[Federal Register Volume 90, Number 63 (Thursday, April 3, 2025)]
[Notices]
[Pages 14633-14636]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2025-05692]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A-583-854]
Certain Steel Nails From Taiwan: Preliminary Results of
Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and Partial Rescission of
Review; 2023-2024
AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) preliminarily finds
that Dar Yu Enterprise Co Ltd. (Dar Yu), Liang Chyuan Industrial Co.
Ltd. (Liang Chyuan), Tricera Corp. (Tricera), and Your Standing
International Inc. (YSI) made sales of certain steel nails (nails) from
Taiwan at prices below normal value (NV) during the period of review
(POR), July 1, 2023, through June 30, 2024. Additionally, Commerce is
rescinding this administrative review, in part, with respect to certain
companies that had no entries of subject merchandise during the POR. We
invite interested parties to comment on these preliminary results.
DATES: Applicable April 3, 2025.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Henry Wolfe, AD/CVD Operations, Office
VIII, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration,
U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington,
DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-0574.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On July 13, 2015, Commerce published the antidumping duty (AD)
order on nails from Taiwan.\1\ On July 1, 2024, Commerce published a
notice of opportunity to request an administrative review of the
Order.\2\ On July 31, 2024, Mid Continent Steel & Wire Inc. (Mid
Continent) filed a timely request for review with respect to 23
companies.\3\ Pursuant to this request, on August 14, 2024, Commerce
published the Initiation Notice in the Federal Register.\4\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ See Certain Steel Nails from the Republic of Korea,
Malaysia, the Sultanate of Oman, Taiwan, and the Socialist Republic
of Vietnam: Antidumping Duty Orders, 80 FR 39994 (July 13, 2015)
(Order).
\2\ See Antidumping or Countervailing Duty Order, Finding, or
Suspended Investigation; Opportunity to Request Administrative
Review and Join Annual Inquiry Service List, 89 FR 54437, 54438
(July 1, 2024).
\3\ See Mid Continent's Letter, ``Request for Administrative
Review,'' dated July 31, 2024.
\4\ See Initiation of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Administrative Reviews, 89 FR 66035, 66041 (August 14, 2024)
(Initiation Notice).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In the Initiation Notice, Commerce indicated that, in the event
that it limited the respondents for individual examination in
accordance with section 777A(c)(2) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended (the Act), Commerce intended to select respondents for
individual examination based on U.S. Customs and Border Protection
(CBP) data.\5\ On August 22, 2024, Commerce released CBP entry data to
interested parties and provided interested parties the opportunity to
comment on the CBP data and respondent selection.\6\ No interested
parties filed comments regarding the CBP data or respondent selection.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ Id.
\6\ See Memorandum ``Release of Customs Data from U.S. Customs
and Border Protection,'' dated August 22, 2024.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
On September 17, 2024, Commerce selected Liang Chyuan and Tricera
as mandatory respondents in this review.\7\ On September 19, 2024,
Commerce issued the AD questionnaire to Liang Chyuan and Tricera.\8\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ See Memorandum, ``Respondent Selection,'' dated September
17, 2024.
\8\ See Commerce's Letters, ``Request for Information,'' dated
September 19, 2024 (AD Questionnaire).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Because Liang Chyuan and Tricera did not timely respond, or request
an extension of time to respond to Commerce's AD questionnaire,\9\ on
November 25, 2024, Commerce selected Dar Yu and YSI as additional
mandatory respondents.\10\ On November 27, 2024, Commerce issued the AD
questionnaire to Dar Yu and YSI.\11\ Dar Yu and YSI did not timely
respond, or request an extension of time to respond to Commerce's AD
questionnaire.\12\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\9\ See Memorandum, ``Questionnaire Deadline for Liang Chyuan,''
dated October 11, 2024; see also Memorandum, ``Questionnaire
Deadline for Tricera Corp,'' dated October 11, 2024.
\10\ See Memorandum, ``Selection of Additional Mandatory
Respondents,'' dated November 25, 2024.
