[Federal Register Volume 90, Number 89 (Friday, May 9, 2025)]
[Notices]
[Pages 19756-19761]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2025-08115]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-102996; File No. SR-NYSEAMER-2024-78]


Self-Regulatory Organizations; NYSE American LLC; Notice of 
Filing of a Proposed Rule Change, as Modified by Amendment No. 1, To 
Amend Certain Rules Related to Flexible Exchange Options

May 5, 2025.
    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) \1\ of the Securities Exchange Act of 
1934 (``Act'') \2\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\3\ notice is hereby given 
that, on April 25, 2025, NYSE American LLC (``NYSE American'' or 
``Exchange'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission 
(``Commission'') a proposed rule change as described in Items I, II, 
and III below, which Items have been substantially prepared by the 
Exchange. The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments 
on the proposed rule change, as modified by Amendment No. 1, from 
interested persons.\4\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 15 U.S.C. 78a.
    \3\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
    \4\ The initial proposed rule change was filed with the 
Commission on December 13, 2024. See Securities Exchange Act Release 
No. 102014 (Dec. 20, 2024), 89 FR 105669 (Dec. 27, 2024).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance 
of the Proposed Rule Change

    The Exchange proposes to amend Rules 903G and 906G to permit 
Flexible Exchange (``FLEX'') Options on certain Exchange-Traded Funds 
(or ETFs) that hold bitcoin. This Amendment No. 1 supersedes and 
replaces the original filing in its entirety.\5\ The proposed rule 
change is available on the Exchange's website at www.nyse.com, at the 
principal office of the Exchange, and at the Commission's Public 
Reference Room.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ This Amendment No. 1 modifies the scope of the original 
filing to include (i) the Grayscale Bitcoin Mini Trust ETF and (ii) 
the Bitwise Bitcoin ETF. The Exchange also proposes to update 
existing rule text references to make technical corrections, 
including to update the name of the Grayscale Bitcoin Mini Trust 
(BTC) to the Grayscale Bitcoin Mini Trust ETF.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and 
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, the self-regulatory organization 
included statements concerning the purpose of, and basis for, the 
proposed rule change and discussed any comments it received on the 
proposed rule change. The text of those statements may be examined at 
the places specified in Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared 
summaries, set forth in sections A, B, and C below, of the most 
significant parts of such statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and the 
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    The Exchange proposes amend Rules 903G (Terms of FLEX Options) and 
906G (Position Limits) to permit options the Grayscale Bitcoin Trust 
(BTC) (``GBTC''), the Grayscale Bitcoin Mini Trust ETF (``BTC''), and 
the Bitwise Bitcoin ETF (``BITB'') (each a ``Fund'' and, collectively, 
the ``Funds'') to trade as FLEX Equity Options and to require the 
aggregation of any FLEX and non-FLEX positions on the same underlying 
Fund for purposes of calculating position and exercise limits as set 
forth in Rules 904 and 905.\6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ FLEX Options are customized equity or index contracts that 
allow investors to tailor contract terms for exchange-listed equity 
and index options. See generally Section 15 (Flexible Exchange 
(``FLEX'') Options). A ``FLEX Equity Option'' is an option on a 
specified underlying equity security that is subject to the rules of 
Section 15. See Rule 900G(b)(10).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange notes that this proposal is competitive given that 
Nasdaq Phlx, LLC (``Phlx'') recently filed a proposal to permit FLEX 
trading on options on iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF (``IBIT''), with an 
aggregated position and exercise limit for IBIT options of 25,000-
contracts.\7\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 102132 (Jan. 7, 
2025), 90 FR 3266 (Jan. 14, 2025) (SR-Phlx-2024-72) (Notice of 
Filing of Proposed Rule Change To Permit FLEX Trading in the iShares 
Bitcoin Trust ETF) (``Phlx FLEX IBIT Proposal''). Like each of the 
Funds, IBIT is an ETF that holds bitcoin.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

[[Page 19757]]

