[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 59 (Tuesday, March 26, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Pages 21032-21045]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-06319]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-99782; File No. SR-CboeBZX-2023-069]


Self-Regulatory Organizations; Cboe BZX Exchange, Inc.; Notice of 
Filing of Amendment No. 1 to, and Designation of a Longer Period for 
Commission Action on Proceedings To Determine Whether To Approve or 
Disapprove, a Proposed Rule Change To List and Trade Shares of the 
VanEck Ethereum ETF Under BZX Rule 14.11(e)(4), Commodity-Based Trust 
Shares

March 20, 2024.
    On September 6, 2023, Cboe BZX Exchange, Inc. (``BZX'' or 
``Exchange'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission 
(``Commission''), pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities 
Exchange Act of 1934 (``Act'') \1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ a 
proposed rule change to list and trade shares (``Shares'') of the 
VanEck Ethereum ETF (``Trust'') under BZX Rule 14.11(e)(4), Commodity-
Based Trust Shares. The proposed rule change was published for comment 
in the Federal Register on September 26, 2023.\3\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
    \3\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 98457 (Sept. 20, 
2023), 88 FR 66076. Comments on the proposed rule change are 
available at: https://www.sec.gov/comments/sr-cboebzx-2023-069/srcboebzx2023069.htm.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    On September 27, 2023, pursuant to Section 19(b)(2) of the Act,\4\ 
the Commission designated a longer period within which to approve the 
proposed rule change, disapprove the proposed rule change, or institute 
proceedings to determine whether to disapprove the proposed rule 
change.\5\ On December 18, 2023, the Commission instituted proceedings 
under Section 19(b)(2)(B) of the Act \6\ to determine whether to 
approve or disapprove the proposed rule change.\7\ On February 16, 
2024, the Exchange filed Amendment No. 1 to the proposed rule change as 
described in Items I and II below, which Items have been prepared by 
the Exchange. Amendment No. 1 amended and replaced in its entirety the 
proposed rule change as originally submitted. The Commission is 
publishing this notice to solicit comments on the proposed rule change, 
as modified by Amendment No. 1, from interested persons and to extend 
the time period for approving or disapproving the proposed rule change, 
as modified by Amendment No. 1.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
    \5\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 98566, 88 FR 68236 
(Oct. 3, 2023).
    \6\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2)(B).
    \7\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 99195, 88 FR 88683 
(Dec. 22, 2023).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance 
of the Proposed Rule Change

    Cboe BZX Exchange, Inc. (``BZX'' or the ``Exchange'') is filing 
with the Securities and Exchange Commission (``Commission'' or ``SEC'') 
a proposed rule change to list and trade shares of the VanEck Ethereum 
ETF (the ``Trust''),\8\ under BZX Rule 14.11(e)(4), Commodity-Based 
Trust Shares.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ The Trust was formed as a Delaware statutory trust on June 
22, 2021 and is operated as a grantor trust for U.S. federal tax 
purposes. The Trust has no fixed termination date.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The text of the proposed rule change is also available on the 
Exchange's website (http://markets.cboe.com/us/equities/regulation/rule_filings/bzx/), at the Exchange's Office of the Secretary, and at 
the Commission's Public Reference Room.

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and 
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements 
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and 
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The 
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in 
Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in 
sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such 
statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and 
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    This Amendment No. 1 to SR-CboeBZX-2023-069 amends and replaces in 
its entirety the proposal as originally submitted on September 6, 2023. 
The Exchange submits this Amendment No. 1 in order to clarify certain 
points and add additional details to the proposal.
    The Exchange proposes to list and trade the Shares under BZX Rule 
14.11(e)(4),\9\ which governs the listing and trading of Commodity-
Based Trust Shares on the Exchange.\10\ VanEck Digital Assets, LLC is 
the sponsor of the Trust (``Sponsor''). The Shares will be registered 
with the Commission by means of the Trust's registration statement on 
Form S-1 (the ``Registration Statement'').\11\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \9\ The Commission approved BZX Rule 14.11(e)(4) in Securities 
Exchange Act Release No. 65225 (August 30, 2011), 76 FR 55148 
(September 6, 2011) (SR-BATS-2011-018).
    \10\ Any of the statements or representations regarding the 
Benchmark composition, the description of the portfolio or reference 
assets, limitations on portfolio holdings or reference assets, 
dissemination and availability of index, reference asset, and 
intraday indicative values, or the applicability of Exchange listing 
rules specified in this filing to list a series of Other Securities 
(collectively, ``Continued Listing Representations'') shall 
constitute continued listing requirements for the Shares listed on 
the Exchange.
    \11\ See Amendment No. 1 to Registration Statement on Form S-1, 
dated February 16, 2024, submitted to the Commission by the Sponsor 
on behalf of the Trust (333-255888). The descriptions of the Trust, 
the Shares, and the Benchmark contained herein are based, in part, 
on information in the Registration Statement. The Registration 
Statement is not yet effective and the Shares will not trade on the 
Exchange until such time that the Registration Statement is 
effective.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Commission has historically approved or disapproved exchange 
filings to list and trade series of Trust Issued Receipts, including 
spot-based Commodity-Based Trust Shares, on the basis of whether the 
listing exchange has in place a comprehensive surveillance sharing 
agreement with a regulated market of significant size related to the 
underlying commodity to be held.\12\ With this in mind, the CME

[[Page 21033]]

Ether Futures market, which launched in February 2021, is the proper 
market to consider in determining whether there is a related regulated 
market of significant size.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \12\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 83723 (July 26, 
2018), 83 FR 37579 (August 1, 2018). This proposal was subsequently 
disapproved by the Commission. See Securities Exchange Act Release 
No. 83723 (July 26, 2018), 83 FR 37579 (August 1, 2018) (the 
``Winklevoss Order''). Prior orders from the Commission have pointed 
out that in every prior approval order for Commodity-Based Trust 
Shares, there has been a derivatives market that represents the 
regulated market of significant size, generally a Commodity Futures 
Trading Commission (the ``CFTC'') regulated futures market. Further 
to this point, the Commission's prior orders have noted that the 
spot commodities and currency markets for which it has previously 
approved spot ETPs are generally unregulated and that the Commission 
relied on the underlying futures market as the regulated market of 
significant size that formed the basis for approving the series of 
Currency and Commodity-Based Trust Shares, including gold, silver, 
platinum, palladium, copper, and other commodities and currencies. 
The Commission specifically noted in the Winklevoss Order that the 
approval order issued related to the first spot gold ETP ``was based 
on an assumption that the currency market and the spot gold market 
were largely unregulated.'' See Winklevoss Order at 37592. As such, 
the regulated market of significant size test does not require that 
the spot bitcoin market be regulated in order for the Commission to 
approve this proposal, and precedent makes clear that an underlying 
market for a spot commodity or currency being a regulated market 
would actually be an exception to the norm. These largely 
unregulated currency and commodity markets do not provide the same 
protections as the markets that are subject to the Commission's 
oversight, but the Commission has consistently looked to 
surveillance sharing agreements with the underlying futures market 
in order to determine whether such products were consistent with the 
Act.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Recently, the Commission issued an order granting approval for 
proposals to list bitcoin-based commodity trust and bitcoin-based trust 
issued receipts (these proposed funds are nearly identical to the 
Trust, but proposed to hold bitcoin instead of ethereum) (``Spot 
Bitcoin ETPs'').\13\ By way of background, in 2022 the Commission 
disapproved proposals \14\ to list Spot Bitcoin ETPs, including the 
Grayscale Order.\15\ Grayscale appealed the decision with the U.S. 
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit, which held that the Commission 
had failed to adequately explain its reasoning that the proposing 
exchange had not established that the CME bitcoin futures market was a 
market of significant size related to spot bitcoin, or that the ``other 
means'' asserted were sufficient to satisfy the statutory standard. As 
a result, the court vacated the Grayscale Order and remanded the matter 
to the Commission.\16\ In considering the remand of the Grayscale Order 
and Spot Bitcoin ETPs, the Commission determined in the Spot Bitcoin 
ETP Approval Order that the CME Bitcoin Futures market is a regulated 
market of significant size. Specifically, the Commission stated:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \13\ See Exchange Act Release No. 99306 (January 10, 2024), 89 
FR 3008 (January 17, 2024) (Self-Regulatory Organizations; NYSE 
Arca, Inc.; The Nasdaq Stock Market LLC; Cboe BZX Exchange, Inc.; 
Order Granting Accelerated Approval of Proposed Rule Changes, as 
Modified by Amendments Thereto, To List and Trade Bitcoin-Based 
Commodity-Based Trust Shares and Trust Units) (the ``Spot Bitcoin 
ETP Approval Order'').
    \14\ See Order Disapproving a Proposed Rule Change To List and 
Trade Shares of the VanEck Bitcoin Trust Under BZX Rule 14.11(e)(4), 
Commodity-Based Trust Shares, Securities Exchange Act Release No. 
97102 (Mar. 10, 2023), 88 FR 16055 (Mar. 15, 2023) (SR-CboeBZX-2022-
035) (``VanEck Order II'') and n.11 therein for the complete list of 
previous proposals.
    \15\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 95180 (June 29, 
2022) 87 FR 40299 (July 6, 2022) (SR-NYSEArca-2021-90) (Order 
Disapproving a Proposed Rule Change, as Modified by Amendment No. 1, 
to List and Trade Shares of Grayscale Bitcoin Trust Under NYSE Arca 
Rule 8.201-E (Commodity-Based Trust Shares) (the ``Grayscale 
Order'').
    \16\ See Grayscale Investments, LLC v. SEC, 82 F.4th 1239 (D.C. 
Cir. 2023).

