[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 114 (Wednesday, June 12, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Pages 49911-49916]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-12825]



[[Page 49911]]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET


Statistical Policy Directive No. 10 Standard Occupational 
Classification (SOC)--Request for Comments on Possible Revision for 
2028

AGENCY: Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Office of 
Management and Budget, Executive Office of the President.

ACTION: Notice of solicitation of comments to revise the SOC for 2028.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Office of Management and Budget (OMB), on behalf of the 
Standard Occupational Classification Policy Committee (SOCPC), 
announces the review of the 2018 Standard Occupational Classification 
(SOC) Manual for potential revisions to be made for 2028 and solicits 
public comment. This review and possible revision of the 2018 SOC is 
intended to be completed by the beginning of 2027 and then released to 
begin use in reference year 2028. Details about these topics are 
available in the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section below.

DATES: To ensure consideration of comments on this notice, they must be 
received no later than August 12, 2024. Because of delays in the 
receipt of regular mail related to security screening, respondents are 
encouraged to send comments electronically (see ADDRESSES, below).

ADDRESSES: Submit comments through https://www.regulations.gov--a 
Federal E-Government website that allows the public to find, review, 
and submit comments on documents that agencies have published in the 
Federal Register and that are open for comment. Enter ``BLS-2024-0001'' 
(in quotes) in the Comment or Submission search box, click Go, and 
follow the instructions for submitting comments. Comments received by 
the date specified above will be included as part of the official 
record. Please include the Docket ID (BLS-2024-0001) and the phrase 
``Standard Occupation Classification (SOC)--Updates for 2028'' at the 
beginning of your comments. Please also indicate which Standard 
Occupation Classification Policy Committee (SOCPC) recommendations 
described in the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION of this notice are addressed 
in your comments.
    Privacy Act Statement: OMB is issuing this request for comments 
pursuant to its authority to oversee the Federal statistical system 
under 44 U.S.C. 3504(e). Submission of comments in response to this 
notice is voluntary. Information you provide will be used to inform 
sound decision making regarding potential updates to the SOC. Please 
note that all submissions received in response to this notice may be 
posted on https://www.regulations.gov/ or otherwise released in their 
entirety, including any personal and business confidential information 
provided. Do not include in your submissions any copyrighted material; 
information of a confidential nature, such as personal or proprietary 
information; or any information you would not like to be made publicly 
available. The OMB System of Records Notice, OMB Public Input System of 
Records, OMB/INPUT/01, 88 FR 20913 (https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2023/04/07/2023-07452/privacy-act-of-1974-system-of-records/
), includes a list of routine uses associated with the collection of 
this information.
    Electronic availability. Federal Register notices are available 
electronically at https://www.federalregister.gov/. This document is 
also available on the SOC website at https://www.bls.gov/soc. The SOC 
website contains information on the purpose, background, and structure 
of the SOC, as well as additional guidance and formats on providing 
input to the Standard Occupational Classification Policy Committee 
(SOCPC) for consideration by OMB during the SOC revision for 2028.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For information about this request for 
comments, contact Jeongsoo Kim, Office of Management and Budget, New 
Executive Office Building, Washington, DC 20503; email: 
[email protected]; telephone number: (202) 395-1613; 
fax number: (202) 395-5898.
    The SOC coordination team may be reached by email at [email protected]. 
Please note: Communication through this email will not be included in 
the record for BLS-2024-0001. Comments should be submitted through 
https://www.regulations.gov, as described in the ADDRESSES section 
above.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant to its authority under 44 U.S.C. 
3504(e), the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) announces the review 
of the 2018 SOC Manual for possible revision in 2028 and solicits 
public comment on the following topics: intention to retain the 2018 
SOC Classification Principles; the intention to retain the 2018 SOC 
Coding Guidelines; the intention to retain the 2018 SOC Major Group 
Structure; whether to develop definitions for major occupation groups; 
whether to consider changes to, or consolidation of, selected 2018 SOC 
detailed occupations, including specifically public safety 
telecommunicators and whether production occupations should be combined 
based on common job duties; whether to consider the addition of new 
detailed occupations or occupational groups, including specifically 
care workers; possible changes to major, minor, and broad occupation 
groups; possible changes to the STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering, 
and Math) occupation framework and its domains; and uses and 
applications of the SOC. The SOC classifies all occupations for which 
work is performed for pay or profit. It is designed to cover all jobs 
in the national economy, including occupations in the public, private, 
and military sectors. In this way, the SOC is designed to reflect the 
current occupational composition of the United States. The SOC supports 
efficiency and effectiveness of the U.S. Federal statistical system by 
providing a standard for occupation-based statistical data 
classification, thereby ensuring comparability of these data across 
Federal statistical agencies. Accordingly, all Federal agencies that 
publish occupational data for statistical purposes are required to use 
the SOC. State and local government agencies are also strongly 
encouraged to use this national system to promote a common language for 
categorizing and analyzing occupations. Consistent with good 
statistical practice, these classifications are reviewed and revised 
periodically to ensure statistical robustness, relevance, accuracy, and 
comparability of occupational data produced for statistical purposes. 
This is the first Federal Register Notice requesting public comment in 
the process leading up to the potential 2028 SOC revision. More 
information on the SOC, including information on past revision 
processes, is available at https://www.bls.gov/SOC.