Background
    Each Fund is ETF that holds bitcoin and is listed on NYSE Arca, 
Inc. (``NYSE Arca''), the Exchange's affiliated equities exchange.\8\ 
Recently, the Commission approved options trading on the Funds.\9\ For 
each Fund, the position and exercise limits are 25,000 contracts, as 
set forth in Rule 904, Commentary .07(f), the lowest available 
limit.\10\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ NYSE Arca received approval to list and trade Bitcoin-Based 
Commodity-Based Trust Shares in GBTC, BTC, and BITB pursuant to NYSE 
Arca Rule Rule 8.201-E(c)(1). See Securities Exchange Act Release 
Nos. 99306 (January 10, 2024) (Order Granting Accelerated Approval 
of Proposed Rule Changes, as Modified by Amendments Thereto, to list 
and trade options in GBTC and BITB), 89 FR 3008 (January 17, 2024) 
(SR-NYSEARCA-2021-90); 100610 (July 26, 2024) (Order Granting 
Approval of Proposed Rule Changes, as Modified by Amendment No. 1, 
to permit the listing and trading of options on BTC), 89 FR 62821 
(August 1, 2024) (SR-NYSEARCA-2023-45)
    \9\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 101386 (October 18, 
2024), 89 FR 84960 (October 24, 2024) (SR-NYSEAMER-2024-49) (Order 
approving the listing and trading of options on GBTC, BTC, and BITB, 
pursuant to Rule 915, Commentary .10(a) (the ``Fund Options Approval 
Order'').
    \10\ Per Rule 905(a)(i), the exercise limit for options on each 
Fund is the same as the position limit for that Fund as determined 
by Rule 904. The following ETFs are also subject to a 25,000-
contract position and exercise limit: IBIT, Fidelity Wise Origin 
Bitcoin Fund (``FBTC''), and ARK 21Shares Bitcoin (``ARKB''). See 
Rules 904, Commentary .07(f) and 905(a)(i).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    FLEX Equity Options are not generally subject to position or 
exercise limits.\11\ Today, pursuant to Rule 903G(a)(1), Fund options 
are not approved for FLEX trading.\12\ Therefore, the 25,000-contract 
limit applicable to options on each Fund currently applies solely to 
non-FLEX Fund options.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \11\ See Rule 906G(b) (subject to the exceptions enumerated in 
the rule ``there shall be no position limits for FLEX Equity 
options.'')
    \12\ Rule 903G(a)(1) also does not permit FLEX trading on 
options on IBIT, FBTC, and ARKB.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Proposal
    The Exchange proposes to permit options on each Fund to trade as 
FLEX Equity Options and would require the aggregation of any FLEX and 
non-FLEX positions in the same underlying Fund for purposes of 
calculating the 25,000-contract position and exercise limits applicable 
to each Fund.\13\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \13\ See proposed Rules 5.32-O(f)(1) (excluding GBTC, BTC, and 
BITB options from the prohibition against FLEX trading); and 5.35-
O(b)(iii) (adopting the requirement that, for options on each Fund, 
the Exchange will aggregate any FLEX and non-FLEX positions in the 
same underlying Fund for purposes of calculating the position and 
exercise limits for that Fund, as set forth in Rules 904 and 905.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Per the Commission ``rules regarding position and exercise limits 
are intended to prevent the establishment of options positions that can 
be used or might create incentives to manipulate or disrupt the 
underlying market so as to benefit the options positions.'' \14\ For 
this reason, the Commission requires that ``position and exercise 
limits must be sufficient to prevent investors from disrupting the 
market for the underlying security by acquiring and exercising a number 
of options contracts disproportionate to the deliverable supply and 
average trading volume of the underlying security.'' \15\ Based on its 
review of the data and analysis provided by the Exchange, the 
Commission concluded that the 25,000-contract position (and exercise) 
limit for non-FLEX options on each Fund satisfied these objectives.\16\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \14\ See supra note 9, Fund Options Approval Order, 89 FR, at 
84971.
    \15\ See id.
    \16\ See id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    As proposed, for options on each Fund, the Exchange will aggregate 
