[Federal Register Volume 90, Number 74 (Friday, April 18, 2025)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 16469-16474]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2025-06729]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
10 CFR Part 430
[EERE-2025-BT-DET-0004]
RIN 1904-AF74
Energy Conservation Program: Proposed Withdrawal of Determination
of Portable Electric Spas as a Covered Consumer Product
AGENCY: Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Department of
Energy.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking; proposed withdrawal of
determination.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: DOE is proposing to withdraw its prior determination that
portable electric spas (``PESs'') qualify as covered products under
Part A of Title III of the Energy Policy and Conservation Act, as
amended (``EPCA'').
DATES: Written comments, data, and information are requested and will
be accepted on or before May 19, 2025.
ADDRESSES: Interested persons are encouraged to submit comments using
the Federal eRulemaking Portal at www.regulations.gov under docket
number EERE-2025-BT-DET-0004.
[[Page 16470]]
Follow the instructions for submitting comments. Alternatively,
interested persons may submit comments, identified by docket number
EERE-2025-BT-DET-0004, by any of the following methods:
(1) Email: [email protected]. Include the docket number
EERE-2025-BT-DET-0004 in the subject line of the message.
(2) Postal Mail: Appliance and Equipment Standards Program, U.S.
Department of Energy, Building Technologies Office, Mailstop EE-5B,
1000 Independence Avenue SW, Washington, DC 20585-0121. Telephone:
(202) 287-1445. If possible, please submit all items on a compact disc
(``CD''), in which case it is not necessary to include printed copies.
(3) Hand Delivery/Courier: Appliance and Equipment Standards
Program, U.S. Department of Energy, Building Technologies Office, 1000
Independence Avenue SW, Washington, DC 20585-0121. Telephone: (202)
287-1445. If possible, please submit all items on a CD, in which case
it is not necessary to include printed copies.
No telefacsimiles (``faxes'') will be accepted. For detailed
instructions on submitting comments and additional information on this
process, see section III of this document.
Docket: The docket for this activity, which includes Federal
Register notices, public meeting attendee lists and transcripts (if a
public meeting is held), comments, and other supporting documents/
materials, is available for review at www.regulations.gov. All
documents in the docket are listed in the www.regulations.gov index.
However, not all documents listed in the index may be publicly
available, such as information that is exempt from public disclosure.
The docket web page can be found at www.regulations.gov/docket/EERE-2025-BT-DET-0004. The docket web page contains instructions on how
to access all documents, including public comments, in the docket. See
section III of this document for information on how to submit comments
through www.regulations.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Dr. Carl Shapiro, U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Energy
Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Building Technologies Office, EE-5B,
1000 Independence Avenue SW, Washington, DC 20585-0121. Telephone:
(240) 315-4339. Email: [email protected].
Ms. Kristin Koernig, U.S. Department of Energy, Office of the
General Counsel, GC-33, 1000 Independence Avenue SW, Washington, DC
20585-0121. Telephone: (202) 586-4798. Email:
[email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Table of Contents
I. General Discussion
II. Procedural Issues and Regulatory Review
A. Review Under Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
B. Review Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act
C. Review Under the Paperwork Reduction Act
D. Review Under the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969
E. Review Under Executive Order 13132
F. Review Under Executive Order 12988
G. Review Under the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
H. Review Under the Treasury and General Government
Appropriations Act, 1999
I. Review Under Executive Order 12630
J. Review Under the Treasury and General Government
Appropriations Act, 2001
K. Review Under Executive Order 13211
L. Review Under the Information Quality Bulletin for Peer Review
M. Review Under Additional Executive Orders and Presidential
Memoranda
III. Public Participation
A. Submission of Comments
B. Issues on Which DOE Seeks Comments
IV. Approval of the Office of the Secretary
I. General Discussion
Under EPCA, DOE may add consumer products to the list of covered
products for which energy conservation standards can be established. 42
U.S.C. 6292(b)(1) The coverage determination procedures require DOE to
conclude that classifying products of such type as covered products is
necessary or appropriate to carry out the purposes of this chapter,
among other requirements. Id. at 42 U.S.C. 6292(b)(1)(A). Only after
coverage is determined, DOE may then adopt standards and test
procedures regulating such products, pursuant to the requirements set
out in the statute. See generally 42 U.S.C. 6293, 6295.