Purpose and History of the SOC

    The U.S. Federal statistical system is decentralized, with 16 OMB-
recognized statistical agencies and units that have data collection as 
their primary mission and over 100 other agencies that collect 
statistical data, along with carrying out another primary mission. The 
Chief Statistician of the United States at OMB coordinates the Federal 
statistical system by developing and overseeing the implementation of 
Government-wide principles, policies, standards, and guidelines 
concerning the presentation and dissemination of statistical 
information. These coordination efforts promote the efficiency and 
effectiveness of the Federal statistical system. More information on 
the Federal statistical system, including its structure and

[[Page 49912]]

policies that govern it, is available at https://www.statspolicy.gov/.
    One such standard for statistical data classification established 
by OMB is Statistical Policy Directive No. 10: Standard Occupational 
Classification (SOC), which ensures consistency and comparability of 
occupation-based statistical data classification across Federal 
statistical activities. All Federal agencies that publish occupational 
data for statistical purposes are required to use the SOC to increase 
data comparability (and thus, data utility) across Federal programs. 
Information about occupations--employment levels, trends, pay and 
benefits, demographic characteristics, skills required, and many other 
items--is widely used by individuals, businesses, researchers, 
educators, and public policy-makers. The SOC helps ensure that 
occupational data produced across the Federal statistical system are 
comparable and can be used together in analysis.
    The SOC is designed exclusively for statistical purposes. Although 
the SOC may also be used for various nonstatistical purposes (e.g., for 
administrative, regulatory, or taxation functions), the requirements of 
government agencies, businesses, or private users that choose to use 
the SOC for non-statistical purposes play no role in the development or 
revision of the SOC. The appropriateness of using the SOC for non-
statistical purposes must be evaluated on a case-by-case basis.
    To reflect changes in the economy and in the nature of work, 
revision of the SOC is considered periodically. The SOC was first 
issued in 1977, with subsequent revisions in 1980, 2000, 2010, and 
2018. Although the 1980 SOC was the basis for the occupational 
classification system used in the Census of Population and Housing in 
1980 and 1990, neither the 1977 nor the 1980 SOC was widely used by the 
Federal statistical system in producing data. However, with the 
implementation of the 2000 SOC, for the first time OMB required that 
all major occupational data produced by the Federal statistical system 
use the SOC, which greatly improved the utility of the data by 
improving comparability. The 2010 and 2018 SOC revisions improved 
comparability and maintained currency. Both the 2010 and 2018 SOC 
revisions were accompanied by new explanatory and implementation 
resources; namely, the Coding Guidelines and the Direct Match Title 
File, to both help data collectors code occupations more consistently, 
and help data users better understand how occupations are classified. 
For more information, see the SOC website at https://www.bls.gov/soc/.

