[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 28 (Friday, February 9, 2024)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 9292-9537]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-00476]



[[Page 9291]]

Vol. 89

Friday,

No. 28

February 9, 2024

Part II





Regulatory Information Service Center





-----------------------------------------------------------------------





Introduction to the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and 
Deregulatory Actions--Fall 2023

  Federal Register / Vol. 89 , No. 28 / Friday, February 9, 2024 / UA: 
Reg Flex Agenda  

[[Page 9292]]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

REGULATORY INFORMATION SERVICE CENTER


Introduction to the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and 
Deregulatory Actions--Fall 2023

AGENCY: Regulatory Information Service Center.

ACTION: Introduction to the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and 
Deregulatory Actions.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Publication of the Fall 2023 Unified Agenda of Federal 
Regulatory and Deregulatory Actions represents a key component of the 
regulatory planning mechanism prescribed in Executive Order (``E.O.'') 
12866, ``Regulatory Planning and Review,'' (58 FR 51735, as amended) 
and reaffirmed in E.O. 13563, ``Improving Regulation and Regulatory 
Review,'' (76 FR 3821) and E.O. 14094, ``Modernizing Regulatory 
Review,'' (88 FR 21879). The Regulatory Flexibility Act requires that 
agencies publish semiannual regulatory agendas in the Federal Register 
describing regulatory actions they are developing that may have a 
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities 
(5 U.S.C. 602). The Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and 
Deregulatory Actions (Unified Agenda), published in the fall and 
spring, helps agencies fulfill all of these requirements. All Federal 
regulatory agencies have chosen to publish their regulatory agendas as 
part of this publication. The complete publication of the Fall 2023 
Unified Agenda contains the Regulatory Plans of 29 Federal agencies and 
69 Federal agency regulatory agendas available to the public at 
www.reginfo.gov.
    The Fall 2023 Unified Agenda publication appearing in the Federal 
Register includes the Regulatory Plan and agency Regulatory Flexibility 
Agendas, in accordance with the publication requirements of the 
Regulatory Flexibility Act. Agency Regulatory Flexibility Agendas 
contain only those Agenda entries for rules that are likely to have a 
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities 
and entries that have been selected for periodic review under section 
610 of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.

ADDRESSES: Regulatory Information Service Center (MV), General Services 
Administration, 1800 F Street NW, Washington, DC 20405.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For further information about specific 
regulatory actions, please refer to the agency contact listed for each 
entry. To provide comment on or to obtain further information about 
this publication, contact: Boris Arratia, Director, Regulatory 
Information Service Center (MV), General Services Administration, 1800 
F Street NW, Washington, DC 20405, 703-795-0816. You may also send 
comments to us by email at: [email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Table of Contents

Introduction to the Regulatory Plan and the Unified Agenda of Federal 
Regulatory and Deregulatory Actions

I. What are the Regulatory Plan and the Unified Agenda?
II. Why are the Regulatory Plan and the Unified Agenda published?
III. How are the Regulatory Plan and the Unified Agenda organized?
IV. What information appears for each entry?
V. Abbreviations
VI. How can users get copies of the Plan and the Agenda?

Introduction to the Fall 2023 Regulatory Plan

Agency Regulatory Plans

Cabinet Departments

Department of Agriculture
Department of Commerce
Department of Defense
Department of Education
Department of Energy
Department of Health and Human Services
Department of Homeland Security
Department of Housing and Urban Development
Department of the Interior
Department of Justice
Department of Labor
Department of Transportation
Department of the Treasury
Department of Veterans Affairs

Other Executive Agencies

Corporation for National and Community Service
Environmental Protection Agency
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
General Services Administration
National Archives and Records Administration
National Archives and Records Administration
National Science Foundation
Office of Personnel Management
Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation
Small Business Administration
Social Security Administration

Joint Authority

Department of Defense/General Services Administration/National 
Aeronautics and Space Administration (Federal Acquisition 
Regulation)

Independent Regulatory Agencies

Consumer Product Safety Commission
Federal Trade Commission
Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Regulatory Flexibility Agendas

Cabinet Departments

Department of Agriculture
Department of Commerce
Department of Defense
Department of Education
Department of Energy
Department of Health and Human Services
Department of Homeland Security
Department of the Interior
Department of Justice
Department of Labor
Department of Transportation
Department of the Treasury

Other Executive Agencies

Architectural and Transportation Barriers Compliance Board
Environmental Protection Agency
General Services Administration
Small Business Administration

Joint Authority

Department of Defense/General Services Administration/National 
Aeronautics and Space Administration (Federal Acquisition 
Regulation)

Independent Regulatory Agencies

Consumer Financial Protection Bureau
Consumer Product Safety Commission
Federal Communications Commission
Federal Reserve System
National Labor Relations Board
Nuclear Regulatory Commission
Securities and Exchange Commission
Surface Transportation Board

Introduction to the Regulatory Plan and Unified Agenda of Federal 
Regulatory and Deregulatory Actions

I. What are the Regulatory Plan and the Unified Agenda?

    The Regulatory Plan serves as a defining statement of the 
Administration's regulatory and deregulatory policies and priorities. 
The Plan is part of the fall edition of the Unified Agenda. Each 
participating agency's regulatory plan contains: (1) A narrative 
statement of the agency's regulatory and deregulatory priorities, and, 
for the most part; and (2) a description of the most important 
significant regulatory and deregulatory actions that the agency 
reasonably expects to issue in proposed or final form during the 
upcoming fiscal year. This edition includes the regulatory plans of 29 
agencies.
    The Unified Agenda provides information about regulations that the 
Government is considering or reviewing. The Unified Agenda has appeared 
in the Federal Register twice each year since 1983 and has been 
available online since 1995. The complete Unified Agenda is available 
to the public at www.reginfo.gov. The online Unified Agenda offers 
flexible search tools and access to the historic Unified Agenda 
database dating back to

[[Page 9293]]

1995. The complete online edition of the Unified Agenda includes 
regulatory agendas from 69 Federal agencies. Agencies of the United 
States Congress are not included.
    The Fall 2023 Unified Agenda publication appearing in the Federal 
Register consists of the Regulatory Plan and Regulatory Flexibility 
Agendas, in accordance with the publication requirements of the 
Regulatory Flexibility Act. Agency Regulatory Flexibility Agendas 
contain only those Agenda entries for rules that are likely to have a 
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities 
and entries that have been selected for periodic review under section 
610 of the Regulatory Flexibility Act. Printed entries display only the 
fields required by the Regulatory Flexibility Act. Complete Unified 
Agenda information for those entries appears online in a uniform format 
at www.reginfo.gov.
    The following agencies have no entries identified for inclusion in 
the printed Regulatory Flexibility Agenda. An asterisk (*) indicates 
agencies that appear in The Regulatory Plan. The regulatory agendas of 
these agencies are available to the public at www.reginfo.gov.

Cabinet Departments

Department of Housing and Urban Development*
Department of State
Department of Veterans Affairs*

Other Executive Agencies

Agency for International Development
Committee for Purchase From People Who Are Blind or Severely 
Disabled
Corporation for National and Community Service*
Council on Environmental Quality
Court Services and Offender Supervision Agency for the District of 
Columbia
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission*
Federal Mediation Conciliation Service
Institute of Museum and Library Services
Inter-American Foundation
National Aeronautics and Space Administration*
National Archives and Records Administration*
National Endowment for the Arts
National Endowment for the Humanities
National Mediation Board
National Science Foundation*
Office of Government Ethics
Office of Management and Budget
Office of the National Cyber Director
Office of Personnel Management*
Office of the United States Trade Representative
Peace Corps
Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation*
Railroad Retirement Board
Selective Service System
Social Security Administration*
U.S. Agency for Global Media

Independent Agencies

Commodity Futures Trading Commission
Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board
Farm Credit Administration
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Federal Housing Finance Agency
Federal Maritime Commission
Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission
Federal Permitting Improvement Steering Council
Federal Trade Commission*
National Credit Union Administration
National Indian Gaming Commission
National Transportation Safety Board
Postal Regulatory Commission
U.S. Chemical Safety and Hazard Investigation Board

    The Regulatory Information Service Center compiles the Unified 
Agenda for the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs (OIRA), 
part of the Office of Management and Budget. OIRA is responsible for 
overseeing the Federal Government's regulatory, paperwork, and 
information resource management activities, including implementation of 
Executive Order 12866, as amended (incorporated in Executive Order 
13563). The Center also provides information about Federal regulatory 
activity to the President and his Executive Office, the Congress, 
agency officials, and the public.
    The activities included in the Agenda are, in general, those that 
will have a regulatory action within the next 12 months. Agencies may 
choose to include activities that will have a longer timeframe than 12 
months. Agency agendas also show actions or reviews completed or 
withdrawn since the last Unified Agenda. Executive Order 12866, as 
amended, does not require agencies to include regulations concerning 
military or foreign affairs functions or regulations related to agency 
organization, management, or personnel matters.
    Agencies prepared entries for this publication to give the public 
notice of their plans to review, propose, and issue regulations. They 
have tried to predict their activities over the next 12 months as 
accurately as possible, but dates and schedules are subject to change. 
Agencies may withdraw some of the regulations now under development, 
and they may issue or propose other regulations not included in their 
agendas. Agency actions in the rulemaking process may occur before or 
after the dates they have listed. The Unified Agenda does not create a 
legal obligation on agencies to adhere to schedules in this publication 
or to confine their regulatory activities to those regulations that 
appear within it.

II. Why are the Regulatory Plan and the Unified Agenda published?

    The Regulatory Plan and the Unified Agenda helps agencies comply 
with their obligations under the Regulatory Flexibility Act and various 
Executive orders and other statutes.

Regulatory Flexibility Act

    The Regulatory Flexibility Act requires agencies to identify those 
rules that may have a significant economic impact on a substantial 
number of small entities (5 U.S.C. 602). Agencies meet that requirement 
by including the information in their submissions for the Unified 
Agenda. Agencies may also indicate those regulations that they are 
reviewing as part of their periodic review of existing rules under the 
Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 610). Executive Order 13272, 
``Proper Consideration of Small Entities in Agency Rulemaking,'' signed 
August 13, 2002 (67 FR 53461), provides additional guidance on 
compliance with the Act.

Executive Order 12866

    Executive Order 12866, ``Regulatory Planning and Review,'' 
September 30, 1993 (58 FR 51735), as amended, requires covered agencies 
to prepare an agenda of all regulations under development or review. 
The Order also requires that certain agencies prepare annually a 
regulatory plan of their ``most important significant regulatory 
actions,'' which appears as part of the fall Unified Agenda. Executive 
Order 13497, signed January 30, 2009 (74 FR 6113), revoked the 
amendments to Executive Order 12866 that were contained in Executive 
Order 13258 and Executive Order 13422.

Executive Order 14094

    Executive Order (E.O.) 14094, ``Modernizing Regulatory Review,'' 
April 6, 2023 (88 FR 21879) sets forth specific actions for Federal 
agencies and OIRA designed to modernize the regulatory process in order 
to advance policies that promote the public interest and address 
national priorities. E.O. 14094, among other things, amends Section 
3(f)(1) of E.O. 12866 (Regulatory Planning and Review) to increase the 
monetary threshold for significance under that provision, amends 
Section 3(f)(4) to clarify what is significant under that provision, 
and encourages greater public participation during all stages of the 
regulatory process.

Executive Order 13563

    Executive Order 13563, ``Improving Regulation and Regulatory 
Review,'' January 18, 2011 (76 FR 3821) supplements and reaffirms the

[[Page 9294]]

principles, structures, and definitions governing contemporary 
regulatory review that were established in Executive Order 12866, which 
includes the general principles of regulation and public participation, 
and orders integration and innovation in coordination across agencies; 
flexible approaches where relevant, feasible, and consistent with 
regulatory approaches; scientific integrity in any scientific or 
technological information and processes used to support the agencies' 
regulatory actions; and retrospective analysis of existing regulations.

Executive Order 13132

    Executive Order 13132, ``Federalism,'' August 4, 1999 (64 FR 
43255), directs agencies to have an accountable process to ensure 
meaningful and timely input by State and local officials in the 
development of regulatory policies that have ``federalism 
implications'' as defined in the Order. Under the Order, an agency that 
is proposing a regulation with federalism implications, which either 
preempt State law or impose non-statutory unfunded substantial direct 
compliance costs on State and local governments, must consult with 
State and local officials early in the process of developing the 
regulation. In addition, the agency must provide to the Director of the 
Office of Management and Budget a federalism summary impact statement 
for such a regulation, which consists of a description of the extent of 
the agency's prior consultation with State and local officials, a 
summary of their concerns and the agency's position supporting the need 
to issue the regulation, and a statement of the extent to which those 
concerns have been met. As part of this effort, agencies include in 
their submissions for the Unified Agenda information on whether their 
regulatory actions may have an effect on the various levels of 
government and whether those actions have federalism implications.

Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995

    The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4, title II) 
requires agencies to prepare written assessments of the costs and 
benefits of significant regulatory actions ``that may result in the 
expenditure by State, local, and tribal governments, in the aggregate, 
or by the private sector, of $100,000,000 or more in any 1 year.'' The 
requirement does not apply to independent regulatory agencies, nor does 
it apply to certain subject areas excluded by section 4 of the Act. 
Affected agencies identify in the Unified Agenda those regulatory 
actions they believe are subject to title II of the Act.

Executive Order 13211

    Executive Order 13211, ``Actions Concerning Regulations That 
Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use,'' May 18, 
2001 (66 FR 28355), directs agencies to provide, to the extent 
possible, information regarding the adverse effects that agency actions 
may have on the supply, distribution, and use of energy. Under the 
Order, the agency must prepare and submit a Statement of Energy Effects 
to the Administrator of the Office of Information and Regulatory 
Affairs, Office of Management and Budget, for ``those matters 
identified as significant energy actions.'' As part of this effort, 
agencies may optionally include in their submissions for the Unified 
Agenda information on whether they have prepared or plan to prepare a 
Statement of Energy Effects for their regulatory actions.

Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act

    The Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act (Pub. L. 
104-121, title II) established a procedure for congressional review of 
rules (5 U.S.C. 801 et seq.), which defers, unless exempted, the 
effective date of a ``major'' rule for at least 60 days from the 
publication of the final rule in the Federal Register. The Act 
specifies that a rule is ``major'' if it has resulted, or is likely to 
result, in an annual effect on the economy of $100 million or more or 
meets other criteria specified in that Act. The Act provides that the 
Administrator of OIRA will make the final determination as to whether a 
rule is major.

III. How are the Regulatory Plan and the Unified Agenda organized?

    The Regulatory Plan appears in part II in a daily edition of the 
Federal Register. The Plan is a single document beginning with an 
introduction, followed by a table of contents, followed by each 
agency's section of the Plan. Following the Plan in the Federal 
Register, as separate parts, are the Regulatory Flexibility Agendas for 
each agency whose agenda includes entries for rules which are likely to 
have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small 
entities or rules that have been selected for periodic review under 
section 610 of the Regulatory Flexibility Act. Each printed agenda 
appears as a separate part. The sections of the Plan and the parts of 
the Unified Agenda are organized alphabetically in four groups: Cabinet 
departments; other executive agencies; the Federal Acquisition 
Regulation, a joint authority (Agenda only); and independent regulatory 
agencies. Agencies may in turn be divided into subagencies. Each 
printed agency agenda has a table of contents listing the agency's 
printed entries that follow. Each agency's part of the Agenda contains 
a preamble providing information specific to that agency. Each printed 
agency agenda has a table of contents listing the agency's printed 
entries that follow.
    Each agency's section of the Plan contains a narrative statement of 
regulatory priorities and, for most agencies, a description of the 
agency's most important significant regulatory and deregulatory 
actions. Each agency's part of the Agenda contains a preamble providing 
information specific to that agency plus descriptions of the agency's 
regulatory and deregulatory actions.
    Agency regulatory flexibility agendas are printed in a single daily 
edition of the Federal Register. A regulatory flexibility agenda is 
printed for each agency whose agenda includes entries for rules which 
are likely to have a significant economic impact on a substantial 
number of small entities or rules that have been selected for periodic 
review under section 610 of the Regulatory Flexibility Act. Each 
printed agenda appears as a separate part. The parts are organized 
alphabetically in four groups: Cabinet departments; other executive 
agencies; the Federal Acquisition Regulation, a joint authority; and 
independent regulatory agencies. Agencies may in turn be divided into 
sub-agencies. Each agency's part of the Agenda contains a preamble 
providing information specific to that agency. Each printed agency 
agenda has a table of contents listing the agency's printed entries 
that follow.
    The online, complete Unified Agenda contains the preambles of all 
participating agencies. Unlike the printed edition, the online Agenda 
has no fixed ordering. In the online Agenda, users can select the 
particular agencies' agendas they want to see. Users have broad 
flexibility to specify the characteristics of the entries of interest 
to them by choosing the desired responses to individual data fields. To 
see a listing of all of an agency's entries, a user can select the 
agency without specifying any particular characteristics of entries.
    Each entry in the Agenda is associated with one of five rulemaking 
stages. The rulemaking stages are:
    1. Prerule Stage--actions agencies will undertake to determine 
whether or how to initiate rulemaking. Such actions occur prior to a 
Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) and may include

[[Page 9295]]

Advance Notices of Proposed Rulemaking (ANPRMs) and reviews of existing 
regulations.
    2. Proposed Rule Stage--actions for which agencies plan to publish 
a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking as the next step in their rulemaking 
process or for which the closing date of the NPRM Comment Period is the 
next step.
    3. Final Rule Stage--actions for which agencies plan to publish a 
final rule or an interim final rule or to take other final action as 
the next step.
    4. Long-Term Actions--items under development but for which the 
agency does not expect to have a regulatory action within the 12 months 
after publication of this edition of the Unified Agenda. Some of the 
entries in this section may contain abbreviated information.
    5. Completed Actions--actions or reviews the agency has completed 
or withdrawn since publishing its last agenda. This section also 
includes items the agency began and completed between issues of the 
Agenda.
    Long-Term Actions are rulemakings reported during the publication 
cycle that are outside of the required 12-month reporting period for 
which the Agenda was intended. Completed Actions in the publication 
cycle are rulemakings that are ending their lifecycle either by 
Withdrawal or completion of the rulemaking process. Therefore, the 
Long-Term and Completed RINs do not represent the ongoing, forward-
looking nature intended for reporting developing rulemakings in the 
Agenda pursuant to Executive Order 12866, section 4(b) and 4(c). To 
further differentiate these two stages of rulemaking in the Unified 
Agenda from active rulemakings, Long-Term and Completed Actions are 
reported separately from active rulemakings, which can be any of the 
first three stages of rulemaking listed above. A separate search 
function is provided on www.reginfo.gov to search for Completed and 
Long-Term Actions apart from each other and active RINs.
    A bullet () preceding the title of an entry indicates that 
the entry is appearing in the Unified Agenda for the first time.
    In the printed edition, all entries are numbered sequentially from 
the beginning to the end of the publication. The sequence number 
preceding the title of each entry identifies the location of the entry 
in this edition. The sequence number is used as the reference in the 
printed table of contents. Sequence numbers are not used in the online 
Unified Agenda because the unique Regulation Identifier Number (RIN) is 
able to provide this cross-reference capability.
    Editions of the Unified Agenda prior to fall 2007 contained several 
indexes, which identified entries with various characteristics. These 
included regulatory actions for which agencies believe that the 
Regulatory Flexibility Act may require a Regulatory Flexibility 
Analysis, actions selected for periodic review under section 610(c) of 
the Regulatory Flexibility Act, and actions that may have federalism 
implications as defined in Executive Order 13132 or other effects on 
levels of government. These indexes are no longer compiled, because 
users of the online Unified Agenda have the flexibility to search for 
entries with any combination of desired characteristics. The online 
edition retains the Unified Agenda's subject index based on the Federal 
Register Thesaurus of Indexing Terms. In addition, online users have 
the option of searching Agenda text fields for words or phrases.

IV. What information appears for each entry?

    All entries in the online Unified Agenda contain uniform data 
elements including, at a minimum, the following information:
    Title of the Regulation--a brief description of the subject of the 
regulation. In the printed edition, the notation ``Section 610 Review'' 
following the title indicates that the agency has selected the rule for 
its periodic review of existing rules under the Regulatory Flexibility 
Act (5 U.S.C. 610(c)). Some agencies have indicated completions of 
section 610 reviews or rulemaking actions resulting from completed 
section 610 reviews. In the online edition, these notations appear in a 
separate field.
    Priority--an indication of the significance of the regulation. 
Agencies assign each entry to one of the following five categories of 
significance.

(1) Economically Significant and Section 3(f)(1) Significant

    On April 6, 2023, the President issued E.O. 14904 entitled 
``Modernizing Regulatory Review.'' E.O. 14904 amends Section 3(f)(1) of 
E.O. 12866 to increase the monetary threshold for significance under 
this provision from $100 million to $200 million in annual effects and 
directs that it be adjusted for GDP growth every three years. For 
rulemaking actions that were in development prior to the issuance of 
E.O. 14904, the Agenda largely uses the previous nomenclature of 
``economically significant'' to indicate rulemaking actions expected to 
have an annual effect on the economy of $100 million or more, the 
threshold in E.O. 12866 prior to April 6, 2023. For rulemaking actions 
which were submitted for OIRA review after the issuance of the E.O. 
14904 on April 6, 2023 and are expected to have an annual effect on the 
economy of $200 million or more, the term ``Section 3(f)(1) 
Significant'' is used and will continue to be used in future Unified 
Agendas. The amended definition of ``Section 3(f)(1) Significant'' 
under Executive Order 12866 is a rulemaking action that will ``have an 
annual effect on the economy of $200 million or more (adjusted every 3 
years by the Administrator of OIRA for changes in gross domestic 
product); or will adversely affect in a material way the economy, a 
sector of the economy, productivity, competition, jobs, the 
environment, public health or safety, or State, local, or tribal 
governments or communities.''

(2) Other Significant

    A rulemaking that is not Economically Significant but is considered 
Significant by the agency. This category includes rules that the agency 
anticipates will be reviewed under Executive Order 12866, as amended, 
or rules that are a priority of the agency head. These rules may or may 
not be included in the agency's regulatory plan.

(3) Substantive, Nonsignificant

    A rulemaking that has substantive impacts, but is neither 
Significant, nor Routine and Frequent, nor Informational/
Administrative/Other.

(4) Routine and Frequent

    A rulemaking that is a specific case of a multiple recurring 
application of a regulatory program in the Code of Federal Regulations 
and that does not alter the body of the regulation.

(5) Informational/Administrative/Other

    A rulemaking that is primarily informational or pertains to agency 
matters not central to accomplishing the agency's regulatory mandate 
but that the agency places in the Unified Agenda to inform the public 
of the activity.
    Major--whether the rule is ``major'' under 5 U.S.C. 801 (Pub. L. 
104-121) because it has resulted or is likely to result in an annual 
effect on the economy of $100 million or more or meets other criteria 
specified in that Act. The Act provides that the Administrator of the 
Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs will make the final 
determination as to whether a rule is major.

[[Page 9296]]

    Unfunded Mandates--whether the rule is covered by section 202 of 
the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4). The Act 
requires that, before issuing an NPRM likely to result in a mandate 
that may result in expenditures by State, local, and tribal 
governments, in the aggregate, or by the private sector of more than 
$100 million in 1 year, agencies, other than independent regulatory 
agencies, shall prepare a written statement containing an assessment of 
the anticipated costs and benefits of the Federal mandate.
    Legal Authority--the section(s) of the United States Code (U.S.C.) 
or Public Law (Pub. L.) or the Executive order (E.O.) that authorize(s) 
the regulatory action. Agencies may provide popular name references to 
laws in addition to these citations.
    CFR Citation--the section(s) of the Code of Federal Regulations 
that will be affected by the action.
    Legal Deadline--whether the action is subject to a statutory or 
judicial deadline, the date of that deadline, and whether the deadline 
pertains to an NPRM, a Final Action, or some other action.
    Abstract--a brief description of the problem the regulation will 
address; the need for a Federal solution; to the extent available, 
alternatives that the agency is considering to address the problem; and 
potential costs and benefits of the action.
    Timetable--the dates and citations (if available) for all past 
steps and a projected date for at least the next step for the 
regulatory action. A date displayed in the form 12/00/19 means the 
agency is predicting the month and year the action will take place but 
not the day it will occur. In some instances, agencies may indicate 
what the next action will be, but the date of that action is ``To Be 
Determined.'' ``Next Action Undetermined'' indicates the agency does 
not know what action it will take next.
    Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required--whether an analysis is 
required by the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.) 
because the rulemaking action is likely to have a significant economic 
impact on a substantial number of small entities as defined by the Act.
    Small Entities Affected--the types of small entities (businesses, 
governmental jurisdictions, or organizations) on which the rulemaking 
action is likely to have an impact as defined by the Regulatory 
Flexibility Act. Some agencies have chosen to indicate likely effects 
on small entities even though they believe that a Regulatory 
Flexibility Analysis will not be required.
    Government Levels Affected--whether the action is expected to 
affect levels of government and, if so, whether the governments are 
State, local, tribal, or Federal.
    International Impacts--whether the regulation is expected to have 
international trade and investment effects, or otherwise may be of 
interest to the Nation's international trading partners.
    Federalism--whether the action has ``federalism implications'' as 
defined in Executive Order 13132. This term refers to actions ``that 
have substantial direct effects on the States, on the relationship 
between the national government and the States, or on the distribution 
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.'' 
Independent regulatory agencies are not required to supply this 
information.
    Included in the Regulatory Plan--whether the rulemaking was 
included in the agency's current regulatory plan published in the fall 
2022.
    Agency Contact--the name and phone number of at least one person in 
the agency who is knowledgeable about the rulemaking action. The agency 
may also provide the title, address, fax number, email address, and TDD 
for each agency contact.
    Some agencies have provided the following optional information:
    RIN Information URL--the internet address of a site that provides 
more information about the entry.
    Public Comment URL--the internet address of a site that will accept 
public comments on the entry.
    Alternatively, timely public comments may be submitted at the 
Governmentwide e-rulemaking site, www.regulations.gov.
    Additional Information--any information an agency wishes to include 
that does not have a specific corresponding data element.
    Compliance Cost to the Public--the estimated gross compliance cost 
of the action.
    Affected Sectors--the industrial sectors that the action may most 
affect, either directly or indirectly. Affected sectors are identified 
by North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) codes.
    Energy Effects--an indication of whether the agency has prepared or 
plans to prepare a Statement of Energy Effects for the action, as 
required by Executive Order 13211 ``Actions Concerning Regulations That 
Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use,'' signed May 
18, 2001 (66 FR 28355).
    Related RINs--one or more past or current RIN(s) associated with 
activity related to this action, such as merged RINs, split RINs, new 
activity for previously completed RINs, or duplicate RINs.
    Statement of Need--a description of the need for the regulatory 
action.
    Summary of the Legal Basis--a description of the legal basis for 
the action, including whether any aspect of the action is required by 
statute or court order.
    Alternatives--a description of the alternatives the agency has 
considered or will consider as required by section 4(c)(1)(B) of 
Executive Order 12866.
    Anticipated Costs and Benefits--a description of preliminary 
estimates of the anticipated costs and benefits of the action.
    Risks--a description of the magnitude of the risk the action 
addresses, the amount by which the agency expects the action to reduce 
this risk, and the relation of the risk and this risk reduction effort 
to other risks and risk reduction efforts within the agency's 
jurisdiction.

V. Abbreviations

    The following abbreviations appear throughout this publication:
    ANPRM--An Advance Notice of Proposed Rulemaking is a preliminary 
notice, published in the Federal Register, announcing that an agency is 
considering a regulatory action. An agency may issue an ANPRM before it 
develops a detailed proposed rule. An ANPRM describes the general area 
that may be subject to regulation and usually asks for public comment 
on the issues and options being discussed. An ANPRM is issued only when 
an agency believes it needs to gather more information before 
proceeding to a notice of proposed rulemaking.
    CFR--The Code of Federal Regulations is an annual codification of 
the general and permanent regulations published in the Federal Register 
by the agencies of the Federal Government. The Code is divided into 50 
titles, each title covering a broad area subject to Federal regulation. 
The CFR is keyed to and kept up to date by the daily issues of the 
Federal Register.
    E.O.--An Executive order is a directive from the President to 
Executive agencies, issued under constitutional or statutory authority. 
Executive orders are published in the Federal Register and in title 3 
of the Code of Federal Regulations.
    FR--The Federal Register is a daily Federal Government publication 
that provides a uniform system for publishing Presidential documents, 
all proposed and final regulations, notices

[[Page 9297]]

of meetings, and other official documents issued by Federal agencies.
    FY--The Federal fiscal year runs from October 1 to September 30.
    NPRM--A Notice of Proposed Rulemaking is the document an agency 
issues and publishes in the Federal Register that describes and 
solicits public comments on a proposed regulatory action. Under the 
Administrative Procedure Act (5 U.S.C. 553), an NPRM must include, at a 
minimum: A statement of the time, place, and nature of the public 
rulemaking proceeding;
    Legal Authority--A reference to the legal authority under which the 
rule is proposed; and either the terms or substance of the proposed 
rule or a description of the subjects and issues involved.
    Public Law--A public law is a law passed by Congress and signed by 
the President or enacted over his veto. It has general applicability, 
unlike a private law that applies only to those persons or entities 
specifically designated. Public laws are numbered in sequence 
throughout the 2-year life of each Congress; for example, Public Law 
112-4 is the fourth public law of the 112th Congress.
    RFA--A Regulatory Flexibility Analysis is a description and 
analysis of the impact of a rule on small entities, including small 
businesses, small governmental jurisdictions, and certain small not-
for-profit organizations. The Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 
et seq.) requires each agency to prepare an initial RFA for public 
comment when it is required to publish an NPRM and to make available a 
final RFA when the final rule is published, unless the agency head 
certifies that the rule would not have a significant economic impact on 
a substantial number of small entities.
    RIN--The Regulation Identifier Number is assigned by the Regulatory 
Information Service Center to identify each regulatory action listed in 
the Regulatory Plan and the Unified Agenda, as directed by Executive 
Order 12866 (section 4(b)). Additionally, OMB has asked agencies to 
include RINs in the headings of their Rule and Proposed Rule documents 
when publishing them in the Federal Register, to make it easier for the 
public and agency officials to track the publication history of 
regulatory actions throughout their development.
    Seq. No.--The sequence number identifies the location of an entry 
in the printed edition of the Regulatory Plan and the Unified Agenda. 
Note that a specific regulatory action will have the same RIN 
throughout its development but will generally have different sequence 
numbers if it appears in different printed editions of the Unified 
Agenda. Sequence numbers are not used in the online Unified Agenda.
    U.S.C.--The United States Code is a consolidation and codification 
of all general and permanent laws of the United States. The U.S.C. is 
divided into 50 titles, each title covering a broad area of Federal 
law.

VI. How can users get copies of the Unified Agenda?

    Copies of the Federal Register issue containing the printed edition 
of the Unified Agenda (agency regulatory flexibility agendas) are 
available from the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government 
Publishing Office, P.O. Box 371954, Pittsburgh, PA 15250-7954. 
Telephone: (202) 512-1800 or 1-866-512-1800 (toll-free). Copies of 
individual agency materials may be available directly from the agency 
or may be found on the agency's website. Please contact the particular 
agency for further information. All editions of The Regulatory Plan and 
the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory Actions since 
fall 1995 are available in electronic form at www.reginfo.gov, along 
with flexible search tools. The Government Publishing Office's GPO 
GovInfo website contains copies of the Agendas and Regulatory Plans 
that have been printed in the Federal Register. These documents are 
available at www.govinfo.gov.

Boris Arratia,
Director.

                                            Department of Agriculture
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                              Regulation
         Sequence No.                     Title             Identifier No.             Rulemaking stage
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1.............................  Unfair Practices, Undue           0581-AE04  Proposed Rule Stage.
                                 Preferences, and Harm to
                                 Competition Under the
                                 Packers and Stockyards
                                 Act (AMS-FTPP-21-0046).
2.............................  Inclusive Competition and         0581-AE05  Final Rule Stage.
                                 Market Integrity Under
                                 the Packers and
                                 Stockyards Act (AMS-FTPP-
                                 21-0045).
3.............................  Special Supplemental              0584-AE82  Final Rule Stage.
                                 Nutrition Program for
                                 Women, Infants and
                                 Children (WIC):
                                 Revisions in the WIC
                                 Food Packages.
4.............................  Child Nutrition Programs:         0584-AE88  Final Rule Stage.
                                 Revisions to Meal
                                 Patterns Consistent With
                                 the 2020 Dietary
                                 Guidelines for Americans.
5.............................  Special Supplemental              0584-AE94  Final Rule Stage.
                                 Nutrition Program for
                                 Women, Infants, and
                                 Children (WIC):
                                 Implementation of the
                                 Access to Baby Formula
                                 Act of 2022 and Related
                                 Provisions.
6.............................  Interim Final Rule--              0584-AE96  Final Rule Stage.
                                 Implementing Provisions
                                 From the Consolidated
                                 Appropriations Act,
                                 2023: Establishing the
                                 Summer EBT Program and
                                 Non-Congregate Option in
                                 the Summer Food Service
                                 Program.
7.............................  Labeling of Meat and              0583-AD89  Proposed Rule Stage.
                                 Poultry Products Made
                                 Using Animal Cell
                                 Culture Technology.
8.............................  Salmonella Framework.....         0583-AD96  Proposed Rule Stage.
9.............................  Revision of the Nutrition         0583-AD56  Final Rule Stage.
                                 Facts Labels for Meat
                                 and Poultry Products and
                                 Updating Certain
                                 Reference Amounts
                                 Customarily Consumed.
10............................  Voluntary Labeling of             0583-AD87  Final Rule Stage.
                                 FSIS-Regulated Products
                                 With U.S. Origin Claims.
11............................  Update and Clarification          0596-AD32  Proposed Rule Stage.
                                 of the Locatable
                                 Minerals Regulations.
12............................  Higher Blends                     0570-AB11  Proposed Rule Stage.
                                 Infrastructure Incentive
                                 Program.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


[[Page 9298]]


                                             Department of Commerce
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                              Regulation
         Sequence No.                     Title             Identifier No.             Rulemaking stage
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
13............................  Illegal, Unreported, and          0648-BG11  Proposed Rule Stage.
                                 Unregulated Fishing;
                                 Fisheries Enforcement;
                                 High Seas Driftnet
                                 Fishing Moratorium
                                 Protection Act.
14............................  Amendments to the North           0648-BI88  Final Rule Stage.
                                 Atlantic Right Whale
                                 Vessel Strike Reduction
                                 Rule.
15............................  Endangered and Threatened         0648-BK47  Final Rule Stage.
                                 Wildlife and Plants;
                                 Regulations for Listing
                                 Species and Designating
                                 Critical Habitat.
16............................  Endangered and Threatened         0648-BK48  Final Rule Stage.
                                 Wildlife and Plants;
                                 Revision of Regulations
                                 for Interagency
                                 Cooperation.
17............................  Setting and Adjusting             0651-AD64  Proposed Rule Stage.
                                 Patent Fees.
18............................  Setting and Adjusting             0651-AD65  Proposed Rule Stage.
                                 Trademark Fees.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


                                              Department of Defense
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                              Regulation
         Sequence No.                     Title             Identifier No.             Rulemaking stage
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
19............................  Cybersecurity Maturity            0790-AL49  Proposed Rule Stage.
                                 Model Certification
                                 (CMMC) Program.
20............................  Department of Defense             0790-AK86  Final Rule Stage.
                                 (DoD)-Defense Industrial
                                 Base (DIB) Cybersecurity
                                 (CS) Activities.
21............................  Definitions of Gold Star          0790-AL56  Final Rule Stage.
                                 Family and Gold Star
                                 Survivor.
22............................  Nondiscrimination on the          0790-AJ04  Long-Term Actions.
                                 Basis of Disability in
                                 Programs or Activities
                                 Assisted or Conducted by
                                 the DoD and in Equal
                                 Access to Information
                                 and Communication
                                 Technology Used by DoD.
23............................  Assessing Contractor              0750-AK81  Proposed Rule Stage.
                                 Implementation of
                                 Cybersecurity
                                 Requirements (DFARS Case
                                 2019-D041).
24............................  Modification of Prize             0750-AL65  Proposed Rule Stage.
                                 Authority For Advanced
                                 Technology Achievements
                                 (DFARS Case 2022-D014).
25............................  Past Performance of               0750-AK16  Final Rule Stage.
                                 Subcontractors and Joint
                                 Venture Partners (DFARS
                                 Case 2018-D055).
26............................  Small Business Innovation         0750-AK84  Final Rule Stage.
                                 Research Program Data
                                 Rights (DFARS Case 2019-
                                 D043).
27............................  DFARS Buy American Act            0750-AL74  Final Rule Stage.
                                 Requirements (DFARS Case
                                 2022-D019).
28............................  Policy and Procedures for         0710-AB22  Proposed Rule Stage.
                                 Processing Requests to
                                 Alter U.S. Army Corps of
                                 Engineers Civil Works
                                 Projects Pursuant to 33
                                 U.S.C. 408.
29............................  Flood Control Cost-               0710-AB34  Proposed Rule Stage.
                                 Sharing Requirements
                                 Under the Ability to Pay
                                 Provision.
30............................  USACE Implementing                0710-AB41  Proposed Rule Stage.
                                 Procedures for
                                 Principles,
                                 Requirements, and
                                 Guidelines Applicable to
                                 Actions Involving
                                 Investment in Water
                                 Resources.
31............................  Appendix C Procedures for         0710-AB46  Proposed Rule Stage.
                                 the Protection of
                                 Historic Properties.
32............................  Natural Disaster                  0710-AA78  Final Rule Stage.
                                 Procedures:
                                 Preparedness, Response,
                                 and Recovery Activities
                                 of the Corps of
                                 Engineers.
33............................  Credit Assistance for             0710-AB31  Completed Actions.
                                 Water Resources
                                 Infrastructure Projects.
34............................  Revised Definition of             0710-AB55  Completed Actions.
                                 ``Waters of the United
                                 States''; Conforming.
35............................  TRICARE Coverage of               0720-AB83  Final Rule Stage.
                                 Clinical Trials and
                                 Termination of Expanded
                                 Access Treatments.
36............................  Expanding TRICARE Access          0720-AB85  Final Rule Stage.
                                 to Care in Response to
                                 the COVID-19 Pandemic.
37............................  Collection From Third             0720-AB87  Final Rule Stage.
                                 Party Payers of
                                 Reasonable Charges for
                                 Healthcare Services;
                                 Amendment.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


                                             Department of Education
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                              Regulation
         Sequence No.                     Title             Identifier No.             Rulemaking stage
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
38............................  Nondiscrimination on the          1870-AA16  Final Rule Stage.
                                 Basis of Sex in
                                 Education Programs or
                                 Activities Receiving
                                 Federal Financial
                                 Assistance.
39............................  Nondiscrimination on the          1870-AA19  Final Rule Stage.
                                 Basis of Sex in
                                 Education Programs or
                                 Activities Receiving
                                 Federal Financial
                                 Assistance: Sex-Related
                                 Eligibility Criteria For
                                 Male and Female Athletic
                                 Teams.
40............................  EDGAR Revisions..........         1875-AA14  Proposed Rule Stage.
41............................  Family Educational Rights         1875-AA15  Proposed Rule Stage.
                                 and Privacy Act.
42............................  Student Loan Relief......         1840-AD93  Proposed Rule Stage.
43............................  Gainful Employment.......         1840-AD57  Completed Actions.
44............................  Improving Income Driven           1840-AD81  Completed Actions.
                                 Repayment.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


[[Page 9299]]


                                              Department of Energy
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                              Regulation
         Sequence No.                     Title             Identifier No.             Rulemaking stage
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
45............................  Clean Energy for New              1904-AB96  Final Rule Stage.
                                 Federal Buildings and
                                 Major Renovations of
                                 Federal Buildings.
46............................  Energy Conservation               1904-AD91  Final Rule Stage.
                                 Standards for Consumer
                                 Water Heaters.
47............................  Coordination of Federal           1901-AB62  Final Rule Stage.
                                 Authorizations for
                                 Electric Transmission
                                 Facilities.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


                                     Department of Health and Human Services
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                              Regulation
         Sequence No.                     Title             Identifier No.             Rulemaking stage
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
48............................  Rulemaking on                     0945-AA15  Proposed Rule Stage.
                                 Discrimination on the
                                 Basis of Disability in
                                 Health and Human
                                 Services Programs or
                                 Activities.
49............................  Proposed Modifications to         0945-AA22  Proposed Rule Stage.
                                 the HIPAA Security Rule
                                 to Strengthen the
                                 Cybersecurity of
                                 Electronic Protected
                                 Health Information.
50............................  Confidentiality of                0945-AA16  Final Rule Stage.
                                 Substance Use Disorder
                                 Patient Records.
51............................  Nondiscrimination in              0945-AA17  Final Rule Stage.
                                 Health Programs and
                                 Activities.
52............................  Safeguarding the Rights           0945-AA18  Final Rule Stage.
                                 of Conscience as
                                 Protected by Federal
                                 Statutes.
53............................  Health and Human Services         0945-AA19  Final Rule Stage.
                                 Grants Regulation.
54............................  Proposed Modifications to         0945-AA20  Final Rule Stage.
                                 the HIPAA Privacy Rule
                                 to Support Reproductive
                                 Health Care Privacy.
55............................  Establishment of                  0955-AA05  Proposed Rule Stage.
                                 Disincentives for Health
                                 Care Providers Who Have
                                 Committed Information
                                 Blocking.
56............................  Control of Communicable           0920-AA75  Final Rule Stage.
                                 Diseases; Foreign
                                 Quarantine.
57............................  Tobacco Product Standard          0910-AI76  Proposed Rule Stage.
                                 for Nicotine Level of
                                 Certain Tobacco Products.
58............................  Front-of-Package                  0910-AI80  Proposed Rule Stage.
                                 Nutrition Labeling.
59............................  Medical Devices;                  0910-AI85  Proposed Rule Stage.
                                 Laboratory Developed
                                 Tests.
60............................  Nonprescription Drug              0910-AH62  Final Rule Stage.
                                 Product With an
                                 Additional Condition for
                                 Nonprescription Use.
61............................  Nutrient Content Claims,          0910-AI13  Final Rule Stage.
                                 Definition of Term:
                                 Healthy.
62............................  Tobacco Product Standard          0910-AI28  Final Rule Stage.
                                 for Characterizing
                                 Flavors in Cigars.
63............................  Standards for the                 0910-AI49  Final Rule Stage.
                                 Growing, Harvesting,
                                 Packing, and Holding of
                                 Produce for Human
                                 Consumption Relating to
                                 Agricultural Water.
64............................  Tobacco Product Standard          0910-AI60  Final Rule Stage.
                                 for Menthol in
                                 Cigarettes.
65............................  Countermeasures Injury            0906-AB31  Proposed Rule Stage.
                                 Compensation Program:
                                 COVID-19 Countermeasures
                                 Injury Table.
66............................  340B Drug Pricing                 0906-AB28  Final Rule Stage.
                                 Program; Administrative
                                 Dispute Resolution.
67............................  Healthcare System                 0938-AU91  Proposed Rule Stage.
                                 Resiliency and
                                 Modernization (CMS-3426).
68............................  Appeal Rights for Certain         0938-AV16  Proposed Rule Stage.
                                 Changes in Patient
                                 Status (CMS-4204).
69............................  Contract Year 2025 Policy         0938-AV24  Proposed Rule Stage.
                                 and Technical Changes to
                                 the Medicare Advantage,
                                 Medicare Prescription
                                 Drug Benefit, and
                                 Medicare Cost Plan
                                 Programs, and PACE (CMS-
                                 4205).
70............................  Minimum Staffing                  0938-AV25  Proposed Rule Stage.
                                 Standards for Long-Term
                                 Care Facilities and
                                 Medicaid Institutional
                                 Payment Transparency
                                 Reporting (CMS-3442).
71............................  Streamlining the                  0938-AU00  Final Rule Stage.
                                 Medicaid, CHIP, and BHP
                                 Application, Eligibility
                                 Determination,
                                 Enrollment, and Renewal
                                 Processes (CMS-2421).
72............................  Short-Term, Limited-              0938-AU67  Final Rule Stage.
                                 Duration Insurance;
                                 Independent,
                                 Noncoordinated Excepted
                                 Benefits Coverage; Level-
                                 Funded Plan
                                 Arrangements; and Tax
                                 Treatment of Certain
                                 Accident and Health
                                 Insurance (CMS-9904).
73............................  Ensuring Access to                0938-AU68  Final Rule Stage.
                                 Medicaid Services (CMS-
                                 2442).
74............................  Coverage of Certain               0938-AU94  Final Rule Stage.
                                 Preventive Services
                                 Under the Affordable
                                 Care Act (CMS-9903).
75............................  Medicaid and Children's           0938-AU99  Final Rule Stage.
                                 Health Insurance Program
                                 (CHIP) Managed Care
                                 Access, Finance, and
                                 Quality (CMS-2439).
76............................  Disclosures of Ownership          0938-AU90  Long-Term Actions.
                                 and Additional
                                 Disclosable Parties
                                 Information for Skilled
                                 Nursing Facilities and
                                 Nursing Facilities (CMS-
                                 6084).
77............................  Hospital Outpatient               0938-AV18  Completed Actions.
                                 Prospective Payment
                                 System: Remedy for 340B-
                                 Acquired Drugs Purchased
                                 in Cost Years 2018-2022
                                 (CMS-1793).
78............................  Strengthening Temporary           0970-AC97  Proposed Rule Stage.
                                 Assistance for Needy
                                 Families (TANF) as a
                                 Safety Net Program.
79............................  Employment and Training           0970-AD00  Proposed Rule Stage.
                                 Services for
                                 Noncustodial Parents in
                                 the Child Support
                                 Services Program.
80............................  Supporting the Head Start         0970-AD01  Proposed Rule Stage.
                                 Workforce and Other
                                 Quality Improvements.
81............................  Safe and Appropriate              0970-AD03  Proposed Rule Stage.
                                 Foster Care Placement
                                 Requirements for Titles
                                 IV-E and IV-B.
82............................  Improving Child Care              0970-AD02  Final Rule Stage.
                                 Access, Affordability,
                                 and Stability in the
                                 Child Care and
                                 Development Fund (CCDF).
83............................  Separate Licensing                0970-AC91  Completed Actions.
                                 Standards for Relative
                                 or Kinship Foster Family
                                 Homes.
84............................  Adult Protective Services         0985-AA18  Proposed Rule Stage.
                                 Functions and Grant
                                 Programs.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


[[Page 9300]]


                                         Department of Homeland Security
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                              Regulation
         Sequence No.                     Title             Identifier No.             Rulemaking stage
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
85............................  Victims of Qualifying             1615-AA67  Proposed Rule Stage.
                                 Criminal Activities;
                                 Eligibility Requirements
                                 for U Nonimmigrant
                                 Status and Adjustment of
                                 Status.
86............................  Improving the Regulations         1615-AC22  Proposed Rule Stage.
                                 Governing the Adjustment
                                 of Status to Lawful
                                 Permanent Residence and
                                 Related Immigration
                                 Benefits.
87............................  Asylum Eligibility and            1615-AC57  Proposed Rule Stage.
                                 Public Health.
88............................  Clarifying Definitions            1615-AC65  Proposed Rule Stage.
                                 and Analyses for Fair
                                 and Efficient Asylum and
                                 Other Protection
                                 Determinations.
89............................  Procedures for Asylum and         1615-AC69  Proposed Rule Stage.
                                 Bars to Asylum
                                 Eligibility.
90............................  Modernizing H-1B                  1615-AC70  Proposed Rule Stage.
                                 Requirements and
                                 Oversight, Providing
                                 Flexibility in the F-1
                                 Program, and Program
                                 Improvements Affecting
                                 Other Nonimmigrant
                                 Workers.
91............................  Modernizing H-2 Program           1615-AC76  Proposed Rule Stage.
                                 Requirements, Oversight,
                                 and Worker Protections.
92............................  Citizenship and                   1615-AC80  Proposed Rule Stage.
                                 Naturalization and Other
                                 Related Flexibilities.
93............................  U.S. Citizenship and              1615-AC68  Final Rule Stage.
                                 Immigration Services Fee
                                 Schedule and Changes to
                                 Certain Other
                                 Immigration Benefit
                                 Request Requirements.
94............................  Shipping Safety Fairways          1625-AC57  Proposed Rule Stage.
                                 Along the Atlantic Coast.
95............................  Cybersecurity in the              1625-AC77  Proposed Rule Stage.
                                 Marine Transportation
                                 System.
96............................  MARPOL Annex VI;                  1625-AC78  Proposed Rule Stage.
                                 Prevention of Air
                                 Pollution From Ships.
97............................  Advance Passenger                 1651-AB43  Final Rule Stage.
                                 Information System:
                                 Electronic Validation of
                                 Travel Documents.
98............................  Enhancing Surface Cyber           1652-AA74  Proposed Rule Stage.
                                 Risk Management.
99............................  Flight Training Security          1652-AA35  Final Rule Stage.
                                 Program.
100...........................  Frequency of Renewal              1652-AA72  Final Rule Stage.
                                 Cycle for Indirect Air
                                 Carrier Security
                                 Programs.
101...........................  Minimum Standards for             1652-AA76  Final Rule Stage.
                                 Driver's Licenses and
                                 Identification Cards
                                 Acceptable by Federal
                                 Agencies for Official
                                 Purposes; Waiver for
                                 Mobile Driver's Licenses.
102...........................  Clarifying and Revising           1653-AA92  Proposed Rule Stage.
                                 Custody Determination
                                 and Detention
                                 Classification
                                 Procedures.
103...........................  National Flood Insurance          1660-AB06  Proposed Rule Stage.
                                 Program: Standard Flood
                                 Insurance Policy,
                                 Homeowner Flood Form.
104...........................  Update of FEMA's Public           1660-AB09  Proposed Rule Stage.
                                 Assistance Regulations.
105...........................  Updates to Floodplain             1660-AB12  Proposed Rule Stage.
                                 Management and
                                 Protection of Wetlands
                                 Regulations to Implement
                                 the Federal Flood Risk
                                 Management Standard.
106...........................  Individual Assistance             1660-AB07  Final Rule Stage.
                                 Program Equity.
107...........................  National Flood Insurance          1660-AB11  Long-Term Actions.
                                 Program's Floodplain
                                 Management Standards for
                                 Land Management & Use, &
                                 an Assessment of the
                                 Program's Impact on
                                 Threatened and
                                 Endangered Species &
                                 Their Habitats.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


                                           Department of the Interior
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                              Regulation
         Sequence No.                     Title             Identifier No.             Rulemaking stage
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
108...........................  ONRR Designation Form for         1012-AA33  Proposed Rule Stage.
                                 Payment Responsibility.
109...........................  Oil-Spill Response                1014-AA44  Proposed Rule Stage.
                                 Requirements for
                                 Facilities Located
                                 Seaward of the Coast
                                 Line Proposed Rule.
110...........................  Revisions to Subpart J--          1014-AA45  Proposed Rule Stage.
                                 Pipelines and Pipeline
                                 Rights-of-Way Proposed
                                 Rule.
111...........................  Outer Continental Shelf           1014-AA49  Final Rule Stage.
                                 Lands Act; Operating in
                                 High-Pressure and/or
                                 High-Temperature (HPHT)
                                 Environments.
112...........................  Carbon Sequestration.....         1082-AA04  Proposed Rule Stage.
113...........................  Department of the                 1090-AB25  Proposed Rule Stage.
                                 Interior Acquisition
                                 Regulation Governance
                                 Titles.
114...........................  Natural Resource Damages          1090-AB26  Proposed Rule Stage.
                                 for Hazardous Substances.
115...........................  Privacy Act Exemption for         1090-AB28  Proposed Rule Stage.
                                 INTERIOR/DOI-10, DOI Law
                                 Enforcement Records
                                 Management System
                                 (LERMS).
116...........................  Privacy Act Exemption for         1090-AB27  Final Rule Stage.
                                 INTERIOR/OIG-02
                                 Investigative Records.
117...........................  Office of Hearings and            1094-AA57  Proposed Rule Stage.
                                 Appeals (OHA) Rule.
118...........................  Wildlife and Fisheries;           1018-BF63  Proposed Rule Stage.
                                 Compensatory Mitigation
                                 Mechanisms.
119...........................  Migratory Bird Permits;           1018-BF71  Proposed Rule Stage.
                                 Authorizing the
                                 Incidental Take of
                                 Migratory Birds,
                                 Proposed Rule.
120...........................  Maintaining the                   1018-BG78  Proposed Rule Stage.
                                 Biological Integrity,
                                 Diversity, and
                                 Environmental Health of
                                 the National Wildlife
                                 Refuge System, Proposed
                                 rule.
121...........................  Permits for Incidental            1018-BE70  Final Rule Stage.
                                 Take of Eagles and Eagle
                                 Nests, Final Rule.
122...........................  Regulations Pertaining to         1018-BF88  Final Rule Stage.
                                 Endangered and
                                 Threatened Wildlife and
                                 Plants.
123...........................  Regulations for Listing           1018-BF95  Final Rule Stage.
                                 Endangered and
                                 Threatened Species and
                                 Designating Critical
                                 Habitat, Final Rule.
124...........................  Endangered and Threatened         1018-BF96  Final Rule Stage.
                                 Wildlife and Plants;
                                 Interagency Cooperation.
125...........................  Endangered Species Act            1018-BF99  Final Rule Stage.
                                 Section 10 Regulations;
                                 Enhancement of Survival
                                 and Incidental Take
                                 Permits, Final rule.
126...........................  Revision to the Section           1018-BG66  Final Rule Stage.
                                 4(d) Rule for the
                                 African Elephant, Final
                                 rule.
127...........................  Establishment of a                1018-BG79  Final Rule Stage.
                                 Nonessential
                                 Experimental Population
                                 of the Gray Wolf in the
                                 State of Colorado, Final
                                 Rule.

[[Page 9301]]

 
128...........................  National Wildlife Refuge          1018-BG71  Completed Actions.
                                 System; Station-Specific
                                 Hunting and Sport
                                 Fishing Regulations,
                                 2023-24, Final rule.
129...........................  Native American Graves            1024-AE19  Final Rule Stage.
                                 Protection and
                                 Repatriation Act
                                 Regulations.
130...........................  Alaska; Hunting and               1024-AE70  Final Rule Stage.
                                 Trapping in National
                                 Preserves.
131...........................  Agricultural Leasing of           1076-AF66  Proposed Rule Stage.
                                 Indian Land.
132...........................  Procedures for Federal            1076-AF67  Proposed Rule Stage.
                                 Acknowledgment of Indian
                                 Tribes.
133...........................  Indian Arts and Crafts...         1076-AF69  Proposed Rule Stage.
134...........................  Mining of the Osage               1076-AF59  Final Rule Stage.
                                 Mineral Estate for Oil
                                 and Gas.
135...........................  Class III Tribal State            1076-AF68  Final Rule Stage.
                                 Gaming Compact Process.
136...........................  Land Acquisitions........         1076-AF71  Final Rule Stage.
137...........................  Fitness to Operate                1010-AE21  Proposed Rule Stage.
                                 Standards for Oil and
                                 Gas Operators and
                                 Lessees on the Outer
                                 Continental Shelf.
138...........................  Renewable Energy                  1010-AE04  Final Rule Stage.
                                 Modernization Rule.
139...........................  Protection of Marine              1010-AE11  Final Rule Stage.
                                 Archaeological Resources.
140...........................  Risk Management and               1010-AE14  Final Rule Stage.
                                 Financial Assurance for
                                 OCS Lease and Grant
                                 Obligations.
141...........................  Emergency Preparedness            1029-AC82  Proposed Rule Stage.
                                 for Impoundments.
142...........................  Ten-Day Notices..........         1029-AC81  Final Rule Stage.
143...........................  Public Conduct on Bureau          1006-AA58  Final Rule Stage.
                                 of Reclamation
                                 Facilities, Lands and
                                 Waterbodies.
144...........................  Closure and Restriction           1004-AE89  Proposed Rule Stage.
                                 Orders.
145...........................  Management and Protection         1004-AE95  Proposed Rule Stage.
                                 of the National
                                 Petroleum Reserve in
                                 Alaska.
146...........................  Update of the                     1004-AE60  Final Rule Stage.
                                 Communications Uses
                                 Program, Right-of-Way
                                 Cost Recovery Fee
                                 Schedules and Section
                                 512 of FLPMA for Rights-
                                 of-Way.
147...........................  Rights-of-Way, Leasing            1004-AE78  Final Rule Stage.
                                 and Operations for
                                 Renewable Energy.
148...........................  Waste Prevention,                 1004-AE79  Final Rule Stage.
                                 Production Subject to
                                 Royalties, and Resource
                                 Conservation.
149...........................  Fluid Mineral Leases and          1004-AE80  Final Rule Stage.
                                 Leasing Process.
150...........................  Conservation and                  1004-AE92  Final Rule Stage.
                                 Landscape Health.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


                                              Department of Justice
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                              Regulation
         Sequence No.                     Title             Identifier No.             Rulemaking stage
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
151...........................  Implementation of the ADA         1190-AA73  Proposed Rule Stage.
                                 Amendments Act of 2008:
                                 Federally Conducted
                                 (Section 504 of the
                                 Rehabilitation Act of
                                 1973).
152...........................  Nondiscrimination on the          1190-AA77  Proposed Rule Stage.
                                 Basis of Disability by
                                 State and Local
                                 Governments; Public
                                 Right-of-Way.
153...........................  Nondiscrimination on the          1190-AA78  Proposed Rule Stage.
                                 Basis of Disability by
                                 State and Local
                                 Governments: Medical
                                 Diagnostic Equipment.
154...........................  Nondiscrimination on the          1190-AA79  Final Rule Stage.
                                 Basis of Disability:
                                 Accessibility of Web
                                 Information and Services
                                 of State and Local
                                 Government Entities.
155...........................  Telemedicine Prescribing          1117-AB40  Proposed Rule Stage.
                                 of Controlled Substances
                                 When the Practitioner
                                 and the Patient Have not
                                 had a Prior In-Person
                                 Medical Evaluation.
156...........................  Import/Export and                 1117-AB80  Proposed Rule Stage.
                                 Domestic Transactions of
                                 Tableting and
                                 Encapsulating Machines.
157...........................  Clarifying Definitions            1125-AB13  Proposed Rule Stage.
                                 and Analyses for Fair
                                 and Efficient Asylum and
                                 Other Protection
                                 Determinations.
158...........................  Appellate Procedures and          1125-AB18  Proposed Rule Stage.
                                 Decisional Finality in
                                 Immigration Proceedings;
                                 Administrative Closure.
159...........................  Hearing Requirements and          1125-AB22  Proposed Rule Stage.
                                 Application Procedures
                                 for Asylum and Related
                                 Protection.
160...........................  Clarifying and Revising           1125-AB27  Proposed Rule Stage.
                                 Custody Determination
                                 Procedures for
                                 Noncitizens Subject to
                                 Discretionary Detention
                                 (INA 236(a)/8 U.S.C.
                                 1226 detention).
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


                                               Department of Labor
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                              Regulation
         Sequence No.                     Title             Identifier No.             Rulemaking stage
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
161...........................  Defining and Delimiting           1235-AA39  Proposed Rule Stage.
                                 the Exemptions for
                                 Executive,
                                 Administrative,
                                 Professional, Outside
                                 Sales, and Computer
                                 Employees.
162...........................  Nondisplacement of                1235-AA42  Final Rule Stage.
                                 Qualified Workers Under
                                 Service Contracts.
163...........................  Employee or Independent           1235-AA43  Final Rule Stage.
                                 Contractor
                                 Classification Under the
                                 Fair Labor Standards Act.
164...........................  Improving Protections For         1205-AC12  Proposed Rule Stage.
                                 Workers in Temporary
                                 Agricultural Employment
                                 in the United States.
165...........................  National Apprenticeship           1205-AC13  Proposed Rule Stage.
                                 System Enhancements.
166...........................  Wagner-Peyser Act                 1205-AC02  Final Rule Stage.
                                 Staffing.
167...........................  Retirement Security Rule:         1210-AC02  Proposed Rule Stage.
                                 Definition of an
                                 Investment Advice
                                 Fiduciary.

[[Page 9302]]

 
168...........................  Mental Health Parity and          1210-AC11  Proposed Rule Stage.
                                 Addiction Equity Act and
                                 the Consolidated
                                 Appropriations Act, 2021.
169...........................  Definition of 'Employer'          1210-AC16  Proposed Rule Stage.
                                 Under Section 3(5) of
                                 ERISA-Association Health
                                 Plans.
170...........................  Coverage of Certain               1210-AC13  Final Rule Stage.
                                 Preventive Services
                                 Under the Affordable
                                 Care Act.
171...........................  Respirable Crystalline            1219-AB36  Final Rule Stage.
                                 Silica.
172...........................  Safety Program for                1219-AB91  Final Rule Stage.
                                 Surface Mobile Equipment.
173...........................  Heat Illness Prevention           1218-AD39  Prerule Stage.
                                 in Outdoor and Indoor
                                 Work Settings.
174...........................  Infectious Diseases......         1218-AC46  Proposed Rule Stage.
175...........................  Emergency Response.......         1218-AC91  Proposed Rule Stage.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


                                          Department of Transportation
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                              Regulation
         Sequence No.                     Title             Identifier No.             Rulemaking stage
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
176...........................  Safety Management Systems         2120-AL60  Final Rule Stage.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


                                         Department of Veterans Affairs
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                              Regulation
         Sequence No.                     Title             Identifier No.             Rulemaking stage
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
177...........................  Updating VA Adjudication          2900-AR10  Proposed Rule Stage.
                                 Regulations for
                                 Disability or Death
                                 Benefit Claims Related
                                 to Herbicide Exposure.
178...........................  Expanding Veterans                2900-AR47  Proposed Rule Stage.
                                 Cemetery Grant Program
                                 (VCGP) Grants to Include
                                 Training Costs.
179...........................  Technical Revisions to            2900-AR73  Proposed Rule Stage.
                                 Expand Health Care for
                                 Certain Toxic Exposure
                                 and Overseas Contingency
                                 Service.
180...........................  Updating VA Adjudication          2900-AR75  Proposed Rule Stage.
                                 Regulations for
                                 Disability or Death
                                 Benefits Based on Toxic
                                 Exposure.
181...........................  Evidence Requirements for         2900-AR91  Proposed Rule Stage.
                                 Direct Service
                                 Connection of Covered
                                 Mental Health Conditions
                                 Based on In-Service
                                 Personal Trauma.
182...........................  Amendments to the                 2900-AR96  Proposed Rule Stage.
                                 Caregivers Program.
183...........................  Revision of Veterans              2900-AS00  Proposed Rule Stage.
                                 Community Care Program
                                 (VCCP) Access Standards.
184...........................  Modifying Copayments for          2900-AQ30  Final Rule Stage.
                                 Veterans at High Risk
                                 for Suicide.
185...........................  Update and Clarify                2900-AQ95  Final Rule Stage.
                                 Regulatory Bars to
                                 Benefits Based on
                                 Character of Discharge.
186...........................  Veteran and Spouse                2900-AR68  Final Rule Stage.
                                 Transitional Assistance
                                 Grant Program.
187...........................  Reevaluation of Claims            2900-AR76  Final Rule Stage.
                                 for Dependency and
                                 Indemnity Compensation
                                 Based on Public Law 117-
                                 168.
188...........................  Presumptive Service               2900-AR25  Completed Actions.
                                 Connection for
                                 Respiratory Conditions
                                 Due to Exposure to
                                 Particulate Matter.
189...........................  Presumptive Service               2900-AR44  Completed Actions.
                                 Connection for Rare
                                 Respiratory Cancers Due
                                 to Exposure to Fine
                                 Particulate Matter.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


                                         Environmental Protection Agency
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                              Regulation
         Sequence No.                     Title             Identifier No.             Rulemaking stage
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
190...........................  Review of the Secondary           2060-AS35  Proposed Rule Stage.
                                 National Ambient Air
                                 Quality Standards for
                                 Ecological Effects of
                                 Oxides of Nitrogen,
                                 Oxides of Sulfur and
                                 Particulate Matter.
191...........................  NSPS for GHG Emissions            2060-AV09  Proposed Rule Stage.
                                 From New, Modified, and
                                 Reconstructed Fossil
                                 Fuel-Fired EGUs;
                                 Emission Guidelines for
                                 GHG Emissions From
                                 Existing Fossil Fuel-
                                 Fired EGUs; and Repeal
                                 of the ACE Rule.
192...........................  Review of Final Rule              2060-AV20  Proposed Rule Stage.
                                 Reclassification of
                                 Major Sources as Area
                                 Sources Under Section
                                 112 of the Clean Air Act.
193...........................  Phasedown of                      2060-AV84  Proposed Rule Stage.
                                 Hydrofluorocarbons:
                                 Management of Certain
                                 Hydrofluorocarbons and
                                 Substitutes Under
                                 Subsection (h) of the
                                 American Innovation and
                                 Manufacturing Act of
                                 2020.
194...........................  Phasedown of                      2060-AV98  Proposed Rule Stage.
                                 Hydrofluorocarbons:
                                 Review and Renewal of
                                 Eligibility for
                                 Application-specific
                                 Allowances.
195...........................  1-Bromopropane (1-BP);            2070-AK73  Proposed Rule Stage.
                                 Regulation Under the
                                 Toxic Substances Control
                                 Act (TSCA).
196...........................  Trichloroethylene;                2070-AK83  Proposed Rule Stage.
                                 Regulation Under the
                                 Toxic Substances Control
                                 Act (TSCA).
197...........................  N-Methylpyrrolidone               2070-AK85  Proposed Rule Stage.
                                 (NMP); Regulation Under
                                 the Toxic Substances
                                 Control Act (TSCA).
198...........................  Procedures for Chemical           2070-AK90  Proposed Rule Stage.
                                 Risk Evaluation Under
                                 the Toxic Substances
                                 Control Act (TSCA).

[[Page 9303]]

 
199...........................  Revisions to Standards            2050-AH24  Proposed Rule Stage.
                                 for the Open Burning/
                                 Open Detonation of Waste
                                 Explosives.
200...........................  Listing of PFOA, PFOS,            2050-AH26  Proposed Rule Stage.
                                 PFBS, and GenX as
                                 Resource Conservation
                                 and Recovery Act (RCRA)
                                 Hazardous Constituents.
201...........................  Definition of Hazardous           2050-AH27  Proposed Rule Stage.
                                 Waste Applicable to
                                 Corrective Action for
                                 Solid Waste Management
                                 Units.
202...........................  National Primary Drinking         2040-AG16  Proposed Rule Stage.
                                 Water Regulations for
                                 Lead and Copper:
                                 Improvements (LCRI).
203...........................  National Emission                 2060-AU37  Final Rule Stage.
                                 Standards for Hazardous
                                 Air Pollutants: Ethylene
                                 Oxide Commercial
                                 Sterilization and
                                 Fumigation Operations.
204...........................  New Source Performance            2060-AV16  Final Rule Stage.
                                 Standards and Emission
                                 Guidelines for Crude Oil
                                 and Natural Gas
                                 Facilities: Climate
                                 Review.
205...........................  Revisions to the Air              2060-AV41  Final Rule Stage.
                                 Emission Reporting
                                 Requirements (AERR).
206...........................  Multi-Pollutant Emissions         2060-AV49  Final Rule Stage.
                                 Standards for Model
                                 Years 2027 and Later
                                 Light-Duty and Medium-
                                 Duty Vehicles.
207...........................  Greenhouse Gas Emissions          2060-AV50  Final Rule Stage.
                                 Standards for Heavy-Duty
                                 Vehicles--Phase 3.
208...........................  Reconsideration of the            2060-AV52  Final Rule Stage.
                                 National Ambient Air
                                 Quality Standards for
                                 Particulate Matter.
209...........................  NESHAP: Coal-and Oil-             2060-AV53  Final Rule Stage.
                                 Fired Electric Utility
                                 Steam Generating Units-
                                 Review of the Residual
                                 Risk and Technology
                                 Review.
210...........................  NSPS for the Synthetic            2060-AV71  Final Rule Stage.
                                 Organic Chemical
                                 Manufacturing Industry
                                 and NESHAP for the
                                 Synthetic Organic
                                 Chemical Manufacturing
                                 Industry and Group I &
                                 II Polymers and Resins
                                 Industry.
211...........................  Methylene Chloride (MC);          2070-AK70  Final Rule Stage.
                                 Regulation Under the
                                 Toxic Substances Control
                                 Act (TSCA).
212...........................  Carbon Tetrachloride              2070-AK82  Final Rule Stage.
                                 (CTC); Regulation Under
                                 the Toxic Substances
                                 Control Act (TSCA).
213...........................  Perchloroethylene (PCE);          2070-AK84  Final Rule Stage.
                                 Regulation Under the
                                 Toxic Substances Control
                                 Act (TSCA).
214...........................  Asbestos Part 1                   2070-AK86  Final Rule Stage.
                                 (Chrysotile Asbestos);
                                 Regulation of Certain
                                 Conditions of Use Under
                                 the Toxic Substances
                                 Control Act (TSCA).
215...........................  Reconsideration of the            2070-AK91  Final Rule Stage.
                                 Dust-Lead Hazard
                                 Standards and Dust-Lead
                                 Post Abatement Clearance
                                 Levels.
216...........................  Designating PFOA and PFOS         2050-AH09  Final Rule Stage.
                                 as CERCLA Hazardous
                                 Substances.
217...........................  Hazardous and Solid Waste         2050-AH14  Final Rule Stage.
                                 Management System:
                                 Disposal of Coal
                                 Combustion Residuals
                                 From Electric Utilities;
                                 Legacy Surface
                                 Impoundments.
218...........................  Clean Water Act Hazardous         2050-AH17  Final Rule Stage.
                                 Substance Facility
                                 Response Plans.
219...........................  Accidental Release                2050-AH22  Final Rule Stage.
                                 Prevention Requirements:
                                 Risk Management Program
                                 Under the Clean Air Act;
                                 Safer Communities by
                                 Chemical Accident
                                 Prevention.
220...........................  Federal Baseline Water            2040-AF62  Final Rule Stage.
                                 Quality Standards for
                                 Indian Reservations.
221...........................  Water Quality Standards           2040-AG17  Final Rule Stage.
                                 Regulatory Revisions to
                                 Protect Tribal Reserved
                                 Rights.
222...........................  PFAS National Primary             2040-AG18  Final Rule Stage.
                                 Drinking Water
                                 Regulation Rulemaking.
223...........................  Supplemental Effluent             2040-AG23  Final Rule Stage.
                                 Limitations Guidelines
                                 and Standards for the
                                 Steam Electric Power
                                 Generating Point Source
                                 Category.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


                                     Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                              Regulation
         Sequence No.                     Title             Identifier No.             Rulemaking stage
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
224...........................  Regulations to Implement          3046-AB30  Final Rule Stage.
                                 the Pregnant Workers
                                 Fairness Act.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


                                      Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                              Regulation
         Sequence No.                     Title             Identifier No.             Rulemaking stage
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
225...........................  Actuarial Assumptions for         1212-AB54  Final Rule Stage.
                                 Determining an
                                 Employer's Withdrawal
                                 Liability.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


                                         Social Security Administration
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                              Regulation
         Sequence No.                     Title             Identifier No.             Rulemaking stage
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
226...........................  Omitting Food From In-            0960-AI60  Final Rule Stage.
                                 Kind Support and
                                 Maintenance Calculations.
227...........................  Expand the Definition of          0960-AI81  Final Rule Stage.
                                 a Public Assistance (PA)
                                 Household.
228...........................  Nationwide Expansion of           0960-AI82  Final Rule Stage.
                                 the Rental Subsidy
                                 Policy for SSI
                                 Recipients.

[[Page 9304]]

 
229...........................  Intermediate Improvement          0960-AI83  Final Rule Stage.
                                 to the Disability
                                 Adjudication Process,
                                 Including How we
                                 Consider Past Work.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


                                       Consumer Product Safety Commission
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                              Regulation
         Sequence No.                     Title             Identifier No.             Rulemaking stage
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
230...........................  Regulatory Options for            3041-AC31  Proposed Rule Stage.
                                 Table Saws.
231...........................  Safety Standard for               3041-AD70  Proposed Rule Stage.
                                 Residential Gas Furnaces
                                 and Boilers.
232...........................  Portable Generators......         3041-AC36  Final Rule Stage.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Introduction to the Fall 2023 Regulatory Plan

    Executive Order 12866, issued in 1993, requires the annual 
production of a Unified Regulatory Agenda and Regulatory Plan. It does 
so in order to promote transparency--or in the words of the Executive 
Order itself, ``to have an effective regulatory program, to provide for 
coordination of regulations, to maximize consultation and the 
resolution of potential conflicts at an early stage, to involve the 
public and its State, local, and tribal officials in regulatory 
planning, and to ensure that new or revised regulations promote the 
President's priorities and the principles set forth in this Executive 
order.'' Executive Order 13563, issued in 2011, and Executive Order 
14094, issued in 2023, reaffirmed and amended the requirements of 
Executive Order 12866.
    We are now providing the Fall 2023 Regulatory Plan. The regulatory 
plans and agendas submitted by agencies and included here offer a 
window into how the Administration plans to continue delivering on the 
President's agenda to advance economic prosperity and equity, tackle 
the climate crisis, advance public health, and much more to improve the 
lives of the American people. Agencies will be continuing their work to 
implement landmark legislation passed during this Administration, 
including the implementation of the PACT Act, (Pub. L. 117-168); the 
Inflation Reduction Act, (Pub. L. 117-169); and the CHIPS and Science 
Act, (Pub. L. 117-167); as well as ongoing efforts to implement the 
Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act (Bipartisan Infrastructure Law), 
Public Law 117-58. Agencies have also highlighted in their plans and 
agendas how they have engaged with the public in developing regulatory 
priorities, as well as future opportunities for engagement.

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Statement of Regulatory Priorities

    In 2024, the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) plans to 
prioritize initiatives that promote growth and new market opportunity 
in Rural America for our farmers, ranchers, small businesses, and 
communities, particularly among historically underserved communities, 
while implementing an expected new 5 year Farm Bill reauthorization for 
our major agricultural and food programs. USDA further anticipates a 
Farm Bill reauthorization as an opportunity to strengthen and improve 
our customer service and delivery combined with IT modernization that 
fosters 21st century innovation. USDA will use available outreach and 
communication tools to seek input and engagement from our traditional 
stakeholders as well as those communities whom we may not have been 
able to reach in the past but who, like our traditional stakeholders, 
offer critical implementation input and feedback. In short, we want to 
know what works, and what doesn't work, from everyone.
    In 2024, USDA will seek and promote 21st century innovation 
initiatives like carbon capture and storage, addressing the effects of 
climate change such as drought and wildfire risks, and other climate-
smart agriculture initiatives. As in the past, USDA will continue to 
tackle food and nutrition insecurity while maintaining a safe food 
supply and responding to any disaster and emergency threats impacting 
the American Farm economy, schools, individual households, and our 
National Forests. Finally, all of USDA's programs, including the 
priorities contained in this Regulatory Plan, will be structured to 
advance the cause of equity by removing barriers and opening new 
opportunities for our customers.
    In 2023, the USDA:
    Agricultural Marketing Service published the Strengthening Organic 
Enforcement (SOE) final rule (January 19, 2023, 88 FR 3548) that became 
effective on March 20, 2023. As required by the 2018 Farm Bill, SOE 
protects organic integrity and bolsters farmer and consumer confidence 
in the USDA organic seal by supporting strong organic control systems, 
improving farm to market traceability, increasing import oversight 
authority, and providing robust enforcement of the organic regulations. 
Topics addressed in this rulemaking include: National Organic Program 
Import Certificates; recordkeeping and product traceability; certifying 
agent personnel qualifications and training; standardized certificates 
of organic operation; unannounced on-site inspections of certified 
operations; oversight of certification activities; foreign conformity 
assessment systems; certification of producer group operations; 
labeling of nonretail containers; and, calculating organic content of 
multi-ingredient products.
    Forest Service implemented a final rule on Special Areas; Roadless 
Area Conservation; National Forest System Lands in Alaska (January 27, 
2023, 88 FR 5252) that repealed a final rule promulgated in 2020 
exempting the Tongass National Forest from the 2001 Roadless Area 
Conservation Rule (2001 Roadless Rule). The 2001 Roadless Rule 
prohibited timber harvest and road construction or reconstruction 
within designated inventoried Roadless Areas, with limited exceptions. 
The rule is consistent with President Biden's Executive Order 13990, 
Protecting Public Health and the Environment and Restoring Science to 
Tackle the Climate Crisis.
    In late 2023, the Forest Service plans to publish a proposed rule 
on Carbon Capture, Utilization, and Storage that would allow exclusive 
or perpetual right of use or occupancy of National Forest System lands 
that will allow for permanent carbon dioxide sequestration in order to 
reduce the impacts of climate

[[Page 9305]]

change. Furthermore, the Forest Service plans to publish a Financial 
Assurance for Locatable Minerals Interim Final rule that will allow 
equities and private investment-rated securities within trust funds as 
financial assurance for long-term post-closure obligations, which is 
crucial for the stewardship and restoration of National Forest System 
lands affected by mining. Finally, the Forest Service is making several 
updates to its directives that will strengthen its ability to combat 
climate change and improve access to, and delivery of, public programs 
and services by reducing administrative burden--including equitable 
access to recreation, mitigation of adverse impacts, climate 
resilience, and its Tribal action plan.
    In late 2023, Food and Nutrition Service (FNS) plans to publish an 
interim final rule (December 2023) that codifies flexibility for rural 
program operators to provide non-congregate meal service in the Summer 
Food Service Program (SFSP) and establishes a permanent Summer 
Electronic Benefits Transfer for Children Program (Summer EBT). To 
gather information for this rulemaking, between April-August 2023, FNS 
hosted more than 100 listening sessions and information meetings with 
State agencies, advocacy groups, program operators, and industry 
partners. For more information about this rule, see RIN 0584-AE96.
    In December 2023, FNS also plans to publish a final rule codifying 
the provisions of the Access to Baby Formula Act of 2022. Amongst other 
things, the rule codifies requirements for State agencies to include 
language in their Women, Infants and Children (WIC) infant formula 
rebate contracts that describes remedies in the event of an infant 
formula recall. This rule was informed by lessons learned and feedback 
received from State and local agencies, advocacy organizations, and 
Federal research on the response to recent disasters, the COVID-19 
pandemic, and a major WIC product recall. For more information about 
this rule, see RIN 0584-AE94.
    Outlined below are some of USDA's most important upcoming 
regulatory actions for 2024. These include efforts to restore and 
expand economic opportunity; address the climate crisis; and support 
agricultural markets that are free, open, and promote competition. This 
Regulatory Plan also reflects USDA's continued commitments to ensuring 
a safe and nutritious food supply and animal welfare protections. As 
always, our Semiannual Regulatory Agenda contains information on a 
broad-spectrum of USDA's initiatives and planned upcoming regulatory 
actions.

Foster Sustainable Economic Growth by Promoting Innovation, Building 
Resilience to Climate Change, and Expanding Renewable Energy

    Higher Blends Infrastructure Incentive Program: Rural Business 
Cooperative Service (RBCS) Higher Blends Infrastructure Incentive 
Program (HBIIP): HBIIP is a program designed to increase the sales and 
use of higher blends of ethanol and biodiesel by expanding the 
infrastructure for renewable fuels derived from U.S. agricultural 
products. The program is also intended to encourage a more 
comprehensive approach to market higher blends by sharing the costs 
related to building out biofuel-related infrastructure. The program 
should increase availability of domestic biofuels and give Americans 
additional cleaner fuel options at the pump. RBCS is proposing a rule 
to codify the policies and procedures for the program in the Code of 
Federal Regulations, as this program has a significant impact on 
climate change which is an Administration priority. Public engagement 
will occur in early fall of 2023. A virtual listening session will be 
announced in the Federal Register. For more information about this 
rule, see RIN 0570-AB11.

Foster an Equitable and Competitive Marketplace for All Agricultural 
Producers

    Inclusive Competition and Market Integrity Rules Under the Packers 
and Stockyards Act: USDA plans to supplement a recent revision to 
regulations under the Packers and Stockyards (P&S) Act to prohibit 
certain prejudices and disadvantages and unjustly discriminatory 
conduct against covered producers in the livestock, meat, and poultry 
markets. The proposal (October 3, 2022, 87 FR 60010) set forth 
prohibited discrimination on the bases of the producer's personal 
characteristics and identified as prohibited certain retaliatory 
practices that interfere with lawful communications, assertion of 
rights, and participation in associations, among other protected 
activities. The proposal also identified unlawfully deceptive practices 
that violate the P&S Act with respect to contract formation, contract 
performance, contract termination and contract refusal. The purpose of 
the final rule is to promote inclusive competition and market integrity 
in the livestock, meats, and poultry markets. For more information 
about this rule, see RIN 0581-AE05.
    Unfair Practices, Undue Preferences, and Harm to Competition under 
the Packers and Stockyards Act: The proposal would revise regulations 
under the Packers and Stockyards Act (Act), providing clarity regarding 
conduct that may violate the Act, including addressing harm to 
competition. This proposal reflects feedback received from public input 
generated by previous proposed and interim final rules. On June 22, 
2010, USDA published in the Federal Register (75 FR 35338-35354) a 
proposed rule recommending several changes to the regulations issued 
under the Packers and Stockyards Act, 1921, as amended (P&S Act). On 
December 20, 2016, USDA published a new ``Scope'' paragraph in the 
Federal Register as an Interim Final Rule ``IFR'' with a request for 
comments (81 FR 92566-92594). On October 18, 2017, USDA withdrew the 
IFR (82 FR 48594-01). Though neither of these proposed rules became a 
final rule, USDA received, reviewed, and considered public comments. 
For more information about this rule, see RIN 0581-AE04.

