd.
(Huong Son), and (4) Thang Long Wood Panel Company (Thang Long)
requested review of their exports under the Orders.\12\ On April 24,
2024, and May 1, 2024, Govina, Groll Ply, Huong Son, and Thang Long
withdrew their requests for review in the AD and CVD reviews.\13\
Because the requests for review were timely withdrawn for Govina, Groll
Ply, Huong Son, and Thang Long, and because no other party requested
reviews of these companies, in accordance with 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1),
Commerce is rescinding these reviews for Govina, Groll Ply, Huong Son,
and Thang Long.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\12\ See Govina, Groll, Huong Son, and Thang Long's Letter,
``Certain Hardwood Plywood Products from the People's Republic of
China: Administrative Review Request,'' dated January 31, 2024
(filed on the AD/CVD records).
\13\ See Govina, Groll, Huong Son, and Thang Long's Letters,
``Withdrawal of Administrative Review Request,'' dated April 24,
2024 (AD); and ``Withdrawal of Administrative Review Request,''
dated April 24, 2024 (CVD).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.213(d)(3), when there are no reviewable
entries of subject merchandise during the POR subject to the AD or CVD
order for which liquidation is suspended, Commerce may rescind an
administrative review, in whole or only with respect to a particular
exporter or producer.\14\ At the end of the administrative review, any
suspended entries are liquidated at the assessment rate computed for
the review period.\15\ Therefore, for an administrative review to be
conducted, there must be a reviewable, suspended entry to be liquidated
at the newly calculated assessment rate. On September 25, 2024, and
October 11, 2024, respectively, Commerce notified all interested
parties of its intent to rescind the AD and CVD reviews with respect to
certain companies because those companies had no reviewable, suspended
entries of subject merchandise and invited parties to comment.\16\ We
received no comments on our intent to rescind the reviews with respect
to these companies. Accordingly, in the absence of suspended entries of
subject merchandise during the POR for these companies under review, we
are hereby rescinding these administrative reviews, in part, with
respect to these companies, in accordance with 19 CFR 351.213(d)(3).
See Appendix II for a list of all companies for which Commerce is
rescinding these reviews.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\14\ See, e.g., Forged Steel Fittings from Taiwan: Rescission of
Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2018-2019, 85 FR 71317,
71318 (November 9, 2020); see also Certain Circular Welded Non-Alloy
Steel Pipe from Mexico: Rescission of Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review; 2016-2017, 83 FR 54084 (October 26, 2018).
\15\ See 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1).
\16\ See Intent to Rescind Memoranda.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Methodology
Commerce is conducting these reviews in accordance with section
751(a)(1) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act) and 19 CFR
351.213. For a full description of the methodology underlying these
preliminary results, see the Preliminary Decision Memorandum. See
Appendix III for a complete list of topics discussed in the Preliminary
Decision Memorandum.
Preliminary Determinations of No Shipments
In these administrative reviews, we issued a questionnaire to
Eagle, Golden Bridge, Greatwood Hung Yen, and Lechenwood to gather
information on the quantity and value of their shipments of hardwood
plywood to the United States.\17\ All four companies reported that they
had no shipments of subject merchandise during the POR.\18\ As a result
of an inquiry into whether hardwood plywood exported from the Socialist
Republic of Vietnam (Vietnam) was circumventing the Orders, Commerce
established a certification program that allows eligible exporters to
certify that their shipments of plywood from Vietnam were not produced
using certain inputs from China.\19\ Eagle, Golden Bridge, and
Lechenwood are currently not eligible to certify their shipments of
plywood. Therefore, we issued these companies ``certification
eligibility'' questionnaires to collect information about the
companies' production process and material inputs. The three companies
all reported that their suspended entries consisted exclusively of non-
subject merchandise.\20\ We have analyzed the information in these
responses, which was consistent with the types of information we have
examined in prior segments, and preliminarily find that all of the
companies have provided information to support their claims that the
hardwood plywood they exported to the United States are of non-subject
plywood, and thus, they had no shipments of subject plywood from China
during the POR.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\17\ See Commerce's Letter, ``Quantity and Value
Questionnaire,'' dated September 26, 2024.
\18\ See Eagle's Letter, ``Eagle Quantity & Value Response,''
dated October 10, 2024; see also Golden Bridge's Letter, ``Golden
Bridge Quantity & Value Response,'' dated October 10, 2024;
Greatwood Hung Yen's Letter, ``Greatwood HY Quantity & Value
Response,'' dated October 10, 2024 (Greatwood Hung Yen's Q&V
Response); and Lechenwood's Letter, ``Lechenwood Quantity & Value
Response,'' dated October 10, 2024.
\19\ See Certain Hardwood Plywood Products from the People's
Republic of China: Final Scope Determination and Affirmative Final
Determination of Circumvention of the Antidumping and Countervailing
Duty Orders, 88 FR 46740 (July 20, 2023) (Circumvention Final
Determination), and accompanying Issues and Decision Memorandum
(IDM).
