[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 155 (Monday, August 12, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Pages 65670-65671]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-17841]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

[Investigation No. 337-TA-1350]


Certain Integrated Circuits, Components Thereof, and Products 
Containing the Same; Notice of Commission Determination To Grant in 
Part a Joint Motion To Terminate the Investigation Due to Settlement; 
Denial of Request To Take No Position With Respect to Unreviewed Issues 
Addressed in Initial Determination; Termination of Investigation

AGENCY: U.S. International Trade Commission.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade 
Commission (``Commission'') has determined to grant in part a joint 
motion to terminate this investigation in view of a settlement 
agreement. Specifically, the Commission has determined to grant the 
motion to terminate but denies the request to reconsider its previous 
determination not to review and take no position with respect to the 
unreviewed issues addressed in the final initial determination 
(``FID''). This investigation is hereby terminated in its entirety.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Carl P. Bretscher, Esq., Office of the 
General Counsel, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW, 
Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 205-2382. Copies of non-
confidential documents filed in connection with this investigation may 
be viewed on the Commission's electronic docket (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov. For help accessing EDIS, please email 
[email protected]. General information concerning the Commission may 
also be obtained by accessing its internet server at https://www.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired persons are advised that information on 
this matter can be obtained by contacting the Commission's TDD terminal 
on (202) 205-1810.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On January 24, 2023, the Commission 
instituted the above-captioned investigation based on a complaint, as 
supplemented, filed by Realtek Semiconductor Corporation of Hsinchu, 
Taiwan (``Realtek''). 88 FR 4205-06 (Jan. 24, 2023). The complaint, as 
supplemented, alleges that respondent Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. of 
Santa Clara, California (``AMD'') violated section 337 of the Tariff 
Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C 1337, by importing into the United 
States, selling for importation, or selling within the United States 
after importation certain integrated circuits, components thereof, and 
products containing the same that infringe one or more asserted claims 
of U.S. Patent Nos. 7,936,245 (``the '245 patent''); 8,006,218 (``the 
'218 patent''); or 9,590,582 (``the '582 patent''). The complaint 
alleges that a domestic industry exists. The Office of Unfair Import 
Investigations is not participating in this investigation.
    The presiding administrative law judge (``ALJ'') held a claim 
construction (Markman) hearing on June 5, 2023. The ALJ issued the 
claim construction order on July 25, 2023. Order No. 21 (July 25, 
2023).
    On June 20, 2023, AMD moved to preclude Mr. Steve Baik, Realtek's 
outside counsel, from testifying as a fact witness in the evidentiary 
hearing. On July 7, 2023, the ALJ issued Order No. 19, ordering AMD to 
show cause why Winston & Strawn (``Winston''), AMD's counsel, should 
not be disqualified due to an alleged conflict of interest. Order No. 
19 at 2 (July 7, 2023).
    On August 4, 2023, the ALJ held a teleconference with the parties 
regarding Mr. Baik and Winston. On August 17, 2023, the ALJ issued 
Order No. 23, which granted AMD's motion to preclude Mr. Baik from 
testifying on behalf of Realtek but did not disqualify Winston. Order 
No. 23 at 1 (Aug. 17, 2023). On August 24, 2023, the ALJ denied 
Realtek's motions for reconsideration and for interlocutory review of 
Order No. 23. Order No. 24 (Aug. 24, 2023). On September 6, 2023, 
Realtek filed a petition in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal 
Circuit (``Federal Circuit'') seeking a writ of mandamus to order the 
ALJ to vacate the ruling striking Mr. Baik. The Federal Circuit denied 
the petition on September 25, 2023. In re Realtek

[[Page 65671]]