Role of the SOC Policy Committee

    The SOC Policy Committee (SOCPC), a standing committee established 
by OMB in 2005, is charged with carrying out the review of the SOC for 
2028, including making recommendations to the Chief Statistician of the 
United States at OMB for possible revisions for 2028. Currently, the 
SOCPC is comprised of representatives from 18 Federal agencies and 
components.

Review of the 2018 SOC and Request for Comments on Possible Revisions 
for 2028

    OMB has charged the SOCPC with the review of the 2018 SOC for 
possible recommendations for revision for 2028. Given the multiple 
interdependent programs that rely on the SOC, coordinating the 
revisions of the SOC with these programs is best accomplished by timing 
revisions of the SOC for the year following North American Industry 
Classification System (NAICS) revisions. The next such year is 2028, 
and OMB plans to review for possible revision every 10 years 
thereafter. This is the first opportunity for public comment in the 
process, and OMB expects there to be a second opportunity for public 
comment as part of the process prior to OMB announcing its final 
decisions.
    The SOCPC began focusing on the possible recommendations for 
revision for 2028 in December 2023 and has identified the following 
topics and intentions as specific areas for public comment in addition 
to any aspect of occupational classification. To facilitate the work of 
the SOCPC, OMB, on behalf of the SOCPC, solicits and welcomes comments 
related to any aspect of occupational classification, especially 
comments concerning the following items, some of which are described in 
more detail below:
     the intention to retain the 2018 SOC Classification 
Principles;
     the intention to retain the 2018 SOC Coding Guidelines;
     the intention to retain the 2018 SOC Major Group 
Structure;
     whether to develop definitions for major occupation 
groups;
     whether to consider changes to, or consolidation of, 
selected 2018 SOC detailed occupations, including specifically the 
classification of public safety telecommunicators and whether 
production occupations should be combined based on common job duties;
     whether to consider the addition of new detailed 
occupations or occupational groups, including specifically care 
workers;
     possible changes to major, minor, and broad occupation 
groups;
     possible changes to the STEM occupation framework and its 
domains; and
     uses and applications of the SOC.

Job Versus Occupation

    One key concept to help the public understand the philosophy behind 
the SOC classification philosophy is that the terms ``jobs'' and 
``occupations'' do not necessarily refer to the same concept. In many 
cases, job titles intrinsically represent jobs, rather than true 
occupations as defined in the SOC. Specifically, a job is a set of work 
activities performed by an individual. The exact set of activities 
varies depending on the size and organization of the establishment and 
is often, but not always, unique to that individual worker. An 
occupation is a grouping of a number of individual jobs, where everyone 
performs certain tasks that provide a natural grouping used to define 
the occupation. Thus, an occupational definition is a collective 
description of a number of similar individual jobs performed, with 
minor variations, in different establishments. Occupational 
classification schemes such as the SOC organize millions of jobs into 
discrete occupations based on common tasks as determined by the 
schemes' classification principles. For example, in the 2018 SOC, 
workers with the job title `Coronary Care Unit Staff Nurse' are 
classified in the occupation Registered Nurses (29-1141). Likewise, 
workers with the job title `Automotive Fuel Injection Servicer' are 
classified in the occupation Automotive Service Technicians and 
Mechanics (49-3023).