\20\ See Eagle's Letter, ``Eagle Certification Eligibility
Questionnaire Response,'' dated March 24, 2025 (Eagle's CEQR); see
also Golden Bridge's Letter, ``Golden Bridge Certification
Eligibility Questionnaire Response,'' dated March 24, 2025 (Golden
Bridge's CEQR); and Lechenwood's Letter, ``Lechenwood Certification
Eligibility Questionnaire Response,'' dated March 14, 2025
(Lechenwood's CEQR).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The fourth respondent, Greatwood Hung Yen, is currently eligible to
certify that its entries of hardwood plywood shipped from Vietnam are
not subject to the Orders, but was unable to certify certain of its
shipments at the time of entry because Greatwood Hung Yen became
eligible to participate in the certification program under these Orders
near the mid-point of the POR.\21\ Therefore, at Commerce's request,
Greatwood Hung Yen submitted the certifications that would have
accompanied its entries had the company been permitted to submit the
certifications at the time of entry.\22\ Based on these certifications,
we preliminarily find that Greatwood Hung Yen had no shipments of
plywood from China during the POR.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\21\ See Circumvention Final Determination IDM at 76.
\22\ See Greatwood Hung Yen's Q&V Response.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
China-Wide Entity
Commerce's policy regarding conditional review of the China-wide
entity applies to the AD administrative
[[Page 20277]]
review.\23\ Under this policy, the China-wide entity will not be under
review unless a party specifically requests, or Commerce self-
initiates, a review of the China-wide entity.\24\ Because no party
requested a review of the China-wide entity, the China-wide entity is
not under review. For additional information, see the Preliminary
Decision Memorandum.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\23\ See Antidumping Proceedings: Announcement of Change in
Department Practice for Respondent Selection in Antidumping Duty
Proceedings and Conditional Review of the Nonmarket Economy Entity
in NME Antidumping Duty Proceedings, 78 FR 65963 (November 4, 2013).
\24\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Separate Rates
In the AD administrative review, we have not addressed the separate
rate status of the four companies subject to this review because we
preliminarily determine that they had no entries of subject merchandise
during the POR. For additional information, see the Preliminary
Decision Memorandum.
Certification Eligibility
Eagle, Golden Bridge, and Lechenwood are currently ineligible to
certify that their shipments of hardwood plywood from Vietnam are not
subject to the Orders \25\ All three of these respondents have
requested that they be eligible to participate in the certification
program in place for entries of hardwood plywood exported from
Vietnam.\26\ With respect to these requests, we are currently
evaluating the certification eligibility of these three exporters in
the 2021-2022 administrative review of these Orders, and the
determinations in those reviews are forthcoming.\27\ We preliminarily
find it appropriate to apply the certification eligibility
determinations made in the forthcoming final results of the 2021-2022
administrative reviews to the respondents in the final results of these
reviews.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\25\ See Circumvention Final Determination IDM.
\26\ See Eagle's CEQR; see also Golden Bridge's CEQR; and
Lechenwood's CEQR.
\27\ See Certain Hardwood Plywood Products from the People's
Republic of China: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review, Preliminary Determination of No Shipments,
and Partial Recission; 2021-2022, 89 FR 66346 (August 15, 2024), and
accompanying Preliminary Decision Memorandum (PDM); and Certain
Hardwood Plywood Products from the People's Republic of China:
Preliminary Results of Countervailing Duty Administrative Review,
Preliminary Determination of No Shipments, and Partial Rescission;
2021-2022, 89 FR 66343 (August 15, 2024), and accompanying PDM.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Public Comment
In accordance with 19 CFR 351.309(c)(1)(ii), interested parties may
submit case briefs or other written comments to the Assistant Secretary
for Enforcement and Compliance at a date to be determined. Rebuttal
briefs, limited to issues raised in case briefs, may be submitted no
later than five days after the deadline for case briefs.\28\ Pursuant
to 19 CFR 351.309(c)(2) and (d)(2), parties who submit case briefs or
rebuttal briefs in these reviews are encouraged to submit with each
argument: (1) a statement of the issue; (2) a brief summary of the
argument; and (3) a table of authorities.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\28\ See 19 CFR 351.309; see also 19 CFR 351.303 (for general
filing requirements).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
As provided under 19 CFR 351.309(c)(2) and (d)(2), in prior
proceedings we have encouraged interested parties to provide an
executive summary of their briefs that should be limited to five pages
total, including footnotes. In these reviews, we instead request that
interested parties provide at the beginning of their briefs a public,
executive summary for each issue raised in their briefs.\29\ Further,
we request that interested parties limit their executive summary of
each issue to no more than 450 words, not including citations. We
intend to use the executive summaries as the basis of the comment
summaries included in the issues and decision memorandum that will
accompany the final results in these reviews. We request that
interested parties include footnotes for relevant citations in the
executive summary of each issue. Note that Commerce has amended certain
of its requirements pertaining to the service of documents in 19 CFR
351.303(f).\30\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\29\ We use the term ``issue'' here to describe an argument that
Commerce would normally address in a comment of the Issues and
Decision Memorandum.