any FLEX and non-FLEX positions in the same underlying Fund for 
purposes of calculating the 25,000-contract position and exercise 
limits. For each Fund, this proposed aggregated limit effectively 
restricts a market participant from holding positions that could result 
in the receipt of more than 2,500,000 shares, aggregated for FLEX and 
non-FLEX in the same underlying Fund (if that market participant 
exercised all its options). The Exchange believes that capping the 
aggregated position and exercise limits at 25,000 contracts, the lowest 
available limit, would be sufficient to address concerns related to 
manipulation and the protection of investors. The Exchange notes that 
this number is conservative given the liquidity of each Fund.\17\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \17\ See id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    While the Exchange proposes an aggregated 25,000-contract position 
and exercise limit for options on each Fund, it nonetheless believes 
that, for the reasons set forth below, evidence exists to support a 
much higher position limit.\18\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \18\ The Exchange may file a subsequent rule change to increase 
the position and exercise limit for options on the Funds based on 
additional data regarding trading activity, to continue to balance 
any concerns regarding manipulation. A higher position and exercise 
limit would allow institutional investors to utilize Fund options 
for prudent risk management purposes. In this regard, the Exchange 
would address the impact of higher position (and exercise) limits on 
the proposed FLEX Fund options.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Specifically, in approving the options on each Fund, the Commission 
considered and reviewed the Exchange's analysis that the exercisable 
risk associated with a position limit of 25,000 contracts represented 
only 0.9%, 0.7%, and 3.6% of the outstanding shares of GBTC, BTC and 
BITB, respectively.\19\ The Commission also considered and reviewed the 
Exchange's arguments that with a 25,000-contract limit for each Fund: 
(i) the 284,570,100 GBTC shares outstanding, 114 market participants 
would have to simultaneously exercise their positions to place GBTC 
under stress; (ii) the 366,950,100 BTC shares outstanding, meant that 
147 market participants would have to simultaneously exercise their 
same-side positions to place BTC under stress; and (iii) the 68,690,000 
BITB shares outstanding, meant that 27 market participants would have 
to simultaneously exercise their same-side positions to place BITB 
under stress.\20\ Based on the Commission's review of this information 
and analysis, the Commission concluded that the 25,000-contract 
position and exercise limit for options on each Fund would address 
concerns related to manipulation and investor protection and deemed 
this limit conservative and therefore appropriate given the liquidity 
of each Fund.\21\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \19\ See id. Data represents figures from FactSet as of August 
30, 2024.
    \20\ See supra note 9, Fund Options Approval Order, 89 FR, at 
84971.
    \21\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Each Fund qualifies a 250,000-contract limit, pursuant to Rule 904, 
Commentary .06(e), which requires that, for the most recent six-month 
period, trading volume for the underlying security is at least 
100,000,000 shares.\22\ The following table sets forth the trading data 
for each Fund, as of November 25, 2024, for the preceding six months 
and the average daily volume (``ADV'') for the preceding three months.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \22\ See Rule 904, Commentary .06 (providing at subparagraph (e) 
that the position limit shall be 250,000 contracts for options: (i) 
on underlying stock or Exchange-Traded Fund Share that had trading 
volume of at least 100,000,000 shares during the most recent six-
month trading period; or (ii) on an underlying stock or Exchange-
Traded Fund Share that had trading volume of at least 75,000,000 
shares during the most recent six-month trading period and has at 
least 300,000,000 shares currently outstanding).