    [B]ased on the record before the Commission and the improved 
quality of the correlation analysis in the record . . . the 
Commission is able to conclude that fraud or manipulation that 
impacts prices in spot bitcoin markets would likely similarly impact 
CME bitcoin futures prices. And because the CME's surveillance can 
assist in detecting those impacts on CME bitcoin futures prices, the 
Exchanges' comprehensive surveillance-sharing agreement with the 
CME--a U.S. regulated market whose bitcoin futures market is 
consistently highly correlated to spot bitcoin, albeit not of 
``significant size'' related to spot bitcoin--can be reasonably 
expected to assist in surveilling for fraudulent and manipulative 
acts and practices in the specific context of the [p]roposals.\17\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \17\ See the Spot Bitcoin ETP Approval Order at 3011-3012.

    As further discussed below, both the Exchange and the Sponsor 
believe that this proposal and the included analysis are sufficient to 
establish that the CME Ether Futures market represents a regulated 
market of significant size and that this proposal should be approved.
Background
    Ethereum (also referred to as ``ETH'' or ``ether'') is free 
software that is hosted on computers distributed throughout the globe. 
It employs an array of logic, called a protocol, to create a unified 
understanding of ownership, commercial activity, and business logic. 
This allows users to engage in commerce without the need to trust any 
of its participants or counterparties. Ethereum code creates verifiable 
and unambiguous rules that assign clear, strong property rights to 
create a platform for unrestrained business formation and free 
exchange. It is widely understood that no single intermediary or entity 
operates or controls the Ethereum network (referred to as 
``decentralization''), the transaction validation and recordkeeping 
infrastructure of which is collectively maintained by a disparate user 
base. The Ethereum network allows people to exchange tokens of value, 
or ETH, which are recorded on a distributed public recordkeeping system 
or ledger known as a blockchain (the ``Ethereum Blockchain''), and 
which can be used to pay for goods and services, including 
computational power on the Ethereum network, or converted to fiat 
currencies, such as the U.S. dollar, at rates determined on digital 
asset exchanges or in individual peer-to-peer transactions. 
Furthermore, by combining the recordkeeping system of the Ethereum 
Blockchain with a flexible scripting language that is programmable and 
can be used to implement sophisticated logic and execute a wide variety 
of instructions, the Ethereum network is intended to act as a 
foundational infrastructure layer on top of which users can build their 
own custom software programs, as an alternative to centralized web 
servers. In theory, anyone can build their own custom software programs 
on the Ethereum network. In this way, the Ethereum network represents a 
project to expand blockchain deployment beyond a limited-purpose, peer-
to-peer private money system into a flexible, distributed alternative 
computing infrastructure that is available to all. On the Ethereum 
network, ETH is the unit of account that users pay for the 
computational resources consumed by running their programs.
    Heretofore, U.S. retail investors have lacked a U.S. regulated, 
U.S. exchange-traded vehicle to gain exposure to ETH. Instead current 
options include: (i) facing the counter-party risk, legal uncertainty, 
technical risk, and complexity associated with accessing spot ether; or 
(ii) over-the-counter ether funds (``OTC ETH Funds'') with high 
management fees and potentially volatile premiums and discounts. 
Meanwhile, investors in other countries, including Germany, Canada, 
Switzerland, and France, are able to use more traditional exchange 
listed and traded products (including exchange-traded funds holding 
physical ETH) to gain exposure to ETH. Investors across Europe and 
Canada have access to products which trade on regulated exchanges and 
provide exposure to a broad array of spot crypto assets. U.S. 
investors, by contrast, are left with fewer and more risky means of 
getting ether exposure.\18\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \18\ The Exchange notes that the list of countries above is not 
exhaustive and that securities regulators in a number of additional 
countries have either approved or otherwise allowed the listing and 
trading of Spot Ether ETPs.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    To this point, the lack of an ETP that holds spot ETH (a ``Spot 
Ether ETP'') exposes U.S. investor assets to significant risk because 
investors that would otherwise seek cryptoasset exposure through a Spot 
Ether ETP are forced to find alternative exposure through generally 
riskier means. For example, investors in OTC ETH Funds are not afforded 
the benefits and protections of regulated Spot Ether ETPs, resulting in 
retail investors suffering losses due to drastic movements in the 
premium/discount of OTC ETH Funds. An investor who purchased the 
largest OTC ETH Fund in

[[Page 21034]]

January 2021 and held the position at the end of 2022 would have 
suffered a 69% loss due to the premium/discount, even if the price of 
ETH did not change. Many retail investors likely suffered losses due to 
this premium/discount in OTC ETH Fund trading; all such losses could 
have been avoided if a Spot Ether ETP had been available. Additionally, 
many U.S. investors that held their digital assets in accounts at 
FTX,\19\ Celsius Network LLC,\20\ BlockFi Inc.\21\ and Voyager Digital 
Holdings, Inc.\22\ have become unsecured creditors in the insolvencies 
of those entities. If a Spot Ether ETP was available, it is likely that 
at least a portion of the billions of dollars tied up in those 
proceedings would still reside in the brokerage accounts of U.S. 
investors, having instead been invested in a transparent, regulated, 
and well-understood structure--a Spot Ether ETP. To this point, 
approval of a Spot Ether ETP would represent a major win for the 
protection of U.S. investors in the cryptoasset space. The Trust, like 
all other series of Commodity-Based Trust Shares, is designed to 
protect investors against the risk of losses through fraud and 
insolvency that arise by holding digital assets, including ETH, on 
centralized platforms.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \19\ See FTX Trading Ltd., et al., Case No. 22-11068.
    \20\ See Celsius Network LLC, et al., Case No. 22-10964.
    \21\ See BlockFi Inc., Case No. 22-19361.
    \22\ See Voyager Digital Holdings, Inc., et al., Case No. 22-
10943.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Ether Futures ETFs
    The Exchange and Sponsor applaud the Commission for allowing the 
launch of ETFs registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as 
amended (the ``1940 Act'') that provide exposure to ether primarily 
through CME Ether Futures (``Ether Futures ETFs''). Allowing such 
products to list and trade is a productive first step in providing U.S. 
investors and traders with transparent, exchange-listed tools for 
expressing a view on ether.
    The structure of Ether Futures ETFs provides negative outcomes for 
buy and hold investors as compared to a Spot Ether ETP. Specifically, 
the cost of rolling CME Ether Futures contracts will cause the Ether 
Futures ETFs to lag the performance of ether itself and could cost U.S. 
investors significant amounts of money on an annual basis compared to 
Spot Ether ETPs. Such rolling costs would not be required for Spot 
Ether ETPs that hold ether. Further, Ether Futures ETFs could 
potentially hit CME position limits, which would force an Ether Futures 
ETF to invest in non-futures assets for ether exposure and cause 
potential investor confusion and lack of certainty about what such 
Ether Futures ETFs are actually holding to try to get exposure to 
ether, not to mention completely changing the risk profile associated 
with such an ETF. While Ether Futures ETFs represent a useful trading 
tool, they are clearly a sub-optimal structure for U.S. investors that 
are looking for long-term exposure to ether that will unnecessarily 
cost U.S. investors significant amounts of money every year compared to 
Spot Ether ETPs and the Exchange believes that any proposal to list and 
trade a Spot Ether ETP should be reviewed by the Commission with this 
important investor protection context in mind.
    To the extent the Commission may view differential treatment of 
Ether Futures ETFs and Spot Ether ETPs as warranted based on the 
Commission's concerns about the custody of physical ether that a Spot 
Ether ETP would hold (compared to cash-settled futures contracts),\23\ 
the Sponsor believes this concern is mitigated to a significant degree 
by the custodial arrangements that the Trust has contracted with the 
Custodian to provide, as further outlined below. In the custody 
statement, the Commission stated that the fourth step that a broker-
dealer could take to shield traditional securities customers and others 
from the risks and consequences of digital asset security fraud, theft, 
or loss is to establish, maintain, and enforce reasonably designed 
written policies, procedures, and controls for safekeeping and 
demonstrating the broker-dealer has exclusive possession or control 
over digital asset securities that are consistent with industry best 
practices to protect against the theft, loss, and unauthorized and 
accidental use of the private keys necessary to access and transfer the 
digital asset securities the broker-dealer holds in custody. While 
ether is not a security and the Custodian is not a broker-dealer, the 
Sponsor believes that similar considerations apply to the Custodian's 
holding of the Trust's ether. After diligent investigation, the Sponsor 
believes that the Custodian's policies, procedures, and controls for 
safekeeping, exclusively possessing, and controlling the Trust's ether 
holdings are consistent with industry best practices to protect against 
the theft, loss, and unauthorized and accidental use of the private 
keys. As a trust company chartered by the NYDFS, the Sponsor notes that 
the Custodian is subject to extensive regulation and has among longest 
track records in the industry of providing custodial services for 
digital asset private keys. Under the circumstances, therefore, to the 
extent the Commission believes that its concerns about the risks of 
spot ether custody justifies differential treatment of a Ether Futures 
ETF versus a Spot Ether ETP, the Sponsor believes that the fact that 
the Custodian employs the same types of policies, procedures, and 
safeguards in handling spot ether that the Commission has stated that 
broker-dealers should implement with respect to digital asset 
securities would appear to weaken the justification for treating a 
Ether Futures ETF compared to a Spot Ether ETP differently due to spot 
ether custody concerns.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \23\ See, e.g., Division of Investment Management Staff, Staff 
Statement on Funds Registered Under the Investment Company Act 
Investing in the Bitcoin Futures Market, May 11, 2021 (``The Bitcoin 
Futures market also has not presented the custody challenges 
associated with some cryptocurrency-based investing because the 
futures are cash-settled'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Based on the foregoing, the Exchange and Sponsor believe that any 
objective review of the proposals to list Spot Ether ETPs compared to 
the Ether Futures ETFs would lead to the conclusion that Spot Ether 
ETPs should be available to U.S. investors and, as such, this proposal 
and other comparable proposals to list and trade Spot Ether ETPs should 
be approved by the Commission. Stated simply, U.S. investors will 
continue to lose significant amounts of money from holding Ether 
Futures ETFs as compared to Spot Ether ETPs, losses which could be 
prevented by the Commission approving Spot Ether ETPs. Additionally, 
any concerns related to preventing fraudulent and manipulative acts and 
practices related to Spot Ether ETPs would apply equally to the spot 
markets underlying the futures contracts held by an Ether Futures ETF. 
Both the Exchange and Sponsor believe that the CME Ether Futures market 
is a regulated market of significant size and that such manipulation 
concerns are mitigated, as described extensively below. After allowing 
the listing and trading of Ether Futures ETFs that hold primarily CME 
Ether Futures, however, the only consistent outcome would be approving 
Spot Ether ETPs on the basis that the CME Ether Futures market is a 
regulated market of significant size.
    Given the current landscape, approving this proposal (and others 
like it) and allowing Spot Ether ETPs to be listed and traded alongside 
Ether Futures ETFs and Spot Bitcoin ETPs would establish a consistent 
regulatory approach, provide U.S. investors with choice in product 
structures for ether exposure, and offer flexibility in the