\11\ See Commerce's Letters, ``Request for Information,'' dated
November 27, 2024.
\12\ See Memorandum, ``Questionnaire Deadline for Dar Yu,''
dated January 3, 2025; see also Memorandum, ``Questionnaire Deadline
for YSI,'' dated January 3, 2025.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
On December 9, 2024, Commerce tolled the deadline to issue the
preliminary results in this administrative review by 90 days.\13\
Accordingly, the deadline for these preliminary results is now July 1,
2025.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\13\ See Memorandum, ``Tolling of Deadlines for Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Proceedings,'' dated December 9, 2024.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
On February 20, 2025, Commerce set a deadline to file pre-
preliminary comments on the record of this administrative review.\14\
On March 6, 2025, Mid-Continent submitted pre-preliminary comments.\15\
No other interested parties filed pre-preliminary comments.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\14\ See Memorandum, ``Deadline for Pre-Preliminary Comments,''
dated February 20, 2025.
\15\ See Mid-Continent's Letter, ``Pre-Preliminary Comments,''
dated March 6, 2025.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Scope of the Order
The merchandise covered by the order is nails having a nominal
shaft length not exceeding 12 inches.\16\ Nails include, but are not
limited to, nails made from round wire and nails that are cut from
flat-rolled steel. Nails may be of one piece construction or
constructed of two or more pieces. Nails may be produced from any type
of steel, and may have any type of surface finish, head type, shank,
point type and shaft diameter. Finishes include, but are not limited
to, coating in vinyl, zinc (galvanized, including but not limited to
electroplating or hot dipping one or more times), phosphate, cement,
and paint. Nails may have one or more surface finishes. Head styles
include, but are not limited to, flat, projection, cupped, oval, brad,
headless, double, countersunk, and sinker. Shank styles include, but
are not limited to, smooth, barbed, screw threaded, ring shank and
fluted. Screw-threaded nails subject to this proceeding are driven
using direct force and not by turning the nail using a tool that
engages with the head. Point
[[Page 14634]]
styles include, but are not limited to, diamond, needle, chisel and
blunt or no point. Nails may be sold in bulk, or they may be collated
in any manner using any material.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\16\ The shaft length of nails with flat heads or parallel
shoulders under the head shall be measured from under the head or
shoulder to the tip of the point. The shaft length of all other
nails shall be measured overall.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Excluded from the scope of the order are nails packaged in
combination with one or more non-subject articles, if the total number
of nails of all types, in aggregate regardless of size, is less than
25. If packaged in combination with one or more non-subject articles,
nails remain subject merchandise if the total number of nails of all
types, in aggregate regardless of size, is equal to or greater than 25,
unless otherwise excluded based on the other exclusions below.
Also excluded from the scope are nails with a nominal shaft length
of one inch or less that are (a) a component of an unassembled article,
(b) the total number of nails is sixty (60) or less, and (c) the
imported unassembled article falls into one of the following eight
groupings: (1) Builders' joinery and carpentry of wood that are
classifiable as windows, French-windows and their frames; (2) builders'
joinery and carpentry of wood that are classifiable as doors and their
frames and thresholds; (3) swivel seats with variable height
adjustment; (4) seats that are convertible into beds (with the
exception of those classifiable as garden seats or camping equipment);
(5) seats of cane, osier, bamboo or similar materials; (6) other seats
with wooden frames (with the exception of seats of a kind used for
aircraft or motor vehicles); (7) furniture (other than seats) of wood
(with the exception of (i) medical, surgical, dental or veterinary
furniture; and (ii) barbers' chairs and similar chairs, having rotating
as well as both reclining and elevating movements); or (8) furniture
(other than seats) of materials other than wood, metal, or plastics
(e.g., furniture of cane, osier, bamboo or similar materials). The
aforementioned imported unassembled articles are currently classified
under the following Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States
(HTSUS) subheadings: 4418.10, 4418.20, 9401.30, 9401.40, 9401.51,
9401.59, 9401.61, 9401.69, 9403.30, 9403.40, 9403.50, 9403.60, 9403.81,
or 9403.89.