[[Page 19758]]



----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                           Trading volume         Market
                          Fund                                (shares)        capitalization      ADV (shares)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
GBTC...................................................        550,687,400  * $20,661,316,542          3,829,597
BTC....................................................        163,712,700           [dagger]          2,036,369
                                                                               $3,496,748,882
BITB...................................................        288,800,860           [Dagger]          2,480.478
                                                                                4,095,157,000
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* The market capitalization was determined by multiplying a settlement price ($75.42) by the number of shares
  outstanding (273,950,100). Data represents figures from FactSet as of November 25, 2024.
[dagger] The market capitalization of BTC was determined by multiplying a settlement price ($42.16) by the
  number of shares outstanding (82,939,964). Data represents figures from FactSet as of November 25, 2024.
[Dagger] The market capitalization of BITB was determined by multiplying a settlement price ($51.70) by the
  number of shares outstanding (79,950,100). Data represents figures from FactSet as of November 25, 2024.

    Also, as of November 25, 2024, there were 19,787,762 bitcoins in 
circulation.\23\ At a price of $94,830 per bitcoin,\24\ that equates to 
a market capitalization of greater than $1.876 trillion. If a position 
and exercise limit of 250,000 contracts were considered for each Fund, 
the exercisable risk would represent 9.13% \25\ of the GBTC shares 
outstanding; 30.14% \26\ of BTC shares outstanding; and 31.27% \27\ of 
BITB shares outstanding. Given the liquidity of BTC and BITB, the 
current 25,000 position and exercise limit appears extremely 
conservative.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \23\ See https://www.coingecko.com/en/coins/bitcoin.
    \24\ This is the approximate price of bitcoin from 4:00 p.m. ET 
on November 25, 2024.
    \25\ This percentage is arrived at with this equation: (250,000 
contract limit * 100 shares per option/273,950.100 GBTC shares 
outstanding).
    \26\ This percentage is arrived at with this equation: (250,000 
contract limit * 100 shares per option/82,939,964 BTC shares 
outstanding).
    \27\ This percentage is arrived at with this equation: (250,000 
contract limit * 100 shares per option/79,950,100 BITB shares 
outstanding).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Despite the proposed addition of FLEX trading in options on GBTC, 
BTC, and BITB (collectively, ``FLEX Fund Options''), the Exchange would 
continue to limit to 25,000 the number of options on each Fund traded 
on the Exchange that an investor, acting alone or in concert with 
others directly or indirectly, may control and thereby mitigate 
potential manipulation. The Exchange believes that allowing FLEX Fund 
Options it consistent with the Act given FLEX trading is permitted 
today in other ETFs overlying a commodity such as SPDR Gold Shares 
(``GLD'') and iShares Silver Trust (``SLV'').\28\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \28\ GLD and SLV, like the each of the Funds, holds one asset in 
trust.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Further, the Exchange believes that the share creation and 
redemption process unique to ETFs would mitigate any potential risk of 
manipulation in FLEX Fund Options. The creation and redemption process 
is designed to ensure that an ETF's price closely tracks the value of 
its underlying asset(s). For example, if a market participant exercised 
a long call position for 25,000 contracts and purchased 2,500,000 
shares of GBTC and this purchase resulted in the value of GBTC shares 
to trade at a premium to the value of the (underlying) bitcoin held by 
GBTC, the Exchange believes that other market participants would 
attempt to arbitrage this price difference by selling short GBTC shares 
while concurrently purchasing bitcoin. Those market participants 
(arbitrageurs) would then deliver cash to GBTC and receive shares of 
GBTC, which would be used to close out any previously established short 
position in GBTC. Thus, this creation and redemptions process would 
significantly reduce the potential risk of price dislocation between 
the value of shares in each Fund and the value of bitcoin holdings.
    The Exchange understands that FLEX Equity Options on ETFs are 
currently traded in the over-the-counter (``OTC'') market by a variety 
of market participants, e.g., hedge funds, proprietary trading firms, 
and pension funds, to name a few. The Exchange believes there is room 
for significant growth if a comparable product were introduced for 
trading on a regulated market. The Exchange expects that users of these 
OTC products would be among the primary users of FLEX Fund Options. The 
Exchange also believes that the trading of FLEX Fund Options would 
allow these same market participants to better manage the risk 
associated with the volatility of positions in the underlying ETF 
(i.e., GBTC, BTC, or BITB) given the enhanced liquidity that an 
exchange-traded product would bring.
    Additionally, the Exchange believes that FLEX Fund Options traded 
on the Exchange would have three important advantages over the 
contracts that are traded in the OTC market. First, as a result of 
greater standardization of contract terms, exchange-traded contracts 
should develop more liquidity. Second, counter-party credit risk would 
be mitigated by the fact that the contracts are issued and guaranteed 
by The Options Clearing Corporation (``OCC''). Finally, the price 
discovery and dissemination provided by the Exchange and its members 
would lead to more transparent markets. The Exchange believes that its 
ability to offer FLEX Fund Options would aid it in competing with the 
OTC market and at the same time expand the universe of products 
available to interested market participants. The Exchange believes that 
an exchange-traded alternative may provide a useful risk management and 
trading vehicle for market participants and their customers.
    The Exchange has analyzed its capacity and represents that it and 
The Options Price Reporting Authority (``OPRA'') have the necessary 
systems capacity to handle the additional traffic associated with the 
listing of FLEX Fund Options. The Exchange believes any additional 
traffic that would be generated from the trading of FLEX Fund Options 
would be manageable. The Exchange believes ATP Holders will not have a 
capacity issue as a result of this proposed rule change. The Exchange 
also represents that it does not believe this proposed rule change will 
cause fragmentation of liquidity. The Exchange will monitor the trading 
volume associated with the additional options series listed as a result 
of this proposed rule change and the effect (if any) of these 
additional series on market fragmentation and on the capacity of the 
Exchange's automated systems.
    The Exchange represents that the same surveillance procedures 
applicable to the Exchange's other options products listed and traded 
on the Exchange, including non-FLEX options in each Fund, will apply to 
FLEX Fund Options, and that it has the necessary systems capacity to 
support such options. FLEX options products (and their respective 
symbols) are integrated into the Exchange's existing surveillance 
system architecture and are thus subject to the relevant surveillance 
processes. The Exchange's market surveillance staff (including staff of 
the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (``FINRA'') who perform 
surveillance and investigative work on behalf of the Exchange pursuant 
a regulatory services agreement) conducts surveillances with respect to 
GBTC, BTC, and BITB (i.e., the underlying ETFs) and, as

