[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 47 (Friday, March 8, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Pages 16726-16729]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-04980]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

[A-570-117]


Wood Mouldings and Millwork Products From the People's Republic 
of China: Preliminary Results Intent To Rescind, in Part, and 
Rescission in Part, of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2022-
2023

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, 
Department of Commerce.

SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) preliminarily 
determines that Fujian Jinquan Trade Co., Ltd./Baiyuan Wood Machining 
Co., Ltd. (Jinquan/Baiyuan) and 22 non-individually examined and 
separate-rate eligible exporters of wood mouldings and millwork 
products (millwork products) from the People's Republic of China 
(China) sold subject merchandise to the United States at prices below 
normal value (NV) during the period of review (POR), February 1, 2022, 
through January 31, 2023. Commerce also preliminarily determines that 
Fujian Yinfeng Imp & Exp Trading Co., Ltd./Fujian Province Youxi City 
Mangrove Wood Machining Co., Ltd. (Yinfeng/Mangrove) did not sell 
subject merchandise to the United States at prices below NV during the 
POR. We intend to rescind this review with respect to 12 companies for 
which the U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) data show no entries 
of the subject merchandise from these companies during the POR. 
Additionally, we are rescinding this administrative review with respect 
to seven companies because the requests for review for these companies 
were timely withdrawn. Finally, we preliminarily find that four 
companies are part of the China-wide entity. We invited interested 
parties to comment on these preliminary results.

DATES: Applicable March 8, 2024.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Brian Smith or Robert Palmer, AD/CVD 
Operations, Office VIII, Enforcement and Compliance, International 
Trade Administration, Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue 
NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-1766 and (202) 482-9068, 
respectively.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

    This administrative review is being conducted in accordance with 
section 751(a) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act). The 
review covers 47 companies, including mandatory respondents, Jinquan/
Baiyuan and Yinfeng/Mangrove.\1\ For a complete description of the 
events that followed the initiation of this administrative review, see 
the Preliminary Decision Memorandum. A list of topics discussed in the 
Preliminary Decision Memorandum is included as Appendix I to this 
notice. The Preliminary Decision Memorandum is a public document and is 
on file electronically via Enforcement and Compliance's Antidumping and 
Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS). 
ACCESS is available to registered users at https://access.trade.gov. In 
addition, a complete version of the Preliminary Decision Memorandum can 
be accessed directly at https://access.trade.gov/public/FRNoticesListLayout.aspx.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ We have determined that it is appropriate to continue to 
treat affiliates Yinfeng and Mangrove as a single entity, and 
affiliates Jinquan and Baiyuan, as a single entity for purposes of 
this administrative review, consistent with past segments of this 
proceeding. For further discussion, see Memorandum, ``Decision 
Memorandum for the Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty 
Administrative Review; 2022-2023: Wood Mouldings and Millwork 
Products from the People's Republic of China,'' dated concurrently 
with, and hereby adopted by, this notice (Preliminary Decision 
Memorandum).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Scope of the Order 2
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \2\ See Wood Mouldings and Millwork Products from the People's 
Republic of China: Amended Final Antidumping Duty Determination and 
Antidumping Duty Order, 86 FR 9486 (February 16, 2021) (Order).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The merchandise covered by the Order is wood mouldings and millwork

[[Page 16727]]

products from China. For a complete description of the scope of the 
Order, see the Preliminary Decision Memorandum.

Methodology

    Commerce is conducting this review in accordance with section 
751(a)(1)(B) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.213. We calculated export prices 
in accordance with section 772 of the Act. Because China is a non-
market economy (NME) country within the meaning of section 771(18) of 
the Act, NV has been calculated in accordance with section 773(c) of 
the Act. For a full description of the methodology underlying our 
preliminary conclusions, see the Preliminary Decision Memorandum.

