[Federal Register Volume 90, Number 49 (Friday, March 14, 2025)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 12108-12109]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2025-04129]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

National Park Service

36 CFR Part 7

[NPS-GLCA-NPS39678; NPS-2024-0005; PPIMGLCAA0.PPMPSAS1Z.Y00000-
255P10361]
RIN 1024-AE91


Glen Canyon National Recreation Area; Motor Vehicles; 
Postponement of Effective Date

AGENCY: National Park Service, Interior.

ACTION: Final rule; postponement of effective date.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This action further postpones the effective date for a rule 
published on January 13, 2025, pending judicial review.

DATES: As of March 14, 2025, the effective date of the rule amending 36 
CFR part 7 published at 90 FR 2621, January 13, 2025, delayed on 
February 13, 2025, at 90 FR 9518, is postponed indefinitely, pending 
judicial review. The National Park Service (NPS) will publish a 
document in the Federal Register announcing the new effective date or 
other dates the public may need to know.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Michelle Kerns, Superintendent, Glen 
Canyon National Recreation Area, P.O. Box 1507, Page, Arizona 86040, by 
phone at 928-608-6210, or by email at [email protected]. 
Individuals in the United States who are deaf, deafblind, hard of 
hearing, or have a speech disability may dial 711 (TTY, TDD, or 
TeleBraille) to access telecommunications relay services. Individuals 
outside the United States should use the relay services offered within 
their country to make international calls to the point-of-contact in 
the United States.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On January 13, 2025, the NPS published a 
final rule revising special regulations at Glen Canyon National 
Recreation Area to update rules about the use of motor vehicles on 
roads and off roads on designated routes and areas (the ``Final Rule''; 
90 FR 2621). On January 20, 2025, the President issued a memorandum 
titled ``Regulatory Freeze Pending Review'' (``Freeze Memo''). The 
Freeze Memo directed all executive departments and agencies to consider 
postponing for 60 days from the date of the Freeze Memo the effective 
date for any rules that had been published in the Federal Register but 
had not yet taken effect for the purpose of reviewing any questions of 
fact, law, and policy that the rules may raise.
    On February 13, the NPS published an action delaying the effective 
date for the Final Rule until March 21, 2025 (90 FR 9518) for the 
purpose of giving agency officials the opportunity to further review 
any questions of fact, law, and policy that the Final Rule may raise.
    After conducting that review, the NPS has determined that justice 
requires an indefinite postponement of the effective date of the Final 
Rule, pending resolution of ongoing litigation. Under section 705 of 
the Administrative Procedure Act ``[w]hen an agency finds that justice 
so requires, it may postpone the effective date of action taken by it, 
pending judicial review.'' 5 U.S.C. 705. The State of Utah, Wayne and 
Garfield Counties, and the Utah School and Institutional Trust Lands 
Administration have challenged the special regulations for motor 
vehicle use at Glen Canyon National Recreation Area that were 
promulgated in 2021 (the ``2021 Rule''; 86 FR 3804) and the 
corresponding off-road vehicle management plan (``ORV plan''). State of 
Utah v. Haaland, 4:24-cv-00048 (D. Utah). The plaintiffs allege 
numerous legal deficiencies, including claimed State interests in roads 
affected by the 2021 Rule, the plaintiffs' inability to economically 
develop school trust lands accessed from roads managed by the ORV Plan, 
and the opportunity for Department of the Interior agencies to better 
coordinate motorized vehicle regulation across jurisdictional 
boundaries. While the plaintiffs' challenge is to the 2021 Rule, many 
of the issues raised in that litigation, including the effects of off-
road vehicle management on State interests and school trust lands, are 
also relevant to the Final Rule.
    The NPS has determined that postponing the effective date of the 
Final Rule and preserving the regulatory status quo of the 2021 Rule 
pending the resolution of ongoing litigation regarding that rule is 
necessary in order to avoid unduly foreclosing potential remedies, 
ensure proper adjudication of these claims, and avoid creating a 
shifting regulatory landscape that may frustrate resolution of the 
issues raised in that litigation. Maintaining the status quo will also 
serve the public interest by avoiding confusion with the public on what 
motorized uses are allowed in the Recreation Area and avoiding 
unnecessary and costly agency operations to implement additional 
changes while the previous changes are the subject of the pending 
litigation.
    Additionally, the Bureau of Land Management (``BLM'') released its 
Travel Management Plan for the Henry Mountains and Freemont Gorge Area 
on January 17, 2025, shortly after the publication of the Final Rule. 
This area is adjacent to the Recreation Area, and roads from the 
Recreation Area extend into this BLM planning area, and vice versa. 
Postponing the effective date of the Final Rule will allow for ongoing 
coordination on these matters that will better inform the adjudication 
of the pending claims from the State of Utah and the other plaintiffs.
    Finally, the National Parks Conservation Association and Southern 
Utah Wilderness Alliance, parties to the Settlement Agreement under 
which the Final Rule was published, have been granted intervenor status 
in the challenge from the State of Utah to the 2021 Rule, so that the 
interests of all parties will be heard and adequately protected by 
resolution of these issues in that forum. In light of this active 
litigation, the NPS has concluded that justice requires it to postpone 
the effective date for the Final Rule until the

[[Page 12109]]

judicial challenges to the 2021 Rule are resolved.
    In addition to the ongoing judicial review of the 2021 Rule, which 
as described above raises issues relevant to the Final Rule, the United 
States House of Representatives and the United States Senate have both 
introduced joint resolutions providing for congressional disapproval of 
the Final Rule under the Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. chapter 8. 
See H.J. Res. 60 (referred to the House Committee on Natural Resources 
on February 21, 2025) and S.J. Res. 30 (placed on the Senate 
Legislative Calendar on March 4, 2025). These resolutions create 
additional uncertainty for the parties about whether the Final Rule 
will become effective or will remain in effect if it does, providing 
additional support for this decision to further postpone the effective 
date of the Final Rule.

Maureen D. Foster,
Chief of Staff, Exercising the Delegated Authority of the Assistant 
Secretary for Fish and Wildlife and Parks.
[FR Doc. 2025-04129 Filed 3-13-25; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4312-52-P