[Federal Register Volume 90, Number 89 (Friday, May 9, 2025)]
[Notices]
[Pages 19677-19679]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2025-08163]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

[A-489-855]


Certain Corrosion-Resistant Steel Products From the Republic of 
T[uuml]rkiye: Amended Preliminary Determination of Sales at Less Than 
Fair Value

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, 
Department of Commerce.

SUMMARY: On April 10, 2025, the U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) 
published its preliminary determination in the less-than-fair-value 
investigation of certain corrosion-resistant steel products (CORE) from 
the Republic of T[uuml]rkiye (T[uuml]rkiye) in the Federal Register. 
Commerce is amending this preliminary determination to correct a 
significant ministerial error.

DATES: Applicable May 9, 2025.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Olivia Woolverton or Brittany Bauer, 
AD/CVD Operations, Office V, Enforcement and Compliance, International 
Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution 
Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-7452 or (202) 
482-3860, respectively.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

    On April 10, 2025, Commerce published in the Federal Register the 
Preliminary Determination in the less-than-fair-value investigation of 
CORE from T[uuml]rkiye.\1\ On April 14, 2025, Steel Dynamics, Inc., 
Nucor Corporation, United States Steel Corporation, Wheeling-Nippon 
Steel, Inc., and the United Steel, Paper and Forestry, Rubber, 
Manufacturing, Energy, Allied Industrial and Service Workers 
International Union, AFL-CIO, CLC (collectively, the petitioners) filed 
a timely ministerial error allegation concerning the Preliminary 
Determination.\2\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ See Certain Corrosion-Resistant Steel Products from the 
Republic of T[uuml]rkiye: Preliminary Affirmative Determination of 
Sales at Less Than Fair Value, Postponement of Final Determination, 
and Extension of Provisional Measures, 90 FR 15340 (April 10, 2025) 
(Preliminary Determination), and accompanying Preliminary Decision 
Memorandum.
    \2\ See Petitioners' Letter, ``Petitioners' Comments on 
Significant Ministerial Error in the Preliminary Determination,'' 
dated April 14, 2025 (Petitioners' Ministerial Error Allegation).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Scope of the Investigation

    The product covered by this investigation is CORE from 
T[uuml]rkiye. For a complete description of the scope of this 
investigation, see the appendix to this notice.

Legal Framework

    A ministerial error is defined in 19 CFR 351.224(f) as ``an error 
in addition, subtraction, or other arithmetic function, clerical error 
resulting from inaccurate copying, duplication, or the like, and any 
other similar type of unintentional error which the Secretary considers 
ministerial.'' A significant ministerial error is defined as a 
ministerial error, the correction of which, singly or in combination 
with other errors, would result in: (1) a change of at least five 
absolute percentage points in, but not less than 25 percent of, the 
weighted-average dumping margin calculated in the original preliminary 
determination; or (2) a difference between a weighted-average dumping 
margin of zero or de minimis and a weighted-average dumping margin of 
greater than de minimis or vice versa.\3\ In accordance with 19 CFR 
351.224(e), Commerce ``will analyze any comments received and, if 
appropriate, correct any significant ministerial error by amending the 
preliminary determination.''
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ See 19 CFR 351.224(g)(1) and (2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Analysis of Significant Ministerial Error