Provide All Americans Safe, Nutritious Food

    USDA's Food Safety and Inspection Service (FSIS) continues to 
ensure that meat, poultry, and egg products are safe, wholesome and 
properly marked, labeled, and packaged, and prohibits the distribution 
in-commerce of meat, poultry, and egg products that are adulterated or 
misbranded.
    Salmonella Framework: One of FSIS' top priorities is to develop a 
more comprehensive and effective strategy to reduce Salmonella 
illnesses associated with poultry products. The agency gathered data 
and information and solicited stakeholder input on Salmonella in 
poultry. FSIS proposed in 2023 to declare that not-ready-to- eat 
breaded stuffed chicken products that contain Salmonella at levels of 1 
colony forming unit per gram or higher in the chicken components are 
adulterated within the meaning of the Poultry Products Inspection Act 
(April 28, 2023, 82 FR 26249) and will finalize this determination in 
2024. FSIS also plans to propose a new regulatory framework targeted at 
reducing Salmonella illnesses associated with poultry products and 
moving closer to the national target of a 25 percent reduction in 
Salmonella illnesses. For more information about the proposed new 
regulatory framework, see RIN 0583-AD96.
    In addition, FSIS intends to publish several rules to improve 
regulatory certainty, which assure consumers that

[[Page 9306]]

meat, poultry, and egg products are safe and truthfully labeled.
    Voluntary Labeling of Meat Products With ``Product of USA'' and 
Similar Statements: FSIS plans to publish a final rule to address 
concerns that the voluntary ``Product of USA'' label claim may confuse 
consumers about the origin of FSIS regulated products. FSIS received 
3,364 comments on the proposed rule during a 60-day comment period that 
FSIS extended to 90 days based on requests from stakeholders. In 
response to the Agency's consumer research and comments received on the 
proposed rule, FSIS will define voluntary U.S.-origin label claims so 
that they are more meaningful to consumers. For more information about 
this rule, see RIN 0583-AD87.
    Labeling of Meat or Poultry Products Comprised of or Containing 
Cultured Animal Cells; and Revision of the Nutrition Facts Panels for 
Meat and Poultry Products and Updating Certain Reference Amounts 
Customarily Consumed: FSIS will propose to establish new requirements 
for the labeling of meat and poultry food products made using animal 
cell culture technology (i.e., ``cell-cultured'' food products). In 
advance of the proposed rule, FSIS and FDA held a joint public meeting 
in October 2018 to discuss the potential hazards, oversight 
considerations, and labeling of cell-cultured food products derived 
from livestock and poultry tissue (September 13, 2018, 83 FR 46476). In 
addition, FSIS published an advanced notice of proposed rulemaking in 
the Federal Register, soliciting public input on the labeling of cell-
cultured seafood, meat, and poultry food products (September 3, 2021, 
86 FR 49491). FSIS also plans to finalize a labeling rule to update 
nutrition labeling for meat and poultry products. The two rules would 
provide additional certainty about what is required for meat and 
poultry labeling while ensuring that consumers have accurate 
information about the food they buy. For more information about these 
rules, see RINs 0583-AD56 and 0583-AD89.
    FNS' Child Nutrition Programs: Revisions to Meal Patterns 
Consistent with the 2020 Guidelines for Americans: The final rule would 
revise meal patterns in the National School Lunch Program and School 
Breakfast Program to make school meals healthier and more consistent 
with the most recent Dietary Guidelines for Americans while reflecting 
the nutrient needs of children at risk for food insecurity. Throughout 
2022, USDA held over 50 listening sessions with State agencies, school 
food authorities, advocacy organizations, Tribal dietitians and 
schools, professional associations, food manufacturers, and other 
Federal agencies to inform the proposed rule (February 7, 2023, 88 FR 
8050). USDA also received extensive input through over 136,000 public 
comments on the proposed rule during a 60-day comment period that USDA 
extended to 90 days based on requests from stakeholders. Through this 
stakeholder engagement, USDA gained valuable insights into the 
successes and challenges that schools experience implementing the 
school meal nutrition standards and will use this information to 
develop a practical and durable final rule. For more information about 
this rule, see RIN 0584-AE88.
    FNS' Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants and 
Children (WIC): Revisions in the WIC Food Packages: Consistent with 
recommendations from the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, 
and Medicine and the latest Dietary Guidelines for Americans, the final 
rule would provide participants with greater choices in variety and 
food package sizes and align the WIC food packages with available 
nutrition science. When developing the proposed rule (November 21, 
2022, 87 FR 71090), FNS solicited feedback from WIC participants, state 
and tribal partners, and other government agencies. FNSpublished the 
proposed rule with a 90-day comment period and will consider comments 
received in development of this final rule. For more information about 
this rule, see RIN 0584-AE82.
    National Organic Program; Organic Livestock and Poultry Standards: 
The final rule would establish standards that support additional 
practice standards for organic livestock and poultry production. This 
final action would add provisions to the USDA organic regulations to 
address and clarify livestock and poultry living conditions (for 
example, outdoor access, housing environment and stocking densities), 
health care practices (for example physical alterations, administering 
medical treatment, euthanasia), and animal handling and transport to 
and during slaughter. For more information about this rule, see RIN 
0581-AE06.

Improve Access to, and Delivery of, Public Programs and Services by 
Reducing Administrative Burden

    Forest Service Amendment to Locatable Minerals: The locatable 
minerals regulations have remained mostly unchanged since they were 
first promulgated in 1974. Court cases, government audits, and 
implementation experience have identified many shortcomings in the 
current regulations that challenge the agency's ability to efficiently 
and effectively administer locatable mineral activity on National 
Forest System lands. The Forest Service is proposing to revise its 
regulations for administering hard-rock mining activities on National 
Forest System lands, providing permitting certainty; strong, 
responsible mining standards; enhanced community and Tribal engagement; 
and proactive environmental management. To gather public input into 
this proposed rule, it was preceded by a Locatable Minerals advance 
notice of proposed rulemaking (ANPR) (September 13, 2018, 83 FR 46451). 
Following the completion of the comment period for the ANPR, the Forest 
Service analyzed the comments received and used the information to 
draft the proposed regulation. For more information about this rule, 
see RIN: 0596-AD32.

USDA--AGRICULTURAL MARKETING SERVICE (AMS)

Proposed Rule Stage

1. Unfair Practices, Undue Preferences, and Harm to Competition Under 
the Packers and Stockyards Act (AMS-FTPP-21-0046) [0581-AE04]

    Priority: Other Significant.
    Legal Authority: 7 U.S.C. 181 to 229c
    CFR Citation: 9 CFR 201.
    Legal Deadline: None.
    Abstract: This action proposes to revise regulations issued under 
the Packers and Stockyards Act (Act) (7 U.S.C. 181 229c), providing 
clarity regarding conduct that may violate the Act. Revisions are 
intended to support market growth, assure fair trade practices and 
competition, and protect livestock and poultry growers and producers. 
The action addresses long-standing issues related to competitiveness 
and showings of harm or likely harm to competition.
    Statement of Need: Revisions to regulations pertaining to the 
Packers and Stockyards Act (Act) clarify the types of conduct by 
packers, swine contractors, or live poultry dealers that the 
Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS) considers unfair practices or 
undue preferences and a violation of sections 202(a) or 202(b) of the 
Act.
    Sections 202(a) and 202(b) of the P&S Act are broadly written to 
prohibit unjustly practices and undue preferences. Industry members 
have complained that the regulations effectuating the Act are too vague 
and do not provide adequate clarity about

[[Page 9307]]

the types of conduct or action that are likely to violate theAct. This 
rule is needed to provide essential clarity about what would be 
considered violations of the Act.
    Revisions to regulations pertaining to the Packers and Stockyards 
Act (Act) that would also clarify the scope of the Act are needed to 
establish what conduct or action, depending on their nature and the 
circumstances, violate the Act without a finding of harm or likely harm 
to competition or as they may relate to harm or likely harm to 
competition as such terms were contemplated under the Act. Such 
revisions reflect the Department of Agriculture's (USDA) longstanding 
position in this regard.
    Summary of Legal Basis: The Packers and Stockyards Act (Act) 
authorizes AMS to determine if conduct within the poultry and livestock 
industries constitutes unfair practices or undue preferences and, 
therefore a violation of the Act.
    The Act provides USDA with the authority to assure fair competition 
and trade practices and to safeguard farmers against receiving less 
than the true market value of their livestock. Sections 202(c), (d), 
and (e) of the Act limit the application of those sections to acts or 
practices that have an adverse effect on competition, such as acts 
restraining commerce, creating a monopoly, or producing another type of 
antitrust injury. However, provisions in sections 202(a) and (b) 
restrict practices that are deceptive, unfair, unjust, undue, and 
unreasonable; terms that are understood to encompass more than 
anticompetitive conduct. USDA's position is that Congress did not 
intend application of sections 202(a) and (b) to be limited to 
instances in which there is harm to competition.
    Alternatives: USDA considered doing nothing. However, courts are 
not unanimous in their findings. Further, several courts disagree with 
USDA's position. Lack of clarity hinders the agency's ability to 
consistently administer and enforce the Act.
    Anticipated Cost and Benefits: USDA estimate annual costs related 
to this rule of $9 million for the first five years, decreasing in 
subsequent years, for total ten-year costs of $66 million. We believe 
the primary benefit of the proposed regulation is the increased ability 
to protect producers and growers through enforcement of the Act for 
violations of section 202(a) and/or (b) that do not result in harm, or 
a likelihood of harm, to competition.
    Risks: Courts have recognized that the proper analysis of alleged 
violations of these two sections depends on the facts of each case. 
However, four courts of appeals have disagreed with USDA's 
interpretation of the Act and have concluded that plaintiffs could not 
prove their claims under those sections without proving harm to 
competition or likely harm to competition. There is a risk if future 
legal challenge of USDA interpretation of sections 202(c), (d), and (e) 
of the Act.
    Timetable:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Action                    Date            FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NPRM................................   02/00/24  .......................
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No.
    Government Levels Affected: None.
    Agency Contact: Michael V. Durando, Deputy Administrator, Fair 
Trade Practices Program, Department of Agriculture, Agricultural 
Marketing Service, 1400 Independence Avenue SW, Washington, DC 20250-
0237, Phone: 202 720-0219.
    RIN: 0581-AE04

USDA--AMS

Final Rule Stage

2. Inclusive Competition and Market Integrity Under the Packers and 
Stockyards Act (AMS-FTPP-21-0045) [0581-AE05]

    Priority: Other Significant.
    Legal Authority: 7 U.S.C. 181 to 229c
    CFR Citation: 9 CFR 201.
    Legal Deadline: None.
    Abstract: This final rule would supplement a recent revision to 
regulations issued under the Packers and Stockyards Act (Act) (7 U.S.C. 
181 229c) that provided criteria for the Secretary to consider when 
determining whether certain conduct or action by packers, swine 
contractors, or live poultry dealers is unduly or unreasonably or 
advantageous. Supplemental amendments clarify the conduct the 
Department considers unfair, preferential, unjustly discriminatory, or 
deceptive and a violation of sections 202(a) and (b) of the Act. The 
rule would also clarify the criteria and types of conduct that would be 
considered unduly or unreasonably preferential, advantageous, 
prejudicial, or disadvantageous and violations of the Act, including 
retaliatory practices that interfere with lawful communications, 
assertion of rights, and associational participation.
    Statement of Need: Revisions to regulations pertaining to the 
Packers and Stockyards Act (Act) clarify the types of conduct by 
packers, swine contractors, or live poultry dealers that the 
Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS) considers unfair, unjustly 
discriminatory, or deceptive and a violation of section 202(a) of the 
Act, regardless of whether such action harms or is likely to harm 
competition. The rule also clarifies the criteria and/or types of 
conduct that would be considered unduly or unreasonably preferential, 
advantageous, prejudicial, or disadvantageous and a violation of 
section 202(b) of the Act.
    Sections 202(a) and 202(b) of the P&S Act are broadly written to 
prohibit unjustly discriminatory practices and undue preferences and 
prejudices. Industry members have complained that the regulations 
effectuating the Act are too vague and do not provide adequate clarity 
about the types of conduct or action that are likely to violate the 
Act. This rule is needed to provide essential clarity about what would 
be considered violations of the Act, regardless of whether such 
violations harm or are likely to harm competition.
    Summary of Legal Basis: The Packers and Stockyards Act (Act) 
authorizes AMS to determine if conduct within the poultry and livestock 
industries are unfair, unjustly discriminatory, or deceptive and, 
therefore a violation of the Act.
    Alternatives: AMS considered taking no further action, allowing 100 
years of case law to determine precedent in making determinations about 
whether certain behaviors violate the Act. AMS also considered 
revisiting the withdrawn 2016 rulemaking approach that would have 
identified criteria with which to determine whether certain behaviors 
violate the Act.
    Anticipated Cost and Benefits: USDA estimates first-year costs 
associated with this rule to be $517 thousand, with decreased costs 
each year thereafter, resulting in a ten-year total cost of $2.88 
million. AMS expects this rule to benefit all segments of the industry, 
providing greater clarity about what would be considered violations of 
the Act. AMS expects this rule, coupled with a concurrent rule on the 
scope of the Act, to strengthen enforcement of the Act, resulting in 
fairer and more competitive markets for producers and poultry growers.
    Risks: Industry is divided about adding lists or examples of 
specific prohibited conduct to the regulations. Some argue such lists 
would inhibit freedom to forge contracts that fit individual 
situations, while others contend greater specificity is required so 
that affected parties can more readily identify violative behavior. 
Industry is also split on the question of whether

[[Page 9308]]

identified prohibited behaviors must be found to harm or likely harm 
competition to be considered violations of the Act. AMS expects to 
resolve some of the controversy by being proactive and transparent with 
the industry to allow for critical discussions and decisions on the 
rule.
    Timetable:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Action                    Date            FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NPRM................................   10/03/22  87 FR 60010
NPRM Comment Period Extended........   11/30/22  87 FR 73507
NPRM Comment Period End.............   12/02/22  .......................
NPRM Comment Period Extended End....   01/17/23  .......................
Final Rule..........................   12/00/23  .......................
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Yes.
    Small Entities Affected: Businesses.
    Government Levels Affected: None.
    Agency Contact: Michael V. Durando, Deputy Administrator, Fair 
Trade Practices Program, Department of Agriculture, Agricultural 
Marketing Service, 1400 Independence Avenue SW, Washington, DC 20250-
0237, Phone: 202 720-0219.
    RIN: 0581-AE05

USDA--FOOD AND NUTRITION SERVICE (FNS)

Final Rule Stage

3. Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants and 
Children (WIC): Revisions in the WIC Food Packages [0584-AE82]

    Priority: Section 3(f)(1) Significant. Major under 5 U.S.C. 801.
    Legal Authority: 42 U.S.C. 1786, sec. 17(f)(11)(C)
    CFR Citation: 7 CFR 246.10.
    Legal Deadline: None.
    Abstract: This final rulemaking will amend regulations governing 
the WIC food packages to: (1) incorporate recommendations of the 
National Academies of Science, Engineering, and Medicine 2017 
scientific report, Review of WIC Food Packages: Improving Balance and 
Choice; (2) align with 2020 Dietary Guidelines for Americans; and (3) 
make other administrative revisions or clarifications to food package 
requirements. In the development of the proposed rule, FNS solicited 
feedback from WIC participants, state and tribal partners, and other 
government agencies. FNS published the proposed rule with a 90-day 
comment period and will consider comments received in development of 
this final rule.
    Statement of Need: The National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, 
and Medicine (NASEM) issued a 2017 report with recommendations to align 
the WIC food packages with the available nutrition science and to 
reflect the supplemental nature of the Program. In December 2020, the 
USDA and the Department of Health and Human Services released the 2020-
2025 Dietary Guidelines for Americans (DGAs). USDA FNS will propose 
rulemaking to incorporate NASEM recommendations and align the food 
package with the latest DGAs.
    Summary of Legal Basis: 42 U.S.C. 1786, sec. 17(f)(11)(C).
    Alternatives: N/A.
    Anticipated Cost and Benefits: This is discussed in the proposed 
rulemaking's Regulatory Impact Analysis which was published on November 
21, 2022 as an appendix to the rule, available at 87 FR 71090.
    Risks: N/A.
    Timetable:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Action                    Date            FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NPRM................................   11/21/22  87 FR 71090
NPRM Comment Period End.............   02/21/23  .......................
Final Action........................   04/00/24  .......................
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Undetermined.
    Government Levels Affected: Federal, Local, State.
    Federalism: This action may have federalism implications as defined 
in E.O. 13132.
    Agency Contact: Michael DePiro, Specialist, Department of 
Agriculture, Food and Nutrition Service, 1320 Braddock Place, 
Alexandria, VA 22314, Phone: 703 305-2876, Email: 
[email protected].
    Maureen Lydon, Department of Agriculture, Food and Nutrition 
Service, 1320 Braddock Place, Alexandria, VA 22314, Phone: 703 457-
7713, Email: [email protected].
    RIN: 0584-AE82

USDA--FNS

4. Child Nutrition Programs: Revisions to Meal Patterns Consistent With 
the 2020 Dietary Guidelines for Americans [0584-AE88]

    Priority: Section 3(f)(1) Significant. Major under 5 U.S.C. 801.
    Legal Authority: 42 U.S.C. 1758, sec. 9(f)(1)
    CFR Citation: 7 CFR 210.10; 7 CFR 210.11; 7 CFR 215.7a; 7 CFR 
220.8; 7 CFR 226.20; . . .
    Legal Deadline: None.
    Abstract: This rule would finalize long-term school nutrition 
standards based on the Dietary Guidelines for Americans, 2020-2025, and 
feedback that USDA received from child nutrition program stakeholders 
through an extensive stakeholder engagement campaign. The revisions are 
expected to make school meals more nutritious and more consistent with 
the goals of the most recent Dietary Guidelines, as required by 
statute. In addition, this rule would address the Buy American 
provision, which requires school food authorities to purchase, to the 
maximum extent practicable, domestic commodities or products for use in 
the school meal programs. This rulemaking would impact schools that 
participate in the school meal programs, and for certain rule 
provisions, facilities and institutions that participate in the Child 
and Adult Care Food Program and sponsors that participate in the Summer 
Food Service Program. This rulemaking would also impact participants 
who receive meals and snacks through the child nutrition programs. USDA 
received stakeholder input on this rulemaking prior to publishing the 
proposed rule. Throughout 2022, USDA held over 50 listening sessions 
with State agencies, school food authorities, advocacy organizations, 
Tribal stakeholders, professional associations, food manufacturers, and 
other Federal agencies to inform the proposed rule. USDA also received 
extensive input through public comments on the proposed rule. Through 
this stakeholder engagement, USDA gained valuable insights into the 
successes and challenges that schools experience implementing the 
school meal nutrition standards and will use this information to 
develop a practical and durable final rule.
    Statement of Need: The revisions are needed to make school meals 
more nutritious and more consistent with the goals of the most recent 
Dietary Guidelines, as required by statute.
    Summary of Legal Basis: 42 U.S.C. 1758, sec. 9(f)(1).
    Alternatives: In the proposed rule, USDA considered two alternative 
proposals for the milk requirements in school meals, one that would 
maintain the current requirements and an alternative that would not 
allow flavored milk for children in grades K-8. USDA also considered 
two alternatives for the grain requirements in school meals, one that 
would maintain the current requirements and an alternative that would 
require all grains to be whole grain-rich, except that one day per 
week, schools may offer enriched grains. In addition, USDA

[[Page 9309]]

considered proposing product-specific total sugars limits (to align 
with existing CACFP requirements) rather than added sugars limits.
    Anticipated Cost and Benefits: USDA estimated that the proposed 
rule would cost schools between $0.03 and $0.04 per breakfast and lunch 
served or between $220 and $274 million annually including both the 
School Breakfast Program and National School Lunch Program starting in 
School Year 2024-2025. The costs to schools would mainly be due to a 
shift in purchasing patterns to products with reduced levels of added 
sugars and sodium, administrative costs, and increased labor costs for 
continued sodium reduction over time.
    Risks: None known at this time.
    Timetable:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Action                    Date            FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NPRM................................   02/07/23  88 FR 8050
NPRM................................   03/31/23  88 FR 19229
NPRM Comment Period End.............   04/10/23  .......................
NPRM Comment Period Extension.......   05/10/23  .......................
Final Rule..........................   04/00/24  .......................
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No.
    Small Entities Affected: No.
    Government Levels Affected: Local, State.
    Federalism: Undetermined.
    Agency Contact: Michael DePiro, Specialist, Department of 
Agriculture, Food and Nutrition Service, 1320 Braddock Place, 
Alexandria, VA 22314, Phone: 703 305-2876, Email: 
[email protected].
    Maureen Lydon, Department of Agriculture, Food and Nutrition 
Service, 1320 Braddock Place, Alexandria, VA 22314, Phone: 703 457-
7713, Email: [email protected].
    Related RIN: Merged with 0584-AE91
    RIN: 0584-AE88

USDA--FNS

5. Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and 
Children (WIC): Implementation of the Access to Baby Formula Act of 
2022 and Related Provisions [0584-AE94]

    Priority: Other Significant.
    Legal Authority: Pub. L. 117-129
    CFR Citation: 7 CFR 246.
    Legal Deadline: None.
    Abstract: This rule would amend 7 CFR 246 to codify the provisions 
of the Access to Baby Formula Act of 2022 (ABFA). ABFA amends section 
17 of the Child Nutrition Act of 1966 to (1) add requirements to State 
agency infant formula cost containment contracts; (2) establish waiver 
authority to the Secretary of Agriculture to address certain 
emergencies, disasters, and supply chain disruptions impacting WIC; and 
(3) require WIC State agencies to develop a plan of alternate operating 
procedures, commonly referred to as a disaster plan. FNS would make 
other related technical corrections and updates as necessary to 
modernize applicable WIC Program regulations. This rule was informed by 
lessons learned and feedback received from State and local agencies, 
advocacy organizations, and Federal research on the response to recent 
disasters, the COVID-19 pandemic, and a major WIC product recall.
    Statement of Need: This rule would codify requirements for State 
agencies to include language in their WIC infant formula rebate 
contracts that describes remedies in the event of an infant formula 
recall, including how an infant formula manufacturer would protect 
against disruption to program participants in the State (i.e., ensure 
that WIC participants can purchase formula using WIC benefits). The 
rule would also codify permanent expanded waiver authority to aid 
participants in obtaining and redeeming WIC benefits during certain 
emergencies, disasters, and supply chain disruptions impacting WIC. The 
required plan of alternate operating procedures would ensure WIC State 
agencies have plans in place to support the critical need for 
continuity of operations in the event of a disruption of WIC services, 
including but not limited to emergency periods, supplemental food 
recalls, and other supply chain disruptions. Finally, the rule would 
make other miscellaneous technical corrections and updates as necessary 
to update WIC regulations.
    Summary of Legal Basis: The Access to Baby Formula Act of 2022 
(ABFA, Pub. L. 117-129) amends section 17 of the Child Nutrition Act of 
1966 (Pub. L. 89-642).
    Alternatives: No alternatives have been identified at this time.
    Anticipated Cost and Benefits: The costs associated with 
implementing the rule's regulatory requirements are not expected to 
significantly add to current program costs at the State and local 
levels.
    Risks: No risks have been identified at this time.
    Timetable:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Action                    Date            FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Final Rule With Comment.............   12/00/23  .......................
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No.
    Small Entities Affected: No.
    Government Levels Affected: Local, State.
    Agency Contact: Michael DePiro, Specialist, Department of 
Agriculture, Food and Nutrition Service, 1320 Braddock Place, 
Alexandria, VA 22314, Phone: 703 305-2876, Email: 
[email protected].
    Maureen Lydon, Department of Agriculture, Food and Nutrition 
Service, 1320 Braddock Place, Alexandria, VA 22314, Phone: 703 457-
7713, Email: [email protected].
    RIN: 0584-AE94

USDA--FNS

6. Interim Final Rule--Implementing Provisions From the Consolidated 
Appropriations Act, 2023: Establishing the Summer EBT Program and Non-
Congregate Option in the Summer Food Service Program [0584-AE96]

    Priority: Section 3(f)(1) Significant. Major status under 5 U.S.C. 
801 is undetermined.
    Legal Authority: Pub. L. 117-328
    CFR Citation: 7 CFR 225.
    Legal Deadline: Other, Statutory, December 29, 2023, Interim Final 
Rule.
    The Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2023 (Pub. L. 117-328) 
requires FNS to promulgate regulations to carry out the provisions 
under section 502 of the Act no later than 1 year after the date of 
enactment. Public Law 117-328 was enacted on December 29, 2022; 
therefore, FNS is required to publish an interim final rule by December 
29, 2023. However, FNS is aiming for publication by December 15, 2023, 
in order to ensure the statutory deadline is met.
    Abstract: This interim final rule (IFR) will amend 7 CFR part 225 
to codify the flexibility for rural program operators to provide non-
congregate meal service in the Summer Food Service program (SFSP). This 
rule will also establish a new 7 CFR part and codify a new Summer 
Electronic Benefits Transfer (EBT) for Children Program in this part. 
The mandate for these changes is found in section 502 of the 
Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2023 (Pub. L. 117-328), which added 
new section 13a of the Richard B. Russell Nation School Lunch Act 
(NSLA) to allow rural non-congregate meal service in the SFSP and NSLP 
Seamless Summer Option (SSO) and created a new section 13a to

[[Page 9310]]

establish a permanent Summer EBT Program.
    To gather information in support of this rulemaking, between April-
August 2023, FNS has hosted more than 100 listening sessions and 
information meetings to date with State agencies, advocacy groups, 
Program operators, and industry partners. These listening sessions 
focused primarily, but not exclusively, on the rural non-congregate 
meal service option. Additional listening sessions related to Summer 
EBT are forthcoming. Since the enactment of The Consolidated 
Appropriations Act, 2023, FNS published guidance that serves as the 
instructions for state agencies and program operators on how to 
implement SFSP and SSO rural non-congregate meal service during summer 
2023, including guidance on oversight and monitoring pertaining to non-
congregate operations to assist program operators. In addition, FNS has 
published early implementation guidance on Summer EBT for Indian Tribal 
Organizations and State agencies.
    Statement of Need: The Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2023 (Pub. 
L. 117-328) established a permanent Summer EBT Program and authorized a 
rural non-congregate meal service option in the Summer Food Service 
Program (SFSP), to be promulgated through interim final regulations no 
later than 1 year after the date of enactment. Accordingly, this 
interim final rulemaking will amend the SFSP regulations in 7 CFR part 
225 and create a new 7 CFR section to allow State agencies and program 
operators to carry out the statutory provisions of Public Law 117-328. 
Implementation of this legislation will expand the reach of FNS' summer 
nutrition programs, providing greater access for communities and 
families whom the traditional SFSP cannot reliably reach, which in turn 
will have a lasting impact on how the nutritional needs of children are 
met during the summer months.
    Summary of Legal Basis: Richard B. Russell National School Lunch 
Act (NSLA) at 42 U.S.C. 1761 and 1762a.
    Alternatives: The Agency considered alternatives pertaining to the 
non-congregate meal service provisions in the Summer Food Service 
Program include the definition of rural, measures to ensure program 
integrity, meal service models, and State discretion on implementation 
approaches. For Summer EBT, in addition to the policies included in the 
interim final rule, the Agency considered alternatives in the areas of 
State administration, enrollment, EBT issuance and expungement, and 
program operations for Indian Tribal Organizations.
    Anticipated Cost and Benefits: Implementing the rule's regulatory 
requirements is expected to add to current program costs at the 
Federal, State, and local levels, with the majority of costs going 
towards the establishment and implementation a permanent Summer EBT 
program. The implementation of this legislation is anticipated to 
benefit families with children by enabling more such families access to 
critical nutrition assistance for their children. FNS anticipates that 
29 million children currently receiving free or reduced price meals 
will be eligible for Summer EBT annually. Participation in the SFSP 
will increase over time by 4.4 million, lifting the number of meals 
served to children in the summer by more than 380 million.
    Risks: Summer EBT will be the first new FNS nutrition program in 
decades and will reach millions of children each summer. Crafting 
implementing regulations will be a complex process as FNS will need to 
consider and make determinations with regards to a large number of 
policy decisions. FNS will also need to engage a wide spectrum of 
stakeholders early in this process to gather input on best practices 
and effective approaches to implementation. Given the short timeframe 
to promulgate this IFR, there is a risk that regulations will not 
publish in time.
    Timetable:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Action                    Date            FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Interim Final Rule..................   12/00/23  .......................
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Undetermined.
    Government Levels Affected: Local, State.
    Agency Contact: Michael DePiro, Specialist, Department of 
Agriculture, Food and Nutrition Service, 1320 Braddock Place, 
Alexandria, VA 22314, Phone: 703 305-2876, Email: 
[email protected].
    Maureen Lydon, Department of Agriculture, Food and Nutrition 
Service, 1320 Braddock Place, Alexandria, VA 22314, Phone: 703 457-
7713, Email: [email protected].
    RIN: 0584-AE96

USDA--FOOD SAFETY AND INSPECTION SERVICE (FSIS)

Proposed Rule Stage

7. Labeling of Meat and Poultry Products Made Using Animal Cell Culture 
Technology [0583-AD89]

    Priority: Other Significant.
    Legal Authority: 21 U.S.C. 451 et seq.
    CFR Citation: 9 CFR ch. III.
    Legal Deadline: None.
    Abstract: The Food Safety and Inspection Service (FSIS) is 
proposing to establish new requirements for the labeling of meat or 
poultry products made using animal cell-culture technology.
    Statement of Need: Many companies, both domestic and foreign, are 
currently developing cultured products derived from the cells of food 
animals amenable to the Federal Meat Inspection Act (FMIA; 21 U.S.C. 
601 et seq.) (cattle, sheep, swine, goats, and fish of the order 
Siluriformes, e.g., catfish) or the Poultry Products Inspection Act 
(PPIA; 21 U.S.C. 451 et seq.) (chickens, turkeys, ducks, geese, 
guineas, ratites, and squabs). Human food products derived from these 
species fall under FSIS jurisdiction.
    Based on FSIS' review of comments on the Advanced Notice of 
Proposed Rulemaking, the available literature, and the Agency's ongoing 
interactions with the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and 
industry, FSIS has determined that new regulatory requirements for 
labeling are necessary to ensure that cell-cultured meat and poultry 
products are truthfully and accurately labeled. Due to the novel method 
of production utilized to produce these products, the biological, 
chemical, nutritional, or organoleptic properties of some cell-cultured 
products may substantively differ from conventionally produced meat and 
poultry in a manner that is relevant to consumers. Moreover, these meat 
and poultry products, unlike any others on the U.S. market, are not 
derived from slaughter. It is imperative, therefore, that such products 
display unique labeling terminology that enables consumers to 
accurately identify the nature and source of such products.
    Summary of Legal Basis: The Federal Meat Inspection Act (FMIA; 21 
U.S.C. 601 et seq.) and the Poultry Products Inspection Act (PPIA; 21 
U.S.C. 451 et seq.) require that meat and poultry products be 
truthfully and accurately labeled and that their labels be pre-approved 
by FSIS (21 U.S.C. 607(d) and 457(c), respectively), prior to movement 
in commerce. FSIS issues labeling regulations and reviews and approves

[[Page 9311]]

meat and poultry product labels pursuant to these statutory labeling 
requirements. Food products made using animal cell culture technology 
and derived from the cells of livestock subject to the FMIA or the PPIA 
are subject to the labeling (and other applicable) requirements of 
these Acts and the regulations issued thereunder.
    Alternatives: In addition to the option proposed, the Agency would 
consider alternatives for the requirements for labeling of meat or 
poultry products made using animal cell culture technology.
    Anticipated Cost and Benefits: This proposed rule would benefit the 
public by providing truthful and accurate labeling of meat and poultry 
products produced using animal cell-culture technology. Consumers would 
be able to clearly differentiate cell-cultured products from other meat 
and poultry products to make better informed choices. The proposed rule 
would benefit industry because all producers would have consistent 
labels for their products made using animal cell-culture technology. It 
would also allow producers to design their labels with more certainty 
because producers would already be aware of FSIS labeling requirements 
for these products, reducing potential label modification costs.
    FSIS expects its costs to be minimal and that current FSIS staffing 
would meet sketch approval needs.
    Risks: None.
    Timetable:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Action                    Date            FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
ANPRM...............................   09/03/21  86 FR 49491
ANPRM Comment Period End............   12/02/21  .......................
NPRM................................   05/00/24  .......................
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No.
    Small Entities Affected: No.
    Government Levels Affected: None.
    Agency Contact: Melissa Hammar, Director, Regulations Development 
Staff, Department of Agriculture, Food Safety and Inspection Service, 
1400 Independence Avenue SW, Washington, DC 20250-3700, Phone: 202 286-
2255, Email: [email protected].
    RIN: 0583-AD89

USDA--FSIS

8.  Salmonella Framework [0583-AD96]

    Priority: Other Significant. Major status under 5 U.S.C. 801 is 
undetermined.
    Legal Authority: 21 U.S.C. 451 et seq.
    CFR Citation: 9 CFR 381.65.
    Legal Deadline: None.
    Abstract: FSIS is proposing a new regulatory framework targeted at 
reducing Salmonella illnesses associated with poultry products. First, 
FSIS is proposing final product standards that would define whether 
certain raw poultry products contaminated with certain Salmonella 
levels and serotypes are adulterated and thus prohibited from entering 
commerce. FSIS is also proposing to revise the regulations that require 
that all poultry slaughter establishments develop, implement, and 
maintain written procedures to prevent contamination by enteric 
pathogens throughout the entire slaughter and dressing operation, by 
establishing new requirements pertaining to how establishments monitor 
and document whether their processes for preventing microbial 
contamination are in control. The proposal also focuses on a non- 
regulatory approach for controlling Salmonella on incoming flocks.
    Statement of Need: While the results of FSIS' Salmonella 
verification sampling show that the Agency's current prevalence-based 
performance standards approach has been effective in reducing the 
proportion of poultry products contaminated with Salmonella, these 
measures have not had an observable impact on human illness rates, 
estimated to be over 1 million annual Salmonella illnesses from all 
sources. Poultry is the leading source of Salmonella foodborne illness 
acquired domestically in the United States. Therefore, in October 2021, 
FSIS announced that it was mobilizing a stronger, and more 
comprehensive effort to reduce Salmonella illnesses associated with 
poultry products. As part of this effort, FSIS initiated several 
activities designed to gather data and information to inform and 
support future actions related to this new effort. FSIS also held a 
public meeting in November 2022 to solicit stakeholder input on a draft 
regulatory framework that the Agency was considering for a new strategy 
to control Salmonella in poultry products and provided an opportunity 
for stakeholders to submit written comments. After carefully evaluating 
the written comments and other stakeholder input, along with studies 
and information that have become available after FSIS made the 
framework under consideration available to the public, FSIS is 
proposing a new regulatory framework targeted at reducing Salmonella 
illnesses associated with poultry products.
    Summary of Legal Basis: FSIS regulates the production of poultry 
prepared for distribution in interstate commerce under the authority of 
the Poultry Products Inspection Act (PPIA) (21 U.S.C. 451 et seq.). 21 
U.S.C. 455(b) provides that the Secretary shall cause to be made by 
inspector's post-mortem inspection of the carcass of each bird 
processed, and at any time reinspection as he deems necessary of 
poultry and poultry products capable of use as human food. 21 U.S.C. 
455(c) requires that all poultry carcasses and other poultry products 
found to be adulterated be condemned. Under the PPIA, a poultry product 
is adulterated, among other circumstances, if it bears or contains any 
poisonous or deleterious substance that may render it injurious to 
health; it is unhealthful, unwholesome, or otherwise unfit for human 
consumption; or it was prepared, packaged, or held under unsanitary 
conditions whereby it may have been rendered injurious to health (21 
U.S.C. 453(g)(1), (3), and (4)). Finally, 21 U.S.C. 463(b) provides 
that the Secretary shall promulgate such other rules and regulations as 
are necessary to carry out the provisions of the PPIA.
    Alternatives: In addition to the proposed option, FSIS considered 
an alternative that would keep the current Salmonella performance 
standards. The Agency also considered alternatives for various 
Salmonella levels and serotypes for the proposed final product 
standards.
    Anticipated Cost and Benefits: FSIS estimates this proposal would 
benefit society by preventing Salmonella illnesses associated with 
poultry products. The proposal is also estimated to benefit industry by 
reducing the risk of illness outbreak-related recalls. The main cost 
associated with this proposal is the cost to industry associated with 
maintaining control of products sampled by FSIS for adulterants pending 
test results.
    Risks: FSIS estimates this proposal would benefit society by 
preventing Salmonella illnesses associated with poultry products. The 
proposal is also estimated to benefit industry by reducing the risk of 
out-break- related recalls. The main cost associated with this proposal 
is the cost to industry associated with maintaining control of products 
sampled by FSIS for adulterants pending test results.
    Timetable:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Action                    Date            FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NPRM................................   02/00/24  .......................
------------------------------------------------------------------------


[[Page 9312]]

    Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No.
    Government Levels Affected: None.
    Agency Contact: Melissa Hammar, Director, Regulations Development 
Staff, Department of Agriculture, Food Safety and Inspection Service, 
1400 Independence Avenue SW, Washington, DC 20250-3700, Phone: 202 286-
2255, Email: [email protected].
    RIN: 0583-AD96

USDA--FSIS

Final Rule Stage

9. Revision of the Nutrition Facts Labels for Meat and Poultry Products 
and Updating Certain Reference Amounts Customarily Consumed [0583-AD56]

    Priority: Other Significant.
    Legal Authority: 21 U.S.C. 601 et seq.; 21 U.S.C. 451 et seq.
    CFR Citation: 9 CFR 317; 9 CFR 381; 9 CFR 413.
    Legal Deadline: None.
    Abstract: Consistent with the changes that the Food and Drug 
Administration (FDA) finalized, the Food Safety and Inspection Service 
(FSIS) is amending the Federal meat and poultry products inspection 
regulations to update and revise the nutrition labeling requirements 
for meat and poultry products to reflect recent scientific research and 
dietary recommendations and to improve the presentation of nutrition 
information to assist consumers in maintaining healthy dietary 
practices.
    Statement of Need: On May 27, 2016, the Food and Drug 
Administration (FDA) published two final rules: (1) ``Food Labeling: 
Revision of the Nutrition and Supplement Facts Labels'' (81 FR 33742); 
and (2) ``Food Labeling: Serving Sizes of Foods that Can Reasonably be 
Consumed at One Eating Occasion; Dual-Column Labeling; Updating, 
Modifying, and Establishing Certain Reference Amounts Customarily 
Consumed; Serving Size for Breath Mints; and Technical Amendments'' (81 
FR 34000). FDA finalized these rules to update the Nutrition Facts 
label to reflect new nutrition and public health research, to reflect 
recent dietary recommendations from expert groups, and to improve the 
presentation of nutrition information to help consumers make more 
informed choices and maintain healthy dietary practices. FSIS has 
reviewed FDA's analysis and, to ensure that nutrition information is 
presented consistently across the food supply, FSIS is amending the 
nutrition labeling regulations for meat and poultry products to 
parallel, to the extent possible, FDA's regulations. This approach will 
help increase clarity of information for consumers and will improve 
efficiency in the marketplace.
    Summary of Legal Basis: Under the Federal Meat Inspection Act 
(FMIA) (21 U.S.C. 601-695, at 607), the Poultry Products Inspection Act 
(PPIA) (21 U.S.C. 451-470, at 457), and the Egg Products Inspection Act 
(21 U.S.C. 1031-1056, at 1036) (the Acts), the labels of meat, poultry, 
and egg products must be approved by the Secretary of Agriculture, who 
has delegated this authority to FSIS, before these products can enter 
commerce. The Acts prohibit the sale or offer for sale by any person, 
firm, or corporation of any article in commerce under any name or other 
marking or labeling that is false or misleading or in any container of 
a misleading form or size (21 U.S.C. 607(d); 21 U.S.C. 457(c)). The 
Acts also prohibit the distribution in commerce of meat or poultry 
products that are adulterated or misbranded. The FMIA and PPIA give 
FSIS broad authority to promulgate such rules and regulations as are 
necessary to carry out the provisions of the Acts (21 U.S.C. 621 and 
463(b)).
    To prevent meat and poultry products from being misbranded, the 
meat and poultry product inspection regulations require that the labels 
of meat and poultry products include specific information, such as 
nutrition labels, and that such information be displayed as prescribed 
in the regulations (9 CFR parts 317 and 381). The nutrition labeling 
requirements for meat and meat food products are in 9 CFR 317.300-
317.400, and the nutrition labeling requirements for poultry products 
are in 9 CFR 381.400-381.500.
    Alternatives: FSIS considered three alternatives for the final 
rule: (1) No action; (2) A 24-month compliance period for large 
businesses and a 36-month compliance period for small businesses (as 
proposed); or (3) A 12-month compliance period for large businesses and 
a 24-month compliance period for small businesses for faster label 
harmonization.
    Anticipated Cost and Benefits: These regulations are expected to 
benefit consumers by increasing and improving dietary information 
available in the market. Firms will incur a one-time cost for 
relabeling, recordkeeping costs, and costs associated with voluntary 
reformulation. Many firms have voluntarily begun using the FDA format, 
which will reduce costs.
    Risks: None.
    Timetable:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Action                    Date            FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NPRM................................   01/19/17  82 FR 6732
NPRM Comment Period End.............   04/19/17  .......................
Final Action........................   04/00/24  .......................
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No.
    Small Entities Affected: Businesses.
    Government Levels Affected: None.
    Agency Contact: Melissa Hammar, Director, Regulations Development 
Staff, Department of Agriculture, Food Safety and Inspection Service, 
1400 Independence Avenue SW, Washington, DC 20250-3700, Phone: 202 286-
2255, Email: [email protected].
    RIN: 0583-AD56

USDA--FSIS

10. Voluntary Labeling of FSIS-Regulated Products With U.S. Origin 
Claims [0583-AD87]

    Priority: Other Significant.
    Legal Authority: 21 U.S.C. 601 et seq.; 21 U.S.C. 451 et seq.; 21 
U.S.C. 1031 et seq.; 7 U.S.C. 1622 and 1624
    CFR Citation: 9 CFR 412.3.
    Legal Deadline: None.
    Abstract: The Food Safety and Inspection Service (FSIS) is amending 
its regulations to define the conditions under which the labeling of 
meat, poultry, and egg products, as well as voluntarily-inspected 
products, can bear voluntary statements indicating that the product is 
of United States (U.S.) origin.
    Statement of Need: FSIS conducted a comprehensive review of the 
Agency's current voluntary Product of USA labeling policy to help 
determine what the Product of USA label claim means to consumers of 
FSIS-regulated products in the U.S. marketplace. FSIS started this 
review after receiving several petitions stating that the voluntary 
label claim Product of USA is confusing to consumers. FSIS' review of 
the policy included a consumer survey on Product of USA labeling on 
beef and pork products. Based on the consumer survey results, reviews 
of consumer research, and comments received on the petitions, FSIS is 
revising its regulations to reduce consumer confusion surrounding 
current voluntary U.S.-origin labeling policy.
    Summary of Legal Basis: Under the Federal Meat Inspection Act 
(FMIA) (21 U.S.C. 601-695, at 607), the Poultry Products Inspection Act 
(PPIA) (21 U.S.C. 451-470, at 457), and the Egg Products Inspection Act 
(21 U.S.C. 1031-1056, at 1036), the labels of meat, poultry, and egg 
products must be approved by the Secretary of

[[Page 9313]]

Agriculture, who has delegated this authority to FSIS, before these 
products can enter commerce. FSIS also provides voluntary reimbursable 
inspection services, including label approval, under the Agricultural 
Marketing Act (AMA) (7 U.S.C. 1622 and 1624) for eligible products not 
requiring mandatory inspection under the FMIA, PPIA, and EPIA. Under 
the mandates of the FMIA, PPIA, and EPIA, any meat, poultry, or egg 
product is misbranded if its labeling is false or misleading in any 
particular (21 U.S.C. 601(n)(1); 21 U.S.C. 453(h)(1); 21 U.S.C. 
1036(b)). FSIS has similar authority under the AMA concerning labels of 
products receiving voluntary inspection services (7 U.S.C. 1622(h)(1)).
    Alternatives: In addition to the option proposed, the Agency 
considered the following alternatives: (1) Keeping the current 
regulatory requirements for U.S.-origin product labeling and taking no 
proposed regulatory action; and (2) Taking the proposed regulatory 
action but extending the compliance period for the regulatory changes 
after publication of the final rule.
    Anticipated Cost and Benefits: Establishments may incur costs 
associated with voluntarily changing their labels as a result of any 
revised regulatory requirements. The finale rule is expected to result 
in quantified industry relabeling, recordkeeping, and market testing 
costs, which combined are estimated to cost approximately $3 million, 
annualized at a 7 percent discount rate over 10 years. The changes will 
benefit consumers by matching the voluntary Product of USA and Made in 
the USA label claims with the definition that consumers' likely 
expected, i.e., as product being derived from animals born, raised, 
slaughtered, and processed in the United States. The final rule will 
reduce false or misleading U.S. origin labeling and will reduce the 
market failures associated with incorrect and imperfect information.
    Risks: N/A.
    Timetable:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Action                    Date            FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NPRM................................   03/13/23  88 FR 15290
NPRM Comment Period End.............   06/11/23  .......................
Final Action........................   03/00/24  .......................
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No.
    Small Entities Affected: Businesses.
    Government Levels Affected: None.
    Agency Contact: Melissa Hammar, Director, Regulations Development 
Staff, Department of Agriculture, Food Safety and Inspection Service, 
1400 Independence Avenue SW, Washington, DC 20250-3700, Phone: 202 286-
2255, Email: [email protected].
    RIN: 0583-AD87

USDA--FOREST SERVICE (FS)

Proposed Rule Stage

11. Update and Clarification of the Locatable Minerals Regulations 
[0596-AD32]

    Priority: Other Significant.
    Legal Authority: 30 U.S.C. 612
    CFR Citation: 36 CFR 228 (A).
    Legal Deadline: None.
    Abstract: The Forest Service proposes the revision of its locatable 
mineral regulations to better reflect the needs of our national 
defense, economic prosperity, and environmental stewardship. The agency 
has identified many challenges in the current regulations, and revising 
the regulations to address these would allow the Forest Service to 
better implement its mining regulations. Specifically, the Forest 
Service is considering in this proposed rule to (1) better meet the 
purpose of the rule, which is to minimize, to the fullest extent 
practicable, adverse impacts to surface resources which may result from 
locatable mineral operations; (2) increase efficiency and transparency 
in the review process for proposed mineral operations; and (3) increase 
consistency with the Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land 
Management (BLM) surface management regulations. This rule will meet 
the Administration's goals of improving environmental stewardship while 
also providing more timely response, especially to proposed critical 
minerals operations.
    Statement of Need: The Forest Service proposes the amendment of its 
locatable mineral regulations to better reflect the needs of both the 
Forest Service and mining industry. Despite major changes in the mining 
industry and many lessons learned through administering minerals 
activity on National Forest System (NFS) lands, the Forest Service 
locatable mineral regulations at 36 CFR 228 subpart A (228A) have 
remained largely unchanged since first published in 1974. Moreover, 
specific recommendations to revise and update the 228A regulations have 
been made in two prominent external reports: the 1999 National Research 
Council publication Hard Rock Mining on Federal Lands and the 2016 
Government Accountability Office report Hardrock Mining: BLM and Forest 
Service Have Taken Some Actions to Expedite the Mine Plan Review 
Process but Could Do More (GAO-16-165). By addressing recent issues and 
remedying existing weakness in current regulations that have been 
identified, the Forest Service would be consistent with the Biden-
Harris Administration Fundamental Principles for Domestic Mining Reform 
by establishing strong responsible mining standards, increasing 
efficiency in permitting times, and improving environmental, social, 
and economic outcomes.
    Summary of Legal Basis: The Mining Law of 1872, as amended, confers 
a statutory right to enter upon certain National Forest System lands to 
search for locatable minerals. The Organic Act of 1897 authorized the 
Forest Service to make rules to regulate occupancy and use of the land 
and preserve the forests from destruction. The Forest Service's 
existing regulations for administering locatable minerals activity on 
National Forest System (NFS) lands are found at 36 CFR part 228 subpart 
A. These rules govern prospecting, exploration, development, mining, 
and processing operations conducted on National Forest System lands. 
Under these rules, the Forest Service requires operators proposing to 
conduct locatable mineral activity which would likely cause significant 
disturbance of surface resources to obtain prior approval file a plan 
of operations.
    Alternatives: Proposed Action: Publish a proposed rule and seek 
public comment on updates to 228A that will significantly improve and 
clarify requirements related to processing plans of operation, 
reclamation, and operator financial assurance in the event of default. 
These changes would support the following Administration priorities:
     Provide Permitting Certainty: The proposed rule will 
modernize Forest Service administration of surface use and occupancy of 
NFS lands for locatable mining operations, provide additional clarity 
for operators subject to these regulations, continue to minimize 
adverse impacts to surface resources on NFS lands, and increase 
alignment with BLM's mining law regulations which will facilitate 
coordination for projects that span both agency jurisdictions. 
Increased detail and clarity in agency regulations will reduce the need 
for time consuming, back-and-forth information requests to obtain a 
complete operating plan from proponents.
     Climate: The proposed rule requires more detail in 
operating plan submittals to put greater emphasis on up-front planning 
and subsequent operational monitoring of mining activity to address 
potential environmental and public safety impacts of more frequent 
extreme weather events, and decrease the

[[Page 9314]]

likelihood of catastrophic events, such as tailings impoundment 
failures.
     Critical Minerals and American Supply Chains: The demand 
for minerals produced from federal lands is expected to increase to 
address green energy and carbon-neutral goals. Many critical minerals 
are only economic to recover when combined with the recovery of a host 
mineral. The proposed rule clarifies many aspects of administering 
locatable mining activity on NFS land which is expected to increase 
agency efficiency, reduce processing time, and facilitate sustainable 
exploration and development of all locatable mineral deposits, 
including those containing critical minerals.
     Meaningful Consultation with Tribal Nations: The proposed 
rule's detailed requirements for operating plan submittals will enhance 
consultation with Tribal Nations through the availability of more 
information earlier in the process to better assess potential impacts 
to sacred sites and treaty rights.
     Conserving Lands and Waters (30 by 30): The proposed rule 
expands surface resource protection requirements, agency enforcement 
options, and financial guarantee provisions to minimize the impact of 
hardrock mining activity to NFS land and water and will reduce the risk 
and consequences of legacy pollution.
     Economy: Hardrock exploration and mining activity 
generates jobs in many rural communities adjacent to NFS lands. Mining 
companies pay income and many other taxes to federal and state 
governments. For every job at a mine, there's another job in the 
regional economy that exists because of the mining operation. The 
locatable mining industry in 2018 supported more than 7,800 direct and 
indirect jobs. Through more efficient administration of hardrock 
activity, the Forest Service can better implement federal policy to 
foster and encourage private enterprise in the sustainable development 
of domestic resources which would benefit local economies as well as 
decrease vulnerability to national supply chains.
    No Action: A no action alternative would leave the regulations 
unchanged, thus maintaining the status-quo.
    Anticipated Cost and Benefits: Anticipated costs include increased 
costs to industry in providing more detail in submitting plans of 
operation. However, a substantial cost savings for the Forest Service 
is expected from more modern and efficient agency review and approval 
of plans of operations.
    Anticipated benefits of the updates to 228A would stem from more 
modern and efficient agency review and approval of plans of operations. 
The benefits to industry derive from timelier development of, access 
to, and use of locatable minerals on National Forest System lands. 
Expedited access and development of locatable mineral resources is 
expected to result in an increase in the time value of revenues 
generated by locatable operations. A potential benefit to the public of 
facilitating access to National Forest System lands is the increased 
opportunity to develop domestic sources of strategic and critical 
minerals which would decrease vulnerability to American supply chains. 
Most importantly, benefits to the public from the proposed rule are the 
continued protection, and in some cases, increased assurance about 
protection of ecosystems and corresponding goods and services from the 
potential damages of locatable mining activities.
    Risks: Not applicable.
    Timetable:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Action                    Date            FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
ANPRM...............................   09/13/18  83 FR 46451
ANPRM Comment Period End............   10/15/18  .......................
NPRM................................   08/00/24  .......................
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Undetermined.
    Government Levels Affected: Federal.
    Agency Contact: Nathan Morris, Department of Agriculture, Forest 
Service, 1400 Independence Avenue SW, Washington, DC 20250, Phone: 202 
205-0833, Email: [email protected].
    RIN: 0596-AD32

USDA--RURAL BUSINESS--COOPERATIVE SERVICE (RBS)

Proposed Rule Stage

12.  Higher Blends Infrastructure Incentive Program [0570-AB11]

    Priority: Section 3(f)(1) Significant. Major status under 5 U.S.C. 
801 is undetermined.
    Legal Authority: 5 U.S.C. 301; 7 U.S.C. 1989
    CFR Citation: Not Yet Determined.
    Legal Deadline: None.
    Abstract: The Higher Blends Infrastructure Program (HBIIP) is a 
program designed to increase the sales and use of higher blends of 
ethanol and biodiesel by expanding the infrastructure for renewable 
fuels derived from U.S. agricultural products. The program is also 
intended to encourage a more comprehensive approach to market higher 
blends by sharing the costs related to building out biofuel-related 
infrastructure. The program should increase availability of domestic 
biofuels and give Americans additional cleaner fuel options at the 
pump.
    RBCS is proposing a rule to codify the policies and procedures for 
the program in the Code of Federal Regulations, as this program has a 
significant impact on climate change which is an administration 
priority. The proposed rule is intended to seek comment on codification 
of existing authorities provided through statutory language on 
eligibility requirements, types and terms of funding, program 
requirements and processing procedures.
    RBCS intends to conduct public engagement to hear from stakeholders 
and potential applicants about what they would like to see in the 
regulation as well as what has worked and what has not worked in the 
past. This program has been implemented for multiple years, so the 
public should have some input on what has worked and what has not in 
the past. RBCS is looking for suggestions and input both from those who 
have applied in the past and those that did not, why they opted not to 
and if the program could do anything to encourage new applicants.
    Targeted primary stakeholders include owners of fueling station 
owners, convenience store, and fleets, including auto, truck, rail and 
marine, and their industry associations. Secondary stakeholders include 
equipment manufacturers, distributors, and installers; State Energy 
Offices and State Departments of Agriculture; biofuel producers and 
farmers/agricultural producers and their industry associations; EPA, 
DOT, DOE, and other Federal agencies; and other stakeholders and groups 
with related interests such as environmental and health.
    Statement of Need: The purpose HBIIP is to increase significantly 
the sales and use of higher blends of ethanol and bio diesel by 
expanding the infrastructure for renewable fuels derived from U.S. 
agricultural products. The program is also intended to encourage a more 
comprehensive approach to market higher blends by sharing the costs 
related to building out biofuel-related infrastructure. Currently, the 
Rural Business-Cooperative Service (RBCS) implements the program 
through a Notice of Funding Opportunity. This program was initially 
implemented in fiscal year 2020 through a Notice of Funding Opportunity 
and under the Commodity Credit Corporation (CCC) authority. In fiscal

[[Page 9315]]

year 2023 this was included in IRA and under RBCS authority and a 
Notice of Funding Opportunity was yet again issued. RBCS is proposing a 
rule to codify the policies and procedures for the program in the Code 
of Federal Regulations as this program has a significant impact on 
climate change which is an administration priority.
    Summary of Legal Basis: This regulatory action is not required by 
statute or court order; however, the underlying statutes authorizing 
RBCS to create these regulations are 5 U.S.C. 301 and 7 U.S.C. 1989.
    Alternatives: The alternative to rulemaking is to continue to 
operate the program through issuance of a Notice of Funding Opportunity 
to announce application windows and applicable requirements for the 
program.
    Anticipated Cost and Benefits: The Agency does not expect the new 
regulation to result in additional costs to applicants or the 
government.
    Risks: At this time, the Agency has not completed risk analysis for 
this action.
    Timetable:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Action                    Date            FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Proposed Rule.......................   06/00/24  .......................
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No.
    Government Levels Affected: None.
    Agency Contact: Jeffrey Carpenter, HBIIP Program Manager, 
Department of Agriculture, Rural Business-Cooperative Service, 1400 
Independence Avenue SW, Washington, DC 20250, Phone: 402 437-5554, 
Email: [email protected].
    RIN: 0570-AB11

BILLING CODE 3410-90-P

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Statement of Regulatory Priorities

    Established in 1903, the Department of Commerce (Commerce or 
Department) is one of the oldest Cabinet-level agencies in the Federal 
Government. Commerce's mission is to create the conditions for economic 
growth and opportunity across all American communities by promoting 
innovation, entrepreneurship, competitiveness, and environmental 
stewardship. Commerce has 12 operating units, which manage a diverse 
portfolio of programs and services ranging from trade promotion and 
economic development assistance to improved broadband access and the 
National Weather Service, and from standards development and 
statistical data production, including the decennial census, to patents 
and fisheries management. Across these varied activities, the 
Department seeks to provide a foundation for a more equitable, 
resilient, and globally competitive economy.
    To fulfill its mission, Commerce works in partnership with 
businesses, educational institutions, community organizations, 
government agencies, and individuals to:
     Innovate by supporting the creation of new ideas through 
cutting-edge science and technology, from advances in nanotechnology to 
ocean exploration to broadband deployment, and by protecting American 
innovations through the patent and trademark system;
     Support entrepreneurship and commercialization by enabling 
community development and strengthening opportunities for minority and 
other underserved businesses and small businesses;
     Maintain U.S. economic competitiveness in the global 
marketplace by promoting exports and foreign direct investment, 
ensuring a level playing field for U.S. businesses, and ensuring that 
technology transfer is consistent with our nation's economic and 
security interests;
     Provide effective management and stewardship of our 
nation's resources and assets to ensure sustainable economic 
opportunities; and
     Make informed policy decisions and enable better 
understanding of the economy and our communities by providing timely, 
accessible, and accurate economic and demographic data.
    Commerce's Regulatory Plan tracks the most important regulations 
that the Department anticipates issuing to implement these policy and 
program priorities and foster sustainable and equitable growth. Of 
Commerce's 12 primary operating units, three bureaus--the National 
Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), the United States Patent 
and Trademark Office (USPTO), and the Bureau of Industry and Security 
(BIS)--issue the vast majority of the Department's regulations, and 
these three bureaus account for all the planned actions that are 
considered the Department's highest priority pre-regulatory or 
regulatory actions for FY 2024.
    Consistent with Executive Order 14094, moreover, the Department and 
its bureaus routinely seek to inform their rulemaking with meaningful 
opportunities for public input. The efforts of NOAA, USPTO, and BIS to 
promote public engagement are discussed in their respective sections, 
below.

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

    NOAA's mission is built on three pillars: science, service, and 
stewardship--to understand and predict changes in climate, weather, 
oceans, and coasts; to share that knowledge and information with 
others; and to conserve and manage coastal and marine ecosystems and 
resources.
    At its core, NOAA is a scientific agency. It observes, measures, 
monitors, and collects data from the depths of the ocean to the surface 
of the sun, and it does so following principles of scientific 
integrity. These data are turned into weather and climate models and 
forecasts that are then used for everything from local weather 
forecasts to predicting the movement of wildfire smoke to identifying 
the impacts of climate change on fisheries and living marine resources.
    With respect to service, NOAA not only collects data but seeks to 
make it operational. By providing Federal, State, local, Tribal 
government partners, the private sector, and the public with actionable 
environmental information, NOAA can facilitate decision-making in the 
face of climate change. Such decisions can range from businesses 
planning the location of offices; insurance companies trying to 
incorporate climate risk into their insurance policies; and 
municipalities looking to ensure that plans for construction of new 
housing developments will be resilient to the effects of climate 
change.
    The final pillar of NOAA's mission is stewardship. NOAA seeks to 
conserve our lands, waters, and natural resources, protecting people 
and the environment now and for future generations. As part of 
Commerce, moreover, NOAA recognizes that economic growth must go hand-
in-hand with environmental stewardship. For example, the nation's 
fisheries enhance the nation's productivity and long-term economic 
growth while ensuring sustainability. Similarly, national marine 
sanctuaries both protect important natural resources and are 
significant drivers of eco-tourism and local recreation.
    Within NOAA, the National Marine Fisheries Services (NMFS) and the 
National Ocean Service (NOS) are the components that most often 
exercise regulatory authority to implement NOAA's mission. NMFS 
oversees the management and conservation of the nation's marine 
fisheries; protects marine mammals and Endangered

[[Page 9316]]

Species Act (ESA)-listed marine and anadromous species; and promotes 
economic development of the U.S. fishing industry. NOS assists the 
coastal states in their management of land and ocean resources in their 
coastal zones, including estuarine research reserves; manages national 
marine sanctuaries; monitors marine pollution; and directs the national 
program for deep-seabed minerals and ocean thermal energy.
    Many of NOAA's rulemakings are issued pursuant to the following key 
statutes:

Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act

    Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act (Magnuson-
Stevens Act) rulemakings concern the conservation and management of 
fishery resources in the U.S. Exclusive Economic Zone (generally 3-200 
nautical miles from shore). As itemized in the Unified Agenda, NOAA 
plans to take several hundred actions in FY 2024 under Magnuson-Stevens 
Act authority. With certain exceptions, rulemakings under the Magnuson-
Stevens Act are usually initiated by the actions of eight regional 
Fishery Management Councils (Councils). The Magnuson-Stevens Act 
provides a robust public process for managing our nation's fisheries 
through the work of the Councils. Throughout the Council process, there 
is significant opportunity for public engagement, including 
participating on advisory panels, providing testimony at public 
hearings, and commenting on Council actions. These Councils are 
comprised of representatives from the commercial and recreational 
fishing sectors, environmental groups, academia, and Federal and State 
government, and they are responsible for preparing fishery management 
plans (FMPs) and FMP amendments, and for recommending implementing 
regulations for each managed fishery. This unique management system 
gives fishery managers the flexibility to use local level input to 
develop management strategies appropriate for each region's unique 
fisheries, challenges, and opportunities. FMPs address a variety of 
issues, including maximizing fishing opportunities on healthy stocks, 
rebuilding overfished stocks, and addressing gear conflicts. After 
considering the Councils' recommendations in light of the standards and 
requirements set forth in the Magnuson-Stevens Act and in other 
applicable laws, NOAA may issue regulations to implement the proposed 
FMPs and FMP amendments.

Marine Mammal Protection Act

    The Marine Mammal Protection Act of 1972 (MMPA) provides authority 
for the conservation and management of marine mammals under U.S. 
jurisdiction. It expressly prohibits, with certain exceptions, the 
intentional take of marine mammals. The MMPA allows, upon request and 
subsequent authorization, the incidental take of marine mammals by U.S. 
citizens who engage in a specified activity (e.g., oil and gas 
development, pile driving) within a specified geographic region. NMFS 
authorizes incidental take under the MMPA if it finds that the taking 
would be of small numbers, have no more than a ``negligible impact'' on 
those marine mammal species or stock, and would not have an 
``unmitigable adverse impact'' on the availability of the species or 
stock for ``subsistence'' uses. NMFS also initiates rulemakings under 
the MMPA to establish a management regime to reduce marine mammal 
mortalities and injuries as a result of interactions with fisheries. In 
addition, the MMPA allows NMFS to permit the take or import of wild 
animals for scientific research or public display or to enhance the 
survival of a species or stock.

Endangered Species Act

    The Endangered Species Act of 1973 (ESA) provides for the 
conservation of species that are determined to be ``endangered'' or 
``threatened,'' and the conservation of the ecosystems on which these 
species depend. NMFS and the Department of Interior's Fish and Wildlife 
Service (FWS) jointly administer the provisions of the ESA: NMFS 
manages marine and several anadromous species, and FWS manages land and 
freshwater species. Together, NMFS and FWS work to protect critically 
imperiled species from extinction. NMFS rulemaking actions under the 
ESA are focused on determining whether any species under its 
responsibility is an endangered or threatened species and whether those 
species must be added to the list of protected species. NMFS is also 
responsible for designating, reviewing and revising critical habitat 
for any listed species. In addition, as indicated in the list of 
highlighted actions below, NMFS and FWS may also issue rules clarifying 
how particular provisions of the ESA will be implemented.

The National Marine Sanctuaries Act

    The National Marine Sanctuaries Act (NMSA) authorizes the Secretary 
of Commerce to designate and protect as national marine sanctuaries 
areas of the marine environment with special national significance due 
to their conservation, recreational, ecological, historical, 
scientific, cultural, archeological, educational, or aesthetic 
qualities. The primary objective of the NMSA is to protect marine 
resources, such as coral reefs, sunken historical vessels, or unique 
habitats.
    NOAA's Office of National Marine Sanctuaries (ONMS), within NOS, 
has responsibility for management of national marine sanctuaries. ONMS 
regulations, issued pursuant to NMSA, prohibit specific kinds of 
activities, describe and define the boundaries of the designated 
national marine sanctuaries, and set up a system of permits to allow 
the conduct of certain types of activities that would otherwise not be 
allowed.
    These regulations can, among other things, regulate and restrict 
activities that may injure natural resources, including all extractive 
and destructive activities, consistent with community-specific needs 
and NMSA's purpose to ``facilitate to the extent compatible with the 
primary objective of resource protection, all public and private uses 
of the resources of these marine areas.'' In FY 2024, NOAA is expected 
to have at least three regulatory actions under NMSA.

Coastal Zone Management Act

    The Coastal Zone Management Act (CZMA) was passed in 1972 to 
preserve, protect, and develop and, where possible, to restore and 
enhance the resources of the nation's coastal zone. The CZMA creates a 
voluntary state-federal partnership, where coastal states (States in, 
or bordering on, the Atlantic, Pacific or Arctic Ocean, the Gulf of 
Mexico, Long Island Sound, or one or more of the Great Lakes), may 
elect to develop comprehensive programs that meet federal approval 
standards. Currently, 34 of the 35 eligible entities are implementing a 
federally approved coastal management plan approved by the Secretary of 
Commerce.

NOAA's Regulatory Plan Actions

    Of the numerous regulatory actions that NOAA is planning for this 
year, of which approximately 21 are expected to be determined to be 
significant rulemaking under E.O. 12866, there are four, described 
below, that the Department considers to be of particular importance.
    1. Illegal, Unreported, and Unregulated Fishing; Fisheries 
Enforcement; High Seas Driftnet Fishing Moratorium Protection Act 
(0648-BG11): This proposed rule makes conforming amendments to 
regulations

[[Page 9317]]

implementing various statutes amended by the Illegal, Unreported and 
Unregulated Fishing Enforcement Act of 2015. The Act provides the 
authority to implement two new international agreements under the 
Antigua Convention and the United Nations Food and Agriculture 
Organization Agreement on Port State Measures to Prevent, Deter, and 
Eliminate Illegal, Unreported and Unregulated Fishing (Port State 
Measures Agreement, or PMSA) The PMSA is aimed at combating illegal, 
unreported and unregulated (IUU) fishing activities through increased 
port inspection of foreign fishing vessels and thereby closing seafood 
markets to IUU fish and fish products. This proposed rule would require 
the collection of certain information from foreign fishing vessels 
requesting permission to use U.S. ports. It will also include 
procedures to designate and publicize the ports to which foreign 
fishing vessels may seek entry and procedures for conducting 
inspections of these foreign vessels accessing U.S. ports. In addition, 
this proposed rule will identify and certify nations for IUU fishing 
and other adverse fishing activities, bycatch of protected living 
marine resources, and shark catch under the authority of the High Seas 
Driftnet Fishing Moratorium Protection Act that need to be updated in 
light of amendments made by the James M. Inhofe National Defense 
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2023.
    2. Amendments to the North Atlantic Right Whale Vessel Strike 
Reduction Rule (0648-BI88): This final rule makes changes to existing 
vessel speed regulations in an effort to further reduce the likelihood 
of mortalities and serious injuries to endangered North Atlantic right 
whales from vessel collisions and prevent the species' extinction. 
Vessel collisions are a leading cause of the species' decline and 
contributor to the ongoing Unusual Mortality Event (2017-present). The 
North Atlantic right whale (Eubalaena glacialis) was severely depleted 
by commercial whaling and, despite protection from commercial harvest 
since 1935, has not recovered. Following two decades of growth between 
1990 and 2010, the species has been in decline over the past decade 
with a best population estimate of fewer than 350 individuals.
    3. Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Regulations for 
Listing Species and Designating Critical Habitat (0648-BK47): The 
Secretaries of Interior and Commerce share responsibility for 
implementing most of the provisions of the Endangered Species Act 
(ESA). Together, the Department of Interior's Fish and Wildlife Service 
and the Department of Commerce's National Marine Fisheries Services 
(collectively, the Services) have promulgated regulations that 
implement aspects of the listing and critical habitat designation 
provisions of section 4 of the ESA. Pursuant to the January 20, 2021 
Executive Order on Protecting Public Health and the Environment and 
Restoring Science to Tackle the Climate Crisis (E.O. 13990), the 
Services initiated a review of a 2019 rule that revised the regulations 
for adding and removing species from the Lists of Endangered and 
Threatened Wildlife and Plants and clarified procedures for designating 
critical habitat. Following the review, the Services issued a proposed 
rule and now seek to finalize a rule that revises the regulations to 
clarify, interpret, and implement portions of the Act concerning the 
procedures and criteria used for listing, reclassifying, and delisting 
species on the Lists of Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants 
and designating critical habitat.
    4. Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Revision of 
Regulations for Interagency Cooperation (0648-BK48): Pursuant to E.O. 
13990, the Services also initiated a review of a 2019 rule that 
implemented the interagency consultation provisions in section 7 of the 
ESA. Following the review, the Services issued a proposed rule and now 
seek to finalize a rule that revises the regulations to further clarify 
and improve the interagency consultation process, while continuing to 
provide for the conservation of listed species.

The United States Patent and Trademark Office

    The USPTO's mission is to foster innovation, competitiveness, and 
economic growth, domestically and abroad, by delivering high quality 
and timely examination of patent and trademark applications, guiding 
domestic and international intellectual property policy, and delivering 
intellectual property information and education worldwide.

Major Programs and Activities

    The USPTO is responsible for granting U.S. patents and registering 
trademarks. This system of secured property rights, which has its 
foundation in Article I, Section 8, Clause 8, of the Constitution 
(providing that Congress shall have the power to ``promote the Progress 
of Science and useful Arts, by securing for limited Times to Authors 
and Inventors the exclusive Right to their respective Writings and 
Discoveries'') has enabled American industry to flourish. New products 
have been invented, new uses for old ones discovered, and employment 
opportunities created for millions of Americans. The continued demand 
for patents and trademarks underscores the importance to the U.S. 
economy of effective mechanisms to protect new ideas and investments in 
innovation, as well as the ingenuity of American inventors and 
entrepreneurs.
    In addition to granting patents and trademarks, the USPTO advises 
the President of the United States, the Secretary of Commerce, and U.S. 
government agencies on intellectual property (IP) policy, protection, 
and enforcement; and promotes strong and effective IP protection around 
the world. The USPTO furthers effective IP protection for U.S. 
innovators and entrepreneurs worldwide by working with other agencies 
to secure strong IP provisions in free trade and other international 
agreements. It also provides training, education, and capacity building 
programs designed to foster respect for IP and encourage the 
development of strong IP enforcement regimes by U.S. trading partners.
    As part of its work, the USPTO administers regulations located at 
title 37 of the Code of Federal Regulations concerning its patent and 
trademark services and the other functions it performs. In the 
development of its regulations, the USPTO seeks to increase 
participation and engagement from members of the public affected by our 
regulations, including in the development of our regulatory priorities. 
During the past year, we have increased our engagement efforts to help 
inform our priorities to date, as well as future priorities. We have 
held public hearings, as well as published requests for comments, on 
several of our regulatory actions not only to better understand our 
stakeholders' needs, but to ensure robust and transparent engagement 
throughout the rulemaking process. For example, public hearings were 
held in two rulemakings where the USPTO will be setting and adjusting 
patent and trademark fees. See ``Setting and Adjusting Patent Fees'' 
(0651-AD64) and ``Setting and Adjusting Trademark Fees'' (0651-AD65). 
In addition, the USPTO published notices requesting comments on several 
rulemakings to inform the agency as it develops its proposals. See 
``Changes Under Consideration to Discretionary Institution Practices, 
Petition Word-count Limits, and Settlement Practices for America 
Invents Act Trial Proceedings Before the Patent Trial and Appeal 
Board'' (0651-AD47); ``Motion to Amend Practice and Procedures in

[[Page 9318]]

Trial Proceedings Under the America Invents Act Before the Patent Trial 
and Appeal Board'' (0651-AD50); ``Changes to the Representation of 
Others in Design Patent Matters Before the United States Patent and 
Trademark Office'' (0651-AD67), and ``Rules Governing Pre-Issuance 
Internal Circulation and Review of Decisions Within the Patent Trial 
and Appeal Board'' (0651-AD68). More information about the specific 
public engagement activity conducted by the USPTO for each of these 
rulemakings is found in their respective abstract. The USPTO is 
currently considering all public feedback as it develops its 
rulemakings. Throughout our engagement, the USPTO is ensuring that in 
the regulatory process, we hear from a wide array of members of the 
public to help the USPTO shape the provisions proposed in its proposed 
rule or ultimately implemented in the final rule.
    Outlined below are the USPTO's most important upcoming regulatory 
actions for this year.

The USPTO's Regulatory Plan Actions

    1. Setting and Adjusting Patent Fees (0651-AD64): This proposed 
rule would set and adjust Patent fee amounts to provide USPTO with 
sufficient aggregate revenue to recover its aggregate cost of 
operations thereby maintaining a sustainable funding model. The new fee 
amounts would provide USPTO with additional resources to decrease 
patent pendency and ensure robust and reliable patents are granted 
while continuing to promote access to the patent system for 
underresourced individuals. The proposed fee amounts reflect feedback 
received from members of the Patent Public Advisory Committee and the 
public, including organizations, practitioners, and independent 
inventors, during a public hearing held on May 18, 2023.
    2. Setting and Adjusting Trademark Fees (0651-AD65): This proposed 
rule would set and adjust Trademark fee amounts to provide USPTO with 
sufficient aggregate revenue to recover its aggregate cost of 
operations thereby maintaining a sustainable funding model. The new fee 
amounts would provide USPTO with additional resources to ensure the 
integrity of the Trademark register and promote efficiency of processes 
while continuing to offer affordable options to stakeholders. The 
proposed fee amounts reflect feedback received from members of the 
Trademark Public Advisory Committee and the public, including 
organizations, practitioners, and small business owners, during a 
public hearing held on June 5, 2023.

Bureau of Industry and Security

    BIS advances U.S. national security, foreign policy, and economic 
objectives by maintaining and strengthening adaptable, efficient, and 
effective export control and treaty compliance systems as well as by 
administering programs to prioritize certain contracts to promote the 
national defense and to protect and enhance the defense industrial 
base.

BIS Public Engagement

    BIS seeks to increase participation and engagement from members of 
the public affected by our regulations, including in the development of 
our regulatory priorities. Within the regulatory process itself, BIS 
often requests public comments even when not legally required to do so. 
BIS's acceptance of comments submitted anonymously or accompanied by 
requests for protection of business confidential information helps 
bolster public trust. For nearly all rules, even those that do not 
include requests for public comment, BIS obtains input from its 
Technical Advisory Committees (TACs), constituted under the Federal 
Advisory Committee Act. The TACs are composed of industry experts from 
a variety of fields. In addition to providing technical and compliance 
advice on draft rules, the TACs provide technical guidance on 
developing proposals to multilateral export control regimes, thereby 
supporting control policy development even prior to rulemaking.
    BIS also engages with the public outside of the rulemaking process. 
BIS has an Office of Exporter Services (OExS), with a Division of 
Outreach and Educational Services and a Regulatory Policy Division, 
which support public compliance with and understanding of BIS 
regulations, including by interacting personally in meetings or on 
phone calls and responding to written inquiries. BIS itself puts on 
multiple training seminars per year, many of them outside of the 
Washington, DC area or online. In addition to these smaller seminars, 
BIS has a large annual conference (called ``Update''), at which it 
provides an overview of changes to policies and regulations over the 
past year. The Update Conference involves review and discussion of 
large, complex regulatory concepts pertaining to BIS, inviting follow-
on discussion and interaction from participants, which in turn informs 
BIS's deliberations. Many BIS staffers also participate in seminars and 
conferences hosted by other government agencies or private partners. 
Public engagement is a vital part of BIS's operations.

Major Programs and Activities

    BIS administers four sets of regulations:
     The Export Administration Regulations (EAR) regulate 
exports and reexports to protect national security, foreign policy, and 
short supply interests. The EAR includes the Commerce Control List, 
which describes commodities, software, and technology that are subject 
to licensing requirements for specific reasons for control. The EAR 
also regulates U.S. persons' participation in certain boycotts 
administered by foreign governments.
     The National Security Industrial Base Regulations provide 
for prioritization of certain contracts and allocations of resources to 
promote the national defense, require reporting of foreign government-
imposed offsets in defense sales, provide for surveys to assess the 
capabilities of the industrial base to support the national defense, 
and address the effect of imports on the defense industrial base.
     The Chemical Weapons Convention Regulations implement 
declaration, reporting, and on-site inspection requirements in the 
private sector necessary to meet United States treaty obligations under 
the Chemical Weapons Convention treaty.
     The Additional Protocol Regulations implement similar 
requirements for certain civil nuclear and nuclear-related items with 
respect to an agreement between the United States and the International 
Atomic Energy Agency.
    BIS also has an enforcement component with nine offices covering 
the United States, as well as BIS export control officers stationed at 
several U.S. embassies and consulates abroad. BIS works with other U.S. 
Government agencies to promote coordinated U.S. Government efforts in 
export controls and other programs. BIS participates in U.S. Government 
efforts to strengthen multilateral export control regimes and promote 
effective export controls through cooperation with other governments.
    In FY 2024, BIS plans to publish a number of proposed and final 
rules amending the EAR. These rules will cover a range of issues, 
including countering Russia's ongoing aggression against Ukraine and 
China's military modernization; imposing controls on military, 
intelligence, and security end uses and end users that are contrary to 
the national security or foreign policy interests of the United States, 
including

[[Page 9319]]

human rights values; and increasing the effectiveness of U.S. actions 
by substantially aligning controls with ally and partner countries. BIS 
also continues to identify and propose controls for emerging and 
foundational technologies.
    Outlined below are BIS's most important upcoming regulatory actions 
for this year.

BIS's Regulatory Plan Actions

    1. Implementation of Additional Export Controls: Certain Advanced 
Computing and Semiconductor Manufacturing Items; Supercomputer and 
Semiconductor End Use (0694-AI94): The interim final rule (IFR), 
Implementation of Additional Export Controls: Certain Advanced 
Computing and Semiconductor End Use; Entity List Modification, which 
went into effect on October 7, 2022, amended the EAR to implement 
controls on advanced computing integrated circuits (ICs), computer 
commodities that contain such ICs, and certain semiconductor 
manufacturing items. This interim final rule addresses comments 
received and makes changes to the original October 7 IFR in response to 
those comments related to advanced computing integrated circuits and 
computer commodities that contain such ICs.
    2. Section 1758 Technology Export Controls on Instruments for the 
Automated Chemical Synthesis of Peptides (0694-AI84): Section 1758 of 
the Export Control Reform Act of 2018 authorizes BIS to establish 
appropriate controls on the export, reexport or transfer (in-country) 
of emerging and foundational technologies essential to the national 
security of the United States. Certain instruments for the automated 
synthesis of peptides (automated peptide synthesizers) have been 
identified by BIS for evaluation as a Section 1758 emerging and 
foundational technology. This final rule implements controls for these 
automated peptide synthesizers.
    3. Authorization of Certain ``Items'' to Entities on the Entity 
List in the Context of Specific Standards Activities (0694-AI06): This 
final rule amends the EAR to authorize the release of specified items 
subject to the EAR without a license when that release occurs in the 
context of a ``standards-related activity.'' BIS published an interim 
final rule in September 2022 that revised the terms used in the EAR to 
describe the actions permissible under the authorization rather than 
defining the organizations to which it applies. This final rule 
responds to comments received in response to the interim final rule.

DOC--NATIONAL OCEANIC AND ATMOSTPHERIC ADMINISTRATION (NOAA)

Proposed Rule Stage

13. Illegal, Unreported, and Unregulated Fishing; Fisheries 
Enforcement; High Seas Driftnet Fishing Moratorium Protection Act 
[0648-BG11]

    Priority: Other Significant.
    Legal Authority: Pub. L. 114-81
    CFR Citation: 50 CFR 300.
    Legal Deadline: Final, Statutory, December 31, 2023, National 
Defense Authorization Act, 2023 amended the Moratorium Protection Act 
and requires that not later than 1 year after the date of enactment of 
this Act all other updates be enacted.
    Abstract: This proposed rule would make conforming amendments to 
regulations implementing the various statutes amended by the Illegal, 
Unreported and Unregulated Fishing Enforcement Act of 2015 (Pub. L. 
114-81). The Act amends several regional fishery management 
organization implementing statutes as well as the High Seas Driftnet 
Fishing Moratorium Protection Act. It also provides authority to 
implement two new international agreements under the Antigua 
Convention, which amends the Convention for the establishment of an 
Inter-American Tropical Tuna Commission, and the United Nations Food 
and Agriculture Organization Agreement on Port State Measures to 
Prevent, Deter, and Eliminate Illegal, Unreported and Unregulated 
Fishing (Port State Measures Agreement), which restricts the entry into 
U.S. ports by foreign fishing vessels that are known to be or are 
suspected of engaging in illegal, unreported, and unregulated fishing. 
This proposed rule would also implement the Port State Measures 
Agreement. To that end, this proposed rule would require the collection 
of certain information from foreign fishing vessels requesting 
permission to use U.S. ports. It also includes procedures to designate 
and publicize the ports to which foreign fishing vessels may seek entry 
and procedures for conducting inspections of these foreign vessels 
accessing U.S. ports. Further, the rule would establish procedures for 
notification of: the denial of port entry or port services for a 
foreign vessel, the withdrawal of the denial of port services if 
applicable, the taking of enforcement action with respect to a foreign 
vessel, or the results of any inspection of a foreign vessel to the 
flag nation of the vessel and other competent authorities as 
appropriate.
    Statement of Need: The United States is a signatory to the Port 
State Measures Agreement (PSMA). The agreement is aimed at combating 
illegal, unreported and unregulated (IUU) fishing activities through 
increased port inspection of foreign fishing vessels and thereby 
closing seafood markets to IUU fish and fish products. In addition, 
regulations to identify and certify nations for IUU fishing and other 
adverse fishing activities, bycatch of protected living marine 
resources, and shark catch under the authority of the High Seas 
Driftnet Fishing Moratorium Protection Act must be updated in light of 
amendments made by the James M. Inhofe National Defense Authorization 
Act for Fiscal year 2023. NMFS proposes to streamline the Moratorium 
Protection Act regulations by removing provisions that only repeat 
statutory text, including those provisions regarding identification, 
notification, and consultation with identified nations.
    Summary of Legal Basis: This action is required under several 
statutes: Illegal, Unreported, and Unregulated Fishing Enforcement Act 
of 2015 (Pub. L. 114-81); Ensuring Access to Pacific Fisheries Act 
(Pub. L. 114-327); High Seas Driftnet Fishing Moratorium Protection Act 
(Pub. L. 104-43); and, the James M. Inhofe National Defense 
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2023 (Pub. L. 117-263). The Secretary 
of Commerce is authorized to issue regulations to implement the 
statutory obligations to counter IUU fishing by foreign fishing vessels 
and to prevent the importation of illegally harvested seafood.
    Alternatives: Alternatives to taking action at the port would 
include taking action at sea against IUU fishing vessels and in the 
supply chain against detected IUU fish or fish products. At-sea 
monitoring and inspection is part of an overall strategy to combat IUU 
fishing, but it is extremely expensive, resources are limited, and the 
United States has limited jurisdiction to board foreign flag vessels at 
sea. Likewise, tracing and removing illegal products already released 
into the U.S. seafood market would be difficult and resource intensive. 
Preventing entry of IUU fishing vessels into ports or investigating 
fishing vessels at the port is an efficient and effective approach to 
combat illegal activity and to prevent illegal products from entering 
the supply chain. There are no alternatives to the conforming 
amendments to the High Seas Driftnet Fishing Moratorium Protection Act. 
Without these changes, the implementing regulations would not be 
consistent with the revised statute.