The Intention To Retain the 2018 SOC Classification Principles

    The SOC Classification Principles form the basis on which the SOC 
is structured and provide a foundation for classification decisions. As 
noted above, in the first few meetings of the SOCPC on the possible 
revision for 2028, the SOCPC identified that it would prefer to retain 
as is the 2018 SOC Classification Principles (listed below) and seeks 
input from the public on whether these Principles should be retained 
as-is or modified in some manner. The SOCPC welcomes suggestions from 
the public on any aspect of these Principles.
    The proposed Classification Principles for use in the 2028 SOC are 
identical to those used for the 2018 SOC and are as follows:
    1. The SOC covers all occupations in which work is performed for 
pay or

[[Page 49913]]

profit, including work performed in family-operated enterprises by 
family members who are not directly compensated. It excludes 
occupations unique to volunteers. Each occupation is assigned to only 
one occupational category at the most detailed level of the 
classification.
    2. Occupations are classified based on work performed and, in some 
cases, on the skills, education or training needed to perform the work.
    3. Workers primarily engaged in planning and the directing of 
resources are classified in management occupations in Major Group 11-
0000. Duties of these workers may include supervision.
    4. Supervisors of workers in Major Groups 13-0000 through 29-0000 
usually have work experience and perform activities similar to those of 
the workers they supervise, and therefore are classified with the 
workers they supervise.
    5. Workers in Major Group 31-0000 Healthcare Support Occupations 
assist and are usually supervised by workers in Major Group 29-0000 
Healthcare Practitioners and Technical Occupations, and therefore there 
are no first-line supervisor occupations in Major Group 31-0000.
    6. Workers in Major Groups 33-0000 through 53-0000 whose primary 
duty is supervising are classified in the appropriate first-line 
supervisor category because their work activities are distinct from 
those of the workers they supervise.
    7. Apprentices and trainees are classified with the occupations for 
which they are being trained, while helpers and aides are classified 
separately because they are not in training for the occupation they are 
helping.
    8. If an occupation is not included as a distinct detailed 
occupation in the structure, it is classified in an appropriate ``All 
Other'' occupation. ``All Other'' occupations are placed in the 
structure when it is determined that the detailed occupations 
comprising a broad occupation group do not account for all of the 
workers in the group, even though such workers may perform a distinct 
set of work activities. These occupations appear as the last occupation 
in the group with a code ending in ``9'' and are identified in their 
title by having ``All Other'' appear at the end.
    9. The U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics and the U.S. Census Bureau 
are charged with collecting and reporting data on total U.S. employment 
across the full spectrum of SOC major groups. Thus, for a detailed 
occupation to be included in the SOC, either the Bureau of Labor 
Statistics or the Census Bureau must be able to collect and report data 
on that occupation.
    10. To maximize the comparability of data, time series continuity 
is maintained to the extent possible.

The Intention To Retain the 2018 SOC Coding Guidelines

    The SOC Coding Guidelines are intended to assist users when 
assigning SOC codes and titles to survey responses, and in other coding 
activities. The SOCPC proposes to retain as is the 2018 SOC Coding 
Guidelines (listed below) and seeks input from the public on whether 
these Guidelines should be retained as-is or modified in some manner. 
The SOCPC welcomes suggestions from the public on any aspects of the 
Guidelines;
    The proposed Coding Guidelines for use in the 2028 SOC are 
identical to those used for the 2018 SOC and are as follows:
    1. A worker should be assigned to an SOC occupation code based on 
work performed.
    2. When workers in a single job could be coded in more than one 
occupation, they should be coded in the occupation that requires the 
highest level of skill. If there is no measurable difference in skill 
requirements, workers should be coded in the occupation in which they 
spend the most time. Workers whose job is to teach at different levels 
(e.g., elementary, middle, or secondary) should be coded in the 
occupation corresponding to the highest educational level they teach.
    3. Data collection and reporting agencies should assign workers to 
the most detailed occupation possible. Different agencies may use 
different levels of aggregation, depending on their ability to collect 
data.
    4. Workers who perform activities not described in any distinct 
detailed occupation in the SOC structure should be coded in an 
appropriate ``All Other'' or residual occupation. These residual 
occupational categories appear as the last occupation in a group with a 
code ending in ``9'' and are identified by having the words ``All 
Other'' appear at the end of the title.
    5. Workers in Major Groups 33-0000 through 53-0000 who spend 80 
percent or more of their time performing supervisory activities are 
coded in the appropriate first-line supervisor category in the SOC. In 
these same Major Groups (33-0000 through 53-0000), persons with 
supervisory duties who spend less than 80 percent of their time 
supervising are coded with the workers they supervise.
    6. Licensed and non-licensed workers performing the same work 
should be coded together in the same detailed occupation, except where 
specified otherwise in the SOC definition.