[[Page 21035]]

means of gaining exposure to ether through transparent, regulated, U.S. 
exchange-listed vehicles.
CME Ether Futures \24\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \24\ Unless otherwise noted, all data and analysis presented in 
this section and referenced elsewhere in the filing has been 
provided by the Sponsor.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    CME began offering trading in Ether Futures in February 2021. Each 
contract represents 50 ETH and is based on the CME CF Ether-Dollar 
Reference Rate.\25\ The contracts trade and settle like other cash-
settled commodity futures contracts. Most measurable metrics related to 
CME Ether Futures have generally trended up since launch, although some 
metrics have slowed recently. For example, there were 76,293 CME Ether 
Futures contracts traded in July 2023 (approximately $7.3 billion) 
compared to 70,305 ($11.1 billion) and 158,409 ($7.5 billion) contracts 
traded in July 2021, and July 2022 respectively.\26\ The Sponsor's 
research indicates daily correlation between the spot ETH and the CME 
Ether Futures is 0.998 from the period of 9/1/22 through 9/1/23.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \25\ The CME CF Ether-Dollar Reference Rate is based on a 
publicly available calculation methodology based on pricing sourced 
from several crypto trading platforms, including Bitstamp, Coinbase, 
Gemini, itBit, Kraken, and LMAX Digital.
    \26\ Source: CME, 7/31/23
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The number of large open interest holders \27\ and unique accounts 
trading CME Ether Futures have both increased, even in the face of 
heightened ether price volatility.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \27\ A large open interest holder in CME Ether Futures is an 
entity that holds at least 25 contracts, which is the equivalent of 
1,250 ether. At a price of approximately $1,867 per ether on 7/31/
2023, more than 59 firms had outstanding positions of greater than 
$2.3 million in CME Ether Futures.
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN26MR24.000

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN26MR24.001


[[Page 21036]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN26MR24.002

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN26MR24.003

Section 6(b)(5) and the Applicable Standards
    The Commission has approved numerous series of Trust Issued 
Receipts,\28\ including Commodity-Based Trust Shares,\29\ to be listed 
on U.S. national securities exchanges. In order for any proposed rule 
change from an exchange to be approved, the Commission must determine 
that, among other things, the proposal is consistent with the 
requirements of Section 6(b)(5) of the Act, specifically including: (i) 
the requirement that a national securities exchange's rules are 
designed to prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts and practices; 
\30\ and (ii) the requirement that an exchange proposal be designed, in 
general, to protect investors and the public interest. The Exchange 
believes that this proposal is consistent with the requirements of 
Section 6(b)(5) of the Act and that this filing sufficiently

[[Page 21037]]

demonstrates that the CME Ether Futures market represents a regulated 
market of significant size and that, on the whole, the manipulation 
concerns previously articulated by the Commission are sufficiently 
mitigated to the point that they are outweighed by quantifiable 
investor protection issues that would be resolved by approving this 
proposal.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \28\ See Exchange Rule 14.11(f).
    \29\ Commodity-Based Trust Shares, as described in Exchange Rule 
14.11(e)(4), are a type of Trust Issued Receipt.
    \30\ The Exchange believes that ETH is resistant to price 
manipulation and that ``other means to prevent fraudulent and 
manipulative acts and practices'' exist to justify dispensing with 
the requisite surveillance sharing agreement. The geographically 
diverse and continuous nature of ETH trading render it difficult and 
prohibitively costly to manipulate the price of ETH. The 
fragmentation across ETH platforms, the relatively slow speed of 
transactions, and the capital necessary to maintain a significant 
presence on each trading platform make manipulation of ETH prices 
through continuous trading activity challenging. To the extent that 
there are ETH exchanges engaged in or allowing wash trading or other 
activity intended to manipulate the price of ETH on other markets, 
such pricing does not normally impact prices on other exchange 
because participants will generally ignore markets with quotes that 
they deem non-executable. Moreover, the linkage between the ETH 
markets and the presence of arbitrageurs in those markets means that 
the manipulation of the price of ETH price on any single venue would 
require manipulation of the global ETH price in order to be 
effective. Arbitrageurs must have funds distributed across multiple 
trading platforms in order to take advantage of temporary price 
dislocations, thereby making it unlikely that there will be strong 
concentration of funds on any particular ETH exchange or OTC 
platform. As a result, the potential for manipulation on a trading 
platform would require overcoming the liquidity supply of such 
arbitrageurs who are effectively eliminating any cross-market 
pricing differences.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

(i) Designed To Prevent Fraudulent and Manipulative Acts and Practices
    In order to meet this standard in a proposal to list and trade a 
series of Commodity-Based Trust Shares, the Commission requires that an 
exchange demonstrate that there is a comprehensive surveillance-sharing 
agreement in place \31\ with a regulated market of significant size. 
Both the Exchange and CME are members of the Intermarket Surveillance 
Group (``ISG'').\32\ The only remaining issue to be addressed is 
whether the Ether Futures market constitutes a market of significant 
size, which both the Exchange and the Sponsor believe that it does. The 
terms ``significant market'' and ``market of significant size'' include 
a market (or group of markets) as to which: (a) there is a reasonable 
likelihood that a person attempting to manipulate the ETP would also 
have to trade on that market to manipulate the ETP, so that a 
surveillance-sharing agreement would assist the listing exchange in 
detecting and deterring misconduct; and (b) it is unlikely that trading 
in the ETP would be the predominant influence on prices in that 
market.\33\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \31\ As previously articulated by the Commission, ``The standard 
requires such surveillance-sharing agreements since ``they provide a 
necessary deterrent to manipulation because they facilitate the 
availability of information needed to fully investigate a 
manipulation if it were to occur.'' The Commission has emphasized 
that it is essential for an exchange listing a derivative securities 
product to enter into a surveillance-sharing agreement with markets 
trading underlying securities for the listing exchange to have the 
ability to obtain information necessary to detect, investigate, and 
deter fraud and market manipulation, as well as violations of 
exchange rules and applicable federal securities laws and rules. The 
hallmarks of a surveillance-sharing agreement are that the agreement 
provides for the sharing of information about market trading 
activity, clearing activity, and customer identity; that the parties 
to the agreement have reasonable ability to obtain access to and 
produce requested information; and that no existing rules, laws, or 
practices would impede one party to the agreement from obtaining 
this information from, or producing it to, the other party.'' The 
Commission has historically held that joint membership in the ISG 
constitutes such a surveillance sharing agreement. See Securities 
Exchange Act Release No. 88284 (February 26, 2020), 85 FR 12595 
(March 3, 2020) (SR-NYSEArca-2019-39) (the ``Wilshire Phoenix 
Disapproval'').
    \32\ For a list of the current members and affiliate members of 
ISG, see www.isgportal.com.
    \33\ See Wilshire Phoenix Disapproval.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Commission has also recognized that the ``regulated market of 
significant size'' standard is not the only means for satisfying 
Section 6(b)(5) of the act, specifically providing that a listing 
exchange could demonstrate that ``other means to prevent fraudulent and 
manipulative acts and practices'' are sufficient to justify dispensing 
with the requisite surveillance-sharing agreement.34 35
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \34\ See Winklevoss Order at 37580. The Commission has also 
specifically noted that it ``is not applying a `cannot be 
manipulated' standard; instead, the Commission is examining whether 
the proposal meets the requirements of the Exchange Act and, 
pursuant to its Rules of Practice, places the burden on the listing 
exchange to demonstrate the validity of its contentions and to 
establish that the requirements of the Exchange Act have been met.'' 
Id. at 37582.
    \35\ According to reports, the Commission is poised to allow the 
launch of ETFs registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, 
as amended (the ``1940 Act''), that provide exposure to ETH 
primarily through CME Ether Futures (``ETH Futures ETFs'') as early 
as October 2023. Allowing such products to list and trade is a 
productive first step in providing U.S. investors and traders with 
transparent, exchange-listed tools for expressing a view on ETH. 
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2023-08-17/sec-said-to-be-poised-to-allow-us-debut-of-ether-futures-etfs-eth#xj4y7vzkg.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

(a) Manipulation of the ETP
    The significant market test requires that there is a reasonable 
likelihood that a person attempting to manipulate the ETP would also 
have to trade on that market to manipulate the ETP, so that a 
surveillance-sharing agreement would assist the listing exchange in 
detecting and deterring misconduct. In light of the similarly high 
correlation between spot ETH/CME Ether Futures and spot bitcoin/CME 
Bitcoin Futures, applying the same rationale that the Commission 
applied to a Spot Bitcoin ETP in the Spot Bitcoin ETP Approval Order 
\36\ also indicates that this test is satisfied for this proposal. As 
noted above, in the Spot Bitcoin ETP Approval Order, the SEC concluded 
that:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \36\ See Exchange Act Release No. 99306 (January 10, 2024), 89 
FR 3008 (January 17, 2024) (Self-Regulatory Organizations; NYSE 
Arca, Inc.; The Nasdaq Stock Market LLC; Cboe BZX Exchange, Inc.; 
Order Granting Accelerated Approval of Proposed Rule Changes, as 
Modified by Amendments Thereto, To List and Trade Bitcoin-Based 
Commodity-Based Trust Shares and Trust Units) (the ``Spot Bitcoin 
ETP Approval Order'').