On February 16, 2022, DOE published in the Federal Register a
notice of proposed determination (``NOPD'') that proposed to determine
coverage for PESs. 87 FR 8745 (February 16, 2022) (``February 2022
NOPD''). After considering public comments, data, and information from
interested parties submitted in response to the February 2022 NOPD, DOE
finalized the coverage determination for PESs. 87 FR 54123 (Sept. 2,
2022) (``September 2022 Determination''). As part of the determination,
DOE adopted a definition of ``portable electric spa.'' \1\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ DOE defined ``portable electric spa'' as a factory-built
electric spa or hot tub, supplied with equipment for heating and
circulating water at the time of sale or sold separately for
subsequent attachment. See 10 CFR 430.2.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
DOE has reevaluated whether including portable electric spas as a
covered product is necessary and appropriate to carry out the purposes
of EPCA. Based on that evaluation, DOE has tentatively determined that,
at this time, it is not necessary or appropriate to classify portable
electric spas as a covered product to carry out the purposes of EPCA.
EPCA provides the Secretary discretion in classifying a type of
consumer product as a covered product as the Secretary may classify if
certain requirements are met. (See 42 U.S.C. 6292(b) (emphasis added)).
While DOE found in the September 2022 Determination that classifying
PESs as a covered product was needed to set energy conservation
standards for PESs and carry out EPCA's purposes to conserve energy
supplies and provide for improved energy efficiency of other consumer
products, DOE has reevaluated that determination. See 87 FR 54123,
54126. Using the discretion provided by EPCA for classifying additional
covered products, DOE has tentatively determined that there are other
avenues to conserve energy supplies than classifying PESs as a covered
product and establishing standards. Therefore, DOE has tentatively
found that classifying PESs as a covered product is not necessary or
appropriate to carry out the purposes of EPCA.
DOE requests comment on its proposal to withdraw coverage for
portable electric spas.
II. Procedural Issues and Regulatory Review
A. Review Under Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
Executive Order (``E.O.'') 12866, ``Regulatory Planning and
Review,'' as supplemented and reaffirmed by E.O. 13563, ``Improving
Regulation and Regulatory Review, 76 FR 3821 (Jan. 21, 2011), requires
agencies, to the extent permitted by law, to (1) propose or adopt a
regulation only upon a reasoned determination that its benefits justify
its costs (recognizing that some benefits and costs are difficult to
quantify); (2) tailor regulations to impose the least burden on
society, consistent with obtaining regulatory objectives, taking into
account, among other things, and to the extent practicable, the costs
of cumulative regulations; (3) select, in choosing among alternative
regulatory approaches, those approaches that maximize net benefits
(including potential economic, environmental,
[[Page 16471]]
public health and safety, and other advantages; distributive impacts;
and equity); (4) to the extent feasible, specify performance
objectives, rather than specifying the behavior or manner of compliance
that regulated entities must adopt; and (5) identify and assess
available alternatives to direct regulation, including providing
economic incentives to encourage the desired behavior, such as user
fees or marketable permits, or providing information upon which choices
can be made by the public. DOE emphasizes as well that E.O. 13563
requires agencies to use the best available techniques to quantify
anticipated present and future benefits and costs as accurately as
possible. In its guidance, the Office of Information and Regulatory
Affairs (``OIRA'') in the Office of Management and Budget (``OMB'') has
emphasized that such techniques may include identifying changing future
compliance costs that might result from technological innovation or
anticipated behavioral changes. For the reasons stated in the preamble,
this proposed regulatory action is consistent with these principles.
Section 6(a) of E.O. 12866 also requires agencies to submit
``significant regulatory actions'' to OIRA for review. OIRA has
determined that this proposed regulatory action does not constitute a
``significant regulatory action'' under section 3(f) of E.O. 12866.
Accordingly, this proposed action was not submitted to OIRA for review
under E.O. 12866.
B. Review Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.) requires
preparation of an initial regulatory flexibility analysis (``IRFA'')
and a final regulatory flexibility analysis (``FRFA'') for any rule
that by law must be proposed for public comment, unless the agency
certifies that the rule, if promulgated, will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial number of small entities. As required
by E.O. 13272, ``Proper Consideration of Small Entities in Agency
Rulemaking,'' 67 FR 53461 (Aug. 16, 2002), DOE published procedures and
policies on February 19, 2003, to ensure that the potential impacts of
its rules on small entities are properly considered during the
rulemaking process. 68 FR 7990. DOE has made its procedures and
policies available on the Office of the General Counsel's website
(www.energy.gov/gc/office-general-counsel).