[[Page 9320]]

    Anticipated Cost and Benefits: The anticipated costs will be 
minimal in that foreign vessels requesting permission to visit U.S. 
ports are already required to report. Under this rule, fishing vessel 
masters will have to include more information about the vessel and its 
fishing activities directly to the National Marine Fisheries Service 
(NMFS) Office of Law Enforcement after they submit an electronic notice 
of arrival to the U.S. Coast Guard. Based on the information submitted, 
NMFS may deny port privileges for vessels known to have engaged in IUU 
fishing or may meet the vessel in port to conduct an inspection. The 
minimal additional data elements required of foreign fishing vessels 
will be collected through an email to the NMFS Office of Law 
Enforcement. The additional reporting costs are not anticipated to 
affect shipping patterns, port usage, or international commerce. In 
addition, vessel inspections will be coordinated and planned based on 
the advance notice of arrival information submitted to the U.S. Coast 
Guard prior to entry into port, thus delays for inspection will be 
minimal and not result in significant costs to legitimate vessels. 
Benefits of the rule will accrue when IUU fishing vessels are denied 
entry, and illegal seafood products are precluded from the U.S. supply 
chain, thereby maintaining higher prices and market share for 
legitimate producers of fishery products. In addition, benefits will 
accrue from reduced costs of inspection and monitoring at ports of 
entry due to the advance notice provided and the ability of NMFS and 
Coast Guard to take a risk- management approach to vessel inspection. 
Should the United States impose trade restrictions on foreign nations 
due to the amendments to the High Seas Driftnet Fishing Moratorium 
Protection Act, some costs would be borne by U.S. importers who would 
have to adjust their supply chains. However, many U.S. importers and 
seafood dealers are already adjusting supply chains to respond to 
consumer demand for lawfully-acquired, sustainable and environmentally 
responsible seafood. The benefits of additional steps to counter IUU 
fishing will accrue to law-abiding harvesters, processors and traders 
as fish stocks are recovered and they no longer must compete with 
illegitimate products in the supply chain.
    Risks: If the port entry reporting and inspection provisions of 
this rule were not implemented, there is an increased risk of IUU 
fishing vessels entering U.S. ports and/or the products of IUU fishing 
infiltrating the U.S. supply chain. In addition, the United States 
would be out of compliance with its international obligations under the 
PSMA. If the revisions to the High Seas Driftnet Fishing Moratorium 
Protection Act are not implemented through conforming amendments to the 
regulations, nations might not be identified under the statute, 
therefore diminishing the likelihood of corrective actions to counter 
IUU fishing and to address the bycatch of protected living marine 
resources and the catch of sharks.
    Timetable:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Action                    Date            FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NPRM................................   07/08/22  87 FR 40763
NPRM Comment Period End.............   09/06/22  .......................
Supplemental NPRM...................   11/00/23  .......................
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Yes.
    Small Entities Affected: Businesses.
    Government Levels Affected: Federal.
    International Impacts: This regulatory action will be likely to 
have international trade and investment effects, or otherwise be of 
international interest.
    Agency Contact: Alexa Cole, Director, Office of International 
Affairs, Trade, and Commerce, Department of Commerce, National Oceanic 
and Atmospheric Administration, 1315 East-West Highway, Silver Spring, 
MD 20910, Phone: 301 427-8286, Email: [email protected].
    RIN: 0648-BG11

DOC--NOAA

Final Rule Stage

14. Amendments to the North Atlantic Right Whale Vessel Strike 
Reduction Rule [0648-BI88]

    Priority: Other Significant.
    Legal Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1361 et seq.; 16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.
    CFR Citation: 50 CFR 224.
    Legal Deadline: None.
    Abstract: NMFS published a proposed rule to amend the North 
Atlantic Right Whale Vessel Strike Reduction Rule (per 50 CFR 224.105; 
87 FR 46921, August 1, 2022). NMFS proposed this action to further 
reduce the likelihood of mortalities and serious injuries to endangered 
right whales from vessel collisions, which are a leading cause of the 
species' decline and a primary factor in an ongoing Unusual Mortality 
Event. The proposed rule would (1) modify the spatial and temporal 
boundaries of current speed restriction areas, currently referred to as 
Seasonal Management Areas (SMAs), (2) include most vessels greater than 
or equal to 35 ft (10.7 m) and less than 65 ft (19.8 m) in length in 
the vessel size class subject to speed restriction, (3) create a 
Dynamic Speed Zone framework to implement mandatory speed restrictions 
when whales are known to be present outside active SMAs, and (4) update 
the speed rule's safety deviation provision. The proposed amendments to 
current speed regulations reduce vessel strike risk based on a coast 
wide collision mortality risk assessment and updated information on 
right whale distribution, vessel traffic patterns, and vessel strike 
mortality and serious injury events. NMFS solicited public comment on 
the proposed action and received over 90,000 public comments. The 
agency plans to take final action on the proposed rule in 2023.
    Statement of Need: This action is needed to further reduce the 
likelihood of mortalities and serious injuries to endangered North 
Atlantic right whales from vessel collisions, which are a leading cause 
of the species' decline and contributing to the ongoing Unusual 
Mortality Event (2017-present). Following two decades of growth, the 
species has been in decline over the past decade with a best population 
estimate of fewer than 350 individuals. Entanglement in fishing gear 
and vessel strikes are the two primary causes of North Atlantic right 
whale mortality and serious injury across their range, and human-caused 
mortality to adult females, in particular, is limiting recovery of the 
species.
    Summary of Legal Basis: NMFS is implementing this rule pursuant to 
its rulemaking authority under MMPA section 112(a) (16 U.S.C. 1382(a)), 
and ESA section 11(f) (16 U.S.C. 1540(f)).
    Alternatives: In January 2021, NMFS released, and solicited public 
comment on, an assessment of the current right whale vessel speed rule 
(50 CFR 224.105). The assessment highlighted the need to address 
collision risk from vessels less than 65 ft in length and modify the 
boundaries and timing of Seasonal Management Areas (SMAs) to better 
reflect current whale and vessel traffic distribution, along with other 
recommendations to improve vessel strike mitigation efforts. In 2022, 
NMFS completed a coastwide right whale vessel strike risk model 
(Garrison et al. 2022), which informed development of proposed 
modifications to the existing speed rule. The proposed rule considered 
number of alternatives in the draft Regulatory Impact Review and

[[Page 9321]]

draft Environmental Assessment. The Preferred Alternative would modify 
the spatial and temporal boundaries of the existing SMAs to create 
newly proposed Seasonal Speed Zones (SSZs), add smaller vessels down to 
35 ft in length, and establish a mandatory Dynamic Speed Zone program.
    Anticipated Cost and Benefits: Under the Preferred Alternative, 
NMFS estimated modifications to the speed rule would cost just over $46 
million per year. Estimated costs would be borne primarily by the 
owners and operators of vessels currently transiting within newly 
expanded portions of SSZs along the U.S. East Coast. Owners and 
operators of vessels of applicable size classes that regularly transit 
within active SSZs at speeds in excess of 10 knots would be most 
affected. Vessels operating in the Northeast and Mid-Atlantic regions 
are expected to bear the majority of costs (89 percent) if the proposed 
modifications are finalized. Potential benefits stemming from this 
action include a reduction in North Atlantic right whale mortalities 
and serious injuries resulting from collisions with vessels, with 
potential reduction in vessel strike risk for other large whale 
species.
    Risks: This action is essential to ensure long-term recovery of 
North Atlantic right whales. The proposed modifications to the current 
speed rule are designed to: (1) address a misalignment between existing 
Seasonal Management Areas and places/times with elevated strike risk, 
and (2) mitigate currently unregulated lethal strike risk from vessels 
35-65 ft in length. Given the endangered status of the North Atlantic 
right whale, the large geographic area, and the number of stakeholders 
and potentially regulated entities, final modifications to the current 
speed rule is of high interest.
    Timetable:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Action                    Date            FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NPRM................................   08/01/22  87 FR 46921
NPRM Comment Period End.............   09/30/22  .......................
NPRM Comment Period Extension.......   09/16/22  87 FR 56925
NPRM Comment Period Extension End...   10/31/22  .......................
Final Action........................   12/00/23  .......................
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Yes.
    Small Entities Affected: Businesses.
    Government Levels Affected: None.
    Agency Contact: Kim Damon-Randall, Director, Office of Protected 
Resources, Department of Commerce, National Oceanic and Atmospheric 
Administration, 1315 East-West Highway, Silver Spring, MD 20910, Phone: 
301 427-8400, Email: [email protected].
    Related RIN: Related to 0648-AS36
    RIN: 0648-BI88

DOC--NOAA

15. Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Regulations for 
Listing Species and Designating Critical Habitat [0648-BK47]

    Priority: Other Significant.
    Legal Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.
    CFR Citation: 50 CFR 424.
    Legal Deadline: None.
    Abstract: Per section 2 of the Executive Order on Protecting Public 
Health and the Environment and Restoring Science to Tackle the Climate 
Crisis (E.O. 13990), and subsequent Fact Sheet: List of Agency Actions 
for Review, the Departments of Commerce and the Interior (the 
Departments) initiated a review of the previous rulemaking action with 
the title, ``Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Regulations 
for Listing Species and Designating Critical Habitat'' (84 FR 45020; 
August 27, 2019) that revised the regulations for adding and removing 
species from the Lists of Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants 
and clarified procedures for designating critical habitat. As a result 
of that review, the Departments proposed to revise those regulations 
(88 FR 40764, June 22, 2023), and after publication of that proposal, 
delivered a series of informational sessions to stakeholders including: 
Federal agencies, State agencies, Federally recognized tribes, Native 
Hawaiian community leaders, Non-governmental organizations, 
conservation partners, Industry groups, and Pacific Islander community 
leaders. FAQs and a recording of the presentation can be viewed on the 
website https://fws.gov/project/endangered-species-act-regulation-revisions.
    Statement of Need: This action responds to the Executive Order on 
Protecting Public Health and the Environment and Restoring Science to 
Tackle the Climate Crisis (E.O. 13990) and the associated Fact Sheet 
(List of Agency Actions for Review).
    Summary of Legal Basis: This action is authorized under 16 U.S.C. 
1531 et seq.
    Alternatives: This is a joint rulemaking by the National Marine 
Fisheries Service (NMFS) and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS; 
the Services) to revise joint regulations implementing the Endangered 
Species Act (ESA). Pursuant to E.O. 13990, the Services reviewed the 
2019 final rule with the title, ``Endangered and Threatened Wildlife 
and Plants; Regulations for Listing Species and Designating Critical 
Habitat'' (84 FR 45020; August 27, 2019), which revised the regulations 
for adding and removing species from the Lists of Endangered and 
Threatened Wildlife and Plants and clarified procedures for designating 
critical habitat. Following a review of the 2019 rule, the Services 
proposed to revise portions of the regulations that the 2019 rule 
addressed (see 88 FR 40764, June 22, 2023). The Services have since 
held a series of seven informational webinars for stakeholders and are 
seeking public comment on the proposed rule as well as all aspects of 
the 2019 final rule.
    Anticipated Cost and Benefits: Potential costs directly stemming 
from this rule would be borne by the Services and would be non-
significant. Potential benefits stemming from this rule would be 
improved clarity and effectiveness of the implementing regulations that 
guide the Services when classifying species and designating critical 
habitat under the ESA.
    Risks: This action addresses several different provisions in the 
Services' joint ESA-implementing regulations. Overall, the proposed 
changes will reduce the risk associated with making listing, delisting, 
and reclassification decisions; however, those actions will continue to 
have independent levels of risk that vary depending on the particular 
species. The proposed changes will also reduce risk associated with 
some but not necessarily all, critical habitat determinations and 
designations, which will continue to have independent risk levels that 
vary based on the particular species and habitats involved.
    Timetable:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Action                    Date            FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NPRM................................   06/22/23  88 FR 40764
NPRM Comment Period End.............   08/21/23  .......................
Final Action........................   04/00/24  .......................
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No.
    Government Levels Affected: Federal.
    Agency Contact: Kim Damon-Randall, Director, Office of Protected 
Resources, Department of Commerce, National Oceanic and Atmospheric 
Administration, 1315 East-West Highway, Silver Spring, MD 20910,

[[Page 9322]]

Phone: 301 427-8400, Email: [email protected].
    Related RIN: Related to 0648-BH42, Related to 1018-BC88
    RIN: 0648-BK47

DOC--NOAA

16. Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Revision of 
Regulations for Interagency Cooperation [0648-BK48]

    Priority: Other Significant.
    Legal Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.
    CFR Citation: 50 CFR 402.
    Legal Deadline: None.
    Abstract: Per section 2 of the Executive Order on Protecting Public 
Health and the Environment and Restoring Science to Tackle the Climate 
Crisis (E.O. 13990), and subsequent Fact Sheet: List of Agency Actions 
for Review, the Departments of Commerce and the Interior (the 
Departments) initiated a review of the previous rulemaking action with 
the title, Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Regulations 
for Interagency Cooperation'' (84 FR 44976; August 27, 2019) that 
revised portions of the regulations that implement section 7 of the 
Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended. As a result of that review, 
the Departments proposed to revise those regulations (88 FR 40753; June 
22, 2023), and after publication of that proposal, delivered a series 
of informational sessions to stakeholders including: Federal agencies, 
State agencies, Federally recognized tribes, Native Hawaiian community 
leaders, Non-governmental organizations, conservation partners, 
industry groups, and Pacific Islander community leaders. FAQs and a 
recording of the presentation can be viewed on the website https://fws.gov/project/endangered-species-act-regulation-revisions.
    Statement of Need: This action responds to the Executive Order on 
Protecting Public Health and the Environment and Restoring Science to 
Tackle the Climate Crisis (E.O. 13990) and the associated Fact Sheet 
(List of Agency Actions for Review).
    Summary of Legal Basis: This action is authorized under 16 U.S.C. 
1531 et seq.
    Alternatives: This is a joint rulemaking by the National Marine 
Fisheries Service (NMFS) and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS; 
the Services) to revise joint regulations implementing the Endangered 
Species Act (ESA). Pursuant to E.O. 13990, the Services reviewed the 
2019 final rule with the title, Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and 
Plants: Regulations for Interagency Cooperation (84 FR 44976; August 
27, 2019), which revised portions of the regulations that implement 
section 7 of the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended. Following 
a review of the 2019 rule, the Services proposed to revise portions of 
the regulations that the 2019 rule addressed (see 88 FR 40753; June 22, 
2023). The Services have since held a series of seven informational 
webinars for stakeholders and are seeking public comments on the 
proposed rule as well as all aspects of the 2019 finale rule.
    Anticipated Cost and Benefits: The rulemaking revises and clarifies 
existing requirements for Federal agencies, including the Services, 
under section 7 of the ESA. Federal agencies are the only entities 
affected by this rule. We do not anticipate significant costs 
associated with the rule. This rule is meant to provide clarity to the 
standards with which we evaluate proposed Federal agency actions 
pursuant to section 7 of the ESA, which will be a benefit to the 
Services and Federal action agencies.
    Risks: This action addresses the ESA Interagency Cooperation 
provisions in the Services' joint ESA-implementing regulations. 
Overall, the proposed changes will reduce the risk to ESA-listed 
species and designated critical habitat associated with ensuring 
Federal action agencies do not jeopardize the continued existence of 
listed species or destroy or adversely modify designated critical 
habitat by clarifying and improving the interagency consultation 
process and continuing to provide for the conservation of ESA 
resources.
    Timetable:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Action                    Date            FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NPRM................................   06/22/23  88 FR 40753
NPRM Comment Period End.............   08/21/23  .......................
Final Action........................   04/00/24  .......................
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No.
    Government Levels Affected: None.
    Agency Contact: Kim Damon-Randall, Director, Office of Protected 
Resources, Department of Commerce, National Oceanic and Atmospheric 
Administration, 1315 East-West Highway, Silver Spring, MD 20910, Phone: 
301 427-8400, Email: [email protected].
    Related RIN: Related to 0648-BH41, Related to 1018-BC87
    RIN: 0648-BK48

DOC--PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE (PTO)

Proposed Rule Stage

17. Setting and Adjusting Patent Fees [0651-AD64]

    Priority: Other Significant. Major status under 5 U.S.C. 801 is 
undetermined.
    Legal Authority: Pub. L. 112-29
    CFR Citation: 37 CFR 1; 37 CFR 41.
    Legal Deadline: None.
    Abstract: The United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO or 
Office) takes this action to set and adjust Patent fee amounts to 
provide the Office with a sufficient aggregate revenue to recover its 
aggregate cost of operations thereby maintaining a sustainable funding 
model. The new fee amounts will provide the Office with additional 
resources to decrease patent pendency and ensure robust and reliable 
patents are allowed while continuing to promote access to the patent 
system for underresourced individuals. This proposal reflects feedback 
we have received from members of the Patent Public Advisory Committee 
and the public, including organizations, practitioners, and independent 
inventors, during a public hearing held on May 18, 2023. As we develop 
this regulation, we will be seeking additional public comment through 
the rulemaking process.
    Statement of Need: The purpose of this rule is to set and adjust 
patent fee amounts to provide sufficient aggregate revenue to cover the 
agency's aggregate cost of operations. To this end, this rule creates 
new or changes existing fees for patent services, and does so without 
imposing any new costs.
    Summary of Legal Basis: The Leahy-Smith America Invents Act (AIA), 
enacted in 2011, provided USPTO with the authority to set and adjust 
its fees for patent and trademark services. Since then, USPTO has 
conducted an internal biennial fee review, in which it undertook 
internal consideration of the current fee structure, and considered 
ways that the structure might be improved, including rulemaking 
pursuant to the USPTO's fee setting authority. This fee review process 
involves public outreach, including, as required by the Act, public 
hearings held by the USPTO's Public Advisory Committees, as well as 
public comment and other outreach to the user community and public in 
general.
    Alternatives: This rulemaking action is currently in development 
and alternatives have not yet been determined.
    Anticipated Cost and Benefits: This rulemaking action is currently 
in

[[Page 9323]]

development and aggregate annual economic impacts have not yet been 
determined. The user fees charged by the USPTO for its services are 
considered transfer payments that do not affect the total resources 
available to society, and therefore the changes to patent fees being 
developed by this rulemaking are transfers, and are not costs of this 
rulemaking. It is anticipated that the final rule would become 
effective with the new fee schedule in 2024.
    Risks: The USPTO will set and adjust Patent fee amounts to provide 
the Office with a sufficient amount of aggregate revenue to recover its 
aggregate cost of operations while helping the Office maintain a 
sustainable funding model, reduce the current patent application 
backlog, decrease patent pendency, and improve the reliability of 
issued patents. Therefore, one risk of taking no action could be that 
USPTO might not be able to recover its aggregate costs of operations in 
the long run.
    Timetable:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Action                    Date            FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Notice of Public Hearing and Request   04/20/23  88 FR 24392
 for Comments.
Comment Period End..................   05/25/23  .......................
NPRM................................   01/00/24  .......................
NPRM Comment Period End.............   04/00/24  .......................
Final Action........................   10/00/24  .......................
Final Action Effective..............   11/00/24  .......................
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Yes.
    Small Entities Affected: Businesses, Organizations.
    Government Levels Affected: None.
    Agency Contact: Brendan Hourigan, Director, Office of Planning and 
Budget, Department of Commerce, Patent and Trademark Office, P.O. Box 
1450, Alexandria, VA 22313-1450, Phone: 571 272-8966, Fax: 571 273-
8966, Email: [email protected].
    RIN: 0651-AD64

DOC--PTO

18. Setting and Adjusting Trademark Fees [0651-AD65]

    Priority: Other Significant. Major status under 5 U.S.C. 801 is 
undetermined.
    Legal Authority: Pub. L. 112-29
    CFR Citation: 37 CFR 2.
    Legal Deadline: None.
    Abstract: The United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO or 
Office) takes this action to set and adjust Trademark fee amounts to 
provide the Office with a sufficient aggregate revenue to recover its 
aggregate cost of operations thereby maintaining a sustainable funding 
model. The new fee amounts will provide the Office with additional 
resources to ensure the integrity of the Trademark register and promote 
efficiency of processes while continuing to offer affordable options to 
stakeholders. This proposal reflects feedback we have received from 
members of the Trademark Public Advisory Committee and the public, 
including organizations, practitioners, and small business owners, 
during a public hearing held on June 5, 2023. As we develop this 
regulation, we will be seeking additional public comment through the 
rulemaking process.
    Statement of Need: The purpose of this rule is to set and adjust 
trademark fee amounts to provide sufficient aggregate revenue to cover 
the agency's aggregate cost of operations. To this end, this rule 
creates new or changes existing fees for trademark services.
    Summary of Legal Basis: The Leahy-Smith America Invents Act (AIA), 
enacted in 2011, provided USPTO with the authority to set and adjust 
its fees for patent and trademark services. This authority was extended 
by the Study of Underrepresented Classes Chasing Engineering and 
Science Success (SUCCESS) Act of 2018. Since then, USPTO has conducted 
an internal biennial fee review, in which it undertook internal 
consideration of the current fee structure, and considered ways that 
the structure might be improved, including rulemaking pursuant to the 
USPTO's fee-setting authority. This fee review process involves public 
outreach, including, as required by the Act, a public hearing held by 
the USPTO's Trademark Public Advisory Committee, as well as public 
comment and other outreach to the user community and public in general.
    Alternatives: This rulemaking action is currently in development 
and alternatives have not yet been determined.
    Anticipated Cost and Benefits: This rulemaking action is currently 
in development and aggregate annual economic impacts have not yet been 
determined. The user fees charged by the USPTO for its services are 
considered transfer payments that do not affect the total resources 
available to society, and therefore the changes to trademark fees 
proposed by this rulemaking are transfers, and are not costs of this 
rulemaking.
    Risks: The USPTO will set and adjust trademark fee amounts to 
provide the Office with a sufficient amount of aggregate revenue to 
recover its aggregate cost of operations while helping the Office 
maintain a sustainable funding model, ensure the integrity of the 
Trademark register, and promote efficiency of processes. Therefore, one 
risk of taking no action could be that USPTO might not be able to 
recover its aggregate costs of operations in the long run.
    Timetable:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Action                    Date            FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Notice of Public Hearing and Request   04/27/23  88 FR 25623
 for Comments.
Comment Period End..................   06/12/23  .......................
NPRM................................   11/00/23  .......................
NPRM Comment Period End.............   01/00/24  .......................
Final Action........................   07/00/24  .......................
Final Action Effective..............   09/00/24  .......................
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Yes.
    Small Entities Affected: Businesses, Organizations.
    Government Levels Affected: None.
    Agency Contact: Brendan Hourigan, Director, Office of Planning and 
Budget, Department of Commerce, Patent and Trademark Office, P.O. Box 
1450, Alexandria, VA 22313-1450, Phone: 571 272-8966, Fax: 571 273-
8966, Email: [email protected].
    RIN: 0651-AD65

BILLING CODE 3410-12-P

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Statement of Regulatory Priorities

Background

    The Department of Defense (DoD) is the largest Federal department, 
employing over 1.6 million military personnel and 750,000 civilians 
with operations all over the world. DoD's enduring mission is to 
provide combat-credible military forces needed to deter war and protect 
the security of our nation. To guide this mission, the Secretary of 
Defense has outlined three top priorities, which are to defend the 
nation, take care of our people, and succeed through teamwork. In 
addition, the National Defense Strategy sets out how DoD will 
contribute to advancing and safeguarding vital U.S. national 
interests--protecting the American people, expanding America's 
prosperity, promoting global security, seizing new strategic 
opportunities, and realizing and defending our democratic values.

[[Page 9324]]

Because of this expansive and diversified mission and reach, DoD 
regulations can address a broad range of matters and have an impact on 
varied members of the public, as well as other federal agencies.
    Pursuant to Executive Order 12866, ``Regulatory Planning and 
Review'' (September 30, 1993) and Executive Order 13563, ``Improving 
Regulation and Regulatory Review'' (January 18, 2011), the DoD issues 
this Regulatory Plan and Agenda to provide notice about the DoD's 
regulatory and deregulatory actions.

Retrospective Review of Existing Regulations

    Pursuant to section 6 of Executive Order 13563 ``Improving 
Regulation and Regulatory Review'' (January 18, 2011), the Department 
continues to review existing regulations with a goal to eliminate 
outdated, unnecessary, or ineffective regulations; account for the 
currency and legitimacy of each of the Department's regulations; and 
ultimately reduce regulatory burden and costs.

Public Participation and Community Outreach

    As the DoD develops our regulations, we seek to increase public 
participation and community outreach to be better informed of and 
address issues from members of the public affected by our regulations. 
The following provides examples of our specific outreach and public 
participation efforts.
    The Office of the Assistant to the Secretary of Defense for Public 
Affairs/Community Engagement Directorate, via its Opinion Leader 
Engagement portfolio, provides public affairs support to leaders 
throughout the Office of the Secretary of Defense (OSD) who are 
responsible for regulatory activities. This support includes convening 
roundtables and similar engagements for national stakeholder 
organizations to meet with OSD leaders to discuss and share information 
about DoD policies and programs that are governed by Federal 
regulations. For example, regular engagements with leaders of national 
military and veteran supporting organizations include topics such as 
military benefits, housing, healthcare, compensation, and sexual 
assault prevention and response, which are governed by law and Federal 
regulation. These meetings allow the regulating authorities in OSD an 
opportunity to dialogue with national organizations with a stakeholder 
interest in the impact and effect of DoD regulations.
    DoD engages with the public on procurement-related regulations that 
will affect the Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement 
(DFARS) in several ways. In addition to publishing abstracts of and 
anticipated publication dates for upcoming rules in the biannual 
Unified Agenda, members of the public can track the progress of any 
open and pending DFARS regulation via the Open DFARS Cases Report, 
which is publicly available at https://www.acq.osd.mil/dpap/dars/case_status.html. The report is updated on a weekly basis and includes 
the following information: a case number, title, DFARS parts 
anticipated to be impacted by the regulation, a summary of the basis 
for the regulation, and the status of the regulation. Members of the 
public who are interested in a particular DFARS case are encouraged to 
monitor the Open DFARS Cases Report to track the progress of a 
particular regulation through the rulemaking process.
    DoD also meets with industry associations on a quarterly basis. 
Industry associations that regularly participate in these quarterly 
discussions include the Council of Defense and Space Industry 
Associations, the Professional Services Council, the Aerospace 
Industries Association, and the National Defense Industrial 
Association. During these meetings, DoD often provides updates on open 
DFARS cases.
    While developing certain DFARS regulations, DoD may seek input from 
the public by publishing in the Federal Register an early engagement 
opportunity, an advance notice of proposed rulemaking (ANPR), or a 
general request for information (RFI). Notices for early engagement 
opportunities usually pertain to a recent law, such as the annual 
National Defense Authorization Act, and request input on implementation 
of the law in the DFARS. ANPRs and RFIs may include a summary of the 
overarching policy objectives of the regulation and a list of questions 
seeking input that will help DoD develop a proposed regulation. 
Information on whether DoD plans to publish an ANPR or RFI is included 
in both the Open DFARS Cases Report and the biannual Unified Agenda.
    Occasionally, while an ANPR, proposed DFARS regulation, or interim 
DFARS regulation is out for public comment, DoD may hold a public 
meeting to allow the public to provide feedback to the Government in an 
open forum. Information about whether DoD plans on holding a public 
meeting for an ANPR or a regulation is normally included in the ANPR, 
proposed regulation, or interim regulation when it is published for 
public comment. Presentations made during the public meeting are made 
publicly available.
    The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) often utilizes listening 
sessions prior to proposing a rule to obtain public input that is then 
used to inform the contents of the proposed rule. Additionally, Federal 
Register notices, website postings, press releases, and social media 
releases are used to notify the public of the dates and times for the 
listening sessions. When a Federal Register notice is used to provide 
notification of the listening sessions, the use of an open docket is 
employed for the submission public comments in addition to receipt of 
public comments during the listening sessions. Also, the USACE may 
publish an advanced notice of proposed rulemaking to engage the public 
on the development of a proposed rule. Federal Register notices, 
website postings, press releases, and social media releases are used to 
notify the public of the publication of the proposed rule and how they 
can provide comments and engage in the rulemaking effort.
    Finally, the USACE has meetings with industry associations, NGOs, 
or similar stakeholders to provide updates on proposed policies or 
actions to solicit informal feedback that is used to help inform the 
path forward for the development of a proposed rule.

DOD Priority Regulatory Actions

    The regulatory and deregulatory actions identified in this 
Regulatory Plan embody the core of DoD's regulatory priorities for 
Fiscal Year (FY) 2024 and help support President Biden's regulatory 
priorities, the Secretary of Defense's top priorities, and those 
priorities set out in the National Defense Strategy. The DoD regulatory 
prioritization is focused on initiatives that:
     Promote the country's economic resilience, including by 
addressing COVID-related and other healthcare issues.
     Support underserved communities and improve small business 
opportunities.
     Promote competition in the American economy.
     Promote diversity, equity, inclusion, and accessibility in 
the Federal workforce.
     Support national security efforts, especially safeguarding 
Federal Government information and information technology systems.
     Tackle the climate crisis and protect the environment.
     Address military family matters.

[[Page 9325]]

Rules That Promote the Country's Economic Resilience

Pandemic COVID-19 Rules

    Pursuant to Executive Order 13987, ``Organizing and Mobilizing the 
United States Government to Provide a Unified and Effective Response to 
Combat COVID-19 and to Provide United States Leadership on Global 
Health and Security,'' January 20, 2021; Executive Order 13995, 
``Ensuring an Equitable Pandemic Response and Recovery,'' January 21, 
2021; Executive Order 13997, ``Improving and Expanding Access to Care 
and Treatments for COVID-19,'' January 21, 2021; and Executive Order 
13999, ``Protecting Worker Health and Safety,'' January 21, 2021, the 
Department temporarily modified its TRICARE regulation so TRICARE 
beneficiaries have access to the most up-to-date care required for the 
diagnosis and treatment of COVID-19. TRICARE continues to reimburse 
like Medicare, to the extent practicable, as required by statute. The 
Department is researching the impacts of making some of those 
modifications permanent and may pursue such future action. These 
modifications include:
TRICARE Coverage of National Institute of Allergy and Infectious 
Disease--Coronavirus Disease 2019 Clinical Trials. RIN 0720-AB83
    The Department of Defense is finalizing an interim final rule to 
amend 32 CFR part 199 to include coverage that was temporarily added 
for National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Disease-sponsored 
clinical trials for the treatment or prevention of COVID-19. This rule 
will also finalize the temporary addition of the treatment use of 
investigation drugs under U.S. Food and Drug Administration-approved 
expanded access programs for the treatment of coronavirus disease 2019 
(COVID-19) from the interim final rule titled ``TRICARE Coverage of 
Certain Medical Benefits in Response to the COVID-19 Pandemic'' (32 CFR 
part 199, 0720-AB82), which published in the Federal Register on 
September 3, 2020 (85 FR 54914-54924).
Expanding TRICARE Access to Care in Response to the COVID-19 Pandemic. 
RIN 0720-AB85
    This rule finalizes an interim final rule that amended 32 CFR part 
199 by: (1) adding freestanding End Stage Renal Disease (ESRD) 
facilities as a category of TRICARE-authorized institutional provider 
and modifying the reimbursement for such facilities; and (2) 
temporarily adopting Medicare's New COVID-19 Treatments Add-on Payment 
(NCTAP). The ESRD provisions are permanent, and the temporary NCTAP 
provisions expire at the end of the fiscal year in which the Secretary 
of Health and Human Services' declared coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID- 
19) public health emergency ends.

Medical Debt Relief

Medical Billing for Healthcare Services Provided by Department of 
Defense Medical Treatment Facilities to Civilian Non-Beneficiaries. RIN 
0720-AB87
    This rule is aimed at preventing severe financial harm to civilians 
who are not covered beneficiaries of the Military Health System, and 
who receive healthcare services at military medical treatment 
facilities. The rule implements the requirement to apply a sliding fee 
and/or a catastrophic waiver to medical invoices of non-beneficiaries; 
to accept payments from health insurers as full payment; to not balance 
bill non-beneficiaries except for copays, coinsurance, deductibles, 
nominal fees, and non-covered services; and grants the Director of 
Defense Health Agency (DHA) discretionary authority to waive medical 
debts of non-beneficiaries when the healthcare provided enhances the 
knowledge, skills, and abilities of healthcare providers, as determined 
by the Director of DHA.

Rules That Promote Diversity, Equity, Inclusion, and Accessibility in 
the Federal Workforce

Nondiscrimination on the Basis of Disability in Program or Activities 
Assisted or Conducted by the DoD and in Equal Access to Information and 
Communication Technology Used by DoD, and Procedures for Resolving 
Complaints. RIN: 0790-AJ04
    Revisions to this regulation: (1) update and clarify the 
obligations that Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (section 
504) imposes on recipients of Federal financial assistance and the 
Military Departments and Components (DoD Components); (2) reflect the 
most current Federal statutes and regulations, as well as developments 
in Supreme Court jurisprudence, regarding unlawful discrimination on 
the basis of disability and promotes consistency with comparable 
provisions implementing title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act 
(ADA); (3) implement section 508 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 
(section 508), requiring DoD make its electronic and information 
technology accessible to individuals with disabilities; (4) establish 
and clarify obligations under the Architectural Barriers Act of 1968 
(ABA), which requires that DoD make facilities accessible to 
individuals with disabilities; and (5) Provide complaint resolution and 
enforcement procedures pursuant to section 504 and the complaint 
resolution and enforcement procedures pursuant to section 508. These 
revisions incorporate the directive of Executive Order 14035, 
``Diversity, Equity, Inclusion, and Accessibility in the Federal 
Workforce'' by defining, clarifying, advancing accessibility throughout 
DoD programs and activities.

Executive Order 13985, ``Advancing Racial Equity and Support for 
Underserved Communities Through the Federal Government' January 20, 
2021

USACE Implementing Procedures for Principles, Requirements, and 
Guidelines Applicable to Actions Involving Investment in Water 
Resources. RIN 0710-AB41
    Section 2031 of the Water Resources Development Act of 2007 (Pub. 
L. 110-114) called for revisions to the 1983 Principles and Guidelines 
for Water and Land Related Resources Implementation Studies, resulting 
in the issuance of the Principles and Requirements (P&R) guidance 
document in March 2013 and the Interagency Guidelines in December 2014, 
which together comprise the Principles, Requirements, and Guidelines 
(PR&G). The PR&G are intended to provide a common framework and 
comprehensive policy and guidance for analyzing a diverse range of 
water resources projects, programs, activities, and related actions 
involving Federal investment in water resources. The U.S. Army Corps of 
Engineers (Corps) proposes a regulation to show how it would apply the 
PR&G to the Corps' mission and authorities. In this proposed 
regulation, the Corps intends to increase consistency and compatibility 
in Federal water resources investment decision making to include 
considerations such as analyzing a broader range of long-term costs and 
benefits, enhancing collaboration, including a more thorough and 
transparent risk and uncertainty analyses, and improving resilience for 
dealing with emerging challenges, including climate change.
Flood Control Cost-Sharing Requirements Under the Ability To Pay 
Provision. RIN: 0710-AB34
    Section 103(m) of the Water Resources Development Act (WRDA) of 
1986, as amended (33 U.S.C. 2213(m)), authorizes the USACE to reduce 
the non-Federal share of the cost of a study

[[Page 9326]]

or project for certain communities that are not able financially to 
afford the standard cost-share. Part 241 of title 33 in the Code of 
Federal Regulations provides the criteria that the USACE uses in making 
these determinations where the primary purpose of the study or project 
is flood damage reduction. The proposed rule would update this 
regulation, by broadening its applicability to include projects with 
other purposes (instead of just flood damage reduction) and the 
feasibility study of a project (instead of just design and 
construction). The WRDA 2000 modified section 103(m) to include 
projects with the following purposes: environmental protection and 
restoration, flood control, navigation, storm damage protection, 
shoreline erosion, hurricane protection, and recreation or an 
agricultural water supply project which have not yet been added to the 
regulation. It also included the opportunity to cost share all phases 
of a USACE project to also include feasibility studies in addition to 
the already covered design and construction. This rule would update the 
framework for determining whether a project is eligible for 
consideration for a reduction in the non-Federal cost share based on 
ability to pay.

Rules That Support Underserved Communities and Improve Small Business 
Opportunities Rules of Particular Interest to Small Business

Small Business Innovation Research Program Data Rights (DFARS Case 
2019-D043). RIN 0750-AK84
    This rule implements changes made by the Small Business 
Administration (SBA) related to data rights in the Small Business 
Innovation Research (SBIR) Program and Small Business Technology 
Transfer (STTR) Program Policy Directive, published in the Federal 
Register on April 2, 2019 (84 FR 12794). The SBIR and STTR programs 
fund a diverse portfolio of startups and small businesses across 
technology areas and markets to stimulate technological innovation, 
meet Federal research and development (R&D) needs, and increase 
commercialization to transition R&D into impact. The final SBA Policy 
Directive includes several revisions to clarify data rights, which 
require corresponding revisions to the Defense Federal Acquisition 
Regulation Supplement (DFARS). These changes include harmonizing 
definitions, lengthening the SBIR/STTR protection period from 5 years 
to 20 years, and providing for the granting of Government-purpose 
rights license in place of an unlimited rights license upon expiration 
of the SBIR/STTR protection period. DoD hosted public meetings to 
obtain the views of interested parties regarding the advance notice of 
proposed rulemaking and the proposed rule published in the Federal 
Register on August 31, 2020 (85 FR 53758) and December 19, 2022 (87 FR 
77680), respectively.

Executive Order 14036, ``Promoting Competition in the American 
Economy'' July 9, 2021 Rule That Promotes Competition in the American 
Economy

Past Performance of Subcontractors and Joint Venture Partners (DFARS 
Case 2018-D055). RIN 0750-AK16
    This rule implements section 823 of the National Defense 
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2019, which establishes a requirement 
for use of the best available information regarding past performance of 
subcontractors and joint venture partners when awarding DoD 
construction and architect-engineer contracts. Section 823 requires 
annual performance evaluations for first-tier subcontractors and 
individual parties to joint ventures performing construction and 
architect-engineer contracts valued at either $750,000 or more, or 20 
percent of the value of the prime contract (whichever is higher), in 
accordance with specified conditions. In addition, processes for 
exceptions from the annual evaluation requirement will be established 
for construction and architect-engineer contracts where submission of 
annual evaluations would not provide the best representation of the 
performance of a contractor, including subcontractors and joint venture 
partners under specified conditions. This rule will make it easier for 
subcontractors and individual parties to joint ventures to establish a 
record of their past performance. These entities will be able to take 
credit for the work they performed on contracts and subcontracts, which 
will help them be more competitive when bidding on future DoD 
contracts. This will help increase competition for DoD contracts.
Modification of Prize Authority for Advanced Technology Achievements 
(DFARS Case 2022-D014). RIN 0750-AL65
    This rule implements section 822 of the National Defense 
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2022 (Pub. L. 117-81). Section 822 
revises 10 U.S.C. 2374a, redesignated as 10 U.S.C. 4025, regarding the 
award of prizes for advanced technology achievement to: (1) authorize 
the award of procurement contracts and other agreements ``as another 
type of prize'' (as in other than cash prizes); (2) permit the award of 
prizes, including procurement contracts and other agreements, in excess 
of $10,000,000 with the approval of the Under Secretary of Defense for 
Research and Engineering; and (3) require DoD provide Congress with 
notice of an award of a procurement contract or other agreement under 
this program that exceeds $10 million. This rule will help to expand 
the Defense Industrial Base, thereby increasing competition for future 
DoD contracts.
DFARS Buy American Act Requirements (DFARS Case 2022-D019). RIN 0750-
AL74
    This rule implements the requirements of Executive Order 14005, 
Ensuring the Future Is Made in All of America by All of America's 
Workers. Changes to the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) were made 
via RIN 9000-AO22 (FAR Case 2021-008, Amendments to the FAR Buy 
American Act Requirements). This rule makes conforming changes to the 
DFARS.

Rules That Support National Security Efforts

Assessing Contractor Implementation of Cybersecurity Requirements 
(DFARS Case 2019-D041). RIN 0750-AK81
    The purpose of this rule is to ensure that Defense Industrial Base 
(DIB) contractors will adequately protect sensitive unclassified 
information at a level commensurate with the risk, accounting for 
information flow down to its subcontractors in a multi-tier supply 
chain.
Cybersecurity Maturity Model Certification (CMMC) Program. RIN 0790-
AL49
    This rule establishes a requirement for Defense Industrial Base 
(DIB) contractors to be assessed against the Cybersecurity Maturity 
Model Certification (CMMC) requirements at Level 1, 2 or 3 to be 
eligible for award of designated future DoD contracts. The CMMC Program 
is designed to provide increased assurance to the DoD that defense 
contractors and subcontractors are compliant with information 
protection requirements for Federal Contract Information (FCI) and 
Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI) and are protecting such 
information at a level commensurate with risk from cybersecurity 
threats.
Department of Defense (DoD)-Defense Industrial Base (DIB) Cybersecurity 
(CS) Activities. RIN: 0790-AK86
    This rule will allow a broader community of defense contractors to 
access to relevant cyber threat

[[Page 9327]]

information the Department believes is critical in defending 
unclassified networks and information systems and protecting DoD 
warfighting capabilities. These revisions seek to address the 
increasing cyber threat targeting all defense contractors by expanding 
eligibility to defense contractors that process, store, develop, or 
transmit DoD Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI). This rule is 
part of DoD's approach to collaborate with industry to counter cyber 
threats through information sharing.

Rules That Tackle the Climate Crisis and Protect the Environment

Policy and Procedures for Processing Requests To Alter U.S. Army Corps 
of Engineers Civil Works Projects Pursuant to 33 U.S.C. 408. RIN: 0710-
AB22
    Where a party other than the USACE seeks to use or alter a Civil 
Works project that USACE constructed, the proposed use or alteration is 
subject to the prior approval of the USACE. Some examples of such 
alterations include an improvement to the project; relocation of part 
of the project; or installing utilities or other non-project features. 
These alterations may be proposed by local or state governments, other 
federal agencies, private corporations, or private citizens, for 
example. This requirement was established in section 14 of the Rivers 
and Harbors Act of 1899 and is codified at 33 U.S.C. 408 (section 408). 
Section 408 provides that the USACE may grant permission for another 
party to alter a Civil Works project, upon a determination that the 
alteration proposed will not be injurious to the public interest and 
will not impair the usefulness of the Civil Works project. The USACE is 
proposing to convert its policy that governs the section 408 program to 
a binding regulation. This policy, Engineer Circular 1165-2-220, 
Policy, and Procedural Guidance for Processing Requests to Alter U.S. 
Army Corps of Engineers Civil Works Projects Pursuant to 33 U.S.C. 408, 
was issued in September 2018.
Natural Disaster Procedures: Preparedness, Response, and Recovery 
Activities of the Corps of Engineers. RIN 0710-AA78
    The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) is proposing to update the 
Federal regulation that covers the procedures that the Corps uses under 
section 5 of the Flood Control Act of 1941, as amended (33 U.S.C. 
701n), commonly referred to as Public Law 84-99. The Corps relies on 
this program to prepare for, respond to, and help communities recover 
from a flood, hurricane, or other natural disaster, including the 
repair of damage to eligible flood risk reduction infrastructure. The 
Corps initiated this rulemaking process through an advanced notice of 
proposed rulemaking (ANPRM) on February 13, 2015. As a next step, the 
Corps issued a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) on November 11, 
2022, which proposed to repeal the existing regulation and replace it 
with a new regulation that addresses statutory changes under various 
Water Resources Development Act provisions, reflects lessons learned 
over the past 20 years, and incorporates agency policies now in 
guidance relating to natural disaster procedures. Hurricane Katrina 
(2005), Hurricane Sandy (2012), flooding on the Mississippi and 
Missouri Rivers (2008, 2011, and 2013), and Hurricanes Harvey, Irma, 
and Maria (2017) have provided a more detailed understanding of the 
nature and severity of risk associated with flood control projects. In 
addition, the maturation of risk-informed decision-making approaches 
and technological advancements influenced the outlook on the 
implementation of Public Law 84-99 activities, with a shift toward 
better alignment with Corps Levee Safety and National Flood Risk 
Management Programs, as well as the National Preparedness and Response 
Frameworks. Through these programs, the Corps works with non-Federal 
sponsors and stakeholders to assess, communicate, and manage the risks 
to people, property, and the environment associated with levee systems 
and flood risks.
Appendix C Procedures for the Protection of Historic Properties. RIN 
0710-AB46
    The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) considers the effects of 
its actions on historic properties pursuant to section 106 of the 
National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA). The Corps' Regulatory 
Program's regulations for complying with the NHPA are outlined at 33 
CFR 325 Appendix C. Since these regulations were promulgated in 1990, 
there have been amendments to the NHPA and revisions to the Advisory 
Council on Historic Preservation's (ACHP) regulations at 36 CFR part 
800. In response, the Corps issued interim guidance until rulemaking 
could be completed in order to ensure full compliance with the NHPA and 
ACHP's regulations. To demonstrate the greatest possible consistency 
between the procedures used by the Corps Regulatory Program to comply 
with NHPA when processing permit applications and the ACHP's NHPA 
implementing regulations, the Corps is proposing to remove the 
Regulatory Program's implementing regulations from its permitting 
regulations. The Corps will instead follow the ACHP's NHPA implementing 
regulations, relying on the flexibility in those regulations. The Corps 
is also proposing to make conforming changes to its nationwide permit 
program regulations.
Amendments to the Revised Definition of ``Waters of the United 
States''. RIN: 0710-AB55
    In April 2020, the EPA and the Department of the Army (``the 
agencies'') published the Navigable Waters Protection Rule that revised 
the previously codified definition of ``waters of the United States'' 
(85 FR 22250, April 21, 2020). The Navigable Waters Protection Rule was 
vacated by courts. On January 18, 2023, the agencies issued a final 
rule, ``Revised Definition of 'Waters of the United States''' (88 FR 
3004) which became effective on March 20, 2023. On May 25, 2023, the 
U.S. Supreme Court issued its decision in the case of Sackett v. 
Environmental Protection Agency. In light of this decision, the 
agencies are interpreting the phrase waters of the United States 
consistent with the Supreme Court's decision in Sackett. The agencies 
are developing a rule to amend the final ``Revised Definition of 
'Waters of the United States''' rule, published in the Federal Register 
on January 18, 2023, consistent with the U.S. Supreme Court's decision 
in Sackett.

Rules That Address Military Family Matters

Definitions of Gold Star Family and Gold Star Survivor. RIN 0790-AL56
    This rule implements section 626 of the FY 2022 NDAA to define the 
terms ``gold star family'' and ``gold star survivor'' for consistent 
use across all military departments. The Defense Department treats all 
surviving family members equally and survivor benefits are the same 
across the board unless their Service member is killed or dies from 
causes under dishonorable conditions.


[[Page 9328]]



DOD--OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY (OS)

Proposed Rule Stage

19. Cybersecurity Maturity Model Certification (CMMC) Program [0790-
AL49]

    Priority: Section 3(f)(1) Significant. Major under 5 U.S.C. 801.
    Legal Authority: 5 U.S.C. 301; Pub. L. 116-92, sec. 1648
    CFR Citation: 32 CFR 170.
    Legal Deadline: None.
    Abstract: DoD is proposing to implement the Cybersecurity Maturity 
Model Certification (CMMC) Framework, to help assess a Defense 
Industrial Base (DIB) contractor's compliance with implementation of 
cybersecurity requirements to safeguard Federal Contract Information 
(FCI) and Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI) transiting non-
federal systems to help mitigate the treats posed by Advanced 
Persistent Threats--adversaries with sophisticated levels of expertise 
and significant resources.
    Office of the DoD CIO/CMMC Program Management Office plans to host 
a public meeting on the 32 CFR CMMC Program proposed rule after it is 
published in the Federal Register for public review and comment.
    Statement of Need: CMMC is designed to provide increased assurance 
to the DoD that a DIB contractor can adequately protect sensitive 
unclassified information (i.e., FCI and CUI) at a level commensurate 
with the risk, and accounting for necessary information flow down to 
its subcontractors in a multi-tier supply chain.
    Summary of Legal Basis: 5 U.S.C. 301 authorizes the head of an 
Executive department or military department to prescribe regulations 
for the government of his or her department, the conduct of its 
employees, the distribution and performance of its business, and the 
custody, use, and preservation of its records, papers, and property.
    41 U.S.C 1303; Public Law 116-92, sec. 1648 directs the Secretary 
of Defense to develop a consistent, comprehensive framework to enhance 
cybersecurity for the U.S. defense industrial base. Developing the CMMC 
Program was as an important first step toward meeting these 
requirements. *
    Alternatives: DoD considered and adopted several alternatives 
during the development of this rule that reduce the burden on the DIB 
community and still meet the objectives of the rule. These alternatives 
include: (1) maintaining status quo, leveraging only the current 
requirements implemented in DFARS provision 252.204-7019 and DFARS 
clause 252.204-7020 requiring DIB contractors and offerors to self-
assess utilizing the DoD Assessment Methodology and entering a Basic 
Summary Score; (2) revising CMMC to reduce the burden for small 
businesses and contractors who do not process, store or transmit 
critical CUI by eliminating the requirement to hire a C3PAO and instead 
allow self-assessment with affirmation to maintain compliance at CMMC 
Level 1, and allowing triennial self-assessment with annual affirmation 
to maintain compliance for some CMMC Level 2 programs; (3) exempting 
contracts and orders exclusively for the acquisition of commercially 
available off-the-shelf items; and, (4) implementing a phased 
implementation for CMMC.
    In addition, the Department took into consideration the timing of 
the requirement to achieve a specified CMMC level: (1) at time of 
proposal or offer submission, (2) after contract award, (3) at the time 
of contract award, or (4) permitting government program managers to 
seek approval to waive inclusion of a CMMC requirement in a 
solicitation, subject to DoD internal policies, procedures, and waiver 
approval requirements.
    Anticipated Cost and Benefits: The theft of intellectual property 
and sensitive information, including FCI and CUI, from all U.S. 
industrial sectors due to malicious cyber activity threatens U.S. 
economic and national security. The Council of Economic Advisors 
estimates that malicious cyber activity cost the U.S. economy between 
$57 billion and $109 billion in 2016. By incorporating heightened 
cybersecurity standards into acquisition programs, the CMMC Program 
provides the Department assurance that contractors and subcontractors 
are meeting DoD's cybersecurity requirements and provides a key 
mechanism to adapt to an evolving threat landscape.
    Risks: The aggregate loss of intellectual property and certain 
unclassified information from the DoD supply chain can undercut U.S. 
technical advantages and innovation, as well as significantly increase 
risk to national security.
    Timetable:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Action                    Date            FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NPRM................................   11/00/23
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Yes.
    Small Entities Affected: Businesses.
    Government Levels Affected: Federal.
    Agency Contact: Diane L. Knight, Senior Management and Program 
Analyst, Department of Defense, Office of the Secretary, 4800 Mark 
Center Drive, Suite 12E08, Alexandria, VA 22350, Phone: 202 770-9100, 
Email: [email protected].
    RIN: 0790-AL49

DOD--OS

Final Rule Stage

20. Department of Defense (DOD)-Defense Industrial Base (DIB) 
Cybersecurity (CS) Activities [0790-AK86]

    Priority: Other Significant.
    Legal Authority: 10 U.S.C. 391; 10 U.S.C. 2224; 44 U.S.C. 3541; 10 
U.S.C. 393
    CFR Citation: 32 CFR 236.
    Legal Deadline: None.
    Abstract: The DIB CS Program currently provides cyber threat 
information to cleared defense contractors. Proposed revisions would 
allow all defense contractors who process, store, develop, or transit 
DoD controlled unclassified information to be eligible for the program 
and to receive cyber threat information. Expanding participation will 
allow a broader community of defense contractors to participate in the 
DIB CS Program and is in alignment with the National Defense Strategy.
    Statement of Need: The unauthorized access and compromise of DoD 
unclassified information and operations poses an imminent threat to 
U.S. national security and economic security interests and contractors 
are being targeted on a daily basis. Many of these contractors are 
small and medium size contractors that can benefit from partnering with 
DoD to enhance and supplement their cybersecurity capabilities.
    Summary of Legal Basis: This revised regulation supports the 
Administration's effort to promote public-private cyber collaboration 
by expanding eligibility for the DIB CS voluntary cyber threat 
information sharing program to all defense contractors contractors who 
process, store, develop, or transmit DoD controlled unclassified 
information. This regulation aligns with DoD's statutory 
responsibilities for cybersecurity engagement with those contractors 
supporting the Department.
    Alternatives: (1) No action alternative: Maintain status quo with 
the ongoing voluntary cybersecurity program for cleared contractors. 
(2) Next best alternative: DoD posts generic cyber threat information 
and cybersecurity best practices on a public accessible

[[Page 9329]]

website without directly engaging participating companies.
    Anticipated Cost and Benefits: Participation in the voluntary DIB 
CS Program enables DoD contractors to access Government Furnished 
Information and collaborate with the DoD Cyber Crime Center (DC3) to 
better respond to and mitigate cyber threats. In order to join the DIB 
CS Program, there is an initial labor burden to apply to the program 
and provide point of contact information which is estimated to take 20 
minutes per company. In addition, there is a cost for defense 
contractors to voluntarily share cyber indicator information. DoD 
estimates that each response will take a respondent two hours to 
complete. The costs are under review as part of 0704-0489 and 0704-
0490. For DIB participants, this program provides cyber threat 
information and technical assistance through analyst-to-analyst 
exchanges, mitigation and remediation strategies, and cybersecurity 
best practices in a collaborative environment for participating 
companies.
    Risks: Threats to unclassified information systems represent a risk 
of compromise of DoD information and mission. This threat is 
particularly acute for small and medium size companies with less mature 
cybersecurity capabilities. Through collaboration with DoD and the 
sharing with other contractors in the DIB CS Program, defense 
contractors will be better prepared to mitigate the cyber risk they 
face today and in the future.
    Timetable:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Action                    Date            FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NPRM................................   05/03/23  88 FR 27832
NPRM Comment Period End.............   06/20/23
Final Action........................   04/00/24
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No.
    Small Entities Affected: No.
    Government Levels Affected: Federal.
    Agency Contact: Ms. Stacy Bostjanick, Director of CMMC, Department 
of Defense, Office of the Secretary, 1550 Cystal Drive, Suite 1000-A, 
Arlington, VA 22202, Phone: 703 604-3167, Email: [email protected].
    RIN: 0790-AK86

DOD--08

21. Definitions of Gold Star Family and Gold Star Survivor [0790-AL56]

    Priority: Other Significant.
    Legal Authority: Pub. L. 117-81
    CFR Citation: 32 CFR 46.
    Legal Deadline: Final, Statutory, December 27, 2022, Sec. 626 of 
the NDAA 2022 (Pub. L. 117-81). Section 626 of the NDAA 2022 (Pub, L. 
117-81) requires publication of an interim final rule no later than one 
year after the date of the enactment of this Act.
    Abstract: This rule implements section 626 of the National Defense 
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2022 (Pub. L. 117-81) to establish 
standard definitions, for use across the military departments, of the 
terms ``gold star family'' and ``gold star survivor.''
    Statement of Need: The objective of the rule is to establish 
standard definitions, for use across the military departments, of the 
terms gold star family and gold star survivor.
    Summary of Legal Basis: This rule is proposed under the authorities 
of section 626(c) of Public Law 117-81, FY 2022 NDAA.
    Alternatives: The alternative is to take no action.
    Anticipated Cost and Benefits: The cost to publish this new rule 
and update the Defense Department's policies is estimated at $900,000. 
This includes the public's time to review the proposed rule and 
resources needed to respond to any public comments, publish the interim 
rule, revise policies, and possibly revamp the Navy and Coast Guard's 
long-term case management programs.
    Risks: This action does not reduce risks to public health, safety, 
or the environment, or effect other risks within the jurisdiction of 
the Defense Department.
    Timetable:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Action                    Date            FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Interim Final Rule..................   04/00/24  .......................
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No.
    Small Entities Affected: No.
    Government Levels Affected: None.
    Agency Contact: Lisiane Valentine, Department of Defense, Office of 
the Secretary, 4000 Defense Pentagon, Room 1C546, Washington, DC 20301, 
Phone: 571 372-5319, Email: [email protected]
    RIN: 0790-AL56

DOD--OS

Long-Term Actions

22. Nondiscrimination on the Basis of Disability in Programs or 
Activities Assisted or Conducted by the DOD and in Equal Access to 
Information and Communication Technology Used by DOD [0790-AJ04]

    Priority: Other Significant.
    CFR Citation: 32 CFR 56.
    Abstract: The Department of Defense (DoD) is finalizing revisions 
to implement Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, which 
prohibits discrimination on the basis of disability in programs or 
activities receiving Federal financial assistance from DoD and those 
programs or activities conducted by DoD. The regulation also implements 
section 508 of the Rehabilitation Act, which requires DoD make its 
electronic and information technology accessible to individuals with 
disabilities. Additionally, the regulation implements the Architectural 
Barriers Act of 1968, which requires that DoD make facilities 
accessible to individuals with disabilities. Finally, the regulation 
updates the complaint resolution and enforcement procedures pursuant to 
section 504 and the complaint resolution and enforcement procedures 
pursuant to section 508.
    Statement of Need: Finalization of this Department-wide rule will 
clarify the longstanding policy of the Department. It will modernize 
the Department's practices in addressing issues of discrimination. This 
rule amends the Department's prior regulation to include updated 
accessibility standards for recipients of Federal financial assistance 
to be more user-friendly and to support individuals with disabilities. 
This update incorporates the directive of Executive Order 14035, 
Diversity, Equity, Inclusion, and Accessibility in the Federal 
Workforce by defining, clarifying, advancing accessibility throughout 
DoD programs and activities.
    Summary of Legal Basis: Title 28, Code of Federal Regulations, part 
41, implementing Executive Order 12250, assigns the DOJ responsibility 
to coordinate implementation of section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act.
    This rule is being finalized under the authorities of title 29, 
U.S.C., chapter 16, subchapter V, sections 794 through 794d, codifying 
legislation prohibiting discrimination on the basis of disability under 
any program or activity receiving Federal financial assistance or under 
any program or activity conducted by any Federal agency, including

[[Page 9330]]

provisions establishing the United States Access Board and requiring 
Federal agencies to ensure that information and communication 
technology is accessible to and usable by individuals with 
disabilities.
    Alternatives: The Department considered taking no new action and 
continuing to rely on the existing regulation. The Department 
considered issuing sub-regulatory guidance to clarify existing 
regulation. Both options were rejected because of the need to update 
and clarify the Department's obligations pursuant to section 504 and 
section 508 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended.
    Anticipated Cost and Benefits: TBD.
    Risks: Without this final rule, the Department's current regulation 
is inconsistent with current Federal statutes and regulations, as well 
as developments in Supreme Court jurisprudence, regarding unlawful 
discrimination on the basis of disability. Consistent with 
congressional intent, the provisions in the final rule are consistent 
with the nondiscrimination provisions in DOJ regulations implementing 
title II of the ADA Amendments Act (applicable to state and local 
government entities).
    Timetable:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Action                    Date            FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NPRM................................   07/16/20  85 FR 43168
NPRM Comment Period End.............   09/14/20
Final Action........................   11/00/24
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No.
    Small Entities Affected: No.
    Government Levels Affected: None.
    Agency Contact: Dr. Lisa Arfaa, Department of Defense, Office of 
the Secretary, 9999 Joint Staff Pentagon, Washington, DC 20318, Phone: 
703 692-6878, Email: [email protected].
    RIN: 0790-AJ04

DOD--DEFENSE ACQUISITION REGULATIONS COUNCIL (DARC)

Proposed Rule Stage

23. Assessing Contractor Implementation of Cybersecurity Requirements 
(DFARS Case 2019-D041) [0750-AK81]

    Priority: Section 3(f)(1) Significant. Major under 5 U.S.C. 801.
    Legal Authority: 41 U.S.C. 1303; Pub. L. 116-92, sec. 1648
    CFR Citation: 48 CFR 204; 48 CFR 212; 48 CFR 217; 48 CFR 252.
    Legal Deadline: None.
    Abstract: DoD is amending an interim rule to implement the CMMC 
framework 2.0 in order to protect against the theft of intellectual 
property and sensitive information from the Defense Industrial Base 
(DIB) sector. The CMMC framework, as defined in Title 32 of the Code of 
Federal Regulations (CFR), assesses compliance with applicable 
information security requirements. This rule provides the Department 
with assurances that a DIB contractor can adequately protect sensitive 
unclassified information at a level commensurate with the risk, 
accounting for information flow down to its subcontractors in a multi-
tier supply chain.
    Statement of Need: The purpose of this DFARS rule is to ensure that 
Defense Industrial Base (DIB) contractors will adequately protect 
sensitive unclassified information at a level commensurate with the 
risk, accounting for information flow down to its subcontractors in a 
multi-tier supply chain.
    Summary of Legal Basis: This rule is being implemented under the 
authority of 41 U.S.C. 1303 and section 1648 of the National Defense 
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year (FY) 2020 (Pub. L. 116-92). The USD 
(A&S) has the authority and responsibility for promulgating DoD 
procurement rules under the OFPP statute, codified at title 41 of the 
U.S. Code. Section 1648 of the National Defense Authorization Act for 
Fiscal Year 2020 (Pub. L. 116-92) directs the Secretary of Defense to 
develop a risk-based cybersecurity framework for the DIB sector, such 
as CMMC, as the basis for a mandatory DoD standard.
    Alternatives: DoD considered and adopted several alternatives 
during the development of the interim rule that reduced the burden on 
small entities and still meet the objectives of the rule. DoD will 
consider similar alternatives for the amendment rule. One alternative 
considered includes exempting contracts and orders exclusively for the 
acquisition of commercially available off-the-shelf items.
    Anticipated Cost and Benefits: The annualized value of costs 
beginning in fiscal year 2021 (calculated in perpetuity in 2016 dollars 
at a 7 percent discount rate) associated with implementing the CMMC 
Framework in the published interim rule is $4 billion. The cost 
analysis for CMMC 2.0 is being handled in the Title 32 CFR rule (RIN 
0790-AL49). The primary benefit of this rule is improving the 
protection of the Department's sensitive information and reducing the 
threat to DIB sector intellectual property by:
     Enabling assessments at the entity-level of contractor 
implementation of cyber security processes and practices that should 
already be in place;
     Requiring comprehensive implementation of cybersecurity 
requirements rather than plans of action to accomplish implementation;
     Verifying DIB sector contractor and subcontractor 
cybersecurity postures; and
     Reducing duplicative or repetitive assessments of our 
industry partners through standardization.
    Risks: The theft of intellectual property and sensitive information 
from all U.S. industrial sectors due to malicious cyber activity 
threatens economic security and national security. Malicious cyber 
actors have and continue to target the DIB sector and the supply chain 
of the Department of Defense. These attacks not only focus on the large 
prime contractors, but also target subcontractors that make up the 
lower tiers of the DoD supply chain. Many of these subcontractors are 
small entities that provide critical support and innovation. The 
aggregate loss of intellectual property and certain unclassified 
information from the DoD supply chain can undercut U.S. technical 
advantages and innovation, as well as significantly increase risk to 
national security.
    Timetable:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                Action                    Date            FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Interim Final Rule...................   09/29/20  85 FR 48513
Interim Final Rule Effective.........   11/30/20
NPRM.................................   03/00/24
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Yes.
    Small Entities Affected: Businesses.
    Government Levels Affected: Federal.
    Public Compliance Cost: Base Year for Dollar Estimates: $2,021.
    Agency Contact: Jennifer D. Johnson, Office of the Under Secretary 
of Defense for Acquisition and Sustainment, Department of Defense, 
Defense Acquisition Regulations Council, Defense Pricing and 
Contracting, Defense Acquisition Regulations System, Room 3B938, 3060 
Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301-3060, Phone: 703 717-8226, Email: 
[email protected].
    Related RIN: Split from 0750-AL68, Related to 0790-AL49
    RIN: 0750-AK81


[[Page 9331]]



DOD--DARC

24. Modification of Prize Authority for Advanced Technology 
Achievements (DFARS Case 2022-D014) [0750-AL65]

    Priority: Other Significant.
    Legal Authority: 41 U.S.C. 1303; 10 U.S.C. 4025; Pub. L. 117-81, 
sec. 822
    CFR Citation: 48 CFR 235.
    Legal Deadline: None.
    Abstract: DoD is proposing to amend the Defense Federal Acquisition 
Regulation Supplement to implement section 822 of the National Defense 
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2022, which revises 10 U.S.C. 2374a, 
redesignated as 10 U.S.C. 4025, regarding the award of prizes for 
advanced technology achievement to: (1) authorize the award of 
procurement contracts and other agreements ``as in other type of 
prize'' (as in other than cash prizes); (2) permit the award of prizes, 
including procurement contracts and other agreements, in excess of 
$10,000,000 with the approval of the Under Secretary of Defense for 
Research and Engineering; and (3) require DoD provide Congress with 
notice of an award of a procurement contract or other agreement under 
this program that exceeds $10 million.
    Statement of Need: This rule is necessary to implement section 822 
of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2022 (Pub. L. 
117-81). Section 822 revises 10 U.S.C. 2374a, redesignated as 10 U.S.C. 
4025, regarding the award of prizes for advanced technology achievement 
to: (1) authorize the award of procurement contracts and other 
agreements as an other type of prize (as in other than cash prizes); 
(2) permit the award of prizes, including procurement contracts and 
other agreements, in excess of $10,000,000 with the approval of the 
Under Secretary of Defense for Research and Engineering; and (3) 
require DoD provide Congress with notice of an award of a procurement 
contract or other agreement under this program that exceeds $10 
million.
    Summary of Legal Basis: The legal basis for this rule is 41 U.S.C. 
1303 and section 822 of Public Law 117-81.
    Alternatives: There are no alternatives that would meet the 
requirements of section 822 of Public Law 117-81.
    Anticipated Cost and Benefits: This rule will help to expand the 
Defense Industrial Base, thereby increasing competition for future DoD 
contracts.
    Risks: The difficulty of accessing advanced technologies creates a 
risk for DoD with regard to finding solutions and obtaining products 
and services that meet the Department's needs.
    Timetable:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Action                    Date            FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NPRM................................   05/00/24
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Undetermined.
    Government Levels Affected: Federal.
    Agency Contact: Jennifer D. Johnson, Office of the Under Secretary 
of Defense for Acquisition and Sustainment, Department of Defense, 
Defense Acquisition Regulations Council, Defense Pricing and 
Contracting, Defense Acquisition Regulations System, Room 3B938, 3060 
Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301-3060, Phone: 703 717-8226, Email: 
[email protected].
    RIN: 0750-AL65

DOD--DARC

Final Rule Stage

25. Past Performance of Subcontractors and Joint Venture Partners 
(DFARS Case 2018-D055) [0750-AK16]

    Priority: Other Significant.
    Legal Authority: 41 U.S.C. 1303; Pub. L. 115-232, sec. 823
    CFR Citation: 48 CFR 215; 48 CFR 236; 48 CFR 242; 48 CFR 252.
    Legal Deadline: Final, Statutory, February 9, 2019, 180 days after 
enactment.
    Abstract: DoD is issuing a final rule to amend the Defense Federal 
Acquisition Regulation Supplement (DFARS) to implement section 823 of 
the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2019, which 
establishes a requirement for use of the best available information 
regarding past performance of subcontractors and joint venture partners 
when awarding DoD construction and architect-engineer (A&E) contracts. 
Section 823 requires annual performance evaluations for first-tier 
subcontractors and individual partners of joint venture construction 
and A&E contracts valued at either $750,000 or more, or 20 percent of 
the value of the prime contract (whichever is higher), in accordance 
with specified conditions. In addition, processes for exceptions from 
the annual evaluation requirement will be established for construction 
and A&E contracts where submission of annual evaluations would not 
provide the best representation of the performance of a contractor, 
including subcontractors and joint venture partners under specified 
conditions. This rule will amend DFARS part 242 to incorporate these 
new requirements and processes.
    Statement of Need: This rule is necessary to implement section 823 
of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2019 (Pub. L. 
115-232), which establishes a requirement for use of the best available 
information regarding past performance of subcontractors and joint 
venture partners when awarding DoD construction and architect-engineer 
contracts. Section 823 requires annual performance evaluations for 
first-tier subcontractors and individual parties to joint ventures 
performing construction and architect-engineer contracts valued at 
either $750,000 or more, or 20 percent of the value of the prime 
contract (whichever is higher), in accordance with specified 
conditions. In addition, processes for exceptions from the annual 
evaluation requirement will be established for construction and 
architect-engineer contracts where submission of annual evaluations 
would not provide the best representation of the performance of a 
contractor, including subcontractors and joint venture partners under 
specified conditions.
    Summary of Legal Basis: The legal basis for this rule is 41 U.S.C. 
1303 and section 823 of Public Law 115-232.
    Alternatives: There are no alternatives that would meet the 
requirements of section 823 of Public Law 115-232.
    Anticipated Cost and Benefits: This rule will make it easier for 
subcontractors and individual parties to joint ventures to establish a 
record of their past performance. These entities will be able to take 
credit for the work they performed on contracts and subcontracts, which 
will help them be more competitive when bidding on future DoD 
contracts. This will help increase competition for DoD contracts.
    Risks: Due to the difficulty of establishing a record of past 
performance on DoD contracts, there is a risk of reduced 
competitiveness for subcontractors and individual parties to joint 
ventures.
    Timetable:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Action                    Date            FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NPRM................................   05/20/21  86 FR 27358
NPRM Comment Period End.............   07/19/21
Final Action........................   07/00/24
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No.
    Small Entities Affected: Businesses.
    Government Levels Affected: Federal.
    Agency Contact: Jennifer D. Johnson, Office of the Under Secretary 
of Defense for Acquisition and Sustainment, Department of Defense, 
Defense Acquisition Regulations Council, Defense Pricing and 
Contracting,

[[Page 9332]]

Defense Acquisition Regulations System, Room 3B938, 3060 Pentagon, 
Washington, DC 20301-3060, Phone: 703 717-8226, Email: 
[email protected].
    RIN: 0750-AK16

DOD--DARC

26. Small Business Innovation Research Program Data Rights (DFARS Case 
2019-D043) [0750-AK84]

    Priority: Other Significant.
    Legal Authority: 41 U.S.C. 1303
    CFR Citation: 48 CFR 227; 48 CFR 252.
    Legal Deadline: None.
    Abstract: DoD is issuing a final rule to amend the Defense Federal 
Acquisition Regulation Supplement (DFARS) to implement changes related 
to data rights in the Small Business Administration's Policy Directive 
for the Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR) Program, published in 
the Federal Register on April 2, 2019 (84 FR 12794). The final SBA 
Policy Directive includes several revisions to clarify data rights, 
which require corresponding revisions to the DFARS.
    Statement of Need: This rule is necessary to implement the Small 
Business Administration (SBA) policies related to data rights in the 
Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR) Program and Small Business 
Technology Transfer (STTR) Program Policy Directive, published in the 
Federal Register on April 2, 2019 (84 FR 12794). The final SBA Policy 
Directive includes several revisions to clarify data rights, which 
require corresponding revisions to the DFARS.
    Summary of Legal Basis: The legal basis for this rule is 15 U.S.C. 
638, which provides the authorization, policy, and framework for SBIR/
STTR programs.
    Alternatives: There are no alternatives that would meet the stated 
objective of this rule.
    Anticipated Cost and Benefits: While specific costs and savings 
have not been quantified, this rule is expected to have significant 
benefit for small businesses participating in the DoD SBIR and STTR 
programs. SBIR and STTR enable small businesses to explore their 
technological potential and provide the incentive to profit from its 
commercialization. By including qualified small businesses in the 
nation's research and development arena, high-tech innovation is 
stimulated, and the United States gains entrepreneurial spirit as it 
meets its specific research and development needs.
    Risks: The continuous protection of a contractor's SBIR/STTR data 
while actively pursuing or commercializing its technology with the 
Federal Government, provides a significant incentive for innovative 
small businesses to participate in these programs.
    Timetable:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Action                    Date            FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
ANPRM...............................   08/31/20  85 FR 53758
Correction..........................   09/21/20  85 FR 59258
ANPRM Comment Period End............   10/30/20
Comment Period Extended.............   12/04/20  85 FR 78300
ANPRM Comment Period End............   01/31/21
NPRM................................   12/19/22  87 FR 77680
Correction..........................   12/23/22  87 FR 78911
Comment Period Extended.............   02/14/23  88 FR 9420
NPRM Comment Period End.............   02/17/23
NPRM Comment Period End.............   03/20/23
Final Action........................   02/00/24
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No.
    Government Levels Affected: Federal.
    Agency Contact: Jennifer D. Johnson, Office of the Under Secretary 
of Defense for Acquisition and Sustainment, Department of Defense, 
Defense Acquisition Regulations Council, Defense Pricing and 
Contracting, Defense Acquisition Regulations System, Room 3B938, 3060 
Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301-3060, Phone: 703 717-8226, Email: 
[email protected].
    RIN: 0750-AK84

DOD--DARC

27. DFARS Buy American Act Requirements (DFARS Case 2022-D019) [0750-
AL74]

    Priority: Other Significant.
    Legal Authority: 41 U.S.C. 1303
    CFR Citation: 48 CFR 225; 48 CFR 252.
    Legal Deadline: None.
    Abstract: DoD is issuing a final rule amending the Defense Federal 
Acquisition Regulation Supplement (DFARS) to implement the requirements 
of Executive Order 14005, Ensuring the Future Is Made in All of America 
by All of America's Workers. Changes to the Federal Acquisition 
Regulation (FAR) are being made via RIN 9000-AO22 (FAR Case 2021-008, 
Amendments to the FAR Buy American Act Requirements). This rule makes 
conforming changes to the DFARS.
    Statement of Need: This rule is necessary to implement Executive 
Order 14005, Ensuring the Future Is Made in All of America by All of 
America's Workers, which increases the required percentage of domestic 
content for end products and construction material. Changes to the 
Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) are being made via RIN 9000-AO22 
(FAR Case 2021-008, Amendments to the FAR Buy American Act 
Requirements). This rule proposes conforming changes to the DFARS.
    Summary of Legal Basis: The legal basis for this rule is 41 U.S.C. 
1303 and Executive Order 14005, Ensuring the Future Is Made in All of 
America by All of America's Workers.
    Alternatives: There are no alternatives that would meet the 
requirements of Executive Order 14005.
    Anticipated Cost and Benefits: This rule increases the percentage 
for use in the domestic content text applied to offers of end products 
and construction materials to determine domestic or foreign origin. The 
rule will strengthen domestic preferences under the Buy American 
statute. It is expected that this rule will benefit large and small 
U.S. manufacturers supplying domestic end products and materials.
    Risks: There is a risk that U.S. manufacturers would experience a 
competitive disadvantage without the increase in the required domestic 
content.
    Timetable:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Action                    Date            FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NPRM................................   06/09/23  88 FR 37942
NPRM Comment Period End.............   08/08/23
Final Action........................   12/00/23
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No.
    Government Levels Affected: Federal.
    Agency Contact: Jennifer D. Johnson, Office of the Under Secretary 
of Defense for Acquisition and Sustainment, Department of Defense, 
Defense Acquisition Regulations Council, Defense Pricing and 
Contracting, Defense Acquisition Regulations System, Room 3B938, 3060 
Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301-3060, Phone: 703 717-8226, Email: 
[email protected].
    RIN: 0750-AL74


[[Page 9333]]



DOD--U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS (COE)

Proposed Rule Stage

28. Policy and Procedures for Processing Requests To Alter U.S. Army 
Corps of Engineers Civil Works Projects Pursuant to 33 U.S.C. 408 
[0710-AB22]

    Priority: Other Significant.
    Legal Authority: 33 U.S.C. 408
    CFR Citation: 33 CFR 350.
    Legal Deadline: None.
    Abstract: Where a party other than the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers 
(Corps) seeks to use or alter a Civil Works project that the Corps 
constructed, the proposed use or alteration is subject to the prior 
approval of the Corps. Some examples of such alterations include an 
improvement to the project; relocation of part of the project; or 
installing utilities or other non-project features. This requirement 
was established in section 14 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899 and 
is codified at 33 U.S.C. 408 (section 408). Section 408 provides that 
the Corps may grant permission for another party to alter a Civil Works 
project upon a determination that the alteration proposed will not be 
injurious to the public interest and will not impair the usefulness of 
the Civil Works project. The Corps is proposing to convert its policy 
that governs the section 408 program to a binding regulation. This 
policy, Engineer Circular 1165-2-220, Policy and Procedural Guidance 
for Processing Requests to Alter U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Civil 
Works Projects Pursuant to 33 U.S.C. 408, was issued in September 2018.
    The Corps conducted six virtual listening sessions in the summer of 
2022 to solicit feedback on the Section 408 program from Section 408 
applicants and Non-federal partners. The feedback was helpful to 
understanding the challenges, best practices, and future opportunities 
with the Section 408 program and helped inform development of the 
proposed rule. Additional sessions will be conducted once the draft 
rule is published in the Federal Register. The Corps will widely 
publicize the dates and times of the additional listening sessions to 
Section 408 applicants, non-federal sponsors and partners by posting on 
Corps websites (the Corps HQ website can be found here: https://www.usace.army.mil/Missions/Civil-Works/Section408/) and utilize 
existing email distribution lists of interested parties.
    Statement of Need: Through the Civil Works program, the U.S. Army 
Corps of Engineers (Corps), in partnership with stakeholders, has 
constructed many Civil Works projects across the Nation's landscape. 
Given the widespread locations of these projects, others outside of the 
Corps sometimes want to alter or occupy these projects or the 
associated lands. Reasons for alterations could include activities such 
as improvements to the project; relocation of part of the project; or 
installing utilities or other non-project features. In order to ensure 
that these projects continue to provide their intended benefits to the 
public, Congress provided that any use or alteration of a Civil Works 
project by another party is subject to the prior approval of the Corps. 
This requirement was established in section 14 of the Rivers and 
Harbors Act of 1899 and is codified at 33 U.S.C. 408 (section 408). 
Specifically, section 408 provides that the Corps may grant permission 
for another party to alter a Civil Works project upon a determination 
that the alteration proposed will not be injurious to the public 
interest and will not impair the usefulness of the Civil Works project. 
The Corps is proposing to convert its policy that governs the section 
408 program to a binding regulation. Engineer Circular 1165-2-220, 
Policy and Procedural Guidance for Processing Requests to Alter U.S. 
Army Corps of Engineers Civil Works Projects Pursuant to 33 U.S.C. 408 
was issued in September 2018.
    Summary of Legal Basis: The Corps operates the section 408 program 
under 33 U.S.C. 408.
    Alternatives: The preferred alternative is to conduct rulemaking to 
issue the requirements governing the section 408 review process in the 
form of a binding regulation. The current Corps policy appears in an 
Engineer Circular that has expired. The next best alternative would 
involve issuing these requirements in the form of an Engineer 
Regulation. That alternative would not fulfill the intent of the law 
because it would not be binding on the regulated public.
    Anticipated Cost and Benefits: The proposed rule would reduce costs 
to the regulated public by clarifying the applicable requirements and 
providing consistent implementation of these requirements nationwide 
across the Corps program. It is anticipated that a form would be 
developed for submission of requests which could help to reduce the 
cost to prepare a section 408 request.
    Risks: The proposed action is not anticipated to affect the risk to 
public health, safety, or the environment. It would outline the 
procedures the Corps will follow when evaluating requests for section 
408 permissions. The Corps will comply with all statutory requirements 
when reviewing requests.
    Timetable:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Action                    Date            FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NPRM................................   01/00/24
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No.
    Small Entities Affected: No.
    Government Levels Affected: None.
    Agency Contact: Virginia Rynk, Department of Defense, U.S. Army 
Corps of Engineers, Attn: CECW-EC, 441 G Street NW, Washington, DC 
20314, Phone: 202 761-4741.
    RIN: 0710-AB22

DOD-COE

29. Flood Control Cost-Sharing Requirements Under the Ability To Pay 
Provision [0710-AB34]

    Priority: Other Significant. Major status under 5 U.S.C. 801 is 
undetermined.
    Unfunded Mandates: Undetermined.
    Legal Authority: 33 U.S.C. 2213(m)
    CFR Citation: 33 CFR 241.
    Legal Deadline: None.
    Abstract: Section 103(m) of the Water Resources Development Act 
(WRDA) of 1986, as amended (33 U.S.C. 2213(m)), authorizes the U.S. 
Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) to reduce the non-Federal share of the 
cost of a study or project for certain communities that are not able 
financially to afford the standard non-Federal cost-share. Part 241 of 
Title 33 in the Code of Federal Regulations provides the criteria that 
the Corps uses in making these determinations where the primary purpose 
of the study or project is flood damage reduction. The proposed rule 
would update this regulation, by broadening its applicability to 
include projects with other purposes (instead of just flood damage 
reduction) and the feasibility study of a project (instead of just 
design and construction).
    Statement of Need: The Corps will conduct rulemaking to propose 
amendments to the Corps' regulations at 33 CFR part 241 for Corps 
projects. The WRDA 2000 modified section 103(m) to include the projects 
with the following purposes: environmental protection and restoration, 
flood control, navigation, storm damage protection, shoreline erosion, 
hurricane protection, and recreation or an agricultural water supply 
project which have not yet been added to the regulation. It also 
included the opportunity to cost share all phases of a USACE project to 
also include feasibility studies in addition to the