    In the Preliminary Determination, Commerce calculated the foreign 
unit price in dollars (FUPDOL) for Borcelik.\4\ The petitioners allege 
that, in calculating Borcelik's FUPDOL, Commerce made a currency 
conversion into U.S. dollars for certain values (i.e., the home market 
net price and difference-in-merchandise adjustment), which were already 
denominated in U.S. dollars.\5\ After analyzing this allegation, we 
determine that we made an error with respect to the calculation of 
Borcelik's FUPDOL. Further, we find that this miscalculation is ``an 
error in addition, subtraction, or other arithmetic function'' that 
resulted from Commerce not appropriately accounting for the currency in 
which certain values are denominated. Thus, this error constitutes a 
ministerial error in the Preliminary Determination.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ Commerce has determined that Borcelik is a single entity 
which consists of Borcelik Celik Sanayii Ticaret A.S., ArcelorMittal 
[Ccedil]elik Ticaret A.[Scedil]., Bamesa Celik Serv[inodot]s San. Ve 
Tic. A.[Scedil]. and Bamesa Muradiye Demir [Ccedil]elik San. Ve Tic. 
A.[Scedil]. See Memorandum, ``Single-Entity Analysis for Borcelik 
Celik Sanayii Ticaret A.S. and Affiliated Companies,'' dated April 
3, 2025.
    \5\ See Petitioners' Ministerial Error Allegation.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Lastly, pursuant to 19 CFR 351.224(g)(2), Commerce's ministerial 
error in the calculation of Borcelik's FUPDOL is significant because 
its correction results in a difference between a weighted-average 
dumping margin of zero and a weighted-average dumping margin greater 
than de minimis (i.e., a change from an estimated weighted-average 
dumping margin of 0.00 percent to 2.04 percent). Therefore, we are 
correcting this ministerial error and amending the Preliminary 
Determination accordingly. For a detailed discussion of the 
aforementioned ministerial error allegation, as well as Commerce's 
analysis of the petitioners' comments, see the Ministerial Error 
Memorandum.\6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ See Memorandum, ``Less-Than-Fair-Value Investigation of 
Certain Corrosion-Resistant Steel Products from the Republic of 
T[uuml]rkiye--Analysis of Ministerial Error Allegation,'' dated 
concurrently with, and hereby adopted by, this notice (Ministerial 
Error Memorandum).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

All-Others Rate

    Section 735(c)(5)(A) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the 
Act), provides that Commerce shall determine an estimated all-others 
rate for all exporters and producers not individually examined. This 
rate shall be an amount equal to the weighted average of the estimated 
weighted-average dumping margins established for exporters and 
producers individually investigated, excluding any zero and de minimis 
margins, and any margins determined entirely under section 776 of the 
Act.
    As a result of this amended preliminary determination, in this 
investigation Commerce calculated estimated weighted-average dumping 
margins for both Borcelik and Y[inodot]ld[inodot]z Demir [Ccedil]elik 
Sanayi A.S. and Y[inodot]ld[inodot]z Entegre A[gbreve]a[ccedil] Sanayi 
ve Ticaret A.S. (collectively, YD[Ccedil]) that are not zero, de 
minimis, or based entirely on facts otherwise available. Accordingly, 
Commerce recalculated the all-others rate using a simple average of the 
estimated weighted-average dumping margins calculated for Borcelik and 
YD[Ccedil].\7\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ With two respondents under examination, Commerce normally 
calculates: (A) a weighted-average of the estimated weighted-average 
dumping margins calculated for the examined respondents; (B) a 
simple average of the estimated weighted-average dumping margins 
calculated for the examined respondents; and (C) a weighted-average 
of the estimated weighted-average dumping margins calculated for the 
examined respondents using each company's publicly-ranged U.S. sales 
values for the merchandise under consideration. Commerce then 
compares (B) and (C) to (A) and selects the rate closest to (A) as 
the most appropriate rate for all other producers and exporters. 
See, e.g., Ball Bearings and Parts Thereof from France, Germany, 
Italy, Japan, and the United Kingdom: Final Results of Antidumping 
Duty Administrative Reviews, Final Results of Changed-Circumstances 
Review, and Revocation of an Order in Part, 75 FR 53661, 53662 
(September 1, 2010), and accompanying Issues and Decision Memorandum 
at Comment 1. For a complete analysis of the data, see Memorandum, 
``Amended Calculation of All-Others Rate,'' dated concurrently with 
this notice.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

[[Page 19678]]

Amended Preliminary Determination

    As a result of the correction of the ministerial error, the revised 
estimated weighted-average dumping margin for Borcelik and all other 
producers and exporters are as follows:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                               Estimated
                                                               weighted-
                                                                average
                    Exporter or producer                        dumping
                                                                margin
                                                               (percent)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Borcelik Celik Sanayii Ticaret A.S., ArcelorMittal                  2.04
 [Ccedil]elik Ticaret A.[Scedil]., Bamesa Celik
 Serv[inodot]s San. Ve Tic. A.[Scedil]. and Bamesa Muradiye
 Demir [Ccedil]elik San. Ve Tic. A.[Scedil].................
Y[inodot]ld[inodot]z Demir [Ccedil]elik Sanayi A.S.,               15.18
 Y[inodot]ld[inodot]z Entegre A[gbreve]a[ccedil] Sanayi ve
 Ticaret A.S................................................
All Others..................................................        8.61
------------------------------------------------------------------------

Disclosure

    We intend to disclose the calculations performed to parties in this 
proceeding within five days after public announcement of the amended 
preliminary determination, in accordance with 19 CFR 351.224.