The Intention To Retain the 2018 SOC Major Group Structure

    The 2018 SOC classifies workers at four levels of aggregation: (1) 
Major Group; (2) Minor Group; (3) Broad Occupation; and (4) Detailed 
Occupation. In order to ensure consistency and satisfy a strong user 
preference for time series continuity in occupational employment and 
wage data, the SOCPC proposes to retain as is the current Major Groups 
from the 2018 SOC and seeks input from the public on whether these 
Major Groups should be retained as-is or modified in some manner. The 
SOCPC welcomes suggestions from the public on any aspects of the Major 
Groups, including proposals to update the titles of any of the Major 
Groups to reflect current terminology.
    All occupations are clustered into one of the following 23 Major 
Groups in the 2018 SOC:

11-0000 Management Occupations
13-0000 Business and Financial Operations Occupations
15-0000 Computer and Mathematical Occupations
17-0000 Architecture and Engineering Occupations
19-0000 Life, Physical, and Social Science Occupations
21-0000 Community and Social Service Occupations
23-0000 Legal Occupations
25-0000 Educational Instruction and Library Occupations
27-0000 Arts, Design, Entertainment, Sports, and Media Occupations
29-0000 Healthcare Practitioners and Technical Occupations
31-0000 Healthcare Support Occupations
33-0000 Protective Service Occupations
35-0000 Food Preparation and Serving Related Occupations
37-0000 Building and Grounds Cleaning and Maintenance Occupations
39-0000 Personal Care and Service Occupations
41-0000 Sales and Related Occupations
43-0000 Office and Administrative Support Occupations
45-0000 Farming, Fishing, and Forestry Occupations
47-0000 Construction and Extraction Occupations
49-0000 Installation, Maintenance, and Repair Occupations
51-0000 Production Occupations
53-0000 Transportation and Material Moving Occupations
55-0000 Military Specific Occupations

[[Page 49914]]

Proposals From the Public for Changes to Existing 2018 SOC Detailed 
Occupations

    Generally, the definitions for SOC detailed occupations contain the 
minimum description needed to determine which workers would be 
classified in a particular occupation. Comments are welcome on 
corrections concerning typographical or definitional errors and other 
changes to the existing detailed occupations, including the combination 
of occupations. Suggested changes to existing detailed occupations may 
address the occupational title, definition, or its placement in the 
structure. In particular, comments are welcome on public safety 
telecommunicators and care worker occupations. OMB charged the SOCPC 
specifically with reviewing the classification for public safety 
telecommunicators and with assessing a possible new occupation for care 
workers because these two areas have been raised to OMB by Congress 
over the years since the issuance of the 2018 SOC.
    In addition, each SOC occupation has one or more Illustrative 
Examples, drawn from the Direct Match Title File, referenced above. 
Comments are invited on Illustrative Examples or Direct Match Titles 
that should be added, moved, or deleted.
    Detailed information on the purpose, structure, and the components 
of SOC definitions is available on the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) 
SOC website at https://www.bls.gov/soc. For a description of the 
elements of an SOC definition, please see ``Revising the Standard 
Occupational Classification'' available at https://www.bls.gov/soc/revising_the_standard_occupational_classification_2028.pdf. In 
particular, Figure 1 (copied below) and the accompanying text in that 
document describe the elements of a detailed SOC occupation. Additional 
guidance on the type of information that the SOCPC will find critical 
in making recommendations to OMB appears in the section ``Public Input 
Requested'' below.
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN12JN24.020