[[Page 9334]]

already covered design and construction. This rule would update the 
framework for determining whether a project is eligible for 
consideration for a reduction in the non-Federal cost share based on 
ability to pay.
    Summary of Legal Basis: 33 U.S.C. 2213(m).
    Alternatives: The preferred alternative is to conduct rulemaking to 
amend 33 CFR 241 by broadening the project purposes for which the Corps 
could reduce the non-Federal cost-share based on ability to pay and by 
allowing such a reduction for feasibility studies. The next best 
alternative would be to provide additional guidance instead of amending 
the existing regulation. This alternative could lead to confusion for 
the regulated public.
    Anticipated Cost and Benefits: The proposed rule would add Corps 
procedures on the ability to pay provision allowing for consistent 
implementation across the Corps and clear understanding of the program 
and its requirements by the regulated public.
    Risks: The proposed action is not anticipated to affect risk to 
public health, safety, or the environment. It would outline the 
procedures the Corps will follow when evaluating the ability to pay 
provision for cost-sharing with the non-Federal sponsor.
    Timetable:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Action                    Date            FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NPRM................................   01/00/24
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Undetermined.
    Government Levels Affected: None.
    Agency Contact: Amy Frantz, Program Manager, Department of Defense, 
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, CECW-P, 441 G Street NW, Washington, DC 
20314, Phone: 202 761-0106, Email: [email protected].
    Related RIN: Previously reported as 0710-AA91
    RIN: 0710-AB34

DOD--COE

30. USACE Implementing Procedures for Principles, Requirements, and 
Guidelines Applicable to Actions Involving Investment in Water 
Resources [0710-AB41]

    Priority: Other Significant. Major status under 5 U.S.C. 801 is 
undetermined.
    Unfunded Mandates: Undetermined.
    Legal Authority: sec. 2031 of Pub. L. 110-114
    CFR Citation: Not Yet Determined.
    Legal Deadline: None.
    Abstract: Section 2031 of the Water Resources Development Act of 
2007 (Pub. L. 110-114) called for revisions to the 1983 Principles and 
Guidelines for Water and Land Related Resources Implementation Studies, 
resulting in the issuance of the Principles and Requirements (P&R) 
guidance document in March 2013 and the Interagency Guidelines in 
December 2014, which together comprise the Principles, Requirements, 
and Guidelines (PR&G). The PR&G are intended to provide a common 
framework and policy guidance for analyzing a diverse range of water 
resources projects, programs, activities, and related actions involving 
Federal investment in water resources. The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers 
(Corps) plans to propose a regulation to show how it would apply the 
PR&G to the Corps' civil works program and authorities. In this 
proposed regulation, the Corps intends to increase consistency and 
compatibility in its Federal water resources investment decision making 
to include considerations such as analyzing a broader range of long-
term costs and benefits, enhancing collaboration, including a more 
thorough and transparent risk and uncertainty analyses, and improving 
resilience for dealing with emerging challenges, including climate 
change.
    The Department of the Army completed an outreach strategy and 
engagement effort through publication of a Federal Register notice in 
June 2022 on the PR&G. This engagement effort included an open docket 
for submission of comments, a series of virtual meetings with the 
public, and a series of virtual meetings with Tribes to solicit early 
input prior to embarking on a rulemaking action on agency specific 
procedures outlining how the Corps can best meet the policy goals of 
PR&G. The Corps will consider the input received during these 
engagements to inform the development of the proposed rule.
    Statement of Need: The Corps is developing implementing procedures 
for the Principles, Requirements, and Guidelines (PR&G) under section 
110 of the Water Resources Development Act of 2020.
    Summary of Legal Basis: Section 110 of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 2020 provided for the Secretary of the Army to issue 
agency specific guidelines to implement the PR&G. Also see section 2031 
of Public Law 110-114.
    Alternatives: The Corps could implement PR&G with guidance rather 
than through rulemaking; however, such procedures would not be binding. 
As an alternative, the Corps could seek to rely solely on the PR&G 
documents to implement PR&G in lieu of developing its own procedures. 
This could result in confusion and a lack of consistency for the Corps 
as to how and when it would apply the PR&G in the Civil Works program. 
The Corps decided to conduct this rulemaking to ensure the PR&G 
implementing procedures are clear for the Corps and the public as well 
as binding.
    Anticipated Cost and Benefits: As this rulemaking is developing 
procedures for the Corps to implement to ensure compliance with the 
PR&G, there may be some administrative costs incurred to the Corps for 
implementation-related training. There also would be benefits that 
accrue to the public in some cases in the form of improved outcomes in 
Corps decisions related to proposed and ongoing water resource 
development projects.
    Risks: The proposed action is not anticipated to increase risk to 
public health, safety, or the environment, but could potentially help 
to reduce such risks in some cases.
    Timetable:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Action                    Date            FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NPRM................................   11/00/23
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No.
    Government Levels Affected: None.
    Agency Contact: Stacey M. Jensen, Office of the Assistant Secretary 
of the Army, Department of Defense, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, 108 
Army Pentagon, Washington, DC 22202, Phone: 703 695-6791, Email: 
[email protected].
    RIN: 0710-AB41

DOD--COE

31. Appendix C Procedures for the Protection of Historic Properties 
[0710-AB46]

    Priority: Other Significant. Major status under 5 U.S.C. 801 is 
undetermined.
    Unfunded Mandates: Undetermined.
    Legal Authority: 33 U.S.C. 401; 33 U.S.C. 1344; 33 U.S.C. 1413
    CFR Citation: 33 CFR 325.
    Legal Deadline: None.
    Abstract: The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) considers the 
effects of its actions on historic properties pursuant to section 106 
of the National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA). The Corps' Regulatory 
Program's regulations for complying with the NHPA are outlined at 33 
CFR 325 appendix C. Since these regulations were promulgated in 1990, 
there have been

[[Page 9335]]

amendments to the NHPA and revisions to the Advisory Council on 
Historic Preservation's (ACHP) regulations at 36 CFR part 800. In 
response, the Corps issued interim guidance until rulemaking could be 
completed in order to ensure full compliance with the NHPA and ACHP's 
regulations. The Corps proposes to revise its regulations to conform to 
the ACHP regulations.
    The Department of the Army completed an outreach strategy and 
engagement effort through publication of a Federal Register notice in 
June 2022 to solicit comment on the best approach to modernize Appendix 
C. This engagement effort included an open docket for submission of 
comments, a series of virtual meetings with the public, and a series of 
virtual meetings with Tribes to solicit early input prior to embarking 
on a rulemaking action on Appendix C. The input received from these 
efforts will help inform this action.
    Statement of Need: Appendix C provides the implementing procedures 
for the Regulatory Program's compliance with section 106 of the 
National Historic Preservation Act. Rulemaking is required to ensure 
the Regulatory Program is compliant with the NHPA and ACHP's 
implementing regulations at 36 CFR 800 for federal agency compliance 
with Section 106. The NHPA and the ACHP regulations have been revised 
since Appendix C was promulgated.
    Summary of Legal Basis: Appendix C was promulgated through an APA 
rulemaking process intended to provide compliance with section 106 of 
the NHPA specific to the Regulatory Program.
    Alternatives: The preferred alternative is to remove the Regulatory 
Program's implementing regulations (i.e., appendix C) from its 
permitting regulations and instead follow the ACHP's NHPA implementing 
regulations. Other alternatives considered include retaining the 
current appendix C, which does not reflect the current versions of the 
NHPA or the ACHP implementing regulations for federal agencies or 
current Federal policies regarding Tribal Nations. Another alternative 
is to modify Appendix C by incorporating changes made since 1990 to the 
NHPA and the ACHP implementing regulations.
    Anticipated Cost and Benefits: As this rulemaking action is 
implementing procedures for the Corps to ensure compliance with the 
NHPA, there may be some administrative costs incurred to the Corps for 
training. There would be benefits accrued to the public in the form of 
reduced confusion and assurance of consideration of potential adverse 
effects to historic properties and items and areas of cultural/
religious significance.
    Risks: The proposed action is not anticipated to increase risk to 
public health, safety, or the environment because it outlines the 
procedures the Corps will follow for implementing a federal statutory 
requirement. The Corps will comply with all statutory requirements when 
reviewing permit applications.
    Timetable:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Action                    Date            FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NPRM................................   12/00/23
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Undetermined.
    Government Levels Affected: None.
    Federalism: Undetermined.
    Agency Contact: Margaret Gaffney-Smith, Regulatory Program Manager, 
Department of Defense, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Attn: CECW-CO, 441 
G Street NW, Washington, DC 20314, Phone: 202 761-4229.
    RIN: 0710-AB46

DOD--COE

Final Rule Stage

32. Natural Disaster Procedures: Preparedness, Response, and Recovery 
Activities of the Corps of Engineers [0710-AA78]

    Priority: Other Significant.
    Legal Authority: 33 U.S.C. 701n
    CFR Citation: 33 CFR 203.
    Legal Deadline: None.
    Abstract: The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) is finalizing an 
update to the Federal regulation that covers the procedures that the 
Corps uses under section 5 of the Flood Control Act of 1941, as amended 
(33 U.S.C. 701n), commonly referred to as Public Law 84-99. The Corps 
relies on this program to prepare for, respond to, and help communities 
recover from a flood, hurricane, or other natural disaster, including 
the repair of damage to eligible flood risk reduction infrastructure. 
The Corps initiated this rulemaking process through an advanced notice 
of proposed rulemaking (ANPRM) on February 13, 2015. The Corps 
published a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) on November 15, 2022. 
The NPRM included a summary of the comments to the ANPRM. The NPRM 
proposed to repeal the existing regulation and replace it with a new 
regulation that addresses statutory changes under various Water 
Resources Development Act provisions, reflects lessons learned over the 
past 20 years, and incorporates agency policies now in guidance 
relating to natural disaster procedures.
    In 2015, the Corps published an Advance Notice of Proposed Rule 
Making (ANPR) in the Federal Register for a 60 day public comment 
period on policy revision concepts being considered for 33 CFR part 
203. The Corps then published proposed revisions to 33 CFR part 203 in 
the Federal Register with a public comment period from November 15, 
2022 to January 17, 2023. The Corps hosted nine regional workshops in 
Kansas City, MO; Fort Worth, TX; Seattle, WA; Sacramento, CA; Chicago, 
IL; Rock Island, IL; New Orleans, LA; and Wilmington, NC; Concord, MA; 
and two webinars to solicit input from interested parties. The Corps 
also met with two Tribal Nations for direct consultation and input. The 
final rule will address the input received by the Corps through the 
comment and public engagement process.
    Statement of Need: Since the last revision in 2003, significant 
disasters, including Hurricane Katrina (2005), Hurricane Sandy (2012), 
flooding on the Mississippi and Missouri Rivers (2008, 2011, and 2013), 
and Hurricanes Harvey, Irma, and Maria (2017) led to a great 
understanding of the nature and severity of risk associated with flood 
and storm damage reduction projects. In addition, the maturation of 
risk-informed decision making approaches and technological advancements 
have influenced the outlook on the implementation of Public Law 84-99 
activities, with a shift toward better alignment with Corps Levee 
Safety and National Flood Risk Management Programs, as well as the 
National Preparedness and Response Frameworks. Through these programs, 
the Corps works with non-Federal sponsors and stakeholders to assess, 
communicate, and manage the risks to people, property, and the 
environment associated with levee systems and flood risks. Revisions to 
part 203 also would implement certain statutes that amended or 
otherwise affected Public Law 84-99, as explained in the next section.
    Summary of Legal Basis: Public Law 84-99 authorizes an emergency 
fund to be expended at the discretion of the Chief of Engineers for 
preparation for natural disasters, flood fighting, rescue operations, 
repairing or restoring flood control works, emergency protection of 
federally authorized hurricane or shore protection projects, and the 
repair and restoration of federally authorized

[[Page 9336]]

hurricane and shore protection projects damaged or destroyed by wind, 
wave, or water of other than ordinary nature.
    1. Subsection 3029(a) of the Water Resources Reform and Development 
Act of 2014 (WRRDA 2014) (Pub. L. 113-121) authorized the Chief of 
Engineers, under certain circumstances, to make modifications to flood 
control and hurricane or shore protections works damaged during flood 
or coastal storms events, as well as the authority to implement 
nonstructural alternatives in the repair and restoration of hurricane 
or shore protection works.
    2. Subsection 3029(b) of WRRDA 2014 authorized the Secretary of the 
Army to undertake a review of implementation of Public Law 84-99 to 
improve the safety of affected communities to future flooding and storm 
events; the resiliency of water resources development projects to 
future flooding and storm events; the long-term cost-effectiveness of 
water resources development projects that provide flood control and 
hurricane and storm damage reduction benefits; and achieve certain 
other policy goals and objectives.
    3. Section 3011 of WRRDA 2014 states that a levee system shall 
remain eligible for rehabilitation assistance under Public Law 84-99, 
as long as the system sponsor continues to make satisfactory progress, 
as determined by the Secretary of the Army, on an approved system wide 
improvement framework or letter of intent.
    4. Section 1176 of the Water Resources Development Act of 2016 
(WRDA 2016) (Pub. L. 114-322, title I) provided an express definition 
of nonstructural alternatives, as that term is used in Public Law 84-
99, and authorized the Chief of Engineers, under certain circumstances, 
to increase the level of protection of flood control or hurricane or 
shore protection works or increase the capacity of a pumping station 
when conducting repair or restoration activities to such works under 
Public Law 84-99.
    Alternatives:
    1. No rule update: Continue to implement all changes through agency 
guidance documents and agency discretion.
    2. Modify: Incorporate in the rule only those changes related to 
changes in the program that the Congress has mandated in law.
    3. Repeal and replace (Selected Alternative): Incorporate and 
integrate the current state of practice for flood risk management 
principles and concepts through the provision of agency policy codified 
in a federal rule. The intended benefit is to encourage broader 
community flood risk management activities, as undertaken by non-
Federal project sponsors. The rule alternative also consolidates recent 
Public Law 84-99 amendments into one comprehensive rule, ensuring the 
public understands how the Corps would implement them.
    Anticipated Cost and Benefits: Overall, the purpose of the proposed 
changes to this regulation is to improve the effectiveness of Federal 
and local investments to reduce flood risks in both riverine and 
coastal settings. These proposed changes take advantage of our 
increased understanding of flood and storm risks, moving from an 
assessment of how the project is expected to perform to a focus on a 
broader set of actions to reduce risk to life, including operations, 
maintenance, planning, and execution actions to improve emergency 
warning and evacuation and other activities to improve the ability of 
communities and individuals to understand and manage project-related 
risks. Informed by more detailed understanding of risk for levee 
systems, the Federal Government and non-Federal sponsors should be able 
to apply the available resources to the risk management activities that 
most effectively reduce riverine flood risk and avoid expenditures that 
have little risk reduction benefit.
    Risks: The rule would repeal and replace the current 33 CFR 203 in 
order to reflect the current state of practice for flood risk 
management principles and concepts. It would also amend and clarify the 
current role of the Corps in preparing for, and responding a natural 
disaster, and in helping in the recovery effort. The rule may also 
encourage broader community flood risk management activities, as 
undertaken by non-Federal project sponsors.
    Timetable:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Action                    Date            FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
ANPRM...............................   02/13/15  80 FR 8014
ANPRM Comment Period End............   04/14/15
NPRM................................   11/15/22  87 FR 68386
NPRM Comment Period End.............   02/16/23
Final Action........................   02/00/24
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No.
    Small Entities Affected: No.
    Government Levels Affected: None.
    Agency Contact: Willem Helms, Department of Defense, U.S. Army 
Corps of Engineers, CECW-HS, 441 G Street NW, Washington, DC 20314, 
Phone: 202 761-5909, Email: [email protected].
    RIN: 0710-AA78

DOD--COE

Completed Actions

33. Credit Assistance for Water Resources Infrastructure Projects 
[0710-AB31]

    Priority: Other Significant.
    Legal Authority: Pub. L. 114-94; Pub. L. 114-322; Pub. L. 115-270; 
33 U.S.C. 3901
    CFR Citation: 33 CFR 386.
    Legal Deadline: None.
    Abstract: The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) issued a final 
rule to implement a new credit assistance program for dam safety work 
at non-Federal dams. The program is authorized under the Water 
Infrastructure Finance and Innovation Act of 2014 (WIFIA) and Division 
D, title 1 of the Consolidated Appropriations Act of 2020. WIFIA 
authorizes the Corps to provide secured (direct) loans and loan 
guarantees (Federal Credit instruments) to eligible water resources 
infrastructure projects and to charge fees to recover all or a portion 
of the Corps' cost of providing credit assistance and the costs of 
conducting engineering reviews and retaining expert firms, including 
financial and legal services, to assist in the underwriting and 
servicing of Federal credit instruments. Projects will be evaluated and 
selected by the Secretary of the Army (the Secretary) based on the 
requirements and the criteria described in this rule.
    Statement of Need: The Corps' WIFIA program is focused on providing 
Federal loans, and potentially to also include loan guarantees, to 
projects for maintaining, upgrading, and repairing dams identified in 
the National Inventory of Dams owned by non-federal entities. These 
loans will be repaid with non-Federal funding.
    Summary of Legal Basis: The Corps WIFIA program was authorized 
under subtitle C of title V of the Water Resources Reform and 
Development Act of 2014 (WRRDA 2014), which authorizes the Corps to 
provide secured (direct) loans, and potentially to also include loan 
guarantees, to eligible water resources infrastructure projects (needed 
further authorization was provided by Division D, title 1 of the 
Consolidated Appropriations Act of 2020). The statute also authorizes 
the Corps to charge fees to recover all or a portion of the Corps' cost 
of providing credit assistance and the costs of conducting engineering 
reviews and retaining expert firms, including financial and legal 
services, to assist in the underwriting and servicing of Federal credit 
instruments.

[[Page 9337]]

    The Fiscal 2021 Consolidated Appropriations Act, provided the Corps 
WIFIA appropriations of $2.2M admin, and $12M credit subsidy and a loan 
volume limit of $950M. These appropriated funds are limited to fund 
projects focused on maintaining, upgrading, and repairing dams 
identified in the National Inventory of Dams owned by non-federal 
entities, essentially dams where the primary owner is a state, local 
government, public utility, or private owner.
    Alternatives: The preferred alternative would be to conduct 
proposed rulemaking to implement a new credit program for dam safety 
work at non-Federal dams in the form of a binding regulation in 
compliance with the Water Infrastructure Finance and Innovation Act of 
2014 (WIFIA) and Division D, title 1 of the Consolidated Appropriations 
Act of 2020. The next best alternative would involve issuing these 
implementing procedures in the form of an Engineer Regulation. That 
alternative would not fulfill the intent of the law because it would 
not be binding on the regulated public. The no action alternative would 
be to not conduct rulemaking which would not fulfill the authorization 
provided by Congress.
    Anticipated Cost and Benefits: The rule adds Corps procedures to 
the CFR on the implementation of a new credit program for dam safety 
work at non-Federal dams to allow for consistent implementation across 
the Corps and clear understanding of the program and its requirements 
by the regulated public. The USACE will incur costs to administer the 
loan program while benefits are expected for the public in the form of 
benefits from projects enabled by WIFIA loans. WIFIA compliance costs 
will likely include costs associated with application and transaction 
processing fees, which are waived or reduced for small and 
disadvantaged communities, obtaining a credit rating letter, any 
consultant fees (not required), completing applications, reporting 
requirements, and record keeping. These costs are not anticipated to 
represent a significant economic impact, especially given that 
participation in the program is voluntary.
    Risks: The action is not anticipated to increase risk to public 
health, safety, or the environment because it outlines the procedures 
the Corps will follow for implementing a federal loan program. The 
Corps will comply with all statutory requirements when reviewing 
requests.
    Timetable:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Action                    Date            FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NPRM................................   06/10/22  87 FR 35473
NPRM Comment Period End.............   08/09/22
Final Action........................   05/22/23  88 FR 32661
Final Action Effective..............   06/21/23
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No.
    Small Entities Affected: No.
    Government Levels Affected: None.
    Agency Contact: Aaron Snyder, Department of Defense, U.S. Army 
Corps of Engineers, 441 G Street NW, Washington, DC 20314, Phone: 651 
290-5489, Email: [email protected].
    Related RIN: Merged with 0710-AB32
    RIN: 0710-AB31

DOD--COE

34.  Revised Definition of ``Waters of the United States''; 
Conforming [0710-AB55]

    Priority: Other Significant.
    Legal Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1251 et seq.
    CFR Citation: 40 CFR part 120; 33 CFR part 328.
    Legal Deadline: None.
    Abstract: On September 8, 2023, the Environmental Protection Agency 
(EPA) and the Department of the Army (the agencies'') finalized a rule 
to amend the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) to conform the 
definition of ``waters of the United States'' to a 2023 Supreme Court 
decision. This conforming rule amends the provisions of the agencies' 
definition of ``waters of the United States'' that are invalid under 
the Supreme Court's interpretation of the Clean Water Act in the 2023 
decision.
    Statement of Need: In April 2020, the EPA and the Department of the 
Army (``the agencies'') published the Navigable Waters Protection Rule 
that revised the previously codified definition of ``waters of the 
United States (85 FR 22250, April 21, 2020). The Navigable Waters 
Protection Rule was vacated by courts. On January 18, 2023, the 
agencies issued a final rule, ``Revised Definition of ``Waters of the 
United States' '' (88 FR 3004) which became effective on March 20, 
2023. On May 25, 2023, the U.S. Supreme Court issued its decision in 
the case of Sackett v. Environmental Protection Agency. In light of 
this decision, the agencies are interpreting the phrase waters of the 
United States consistent with the Supreme Court's decision in Sackett. 
The agencies are developing a rule to amend the final ``Revised 
Definition of `Waters of the United States' '' rule, published in the 
Federal Register on January 18, 2023, consistent with the U.S. Supreme 
Court's decision in Sackett.
    Summary of Legal Basis: The Clean Water Act (33 U.S.C. 1251 et 
seq.).
    Alternatives: Please see EPA's alternatives. EPA is the lead for 
this rulemaking action.
    Anticipated Cost and Benefits: Please see EPA's statement of 
anticipated costs and benefits. EPA is the lead for this rulemaking 
action.
    Risks: Please see EPA's risks. EPA is the lead for this rulemaking 
action.
    Timetable:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Action                    Date            FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Final Action........................   09/08/23  88 FR 61964
Final Action Effective..............   09/08/23
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No.
    Small Entities Affected: No.
    Government Levels Affected: None.
    Agency Contact: Stacey M. Jensen, Office of the Assistant Secretary 
of the Army, Department of Defense, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, 108 
Army Pentagon, Washington, DC 22202, Phone: 703 695-6791, Email: 
[email protected].
    Related RIN: Related to 2040-AG32
    RIN: 0710-AB55

DOD--OFFICE OF ASSISTANT SECRETARY FOR HEALTH AFFAIRS (DODOASHA)

Final Rule Stage

35. TRICARE Coverage of Clinical Trials and Termination of Expanded 
Access Treatments [0720-AB83]

    Priority: Other Significant.
    Legal Authority: 5 U.S.C. 301; 10 U.S.C. ch 55
    CFR Citation: 32 CFR 199.
    Legal Deadline: None.
    Abstract: The Department of Defense is finalizing an interim final 
rule to amend 32 CFR part 199 to include coverage that was temporarily 
added for National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Disease-
sponsored clinical trials for the treatment or prevention of COVID-19. 
This rule will also finalize the temporary addition of the treatment 
use of investigation drugs under U.S. Food and Drug Administration-
approved expanded access programs for the treatment of coronavirus 
disease 2019 (COVID-19) from the interim final rule titled ``TRICARE 
Coverage of Certain Medical Benefits in Response to the COVID-19 
Pandemic'' (32 CFR part

[[Page 9338]]

199, 0720-AB82), which published in the Federal Register on September 
3, 2020 (85 FR 54914-54924).
    Statement of Need: This final rule is required to finalize certain 
temporary flexibilities enacted in interim final rules published in 
2020 in response to the COVID-19 pandemic.
    Pursuant to the President's national emergency declaration and as a 
result of the worldwide COVID-19 pandemic, the Assistant Secretary of 
Defense for Health Affairs hereby temporarily modified the regulation 
at 32 CFR 199.4(e)(26) to permit TRICARE coverage for National 
Institute of Allergy and Infectious Disease (NIAID)-sponsored COVID-19 
phase I, II, III, and IV clinical trials for the treatment or 
prevention of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). This provision 
supports increased access to emerging therapies for TRICARE 
beneficiaries.
    Summary of Legal Basis: This rule is issued under 10 U.S.C. 
1073(a)(2) giving authority and responsibility to the Secretary of 
Defense to administer the TRICARE program.
    Alternatives:
    (1) No action.
    (2) The second alternative the DoD considered was implementing a 
more limited benefit change for COVID-19 patients by not covering phase 
I clinical trials. Although this would have the benefit of reimbursing 
only care that has more established evidence in its favor, this 
alternative is not preferred because early access to treatments is 
critical for TRICARE beneficiaries given the rapid progression of the 
disease and the lack of available approved treatments.
    Anticipated Cost and Benefits: Any cost to beneficiaries would be 
consistent with existing costs under the TRICARE Program (such as cost-
shares and copayments). Finalizing TRICARE coverage of clinical trials 
will benefit TRICARE beneficiaries by ensuring they continue to have 
access to emerging therapies in the safest setting possible.
    In the interim final rule, DoD estimated the total cost for TRICARE 
participation in NIAID-sponsored COVID-19 clinical trials would be 
$3.2M for the duration of the national emergency, with an additional 
$4.0M for continued care for beneficiaries enrolled in clinical trials 
prior to termination of the national emergency. There were several 
assumptions we made in developing this estimate. The duration of the 
COVID-19 national emergency is uncertain; however, for the purposes of 
this estimate, we assumed the national emergency would expire on 
September 30, 2021. As of the drafting of the IFR, there were 27 NIAID-
sponsored COVID-19 clinical trials begun since the start of the 
national emergency. We assumed 6.2 new trials every 30 days, for a 
total of 126 trials by September 2021. We assumed, based on average 
trial enrollment and that TRICARE beneficiaries would participate in 
trials at the same rate as the general population, that 4,549 TRICARE 
beneficiaries would participate through September 2021. Each of the 
assumptions in this estimate is highly uncertain, and our estimate 
could be higher or lower depending on real world events (more or fewer 
trials, a longer or shorter national emergency, and/or higher or lower 
participation in clinical trials by TRICARE beneficiaries).
    Benefits: These changes expand the therapies available to TRICARE 
beneficiaries in settings that ensure informed consent of the 
beneficiary, and where the benefits of treatment outweigh the potential 
risks. Participation in clinical trials may provide beneficiaries with 
benefits such as reduced hospitalizations and/or use of a mechanical 
ventilator. Although we cannot estimate the value of avoiding these 
outcomes quantitatively, the potential long-term consequences of 
serious COVID-19 illness, including permanent cardiac or lung damage, 
are not insignificant. Beneficiary access to emerging therapies that 
reduce these long-term consequences or even death can be considered to 
be high-value for those able to participate.
    TRICARE providers will be positively affected by being able to 
provide their patients with a broader range of treatment options. The 
general public will benefit from an increased pool of available 
participants for the development of treatments and vaccines for COVID-
19, as well as the evidence (favorable or otherwise) that results from 
this participation.
    Risks: None. This rule will not directly affect the efficient 
functioning of the economy or private markets. However, increasing the 
pool of available participants for clinical trials may help speed the 
development of treatments or vaccines for COVID-19. Once effective 
treatments or vaccines for COVID-19 exist, individuals are likely to be 
more confident interacting in the public sphere, resulting in a 
positive impact on the economy and private markets.
    Timetable:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Action                    Date            FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Interim Final Rule..................   10/30/20  85 FR 68753
Interim Final Rule Effective........   10/30/20
Interim Final Rule Comment Period      11/30/20
 End.
Final Action........................   02/00/24
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Undetermined.
    Government Levels Affected: Undetermined.
    Additional Information: The interim final rule was titled ``TRICARE 
Coverage of National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Disease 
Coronavirus Disease 2019 Clinical Trials.'' The final rule will be 
titled ``TRICARE Coverage of Clinical Trials and Termination of 
Expanded Access Treatments.''
    Agency Contact: Jennifer Stankovic, Department of Defense, Office 
of Assistant Secretary for Health Affairs, 16401 E Centretech Parkway, 
Aurora, CO 80011-9066, Phone: 303 676-3742, Email: 
[email protected].
    Related RIN: Related to 0720-AB81, Related to 0720-AB82
    RIN: 0720-AB83

DOD--DODOASHA

36. Expanding TRICARE Access to Care in Response to the COVID-19 
Pandemic [0720-AB85]

    Priority: Other Significant.
    Legal Authority: 5 U.S.C. 301; 10 U.S.C. ch. 55
    CFR Citation: 32 CFR 199.
    Legal Deadline: None.
    Abstract: This rule finalizes an interim final rule that amended 32 
CFR part 199 by: (1) adding freestanding End Stage Renal Disease (ESRD) 
facilities as a category of TRICARE-authorized institutional provider 
and modifying the reimbursement for such facilities; and (2) 
temporarily adopting Medicare's New COVID-19 Treatments Add-on Payment 
(NCTAP). The ESRD provisions are permanent, and the temporary NCTAP 
provisions expire at the end of the fiscal year in which the Secretary 
of Health and Human Services' declared coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-
19) public health emergency ends.
    Statement of Need: Pursuant to the President's emergency 
declaration and as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic, the Assistant 
Secretary of Defense for Health Affairs is temporarily modifying the 
following regulations (except for the modifications to paragraphs 
199.6(b)(4)(xxi) and 199.14(a)(1)(iii)(E)(7), which will not expire), 
but, in each case, only to the extent necessary to ensure that

[[Page 9339]]

TRICARE beneficiaries have access to the most up-to-date care required 
for the prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of COVID-19, and that 
TRICARE continues to reimburse like Medicare, to the extent 
practicable, as required by statute.
    The modifications to paragraphs 199.6(b)(4)(xxi) and 
199.14(a)(1)(iii)(E)(7) establish freestanding End Stage Renal Disease 
(ESRD) facilities as a category of TRICARE-authorized institutional 
provider and modify TRICARE reimbursement of freestanding ESRD 
facilities. These provisions will improve TRICARE beneficiary access to 
medically necessary dialysis and other ESRD services and supplies. 
These provisions also support the requirement that TRICARE reimburse 
like Medicare, and will help to alleviate regional health care 
shortages due to the COVID-19 pandemic by ensuring access to dialysis 
care in freestanding ESRD facilities rather than hospital outpatient 
departments.
    The modification to paragraph 199.14(a)(iii)(E) adopts Medicare's 
New COVID-19 Treatments Add-on Payment (NCTAP) for COVID-19 cases that 
meet Medicare's criteria. This provision increases access to emerging 
COVID-19 treatments and supports the requirement that TRICARE reimburse 
like Medicare.
    Summary of Legal Basis: This rule is issued under 10 U.S.C. 1073 
(a)(2) giving authority and responsibility to the Secretary of Defense 
to administer the TRICARE program.
    Alternatives: (1) No action.
    (2) The second alternative the Department of Defense considered was 
to adopt Medicare's ESRD reimbursement methodology, the ESRD 
Prospective Payment System (PPS), in total. While this would have been 
completely consistent with the statutory provision to pay institutional 
providers using the same reimbursement methodology as Medicare, this 
alternative is not preferred because there is still a relatively low 
volume of TRICARE beneficiaries who receive dialysis services from 
freestanding ESRDs and who are not enrolled to Medicare. The cost of 
implementing the full ESRD PPS system is estimated to be at least 
$600,000.00 in start-up costs, plus ongoing administrative costs, to 
ensure all adjustments were made for each claim, plus additional 
special pricing software or algorithms. In contrast, we estimate that 
the option provided in this IFR can be implemented relatively quickly 
(within six months of publication), and for approximately $300,000.00 
in start-up costs with lower ongoing administrative costs. Further, the 
flat rate will provide the ESRD facilities with predictability with 
regard to TRICARE payments and will reduce uncertainty and specialized 
coding or case-mix documentation requirements that may be required by 
the ESRD PPS, reducing the administrative burden on the provider.
    To summarize, adopting the ESRD PPS was considered, but was deemed 
impracticable and overly burdensome to both the Government and 
providers due to the relative low volume of claims that will be priced 
and paid by TRICARE as primary under this system.
    Anticipated Cost and Benefits: $8.08 million. Only the ESRD 
provisions are expected to result in recurring incremental health care 
costs; the remaining two provisions are expected to result in one-time 
cost increases.
    This estimate includes approximately $0.9M in administrative costs 
and $5.9M in direct health care costs. $1.8M of the total cost impact 
is expected to be a one-time start-up cost for both the temporary and 
permanent provisions, while the permanent ESRD provisions are expected 
to result in $5M in incremental annual costs.
    Risks: None. This rule will promote the efficient functioning of 
the economy and markets by modifying the regulations to better 
reimburse health care providers for care provided during the COVID-19 
pandemic, particularly as strain on the health care economy is being 
felt due to reductions in higher cost elective procedures. 
Additionally, this rule will increase the access of TRICARE 
beneficiaries to more providers administering COVID-19 vaccinations, 
which promotes the efficient functioning of the U.S. economy by 
quickening the pace at which the public receives COVID-19 vaccinations.
    Timetable:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Action                    Date            FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Interim Final Rule..................   01/12/23  88 FR 1992
Interim Final Rule Effective........   01/12/23
Interim Final Rule Comment Period      03/13/23
 End.
Final Action........................   06/00/24
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No.
    Small Entities Affected: No.
    Government Levels Affected: None.
    Agency Contact: Elan Green, Department of Defense, Office of 
Assistant Secretary for Health Affairs, 16401 East Centretech Parkway, 
Aurora, CO 80011, Phone: 303 676-3907, Email: 
[email protected].
    RIN: 0720-AB85

DOD--DODOASHA

37. Collection From Third Party Payers of Reasonable Charges for 
Healthcare Services; Amendment [0720-AB87]

    Priority: Other Significant.
    Legal Authority: NDAA 2021, sec. 716
    CFR Citation: 32 CFR 220.
    Legal Deadline: NPRM, Statutory, June 21, 2023.
    Abstract: The Department of Defense, Defense Health Agency (DHA), 
is proposing a rule to implement Section 716 of the Fiscal Year 2023 
National Defense Authorization Act (Pub. L. 117-263). Section 716, 
which provides new statutory language that supersedes language 
previously enacted in Section 702 of the Fiscal Year 2021 National 
Defense Authorization Act (Pub. L. 116-283), directs the Director of 
the DHA to implement a modified payment plan for certain civilians (who 
are not covered beneficiaries). This Section also provides the Director 
with the authority to waive fees for medical care provided to such 
civilians, when the provision of care enhances the knowledge, skills 
and abilities of health care providers.
    Statement of Need: Due to the high cost of healthcare in the United 
States and the mandate to aggressively pursue collection of debts, some 
civilian non-beneficiaries who were provided emergency or trauma 
healthcare services in DoD MTFs have incurred financial harm after 
receiving MTF medical invoices. Other than the requirements of FCCS, 
the DoD did not have authority to provide FAPs like those offered by 
for-profit and non-profit hospitals which include elements such as 
sliding fees and catastrophic waivers. In consequence, Congress wholly 
amended 10 U.S.C. 1079b via section 716 of the FY 2023 NDAA. Section 
716 directs DoD to apply a sliding fee and/or a catastrophic waiver to 
medical invoices of non-beneficiaries. For non-beneficiaries who have 
health insurance, section 716 directs DoD to accept payments from 
health insurers as full payment and to not balance bill non-
beneficiaries except for copays, coinsurance, deductibles, nominal 
fees, and non-covered services. It also grants the Director of DHA 
discretionary authority, to waive medical debts of non-beneficiaries 
when the healthcare provided enhances the knowledge, skills, and 
abilities of healthcare providers, as determined by the Director of 
DHA.
    Summary of Legal Basis: DoD's authority to compute reasonable 
charges for inpatient and ambulatory (outpatient) care provided by 
MTFs, including charges for pharmaceuticals, durable medical equipment, 
supplies,

[[Page 9340]]

immunizations, injections or other medications, is found at 32 CFR part 
220, last updated on August 20, 2020 (55 FR 21742-21750). Medical 
billing is structured under three existing healthcare cost recovery 
programs: Third Party Collections (10 U.S.C. 1095); Medical Services 
Account (10 U.S.C. 1079b, 1085, and 1104); and Medical Affirmative 
Claims (42 U.S.C. 26512653). The rates used for billing are modeled 
after the rates published by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid 
Services. The rates are approved annually by the Assistant Secretary of 
Defense for Health Affairs (ASD(HA)) and published on the DoD 
Comptroller's website at https://comptroller.defense.gov/Financial-Management/Reports/rates2023/. Funds collected through the healthcare 
cost recovery programs are used to enhance healthcare delivery at MTFs.
    In carrying out the DoD's healthcare cost recovery programs, DoD 
abides by the Federal Claims Collection Standards (FCCS), under 31 CFR 
parts 900-904, which are published jointly by the Department of the 
Treasury and the Department of Justice. The FCCS require that Federal 
agencies aggressively collect all debts arising out of activities of 
that agency. Collection activities must be undertaken promptly with 
follow-up action taken as necessary. Accordingly, DoD MTFs generate 
medical claims and invoices for care rendered within MTFs and execute 
the FCCS requirements.
    Other Applicable Authority: In accordance with 26 CFR 1.6050P-
1(b)(2)(G), if DoD waives fees under 10 U.S.C. 1079b(b), then it would 
trigger information reporting requirements to the Internal Revenue 
Service (IRS) and the furnishing of Form 1099-C, Cancellation of Debt, 
to the patient since the discharge of indebtedness under 10 U.S.C. 
1079b(b) qualifies as an identifiable event. Consequently, the waived 
medical fees could result in the debt being attributed to the patient 
as taxable income; and have the effect of causing severe financial 
harm. Therefore, DHA will consider a waiver of fees under 10 U.S.C. 
1079b(b), only after any discounts according to the sliding scale and 
catastrophic cap have been applied. Any fees waived will be from the 
discounted amount, which will mitigate some of the financial impact of 
attributing the waived amount as income. Additionally, the DoD will 
seek to use that authority judiciously, on a case-by-case basis, and 
when other efforts such as application of a sliding and catastrophic 
waiver fail to mitigate the risk of severe financial harm to the 
civilian non-beneficiary.
    Alternatives: The amended 10 U.S.C. 1079b mandates that DoD 
implement the amended statute within 180 days of the amendment being 
enacted. With this constrained timeline, the Department launched 
research efforts to discern whether private sector hospitals offered 
programs similar to what the statute mandates and which could 
potentially serve as a model for the Department. This research was 
necessary because prior to enactment of the amended 10 U.S.C. 1079b, 
the DoD did not have the authority to apply sliding scale or 
catastrophic waiver discounts to medical bills generated by MTFs, nor 
did the Director of DHA have discretionary authority to waive medical 
bills. Market research on charity care and FAPs offered by both for-
profit and non-profit hospitals throughout the United States and 
eligibility requirements for those programs were reviewed. Of note, 
while for-profit and non-profit hospitals derive a tax benefit from the 
provision of charity care and FAPs, the DoD's hospitals do not. 
Research conducted yielded that while there are generally accepted 
accounting standards applicable to the financial reporting of charity 
and FAPs, there is no single standard, statute, or regulation that 
outlines the content and structure of those programs. Programs vary 
widely. The market research also included a review of the rules 
pertaining to eligibility for Federal and State FAPs such as Medicaid. 
The research provided a few alternatives for consideration in 
establishing the MHS FAP, including:
     Alternative #1: Generally, for-profit and non-profit 
hospitals determine a patient's eligibility for FAPs by measuring the 
applicant's annual household income against the Federal Poverty 
Guidelines (FPGs). The FPGs are published annually by the Department of 
Health and Human Services pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 9902(2). There is one 
set of FPGs for the contiguous 48 states and Washington DC, one set for 
Alaska, and another for Hawaii. The Census Bureau annually publishes 
FPG thresholds. The threshold is a statistical calculation used to 
identify the number of people living in poverty. There is no geographic 
variation; the same figures are used for all 50 states and Washington, 
DC. The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) designates the Census 
Bureau poverty thresholds as the Federal Government's official 
statistical definition of poverty. The FPGs are also used by State and 
Federal agencies for determining an individual's eligibility for 
Federal programs such as Medicaid.
     Alternative #2: Both for-profit and non-profit hospitals 
typically offer a sliding fee discount based upon the patient's 
household income when compared to the FPGs. Predominantly, discounts 
are offered to individuals whose household income falls within the 
range of 125% to 400% of the FPGs, with most hospitals offering 
discounts to patients whose income is at or below 200% of the FPGs.
     Alternative #3: Most private sector hospitals do not offer 
a catastrophic waiver policy, but a few will limit a patient's bill to 
a maximum percentage of the patient's household income (range of 10 to 
20 percent of monthly income). In addition, we examined the Department 
of the Treasury's Administrative Wage Garnishment policy to determine 
the maximum percentage that the Treasury garnishes from an individual's 
monthly income (15 percent).
    The three alternatives uncovered through market research represent 
fair and reasonable approaches that could readily be adopted for use in 
the administration of the MHS FAP, with some modifications, and without 
incurring significant costs to implement. Specifically:
    Alternative #1: Adopted. Since 10 U.S.C. 1079b mandates the 
application of a sliding scale and catastrophic waivers, the FPGs will 
be used as the measure to determine a patient's eligibility for these 
discounts.
    Alternative #2: Adopted. The FPG range for eligibility for the 
sliding scale discount will be set annually by policy issued by the 
ASD(HA). The range will be published on the DoD Comptroller's 
Reimbursement Rates website. Reserving the ability to set the range via 
policy gives DoD maximum flexibility to mitigate financial harm.
    Alternative #3: Adopted. The catastrophic waiver will be limited to 
a percentage of a patient's monthly household income. The percentage 
will be established by policy issued annually by the ASD(HA). The 
percentage will be published on the DoD Comptroller's Reimbursement 
Rates website. Reserving the ability to set the percentage via policy 
gives DoD maximum flexibility to mitigate financial harm.
    Anticipated Cost and Benefits:
    Benefit Cost Analysis: The anticipated costs for the MHS Financial 
Assistance and Waiver Program include only the time required for a 
patient's application to be reviewed. This includes time required for a 
civilian non-beneficiary patient to complete the associated DD Form 
3857, Application for Military Health System Financial Assistance

[[Page 9341]]

Program/Waiver Program, declaring their income, DHA UBO and associated 
agencies to receive and assess the application, followed by the 
determination of the eligibility for a sliding scale discount, 
catastrophic waiver, or debt cancellation waiver, and the response time 
for the decision. The total estimated time is less than 90 days.
    Risks: Currently, Federal debt collection legislation and policies 
can lead to serious financial harm to some civilian non-beneficiary 
patients who receive treatment at MTFs. Delays in implementation of 
this rule could potentially exacerbate these problems.
    Timetable:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Action                    Date            FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Interim Final Rule..................   03/00/24
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No.
    Small Entities Affected: No.
    Government Levels Affected: None.
    Agency Contact: DeLisa Prater, DHA Uniform Business Office Program 
Manager, Department of Defense, Office of Assistant Secretary for 
Health Affairs, 8111 Gatehouse Road, Suite #221, Falls Church, VA 
22042-5101, Phone: 703 275-6380, Email: [email protected].
    RIN: 0720-AB87

BILLING CODE 5001-06-P

DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION

Statement of Regulatory Priorities

I. Introduction

    The U.S. Department of Education (Department) supports States, 
local communities, institutions of higher education, and families in 
improving education and other services nationwide to ensure that all 
Americans, including those with disabilities and who have been 
underserved, receive a high-quality and safe education and are prepared 
for employment that provides a livable wage. We provide leadership and 
financial assistance pertaining to education and related services at 
all levels to a wide range of stakeholders and individuals, including 
State educational and other agencies, local school districts, providers 
of early learning programs, elementary and secondary schools, 
institutions of higher education, career and technical schools, 
nonprofit organizations, students, members of the public, families, and 
many others. These efforts are helping to advance equity, recover from 
the COVID-19 pandemic, and ensure that all children and students from 
pre-kindergarten through grade 12 will be ready for, and succeed in, 
postsecondary education and employment, and that students attending 
postsecondary institutions, or participating in other postsecondary 
education options, are prepared for a profession or career.
    We also vigorously monitor and enforce the implementation of 
Federal civil rights laws in educational programs and activities that 
receive Federal financial assistance from the Department, and support 
innovative and promising programs, research and evaluation activities, 
technical assistance, and the dissemination of data, research, and 
evaluation findings to improve the quality of education.
    In developing and implementing regulations, guidance, technical 
assistance, evaluations, data gathering and reporting, and monitoring 
related to our programs, we are committed to working closely with 
affected persons and groups. Our core mission includes serving the most 
vulnerable, and facilitating equal access for all, to ensure all 
students receive a high-quality and safe education and complete it with 
a well-considered and attainable path to a sustainable career. Toward 
these ends, we work with a broad range of interested parties and the 
general public, including families, students, and educators; State, 
local, and Tribal governments; other Federal agencies; and neighborhood 
groups, community-based early learning programs, elementary and 
secondary schools, postsecondary institutions, rehabilitation service 
providers, adult education providers, professional associations, civil 
rights organizations, nonprofits, advocacy organizations, businesses, 
and labor organizations.
    If we determine that it is necessary to develop regulations, we can 
seek public participation at the key stages in the rulemaking process. 
We invite the public to submit comments on all proposed regulations 
through the internet or by regular mail. We also continue to seek 
greater public participation in our rulemaking activities through the 
use of transparent and interactive rulemaking procedures and new 
technologies. For example, on June 7-11, 2021, we sought public input 
through a virtual public hearing on Title IX of the Education 
Amendments of 1972. We hosted this hearing to provide a forum for all 
of our stakeholders and other members of the public, including those 
from underserved communities, to share their experiences, insights, and 
expertise on Title IX. The information shared during this helped us 
determine changes to propose to the regulations regarding Title IX. 
Additionally, on January 11, 2023, we published a Request for 
Information (RFI) on Regarding Public Transparency for Low-Financial-
Value Postsecondary Programs. For this RFI, we solicited public 
comments from stakeholders and members of the public, including those 
from underserved communities, on how to identify the best ways to 
calculate the metrics that may be used to identify low-financial-value 
programs and inform technical considerations. We also note that the 
Higher Education Act of 1965 requires the Department to use the 
negotiated rulemaking process for a majority of its higher education 
rulemakings, which is a process that necessitates public participation 
from a broad range of stakeholders. Additionally, at the end of each 
day during the negotiated rulemaking sessions, the Department provides 
an opportunity for members of the public who are not at the negotiating 
table to speak and provide input. The Department has exclusively used 
virtual negotiated rulemaking sessions for these higher education 
regulations since 2021. Hosting virtual meetings instead of in-person 
sessions has significantly expanded the ability to draw in robust 
public comment from across the country, as the time commitment is more 
manageable and does not require traveling in order to participate.
    The Department has also taken steps to seek public input on the 
development of guidance documents. On February 15, 2023, we announced 
that we would conduct a review of existing guidance related to a 
statutory provision about how institutions of higher education may 
compensate recruiters. To engage public participation we held a virtual 
public hearing on this topic on March 8 and 9, 2023. This gave dozens 
of members of the public a chance to express their opinions before the 
Department took any formal steps through guidance. We also sought 
public comment on this topic, which yielded nearly 270 comments. This 
approach allowed the Department to get thoughts from the public at the 
pre-drafting stage and will assist in gauging what changes, if any, to 
make to this guidance.
    To facilitate the public's involvement, we participate in the 
Federal Docket Management System (FDMS), an electronic single 
Government-wide access point (www.regulations.gov) that enables the 
public to submit comments on different types of Federal regulatory 
documents and read and respond to comments submitted by other members 
of the public during the public comment period. This system provides 
the public

[[Page 9342]]

with the opportunity to submit comments electronically on any notice of 
proposed rulemaking or interim final regulations open for comment as 
well as read and print any supporting regulatory documents.

II. Regulatory Priorities

    The following are the key rulemaking actions the Department is 
planning for the coming year. These rulemaking actions advance the 
Department's mission of ``promot[ing] student achievement and 
preparation for global competitiveness by fostering educational 
excellence and ensuring equal access.'' These rulemaking actions also 
advance the President's priorities of ensuring that every American has 
access to a high-quality education, regardless of background, and that 
government should affirmatively work to expand educational 
opportunities for underserved communities. During his time in office, 
the President has repeatedly made clear the importance of advancing 
equity and opportunity for those who have historically been 
underserved, both as a general matter and with regard to the education 
system in particular. See Executive Order 13985 (On Advancing Racial 
Equity and Support for Underserved Communities Through the Federal 
Government); Executive Order 14021 (Guaranteeing an Educational 
Environment Free From Discrimination on the Basis of Sex, Including 
Sexual Orientation or Gender Identity); Executive Order 14041 (White 
House Initiative on Advancing Educational Equity, Excellence, and 
Economic Opportunity Through Historically Black Colleges and 
Universities); Executive Order 14045 (White House Initiative on 
Advancing Educational Equity, Excellence, and Economic Opportunity for 
Hispanics); Executive Order 14049 (White House Initiative on Advancing 
Educational Equity, Excellence, and Economic Opportunity for Native 
Americans and Strengthening Tribal Colleges and Universities); and 
Executive Order 14050 (White House Initiative on Advancing Educational 
Equity, Excellence, and Economic Opportunity for Black Americans). The 
rulemaking actions on the Department's agenda seek to advance the 
President's priorities, as set out in these executive orders and more 
broadly. Our regulatory agenda covers a wide range of topics, and a 
wide range of educational institutions--from those serving our youngest 
children to colleges, universities, and adult education programs. In 
each of these contexts, promoting equity and opportunity for students 
who have been historically underserved is central to the Department's 
regulatory plan.

Postsecondary Education/Federal Student Aid

    The Department plans to propose regulations to provide debt relief 
to student loan borrowers. Specifically, the Department is working on 
regulations to better clarify the use of the Secretary's authority to 
waive some or all of a borrower's outstanding balance on a Federal 
student loan, pursuant to Section 432(a)(6) of the Higher Education Act 
of 1965, as amended. Negotiation sessions are taking place during the 
fall of 2023, with draft and final rules expected next year.

Civil Rights/Title IX

    The Secretary proposed to amend its regulations implementing Title 
IX of the Education Amendments of 1972, as amended, consistent with the 
priorities of the Biden-Harris Administration. These priorities include 
those set forth in Executive Order 13988 on Preventing and Combating 
Discrimination on the Basis of Gender Identity or Sexual Orientation 
and Executive Order 14021 on Guaranteeing an Educational Environment 
Free from Discrimination on the Basis of Sex, Including Sexual 
Orientation and Gender Identity.

Student Privacy

    The Department is considering policy options to amend the Family 
Educational Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA) regulations, to update, 
clarify, and improve the current regulations. The proposed regulations 
are also needed to implement statutory amendments to FERPA contained in 
the Uninterrupted Scholars Act of 2013 and the Healthy, Hunger-Free 
Kids Act of 2010, to reflect a change in the name of the office 
designated to administer FERPA, and to make changes related to the 
enforcement responsibilities of the office concerning FERPA.

Grants

    The Department plans to propose revisions to the Education 
Department General Administrative Regulations (EDGAR) to make a variety 
of updates and revisions, including to update and clarify evidence-
related components, to clarify how the Department makes determinations 
related to continuation awards under competitive grant programs, and to 
expand flexibility for grantees by clarifying that, where not 
prohibited by law or the terms and conditions of the grant award, 
subgranting authority rests with States. These proposed changes would 
ensure that the EDGAR regulations are consistent with current law and 
would reduce or eliminate unnecessary burdens and restrictions.

Recently Completed Rulemakings

    Additionally, the Department has recently concluded its Improving 
Income Driven Repayment and Gainful Employment rulemakings. For 
Improving Income Driven Repayment, the Department issued final 
regulations governing income-contingent repayment plans by amending the 
Revised Pay as You Earn repayment plan and restructuring and renaming 
the repayment plan regulations under the William D. Ford Federal Direct 
Loan Program, including combining the Income Contingent Repayment and 
the Income-Based Repayment plans under the umbrella term of ``Income-
Driven Repayment'' plans, and providing conforming edits to the FFEL 
Program. For Gainful Employment, the Department published final 
regulations that determine whether postsecondary educational programs 
prepare students for gainful employment in recognized occupations, and 
the conditions under which programs remain eligible for student 
financial assistance programs under Title IV of the HEA. The Department 
also published final regulations on Financial Responsibility, 
Administrative Capability, Certification, and Ability to Benefit.

III. Principles for Regulating

    Over the next year, we may need to issue other regulations because 
of new legislation or programmatic changes. In doing so, we will follow 
the Principles for Regulating, which determine when and how we will 
regulate. Through consistent application of those principles, we have 
eliminated unnecessary regulations and identified situations in which 
major programs could be implemented without regulations or with limited 
regulatory action.
    In deciding when to regulate, we consider the following:
     Whether regulations are essential to promote quality and 
equality of opportunity in education.
     Whether a demonstrated problem cannot be resolved without 
regulation.
     Whether regulations are necessary to provide a legally 
binding interpretation to resolve ambiguity.
     Whether entities or situations subject to regulation are 
similar enough that a uniform approach through regulation would be 
meaningful and do more good than harm.
     Whether regulations are needed to protect the Federal 
interest, that is, to ensure that Federal funds are used for

[[Page 9343]]

their intended purpose and to eliminate fraud, waste, and abuse.
    In deciding how to regulate, we are mindful of the following 
principles:
     Regulate no more than necessary.
     Minimize burden to the extent possible and promote 
multiple approaches to meeting statutory requirements if possible.
     Encourage coordination of federally funded activities with 
State and local reform activities.
     Ensure that the benefits justify the costs of regulating.
     To the extent possible, establish performance objectives 
rather than specify the behavior or manner of compliance a regulated 
entity must adopt.
     Encourage flexibility, to the extent possible and as 
needed to enable institutional forces to achieve desired results.

ED--OFFICE FOR CIVIL RIGHTS (OCR)

Final Rule Stage

38. Nondiscrimination on the Basis of Sex in Education Programs or 
Activities Receiving Federal Financial Assistance [1870-AA16]

    Priority: Other Significant.
    Unfunded Mandates: Undetermined.
    Legal Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1681 et seq.
    CFR Citation: 34 CFR 106.
    Legal Deadline: None.
    Abstract: The Department plans to issue a final rule amending its 
regulations implementing Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972, 
20 U.S.C. 1681 et seq., consistent with the priorities of the Biden-
Harris Administration. These priorities include those set forth in 
Executive Order 13988 on Preventing and Combating Discrimination on the 
Basis of Gender Identity or Sexual Orientation and Executive Order 
14021 on Guaranteeing an Educational Environment Free from 
Discrimination on the Basis of Sex, Including Sexual Orientation and 
Gender Identity. The proposed amendments include, among others, 
revisions to 34 CFR 106.2 (Definitions), 106.6 (Effect of other 
requirements and preservation of rights), 106.8 (Designation of 
coordinator, dissemination of policy, and adoption of grievance 
procedures), 106.10 (Scope), 106.11 (Application), 106.30 
(Definitions), 106.31 (Education programs or activities), 106.40 
(Parental, family, or marital status; pregnancy or related conditions), 
106.44 (Action by a recipient to operate its education program or 
activity free from sex discrimination), 106.45 (Grievance procedures 
for the prompt and equitable resolution of complaints of sex 
discrimination), 106.46 (Grievance procedures for the prompt and 
equitable resolution of complaints of sex-based harassment involving 
student complainants or student respondents at postsecondary 
institutions); 106.51 (Employment), 106.57 (Parental, family, or 
marital status; pregnancy or related conditions), 106.60 (Pre-
employment inquiries), and 106.71 (Retaliation).
    Statement of Need: This rulemaking is necessary to align the Title 
IX regulations with the priorities of the Biden-Harris Administration, 
including those set forth in the Executive Order on Preventing and 
Combating Discrimination on the Basis of Gender Identity or Sexual 
Orientation (E.O. 13988) and the Executive Order on Guaranteeing an 
Educational Environment Free from Discrimination on the Basis of Sex, 
Including Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity (E.O. 14021).
    Summary of Legal Basis: We are conducting this rulemaking under 20 
U.S.C. 1681 et seq.
    Alternatives: This was discussed in the notice of proposed 
rulemaking (NPRM) and will be discussed in the final regulations.
    Anticipated Cost and Benefits: This was discussed in the notice of 
proposed rulemaking (NPRM) and will be discussed in the final 
regulations.
    Risks: This was discussed in the notice of proposed rulemaking 
(NPRM) and will be discussed in the final regulations.
    Timetable:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Action                    Date            FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NPRM................................   07/12/22  87 FR 41390
NPRM Comment Period End.............   09/12/22
Final Action........................   03/00/24
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No.
    Small Entities Affected: No.
    Government Levels Affected: State.
    Federalism: This action may have federalism implications as defined 
in E.O. 13132.
    URL For Public Comments: www.regulations.gov.
    Agency Contact: Alejandro Reyes, Department of Education, Office 
for Civil Rights, 400 Maryland Avenue SW, 5A-137, Washington, DC 20202, 
Phone: 202 245-7705, Email: [email protected].
    RIN: 1870-AA16

ED--OCR

39. Nondiscrimination on the Basis of Sex in Education Programs or 
Activities Receiving Federal Financial Assistance: Sex-Related 
Eligibility Criteria for Male and Female Athletic Teams [1870-AA19]

    Priority: Other Significant. Major status under 5 U.S.C. 801 is 
undetermined.
    Legal Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1681 et seq.
    CFR Citation: 34 CFR 106.
    Legal Deadline: None.
    Abstract: The Department issued a proposed rule amending its 
regulations implementing Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972, 
20 U.S.C. 1681 et seq., consistent with the priorities of the Biden-
Harris Administration. These priorities include those set forth in 
Executive Order 13988 on Preventing and Combating Discrimination on the 
Basis of Gender Identity or Sexual Orientation and Executive Order 
14021 on Guaranteeing an Educational Environment Free from 
Discrimination on the Basis of Sex, Including Sexual Orientation and 
Gender Identity.
    Statement of Need: This rulemaking is necessary to align the Title 
IX regulations to fully implement the statute.
    Summary of Legal Basis: We are conducting this rulemaking under 20 
U.S.C. 1681 et seq.
    Alternatives: We have limited information about the alternatives at 
this time.
    Anticipated Cost and Benefits: We have limited information about 
the costs and benefits at this time.
    Risks: We have limited information about the risks at this time.
    Timetable:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Action                    Date            FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NPRM................................   04/13/23  88 FR 22860
NPRM Comment Period End.............   05/15/23
Final Rule..........................   03/00/24
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Undetermined.
    Government Levels Affected: State.
    Federalism: This action may have federalism implications as defined 
in E.O. 13132.
    URL For Public Comments: www.regulations.gov.
    Agency Contact: Alejandro Reyes, Department of Education, Office 
for Civil Rights, 400 Maryland Avenue SW, Room 5A-137, Washington, DC 
20202, Phone: 202 245-7705, Email: [email protected].
    RIN: 1870-AA19


[[Page 9344]]



ED--OFFICE OF PLANNING, EVALUATION AND POLICY DEVELOPMENT (OPEPD)

Proposed Rule Stage

40. EDGAR Revisions (Rulemaking Resulting From a Section 610 Review) 
[1875-AA14]

    Priority: Section 3(f)(1) Significant. Major under 5 U.S.C. 801.
    Legal Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1221e-3 and 3474, and 6511(a); E.O. 
13559; 20 U.S.C. 1101 et seq.; 20 U.S.C. 1057 et seq.; 20 U.S.C. 1062; 
20 U.S.C. 1063a; 20 U.S.C. 1065; 20 U.S.C. 1069c; 20 U.S.C. 1134 to 
1134d
    CFR Citation: 34 CFR 75; 34 CFR 76; 34 CFR 77; 34 CFR 299; and 
other sections as applicable; 34 CFR 79; . . .
    Legal Deadline: None.
    Abstract: The Education Department General Administrative 
Regulations (EDGAR) will be revised to make a variety of updates and 
revisions, including to update and clarify evidence-related components, 
to clarify how the Department makes determinations related to 
continuation awards under competitive grant programs, and to expand 
flexibility for grantees by clarifying that, where not prohibited by 
law or the terms and conditions of the grant award, subgranting 
authority rests with States. In addition, the Department plans to amend 
these regulations where they are outdated in order to be consistent 
with current law.
    Statement of Need: It is necessary to review and revise these 
regulations to ensure they are consistent with current law and to 
reduce or eliminate unnecessary burdens and restrictions.
    Summary of Legal Basis: We are conducting this rulemaking under the 
following authorities: 20 U.S.C. 1221e-3 and 3474, and 6511(a); E.O. 
13559; 20 U.S.C. 1101 et seq.; 20 U.S.C. 1057 et seq.; 20 U.S.C. 1062, 
1063a, 1065, and 1069c; 20 U.S.C. 1134-1134d.
    Alternatives: We have limited information about the alternatives at 
this time.
    Anticipated Cost and Benefits: We have limited information about 
the potential cost and benefits and cannot estimate at this time.
    Risks: We have limited information about the risks at this time.
    Timetable:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Action                    Date            FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NPRM................................   11/00/23
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No.
    Small Entities Affected: No.
    Government Levels Affected: Undetermined.
    URL For Public Comments: www.regulations.gov.
    Agency Contact: Kelly Terpak, Department of Education, Office of 
Planning, Evaluation and Policy Development, 400 Maryland Avenue SW, 
Washington, DC 20202, Phone: 202 205-5321, Email: [email protected].
    RIN: 1875-AA14

ED--OPEPD

41. Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act [1875-AA15]

    Priority: Other Significant.
    Legal Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1232g; 20 U.S.C. 1221e-3; 20 U.S.C. 3474
    CFR Citation: 34 CFR 99.
    Legal Deadline: None.
    Abstract: The Department plans to propose to amend the Family 
Educational Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA) regulations, 34 CFR part 99, 
to update, clarify, and improve the current regulations by addressing 
outstanding policy issues, such as clarifying the definition of 
``education records'' and clarifying provisions regarding disclosures 
to comply with a judicial order or subpoena. The proposed regulations 
are also needed to implement statutory amendments to FERPA contained in 
the Uninterrupted Scholars Act of 2013 and the Healthy, Hunger-Free 
Kids Act of 2010, to reflect a change in the name of the office 
designated to administer FERPA, and to make changes related to the 
enforcement responsibilities of the office concerning FERPA.
    Statement of Need: These regulations are needed to implement 
amendments to FERPA contained in the Healthy, Hunger-Free Kids Act of 
2010 (Pub. L. 111296) and the Uninterrupted Scholars Act (USA) of 2013 
(Pub. L. 112278); to provide needed clarity regarding the definitions 
of terms and other key provisions of FERPA; and to make necessary 
changes identified as a result of the Department's experience 
administering FERPA and the current regulations. A number of the 
proposed changes reflect the Department's existing guidance and 
interpretations of FERPA.
    Summary of Legal Basis: These regulations are being issued under 
the authority provided in 20 U.S.C. 1221e-3, 20 U.S.C. 3474, and 20 
U.S.C. 1232g.
    Alternatives: These are discussed in the preamble to the proposed 
regulations.
    Anticipated Cost and Benefits: These are discussed in the preamble 
to the proposed regulations.
    Risks: These are discussed in the preamble to the proposed 
regulations.
    Timetable:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Action                    Date            FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NPRM................................   05/00/24
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No.
    Small Entities Affected: No.
    Government Levels Affected: None.
    URL For Public Comments: www.regulations.gov.
    Agency Contact: Dale King, Department of Education, Office of 
Planning, Evaluation and Policy Development, 400 Maryland Avenue SW, 
Room 6C100, Washington, DC 20202, Phone: 202 453-5943, Email: 
[email protected].
    RIN: 1875-AA15

ED--OFFICE OF POSTSECONDARY EDUCATION (OPE)

Proposed Rule Stage

42.  Student Loan Relief [1840-AD93]

    Priority: Section 3(f)(1) Significant. Major under 5 U.S.C. 801.
    Unfunded Mandates: Undetermined.
    Legal Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1082(a)
    CFR Citation: 34 CFR 30.1(c)(6); 34 CFR 30; 34 CFR 682; 34 CFR 685.
    Legal Deadline: None.
    Abstract: The Department intends to amend regulations related to 
the authorities granted to the Secretary under 20 U.S.C. 1082(a) of the 
Higher Education Act of 1965, as amended, to provide relief to Federal 
student loan borrowers.
    Statement of Need: This rulemaking is necessary to provide debt 
relief to the numerous working and middle class student loan borrowers.
    Summary of Legal Basis: We are conducting this rulemaking under the 
authority in 20 U.S.C. 1082(a).
    Alternatives: We have limited information about the alternatives at 
this time.
    Anticipated Cost and Benefits: We have limited information about 
the anticipated costs and benefits at this time.
    Risks: We have limited information about the risks at this time.
    Timetable:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Action                    Date            FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Notice of Intent to Commence           08/31/23  88 FR 60163
 Negotiated Rulemaking.
NPRM................................   05/00/24
------------------------------------------------------------------------


[[Page 9345]]

    Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Undetermined.
    Government Levels Affected: Undetermined.
    Federalism: Undetermined.
    URL For Public Comments: www.regulations.gov.
    Agency Contact: Tamy Abernathy, Department of Education, Office of 
Postsecondary Education, 400 Maryland Avenue SW, 2C-232, Washington, DC 
20202, Phone: 202 987-0385, Email: [email protected].
    RIN: 1840-AD93

ED--OPE

Completed Actions

43. Gainful Employment [1840-AD57]

    Priority: Section 3(f)(1) Significant. Major under 5 U.S.C. 801.
    Unfunded Mandates: This action may affect the private sector under 
Public Law 104-4.
    Legal Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1001; 20 U.S.C. 1002; 20 U.S.C. 1003; 20 
U.S.C. 1088; 20 U.S.C. 1091; 20 U.S.C. 1094; 20 U.S.C. 1099(b); 20 
U.S.C. 1099(c); 20 U.S.C. 1082; . . .
    CFR Citation: 34 CFR 668; 34 CFR 600.
    Legal Deadline: None.
    Abstract: The Secretary proposed regulations related to GE to 
address ongoing concerns about educational programs designed to prepare 
students for gainful employment in a recognized occupation, but that 
instead leave them with unaffordable amounts of student loan debt in 
relation to their earnings. We further seek to provide additional 
transparency by providing information about all academic programs at 
postsecondary institutions that are eligible under title IV of the 
Higher Education Act of 1965, as amended (HEA).
    Statement of Need: This rulemaking is necessary to determine 
whether postsecondary educational programs prepare students for gainful 
employment and the conditions under which institutions and programs 
remain eligible for student financial assistance programs under Title 
IV of the HEA.
    Summary of Legal Basis: We are conducting this rulemaking under the 
following authorities: 20 U.S.C. 1001; 20 U.S.C. 1002; 20 U.S.C. 1003; 
20 U.S.C. 1088; 20 U.S.C. 1091; 20 U.S.C. 1094; 20 U.S.C. 1099(b); 20 
U.S.C. 1099(c); and 20 U.S.C. 1082.
    Alternatives: We have limited information about the alternatives at 
this time.
    Anticipated Cost and Benefits: We have limited information about 
the anticipated costs and benefits at this time.
    Risks: We have limited information about the risks at this time.
    Timetable:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Action                    Date            FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Notice of Intent to Commence           05/26/21  86 FR 28299
 Negotiated Rulemaking.
NPRM................................   05/19/23  88 FR 32300
NPRM Comment Period End.............   06/20/23
Final Action........................   10/10/23  88 FR 70004
Final Action Effective..............   07/01/24
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No.
    Small Entities Affected: Organizations.
    Government Levels Affected: None.
    URL For Public Comments: www.regulations.gov.
    Agency Contact: Joe Massman, Program Manager, Department of 
Education, Office of Postsecondary Education, 400 Maryland Avenue, 
Washington, DC 20202, Phone: 202 453-7771, Email: [email protected].
    Gregory Martin, Department of Education, Office of Postsecondary 
Education, 400 Maryland Avenue SW, Room 2C136, Washington, DC 20202, 
Phone: 202 453-7535, Email: [email protected].
    RIN: 1840-AD57

ED--OPE

44. Improving Income Driven Repayment [1840-AD81]

    Priority: Section 3(f)(1) Significant. Major under 5 U.S.C. 801.
    Legal Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1070g; 20 U.S.C. 1087a et seq.
    CFR Citation: 34 CFR 685.
    Legal Deadline: None.
    Abstract: The Secretary plans to propose amendments to the 
regulations governing income-contingent repayment plans by amending the 
Revised Pay as You Earn (REPAYE) repayment plan, and to restructure and 
rename the repayment plan regulations under the William D. Ford Federal 
Direct Loan (Direct Loan) Program, including combining the Income 
Contingent Repayment (ICR) and the Income-Based Repayment (IBR) plans 
under the umbrella term of Income-Driven Repayment (IDR) plans.
    Statement of Need: This rulemaking is necessary to make 
improvements to the income-driven repayment plans created under the ICR 
authority in the Higher Education Act of 1965 that allows the Secretary 
to cap payments at a set share of a borrower's income.
    Summary of Legal Basis: 20 U.S.C. 1070g, 1087a et seq., unless 
otherwise noted.
    Alternatives: We have limited information about the alternatives at 
this time.
    Anticipated Cost and Benefits: We have limited information about 
the anticipated costs and benefits at this time.
    Risks: We have limited information about the risks at this time.
    Timetable:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Action                    Date            FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Notice of Intent to Commence           05/26/21  86 FR 28299
 Negotiated Rulemaking.
NPRM................................   01/11/23  88 FR 1894
NPRM Comment Period End.............   02/10/23
Final Action........................   07/10/23  88 FR 43820
Final Action Effective..............   07/01/24
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No.
    Small Entities Affected: Businesses.
    Government Levels Affected: None.
    URL For Public Comments: www.regulations.gov.
    Agency Contact: Tamy Abernathy, Department of Education, Office of 
Postsecondary Education, 400 Maryland Avenue SW, 2C-232, Washington, DC 
20202, Phone: 202 987-0385, Email: [email protected].
    RIN: 1840-AD81

BILLING CODE 4000-01-P

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Statement of Regulatory and Deregulatory Priorities

    The Department of Energy (Department or DOE) makes vital 
contributions to the Nation's welfare through its activities focused on 
improving national security, energy supply, energy efficiency, 
environmental remediation, and energy research. The Department's 
mission is to:
     Promote dependable, affordable and environmentally sound 
production and distribution of energy;
     Advance energy efficiency and conservation;
     Provide responsible stewardship of the Nation's nuclear 
weapons;
     Provide a responsible resolution to the environmental 
legacy of nuclear weapons production; and
     Strengthen U.S. scientific discovery, economic 
competitiveness,

[[Page 9346]]

and improve quality of life through innovations in science and 
technology.
    The Department's regulatory activities are essential to achieving 
its critical mission and to implementing the President's clean energy 
and climate initiatives. Among other things, the Regulatory Plan and 
the Unified Agenda contain the rulemakings the Department will be 
engaged in during the coming year to fulfill the Department's 
commitment to meeting deadlines for issuance of energy conservation 
standards and related test procedures. The Regulatory Plan and Unified 
Agenda also reflect the Department's continuing commitment to cut 
costs, reduce regulatory burden, and increase responsiveness to the 
public. Additionally, DOE recognizes that public participation and 
community engagement are a crucial aspect of the Department's 
rulemaking process, as well as an important vehicle to assist the 
Department in streamlining its regulatory priorities. DOE's existing ex 
parte communication process provides an avenue for stakeholders and 
members of the public to meet with the Department to discuss regulatory 
practices, either during or not during a rulemaking. This process is 
intended to encourage the public to provide the Department with all 
information necessary to develop rules that advance public interest. 
The process serves to increase public participation in the Department's 
rulemaking activities and adds transparency to the development of any 
regulatory action.

Energy Efficiency Program for Consumer Products and Commercial 
Equipment

    The Energy Policy and Conservation Act (EPCA) requires DOE to set 
appliance efficiency standards at levels that achieve the maximum 
improvement in energy efficiency that is technologically feasible and 
economically justified. The Department continues to follow its schedule 
for setting new appliance efficiency standards by both tackling its 
backlog of rulemakings with missed statutory deadlines and advancing 
rulemakings with upcoming statutory deadlines. In 2023, DOE published 
40 actions relating to energy conservation standards, including 11 
final actions; and 25 actions relating to test procedures, including 19 
final rules. DOE tentatively plans to publish 20 additional actions 
relating to energy conservation standards and test procedures by the 
end of the year. These rulemakings are expected to save American 
consumers billions of dollars in energy costs over a 30-year timeframe.
    Additionally, EPCA directs DOE to provide interested persons an 
opportunity to present oral and written comments on matters related to 
any energy conservation standard or test procedure proposed rule. DOE 
fulfills this obligation by organizing public meetings, held as 
webinars, as part of the rulemaking process. The meetings take place 
during the comment period, which provides the public time to review the 
proposed action prior to attending. During the meeting, a DOE 
representative presents an overview of the proposed action that may 
include a general discussion of the rulemaking background, legal 
authority for the action being taken, and a robust discussion of the 
proposed action. Participants are offered an opportunity to ask the DOE 
representative questions about the proposal in real time and may 
present a prepared statement during the meeting if requested. After the 
meeting, DOE releases a meeting transcript and considers any question 
or information presented by the public during the meeting in the next 
stage of the rulemaking along with the written comments submitted 
during the comment period. Interested members of the public may 
participate in these meetings by registering online.
    The Department is highlighting one important energy conservation 
standard rule titled ``Energy Conservation Standards for Consumer Water 
Heaters.'' For consumer water heaters, DOE estimates that energy 
savings for active mode operation (in terms of uniform energy factor) 
will be 27 quads over 30 years and that the cumulative net present 
value to total consumer benefits of the proposed standards for consumer 
water heaters will be between $56 billion at a 7-percent discount rate 
and $161 billion at a 3-percent discount rate. Additionally, the 
Department notes that two public meeting were held to satisfy EPCA's 
requirements that interested persons are provided an opportunity to 
present oral and written comments on matters related to this 
rulemaking. In April 2022, DOE held a public meeting to discuss a 
preliminary technical support document and participants included 
members from relevant trade organizations, representatives of investor-
owned electric companies, energy efficiency organizations, and 
advocates for appliance standards. DOE held a second public meeting to 
discuss the proposed rule in September 2023. During both meetings, DOE 
provided an overview of the published rulemaking materials and took 
questions from attendees in real time. As part of the rulemaking 
process, DOE intends to address any comment raised during the September 
meeting in a subsequent rulemaking material, along with all written 
comments submitted for the proposal.

Federal Agency Leadership in Climate Change

    Beyond the appliance program, DOE is supporting Federal agency 
leadership in climate change in various ways, including in its ``Clean 
Energy Rule for New Federal Buildings and Major Renovations'' (Clean 
Energy Rule), which implements a provision of the Energy Independence 
and Security Act of 2007 (EISA) that requires the Department to 
establish revised-performance standards for the construction of all new 
Federal buildings, including commercial buildings, multi-family high-
rise residential buildings, and low-rise residential buildings. As 
directed by EISA, this rule would require reductions in Federal 
agencies' on-site use of fossil fuels, and provides processes by which 
agencies can petition DOE for the downward adjustment of these targets 
for their buildings. For covered buildings for which design for 
construction or whole building renovation begins in fiscal year 2030 or 
beyond, the onsite fossil fuel-generated energy consumption of the 
building must be zero for all building types and climate zones, based 
on the calculation established in the regulations, and consistent with 
the requirements of EISA. DOE initiated this rulemaking in 2010, and 
published its current proposal through a supplemental notice of 
proposed rulemaking (SNOPR) published in the Federal Register in 
December of 2022. DOE hosted a public stakeholder meeting (January 
2022) to present its updated proposal and accept feedback from 
stakeholders. DOE also solicited formal public comments from 
stakeholders through March (2023), receiving 49 comment submissions, 
which will be addressed in DOE's Final Rule (anticipated March 2024).

Federal Authorizations for Interstate Electric Transmission Facilities

    This rulemaking proposes to provide an updated process for the 
timely coordination of Federal authorizations for proposed interstate 
electric transmission facilities pursuant to section 216(h) of the 
Federal Power Act (FPA) (16 U.S.C. 824p(h)). The U.S. Department of 
Energy (DOE) is proposing to establish an integrated and comprehensive 
Coordinated Interagency Transmission Authorizations and Permits Program 
(CITAP Program), to ensure electric transmission projects are

[[Page 9347]]

developed expeditiously and consistent with the nation's environmental 
laws, including laws that protect endangered and threatened species, 
critical habitats, and historic properties. The CITAP Program improves 
the Integrated Interagency Pre-Application (IIP) Process by ensuring 
timely submission of materials necessary for Federal authorizations and 
related environmental reviews. Under the program, project proponents 
develop resource reports and public engagement plans for communities 
that would be affected by a proposed qualifying project through an 
iterative and collaborative process with Federal agencies, while 
providing that those Federal agencies would remain responsible for 
completion of environmental review. DOE will coordinate submission of 
the materials necessary for federal authorizations and related 
environmental reviews required under Federal law to site the qualified 
electric transmission facilities.
    Throughout the rulemaking process, DOE has taken steps to encourage 
public participation in the rulemaking. On August 23, 2023, DOE held a 
public meeting for the proposed rulemaking in which DOE provided a 
briefing of the proposed regulatory text and gave participants the 
opportunity to provide comments on the proposed rule. Throughout the 
comment period, DOE has also provided briefings to various stakeholder 
groups and encouraged the submission of comments through the processes 
outlined in the notice of proposed rulemaking. Likewise, after the 
comment period closes on October 2, 2023, DOE intends to continue 
providing stakeholder briefings to groups wishing to learn more about 
the proposed rule.

DOE--ENERGY EFFICIENCY AND RENEWABLE ENERGY (EE)

Final Rule Stage

45. Clean Energy for New Federal Buildings and Major Renovations of 
Federal Buildings [1904-AB96]

    Priority: Section 3(f)(1) Significant. Major under 5 U.S.C. 801.
    Legal Authority: 42 U.S.C. 6834(a)(3)(D)
    CFR Citation: 10 CFR 433; 10 CFR 435.
    Legal Deadline: Other, Statutory, Subject to the requirements in 42 
U.S.C. 6834(a)(3)(D).
    Abstract: This rulemaking implements provisions of the Energy 
Independence and Security Act of 2007 (EISA) that require the U.S. 
Department of Energy (DOE) to establish revised-performance standards 
for the construction of all new Federal buildings, including 
commercial, multi-family high-rise residential and low- rise 
residential buildings. This rulemaking will specifically address the 
reduction of fossil fuel-generated energy consumption in new buildings 
and buildings undergoing major renovations, as well as how agencies may 
petition DOE for a downward adjustment of the requirements if they 
believe meeting required energy reduction levels would be technically 
impracticable. DOE has published a supplemental proposal with a new 
focus that accounts for the needs of Federal agencies and the goals of 
President Biden's Administration and responds to comments received on 
prior rulemaking documents. This document proposes standards that would 
require reductions in Federal agencies' on-site use of fossil fuels 
(which include coal, petroleum, natural gas, oil shales, bitumens, tar 
sands, and heavy oils) consistent with the targets of ECPA and EISA and 
provides processes by which agencies can petition DOE for the downward 
adjustment of said targets for buildings. DOE issued this effort was 
previously reported as the Fossil Fuel-Generated Energy Consumption 
Reduction for New Federal Buildings and Major Renovations of Federal 
Buildings rulemaking.
    Statement of Need: The Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007 
(EISA 2007) requires certain new Federal buildings and Federal 
buildings undergoing major renovations to meet fossil fuel-generated 
consumption reduction targets based on fiscal year.
    Summary of Legal Basis: Section 433(a) of EISA 2007 2007 (Pub. L. 
110-140) amended section 305 of the Energy Conservation and Production 
Act (ECPA) and directed the DOE to establish regulations that require 
fossil fuel-generated energy consumption reductions for certain new 
Federal buildings and Federal buildings undergoing major renovations. 
(42 U.S.C. 6834(a)(3)(D)(i)) For these buildings, section 305 of ECPA, 
as amended by EISA 2007, mandates that the buildings be designed so 
that a building's fossil fuel-generated energy consumption is reduced 
as compared with such energy consumption by a similar building in 
fiscal year (FY) 2003 (as measured by Commercial Buildings Energy 
Consumption Survey (CBECS) or Residential Energy Consumption Survey 
(RECS) data from the DOE's Energy Information Administration (EIA)) by 
55 percent beginning in FY2010, 65 percent beginning in FY2015, 80 
percent beginning in FY2020, 90 percent beginning in FY2025, and 100 
percent beginning in FY2030. (42 U.S.C. 6834(a)(3)(D)(i)(I))
    Alternatives: The statute requires DOE to establish regulations 
implementing the specific fossil fuel-generated energy consumption 
targets for certain new Federal buildings and Federal buildings 
undergoing major renovations. The targets may be adjusted with respect 
to a specific building upon petition from an agency, with agreement 
from the DOE Secretary. In implementing these regulations, DOE 
considers the technologies available to achieve the statutory targets 
and those relevant for petitions submitted by agencies.
    Anticipated Cost and Benefits: The cumulative net present value 
(NPV) of the proposed Clean Energy Rule compliant buildings ranges from 
-$16.0 million (at a 7-percent discount rate) to -$85.3 million (at a 
3-percent discount rate). DOE also analyzed an additional case where 
the future grid emission factors were assumed to follow a 95% reduction 
by 2035 (95 by 2035) profile as defined in the National Renewable 
Energy Laboratory's (NREL) 2021 Standard Scenarios Report: A U.S. 
Electricity Sector Outlook. This case represents a change in national 
electricity generation which assumes national power sector 
CO2 emissions reach 95% below 2005 levels by 2035 and are 
eliminated on a net basis by 2050. The cumulative NPV of the proposed 
Clean Energy Rule compliant buildings in the 95 by 2035 case ranges 
from $104.6 million (at a 7-percent discount rate) to $83.4 million (at 
a 3-percent discount rate).
    Risks: Optional field--no response.
    Timetable:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Action                    Date            FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NPRM................................   10/15/10  75 FR 63404
NPRM Comment Period End.............   12/14/10  .......................
Supplemental NPRM...................   10/14/14  79 FR 61693
Supplemental NPRM Comment Period End   12/15/14  .......................
Supplemental NPRM...................   12/21/22  87 FR 78382
Public Meeting (webinar) held          12/21/22  87 FR 78382
 January 5, 2023.
Supplemental NPRM Comment Period End   02/21/23  .......................
Supplemental NPRM Comment Period       02/27/23  88 FR 12267
 Reopened.

