[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 104 (Wednesday, May 29, 2024)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 46352-46357]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-11732]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
50 CFR Part 300
[Docket No. 240522-0142]
RIN 0648-BM86
International Fisheries; Western and Central Pacific Fisheries
for Highly Migratory Species; Changes to Purse Seine Fish Aggregating
Device Closure Periods
AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.
ACTION: Proposed rule; request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: NMFS seeks comments on this proposed rule issued under
authority of the Western and Central Pacific Fisheries Convention
Implementation Act (WCPFC Implementation Act). The proposed rule would
implement a recent decision of the Commission for the Conservation and
Management of Highly Migratory Fish Stocks in the Western and Central
Pacific Ocean (WCPFC or Commission). This decision shortens the
duration of fish aggregating device (FAD) closure periods for the U.S.
purse seine fishery. This action is necessary to satisfy the
obligations of the United States under the Convention on the
Conservation and Management of Highly Migratory Species in the Western
and Central Pacific Ocean (Convention), to which it is a formal
signatory to the Convention (Contracting Party).
DATES: Comments on the proposed rule must be submitted in writing by
June 13, 2024.
ADDRESSES: A plain language summary of this proposed rule is available
at https://www.regulations.gov/docket/NOAA-NMFS-2024-0057. You may
submit comments on this document, identified by NOAA-NMFS-2024-0057, by
any of the following methods:
Electronic Submission: Submit all electronic public
comments via the Federal e-Rulemaking Portal. Visit https://www.regulations.gov and type NOAA-NMFS-2024-0057 in the Search box.
Click on the ``Comment'' icon, complete the required fields, and enter
or attach your comments.
Mail: Submit written comments to Sarah Malloy, Acting
Regional Administrator, NMFS, Pacific Islands Regional Office (PIRO),
1845 Wasp Blvd., Building 176, Honolulu, HI 96818.
Instructions: Comments sent by any other method, to any other
address or individual, or received after the end of the comment period,
may not be considered by NMFS. All comments received are a part of the
public record and will generally be posted for public viewing on
https://www.regulations.gov without change. All personal identifying
information (e.g., name, address, etc.), confidential business
information, or otherwise sensitive information submitted voluntarily
by the sender will be publicly accessible. NMFS will accept anonymous
comments (enter ``N/A'' in the required fields if you wish to remain
anonymous).
An initial regulatory flexibility analysis (IRFA) prepared under
authority of the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) is included in the
Classification section of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section of this
document.
Copies of the Regulatory Impact Review (RIR) and the documents
prepared for National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) purposes are
available at https://www.regulations.gov or may be obtained from Sarah
Malloy, Acting Regional Administrator, NMFS PIRO (see address above).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Rini Ghosh, NMFS PIRO, 808-725-5033.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background on the Convention
The Convention is focused on the conservation and management of
[[Page 46353]]
fisheries for highly migratory species (HMS). The objective of the
Convention is to ensure, through effective management, the long-term
conservation and sustainable use of HMS in the Western and Central
Pacific Ocean (WCPO). To accomplish this objective, the Convention
established the Commission, which includes Members, Cooperating Non-
members, and Participating Territories (collectively referred to here
as members). The United States of America is a Member. American Samoa,
Guam, and the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands (CNMI) are
Participating Territories.
As a Contracting Party to the Convention and a Member of the
Commission, the United States implements, as appropriate, conservation
and management measures and other decisions adopted by the Commission.
The WCPFC Implementation Act (16 U.S.C. 6901 et seq.), authorizes the
Secretary of Commerce, in consultation with the Secretary of State and
the Secretary of the Department in which the United States Coast Guard
is operating (currently the Department of Homeland Security), to
promulgate such regulations as may be necessary to carry out the
obligations of the United States under the Convention, including the
decisions of the Commission. The WCPFC Implementation Act further
provides that the Secretary of Commerce shall ensure consistency, to
the extent practicable, of fishery management programs administered
under the WCPFC Implementation Act and the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery
Conservation and Management Act (MSA; 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.), as well
as other specific laws (see 16 U.S.C. 6905(b)). The Secretary of
Commerce has delegated the authority to promulgate regulations under
the WCPFC Implementation Act to NMFS. A map showing the boundaries of
the area of application of the Convention (Convention Area), which
comprises the majority of the WCPO, can be found on the WCPFC website
at: www.wcpfc.int/doc/convention-area-map.