    . . . fraud or manipulation that impacts prices in spot bitcoin 
markets would likely similarly impact CME bitcoin futures prices. 
And because the CME's surveillance can assist in detecting those 
impacts on CME bitcoin futures prices, the Exchanges' comprehensive 
surveillance-sharing agreement with the CME . . . can be reasonably 
expected to assist in surveilling for fraudulent and manipulative 
acts and practices in the specific context of the [p]roposals.\37\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \37\ See the Spot Bitcoin ETP Approval Order at 3011-3012.

    The assumptions from this statement are also true for CME Ether 
Futures. CME Ether Futures pricing is based on pricing from spot ether 
markets. The statement from the Spot Bitcoin ETP Approval Order that 
the surveillance-sharing agreement with the CME ``can be reasonably 
expected to assist in surveilling for fraudulent and manipulative acts 
and practices in the specific context of the [p]roposals'' makes clear 
that the Commission believes that CME's surveillance can capture the 
effects of trading on the relevant spot markets on the pricing of CME 
Bitcoin Futures. This same logic would extend to CME Ether Futures 
markets where CME's surveillance would be able to capture the effects 
of trading on the relevant spot markets on the pricing of CME Ether 
Futures.
(b) Predominant Influence on Prices in Spot and ETH Futures
    The Exchange and Sponsor also believe that trading in the Shares 
would not be the predominant force on prices in the CME Ether Futures 
market for a number of reasons. First, because the Trust would not hold 
CME Ether Futures contracts, the only way that it could be the 
predominant force on prices in that market is through the spot markets 
that CME Ether Futures contracts use for pricing.\38\ The Sponsor notes 
that ether total 24-hour spot trading volume has averaged $9.4 billion 
over the year ending September 1, 2023.\39\ The Sponsor expects that 
the Trust would represent a very small percentage of this daily trading 
volume in the spot ether market even in its most aggressive projections 
for the Trust's assets and therefore could not be the predominant force 
on prices in the CME Ether Futures market. Second, much like the CME 
Bitcoin Futures market, the CME Ether Futures market has progressed and 
matured significantly. As the court found in the Grayscale Order, 
``Because the spot market is deeper and more liquid than the futures 
market, manipulation should be more difficult, not less.'' The Exchange 
and Sponsor agree with this sentiment and

[[Page 21038]]

believe it applies equally to the spot ether and CME Ether Futures 
markets.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \38\ This logic is reflected by the court in the Grayscale Order 
at 17-18. Specifically, the court found that ``Because Grayscale 
owns no futures contracts, trading in Grayscale can affect the 
futures market only through the spot market . . . But Grayscale 
holds just 3.4 percent of outstanding bitcoin, and the Commission 
did not suggest Grayscale can dominate the price of bitcoin.''
    \39\ Source: TokenTerminal.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

(c) Other Means To Prevent Fraudulent and Manipulative Acts and 
Practices
    As noted above, the Commission also permits a listing exchange to 
demonstrate that ``other means to prevent fraudulent and manipulative 
acts and practices'' are sufficient to justify dispensing with the 
requisite surveillance-sharing agreement. The Exchange and Sponsor 
believe that such conditions are present.
    The Exchange believes that the proposal is designed to protect 
investors and the public interest. Over the past several years, U.S. 
investor exposure to ether through OTC ETH Funds has grown. With that 
growth, so too has grown the quantifiable investor protection issues to 
U.S. investors through roll costs for Ether Futures ETFs and premium/
discount volatility and management fees for OTC ETH Funds. The Exchange 
believes that the concerns related to the prevention of fraudulent and 
manipulative acts and practices have been sufficiently addressed to be 
consistent with the Act and, to the extent that the Commission 
disagrees with that assertion, also believes that such concerns are now 
outweighed by these investor protection concerns. As such, the Exchange 
believes that approving this proposal (and comparable proposals) 
provides the Commission with the opportunity to allow U.S. investors 
with access to ether in a regulated and transparent exchange-traded 
vehicle that would act to limit risk to U.S. investors by: (i) reducing 
premium and discount volatility; (ii) reducing management fees through 
meaningful competition; (iii) reducing risks and costs associated with 
investing in Ether Futures ETFs and operating companies that are 
imperfect proxies for ether exposure; and (iv) providing an alternative 
to custodying spot ether.
VanEck Ethereum ETF
    Delaware Trust Company is the trustee (``Trustee''). The State 
Street Bank and Trust Company will be the administrator 
(``Administrator'') and transfer agent (``Transfer Agent'') and will be 
responsible for the custody of the Trust's cash and cash equivalents 
\40\ (the ``Cash Custodian''). Van Eck Securities Corporation will be 
the marketing agent (``Marketing Agent'') in connection with the 
creation and redemption of ``Creation Baskets'', as defined below, of 
Shares. A custodian (the ``Custodian'') will be responsible for custody 
of the Trust's ether.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \40\ Cash equivalents are short-term instruments with maturities 
of less than 3 months.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    According to the Registration Statement, each Share will represent 
a fractional undivided beneficial interest in the Trust's net assets. 
The Trust's assets will only consist of ether, cash and cash 
equivalents.
    According to the Registration Statement, the Trust is neither an 
investment company registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, 
as amended,\41\ nor a commodity pool for purposes of the Commodity 
Exchange Act (``CEA''), and neither the Trust nor the Sponsor is 
subject to regulation as a commodity pool operator or a commodity 
trading adviser in connection with the Shares.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \41\ 15 U.S.C. 80a-1.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    When the Trust sells or redeems its Shares, it will do so in cash 
transactions in blocks of 25,000 Shares (a ``Creation Basket'') at the 
Trust's net asset value (``NAV''). A third party will use cash to buy 
and deliver ether to create Shares or withdraw and sell ether for cash 
to redeem Shares, on behalf of the Trust. For creations, authorized 
participants will deliver cash to the Trust's account with the Cash 
Custodian in exchange for Shares. Upon receipt of an approved creation 
order, the Sponsor, on behalf of the Trust, will submit an order to buy 
the amount of ether represented by a Creation Basket. Based off ether 
executions, the Cash Custodian will request the required cash from the 
authorized participant; the Transfer Agent will only issue ETF shares 
when the authorized participant has made delivery of the cash. 
Following receipt by the Cash Custodian of the cash from an authorized 
participant, the Sponsor, on behalf of the Trust, will approve an order 
with one or more previously onboarded trading partners to purchase the 
amount of ether represented by the Creation Basket. This purchase of 
ether will normally be cleared through an affiliate of the Custodian 
(although the purchase may also occur directly with the trading 
partner) and the ether will settle directly into the Trust's account at 
the Custodian.\42\ Authorized participants may then offer Shares to the 
public at prices that depend on various factors, including the supply 
and demand for Shares, the value of the Trust's assets, and market 
conditions at the time of a transaction. Shareholders who buy or sell 
Shares during the day from their broker may do so at a premium or 
discount relative to the NAV of the Shares of the Trust.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \42\ For redemptions, the process will occur in the reverse 
order. Upon receipt of an approved redemption order, the Sponsor, on 
behalf of the Trust, will submit an order to sell the amount of 
ether represented by a Creation Basket and the cash proceeds will be 
remitted to the authorized participant when the 50,000 Shares are 
received by the Transfer Agent.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Investment Objective
    According to the Registration Statement and as further described 
below, the investment objective of the Trust is for the Shares to 
reflect the performance of ether less the expenses of the Trust's 
operations. In seeking to achieve its investment objective, the Trust 
will hold ether and will value its Shares daily based on the reported 
Benchmark and process all creations and redemptions in cash 
transactions with authorized participants. The Trust is not actively 
managed.
The Benchmark
    As described in the Registration Statement, the Fund will use the 
Benchmark to calculate the Trust's NAV. The Benchmark is designed to be 
a robust price for ETH in USD and there is no component other than ETH 
in the Benchmark. The underlying ether platforms are sourced from the 
industry leading CryptoCompare Exchange Benchmark review report. 
CryptoCompare Exchange Benchmark was established in 2019 as a tool 
designed to bring clarity to the digital trading platform sector by 
providing a framework for assessing risk and in turn bringing 
transparency and accountability to a complex and rapidly evolving 
market.\43\ The current ether platform composition of the Benchmark is 
Bitstamp, Coinbase, Gemini, itBit, and Kraken. CryptoCompare Data 
Limited is the index sponsor and index administrator for the Benchmark. 
Data is the calculation agent for the Benchmark. The Benchmark is 
calculated daily between 00:00 and 24:00 (CET) and the Benchmark values 
are disseminated to

[[Page 21039]]