[[Page 9348]]

 
Supplemental NPRM Comment Period       03/23/23  .......................
 Reopened End.
Final Action........................   04/00/24  .......................
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No.
    Government Levels Affected: Federal.
    URL For More Information: www.energy.gov/eere/femp/notices-and-rules.
    URL For Public Comments: www.regulations.gov.
    Agency Contact: Laura Zuber, Attorney, Department of Energy, 1000 
Independence Avenue SW, Washington, DC 20585, Phone: 240 306-7651, 
Email: [email protected].
    RIN: 1904-AB96

DOE--EE

46. Energy Conservation Standards for Consumer Water Heaters [1904-
AD91]

    Priority: Section 3(f)(1) Significant. Major under 5 U.S.C. 801.
    Unfunded Mandates: This action may affect the private sector under 
Public Law 104-4.
    Legal Authority: 42 U.S.C. 6295(m)(1)
    CFR Citation: 10 CFR 430.
    Legal Deadline: Other, Statutory, Subject to 6-year-look-back in 42 
U.S.C. 6295(m)(1).
    Abstract: Consistent with the requirements under the Energy Policy 
and Conservation Act (EPCA), as amended, the U.S. Department of Energy 
(DOE) is examining whether to amend the current energy conservation 
standards for consumer water heaters found at 10 CFR 430.32(d). Once 
completed, this rulemaking will fulfill DOE's statutory obligation to 
either propose amended standards for this product or determine that the 
standards do not need to be amended. In this rulemaking, DOE has 
tentatively concluded that the proposed standards represent the maximum 
improvement in energy efficiency that is technologically feasible and 
economically justified, and would result in the significant 
conservation of energy. Specifically, with regards to technological 
feasibility, products achieving these proposed standard levels are 
already commercially available for all product classes covered by the 
proposal. As for economic justification, DOE's analysis shows that the 
benefits of the proposed standards exceed the burdens of the proposed 
standards.
    Statement of Need: The Energy Policy and Conservation Act requires 
minimum energy efficiency standards for certain appliances and 
commercial equipment, including consumer water heaters. (42 U.S.C. 
6292(a)(4))
    Summary of Legal Basis: Title III of the Energy Policy and 
Conservation Act (EPCA), Public Law 94-163 (42 U.S.C. 6291-6309, as 
codified), established the Energy Conservation Program for Consumer 
Products Other Than Automobiles. Pursuant to EPCA, any new or amended 
energy conservation standard that the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) 
prescribes for certain products, such as consumer water heaters, shall 
be designed to achieve the maximum improvement in energy efficiency 
that is technologically feasible and economically justified (42 U.S.C. 
6295(o)(2)(A)) and to result in a significant conservation of energy 
(42 U.S.C. 6295(o)(3)(B)). EPCA provides that not later the six years 
after the issuance of any final rule establishing or amending a 
standard, DOE must publish either a notice of determination that 
standards for the product do not need to be amended, or a notice of 
proposed rulemaking including new proposed energy conservation 
standards (proceeding to a final rule, as appropriate). (42 U.S.C. 
6295(m)(1))
    Alternatives: The statute requires DOE to conduct rulemakings to 
review standards and to revise standards to achieve the maximum 
improvement in energy efficiency that the Secretary determines is 
technologically feasible and economically justified. In making this 
determination, DOE conducts a thorough analysis of alternative standard 
levels, including the existing standard, based on the criteria 
specified in the statute.
    Anticipated Cost and Benefits: DOE finds that the benefits to the 
Nation of the proposed energy conservation standards for Consumer Water 
Heaters (such as energy savings, consumer average life-cycle cost 
savings, an increase in national net present value, and emissions 
reductions) outweigh the burdens (such as loss of industry net present 
value). For consumer water heaters, DOE estimates that energy savings 
(in terms of uniform energy factor (UEF)) will be 27 quads over 30 
years and that the cumulative net present value (NPV) of total consumer 
benefits of the proposed standards for consumer water heaters will be 
between $56 billion at a 7-percent discount rate and $161 billion at a 
3-percent discount rate.
    Risks: Optional field--no response.
    Timetable:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Action                    Date            FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Request for Information (RFI).......   05/21/20  85 FR 30853
RFI Comment Period End..............   07/06/20  .......................
Notice of Webinar and Availability     03/01/22  87 FR 11327
 of Preliminary Technical Support
 Document.
Public Meeting......................   04/12/22  .......................
Preliminary Technical Support          05/02/22  .......................
 Document Comment Period End.
RFI Comment Period Reopened.........   05/04/22  87 FR 26303
RFI Comment Period Reopened End.....   05/16/22  .......................
NPRM................................   07/28/23  88 FR 49058
Public Meeting......................   09/13/23  .......................
NPRM Comment Period End.............   09/26/23  .......................
Final Action........................   04/00/24  .......................
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Yes.
    Small Entities Affected: Businesses.
    Government Levels Affected: Undetermined.
    Agency Contact: Julia Hegarty, Department of Energy, 1000 
Independence Avenue SW, Washington, DC 20585, Phone: 240 597-6737, 
Email: [email protected].
    RIN: 1904-AD91

DOE--DEPARTMENTAL AND OTHERS (ENDEP)

Final Rule Stage

47. Coordination of Federal Authorizations for Electric Transmission 
Facilities [1901-AB62]

    Priority: Other Significant.
    Legal Authority: 16 U.S.C. 824p(h)
    CFR Citation: 10 CFR part 900.
    Legal Deadline: None.
    Abstract: This rulemaking proposes to provide an updated process 
for the timely submission of information needed for Federal 
authorizations for proposed electric transmission facilities pursuant 
to section 216(h) of the Federal Power Act (FPA) (16 U.S.C. 824p(h)). 
It seeks to ensure electric transmission projects are developed 
consistent with the nation's environmental laws, including laws that 
protect endangered and threatened species, critical habitats, and 
historic properties. It provides a framework, called the Integrated 
Interagency Pre-Application (IIP) Process, by which the U.S. Department 
of Energy (DOE) will coordinate submission of materials necessary for

[[Page 9349]]

federal authorizations and related environmental reviews required under 
Federal law to site qualified electric transmission facilities, and 
integrates that IIP Process into the Federal Electric Transmission 
Authorization Coordination Program.
    Statement of Need: To address capacity constraints and congestion 
on the nation's electric transmission grid, DOE is amending 10 CFR part 
900 to establish a Coordinated Interagency Transmission Authorizations 
and Permits Program (CITAP Program) to reduce the time required for 
transmission project developers to receive decisions on Federal 
authorizations for interstate transmission projects.
    Summary of Legal Basis: The Energy Policy Act of 2005 (Pub. L. 109-
58) (EPAct) established a national policy to enhance coordination and 
communication among Federal agencies with authority to site electric 
transmission facilities. Section 1221(a) of EPAct added a new section 
216 to part II of the Federal Power Act (16 U.S.C. 824p) (FPA), which 
sets forth provisions relevant to the siting of interstate electric 
transmission facilities. Section 216(h) of the FPA (16 U.S.C. 824p(h)), 
Coordination of Federal Authorizations for Transmission Facilities, 
requires the DOE to coordinate all Federal authorizations and related 
environmental reviews needed for siting interstate electric 
transmission projects, including National Environmental Policy Act of 
1969 (Pub. L. 91-190, as amended, 42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.) (NEPA) 
reviews. In response to the investments made in clean energy by the 
infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act (IIJA) (Pub. L. 117-58) and the 
Inflation Reduction Act (IRA) (Pub. L. 117-169), DOE is proposing to 
amend its section 216(h) implementing regulations, found in 10 CFR part 
900, to implement this authority and better coordinate review of 
Federal authorizations to expediently increase interstate electric 
transmission infrastructure.
    Alternatives: The U.S. Department of Agriculture, Department of 
Commerce, Department of Defense, Department of Energy, the 
Environmental Protection Agency, the Council on Environmental Quality, 
the Federal Permitting Improvement Steering Council, Department of the 
Interior, and the Office of Management and Budget Regarding 
Facilitating Federal Authorizations for Electric Transmission 
Facilities entered into a Memorandum of Understanding, executed May 
2023, to expedite the siting, permitting, and construction of electric 
transmission infrastructure in the United States under section 216(h) 
of the Federal Power Act (FPA), 16 U.S.C. 824p(h), as enacted by 
section 1221(a) of the Energy Policy Act of 2005, as such, alternatives 
were not considered.
    Anticipated Cost and Benefits: The societal costs of the action are 
the direct costs incurred by project proponents during the IIP Process. 
Most of the information required to be submitted during the IIP Process 
would likely be required absent this proposal and therefore the 
investment of time and resources required by this proposed process are 
unlikely to be an additional burden on respondents. However, the full 
costs are considered for transparency. These costs of $399,083 per year 
are detailed in the Paperwork Reduction Act burden analysis. The 10-
year and 20-year net present value of those annual costs, assuming 2% 
annual inflation, are $3.8 million and 7.2 million under a 3% discount 
rate, and $3.1 million and 5.0 million under a 7% discount rate.
    The benefits of the CITAP Program, designed to reduce the Federal 
authorization timelines for interstate electric transmission facilities 
and enable more rapid deployment of transmission infrastructure, 
include direct benefits to the project proponents in decreased time and 
expenditure on authorizations and a series of indirect social benefits. 
Increasing the current pace of transmission infrastructure deployment 
will generate benefits to the public in multiple ways that can be 
categorized into grid operations, system planning, and non-market 
benefits. Grid operation benefits include a reduction in the congestion 
costs for generating and delivering energy; mitigation of weather and 
variable generation uncertainty enhanced diversity of supply, which 
increases market competition and reduces the need for regional backup 
power options; and increased market liquidity and competition. From a 
system planning standpoint, accelerated transmission investments will 
allow the development of new, low-cost power plants in areas of high 
congestion which might not otherwise see investment due to capacity 
constraints, and additional grid hardening or resilience. Finally, non-
market benefits to the public include reduced costs for meeting public 
policy goals related to emissions and equitable energy access, as well 
as emissions reductions system wide.
    Risks: Optional field--no response.
    Timetable:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Action                    Date            FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NPRM................................   08/16/23  88 FR 55826
Notice of Public Meeting............   08/22/23  88 FR 57011
Public Meeting......................   08/23/23  .......................
NPRM Comment Period End.............   10/02/23  .......................
Final Action........................   03/00/24  .......................
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No.
    Government Levels Affected: Undetermined.
    Agency Contact: Gabriel Daly, Department of Energy, 1000 
Independence Avenue SW, Washington, DC 20585, Phone: 240 597-6973, 
Email: [email protected].
    RIN: 1901-AB62

BILLING CODE 6450-01-P

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES

Statement of Regulatory Priorities for Fiscal Year 2024

    As the Federal agency with principal responsibility for protecting 
the health of all Americans and providing essential human services, the 
Department of Health and Human Services (HHS or the Department) 
implements programs that strengthen the health care system; advance 
scientific knowledge and innovation; and improve the health, safety, 
and wellbeing of the American people.
    The Department's Regulatory Plan for Fiscal Year (FY) 2024 focuses 
on lowering costs and expanding coverage, reducing disparities and 
advancing equity, increasing public health preparedness, and supporting 
the wellbeing of families and communities. Highlights from the FY2024 
Regulatory Plan include:
     Policies to expand access to affordable care and protect 
health coverage following the end of the COVID-19 public health 
emergency.
     Policies to strengthen Federal early care and education 
programs that enhance quality of services to children and families, 
lower child care costs for working families, and provide needed support 
to early educators.
     Advancing health and safety across the health care 
delivery system through policies and programs that promote health 
equity.
     Expanding access to the full continuum of mental health 
and substance use prevention, treatment, and recovery.
     Bolstering the Department's ability to identify and 
prevent future public health threats.

[[Page 9350]]

     Improving the Department's ability to identify foodborne 
illnesses and advancing work to improve consumers' ability to access 
nutritious food to prevent disease and protect public health.
     Strengthening services for older Americans to allow them 
to remain in their communities.
     Ensuring that children and youth receive safe and 
appropriate care and support in order to thrive.
    In short, the Department's Regulatory Plan reflects the Biden-
Harris Administration's commitment to continue building a better, 
healthier America, through rules designed to protect and enhance the 
lives of every person touched by HHS programs.

I. Lowering Health Care Costs and Expanding Access to Coverage

    The Biden-Harris Administration has worked to expand and strengthen 
coverage for millions of Americans enrolled in Medicare, Medicaid, or 
ACA Marketplace plans. In implementing key provisions of the Inflation 
Reduction Act, HHS rules will help lower the cost of prescription drugs 
in Medicare. HHS has prioritized efforts to protect health coverage 
following the end of the COVID-19 public health emergency, working with 
State partners to make it easier for beneficiaries and consumers to 
stay covered.

a. Enhancing Coverage and Access in the ACA Marketplaces, Medicaid, 
CHIP, and Medicare

    Rulemaking related to Medicare, Medicaid, and the ACA Marketplaces 
will strengthen coverage under these programs and help make it easier 
for Americans to stay covered. In response to the President's Executive 
Orders to strengthen Medicaid and the ACA, HHS rules will simplify the 
enrollment process to help maintain continuous coverage for vulnerable 
populations and reduce administrative burdens for States, while 
improving access to care, quality, and health outcomes across delivery 
systems. HHS rules will set a minimum access standard in Medicaid and 
CHIP programs, advancing access to care for adult and pediatric 
populations in primary care, behavioral health, home and community-
based services and maternal health.
    In collaboration with the Departments of Labor and Treasury, HHS 
has issued proposed rules to improve the comprehensiveness of coverage 
and protect consumers from low-quality coverage. These rules will help 
to expand access to mental health and substance use care and preventive 
services as well as ensure that consumers protected from buying 
coverage through Short-Term, Limited-Duration Insurance (STLDI) that 
provide little to no coverage and can discriminate against those with 
pre-existing conditions.
    In addition, CMS will issue annual payment rules and notices over 
the next year that affect federal health programs, including Medicare 
and the ACA Marketplace. Though they are not included in the HHS 
Regulatory Plan, these rules will include policies that further the 
Secretary's priority of expanding access to affordable, high-quality 
health care.

b. Expanding the Accessibility and Affordability of Drugs and Medical 
Products

    Under the Inflation Reduction Act (IRA), HHS policy will allow 
Medicare to negotiate the cost of some drugs and provide coverage 
without cost sharing for recommended vaccines in the Medicare program. 
The IRA will require rebates if the cost of some Medicare Part B 
physician-administered drugs rise faster than the rate of inflation--
reducing costs and increasing peace of mind for millions of older 
Americans and those with disabilities.
    Consistent with the President's drug pricing priorities, revisions 
to the 340B Drug Pricing Program's (340B Program) Administrative 
Dispute Resolution (ADR) rule would establish new requirements and 
procedures for the Program's ADR process, making the process more 
equitable and accessible for participation, while supporting the 
Program's mission to expand access to health care for underserved 
communities.

c. Streamlining the Secure Exchange of Health Information

    The secure exchange of health information and interoperability 
among health care providers and other entities improves patient care, 
promotes competition, reduces costs, and provides more accurate public 
health data. Upcoming HHS rulemaking will implement provisions of the 
21st Century Cures Act to set out disincentives for health care 
providers who engage in information blocking, ensuring effective health 
information exchange and patient access to quality care. HHS will also 
issue proposed modifications to the HIPAA Security Rule to improve 
cybersecurity in the health care sector by strengthening requirements 
for HIPAA regulated entities to safeguard individuals' electronic 
protected health information to prevent, detect, contain, mitigate, and 
recover from cybersecurity threats.

II. Reducing Disparities and Advancing Equity

    Equity is the focus of over a dozen Executive Orders issued by 
President Biden, and it remains a cornerstone of the Biden-Harris 
Administration's agenda. The Department recognizes that people of 
color; people with disabilities; lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, 
queer, and intersex (LGBTQI+) people; and other underserved groups in 
the U.S. have been systematically denied a full and fair opportunity to 
participate in economic, social, and civic life. Among its other 
manifestations, this history of inequality shows up as persistent 
disparities in health and social outcomes and in access to care.
    As the Federal agency responsible for ensuring the health and 
wellbeing of Americans, the Department, under Secretary Becerra's 
leadership, is committed to tackling these entrenched inequities and 
their root causes throughout its programs and policies. The 
Department's regulatory priority of reducing disparities and advancing 
equity includes rules aimed at preventing and remedying discrimination, 
strengthening health and safety standards for consumer products that 
impact underserved communities, and promoting equity in federally 
supported health care services.
    In addition to the specific rulemakings identified in this section, 
HHS is committed to advancing equity in all aspects of the Department's 
work. Consistent with President Biden's Executive Order on Advancing 
Racial Equity and Support for Underserved Communities Through the 
Federal Government (E.O. 13985), the Department's efforts in this area 
include an ongoing assessment of whether underserved communities face 
barriers in accessing benefits and opportunities in HHS programs and 
whether policy changes are necessary to advance equity. This process 
continues to inform the Department's broader regulatory agenda.
    Further, HHS continues to seek out meaningful and equitable 
opportunities for public input by a range of interested or affected 
individuals and communities, including underserved communities, to 
inform our regulatory actions consistent with Executive Order 14094, 
Modernizing Regulatory Review.

a. Preventing and Remedying Discrimination

    The HHS Regulatory Plan includes actions to eliminate 
discrimination as a barrier for historically marginalized communities 
seeking access to HHS programs and activities. For instance,

[[Page 9351]]

the Department plans to finalize its rule on nondiscrimination in 
health programs and activities, which would amend the existing 
regulations implementing Section 1557 of the ACA, ensuring that the 
regulations reflect the proper scope of the statute's protections. 
Because discrimination in the U.S. health care system is a driver of 
health disparities, the Section 1557 regulations present a key 
opportunity for the Department to promote equity and ensure protection 
of health care as a right.
    Additionally, the Department has issued a proposed rule addressing 
discrimination on the basis of disability in health and human services 
programs or activities. This rule would revise regulations under 
section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 to address unlawful 
discrimination on the basis of disability in HHS-funded health and 
human services programs. The proposed rule includes new requirements 
prohibiting discrimination in the areas of medical treatment; the use 
of value assessments; web, mobile, and kiosk accessibility; and 
requirements for accessible medical equipment, so that persons with 
disabilities have an opportunity to participate in or benefit from 
health care programs and activities that is equal to the opportunity 
afforded others. It also adds a section on child welfare to expand on 
and clarify the obligation to provide nondiscriminatory child welfare 
services. The proposed rule would also update the definition of 
disability and other provisions to ensure consistency with statutory 
amendments to the Rehabilitation Act, enactment of the Americans with 
Disabilities Act and the Americans with Disabilities Amendments Act of 
2008, the Affordable Care Act, as well as Supreme Court and other 
significant court cases. It also further clarifies the obligation to 
provide services in the most integrated setting.

b. Strengthening Health and Safety Standards for Consumer Products, 
Including Those That Disproportionately Impact Underserved Communities

    To protect the public health and advance equity, the Department 
continues to pursue regulatory action with respect to consumer products 
that harm the health of underserved groups.
    Further, the Department plans to finalize two rules that prohibit 
menthol as a characterizing flavor in cigarettes and prohibit all 
characterizing flavors (other than tobacco) in cigars. These and other 
potential future regulatory actions would significantly reduce disease 
and death from combusted tobacco product use, the leading cause of 
preventable death in the United States.
    The regulations are also expected to promote better health outcomes 
across population groups. Evidence shows that menthol cigarettes are 
disproportionately marketed to specific communities--such as 
disproportionate storefront and outdoor marketing, as well as point-of-
sale marketing, in Black, Hispanic, and low-income communities. The 
disparities in tobacco marketing and use shape disparities in tobacco-
related disease and death. These planned regulatory actions on tobacco 
are expected not only to benefit the population as a whole, but in 
doing so, also substantially decrease tobacco-related health 
disparities.

c. Promoting Equity in Federally Supported Health Care Services

    The Department continues to seek out opportunities to embed equity 
throughout HHS programs and policies, including in federally supported 
health care services, and through upcoming rulemaking aimed at 
identifying appropriate culturally competent and person-centered care 
requirements for Medicare and Medicaid participating providers. The 
Department will continue to provide comprehensive, culturally 
appropriate and quality personal and public health services to American 
Indian and Alaskan Native people through the Indian Health Service 
(IHS).

III. Increasing Public Health Preparedness

    Protecting the nation's public health is a primary responsibility 
of the Department. This responsibility includes ensuring that the right 
protections and infrastructure are in place to help the nation to 
respond to public health threats and outbreaks quickly and effectively. 
It also includes ensuring healthy and safe food for every American 
through protections against foodborne illness in the food supply chain. 
In service of this regulatory priority, over the next year, the 
Department is pursuing rules that would bolster the nation's resilience 
to better manage the long-term effects of COVID-19 and future public 
health threats and improve Americans' access to safe and nutritious 
food.

a. Bolstering the Nation's Resilience To Manage COVID-19 and Future 
Public Health Threats

    In the context of COVID-19 and other disease outbreaks, it is 
crucial for public health authorities to be able to identify and 
evaluate persons who may have been exposed to a communicable disease. 
Currently, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) is 
authorized to require airlines to collect certain data regarding 
passengers and crew arriving from foreign countries for the purposes of 
health education, treatment, prophylaxis, or other appropriate public 
health interventions, including contact tracing and travel 
restrictions. The Department intends to finalize a rulemaking in FY 
2024 that allows the Department to continue to receive data in a timely 
manner and more effectively provide critical public health services in 
response to COVID-19 and other communicable diseases that may put 
Americans' health at risk.
    HHS will also propose rulemaking that incorporates learnings from 
the public health emergency into updates to national emergency 
preparedness requirements for participating Medicare and Medicaid 
providers, to assure adequate planning for natural and man-made 
disasters, including climate-related disasters, and coordination with 
official emergency preparedness systems.

b. Improving Access to Safe and Nutritious Food

    To help ensure healthy and safe food for every American, the HHS 
Regulatory Plan includes rules that improve the Department's ability to 
identify foodborne illnesses, prevent them from reoccurring, and remove 
unsafe products from the market. For example, the Department intends to 
finalize a rule intended to improve the safety of produce by requiring 
farms to conduct comprehensive assessments of pre- harvest agricultural 
water that would help farms identify and mitigate hazards in water used 
to grow produce.
    The HHS Regulatory Plan also supports the goals of the White House 
Conference and Strategy on Hunger, Nutrition, and Health, by advancing 
work to improve consumers' ability to access nutritious food to prevent 
disease and protect public health. The Department seeks to improve 
dietary patterns in the United States to help reduce the burden of 
diet-related chronic diseases. Another way HHS is working towards 
creating a healthier food supply is by proposing a rule that would 
permit use of salt substitutes, rather than salt, to help reduce the 
amount of sodium in standardized foods. Moreover, proposed rulemaking 
that would standardize food package labeling and finalization of a rule 
updating the definition of the term ``healthy'' would help consumers 
more easily identify nutritious foods and maintain healthy diets.

[[Page 9352]]

IV. Supporting the Wellbeing of Families and Communities

    The Department strives to support the wellbeing of Americans by 
funding and providing access to a range of critical social services. 
Millions of people benefit from HHS programs that help older adults and 
people with disabilities participate fully in their communities, 
promote opportunity and economic security for families, help refugees 
and other eligible newcomers integrate and thrive, and provide care for 
unaccompanied children. The Secretary recognizes that these programs 
and forms of assistance are more important than ever due to ongoing 
consequences of the pandemic, which have had an outsized impact on 
people of color and other underserved communities.
    To sustain and strengthen these essential benefits and services, 
the Department is prioritizing regulations that would improve their 
quality and accessibility while reducing burdens and increasing the 
efficiency of service delivery. The Secretary's regulatory priority in 
this area includes rules aimed at strengthening high-quality services 
for older adults, expanding opportunities for children and youth to 
thrive, and providing pathways to economic success.

a. Strengthening High-Quality Services for Older Adults

    The HHS Regulatory Plan includes rules aimed at enhancing the 
ability of Administration for Community Living (ACL) programs to 
protect the rights and wellbeing of older adults. For instance, the 
Department plans to finalize regulations for Adult Protective Services 
(APS) programs that will strengthen services for older adults and 
adults with disabilities that may experience elder abuse.
    Furthermore, consistent with the Biden-Harris Administration's 
Nursing Home Reform Action Plan, the Department's Regulatory Plan 
includes efforts to improve the safety and quality of care in the 
nation's nursing homes. For example, the Department plans to finalize 
rules that institute minimum staffing standards in nursing homes, 
protect residents, and prevent fraud, waste, and abuse, and mandate 
transparency of ownership, management, and other information regarding 
Medicare skilled nursing facilities (SNFs) and Medicaid nursing 
facilities. These efforts complement the Department's ongoing efforts 
to also strengthen long term services and supports delivered to older 
adults and people with disabilities in their homes and communities.
    Notably, consistent with the Administration's commitment to 
maximize transparency and public engagement, and to allow communities 
greater opportunities to provide input in the regulatory process, HHS 
sought the expertise of colleagues in the Office of Management and 
Budget, the General Services Administration, and the Consumer Financial 
Protection Bureau to inform an alternative approach to public comments 
for the proposed nursing home minimum staffing rule. The Department 
ultimately established and disseminated in public materials a direct 
web link to allow a more accessible comment submission path to the 
public, lowering the barriers to participation for the nursing home 
residents, families, and facility staff who will be directly impacted 
by this regulation.

b. Expanding Opportunities for Children and Youth To Thrive

    The Department's mission to provide effective human services 
includes a focus on protecting the wellbeing of children and youth. 
This focus has special significance given the ongoing consequences of 
the pandemic, which have deeply affected the lives of children and 
youth--particularly Black, Latino, Indigenous, Native American, and 
other underserved youth with disproportionate involvement in the child 
welfare system. Several rules planned for FY 2024 are aimed at 
enhancing programs and protections for youth and families experiencing 
foster care, unaccompanied children in the Department's care, and 
individuals entitled to child support.
    As part of its focus on the foster care and the child welfare 
system, the Department plans to clarify requirements for title IV-E/IV-
B agencies to effectively serve LGBTQI+ children and families by 
ensuring safe and appropriate foster care placements and ensure a 
process that is responsive to children's concerns. The Department 
recently issued a final rule allowing licensing standards for relative 
or kinship foster family homes that are different from non-relative or 
non-kinship homes. These changes reduce barriers to licensing for 
relatives and kin who can provide continuity and a safe and loving home 
for children when they cannot be with their parents. Additionally, the 
Department recently issued a proposed rule to facilitate the provision 
of independent legal representation to a child who is a candidate for 
foster care, or in foster care, and to a parent preparing for 
participation in foster care legal proceedings. Improving access to 
independent legal representation may help prevent the removal of a 
child from the home or, for a child in foster care, achieve permanence 
faster.
    The Department will also finalize a rule to amend the Child Care 
and Development Fund (CCDF) regulations with changes that will lower 
child care costs for families, increase parent's child care options, 
reduce barriers to receiving child care assistance, increase payments 
to providers, support higher program quality, and improve child care 
stability.
    Moreover, the Department will propose a rule that aims to improve 
the quality, stability, and continuity of comprehensive Head Start 
services for thousands of children and their families by adding 
provisions to the Head Start Program Performance standards to better 
support the Head Start workforce.
    The Department also plans to finalize a rule to strengthen services 
and protections for unaccompanied children in its care.

c. Providing Pathways to Economic Success

    In administering the Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) 
program, the Department works with States, territories, and tribes to 
help children and families achieve economic success. The COVID-19 
pandemic highlighted the importance of using Federal investments and 
existing program flexibilities strategically to reduce family poverty 
and alleviate economic crises, especially for families of color and 
underserved communities. In the next year, the Department plans to 
finalize a rule to reform the TANF program to strengthen its role as a 
safety net and for families and individuals with the lowest incomes. 
The proposed rule would strengthen TANF's role in supporting family 
well-being and work, as well as creating additional accountability for 
States to ensure TANF funds serve their intended purpose, while 
maintaining State flexibility. These changes are intended to improve 
the overall wellbeing of families while addressing inequities in 
program services and policies.
    Additionally, the Department is proposing Federal support for 
employment and training services for non-custodial parents as a 
supplement to traditional enforcement tools, to make the child support 
program more effective and help noncustodial parents find and sustain 
work to be able to support their children.


[[Page 9353]]



HHS--OFFICE FOR CIVIL RIGHTS (OCR)

Proposed Rule Stage

48. Rulemaking on Discrimination on the Basis of Disability in Health 
and Human Services Programs or Activities [0945-AA15]

    Priority: Section 3(f)(1) Significant. Major under 5 U.S.C. 801.
    Legal Authority: sec. 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973; 29 
U.S.C. 794
    CFR Citation: 45 CFR 84.
    Legal Deadline: None.
    Abstract: This proposed rule would revise regulations under section 
504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 to address discrimination on the 
basis of disability in HHS-funded programs and activities. Covered 
topics include nondiscrimination in medical treatment; child welfare 
programs and activities; value assessment methods; accessible medical 
equipment; accessible web content, mobile apps, and kiosks; and other 
relevant health and human services activities.
    Statement of Need: To robustly enforce the prohibition of 
discrimination on the basis of disability, OCR will update the section 
504 of the Rehabilitation Act regulations to clarify obligations and 
address issues that have emerged in our enforcement experience 
(including complaints OCR has received), case law, and statutory 
changes under the Americans with Disabilities Act and other relevant 
laws, in the forty-plus years since the regulation was promulgated. OCR 
has heard from complainants and many other stakeholders, as well as 
Federal partners, including the National Council on Disability, on the 
need for updated regulations in a number of important areas.
    Summary of Legal Basis: The current regulations have not been 
updated to be consistent with the Americans with Disabilities Act, the 
Americans with Disabilities Amendments Act, or the 1992 Amendments to 
the Rehabilitation Act, all of which made changes that should be 
reflected in the HHS section 504 regulations. Under Executive Order 
12250, the Department of Justice has provided a template for HHS to 
update this regulation.
    Alternatives: OCR considered issuing guidance, and/or investigating 
individual complaints and compliance reviews. However, we concluded 
that not taking regulatory action could result in continued 
discrimination, inequitable treatment and even untimely deaths of 
people with disabilities. OCR continues to receive complaints alleging 
serious acts of disability discrimination each year. While we continue 
to engage in enforcement, we believe that our enforcement and 
recipients' overall compliance with the law will be better supported by 
the presence of a clearly articulated regulatory framework than 
continuing the status quo. Continuing to conduct case-by-case 
investigations without a broader framework risks lack of clarity on the 
part of providers and violations of section 504 that could have been 
avoided and may go unaddressed. By issuing a proposed rule, we are 
undertaking the most efficient and effective means of promoting 
compliance with section 504.
    Anticipated Cost and Benefits: The Department anticipates that this 
rulemaking will result in significant benefits, namely by providing 
clear guidance to the covered entity community regarding requirements 
to administer their health programs and activities in a non-
discriminatory manner. In turn, the Department anticipates cost savings 
as individuals with disabilities can access a range of health care 
services. The Department expects that the rule, when finalized, will 
generate some changes in action and behavior that may generate some 
costs. The rule will address a wide range of issues, with varying 
impacts and a comprehensive analysis is underway. Total anticipated 
costs are approximately $1,843.2 million (7% discount) or $1,782 
million (3% discount) and total anticipated benefits are approximately 
$1,864.3 million (7% discount) or 1,927.7 million (3% discount). There 
are additional but necessary costs to make web content and mobile 
applications accessible and to purchase accessible medical diagnostic 
equipment (MDE). DOJ has issued/will issue substantially similar 
rulemaking under Title II of the ADA, those costs are widely understood 
to be necessary to ensure people with disabilities have equal or 
comparable access to health and human services.
    Risks: To be determined.
    Timetable:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Action                    Date            FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NPRM................................   09/14/23  88 FR 63392
NPRM Comment Period End.............   11/13/23  .......................
Final Action........................   04/00/24  .......................
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Yes.
    Small Entities Affected: Businesses.
    Government Levels Affected: Local, State.
    Agency Contact: Molly Burgdorf, Section Chief, Policy Division, 
Department of Health and Human Services, Office for Civil Rights, 200 
Independence Avenue SW, Washington, DC 20201, Phone: 800 368-1019, TDD 
Phone: 800 537-7697, Email: [email protected].
    RIN: 0945-AA15

HHS--OCR

49.  Proposed Modifications to the HIPAA Security Rule To 
Strengthen the Cybersecurity of Electronic Protected Health Information 
[0945-AA22]

    Priority: Section 3(f)(1) Significant. Major under 5 U.S.C. 801.
    Unfunded Mandates: Undetermined.
    Legal Authority: Health Insurance Portability and Accountability 
Act of 1996 (HIPAA), sec. 262 (42 U.S.C. 1320d-2); Health Information 
Technology for Economic and Clinical Health (HITECH) Act, sec. 13401 
(42 U.S.C. 17931)
    CFR Citation: 45 CFR 160; 45 CFR 164.
    Legal Deadline: None.
    Abstract: This rule will propose modifications to the Security 
Standards for the Protection of Electronic Protected Health Information 
(the Security Rule) under the Health Insurance Portability and 
Accountability Act of 1996 (HIPAA) and the Health Information 
Technology for Economic and Clinical Health Act of 2009 (HITECH Act). 
These modifications will improve cybersecurity in the health care 
sector by strengthening requirements for HIPAA regulated entities to 
safeguard electronic protected health information to prevent, detect, 
contain, mitigate, and recover from cybersecurity threats.
    Statement of Need: In February 2003, the HIPAA Security Rule 
established standards for the security of electronic protected health 
information (ePHI) to be implemented by HIPAA covered entities and, by 
amendment of the HITECH Act, their business associates (collectively, 
``regulated entities''). Prior to the HIPAA Security Rule, standard 
security measures did not exist in the health care industry to address 
the security of ePHI while stored and exchanged between entities. Since 
2003, the Department has received recommendations from the National 
Committee on Vital and Health Statistics (NCVHS), an advisory committee 
to the Secretary of HHS, and the public to update and strengthen 
security standards to protect ePHI, especially in light of newer 
threats not previously contemplated in 2003 such as ransomware. 
Additionally, the

[[Page 9354]]

Department has reviewed media reports advocating the strengthening of 
protections provided by the HIPAA Security Rule as well as a report 
from a U.S. Senator advocating for modernizing HIPAA to increase 
protections of ePHI in the face of current cyber threats.
    Summary of Legal Basis: The current HIPAA Security Rule has not 
been updated to address the recent dramatic increase in cyber-attacks 
on the health care sector that are undermining the security of 
individuals' ePHI. Section 1173(d) of the Social Security Act requires 
the Secretary of HHS to adopt security standards that take into account 
the technical capabilities of record systems used to maintain health 
information, the costs of security measures, the need to train persons 
who have access to health information, the value of audit trails in 
computerized record systems, and the needs and capabilities of small 
health care providers and rural health care providers. Since 
publication of the HIPAA Security Rule in 2003, there has been an 
evolution in technical capabilities of record systems used to maintain 
health information and costs of security measures that support updating 
the HIPAA Security Rule to help ensure that it can continue to provide 
a baseline of security standards to meet current and emerging security 
risks and threats to ePHI.
    Alternatives: HHS considered whether these policy updates could be 
implemented through guidance. However, the Department determined that 
this would be insufficient to prevent and address cybersecurity threats 
and vulnerabilities facing the U.S. health care system. Revisions to 
the existing HIPAA Security Rule will help ensure the cybersecurity of 
individuals' ePHI.
    Anticipated Cost and Benefits: To be determined.
    Risks: To be determined.
    Timetable:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Action                    Date            FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NPRM................................   09/00/24  .......................
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Undetermined.
    Small Entities Affected: Businesses, Governmental Jurisdictions, 
Organizations.
    Government Levels Affected: Undetermined.
    Federalism: Undetermined.
    International Impacts: This regulatory action will be likely to 
have international trade and investment effects, or otherwise be of 
international interest.
    Agency Contact: Marissa Gordon-Nguyen, Senior Advisor for Health 
Information Privacy, Data, and Cybersecurity Policy, Department of 
Health and Human Services, Office for Civil Rights, 200 Independence 
Avenue SW, Washington, DC 20201, Phone: 800 368-1019, TDD Phone: 800 
537-7697, Email: [email protected].
    RIN: 0945-AA22

HHS--OCR

Final Rule Stage

50. Confidentiality of Substance Use Disorder Patient Records [0945-
AA16]

    Priority: Other Significant.
    Legal Authority: 42 U.S.C. 290dd-2 amended by the Coronavirus Aid, 
Relief, and Economic Security Act (the CARES Act), Pub. L. 116-136, 
sec. 3221 (March 27, 2020); Health Information Technology for Economic 
and Clinical Health (HITECH) Act, Pub. L. 111-5, sec. 13402 and 13405 
(February 17, 2009); Health Insurance Portability and Accountability 
Act of 1996 (HIPAA) Pub. L. 104-191, sec. 264 (August 21, 1996); Social 
Security Act, Pub. L. 74-271 (August 14, 1935) (see secs. 1171 to 1179 
of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. 1320d to 1320d-8)
    CFR Citation: 42 CFR 2; 45 CFR 160; 45 CFR 164.
    Legal Deadline: NPRM, Statutory, March 27, 2021. The CARES Act 
requires revisions to regulations with respect to uses and disclosures 
of information occurring on or after the date that is 12 months after 
the date of enactment of the Act (March 27, 2021); and not later than 
one year after the date of enactment, an update to the Notice of 
Privacy Practices (NPP) provisions of the HIPAA Privacy Rule at 45 CFR 
164.520.
    Abstract: This final rule, to be issued in coordination with the 
Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA), 
would implement provisions of section 3221 of the CARES Act. Section 
3221 amended 42 U.S.C. 290dd-2 to better harmonize the 42 CFR part 2 
(part 2) confidentiality requirements with certain permissions and 
requirements of the HIPAA Rules and the HITECH Act.
    Statement of Need: Rulemaking is needed to implement section 3221 
of the CARES Act, which modified the statute that establishes 
protections for the confidentiality of substance use disorder (SUD) 
treatment records and authorizes the implementing regulations at 42 CFR 
part 2 (part 2). As required by the CARES Act, this regulation will: 
(1) Align certain provisions of part 2 with aspects of the HIPAA 
Privacy, Breach Notification, and Enforcement Rules. (2) Strengthen 
part 2 protections against uses and disclosures of patients' SUD 
records for civil, criminal, administrative, and legislative 
proceedings. (3) Require that a HIPAA Notice of Privacy Practices 
address privacy practices with respect to part 2 records.
    Summary of Legal Basis: Section 3221(i) of the CARES Act requires 
rulemaking as may be necessary to implement and enforce section 3221.
    Alternatives: HHS considered whether the CARES Act provisions could 
be implemented through guidance. However, rulemaking is required 
because the current part 2 regulations are inconsistent with the 
authorizing statute, as amended by the CARES Act. HHS considered 
whether to include the anti-discrimination provisions of section 
3221(g) in this rulemaking. However, because implementation of the 
anti-discrimination provisions implicates numerous civil rights 
authorities, which require collaboration with the Department of 
Justice, HHS will address the anti-discrimination provisions in a 
separate rulemaking.
    Anticipated Cost and Benefits: HHS estimates that the effects of 
the requirements for regulated entities would result in new costs of 
$64,299,891 within 12 months of implementing the final rule, followed 
by $2,514,756 of recurring annual costs in years two through five. HHS 
estimates these first-year costs would be partially offset by 
$12,755,378 annual cost savings, resulting in overall net costs of 
$10,582,027 over 5 years.
    Risks: To be determined.
    Timetable:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Action                    Date            FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NPRM................................   12/02/22  87 FR 74216
NPRM Comment Period End.............   01/31/23  .......................
Final Action........................   11/00/23  .......................
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No.
    Small Entities Affected: Businesses, Governmental Jurisdictions, 
Organizations.
    Government Levels Affected: Federal, Local, State, Tribal.
    Agency Contact: Marissa Gordon-Nguyen, Senior Advisor for Health 
Information Privacy, Data, and Cybersecurity Policy, Department of 
Health and Human Services, Office for Civil Rights, 200 Independence 
Avenue SW, Washington, DC 20201, Phone: 800

[[Page 9355]]

368-1019, TDD Phone: 800 537-7697, Email: [email protected].
    RIN: 0945-AA16

HHS--OCR

51. Nondiscrimination in Health Programs and Activities [0945-AA17]

    Priority: Section 3(f)(1) Significant. Major under 5 U.S.C. 801.
    Legal Authority: sec. 1557 of the Patient Protection and Affordable 
Care Act (42 U.S.C. 18116); 42 U.S.C. 1302; 42 U.S.C. 1395; 42 U.S.C. 
1395eee(f); 42 U.S.C. 1396u-4(f); 42 U.S.C. 2000d-1; 20 U.S.C. 1405; 29 
U.S.C. 794; 42 U.S.C. 290dd-2; 21 U.S.C. 1174; 42 U.S.C. 300gg to 
300gg-63; 42 U.S.C. 300gg-91; 42 U.S.C. 300gg-92; 42 U.S.C. 300gg-111 
to 300gg-139 as amended, sec. 3203; Pub. L. 116-136, 134 Stat. 281; 42 
U.S.C. 18021 to 18024; 42 U.S.C. 18031 to 18033; 42 U.S.C. 18041 to 
18042; 42 U.S.C. 18044; 42 U.S.C. 18051; 42 U.S.C. 18054; 42 U.S.C. 
18061; 42 U.S.C. 18063; 42 U.S.C. 18071; 42 U.S.C. 18081 to 18083; 26 
U.S.C. 36B
    CFR Citation: 42 CFR 438; 42 CFR 440; 42 CFR 457; 42 CFR 460; 45 
CFR 80; 45 CFR 84; 45 CFR 86; 45 CFR 91; 45 CFR 92; 45 CFR 147; 45 CFR 
155; 45 CFR 156; . . .
    Legal Deadline: None.
    Abstract: This rule proposed to address changes to the 2020 Final 
Rule implementing section 1557 of the Patient Protection and Affordable 
Care Act (PPACA). Section 1557 of PPACA prohibits discrimination on the 
basis of race, color, national origin, sex, age, or disability under 
any health program or activity, any part of which is receiving Federal 
financial assistance, including credits, subsidies, or contracts of 
insurance, or under any program or activity that is administered by an 
Executive Agency, or any entity established under title l of the PPACA.
    Statement of Need: The Biden-Harris Administration has made 
advancing health equity and nondiscrimination in health care a 
cornerstone of its policy agenda. The current section 1557 implementing 
regulation significantly curtails the scope of application of section 
1557 protections and creates uncertainty and ambiguity as to what 
constitutes prohibited discrimination in covered health programs and 
activities. Issuance of a revised section 1557 implementing regulation 
is important because it would provide clear and concise regulations 
that are consistent with the statutory text and protect historically 
marginalized communities as they seek access to health programs and 
activities.
    Summary of Legal Basis: The Secretary of the Department is 
statutorily authorized to promulgate regulations to implement section 
1557. 42 U.S.C. 18116(c). The current section 1557 Final Rule (issued 
in 2020) is in litigation.
    Alternatives: The Department has considered the alternative of 
maintaining the section 1557 implementing regulation in its current 
form; however, the Department believes it is appropriate to undertake 
rulemaking given the Administration's commitment to advancing equity 
and access to health care and in light of the issues raised in 
litigation challenges to the current rule.
    Anticipated Cost and Benefits: In enacting section 1557 of the ACA, 
Congress recognized the benefits of equal access to health services and 
health insurance that all individuals should have, regardless of their 
race, color, national origin, sex, age, or disability. The Department 
anticipates that this rulemaking will result in significant benefits 
that are difficult to quantify, namely by providing clear guidance to 
the covered entity community regarding requirements to administer their 
health programs and activities in a non-discriminatory manner. In turn, 
the Department anticipates cost savings as individuals are able to 
access a range of health care services that will result in decreased 
health disparities among historically marginalized groups and increased 
health benefits. The Department estimates annualized costs over a 5-
year time horizon of about $551 million or $560 million; however, it is 
important to recognize that this rule applies pre-existing 
nondiscrimination requirements in Federal civil rights laws to various 
entities, the great majority of which have been covered by these 
requirements for years.
    Risks: To be determined.
    Timetable:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Action                    Date            FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NPRM................................   08/04/22  87 FR 47751
NPRM Comment Period End.............   10/03/22  .......................
Final Action........................   01/00/24  .......................
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No.
    Government Levels Affected: Federal, Local, State.
    URL For More Information: https://www.hhs.gov/civil-rights/for-individuals/section-1557/index.html.
    URL For Public Comments: https://www.regulations.gov/document/HHS-OS-2022-0012-0001.
    Agency Contact: Daniel Shieh, Associate Deputy Director, Policy 
Division, Department of Health and Human Services, Office for Civil 
Rights, 200 Independence Avenue SW, Washington, DC 20201, Phone: 800 
368-1019, Email: [email protected].
    Related RIN: Related to 0945-AA02, Related to 0945-AA11
    RIN: 0945-AA17

HHS--OCR

52. Safeguarding the Rights of Conscience as Protected by Federal 
Statutes [0945-AA18]

    Priority: Section 3(f)(1) Significant. Major status under 5 U.S.C. 
801 is undetermined.
    Unfunded Mandates: Undetermined.
    Legal Authority: 5 U.S.C. 301
    CFR Citation: 44 CFR 88.
    Legal Deadline: None.
    Abstract: The Department proposed to partially rescind the May 21, 
2019, final rule entitled, Protecting Statutory Conscience Rights in 
Health Care; Delegations of Authority (2019 Final Rule), while leaving 
in effect the framework created by the February 23, 2011, final rule, 
entitled, Regulation for the Enforcement of Federal Health Care 
Provider Conscience Protection Laws. The Department also proposed to 
retain, with some modifications, certain provisions of the 2019 Final 
Rule regarding federal conscience protections but eliminate others.
    Statement of Need: The Biden-Harris Administration takes seriously 
its obligations to comply with Federal conscience laws and the balance 
that Congress struck through these statutes. This rule demonstrates the 
Department's commitment to educating patients, providers, and other 
covered entities about their rights and obligations under the 
conscience statutes and to ensure compliance with those authorities.
    Summary of Legal Basis: The Secretary of the Department of Health & 
Human Services is statutorily authorized to promulgate regulations to 
prescribe regulations for the government of his department, the conduct 
of its employees, the distribution and performance of its business, and 
the custody, use, and preservation of its records, papers, and 
property. 5 U.S.C. 301. The current Conscience Final Rule (issued in 
2019) is in pending litigation.
    Alternatives: The Department has considered the alternative of 
maintaining the current regulation in its current form; however, the 
Department believes it is appropriate to undertake rulemaking in light 
of the issues raised

[[Page 9356]]

in litigation challenges to the current rule.
    Anticipated Cost and Benefits: The Department estimates that the 
final rule would generate cost savings of $725.5 million using a 3-
percent discount rate and $586.4 million using a 7-percent discount 
rate over the next five years.
    Risks: To be determined.
    Timetable:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Action                    Date            FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NPRM................................   01/05/23  88 FR 820
NPRM Comment Period End.............   03/06/23  .......................
Final Action........................   11/00/23  .......................
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No.
    Small Entities Affected: Organizations.
    Government Levels Affected: Federal, Local, State
    Agency Contact: David Christensen, Section Chief, Policy Division, 
Department of Health and Human Services, Office for Civil Rights, 200 
Independence Avenue SW, Washington, DC 20201, Phone: 800 368-1019, 
Email: [email protected].
    Related RIN: Related to 0945-AA10
    RIN: 0945-AA18

HHS--OCR

53. Health and Human Services Grants Regulation [0945-AA19]

    Priority: Other Significant.
    Legal Authority: 5 U.S.C. 301
    CFR Citation: 45 CFR 75.
    Legal Deadline: None.
    Abstract: This final rule will repromulgate certain 
nondiscrimination provisions of the Uniform Administrative 
Requirements, 45 CFR part 75, under the Department's Housekeeping 
Authority, 5 U.S.C. 301. The rule will clarify the Department's public 
policy requirement that no person otherwise eligible will be 
discriminated against in the administration of HHS grants, consistent 
with applicable federal statute and applicable Supreme Court precedent. 
It will also set forth a list of thirteen Federal statutes which 
prohibit discrimination on the basis of sex to include on the basis of 
sexual orientation and gender identity, consistent with the Supreme 
Court's decision in Bostock v. Clayton County.
    Statement of Need: This rule is needed to provide the Department 
with uniform regulations governing HHS grants, put the Department in 
the best position to defend HHS from ongoing litigation risk, and 
provide certainty to participants in HHS grant programs.
    Summary of Legal Basis: This rule is promulgated under 5 U.S.C. 301 
and the December 26, 2013 OMB requirements, Uniform Administrative 
Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal 
Awards, 79 FR 75867.
    Alternatives: The Department published a final rule in 2021, 86 FR 
2257. That rule was vacated by a federal district court because it had 
not been promulgated in compliance with the Administrative Procedure 
Act. Thus, HHS effectively reverts to the prior Final Rule (2016 Grants 
Rule), 81 FR 89393, which is currently not being enforced due to a 2019 
Notice of Nonenforcement, 84 FR 63809. Both the 2016 Grants Rule and 
the 2019 Notice of Nonenforcement are subject to litigation risk. If 
OCR did not promulgate this new Grants Rule, HHS could lift the 2019 
Notice of Nonenforcement and defend the 2016 Grants Rule. However, we 
believe that issuing the proposed rule is the most effective way to 
provide the Department with uniform grants regulations in a manner that 
avoids costly litigation.
    Anticipated Cost and Benefits: The Department expects the benefits 
of regulatory clarity will simplify compliance and ensure fair and 
nondiscriminatory administration of covered programs under this rule. 
Costs associated with implementing this administrative change include 
costs for grantees to become familiar with the rule and for some 
covered entities to seek an exemption from the rule.
    Risks: To be determined.
    Timetable:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Action                    Date            FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NPRM................................   07/13/23  88 FR 44750
NPRM Comment Period End.............   09/11/23  .......................
Final Action........................   03/00/24  .......................
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No.
    Small Entities Affected: No.
    Government Levels Affected: None.
    Agency Contact: David Hyams, Section Chief, Policy Division, 
Department of Health and Human Services, Office for Civil Rights, 200 
Independence Avenue SW, Washington, DC 20201, Phone: 800 368-1019, 
Email: [email protected].
    Related RIN: Related to 0991-AC06, Related to 0991-AC16
    RIN: 0945-AA19

HHS--OCR

54. Proposed Modifications to the HIPAA Privacy Rule To Support 
Reproductive Health Care Privacy [0945-AA20]

    Priority: Section 3(f)(1) Significant. Major under 5 U.S.C. 801.
    Legal Authority: Health Insurance Portability and Accountability 
Act (PL 104-191); Executive Order 14076, Protecting Access to 
Reproductive Healthcare Services
    CFR Citation: 45 CFR 160; 45 CFR 164.
    Legal Deadline: None.
    Abstract: This final rule will modify the Standards for Privacy of 
Individually Identifiable Health Information (Privacy Rule) under the 
Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (HIPAA) and 
the Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health Act 
of 2009 (HITECH Act). These modifications will modify existing 
standards permitting uses and disclosures of protected health 
information (PHI) by limiting uses and disclosures of PHI for certain 
purposes.
    Statement of Need: HIPAA and the HIPAA Rules promote access to 
health care by establishing standards for the privacy of PHI to protect 
the confidentiality of individuals' health information. These 
protections promote the development and maintenance of confidence and 
trust between individuals and covered entities, and help to improve the 
completeness and accuracy of individual medical records. The Privacy 
Rule, as it has been amended over time, carefully balances the 
interests of individuals and society in identifiable health information 
by establishing when and how such information may be used and 
disclosed, with and without the individual's permission. The Department 
has received communications from members of Congress and the public and 
reviewed media reports indicating concerns and confusion regarding the 
role of the Privacy Rule in protecting the privacy of individual's 
health information, given the evolution of state law in the area of 
reproductive health care.
    Summary of Legal Basis: The current HIPAA Privacy Rule has not been 
updated to reflect the evolution in state law that undermines the 
privacy of individuals' protected health information, particularly for 
use in investigations into or legal proceedings against persons in 
connection with reproductive health care. The final rule is consistent 
with Executive Order 14076, which directed the Secretary of

[[Page 9357]]

Health and Human Services to consider actions to strengthen the 
protection of sensitive information related to reproductive healthcare 
services and bolster patient-provider confidentiality.
    Alternatives: HHS considered whether these policy changes could be 
implemented through guidance. However, the Department determined that 
this would be insufficient to address the concerns that have arisen in 
the wake of the recent evolution in state law pertaining to 
reproductive health care that has jeopardize the privacy of 
individuals' protected health information and affected individuals' 
relationship with their health care providers and the U.S. health care 
system. Revisions to the existing HIPAA Privacy Rule are necessary to 
reestablish that trust and to ensure the privacy of individuals' 
protected health information.
    Anticipated Cost and Benefits: HHS estimates that the effects of 
the requirements for regulated entities would result in new costs of 
$611,831,396 within 12 months of implementing the final rule, followed 
by approximately $67,831,396 of recurring annual costs in years two 
through five. The Department anticipates that this rulemaking will 
result in significant benefits that are difficult to quantify because 
the area of health care the proposed rule addresses is among the most 
sensitive for patients and providers if privacy is violated. 
Additionally, the value of privacy, which cannot be recovered once 
lost, and trust that privacy will be protected by others, is difficult 
to quantify fully. The rule would prevent or reduce numerous harms, 
resulting in non-quantifiable benefits to patient and providers.
    Risks: To be determined.
    Timetable:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Action                    Date            FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NPRM................................   04/17/23  88 FR 23506
NPRM Comment Period End.............   06/16/23  .......................
Final Action........................   03/00/24  .......................
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Undetermined.
    Small Entities Affected: Businesses, Governmental Jurisdictions, 
Organizations.
    Government Levels Affected: Federal, Local, State, Tribal.
    Federalism: This action may have federalism implications as defined 
in E.O. 13132.
    Agency Contact: Marissa Gordon-Nguyen, Senior Advisor for Health 
Information Privacy, Data, and Cybersecurity Policy, Department of 
Health and Human Services, Office for Civil Rights, 200 Independence 
Avenue SW, Washington, DC 20201, Phone: 800 368-1019, TDD Phone: 800 
537-7697, Email: [email protected].
    RIN: 0945-AA20

HHS--OFFICE OF THE NATIONAL COORDINATOR FOR HEALTH INFORMATION 
TECHNOLOGY (ONC)

Proposed Rule Stage

55. Establishment of Disincentives for Health Care Providers Who Have 
Committed Information Blocking [0955-AA05]

    Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant.
    Legal Authority: 42 U.S.C. 300jj-52; 42 U.S.C. 1302; 42 U.S.C. 
1306; 42 U.S.C. 1395hh; 42 U.S.C. 1395jjj; 42 U.S.C. 1395rr(1); 5 
U.S.C. 552.2
    CFR Citation: 45 CFR 171; 42 CFR 414; 42 CFR 425; 42 CFR 495.
    Legal Deadline: None.
    Abstract: The rulemaking implements certain provisions of the 21st 
Century Cures Act (Cures Act) to establish appropriate disincentives 
for health care providers determined by the HHS Inspector General to 
have committed information blocking. Consistent with the Cures Act, the 
rulemaking establishes a first set of disincentives using HHS 
authorities under applicable Federal law, including authorities 
delegated to the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services.
    Statement of Need: The rulemaking would implement a provision of 
the Cures Act which requires the HHS Office of the Inspector General 
(OIG) to refer health care providers that OIG determines to have 
committed information blocking to the appropriate agency to be subject 
to appropriate disincentives using authorities under applicable Federal 
law, as the Secretary sets forth through notice and comment rulemaking. 
Release of the proposed rule is needed to implement this critical 
component of the Cures Act and ensure effective enforcement of 
information blocking rules.
    Summary of Legal Basis: The provisions would be implemented under 
the authority of the Public Health Service Act, as amended by the Cures 
Act.
    Alternatives: ONC will consider different available authorities 
under which appropriate disincentives could be established deter 
information blocking and still minimize regulatory burden for health 
care providers.
    Anticipated Cost and Benefits: The costs of this proposed rule 
would be minimal. Investigated parties may incur some costs in response 
to an OIG investigation or the application of a disincentive by an HHS 
agency, however, this would depend on the frequency of prohibited 
conduct. The expected benefits of the regulation are deterring 
information and its negative impacts on many important aspects of 
health care, including effective health information exchange, patient 
access, duplicative testing and costs, and the availability and quality 
of care.
    Risks: We anticipate that health care providers will express 
concern with the potential complexity of the approach (i.e., the 
application of a range of disincentives based on available authorities) 
as compared to a range of civil monetary penalties or fines. ONC will 
continue to consider additional potential risks, identify them for 
stakeholders, and seek comment from stakeholders during the comment 
period for the proposed rule.
    Timetable:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Action                    Date            FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NPRM................................   11/01/23  88 FR 74947
NPRM Comment Period End.............   01/02/24  .......................
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No.
    Small Entities Affected: No.
    Government Levels Affected: None.
    Agency Contact: Alex Baker, Federal Policy Branch Chief, Department 
of Health and Human Services, Office of the National Coordinator for 
Health Information Technology, 330 C Street SW, 7th Fl, Washington, DC 
20201, Phone: 202 690-7151, Email: [email protected].
    RIN: 0955-AA05

HHS--CENTERS FOR DISEASE CONTROL AND PREVENTION (CDC)

Final Rule Stage

56. Control of Communicable Diseases; Foreign Quarantine [0920-AA75]

    Priority: Other Significant.
    Legal Authority: 42 U.S.C. 264; 42 U.S.C. 265
    CFR Citation: 42 CFR 71.
    Legal Deadline: None.
    Abstract: This rulemaking amends current regulation to enable CDC 
to require airlines to collect and provide to CDC certain data elements 
regarding passengers and crew arriving from foreign countries under 
certain circumstances.
    Statement of Need: In order to control the introduction, 
transmission, and

[[Page 9358]]

spread of communicable diseases such as COVID-19 into the United 
States, the collection of traveler contact information helps ensure 
that CDC and state and local health authorities are able to identify 
and locate persons arriving in, or transiting through, the United 
States from a foreign country who may have been exposed to a 
communicable disease abroad.
    Summary of Legal Basis: The Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 
264 and 268) authorizes the Secretary of the Department of Health and 
Human Services to make and enforce regulations necessary to prevent the 
introduction, transmission, or spread of communicable diseases from 
foreign countries into the United States, or from one State or 
possession into any other State or possession. Regulations that 
implement federal quarantine authority are currently promulgated in 42 
CFR parts 70 and 71. CDC's authority for collecting these data fields 
is contained in 42 CFR 71.4.
    Alternatives: The transmission of disease, as seen during the 
COVID-19 pandemic, has the potential to lead to thousands or millions 
of deaths in addition to the significant healthcare and economic costs. 
Follow-up with passengers arriving from foreign countries who may be 
infectious or exposed to a communicable disease is critical. The 
alternative to collecting traveler contact information before their 
flight is to collect the information from airlines following the 
passenger's flight. When this was done in the past, some airlines took 
several days to respond to a single request if the information was 
available. In addition, there is significant time and labor required 
for CDC to obtain additional information from federal databases and 
process the received information into a format suitable for 
distribution to state and local health authorities in the United 
States. As a result, obtaining contact information after a flight, 
assuming that information is available, can lead to a delay of several 
days before health authorities can start contacting potentially exposed 
travelers. This time delay allows for travelers to be lost to follow-up 
or become symptomatic or infectious. The time required and costs 
incurred under this alternative increase exponentially with multiple 
post-flight manifest requests to airlines.
    Anticipated Cost and Benefits: The annual, ongoing costs to collect 
traveler contact information, in the form of airline and travel agency 
staff time and passenger time, are estimated to be approximately $285 
million. This does not include the initial costs for updating IT 
systems and employee training, which have already been incurred. The 
costs to the government are minimal, as the vast majority of passenger 
information that is being collected is transmitted to the government 
via established data systems that are already in use for other 
purposes.
    The benefits to this rulemaking include rapid follow-up by public 
health authorities with passengers who may be infectious or exposed to 
a communicable disease, resulting in less spread and transmission of 
disease into and throughout the United States, helping to prevent 
public health and economic costs. The availability of passenger contact 
data may be used by public health authorities to slow the introduction 
and transmission of novel infectious diseases, including new variants 
of the SARS-CoV-2 virus, which causes COVID-19 disease.
    Risks: The risk to not collecting this information is that CDC 
would have to revert to previous ways of obtaining this information for 
public health follow up. Some of those methods were time intensive and 
resulted in delays in follow up.
    The risk, although minimal, in collecting this information is that 
airlines and international passengers often do not want to comply (or 
may not want to comply) with the requirement. To date, however, CDC has 
found instances of noncompliance have been very limited.
    Timetable:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Action                    Date            FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Interim Final Rule Effective........   02/07/20  .......................
Interim Final Rule..................   02/12/20  85 FR 7874
Interim Final Rule Comment Period      03/13/20  .......................
 End.
Final Action........................   10/00/24  .......................
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Yes.
    Small Entities Affected: Businesses.
    Government Levels Affected: None.
    International Impacts: This regulatory action will be likely to 
have international trade and investment effects, or otherwise be of 
international interest.
    Agency Contact: Ashley C. Altenburger JD, Regulatory Analyst, 
Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control 
and Prevention, 1600 Clifton Road NE, MS: H 16-4, Atlanta, GA 30307, 
Phone: 800 232-4636, Email: [email protected].
    RIN: 0920-AA75

HHS--FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION (FDA)

Proposed Rule Stage

57. Tobacco Product Standard for Nicotine Level of Certain Tobacco 
Products [0910-AI76]

    Priority: Section 3(f)(1) Significant. Major under 5 U.S.C. 801.
    Unfunded Mandates: Undetermined.
    Legal Authority: 21 U.S.C. 387g
    CFR Citation: 21 CFR 1160.
    Legal Deadline: None.
    Abstract: The proposed rule is a tobacco product standard that 
would establish a maximum nicotine level in cigarettes and certain 
other finished tobacco products.
    Statement of Need: Each year, 480,000 people die prematurely from a 
smoking-attributed disease, making tobacco use the leading cause of 
preventable disease and death in the United States. Nearly all these 
adverse health effects are ultimately the result of addiction to the 
nicotine in combusted tobacco products, leading to repeated exposure to 
toxicants from those products. Nicotine is powerfully addictive. The 
U.S. Surgeon General has reported that 87 percent of adult smokers 
start smoking before age 18, and half of adult smokers become addicted 
before age 18. This proposed rule is a tobacco product standard that 
would establish a maximum nicotine level in cigarettes and certain 
other finished tobacco products. Because tobacco-related harms 
primarily result from addiction to products that repeatedly expose 
users to toxins, FDA would take this action to reduce addictiveness of 
certain tobacco products, thus giving addicted users a greater ability 
to quit. This product standard would also help to prevent experimenters 
(mainly youth) from initiating regular use, and, therefore, from 
becoming regular smokers. The proposed product standard is anticipated 
to benefit the population as a whole, while also advancing health 
equity by addressing disparities associated with cigarette smoking, 
dependence, and cessation.
    Summary of Legal Basis: Section 907 of the FD&C Act authorizes the 
adoption of tobacco product standards if the Secretary finds that a 
tobacco product standard is appropriate for the protection of public 
health, and includes authority related to provisions for nicotine 
yields in tobacco product standards.
    Alternatives: In addition to the costs and benefits of the product 
standard as proposed, FDA plans to assess the costs and benefits of a 
different effective date for the rule and the impact of including

[[Page 9359]]

additional tobacco products in the product standard.
    Anticipated Cost and Benefits: The anticipated benefits of the 
product standard include benefits from reduced death and disease 
resulting from decreased tobacco use among adult consumers, reduced 
death and disease from secondhand smoke, and reduced death and disease 
among youth who are deterred from initiating under the product 
standard. The qualitative benefits of the proposed rule include impacts 
such as reduced illness and increased productivity for smokers and 
nonsmokers, as well as reduced smoking-related fires, cigarette litter, 
and other environmental impacts.
    The proposed rule is expected to generate compliance costs on 
affected entities, such as one-time costs to read and understand the 
rule and alter manufacturing and importing practices; costs to some 
consumers, such as search costs to research substitute products and 
temporary withdrawal costs, and enforcement costs to the government.
    Risks: None.
    Timetable:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Action                    Date            FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NPRM................................   04/00/24  .......................
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Yes.
    Small Entities Affected: Businesses.
    Government Levels Affected: Federal, Local, State, Tribal.
    Federalism: This action may have federalism implications as defined 
in E.O. 13132.
    Agency Contact: Courtney Smith, Senior Regulatory Counsel, 
Department of Health and Human Services, Food and Drug Administration, 
Center for Tobacco Products, Document Control Center, Building 71, Room 
G335, 10903 New Hampshire Avenue, Silver Spring, MD 20993 Phone: 877 
287-1373, Fax: 877 287-1426, Email: [email protected].
    RIN: 0910-AI76

HHS--FDA

58. Front-of-Package Nutrition Labeling [0910-AI80]

    Priority: Section 3(f)(1) Significant. Major status under 5 U.S.C. 
801 is undetermined.
    Unfunded Mandates: Undetermined.
    Legal Authority: Not Yet Determined
    CFR Citation: 21 CFR 101.6 (new).
    Legal Deadline: None.
    Abstract: This proposed rule would require the front of food labels 
to display certain nutrition information to help consumers, especially 
those with lower nutrition knowledge, make more informed dietary 
choices. Front-of-package (FOP) nutrition labeling is intended to 
complement the Nutrition Facts label on packaged foods by giving 
consumers additional context to help them quickly and easily identify 
foods that can help them build a healthy eating pattern. A variety of 
FOP labeling systems have been adopted in countries world-wide and the 
experience in these countries suggests that FOP labeling may aid the 
ability to make healthier choices. FDA plays a key role within a 
broader, whole-of-government approach to help reduce the burden of 
chronic diseases and advance health equity by helping to improve 
dietary patterns in the U.S. This proposed rule is part of FDA's 
nutrition efforts to empower consumers with nutrition information to 
help them more easily identify healthier choices and may result in 
industry innovation to produce healthier foods. FDA will conduct public 
outreach on this project. FDA has held, and will continue to hold, 
listening sessions with a wide range of stakeholders, including 
consumer groups, public health organizations, academia, health care 
groups, and industry. Additionally, the Reagan-Udall Foundation will 
host a public meeting in November in collaboration with FDA to hear 
input from a broad array of stakeholders, and we are launching a series 
of Tribal Listening Sessions to begin a conversation with federally 
recognized tribes on, among other things, our FOP initiative.
    Statement of Need: HHS implemented its first mandatory nutrition 
labeling 32 years ago. The resulting Nutrition Facts label is iconic 
and 87% of American consumers report using the label. However, many 
consumers, particularly those with lower nutrition literacy, may find 
additional information on food packaging helpful in identifying foods 
that are part of constructing a healthy diet. This proposed rule, if 
finalized, could empower consumers with information to help them 
quickly identify foods that can help them build a healthy eating 
pattern.
    Summary of Legal Basis: In general, our legal authority rests on 
the 1990 Nutrition Labeling and Education Act, which gave the Secretary 
the authority to require that certain nutrition information be conveyed 
to allow the public to readily observe and comprehend such information 
and to understand its relative significance in the context of a total 
daily diet. (Nutrition Labeling and Education Act of 1990. Public Law 
101-535, 104 Stat 2353, Sec. 2(b)(1)(A)). Authority for certain aspects 
may also be found in section 403(q), 403(a)(1), and 201(n) of the 
Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FD&C Act). In addition, section 
701(a) of the FD&C Act authorizes the promulgation of regulations for 
the efficient enforcement of the FD&C Act.
    Alternatives: FDA will consider different options so that we 
maximize benefits to consumers.
    Anticipated Cost and Benefits: The proposed rule, if finalized, is 
expected to generate compliance costs on affected entities, such as the 
cost to label packaged foods and the one-time costs to read and 
understand the rule. Estimated benefits to consumers TBD.
    Risks: None.
    Timetable:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Action                    Date            FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NPRM................................   06/00/24  .......................
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Yes.
    Small Entities Affected: Businesses.
    Government Levels Affected: Undetermined.
    Federalism: Undetermined.
    International Impacts: This regulatory action will be likely to 
have international trade and investment effects, or otherwise be of 
international interest.
    Agency Contact: Mark Kantor Nutritionist, Department of Health and 
Human Services Food and Drug Administration, CPK1 RM 3D034, HFS-830, 
5001 Campus Drive, College Park, MD 20740, Phone: 240 402-2082, Email: 
[email protected].
    RIN: 0910-AI80

HHS--FDA

59. Medical Devices; Laboratory Developed Tests [0910-AI85]

    Priority: Section 3(f)(1) Significant. Major under 5 U.S.C. 801.
    Unfunded Mandates: This action may affect the private sector under 
Public Law 104-4.
    Legal Authority: 21 U.S.C. 321; 21 U.S.C. 331; 21 U.S.C. 351; 21 
U.S.C. 352; 21 U.S.C. 360c; . . .
    CFR Citation: 21 CFR 809.
    Legal Deadline: None.
    Abstract: This rule would amend the Food and Drug Administration's 
regulations to make explicit that laboratory developed tests (LDTs) are 
devices under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FD&C Act).
    Statement of Need: In 1976, the Medical Device Amendments of 1976 
(the MDA) amended the FD&C Act to create a comprehensive system for the

[[Page 9360]]

regulation of devices intended for human use. In implementing the MDA, 
FDA has generally exercised enforcement discretion such that it 
generally has not enforced applicable requirements with respect to most 
LDTs. However, the risks associated with LDTs are much greater today 
than they were at the time of enactment of the MDA, and today's LDTs 
are more similar to other in vitro diagnostic products (IVDs) that have 
not been under FDA's general enforcement discretion approach. This 
rulemaking would amend FDA's regulations to reflect that the device 
definition in the FD&C Act does not differentiate between entities 
manufacturing the device. In conjunction with this amendment, FDA is 
advancing a policy under which FDA intends to phase out its general 
enforcement discretion approach for LDTs, so that IVDs manufactured by 
a laboratory would generally fall under the same enforcement approach 
as other IVDs. This action is necessary to redress the imbalance in 
oversight of LDTs and other IVDs and to protect the public health by 
helping to assure the safety and effectiveness of LDTs.
    Summary of Legal Basis: FDA is issuing this rule under the Agency's 
general rulemaking authorities and statutory authorities relating to 
devices in the FD&C Act, including the definition of a device under 
section 201(h)(1) of the FD&C Act and FDA's authority to issue 
regulations for the efficient enforcement of the FD&C Act under section 
701(a) of the FD&C Act.
    Alternatives: The Agency has considered various options to protect 
the public health by helping to assure the safety and effectiveness of 
LDTs while avoiding undue disruption to the testing market.
    Anticipated Cost and Benefits: This rule would result in compliance 
costs for laboratories that are ensuring their IVDs are compliant with 
applicable statutory and regulatory requirements. We anticipate that 
the benefits would include a reduction in healthcare costs associated 
with unsafe or ineffective tests, including tests promoted with false 
or misleading claims, and from therapeutic decisions based on the 
results of those tests.
    Risks: None.
    Timetable:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Action                    Date            FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NPRM................................   10/03/23  88 FR 68006
NPRM Comment Period End.............   12/04/23
Final Action........................   04/00/24
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Yes.
    Small Entities Affected: Businesses.
    Government Levels Affected: None.
    Agency Contact: Eitan Bernstein, Regulatory Counsel, Department of 
Health and Human Services, Food and Drug Administration, 10903 New 
Hampshire Avenue, WO 66, Silver Spring, MD 20993, Phone: 240 402-9812, 
Email: [email protected].
    RIN: 0910-AI85

HHS--FDA

Final Rule Stage

60. Nonprescription Drug Product With an Additional Condition for 
Nonprescription Use [0910-AH62]

    Priority: Other Significant.
    Legal Authority: 21 U.S.C. 321; 21 U.S.C. 352; 21 U.S.C. 355; 21 
U.S.C. 371; 42 U.S.C. 262; 42 U.S.C. 264; . . .
    CFR Citation: 21 CFR 201.67; 21 CFR 314.56; 21 CFR 314.81; 21 CFR 
314.125; 21 CFR 314.127.
    Legal Deadline: None.
    Abstract: The final rule is intended to increase options for 
applicants to develop and market safe and effective nonprescription 
drug products, which could improve public health by broadening the 
types of nonprescription drug products available to consumers. The 
final rule would establish requirements for a drug product that could 
be marketed as a nonprescription drug product with an additional 
condition for nonprescription use (ACNU) that an applicant must 
implement to ensure appropriate self-selection, appropriate actual use, 
or both by consumers.
    Statement of Need: Currently, nonprescription drug products are 
limited to drugs that can be labeled with sufficient information for 
consumers to appropriately self-select and use the drug product. For 
certain drug products, limitations of labeling present challenges for 
adequate communication of information needed for consumers to 
appropriately self-select or use the drug product without the 
supervision of a healthcare practitioner. FDA is finalizing regulations 
that would establish the requirements for a drug product that could be 
marketed as a nonprescription drug product with an ACNU that an 
applicant must implement to ensure appropriate self-selection, 
appropriate actual use or both by consumers.
    Summary of Legal Basis: FDA's revisions to the regulations 
regarding labeling and applications for nonprescription drug products 
are authorized by the FD&C Act (21 U.S.C. 321 et seq.) and by the 
Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 262 and 264).
    Alternatives: FDA evaluated various requirements for new drug 
applications to assess flexibility of nonprescription drug product 
design through drug labeling for appropriate self-selection and 
appropriate use.
    Anticipated Cost and Benefits: The benefits of the final rule would 
include increased consumer access to drug products and reduced access 
costs to these products as compared to their prescription alternatives. 
Benefits to industry would arise from the flexibility in drug product 
approval and the potential expansion of market revenue. Other benefits 
would include a reduction in repetitive meetings with industry and the 
Agency regarding this approval pathway. In addition, private and 
government-sponsored drug coverage plans may experience cost savings. 
Although applicants would incur the costs to develop and submit an 
application for a nonprescription drug with an ACNU, they would likely 
submit applications only when they expect that the profits from the 
approval would exceed the costs of the application. Lastly, we 
anticipate one-time costs of reading and understanding the rule that 
potential applicants would incur.
    Risks: None.
    Timetable:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Action                    Date            FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NPRM................................   06/28/22  87 FR 38313
NPRM Comment Period End.............   10/26/22
NPRM Comment Period Extended........   10/24/22  87 FR 64178
NPRM Comment Period Extended End....   11/25/22
Final Rule..........................   04/00/24
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No.
    Small Entities Affected: Businesses.
    Government Levels Affected: None.
    Agency Contact: Angela Mtungwa, Program Coordinator, Department of 
Health and Human Services, Food and Drug Administration, 10903 New 
Hampshire Avenue, Building 51, Room 4393, Silver Spring, MD 20993 
Phone: 301 796-9329, Email: [email protected].
    RIN: 0910-AH62


[[Page 9361]]



HHS--FDA

61. Nutrient Content Claims, Definition of Term: Healthy [0910-AI13]

    Priority: Section 3(f)(1) Significant. Major under 5 U.S.C. 801.
    Unfunded Mandates: This action may affect the private sector under 
Public Law 104-4.
    Legal Authority: 21 U.S.C. 321; 21 U.S.C. 331; 21 U.S.C. 343; 21 
U.S.C. 371
    CFR Citation: 10 CFR 101.65 (revision).
    Legal Deadline: None.
    Abstract: The rule would update the definition for the implied 
nutrient content claim ``healthy'' to be consistent with current 
nutrition science and federal dietary guidelines. The rule would revise 
the requirements for when the claim ``healthy'' can be voluntarily used 
in the labeling of human food products to indicate that a food, because 
of its nutrient content, may be useful in achieving a total diet that 
conforms to current dietary recommendations and helps consumers 
maintain healthy dietary practices.
    Statement of Need: This rule would update the ``healthy'' claim to 
make it more consistent with advances in nutrition science and public 
health recommendations, including those captured in recent changes to 
the Nutrition Facts label. The existing definition of ``healthy'' is 
based on nutrition recommendations regarding intake of fat, saturated 
fat, and cholesterol, and specific nutrients Americans were not getting 
enough of in the early 1990s. Nutrition recommendations have evolved 
since that time and now emphasize healthy dietary patterns, which 
include getting enough of certain foods from food groups such as 
fruits, vegetables, low- fat dairy, and whole grains. Diet is a 
contributing factor to chronic diseases, such as heart disease, cancer, 
and stroke, which are the leading causes of death and disability in the 
United States. Claims on food packages such as ``healthy'' can provide 
quick signals to busy consumers about the healthfulness of a food or 
beverage.
    FDA is updating the existing definition of the ``healthy'' claim 
based on the food groups recommended by the Dietary Guidelines for 
Americans by requiring that food products bearing the claim contain a 
certain amount of food from such food groups or subgroups. The rule 
would also require a food product to be limited in saturated fat, 
sodium, and added sugar. These updates would ensure that foods bearing 
the claim are ones that are part of a healthy dietary pattern and are 
recommended by current dietary guidelines. The rule is also part of 
FDA's ongoing effort to empower consumers with information to help them 
improve their nutrition and dietary patterns and reduce their risk of 
diet-related chronic disease.
    Summary of Legal Basis: FDA is issuing this rule under sections 
201(n), 301(a), 403(a), 403(r), and 701(a) of the Federal Food, Drug, 
and Cosmetic Act (FD&C Act) (21 U.S.C. 321(n), 331(a), 343(a), 343(r), 
and 371(a)). These sections authorize the agency to adopt regulations 
that prohibit labeling that bears claims that characterize the level of 
a nutrient which is of a type required to be declared in nutrition 
labeling unless the claim is made in accordance with a regulatory 
definition established by FDA. Pursuant to this authority, FDA issued a 
regulation defining the ``healthy'' implied nutrient content claim, 
which is codified at 21 CFR 101.65. This rule would update the existing 
definition to be consistent with current nutrition science and federal 
dietary guidance.
    Alternatives:
    Alternative 1: Codify the alternative criteria in the current 
enforcement discretion guidance.
    In 2016, FDA published ``Use of the Term `Healthy' in the Labeling 
of Human Food Products: Guidance for Industry.'' This guidance was 
intended to advise food manufacturers of FDA's intent to exercise 
enforcement discretion relative to foods that use the implied nutrient 
content claim ``healthy'' on their labels which: (1) Are not low in 
total fat, but have a fat profile makeup of predominantly mono and 
polyunsaturated fats; or (2) contain at least 10 percent of the Daily 
Value (DV) per reference amount customarily consumed (RACC) of 
potassium or vitamin D.
    One alternative is to codify the alternative criteria in this 
guidance rather than the proposed update to the definition. Although 
guidance is non-binding, we assume that most packaged food 
manufacturers are aware of the guidance and, over the past 2 years, 
have already made any adjustments to their products or product 
packaging. Therefore, we assume that this alternative would have no 
costs to industry and no benefits to consumers.
    Alternative 2: Extend the compliance date by 1 year.
    Extending the anticipated compliance date on the rule updating the 
definition of healthy by 1 year would reduce costs to industry as they 
would have more time to change products that may be affected by the 
rule or potentially coordinate label changes with already scheduled 
label changes. On the other hand, an extended compliance date runs the 
risk of not being helpful to consumers because they may not know 
whether a packaged food product labeled ``healthy'' follows the 
existing definition or the updated one.
    Anticipated Cost and Benefits: Food products bearing the 
``healthy'' claim currently make up a small percentage (5%) of total 
packaged foods. Quantified costs to manufacturers include labeling, 
reformulating, and recordkeeping. Discounted at seven percent over 20 
years, the mean present value of costs of the rule is $237 million, 
with a lower bound of $110 million and an upper bound of $434 million.
    Updating the definition of ``healthy'' to align with current 
dietary recommendations can provide information to help consumers build 
more healthful diets to help reduce their risk of diet-related chronic 
diseases. Discounted at seven percent over 20 years, the mean present 
value of benefits of the rule is $290 million, with a lower bound 
estimate of $9 million and an upper bound estimate of $857 million.
    Risks: None.
    Timetable:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Action                    Date            FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NPRM................................   09/29/22  87 FR 59168
NPRM Comment Period End.............   12/28/22
NPRM Comment Period Extended........   11/29/22  87 FR 73267
NPRM Comment Period Extended End....   02/16/23
Final Action........................   04/00/24
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Yes.
    Small Entities Affected: Businesses.
    Government Levels Affected: Undetermined.
    Agency Contact: Vincent De Jesus, Nutritionist, Department of 
Health and Human Services, Food and Drug Administration, Center for 
Food Safety and Applied Nutrition (HFS-830), Room 3D-031, 5100 Paint 
Branch Parkway, College Park, MD 20740, Phone: 240 402-1774, Fax: 301 
436-1191, Email: [email protected].
    RIN: 0910-AI13

HHS--FDA

62. Tobacco Product Standard for Characterizing Flavors in Cigars 
[0910-AI28]

    Priority: Section 3(f)(1) Significant. Major under 5 U.S.C. 801.