[[Page 19759]]

appropriate, would review activity in applicable ETF when conducting 
surveillances for market abuse or manipulation in the FLEX Fund 
Options.\29\ The Exchange does not believe that allowing FLEX Fund 
Options would render the marketplace for non-FLEX options in any of the 
Funds, or equity options in general, more susceptible to manipulative 
practices.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \29\ See supra note 9, Fund Options Approval Order, 89 FR 84966-
68 (regarding surveillance procedures applicable to GBTC, BTC, and 
BITB).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange represents that its existing trading surveillances are 
adequate to monitor the trading in GBTC, BTC, and BITB, as well as any 
subsequent trading of FLEX Fund Options on the Exchange. Additionally, 
the Exchange is a member of the Intermarket Surveillance Group 
(``ISG'') under the ISG Agreement. ISG members work together to 
coordinate surveillance and investigative information sharing in the 
stock, options, and futures markets. For surveillance purposes, the 
Exchange would therefore have access to information regarding trading 
activity in GBTC, BTC, and BITB and in other pertinent underlying 
securities on other exchanges through ISG. In addition, and as 
referenced above, the Exchange has a regulatory services agreement with 
FINRA, pursuant to which FINRA conducts certain surveillances on behalf 
of the Exchange. Further, pursuant to a multi-party 17d-2 joint plan, 
all options exchanges allocate regulatory responsibilities to FINRA to 
conduct certain options-related market surveillances.\30\ The Exchange 
will implement any additional surveillance procedures it deems 
necessary to effectively monitor the trading of FLEX Fund Options.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \30\ Section 19(g)(1) of the Act, among other things, requires 
every SRO registered as a national securities exchange or national 
securities association to comply with the Act, the rules and 
regulations thereunder, and the SRO's own rules, and, absent 
reasonable justification or excuse, enforce compliance by its 
members and persons associated with its members. See 15 U.S.C. 
78q(d)(1) and 17 CFR 240.17d-2. Section 17(d)(1) of the Act allows 
the Commission to relieve an SRO of certain responsibilities with 
respect to members of the SRO who are also members of another SRO. 
Specifically, Section 17(d)(1) allows the Commission to relieve an 
SRO of its responsibilities to: (i) receive regulatory reports from 
such members; (ii) examine such members for compliance with the Act 
and the rules and regulations thereunder, and the rules of the SRO; 
or (iii) carry out other specified regulatory responsibilities with 
respect to such members.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The proposed rule change is designed to allow investors seeking to 
trade options on the Funds to utilize FLEX Fund Options. The Exchange 
believes that offering innovative products flows to the benefit of the 
investing public. A robust and competitive market requires that 
exchanges respond to members' evolving needs by constantly improving 
their offerings. Such efforts would be stymied if exchanges were 
prohibited from offering innovative products such as the proposed FLEX 
Fund Options. The Exchange believes that introducing FLEX Fund Options 
would further broaden the base of investors that use FLEX Equity 
Options (and options on the Funds in general) to manage their trading 
and investment risk, including investors that currently trade in the 
OTC market for customized options. The proposed rule change is also 
designed to encourage market makers to shift liquidity from the OTC 
market on the Exchange, which, it believes, will enhance the process of 
price discovery conducted on the Exchange through increased order flow.
    As discussed herein, the Exchange does not believe that this 
proposed rule change raises any unique regulatory concerns because the 
proposal to aggregate FLEX and non-FLEX option positions in each Fund 
at the (most conservative) 25,000-contract position and exercise limit, 