Background on the WCPFC Decision
This proposed rule would implement specific provisions of
Conservation and Management Measure (CMM) 2023-01, ``Conservation and
Management Measure for Bigeye, Yellowfin, and Skipjack Tuna in the
Western and Central Pacific Ocean.'' The Commission adopted CMM 2023-01
at its twentieth regular annual session, in December 2023, and it went
into effect in February 2024. The provisions of CMM 2023-01 are
described in more detail below.
CMM 2023-01 is the latest in a series of CMMs devoted to the
conservation and management of tropical tuna stocks, particularly
stocks of bigeye tuna (Thunnus obesus), yellowfin tuna (Thunnus
albacares), and skipjack tuna (Katsuwonus pelamis). The stated purpose
of CMM 2023-01 is to support fisheries for skipjack tuna, bigeye tuna,
and yellowfin tuna in the Convention Area that benefit WCPFC members
and their communities, and to do so in a way that is fair to all WCPFC
members and addresses the special requirements of developing States and
Participating Territories. CMM 2023-01's provisions are based on
specific objectives for each of the three tropical tuna stocks.
Many of the provisions of CMM 2023-01 have already been implemented
by NMFS or will be implemented in separate rulemakings. This proposed
rule would implement the provisions regarding FAD prohibition periods
for U.S. purse seine vessels.
Under NMFS' current regulations at 50 CFR 300.223(b)(2), the FAD
prohibition periods are from July 1 through September 30, during each
calendar year for the high seas and exclusive economic zones (EEZs) in
the Convention Area, and from November 1 through December 31 during
each calendar year solely on the high seas in the Convention Area.
Thus, U.S. purse seine vessels are currently prohibited from setting on
FADs for three months in EEZs and on the high seas in the Convention
Area, and for an additional two months on the high seas in the
Convention Area. Per 50 CFR 300.223, these FAD prohibition periods do
not apply in the area of overlap between the WCPFC and the Inter-
American Tropical Tuna Commission (IATTC).
Paragraph 13 of CMM 2023-01 reduces the 3-month FAD prohibition
period for the EEZs and on the high seas in the Convention Area to one
and a half months, running from July 1 to August 15 during each
calendar year. This proposed rule would amend the regulations at 50 CFR
300.223(b)(2)(1) to revise the three-month FAD prohibition period for
the EEZs and on the high seas to be July 1 through August 15 during
each calendar year, consistent with CMM 2023-01.
Paragraph 14 of CMM 2023-01 reduces the additional two-month high
seas FAD prohibition period to one month--either April, May, November,
or December. Previously, WCPFC members could choose between
implementing the two-month additional FAD prohibition period on the
high seas in April and May or in November and December. NMFS had
previously determined that implementing the two-month additional FAD
prohibition period in November and December would be more cost-
effective than implementing the prohibition period in April and May.
Regulations at 50 CFR 300.223(b)(2)(2) implement the additional two-
month high seas FAD prohibition period in November and December. Based
on the analysis in the IRFA and RIR for this proposed rule, NMFS
concludes that continuing to implement the one month high seas FAD
prohibition period late in the year would be more cost-effective for
the fleet. NMFS proposes to implement the additional one-month high
seas FAD prohibition period in December 2024 and in future calendar
years. The American Tunaboat Association has also provided preliminary
information indicating the U.S. purse seine fleet's preference for a
December closure in 2024. NMFS specifically requests comments on this
aspect of the proposed rule and will make adjustments in the final rule
as warranted.
CMM 2023-01 is in effect until February 15, 2027. However, as has
been NMFS's practice, the elements of the proposed rule would remain in
effect until they are replaced or amended, to avoid a lapse in the
management of the fisheries.
Proposed Action
The elements of the proposed rule are detailed below.