[[Page 9362]]

    Unfunded Mandates: This action may affect State, local or tribal 
governments and the private sector.
    Legal Authority: 21 U.S.C. 331; 21 U.S.C. 333; 21 U.S.C. 371(a); 21 
U.S.C. 387b and 387c; 21 U.S.C. 387f(d) and 387g; . . .
    CFR Citation: 21 CFR 1166.
    Legal Deadline: None.
    Abstract: This rule is a tobacco product standard that would 
prohibit characterizing flavors (other than tobacco) in all cigars. We 
are taking this action with the intention of reducing the tobacco-
related death and disease associated with cigar use. Evidence shows 
that flavored tobacco products appeal to youth and also shows that 
youth may be more likely to initiate tobacco use with such products. 
Characterizing flavors in cigars, such as strawberry, grape, orange, 
and cocoa, enhance taste and make these products easier to use. Over a 
half million youth in the United States use flavored cigars, placing 
these youth at risk for cigar-related death and disease.
    Statement of Need: The Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FD&C 
Act), as amended by the Family Smoking Prevention and Tobacco Control 
Act (Tobacco Control Act), authorizes FDA to adopt tobacco product 
standards under section 907 if the Secretary finds that a tobacco 
product standard is appropriate for the protection of the public 
health. This product standard will prohibit characterizing flavors 
(other than tobacco) in all cigars. Characterizing flavors in cigars, 
such as strawberry, grape, cocoa, and fruit punch, increase appeal and 
make the cigars easier to use, particularly among youth and young 
adults. This product standard will reduce the appeal of cigars, 
particularly to youth and young adults, and thereby decrease the 
likelihood of experimentation, development of nicotine dependence, and 
progression to regular use. This product standard will improve public 
health by increasing the likelihood of cessation among existing cigar 
smokers; this product standard will also improve health outcomes within 
groups that experience disproportionate levels of tobacco use, 
including certain vulnerable populations.
    Summary of Legal Basis: Section 907 of the FD&C Act authorizes the 
adoption of tobacco product standards if the Secretary finds that a 
tobacco product standard is appropriate for the protection of public 
health. Section 907 also authorizes FDA to include in a product 
standard a provision that restricts the sale and distribution of a 
tobacco product to the extent that it may be restricted by a regulation 
under section 906(d) of the FD&C Act. Section 906(d) of the FD&C Act 
authorizes the Secretary to issue regulations requiring restrictions on 
the sale and distribution of a tobacco product, including restrictions 
on the access to, and the advertising and promotion of, the tobacco 
product, if the Secretary determines that such regulation would be 
appropriate for the protection of the public health. Section 701(a) of 
the FD&C Act authorizes the promulgation of regulations for the 
efficient enforcement of the FD&C Act.
    Alternatives: In addition to the costs and benefits of the product 
standard, FDA will assess the costs and benefits of, among other 
things, a different effective date for the rule, and including pipe 
tobacco in the product standard.
    Anticipated Cost and Benefits: The anticipated benefits of the 
product standard include those coming from reduced death and disease 
that are the result of cigar use among adult cigar smokers, reduced 
death and disease from secondhand smoke, and reduced death and disease 
among youth who are deterred from initiating under the product 
standard. The anticipated costs of the product standard are those to 
firms to comply with the rule, to consumers impacted by the rule, and 
to the government.
    Risks: None.
    Timetable:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Action                    Date            FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
ANPRM...............................   03/21/18  83 FR 12294
ANPRM Comment Period End............   07/19/18
NPRM................................   05/04/22  87 FR 26396
NPRM Comment Period Extended........   06/21/22  87 FR 36786
NPRM Comment Period End.............   07/05/22
NPRM Comment Period Extended End....   08/02/22
Final Rule..........................   03/00/24
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Yes.
    Small Entities Affected: Businesses.
    Government Levels Affected: Federal, Local, State, Tribal.
    Federalism: This action may have federalism implications as defined 
in E.O. 13132.
    Agency Contact: Nathan Mease, Regulatory Counsel, Department of 
Health and Human Services, Food and Drug Administration, 10903 New 
Hampshire Avenue, Center for Tobacco Products, Document Control Center, 
Building 71, Room G335, Silver Spring, MD 20993, Phone: 877 287-1373, 
Email: [email protected].
    RIN: 0910-AI28

HHS--FDA

63. Standards for the Growing, Harvesting, Packing, and Holding of 
Produce for Human Consumption Relating to Agricultural Water [0910-
AI49]

    Priority: Other Significant.
    Legal Authority: 21 U.S.C. 321; 21 U.S.C. 331; 21 U.S.C. 342; 21 
U.S.C. 350h; 21 U.S.C. 371; 42 U.S.C. 243; 42 U.S.C. 264; 42 U.S.C. 
271; . . .
    CFR Citation: 21 CFR 112.
    Legal Deadline: None.
    Abstract: This rulemaking will revise certain requirements for 
agricultural water for covered produce other than sprouts in the 
Standards for the Growing, Harvesting, Packing, and Holding of Produce 
for Human Consumption (produce safety) regulation for covered produce 
other than sprouts.
    Statement of Need: Agricultural water can be a major conduit of 
pathogens that can contaminate produce. Recent produce outbreaks 
potentially linked to agricultural water have emphasized the importance 
of ensuring that FDA's agricultural water standards are workable across 
the diversity of domestic and foreign farms and account for the variety 
of factors that impact water sources and uses. FDA plans to amend its 
produce safety regulation to address concerns about the practical 
challenges of implementing certain agricultural water requirements for 
covered produce other than sprouts, while protecting the public health.
    Summary of Legal Basis: FDA's authority for issuing this rule is 
provided by sections 402, 419, and 701(a) of the Federal Food, Drug, 
and Cosmetic Act (FD&C Act) (21 U.S.C. 342, 350h, and 371(a)) and 
sections 311, 361, and 368 of the Public Health Service Act (PHS Act) 
(42 U.S.C. 243, 264, and 271).
    Specifically, this rulemaking will amend certain agricultural water 
requirements in the produce safety regulation, codified at 21 CFR part 
112, and issued under the following authorities: Section 419(c)(1)(A) 
of the FD&C Act (21 U.S.C. 350h(c)(1)(A)) authorizes FDA to establish 
science-based minimum standards for the safe production and harvesting 
of those types of fruits and vegetables that are raw agricultural 
commodities for which such standards minimize the risk of serious 
adverse health consequences or death. Section 419(c)(1)(B) of the FD&C 
Act (21 U.S.C. 350h(c)(1)(B)) further

[[Page 9363]]

requires that these minimum standards provide sufficient flexibility to 
be practicable for all sizes and types of businesses. Section 402(a)(3) 
of the FD&C Act (21 U.S.C. 342(a)(3)) provides that a food is 
adulterated if it consists in whole or in part of any filthy, putrid, 
or decomposed substance, or if it is otherwise unfit for food. Section 
402(a)(4) of the FD&C Act (21 U.S.C. 342(a)(4)) provides that a food is 
adulterated if it has been prepared, packed, or held under insanitary 
conditions whereby it may have become contaminated with filth, or 
whereby it may have been rendered injurious to health. Additionally, 
section 701(a) of the FD&C Act (21 U.S.C. 371(a)) grants the authority 
to promulgate regulations for the efficient enforcement of the FD&C 
Act. Sections 311, 361, and 368 of the PHS Act (21 U.S.C. 243, 264, and 
271), provide authority for FDA to issue regulations to prevent the 
spread of communicable diseases from one State to another.
    Alternatives: None.
    Anticipated Cost and Benefits: FDA anticipates costs associated 
with complying with the water risk assessment provisions for non-sprout 
covered produce.
    This final rule will generate unquantified benefits stemming from 
increasing flexibility and addressing practical implementation 
challenges associated with certain agricultural water provisions for 
covered produce other than sprouts in the produce safety regulation and 
quantified benefits resulting from fewer illnesses caused by pre-
harvest agricultural water.
    Risks: In a 2019 Report, the Interagency Food Safety Analytics 
Collaboration (IFSAC) estimated that produce commodities cause 65 
percent of foodborne E. coli O157 illnesses and over 40 percent of 
foodborne Salmonella illnesses. Agricultural water can be a major 
conduit for produce contamination. This rule is intended to address the 
practical implementation challenges of certain agricultural water 
requirements for covered produce other than sprouts, while protecting 
public health by setting forth standards to minimize the risk of 
serious adverse health consequences or death, including those 
reasonably necessary to prevent the introduction of known or reasonably 
foreseeable biological hazards into or onto produce, and provide 
reasonable assurances that the produce is not adulterated on account of 
those hazards.
    Timetable:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Action                    Date            FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NPRM................................   12/06/21  86 FR 69120
NPRM Comment Period End.............   04/05/22
Supplemental NPRM...................   07/19/22  87 FR 42973
Supplemental NPRM Comment Period End   09/19/22
Final Rule..........................   02/00/24
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Undetermined.
    Government Levels Affected: Undetermined.
    Agency Contact: Samir Assar, Supervisory Consumer Safety Officer, 
Department of Health and Human Services, Food and Drug Administration, 
Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition, Office of Food Safety, 
5001 Campus Drive, College Park, MD 20740, Phone: 240 402-1636, Email: 
[email protected].
    RIN: 0910-AI49

HHS--FDA

64. Tobacco Product Standard for Menthol in Cigarettes [0910-AI60]

    Priority: Section 3(f)(1) Significant. Major under 5 U.S.C. 801.
    Unfunded Mandates: This action may affect State, local or tribal 
governments and the private sector.
    Legal Authority: 21 U.S.C. 387g; 21 U.S.C. 371; 21 U.S.C. 387f
    CFR Citation: Not Yet Determined.
    Legal Deadline: None.
    Abstract: This rule is a tobacco product standard to prohibit the 
use of menthol as a characterizing flavor in cigarettes.
    Statement of Need: The Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FD&C 
Act), as amended by the Family Smoking Prevention and Tobacco Control 
Act (Tobacco Control Act), authorizes FDA to adopt tobacco product 
standards under section 907 if the Secretary finds that a tobacco 
product standard is appropriate for the protection of the public 
health. This product standard would prohibit menthol as a 
characterizing flavor in cigarettes. The standard would reduce the 
appeal of cigarettes, particularly to youth and young adults, and 
thereby decrease the likelihood that nonusers who would otherwise 
experiment with menthol cigarettes would progress to regular cigarette 
smoking. In addition, the tobacco product standard would improve the 
health and reduce the mortality risk of current menthol cigarette 
smokers by decreasing cigarette consumption and increasing the 
likelihood of cessation.
    Summary of Legal Basis: Section 907 of the FD&C Act authorizes the 
adoption of tobacco product standards if the Secretary finds that a 
tobacco product standard is appropriate for the protection of public 
health.
    Alternatives: In addition to the costs and benefits of the rule, 
FDA will assess the costs and benefits of extending the effective date 
of the rule, creating a process by which some products may apply for an 
exemption or variance from the product standard, and prohibiting 
menthol as an intentional additive in cigarette products rather than 
prohibiting menthol as a characterizing flavor.
    Anticipated Cost and Benefits: The rule is expected to generate 
compliance costs on affected entities, such as one-time costs to read 
and understand the rule and alter manufacturing/importing practices. 
The quantified benefits of the rule stem from improved health and 
diminished exposure to tobacco smoke for users of cigarettes from 
decreased experimentation, progression to regular use, and consumption 
of menthol cigarettes. The qualitative benefits of the rule include 
impacts such as reduced illness for smokers and non-smokers.
    Risks: None.
    Timetable:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Action                    Date            FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
ANPRM...............................   07/24/13  78 FR 44484
ANPRM Comment Period End............   09/23/13
NPRM................................   05/04/22  87 FR 26454
NPRM Comment Period Extended........   06/21/22  87 FR 36786
NPRM Comment Period End.............   07/05/22
NPRM Comment Period Extended End....   08/02/22
Final Rule..........................   03/00/24
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Yes.
    Small Entities Affected: Businesses.
    Government Levels Affected: Federal, Local, State, Tribal.
    Federalism: This action may have federalism implications as defined 
in E.O. 13132.
    Agency Contact: Beth Buckler, Senior Regulatory Counsel, Department 
of Health and Human Services, Food and Drug Administration, Center for 
Tobacco Products, 10903 New Hampshire Avenue, Document Control Center, 
Building 71, Room G335, Silver Spring, MD 20993, Phone: 877 287-1373, 
Email: [email protected].
    RIN: 0910-AI60


[[Page 9364]]



HHS--HEALTH RESOURCES AND SERVICES ADMINISTRATION (HRSA)

Proposed Rule Stage

65. Countermeasures Injury Compensation Program: COVID-19 
Countermeasures Injury Table [0906-AB31]

    Priority: Other Significant.
    Legal Authority: 42 U.S.C. 247d-6e
    CFR Citation: 42 CFR 110.
    Legal Deadline: None.
    Abstract: This proposed rule would establish the COVID-19 
Countermeasures Injury Table for the Countermeasures Injury 
Compensation Program (CICP). The Public Readiness and Emergency 
Preparedness Act (PREP Act) authorized the Secretary of HHS to 
establish the CICP to provide benefits to certain persons who sustain 
serious physical injury or death as a direct result of the 
administration or use of covered countermeasures identified by the 
Secretary in declarations issued under the PREP Act. In addition, the 
Secretary may provide death benefits to certain survivors of 
individuals who died as a direct result of covered injuries or their 
health complications. One way that an individual who was administered 
or used a covered countermeasure can show that they sustained a covered 
injury is by demonstrating that they sustained an injury listed on a 
Countermeasures Injury Table (Table) within the time interval set forth 
on the Table. The Table will list and explain injuries that, based on 
compelling, reliable, valid, medical, and scientific evidence, are 
presumed to be caused by covered COVID-19 countermeasures, and set 
forth the time periods in which the onset of these injuries must occur 
after the administration or use of these covered COVID-19 
countermeasures.
    Statement of Need: The PREP Act directs the Secretary to establish, 
through regulations, a Table identifying serious physical injuries that 
are presumed to be directly caused by the administration or use of a 
covered countermeasure. The Secretary may only identify such injuries 
if it is determined based on compelling, reliable, valid, medical and 
scientific evidence'' that the administration or use of the covered 
countermeasure directly causes such covered injuries. A Table creates a 
rebuttable presumption of causation, for compensation purposes, for 
eligible individuals whose injuries are listed on and meet the 
requirements of the Table.
    Summary of Legal Basis: Section 319F-4 of the Public Health Service 
Act, as amended, directs the Secretary, following issuance of a 
declaration under Section 319F-3(b), to establish procedures for the 
CICP to provide medical and lost employment benefits to certain 
individuals who sustained a covered injury as the direct result of the 
administration or use of a covered countermeasure consistent with a 
declaration issued pursuant to section 319F-3(b), or in good faith 
belief that administration or use of the covered countermeasure was 
consistent with a declaration. The CICP's regulations are set forth in 
42 CFR part 110. 42 CFR 110.20(a) states that individuals must 
establish that a covered injury occurred to be eligible for benefits 
under the Program. A covered injury is death or a serious injury 
determined by the Secretary to be: (1) An injury meeting the 
requirements of a Table, which is presumed to be the direct result of 
the administration or use of a covered countermeasure unless the 
Secretary determines there is another more likely cause; or (2) an 
injury (or its health complications) that is the direct result of the 
administration or use of a covered countermeasure. Through this NPRM, 
the Secretary proposes to add the COVID-19 Countermeasures Injury Table 
to subpart K of 42 CFR part 110, which lists Injury Tables for covered 
countermeasures, by adding sections (e) and (f).
    Alternatives: An alternative is to continue to review each claim 
and the associated medical records individually to ensure the requester 
has demonstrated that the injury occurred as the direct result of the 
administration or use of a covered countermeasure. This approach would 
be more time- and resource-intensive than providing an evidence-based 
presumption of causation by publishing a COVID-19 Countermeasures 
Injury Table for the CICP.
    Anticipated Cost and Benefits: This NPRM will allow requesters who 
were administered or used a covered COVID-19 countermeasure and whose 
alleged injuries are listed on the Table, but who missed the one-year 
filing deadline, to be able to file their claim within one year from 
the publication of the Table. Also, future requesters, and previous 
requesters who were denied compensation, will be able to benefit from 
the presumption of causation afforded by their injuries being included 
on the Table, rather than needing to prove causation on a case- by-case 
basis. This will likely increase the number of claims filed and 
compensated. However, in rare instances that a COVID-19 countermeasure 
injury has occurred, this will decrease the burden on requesters 
allowing them to more easily receive compensation that may include 
reasonable unreimbursed medical expenses, lost employment income, and 
survivor death benefit.
    Risks: None.
    Timetable:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Action                    Date            FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NPRM................................   12/00/23
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No.
    Small Entities Affected: No.
    Government Levels Affected: None.
    Agency Contact: CDR George Grimes, Director, Division of Injury 
Compensation Programs, Department of Health and Human Services, Health 
Resources and Services Administration, 5600 Fishers Lane, Room 08N146B, 
Rockville, MD 20857, Phone: 855 266-2427, Email: [email protected].
    RIN: 0906-AB31

HHS--HRSA

Final Rule Stage

66. 340B Drug Pricing Program; Administrative Dispute Resolution [0906-
AB28]

    Priority: Other Significant.
    Legal Authority: Not Yet Determined
    CFR Citation: 42 CFR 10.
    Legal Deadline: None.
    Abstract: This final rule will revise the Administrative Dispute 
Resolution (ADR) final rule currently in effect and apply to all drug 
manufacturers and covered entities that participate in the 340B Drug 
Pricing Program (340B Program). It will establish new requirements and 
procedures for the 340B Program's ADR process. This administrative 
process will allow covered entities and manufacturers to file claims 
for specific compliance areas outlined in the statute after good faith 
efforts have been exhausted by the parties.
    Statement of Need: This final rule will revise the December 2020 
340B Administrative Dispute Resolution (ADR) final rule, which became 
effective January 13, 2021. The final rule will implement new 
requirements and procedures for the 340B Program's ADR process. The 
final rule applies to drug manufacturers and covered entities 
participating in the 340B Drug Pricing Program (340B Program) by 
allowing these entities to file claims for specific compliance areas 
outlined in the 340B statute after good faith efforts have been 
exhausted by the parties. It aligns with the President's priorities on 
drug pricing, better reflects the current state

[[Page 9365]]

of the 340B Program, and seeks to correct procedural deficiencies in 
the current 340B ADR process.
    Summary of Legal Basis: Section 340B(d)(3) of the Public Health 
Service Act (PHS Act) requires the Secretary to promulgate regulations 
establishing and implementing an ADR process for certain disputes 
arising under the 340B Program. Under the 340B statute, the purpose of 
the ADR process is to resolve (1) claims by covered entities that they 
have been overcharged for covered outpatient drugs by manufacturers and 
(2) claims by manufacturers, after a manufacturer has conducted an 
audit as authorized by section 340B(a)(5)(C) of the PHS Act, that a 
covered entity has violated the prohibition on diversion or duplicate 
discounts.
    Alternatives: The 2020 340B ADR final rule would remain in effect. 
This final rule is designed to be more accessible to stakeholders and 
will use fewer stakeholder and government resources to resolve disputes 
as opposed to the 2020 340B ADR final rule.
    Anticipated Cost and Benefits: The ADR process will not have a 
significant financial impact on stakeholders nor result in significant 
costs. The final rule will enable stakeholders to resolve disputes in a 
fair, efficient, and expeditious manner in accordance with section 
340B(d)(3) of the Public Health Service Act.
    Risks: None.
    Timetable:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Action                    Date            FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NPRM................................   11/30/22  87 FR 73516
NPRM Comment Period End.............   01/30/23
Final Action........................   12/00/23
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No.
    Small Entities Affected: No.
    Government Levels Affected: None.
    Agency Contact: Michelle Herzog, Deputy Director, Office of 
Pharmacy Affairs, Department of Health and Human Services, Health 
Resources and Services Administration, 5600 Fishers Lane, 08W12, 
Rockville, MD 20857, Phone: 301 443-4353, Email: [email protected].
    RIN: 0906-AB28

HHS--CENTERS FOR MEDICARE & MEDICAID SERVICES (CMS)

Proposed Rule Stage

67. Healthcare System Resiliency and Modernization (CMS-3426) [0938-
AU91]

    Priority: Section 3(f)(1) Significant. Major under 5 U.S.C. 801.
    Unfunded Mandates: This action may affect State, local or tribal 
governments and the private sector.
    Legal Authority: 42 U.S.C. 1395hh; 42 U.S.C 1302; 42 U.S.C. 1821; 
42 U.S.C. 1832(a)(2)(F)(I); 42 U.S.C. 1861(dd)(1); 42 U.S.C. 1905(a)
    CFR Citation: 42 CFR 403; 42 CFR 416; 42 CFR 418; 42 CFR 441; . . .
    Legal Deadline: None.
    Abstract: This rule proposes revisions to the regulations for all 
Medicare- and Medicaid-participating providers and suppliers to ensure 
continuous, ongoing access to safe and effective health care services.
    Statement of Need: This proposed rule would revise and update 
national emergency preparedness requirements for Medicare- and 
Medicaid-participating providers and suppliers to plan adequately for 
both natural and man-made disasters, including climate-related 
disasters, and coordinate with federal, state, tribal, regional, and 
local emergency preparedness systems based on lessons learned during 
the COVID-19 public health emergency and other recent events. This rule 
also proposes revisions that support health care system resiliency. The 
need for this rule is based on feedback and public consultations with 
healthcare providers, public health organizations and professionals, 
and researchers, including multiple listening sessions. Participants 
described how some organizations were unprepared for extended, wide- 
spread, and concurrent emergencies. They expressed that improvements to 
CMS requirements would support better care and outcomes for patients 
during and after emergencies. In addition, this rule would advance 
equity, increase access to culturally and linguistically appropriate 
services, and address and improve outcomes and disparities in maternal 
health care. Lastly, this rule would also advance equity and reduce 
disparities across the continuum of care for patients by improving 
transparency, patient education, and health literacy on the organ 
donation and transplantation process. The proposals are in accordance 
with Executive Orders 13985, 13988, 13995, and 14301 on Advancing 
Racial Equity and Support for Underserved Communities through the 
Federal Government, Preventing and Combating Discrimination on the 
Basis of Gender Identity or Sexual Orientation, Ensuring an Equitable 
Pandemic Response and Recovery, and on Advancing Equity, Justice, and 
Opportunity for Asian Americans, Native Hawaiians, and Pacific 
Islanders, respectively.
    Summary of Legal Basis: There are various sections of the Social 
Security Act (the Act) that define the types of providers and suppliers 
that may participate in Medicare and Medicaid and list the requirements 
that each provider and supplier must meet to be eligible for Medicare 
and Medicaid participation. The Act also authorizes the Secretary to 
establish other requirements as necessary to protect the health and 
safety of patients, although the wording of such authority differs 
slightly between provider and supplier types. Such requirements may 
include the CoPs for providers, CfCs for suppliers, and requirements 
for long term care facilities. The CoPs and CfCs are intended to 
protect public health and safety and promote high quality care for all 
persons. The Public Health Service (PHS) Act sets forth additional 
regulatory requirements that certain Medicare providers and suppliers 
are required to meet in order to participate. The statutory authority 
to revise the health and safety standards for Medicare and Medicaid 
participating providers and suppliers is contained within Section 1102 
(42 U.S.C. 1302) of the Social Security Act. In addition, this rule 
revises the health and safety regulations to advance health equity and 
reduce disparities for all individuals in accordance with Executive 
Orders 13985, 13988, 13995, and 14301 on Advancing Racial Equity and 
Support for Underserved Communities through the Federal Government, 
Preventing and Combating Discrimination on the Basis of Gender Identity 
or Sexual Orientation, Ensuring an Equitable Pandemic Response and 
Recovery, and on Advancing Equity, Justice, and Opportunity for Asian 
Americans, Native Hawaiians, and Pacific Islanders, respectively.
    Alternatives: In developing the policies contained in this rule, we 
considered numerous alternatives, including maintaining existing 
requirements. These alternatives will be described in the rule.
    Anticipated Cost and Benefits: The provisions in this rule aim to 
improve emergency preparedness, increase system resiliency, advance 
health equity, improve maternal health care, increase access to care, 
improve quality of care, and reduce health disparities for

[[Page 9366]]

all individuals. This regulation will ultimately remove barriers and 
ensure continuous access to health care and improve quality of care for 
all. As we move toward publication, estimates of the cost and benefits 
of these provisions will be included in the rule.
    Risks: This action furthers the goals of the Executive Orders on 
Advancing Racial Equity and Support for Underserved Communities Through 
the Federal Government (E.O. 13985), Executive Order on Preventing and 
Combating Discrimination on the Basis of Gender Identity or Sexual 
Orientation (E.O. 13988), Executive Order on Ensuring an Equitable 
Pandemic Response and Recovery (E.O. 13995), and Executive Order on 
Advancing Equity, Justice, and Opportunity for Asian Americans, Native 
Hawaiians, and Pacific Islanders (E.O. 14301). While there may be some 
risks associated with an increased burden on providers as a result of 
these regulations, we believe benefits related to culturally and 
linguistically appropriate services and improved maternal health care 
would far outweigh any risks.
    Timetable:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Action                    Date            FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NPRM................................   12/00/23
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Undetermined.
    Government Levels Affected: Federal, Local, State, Tribal.
    Federalism: This action may have federalism implications as defined 
in E.O. 13132.
    Agency Contact: Lauren Oviatt, Acting Director, Division of Non-
Institutional Standards and Quality, Department of Health and Human 
Services, Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Center for Clinical 
Standards and Quality, MS: C2-21-16, 7500 Security Boulevard, 
Baltimore, MD 21244-1850, Phone: 410 786-4683, Email: 
[email protected]
    Related RIN: Merged with 0938-AV21
    RIN: 0938-AU91

HHS--CMS

68. Appeal Rights for Certain Changes in Patient Status (CMS-4204) 
[0938-AV16]

    Priority: Other Significant.
    Legal Authority: 42 U.S.C. 1395ff
    CFR Citation: 42 CFR 405; 42 CFR 476; 42 CFR 489.
    Legal Deadline: None.
    Abstract: Pursuant to a court order, this proposed rule would 
establish new appeals processes for Medicare beneficiaries who have an 
inpatient hospital admission changed to outpatient by a hospital, and 
meet other conditions set forth in the order.
    Statement of Need: This proposed rule sets forth new appeals 
processes to implement a court order. In this order, the Department of 
Health and Human Services (HHS) is directed to establish appeal process 
for certain beneficiaries in Original Medicare who are initially 
admitted to a hospital as an inpatient by a physician but whose status 
during their stay is changed to outpatient receiving observation 
services by the hospital, thereby effectively denying Part A coverage 
for their hospital stay.
    Summary of Legal Basis: This rule sets forth new appeals procedures 
to implement the court order in Alexander v. Azar, 613 F. Supp. 3d 559 
(D. Conn. 2020)), aff'd sub nom., Barrows v. Becerra, 24 F.4th 116 (2d 
Cir. 2022). The authority for these changes is under various sections 
of the Social Security Act (the Act).
    Alternatives: None. This rule implements a court order.
    Anticipated Cost and Benefits: This rule is not considered a 
significant rule.
    Risks: No risks are anticipated.
    Timetable:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Action                    Date            FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NPRM................................   12/00/23
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No.
    Government Levels Affected: Federal.
    Agency Contact: David Danek, Health Insurance Specialist, 
Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Medicare & 
Medicaid Services, Center for Medicare, MS: 2325, 7500 Security 
Boulevard, Baltimore, MD 21244, Phone: 410 786-8249, Email: 
[email protected].
    RIN: 0938-AV16

HHS--CMS

69. Contract Year 2025 Policy and Technical Changes to the Medicare 
Advantage, Medicare Prescription Drug Benefit, and Medicare Cost Plan 
Programs, and Pace (CMS-4205) [0938-AV24]

    Priority: Section 3(f)(1) Significant. Major under 5 U.S.C. 801.
    Legal Authority: Pub. L. 115-271
    CFR Citation: 42 CFR 422; 42 CFR 423; 42 CFR 460.
    Legal Deadline: None.
    Abstract: This proposed rule would make changes to strengthen and 
improve the Medicare Advantage (Part C) and prescription drug benefit 
(Part D) programs, and Programs of All-Inclusive Care for the Elderly 
(PACE), and implement any legislative changes that are required by 
January 1, 2025.
    Statement of Need: This proposed rule is necessary to amend the 
regulations for the Medicare Advantage (Part C) program, Medicare 
Prescription Drug Benefit (Part D) program, Medicare cost plan program, 
and Program of All- Inclusive Care for the Elderly (PACE) to implement 
certain statutory requirements, to codify existing subregulatory 
guidance, and based on our continued experience in the administration 
of the programs.
    Summary of Legal Basis: This rule addresses multiple sections of 
the Social Security Act and proposes to codify existing Part C and Part 
D subregulatory guidance. It would also implement certain sections of 
the Bipartisan Budget Act of 2018 and the Consolidated Appropriations 
Act (CAA), 2023.
    Alternatives: This rule would implement provisions that require 
public notice and comment and are necessary for the upcoming contract 
year. We will continue to explore additional alternatives as we develop 
the rule.
    Anticipated Cost and Benefits: Preliminary estimates of the 
anticipated costs and benefits of this proposed rule indicate minor 
costs (under $50 million) associated with increased paperwork as well 
as some savings to the Medicare Trust Fund. Numerical estimates are 
pending and as we move toward publication, estimates of costs and 
benefits will be included in the proposed rule.
    Risks: Risks associated with the impact of this rule are under 
development and will be included in the published rule.
    Timetable:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Action                    Date            FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NPRM................................   11/15/23  88 FR 78476
NPRM Comment Period End.............   01/05/24
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Undetermined.
    Government Levels Affected: None.
    Agency Contact: Heather Barkes, Director, Division of Policy, 
Analysis, and Planning, Department of Health and Human Services, 
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Center for Medicare, MS: C4-
21-26, 7500 Security Boulevard, Baltimore, MD 21244, Phone: 410 786-
8615, Email: [email protected].
    RIN: 0938-AV24


[[Page 9367]]



HHS--CMS

70. Minimum Staffing Standards for Long-Term Care Facilities and 
Medicaid Institutional Payment Transparency Reporting (CMS-3442) [0938-
AV25]

    Priority: Section 3(f)(1) Significant. Major under 5 U.S.C. 801.
    Unfunded Mandates: This action may affect the private sector under 
Public Law 104-4.
    Legal Authority: 42 U.S.C. 181; 42 U.S.C. 1919; 42 U.S.C. 1902
    CFR Citation: 42 CFR 483; 42 CFR 442; 42 CFR 438.
    Legal Deadline: Final, Statutory, September 6, 2026, MMA sec. 902 
requires Medicare final rules publish within 3 years of a proposed or 
interim final rule.
    Per the CMS notice published December 30, 2004 (69 FR 78442), 
except for certain Medicare payment regulations and certain other 
statutorily-mandated regulations, we schedule all Medicare final 
regulations for publication within the 3-year standardized time limit 
in the current Unified Agenda. We do not intend to delay publishing a 
Medicare final regulation for 3 years if we are able to publish it 
sooner.
    Abstract: This rule establishes minimum staffing standards for 
long-term care facilities, as part of the Biden-Harris Administration's 
Nursing Home Reform initiative to ensure safe and quality care in long 
term care facilities. In addition, this rule requires States to report 
the percent of Medicaid payments for certain Medicaid-covered 
institutional services that are spent on compensation for direct care 
workers and support staff. Consistent with the Administration's 
commitment to maximize transparency and public engagement, and to allow 
communities greater opportunities to provide input in the regulatory 
process, HHS sought the expertise of colleagues in the Office of 
Management and Budget, the General Services Administration, and the 
Consumer Financial Protection Bureau to inform an alternative approach 
to public comments for the proposed nursing home minimum staffing rule. 
The Department ultimately established and disseminated in public 
materials a direct web link to allow a more accessible comment 
submission path to the public, lowering the barriers to participation 
for the nursing home residents, families, and facility staff who will 
be directly impacted by this regulation.
    Statement of Need: Ensuring that beneficiaries receive safe, 
reliable, and quality nursing home care is a critical function of the 
Medicare and Medicaid programs and a top priority of CMS. The COVID-19 
Public Health Emergency (PHE) tragically caused unprecedented illness 
and death among nursing home residents and workers. The PHE also 
exacerbated staffing challenges experienced in many facilities and 
further highlighted disparities in care and outcomes. Despite existing 
requirements that facilities provide sufficient levels of staffing in 
LTC facilities, chronic understaffing remains a significant concern. 
This rule establishes minimum staffing standards for long-term care 
facilities, as part of the Biden-Harris Administration's Nursing Home 
Reform initiative to ensure safe and quality care in long-term care 
facilities. In addition, this rule requires States to report the 
percent of Medicaid payments for certain Medicaid-covered institutional 
services that are spent on compensation for direct care workers and 
support staff.
    Summary of Legal Basis: Sections 1819 and 1919 of the Act authorize 
the Secretary to issue requirements for participation in Medicare and 
Medicaid, including such regulations as may be necessary to protect the 
health and safety of residents (sections 1819(d)(4)(B) and 
1919(d)(4)(B) of the Act).
    Alternatives: In developing the policies contained in this rule, we 
considered numerous alternatives. The proposed rule solicited comments 
on alternative policy options that should be considered for 
establishing minimum nurse staffing standards that would maintain 
acceptable quality and safety within LTC facilities.
    Anticipated Cost and Benefits: The proposed rule included an 
estimated cost of $40.6 billion over 10 years for the 24/7 RN and the 
0.55 RN and 2.45 NA hours per resident day (HPRD) requirements and $147 
million for the Medicaid institutional payment transparency reporting 
requirement. Quantified benefits include an estimated Medicare savings 
of $2.5 billion over 10 years due to fewer hospitalizations and 
emergency department visits, as well as increased resident discharges 
to home or the community.
    Risks: This action establishes minimum staffing standards that 
nursing homes must meet in order to ensure that residents receive safe 
and quality care in LTC facilities. The minimum staffing standards also 
provide staff in LTC facilities with the support they need to safely 
care for residents and reduce staff turnover and burnout, which can 
lead to improved safety and quality for residents and staff. In 
addition, the rule promotes public transparency related to the percent 
of Medicaid payments for certain institutional services that are spent 
on compensation to direct care workers and support staff. While there 
may be additional costs to implement these requirements, the proposals 
strike an appropriate balance between cost and benefit and are 
necessary at this time to protect resident health and safety and ensure 
their needs are met.
    Timetable:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Action                    Date            FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NPRM................................   09/06/23  88 FR 61352
NPRM Comment Period End.............   11/06/23
Final Action........................   09/00/26
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No.
    Government Levels Affected: State.
    Agency Contact: Ronisha Blackstone, Director, Division of 
Institutional Quality Standards, Department of Health and Human 
Services, Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Center for Clinical 
Standards and Quality, MS: S3-02-01, 7500 Security Boulevard, 
Baltimore, MD 21244, Phone: 410 786-6882, Email: 
[email protected].
    RIN: 0938-AV25

HHS--CMS

Final Rule Stage

71. Streamlining the Medicaid, Chip, and BHP Application, Eligibility 
Determination, Enrollment, and Renewal Processes (CMS-2421) [0938-AU00]

    Priority: Section 3(f)(1) Significant. Major under 5 U.S.C. 801.
    Legal Authority: 42 U.S.C. 1302
    CFR Citation: 42 CFR 431; 42 CFR 435; 42 CFR 457; 42 CFR 600; . . .
    Legal Deadline: None.
    Abstract: This rule implements changes to simplify the processes 
for eligible individuals to enroll and retain eligibility in Medicaid, 
the Children's Health Insurance Program (CHIP), and the Basic Health 
Program (BHP). The changes will be finalized in two rules. The first 
final rule removes barriers and facilitates enrollment of new 
applicants, particularly those dually eligible for Medicare and 
Medicaid. The second final rule will follow in CY 2024 and implement 
changes to align enrollment and renewal requirements for most 
individuals in Medicaid; establish beneficiary protections related to 
returned mail; create timeliness

[[Page 9368]]

requirements for redeterminations of eligibility in Medicaid and CHIP; 
make transitions between programs easier; eliminate access barriers for 
children enrolled in CHIP by prohibiting premium lock-out periods, 
waiting periods, and benefit limitations; and modernize recordkeeping 
requirements to ensure proper documentation of eligibility and 
enrollment.
    Statement of Need: Since the implementation of the Affordable Care 
Act (ACA), CMS has made improvements in streamlining the Medicaid and 
CHIP application, eligibility determination, enrollment, and renewal 
processes. Simplifying enrollment in Medicaid and CHIP coverage is a 
foundational step in efforts to address health disparities for low-
income individuals. However, gaps remain in States' ability to 
seamlessly process beneficiaries' eligibility and enrollment in order 
to maximize coverage. This rule will provide States with the tools they 
need to reduce unnecessary barriers to enrollment in Medicaid and CHIP 
and to keep eligible beneficiaries covered. CMS engaged in a series of 
discussions with state Medicaid and CHIP agencies during development of 
the proposed rule, to examine enrollment barriers and discuss potential 
options for relief.
    Summary of Legal Basis: This rule responds to the January 28, 2021, 
Executive Order on Strengthening Medicaid and the Affordable Care Act. 
It addresses components of title XIX and title XXI of the Social 
Security Act and several sections of the Patient Protection and 
Affordable Care Act (Pub. L. 111-148) and the Health Care and Education 
Reconciliation Act of 2010 (Pub. L. 111-152), which amended and revised 
several provisions of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act.
    Alternatives: In developing the policies contained in this rule, we 
considered numerous alternatives, including maintaining existing 
requirements. These alternatives are described in the rule.
    Anticipated Cost and Benefits: The provisions in this rule will 
streamline Medicaid and CHIP enrollment processes and ensure that 
eligible beneficiaries can maintain coverage. While states and the 
Federal Government will incur initial costs to implement these changes, 
this rule aims to reduce administrative barriers to enrollment, which 
is expected to reduce administrative costs over time. The provisions in 
this rule are designed to increase access to affordable health 
coverage, and we believe that the benefits will justify the costs. 
Additionally, through clear and consistent requirements for the timely 
renewal of eligibility for all beneficiaries, this rule promotes 
program integrity, thereby protecting taxpayer funds at both the state 
and federal levels. As we move toward publication, estimates of the 
cost and benefits of these provisions will be included in the rule.
    Risks: We anticipate that the provisions of this rule will further 
the administration's goal of strengthening Medicaid and making high-
quality health care accessible and affordable for every American. At 
the same time, through clear and consistent requirements for conducting 
regular renewals of eligibility, acting on changes reported by 
beneficiaries and maintaining thorough recordkeeping on these 
activities, this rule will reduce the risk of improper payments.
    Timetable:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Action                    Date            FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NPRM................................   09/07/22  87 FR 54760
NPRM Comment Period End.............   11/07/22
1st Final Action....................   09/21/23  88 FR 65230
1st Final Action Effective..........   11/17/23
2nd Final Action....................   02/00/24
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No.
    Government Levels Affected: Federal, Local, State.
    Agency Contact: Sarah Delone, Deputy Director, Children and Adults 
Health Programs Group, Department of Health and Human Services, Centers 
for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Center for Medicaid and CHIP 
Services, MS: S2-01-16, 7500 Security Boulevard, Baltimore, MD 21244, 
Phone: 410 786-5647, Email: [email protected].
    RIN: 0938-AU00

HHS--CMS

72. Short-Term, Limited-Duration Insurance; Independent, Noncoordinated 
Excepted Benefits Coverage; Level-Funded Plan Arrangements; and Tax 
Treatment of Certain Accident and Health Insurance (CMS-9904) [0938-
AU67]

    Priority: Section 3(f)(1) Significant. Major under 5 U.S.C. 801.
    Legal Authority: Pub. L. 111-148, title I
    CFR Citation: 45 CFR 144; 45 CFR 146; 45 CFR 148.
    Legal Deadline: None.
    Abstract: This final rule amends the definition of short-term, 
limited duration insurance, which is excluded from the definition of 
individual health insurance coverage under the Public Health Service 
Act. This document also sets forth amendments to the requirements for 
hospital indemnity or other fixed indemnity insurance to be considered 
an excepted benefit in the group and individual health insurance 
markets. This document further sets forth amendments to clarify the tax 
treatment of certain benefit payments in fixed amounts received under 
employer-provided accident and health plans.
    Statement of Need: These changes support the goals of the 
Affordable Care Act (ACA) by increasing access to affordable and 
comprehensive coverage, strengthening health insurance markets, and 
promoting consumer understanding of coverage options. Consistent with 
E.O. 14094, and accompanying OIRA guidance on Broadening Public 
Participation and Community Engagement in the Regulatory Process, and 
E.O. 12866, the Departments met with interested parties representing 
consumer advocacy and supplemental benefits industry representatives at 
the request of those parties.
    Summary of Legal Basis: The Department of Health and Human Services 
regulations are adopted pursuant to the authority contained in sections 
2701 through 2763, 2791, 2792, 2794, 2799A-1 through 2799B-9 of the PHS 
Act (42 U.S.C. 300gg-300gg-63, 300gg-91, 300gg-92, 300gg-94, 300gg-
300gg139), as amended.
    Alternatives: In developing the rule, the Departments considered 
different approaches, including alternative amendments to the 
definition of short-term, limited-duration insurance, alternative 
amendments to the consumer notices for short-term, limited-duration 
insurance and fixed indemnity excepted benefits coverage, and 
alternative applicability timelines.
    Anticipated Cost and Benefits: These changes are expected to 
increase consumer understanding of short-term, limited-duration 
insurance and fixed indemnity excepted benefits coverage as compared to 
comprehensive health insurance coverage and to strengthen markets for 
comprehensive health insurance coverage. These changes are also 
expected to reduce harm caused to consumers who enroll in short-term, 
limited- duration insurance or fixed indemnity excepted benefits 
coverage as an alternative to or replacement for comprehensive health 
insurance coverage. The changes to the definition of short-term, 
limited-duration insurance are expected to increase enrollment in 
comprehensive coverage, reduce gross premiums for individuals

[[Page 9369]]

enrolled in individual health insurance coverage purchased on an 
Exchange, and decrease Federal expenditures on the premium tax credit. 
These changes may increase premium costs for individuals who switch 
from short-term, limited-duration insurance to comprehensive health 
insurance coverage and are not eligible for government subsidies. They 
may also increase the number of uninsured individuals if some 
individuals with short-term, limited-duration insurance do not switch 
to comprehensive health insurance coverage or purchase short-term, 
limited-duration insurance from another issuer.
    Risks: Due to a lack of data and information, areas of uncertainty 
include the forecasting of enrollment changes and the potential impacts 
to risk pools, premiums, Federal expenditures, and compensation for 
agents and brokers selling these products.
    Timetable:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Action                    Date            FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NPRM................................   07/12/23  88 FR 44596
NPRM Comment Period End.............   09/11/23
Final Action........................   04/00/24
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Undetermined.
    Government Levels Affected: Federal, State.
    Federalism: This action may have federalism implications as defined 
in E.O. 13132.
    Agency Contact: Lindsey Murtagh, Director, Market-Wide Regulation 
Division, Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Medicare 
& Medicaid Services, Center for Consumer Information and Insurance 
Oversight, 7500 Security Boulevard, Baltimore, MD 21244, Phone: 301 
492-4106, Email: [email protected].
    RIN: 0938-AU67

HHS--CMS

73. Ensuring Access to Medicaid Services (CMS-2442) [0938-AU68]

    Priority: Other Significant. Major under 5 U.S.C. 801.
    Legal Authority: 42 U.S.C. 1302
    CFR Citation: 42 CFR 431; 42 CFR 438; 42 CFR 441; 42 CFR 447.
    Legal Deadline: None.
    Abstract: This rule addresses elements related to assuring access 
in Medicaid and/or the Children's Health Insurance Program (CHIP). 
These elements include processes that support the implementation of a 
comprehensive access strategy as well as payment processes, such as 
those related to specific payment systems.
    Statement of Need: In order to assure equitable access to health 
care for all Medicaid and CHIP beneficiaries across all delivery 
systems, access regulations need to be multi-factorial and focus beyond 
payment rates. Barriers to accessing health care services can be as 
heterogeneous as Medicaid and CHIP populations which can be measured 
through provider availability and provider accessibility to realized or 
perceived access barriers which can be measured through utilization and 
satisfaction with services. The final rule takes a comprehensive 
approach to improving access to care, quality and health outcomes, and 
better addressing health equity issues in the Medicaid program across 
fee-for-service (FFS), managed care delivery systems, and in home and 
community-based services (HCBS) programs. These improvements seek to 
increase transparency and accountability, standardize data and 
monitoring, and create opportunities for States to promote active 
beneficiary engagement in their Medicaid programs, with the goal of 
improving access to care.
    Summary of Legal Basis: Section 1902(a)(30)(A) of the Act requires 
states to ``assure that payments are consistent with efficiency, 
economy, and quality of care and are sufficient to enlist enough 
providers so that care and services are available under the plan at 
least to the extent that such care and services are available to the 
general population in the geographic area.'' In addition, 2402(a) of 
the Affordable Care Act directs the Secretary to promulgate regulations 
ensuring that all states develop service systems that: (1) are 
responsive to the needs of beneficiaries receiving HCBS and enable them 
to maximize their independence; (2) provide necessary support and 
coordination for beneficiaries in need of such services and their 
caregivers; and (3) improve coordination and regulation of providers of 
such services to oversee and monitor functions, including a complaint 
system, and ensure that there are an adequate number of qualified 
direct care workers to provide self-directed services. Further, Section 
1902(a)(4) of the Act is a longstanding statutory provision that, as 
implemented in part in regulations currently codified at 42 CFR 431.12, 
requires States to have a Medical Care Advisory Committee (MCAC) in 
place to advise the State Medicaid agency about health and medical care 
services.
    Alternatives: In developing the policies contained in this rule, we 
considered numerous alternatives, including maintaining existing 
requirements. These alternatives are described in the rule.
    Anticipated Cost and Benefits: This rule is expected to result in 
potential costs for states to come into and remain in compliance. 
Estimates for associated costs are unknown at this time and may vary by 
state. Information about anticipated costs will be included in the 
rule.
    Risks: Risks of this rule are still under development and will be 
included in the final rule.
    Timetable:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Action                    Date            FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NPRM................................   05/03/23  88 FR 27960
NPRM Comment Period End.............   07/03/23
Final Action........................   04/00/24
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No.
    Government Levels Affected: State.
    Agency Contact: Karen Llanos, Director, Medicaid Innovation 
Accelerator Program and Strategy Support, Department of Health and 
Human Services, Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Center for 
Medicaid and CHIP Services, MS: S2-04-28, 7500 Security Boulevard, 
Baltimore, MD 21244, Phone: 410 786-9071, Email: 
[email protected].
    RIN: 0938-AU68

HHS--CMS

74. Coverage of Certain Preventive Services Under the Affordable Care 
Act (CMS-9903) [0938-AU94]

    Priority: Other Significant.
    Legal Authority: Pub. L. 111-148, sec. 1001
    CFR Citation: 45 CFR 147; 45 CFR 156.
    Legal Deadline: None.
    Abstract: This rule amends the final rules regarding religious and 
moral exemptions and accommodations regarding coverage of certain 
preventive services under title I of the Patient Protection and 
Affordable Care Act.
    Statement of Need: Previous rules, regulations, and court decisions 
have left many women without contraceptive coverage and access to 
contraceptive services without cost sharing. This rule seeks to address 
religious objections to providing contraceptive coverage by honoring 
the entities' religious objections, while also ensuring that women 
enrolled in a group health plan established or maintained, or in health 
insurance coverage offered or arranged,

[[Page 9370]]

by an objecting entity described in 45 CFR 147.132(a), which does not 
invoke the optional accommodation (if eligible), have the opportunity 
to obtain contraceptive services at no cost. This rule would also 
eliminate the exemption for entities and individuals that object to 
contraceptive coverage based on non-religious moral beliefs, which 
prevents access to contraceptive services without cost sharing.
    Summary of Legal Basis: The Department of Health and Human Services 
regulations are adopted pursuant to the authority contained in sections 
2701 through 2763, 2791, 2792, 2794, 2799A-1 through 2799B-9 of the PHS 
Act (42 U.S.C. 300gg-63, 300gg-91, 300gg-92, 300gg-94, 300gg-139), as 
amended.
    Alternatives: In developing this rule, the Departments considered 
various alternative approaches. The Departments considered maintaining 
the exemption (along with the existing accommodations and the proposed 
individual contraceptive arrangement) with respect to group health 
plans, health insurance issuers, and institutions of higher education 
that have a non-religious, moral objection to contraceptive coverage. 
With respect to individuals enrolled in coverage through entities that 
have a religious objection to contraceptive coverage, the Departments 
considered an approach under which contraceptive coverage would be 
available through separate individual insurance policies that cover 
only contraceptives and in which participants, beneficiaries, and 
enrollees would have to separately enroll if they desired contraceptive 
coverage. The Departments also considered an approach under which, if 
an objecting entity designs or contracts for a health plan without 
contraceptive coverage, the contraceptive coverage requirement would 
apply directly to the issuer in the case of a fully insured plan, or 
the third party administrator in the case of a self-insured plan. The 
issuer or third party administrator would then be required to fulfill 
its separate and independent obligation to provide contraceptive 
coverage. With respect to the proposed changes to 45 CFR 156.50(d), in 
addition to the proposed submission requirements on the part of the 
participating issuer, HHS considered whether to condition a provider of 
contraceptive services' participation in the individual contraceptive 
arrangement on the submission to HHS of additional information. In 
addition to an arrangement with a participating issuer on the 
Federally-facilitated Exchange or a State-based Exchange on the Federal 
Platform, HHS considered whether to allow a provider of contraceptive 
services to arrange with a third party administrator to submit 
documentation to HHS on their behalf under 45 CFR 156.50(d).
    Anticipated Cost and Benefits: This rule is expected to increase 
access to contraceptive services without cost sharing through the 
individual contraceptive arrangement for eligible individuals and the 
elimination of the exemption for entities and individuals that object 
to contraceptive coverage based on non-religious moral beliefs. This 
rule would increase health equity given the disproportionate burden of 
out-of-pocket spending on contraceptive services currently faced by 
low-income individuals (as those individuals with lower incomes must 
spend a greater percentage of their incomes on contraceptive services). 
This rule would also lead to better health outcomes for eligible 
individuals by increasing access to contraceptive services and reducing 
unintended pregnancies Participating providers of contraceptive 
services (including clinicians, facilities, and pharmacies) and issuers 
would incur costs associated with entering into signed agreements for 
reimbursement of costs associated with the provision of contraceptive 
services to eligible individuals, including costs of verifying consumer 
eligibility and other associated administrative costs. Eligible 
individuals would incur costs associated with participating in the 
individual contraception arrangement, including confirming eligibility 
to their provider of contraceptive services. HHS estimates the total 
cost to providers of contraceptive services, issuers, and eligible 
individuals to be approximately $30.2 million annually. The rule would 
also lead to a reduction in health care costs for individuals, issuers, 
group health plan sponsors, and states due to reductions in unintended 
pregnancies.
    Risks: The Departments do not have information on the number of 
entities and individuals that have claimed a moral exemption to 
providing contraceptive coverage and are therefore uncertain of the 
amount of the potential transfer from plans and issuers to 
participants, beneficiaries, and enrollees due to reduced out- of-
pocket spending on contraceptive services associated with the proposed 
elimination of the exemption for entities and individuals that object 
to contraceptive coverage based on nonreligious moral beliefs. The 
Departments estimate that the provision of the individual contraceptive 
arrangement could lead to a transfer from the Federal Government to 
individuals (via issuers to providers of contraceptive services) of 
approximately $49.9 million annually. This estimate is uncertain due to 
the limited information available in the 2019 user fee adjustment data. 
The Departments are uncertain as to how the number of participating 
providers might vary (for example, across rural and urban areas) and 
how this variation might affect access to services under the individual 
contraceptive arrangement. Due to the lack of data, the Departments are 
unable to develop a precise estimate of the number of eligible 
individuals who might participate in the individual contraceptive 
arrangement. This overall lack of data leads to uncertainty regarding 
the magnitudes of the total cost savings to eligible individuals and 
any resulting potential cost savings to states (associated with reduced 
spending on State-funded programs that provide contraceptive services 
or a potential reduction in the number of unintended pregnancies that 
would otherwise impose costs to states).
    Timetable:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Action                    Date            FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NPRM................................   02/02/23  88 FR 7236
NPRM Comment Period End.............   04/03/23
Final Action........................   08/00/24
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No.
    Government Levels Affected: Federal, Local, State.
    Agency Contact: Lindsey Murtagh, Director, Market-Wide Regulation 
Division, Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Medicare 
& Medicaid Services, Center for Consumer Information and Insurance 
Oversight, 7500 Security Boulevard, Baltimore, MD 21244, Phone: 301 
492-4106, Email: [email protected].
    RIN: 0938-AU94

HHS--CMS

75. Medicaid and Children's Health Insurance Program (CHIP) Managed 
Care Access, Finance, and Quality (CMS-2439) [0938-AU99]

    Priority: Section 3(f)(1) Significant. Major under 5 U.S.C. 801.
    Legal Authority: 42 U.S.C. 1302
    CFR Citation: 42 CFR 430; 42 CFR 438; 42 CFR 457.
    Legal Deadline: None.
    Abstract: This rule implements additional parameters under managed 
care delivery systems related to access to care requirements, States' 
use of In Lieu of Services or Settings (ILOS), State directed payments, 
quality rating systems, and other policy and reporting

[[Page 9371]]

changes to ensure the efficient operation of State managed care 
programs.
    Statement of Need: This rule advances CMS' efforts to improve 
access to care, quality and health outcomes, and better address health 
equity issues for Medicaid and CHIP managed care enrollees. The rule 
specifically addresses standards for timely access to care and States' 
monitoring and enforcement efforts, clarifies standards State directed 
payments and certain quality reporting requirements, adds new standards 
that would apply when States use ILOSs to promote effective utilization 
and identify the scope and nature of ILOS, specifies medical loss ratio 
(MLR) requirements, and establishes a quality rating system (QRS) for 
Medicaid and CHIP managed care plans.
    Summary of Legal Basis: States may implement a Medicaid managed 
care delivery system using four Federal authorities: sections 1915(a), 
1915(b), 1932(a), and 1115(a) of the Social Security Act (the Act), and 
a CHIP managed care delivery system using two Federal authorities 
sections 2101(a) and 2107(e)(2)(A) of the Act.
    Alternatives: In developing the policies contained in this rule, we 
considered numerous alternatives, including maintaining existing 
requirements. These alternatives are described in the rule.
    Anticipated Cost and Benefits: We anticipate that most of the 
provisions in this rule will minimally or moderately increase 
administrative burden and associated costs. Certain provisions 
including State directed payments, MLR reporting standards, and ILOS 
could potentially have a significant impact on the associated and 
corresponding managed care payments. Information about anticipated 
costs will be included in the final rule.
    Risks: Risks of this rule are still under development and will be 
included in the published rule.
    Timetable:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Action                    Date            FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NPRM................................   05/03/23  88 FR 28092
NPRM Comment Period End.............   07/03/23
Final Action........................   04/00/24
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No.
    Government Levels Affected: State.
    Agency Contact: John Giles, Director, Division of Managed Care 
Policy, Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Medicare & 
Medicaid Services, Center for Medicaid and CHIP Services, MS: S2-01-16, 
7500 Security Boulevard, Baltimore, MD 21244, Phone: 410 786-1255, 
Email: [email protected].
    RIN: 0938-AU99

HHS--CMS

Long-Term Actions

76. Disclosures of Ownership and Additional Disclosable Parties 
Information for Skilled Nursing Facilities and Nursing Facilities (CMS-
6084) [0938-AU90]

    Priority: Other Significant.
    Legal Authority: 42 U.S.C. 1302; 42 U.S.C. 1395hh
    CFR Citation: 42 CFR 424; 42 CFR 455.
    Legal Deadline: Final, Statutory, February 15, 2026, MMA sec. 902 
requires Medicare final rules publish within 3 years of a proposed or 
interim final rule.
    Per the CMS notice published December 30, 2004 (69 FR 78442), 
except for certain Medicare payment regulations and certain other 
statutorily-mandated regulations, we schedule all Medicare final 
regulations for publication within the 3-year standardized time limit 
in the current Unified Agenda. We do not intend to delay publishing a 
Medicare final regulation for 3 years if we are able to publish it 
sooner.
    Abstract: This rule implements portions of section 6101 of the 
Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (Affordable Care Act), which 
requires the disclosure of certain ownership, managerial, and other 
information regarding Medicare skilled nursing facilities (SNFs) and 
Medicaid nursing facilities.
    Statement of Need: This rule is necessary for CMS and states to 
obtain important data about the owners and operators of nursing 
facilities. This will better enable CMS and states to monitor the 
ownership and management of these providers; this is an especially 
critical consideration given documented quality issues and differences 
in outcomes in nursing facilities with certain types of owners, such as 
private equity firms. The rule would also serve as an important 
component of this Administration's initiative to improve the safety, 
quality, and accountability of nursing homes.
    Summary of Legal Basis: Section 6101(a) of the Affordable Care Act 
(Pub. L. 111-148) added a new section 1124(c) to the Social Security 
Act (the Act). This provision established requirements for the 
disclosure of information about the owners and operators of Medicare 
SNFs and Medicaid nursing facilities.
    Alternatives: None. This rule implements a statutory requirement.
    Anticipated Cost and Benefits: We believe the data furnished under 
this regulation will help CMS more closely monitor the ownership and 
management of nursing facilities. This, in conjunction with the 
Administration's other initiatives, could help improve beneficiary 
care, although potential benefits cannot be monetarily quantified. As 
discussed in the published proposed rule, the lone category of costs 
associated with this rule involves nursing facilities' submission of 
the required information. We do not anticipate any direct savings or 
transfers principally because the rule merely involves the submission 
of data for CMS or state review.
    Risks: No risks are anticipated.
    Timetable:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Action                    Date            FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NPRM................................   02/15/23  88 FR 9820
NPRM Comment Period End.............   04/14/23
Final Action........................   02/00/26
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No.
    Government Levels Affected: Federal, State.
    Agency Contact: Frank Whelan, Health Insurance Specialist, 
Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Medicare & 
Medicaid Services, Center for Program Integrity, MS: AR-18-50, 7500 
Security Boulevard, Baltimore, MD 21244, Phone: 410 786-1302, Email: 
[email protected].
    RIN: 0938-AU90

HHS--CMS

Completed Actions

77. Hospital Outpatient Prospective Payment System: Remedy for 340B-
Acquired Drugs Purchased in Cost Years 2018-2022 (CMS-1793) (Section 
610 Review) [0938-AV18]

    Priority: Section 3(f)(1) Significant. Major under 5 U.S.C. 801.
    CFR Citation: 42 CFR 419.
    Abstract: This final rule describes the agency's actions to comply 
with the remand from the district court to craft a remedy in light of 
the United States Supreme Court's decision in American Hospital 
Association v. Becerra, 142 S. Ct. 1896 (2022), relating to the 
adjustment of Medicare payment rates for drugs acquired under the 340B

[[Page 9372]]

Program from calendar year (CY) 2018 through September 27th of CY 2022.
    Statement of Need: From CY 2018 through September 27th of CY 2022, 
CMS paid a lower rate (generally ASP minus 22.5 percent) to certain 
hospitals for drugs acquired through the 340B discount program. The 
purpose of this policy was to pay these hospitals for 340B drugs at a 
rate that more accurately reflected the actual costs they incurred to 
acquire them. This 340B policy was the subject of several years of 
litigation, which culminated in a decision of the Supreme Court of the 
United States in American Hospital Association v. Becerra, 142 S. Ct. 
1896 (2022), which held that if CMS has not conducted a survey of 
hospitals' acquisition costs, it may not vary the payment rates for 
outpatient prescription drugs by hospital group. The Supreme Court 
subsequently remanded the case, and the district court ultimately 
ordered CMS to implement a remedy to address the reduced payment 
amounts to the plaintiff hospitals from CY 2018 through September 27th 
of CY 2022.
    Summary of Legal Basis: Under the Hospital Outpatient Prospective 
Payment System (OPPS), we generally set payment rates for separately 
payable drugs and biologicals (hereinafter referred to collectively as 
drugs) under section 1833(t)(14)(A) of the Social Security Act (the 
Act). Section 1833(t)(14)(A)(iii)(II) of the Act provides that, if 
hospital acquisition cost data are not available, the payment amount is 
the average price for the drug in a year established under section 
1842(o), section 1847A, or section 1847B of the Act, as the case may 
be. Payment rates for drugs are usually established under section 1847A 
of the Act, which generally sets a default rate of the average sales 
price (ASP) plus 6 percent. Section 1833(t)(14)(A)(iii)(II) of the Act 
also provides that the average price for the drug in the year as 
established under section 1847A of the Act is calculated and adjusted 
by the Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services 
(Secretary) as necessary for purposes of paragraph (14).
    Alternatives: We evaluated several options to determine which 
remedy would best achieve the objectives of unwinding the unlawful 340B 
payment policy while making certain OPPS providers as close to whole as 
is administratively feasible. A discussion of these options, including 
our reasons for not moving forward with them, will be included in the 
final rule.
    Anticipated Cost and Benefits: To comply with statutory budget 
neutrality requirements, we plan to annually reduce OPPS payments for 
non-drug items and services beginning in CY 2025 by decreasing the OPPS 
conversion factor by 0.5 percent each year, until a total offset of an 
estimated $7.8 billion is reached.
    Risks: Any risks regarding potential impacts will be included in 
the final rule.
    Completed:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Reason                    Date            FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NPRM................................   07/11/23  88 FR 44078
Final Action........................   11/08/23  88 FR 77150
Final Action Effective..............   01/08/24
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Yes.
    Small Entities Affected: Businesses, Governmental Jurisdictions.
    Government Levels Affected: Federal, Local, State.
    Agency Contact: Elise Barringer, Health Insurance Specialist, 
Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Medicare & 
Medicaid Services, Center for Medicare, MS: C4-03-06, 7500 Security 
Boulevard, Baltimore, MD 21244, Phone: 410 786-9222, Email: 
[email protected].
    RIN: 0938-AV18

HHS--ADMINISTRATION FOR CHILDREN AND FAMILIES (ACF)

Proposed Rule Stage

78. Strengthening Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) as a 
Safety Net Program [0970-AC97]

    Priority: Section 3(f)(1) Significant. Major under 5 U.S.C. 801.
    Legal Authority: 42 U.S.C. 609
    CFR Citation: 45 CFR 260.
    Legal Deadline: None.
    Abstract: This rule would improve the effectiveness and integrity 
of the Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) program as a 
safety net program by clarifying allowable uses of TANF funds and 
reducing administrative burden. The rule takes into account concerns 
from Members of Congress from both parties who are focused on ensuring 
TANF funds are serving their intended purpose, and advances the Biden-
Harris Administration's priority for economic growth through investment 
in American families. The rule aims to ensure TANF funds are used in 
accordance with the statute, focusing on services that support families 
to meet their basic needs, get access to opportunities in the job 
market, and remain together.
    Statement of Need: In fiscal year (FY) 2020, combined federal TANF 
and state maintenance-of-effort (MOE) expenditures and transfers 
totaled $31.6 billion. Of that amount only 22 percent was spent on 
basic assistance, compared to 71 percent in FY 1997. As a result, TANF 
currently serves less than 25 percent of eligible families across the 
country, as compared to 1997 when TANF served almost 70 percent of 
eligible families. The rule aims to address these shortcomings and 
would align with the Administration's efforts to increase opportunities 
for economic mobility for low-income families. The NPRM may consider 
changes around use of funds, eligible families, state MOE spending, and 
work flexibilities.
    Summary of Legal Basis: The proposed regulations will relate to 
allowable spending, eligible work activities and penalties, and 
administrative simplification. The NPRM would be issued under the 
Secretary's authority to issue regulations where Congress has charged 
the Department with enforcing penalties, 42 U.S.C. 609.
    Alternatives: In the absence of these regulatory changes, states 
will not experience any relief in their administrative burden to 
operate the TANF program and these changes will improve program 
integrity and access to services.
    Anticipated Cost and Benefits: This NPRM imposes no costs on the 
Federal government nor does it change overall funding amounts for 
States, territories, and tribes, as TANF is a fixed block grant. We 
anticipate a benefit in the transfer of funding toward critical 
supports to families experiencing economic hardships.
    Risks: While we expect more low-income families to receive TANF 
benefits and receive more effective work-related services, this action 
may result in states having to increase their own spending to fund 
activities previously funded by federal TANF dollars or previously 
counted as state MOE spending.
    Timetable:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Action                    Date            FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NPRM................................   10/02/23  88 FR 67697
NPRM Comment Period End.............   12/01/23
Final Action........................   04/00/24
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No.
    Small Entities Affected: No.
    Government Levels Affected: None.
    Agency Contact: Deborah List, Associate Deputy Director, Office of 
Family Assistance, Department of Health and Human Services,

[[Page 9373]]

Administration for Children and Families, 330 C Street SW, Washington, 
DC 20201, Phone: 202 401-5488, Email: [email protected].
    RIN: 0970-AC97

HHS--ACF

79. Employment and Training Services for Noncustodial Parents in the 
Child Support Services Program [0970-AD00]

    Priority: Other Significant.
    Legal Authority: 42 U.S.C. 1302
    CFR Citation: 45 CFR part 302; 45 CFR part 303; 45 CFR part 304.
    Legal Deadline: None.
    Abstract: In an effort to make the child support program more 
effective and to increase regular child support payments, the Office of 
Child Support Services will propose to allow child support agencies to 
strengthen supportive services for noncustodial parents.
    Statement of Need: Currently, IV-D agencies have many enforcement 
tools to collect child support from noncustodial parents who are able 
to pay their child support, but these enforcement tools are less 
effective in collecting support from unemployed noncustodial parents. 
Many of these parents face significant barriers to employment and could 
benefit from employment and training services, but rarely receive them. 
This Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) would explore options for 
providing nonduplicative employment and training services to unemployed 
noncustodial parents, which will help them become employed and pay 
their child support.
    Summary of Legal Basis: This NPRM is published under the authority 
granted to the Secretary of Health and Human Services by section 1102 
of the Social Security Act (Act), 42 U.S.C. 1302.
    Alternatives: There are no satisfactory alternatives to publishing 
this NPRM that provide improved child support program effectiveness.
    Anticipated Cost and Benefits: To Be Determined.
    Risks: None.
    Timetable:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Action                    Date            FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NPRM................................   12/00/23  .......................
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No.
    Small Entities Affected: No.
    Government Levels Affected: None.
    Agency Contact: Chad Edinger, Program Specialist, Department of 
Health and Human Services, Administration for Children and Families, 
330 C Street SW, Washington, DC 20201. Phone: 303 844-1213, Email: 
[email protected].
    RIN: 0970-AD00

HHS--ACF

80. Supporting the Head Start Workforce and Other Quality Improvements 
[0970-AD01]

    Priority: Section 3(f)(1) Significant. Major under 5 U.S.C. 801.
    Legal Authority: 42 U.S.C. 9801; 42 U.S.C. 9836a; 42 U.S.C. 9839
    CFR Citation: 45 CFR parts 1302 and 1305.
    Legal Deadline: None.
    Abstract: This NPRM will propose changes to the Head Start Program 
Performance Standards to better support the Head Start workforce and to 
maintain the quality of comprehensive Head Start services.
    Statement of Need: This notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) 
proposes to add new provisions to the Head Start Program Performance 
Standards to increase pay and support the Head Start workforce, make 
improvements to the overall quality of Head Start program services, and 
strengthen mental health supports. Head Start programs serve hundreds 
of thousands of children ages birth to five, pregnant women, and their 
families each year. This NPRM is critical to improving the quality, 
stability, and continuity of Head Start services for children and 
families.
    Summary of Legal Basis: ACF publishes this NPRM under the authority 
granted to the Secretary of Health and Human Services by sections 641A, 
645, 645A, 648A, and 653 of the Act (42 U.S.C. 9836a, 9840, 9840a, 
9843a, and 9848), as amended by the Improving Head Start for School 
Readiness Act of 2007 (Pub. L. 110-134).
    Alternatives: One alternative is to keep the status quo and not put 
forward this proposed rule. This would likely result in the workforce 
crisis continuing, which ultimately has a negative impact on the 
quality of services for the children and families Head Start aims to 
serve and enrollment levels may continue to decline as programs have 
difficulty filling vacancies.
    Another alternative is to allow this NPRM to be published and move 
forward to a final rule. This would stabilize the Head Start workforce 
and enable Head Start programs to provide consistent, high-quality 
services to children and families.
    Anticipated Cost and Benefits: The costs associated with this 
proposed rule include the funding required for implementing 
compensation requirements proposed in the rule. Another potential cost 
is that burden on programs may temporarily increase as they work to 
implement the proposed requirements.
    The benefits associated with the proposed rule include a more 
stable Head Start workforce and high-quality services consistently 
provided to all children and families served by Head Start. ACF 
strongly believes the anticipated benefits of this proposed rule far 
outweigh the potential costs.
    Risks: None.
    Timetable:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Action                    Date            FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NPRM................................   11/00/23  .......................
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Yes.
    Small Entities Affected: Businesses, Organizations.
    Government Levels Affected: None.
    Agency Contact: Lindsey A. Hutchison, Senior Policy Analyst, 
Department of Health and Human Services, Administration for Children 
and Families, 330 C Street SW, #4305B, Washington, DC 20201, Phone: 904 
860-7032, Email: [email protected].
    RIN: 0970-AD01

HHS--ACF

81.  Safe and Appropriate Foster Care Placement Requirements 
for Titles IV-E and IV-B (Section 610 Review) [0970-AD03]

    Priority: Other Significant.
    Legal Authority: 42 U.S.C. 671(a)(16); 42 U.S.C. 622(b)(8)(A)(ii); 
42 U.S.C. 675(1)(B); 42 U.S.C. 675(5))
    CFR Citation: CFR 1355.22; CFR 1355.34.
    Legal Deadline: None.
    Abstract: This rule will propose to clarify that title IV-E/IV-B 
agencies are required to offer safe and appropriate foster care 
placements, including processes to ensure children can request such 
placements and agencies must respond to concerns about those 
placements, for children in foster care who identify as lesbian, gay, 
bisexual, transgender, queer or questioning, intersex (LGBTQI+). The 
rule will not interfere with faith-based child welfare providers 
continue to partner with title IV-E/IV-B agencies in a way that does 
not interfere with those providers' sincerely held religious beliefs.

[[Page 9374]]

    Statement of Need: To support States and tribes in complying with 
Federal laws that require that all children in foster care receive safe 
and proper care, the proposed rule would clarify the processes and 
requirements to State child welfare agencies must follow to ensure 
children in foster care who identity as LGBTQI+ are provided with 
placements the agency designates as safe and appropriate for an LGBTQI+ 
child, and with services that are necessary to support their health and 
wellbeing. These requirements clarify how title IV-E/IV-B agencies must 
meet IV-E and IV-B statutory requirements, including for the case 
review system and case plan, to appropriately serve children in foster 
care who identify as LGBTQI+. While the general requirements for the 
case review system are not new, ACF is proposing to prescribe how 
agencies must implement the requirements to provide placements and 
services to children in foster care who identity as LGBTQI+.
    Summary of Legal Basis: Sections 471(a)(16), 422(b), and 475(1)(B) 
of the Social Security Act.
    Alternatives: As an alternative to this NPRM, ACF has already 
provided sub-regulatory guidance requiring agencies to implement the 
provisions of the NPRM for children who identify as LGBTQI+. However, 
this guidance did not have the force of law and thus was not sufficient 
to effectively ensure that LGBTQI+ children and youth in foster care 
receive appropriate placements and services.
    Anticipated Cost and Benefits: The benefits of this NPRM are that 
placing children in foster care with providers the agencies designate 
as safe and appropriate for LGBTQI+ children will reduce the negative 
experiences of such children by allowing them to have access to needed 
care and services and to be placed in nurturing placement settings with 
caregivers who have received appropriate training. Ensuring such 
placements may also reduce LGBTQI+ foster children's high rates of 
homelessness, housing instability and food insecurity. ACF acknowledges 
that there will be a cost to implement changes made by this proposed 
rule as we anticipate that a majority of states would need to expand 
their efforts to recruit and identify providers and foster families 
that the state or tribe could designate as safe and appropriate 
placements for a LGBTQI+ child. This cost would vary depending on an 
agency's available resources to implement a final rule, though Federal 
financial participation is available to agencies for eligible 
administrative expenses, including expenses for recruiting and 
identifying providers and foster families that could be designated as 
safe and appropriate placements for an LGBTQI+ child.
    Risks: TBD.
    Timetable:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Action                    Date            FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NPRM................................   09/28/23  88 FR 66752
NPRM Comment Period End.............   11/27/23  .......................
Final Action........................   04/00/24  .......................
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No.
    Government Levels Affected: Federal, Local, State, Tribal.
    Federalism: This action may have federalism implications as defined 
in E.O. 13132.
    Agency Contact: Kathleen McHugh, Director, Division of Policy, 
Children's Bureau, ACYF/ACF/HHS, Department of Health and Human 
Services, Administration for Children and Families, 330 C Street SW, 
Room 3411, Washington, DC 20201, Phone: 202 401-5789, Fax: 202 205-
8221, Email: [email protected].
    RIN: 0970-AD03

HHS--ACF

Final Rule Stage

82. Improving Child Care Access, Affordability, and Stability in the 
Child Care and Development Fund (CCDF) [0970-AD02]

    Priority: Section 3(f)(1) Significant. Major status under 5 U.S.C. 
801 is undetermined.
    Legal Authority: The Child Care and Development Block Grant (CCDBG) 
Act of 1990, as amended (42 U.S.C. 9858 et seq.); sec.418 of the Social 
Security Act (42 U.S.C. 618)
    CFR Citation: 45 CFR part 98.
    Legal Deadline: None.
    Abstract: This final rule would update the Child Care and 
Development Fund (CCDF) regulations to ease eligible families' 
enrollment in the child care subsidy system and increase participating 
families' access to a range of high-quality child care options for 
which they may use child care subsidies. The changes would address: (1) 
Family copayments; (2) provider payment rates and practices; (3) child 
eligibility determination and re-determination; and (4) technical 
changes.
    Statement of Need: This final rule amends Child Care and 
Development Fund (CCDF) regulations in four areas: (1) family co- 
payments; (2) provider payment rates and practices; (3) child 
enrollment and eligibility determination; and, (4) technical changes. 
These changes will lower child care costs for families, increase 
parent's child care options, reduce barriers to receiving child care 
assistance, increase payments to providers, support higher program 
quality, and improve child care stability.
    The Child Care and Development Block Grant (CCDBG) Act, together 
with Section 418 of the Social Security Act, authorize the CCDF, which 
is the primary Federal funding source devoted to supporting families 
with low incomes access child care and to increasing the quality of 
child care for all children. Fiscal year (FY) 2023 funding was over $11 
billion by formula to states, territories, and tribes. CCDF child care 
subsidies support children's positive and healthy development and 
family economic wellbeing, enabling parents to pursue employment, 
education, and training opportunities. More than 900,000 families and 
1.5 million children benefit from CCDF financial assistance each month.
    Congress last authorized the CCDBG Act in 2014, and the Department 
of Health and Human Services (HHS) published final regulations 
clarifying the new provisions of the Act in September 2016. These 
statutory and regulatory actions included significant changes to the 
CCDF program. In the years since 2016 Final Rule, CCDF agencies have 
taken significant steps to implement the requirements, but child care 
remains a broken system in crisis due to chronic underinvestment. 
Parents struggle to find affordable high-quality child care that meets 
their needs, and the system relies on a poorly compensated workforce 
and unaffordable parent fees.
    This final rule builds on the 2016 final rule and to create a 
stronger child care assistance program that will better meet the needs 
of children, families, and child care providers. It provides additional 
clarity around key policies that are needed to provide more help for 
families so they can find child care that meets their families' needs 
and for the continued stabilization of the child care sector.
    Summary of Legal Basis: ACF publishes this final rule under the 
authority granted to the Secretary of Health and Human Services (the 
Secretary) by the Child Care and Development Block Grant (CCDBG) Act of 
1990, as amended (42 U.S.C. 9857, et seq.) and section 418 of the 
Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 618).
    Alternatives:

[[Page 9375]]

    Alternative 1: One alternative is to publish this final rule, which 
will lower family costs, increase parent's options for child care, help 
families receive more timely assistance, increase payments to child 
care providers, incentivize child care providers to accept CCDF 
subsidies, help stabilize the child care sector, and improve child care 
quality.
    Alternative 2: Another alternative is to keep the status quo, which 
will continue current fees and policies that limit a family's ability 
to participate in the CCDF program and access child care, payment 
practices that limit parent choices and undermine child care provider 
stability, and eligibility processes that create barriers to the child 
care subsidy.
    Anticipated Cost and Benefits: Changes made by this final rule 
would have the most direct benefit for the over 900,000 families and 
1.5 million children who use CCDF assistance to help pay for child care 
each month. Families who receive CCDF assistance will benefit from 
lower parent co-payments, more parental options for child care 
arrangements, expanded and easier access to child care which could 
improve the ability of families to participate in the labor market, and 
improved eligibility determination processes.
    Providers will benefit from fairer payment practices that support 
their financial stability, including payments that more accurately 
reflect the cost of providing high quality care, which can lead to 
higher wages for providers and their staff.
    The cost of implementing these changes would vary based on a state, 
territory, or Tribe's specific situation and implementation choices. 
Some states may also need to invest in IT and systems changes.
    Risks: None.
    Timetable:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Action                    Date            FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NPRM................................   07/13/23  88 FR 45022
NPRM Comment Period End.............   08/28/23  .......................
Final Action........................   04/00/24  .......................
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No.
    Government Levels Affected: Local, State, Tribal.
    Agency Contact: Megan Campbell, Child Care Policy Supervisor, 
Department of Health and Human Services, Administration for Children 
and Families, 330 C Street SW, Washington, DC 20201, Phone: 202 690-
6499, Fax: 202 690-5600, Email: [email protected].
    RIN: 0970-AD02

HHS--ACF

Completed Actions

83. Separate Licensing Standards for Relative or Kinship Foster Family 
Homes [0970-AC91]

    Priority: Section 3(f)(1) Significant. Major under 5 U.S.C. 801.
    CFR Citation: 45 CFR 1355.20.
    Abstract: This regulation allows title IV-E agencies to adopt 
separate licensing standards for relative or kinship foster family 
homes.
    Statement of Need: Currently, the regulation provides that in order 
to claim title IV-E, all foster family homes must meet the same 
licensing standards, regardless of whether the foster family home is a 
relative or non-relative placement. This Notice of Proposed Rulemaking 
(NPRM) allows a title IV-E agency to adopt licensing or approval 
standards for all relative foster family homes that are different from 
the licensing standards used for non-related foster family homes.
    Summary of Legal Basis: This NPRM is published under the authority 
granted to the Secretary of Health and Human Services by section 1102 
of the Social Security Act (Act), 42 U.S.C. 1302. Section 1102 of the 
Act authorizes the Secretary to publish regulations, not inconsistent 
with the Act, as may be necessary for the efficient administration of 
the functions for which the Secretary is responsible pursuant to the 
Act. Section 472 of the Act authorizes federal reimbursement for a FCMP 
for an otherwise eligible child when the child is placed in a fully 
licensed or approved foster family home.
    Alternatives: There are no satisfactory alternatives to publishing 
this NPRM. This change cannot be made in sub- regulatory guidance.
    Anticipated Cost and Benefits: This NPRM impacts state and tribal 
title IV-E agencies and does not impose a burden. The title IV-E agency 
has discretion to develop separate licensing standards for relatives 
and non-relatives and if they do so, they may claim title IV-E funding. 
ACF estimates that the proposed regulatory change would cost the 
Federal Government $3.085 billion in title IV-E foster care federal 
financial participation over 10 years.
    Risks: None.
    Completed:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Reason                    Date            FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Final Action........................   09/28/23  88 FR 66700
Final Action Effective..............   11/27/23  .......................
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No.
    Small Entities Affected: No.
    Government Levels Affected: None.
    Agency Contact: Kathleen McHugh, Director, Division of Policy, 
Children's Bureau, ACYF/ACF/HHS, Department of Health and Human 
Services, Administration for Children and Families, 330 C Street SW, 
Room 3411, Washington, DC 20201, Phone: 202 401-5789, Fax: 202 205-
8221, Email: [email protected].
    RIN: 0970-AC91

HHS--ADMINISTRATION FOR COMMUNITY LIVING (ACL)

Proposed Rule Stage

84. Adult Protective Services Functions and Grant Programs [0985-AA18]

    Priority: Other Significant.
    Legal Authority: Elder Justice Act (SSA sec. 2042. [42 U.S.C. 
1397m-1] (a) Secretarial Responsibilities)
    CFR Citation: Not Yet Determined.
    Legal Deadline: None.
    Abstract: The final rule would create federal regulations for Adult 
Protective Services (APS) programs as authorized by the Elder Justice 
Act. APS programs were originally recognized by federal law in 1975 
under title XX of the Social Security Act via the Social Services Block 
Grant (SSBG). States have wide discretion whether to allocate any 
funding to APS via the SSBG program, and there are no regulations 
pertaining to APS under SSBG. Since 1975, all 50 states, the District 
of Columbia, and four territories have developed APS programs in 
accordance with local needs, structures, and laws. Historic investments 
through the Coronavirus Relief and Response Supplemental Appropriations 
Act (CRRSA) and the American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) provided the very 
first funding for APS program formula funding to states as authorized 
by the Elder Justice Act (EJA). These regulations would promote an 
effective APS response across the country so that all older adults and 
adults with disabilities, regardless of the state or jurisdiction in 
which they live, have similar protections and service delivery from APS 
systems. Following release of the NPRM, ACL held a stakeholder call 
open to all of the public on September 18, 2023, that provided a 
walkthrough of the proposed rule and background resources and 
information

[[Page 9376]]

on how to comment. ACL also held a separate stakeholder call with 
Tribal grantees and leadership regarding the same. ACL has created a 
specific stakeholder web page at https://acl.gov/APSrule, which 
includes a summary of the rule and how to comment.
    Statement of Need: The proposed rule would create federal 
regulations for Adult Protective Services (APS) programs as authorized 
by the Elder Justice Act (EJA). These regulations are critical in 
establish consistent national requirements and standards for EJA APS 
program formula funding to states.
    Summary of Legal Basis: Development, promulgation and 
implementation of this regulation will be carried out consistently with 
the statute; however, this regulatory action is not required by the 
statute or a court order.
    Alternatives: ACL considers sub-regulatory guidance, information 
and education outreach, and voluntary approaches as alternatives to 
regulatory action. Prior to the availability of appropriations for 
formula funding for this program ACL utilized guidance and voluntary 
approach for the establishment of a national data system and in 
supporting the establishment and dissemination of program best 
practices. However, now that federal funding is available to all states 
and territories, none of these alternatives are the appropriate option 
for promulgating and administering the provisions that will be included 
in the regulations consistent with statute. Economic incentives and 
instruments are not an option.
    Anticipated Cost and Benefits: The proposed rule will require the 
revision of State policies and procedures, require training on new 
rules for APS staff, require the submission of new State plans, require 
data sharing agreements between APS systems and other State entities, 
require APS systems create a feedback loop to provide information to 
mandatory reporters, require data reporting to ACL, inform potential 
APS clients of their rights under State law, and require new or updated 
record retention systems for certain States. The rule will result in 
improved consistency in implementation of APS systems within and across 
States, clarity of obligations associated with Federal funding for 
administrators of APS systems and will result in better and more 
effective service delivery within and across States with better quality 
investigations in turn leading to more person-directed outcomes. The 
rule is anticipated to cost a total of $3,532,916.99 to fully 
implement. This cost will be offset by improved investigations and 
better outcomes for the victims of adult maltreatment. This represents 
significant value, particularly given the widespread and egregious 
nature of adult maltreatment in the United States.
    Risks: These regulations would establish first ever regulations for 
APS programs consistent with the Elder Justice Act passed in 2010. 
Promulgating this NPRM and obtaining public feedback in order to issue 
a new final rule will result in decreased risk for administering 
agencies at the federal, state and local level in ensuring the 
administration of appropriations for APS programs consistent with the 
statute, and in also supporting the statute's programmatic purpose of 
detecting, preventing and reducing the abuse, neglect and exploitation 
of adults, including older adults.
    Timetable:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Action                    Date            FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NPRM................................   09/12/23  88 FR 62503
NPRM Comment Period End.............   11/13/23  .......................
Final Action........................   05/00/24  .......................
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No.
    Small Entities Affected: No.
    Government Levels Affected: State.
    Federalism: This action may have federalism implications as defined 
in E.O. 13132.
    Agency Contact: Richard Nicholls, Chief of Staff and Executive 
Secretary, Department of Health and Human Services, Administration for 
Community Living, 330 C Street SW, Room 1004B, Washington, DC 20201, 
Phone: 202 795-7415, Fax: 202 205-0399, Email: 
[email protected]
    RIN: 0985-AA18

BILLING CODE 4150-03-P

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY (DHS)

Fall 2023 Statement of Regulatory Priorities

    The Department of Homeland Security (DHS or Department) was 
established in 2003 pursuant to the Homeland Security Act of 2002, 
Public Law 107-296. The DHS mission statement provides the following: 
``With honor and integrity, we will safeguard the American people, our 
homeland, and our values.''
    DHS was created in the aftermath of the horrific attacks of 9/11, 
and its distinctive mission is defined by those words. The phrase 
``homeland security'' refers to the security of the American people, 
the homeland (understood in the broadest sense), and the nation's 
defining values. A central part of the mission of protecting ``our 
values'' includes fidelity to law and the rule of law, reflected above 
all in the Constitution of the United States, and also in statutes 
enacted by Congress, including the Administrative Procedure Act. That 
commitment is also associated with a commitment to individual dignity. 
Among other things, the attacks of 9/11 were attacks on that value as 
well.
    The regulatory priorities of DHS are founded on an insistence on 
the rule of law--and also on a belief that individual dignity, 
symbolized and made real by the opening words of the Constitution (``We 
the People''), the separation of powers, and the Bill of Rights 
(including the Due Process Clause), helps to define our mission.
    Fulfilling that mission requires the dedication of more than 
240,000 employees in jobs that range from aviation and border security 
to emergency response, from cybersecurity analyst to chemical facility 
inspector, from the economist seeking to identify the consequences of 
our actions to the scientist and policy analyst seeking to make the 
nation more resilient against flooding, drought, extreme heat, and 
wildfires. Our duties are wide-ranging, but our goal is clear: keep 
America safe.
    There are six overarching homeland security missions that make up 
DHS's strategic plan: (1) Counter terrorism and homeland security 
threats; (2) secure U.S. borders and approaches; (3) secure cyberspace 
and critical infrastructure; (4) preserve and uphold the Nation's 
prosperity and economic security; (5) strengthen preparedness and 
resilience (including resilience from risks actually or potentially 
aggravated by climate change); and (6) champion the DHS workforce and 
strengthen the Department. See also 6 U.S.C. 111(b)(1) (identifying the 
primary mission of the Department).
    In promoting these goals, we attempt to evaluate our practices by 
reference to evidence and data, and to improve them in real time. We 
also attempt to deliver our multiple services in a way that, at once, 
protects the American people and does not impose excessive or 
unjustified barriers and burdens on those who use them.
    In achieving those goals, we are committed to public participation 
and to listening carefully to the American people (and to noncitizens 
as well). We are continually strengthening our partnerships with 
communities, first responders, law enforcement, and Government 
agencies--at the Federal,

[[Page 9377]]

State, local, tribal, and international levels. We are accelerating the 
deployment of science, technology, and innovation in order to make 
America more secure against risks old and new--and to perform our 
services better. We are becoming leaner, smarter, and more efficient, 
ensuring that every security resource is used as effectively as 
possible. We are reducing administrative burdens and simplifying our 
processes. For a further discussion of our mission, see the DHS website 
at https://www.dhs.gov/mission.
    The regulations we have summarized below in the Department's Fall 
2023 regulatory plan and agenda support the Department's mission. We 
are committed to continuing evaluation of our regulations, consistent 
with Executive Order 13563, and Executive Order 13707, and in a way 
that improves them over time. These regulations will improve the 
Department's ability to accomplish its mission. Also, these regulations 
address legislative initiatives such as the ones found in the 
Implementing Recommendations of the 9/11 Commission Act of 2007 (9/11 
Act) and the FAA Extension, Safety, and Security Act of 2016.
    We emphasize here our commitments (1) To fidelity to law; (2) to 
treating people with dignity and respect; (3) to increasing national 
resilience against multiple risks and hazards, including those actually 
or potentially associated with climate change; (4) to modernization of 
existing requirements; and (5) to reducing unjustified barriers and 
burdens, including administrative burdens.
    DHS strives for organizational excellence and uses a centralized 
and unified approach to managing its regulatory resources. The Office 
of the General Counsel manages the Department's regulatory program, 
including the agenda and regulatory plan. In addition, DHS senior 
leadership reviews each significant regulatory project in order to 
ensure that the project fosters and supports the Department's mission.
    The Department is committed to ensuring that all of its regulatory 
initiatives are aligned with its guiding principles to remain faithful 
to law, protect civil rights and civil liberties, integrate our 
actions, listen to those affected by our actions, build coalitions and 
partnerships, develop human resources, innovate, and be accountable to 
the American public.
    DHS is strongly committed to the principles described in Executive 
Orders 13563 and 12866 (as amended). Both Executive Orders direct 
agencies to assess the costs and benefits of available regulatory 
alternatives and, if regulation is necessary, to select regulatory 
approaches that maximize net benefits. Executive Order 13563 emphasizes 
the importance of quantifying both costs and benefits, of reducing 
costs, of harmonizing rules, and of promoting flexibility. Executive 
Order 13563 explicitly draws attention to human dignity and to equity.
    Finally, the Department values public involvement in the 
development of its regulatory plan, agenda, and regulations. It is 
particularly concerned with the impact its regulations have on small 
businesses and startups, consistent with its commitment to promoting 
economic growth. DHS is also concerned to ensure that its regulations 
are equitable, and that they do not have unintended or adverse effects 
on (for example) women, disabled people, people of color, or the 
elderly. Its general effort to modernize regulations, and to remove 
unjustified barriers and burdens, is meant in part to avoid harmful 
effects on small businesses, startups, and disadvantaged groups of 
multiple sorts. DHS and its components continue to emphasize the use of 
plain language in our regulatory documents to promote a better 
understanding of regulations and to promote increased public 
participation in the Department's regulations. We want our regulations 
to be transparent and ``navigable,'' so that people are aware of how to 
comply with them (and in a position to suggest improvements). DHS and 
its components regularly seek public input on regulatory plans, 
including through Requests for Information and Advanced Notices of 
Proposed Rulemaking, listening sessions, Federal Advisory Committees, 
and more.
    The Fall 2023 regulatory plan for DHS includes regulations from 
multiple DHS components, including the Federal Emergency Management 
Agency (FEMA), U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS), the 
U.S. Coast Guard (the Coast Guard), U.S. Customs and Border Protection 
(CBP), Transportation Security Administration (TSA), U.S. Immigration 
and Customs Enforcement (ICE), and the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure 
Security Agency (CISA). We next describe the regulations that comprise 
the DHS fall 2023 regulatory plan.