DOE reviewed this proposed withdrawal of determination under the
provisions of the Regulatory Flexibility Act and the policies and
procedures published on February 19, 2003. This proposal does not
establish test procedures or standards for PESs, and, if adopted, DOE
would no longer have the authority to consider establishing or amending
such measures. Therefore, DOE initially concludes that the impacts of
the proposed withdrawal of determination would not have a ``significant
economic impact on a substantial number of small entities,'' and that
the preparation of an IRFA is not warranted. DOE will transmit this
certification and supporting statement of factual basis to the Chief
Counsel for Advocacy of the Small Business Administration for review
under 5 U.S.C. 605(b).
C. Review Under the Paperwork Reduction Act
This proposed withdrawal of determination, which proposes that PESs
do not meet the criteria for a covered product for which the Secretary
may consider prescribing energy conservation standards pursuant to 42
U.S.C. 6295(o) and (p), imposes no new information or record-keeping
requirements. Accordingly, the OMB clearance is not required under the
Paperwork Reduction Act. (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.)
D. Review Under the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969
Pursuant to the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969
(``NEPA''), DOE is analyzing this proposed withdrawal of determination
in accordance with NEPA and DOE's NEPA implementing regulations (10 CFR
part 1021). DOE's regulations include a categorical exclusion for
rulemakings that are strictly procedural. See 10 CFR part 1021, subpart
D, appendix A6. DOE anticipates that this proposed rulemaking qualifies
for categorical exclusion A6 because it is a strictly procedural
rulemaking and otherwise meets the requirements for application of a
categorical exclusion. See 10 CFR 1021.410. DOE will complete its NEPA
review before issuing the final determination.
E. Review Under Executive Order 13132
E.O. 13132, ``Federalism,'' 64 FR 43255 (Aug. 10, 1999), imposes
certain requirements on Federal agencies formulating and implementing
policies or regulations that preempt State law or that have federalism
implications. The Executive order requires agencies to examine the
constitutional and statutory authority supporting any action that would
limit the policymaking discretion of the States and to carefully assess
the necessity for such actions. The Executive order also requires
agencies to have an accountable process to ensure meaningful and timely
input by State and local officials in the development of regulatory
policies that have federalism implications. On March 14, 2000, DOE
published a statement of policy describing the intergovernmental
consultation process it will follow in the development of such
regulations. 65 FR 13735. DOE has examined this proposed withdrawal of
determination and has tentatively determined that it would not have a
substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship between
the national government and the States, or on the distribution of power
and responsibilities among the various levels of government. EPCA
governs and prescribes Federal preemption of State regulations as to
energy conservation for the products that are the subject of this
proposed withdrawal of determination. States can petition DOE for
exemption from such preemption to the extent, and based on criteria,
set forth in EPCA. (42 U.S.C. 6297) Therefore, no further action is
required by E.O. 13132.
F. Review Under Executive Order 12988
With respect to the review of existing regulations and the
promulgation of new regulations, section 3(a) of E.O. 12988, ``Civil
Justice Reform,'' imposes on Federal agencies the general duty to
adhere to the following requirements: (1) eliminate drafting errors and
ambiguity, (2) write regulations to minimize litigation, (3) provide a
clear legal standard for affected conduct rather than a general
standard, and (4) promote simplification and burden reduction. 61 FR
4729 (Feb. 7, 1996). Regarding the review required by section 3(a),
section 3(b) of E.O. 12988 specifically requires that Executive
agencies make every reasonable effort to ensure that the regulation (1)
clearly specifies the preemptive effect, if any, (2) clearly specifies
any effect on existing Federal law or regulation, (3) provides a clear
legal standard for affected conduct while promoting simplification and
burden reduction, (4) specifies the retroactive effect, if any, (5)
adequately defines key terms, and (6) addresses other important issues
affecting clarity and general draftsmanship under any guidelines issued
by the Attorney General. Section 3(c) of E.O. 12988 requires Executive
agencies to review regulations in light of applicable standards in
section 3(a) and section 3(b) to determine whether they are met or it
is unreasonable to meet one or more of them. DOE has completed the
required review and determined that, to the extent permitted by law,
this proposed withdrawal of determination
[[Page 16472]]
meets the relevant standards of E.O. 12988.