Also excluded from the scope of the order are nails that meet the
specifications of Type I, Style 20 nails as identified in Tables 29
through 33 of ASTM Standard F1667 (2013 revision).
Also excluded from the scope of the order are nails suitable for
use in powder-actuated hand tools, whether or not threaded, which are
currently classified under HTSUS subheadings 7317.00.20.00 and
7317.00.30.00.
Also excluded from the scope of the order are nails having a case
hardness greater than or equal to 50 on the Rockwell Hardness C scale
(HRC), a carbon content greater than or equal to 0.5 percent, a round
head, a secondary reduced-diameter raised head section, a centered
shank, and a smooth symmetrical point, suitable for use in gas-actuated
hand tools.
Also excluded from the scope of the order are corrugated nails. A
corrugated nail is made up of a small strip of corrugated steel with
sharp points on one side.
Also excluded from the scope of the order are thumb tacks, which
are currently classified under HTSUS subheading 7317.00.10.00.
Nails subject to the order are currently classified under HTSUS
subheadings 7317.00.55.02, 7317.00.55.03, 7317.00.55.05, 7317.00.55.07,
7317.00.55.08, 7317.00.55.11, 7317.00.55.18, 7317.00.55.19,
7317.00.55.20, 7317.00.55.30, 7317.00.55.40, 7317.00.55.50,
7317.00.55.60, 7317.00.55.70, 7317.00.55.80, 7317.00.55.90,
7317.00.65.30, 7317.00.65.60, and 7317.00.75.00. Nails subject to these
orders also may be classified under HTSUS subheadings 7907.00.60.00,
8206.00.00.00, 7806.00.80.00, 7318.29.00.00, or other HTSUS
subheadings.
While the HTSUS subheadings are provided for convenience and
customs purposes, the written description of the scope of the Order is
dispositive.
Partial Rescission of Review
Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.213(d)(3), it is Commerce's practice to
rescind an administrative review of an AD order when there are no
reviewable entries of subject merchandise during the POR for which
liquidation is suspended.\17\ Normally, upon completion of an
administrative review, the suspended entries are liquidated at the AD
assessment rate calculated for the review period.\18\ Therefore, for an
administrative review to be conducted, there must be at least one
reviewable, suspended entry that Commerce can instruct CBP to liquidate
at the AD assessment rate calculated for the review period.\19\ There
were no entries of subject merchandise during the POR for 19 of the
companies subject to review.\20\ As a result, on December 2, 2024,
Commerce notified all interested parties of its intent to rescind this
review, in part, with respect to these 19 companies and received no
comments.\21\ Therefore, we are rescinding this review, in part, with
respect to these 19 companies which had no suspended entries in the
POR. The administrative review remains active with respect to four
companies.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\17\ See, e.g., Dioctyl Terephthalate from the Republic of
Korea: Rescission of Antidumping Administrative Review; 2021-2022,
88 FR 24758 (April 24, 2023); see also Certain Carbon and Alloy
Steel Cut-to-Length Plate from the Federal Republic of Germany:
Recission of Antidumping Administrative Review; 2020-2021, 88 FR
4154 (January 24, 2023).
\18\ See 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1).
\19\ See 19 CFR 351.213(d)(3).
\20\ See Appendix for a list of these companies.
\21\ See Memorandum, ``Notice of Intent to Rescind Review, In
Part,'' dated December 2, 2024.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Facts Available With Adverse Inferences
Section 776(a) of the Act provides that, subject to section 782(d)
of the Act, Commerce shall apply ``facts otherwise available'' if,
inter alia, necessary information is not on the record or an interested
party or any other person: (A) withholds information that has been
requested; (B) fails to provide information within the deadlines
established, or in the form and manner requested by Commerce, subject
to subsections (c)(1) and (e) of section 782 of the Act; (C)
significantly impedes a proceeding; or (D) provides information that
cannot be verified as provided by section 782(i) of the Act.