data vendors every fifteen seconds. The Benchmark is disseminated in 
USD and the closing value is calculated at 16:00:00 ET with fixed 16:00 
ether platform rates.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \43\ The CryptoCompare Exchange Benchmark methodology utilizes a 
combination of qualitative and quantitative metrics to analyze a 
comprehensive data set across eight categories of evaluation legal/
regulation, KYC/transaction risk, data provision, security, team/
exchange, asset quality/diversity, market quality and negative 
events. The CryptoCompare Exchange Benchmark review report assigns a 
grade to each exchange which helps identify what it believes to be 
the lowest risk exchanges in the industry. Based on the 
CryptoCompare Exchange Benchmark, MarketVector Indexes initially 
selects the top five exchanges by rank for inclusion in the 
MarketVectorTM Ethereum Benchmark Rate. If an eligible 
exchange is downgraded by two or more notches in a semi-annual 
review and is no longer in the top five by rank, it is replaced by 
the highest ranked non-component exchange. Adjustments to exchange 
coverage are announced four business days prior to the first 
business day of each of June and December 23:00 CET. The 
MarketVectorTM Ethereum Benchmark Rate is rebalanced at 
16:00:00 GMT/BST on the last business day of each of May and 
November.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In calculating the closing price of the Benchmark, the methodology 
captures trade prices and sizes from ether platforms and examines 
twenty three-minute periods leading up to 4:00 p.m. EST. It then 
calculates an equal-weighted average of the volume-weighted median 
price of these twenty three-minute periods, removing the highest and 
lowest contributed prices. Using twenty consecutive three-minute 
segments over a sixty-minute period means malicious actors would need 
to sustain efforts to manipulate the market over an extended period of 
time, or would need to replicate efforts multiple times across ether 
platforms, potentially triggering review. This extended period also 
supports authorized participant activity by capturing volume over a 
longer time period, rather than forcing authorized participants to mark 
an individual close or auction. The use of a median price reduces the 
ability of outlier prices to impact the NAV, as it systematically 
excludes those prices from the NAV calculation. The use of a volume-
weighted median (as opposed to a traditional median) serves as an 
additional protection against attempts to manipulate the NAV by 
executing a large number of low-dollar trades, because any manipulation 
attempt would have to involve a majority of global spot ETH volume in a 
three-minute window to have any influence on the NAV. As discussed in 
the Registration Statement, removing the highest and lowest prices 
further protects against attempts to manipulate the NAV, requiring bad 
actors to act on multiple ether platforms at once to have any ability 
to influence the price.
Net Asset Value
    NAV means the total assets of the Trust (which includes all ether, 
cash, and cash equivalents) less total liabilities of the Trust. The 
Administrator determines the NAV of the Trust on each day that the 
Exchange is open for regular trading, as promptly as practical after 
4:00 p.m. ET based on the Benchmark. The NAV of the Trust is the 
aggregate value of the Trust's assets less its estimated accrued but 
unpaid liabilities (which include accrued expenses). In determining the 
NAV, the Administrator values the Shares of the Trust based on the 
closing price of the Benchmark as of 4:00 p.m. Eastern time. The 
Administrator also determines the NAV per Share.
    The NAV for the Trust will be calculated by the Administrator once 
a day and will be disseminated daily to all market participants at the 
same time. The Sponsor will monitor for significant events related to 
crypto assets that may impact the value of ether and will determine, in 
good faith, and in accordance with its valuation policies and 
procedures, whether to fair value the Trust's ether on a given day 
based on whether certain pre-determined criteria have been met. For 
example, if the Benchmark deviates by more than a pre-determined amount 
from an alternate benchmark available to the Sponsor, the Sponsor may 
determine to utilize an alternate benchmark, such as the 
MarketVector\TM\ Ethereum Index or the S&P Ethereum Index. The Sponsor 
may also fair value the Trust's ether using observed market 
transactions from various trading platforms, including some or all of 
the trading platforms included in the Benchmark.\44\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \44\ Any alternative method to determining NAV will only be 
employed on an ad hoc basis. Any permanent change to the calculation 
of the NAV would require a proposed rule change under Rule 19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Availability of Information
    In addition to the price transparency of the Benchmark, the Trust 
will provide information regarding the Trust's ETH holdings as well as 
additional data regarding the Trust. The website for the Trust, which 
will be publicly accessible at no charge, will contain the following 
information: (a) the current NAV per Share daily and the prior business 
day's NAV and the reported closing price; (b) the BZX Official Closing 
Price \45\ in relation to the NAV as of the time the NAV is calculated 
and a calculation of the premium or discount of such price against such 
NAV; (c) data in chart form displaying the frequency distribution of 
discounts and premiums of the Official Closing Price against the NAV, 
within appropriate ranges for each of the four previous calendar 
quarters (or for the life of the Trust, if shorter); (d) the 
prospectus; and (e) other applicable quantitative information. The 
aforementioned information will be published as of the close of 
business available on the Sponsor's website at www.vaneck.com, or any 
successor thereto. The NAV for the Trust will be calculated by the 
Administrator once a day and will be disseminated daily to all market 
participants at the same time. Quotation and last-sale information 
regarding the Shares will be disseminated through the facilities of the 
Consolidated Tape Association (``CTA''). The Trust will also 
disseminate its holdings on a daily basis on its website.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \45\ As defined in Rule 11.23(a)(3), the term ``BZX Official 
Closing Price'' shall mean the price disseminated to the 
consolidated tape as the market center closing trade.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Intraday Indicative Value (``IIV'') will be updated during 
Regular Trading Hours to reflect changes in the value of the Trust's 
ether holdings during the trading day. The IIV may differ from the NAV 
because NAV is calculated, using the closing price of the Benchmark, 
once a day at 4:00 p.m. Eastern time whereas the IIV draws prices from 
the last trade on each ether platform to produce a relevant, real-time 
price. The IIV disseminated during Regular Trading Hours should not be 
viewed as an actual real-time update of the NAV, which will be 
calculated only once at the end of each trading day. The Trust will 
provide an IIV per Share updated every 15 seconds, as calculated by the 
Exchange or a third-party financial data provider during the Exchange's 
Regular Trading Hours (9:30 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. E.T.). The IIV will be 
widely disseminated on a per Share basis every 15 seconds during the 
Exchange's Regular Trading Hours through the facilities of the 
consolidated tape association (CTA) and Consolidated Quotation System 
(CQS) high speed lines. In addition, the IIV will be available through 
on-line information services such as Bloomberg and Reuters.
    The price of ether will be made available by one or more major 
market data vendors, updated at least every 15 seconds during Regular 
Trading Hours.
    As noted above, the Benchmark is calculated every 15 seconds and 
information about the Benchmark and Benchmark value, including index 
data and key elements of how the Benchmark is calculated, will be 
publicly available at https://www.marketvector.com/.
    Quotation and last sale information for ether is widely 
disseminated through a variety of major market data vendors, including 
Bloomberg and Reuters. Information relating to trading, including price 
and volume information, in ether is available from major market data 
vendors and from the trading platforms on which ether are traded. Depth 
of book information is also available from ether trading platforms. The 
normal trading hours for ether trading platforms are 24 hours per day, 
365 days per year.
    Information regarding market price and trading volume of the Shares 
will be continually available on a real-time basis throughout the day 
on brokers' computer screens and other electronic services. Information 
regarding the previous day's closing price and trading

[[Page 21040]]

volume information for the Shares will be published daily in the 
financial section of newspapers.
The Custodian
    The Custodian's services (i) allow ETH to be deposited from a 
public blockchain address to the Trust's ETH account and (ii) allow ETH 
to be withdrawn from the ETH account to a public blockchain address as 
instructed by the Trust. The custody agreement requires the Custodian 
to hold the Trust's ETH in cold storage, unless required to facilitate 
withdrawals as a temporary measure. The Custodian will use segregated 
cold storage ETH addresses for the Trust which are separate from the 
ETH addresses that the Custodian uses for its other customers and which 
are directly verifiable via the ETH blockchain. The Custodian will 
safeguard the private keys to the ETH associated with the Trust's ETH 
account. The Custodian will at all times record and identify in its 
books and records that such ETH constitutes the property of the Trust. 
The Custodian will not withdraw the Trust's ETH from the Trust's 
account with the Custodian, or loan, hypothecate, pledge or otherwise 
encumber the Trust's ETH, without the Trust's instruction. If the 
custody agreement terminates, the Sponsor may appoint another custodian 
and the Trust may enter into a custodian agreement with such custodian.
Creation and Redemption of Shares
    When the Trust sells or redeems its Shares, it will do so in cash 
transactions in blocks of 25,000 Shares that are based on the amount of 
ether held by the Trust on a per unit (i.e., 25,000 Share) basis. 
According to the Registration Statement, on any business day, an 
authorized participant may place an order to create one or more 
Creation Baskets. Purchase orders must be placed by 4:00 p.m. ET, or 
the close of regular trading on the Exchange, whichever is earlier. The 
day on which an order is received is considered the purchase order 
date. The total deposit of cash required to create each Creation Unit 
is an amount of cash that is in the same proportion to the total assets 
of the Trust, net of accrued expenses and other liabilities, on the 
date the order to purchase is properly received, as the number of 
Shares to be created under the purchase order is in proportion to the 
total number of Shares outstanding on the date the order is received. 
The Administrator determines the required deposit for a given day by 
dividing the number of ether held by the Trust as of the opening of 
business on that business day, adjusted for the amount of ether 
constituting estimated accrued but unpaid fees and expenses of the 
Trust as of the opening of business on that business day, by the 
quotient of the number of Shares outstanding at the opening of business 
divided by the number of Shares in a Creation Unit.
    The authorized participants will deliver only cash to create shares 
and will receive only cash when redeeming shares. Further, authorized 
participants will not directly or indirectly purchase, hold, deliver, 
or receive ether as part of the creation or redemption process or 
otherwise direct the Trust or a third party with respect to purchasing, 
holding, delivering, or receiving ether as part of the creation or 
redemption process.
    The Trust will create shares by receiving ether from a third party 
that is not the authorized participant and the Trust--not the 
authorized participant--is responsible for selecting the third party to 
facilitate the delivery of the ether. Further, the third party will not 
be acting as an agent of the authorized participant with respect to the 
delivery of the ether to the Trust or acting at the direction of the 
authorized participant with respect to the delivery of the ether to the 
Trust. When fulfilling a redemption request, the Trust will deliver 
ether to a third party that is not the authorized participant and the 
Trust--not the authorized participant--is responsible for selecting 
such third party to receive the ether. Further, the third party will 
not be acting as an agent of the authorized participant with respect to 
the receipt of the ether from the Trust or acting at the direction of 
the authorized participant with respect to the receipt of the ether 
from the Trust.
    The procedures by which an authorized participant can redeem one or 
more Creation Baskets mirror the procedures for the creation of 
Creation Baskets. A third party, that is unaffiliated with the Trust 
and the Sponsor, will use cash to buy and deliver ether to create 
Shares or withdraw and sell ether for cash to redeem Shares, on behalf 
of the Trust.
    The Sponsor will maintain ownership and control of ether in a 
manner consistent with good delivery requirements for spot commodity 
transactions.
Rule 14.11(e)(4)--Commodity-Based Trust Shares
    The Shares will be subject to BZX Rule 14.11(e)(4), which sets 
forth the initial and continued listing criteria applicable to 
Commodity-Based Trust Shares. The Exchange represents that, for initial 
and continued listing, the Trust must be in compliance with Rule 10A-3 
under the Act. A minimum of 100,000 Shares will be outstanding at the 
commencement of listing on the Exchange. The Exchange will obtain a 
representation that the NAV will be calculated daily and that the NAV 
and information about the assets of the Trust will be made available to 
all market participants at the same time. The Exchange notes that, as 
defined in Rule 14.11(e)(4)(C)(i), the Shares will be: (a) issued by a 
trust that holds (1) a specified commodity \46\ deposited with the 
trust, or (2) a specified commodity and, in addition to such specified 
commodity, cash; (b) issued by such trust in a specified aggregate 
minimum number in return for a deposit of a quantity of the underlying 
commodity and/or cash; and (c) when aggregated in the same specified 
minimum number, may be redeemed at a holder's request by such trust 
which will deliver to the redeeming holder the quantity of the 
underlying commodity and/or cash.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \46\ For purposes of Rule 14.11(e)(4), the term commodity takes 
on the definition of the term as provided in the Commodity Exchange 
Act.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Upon termination of the Trust, the Shares will be removed from 
listing. The Trustee, Delaware Trust Company, is a trust company having 
substantial capital and surplus and the experience and facilities for 
handling corporate trust business, as required under Rule 
14.11(e)(4)(E)(iv)(a) and that no change will be made to the trustee 
without prior notice to and approval of the Exchange. The Exchange also 
notes that, pursuant to Rule 14.11(e)(4)(F), neither the Exchange nor 
any agent of the Exchange shall have any liability for damages, claims, 
losses or expenses caused by any errors, omissions or delays in 
calculating or disseminating any underlying commodity value, the 
current value of the underlying commodity required to be deposited to 
the Trust in connection with issuance of Commodity-Based Trust Shares; 
resulting from any negligent act or omission by the Exchange, or any 
agent of the Exchange, or any act, condition or cause beyond the 
reasonable control of the Exchange, its agent, including, but not 
limited to, an act of God; fire; flood; extraordinary weather 
conditions; war; insurrection; riot; strike; accident; action of 
government; communications or power failure; equipment or software 
malfunction; or any error, omission or delay in the reports of 
transactions in an underlying commodity. Finally, as required in Rule 
14.11(e)(4)(G), the Exchange notes that any registered market maker 
(``Market Maker'') in the Shares must file with the Exchange in a 
manner prescribed by the Exchange