In accordance with CMM 2023-01, NMFS proposes to shorten the
duration of the FAD prohibition period from July 1 through August 15
during each calendar year in the Convention Area between the latitudes
of 20[deg] N and 20[deg] S (inclusive of the EEZs and high seas in the
Convention Area and excluding the area of overlap between the WCPFC and
the IATTC). Regarding the additional one-month FAD prohibition period
on the high seas in the Convention Area, after considering the
objectives of CMM 2023-01, the expected economic impacts on U.S.
fishing operations and the nation as a whole, and expected
environmental and other effects, NMFS expects that a high seas FAD
prohibition period in December of each calendar year may be the most
cost effective. Thus, NMFS is proposing to implement the high seas FAD
prohibition period in December in 2024 and during each calendar year
thereafter. NMFS specifically seeks public comment on this aspect of
the proposed rule. A comparison of the options' expected direct
economic impacts on affected fishing businesses is
[[Page 46354]]
provided in the RIR. The RIR also includes discussion of potential
impacts to the cannery in Pago Pago, American Samoa.
To the extent that the FAD closures under the proposed rule cause
more fishing effort and/or catches, the delivery of more tuna from the
U.S. purse seine fleet, and consequent reduced adverse economic impacts
to the producers (fishing businesses), they could also bring reduced
adverse impacts to business sectors with forward linkages to the
producers, such as the cannery in Pago Pago that processes much of
their catches.
NMFS also analyzed the environmental effects of the proposed action
on living marine resources in the affected environment. NMFS published
a supplemental environmental assessment (SEA) in 2021 that analyzed the
the potential impacts of implementation of WCPFC tropical tunas
measures through 2025. In the SEA, NMFS analyzed the impacts of the FAD
prohibition periods of various lengths that were either shorter or
longer in duration than the FAD prohibition periods under this proposed
rule. The SEA considered that FAD prohibition periods might influence
the overall composition of catch of the fishery, both in terms of
species and fish sizes. If there is a transfer of effort to fishing on
unassociated sets during the prohibition periods, catches would more
likely consist of less bigeye tuna, and possibly more larger-sized
yellowfin tuna and skipjack tuna. It is possible that shorter FAD
prohibition periods could result in reduced mortality for some stocks.
However, to the extent there is a shift in fishing patterns and
practices, any effects on stocks are expected to be small compared to
typical year-to-year interactions driven by changing oceanic and
economic conditions. Indeed, many other factors affect these stocks,
and it is unlikely that changes to the duration of FAD fishing alone
would significantly impact their statuses. The WCPO stocks of the tuna
species mostly likely to be caught while fishing on FADs--yellowfin
tuna, bigeye tuna, and skipjack tuna--are all determined to be not
overfished and not subject to overfishing. The SEA also considered
impacts of FAD fishing on non-target species and protected resources
and likewise determined that any reduction in interactions resulting
from longer FAD prohibition periods would likely be small compared to
typical year-to-year variations in such interactions. Based on the
analyses in the SEA, NMFS concluded that the FAD prohibition periods
would not significantly impact living marine resources in the affected
environment.
As currently defined in 50 CFR 300.211, a FAD is ``any artificial
or natural floating object, whether anchored or not and whether
situated at the water surface or not, that is capable of aggregating
fish, as well as any object used for that purpose that is situated on
board a vessel or otherwise out of the water. The definition of FAD
does not include a vessel.'' Under this proposed rule, the regulatory
definition of a FAD would not change. Although the definition of a FAD
does not include a vessel, the restrictions during the FAD prohibition
periods would include certain activities related to fish that have
aggregated in association with a vessel, or drawn by a vessel, as
described below.
The prohibitions applicable to these proposed FAD-related measures
are in existing regulations at 50 CFR 300.223(b)(1)(i)-(v).