Where Commerce determines that a response to a request for
information does not comply with the request, section 782(d) of the Act
provides that Commerce will so inform the party submitting the response
and will, to the extent practicable, provide that party the opportunity
to remedy or explain the deficiency. If the party fails to remedy the
deficiency within the applicable time limits and subject to section
782(e) of the Act, Commerce may disregard all or part of the original
and subsequent responses, as appropriate.
Section 776(b) of the Act provides that Commerce may use an adverse
inference in applying the facts otherwise available when a party has
failed to cooperate by not acting to the best of its ability to comply
with a request for information. In doing so, Commerce is not required
to determine, or make any adjustments to, a weighted average dumping
margin based on any assumptions about information an interested party
would have provided if the interested party had complied with the
request for information.\22\ Further, section 776(b)(2) of the Act
states that an adverse inference may include reliance on information
derived from
[[Page 14635]]
the petition, the final determination from the AD investigation, a
previous administrative review, or other information placed on the
record.\23\ The SAA explains that Commerce may employ an adverse
inference ``to ensure that the party does not obtain a more favorable
result by failing to cooperate than if it had cooperated fully.'' \24\
Further, affirmative evidence of bad faith on the part of a respondent
is not required before Commerce may make an adverse inference.\25\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\22\ See sections 776(b)(1)(B) and 776(d)(3)(A) of the Act.
\23\ See 19 CFR 351.308(c).
\24\ See Statement of Administrative Action Accompanying the
Uruguay Round Agreements Act, H.R. Doc. No. 103-316, 103d Cong., 2d
Session, vol. 1 (1994) (SAA) at 870.
\25\ See, e.g., Notice of Final Determination of Sales at Less
Than Fair Value: Circular Seamless Stainless Steel Hollow Products
from Japan, 65 FR 42985 (July 12, 2000); and Antidumping Duties,
Countervailing Duties, 62 FR 27296, 27340 (May 19, 1997); and Nippon
Steel Corp. v. United States, 337 F.3d 1373, 1382-83 (Fed. Cir.
2003).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Section 776(c) of the Act provides that, in general, when Commerce
relies on secondary information rather than on information obtained in
the course of an investigation, it shall, to the extent practicable,
corroborate that information from independent sources that are
reasonably at its disposal.\26\ Secondary information is defined as
information derived from the petition that gave rise to the
investigation, the final determination concerning the subject
merchandise, or any previous review under section 751 of the Act
concerning the subject merchandise.\27\ When selecting facts available
with an adverse inference, Commerce is not required to estimate what
the dumping margin would have been if the interested party failing to
cooperate had cooperated or to demonstrate that the dumping margin
reflects an ``alleged commercial reality'' of the interested party.\28\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\26\ See 19 CFR 351.308(d).
\27\ See SAA at 870.
\28\ See section 776(d)(3)(B) of the Act.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Pursuant to sections 776(a)(1) and 776(a)(2)(A)-(C) of the Act,
Commerce is preliminarily relying upon facts otherwise available to
assign estimated dumping margins to mandatory respondents Dar Yu, Liang
Chyuan, Tricera, and YSI because all four companies were unresponsive
to our requests for information, thereby withholding necessary
information that was requested by Commerce, failing to provide the
information requested by the specified deadlines in the form and manner
requested, and significantly impeding the conduct of the review.