Intent To Rescind Administrative Review, in Part

    Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.213(d)(3), it is Commerce's practice to 
rescind an administrative review of an antidumping duty order where it 
determines that there were no suspended entries of subject merchandise 
during the POR.\3\ Normally, upon completion of an administrative 
review, the suspended entries are liquidated at the antidumping duty 
assessment rate for the review period.\4\ Therefore, for an 
administrative review to be conducted, there must be a reviewable, 
suspended entry that Commerce can instruct CBP to liquidate at the 
calculated antidumping duty assessment rate for the review period.\5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ See, e.g., Certain Carbon and Alloy Steel Cut-to Length 
Plate from the Federal Republic of Germany: Recission of Antidumping 
Administrative Review; 2020-2021, 88 FR 4157 (January 24, 2023).
    \4\ See 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1).
    \5\ See, e.g., Shanghai Sunbeauty Trading Co. v. United States, 
380 F. Supp. 3d 1328, 1335-36 (CIT 2019), at 12 (referring to 
section 751(a) of the Act, the U.S. Court of International Trade 
held that: ``While the statute does not explicitly require that an 
entry be suspended as a prerequisite for establishing entitlement to 
a review, it does explicitly state the determined rate will be used 
as the liquidation rate for the reviewed entries. This result can 
only obtain if the liquidation of entries has been suspended . . 
.;'' see also Certain Frozen Fish Fillets from the Socialist 
Republic of Vietnam: Final Results of Antidumping Duty 
Administrative Review and Final Determination of No Shipments; 2018-
2019, 86 FR 36102, and accompanying Issues and Decision Memorandum 
at Comment 4; and Solid Fertilizer Grade Ammonium Nitrate from the 
Russian Federation: Notice of Rescission of Antidumping Duty 
Administrative Review, 77 FR 65532 (October 29, 2012) (noting that 
``for an administrative review to be conducted, there must be a 
reviewable, suspended entry to be liquidated at the newly calculated 
assessment rate'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    On May 31, 2023, Commerce placed CBP entry data on the record for 
U.S. imports of the subject merchandise during the POR for respondent 
selection purposes.\6\ Twelve companies under review have existing 
separate rates but no suspended entries during the POR.\7\ In the 
absence of any reviewable, suspended entries of subject merchandise 
from these companies during the POR, Commerce hereby notifies all 
interested parties of its intent to rescind this administrative review 
with respect to these companies. Commerce is providing interested 
parties with an opportunity to submit comments on this preliminary 
decision, including factual information. Comments, including factual 
information, from interested parties are due to Commerce no later than 
seven days after the publication of these preliminary results. Rebuttal 
comments, including rebuttal factual information, are due seven days 
thereafter. All submissions must be filed electronically at http://access.trade.gov in accordance with 19 CFR 351.303.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ See Memorandum, ``Release of U.S. Customs and Border 
Protection Data,'' dated May 31, 2023.
    \7\ See Appendix IV for a list of these companies.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Rescission of Administrative Review, in Part

    Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1), Commerce will rescind an 
administrative review, in whole or in part, if a party who requested 
the review withdraws the request within 90 days of the date of 
publication of the notice of initiation of the requested review. On May 
8, 2023, Xuzhou Goodwill Resource Co., Ltd. (Xuzhou Goodwill) and 
Sanming Lintong Trading Co., Ltd. (Sanming Lintong) each timely 
withdrew its request for review of itself.\8\ On July 7, 2023, Jeld-
Wen, Inc. (Jeld-Wen), a U.S. importer of the subject merchandise, 
timely withdrew its request for review of Zhejiang Senya Board Industry 
Co., Ltd. (Zhejiang Senya).\9\ Finally, on July 10, 2023, the 
petitioner timely withdrew its requests for review of four companies 
(i.e., Fujian Shunchang Shengsheng Wood Industry Limited Company 
(Shunchang Shengsheng), TL Wood Products, Inc. (TL Wood), Xiamen Jinxi 
Building Material Co., Ltd. (Xiamen Jinxi), and Zhangzhou Green Wood 
Industry and Trade Co., Ltd. (Zhangzhou Green Wood),\10\ one of which, 
Shunchang Shengsheng, also withdrew its review request on July 10, 
2023.\11\ Because no other parties requested a review of the above 
seven companies, Commerce is rescinding the administrative review with 
respect to these companies.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ See Sanming Lintong's Letter, ``Withdrawal of Request for 
Review,'' dated May 8, 2023; see also Xuzhou Goodwill's Letter, 
``Withdrawal of Request for Review,'' dated May 8, 2023.
    \9\ See Jeld-Wen's Letter, ``Withdrawal of Request for 
Administrative Review,'' dated July 7,2023; see also Jeld-Wen's 
Letter, ``Request of administrative Review,'' dated February 28, 
2023.
    \10\ See Petitioner's Letter, ``Partial Withdrawal of Request 
for Administrative Review,'' dated July 10, 2023.
    \11\ See Shunchang Shengcheng's Letter, ``Withdraw of Request 
for Administrative Review,'' dated July 10, 2023.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Separate Rates