which currently applies solely to non-FLEX options on each Fund, should 
provide an adequate safeguard.
    Finally, the Exchange proposes to make technical changes to Rule 
904, Commentary. 07(f) to update the name of the Grayscale Bitcoin Mini 
Trust ETF (previously known as the Grayscale Bitcoin Mini Trust (BTC)) 
and to correct the symbol associated with Fidelity Ethereum Fund, which 
changes will add accuracy and internal consistent to Exchange rules 
making them easier to comprehend and understand.\31\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \31\ See proposed Rule 904, Commentary .07(f) (updating the name 
of the Grayscale Bitcoin Mini Trust (BTC) to Grayscale Bitcoin Mini 
Trust ETF and correcting the trading symbol for the Fidelity 
Ethereum Fund from ``ETH'' to ``FETH'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Implementation
    The Exchange will announce the implementation date by Trader Update 
within sixty (60) days of the rule approval.
2. Statutory Basis
    The Exchange believes that its proposal is consistent with Section 
6(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the ``Act''),\32\ in 
general, and furthers the objectives of Section 6(b)(5) of the Act,\33\ 
in particular, in that it is designed to prevent fraudulent and 
manipulative acts and practices, to promote just and equitable 
principles of trade, to remove impediments to and perfect the mechanism 
of a free and open market and a national market system, and, in 
general, to protect investors and the public interest. Specifically, 
the Exchange believes that introducing FLEX Fund Options will increase 
order flow to the Exchange, increase the variety of options products 
available for trading, and provide a valuable tool for investors to 
manage risk. The proposed rule change is designed to allow investors 
seeking to trade options on any of the Funds to utilize FLEX Fund 
Options.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \32\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
    \33\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange believes that the proposal to permit FLEX Fund Options 
would remove impediments to and perfect the mechanism of a free and 
open market. The Exchange believes that offering FLEX Fund Options will 
benefit investors by providing them with an additional, relatively 
lower cost investing tool to gain exposure to the price of bitcoin and 
provide a hedging vehicle to meet their investment needs in connection 
with a bitcoin-related product. Moreover, the proposal would broaden 
the base of investors that use FLEX Options to manage their trading and 
investment risk, including investors that currently trade in the OTC 
market for customized options. By trading a product in an exchange-
traded environment (that is currently being used in the OTC market), 
the Exchange would be able to compete more effectively with the OTC 
market. The Exchange believes the proposed rule change is designed to 
prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts and practices in that it would 
lead to the migration of options currently trading in the OTC market to 
trading to the Exchange. Also, any migration to the Exchange from the 
OTC market would result in increased market transparency and enhance 
the process of price discovery conducted on the Exchange through 
increased order flow. The Exchange also believes that offering FLEX 
Fund Options may appeal to retail investors interested in options 
trading (both FLEX and non-FLEX) on GBTC, BTC, and BITB.
    Additionally, the Exchange believes the proposed rule change is 
designed to remove impediments to and to perfect the mechanism for a 
free and open market and a national market system, and, in general, to 
protect investors and the public interest in that it should create 
greater trading and hedging opportunities and flexibility. The proposed 
rule change should also result in enhanced efficiency in initiating and 
closing out positions and heightened contra-party creditworthiness due 
to the role of OCC as issuer and guarantor of FLEX Fund Options. 
Further, the