Further, Commerce preliminarily finds that Dar Yu, Liang Chyuan,
Tricera, and YSI failed to cooperate by not acting to the best of their
ability to comply with requests for information and, thus, Commerce is
applying an adverse inference in selecting among the facts available,
in accordance with section 776(b) of the Act. As adverse facts
available, we are assigning these companies a rate of 78.17 percent,
which is the highest rate applied in any segment of this
proceeding.\29\ Pursuant to section 776(c)(2) of the Act, Commerce is
not required to corroborate any dumping margin applied in a separate
segment of the same proceeding.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\29\ See Certain Steel Nails from Taiwan: Preliminary Results of
Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and Partial Rescission of
Administrative Review; 2015-2016, 82 FR 36744 (August 7, 2017), and
accompanying Preliminary Decision Memorandum, unchanged in Certain
Steel Nails from Taiwan: Final Results of Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review and Partial Rescission of Administrative
Review; 2015-2016, 83 FR 6163 (February 13, 2018).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Preliminary Results
Commerce preliminarily determines that the following estimated
weighted-average dumping margin exists for the period, July 1, 2023,
through June 30, 2024:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Weighted-
average
Producer or exporter dumping
margin
(percent)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dar Yu Enterprise Co Ltd.................................... 78.17
Liang Chyuan Industrial Co. Ltd............................. 78.17
Tricera Corp................................................ 78.17
Your Standing International Inc............................. 78.17
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Disclosure
Normally, Commerce discloses to interested parties the calculations
performed in connection with a preliminary determination within five
days of any public announcement or, if there is no public announcement,
within five days of the date of publication of the notice of
preliminary determination in the Federal Register, in accordance with
19 CFR 351.224(b). However, because Commerce preliminarily applied
total adverse facts available to the four companies subject to this
review, in accordance with section 776 of the Act, there are no
calculations to disclose.
Public Comment
Case briefs or other written comments may be submitted to the
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. Pursuant to 19 CFR
351.309(c)(1)(ii), we have modified the deadline for interested parties
to submit case briefs to Commerce to no later than 21 days after the
date of the publication of this notice.\30\ Rebuttal briefs, limited to
issues raised in the case briefs, may be filed no later than five days
after the date for filing case briefs.\31\ Interested parties who
submit case or rebuttal briefs in this proceeding must submit: (1) a
table of contents listing each issue; and (2) a table of
authorities.\32\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\30\ See 19 CFR 351.303 (for general filing requirements).
\31\ See 19 CFR 351.309(d); see also Administrative Protective
Order, Service, and Other Procedures in Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Proceedings, 88 FR 67069, 67077 (September 29,
2023) (APO and Service Final Rule).
\32\ See 19 CFR 351.309(c)(2) and (d)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
As provided under 19 CFR 351.309(c)(2) and (d)(2), in prior
proceedings we have encouraged interested parties to provide an
executive summary of their brief that should be limited to five pages
total, including footnotes. In this review, we instead request that
interested parties provide at the beginning of their briefs a public,
executive summary for each issue raised in their briefs. Further, we
request that interested parties limit their public executive summary of
each issue to no more than 450 words, not including citations. We
intend to use the executive summaries as the basis of the comment
summaries included in the issues and decision memorandum that will
accompany the final determination in this review. We request that
interested parties include footnotes for relevant citations in the
public executive summary of each issue. Note that Commerce has amended
certain of its requirements pertaining to the service of documents in
19 CFR 351.303(f).\33\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\33\ See APO and Service Final Rule.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.310(c), interested parties who wish to
request a hearing must submit a written request to the Assistant
Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance, filed electronically via
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service
System (ACCESS). Requests should contain: (1) the party's name,
address, and telephone number; (2) the number of participants and
whether any participant is a foreign national; and (3) a list of issues
to be discussed. Issues raised in the hearing will be limited to those
raised in the respective case briefs. An electronically filed hearing
request must be received successfully in its entirety by Commerce's
electronic records system, ACCESS, within 30 days after the date of
publication of this notice. If a request for a hearing is made,
Commerce intends to hold a hearing at a time and date to be
determined.\34\
[[Page 14636]]
Parties should confirm the date, time, and location of the hearing two
days before the scheduled date. All submissions, including case and
rebuttal briefs, as well as hearing requests, should be filed using
ACCESS.\35\ An electronically-filed document must be received
successfully in its entirety by ACCESS by 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time on the
established deadline.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\34\ See 19 CFR 351.310(d).