[[Page 21041]]

and keep current a list identifying all accounts for trading in an 
underlying commodity, related commodity futures or options on commodity 
futures, or any other related commodity derivatives, which the 
registered Market Maker may have or over which it may exercise 
investment discretion. No registered Market Maker shall trade in an 
underlying commodity, related commodity futures or options on commodity 
futures, or any other related commodity derivatives, in an account in 
which a registered Market Maker, directly or indirectly, controls 
trading activities, or has a direct interest in the profits or losses 
thereof, which has not been reported to the Exchange as required by 
this Rule. In addition to the existing obligations under Exchange rules 
regarding the production of books and records (see, e.g., Rule 4.2), 
the registered Market Maker in Commodity-Based Trust Shares shall make 
available to the Exchange such books, records or other information 
pertaining to transactions by such entity or registered or non-
registered employee affiliated with such entity for its or their own 
accounts for trading the underlying physical commodity, related 
commodity futures or options on commodity futures, or any other related 
commodity derivatives, as may be requested by the Exchange.
    The Exchange is able to obtain information regarding trading in the 
Shares and the underlying ether, Eth Futures contracts, options on Eth 
Futures, or any other ether derivative through members acting as 
registered Market Makers, in connection with their proprietary or 
customer trades.
    As a general matter, the Exchange has regulatory jurisdiction over 
its Members and their associated persons, which include any person or 
entity controlling a Member. To the extent the Exchange may be found to 
lack jurisdiction over a subsidiary or affiliate of a Member that does 
business only in commodities or futures contracts, the Exchange could 
obtain information regarding the activities of such subsidiary or 
affiliate through surveillance sharing agreements with regulatory 
organizations of which such subsidiary or affiliate is a member.
Trading Halts
    With respect to trading halts, the Exchange may consider all 
relevant factors in exercising its discretion to halt or suspend 
trading in the Shares. The Exchange will halt trading in the Shares 
under the conditions specified in BZX Rule 11.18. Trading may be halted 
because of market conditions or for reasons that, in the view of the 
Exchange, make trading in the Shares inadvisable. These may include: 
(1) the extent to which trading is not occurring in the ether 
underlying the Shares; or (2) whether other unusual conditions or 
circumstances detrimental to the maintenance of a fair and orderly 
market are present. Trading in the Shares also will be subject to Rule 
14.11(e)(4)(E)(ii), which sets forth circumstances under which trading 
in the Shares may be halted.
    If the IIV or the value of the Benchmark is not being disseminated 
as required, the Exchange may halt trading during the day in which the 
interruption to the dissemination of the IIV or the value of the 
Benchmark occurs. If the interruption to the dissemination of the IIV 
or the value of the Benchmark persists past the trading day in which it 
occurred, the Exchange will halt trading no later than the beginning of 
the trading day following the interruption.
    In addition, if the Exchange becomes aware that the NAV with 
respect to the Shares is not disseminated to all market participants at 
the same time, it will halt trading in the Shares until such time as 
the NAV is available to all market participants.
Trading Rules
    The Exchange deems the Shares to be equity securities, thus 
rendering trading in the Shares subject to the Exchange's existing 
rules governing the trading of equity securities. BZX will allow 
trading in the Shares during all trading sessions on the Exchange. The 
Exchange has appropriate rules to facilitate transactions in the Shares 
during all trading sessions. As provided in BZX Rule 11.11(a) the 
minimum price variation for quoting and entry of orders in securities 
traded on the Exchange is $0.01 where the price is greater than $1.00 
per share or $0.0001 where the price is less than $1.00 per share. The 
Shares of the Trust will conform to the initial and continued listing 
criteria set forth in BZX Rule 14.11(e)(4).
Surveillance
    The Exchange represents that its surveillance procedures are 
adequate to properly monitor the trading of the Shares on the Exchange 
during all trading sessions and to deter and detect violations of 
Exchange rules and the applicable federal securities laws. Trading of 
the Shares through the Exchange will be subject to the Exchange's 
surveillance procedures for derivative products, including Commodity-
Based Trust Shares. FINRA conducts certain cross-market surveillances 
on behalf of the Exchange pursuant to a regulatory services agreement. 
The Exchange is responsible for FINRA's performance under this 
regulatory services agreement.
    The Exchange or FINRA, on behalf of the Exchange, or both, will 
communicate as needed regarding trading in the Shares and Ether Futures 
with other markets and other entities that are members of the ISG, and 
the Exchange, or FINRA, on behalf of the Exchange, or both, may obtain 
trading information regarding trading in the Shares and Ether Futures 
from such markets and other entities.\47\ The Exchange may obtain 
information regarding trading in the Shares and Eth Futures via ISG, 
from other exchanges who are members or affiliates of the ISG, or with 
which the Exchange has entered into a comprehensive surveillance 
sharing agreement.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \47\ For a list of the current members and affiliate members of 
ISG, see www.isgportal.com.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In addition, the Exchange also has a general policy prohibiting the 
distribution of material, non-public information by its employees.
    The issuer has represented to the Exchange that it will advise the 
Exchange of any failure by the Trust or the Shares to comply with the 
continued listing requirements, and, pursuant to its obligations under 
Section 19(g)(1) of the Exchange Act, the Exchange will surveil for 
compliance with the continued listing requirements. If the Trust or the 
Shares are not in compliance with the applicable listing requirements, 
the Exchange will commence delisting procedures under Exchange Rule 
14.12.
Information Circular
    Prior to the commencement of trading, the Exchange will inform its 
members in an Information Circular of the special characteristics and 
risks associated with trading the Shares. Specifically, the Information 
Circular will discuss the following: (i) the procedures for the 
creation and redemption of Creation Baskets (and that the Shares are 
not individually redeemable); (ii) BZX Rule 3.7, which imposes 
suitability obligations on Exchange members with respect to 
recommending transactions in the Shares to customers; (iii) how 
information regarding the IIV and the Trust's NAV are disseminated; 
(iv) the risks involved in trading the Shares outside of Regular 
Trading Hours \48\ when an updated IIV will not be calculated or 
publicly disseminated; (v) the requirement that members deliver a 
prospectus to investors purchasing

[[Page 21042]]