    Commerce preliminarily finds that, in addition to Yinfeng/Mangrove 
and Jinquan/Baiyuan, the information placed on the record by 22 
companies not individually examined in this review demonstrates that 
these companies are eligible for a separate rate.\12\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \12\ See Appendix II for a list of these companies.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The statute and Commerce's regulations do not address what dumping 
margin to apply to respondents not selected for individual examination 
when Commerce limits its examination in an administrative review 
pursuant to section 777A(c)(2) of the Act. Generally, Commerce looks to 
section 735(c)(5) of the Act, which provides instructions for 
calculating the all-others rate in an investigation, for guidance when 
calculating the dumping margin for respondents that are not selected 
for individual examination in an administrative review. Section 
735(c)(5)(A) of the Act states that the all-others rate should be 
calculated by averaging the weighted-average dumping margins calculated 
for individually-examined respondents, excluding dumping margins that 
are zero, de minimis, or based entirely on facts available. Because we 
calculated a preliminary dumping margin of zero for Yinfeng/Mangrove, 
and a preliminary dumping margin that is not zero, de minimis, or based 
entirely on facts available for Jinquan/Baiyuan, we assigned the 
separate-rate recipients a preliminary dumping margin equal to Jinquan/
Baiyuan's preliminary dumping margin consistent with Commerce's 
practice and section 735(c)(5)(A) of the Act.

The China-Wide Entity

    Commerce's policy regarding conditional review of the China-wide 
entity applies to this administrative review.\13\ Under this policy, 
the China-wide entity will not be under review unless a party 
specifically requests and Commerce initiates, or Commerce self-
initiates, a review of the China-wide

[[Page 16728]]

entity.\14\ Because no party requested a review of the China-wide 
entity and no review was initiated for this POR, the China-wide entity 
is not under review and the China-wide entity's rate (i.e., 220.87 
percent) is not subject to change.\15\ Commerce preliminarily finds 
that four companies \16\ did not establish their eligibility for a 
separate rate because they failed to provide a separate rate 
application or a separate rate certification. As such, we preliminarily 
determine that these companies are part of the China-wide entity.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \13\ See Antidumping Proceedings: Announcement of Change in 
Department Practice for Respondent Selection in Antidumping 
Proceedings and Conditional Review of the Nonmarket Economy Entity 
in NME Antidumping Duty Proceedings, 78 FR 65963 (November 4, 2013).
    \14\ Id.
    \15\ See Order, 86 FR at 9488.
    \16\ These companies are: (1) Aventra, Inc. (Aventra); (2) China 
Cornici, Co. Ltd. (China Cornici); (3) Gaomi Hongtai Home Furniture 
Co., Ltd. (Gaomi Hongtai); and (4) and Shuyang Zhongding Decoration 
Materials Co., Ltd. (Shuyang Zhongding).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Preliminary Results of Review