G. Review Under the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
Title II of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (``UMRA'')
requires each Federal agency to assess the effects of Federal
regulatory actions on State, local, and Tribal governments and the
private sector. Public Law 104-4, sec. 201 (codified at 2 U.S.C. 1531).
For a regulatory action likely to result in a rule that may cause the
expenditure by State, local, and Tribal governments, in the aggregate,
or by the private sector of $100 million or more in any one year
(adjusted annually for inflation), section 202 of UMRA requires a
Federal agency to publish a written statement that estimates the
resulting costs, benefits, and other effects on the national economy.
(2 U.S.C. 1532(a), (b)) The UMRA also requires a Federal agency to
develop an effective process to permit timely input by elected officers
of State, local, and Tribal governments on a ``significant
intergovernmental mandate,'' and requires an agency plan for giving
notice and opportunity for timely input to potentially affected small
governments before establishing any requirements that might
significantly or uniquely affect them. On March 18, 1997, DOE published
a statement of policy on its process for intergovernmental consultation
under UMRA. 62 FR 12820. DOE's policy statement is also available at
www.energy.gov/sites/prod/files/gcprod/documents/umra_97.pdf.
DOE examined this proposed withdrawal of determination according to
UMRA and its statement of policy and determined that the proposed
withdrawal of determination does not contain a Federal
intergovernmental mandate, nor is it expected to require expenditures
of $100 million or more in any one year by State, local, and Tribal
governments, in the aggregate, or by the private sector. As a result,
the analytical requirements of UMRA do not apply.
H. Review Under the Treasury and General Government Appropriations Act,
1999
Section 654 of the Treasury and General Government Appropriations
Act, 1999 (Pub. L. 105-277) requires Federal agencies to issue a Family
Policymaking Assessment for any rule that may affect family well-being.
This proposed withdrawal of determination would not have any impact on
the autonomy or integrity of the family as an institution. Accordingly,
DOE has concluded that it is not necessary to prepare a Family
Policymaking Assessment.
I. Review Under Executive Order 12630
Pursuant to E.O. 12630, ``Governmental Actions and Interference
with Constitutionally Protected Property Rights,'' 53 FR 8859 (March
18, 1988), DOE has determined that this proposed withdrawal of
determination would not result in any takings that might require
compensation under the Fifth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.
J. Review Under the Treasury and General Government Appropriations Act,
2001
Section 515 of the Treasury and General Government Appropriations
Act, 2001 (44 U.S.C. 3516, note) provides for Federal agencies to
review most disseminations of information to the public under
information quality guidelines established by each agency pursuant to
general guidelines issued by OMB. OMB's guidelines were published at 67
FR 8452 (Feb. 22, 2002), and DOE's guidelines were published at 67 FR
62446 (Oct. 7, 2002). Pursuant to OMB Memorandum M-19-15, Improving
Implementation of the Information Quality Act (April 24, 2019), DOE
published updated guidelines which are available at: www.energy.gov/sites/prod/files/2019/12/f70/DOE%20Final%20Updated%20IQA%20Guidelines%20Dec%202019.pdf. DOE has
reviewed this proposed withdrawal of determination under the OMB and
DOE guidelines and has concluded that it is consistent with applicable
policies in those guidelines.
K. Review Under Executive Order 13211
E.O. 13211, ``Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly
Affect Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use,'' 66 FR 28355 (May 22,
2001), requires Federal agencies to prepare and submit to OIRA at OMB,
a Statement of Energy Effects for any significant energy action. A
``significant energy action'' is defined as any action by an agency
that promulgates or is expected to lead to promulgation of a final
rule, and that: (1) is a significant regulatory action under Executive
Order 12866, or any successor order and is likely to have a significant
adverse effect on the supply, distribution, or use of energy; or (2) is
designated by the Administrator of OIRA as a significant energy action.
For any significant energy action, the agency must give a detailed
statement of any adverse effects on energy supply, distribution, or use
should the proposal be implemented, and of reasonable alternatives to
the action and their expected benefits on energy supply, distribution,
and use.
This proposed withdrawal of determination, which does not amend or
establish energy conservation standards for PESs, is not a significant
regulatory action under E.O. 12866. Moreover, it would not have a
significant adverse effect on the supply, distribution, or use of
energy, nor has it been designated as such by the Administrator at
OIRA. Accordingly, DOE has not prepared a Statement of Energy Effects.