[[Page 19760]]

proposed rule change would result in increased competition by 
permitting the Exchange to offer products that are currently used in 
the OTC market.
    The Exchange does not believe that this proposed rule change raises 
any unique regulatory concerns because the proposal to aggregate any 
FLEX and non-FLEX options in each Fund at the current (and most 
conservative) 25,000-contract limit should provide an adequate 
safeguard. As noted herein, the purpose of position (and exercise) 
limits is to address potential manipulative schemes and adverse market 
impacts surrounding the use of options, such as disrupting the market 
in the security underlying the options. The Exchange believes the 
proposal will benefit investors and public interest because the 
aggregated position and exercise limits for (FLEX and non-FLEX) options 
on the same underlying Fund at 25,000 contracts, the lowest limit 
available in options, would address concerns related to manipulation 
and protection of investors as this number is conservative and 
therefore appropriate given the sufficient liquidity in each Fund.
    The Exchange believes that offering innovative products benefits 
the investing public. A robust and competitive market requires that 
exchanges respond to the evolving needs of their members by constantly 
improving their offerings. Such efforts would be stymied if exchanges 
were prohibited from offering innovative products such as the proposed 
FLEX Fund Options. The Exchange does not believe that allowing FLEX 
Fund Options would render the marketplace for equity options more 
susceptible to manipulative practices.
    Finally, the Exchange represents that it has an adequate 
surveillance program in place to detect manipulative trading in FLEX 
Fund Options. Regarding the proposed FLEX Fund Options, the Exchange 
would use the same surveillance procedures utilized for FLEX Options 
currently listed on the Exchange (as well as for non-FLEX options on 
each Fund). For surveillance purposes, the Exchange would have access 
to information regarding trading activity in the underlying Funds 
(i.e., GBTC, BTC, and BITB).\34\ In light of surveillance measures 
related to both options and the underlying Funds, the Exchange believes 
that existing surveillance procedures are designed to deter and detect 
possible manipulative behavior which might potentially arise from 
listing and trading the proposed FLEX Fund Options.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \34\ See supra note 9, Fund Options Approval Order, 89 FR at 
84966-68 (regarding surveillance procedures applicable to GBTC, BTC, 
and BITB).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will 
impose any burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate 
in furtherance of the purposes of the Act.
    Intra-market competition. The Exchange does not believe that its 
proposed rule change will impose any burden on intra-market competition 
as all market participants would have the option of utilizing the FLEX 
Fund Options. The proposed rule change is designed to allow investors 
seeking option exposure to bitcoin to trade FLEX Fund Options. 
Moreover, the Exchange believes that the proposal to permit FLEX Fund 
Options would broaden the base of investors that use FLEX Options to 
manage their trading and investment risk, including investors that 
currently trade in the OTC market for customized options.
    Inter-market competition. The Exchange does not believe that its 
proposed rule change will impose any burden on inter-market competition 
as all market participants would have the option of utilizing the FLEX 
Fund Options. The Exchange notes that it operates in a highly 
competitive market in which market participants can readily direct 
order flow to competing venues. The proposed rule change would support 
that intermarket competition by allowing the Exchange to offer 
additional functionality to ATP Holders. The Exchange believes that the 
proposed FLEX Fund Options will increase the variety of options 
products available for trading in general and bitcoin-related products 
in particular and, as such, will provide a valuable tool for investors 
to manage risk.
    As such, the Exchange believes that this proposal does not create 
an undue burden on intermarket competition. Rather, the Exchange 
believes that the proposed rule would bolster intermarket competition 
by promoting fair competition among individual markets. The Exchange 
notes that, upon approval of this proposal, competing options exchanges 
will be free to offer products like the proposed FLEX Fund Options.

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed 
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others

    No written comments were solicited or received with respect to the 
proposed rule change.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for 
Commission Action

    Within 45 days of the date of publication of this notice in the 
Federal Register or within such longer period up to 90 days (i) as the 
Commission may designate if it finds such longer period to be 
appropriate and publishes its reasons for so finding or (ii) as to 
which the self-regulatory organization consents, the Commission will:
    (A) by order approve or disapprove the proposed rule change, or
    (B) institute proceedings to determine whether the proposed rule 
change should be disapproved.

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views and 
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule 
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of 
the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's internet comment form (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
     Send an email to [email protected]. Please include 
file number SR-NYSEAMER-2024-78 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities 
and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to file number SR-NYSEAMER-2024-78. This 
file number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To 
help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently, 
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on 
the Commission's internet website (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all 
written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are 
filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to 
the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other 
than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the 
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for website viewing and 
printing in the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE, 
Washington, DC 20549, on official business days between the hours of 10 
a.m. and 3 p.m. Copies of the filing also

[[Page 19761]]

will be available for inspection and copying at the principal office of 
the Exchange. Do not include personal identifiable information in 
submissions; you should submit only information that you wish to make 
available publicly. We may redact in part or withhold entirely from 
publication submitted material that is obscene or subject to copyright 
protection. All submissions should refer to file number SR-NYSEAMER-
2024-78 and should be submitted on or before May 30, 2025.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets, 
pursuant to delegated authority.\35\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \35\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Sherry R. Haywood,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2025-08115 Filed 5-8-25; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P