    Commerce preliminarily determines that the following estimated 
weighted-average dumping margins exist for the POR:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \17\ See Appendix II.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                       Weighted-average
                      Exporter                          dumping margin
                                                           (percent)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Fujian Jinquan Trade Co., Ltd./Baiyuan Wood                         4.72
 Machining Co., Ltd.................................
Fuijian Yinfeng Imp & Exp Trading Co., Ltd./Fujian                  0.00
 Province Youxi City Mangrove Wood Machining Co.,
 Ltd................................................
Non-Selected Companies Under Review Receiving a                     4.72
 Separate Rate\17\..................................
------------------------------------------------------------------------

Disclosure and Public Comment

    Commerce intends to disclose its calculations and analysis 
performed to interested parties for these preliminary results within 
five days of any public announcement or, if there is no public 
announcement, within five days of the date of publication of this 
notice in accordance with 19 CFR 351.224(b).
    Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.309(c), interested parties may submit case 
briefs to Commerce no later than 30 days after the date of publication 
of this notice. Rebuttal briefs, limited to issues raised in the case 
briefs, may be filed not later than five days after the date for filing 
case briefs.\18\ Interested parties who submit case briefs or rebuttal 
briefs in this proceeding must submit: (1) a table of contents listing 
each issue; and (2) a table of authorities.\19\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \18\ See 19 CFR 351.309(d); see also Administrative Protective 
Order, Service, and Other Procedures in Antidumping and 
Countervailing Duty Proceedings, 88 FR 67069, 67077 (September 29, 
2023) (APO and Service Final Rule).
    \19\ See 19 351.309(c)(2) and (d)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    As provided under 19 CFR 351.309(c)(2) and (d)(2), in prior 
proceedings we have encouraged interested parties to provide an 
executive summary of their briefs that should be limited to five pages 
total, including footnotes. In this review, we instead request that 
interested parties provide at the beginning of their briefs a public, 
executive summary for each issue raised in their briefs.\20\ Further, 
we request that interested parties limit their executive summary of 
each issue to no more than 450 words, not including citations. We 
intend to use the executive summaries as the basis of the comment 
summaries included in the issues and decision memorandum that will 
accompany the final results in this administrative review. We request 
that interested parties include footnotes for relevant citations in the 
executive summary of each issue. Note that Commerce has amended certain 
of its requirements pertaining to the service of documents in 19 CFR 
351.303(f).\21\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \20\ We use the term ``issue'' here to describe an argument that 
Commerce would normally address in a comment of the Issues and 
Decision Memorandum.
    \21\ See APO and Service Final Rule.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.310(c), interested parties who wish to 
request a hearing must submit a written request to the Assistant 
Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance, filed electronically via 
Enforcement and Compliance's Antidumping and CVD Centralized Electronic 
Service System (ACCESS). Requests should contain: (1) the party's name, 
address, and telephone number; (2) the number of participants; and (3) 
a list of issues to be discussed. Issues raised in the hearing will be 
limited to those raised in the respective case briefs. An 
electronically filed hearing request must be received successfully in 
its entirety by Commerce's electronic records system, ACCESS, by 5:00 
p.m. Eastern Time within 30 days after the date of publication of this 
notice.
    Commerce intends to issue the final results of this administrative 
review, which will include the results of its analysis of issues raised 
in any briefs, within 120 days of the date of publication of these 
preliminary results, pursuant to section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act and 19 
CFR 351.213(h), unless this deadline is extended.