Proposals From the Public for New Detailed Occupations

    The SOCPC also invites proposals for new detailed occupations or 
the splitting of occupations, as warranted by changes in the economy, 
technology, or business practices that affect how employers structure 
work. Suggestions should be guided by the Classification Principles, 
above. In particular, suggestions should specifically address 
Classification Principles 2, 9, and 10, as discussed below.
    Classification Principle 2 dictates that the nature of the work 
performed is the main criterion for classifying a detailed occupation 
and determining where to place it in the structure. Thus, the SOCPC 
needs specific information describing the work performed by workers in 
the occupation, such as specific duties and tasks. This information is 
useful in evaluating whether the work performed in a recommended new 
occupation is sufficiently different from work performed in existing 
occupations and to determine where in the classification structure a 
new occupation should be placed. As noted in Classification Principle 
2, skills, education, or training are occasionally used to guide the 
classification decisions; primarily, however, classification decisions 
are based on the nature of the work performed.
    Classification Principle 9 pertains to collectability and 
reportability--that is, whether data can actually be collected and 
reported on the occupation. For a detailed occupation to be included in 
the SOC, either BLS or the Census Bureau must be able to obtain 
information from households or employers that will allow accurate 
classification of the workers.
    Collectability and reportability are partly a function of the size 
of the occupation--the occupation must be large enough to be detected 
in sample household or business surveys. However, the SOCPC will not 
use a specific employment size cut-off to determine its recommendations 
to OMB. This is because small occupations that are concentrated in 
certain industries or geographic areas may be collectable and 
reportable, while occupations of similar or larger employment that are 
spread throughout the economy may not be collectable and reportable. 
Therefore, size is not the only consideration in collectability and 
reportability. Collectability and reportability are also related to the 
type of data collection used, specifically the comprehensive household 
and business surveys conducted by BLS and the Census Bureau. For more 
information on the considerations for collectability and reportability, 
see ``Revising the Standard Occupational Classification'' available at 
https://www.bls.gov/soc/revising_the_standard_occupational_classification_2028.pdf (``Revising 
the Standard Occupational Classification,'' May 2024, SOC Coordinating 
Team, Bureau of Labor Statistics).
    Classification Principle 10 relates to time series continuity--that 
is, the ability to maintain data series over time without interruption 
due to classification changes. To maintain the

[[Page 49915]]

utility of the SOC, the SOCPC's recommendations to OMB will reflect the 
importance of maintaining time series continuity. To the extent 
possible, new occupations proposed for the 2028 SOC should be easily 
cross-referenced to the 2018 SOC.

STEM Proposed Framework and Classifications

    In order to enhance comparability of data across statistical 
agencies and organizations studying the STEM (Science, Technology, 
Engineering, and Mathematics) workforce for policymaking purposes, 
including educational and workforce planners, OMB requested the SOCPC 
to recommend options for defining STEM occupations. The SOCPC has 
created a recommended framework for identifying and grouping 
occupations in the STEM fields as described here https://www.bls.gov/soc/attachment_a_stem_2018.pdf (``Options for defining STEM (Science, 
Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics) occupations under the 2018 
Standard Occupational Classification (SOC) system,'' June 2019, SOLC 
Policy Committee, Bureau of Labor Statistics). The resulting categories 
and content are available here https://www.bls.gov/soc/Attachment_B_STEM_2018.pdf (``STEM definition options,'' June 2019, SOC 
Policy Committee, Bureau of Labor Statistics). The current framework 
gives users options for defining STEM occupations, while also allowing 
for comparison across agencies and organizations. The SOCPC is seeking 
comment on the framework, the content of each category, and whether the 
STEM categories should become part of the SOC.