newly issued Shares prior to or concurrently with the confirmation of a 
transaction; and (vi) trading information. The Information Circular 
will also reference the fact that there is no regulated source of last 
sale information regarding ether, that the Commission has no 
jurisdiction over the trading of ether as a commodity, and that the 
CFTC has regulatory jurisdiction over the trading of Ether Futures 
contracts and options on Ether Futures contracts.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \48\ Regular Trading Hours is the time between 9:30 a.m. and 
4:00 p.m. Eastern Time.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In addition, the Information Circular will advise members, prior to 
the commencement of trading, of the prospectus delivery requirements 
applicable to the Shares. Members purchasing the Shares for resale to 
investors will deliver a prospectus to such investors. The Information 
Circular will also discuss any exemptive, no-action and interpretive 
relief granted by the Commission from any rules under the Act.
2. Statutory Basis
    The Exchange believes that the proposal is consistent with Section 
6(b) of the Act \49\ in general and Section 6(b)(5) of the Act \50\ in 
particular in that it is designed to prevent fraudulent and 
manipulative acts and practices, to promote just and equitable 
principles of trade, to foster cooperation and coordination with 
persons engaged in facilitating transactions in securities, to remove 
impediments to and perfect the mechanism of a free and open market and 
a national market system and, in general, to protect investors and the 
public interest.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \49\ 15 U.S.C. 78f.
    \50\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Commission has approved numerous series of Trust Issued 
Receipts,\51\ including Commodity-Based Trust Shares,\52\ to be listed 
on U.S. national securities. In order for any proposed rule change from 
an exchange to be approved, the Commission must determine that, among 
other things, the proposal is consistent with the requirements of 
Section 6(b)(5) of the Act, specifically including: (i) the requirement 
that a national securities exchange's rules are designed to prevent 
fraudulent and manipulative acts and practices; \53\ and (ii) the 
requirement that an exchange proposal be designed, in general, to 
protect investors and the public interest. The Exchange believes that 
this proposal is consistent with the requirements of Section 6(b)(5) of 
the Act and that this filing sufficiently demonstrates that the CME 
Ether Futures market represents a regulated market of significant size 
and that, on the whole, the manipulation concerns previously 
articulated by the Commission are sufficiently mitigated to the point 
that they are outweighed by quantifiable investor protection issues 
that would be resolved by approving this proposal.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \51\ See Exchange Rule 14.11(f).
    \52\ Commodity-Based Trust Shares, as described in Exchange Rule 
14.11(e)(4), are a type of Trust Issued Receipt.
    \53\ The Exchange believes that ETH is resistant to price 
manipulation and that ``other means to prevent fraudulent and 
manipulative acts and practices'' exist to justify dispensing with 
the requisite surveillance sharing agreement. The geographically 
diverse and continuous nature of ETH trading render it difficult and 
prohibitively costly to manipulate the price of ETH. The 
fragmentation across ETH platforms, the relatively slow speed of 
transactions, and the capital necessary to maintain a significant 
presence on each trading platform make manipulation of ETH prices 
through continuous trading activity challenging. To the extent that 
there are ETH exchanges engaged in or allowing wash trading or other 
activity intended to manipulate the price of ETH on other markets, 
such pricing does not normally impact prices on other exchange 
because participants will generally ignore markets with quotes that 
they deem non-executable. Moreover, the linkage between the ETH 
markets and the presence of arbitrageurs in those markets means that 
the manipulation of the price of ETH price on any single venue would 
require manipulation of the global ETH price in order to be 
effective. Arbitrageurs must have funds distributed across multiple 
trading platforms in order to take advantage of temporary price 
dislocations, thereby making it unlikely that there will be strong 
concentration of funds on any particular ETH exchange or OTC 
platform. As a result, the potential for manipulation on a trading 
platform would require overcoming the liquidity supply of such 
arbitrageurs who are effectively eliminating any cross-market 
pricing differences.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

(i) Designed To Prevent Fraudulent and Manipulative Acts and Practices
    In order to meet this standard in a proposal to list and trade a 
series of Commodity-Based Trust Shares, the Commission requires that an 
exchange demonstrate that there is a comprehensive surveillance-sharing 
agreement in place \54\ with a regulated market of significant size. 
Both the Exchange and CME are members of ISG.\55\ The only remaining 
issue to be addressed is whether the ETH Futures market constitutes a 
market of significant size, which both the Exchange and the Sponsor 
believe that it does. The terms ``significant market'' and ``market of 
significant size'' include a market (or group of markets) as to which: 
(a) there is a reasonable likelihood that a person attempting to 
manipulate the ETP would also have to trade on that market to 
manipulate the ETP, so that a surveillance-sharing agreement would 
assist the listing exchange in detecting and deterring misconduct; and 
(b) it is unlikely that trading in the ETP would be the predominant 
influence on prices in that market.\56\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \54\ As previously articulated by the Commission, ``The standard 
requires such surveillance-sharing agreements since ``they provide a 
necessary deterrent to manipulation because they facilitate the 
availability of information needed to fully investigate a 
manipulation if it were to occur.'' The Commission has emphasized 
that it is essential for an exchange listing a derivative securities 
product to enter into a surveillance-sharing agreement with markets 
trading underlying securities for the listing exchange to have the 
ability to obtain information necessary to detect, investigate, and 
deter fraud and market manipulation, as well as violations of 
exchange rules and applicable federal securities laws and rules. The 
hallmarks of a surveillance-sharing agreement are that the agreement 
provides for the sharing of information about market trading 
activity, clearing activity, and customer identity; that the parties 
to the agreement have reasonable ability to obtain access to and 
produce requested information; and that no existing rules, laws, or 
practices would impede one party to the agreement from obtaining 
this information from, or producing it to, the other party.'' The 
Commission has historically held that joint membership in ISG 
constitutes such a surveillance sharing agreement. See Wilshire 
Phoenix Disapproval.
    \55\ For a list of the current members and affiliate members of 
ISG, see www.isgportal.com.
    \56\ See Wilshire Phoenix Disapproval.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Commission has also recognized that the ``regulated market of 
significant size'' standard is not the only means for satisfying 
Section 6(b)(5) of the act, specifically providing that a listing 
exchange could demonstrate that ``other means to prevent fraudulent and 
manipulative acts and practices'' are sufficient to justify dispensing 
with the requisite surveillance-sharing agreement.\57\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \57\ See Winklevoss Order at 37580. The Commission has also 
specifically noted that it ``is not applying a `cannot be 
manipulated' standard; instead, the Commission is examining whether 
the proposal meets the requirements of the Exchange Act and, 
pursuant to its Rules of Practice, places the burden on the listing 
exchange to demonstrate the validity of its contentions and to 
establish that the requirements of the Exchange Act have been met.'' 
Id. at 37582.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

(a) Manipulation of the ETP
    The significant market test requires that there is a reasonable 
likelihood that a person attempting to manipulate the ETP would also 
have to trade on that market to manipulate the ETP, so that a 
surveillance-sharing agreement would assist the listing exchange in 
detecting and deterring misconduct. In light of the similarly high 
correlation between spot ETH/CME Ether Futures and spot bitcoin/CME 
Bitcoin Futures, applying the same rationale that the Commission 
applied to a Spot Bitcoin ETP in the Spot Bitcoin ETP Approval Order 
\58\ also

[[Page 21043]]

indicates that this test is satisfied for this proposal. As noted 
above, in the Spot Bitcoin ETP Approval Order, the SEC concluded that:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \58\ See Exchange Act Release No. 99306 (January 10, 2024), 89 
FR 3008 (January 17, 2024) (Self-Regulatory Organizations; NYSE 
Arca, Inc.; The Nasdaq Stock Market LLC; Cboe BZX Exchange, Inc.; 
Order Granting Accelerated Approval of Proposed Rule Changes, as 
Modified by Amendments Thereto, To List and Trade Bitcoin-Based 
Commodity-Based Trust Shares and Trust Units) (the ``Spot Bitcoin 
ETP Approval Order'').

    . . . fraud or manipulation that impacts prices in spot bitcoin 
markets would likely similarly impact CME bitcoin futures prices. 
And because the CME's surveillance can assist in detecting those 
impacts on CME bitcoin futures prices, the Exchanges' comprehensive 
surveillance-sharing agreement with the CME . . . can be reasonably 
expected to assist in surveilling for fraudulent and manipulative 
acts and practices in the specific context of the [p]roposals.\59\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \59\ See the Spot Bitcoin ETP Approval Order at 3011-3012.

    The assumptions from this statement are also true for CME Ether 
Futures. CME Ether Futures pricing is based on pricing from spot ether 
markets. The statement from the Spot Bitcoin ETP Approval Order that 
the surveillance-sharing agreement with the CME ``can be reasonably 
expected to assist in surveilling for fraudulent and manipulative acts 
and practices in the specific context of the [p]roposals'' makes clear 
that the Commission believes that CME's surveillance can capture the 
effects of trading on the relevant spot markets on the pricing of CME 
Bitcoin Futures. This same logic would extend to CME Ether Futures 
markets where CME's surveillance would be able to capture the effects 
of trading on the relevant spot markets on the pricing of CME Ether 
Futures.
(b) Predominant Influence on Prices in Spot and ETH Futures
    The Exchange and Sponsor also believe that trading in the Shares 
would not be the predominant force on prices in the CME Ether Futures 
market for a number of reasons. First, because the Trust would not hold 
CME Ether Futures contracts, the only way that it could be the 
predominant force on prices in that market is through the spot markets 
that CME Ether Futures contracts use for pricing.\60\ The Sponsor notes 
that ether total 24-hour spot trading volume has averaged $9.4 billion 
over the year ending September 1, 2023.\61\ The Sponsor expects that 
the Trust would represent a very small percentage of this daily trading 
volume in the spot ether market even in its most aggressive projections 
for the Trust's assets and therefore could not be the predominant force 
on prices in the CME Ether Futures market. Second, much like the CME 
Bitcoin Futures market, the CME Ether Futures market has progressed and 
matured significantly. As the court found in the Grayscale Order, 
``Because the spot market is deeper and more liquid than the futures 
market, manipulation should be more difficult, not less.'' The Exchange 
and Sponsor agree with this sentiment and believe it applies equally to 
the spot ether and CME Ether Futures markets.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \60\ This logic is reflected by the court in the Grayscale Order 
at 17-18. Specifically, the court found that ``Because Grayscale 
owns no futures contracts, trading in Grayscale can affect the 
futures market only through the spot market . . . But Grayscale 
holds just 3.4 percent of outstanding bitcoin, and the Commission 
did not suggest Grayscale can dominate the price of bitcoin.''
    \61\ Source: TokenTerminal.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