Assessment Rates

    In accordance with section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act, the final 
results of this review shall be the basis for the assessment of 
antidumping duties on entries of merchandise covered by this review. 
Upon issuance of the final results, Commerce will determine, and CBP 
shall assess, antidumping duties on all appropriate entries covered by 
this review.\22\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \22\ See 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    For the companies for which we are not rescinding this 
administrative review, Commerce intends to issue assessment 
instructions to CBP no earlier than 35 days after the date of 
publication of the final results of this review. If a timely summons is 
filed at the U.S. Court of International Trade, the assessment 
instructions will direct CBP not to liquidate relevant entries until 
the time for parties to file a request for a statutory injunction has 
expired (i.e., within 90 days of publication).
    If a mandatory respondent's ad valorem weighted-average dumping 
margin is not zero or de minimis (i.e., less than 0.50 percent) in the 
final results of this review, Commerce will calculate importer-specific 
assessment rates for that respondent, in accordance with 19 CFR 
351.212(b)(1).\23\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \23\ In these preliminary results, Commerce applied the 
assessment rate calculation method adopted in Antidumping 
Proceedings: Calculation of the Weighted-Average Dumping Margin and 
Assessment Rate in Certain Antidumping Proceedings: Final 
Modification, 77 FR 8101 (February 14, 2012).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    For sales for which the respondents reported entered value, 
Commerce intends to calculate importer-specific ad valorem assessment 
rates based on the ratio of the total amount of dumping calculated for 
each importer's examined sales to the total entered value of those 
sales, in accordance with 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1). For sales for which the 
respondents did not report entered value, we will calculate importer-
specific per-unit duty assessment rates based on the ratio of the total 
amount of antidumping duties calculated for the examined sales to the 
total quantity of those sales. To determine whether an importer-
specific, per-unit assessment rate is de minimis, in accordance with 19 
CFR 351.106(c)(2), we also will

[[Page 16729]]

calculate an importer-specific ad valorem ratio based on estimated 
entered values.
    If, in the final results, a mandatory respondent's weighted-average 
dumping margin is zero or de minimis (i.e., less than 0.5 percent), 
Commerce will instruct CBP to liquidate the appropriate entries for 
that respondent without regard to antidumping duties.\24\ For entries 
that were not reported in the U.S. sales databases submitted by each 
mandatory respondent during this review, and for the companies that do 
not qualify for a separate rate, Commerce will instruct CBP to 
liquidate such entries at the China-wide rate (i.e., 220.87 
percent).\25\ For the respondents that were not selected for individual 
examination in this administrative review but qualified for a separate 
rate, the assessment rate will be equal to the weighted-average dumping 
margin determined in the final results of this review.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \24\ See 19 CFR 351.106(c)(2).
    \25\ See Order.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    For the companies for which we are rescinding this review based on 
the timely withdrawal of all review requests, we intend to instruct CBP 
to assess antidumping duties on all appropriate entries at a rate equal 
to the cash deposit rate of estimated antidumping duties required at 
the time of entry, or withdrawal from warehouse, for consumption in 
accordance with 19 CFR 351.212(c)(1)(i). Commerce intends to issue 
assessment instructions to CBP for the rescinded companies no earlier 
than 35 days after the date of publication of this notice in the 
Federal Register.
    For the companies for which we intend to rescind the review in the 
final results based on no reviewable entries, provided we receive no 
contrary information, we intend to instruct CBP to assess antidumping 
duties on all appropriate entries at a rate equal to the cash deposit 
rate of estimated antidumping duties required at the time of entry, or 
withdrawal from warehouse, for consumption in accordance with 19 CFR 
351.212(c)(1)(i). Commerce intends to issue assessment instructions to 
CBP for these companies no earlier than 35 days after the date of 
publication of the final results in the Federal Register.

Cash Deposit Requirements

    The following cash deposit requirements will be effective upon 
publication of the final results of this administrative review for 
shipments of the subject merchandise from China entered, or withdrawn 
from warehouse, for consumption on or after the publication date, as 
provided by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) for companies listed 
above that have established their eligibility for a separate rate, the 
cash deposit rate will be equal to the weighted-average dumping margin 
established in the final results of this review (except, if the rate is 
de minimis, then the cash deposit rate will be zero); (2) for 
previously examined Chinese and non-Chinese exporters not listed above 
that received a separate rate in a prior completed segment of this 
proceeding, the cash deposit rate will continue to be the existing 
exporter-specific cash deposit rate; (3) for all Chinese exporters of 
subject merchandise that have not been found to be entitled to a 
separate rate, the cash deposit rate will be the rate for the China-
wide entity (i.e., 220.87 percent); and (4) for all non-Chinese 
exporters of subject merchandise which have not received their own 
separate rate, the cash deposit rate will be the rate applicable to the 
Chinese exporter that supplied that non-Chinese exporter. These cash 
deposit requirements, when imposed, shall remain in effect until 
further notice.