Federal Emergency Management Agency

    The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) is the government 
agency responsible for helping people before, during, and after 
disasters. FEMA supports the people and communities of our Nation by 
providing experience, perspective, and resources in emergency 
management. FEMA is particularly focused on national resilience in the 
face of the risks of flooding, drought, extreme heat, and wildfire; it 
is acutely aware that these risks, and others, are actually or 
potentially aggravated by climate change. FEMA seeks to ensure, to the 
extent possible, that changing weather conditions do not mean a more 
vulnerable nation. FEMA is also focused on individual equity, and it is 
aware that administrative burdens and undue complexity might produce 
inequitable results in practice.
    Consistent with President Biden's Executive Order on Climate 
Related Financial Risk (Executive Order 14030), FEMA will propose a 
regulation titled National Flood Insurance Program: Standard Flood 
Insurance Policy, Homeowner Flood Form. The National Flood Insurance 
Program (NFIP), established pursuant to the National Flood Insurance 
Act of 1968, is a voluntary program in which participating communities 
adopt and enforce a set of minimum floodplain management requirements 
to reduce future flood damages. Property owners in participating 
communities are eligible to purchase NFIP flood insurance. This 
proposed rule would revise the Standard Flood Insurance Policy by 
adding a new Homeowner Flood Form and five accompanying endorsements. 
The new Homeowner Flood Form would replace the Dwelling Form as a 
source of coverage for homeowners of one-to-four family residences. 
Together, the new Form and endorsements would more closely align with 
property and casualty homeowners' insurance and provide increased 
options and coverage in a more user-friendly and comprehensible format.
    FEMA will also publish an Interim Final Rule (IFR) titled 
Individual Assistance Program Equity to further align with Executive 
Order 13985, Advancing Racial Equity and Support for Underserved 
Communities Through the Federal Government and Executive Order 14091, 
Further Advancing Racial Equity and Support for Underserved Communities 
Through the Federal Government. FEMA will amend its Individual 
Assistance (IA) program regulations to increase equity by simplifying 
processes, removing barriers to entry, and increasing eligibility for 
certain types of assistance under the program. Specifically, FEMA will 
increase eligibility for home repair assistance by amending the 
definitions

[[Page 9378]]

and application of the terms safe, sanitary, and functional, allowing 
assistance for certain accessibility-related items, and amending its 
approach to evaluating insurance proceeds; allow for the re-opening of 
the applicant registration period when the President adds new counties 
to the major disaster declaration; simplify the documentation 
requirements for continued temporary housing assistance; simplify the 
appeals process; simplify the process to request approval for a late 
registration; remove the requirement to apply for a Small Business 
Administration loan as a condition of eligibility for Other Needs 
Assistance (ONA); and establish additional assistance under ONA for 
serious needs, displacement, disaster-damaged computing devices, and 
essential tools for self-employed individuals. FEMA also makes 
revisions to reflect changes to statutory authority that have not yet 
been implemented in regulation, to include provisions for utility and 
security deposit payments, lease and repair of multi-family rental 
housing, child care assistance, maximum assistance limits, and waiver 
authority.
    FEMA informed the development of this IFR by seeking input on 
regulatory changes to the Individuals and Households Program (IHP) 
through an Request for Information (RFI) published on April 22, 2021, 
seeking public input on its programs, regulations, collections of 
information, and policies to ensure they effectively achieve FEMA's 
mission in a manner that furthers the goals of advancing equity for 
all, including those in underserved communities; bolstering resilience 
from the impacts of climate change, particularly for those 
disproportionately impacted by climate change; and environmental 
justice.\1\ FEMA held public meetings and extended the comment period 
on the RFI to ensure all interested parties had sufficient opportunity 
to provide comments.\2\ All relevant comments received in response to 
the RFI, including those received during the public meetings, have been 
posted to the public rulemaking docket on the Federal eRulemaking 
portal at https://www.regulations.gov/document/FEMA-2021-0011-0001/comment. Commenters raised equitable concerns that FEMA will address in 
this IFR, such as by removing the requirement to apply for the SBA for 
a loan before receipt of ONA, amending FEMA's habitability standards, 
increasing assistance for essential tools, simplifying its appeal 
process, and removing documentation requirements for late 
registrations. FEMA will seek public comment on this IFR and will 
carefully consider each comment received to determine whether further 
changes to FEMA's IHP regulations are needed.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 86 FR 21325, Apr. 22, 2021.
    \2\ See ``Request for Information on FEMA Programs, Regulations, 
and Policies; Public Meetings; Extension of Comment Period,'' 86 FR 
30326, June 7, 2021.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In addition, FEMA will propose a regulation titled Update of FEMA's 
Public Assistance Regulations. FEMA proposes to revise its Public 
Assistance program regulations to reflect current statutory authorities 
and implement program improvements. The proposed rule would incorporate 
changes brought about by amendments to the Robert T. Stafford Disaster 
Relief and Emergency Assistance Act. FEMA is also proposing 
clarifications and corrections to improve the efficiency and 
consistency of the Public Assistance program.
    Additionally, FEMA will propose a regulation titled Updates to 
Floodplain Management and Protection of Wetlands Regulations to 
Implement the Federal Flood Risk Management Standard consistent with 
Executive Order 14030. FEMA proposes to amend its existing regulations 
to incorporate amendments that have been made to Executive Order 11988 
and the Federal Flood Risk Management Standard (FFRMS). FEMA has 
engaged the public extensively on these matters. On February 5, 2015, 
FEMA, acting on behalf of the Mitigation Framework Leadership Group, 
posted a Federal Register notice seeking comments on a draft of the 
Revised Guidelines for Implementing Executive Order 11988, Floodplain 
Management.\3\ The 60-day comment period was extended an additional 30 
days.\4\ During the public comment period for the Revised Guidelines, 
FEMA sent advisories to representatives from Governors' offices 
nationwide inviting comments on the draft Revised Guidelines. Over 25 
meetings were held across the country with State, local, and Tribal 
officials and interested stakeholders to discuss the draft Revised 
Guidelines as well as 9 public listening sessions across the country 
attended by over 700 participants to facilitate feedback. All relevant 
comments received in response to these efforts have been posted to the 
public rulemaking docket on the Federal eRulemaking portal at https://www.regulations.gov/document/FEMA-2015-0006-0001/comment. Comments from 
meetings and listening sessions can be found at https://www.regulations.gov/docket/FEMA-2015-0006/document.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ 80 FR 6530, Feb. 5, 2015.
    \4\ 80 FR 16018, Mar. 26, 2015.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Additionally, FEMA published a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) 
in 2016 \5\ seeking public comment on FEMA's proposed implementation of 
the Revised Guidelines. All relevant comments received in response to 
the 2016 NPRM have been posted to the public rulemaking docket on the 
Federal eRulemaking portal at https://www.regulations.gov/document/FEMA-2015-0006-0373/comment. The FFRMS is a flexible framework allowing 
agencies to choose among three approaches to define the floodplain and 
corresponding flood elevation requirements for federally funded 
projects. Existing regulations describe FEMA's process for determining 
whether the proposed location for an action falls within a floodplain 
and how to complete the action in the floodplain in light of the risk 
of flooding. The proposed rule would change how FEMA defines a 
floodplain with respect to certain actions. Additionally, under the 
proposed rule, FEMA would use natural systems, ecosystem process, and 
nature-based approaches, where practicable, when developing 
alternatives to locating the proposed action in the floodplain.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ 81 FR 57401, Aug. 22, 2016.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Finally, FEMA continues to engage with the public related to its 
NFIP minimum floodplain management standards. On October 12, 2021, FEMA 
issued an RFI to receive the public's input on revising the NFIP's 
floodplain management standards for land management and use regulations 
to better align with the current understanding of flood risk and flood 
risk reduction approaches. FEMA's authority under the National Flood 
Insurance Act requires the agency to, from time to time, develop 
comprehensive criteria designed to encourage the adoption of adequate 
State and local measures. During the RFI comment period, FEMA held 
three public meetings and extended the comment period on the RFI to 
ensure all interested parties had sufficient opportunity to provide 
comments.\6\ All relevant comments received in response to the RFI have 
been posted to the public rulemaking docket on the Federal eRulemaking 
portal at https://www.regulations.gov/docket/FEMA-2021-0024/comments 
and transcripts from the public meetings have also been posted at 
https://www.regulations.gov/docket/FEMA-2021-0024/document. In April 
2023, FEMA requested recommendations from the Technical

[[Page 9379]]

Mapping Advisory Council (TMAC) on modifying the definition of the 
Special Flood Hazard Area or modifying how it is calculated. In 
addition, FEMA requested a recommendation from TMAC on how FEMA might 
consider changing mapping procedures related to when land is filled. 
These recommendations will assist FEMA in exploring the feasibility of 
public comments received from the 2021 RFI.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ 86 FR 59745, Oct. 28, 2021 and 86 FR 66329, Nov. 22, 2021.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The agency will propose regulations to better align the NFIP 
minimum floodplain management standards with FEMA's current 
understanding of flood risk, flood insurance premium rates, and risk 
reduction approaches to make communities safer, stronger, and more 
resilient to increased flooding. As part of the proposed regulations, 
FEMA is considering revisions to the NFIP minimum floodplain management 
standards to better protect people and property in a nuanced manner 
that balances community needs with the national scope of the NFIP. FEMA 
will also propose opportunities to make these minimum floodplain 
management standards improve resilience in historically underserved 
communities. The proposed revisions to the NFIP floodplain management 
minimum standards will consider how to advance the conservation of 
threatened and endangered species and their habitat. FEMA is also 
reviewing ways to further promote enhanced resilience efforts through 
the Community Rating System.

United States Citizenship and Immigration Services

    U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) is the government 
agency that administers and oversees lawful immigration to the United 
States. USCIS is firmly committed to creating and strengthening an 
accessible and humane immigration system. The USCIS mission statement 
is: ``USCIS upholds America's promise as a nation of welcome and 
possibility with fairness, integrity, and respect for all we serve.'' 
The American people, through Congress, have entrusted USCIS to 
faithfully administer the legal immigration programs that allow foreign 
nationals to visit, work, study, live, and seek refuge in the United 
States. Every day, USCIS delivers immigration decisions to individuals, 
families, businesses, workers, and those seeking a place of safety and 
shelter in our country, whether they filed applications, petitions, 
requests, or appeals. The work of USCIS employees makes the possibility 
of America a reality for immigrants, for the communities and economies 
they join, and for the nation as a whole. In achieving this mission, 
partnership with our stakeholders and strong public engagement is a 
strategic priority of USCIS to ensure we are crafting policies and 
regulations to reduce unnecessary burdens or barriers to legal 
immigration, meet the economic needs of U.S. employers, and 
reinvigorate the size and scope of humanitarian relief. Over the coming 
year, USCIS will pursue several regulatory actions in support of 
furthering a strong legal immigration system that operates with 
integrity, and that promotes integration, inclusion, and citizenship. 
USCIS will issue regulations that restore and strengthen the family and 
employment-based immigration systems, that improve the lives of 
survivors of domestic and sexual violence and other serious crimes, and 
that are nimble enough to address urgent humanitarian needs effectively 
and quickly. We will publish regulations that are clear and easy to 
understand, and include opportunities for public engagement and input.
    Employment Issues, Economic Needs, and Lawful Pathways. USCIS is 
focused on promulgating policies that are responsive to the needs of 
the U.S. economy and U.S. employers, while providing lawful pathways to 
work in the United States and also protecting the rights of both U.S. 
and noncitizen workers. USCIS has recently proposed a rule to modernize 
and reform the H-2A and H-2B programs. The proposed rule incorporates 
necessary program efficiencies, aims to meet the needs of U.S. 
employers, and include provisions designated to protect against the 
exploitation or other abuse of H-2A and H-2B workers (Modernization and 
Reform of the H-2 Programs). USCIS will also propose a rule to update 
and streamline the H-1B program, with a goal of improving program 
efficiency, integrity, and flexibility including proposed changes to 
the registration system to reduce the possibility of misuse and fraud.
    Many of these proposals will be informed by the public comments we 
received in response to a Request for Public Input that USCIS published 
on April 19, 2021, to solicit feedback from our stakeholders and 
customers on identifying and reducing barriers to immigration (86 FR 
20398). (Modernizing H-1B Requirements and Oversight and Providing 
Flexibility in the F-1 Program.)
    Improvements to the Overall Immigration System. On January 4, 2023, 
USCIS published a proposal to adjust certain immigration and 
naturalization benefit request fees (after performing the required 
biennial fee review) to ensure that fees charged recover full costs 
borne by USCIS. Following publication of the notice of proposed 
rulemaking and during the official comment period, on January 11, 2023, 
USCIS held a virtual listening session, ``National Listening Session on 
the Proposed Rule to Adjust Certain Immigration Fees'' (attended by 
1,671 people), for members of the public to provide their feedback and 
thoughts. USCIS will consider all comments and input received from the 
public in developing the final rule and set fees in a manner that 
adheres to the ideals of removing unjustified barriers and promoting 
access to the immigration system (to promote, among other things, 
economic needs and economic growth); improving and expanding 
naturalization processing; and meeting the administration's 
humanitarian priorities. (USCIS Fee Schedule and Changes to Certain 
Other Immigration Benefit Request Requirements.) In addition, USCIS 
plans to take steps to reform the regulations governing the adjustment 
of status to lawful permanent residence to improve the efficiency and 
administration of that program. USCIS will propose a rule that updates 
outdated regulations, reduces the potential for visa retrogression, and 
promotes the efficient use of immediately available immigrant visas. 
Many of the proposed policy and operational changes contained in this 
rulemaking were informed by public comments USCIS received on its April 
19, 2021 Request for Public Input and are crafted to reduce barriers to 
lawful immigration as identified by our stakeholders. (Improving the 
Regulations Governing the Adjustment of Status to Lawful Permanent 
Residence and Related Immigration Benefits.) Lastly, USCIS is also 
planning a proposed rule to clarify and update eligibility requirements 
governing citizenship and naturalization. This project is also informed 
by information submitted by our public stakeholders in response to the 
2021 Request for Public Input, as well as a CIS Ombudsman's Webinar 
Series: Naturalization and Immigrant Integration on May 23, 2021 
(attended by 635 people and 118 people provided written questions/
comments) and a Citizenship and Naturalization Engagement on March 15, 
2022 (attended by 463 people and 6 people submitted written questions/
comments by email) in which the public provided comments on regulations 
and policies. USCIS reviewed all comments provided through the Request 
for Public Input and the engagements, and incorporated edits into the 
proposed rule as applicable. (Citizenship and

[[Page 9380]]

Naturalization and Other Related Flexibilities.)
    Humanitarian Relief. USCIS will propose reforms to the U 
nonimmigrant visa classification. The U nonimmigrant status is for 
noncitizen victims of certain qualifying criminal activities, and their 
eligible family members, who have been, are, or are likely to be 
helpful in the investigation or persecution of those crimes. To 
streamline the procedures and enhance operational efficiency, USCIS 
will propose a rule to update eligibility, procedural and filing 
requirements governing U nonimmigrant status, and adjustment of status 
for those nonimmigrants. (Victims of Qualifying Criminal Activities; 
Eligibility Requirements for U Nonimmigrant Status and Adjustment of 
Status).
    Asylum Reforms. USCIS is focused on pursuing regulations to 
strengthen, rebuild, and (where appropriate) streamline the asylum 
system, consistent with law and mission imperatives. For example, USCIS 
and DOJ will take steps to remove regulatory provisions that are 
currently enjoined (Procedures for Asylum and Bars to Asylum 
Eligibility), propose updates to clarify eligibility for asylum and 
withholding of removal (Clarifying Definitions and Analyses for Fair 
and Efficient Asylum and Other Protection Determinations), and propose 
modifications or withdrawal of other asylum-related regulatory 
provisions (Asylum Eligibility and Public Health).

United States Coast Guard

    The Coast Guard is a military, multi-mission, maritime service of 
the United States and the only military organization within DHS. It is 
the principal Federal agency responsible for maritime safety, security, 
and stewardship in U.S. ports and waterways.
    Effective governance in the maritime domain hinges upon an 
integrated approach to safety, security, and stewardship. The Coast 
Guard's policies and capabilities are integrated and interdependent, 
delivering results through a network of enduring partnerships with 
maritime stakeholders. Consistent standards of universal application 
and enforcement, which encourage safe, efficient, and responsible 
maritime commerce, are vital to the success of the maritime industry. 
The Coast Guard's ability to field versatile capabilities and highly 
trained personnel is one of the U.S. Government's most significant and 
important strengths in the maritime environment.
    America is a maritime nation, and our security, resilience, and 
economic prosperity are intrinsically linked to the oceans. Safety, 
efficient waterways, and freedom of transit on the high seas are 
essential to our well-being. The Coast Guard is leaning forward, poised 
to meet the demands of the modern maritime environment. The Coast Guard 
creates value for the public through solid prevention and response 
efforts. Activities involving oversight and regulation, enforcement, 
maritime presence, and public and private partnership foster increased 
maritime safety, security, and stewardship.
    The statutory responsibilities of the Coast Guard include ensuring 
marine safety and security, preserving maritime mobility, protecting 
the marine environment, enforcing U.S. laws and international treaties, 
and performing search and rescue. The Coast Guard supports the 
Department's overarching goals of mobilizing and organizing our Nation 
to secure the homeland from terrorist attacks, natural disasters, and 
other emergencies. These goals include protection against the risks 
associated with climate change, and the Coast Guard seeks to obtain 
scientific information to assist in that task, while also acting to 
promote resilience and adaptation.
    In 33 CFR 1.05-15, each year since 1995 the Coast Guard has 
confirmed that it considers public participation essential to effective 
rulemaking. We encourage you to participate. It is Coast Guard policy 
to provide opportunities for you to participate early in potential 
rulemaking projects. Also, in our notices of proposed rulemaking, in 
addition to soliciting your written comments, we solicit requests for 
public meetings to provide you an opportunity for oral comment. We also 
seek recommendations from our ten Federal advisory committees and 
publish notices of those committee meetings should you want to attend. 
And our regulatory advisory group composed of senior Coast Guard 
officials, the Marine Safety and Security Council, has published the 
Proceedings magazine since the 1940s. Available online, the magazine 
informs the public about the subject matter of Coast Guard regulations, 
as well as the rulemaking process itself.
    The Coast Guard highlights the following regulatory actions, which 
are in the proposed rule stage:
    Cybersecurity in the Marine Transportation System. The Coast Guard 
is proposing to update its maritime security regulations by adding 
cybersecurity requirements to existing regulations. This proposed 
rulemaking is part of an ongoing effort to address emerging 
cybersecurity risks and threats to maritime security by including 
additional security requirements to safeguard the marine transportation 
system.
    Shipping Safety Fairways Along the Atlantic Coast. The Coast Guard 
published an Advance Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (ANPRM) on June 19, 
2020. We have considered comments on the ANPRM to develop a proposed 
rule that would establish shipping safety fairways along the Atlantic 
Coast of the United States. Fairways are marked routes for vessel 
traffic. They facilitate the direct and unobstructed transit of ships. 
The proposed fairways will be based on studies about vessel traffic 
along the Atlantic Coast for which we requested public comments.
    MARPOL Annex VI; Prevention of Air Pollution from Ships. The Coast 
Guard is proposing regulations to carry out the provisions of Annex VI 
of the MARPOL Protocol, which is focused on the prevention of air 
pollution from ships. The Act to Prevent Pollution from Ships has 
already given direct effect to most provisions of Annex VI, and the 
Coast Guard and the Environmental Protection Agency have carried out 
some Annex VI provisions through previous rulemakings. This proposed 
rulemaking would fill gaps in the existing framework for carrying out 
the provisions of Annex VI. Chapter 4 of Annex VI contains shipboard 
energy efficiency measures that include short-term measures reducing 
carbon emissions linked to climate change. This proposed rulemaking 
would apply to U.S.-flagged ships. It would also apply to foreign-
flagged ships operating either in U.S. navigable waters or in the U.S. 
Exclusive Economic Zone.
    Regarding outreach in the development of this proposed rulemaking, 
in June 2018, the Coast Guard held a public workshop regarding 
Implementation of Regulation 14.1.3 of MARPOL Annex VI (Global 0.50% 
Sulfur Cap). In October 2011, we held a public meeting on the 
International Maritime Organization guidelines for exhaust gas cleaning 
systems for marine engines with respect to Regulations 4 and 14 of 
MARPOL Annex VI. And in December 2010, we requested comments regarding 
a study on Ship Emission Reduction Technology for cargo and passenger 
vessels, including what methods or equipment were then under 
development that might meet the MARPOL Annex VI requirements.

[[Page 9381]]

United States Customs and Border Protection

    Customs and Border Protection (CBP) is the Federal agency 
principally responsible for the security of our Nation's borders, both 
at and between the ports of entry into the United States. CBP must 
accomplish its border security and enforcement mission without stifling 
the flow of legitimate trade and travel. The primary mission of CBP is 
its homeland security mission, that is, to prevent terrorists and 
terrorist weapons from entering the United States. An important aspect 
of this mission involves improving security at our borders and ports of 
entry, but it also means extending our zone of security beyond our 
physical borders.
    CBP is also responsible for administering laws concerning the 
importation of goods into the United States and enforcing the laws 
concerning the entry of persons into the United States. This includes 
regulating and facilitating international trade; collecting import 
duties; enforcing U.S. trade, immigration and other laws of the United 
States at our borders; inspecting imports; overseeing the activities of 
persons and businesses engaged in importing; enforcing the laws 
concerning smuggling and trafficking in contraband; apprehending 
individuals attempting to enter the United States illegally; protecting 
our agriculture and economic interests from harmful pests and diseases; 
servicing all people, vehicles, and cargo entering the United States; 
maintaining export controls; and protecting U.S. businesses from theft 
of their intellectual property.
    In carrying out its mission, CBP's goal is to facilitate the 
processing of legitimate trade and people efficiently without 
compromising security, and public input is an important tool in meeting 
this goal. CBP regularly seeks input from Federal Advisory Committees, 
issues formal Requests for Information, and holds listening sessions 
and symposia, including those on forced labor, green trade, and the 
21st Century Customs Framework. However, some of CBP's rules further 
law enforcement purposes and are therefore not ripe for robust public 
outreach prior to their issuance. CBP's public Newsroom, with details 
on upcoming public engagements, is available at: https://www.cbp.gov/newsroom.
    Consistent with its primary mission of homeland security, CBP 
intends to issue several regulations that are intended to improve 
security at our borders and ports of entry. During the upcoming year, 
CBP will also work on various projects to streamline CBP processing, 
reduce duplicative processes, reduce various burdens on the public, and 
automate various paper forms. CBP highlights one of those projects 
below.
    Advance Passenger Information System: Electronic Validation of 
Travel Documents. CBP intends to amend current Advance Passenger 
Information System (APIS) regulations to incorporate additional carrier 
requirements that would further enable CBP to determine whether each 
passenger is traveling with valid, authentic travel documents prior to 
the passenger boarding the aircraft. The proposed regulation would 
require commercial air carriers to receive a second message from CBP 
that would state whether CBP matched the travel documents of each 
passenger to a valid, authentic travel document recorded in CBP's 
databases. The proposed regulation would also require air carriers to 
transmit additional data elements regarding contact information through 
APIS for all commercial aircraft passengers arriving in the United 
States to support border operations and national security. CBP expects 
that the collection of these elements would enable CBP to further 
support the Center for Disease Control and Prevention's mission in 
monitoring and tracing the contacts for persons involved in health 
incidents. This action will result in time savings to passengers and 
cost savings to CBP, carriers, and the public.
    In addition to the regulations that CBP issues to promote DHS's 
mission, CBP issues regulations related to the mission of the 
Department of the Treasury. Under section 403(1) of the Homeland 
Security Act of 2002, the former-U.S. Customs Service, including 
functions of the Secretary of the Treasury relating thereto, 
transferred to the Secretary of Homeland Security. As part of the 
initial organization of DHS, the Customs Service inspection and trade 
functions were combined with the immigration and agricultural 
inspection functions and the Border Patrol and transferred into CBP. 
The Department of the Treasury retained certain regulatory authority of 
the U.S. Customs Service relating to customs revenue function. In the 
coming year, CBP expects to continue to issue regulatory documents that 
will facilitate legitimate trade and implement trade benefit programs. 
For a discussion of CBP regulations regarding the customs revenue 
function, see the regulatory plan of the Department of the Treasury.

Transportation Security Administration

    The Transportation Security Administration (TSA) protects the 
Nation's transportation systems to ensure freedom of movement for 
people and commerce. TSA applies an intelligence-driven, risk-based 
approach to all aspects of its mission. This approach results in layers 
of security to mitigate risks effectively and efficiently. In fiscal 
year 2024, TSA is prioritizing the following actions. In general, TSA 
has prioritized actions that are required to meet statutory mandates 
and, that are necessary for national security, and that are consistent 
with the goals of Executive Order 14058, Transforming Federal Customer 
Experience and Service Delivery to Rebuild Trust in Government.
    Consistent with Executive Order 14094, Modernizing Regulatory 
Review, TSA endeavors, as practicable and appropriate, to proactively 
engage parties that are interested in or affected by TSA rulemaking. 
With respect to the actions described below, TSA has used a range of 
measures to engage the public, including advance notices of proposed 
rulemakings, public meetings, and advisory committees.
    Enhancing Surface Cyber Risk Management. On January 28, 2021, the 
President issued the National Security Memorandum on Improving 
Cybersecurity for Critical Infrastructure Controls Systems. Consistent 
with this priority of the Administration and in response to the ongoing 
cybersecurity threat to pipeline systems, TSA used its authority under 
49 U.S.C. 114 to issue security directives to owners and operators of 
TSA-designated critical pipelines that transport hazardous liquids and 
natural gas to implement a number of urgently needed protections 
against cyber intrusions. The first directive, issued in May 2021, 
requires critical pipeline owner/operators to (a) report confirmed and 
potential cybersecurity incidents to DHS's Department of Cybersecurity 
and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA); (b) designate a 
Cybersecurity Coordinator to be available 24 hours a day, seven days a 
week; (3) review current cybersecurity practices; and (4) identify any 
gaps and related remediation measures to address cyber- related risks 
and report the results to TSA and CISA within 30 days of issuance of 
the SD. A second security directive, first issued in July 2021, 
requires these owners and operators to (1) implement specific 
mitigation measures to protect against ransomware attacks and other 
known threats to information technology and operational technology 
systems; (2) develop and implement a cybersecurity contingency and 
recovery plan; and (3) conduct a cybersecurity architecture design

[[Page 9382]]

review. TSA updated the second directive to require owners/operators to 
achieve critical security outcomes through performance-based measures. 
In December 2021 and October 2022, TSA imposed similar requirements on 
certain rail operations to address emerging threats. TSA is committed 
to enhancing and sustaining cybersecurity for all modes of 
transportation and intends to issue a rulemaking that may codify these 
and other requirements following an opportunity for notice and comment. 
TSA published an advance notice of proposed rulemaking on this topic in 
November 2022.
    Flight Training Security Program. Through an interim final rule, 
TSA created a new part 1552, Flight Schools, in title 49 of the Code of 
Federal Regulations (CFR). The IFR requires flight schools to notify 
TSA when noncitizens, and other individuals designated by TSA, apply 
for flight training or recurrent training. TSA subsequently issued 
exemptions and interpretations in response to comments on the IFR, 
questions raised during operation of the program since 2004, and a 
notice extending the comment period on May 18, 2018. Based on the 
comments and questions received, TSA is finalizing the rule with 
modifications that may include changing the frequency of security 
threat assessments from a high-frequency event-based interval to a 
time-based interval, clarify the definitions and other provisions of 
the rule, and enable industry to use TSA-provided electronic 
recordkeeping systems for all documents required to demonstrate 
compliance with the rule. These and other changes will provide 
significant cost-savings to the industry and individuals seeking flight 
training while also enhancing security.
    REAL ID Applicability to Mobile Driver's Licenses. TSA will issue a 
final rule to amend the REAL ID regulation to address mobile driver's 
licenses (mDL). The REAL ID Act of 2005 and DHS implementing regulation 
set minimum requirements for state-issued driver's licenses and 
identification cards accepted by Federal agencies for official 
purposes, which include accessing Federal facilities, boarding 
federally regulated commercial aircraft, entering nuclear power plants, 
and any other purposes that the Secretary shall determine. The REAL ID 
Modernization Act (December 2020) clarifies that the REAL ID Act 
applies to mobile or digital driver's licenses that have been issued in 
accordance with regulations prescribed by DHS. This final rule will 
amend 6 CFR part 37 to set the minimum technical requirements and 
security standards for mDLs to enable Federal agencies to accept mDLs 
for official purposes. to establish a process that states must follow 
to apply for a mDL waiver from the REAL ID regulations. This rulemaking 
would also enable federal agencies to accept state mDLs for official 
purposes from states who are issued such a waiver under this final 
rule.
    Frequency of Renewal Cycle for Indirect Air Carrier Security 
Programs. TSA's regulations for Indirect Air Carriers (IACs) in 49 CFR 
part 1548 currently require annual renewal of an IAC's security program 
and prompt notification to TSA of any changes to operations-related to 
information previously provided to TSA. Through this rulemaking, TSA 
will modify the regulation to allow for a three-year renewal schedule, 
rather than annual renewal. This change will align the security program 
renewal requirement with those applicable to other regulated entities 
within the air cargo industry.

United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement

    U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) is the principal 
criminal investigative arm of DHS and one of the three Department 
components charged with the criminal and civil enforcement of the 
Nation's immigration laws. Its primary mission is to protect national 
security, public safety, and the integrity of our borders through the 
criminal and civil enforcement of Federal law governing border control, 
customs, trade, and immigration. In carrying out this mission and 
consistent with Executive Order 14058 on Transforming Federal Customer 
Experience And Service Delivery To Rebuild Trust In Government ICE is 
committed to providing opportunities for the public to engage in the 
improvement of our programs, processes, and services. For example, on 
October 26, 2021, DHS published a notice in the Federal Register titled 
Remote Document Examination for Form I-9, Employment Eligibility 
Verification: Request for Public Input, (https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-2021-10-26/pdf/2021-23260.pdf) seeking comments from the 
public regarding document examination practices associated with Form I-
9. ICE carefully considered this input resulting in a final rule and 
procedure that incorporates commenters suggestions. During the coming 
fiscal year, ICE will focus rulemaking efforts on regulations 
pertaining to processing improvements, including the rules mentioned 
below.
    Clarifying and Revising Custody Determination Procedures for 
Noncitizens Subject to Discretionary Detention (INA 236(a)/8 U.S.C. 
1226 detention). The Department of Homeland Security (DHS), U.S. 
Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) and the Department of Justice 
(DOJ) Executive Office for Immigration Review (EOIR) (collectively, the 
Departments) are planning to amend the regulations that govern 
detention and release determinations for noncitizens subject to the 
custody provisions in section 236 of the Immigration and Nationality 
Act (Act), 8 U.S.C. 1226(a). The goal of the proposed regulation would 
be to clarify the scope and applicability of section 236(a) of the Act, 
8 U.S.C. 1226(a), and the procedures that apply under that section, 
including the burden and standard of proof for continued detention at 
initial custody determinations and any custody redetermination 
hearings, and related issues. This rulemaking is consistent with 
Executive Order 14058, which directs agencies to take actions that 
improve service delivery and customer experience by decreasing 
administrative burdens, enhancing transparency, and improving the 
efficiency and effectiveness of government.

Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency

    The Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) is 
responsible for leading the national effort to develop cybersecurity 
and critical infrastructure security programs, operations, and 
associated policy to enhance the security and resilience of physical 
and cyber infrastructure.
    Ammonium Nitrate Security Program. This rule implements a 2007 
amendment to the Homeland Security Act. The amendment requires DHS to 
``regulate the sale and transfer of ammonium nitrate facility . . . to 
prevent the misappropriation or use of ammonium nitrate in an act of 
terrorism.'' CISA published a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking in 2011. 
CISA is planning to issue a Supplemental Notice of Proposed Rulemaking.
    Chemical Facility Anti-Terrorism Standards (CFATS). This rule would 
update CFATS' Risk Based Performance Standards to enhance cybersecurity 
requirements, modify the counting rules associated with release-
flammable chemicals, remove release-explosive chemicals, and adjust the 
Screening Threshold Quantities of Appendix A to account for the updated 
risk analysis methodology. CISA previously invited public comment on an 
Advance Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (ANPRM) during August 2014 for 
potential revisions to the CFATS regulations. The

[[Page 9383]]

ANPRM provided an opportunity for the public to provide recommendations 
for possible program changes. In June 2020, CISA published for public 
comment a retrospective analysis of the CFATS program. And in January 
2021, CISA invited additional public comment through an ANPRM 
concerning the removal of certain explosive chemicals from CFATS. CISA 
intends to address many of the subjects raised in both ANPRMs and the 
retrospective analysis in this regulatory action, including potential 
updates to CFATS cybersecurity requirements and Appendix A to the CFATS 
regulations. CISA is planning to issue a notice of proposed rulemaking.
    Cybersecurity Incident Reporting for Critical Infrastructure Act 
Regulations. CISA will propose regulations to implement certain aspects 
of the Cybersecurity Incident Reporting for Critical Infrastructure Act 
of 2022 (CIRCIA). Specifically, CIRCIA directs CISA to develop and 
implement regulations requiring covered entities to submit reports to 
CISA regarding covered cyber incidents and ransom payments. CIRCIA 
requires CISA to publish a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) within 
24 months of the date of enactment of CIRCIA as part of the process for 
developing these regulations. CISA previously issued a Request for 
Information on September 12, 2022, and held a series of listening 
sessions seeking public input on potential aspects of the proposed 
regulation prior to publication of the NPRM. CISA is planning to issue 
a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking.
    A more detailed description of the priority regulations that 
comprise the DHS regulatory plan follows.

DHS--U.S. CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES (USCIS)

Proposed Rule Stage

85. Victims of Qualifying Criminal Activities; Eligibility Requirements 
for U Nonimmigrant Status and Adjustment of Status [1615-AA67]

    Priority: Other Significant.
    Legal Authority: 5 U.S.C. 552; 5 U.S.C. 552a; 8 U.S.C. 1101; 8 
U.S.C. 1101 (note); 8 U.S.C. 1102; Pub. L. 113-4
    CFR Citation: 8 CFR 214; 8 CFR 274a; 8 CFR 103; 8 CFR 299.
    Legal Deadline: None.
    Abstract: This proposed rule would clarify and update eligibility, 
procedural, and filing requirements for U nonimmigrant status (commonly 
known as the ``U'' visa) and adjustment of status for U nonimmigrants. 
U nonimmigrant status is for noncitizen victims of certain qualifying 
criminal activities who have been, are being, or are likely to be 
helpful in the investigation or prosecution of those crimes and 
eligible family members. There is a statutory limit of 10,000 U visas 
per year for principal petitioners. DHS published an interim final rule 
in 2007 (72 FR 53013) to establish the procedures to be followed in 
order to petition for U nonimmigrant status and published an interim 
final rule in 2008 (73 FR 75540) to establish the procedures for 
applying for adjustment of status as a U nonimmigrant. This rule would 
address relevant comments and feedback from stakeholders since 
publication of those interim final rules, as well as update the 
regulations for changes in legislation.
    Statement of Need: This U classification allows noncitizen victims 
of certain crimes to petition for U nonimmigrant status and to adjust 
status to that of a lawful permanent resident. Noncitizen victims of 
certain qualifying criminal activities who have been, are being, or are 
likely to be helpful in the investigation or prosecution of those 
crimes are eligible to petition for U nonimmigrant status. This rule 
would address the eligibility requirements that must be met for 
classification as a U nonimmigrant and implements statutory amendments 
to these requirements, streamlines the procedures to petition for U 
nonimmigrant status, provides evidentiary guidance to assist in the 
petition process, and clarifies adjustment of status requirements.
    Summary of Legal Basis: Section 101(a)(15) of the INA, 8 U.S.C. 
1101(a)(15) establishes classifications for noncitizens who are coming 
temporarily to the United States as nonimmigrants, including the U 
nonimmigrant classification. Section 214(a)(1) of the INA, 8 U.S.C. 
1184(a)(1), authorizes the Secretary to prescribe, by regulation, the 
terms and conditions of the admission of nonimmigrants, including U 
nonimmigrants. Section 214(p) of the INA, 8 U.S.C. 1184(p), sets forth 
certain procedural and substantive requirements for the U nonimmigrant 
classification, including employment authorization for U nonimmigrants 
incident to status and discretionary employment authorization for those 
with pending, bona fide U nonimmigrant visa petitions. Section 274A of 
the INA, 8 U.S.C. 1324a, recognizes the Secretary's authority to extend 
employment authorization to noncitizens in the United States.
    Anticipated Cost and Benefits: DHS is currently considering the 
specific impacts of the proposed provisions.
    Timetable:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Action                    Date            FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Interim Final Rule..................   09/17/07  72 FR 53013
Interim Final Rule Effective........   10/17/07
Interim Final Rule Comment Period      11/17/07
 End.
NPRM................................   02/00/24
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No.
    Small Entities Affected: No.
    Government Levels Affected: Federal, Local, State.
    Additional Information: Transferred from RIN 1115-AG39.
    URL For More Information: https://www.regulations.gov.
    URL For Public Comments: https://www.regulations.gov.
    Agency Contact: Rena Cutlip-Mason, Chief, Division of Humanitarian 
Affairs, OP&S, Department of Homeland Security, U.S. Citizenship and 
Immigration Services, 5900 Capital Gateway Drive, Camp Springs, MD 
20746, Phone: 240 721-3000.
    RIN: 1615-AA67

DHS--USCIS

86. Improving the Regulations Governing the Adjustment of Status to 
Lawful Permanent Residence and Related Immigration Benefits [1615-AC22]

    Priority: Other Significant. Major status under 5 U.S.C. 801 is 
undetermined.
    Unfunded Mandates: Undetermined.
    Legal Authority: 8 U.S.C. 1101; 8 U.S.C. 1103(a); 8 U.S.C. 1153 to 
1155; 8 U.S.C. 1159 and 1160; 8 U.S.C. 1254a; 8 U.S.C. 1255; 8 U.S.C. 
1257; 8 U.S.C. 1324a; 8 U.S.C. 1184; . . .
    CFR Citation: 8 CFR 204.5; 8 CFR 204.12; 8 CFR 205.1; 8 CFR 209.1; 
8 CFR 209.2; 8 CFR 244.15; 8 CFR 245.1; 8 CFR 245.2; 8 CFR 245.5; 8 CFR 
245.11; 8 CFR 245.15; 8 CFR 245.18; 8 CFR 249.2; 8 CFR 264.2; 8 CFR 
274a.12; . . .
    Legal Deadline: None.
    Abstract: The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) proposes to 
amend its regulations governing adjustment of status to lawful 
permanent residence in the United States. The proposed changes include 
permitting concurrent filing of a visa petition and the application for 
adjustment of status for the employment-based 4th preference (certain 
special immigrants) category, including religious workers; permitting 
the transfer of underlying basis of a

[[Page 9384]]

pending adjustment of status application; amending the definition 
relating to ineligibilities under section 245(c) of the INA; clarifying 
when a visa becomes available for purposes of the age calculation under 
the Child Status Protection Act; and authorizing compelling 
circumstances employment authorization for certain derivative 
beneficiaries waiting for immigrant visa availability. DHS also 
proposes to amend the regulations relating to temporary protected 
status and travel authorization and clarify the impact on the 
adjustment of status eligibility. The intent of these proposed changes 
is to reduce processing times, improve the quality of inventory data 
provided to partner agencies, reduce the potential for visa 
retrogression, and promote the efficient use of immediately available 
immigrant visas.
    Statement of Need: This rulemaking is necessary to address outdated 
regulations to improve efficiency and the administration of the 
adjustment of status of immigrants to lawful permanent residence in the 
United States, improve the quality of inventory data that DHS provides 
to agencies, reduce the potential for visa retrogression, and promote 
the efficient use of immediately available immigrant visas. This rule 
also changes eligibility requirements for certain classifications for 
what constitutes compelling circumstances for employment authorization.
    Summary of Legal Basis: The DHS's authority for the regulatory 
amendments proposed are found in various sections of the Immigration 
and Nationality Act (INA), codified at title 8 of the United States 
Code, and the Homeland Security Act of 2002 (HSA), Public Law 107-296, 
116 Stat. 2135 (Nov. 25, 2002), codified at 6 U.S.C. 101 et seq. 
Specifically, 6 U.S.C. 112, and 8 U.S.C. 1103, charge DHS with the 
administration and enforcement of the immigration laws of the United 
States, and 8 U.S.C. 1103(a) authorizes DHS to establish such 
regulations, prescribe such forms of bond, reports, entries, and other 
papers; issue instructions; and perform such other acts deemed 
necessary for carrying out the Secretary's authority under the 
provisions of the INA, including for the provisions related to 
immigrant visa petitions (8 U.S.C. 1153 to 1155); Adjustment of status 
of refugees (8 U.S.C. 1159); Special Agricultural Workers (8 U.S.C. 
1160); Admission of nonimmigrants (8 U.S.C. 1184); Temporary Protected 
Status (8 U.S.C. 1254a); Adjustment of status of nonimmigrant to that 
of person admitted for permanent residence (8 U.S.C. 1255); Adjustment 
of status of certain resident aliens to nonimmigrant status; exceptions 
(8 U.S.C. 1157); Work Authorization (8 U.S.C. 1324a).
    Anticipated Cost and Benefits: DHS is currently considering the 
specific impacts of the proposed provisions.
    Timetable:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Action                    Date            FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NPRM................................   03/00/24
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Undetermined.
    Government Levels Affected: Undetermined.
    Federalism: Undetermined.
    Agency Contact: Mark Phillips, Residence and Naturalization 
Division Chief, Department of Homeland Security, U.S. Citizenship and 
Immigration Services, Office of Policy and Strategy, 5900 Capital 
Gateway Drive, Suite 4S190, Camp Springs, MD 20588-0009, Phone: 240 
721-3000.
    RIN: 1615-AC22

DHS--USCIS

87. Asylum Eligibility and Public Health [1615-AC57]

    Priority: Other Significant.
    Legal Authority: Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant 
Responsibility Act of 1996 (``IIRIRA''), Pub. L. 104-208, 110 Stat. 
3009, sec. 604(a) (codified at INA 208(b)(2)(C), 8 U.S.C. 
1158(b)(2)(C)); INA 241(b)(3)(B), 8 U.S.C. 1231(b)(3)(B); Foreign 
Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act (``FARRA''), Pub. L. 105-277, 112 
Stat. 2681-822, sec. 2242 (1998); INA 235(b), 8 U.S.C. 1225(b)
    CFR Citation: 8 CFR 208; 8 CFR 1208.
    Legal Deadline: None.
    Abstract: On December 23, 2020, DHS and the DOJ (collectively, the 
Departments) published a final rule entitled Security Bars and 
Processing to clarify that the danger to the security of the United 
States statutory bar to eligibility for asylum and withholding of 
removal encompasses certain emergency public health concerns and make 
certain other changes. As of December 28, 2022, the rule's effective 
date was delayed until December 31, 2024. The Departments plan to 
propose modification or withdrawal of the December 23, 2020, rule.
    Statement of Need: The Departments are reviewing and reconsidering 
whether the Security Bars and Processing final rule is consistent with 
the goals of ensuring the safe and orderly reception and processing of 
asylum seekers consistent with public health and safety, with the 
additional context of the complex relationship between the Procedures 
for Asylum and Withholding of Removal; Credible Fear and Reasonable 
Fear Review final rule (RINs 1125-AA94 and 1615-AC42) and the Security 
Bars and Processing final rule. The Departments are reevaluating 
whether the Security Bars and Processing rule provides the most 
appropriate and effective framework for achieving its goals of 
mitigating the spread of communicable diseases, including COVID-19, 
among certain noncitizens in the credible fear screening process, as 
well as DHS personnel and the public. Based on such reconsideration, 
the Departments will propose to modify or withdraw the Security Bars 
rule.
    Anticipated Cost and Benefits: DHS is currently considering the 
specific cost and benefit impacts of the proposed provisions.
    Timetable:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Action                    Date            FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NPRM................................   07/09/20  85 FR 41201
NPRM Comment Period End.............   08/10/20
Final Action........................   12/23/20  85 FR 84160
Final Action Effective..............   01/22/21
Final Rule; Delay of Effective Date.   01/25/21  86 FR 6847
Final Rule; Effective Date Delayed     03/22/21
 Until.
Interim Final Rule; Delay of           03/22/21  86 FR 15069
 Effective Date.
Interim Final Rule Comment Period      04/21/21
 End.
Interim Final Rule Effective Date      12/31/21
 Delayed Until.
Interim Final Rule; Delay of           12/28/21  86 FR 73615
 Effective Date.
Interim Final Rule Comment Period      02/28/22
 End.
Interim Final Rule Effective Date      12/31/22
 Delayed Until.
Interim Final Rule; Delay of           12/28/22  87 FR 79789
 Effective Date.
Interim Final Rule Comment Period      02/27/23
 End.
Interim Final Rule Effective Date      12/31/24
 Delayed Until.
NPRM................................   11/00/23
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No.
    Government Levels Affected: None.
    URL For More Information: https://www.regulations.gov.

[[Page 9385]]

    URL For Public Comments: https://www.regulations.gov.
    Agency Contact: Ren[aacute] Cutlip-Mason, Chief, Division of 
Humanitarian Affairs, Department of Homeland Security, U.S. Citizenship 
and Immigration Services, 5900 Capital Gateway Drive, Camp Springs, MD 
20746, Phone: 240 721-3000.
    Related RIN: Related to 1125-AB08, Related to 1615-AC69
    RIN: 1615-AC57

DHS--USCIS

88. Clarifying Definitions and Analyses for Fair and Efficient Asylum 
and Other Protection Determinations [1615-AC65]

    Priority: Other Significant. Major status under 5 U.S.C. 801 is 
undetermined.
    Unfunded Mandates: Undetermined.
    Legal Authority: 8 U.S.C. 1101(a)(42); 8 U.S.C. 1158; 8 U.S.C. 
1225; 8 U.S.C. 1231 and 1231 (note); E.O. 14010; 86 FR 8267 (Feb. 2, 
2021)
    CFR Citation: 8 CFR 207; 8 CFR 208; 8 CFR 235; 8 CFR 244; 8 CFR 
1003; 8 CFR 1208; 8 CFR 1212; 8 CFR 1235; 8 CFR 1244.
    Legal Deadline: None.
    Abstract: This rule proposes to amend Department of Homeland 
Security (DHS) and Department of Justice (DOJ) (collectively, ``the 
Departments'') regulations that govern eligibility for asylum and 
withholding of removal. The amendments focus on portions of the 
regulations that deal with the definitions of membership in a 
particular social group and the interpretation of various other 
elements of eligibility for asylum, including some that are often 
determinative in particular social group claims, such as the 
requirements for failure of State protection, and determinations about 
whether persecution is on account of a protected ground. The rule will 
also propose to republish, modify, or rescind portions of the 
Procedures for Asylum and Withholding of Removal; Credible Fear and 
Reasonable Fear Review final rule (RINs 1125-AA94 and 1615-AC42). This 
rule is consistent with Executive Order 14010 of February 2, 2021, 
which directs the Departments to promulgate joint regulations, 
consistent with applicable law, addressing the circumstances in which a 
person should be considered a member of a particular social group.
    Statement of Need: The Departments propose this rule to clarify 
standards governing numerous elements of eligibility for asylum, 
withholding of removal under section 241(b)(3) of the Immigration and 
Nationality Act, and protection from removal under the regulations that 
implement U.S. obligations in immigration cases under Article 3 of the 
Convention Against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading 
Treatment or Punishment.
    Anticipated Cost and Benefits: DHS is currently considering the 
specific cost and benefit impacts of the proposed provisions.
    Timetable:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Action                    Date            FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NPRM................................   01/00/24
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No.
    Small Entities Affected: No.
    Government Levels Affected: Undetermined.
    Federalism: Undetermined.
    International Impacts: This regulatory action will be likely to 
have international trade and investment effects, or otherwise be of 
international interest.
    Agency Contact: Rena Cutlip-Mason, Chief, Division of Humanitarian 
Affairs, OP&S, Department of Homeland Security, U.S. Citizenship and 
Immigration Services, 5900 Capital Gateway Drive, Camp Springs, MD 
20746, Phone: 240 721-3000.
    Related RIN: Related to 1615-AC42, Related to 1125-AB13, Related to 
1125-AA94
    RIN: 1615-AC65

DHS--USCIS

89. Procedures for Asylum and Bars to Asylum Eligibility [1615-AC69]

    Priority: Other Significant. Major status under 5 U.S.C. 801 is 
undetermined.
    Legal Authority: Homeland Security Act of 2002, Pub. L. 107-296, 
116 Stat. 2135, sec. 1102, as amended; 8 U.S.C. 1103(a)(1); 8 U.S.C. 
1103(a)(3); 8 U.S.C. 1103(g); 8 U.S.C. 1225(b); 8 U.S.C. 1231(b)(3) and 
1231 (note); 8 U.S.C. 1158
    CFR Citation: 8 CFR 208; 8 CFR 235; 8 CFR 1003; 8 CFR 1208; 8 CFR 
1235.
    Legal Deadline: None.
    Abstract: In 2020, the Department of Homeland Security and 
Department of Justice (collectively, the Departments) published a final 
rule amending their respective regulations governing bars to asylum 
eligibility and procedures: Procedures for Asylum and Bars to Asylum 
Eligibility (RINs 1125-AA87 and 1615-AC41), 85 FR 67202 (Oct. 21, 
2020). The Departments will propose to modify or rescind the regulatory 
changes promulgated in this final rule consistent with Executive Order 
14010 (Feb. 2, 2021).
    Statement of Need: The Departments are reviewing this regulation in 
light of the issuance of Executive Order 14010 and Executive Order 
14012. This rule is needed to restore and strengthen the asylum system 
and to address inconsistencies with the goals and principles outlined 
in Executive Order 14010 and Executive Order 14012.
    Anticipated Cost and Benefits: The Departments are currently 
considering the specific cost and benefit impacts of the proposed 
provisions.
    Timetable:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Action                    Date            FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NPRM................................   06/00/24
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No.
    Government Levels Affected: None.
    Agency Contact: Rena Cutlip-Mason, Chief, Division of Humanitarian 
Affairs, OP&S, Department of Homeland Security, U.S. Citizenship and 
Immigration Services, 5900 Capital Gateway Drive, Camp Springs, MD 
20746, Phone: 240 721-3000.
    Related RIN: Related to 1125-AA87, Split from 1615-AC41, Related to 
1125-AB12
    RIN: 1615-AC69

DHS--USCIS

90. Modernizing H-1B Requirements and Oversight, Providing Flexibility 
in the F-1 Program, and Program Improvements Affecting Other 
Nonimmigrant Workers [1615-AC70]

    Priority: Other Significant. Major under 5 U.S.C. 801.
    Legal Authority: 6 U.S.C. 101, 112 and 202; 8 U.S.C. 1101(a)(15)(F) 
and (H)(i)(b),1103(a), 1184(a), 1184(c), 1184(i) and 1357(b); . . .
    CFR Citation: 8 CFR 214.2.
    Legal Deadline: None.
    Abstract: The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) is proposing to 
amend its regulations governing H-1B specialty occupation workers and 
F-1 students who are the beneficiaries of timely filed H-1B cap-subject 
petitions. Specifically, DHS proposes to revise the regulations 
relating to ``specialty occupation'' and the ``employer-employee 
relationship''; provide flexibility for start-up entrepreneurs; 
implement new requirements and guidelines for H-1B site visits; provide 
flexibility on the employment start date listed on the petition (in 
limited circumstances); address ``cap-gap''

[[Page 9386]]

issues; bolster the H-1B registration process to reduce the possibility 
of misuse and fraud in the H-1B registration system; modernize cap 
exemptions; clarify the requirement that an amended or new petition be 
filed where there are material changes; and codify USCIS' deference 
policy and requirement of maintenance of status for all employment-
based nonimmigrant classifications that use Form I-129, among other 
provisions.
    Statement of Need: These proposed changes are needed to modernize 
and streamline the requirements of the H-1B program, improve program 
efficiency and integrity measures, and provide greater benefits and 
flexibilities for petitioners and beneficiaries.
    Summary of Legal Basis: The Secretary of Homeland Security's 
authority for these proposed regulatory amendments is found in various 
sections of the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA or the Act), 8 
U.S.C. 1101 et seq., and the Homeland Security Act of 2002 (HSA), 
Public Law 107-296, 116 Stat. 2135, 6 U.S.C. 101 et seq. General 
authority for issuing this rule is found in section 103(a) of the INA, 
8 U.S.C. 1103(a), which authorizes the Secretary to administer and 
enforce the immigration and nationality laws, as well as section 112 of 
the HSA, 6 U.S.C. 112, which vests all of the functions of DHS in the 
Secretary and authorizes the Secretary to issue regulations. Section 
101(a)(15) of the INA, 8 U.S.C. 1101(a)(15) establishes classifications 
for noncitizens who are coming temporarily to the United States as 
nonimmigrants. Section 214(a)(1) of the INA, 8 U.S.C. 1184(a)(1), 
authorizes the Secretary to prescribe, by regulation, the terms and 
conditions of the admission of nonimmigrants. Section 214(c) of the 
INA, 8 U.S.C. 1184(c) authorizes the Secretary to prescribe how an 
importing employer may petition for nonimmigrant workers, the 
information that an importing employer must provide in the petition; 
and certain fees that are required for certain nonimmigrant petitions. 
Section 214(g) of the INA, 8 U.S.C. 1184(g), prescribes the H-1B 
numerical limitations, various exceptions to those limitations, and the 
period of authorized admission for H-1B nonimmigrants. Section 214(i) 
of the INA, 8 U.S.C. 1184(i), sets forth the definition and 
requirements of a specialty occupation. Section 248 of the INA, 8 
U.S.C. 1258, authorizes a noncitizen to change from any nonimmigrant 
classification (subject to certain exceptions) to any other 
nonimmigrant classification if the noncitizen was lawfully admitted to 
the United States as a nonimmigrant and is continuing to maintain that 
status and is not otherwise subject to the 3- or 10-year bar applicable 
to certain noncitizens who were unlawfully present in the United 
States. Section 274A of the INA, 8 U.S.C. 1324a, recognizes the 
Secretary's authority to extend employment authorization to noncitizens 
in the United States. Finally, section 287(b) of the INA, 8 U.S.C. 
1357(b), authorizes the taking and consideration of evidence concerning 
any matter that is material or relevant to the enforcement of the INA.
    Anticipated Cost and Benefits: DHS is currently considering the 
specific impacts of the proposed provisions.
    Timetable:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Action                    Date            FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NPRM................................   11/00/23
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Yes.
    Small Entities Affected: Businesses.
    Government Levels Affected: None.
    Agency Contact: Charles Nimick, Chief, Business and Foreign Workers 
Division, Office of Policy and Strategy, Department of Homeland 
Security, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, 5900 Capital 
Gateway Drive, Suite 4S190, Camp Springs, MD 20588-0009, Phone: 240 
721-3000.
    RIN: 1615-AC70

DHS--USCIS

91. Modernizing H-2 Program Requirements, Oversight, and Worker 
Protections [1615-AC76]

    Priority: Other Significant. Major status under 5 U.S.C. 801 is 
undetermined.
    Legal Authority: 8 U.S.C. 1103(a)(3); 8 U.S.C. 
1001(a)(15)(H)(ii)(a) and (b); 8 U.S.C. 1184(a), (c) and (g); 8 U.S.C. 
1324a
    CFR Citation: 8 CFR 214; 8 CFR 274a.
    Legal Deadline: None.
    Abstract: On September 20, 2023, DHS published a notice of proposed 
rulemaking (NPRM) in which proposed several changes to modernize and 
reform the H-2A and H-2B nonimmigrant worker programs. Specifically, 
the NPRM incorporates new policies that if finalized would produce 
program efficiencies, address current aspects of the program that may 
have unintentionally resulted in exploitation or other abuse of persons 
seeking to come to this country as H-2A and H-2B workers, builds upon 
existing protections against prohibited payments or other assessment of 
fees and/or salary deductions by H-2A and H-2B employers in connection 
with recruitment and/or H-2 employment, and otherwise adds protections 
for workers. DHS has not proposed any changes that would revise the 
temporary labor certification process or the regulations contained in 
20 CFR part 655 or 29 CFR part 501 and 503. The public comment period 
closes November 20, 2023, and DHS will review the comments received 
during the comment period and in accordance with the instructions 
contained in the NPRM before issuing any future final rule.
    Statement of Need: This rulemaking is needed to enhance protections 
for workers and better ensure the integrity of the H-2A and H-2B 
programs. In addition, this proposed rule is necessary to improve H-2 
program efficiencies and remove certain barriers to program access.
    Summary of Legal Basis: The Immigration and Nationality Act (INA) 
charges the Secretary of Homeland Security with the administration and 
enforcement of the immigration laws and provides that the Secretary 
shall establish such regulations and perform such other acts as he 
deems necessary for carrying out his authority under the INA. See INA 
section 103(a)(1),(3), 8 U.S.C. 1103(a)(1), (3). In addition, the 
Homeland Security Act of 2002 charges the Secretary with establishing 
and administering rules governing the granting of visas or other forms 
of permission to enter the United States to individuals who are not a 
citizen, or an alien lawfully admitted for permanent residence in the 
United States. See Public Law 107-296, 116 Stat. 2135, 6 U.S.C. 202(4). 
Congress established the H-2A and H-2B nonimmigrant classifications in 
INA section 101(a)(15)(H)(ii)(a) and (b), 8 U.S.C. 
1101(a)(15)(H)(ii)(a) and (b). With respect to nonimmigrants in 
particular, the INA provides that the admission to the United States of 
any alien as a nonimmigrant shall be for such time and under such 
conditions as the Secretary may by regulations prescribe. See INA 
section 214(a)(1), 8 U.S.C. 1184(a)(1). The INA also tasks DHS with 
approving petitions filed by the importing employers of nonimmigrants, 
including those in the H nonimmigrant visa classification, before a 
nonimmigrant visa may be granted. See INA section 214(c)(1), 8 U.S.C. 
1184(c)(1).
    Anticipated Cost and Benefits: In the published proposed rule, DHS 
estimates annualized costs of rule range from $1,998,572 to $2,668,028 
at a 3-percent discount rate and $2,186,033 to $2,915,885 at a 7-
percent discount rate.

[[Page 9387]]

In addition, the total annualized transfers (from consumers to a 
limited number of H-2A and H-2B workers) amount to $2,918,958 in 
additional earnings at the 3-percent and 7-percent discount rate and 
related total tax transfers of $337,122. Fees paid for Form I-129 and 
premium processing as a result of the proposed rule's portability 
provision constitute a transfer of $636,760 from petitioners to USCIS 
(3 and 7-percent annualized equivalent).
    Timetable:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Action                    Date            FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NPRM................................   09/20/23  88 FR 65040
NPRM Comment Period End.............   11/20/23
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Yes.
    Small Entities Affected: Businesses.
    Government Levels Affected: None.
    URL For More Information: https://www.regulations.gov.
    URL For Public Comments: https://www.regulations.gov.
    Agency Contact: Charles Nimick, Chief, Business and Foreign Workers 
Division, Office of Policy and Strategy, Department of Homeland 
Security, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, 5900 Capital 
Gateway Drive, Suite 4S190, Camp Springs, MD 20588-0009, Phone: 240 
721-3000.
    RIN: 1615-AC76

DHS--USCIS

92. Citizenship and Naturalization and Other Related Flexibilities 
[1615-AC80]

    Priority: Other Significant. Major status under 5 U.S.C. 801 is 
undetermined.
    Legal Authority: sec. 102 of the Homeland Security Act of 2002; 6 
U.S.C. 112(a)(3); 8 U.S.C. 1101; 8 U.S.C. 1103; 8 U.S.C. 1151; 8 U.S.C. 
1153; 8 U.S.C. 1154; 8 U.S.C. 1159; 8 U.S.C. 1182; 8 U.S.C. 1255; 8 
U.S.C. 1401; 8 U.S.C. 1409; 8 U.S.C. 1421; 8 U.S.C. 1423; 8 U.S.C. 
1427; 8 U.S.C. 1429 to 1431; 8 U.S.C. 1433; 8 U.S.C. 1435; 8 U.S.C. 
1438 to 1440; 8 U.S.C. 1443; 8 U.S.C. 1445 to 1449; 8 U.S.C. 1452; 8 
U.S.C. 1454; 8 U.S.C. 1481
    CFR Citation: 8 CFR 1.2; 8 CFR 103; 8 CFR 106; 8 CFR 204; 8 CFR 
209; 8 CFR 245; 8 CFR 300; 8 CFR 306; 8 CFR 312; 8 CFR 316; 8 CFR 318; 
8 CFR 319; 8 CFR 320; 8 CFR 322; 8 CFR 324; 8 CFR 329; 8 CFR 333; 8 CFR 
334; 8 CFR 335; 8 CFR 336; 8 CFR 337; 8 CFR 338; 8 CFR 339; 8 CFR 341; 
8 CFR 343a; 8 CFR 349; 8 CFR 212; . . .
    Legal Deadline: None.
    Abstract: The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) will propose to 
amend its regulations governing citizenship and naturalization. This 
includes clarifying the testing requirements, updating eligibility 
requirements, and proposing amendments to clarify definitions. DHS will 
also propose to amend other immigration benefit provisions, such as 
certain provisions related to adjustment of status and waivers of 
inadmissibility that can affect naturalization and acquisition of 
citizenship. In addition, DHS will propose removing certain outdated 
provisions and amending other provisions to align with current 
statutory framework, such as updating the adoption-related regulatory 
provisions consistent with the Intercountry Adoption Universal 
Accreditation Act of 2012.
    Statement of Need: These proposed changes, some of which were 
requested by the public, are needed to improve the efficiency, 
effectiveness, accessibility, uniformity, and consistency of 
adjudications.
    Summary of Legal Basis: DHS's authority is found in several 
statutory provisions. Section 102 of the Homeland Security Act of 2002 
(Pub. L. 107296, 116 Stat. 2135), 6 U.S.C. 112, and section 103(a) of 
the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA or the Act), 8 U.S.C. 1103(a), 
charge the Secretary with the administration and enforcement of the 
immigration and naturalization laws of the United States. In addition 
to establishing the Secretary's general authority for the 
administration and enforcement of immigration laws, section 103(a) of 
the Act, 8 U.S.C. 1103(a), enumerates various related authorities that 
include the Secretary's authority to establish such regulations as the 
Secretary deems necessary for carrying out the Secretary's authority 
under the Act.
    Anticipated Cost and Benefits: DHS is currently considering the 
specific impacts of the proposed provisions.
    Timetable:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Action                    Date            FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NPRM................................   12/00/23
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Undetermined.
    Government Levels Affected: Undetermined.
    Agency Contact: Mark Phillips, Residence and Naturalization 
Division Chief, Department of Homeland Security, U.S. Citizenship and 
Immigration Services, Office of Policy and Strategy, 5900 Capital 
Gateway Drive, Suite 4S190, Camp Springs, MD 20588-0009, Phone: 240 
721-3000.
    RIN: 1615-AC80

DHS--USCIS

Final Rule Stage

93. U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services Fee Schedule and Changes 
to Certain Other Immigration Benefit Request Requirements [1615-AC68]

    Priority: Section 3(f)(1) Significant. Major under 5 U.S.C. 801.
    Legal Authority: 8 U.S.C. 1356(m), (n)
    CFR Citation: 8 CFR 103; 8 CFR 106; 8 CFR 204; 8 CFR 212; 8 CFR 
214; 8 CFR 240; 8 CFR 244; 8 CFR 245; 8 CFR 245a; 8 CFR 264; 8 CFR 
274a.
    Legal Deadline: None.
    Abstract: On January 4, 2023, the Department of Homeland Security 
(DHS) published a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM or proposed rule) 
88 FR 402 that proposed to adjust the fees charged by U.S. Citizenship 
and Immigration Services (USCIS) for immigration and naturalization 
benefit requests. On August 3, 2020, DHS adjusted the fees USCIS 
charges for immigration and naturalization benefit requests, imposed 
new fees, revised certain fee waiver and exemption policies, and 
changed certain application requirements via the rule ``USCIS Fee 
Schedule & Changes to Certain Other Immigration Benefit Request 
Requirements.'' DHS has been preliminarily enjoined from implementing 
that rule by court order. This rule would rescind and replace the 
changes made by the August 3, 2020, rule and establish new USCIS fees 
to recover USCIS operating costs. DHS solicited public comment on the 
NPRM, which DHS intends to consider and address in a final rule.
    Statement of Need: USCIS projects that its costs of providing 
immigration adjudication and naturalization services will exceed the 
financial resources available to it under its existing fee structure. 
DHS proposes to adjust the USCIS fee structure to ensure that USCIS 
recovers the costs of meeting its operational requirements.
    The CFO Act requires each agency's chief financial officer to 
``review, on a biennial basis, the fees, royalties, rents, and other 
charges imposed by the agency for services and things of value it 
provides, and make recommendations on revising those charges to reflect 
costs incurred by it in providing those services and things of value.''
    Summary of Legal Basis: INA 286(m) and (n), 8 U.S.C. 1356(m) and 
(n), authorize the Attorney General and

[[Page 9388]]

Secretary of Homeland Security to recover the full cost of providing 
immigration adjudication and naturalization services by establishing 
and collecting fees deposited into the Immigration Examinations Fee 
Account.
    Anticipated Cost and Benefits: In the published proposed rule, DHS 
estimated the annualized net costs to the public would be $532,379,138 
discounted at 3-and 7-percent. Fee increases and other changes in this 
proposed rule would result in annualized transfer payments from 
applicants/petitioners to USCIS of approximately $1,612,127,862 
discounted at both 3-percent and 7-percent. Fee reductions and 
exemptions in this proposed rule would result in annualized transfer 
payments from USCIS to applicants/petitioners of approximately 
$116,372,429 discounted at both 3-percent and 7-percent. The annualized 
transfer payments from the Department of Defense (DoD) to USCIS would 
be approximately $222,145 at both 3- and 7-percent discount rates. DHS 
is currently considering the specific impacts of the final rule's 
provisions.
    Timetable:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Action                    Date            FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NPRM................................   01/04/23  88 FR 402
NPRM Correction.....................   01/09/23  88 FR 1172
NPRM Comment Period End.............   03/06/23
NPRM Comment Period Extended........   02/24/23  88 FR 11825
NPRM Comment Period Extended End....   03/13/23
Final Action........................   04/00/24
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Yes.
    Small Entities Affected: Businesses, Governmental Jurisdictions, 
Organizations.
    Government Levels Affected: None.
    URL For More Information: https://www.regulations.gov.
    URL For Public Comments: https://www.regulations.gov.
    Agency Contact: Kika Scott, Chief Financial Officer, Department of 
Homeland Security, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, 5900 
Capital Gateway Drive, Suite 4S190, Camp Springs, MD 20588-0009, Phone: 
240 721-3000.
    RIN: 1615-AC68

DHS--U.S. COAST GUARD (USCG)

Proposed Rule Stage

94. Shipping Safety Fairways Along the Atlantic Coast [1625-AC57]

    Priority: Other Significant.
    Legal Authority: 46 U.S.C. 70001; 46 U.S.C. 70003; 46 U.S.C. 70034
    CFR Citation: 33 CFR 166; 33 CFR 167.
    Legal Deadline: None.
    Abstract: The Coast Guard seeks comments regarding the possible 
establishment of shipping safety fairways (fairways) along the Atlantic 
Coast of the United States. Fairways are marked routes for vessel 
traffic in which any fixed obstructions are prohibited. The proposed 
fairways are based on studies about vessel traffic along the Atlantic 
Coast. The Coast Guard is coordinating this action with the Bureau of 
Offshore Energy Management (BOEM) to minimize the impact on potential 
offshore energy leases.
    Statement of Need: This rulemaking would establish shipping safety 
fairways along the Atlantic coast of the United States to facilitate 
the direct and unobstructed transits of ships and facilitate 
development on the outer continental shelf. The establishment of 
fairways would ensure that obstruction-free routes are preserved to and 
from US ports and along the Atlantic coast.
    Summary of Legal Basis: Section 70003 of title 46 United States 
Code (46 U.S.C. 70003) directs the Secretary of the department in which 
the Coast Guard resides to designate necessary fairways that provide 
safe access routes for vessels proceeding to and from U.S. ports.
    Alternatives: The ANPRM outlined the Coast Guard's plans for 
fairways along the Atlantic Coast and requested information and data 
associated with the regulatory concepts. The Coast Guard will use this 
information and data to shape regulatory language and alternatives and 
assess the associated impacts in the NPRM. The Coast Guard is also 
considering comments received on port access route studies notices in 
development of the proposed rule.
    Anticipated Cost and Benefits: The fairways are designed to keep 
traditional vessel navigation routes free from fixed structures that 
could impact navigation safety and impede other shared offshore 
activities. Fairways are not mandatory; however, the Coast Guard 
recognizes that there is increasing interest in offshore commercial 
development, including offshore renewable energy installations, and 
believes this development is best served by the establishment of 
consistent and well-defined fairways. The proposed fairways would help 
ensure that offshore developments remain viable by allowing developers 
to construct and maintain installations without risk of impeding vessel 
traffic.
    Risks: The Bureau of Ocean Energy Management (BOEM) is leasing 
offshore areas that could affect customary shipping routes. Expeditious 
pursuit of this rulemaking is intended to prevent conflict between 
customary shipping routes and areas that may be leased by BOEM.
    Timetable:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Action                    Date            FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
ANPRM...............................   06/19/20  85 FR 37034
ANPRM Comment Period End............   08/18/20
NPRM................................   11/00/23
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Undetermined.
    Government Levels Affected: None.
    Additional Information: Docket number USCG-2019-0279.
    URL For More Information: https://www.regulations.gov.
    URL For Public Comments: https://www.regulations.gov.
    Agency Contact: Maureen Kallgren Program Manager, Department of 
Homeland Security, U.S. Coast Guard, Office of Navigation Systems (CG-
NAV), 2703 Martin Luther King Jr. Avenue SE, STOP 7509, Washington, DC 
20593-7509, Phone: 202 372-1561, Email: [email protected].
    RIN: 1625-AC57

DHS--USCG

95. Cybersecurity in the Marine Transportation System [1625-AC77]

    Priority: Other Significant. Major status under 5 U.S.C. 801 is 
undetermined.
    Legal Authority: 46 U.S.C. 70101; 46 U.S.C. 70102; 46 U.S.C. 70104; 
46 U.S.C. 70124
    CFR Citation: 33 CFR 101.
    Legal Deadline: None.
    Abstract: The Coast Guard proposes to update its maritime security 
regulations by adding cybersecurity requirements to existing Maritime 
Security regulations in 33 CFR part 101 et seq. This proposed 
rulemaking is part of an ongoing effort to address emerging 
cybersecurity risks and threats to maritime security by including 
additional security requirements to safeguard the marine transportation 
system.
    Statement of Need: The purpose of this rulemaking is to set minimum 
cybersecurity requirements for vessels

[[Page 9389]]

and facilities to safeguard the Marine Transportation System (MTS) from 
cybersecurity vulnerabilities.
    Summary of Legal Basis: The Coast Guard exercises the Maritime 
Transportation Security Act of 2002 (MTSA) authorities of Chapter 701 
of Title 46 of the U.S. Code. This includes the authority to promulgate 
Chapter 701 regulations under 46 U.S.C. 70124. This statute provides 
that the Secretary of Homeland Security may issue regulations necessary 
to implement Chapter 701 of Title 46.
    Anticipated Cost and Benefits: The regulatory analysis for the 
proposed rule is still being developed.
    Timetable:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Action                    Date            FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NPRM................................   12/00/23
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Yes.
    Small Entities Affected: Businesses.
    Government Levels Affected: Undetermined.
    Agency Contact: Frank Strom, Chief, Systems Engineering Division 
(CG-ENG-3), Department of Homeland Security, U.S. Coast Guard, Office 
of Design and Engineering Standards, 2703 Martin Luther King Jr. Avenue 
SE, STOP 7509, Washington, DC 20593-7509, Phone: 202 372-1375, Email: 
[email protected].
    RIN: 1625-AC77

DHS--USCG

96. Marpol Annex VI; Prevention of Air Pollution From Ships [1625-AC78]

    Priority: Other Significant.
    Legal Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1903
    CFR Citation: 33 CFR 151.
    Legal Deadline: None.
    Abstract: The Coast Guard is proposing regulations to carry out the 
provisions of Annex VI of the MARPOL Protocol, which is focused on the 
prevention of air pollution from ships. The Act to Prevent Pollution 
from Ships has already given direct effect to most provisions of Annex 
VI, and the Coast Guard and the Environmental Protection Agency have 
carried out some Annex VI provisions through previous rulemakings. This 
proposed rule would fill gaps in the existing framework for carrying 
out the provisions of Annex VI. Chapter 4 of Annex VI contains 
shipboard energy efficiency measures that include short-term measures 
reducing carbon emissions linked to climate change and supports 
Administration goals outlined in Executive Order 14008 titled Tackling 
the Climate Crisis at Home and Abroad. This proposed rule would apply 
to U.S.-flagged ships. It would also apply to foreign-flagged ships 
operating either in U.S. navigable waters or in the U.S. Exclusive 
Economic Zone.
    Statement of Need: The Coast Guard is proposing regulations to 
carry out the provisions of Annex VI of the MARPOL Protocol, which is 
focused on the prevention of air pollution from ships. The Act to 
Prevent Pollution from Ships has already given direct effect to most 
provisions of Annex VI, and the Coast Guard and the Environmental 
Protection Agency have carried out some Annex VI provisions through 
previous rulemakings. This proposed rule would fill gaps in the 
existing framework for carrying out the provisions of Annex VI and 
explain how the United States has chosen to carry out certain 
discretionary aspects of Annex VI.
    Summary of Legal Basis: Section 4 of the Act to Prevent Pollution 
from Ships (Pub. L. 96-478, Oct. 21, 1980, 94 Stat. 2297), as reflected 
in 33 U.S.C. 1903, directs the Secretary of Homeland Security to 
prescribe any necessary or desired regulations to carry out the 
provisions of the MARPOL Protocol. The ``MARPOL Protocol'' is defined 
in 33 U.S.C. 1901 and includes Annex VI of the International Convention 
for the Prevention of Pollution from Ships, 1973.
    Anticipated Cost and Benefits: USCG anticipates the costs for the 
proposed rule to come primarily from additional labor for 5 
requirements including overseeing surveys; developing and maintaining a 
fuel-switching procedure; recording various data during each fuel 
switching; developing and managing a Volatile organic compounds (VOC) 
management plan; crew member to calculate and report the attained 
Energy Efficient Design Index (EEDI) of the vessel, and crew member to 
develop and maintain the Ship Energy Efficiency Management Plan 
(SEEMP). USCG expects the proposed rule to have benefits from avoided 
engine emissions.
    Timetable:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Action                    Date            FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NPRM................................   07/00/24
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Yes.
    Small Entities Affected: Businesses.
    Government Levels Affected: None.
    Federalism: Undetermined.
    Agency Contact: Frank Strom, Chief, Systems Engineering Division 
(CG-ENG-3), Department of Homeland Security, U.S. Coast Guard, Office 
of Design and Engineering Standards, 2703 Martin Luther King Jr. Avenue 
SE, STOP 7509, Washington, DC 20593-7509, Phone: 202 372-1375, Email: 
[email protected].
    RIN: 1625-AC78

DHS--U.S. CUSTOMS AND BORDER PROTECTION (USCBP)

Final Rule Stage

97. Advance Passenger Information System: Electronic Validation of 
Travel Documents [1651-AB43]

    Priority: Other Significant.
    Legal Authority: 49 U.S.C. 44909; 8 U.S.C. 1221
    CFR Citation: 19 CFR 122.
    Legal Deadline: None.
    Abstract: U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) regulations 
require commercial air carriers to electronically transmit passenger 
information to CBP's Advance Passenger Information System (APIS) prior 
to an aircraft's arrival in or departure from the United States. CBP 
proposes to amend these regulations to incorporate additional carrier 
requirements that will enable CBP to validate each passenger's travel 
documents prior to the passenger boarding the aircraft. This proposed 
rule would also require air carriers to transmit additional data 
elements through APIS for all commercial aircraft passengers arriving 
in the United States in order to support border operations and national 
security. The collection of additional data elements will support the 
efforts of the Centers for Disease Control, within the Department of 
Health and Human Services, to monitor and contact-trace health 
incidents. This rule is consistent with Executive Order 14058, which 
directs agencies to take actions that improve service delivery and 
customer experience by decreasing administrative burdens, enhancing 
transparency, and improving the efficiency and effectiveness of 
government.
    Statement of Need: Current regulations require U.S. citizens and 
foreign travelers entering and leaving the United States via air travel 
to submit travel documents containing biographical information, such as 
a passenger's name and date of birth. For security purposes, CBP 
compares the information on passengers' documents to various databases 
and the terrorist watch list through APIS. While in the case of 
security threats CBP may require an air carrier to deny boarding to the 
passenger. CBP recommends that air carriers deny boarding to those 
likely to be deemed inadmissible upon arrival in the United States. To 
further improve

[[Page 9390]]

CBP's vetting processes with respect to identifying and preventing 
passengers with fraudulent or improper documents from traveling to or 
leaving the United States, CBP proposes to require carriers to receive 
from CBP a message that would state whether CBP matched the travel 
documents of each passenger to a valid, authentic travel document prior 
to departure to the United States from a foreign port or place or 
departure from the United States. The proposed rule also would require 
carriers to submit passenger contact information while in the United 
States to CBP through APIS. Submission of such information would enable 
CBP to identify and interdict individuals posing a risk to border, 
national, and aviation safety and security more quickly. Collecting 
these additional data elements would also enable CBP to further assist 
CDC to monitor and trace the contacts of those involved in serious 
public health incidents upon CDC request. Additionally, the proposed 
rule would allow carriers to include the aircraft tail number in their 
electronic messages to CBP and make technical changes to conform with 
current practice.
    Anticipated Cost and Benefits: The proposed rule would result in 
costs to CBP, air carriers, and passengers for additional time spent 
coordinating to resolve a passenger's status should there be a security 
issue upon checking in for a flight. In addition, CBP will incur costs 
for technological improvements to its systems. CBP, air carriers, and 
passengers would benefit from reduced passenger processing times during 
customs screening. Unquantified benefits would result from greater 
efficiency in passenger processing pre-flight, improved national 
security, and fewer penalties for air carriers following entry denial 
of a passenger.
    Timetable:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Action                    Date            FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NPRM................................   02/02/23  88 FR 7016
NPRM Comment Period End.............   04/03/23
Final Action........................   08/00/24
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No.
    Government Levels Affected: None.
    URL For More Information: https://www.regulations.gov.
    URL For Public Comments: https://www.regulations.gov.
    Agency Contact: Robert Neumann, Program Manager, Office of Field 
Operations, Department of Homeland Security, U.S. Customs and Border 
Protection, 1300 Pennsylvania Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20229, Phone: 
202 412-2788, Email: [email protected].
    RIN: 1651-AB43

DHS--TRANSPORTATION SECURITY ADMINISTRATION (TSA)

Proposed Rule Stage

98. Enhancing Surface Cyber Risk Management [1652-AA74]

    Priority: Other Significant.
    Legal Authority: 49 U.S.C. 114; Pub. L. 110-53, secs. 1405, 1512 
and 1531
    CFR Citation: 49 CFR 1520; 49 CFR 1570; 49 CFR 1580; 49 CFR 1582; 
49 CFR 1584.
    Legal Deadline: None.
    Abstract: On July 28, 2021, the President issued the National 
Security Memorandum on Improving Cybersecurity for Critical 
Infrastructure Control Systems. In response to the ongoing threat to 
pipeline systems, TSA used its authority under 49 U.S.C. 114 to issue 
emergency security directives to owners and operators of TSA-designated 
critical pipelines that transport hazardous liquids and natural gas to 
implement a number of urgently needed protections against cyber 
intrusions. TSA also issued security directives in the freight, 
passenger, and transit-rail sectors under the same statutory authority. 
TSA is committed to enhancing and sustaining industry's resilience to 
cybersecurity attacks. TSA intends to issue a rulemaking that will 
permanently codify critical cybersecurity requirements for pipeline and 
rail modes. Through this rulemaking, TSA will also address certain 
requirements in the Implementing Recommendations of the 9/11 Commission 
Act of 2007 related to information and operational technology systems. 
TSA is committed to enhancing and sustaining cybersecurity for all 
modes of transportation and intends to issue a rulemaking that may 
codify these and other requirements following an opportunity for notice 
and comment. In addition to holding numerous technical roundtables with 
the industry regarding cybersecurity requirements, TSA also solicited 
public input in the development of this rulemaking through publication 
of an advance notice of proposed rulemaking in November 2022.
    Statement of Need: This rulemaking is necessary to address the 
ongoing cybersecurity threat to U.S. transportation modes with 
potential impacts on national security, including economic security.
    Anticipated Cost and Benefits: TSA is in the process of determining 
the costs and benefits of this rulemaking.
    Timetable:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Action                    Date            FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
ANPRM...............................   11/30/22  87 FR 73527
ANPRM Comment Period End............   01/17/23
ANPRM Comment Period Extended.......   12/23/22  87 FR 78911
ANPRM Comment Period Extended End...   02/01/23
NPRM................................   11/00/23
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Undetermined.
    Government Levels Affected: Undetermined.
    URL For More Information: https://www.regulations.gov.
    URL For Public Comments: https://www.regulations.gov.
    Agency Contact: Victor Parker, Branch Manager, Policy Development 
Branch, Surface Division, Department of Homeland Security, 
Transportation Security Administration, Policy, Plans and Engagement, 
6595 Springfield Center Drive, Springfield, VA 20598-6028, Phone: 571 
227-3664, Email: [email protected].
    James Ruger, Chief Economist, Economic Analysis Branch-Coordination 
& Analysis Division, Department of Homeland Security, Transportation 
Security Administration, Policy, Plans, and Engagement, 6595 
Springfield Center Drive, Springfield, VA 20598-6028, Phone: 571 227-
5519, Email: [email protected].
    David Kasminoff, Senior Counsel, Regulations and Security 
Standards, Department of Homeland Security, Transportation Security 
Administration, Chief Counsel's Office, 6595 Springfield Center Drive, 
Springfield, VA 20598-6002, Phone: 571 227-3583, Email: 
[email protected].
    Related RIN: Related to 1652-AA56
    RIN: 1652-AA74

DHS--TSA

Final Rule Stage

99. Flight Training Security Program [1652-AA35]

    Priority: Other Significant.
    Legal Authority: 6 U.S.C. 469(b); 49 U.S.C. 114; 49 U.S.C. 44939; 
49 U.S.C. 46105
    CFR Citation: 49 CFR part 1552.
    Legal Deadline: Final, Statutory, February 10, 2004, interim final 
rule required within 60 days of enactment of the Vision 100 Act.