\35\ See 19 CFR 351.303.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Assessment Rates
Consistent with section 751(a)(1) of the Act and 19 CFR
351.212(b)(1), upon issuing the final results of this review, Commerce
will determine, and CBP shall assess, antidumping duties on all
appropriate entries covered by this review.\36\ Commerce intends to
issue assessment instructions to CBP no earlier than 35 days after the
date of publication of the final results of this review in the Federal
Register. If a timely summons is filed at the U.S. Court of
International Trade, the assessment instructions will direct CBP not to
liquidate relevant entries until the time for parties to file a request
for a statutory injunction has expired (i.e., within 90 days of
publication).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\36\ See 19 CFR 351.212(b).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
With respect to the companies for which we have rescinded this
review, Commerce will instruct CBP to assess antidumping duties on all
appropriate entries at rates equal to the cash deposit rate of
estimated antidumping duties required at the time of entry, or
withdrawal from warehouse, for consumption, during the POR, in
accordance with 19 CFR 351.212(c)(1)(i). Commerce intends to issue
rescission instructions to CBP no earlier than 35 days after the date
of publication of this notice in the Federal Register.
Cash Deposit Instructions
The following cash deposit requirements will be effective upon
publication in the Federal Register of the notice of final results of
administrative review for all shipments of nails from Taiwan entered,
or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after the date of
publication, as provided for by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1)
the cash deposit rate for Dar Yu, Liang Chyuan, Tricera, and YSI will
be equal to the weighted-average dumping margin established in the
final results of this review; (2) for merchandise exported by a company
not covered in this review but covered in a prior completed segment of
the proceeding, the cash deposit rate will continue to be the company
specific rate published in the completed segment for the most recent
period; (3) if the exporter is not a firm covered in this review or
another completed segment of this proceeding, but the producer is, then
the cash deposit rate will be the company-specific rate established for
the completed segment for the most recent period for the producer of
the merchandise; and (4) the cash deposit rate for all other producers
or exporters will continue to be 2.16 percent, the all-others rate
established in the less-than-fair-value investigation.\37\ These cash
deposit requirements, when imposed, shall remain in effect until
further notice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\37\ See Certain Steel Nails from Taiwan: Notice of Court
Decision Not in Harmony With Final Determination in Less Than Fair
Value Investigation and Notice of Amended Final Determination, 82 FR
55090 (November 20, 2017).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Final Results of the Review
Unless the deadline is otherwise extended, Commerce intends to
issue the final results of this administrative review, including the
results of its analysis of issues raised by interested parties in the
written briefs, within 120 days after the date of publication of this
notice in the Federal Register, pursuant to section 751(a)(3)(A) of the
Act and 19 CFR 351.213(h)(1).
Notification to Importers
This notice serves as a preliminary reminder to importers of their
responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate
regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation
of the relevant entries during this review period. Failure to comply
with this requirement could result in Commerce's presumption that
reimbursement of antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent
assessment of double antidumping duties.
Notification to Interested Parties
We are issuing and publishing these preliminary results in
accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i) of the Act, and 19 CFR
351.213(h) and 351.221(b)(4).
Dated: March 27, 2025.
Christopher Abbott,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy and Negotiations, Performing the
non-exclusive functions and duties of the Assistant Secretary for
Enforcement and Compliance.
Appendix
Companies for Which Commerce Is Rescinding the Administrative Review
1. Cool Shot Ltd.
2. Chunyu Factory Co., Ltd
3. Create Trading Co., Ltd.
4. Fang Sheng Screw Co., Ltd
5. Fwang Tzay Enterprise Corp
6. Home Value Co., Ltd.
7. Hsi Yi Enterprise Co. Ltd.
8. Hsin Ho Mfg. Co., Ltd.
9. JCH Hardware Company, Inc.
10. Joker Industrial Co., Ltd.
11. Leading Hardware Corporation
12. Panther T & H Industry Co., Ltd.
13. Perfect Seller Co., Ltd.
14. Phoenix Merchandise Inc.
15. Sanji Co., Ltd.
16. Sourcing Metrics Ltd.
17. TG Co., Ltd
18. Xiamen Huiyu Chemical Trading Co.
19. Yeun Chang Hardware Tool Company Limited
[FR Doc. 2025-05692 Filed 4-2-25; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P