[Federal Register Volume 90, Number 40 (Monday, March 3, 2025)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 11029]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2025-03300]



[[Page 11029]]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Office of the Secretary

45 CFR Subtitle A


Policy on Adhering to the Text of the Administrative Procedure 
Act

AGENCY: Office of the Secretary, Department of Health and Human 
Services.

ACTION: Policy statement.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of Health and Human Services' (the Department) 
Immediate Office of the Secretary is rescinding the policy on Public 
Participation in Rule Making (Richardson Waiver) and re-aligning the 
Department's rule-making procedures with the Administrative Procedure 
Act.

DATES: March 3, 2025.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean R. Keveney, Acting General 
Counsel, Office of the General Counsel, HHS. 200 Independence Avenue 
SW, Washington, DC 20201. 202-690-7741.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Administrative Procedure Act (APA) 
establishes procedures for the issuance of rules and regulations. 5 
U.S.C. 553. An agency generally is required to publish a notice of 
proposed rulemaking in the Federal Register; give interested persons an 
opportunity to participate in the rulemaking through the submission of 
written data, views, or arguments; and publish a final rule that is 
accompanied by a statement of the rule's basis and purpose. 5 U.S.C. 
553. The APA exempts from these requirements ``matter(s) relating to 
agency management or personnel or to public property, loans, grants, 
benefits, or contracts.'' 5 U.S.C. 553(a)(2). The APA also permits an 
agency to forgo these requirements for ``good cause'' when the agency 
finds that the procedures are ``impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary 
to the public interest.'' 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B).
    In a 1971 Federal Register document, the Department adopted a 
policy that waived the APA's statutory exemption from procedural 
rulemaking requirements for rules and regulations relating to public 
property, loans, grants, benefits, or contracts (Richardson Waiver). 36 
FR 2532 (Feb. 5, 1971). The Richardson Waiver thus required the 
Department to use the APA's notice and comment rulemaking procedures 
for these types of matters. The policy also instructed the Department 
to use the good cause exception ``sparingly.'' Id. The Department later 
proposed a rule to formally confirm the policy regarding the 
Department's use of rulemaking procedures for rules and regulations 
relating to public property, loans, grants, benefits, or contracts. 47 
FR 26860 (June 22, 1982). The proposed rule was never adopted.
    The policy waiving the statutory exemption for rules relating to 
public property, loans, grants, benefits, or contracts is contrary to 
the clear text of the APA and imposes on the Department obligations 
beyond the maximum procedural requirements specified in the APA. See 
Perez v. Mortgage Bankers Ass'n, 575 U.S. 92, 100 (2015) (finding that 
courts lack authority to impose obligations ``beyond the `maximum 
procedural requirements' specified in the APA''). The text of the APA 
recognizes that it is necessary and appropriate to issue rules relating 
to agency management or personnel or to public property, loans, grants, 
benefits, or contracts without notice and comment procedures. It also 
is contrary to the clear text of the APA to use the good cause 
exception ``sparingly.'' The extra-statutory obligations of the 
Richardson Waiver impose costs on the Department and the public, are 
contrary to the efficient operation of the Department, and impede the 
Department's flexibility to adapt quickly to legal and policy mandates.
    Effective immediately, the Richardson Waiver is rescinded and is no 
longer the policy of the Department. In accordance with the APA, 
``matters relating to agency management or personnel or to public 
property, loans, grants, benefits, or contracts,'' are exempt from the 
notice and comment procedures of 5 U.S.C. 553, except as otherwise 
required by law. Agencies and offices of the Department have discretion 
to apply notice and comment procedures to these matters but are not 
required to do so, except as otherwise required by law. Additionally, 
the good cause exception should be used in appropriate circumstances in 
accordance with the requirements of the APA. The Department will 
continue to follow notice and comment rulemaking procedures in all 
instances in which it is required to do so by the statutory text of the 
APA.

Robert F. Kennedy, Jr.,
Secretary, Department of Health and Human Services.
[FR Doc. 2025-03300 Filed 2-28-25; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4150-26-P