Specifically, during the FAD prohibition periods in each calendar year,
owners, operators, and crew of fishing vessels of the United States
equipped with purse seine gear shall not do any of the following
activities in the Convention Area (excluding the area of overlap
between the WCPFC and IATTC) between 20[deg] N latitude and 20[deg] S
latitude:
(1) Set a purse seine around a FAD or within 1 nautical mile (1,852
meters) of a FAD;
(2) Set a purse seine in a manner intended to capture fish that
have aggregated in association with a FAD or a vessel, such as by
setting the purse seine in an area from which a FAD or a vessel has
been moved or removed within the previous 8 hours, setting the purse
seine in an area in which a FAD has been inspected or handled within
the previous 8 hours, or setting the purse seine in an area into which
fish were drawn by a vessel from the vicinity of a FAD or a vessel;
(3) Deploy a FAD into the water;
(4) Repair, clean, maintain, or otherwise service a FAD, including
any electronic equipment used in association with a FAD, in the water
or on a vessel while at sea, except that: a FAD may be inspected and
handled as needed to identify the FAD, identify and release
incidentally captured animals, un-foul fishing gear, or prevent damage
to property or risk to human safety; and a FAD may be removed from the
water and if removed may be cleaned, provided that it is not returned
to the water; or
(5) From a purse seine vessel or any associated skiffs, other
watercraft or equipment, submerge lights under water, suspend or hang
lights over the side of the purse seine vessel, skiff, watercraft or
equipment, or direct or use lights in a manner other than as needed to
illuminate the deck of the purse seine vessel or associated skiffs,
watercraft or equipment, to comply with navigational requirements, and
to ensure the health and safety of the crew.
These prohibitions would not apply during emergencies as needed to
prevent human injury or the loss of human life, the loss of the purse
seine vessel, skiffs, watercraft or aircraft, or environmental damage.
The proposed rule also would make a technical correction regarding
the area of application in 50 CFR 300.223(b)(3)(i) to explicitly state
that the requirements regarding activating FADs apply in the Convention
Area. The current regulatory text does not include the specific area of
application.
Classification
The Administrator, Pacific Islands Region, NMFS, has determined
that this proposed rule is consistent with the WCPFC Implementation Act
and other applicable laws, subject to further consideration after
public comment.
Administrative Procedure Act (APA)
NMFS finds that a 15-day comment period for this action provides a
reasonable opportunity for public participation in this action pursuant
to APA section 553(c) (5 U.S.C. 553(c)), while also ensuring that the
first revised FAD prohibition period is finalized before the end date
of August 15, 2024. The Commission adopted CMM 2023-01 in December
2023, and NMFS has been diligently working on completing the rulemaking
since that time. Rulemakings of this nature generally take
approximately one-year to complete in order to satisfying the
requirements of APA and other U.S. laws, and thus, in order to complete
the rulemaking by August 15, 2024, NMFS is proceeding in an accelerated
manner. Stakeholder and industry groups have been involved with the
development of this action. Providing for more than 15 days advance
notice and public comment on the proposed rule increases the risk that
the existing regulations extending the FAD prohibition period through
September 30th would remain in place causing unnecessary burden on the
regulated community. Thus, in order to provide the public with the
opportunity to comment on this proposed rule while ensuring that the
agency has sufficient time to consider any public comments and publish
a final rule that is effective by August 15, 2024, NMFS is providing
the public
[[Page 46355]]
with a 15-day comment period on this proposed rule.
Coastal Zone Management Act (CZMA)
NMFS determined that this action is consistent to the maximum
extent practicable with the enforceable policies of the approved
coastal management program of American Samoa, the CNMI, Guam, and the
State of Hawaii. Determinations to Hawaii and each of the Territories
were submitted on March 8, 2024, for review by the responsible state
and territorial agencies under section 307 of the CZMA. The Hawaii
Coastal Zone Management Program responded on March 12, 2024, stating
that because the U.S. WCPO purse seine fishery operates outside the
jurisdiction of its enforceable policies, it would not be reviewing the
consistency determination. Guam requested supplemental information that
NMFS provided on March 28, 2024.
Executive Order 12866
This proposed rule has been determined to be not significant for
purposes of Executive Order 12866.
Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA)
An initial regulatory flexibility analysis (IRFA) was prepared, as
required by section 603 of the RFA. The IRFA describes the economic
impact this proposed rule, if adopted, would have on small entities.
The IRFA includes analysis of two no-action alternatives in comparison
to the proposed action. The first no-action alternative is no FAD
closure periods in place at all. The second no-action alternative is
maintaining the status quo, as included in the current regulations at
50 CFR 300.223(b)(2), which is the three-month FAD closures in the full
Convention Area and the separate two-month FAD closure just on the high
seas in the Convention Area.