(c) Other Means To Prevent Fraudulent and Manipulative Acts and 
Practices
    As noted above, the Commission also permits a listing exchange to 
demonstrate that ``other means to prevent fraudulent and manipulative 
acts and practices'' are sufficient to justify dispensing with the 
requisite surveillance-sharing agreement. The Exchange and Sponsor 
believe that such conditions are present.
    The Exchange believes that the proposal is designed to protect 
investors and the public interest. Over the past several years, U.S. 
investor exposure to ether through OTC ETH Funds has grown. With that 
growth, so too has grown the quantifiable investor protection issues to 
U.S. investors through roll costs for Ether Futures ETFs and premium/
discount volatility and management fees for OTC ETH Funds. The Exchange 
believes that the concerns related to the prevention of fraudulent and 
manipulative acts and practices have been sufficiently addressed to be 
consistent with the Act and, to the extent that the Commission 
disagrees with that assertion, also believes that such concerns are now 
outweighed by these investor protection concerns. As such, the Exchange 
believes that approving this proposal (and comparable proposals) 
provides the Commission with the opportunity to allow U.S. investors 
with access to ether in a regulated and transparent exchange-traded 
vehicle that would act to limit risk to U.S. investors by: (i) reducing 
premium and discount volatility; (ii) reducing management fees through 
meaningful competition; (iii) reducing risks and costs associated with 
investing in Ether Futures ETFs and operating companies that are 
imperfect proxies for ether exposure; and (iv) providing an alternative 
to custodying spot ether.
Commodity-Based Trust Shares
    The Exchange believes that the proposed rule change is designed to 
prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts and practices in that the 
Shares will be listed on the Exchange pursuant to the initial and 
continued listing criteria in Exchange Rule 14.11(e)(4). The Exchange 
believes that its surveillance procedures are adequate to properly 
monitor the trading of the Shares on the Exchange during all trading 
sessions and to deter and detect violations of Exchange rules and the 
applicable federal securities laws. Trading of the Shares through the 
Exchange will be subject to the Exchange's surveillance procedures for 
derivative products, including Commodity-Based Trust Shares. The issuer 
has represented to the Exchange that it will advise the Exchange of any 
failure by the Trust or the Shares to comply with the continued listing 
requirements, and, pursuant to its obligations under Section 19(g)(1) 
of the Exchange Act, the Exchange will surveil for compliance with the 
continued listing requirements. If the Trust or the Shares are not in 
compliance with the applicable listing requirements, the Exchange will 
commence delisting procedures under Exchange Rule 14.12. The Exchange 
may obtain information regarding trading in the Shares and listed ether 
derivatives via the ISG, from other exchanges who are members or 
affiliates of the ISG, or with which the Exchange has entered into a 
comprehensive surveillance sharing agreement.
Availability of Information
    In addition to the price transparency of the Benchmark, the Trust 
will provide information regarding the Trust's ETH holdings as well as 
additional data regarding the Trust. The website for the Trust, which 
will be publicly accessible at no charge, will contain the following 
information: (a) the current NAV per Share daily and the prior business 
day's NAV and the reported closing price; (b) the BZX Official Closing 
Price \62\ in relation to the NAV as of the time the NAV is calculated 
and a calculation of the premium or discount of such price against such 
NAV; (c) data in chart form displaying the frequency distribution of 
discounts and premiums of the Official Closing Price against the NAV, 
within appropriate ranges for each of the four previous calendar 
quarters (or for the life of the Trust, if shorter); (d) the 
prospectus; and (e) other applicable quantitative information. The 
aforementioned information will be published as of the close of 
business

[[Page 21044]]

available on the Sponsor's website at www.vaneck.com, or any successor 
thereto. The NAV for the Trust will be calculated by the Administrator 
once a day and will be disseminated daily to all market participants at 
the same time. Quotation and last-sale information regarding the Shares 
will be disseminated through the facilities of the Consolidated Tape 
Association (``CTA''). The Trust will also disseminate its holdings on 
a daily basis on its website.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \62\ As defined in Rule 11.23(a)(3), the term ``BZX Official 
Closing Price'' shall mean the price disseminated to the 
consolidated tape as the market center closing trade.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Intraday Indicative Value (``IIV'') will be updated during 
Regular Trading Hours to reflect changes in the value of the Trust's 
ether holdings during the trading day. The IIV may differ from the NAV 
because NAV is calculated, using the closing price of the Benchmark, 
once a day at 4:00 p.m. Eastern time whereas the IIV draws prices from 
the last trade on each ether platform to produce a relevant, real-time 
price. The IIV disseminated during Regular Trading Hours should not be 
viewed as an actual real-time update of the NAV, which will be 
calculated only once at the end of each trading day. The Trust will 
provide an IIV per Share updated every 15 seconds, as calculated by the 
Exchange or a third-party financial data provider during the Exchange's 
Regular Trading Hours (9:30 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. E.T.). The IIV will be 
widely disseminated on a per Share basis every 15 seconds during the 
Exchange's Regular Trading Hours through the facilities of the 
consolidated tape association (CTA) and Consolidated Quotation System 
(CQS) high speed lines. In addition, the IIV will be available through 
on-line information services such as Bloomberg and Reuters.
    The price of ether will be made available by one or more major 
market data vendors, updated at least every 15 seconds during Regular 
Trading Hours.
    As noted above, the Benchmark is calculated every 15 seconds and 
information about the Benchmark and Benchmark value, including index 
data and key elements of how the Benchmark is calculated, will be 
publicly available at https://www.marketvector.com/.
    Quotation and last sale information for ether is widely 
disseminated through a variety of major market data vendors, including 
Bloomberg and Reuters. Information relating to trading, including price 
and volume information, in ether is available from major market data 
vendors and from the trading platforms on which ether are traded. Depth 
of book information is also available from ether trading platforms. The 
normal trading hours for ether trading platforms are 24 hours per day, 
365 days per year.
    Information regarding market price and trading volume of the Shares 
will be continually available on a real-time basis throughout the day 
on brokers' computer screens and other electronic services. Information 
regarding the previous day's closing price and trading volume 
information for the Shares will be published daily in the financial 
section of newspapers.
    In sum, the Exchange believes that this proposal is consistent with 
the requirements of Section 6(b)(5) of the Act, that this filing 
sufficiently demonstrates that the CME Ether Futures market represents 
a regulated market of significant size, and that on the whole the 
manipulation concerns previously articulated by the Commission are 
sufficiently mitigated to the point that they are outweighed by 
investor protection issues that would be resolved by approving this 
proposal.
    The Exchange believes that the proposal is, in particular, designed 
to protect investors and the public interest. Premium and discount 
volatility, high fees, rolling costs, insufficient disclosures, and 
technical hurdles are putting U.S. investor money at risk on a daily 
basis that could potentially be eliminated through access to a Spot 
Ether ETP. As such, the Exchange believes that this proposal acts to 
limit the risk to U.S. investors that are increasingly seeking exposure 
to ether by providing direct, 1-for-1 exposure to ether in a regulated, 
transparent, exchange-traded vehicle, specifically by: (i) reducing 
premium volatility; (ii) reducing management fees through meaningful 
competition; (iii) providing an alternative to Ether Futures ETFs which 
will eliminate roll cost; (iv) reducing risks associated with investing 
in operating companies that are imperfect proxies for ether exposure; 
and (v) providing an alternative to custodying spot ether. The investor 
protection issues for U.S. investors has grown significantly over the 
last several years, through roll costs for Ether Futures ETFs and 
premium/discount volatility and management fees for OTC ETH Funds. As 
discussed throughout, this growth investor protection concerns need to 
be reevaluated and rebalanced with the prevention of fraudulent and 
manipulative acts and practices concerns that previous disapproval 
orders have relied upon. Finally, the Exchange notes that in addition 
to all of the arguments herein which it believes sufficiently 
establishes the CME Ether Futures market as a regulated market of 
significant size, it is logically inconsistent to find that the CME 
Ether Futures market is a significant market as it relates to the CME 
Ether Futures market, but not a significant market as it relates to the 
ether spot market for the numerous reasons laid out above.
    For the above reasons, the Exchange believes that the proposed rule 
change is consistent with the requirements of Section 6(b)(5) of the 
Act.

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will 
impose any burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate 
in furtherance of the purpose of the Act. The Exchange notes that the 
proposed rule change, rather will facilitate the listing and trading of 
an additional exchange-traded product that will enhance competition 
among both market participants and listing venues, to the benefit of 
investors and the marketplace.

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed 
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others

    The Exchange has neither solicited nor received written comments on 
the proposed rule change.

III. Notice of Designation of a Longer Period for Commission Action on 
Proceedings To Determine Whether To Approve or Disapprove the Proposed 
Rule Change, as Modified by Amendment No. 1

    Section 19(b)(2) of the Act \63\ provides that, after initiating 
proceedings, the Commission shall issue an order approving or 
disapproving the proposed rule change not later than 180 days after the 
date of publication of notice of filing of the proposed rule change. 
The Commission may extend the period for issuing an order approving or 
disapproving the proposed rule change, however, by not more than 60 
days if the Commission determines that a longer period is appropriate 
and publishes the reasons for such determination. The proposed rule 
change was published for comment in the Federal Register on September 
26, 2023.\64\ The 180th day after publication of the proposed rule 
change is March 24, 2024. The Commission is extending the time period 
for approving or disapproving the proposed rule change for an 
additional 60 days.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \63\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
    \64\ See supra note 3 and accompanying text.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Commission finds that it is appropriate to designate a longer 
period within which to issue an order approving or disapproving the 
proposed rule change so that it has sufficient time to consider the 
proposed rule change, as

[[Page 21045]]

modified by Amendment No. 1, and the issues raised therein. 
Accordingly, the Commission, pursuant to Section 19(b)(2) of the 
Act,\65\ designates May 23, 2024, as the date by which the Commission 
shall either approve or disapprove the proposed rule change (File No. 
SR-CboeBZX-2023-069).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \65\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views and 
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule 
change, as modified by Amendment No. 1, is consistent with the Act. 
Comments may be submitted by any of the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's internet comment form (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
     Send an email to [email protected]. Please include 
file number SR-CboeBZX-2023-069 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities 
and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to file number SR-CboeBZX-2023-069. This 
file number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To 
help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently, 
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on 
the Commission's internet website (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all 
written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are 
filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to 
the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other 
than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the 
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for website viewing and 
printing in the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE, 
Washington, DC 20549, on official business days between the hours of 10 
a.m. and 3 p.m. Copies of the filing also will be available for 
inspection and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. Do not 
include personal identifiable information in submissions; you should 
submit only information that you wish to make available publicly. We 
may redact in part or withhold entirely from publication submitted 
material that is obscene or subject to copyright protection. All 
submissions should refer to file number SR-CboeBZX-2023-069 and should 
be submitted on or before April 16, 2024.
    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets, 
pursuant to delegated authority.\66\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \66\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12), (57).

Sherry Haywood,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2024-06319 Filed 3-25-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P