General Recommendations for Providing SOC Comments

    The SOCPC will use the public comments in response to this and 
related Federal Register notices, as well as its own research, to 
develop recommendations for revisions to the SOC to OMB. Commenters are 
strongly encouraged to provide concise, comprehensive comments to be 
most useful to the work of the SOCPC. In addition, commenters are 
encouraged to conduct the following activities to better inform their 
comments:
    1. Carefully review the information provided in the Federal 
Register Notice as well as the information provided in the remainder of 
this document.
    2. Carefully review the Classification Principles and Coding 
Guidelines, as these guide the SOCPC's recommendations. Comments that 
reflect these Principles and Guidelines are likely to be more pertinent 
to the SOCPC's deliberations.
    3. Carefully review the elements of an SOC detailed occupation as 
described in this document. Figure 1 and the accompanying text in in 
the ``Revising the Standard Occupational Classification'' document 
describe the elements of a detailed SOC occupation.
    4. Review the ``Desired Focus of Comments'' section in the Federal 
Register Notice and provide the specific information requested. Provide 
information on the nature of the work performed, including specific 
activities and tasks. This is the most important type of information 
for new occupations. Providing links to research or citations to other 
helpful reference information is also useful.
    5. Prepare well-organized and concise comments. The SOCPC expects 
to receive hundreds of comments.
    6. The SOC was designed solely for statistical purposes. Although 
there are various uses of the SOC for nonstatistical purposes (e.g., 
for administrative, regulatory, or taxation functions), the 
requirements of government agencies or private users choosing to use 
the SOC for nonstatistical purposes play no role in the development of 
the SOC. As a result, the SOCPC will review comments and develop its 
recommendations based on established Classification Principles and 
Coding Guidelines. Information provided unrelated to the accurate 
gathering of information for statistical purposes, such as perceived 
importance of workers in an occupation, will not influence the SOCPC 
recommendations. Comments will be grouped together based on similar 
topics for consideration. The SOCPC will consider the substance of the 
comments; the volume of comments on the same topic will not impact the 
SOCPC recommendation.

Desired Focus of Comments

    OMB welcomes comments from the public on any aspects of the SOC, 
including in particular those articulated above. To be most useful to 
the SOCPC in its ongoing review of the SOC and to better inform its 
proposed recommendations for changes to the SOC, commenters should 
review the information above and available in the document entitled 
``Revising the Standard Occupational Classification'' (available at 
https://www.bls.gov/soc/revising_the_standard_occupational_classification_2028.pdf) before 
developing and submitting comments. Commenters should be concise and 
should include citations if summarizing or depending on published work, 
and should provide any links to related research. In order to provide 
as useful a comment as possible, commenters can review the SOC website 
at https://www.bls.gov/soc for more information on how to develop a 
concise, comprehensive comment. In addition, comments recommending a 
specific addition, deletion, or other concrete change to a category 
should clearly address the following information. Addressing all 
aspects below is especially important for the proposals for new or 
split out detailed occupations.
    1. Proposed occupation title: Provide a proposed occupational 
title, or titles, that all workers in the occupation may be identified 
by, regardless of their individual job title. For example, a job title 
like `Public Defender' would fall into the occupation title `Lawyers.' 
See more information above about the difference between jobs and 
occupations for the purposes of the SOC.
    2. Description of the nature of the work performed: Providing a 
description that addresses the nature of the work performed by the 
proposed occupation helps the SOCPC adequately assess the proposed 
occupation against the Classification Principles and Coding Guidelines. 
Some questions to address include the following:
     What duties do all the workers in the occupation perform? 
Duties performed by all workers would appear in the ``required duties'' 
statement in the occupation definition.
     What duties are frequent but not performed by all workers 
in the occupation? Frequent duties that are not performed by all 
workers might be included in the ``may'' statements of the occupation 
definition.
     Do the workers have supervisory or management duties? If 
so, what types of workers are supervised and what types of management 
activities are performed?
     For revisions to existing occupations, is the work 
described in the SOC definition accurate and up-to-date?
    3. Description of the relationship to other SOC occupations: 
Providing a description of the relationship of the proposed occupation 
to other SOC occupations helps the SOCPC determine the appropriateness 
of recommending a new occupation versus assessing other SOC occupations 
for revision. Some questions to address include the following:
     What makes the occupation distinct from other detailed 
occupations in the SOC?
     Does the same or similar work appear in other SOC 
occupations? If so, how is the proposed occupation