A detailed description of the proposed rule, why it is being
considered as well as its objectives, and the legal basis for the
proposed rule are contained in the SUMMARY section of the preamble and
in other sections of this SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section of the
preamble. The analysis follows:
Estimated Number of Small Entities Affected
For RFA purposes only, NMFS has established a small business size
standard for businesses, including their affiliates, whose primary
industry is commercial fishing (see 50 CFR 200.2). A business primarily
engaged in commercial fishing (NAICS code 114111) is classified as a
small business if it is independently owned and operated, is not
dominant in its field of operation (including its affiliates), and has
combined annual receipts not in excess of $11 million for all its
affiliated operations worldwide.
The proposed rule would apply to owners and operators of U.S.
commercial purse seine fishing vessels used to fish for HMS in the
Convention Area. Based on the number of U.S. purse seine vessels with
WCPFC Area Endorsements, which are required to fish on the high seas in
the Convention Area, the estimated numbers of affected purse seine
fishing vessels is 13.
Based on limited financial information about the affected fishing
fleets, and using individual vessels as proxies for individual
businesses, NMFS believes 80 percent of the vessels in the purse seine
fleet are small entities as defined by the RFA (i.e., they are
independently owned and operated and not dominant in their fields of
operation, and have annual receipts of no more than $11.0 million).
Within the purse seine fleet, analysis of average revenue, by vessel,
for 2020-2022 reveals that average annual revenue among vessels in the
fleet was about $7 million (NMFS unpublished data combined with price
data from the Pacific Island Forum Fisheries Agency and https://investor.thaiunion.com/raw_material.html accessed on June 12, 2023),
and 12 participating vessels qualified as small entities, with
estimated vessel revenue of less than $11 million (based on the average
revenue across the most recent 3 years for which data is available).
Recordkeeping, Reporting, and Other Compliance Requirements
The reporting, recordkeeping and other compliance requirements of
this proposed rule are described earlier in the Proposed Action sub-
section of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section of the preamble. The
classes of small entities subject to the requirements and the types of
professional skills necessary to fulfill the requirements are described
below.
The FAD restrictions being implemented under the proposed rule
would not establish any new reporting or recordkeeping requirements.
The new requirement would be for affected vessel owners and operators
to comply with the FAD restrictions described earlier in the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section of the preamble, including FAD
prohibition periods throughout the Convention Area from July 1 through
August 15 in each calendar and FAD prohibition periods just on the high
seas in the Convention Area from December 1 through December 31 in each
calendar year. The proposed rule would reduce the current FAD
prohibitions periods by 50 percent in terms of duration.
Fulfillment of the element's requirements is not expected to
require any professional skills that the vessel owners and operators do
not already possess. The costs of complying with the requirements are
described below to the extent possible.
The proposed FAD restrictions would substantially constrain the
manner in which purse seine fishing could be conducted in the specified
areas and periods in the Convention Area compared to the no-action
alternative of no closure periods in place at all; in those areas and
during those periods, vessels would be able to set only on free, or
``unassociated,'' schools.
With respect to the one and a half month FAD closure throughout the
Convention Area, assuming that sets would be evenly distributed through
the year, the number of annual FAD sets would be expected to be about
87.5 percent of the number that would occur without a seasonal FAD
closure, and 12.5 percent more than during the existing three-month FAD
closure. This is calculated by assuming FAD setting would occur at the
same rate throughout the year and that a one and half month closure
would lead to FAD setting for 10.5 out of 12 months of the year instead
of for the full 12 months (i.e., 87.5 percent of the year). The
existing 3-month closure currently leads to FAD setting for 9 out of 12
months of the year instead of the full 12 months (i.e., 75 percent of
the year).