L. Review Under the Information Quality Bulletin for Peer Review
On December 16, 2004, OMB, in consultation with the Office of
Science and Technology Policy (``OSTP''), issued its Final Information
Quality Bulletin for Peer Review (``the Bulletin''). 70 FR 2664 (Jan.
14, 2005). The Bulletin establishes that certain scientific information
shall be peer reviewed by qualified specialists before it is
disseminated by the Federal Government, including influential
scientific information related to agency regulatory actions. The
purpose of the Bulletin is to enhance the quality and credibility of
the Government's scientific information. Under the Bulletin, the energy
conservation standards rulemaking analyses are ``influential scientific
information,'' which the Bulletin defines as ``scientific information
the agency reasonably can determine will have, or does have, a clear
and substantial impact on important public policies or private sector
decisions.'' 70 FR 2664, 2667.
In response to OMB's Bulletin, DOE conducted formal peer reviews of
the energy conservation standards development process and the analyses
that are typically used and prepared a report describing that peer
review.\2\ Generation of this report involved a rigorous, formal, and
documented evaluation using objective criteria and qualified and
independent reviewers to make a judgment as to the technical/
scientific/business merit, the actual or anticipated results, and the
productivity and management effectiveness of programs and/or projects.
Because available data, models, and technological understanding have
changed since 2007, DOE has engaged with the National Academy of
Sciences to review DOE's analytical methodologies to ascertain whether
[[Page 16473]]
modifications are needed to improve the Department's analyses. DOE is
in the process of evaluating the resulting report.\3\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ The 2007 ``Energy Conservation Standards Rulemaking Peer
Review Report'' is available at the following website:
www.energy.gov/eere/buildings/downloads/energy-conservation-standards-rulemaking-peer-review-report-0 (last accessed July 1,
2022).
\3\ The report is available at www.nationalacademies.org/our-work/review-of-methods-for-setting-building-and-equipment-performance-standards.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
M. Review Under Additional Executive Orders and Presidential Memoranda
DOE has examined this proposed withdrawal of determination and has
tentatively determined that it is consistent with the policies and
directives outlined in E.O. 14154 ``Unleashing American Energy,'' E.O.
14192, ``Unleashing Prosperity Through Deregulation,'' and Presidential
Memorandum, ``Delivering Emergency Price Relief for American Families
and Defeating the Cost-of-Living Crisis.'' This proposed withdrawal of
determination, if finalized as proposed, is expected to be an E.O.
14192 deregulatory action.
III. Public Participation
A. Submission of Comments
DOE will accept comments, data, and information regarding this
notification of proposed determination no later than the date provided
in the DATES section at the beginning of this document. Interested
parties may submit comments, data, and other information using any of
the methods described in the ADDRESSES section at the beginning of this
document.
Submitting comments via www.regulations.gov. The
www.regulations.gov web page will require you to provide your name and
contact information. Your contact information will be viewable to DOE
Building Technologies staff only. Your contact information will not be
publicly viewable except for your first and last names, organization
name (if any), and submitter representative name (if any). If your
comment is not processed properly because of technical difficulties,
DOE will use this information to contact you. If DOE cannot read your
comment due to technical difficulties and cannot contact you for
clarification, DOE may not be able to consider your comment.
However, your contact information will be publicly viewable if you
include it in the comment or in any documents attached to your comment.
Any information that you do not want to be publicly viewable should not
be included in your comment, nor in any document attached to your
comment. Otherwise, persons viewing comments will see only first and
last names, organization names, correspondence containing comments, and
any documents submitted with the comments.
Do not submit to www.regulations.gov information for which
disclosure is restricted by statute, such as trade secrets and
commercial or financial information (hereinafter referred to as
Confidential Business Information (``CBI'')). Comments submitted
through www.regulations.gov cannot be claimed as CBI. Comments received
through the website will waive any CBI claims for the information
submitted. For information on submitting CBI, see the Confidential
Business Information section.
DOE processes submissions made through www.regulations.gov before
posting. Normally, comments will be posted within a few days of being
submitted. However, if large volumes of comments are being processed
simultaneously, your comment may not be viewable for up to several
weeks. Please keep the comment tracking number that www.regulations.gov
provides after you have successfully uploaded your comment.