[[Page 49916]]

distinct? Occupations that are similar are included in the ``excludes'' 
statements of the occupation definition.
     What changes should be made to existing SOC occupations 
that have the same or similar work?
    4. Job titles: Provide known job titles used across the proposed 
occupation. This information helps inform additional research 
undertaken by the SOCPC, as well as their recommendations to update 
accompanying products such as the Direct Match Title File. Some 
questions to address include the following:
     What job titles are commonly used by workers in this 
occupation? Are these titles unique to the proposed occupation?
     Are titles listed in the Direct Match Title File actually 
in use?
     Are there other titles commonly used by workers in the 
occupation?
     Do titles vary geographically (urban versus rural, 
southern versus west coast, etc.)?
    5. Indications of the number of jobs or workers in the proposed 
occupation: Employment size and expected growth are helpful to the 
SOCPC in evaluating collectability and reportability. Please provide 
references for the sources of this information including links, 
attachments, or other citations.
    6. Types of employers: Understanding the types of employers of the 
proposed occupation helps clarify the nature of the work performed and 
assists the SOCPC in its evaluation of collectability and 
reportability. In particular, in which industries does this occupation 
occur?
    7. Education and training: While education and training are not 
used for all occupation classification, the SOCPC uses such 
information, when helpful, to better understand the proposed 
occupation. Thus, identification of specific education requirements, 
training programs, and institutions may be helpful. Some questions to 
address include the following:
     What education and training are typically required for 
workers to be able to perform this proposed occupation?
     What types of schools or training providers offer this 
education or training?
     How long does the education or training take?
     What degrees or other credentials are generally required, 
if any?
    8. Licensing: While licensing is not used for all occupation 
classification, the SOCPC uses such information, when helpful, to 
better understand the proposed occupation. Thus, identification of 
specific licensing requirements and licensing agencies may be helpful.
    9. Tools and technologies: The SOCPC uses information on tools and 
technologies, when helpful, to better understand the proposed 
occupation. Some questions to address include the following:
     What tools and technologies are generally used by workers 
in performing the occupation?
     Are the tools and technologies mentioned in existing SOC 
occupation definitions accurate and up-to-date?
    10. Professional trade associations and unions: The SOCPC uses 
information on professional trade associations and unions, when 
helpful, to better understand the proposed occupation. Some questions 
to address include the following:
     Are there professional or trade associations or labor 
unions related to the proposed occupation?
     What are the names of the specific associations or unions?
    11. STEM categories: Comments on the domains, subdomains, and types 
of STEM groupings are welcome, as well as comments regarding changes to 
the content of the categories.

Timing for the 2028 SOC Revision Process

    Following this public comment period, the SOCPC will review the 
comments and develop proposed revisions for the 2028 SOC. Then OMB will 
publish SOCPC's proposed revisions for public comment in a subsequent 
Federal Register Notice. The SOCPC will then review the comments and 
develop final recommendations to the Chief Statistician of the United 
States at OMB on the proposed revisions for the 2028 SOC. OMB expects 
to consider the final recommendations from the SOCPC and finalize the 
final 2028 SOC in calendar year 2027. After the 2028 SOC is finalized, 
the SOCPC will prepare the online 2028 SOC Manual and supporting 
materials, make them available to the public on the BLS website, and 
continue its role of maintaining the SOC leading up to the next 
revision.

Richard L. Revesz,
Administrator, Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs.
[FR Doc. 2024-12825 Filed 6-11-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3110-01-P