With respect to the additional one-month high seas FAD closure, the
effects of this element are difficult to predict. CMM 2023-01 includes
four options for the one-month high seas FAD closure: April, May,
November, or December. In 2018, NMFS analyzed the impacts of the two
previous options included in earlier CMMs, which were the 2-month high
seas FAD closure in April and May and the 2-month high seas FAD closure
in November and December, using data from 2014-2017, and did not find
any statistically significant differences between the average number of
sets in high seas areas, or the number of FAD associated sets in the
high seas across months. The earlier CMMs only included those two
options for two-month high seas FAD closures and did not include the
four options for one-month high seas FAD closures included in CMM 2023-
01. However, NMFS did observe trends in the number of high seas and the
number of FAD sets in the high seas areas that supported selection of
the November-December FAD prohibition period. In
[[Page 46356]]
particular, the number of FAD sets in the high seas areas were low
during November and December due to fishing effort limits met prior to
the end of the season. If the effort limit was reached prior to
November, then the later prohibition period would have a lesser adverse
direct economic impact on the U.S. purse seine fleet. The analysis also
noted that unpredictable future conditions such as ex-vessel price and
environmental conditions--could result in either closure period having
a greater adverse direct economic impact on the fleet. In 2018-2023,
NMFS chose to implement the 2-month high seas FAD closure in November-
December, and in 2018, the high seas was closed from September 19-
December 31, and in 2019, the U.S. EEZ and the high seas were closed
from October 9-November 28 and from December 9-31. Thus, in 2018 and
for most of 2019, the 2-month high seas FAD closure had little to no
additional impacts due to the closures from the fishing effort limits
already being reached. Similarly, for 2024-2026, if the high seas are
closed to all purse seine fishing towards the end of the year as a
result of the fishing effort limit being reached, the high seas FAD
closure during either November or December would have no additional
effect whatsoever. In that situation, given that any closure would
likely occur later in the year, implementing the one-month closure in
December would be likely to have less effect than implementing the one-
month closure in November. However, if the high seas are not closed to
fishing during the closure period, given the performance of the fleet
in recent years, the prohibition on FAD setting would make the high
seas less favorable for fishing than they otherwise would be, since
only unassociated sets would be allowed there, but it is not possible
to characterize how influential that factor would be. Thus, it is not
possible to predict the effects in terms of the spatial distribution of
fishing effort or the proportion of fishing effort that is made on
FADs.
With respect to both the one and a half month FAD closure and one-
month additional high seas FAD closure compared to the no-action
alternative of no FAD closures in place at all, as for the limits on
fishing effort, vessel operators might choose to schedule their routine
maintenance periods so as to take best advantage of the available
opportunities for making FAD sets (e.g., during the FAD closures).
However, the limited number of vessel maintenance facilities in the
region might constrain vessel operators' ability to do this.
Vessels in the U.S. WCPO purse seine fleet make both unassociated
sets and FAD sets when not constrained by regulation, so one type of
set is not always more valuable or efficient than the other. Which set
type is optimal at any given time is a function of immediate conditions
in and on the water. Other factors, such as fuel prices (unassociated
sets involve more searching time and thus tend to bring higher fuel
costs than FAD sets) and market conditions (e.g., FAD fishing, which
tends to result in greater catches of lower-value skipjack tuna and
smaller yellowfin tuna and bigeye tuna than unassociated sets, might be
more attractive and profitable when canneries are not rejecting small
fish) also contribute to whichever set type is optimal at a given time.
Clearly, the ability to do either type of set is valuable, and
constraints on the use of either type can be expected to bring adverse
economic impacts to fishing operations. Thus, the greater the
constraints on the ability to make FAD sets, the greater the expected
economic impacts of the action. Because the factors affecting the
relative value of FAD sets and unassociated sets are many, and because
the relationships among them are not well known, it is not possible to
quantify the expected economic impacts of the FAD restrictions.
However, it appears reasonable to conclude two points. First, the FAD
restrictions would adversely impact producer surplus relative to the
no-action alternative of no FAD prohibiton periods in place. The fact
that the fleet has made such a substantial portion of its sets on FADs
in the past indicates that prohibiting the use of FADs in the specified
areas and periods could bring substantial costs and/or revenue losses.
Second, vessel operators might be able to mitigate the impacts of the
FAD restrictions by scheduling their routine vessel and equipment
maintenance during the FAD closures, but this opportunity might be
constrained by the limited vessel maintenance facilities in the region.
Compared to the second no-action alternative or status quo
alternative of FAD prohibition periods that would be twice as long as
the FAD prohibition periods that would be implemented under the
proposed rule, any adverse effects would be proportionally reduced.
Thus the adverse effects in terms of costs and revenue losses would be
less under the proposed rule than under the status quo no-action
alternative.