Amended Suspension of Liquidation and Cash Deposit Requirements

    The suspension of liquidation and cash deposit requirements will be 
revised according to this amended preliminary determination, in 
accordance with section 733(d) of the Act. Because this amended 
preliminary determination results in revised suspension of liquidation 
and cash deposit requirements, these changes will be effective on the 
date of publication of this notice in the Federal Register. 
Specifically, subject merchandise that is produced and exported to the 
United States by Borcelik is no longer excluded from the provisional 
measures imposed by the Preliminary Determination. Rather, Commerce 
will instruct U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to suspend 
liquidation of shipments of subject merchandise produced and exported 
by Borcelik, entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on 
or after publication of this notice, and require a cash deposit equal 
to the revised estimated weighted-average dumping margin for Borcelik 
(i.e., 2.04 percent).
    Further, Commerce has revised the estimated weighted-average 
dumping margin for all other producers and exporters of subject 
merchandise. Accordingly, Commerce will instruct CBP, for shipments of 
subject merchandise, not produced or exported by Borcelik or 
YD[Ccedil], entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or 
after publication of this notice, and require a cash deposit equal to 
the revised estimated weighted-average dumping margin for all other 
producers and exporters (i.e., 8.61 percent).
    These suspension of liquidation instructions will remain in effect 
until further notice.

U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) Notification

    In accordance with section 773(f) of the Act, we intend to notify 
the ITC of our amended preliminary determination.

Notification to Interested Parties

    This amended preliminary determination is issued and published in 
accordance with sections 733(f) and 777(i) of the Act, and 19 CFR 
351.224(e).

    Dated: May 5, 2025.
Abdelali Elouaradia,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.

Appendix

Scope of the Investigation

    The products covered by this investigation are certain flat-
rolled steel products, either clad, plated, or coated with 
corrosion-resistant metals such as zinc, aluminum, or zinc-, 
aluminum-, nickel- or iron-based alloys, whether or not corrugated 
or painted, varnished, laminated, or coated with plastics or other 
non-metallic substances in addition to the metallic coating. The 
products covered include coils that have a width of 12.7 mm or 
greater, regardless of form of coil (e.g., in successively 
superimposed layers, spirally oscillating, etc.). The products 
covered also include products not in coils (e.g., in straight 
lengths) of a thickness less than 4.75 mm and a width that is 12.7 
mm or greater and that measures at least 10 times the thickness. The 
products covered also include products not in coils (e.g., in 
straight lengths) of a thickness of 4.75 mm or more and a width 
exceeding 150 mm and measuring at least twice the thickness. The 
products described above may be rectangular, square, circular, or 
other shape and include products of either rectangular or non-
rectangular cross-section where such cross-section is achieved 
subsequent to the rolling process, i.e., products which have been 
``worked after rolling'' (e.g., products which have been beveled or 
rounded at the edges).
    For purposes of the width and thickness requirements referenced 
above:
    (1) Where the nominal and actual measurements vary, a product is 
within the scope if application of either the nominal or actual 
measurement would place it within the scope based on the definitions 
set forth above, and
    (2) where the width and thickness vary for a specific product 
(e.g., the thickness of certain products with non-rectangular cross-
section, the width of certain products with non-rectangular shape, 
etc.), the measurement at its greatest width or thickness applies.
    Steel products included in the scope of these investigations are 
products in which: (1) iron predominates, by weight, over each of 
the other contained elements; and (2) the carbon content is 2 
percent or less, by weight.
    Subject merchandise also includes corrosion-resistant steel that 
has been further processed in a third country, including but not 
limited to annealing, tempering, painting, varnishing, trimming, 
cutting, punching and/or slitting or any other processing that would 
not otherwise remove the merchandise from the scope of the 
investigation if performed in the country of manufacture of the in-
scope corrosion resistant steel.
    All products that meet the written physical description are 
within the scope of the investigation unless specifically excluded. 
The following products are outside of and/or specifically excluded 
from the scope of this investigation:
     Flat-rolled steel products either plated or coated with 
tin, lead, chromium, chromium oxides, both tin and lead (``terne 
plate'') or both chromium and chromium oxides (``tin free steel''), 
whether or not painted, varnished or coated with plastics or other 
non-metallic substances in addition to the metallic coating;
     Clad products in straight lengths of 4.7625 mm or more 
in composite thickness and of a width which exceeds 150 mm and 
measures at least twice the thickness;
     Certain clad stainless flat-rolled products, which are 
three-layered corrosion-resistant carbon steel flat-rolled products 
less than 4.75 mm in composite thickness that consist of a carbon 
steel flat-rolled product clad on both sides with stainless steel in 
a 20%-60%-20% ratio; and
    Also excluded from the scope of the antidumping duty 
investigation on corrosion resistant steel from Taiwan are any 
products covered by the existing antidumping duty order on 
corrosion-resistant steel from Taiwan. See Certain Corrosion-
Resistant Steel Products from India, Italy, the People's Republic of 
China, the Republic of Korea and Taiwan: Amended Final Affirmative 
Antidumping Determination for India and Taiwan, and Antidumping Duty 
Orders, 81 FR 48390 (July 25, 2016); Corrosion-Resistant Steel 
Products from Taiwan: Notice of Third Amended Final Determination of 
Sales at