Submitting comments via email. Comments and documents submitted via
email also will be posted to www.regulations.gov. If you do not want
your personal contact information to be publicly viewable, do not
include it in your comment or any accompanying documents. Instead,
provide your contact information in a cover letter. Include your first
and last names, email address, telephone number, and optional mailing
address. With this instruction followed, the cover letter will not be
publicly viewable as long as it does not include any comments.
Include contact information each time you submit comments, data,
documents, and other information to DOE. No faxes will be accepted.
Comments, data, and other information submitted to DOE
electronically should be provided in PDF (preferred), Microsoft Word or
Excel, or text (ASCII) file format. Provide documents that are not
secured, that are written in English, and that are free of any defects
or viruses. Documents should not contain special characters or any form
of encryption and, if possible, they should carry the electronic
signature of the author.
Campaign form letters. Please submit campaign form letters by the
originating organization in batches of between 50 to 500 form letters
per PDF or as one form letter with a list of supporters' names compiled
into one or more PDFs. This reduces comment processing and posting
time.
Confidential Business Information. Pursuant to 10 CFR 1004.11, any
person submitting information that he or she believes to be
confidential and exempt by law from public disclosure should submit via
email two well-marked copies: One copy of the document marked
``confidential'' including all the information believed to be
confidential, and one copy of the document marked ``non-confidential''
with the information believed to be confidential deleted. DOE will make
its own determination about the confidential status of the information
and treat it according to its determination.
It is DOE policy that all comments may be included in the public
docket, without change and as received, including any personal
information provided in the comments (except information deemed to be
exempt from public disclosure).
B. Issues on Which DOE Seeks Comments
DOE welcomes comments on all aspects of this proposed withdrawal of
determination. DOE is particularly interested in receiving comments and
views of interested parties concerning whether withdrawing the coverage
determination of portable electric spas as a covered product is
consistent with the purposes of EPCA.
DOE is also interested in receiving views concerning other relevant
issues that participants believe would affect the tentative conclusions
presented in this document.
After the expiration of the period for submitting written
statements, DOE will consider all comments and additional information
that is obtained from interested parties or through further analyses,
and it may prepare a final withdrawal of the coverage determination for
PESs.
IV. Approval of the Office of the Secretary
The Secretary of Energy has approved publication of this notice of
proposed rulemaking; proposed withdrawal of determination.
List of Subjects in 10 CFR Part 430
Administrative practice and procedure, Confidential business
information, Energy conservation, Household appliances, Imports,
Intergovernmental relations, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements,
and Small businesses.
Signing Authority
This document of the Department of Energy was signed on April 11,
2025, by Louis Hrkman, Principal Deputy
[[Page 16474]]
Assistant Secretary for Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy,
pursuant to delegated authority from the Secretary of Energy. That
document with the original signature and date is maintained by DOE. For
administrative purposes only, and in compliance with requirements of
the Office of the Federal Register, the undersigned DOE Federal
Register Liaison Officer has been authorized to sign and submit the
document in electronic format for publication, as an official document
of the Department of Energy. This administrative process in no way
alters the legal effect of this document upon publication in the
Federal Register.
Signed in Washington, DC, on April 15, 2025.
Treena V. Garrett,
Federal Register Liaison Officer, U.S. Department of Energy.
For the reasons set forth in the preamble, DOE is proposing to
amend part 430 of chapter II, subchapter D, of title 10 of the Code of
Federal Regulations, to read as set forth below:
PART 430--ENERGY CONSERVATION PROGRAM FOR CONSUMER PRODUCTS
0
1. The authority citation for part 430 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 6291-6309; 28 U.S.C. 2461 note.
0
2. Amend Sec. 430.2 by:
0
a. Revising the definition of ``Covered product''; and
0
b. Removing the definition of ``Portable electric spa''.
The revision reads as follows:
Sec. 430.2 Definitions.
* * * * *
Covered product means a consumer product--
(1) Of a type specified in section 322 of the Act; or
(2) That is an air cleaner, battery charger, ceiling fan, ceiling
fan light kit, dehumidifier, external power supply, medium base compact
fluorescent lamp, miscellaneous refrigeration product, portable air
conditioner, or torchiere.
* * * * *
[FR Doc. 2025-06729 Filed 4-17-25; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450-01-P