Notification to Importers

    This notice also serves as a preliminary reminder to importers of 
their responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate 
regarding the reimbursement of antidumping and/or countervailing duties 
prior to liquidation of the relevant entries during this POR. Failure 
to comply with this requirement could result in Commerce's presumption 
that reimbursement of antidumping and/or countervailing duties occurred 
and the subsequent assessment of double antidumping duties, and/or an 
increase in the amount of antidumping duties by the amount of the 
countervailing duties.

Notification to Interested Parties

    This administrative review and notice are issued and published in 
accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act, 19 CFR 
351.213(d)(4), and 19 CFR 351.221(b)(4).

    Dated: February 28, 2024.
Ryan Majerus
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy and Negotiations, performing the 
non-exclusive functions and duties of the Assistant Secretary for 
Enforcement and Compliance.

Appendix I

List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum

I. Summary
II. Background
III. Scope of the Order
IV. Rescission of Review, in Part
V. Intent to Rescind Review, in Part
VI. Discussion of the Methodology
VII. Recommendation

Appendix II

Non-Selected Companies Under Review Receiving a Separate Rate

1. Anji Huaxin Bamboo & Wood Products Co., Ltd.
2. Composite Technology International, Limited
3. Fujian Hongjia Craft Products Co., Ltd.
4. Fujian Sanming City Donglai Wood Co., Ltd.
5. Fujian Wangbin Decorative Material Co., Ltd.
6. Fujian Youxi Best Arts & Crafts Co. Ltd.
7. Huaan Longda Wood Industry Co., Ltd.
8. Jiangsu Wenfeng Wood Co., Ltd.
9. Longquan Jiefeng Trade Co., Ltd.
10. Nanping Huatai Wood & Bamboo Co., Ltd.
11. Nicer Window Fashions Co., Ltd.
12. Putian Yihong Wood Industry Co., Ltd.
13. Qimen Jianxing Bamboo and Wood Goods Co., Ltd.
14. Rui Xing Wooden Products Co., Ltd.
15. Shandong Miting Household Co., Ltd.
16. Shaxian Hengtong Wood Industry Co., Ltd.
17. Shaxian Shiyiwood, Ltd.
18. Shuyang Kevin International Co., Ltd.
19. Sun Valley Shade Co., Ltd.
20. Suqian Sulu Import & Export Trading Co., Ltd.
21. Zhangzhou Wangjiamei Industry & Trade Co., Ltd.
22. Zhangzhou Yihong Industrial Co., Ltd.

Appendix III

Companies for Which the Review Is Rescinded

1. Fujian Shunchang Shengsheng Wood Industry Limited Company
2. Sanming Lintong Trading Co., Ltd.
3. TL Wood Products, Inc.
4. Xiamen Jinxi Building Material Co., Ltd.
5. Xuzhou Goodwill Resource Co., Ltd.
6. Zhangzhou Green Wood Industry and Trade Co., Ltd.
7. Zhejiang Senya Board Industry Co., Ltd.

Appendix IV

Companies Which Have No Reviewable Entries

1. Jiangsu Chen Sheng Forestry Development Co., Ltd.
2. Omni One Co., Ltd.
3. Raoping HongRong Handicrafts Co., Ltd.
4. Baixing Import and Export Trading Co., Ltd Youxi Fujian
5. Bel Trade Wood Industrial Co., Ltd. Youxi Fujian
6. Fotiou Frames Limited
7. Fujian Zhangping Kimura Forestry Products Co., Ltd.
8. Homebuild Industries Co., Ltd.
9. Jim Fine Wooden Products Co., Ltd.
10. Shenzhen Xinjintai Industrial Co., Ltd.
11. Tim Feng Manufacturing Co., Ltd.
12. Wuxi Boda Bamboo & Wood Industrial Co., Ltd.

[FR Doc. 2024-04980 Filed 3-7-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P