[[Page 19679]]

Less Than Fair Value Pursuant to Court Decision and Partial 
Exclusion from Antidumping Duty Order, 88 FR 58245 (August 25, 
2023).
    Also excluded from the scope of the antidumping duty 
investigation on corrosion-resistant steel from the United Arab 
Emirates and the antidumping duty and countervailing duty 
investigations on corrosion-resistant steel from the Socialist 
Republic of Vietnam are any products covered by the existing 
antidumping and countervailing duty orders on corrosion-resistant 
steel from the People's Republic of China and the Republic of Korea 
and the antidumping duty order on corrosion-resistant steel from 
Taiwan. See Certain Corrosion-Resistant Steel Products from India, 
Italy, the People's Republic of China, the Republic of Korea and 
Taiwan: Amended Final Affirmative Antidumping Determination for 
India and Taiwan, and Antidumping Duty Orders, 81 FR 48390 (July 25, 
2016); see also Certain Corrosion-Resistant Steel Products from 
India, Italy, Republic of Korea and the People's Republic of China: 
Countervailing Duty Order, 81 FR 48387 (July 25, 2016). This 
exclusion does not apply to imports of corrosion-resistant steel 
that are entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption in 
the United States for which the relevant importer and exporter 
certifications have been completed and maintained and all other 
applicable certification requirements have been met such that the 
entry is entered into the United States as not subject to the 
antidumping and countervailing duty orders on corrosion-resistant 
steel from the People's Republic of China, the antidumping and 
countervailing duty orders on corrosion-resistant steel from the 
Republic of Korea, or the antidumping duty order on corrosion-
resistant steel from Taiwan.
    The products subject to the investigation are currently 
classified in the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States 
(HTSUS) under subheadings: 7210.30.0030, 7210.30.0060, 7210.41.0000, 
7210.49.0030, 7210.49.0040, 7210.49.0045, 7210.49.0091, 
7210.49.0095, 7210.61.0000, 7210.69.0000, 7210.70.6030, 
7210.70.6060, 7210.70.6090, 7210.90.6000, 7210.90.9000, 
7212.20.0000, 7212.30.1030, 7212.30.1090, 7212.30.3000, 
7212.30.5000, 7212.40.1000, 7212.40.5000, 7212.50.0000, 
7212.60.0000, 7225.91.0000, 7225.92.0000, 7226.99.0110, and 
7226.99.0130.
    The products subject to the investigation may also enter under 
the following HTSUS subheadings: 7210.90.1000, 7215.90.1000, 
7215.90.3000, 7215.90.5000, 7217.20.1500, 7217.30.1530, 
7217.30.1560, 7217.90.1000, 7217.90.5030, 7217.90.5060, 
7217.90.5090, 7225.99.0090, 7226.99.0180, 7228.60.6000, 
7228.60.8000, and 7229.90.1000.
    The HTSUS subheadings above are provided for convenience and 
customs purposes only. The written description of the scope of the 
investigation is dispositive.

[FR Doc. 2025-08163 Filed 5-8-25; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P