Semiconductor Corp., Appeal No. 2023-147, On Petition and Motion (Sept. 
25, 2023).
    On October 16, 2023, the ALJ issued an order regarding AMD's motion 
to sanction Realtek for failing to accurately answer certain 
interrogatories and produce relevant documents regarding Realtek's 
earlier litigations against Avago Technologies General IP (Singapore) 
Pte., Ltd and Broadcom Corp. in the U.S. District Court for the 
District of Delaware. Order No. 39 (Oct. 16, 2023). Order No. 39 
determined Realtek had engaged in sanctionable acts during discovery, 
but deferred ruling on AMD's sanctions motion until after the hearing. 
The ALJ ultimately sanctioned Realtek for discovery misconduct.
    The ALJ held an evidentiary hearing from October 16-20, 2023.
    On November 14, 2023, the Commission terminated the investigation 
as to claim 9 of the '582 patent and claim 14 of the '218 patent, based 
on Realtek's withdrawal of those claims. Order No. 40 (Oct. 20, 2023), 
unreviewed by Comm'n Notice (Nov. 14, 2023).
    On January 19, 2024, the presiding ALJ issued a combined FID and 
Recommended Determination on Remedy and Bond (``RD''). The FID finds no 
violation of section 337 for any of the three patents at issue because: 
(i) asserted claims 1, 2, and 8 of the '245 patent are infringed but 
invalid as anticipated; (ii) asserted claims 12, 13, and 15-18 of the 
'218 patent are infringed but invalid as obvious; (iii) asserted claims 
1-4 of the '582 patent are not infringed, while claims 1-3 (but not 
claim 4) are also invalid as obvious; and (iv) Realtek failed to 
satisfy the economic prong of the domestic industry requirement for any 
of the three asserted patents. FID at 252. The FID also finds that 
Realtek satisfied the technical prong of the domestic industry 
requirement for each patent. Id.
    On February 2, 2024, Realtek and AMD each filed petitions for 
review of certain adverse findings in the FID. Realtek, however, did 
not petition for review of the FID's finding that the asserted claims 
of the '245 patent are invalid. On February 12, 2024, Realtek and AMD 
filed their respective responses to the opposing petitions for review.
    On June 11, 2024, the Commission determined to review the FID in 
part. 89 FR 51366-70 (June 17, 2024) (``WTR Notice''). In particular, 
the Commission determined to review the FID's findings on claim 
construction, infringement, and anticipation or obviousness of the 
asserted claims of the '218 patent and '582 patent, the economic prong 
of the domestic industry requirement, and the sanction against Realtek. 
The Commission did not review, and thus adopted, the FID's findings 
that the asserted claims of the '245 patent are invalid, that the 
claims of the '218 patent are not invalid for lack of written 
description or enablement, that the claims of the '518 patent are not 
invalid for lack of written description, that Mr. Baik was properly 
precluded from testifying as a fact witness at the evidentiary hearing, 
and that Winston should not be disqualified from representing AMD. The 
Commission included a briefing schedule for the issues under review and 
remedy, bond, and the public interest.
    On June 19, 2024, the parties filed a joint motion to terminate the 
investigation due to a settlement agreement and to suspend the 
Commission's briefing schedule. The parties also requested that the 
Commission reconsider its previous determination not to review certain 
findings in the FID and, on review, take no position on any findings.
    On June 27, 2024, the Commission determined to suspend briefing on 
the issues under review and on remedy, bond, and the public interest, 
pending resolution of the parties' motion to terminate. See Comm'n 
Notice (June 27, 2024).
    On July 26, 2024, the parties corrected their joint motion by 
replacing the original, overly redacted public version of their term 
sheet with a version that was properly redacted in compliance with 
Commission Rules 201.6(a), 210.21(b), 19 CFR 201.6(a), 210.21(b).
    Upon review of the parties' submissions, the Commission has 
determined to terminate the investigation due to the settlement 
agreement, in accordance with Commission Rule 210.21(b), 19 CFR 
210.21(b). The Commission finds that the parties have represented that 
their settlement agreement resolves all issues in this and other 
litigations, and that there are no other agreements, written or oral, 
express or implied, between the parties concerning the subject matter 
of this investigation, in satisfaction of Commission Rule 210.21(b), 19 
CFR 210.21(b). The Commission denies the request to reconsider its 
previous determinations not to review certain findings in the FID, as 
set forth in the Commission's WTR Notice, and on review to take no 
position with respect to the unreviewed issues addressed in the FID. 
Pursuant to Commission Rule 210.42(h), 19 CFR 210.42(h), unreviewed 
initial determinations become the final determinations of the 
Commission. While the Commission may reconsider its prior determination 
on whether to review an initial determination under Rule 210.47, 19 CFR 
210.47, the parties have presented no good cause or other justification 
for doing so here. See Corrected Joint Mot. at 2-4.
    This investigation is hereby terminated in its entirety.
    The Commission vote for this determination took place on August 6, 
2024.
    The authority for the Commission's determination is contained in 
section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and 
in part 210 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 
part 210).

    By order of the Commission.

    Issued: August 6, 2024.
Sharon Bellamy,
Supervisory Hearings and Information Officer.
[FR Doc. 2024-17841 Filed 8-9-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P