Disproportionate Impacts
In the purse seine fishing sector, approximately 80 percent of the
affected entities are small entities, so disproportionate impacts would
not be expected. The direct effect of the proposed rule would be to
constrain fishing effort, as compared to the no-action alternative of
no closure periods in place at all, by purse seine fishing vessels,
with consequent constraining effects on both revenues (because catches
would be less) and operating costs (because less fishing would be
undertaken). Although some purse seine fishing entities are larger than
others, NMFS is not aware of any differences between the small entities
and the large entities (as defined by the RFA) in terms of their
capital costs, operating costs, or other aspects of their businesses.
Accordingly, there is no information to suggest that the direct adverse
economic impacts on small purse seine entities would be
disproportionately greater than those on large purse seine entities.
However, the direct effect of the proposed rule would be to reduce
constraints on fishing effort, as compare to the status quo no-action
alternative, by purse seine fishing vessels.
Duplicating, Overlapping, and Conflicting Federal Regulations
NMFS has not identified any Federal regulations that duplicate,
overlap with, or conflict with the proposed regulations.
Alternatives to the Proposed Rule
NMFS has sought to identify alternatives that would minimize the
proposed rule's economic impacts on small entities (i.e., significant
alternatives). Taking the no-action alternative of no FAD prohibition
periods could result in lesser adverse economic impacts than the
proposed action for affected entities, but NMFS does not prefer this
no-action alternative, because it would be inconsistent with the United
States' obligations under the Convention. Taking the no-action
alternative of retaining the status quo FAD prohibition periods that
are twice as long in duration could result in greater adverse economic
impacts than the proposed action for affected entities. This
alternative would also be inconsistent with the United States'
obligations under the Convention. Alternatives identified for the
proposed rule are discussed below.
NMFS considered in detail the timing of the additional one-month
FAD closure for the high seas. CMM 2023-01 allows members to choose
either April,
[[Page 46357]]
May, November, or December, as the additional month for the high seas
FAD closure. NMFS has compared the expected direct economic impacts of
these four options (implementing a high seas FAD closure in April, May,
November, or December) on purse seine fishing businesses in the RIR for
the proposed rule, by analyzing two discrete alternatives. Due to the
similarities between implementing the high seas FAD closure in April or
May (a spring closure) or in November or December (a winter closure),
the RIR analyzed the impacts of implementing the closure in April or
May as compared to November or December. The analysis finds a closure
later in the year--a December closure--is more likely to have a lesser
direct economic impact on those businesses for the following reasons:
because the later closure period is more likely to run concurrently
with a closure of the high seas in the Convention Area to purse seine
fishing (if the fishing effort limits are reached), in which case the
FAD closure would bring no additional economic impacts.
Paperwork Reduction Act
This proposed rule contains no information collection requirements
under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
List of Subjects in 50 CFR Part 300
Administrative practice and procedure, Fish, Fisheries, Fishing,
Marine resources, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Treaties.
Dated: May 23, 2024.
Samuel D. Rauch III,
Deputy Assistant Administrator for Regulatory Programs, National Marine
Fisheries Service.
For the reasons set out in the preamble, NMFS proposes to amend 50
CFR part 300 as follows:
PART 300--INTERNATIONAL FISHERIES REGULATIONS
Subpart O--Western and Central Pacific Fisheries for Highly
Migratory Species
0
1. The authority citation for 50 CFR part 300, subpart O, continues to
read as follows:
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 6901 et seq.
0
2. In Sec. 300.223, revise paragraphs (b)(2) and (b)(3)(i) to read as
follows:
Sec. 300.223 Purse seine fishing restrictions.
* * * * *
(b) * * *
(1) * * *
(2) The requirements of paragraph (b)(1) of this section shall
apply:
(i) From July 1 through August 15, in each calendar year;
(ii) In any area of high seas, from December 1 through December 31,
in each calendar year.
(3) Activating FADs for purse seine vessels. (i) A vessel owner,
operator, or crew of a fishing vessel of the United States equipped
with purse seine gear shall turn on the tracking equipment of an active
FAD while the FAD is onboard the vessel and before it is deployed in
the water in the Convention Area.
* * * * *
[FR Doc. 2024-11732 Filed 5-28-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-P