\30\ See Administrative Protective Order, Service, and Other
Procedures in Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Proceedings, 88 FR
67069, 67077 (September 29, 2023).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.310(c), interested parties who wish to
request a hearing, limited to issues raised in the case and rebuttal
briefs, must submit a written request to the Assistant Secretary for
Enforcement and Compliance, U.S. Department of Commerce, within 30 days
after the date of publication of this notice. Requests should contain:
(1) the party's name, address, and telephone number, and the number of
participants; (2) whether any participant is a foreign national; and
(3) a list of the issues to be discussed. If a request for a hearing is
made, Commerce intends to hold the hearing at a date and time to be
determined. Parties should confirm by telephone the date, time, and
location of the hearing two days before the scheduled date.
Assessment Rates--AD and CVD
Upon issuance of the final results of these reviews, for all
entries of merchandise exported by the companies listed in Appendix I,
we intend to instruct CBP to liquidate the entries without regard to
AD/CVD duties if these preliminary results are unchanged for the final
results. Commerce intends to issue assessment instructions to CBP no
earlier than 35 days after the date of publication of the final results
of this review in the Federal Register. If a timely summons is filed at
the U.S. Court of International Trade (CIT), the assessment
instructions will direct CBP not to liquidate relevant entries until
the time for parties to file a request for a statutory injunction has
expired (i.e., within 90 days of publication).
For the companies (see Appendix II) for which this review is
rescinded with these preliminary results, we will instruct CBP to
assess AD/CVD duties on all appropriate entries at a rate equal to the
cash deposit of estimated AD/CVD duties required at the time of entry,
or withdrawal from warehouse, for consumption, during the period
January 1, 2023, through December 31, 2023, in accordance with 19 CFR
351.212(c)(l)(i). Commerce intends to issue assessment instructions to
CBP for such companies no earlier than 35 days after the date of
publication of the preliminary results of these reviews in the Federal
Register. If a timely summons is filed at the CIT, the assessment
instructions will direct CBP not to liquidate relevant entries until
the time for parties to file a request for a statutory injunction has
expired (i.e., within 90 days of publication).
Cash Deposit Requirements--AD
The following cash deposit requirements will be effective upon
publication of the final results of the AD administrative review for
shipments of subject merchandise, entered, or withdrawn from warehouse,
for consumption on or after the publication date of the final results
of this administrative review, as provided by section 751(a)(2)(C) of
the Act: (1) the cash deposit rates for the four companies that had no
shipments during the POR will remain unchanged from the rates assigned
to them in the most recently completed segment for each company; (2)
for previously investigated or reviewed exporters that have separate
rates, the cash deposit rate will continue to be the exporter-specific
rate published for the most recently completed segment of this
proceeding; (3) for all Chinese exporters of subject
[[Page 20278]]
merchandise that have not been found to be entitled to a separate rate,
the cash deposit rate will be the rate for the China-wide entity (i.e.,
114.72 percent); (4) for all non-Chinese exporters of subject
merchandise that have not received their own rate, the cash deposit
rate will be the rate applicable to the exporter that supplied that
non-Chinese exporter, where available, or the rate for the China-wide
entity (i.e., 114.72), if no alternate rate is available. These deposit
requirements, when imposed, shall remain in effect until further
notice.
Cash Deposit Requirements--CVD
For all firms for which we rescind the CVD review or make a no
shipment determination, we will instruct CBP to continue to collect
cash deposits of estimated countervailing duties at the most recent
company-specific or all-others rate applicable to the company. These
cash deposit instructions, when imposed, shall remain in effect until
further notice.
Final Results of Review
Unless otherwise extended, Commerce intends to issue the final
results of these administrative reviews, which will include the results
of its analysis of issues raised in any briefs, within 120 days of
publication of these preliminary results of review, pursuant to section
751(a)(3)(A) of the Act.
Notification to Importers
This notice also serves as a reminder to importers of their
responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate
regarding the reimbursement of antidumping and/or countervailing duties
prior to liquidation of the relevant entries during this POR. Failure
to comply with this requirement could result in Commerce's presumption
that reimbursement of antidumping and/or countervailing duties occurred
and the subsequent assessment of double antidumping duties.
Notification to Interested Parties
These preliminary results of administrative review are issued and
published in accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(l) of the
Act, and 19 CFR 351.221(b)(4).
Dated: May 7, 2025.
Christopher Abbott,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy and Negotiations, performing the
non-exclusive functions and duties of the Assistant Secretary for
Enforcement and Compliance.
Appendix I
Participating Companies Which Reported No POR Shipments of Subject
Merchandise
1. Eagle Industries Company Limited
2. Golden Bridge Industries Pte. Ltd
3. Greatwood Hung Yen Joint Stock Company
4. Lechenwood Viet Nam Company Limited
Appendix II
Companies Rescinded From Review
A. AD Review
Companies for Which All Review Requests Were Withdrawn
1. Govina Investment Joint Stock Company
2. Groll Ply and Cabinetry Co., Ltd.
3. Huong Son Wood Group Co., Ltd.
4. Thang Long Wood Panel Company
Companies With No Suspended Entries During the POR
5. Anhui Hoda Wood Co., Ltd.
6. Arrow Forest International Co., Ltd
7. Bizlink Technology Inc.
8. BTR New Material Group Co., Ltd.
9. Celtic Co., Ltd
10. China Friend Limited
11. Cosco Star International Co., Ltd.
12. Dalian Sicily Wood Industry Co., Ltd.
13. First Part Manufacturing Limited
14. Fujian Yuansheng Wood., Ltd
15. Fusong Jinlong Wooden Group Co., Ltd
16. Golder International Trade Co., Ltd
17. Happy Wood Industrial Group Co., Ltd.
18. Huainan Mengping Import and Export Co., Ltd
19. Jiangsu Top Point International Co., Ltd
20. Jiaxing Gsun Imp. & Exp. Co., Ltd
21. Jiangsu High Hope Arser Co., Ltd
22. Jiaxing Hengtong Wood Co., Ltd.
23. Linyi City Dongfeng Fukai Wood Industry Co., Ltd
24. Linyi City Shenrui International Trade Co., Ltd
25. Linyi Dahua Wood Co., Ltd
26. Linyi Dongstar Import & Export Co., Ltd.
27. Linyi Evergreen Wood Co., Ltd.
28. Linyi Glary Plywood Co., Ltd.
29. Linyi Hengsheng Wood Industry Co., Ltd
30. Linyi Huasheng Yongbin Wood Co., Ltd.
31. Linyi Jiahe Wood Industry Co., Ltd.
32. Linyi Linhai Wood Co., Ltd
33. Linyi Mingzhu Wood Co., Ltd
34. Phihong Technology Co., Ltd.
35. Pingyi Jinniu Wood Co., Ltd
36. Linyi Sanfortune Wood Co., Ltd.
37. Lianyungang Yuantai International Trade Co., Ltd
38. Qingdao Good Faith Import and Export Co., Ltd
39. Qingdao Top P&Q International Corp.
40. Shandong Qishang International Trading Co., Ltd
41. Shanghai Brightwood Trading Co., Ltd.
42. Shanghai Futuwood Trading Co., Ltd.
43. Shanghai Luli Trading Co., Ltd.
44. Shenzhen Kedali Industry Co., Ltd.
45. Suining Pengxiang Wood Co., Ltd
46. Sumec International Technology Co., Ltd
47. Sun Chain Trading Co., Ltd.
48. Suqian Hopeway International Trade Co., Ltd.
49. Suzhou Dongsheng Wood Co., Ltd
50. Suzhou Fengshuwan Import and Exports Trade Co., Ltd
51. Suzhou Oriental Dragon Import and Export Co., Ltd.
52. Xuzhou Andefu Wood Co., Ltd
53. Xuzhou DNT Commercial Co., Ltd
54. Xuzhou Eastern Huatai International Trading Co., Ltd
55. Xuzhou Jiangheng Wood Products Co., Ltd.
56. Xuzhou Longyuan Wood Industry Co., Ltd
57. Xuzhou Pinlin International Trade Co., Ltd
58. Xuzhou Shengping Imp and Exp Co., Ltd
59. Xuzhou Shelter Import & Export Co., Ltd
60. Xuzhou Shuner Import & Export Trade Co., Ltd
61. Xuzhou Timber International Trade Co., Ltd.
62. Zhejiang Layo Wood Industry Co., Ltd
63. Zhejiang Xingke Wood Co., Ltd
64. Zhejiang Yuhua Timber Co., Ltd
B. CVD Review
Companies for Which All Review Requests Were Withdrawn
1. Govina Investment Joint Stock Company
2. Groll Ply and Cabinetry Co., Ltd.
3. Huong Son Wood Group Co., Ltd.
4. Thang Long Wood Panel Company
Companies With No Suspended Entries During the POR
5. Arrow Forest International Co., Ltd
Appendix III
List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum
I. Summary
II. Background
III. Scope of the Orders
IV. Rescission of Administrative Reviews, In Part
V. Discussion of Methodology
VI. Recommendation
[FR Doc. 2025-08408 Filed 5-12-25; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P