[[Page 9391]]

    Public Law 108-176, sec. 612(a) (Dec. 12, 2003) requires an interim 
final rule to implement the requirements of 49 U.S.C. 44939, as further 
amended by section 612(a), not later than 60 days after the date of 
enactment of the act. Public Law 108-90, sec. 520 (Oct. 1, 2003), 
codified at 6 U.S.C. 469(b), requires collection of fees authorized by 
Public Law 108-176). Public Law 110-329, sec. 543 (Sept. 30, 2008) 
further amends 6 U.S.C. 469 to include both initial and recurrent 
training.
    Abstract: As required by the Vision 100 Act, TSA issued an Interim 
Final Rule (IFR) (effective September 20, 2004) that transferred 
responsibility for the vetting of flight school candidates from the 
Department of Justice to TSA, with certain modifications to the program 
required by the act. TSA reopened the comment period for 30 days on May 
18, 2018. This IFR applies to training providers and to individuals who 
apply for or receive flight training. Flight schools are required to 
notify TSA when non-U.S. citizens, non-U.S. nationals, and other 
individuals designated by TSA, apply for flight training or recurrent 
flight training. TSA issued exemptions and interpretations in response 
to comments on the IFR and questions raised during operation of the 
program since 2004, and a notice published in 2018 extending the 
comment period on the IFR. Many of the changes made to the program 
through this final rule are in direct responses to recommendations from 
the Aviation Security Advisory Committee, a statutorily created 
committee charged with providing input to TSA on regulatory 
requirements. Based on the comments and questions received, TSA is 
finalizing the rule and considering modifications that would change the 
frequency of security threat assessments from a high-frequency, event-
based interval, to a time-based interval; clarify the definitions and 
other provisions of the rule; and enable industry to use TSA-provided 
electronic recordkeeping systems for all documents required to 
demonstrate compliance with the rule. These and other changes will 
provide significant cost-savings to the industry and individuals 
seeking flight training while also enhancing security.
    Statement of Need: In the years since TSA published the IFR, 
members of the aviation industry, the public, and federal oversight 
organizations have identified areas where the Flight Training Security 
Program (formerly the Alien Flight Student Program) could be improved. 
TSA's internal procedures and processes for vetting applicants also 
have advanced through technology and other enhancements. Publishing a 
final rule that addresses comments on the IFR and aligns with modern 
TSA vetting practices would streamline and reduce burden for the Flight 
Training Security Program application, vetting, and recordkeeping 
process for all parties involved.
    Anticipated Cost and Benefits: TSA is considering revising the 
requirements of the Flight Training Security Program to reduce costs 
and industry burden. One action TSA is considering is an electronic 
recordkeeping platform where all flight training providers would upload 
certain information to a TSA-managed website (https://fts.tsa.dhs.gov/
). Also at industry's request, TSA is considering changing the interval 
for a Security Threat Assessment of each non-U.S. citizen and non-U.S. 
national flight student, by eliminating the requirement for a Security 
Threat Assessment for each separate training event. This change would 
result in an annual savings, although there may be additional start-up 
and record retention costs for the agency as a result of this revision. 
The change in the interval of the Security Threat Assessment would 
result in immediate cost savings to flight providers and students who 
are neither U.S. citizens nor U.S. nationals without compromising the 
security process.
    Timetable:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Action                    Date            FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Interim Final Rule; Request for        09/20/04  69 FR 56324
 Comments.
Interim Final Rule Effective........   09/20/04
Interim Final Rule; Comment Period     10/20/04
 End.
Notice-Information Collection; 60-     11/26/04  69 FR 68952
 Day Renewal.
Notice-Information Collection; 30-     03/30/05  70 FR 16298
 Day Renewal.
Notice-Information Collection; 60-     06/06/08  73 FR 32346
 Day Renewal.
Notice-Information Collection; 30-     08/13/08  73 FR 47203
 Day Renewal.
Notice-Alien Flight Student Program    04/13/09  74 FR 16880
 Recurrent Training Fees.
Notice-Information Collection; 60-     09/21/11  76 FR 58531
 Day Renewal.
Notice-Information Collection; 30-     01/31/12  77 FR 4822
 Day Renewal.
Notice-Information Collection; 60-     03/10/15  80 FR 12647
 Day Renewal.
Notice-Information Collection; 30-     06/18/15  80 FR 34927
 Day Renewal.
IFR; Comment Period Reopened........   05/18/18  83 FR 23238
IFR; Comment Period Reopened End....   06/18/18
Notice-Information Collection; 60-     07/06/18  83 FR 31561
 Day Renewal.
Notice-Information Collection; 30-     10/31/18  83 FR 54761
 Day Renewal.
Notice-Information Collection; 60-     08/27/21  86 FR 48239
 Day Renewal.
Notice-Information Collection; 30-     01/19/22  87 FR 2889
 Day Renewal.
Final Rule..........................   11/00/23
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No.
    Government Levels Affected: None.
    URL For More Information: https://www.regulations.gov.
    URL For Public Comments: https://www.regulations.gov.
    Agency Contact: Stephanie Hamilton, Manager, Vetting Programs 
Branch, Department of Homeland Security, Transportation Security 
Administration, Enrollment Services & Vetting Programs, 6595 
Springfield Center Drive, Springfield, VA 20598-6010, Phone: 571 227-
2851, Email: [email protected].
    James Ruger, Chief Economist, Economic Analysis Branch-Coordination 
& Analysis Division, Department of Homeland Security, Transportation 
Security Administration, Policy, Plans, and Engagement, 6595 
Springfield Center Drive, Springfield, VA 20598-6028, Phone: 571 227-
5519, Email: [email protected].
    David Ross, Attorney-Advisor, Regulations and Security Standards, 
Department of Homeland Security, Transportation Security 
Administration, Chief Counsel's Office, 6595 Springfield Center Drive, 
Springfield, VA 20598-6002, Phone: 571 227-2465, Email: 
[email protected].
    Related RIN: Related to 1652-AA61
    RIN: 1652-AA35

DHS--TSA

100. Frequency of Renewal Cycle for Indirect Air Carrier Security 
Programs [1652-AA72]

    Priority: Other Significant. Major status under 5 U.S.C. 801 is 
undetermined.

[[Page 9392]]

    Legal Authority: 49 U.S.C. 114; 49 U.S.C. 5103; 49 U.S.C. 40113; 49 
U.S.C. 44901 to 44905; 49 U.S.C. 4491 to 44914; 49 U.S.C. 44916 to 
44917; 49 U.S.C. 44932; 49 U.S.C. 449354 to 44936; 49 U.S.C. 46105
    CFR Citation: 49 CFR 1548.
    Legal Deadline: None.
    Abstract: The Transportation Security Administration (TSA) is 
reducing the frequency of renewal applications for indirect air 
carriers (IACs). Currently, these entities must submit an application 
to renew their security program each year. Following a review of TSA's 
regulatory requirements seeking to reduce the cost of compliance, TSA 
determined that the duration of the security program for these entities 
can be increased from 1 year to 3 years without having a negative 
impact on transportation security. This change will align the security 
program renewal requirement with the renewal cycle for Certified Cargo 
Screening Facilities under 49 CFR part 1549. This rulemaking is in 
response to a request from the industry subject to these requirements.
    Statement of Need: Consistent with Executive Order 12866 and 
Executive Order 13563, TSA identified portions of air cargo regulations 
that may be tailored to impose a lesser burden on society and that may 
improve government processes. Under 49 CFR part 1548 indirect air 
carriers are required to renew their security programs each year. TSA's 
robust inspection and compliance requirements make the annual renewal 
requirement unnecessary.
    Anticipated Cost and Benefits: This rule would reduce the frequency 
of IAC security program certifications from annually to once every 
three years. This rule does not impose any incremental costs because 
regulated entities are already performing all actions required to 
obtain the certification in question. The expected outcome will have a 
minimal cost impact with positive net benefit due to time saved with a 
lower frequency in the renewal cycle.
    Timetable:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Action                    Date            FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Final Rule..........................   09/16/09  74 FR 47705
Final Rule Effective................   09/16/09
NPRM................................   12/27/22  87 FR 79264
NPRM Comment Period End.............   02/27/23
Final Rule..........................   03/00/24
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No.
    Small Entities Affected: No.
    Government Levels Affected: None.
    URL For More Information: https://www.regulations.gov.
    URL For Public Comments: https://www.regulations.gov.
    Agency Contact: Angel Rodriguez, Acting Section Chief, Department 
of Homeland Security, Transportation Security Administration, 6595 
Springfield Center Drive, Springfield, VA 20598-6028, Phone: 571 227-
2108, Email: [email protected].
    James Ruger, Chief Economist, Economic Analysis Branch-Coordination 
& Analysis Division, Department of Homeland Security, Transportation 
Security Administration, Policy, Plans, and Engagement, 6595 
Springfield Center Drive, Springfield, VA 20598-6028, Phone: 571 227-
5519, Email: [email protected].
    David Ross, Attorney-Advisor, Regulations and Security Standards, 
Department of Homeland Security, Transportation Security 
Administration, Chief Counsel's Office, 6595 Springfield Center Drive, 
Springfield, VA 20598-6002, Phone: 571 227-2465, Email: 
[email protected].
    Related RIN: Related to 1652-AA23
    RIN: 1652-AA72

DHS--TSA

101.  Minimum Standards for Driver's Licenses and 
Identification Cards Acceptable by Federal Agencies for Official 
Purposes; Waiver for Mobile Driver's Licenses [1652-AA76]

    Priority: Other Significant. Major under 5 U.S.C. 801.
    Legal Authority: 49 U.S.C. 30301 note; 6 U.S.C. 111; 6 U.S.C. 112
    CFR Citation: 6 CFR 37.
    Legal Deadline: None.
    Abstract: This proposal is the first rulemaking in a multi-phased 
project to enable Federal agencies, at their discretion, to continue 
accepting mobile driver's licenses and mobile identification cards 
(collectively referred to as mDLs), while the Transportation Security 
Administration (TSA) develops comprehensive regulatory requirements for 
REAL ID-compliant mDLs. This rule is proposing to add new mDL 
definitions to 6 CFR part 37 (REAL ID regulations), and to establish a 
process that states must follow to apply for a mDL waiver from the REAL 
ID regulations. This initial rulemaking would also enable federal 
agencies to accept State mDLs for official purposes from States who are 
issued such a waiver.
    After multiple industry technical standards are finalized and 
published, TSA would repeal the waiver provisions and issue regulations 
setting the minimum technical requirements and security standards for 
mDLs to enable Federal agencies to accept mDLs for official purposes. 
The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) solicited public 
participation in the development of requirements in this rulemaking 
through a request for information published in April 2021, including 
two extensions of the comment period. As part of this public 
engagement, DHS also held a virtual public meeting on June 30, 2021, to 
discuss the purposes of the rulemaking and provide an additional forum 
of comments by stakeholders and other interested persons.
    Effective May 22, 2023, authority to administer the REAL ID program 
was delegated from the Secretary of Homeland Security to the 
Administrator of TSA pursuant to DHS Delegation No. 7060.02.1.
    Statement of Need: This rulemaking is necessary to implement 
authority under the REAL ID Modernization Act, which clarified that 
REAL ID requirements apply to mDLs issued in accordance with 
regulations prescribed by the Secretary. The rule would enable 
continued mDL acceptance when REAL ID enforcement begins in 2025.
    Anticipated Cost and Benefits: TSA anticipates that States, TSA, 
and some Federal agencies will incur costs associated with using mDLs. 
States incur costs to submit waiver applications, TSA incurs costs to 
administer the waiver program, and Federal agencies that choose to 
accept mDLs for official purposes incur costs to implement mDL 
acceptance. TSA anticipates benefits for all stakeholders, including 
increased convenience, security, privacy, and health benefits from 
contact-free identity verification.
    Timetable:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Action                    Date            FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NPRM................................   08/30/23  88 FR 60056
NPRM Comment Period End.............   10/16/23
Final Rule..........................   05/00/24
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No.
    Government Levels Affected: Federal, State.
    URL For More Information: https://www.regulations.gov.
    URL For Public Comments: https://www.regulations.gov.
    Agency Contact: George Petersen, Senior Program Manager, REAL ID 
Program, Department of Homeland Security, Transportation Security 
Administration, Enrollment Services &

[[Page 9393]]

Vetting Programs, 6595 Springfield Center Drive, Springfield, VA 20598-
6010, Phone: 571 227-2215, Email: [email protected].
    Related RIN: Previously reported as 1601-AB06, Related to 1601-
AA37, Related to 1601-AB01, Related to 1601-AB03
    RIN: 1652-AA76

DHS--U.S. IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT (USICE)

Proposed Rule Stage

102. Clarifying and Revising Custody Determination and Detention 
Classification Procedures [1653-AA92]

    Priority: Other Significant. Major status under 5 U.S.C. 801 is 
undetermined.
    Legal Authority: 8 U.S.C. 1103; 6 U.S.C. 251; 6 U.S.C. 111; 8 
U.S.C. 1226
    CFR Citation: 8 CFR 236.1.
    Legal Deadline: None.
    Abstract: The Department of Homeland Security (DHS), U.S. 
Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) and the Department of Justice 
(DOJ) Executive Office for Immigration Review (EOIR) (collectively, the 
Departments) are planning to amend the regulations that govern 
detention and release determinations for noncitizens subject to the 
custody provisions in section 236 of the Immigration and Nationality 
Act (Act), 8 U.S.C. 1226(a). The goal of the proposed regulation would 
be to clarify the scope and applicability of section 236(a) of the Act, 
8 U.S.C. 1226(a), and the procedures that apply under that section, 
including the burden and standard of proof for continued detention at 
initial custody determinations and any custody redetermination 
hearings, and related issues. This rulemaking is consistent with 
Executive Order 14058, which directs agencies to take actions that 
improve service delivery and customer experience by decreasing 
administrative burdens, enhancing transparency, and improving the 
efficiency and effectiveness of government.
    Statement of Need: The proposed rule is needed to bring clarity and 
uniformity to the procedures governing ICE initial custody decisions 
and IJ bond hearings for noncitizens subject to discretionary detention 
under INA 236(a). This rule will also revise the procedures for 
determining whether a noncitizen is properly subject to INA 236(c) 
detention. Additionally, this rule will clarify the detention authority 
that applies during the petition for review process for certain 
noncitizens seeking judicial review of their removal orders. Lastly, 
the proposed rule will make organizational changes to the structure of 
the EOIR regulations governing custody redetermination hearings and 
address outdated provisions in the Departments' custody and bond 
regulations. The Departments believe this rulemaking will help address 
issues that frequently arise in litigation brought by noncitizens 
challenging the Departments' existing custody and bond hearing 
procedures and it may also help to resolve differing interpretations 
among Federal circuit courts.
    Anticipated Cost and Benefits: DOJ and DHS are currently 
considering the specific cost and benefit impacts of the proposed 
provisions.
    Timetable:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Action                    Date            FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NPRM................................   12/00/23
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Undetermined.
    Government Levels Affected: Undetermined.
    Federalism: Undetermined.
    Agency Contact: Sharon Hageman, Deputy Assistant Director, 
Department of Homeland Security, U.S. Immigration and Customs 
Enforcement, 500 12th Street SW, Mail Stop 5006, Washington, DC 20536, 
Phone: 202 732-6960, Email: [email protected].
    Related RIN: Related to 1125-AB27
    RIN: 1653-AA92

DHS--FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY (FEMA)

Proposed Rule Stage

103. National Flood Insurance Program: Standard Flood Insurance Policy, 
Homeowner Flood Form [1660-AB06]

    Priority: Section 3(f)(1) Significant. Major under 5 U.S.C. 801.
    Legal Authority: 42 U.S.C. 4001 et seq.
    CFR Citation: 44 CFR 61.
    Legal Deadline: None.
    Abstract: The National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP), established 
pursuant to the National Flood Insurance Act of 1968, is a voluntary 
program in which participating communities adopt and enforce a set of 
minimum floodplain management requirements to reduce future flood 
damages. Property owners in participating communities are eligible to 
purchase NFIP flood insurance. This proposed rule would revise the 
Standard Flood Insurance Policy by adding a new Homeowner Flood Form 
and five accompanying endorsements. The new Homeowner Flood Form would 
replace the Dwelling Form as a source of coverage for homeowners of 
one-to-four family residences. Together, the new Form and endorsements 
would more closely align with property and casualty homeowners 
insurance and provide increased options and coverage in a more user-
friendly and comprehensible format.
    Statement of Need: The National Flood Insurance Act requires FEMA 
to provide by regulation the general terms and conditions of 
insurability applicable to properties eligible for flood insurance 
coverage. 42 U.S.C. 4013(a). To comply with this requirement, FEMA 
adopts the Standard Flood Insurance Policy (SFIP) in regulation, which 
sets out the terms and conditions of insurance. See 44 CFR part 61, 
Appendix A. FEMA must use the SFIP for all flood insurance policies 
sold through the NFIP. See 44 CFR 61.13.
    The SFIP is a single-peril (flood) policy that pays for direct 
physical damage to insured property. There are currently three forms of 
the SFIP: the Dwelling Form, the General Property Form, and the 
Residential Condominium Building Association Policy (RCBAP) Form. The 
Dwelling Form insures a one-to-four family residential building or a 
single-family dwelling unit in a condominium building. See 44 CFR part 
61, Appendix A(1). Policies under the Dwelling Form offer coverage for 
building property, up to $250,000, and personal property up to 
$100,000. The General Property Form ensures a five-or-more family 
residential building or a non-residential building. See 44 CFR part 61, 
Appendix A(2). The General Property Form offers coverage for building 
and contents up to $500,000 each. The RCBAP Form insures residential 
condominium association buildings and offers building coverage up to 
$250,000 multiplied by the number of units and contents coverage up to 
$100,000 per building. See 44 CFR part 61, appendix A(3). RCBAP 
contents coverage insures property owned by the insured condominium 
association. Individual unit owners must purchase their own Dwelling 
Form policy in order to insure their own contents.
    FEMA last substantively revised the SFIP in 2000. See 65 FR 60758 
(Oct. 12, 2000). In 2020, FEMA published a final rule that made non-
substantive clarifying and plain language improvements to the SFIP. See 
85 FR 43946 (July 20, 2020). However, many policyholders, agents, and 
adjusters continue to find the SFIP difficult to

[[Page 9394]]

read and interpret compared to other, more modern, property and 
casualty insurance products found in the private market. Accordingly, 
FEMA proposes to adopt a new Homeowner Flood Form.
    The new Homeowner Flood Form, which FEMA proposes to add to its 
regulations at 44 CFR 61 appendix A(4), would protect property owners 
in a one-to-four family residence. Upon adoption, the Homeowner Flood 
Form would replace the Dwelling Form as a source of coverage for this 
class of residential properties. FEMA would continue to use the 
Dwelling Form to insure landlords, renters, and owners of mobile homes, 
travel trailers, and condominium units. Compared to the current 
Dwelling Form, the new Homeowner Flood Form would clarify coverage and 
more clearly highlight conditions, limitations, and exclusions in 
coverage as well as add and modify coverages and coverage options. FEMA 
also proposes adding to its regulations five endorsements to accompany 
the new Form: Increased Cost of Compliance Coverage, Actual Cash Value 
Loss Settlement, Temporary Housing Expense, Basement Coverage, and 
Builder's Risk. These endorsements, which FEMA proposes to codify at 44 
CFR 61 appendices A(101)- (105), respectively, would give policyholders 
the option of amending the Homeowner Flood Form to modify coverage with 
a commensurate adjustment to premiums charged. Together, the Homeowner 
Flood Form and accompanying endorsements would increase options and 
coverage for owners of one-to-four family residences.
    FEMA intends that this new Form will be more user-friendly and 
comprehensible. As a result, the new Homeowner Flood Form and its 
accompanying endorsements would provide a more personalized, 
customizable product than the NFIP has offered during its 50 years. In 
addition to aligning with property and casualty homeowners' insurance, 
the result would increase consumer choice and simplify coverage.
    Anticipated Cost and Benefits: FEMA estimates that this rulemaking 
would result in an increase in transfer payments from policyholders to 
FEMA and insurance providers in the form of flood insurance premiums, 
and from FEMA to policyholders in the form of claims payments. 
Additionally, this rulemaking would result in benefits to 
policyholders, insurance providers, and FEMA, mostly through cost 
savings due to increased clarity and fulfillment of customer 
expectations through expanded coverage options. It would also help the 
NFIP better signal risk through premiums, reduce the need for Federal 
assistance, and increase resilience by enhancing mitigation efforts. 
Lastly, FEMA, States, and insurance providers will incur costs for 
implementation and familiarization of the rule.
    Timetable:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Action                    Date            FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NPRM................................   02/00/24
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No.
    Government Levels Affected: Federal.
    Agency Contact: Christine Merk, Lead Management and Program 
Analyst, Department of Homeland Security, Federal Emergency Management 
Agency, Insurance Analytics and Policy Branch, 400 C Street SW, 
Washington, DC 20472, Phone: 202 735-6324, Email: 
[email protected].
    RIN: 1660-AB06

DHS--FEMA

104. Update of FEMA'S Public Assistance Regulations [1660-AB09]

    Priority: Other Significant.
    Legal Authority: 42 U.S.C. 5121 to 5207
    CFR Citation: 44 CFR 206.
    Legal Deadline: None.
    Abstract: The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) proposes 
to revise its Public Assistance (PA) program regulations to reflect 
current statutory authorities and implement program improvements. The 
proposed rule would incorporate changes brought about by amendments to 
the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act. 
FEMA is also proposing clarifications and corrections to improve the 
efficiency and consistency of the Public Assistance program.
    Statement of Need: The Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and 
Emergency Assistance Act (Stafford Act), Pub. L. 100-707, 102 Stat. 
4689, authorizes the President to provide Federal assistance when the 
severity and magnitude of an incident or threatened incident, exceeds 
the affected State, local, Indian Tribal, and Territorial government's 
(SLTT's) capabilities to effectively respond or recover. 42 U.S.C. 5170 
and 5191. If the President declares an emergency or major disaster 
authorizing the Public Assistance program, FEMA may award Public 
Assistance grants to assist SLTTs and certain private nonprofit (PNP) 
organizations so communities can quickly respond to and recover from 
the major disaster or emergency.
    FEMA proposes to amend its Public Assistance and Community Disaster 
Loan program regulations to incorporate statutory changes that have 
amended sections of the Stafford Act relating to Public Assistance and 
Community Disaster Loans and to improve program administration. These 
include the Post-Katrina Emergency Management Reform Act of 2006 
(PKEMRA), Public Law 109-295, 120 Stat. 1394, the Security and 
Accountability for Every Port Act of 2006 (SAFE Port Act), Public Law 
109-347, 120 Stat. 1884, the Pets Evacuation and Transportation 
Standards Act of 2006 (PETS Act), Public Law 109-308, 120 Stat. 1725, 
the Sandy Recovery Improvement Act of 2013 (SRIA), Public Law 113-2, 
127 Stat. 39, the Emergency Information Improvement Act of 2015, Public 
Law 114-111, 129 Stat. 2240, the Bipartisan Budget Act of 2018, Public 
Law 115-123, 132 Stat. 64, and the FAA Reauthorization Act of 2018, 
Division D, Disaster Recovery Reform Act of 2018 (DRRA), Public Law 
115-254, 132 Stat. 3438. FEMA also proposes to implement program 
improvements and make clarifications and corrections to existing 
regulations.
    Anticipated Cost and Benefits: FEMA estimates that this rulemaking 
would result in benefits to SLTTs and FEMA from improving clarity and 
aligning FEMA regulations with statutory changes and current practices. 
Such increased clarity and understanding would improve the efficiency 
and the consistency of FEMA's PA programs. Additionally, proposed 
improvements to State/Tribal administrative plans would better position 
SLTTs to respond to and to recover from emergencies and disasters. 
Lastly, FEMA estimates increases in costs for SLTTs due to additional 
paperwork burden and familiarization of the rule.
    Timetable:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Action                    Date            FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NPRM................................   05/00/24
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No.
    Government Levels Affected: Federal, Local, State, Tribal.
    Additional Information: Docket ID FEMA-2023-0005.
    Agency Contact: Tod Wells, Deputy Director, Public Assistance 
Division Recovery Directorate, Department of Homeland Security, Federal 
Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street SW, Washington, DC 20472-
3100, Phone: 202 646-3834, Email: [email protected].
    RIN: 1660-AB09


[[Page 9395]]



DHS--FEMA

105. Updates to Floodplain Management and Protection of Wetlands 
Regulations To Implement the Federal Flood Risk Management Standard 
[1660-AB12]

    Priority: Other Significant.
    Legal Authority: 6 U.S.C. 101 et seq.; 42 U.S.C. 4001 et seq.; 42 
U.S.C. 4321 et seq.; E.O. 11988 of May 24, 1977, 42 FR 26951, 3 CFR, 
1977 Comp., p. 117; E.O. 11990 of May 24, 1977, 42 FR 26961, 3 CFR, 
1977 Comp., p. 121; E.O. 13690, 80 FR 6425; E.O. 14030, 86 FR 27967
    CFR Citation: 44 CFR 9.
    Legal Deadline: None.
    Abstract: Consistent with President Biden's Executive Order on 
Climate Related Financial Risk (E.O. 14030), the Federal Emergency 
Management Agency (FEMA) proposes to amend its regulations at 44 CFR 
part 9, ``Floodplain Management and Protection of Wetlands,'' to 
incorporate amendments to Executive Order 11988 and the Federal Flood 
Risk Management Standard (FFRMS). The FFRMS is a flexible framework 
allowing agencies to choose among three approaches to define the 
floodplain and corresponding flood elevation requirements for federally 
funded projects. 44 CFR part 9 describes FEMA's process under Executive 
Order 11988 for determining whether the proposed location for an action 
falls within a floodplain and how to complete the action in the 
floodplain, in light of the risk of flooding. The proposed rule would 
change how FEMA defines a floodplain with respect to certain actions. 
Additionally, under the proposed rule, FEMA would use natural systems, 
ecosystem process, and nature-based approaches, where practicable, when 
developing alternatives to locating the proposed action in the 
floodplain.
    FEMA has engaged the public extensively on these matters. On 
February 5, 2015, FEMA acting on behalf of the Mitigation Framework 
Leadership Group, posted a Federal Register notice seeking comments on 
a draft of the Revised Guidelines for Implementing Executive Order 
11988, Floodplain Management. The 60-day comment period was extended an 
additional 30 days. During the public comment period for the Revised 
Guidelines, FEMA sent advisories to representatives from Governors' 
offices nationwide inviting comments on the draft Revised Guidelines. 
Over 25 meetings were held across the country with State, local, and 
Tribal officials and interested stakeholders to discuss the draft 
Revised Guidelines as well as 9 public listening sessions across the 
country attended by over 700 participants to facilitate feedback. All 
relevant comments received in response to these efforts have been 
posted to the public rulemaking docket on the Federal eRulemaking 
portal at https://www.regulations.gov/document/FEMA-2015-0006-0001/comment. Comments from meetings and listening sessions can be found at 
https://www.regulations.gov/docket/FEMA-2015-0006/document. 
Additionally, FEMA published a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) in 
2016 seeking public comment on FEMA's proposed implementation of the 
Revised Guidelines. All relevant comments received in response to the 
2016 NPRM have been posted to the public rulemaking docket on the 
Federal eRulemaking portal at https://www.regulations.gov/document/FEMA-2015-0006-0373/comment.
    Statement of Need: The United States is experiencing increased 
flooding and flood risk from changing conditions. FEMA has not made 
significant updates to its regulations governing floodplain management 
to reflect the challenges faced because of increased flooding and 
changing conditions since initial publication in 1980. As a result, 
FEMA is now proposing to amend 44 CFR part 9, ``Floodplain Management 
and Protection of Wetlands,'' to implement the FFRMS and update the 
agency's 8-step process. The FFRMS is a flood resilience standard that 
is required for federally funded projects and provides a flexible 
framework to increase resilience against flooding and help preserve the 
natural values of floodplains and wetlands. A floodplain is any land 
area that is subject to flooding and refers to geographic features with 
undefined boundaries. 44 CFR part 9 describes the 8-step process FEMA 
uses to determine whether a proposed action would be located within or 
affect a floodplain, and if so, whether and how to continue with or 
modify the proposed action. Executive Order 11988, as amended, and the 
FFRMS changed the Executive Branch-wide guidance for defining the 
floodplain with respect to federally funded projects (i.e., actions 
involving the use of Federal funds for new construction, substantial 
improvement, or to address substantial damage to a structure or 
facility). This proposed rule would ensure that actions subject to the 
FFRMS are designed to be resilient to both current and future flood 
risks to minimize the impact of floods on human health, safety, and 
welfare and to protect Federal investments by reducing the risk of 
flood loss.
    Anticipated Cost and Benefits: FEMA estimates that this rulemaking 
would result in benefits to grant recipients (States, Local, Tribes, 
Territories, and Individuals) and to FEMA, mostly through the reduction 
in damage to properties and contents from future floods, potential 
lives saved, public health and safety benefits, reduced recovery time 
from floods, and increased community resilience to flooding. FEMA 
estimates project cost increases for FEMA and grant recipients due to 
increased elevation or floodproofing requirements of the proposed rule.
    Timetable:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Action                    Date            FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Proposed Policy: Request for           10/02/23  88 FR 67697
 Comments.
Proposed Policy: Comment Period End.   12/01/23
NPRM................................   10/02/23  88 FR 67869
NPRM Comment Period End.............   12/01/23
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Yes.
    Small Entities Affected: Governmental Jurisdictions, Organizations.
    Government Levels Affected: Federal, Local, State, Tribal.
    Additional Information: Docket ID FEMA-2023-0026.
    URL For More Information: https://www.regulations.gov.
    URL For Public Comments: https://www.regulations.gov.
    Agency Contact: Portia Ross, Office of Environmental and Historic 
Preservation, Department of Homeland Security, Federal Emergency 
Management Agency, 400 C Street SW, Washington, DC 20472, Phone: 202 
709-0677, Email: [email protected].
    RIN: 1660-AB12

DHS--FEMA

Final Rule Stage

106. Individual Assistance Program Equity [1660-AB07]

    Priority: Section 3(f)(1) Significant. Major under 5 U.S.C. 801.
    Legal Authority: 42 U.S.C. 5155; 42 U.S.C. 5174; 42 U.S.C. 5189a
    CFR Citation: 44 CFR 206.101; 44 CFR 206.110 to 206.115; 44 CFR 
206.117 to 206.119; 44 CFR 206.191.
    Legal Deadline: None.
    Abstract: The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) will 
publish an interim final rule (IFR) amending its regulations governing 
the Individual Assistance program to

[[Page 9396]]

increase equity by simplifying processes, removing barriers to entry, 
and increasing eligibility for certain types of assistance under the 
program. Specifically, the IFR will: Increase eligibility for home 
repair assistance by amending the definitions and application of the 
terms safe, sanitary, and functional, allowing assistance for certain 
accessibility-related items, and amending its approach to evaluating 
insurance proceeds; allow for the re-opening of the applicant 
registration period when the President adds new counties to the major 
disaster declaration; simplify the documentation requirements for 
continued temporary housing assistance; simplify the appeals process; 
simplify the process to request approval for a late registration; 
remove the requirement to apply for a Small Business Administration 
loan as a condition of eligibility for Other Needs Assistance (ONA); 
and establish additional assistance under ONA for serious needs, 
displacement, disaster- damaged computing devices, and essential tools 
for self-employed individuals. FEMA also makes revisions to reflect 
changes to statutory authority that have not yet been implemented in 
regulation, to include provisions for utility and security deposit 
payments, lease and repair of multi-family rental housing, child care 
assistance, maximum assistance limits, and waiver authority.
    FEMA sought input on regulatory changes to the Individuals and 
Households Program (IHP) through a Request for Information (RFI), 
published on April 22, 2021, seeking public input on its programs, 
regulations, collections of information, and policies to ensure they 
effectively achieve FEMA's mission in a manner that furthers the goals 
of advancing equity for all, including those in underserved 
communities; bolstering resilience from the impacts of climate change, 
particularly for those disproportionately impacted by climate change; 
and environmental justice. 86 FR 21325, Apr. 22, 2021.
    FEMA held public meetings and extended the comment period on the 
RFI to ensure all interested parties had sufficient opportunity to 
provide comments. See ``Request for Information on FEMA Programs, 
Regulations, and Policies; Public Meetings; Extension of Comment 
Period,'' 86 FR 30326, June 7, 2021. All relevant comments received in 
response to the RFI, including those received during the public 
meetings, have been posted to the public rulemaking docket on the 
Federal eRulemaking portal at https://www.regulations.gov/document/FEMA-2021-0011-0001/comment. Commenters raised equitable concerns that 
FEMA will address in this IFR, such as by removing the requirement to 
apply for the SBA for a loan before receipt of ONA, amending FEMA's 
habitability standards, increasing assistance for essential tools, 
simplifying its appeal process, and removing documentation requirements 
for late registrations. FEMA will seek public comment on this IFR and 
will carefully consider each comment received to determine whether 
further changes to FEMA's IHP regulations are needed.
    Statement of Need: FEMA's IHP regulations have not had a major 
review and update since section 206 of the Disaster Mitigation Act of 
2000 replaced the Individual and Family Grant Assistance Program with 
the current IHP. Some minor changes to Repair Assistance were completed 
in 2013, but Congress has passed multiple other laws that have 
superseded portions of the regulations and created other programs or 
forms of assistance with no supporting regulations. This IFR will 
update the IHP regulations now to bring them up to date and address 
other lessons learned through the course of implementing the IHP in 
disasters much larger than any previously addressed at the time the 
regulations were first developed.
    Anticipated Cost and Benefits: FEMA estimates that this rulemaking 
would result in an increase in transfer payments from FEMA and States 
in the form of disaster assistance to individuals and households. It 
would also result in additional costs to States for familiarization of 
the rule and to FEMA and applicants for paperwork burden. The rule 
would ensure disaster assistance is more equitably distributed and 
assist applicants to more quickly and fully recover from disasters by 
expanding eligibility for, and access to, certain types of assistance. 
Lastly, the rulemaking would improve clarity and align FEMA regulations 
with statutory changes improving the efficiency and the consistency of 
IHP assistance.
    Timetable:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Action                    Date            FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Interim Final Rule..................   12/00/23
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No.
    Government Levels Affected: Federal, Local, State.
    Additional Information: Docket ID FEMA-2023-0003.
    Agency Contact: Kristina McAlister, Supervisory Emergency 
Management Specialist (Recovery), Department of Homeland Security, 
Federal Emergency Management Agency, Individual Assistance Division 
Recovery Directorate, 500 C Street SW, Washington, DC 20472, Phone: 866 
826-8751, Email: [email protected].
    RIN: 1660-AB07

DHS--FEMA

Long-Term Actions

107. National Flood Insurance Program's Floodplain Management Standards 
for Land Management & Use, & an Assessment of the Program's Impact on 
Threatened and Endangered Species & Their Habitats [1660-AB11]

    Priority: Other Significant.
    Legal Authority: 42 U.S.C. 4001 et seq.
    CFR Citation: 44 CFR 59 to 60.
    Legal Deadline: None.
    Abstract: The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) issued a 
Request for Information (RFI) to receive the public's input on 
revisions to the National Flood Insurance Program's (NFIP) floodplain 
management standards for land management and use regulations. FEMA's 
authority under the National Flood Insurance Act requires the agency 
to, from time to time, develop comprehensive criteria designed to 
encourage the adoption of adequate State and local measures. The agency 
will propose regulations to better align the NFIP minimum floodplain 
management standards with our current understanding of flood risk, 
flood insurance premium rates, and risk reduction approaches to make 
communities safer, stronger, and more resilient to increased flooding. 
As part of the proposed regulations, FEMA is considering revisions to 
the NFIP minimum floodplain management standards to better protect 
people and property in a nuanced manner that balances community needs 
with the national scope of the NFIP. FEMA will also propose 
opportunities to make these minimum floodplain management standards 
improve resilience in communities that have been historically 
underserved. The proposed revisions to the NFIP minimum floodplain 
management standards will also consider how to advance the conservation 
of threatened and endangered species and their habitat. The agency is 
also reviewing ways to further promote enhanced resilience efforts 
through the Community Rating System.
    During the RFI comment period, FEMA held three public meetings and 
extended the comment period on the RFI to ensure all interested parties 
had

[[Page 9397]]

sufficient opportunity to provide comments. All relevant comments 
received in response to the RFI have been posted to the public 
rulemaking docket on the Federal eRulemaking portal at https://www.regulations.gov/docket/FEMA-2021-0024/comments and transcripts from 
the public meetings have also been posted at https://www.regulations.gov/docket/FEMA-2021-0024/document. In April 2023, FEMA 
requested recommendations from the Technical Mapping Advisory Council 
(TMAC) on modifying the definition of the Special Flood Hazard Area or 
modifying how it is calculated. In addition, FEMA requested a 
recommendation from TMAC on how FEMA might consider changing mapping 
procedures related to when land is filled. These recommendations will 
assist FEMA in exploring the feasibility of public comments received 
from the 2021 RFI.
    Statement of Need: FEMA issued an RFI to seek information from the 
public on the agency's current floodplain management standards to 
ensure the agency receives public input to inform any action to revise 
the NFIP minimum floodplain management standards.
    FEMA is re-evaluating the implementation of the NFIP under the 
Endangered Species Act at the national level. FEMA will propose 
regulations based on the comments received on this RFI to better align 
the NFIP minimum floodplain management standards with our current 
understanding of flood risk, flood insurance premium rates, and risk 
reduction approaches to make communities safer, stronger, and more 
resilient to increased flooding.
    Anticipated Cost and Benefits: FEMA is currently considering the 
cost and benefit impacts of potential proposed actions.
    Timetable:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Action                    Date            FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Request for Information.............   10/12/21  86 FR 56713
Announcement of Public Meetings.....   10/28/21  86 FR 59745
Announcement of Additional Public      11/22/21  86 FR 66329
 Meeting; Extension of Comment
 Period.
Request for Information Comment        01/27/22
 Period End.
                                     -----------------------------------
NPRM................................           To Be Determined
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No.
    Government Levels Affected: None.
    Additional Information: Docket ID FEMA-2021-0024.
    URL For More Information: https://www.regulations.gov.
    URL For Public Comments: https://www.regulations.gov.
    Agency Contact: Rachel Sears, Resilience, Department of Homeland 
Security, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 400 C Street SW, 
Washington, DC 20472, Phone: 202 646-2977, Email: [email protected].
    RIN: 1660-AB11

BILLING CODE 9110-9B-P

DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT

Statement of Regulatory Priorities for Fiscal Year 2024

Introduction

    The Regulatory Plan for the Department of Housing and Urban 
Development (HUD) for Fiscal Year (FY) 2024 highlights two significant 
regulations and policy initiatives that HUD seeks to complete during 
the upcoming fiscal year. As the Federal agency that serves as the 
nation's housing agency, HUD is committed to ensuring everyone has an 
affordable, healthy place to live. As a result, HUD plays a significant 
role in the lives of families and in communities throughout America.
    HUD is currently working to meet the goals of its Strategic Plan 
to: support underserved communities, ensure access to and increase the 
production of affordable housing, promote homeownership, advance 
sustainable communities, and strengthen HUD's internal capacity. Under 
the leadership of Secretary Marcia L. Fudge, HUD is dedicated to 
implementing the Administration's priorities by setting forth 
initiatives related to increasing equity and improving customer 
experience across all HUD programs.
    The rules highlighted in HUD's regulatory plan for FY 2023 reflect 
HUD's efforts to continue its work in building strong and sustainable 
communities and addressing the housing needs of all Americans. 
Additionally, HUD notes that the FY 2023 Semiannual Regulatory Agenda 
includes additional rules that advance the Administration's priorities, 
including rules to advance racial equity and civil rights and rules to 
provide economic relief to homeowners and renters.

HOME Investment Partnerships Program: Program Updates and Streamlining

    HUD's HOME Investment Partnerships Program (HOME) provides formula 
grants to States and units of general local government to fund a wide 
range of activities to produce and maintain affordable rental and 
homeownership housing and provides tenant-based rental assistance for 
low-income and very low-income households.
    This rule proposes to revise the current HOME regulations at 24 CFR 
part 92 to update, simplify, and streamline requirements, better align 
the program with other Federal housing programs, and implement recent 
amendments to the HOME statute. Specifically, the proposed changes to 
the HOME program include significant revisions to the community housing 
development organization requirements, a change in the approach to HOME 
rents, simplified requirements for small-scale rental projects, 
enhanced flexibility in tenant-based rental assistance (TBRA) programs, 
and simplified provisions and new flexibilities for community land 
trusts. The proposed rule would also strengthen and expand tenant 
protections, and create incentives for meeting green building standards 
in new construction, reconstruction, and rehabilitation of housing.

Aggregate Costs and Benefits

    Executive Order 12866, as amended, requires the agency to provide 
its best estimate of the combined aggregate costs and benefits of all 
regulations included in the agency's Regulatory Plan that will be 
pursued in fiscal year 2024. HUD expects that neither the total 
economic costs nor the total efficiency gains will exceed $200 million 
for this proposed rulemaking. In fact, the direct economic impact of 
this rule would be almost entirely within the HOME program. In other 
words, the proposed changes would affect what participating 
jurisdictions do with the HOME funds they receive from HUD and how 
projects that accept this funding source can operate. Many of the 
policy adjustments proposed would only have a practical impact if 
participating jurisdictions choose to participate in HOME-funded 
activities that are affected by the updated policies.

Statement of Need

    The HOME program is authorized by title II of the Cranston-Gonzalez 
National Affordable Housing Act (``NAHA'') (42 U.S.C. 12721 et seq).

[[Page 9398]]

Title II of NAHA has not been significantly revised since the HOME 
program was last reauthorized by Congress in 1992. The constraints of 
the prescriptive statutory authority of title II of NAHA limit the 
scope of changes that the Department can propose to the HOME program 
regulations. Working within these limitations, the Department conducted 
a comprehensive review of title II of NAHA and current HOME program 
regulations to determine whether previously unrecognized opportunities 
might exist to revise current regulatory provisions. In creating the 
proposed rule, the Department focused on its commitment to equity and 
wealth-building and considered input from stakeholders on the most 
challenging aspects of administering and using HOME funds to provide 
affordable housing. This proposed rule is necessary to reduce the 
burden and increase flexibility for participating jurisdictions and 
other program participants, while adhering to statutory intent and 
requiring responsible management of State and local HOME programs.
    This proposed rule also incorporates changes made by the Housing 
Opportunity Through Modernization Act of 2016 (HOTMA) and recent 
amendments to the HOME statute.
    Alternatives: An alternative to promulgating this rule would be to 
maintain HUD's existing regulations governing the HOME program. 
However, doing so would mean failing to fully benefit from the 
advantages of streamlining, updating, and simplifying our regulations. 
It would also mean that HUD would fail to adjust its HOME regulations 
to be fully consistent with HOTMA and recent amendments to the HOME 
statute.
    Risks: This proposed rule would impose tenant protections that may 
not be currently applicable to other affordable housing funding sources 
(e.g., the Low-Income Housing Tax Credit program). This could result in 
some project owners and developers becoming hesitant to include HOME 
funds in the capital funding stack of affordable housing projects. 
Additionally, this proposed rule would make updates throughout the HOME 
regulation, including significant updates to a number of sections 
within the regulation. This could lead to a partially challenging 
transitional period for participating jurisdictions and other 
stakeholders as they learn and implement the new regulations into their 
policies and procedures.
    Timetable:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Action                    Date             FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NPRM...............................   12/00/2023
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No.
    Small Entities Affected: No.
    Government Levels Affected: Local, State.
    Federalism Affected: No.
    Energy Affected: No.
    International Impacts: No.

Section 184 Indian Home Loan Guarantee Program

    Section 184 of the Housing and Community Development Act of 1992 
(Pub. L. 102-550, approved October 28, 1992) (12 U.S.C. 1715z-13a), as 
amended, authorizes the Section 184 Indian Home Loan Guarantee Program 
(Section 184 Program) to improve access to private financing for Native 
American families, Tribes, and Tribally Designated Housing Entities 
(TDHEs) by providing a loan guarantee to financial organizations who 
lend to them.
    This rule would modernize and enhance the regulations governing the 
Section 184 Program. Through the Section 184 Program, HUD guarantees 
home mortgage loans made to Native American borrowers in certain areas. 
The Section 184 Program facilitates homeownership and improves access 
to capital in Native American communities.
    Since its inception in 1994, the number of loans guaranteed under 
the Section 184 Program has increased significantly but its regulations 
have never been substantially revised.
    In 2015, the HUD Office of Inspector General (OIG), audited the 
Section 184 Program and recommended that HUD develop and implement 
policies and procedures for monitoring and evaluating the Section 184 
Program, standardize monthly delinquency reports, deny payments to 
lenders for claims on loans that have material underwriting 
deficiencies, take enforcement actions against certain lenders, and 
ensure that only underwriters that are approved by HUD are underwriting 
Section 184 loans. This rule is part of the improvements to the Section 
184 Program that HUD is pursuing to address the findings in the audit.
    In developing this rule, HUD engaged in robust consultation with 
Tribes consistent with HUD's Tribal Consultation policy. As early as 
2018, prior to drafting the proposed rule, HUD held eleven in-person 
Tribal consultation sessions to outline HUD's vision for the rule and 
obtain feedback from the tribes. As HUD completed drafts of various 
subparts of the regulation, HUD shared these drafts with Tribes and 
held three additional in-person consultations to solicit Tribal 
feedback on each subpart of the proposed rule. During this time, HUD 
also held two in-person Tribal consultations and two national 
teleconferences to review the draft proposed rule. In addition to the 
Tribal consultation sessions held prior and during the drafting of the 
proposed rule, HUD conducted ten additional consultations during the 
proposed rule public comment period. HUD held six regional consultation 
sessions and four national consultation sessions between December 2022 
and March 2023. During these consultation sessions, HUD continued to 
solicit input and answered questions participants had about the 
proposed rule.
    The regulations proposed in this rule, drafted in consideration of 
the public comments and tribal consultations, would strengthen and 
comprehensively modernize the operation of the Section 184 Program. 
Specifically, this rule would make the Section 184 Program sustainable, 
protect Borrowers, address weaknesses identified by OIG, provide 
clarity for new and existing Direct Guarantee and Non-Direct Guarantee 
Lenders, and reduce unreasonable claim payment requests from Servicers 
Many of the procedures and policy proposed by the proposed rule adopt 
industry standards and best practices and do not differ from existing 
HUD guidance or current practice within the Section 184 Program, which 
are often documented in HUD guidance such as ``PIH Notices'' and ``Dear 
Lender Letters''.

Aggregate Costs and Benefits

    Executive Order 12866, as amended, requires the agency to provide 
its best estimate of the combined aggregate costs and benefits of all 
regulations included in the agency's Regulatory Plan that will be 
pursued in FY 2022. HUD expects that neither the total economic costs 
nor the total efficiency gains will exceed $100 million. Expanding 
oversight, improving loan origination quality, enhancing loss 
mitigation and foreclosure prevention, and implementing new claims 
procedures will all help to ensure the fiscal stability of the Section 
184 Loan Guarantee Fund. While most of the requirements and policies in 
the proposed regulations mirror existing practices within the Program, 
some are expected to have a marginal economic impact on mortgagees, 
Tribes, and borrowers. These impacts could impose slightly greater 
administrative costs on

[[Page 9399]]

participating lenders and shift some risk from the Fund to 
participating lenders.

Statement of Need

    Since its inception, the number of loans guaranteed under the 
Section 184 Program has significantly increased. At the same time, the 
program regulations have never been substantially revised. This rule 
helps to address housing challenges that Native American households 
continue to face, particularly: overcrowding and a lack of affordable 
housing in tribal areas; and access to mortgage credit outside of 
tribal area.
    In 2015, the OIG recommended that HUD develop and implement 
policies and procedures for monitoring and evaluating the Section 184 
Program, standardize monthly delinquency reports, deny payments to 
lenders for claims on loans that have material underwriting 
deficiencies, take enforcement actions against certain lenders, and 
ensure that only underwriters that are approved by HUD are underwriting 
Section 184 loans. This rule provides additional structure to the 
Section 184 Program and is part of the OIG's corrective action plan.
    Alternatives: An alternative to promulgating this rule would be to 
maintain HUD's existing regulations and practices concerning the 
Program. However, doing so would ignore the OIG's recommendations and 
pose a greater risk to the Section 184 Loan Guarantee Fund and the 
Program, as demand for the Program has significantly increased since 
its inception.
    Risks: This rule could slightly increase the administrative costs 
for lenders that participate in the Program and dissuade some lenders 
from participating in the Program. However, in the long-term, enhanced 
loan origination and loss mitigation and foreclosure prevention options 
will help to strengthen the vitality of the Program; thus, making the 
Program more attractive for lenders.
    Timetable:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Action                    Date             FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NPRM...............................   12/21/2022  87 FR 78324
NPRM Comment Period End............    3/17/2023
Final Rule.........................   03/00/2024
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No.
    Small Entities Affected: No.
    Government Levels Affected: No.
    Federalism Affected: No.
    Energy Affected: No.
    International Impacts: No.

BILLING CODE 4210-67-P

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Fall 2023 Regulatory Plan

Introduction

    The U.S. Department of the Interior (Department) is the principal 
steward of our Nation's public lands and resources, including many of 
our cultural treasures. The Department serves as trustee to Native 
Americans, Alaska Natives, and Federally Recognized Tribes and is 
responsible for our ongoing relationships with the Island Territories 
under U.S. jurisdiction and the freely associated States. Among the 
Department's many responsibilities is managing more than 500 million 
surface acres of Federal land, which constitutes approximately 20 
percent of the Nation's land area, as well as approximately 700 million 
subsurface acres of Federal mineral estate, and more than 2.5 billion 
acres of submerged lands on the Outer Continental Shelf (OCS).
    In addition, the Department protects and recovers endangered 
species; protects natural, historic, and cultural resources; provides 
scientific and other information about those resources; and manages 
water projects that are an essential lifeline and economic engine for 
many communities.
    Hundreds of millions of people visit Department-managed lands each 
year to take advantage of a wide range of recreational pursuits--
including camping, hiking, hunting, fishing, and various other forms of 
outdoor recreation--and to learn about our Nation's history. Each of 
these activities supports local communities and their economies. The 
Department also provides access to Federal lands and offshore areas for 
the development of energy, minerals, and other natural resources that 
generate billions of dollars in revenue.
    In short, the Department plays a central role in how the United 
States stewards its public lands, ensures environmental protections, 
pursues environmental justice, honors the nation-to-nation relationship 
with Tribes and the special relationships with other Indigenous people 
and the insular areas.

Regulatory and Deregulatory Priorities

    To help advance the Secretary of the Interior's (Secretary) 
commitment to honoring the Nation's trust responsibilities and to 
conserve and manage the Nation's natural resources and cultural 
heritage, the Department's regulatory and deregulatory priorities in 
the coming year will focus on:
     Tackling the Climate Crisis, Strengthening Climate 
Resiliency, and Facilitating the Transition to Renewable Energy;
     Upholding Trust Responsibilities to Federally Recognized 
American Indian and Alaska Native Tribes, Restoring Tribal Lands, and 
Protecting Natural and Cultural Resources, Advancing Equity and 
Supporting Underserved Communities; and
     Investing in Healthy Lands, Waters, and Local Economies 
and Strengthening Conservation of the Nation's Lands, Waters, and 
Wildlife.
     Promoting Equitable and Meaningful Participation in the 
Regulatory Process

Tackling the Climate Crisis, Strengthening Climate Resiliency, and 
Facilitating the Transition to Renewable Energy

    The Biden-Harris administration remains committed to combatting 
climate change and reducing greenhouse gas emissions while improving 
public health, protecting the environment, and ensuring access to clean 
air and water. Under this administration, the Department has been a key 
leader in tackling the climate crises. Pursuant to Executive Order 
(E.O.) 13990 ``Protecting Public Health and the Environment and 
Restoring Science to Tackle the Climate Crisis,'' (signed on Jan. 20, 
2021) and E.O. 14008, ``Tackling the Climate Crisis at Home and 
Abroad,'' (signed January 27, 2021), the Department has advanced 
multiple policy and regulatory efforts to reduce climate pollution; 
improve and increase adaptation and resilience to the impacts of 
drought, wildfire, and extreme weather; address current and historic 
environmental injustice; protect public health; and conserve 
Department-managed lands and waters.
    The historic Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act of 2021 (BIL) 
and the Inflation Reduction Act (IRA), which President Biden signed 
respectively on November 15, 2021, and August 16, 2022, will enable 
transformational outcomes on these clean energy and resilience 
priorities while driving the creation of good-paying union jobs. In 
referring to the BIL, Secretary Haaland said, ``The Interior Department 
is hard at work to deliver these critical investments from the 
President's Investing in America agenda into the hands of American 
communities as quick as we can, and we're making tremendous progress.''

[[Page 9400]]

    In accordance with E.O.s 13990 and 14008, as well as E.O. 14052, 
``Implementation of the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act,'' 
(signed on Nov. 15, 2021), several bureaus within the Department are 
pursuing regulatory actions to implement these administration 
priorities, including steps toincrease renewable energy production by 
improving siting and permitting processes on public lands and in 
offshore waters.
    The Department is committed to fully facilitating the development 
of renewable energy on public lands and waters, as well as supporting 
tribal and territorial efforts to develop renewable energy, including 
deploying 30 gigawatts (GW) of offshore wind by 2030 and 25GW of 
onshore renewable energy by 2025. The Department will meet these 
ambitious goals while also ensuring appropriate protection of public 
lands, waters, and biodiversity and creating good jobs. As Secretary 
Haaland has stated, ``The Department of the Interior continues to make 
significant progress in our efforts to spur a clean energy revolution, 
strengthen and decarbonize the nation's economy, and help communities 
transition to a clean energy future.''
    As part of these ongoing efforts, the Bureau of Ocean Energy 
Management's (BOEM) most important regulatory initiative is focused on 
expanding offshore wind energy's role in strengthening U.S. energy 
security and independence, creating jobs, providing benefits to local 
communities, and further developing the U.S. economy. The BOEM's 
renewable energy program has matured over the past 10 years, a time in 
which BOEM has conducted numerous auctions, and issued and managed 
multiple commercial leases. Based on this experience, BOEM has 
identified multiple opportunities to update its regulations to better 
facilitate the development of renewable energy resources and to promote 
U.S. energy independence. On January 30, 2023 (88 FR 5968), BOEM 
proposed a rule, the ``Renewable Energy Modernization Rule'' (1010-
AE04). As proposed, the rule facilitates development of offshore 
renewable energy and promotes U.S. energy independence in a safe and 
environmentally sound manner that provides a fair return to U.S. 
taxpayers.
    Similarly, the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) plans to update its 
regulations for onshore rights-of- way, leasing, and operations related 
to all activities associated with renewable energy. On June 16, 2023 
(88 FR 39726), the BLM proposed the rule, ``Rights-of-way, Leasing, and 
Operations for Renewable Energy'' (1004-AE78). This rule aims to 
improve permitting activities and processes to facilitate increased 
renewable energy production on public lands.
    To advance the deployment of clean energy infrastructure while also 
meeting obligations to conserve habitats and wildlife, the Department 
will improve permitting frameworks for bird conservation. On September 
30, 2022 (87 FR 59598), the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) 
proposed the ``Eagle Permits; Incidental Take'' rule (1018-BE70) to 
revise the regulations authorizing eagle incidental take and eagle nest 
take permits to increase the efficiency and effectiveness of 
permitting, facilitate and improve compliance, and increase the 
conservation benefit for eagles. The FWS plans to finalize this rule in 
December 2023.
    The FWS will also propose the ``Migratory Bird Permits; Authorizing 
the Incidental Take of Migratory Birds'' rule (1018-BF71), to clarify 
the MBTA's prohibitions on taking and killing migratory birds and 
consider establishing a straightforward process to secure 
authorizations for otherwise prohibited take of migratory birds.
    The BIL enables the Department to establish important regulations 
governing carbon transportation and storage on the OCS. The orderly 
implementation of negative emissions technologies, such as carbon 
capture, utilization, and storage, is necessary to reduce hard-to-abate 
emissions from the industrial sector, which emits nearly 25 percent of 
all carbon dioxide released into the atmosphere in the United States. 
In accordance with the BIL, the Bureau of Safety and Environmental 
Enforcement (BSEE) and BOEM are drafting a joint proposed rule that 
would address the transportation and geologic sequestration aspects of 
carbon storage development on the OCS, including leasing, geological, 
and geophysical exploration for appropriate storage reservoirs; 
environmental plans and mitigations; facility and infrastructure design 
and installation; injection operations; long-term site stewardship 
(i.e., monitoring and response); financial assurance; and safety. BSEE 
and BOEM plan to publish this proposed rule in December 2023.
    The Department is also committed to modernizing its oversight of 
oil and gas leasing and development to help address the climate and 
biodiversity crises and to advance environmental justice. In November 
2021, the Department released its report on Federal oil and gas leasing 
and permitting practices, following a review of onshore and offshore 
oil and gas programs called for in E.O. 14008. The report identified 
significant reforms needed to ensure the programs provide a fair return 
to taxpayers, discourage speculation, hold operators responsible for 
remediation, and create a more inclusive and just approach to managing 
public lands and waters. The Department's ``Report on the Federal Oil 
and Gas Leasing Program'' makes a number of specific recommendations to 
restore balance to these programs, including adjusting royalty rates, 
pursuing adequate financial assurance for decommissioning liabilities, 
and prioritizing leasing in areas with known resource potential while 
avoiding conflicts with other uses.
    This past year, the Department proposed regulations to implement 
important reforms, including the report's recommendations and reforms 
included in the IRA regarding oil and gas resources on public lands. On 
Nov. 30, 2022 (87 FR 73588), the BLM published the proposed rule 
``Waste Prevention, Production Subject to Royalties, and Resource 
Conservation 43 CFR parts 3160 and 3170'' (1004-AE79), known as the 
Waste Prevention Rule. On July 24, 2023 (88 FR 47562), the BLM 
published the proposed rule ``Fluid Mineral Leases and Leasing 
Process'' (1004-AE80), known as the Fluid Minerals Rule. The Waste 
Prevention Rule would prevent waste of Federal resources with an 
additional benefit of reducing methane emissions in the oil and gas 
sector. The Fluid Minerals Rule would incorporate many urgent fiscal 
and programmatic reforms included in the report and IRA, such as 
updating BLM's process for leasing to ensure the protection and proper 
stewardship of the public lands, including potential climate and other 
impacts associated with oil and gas leasing activities. BLM will 
finalize these rules to ensure the responsible development of oil and 
gas on public lands. The BLM also plans to finalize a rule (1004-AE95) 
to govern the management of surface resources and Special Areas in the 
National Petroleum Reserve in Alaska. On September 8, 2023, the BLM 
published the proposed rule ``Management and Protection of the National 
Petroleum Reserve in Alaska'' (88 FR 62025), which would improve upon 
the existing regulations' procedures to balance oil and gas activities 
with the protection of surface resources in the NPR-A; assure maximum 
protection of Special Areas; and protect longstanding subsistence 
activities.
    On June 29, 2023, the BOEM published the proposed rule (1010-AE14) 
``Risk Management and Financial

[[Page 9401]]

Assurance for OCS Lease and Grant Obligations'' (88 FR 42136), which 
would better protect the American taxpayers from shouldering liability 
for the decommissioning of offshore oil and gas facilities.
    BSEE is furthering its mission to promote safety, protect the 
environment, and conserve resources offshore through vigorous 
regulatory oversight and enforcement in several rulemaking efforts. 
Among others, BSEE is working to update its regulations governing oil 
spills (1014-AA44), offshore pipelines (1014-AA45), and decommissioning 
requirements on the OCS (1014-AA53).

Upholding Trust Responsibilities to Federally Recognized American 
Indian and Alaska Native Tribes Restoring Tribal Lands, and Protecting 
Natural and Cultural Resources

    Among the Department's most important responsibilities is its 
commitment to honor the nation-to-nation relationship between the 
Federal Government and Tribes. Secretary Haaland is strongly committed 
to strengthening how the Department carries out its trust 
responsibilities and to increasing economic development opportunities 
for Tribes and other historically underserved communities.
    To advance the Department's trust responsibilities, the Bureau of 
Indian Affairs (BIA) has identified opportunities, following 
consultation and in close collaboration with Tribal governments, to 
promote Tribal economic growth and development, and provide clearer and 
more efficient processes for Tribes that are applying to place land 
into trust or enter into gaming compacts. For example, BIA is working 
to remove barriers to the development of renewable energy and other 
resources in Indian country.
    Deb Haaland stated, ``Through President Biden's Investing in 
America agenda, we're launching a new program to electrify Indian 
Country to provide reliable, resilient energy that Tribes can rely on, 
and advance our work to tackle the climate crisis and build a clean 
energy future.''
    In consultation with Tribes, BIA engaged in efforts to update and 
improve its regulations governing how it manages land held in trust or 
in restricted status for Tribes and individual Indians. These efforts 
included improving the consultation process, identifying best 
practices, and strengthening relationships with Tribal governments. The 
BIA also launched a broader review to determine whether any regulatory 
reforms are needed to facilitate restoration of Tribal lands and 
safeguard natural and cultural resources. As a result of these 
consultations and this review, BIA is preparing a proposed rule, 
``Agricultural Leasing of Indian Land,'' which would revise the 
regulations governing leases of Indian land for agricultural purposes 
found at 25 CFR part 162 (1076-AF66). This proposed rule would 
streamline how leases are obtained and increase the agricultural usage 
of Indian land.
    In December of 2022, BIA published two proposed rules, one 
regarding the fee-to-trust process and one regarding Class III gaming 
compacts (87 FR 74334, 87 FR 74916). The updated regulations will 
provide clearer and more efficient processes for Tribes that are 
applying to place land into trust or enter into gaming compacts. The 
land acquisitions rule (1076-AF71) will lead to a more efficient, less 
cumbersome, and less expensive fee-to-trust process by clarifying the 
Secretary of the Interior's authority to take land in trust for Tribes, 
reducing processing time, and establishing clear decision-making 
criteria. The rule also places an express focus on taking land into 
trust for conservation purposes. The Class III gaming rule (1076-AF68) 
will provide clarity on the criteria the Department would consider when 
deciding whether to approve these compacts by clarifying boundaries as 
to allowable topics of negotiation, better defining key terms, and 
clearly outlining when the Department must review a gaming compact. BIA 
plans to finalize these rules in February 2024.
    The Department is also committed to improving regulations meant to 
protect sacred and cultural resources. To this end, the Assistant 
Secretary for Indian Affairs and the Assistant Secretary for Fish and 
Wildlife and Parks are working with the National Park Service (NPS) to 
incorporate recommendations from consultation with Tribes on updates to 
regulations implementing the Native American Graves and Repatriation 
Act (NAGPRA), 43 CFR part 10 (1024-AE19). This proposed rule, the 
``Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act Systematic 
Process for Disposition and Repatriation of Native American Human 
Remains, Funerary Objects, Sacred Objects, and Objects of Cultural 
Patrimony,'' which published on October 18, 2022 (87 FR 63202), would 
provide for the disposition and repatriation of Native American human 
remains, funerary objects, sacred objects, and objects of cultural 
patrimony. The updates are intended to simplify and improve the 
regulatory process for repatriation, rectify provisions in the current 
regulations that inhibit and effectively prevent respectful 
repatriation, and remove the burden on Indian Tribes and Native 
Hawaiian organizations to initiate the process and add a requirement 
for museums and Federal agencies to complete the process. The 
Department expects to publish a final rule titled ``Native American 
Graves Protection and Repatriation Act Systematic Process for 
Disposition and Repatriation of Native American Human Remains, Funerary 
Objects, Sacred Objects, and Objects of Cultural Patrimony,'' by the 
end of 2023.

Advancing Equity and Supporting Underserved Communities

    The Biden-Harris administration and Secretary Haaland recognize and 
support the goals of advancing equity and addressing the needs of 
underserved communities. In January 2021, the President signed E.O. 
13985, ``Advancing Racial Equity and Support for Underserved 
Communities Through the Federal Government.'' Additionally, On February 
17, 2022, Secretary Haaland issued S.O. 3406, ``Establishment of a 
Diversity, Equity, Inclusion and Accessibility Council.'' In response 
to E.O. 13985 and the S.O. 3406, the Department issued its Equity 
Action Plan on April 14, 2022. The Equity Action Plan is a key part of 
the Department's efforts to implement E.O. 13985, which calls on 
Federal agencies to advance equity by identifying and addressing 
barriers to equal opportunity that underserved communities may face as 
a result of Government policies and programs.
    On February 16, 2023, the President signed E.O. 14091, ``Further 
Advancing Racial Equity and Support for Underserved Communities Through 
the Federal Government.'' This order builds upon the previous equity-
related Executive orders by extending and strengthening equity-
advancing requirements for agencies, and it positions agencies to 
deliver better outcomes for the American people.
    On April 6, 2023, the President signed E.O. 14094, ``Modernizing 
Regulatory Reform.'' Section 2 of this E.O. directs agencies to promote 
equitable and meaningful opportunities for public participation in the 
rulemaking process by a range of interested or affected parties, 
including underserved communities.
    In Fiscal Year (FY) 2024, the Department will undertake a number of 
regulatory actions that will assist people who are members of 
underserved communities by removing barriers, and strengthening equity-
advancing requirements.

[[Page 9402]]

    The BLM (1004-AE60), FWS (1018-BD78), and NPS (1024-AE75) are 
working on right-of-way (ROW) rules that would streamline and improve 
efficiencies in the permitting process for electric transmission, 
distribution facilities, and broadband facilities. The BLM published 
their proposed rule ``Update of the Communications Uses Program, Cost 
Recovery Fee Schedules, and Section 512 of FLPMA for Rights-of-Way,'' 
on November 7, 2022 (87 FR 67306). The FWS published their revised 
proposed rule ``Streamlining U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Permitting 
of Rights-of-Way Across National Wildlife Refuges and Other U.S. Fish 
and Wildlife Service-Administered Lands'' on July 24, 2023 (88 FR 
47442). These rules should result in increased services such as 
broadband connectivity with resulting benefits to underserved 
communities and visitors to Departmental lands and promote good 
governance. These proposed rules are expected to implement several 
provisions of the BIL.

Investing in Healthy Lands, Waters, and Local Economies and 
Strengthening Conservation of the Nation's Lands, Waters, and Wildlife

    The Department's regulatory agenda will continue to advance the 
goals of investing in healthy lands, waters, and local economies across 
the country. These regulatory efforts, which are consistent with the 
Biden-Harris administration's America the Beautiful initiative as well 
as the BIL and IRA which provide the Department with historic 
resilience and restoration investments, include expanding opportunities 
for outdoor recreation, such as hunting and fishing, for all Americans; 
enhancing conservation stewardship; and improving the management of 
species and their habitat. In a priority effort to advance these goals, 
the BLM published a proposed rule on April 3, 2023 (88 FR 19583), 
``Conservation and Landscape Health (1004-AE92),'' to advance the 
bureaus' mission to manage the public lands for multiple use and 
sustained yield by prioritizing the health and resilience of ecosystems 
across those lands. To ensure that health and resilience, the proposed 
rule provides that the BLM will protect intact landscapes, restore 
degraded habitat, and make informed management decisions based on 
science and data.
    Through this regulatory plan, the Department affirms the importance 
of the ESA on the 50th anniversary of its passage in providing a broad 
and flexible framework to facilitate conservation with a variety of 
stakeholders. The Department, through FWS, is committed to working with 
diverse Federal, Tribal, State, and industry partners not only to 
protect and recover America's imperiled wildlife, but to ensure the ESA 
is helping meet 21st century challenges.
    In FY 2023, FWS published numerous proposed and final rules to 
continue improving implementation of the ESA so that it is clearly and 
consistently applied, helps recover listed species, and provides the 
maximum degree of certainty possible to all parties.
    Consistent with the steadfast commitment to allowing access to our 
National Wildlife Refuges (NWRs) and continued efforts to provide 
hunting and fishing opportunities, the FWS opened, for the first time, 
two NWRs that had been closed to hunting and sport fishing. In 
addition, FWS opened or expanded hunting or sport fishing at 16 NWRs 
and added pertinent station-specific regulations for other NWRs that 
pertain to migratory game bird hunting, upland game hunting, big game 
hunting, or sport fishing for the 2022-2023 season. The FWS also 
changed existing station-specific regulations to reduce regulatory 
burden on the public and increase access for hunters and anglers on FWS 
lands and waters. FWS published a proposed rule on June 23, 2023 (88 FR 
41058), ``National Wildlife Refuge System; 2023-2024 Station-Specific 
Hunting and Sport Fishing Regulations,'' that would expand hunting 
opportunities on three NWRs.
    Per section 2 of E.O. 13990 and the ``Fact Sheet: List of Agency 
Actions for Review,'' the Departments of Commerce and the Interior 
(Departments) initiated a review of the August 27, 2019, final rules, 
``Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Regulations for 
Listing Endangered and Threatened Species and Designating Critical 
Habitat,'' (1018-BF95) (84 FR 45020) that revised the regulations for 
adding and removing species from the Lists of Endangered and Threatened 
Wildlife and Plants and the procedures for designating critical habitat 
as well as ``Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Regulations 
for Interagency Cooperation,'' (1018-BC87) (84 FR 44976) that revised 
portions of the regulations that implement section 7 of the ESA, as 
amended. In addition, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service initiated a 
review of the August 27, 2019, final rule ``Endangered and Threatened 
Wildlife and Plants; Regulations for Prohibition to Threatened Wildlife 
and Plants,'' (1018-BC97) (84 FR 44753) that removed default 
protections for threatened species under section 4 of the ESA. On July 
5, 2022, the 2019 rules were vacated and remanded by the U.S. District 
Court for the Northern District of California.
    In response to the court order, the Departments proposed a new 
rulemaking for FY 2023, ``Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and 
Plants; Listing and Designating Critical Habitat,'' which published on 
June 22, 2023 (88 FR, 40764); ``Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and 
Plants; Revision of Regulations for Interagency Cooperation'' (1018-
BF96), which published on June 22, 2023 (88 FR 40753); and ``Endangered 
and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Regulations Pertaining to 
Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants'' (1018-BF88), which 
published on June 22, 2023 (88 FR 40753). The Departments will work to 
finalize these rules in 2024.
    Under section 4(d) of the Endangered Species Act (ESA), FWS plans 
to promulgate several species-specific rules to protect threatened 
species. Of particular note, the FWS issued a proposed rule on November 
17, 2022, (87 FR 68975) that would revise the rule for the African 
elephant (Loxodonta africana) promulgated under section 4(d) of the ESA 
(1018-BG66). The proposed rule intends to increase domestic protection 
for African elephants in light of the recent rise in global trade of 
live African elephants from range countries by establishing ESA permit 
requirements and enhancement standards for trade in live African 
elephants. This rulemaking action would also clarify the existing 
enhancement requirement during our evaluation of the application for a 
permit to import African elephant sport-hunted trophies and incorporate 
a Party's designation under the Convention on International Trade in 
Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (CITES) National Legislation 
Project into the decision-making process for the import of live African 
elephants, African elephant sport-hunted trophies, and African elephant 
parts and products other than ivory. The Department expects to publish 
a final rule titled ``Revision to the Section 4(d) Rule for the African 
Elephant'' in January 2024.
    The NPS is also pursuing several regulatory actions under the 
Department's direction and in accordance with these goals. These 
regulatory actions would authorize recreational activities, such as 
off-road vehicle use, motorized vessels, and bicycling, within 
appropriate, designated areas of certain National Park System units. 
These regulations would promote appropriate visitor use while 
supporting long-term preservation

[[Page 9403]]

of park resources and quality visitor experiences.

Promoting Equitable and Meaningful Participation in the Regulatory 
Process

    In accordance with E.O. 14094, ``Modernizing Regulatory Review,'' 
and the OMB Memorandum ``Broadening Public Participation and Community 
Engagement in the Regulatory Process'' (July 19, 2023), the Department 
is committed to informing their regulatory actions through meaningful 
and equitable opportunities for public input by a range of interested 
or affected parties, including underserved communities.
    For example, to inform the development of and increase awareness of 
the proposed rulemaking for Carbon Sequestration on the OCS (RIN 1082-
AA04), BOEM and BSEE coordinated an extensive outreach strategy to 
facilitate discussions with representatives from the U.S. interagency, 
foreign counterpart agencies, Tribal Nations, state agencies, industry, 
academia, non-governmental organizations, environmental justice groups, 
labor organizations, and international organizations.
    The goals of the outreach strategy were to (1) Facilitate the 
Bureaus' access to information and perspectives related to offshore 
carbon sequestration in support of developing a robust and effective 
rule in a timely manner, and (2) foster relationships with a range of 
stakeholders that could provide value to the bureaus well beyond the 
rulemaking effort. The bureaus began implementing the outreach strategy 
in November 2021, that includes the identification of representatives 
from each category listed above, introductory and follow-up written 
exchanges, coordination of listening sessions and informational sharing 
meetings, and initiation of government-to-government engagements with 
Tribal Nations.
    In another example, on June 22, 2023, the FWS and the National 
Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration's National Marine Fisheries 
Service (NMFS), together the ``Services,'' proposed two rules to 
improve and strengthen implementation of the Endangered Species Act 
(ESA) (RINs 1018-BF95 and 1018-BF96; 88 FR 40764 and 88 FR 40753), and 
FWS published a separate but related action (RIN 1018-BF88; 88 FR 
40742). In accordance with E.O. 13990 (Protecting Public Health and the 
Environment and Restoring Science To Tackle the Climate Crisis), these 
rules will ensure the ESA effectively addresses 21st century 
conservation challenges, such as climate change.
    The Services made a concerted effort to engage with the public to 
inform these rules. With publication of the proposed rules, the 
Services issued a news release with a link to a website with additional 
information about the rules as well as a recording of an informational 
webinar. Additionally, in coordination with Federal and State agency 
association partners we reached out via direct email to hundreds of 
stakeholders with specific registration instructions for virtual 
information sessions. The Services subsequently delivered a series of 
six live virtual informational sessions to Federal agencies, State 
agencies, federally recognized Tribes, Native Hawaiian community 
leaders, non-governmental organizations and conservation partners, and 
industry groups. In total, more than 500 people attended the 6 
information sessions. Frequently asked questions and a recording of the 
presentation can be viewed on the website https://fws.gov/project/endangered-species-act-regulation-revisions.
    The BLM published a proposed rule, ``Conservation and Landscape 
Health,'' on April 3, 2023, (1004-AE92, 88 FR 19583) that provides 
tools for the BLM to improve the resilience of public lands in the face 
of a changing climate; conserve important wildlife habitat and intact 
landscapes; plan for development; and better recognize unique cultural 
and natural resources on public lands. The proposed rule directly 
responds to the growing need to better manage public lands, waters, and 
wildlife in the face of devastating wildfires, historic droughts, and 
severe storms that communities are experiencing across the West, as 
well as to deepen BLM's collaborative work with communities, States and 
Tribes to support responsible development of critical minerals, energy 
and other resources. The BLM held two virtual and three in-person 
meetings to provide detailed information about the proposal. Members of 
the public had an opportunity to ask questions that facilitate a deeper 
understanding of the proposal. BLM also created a separate web page 
detailing specific details on the rule: Public Lands Rule [verbar] 
Bureau of Land Management (blm.gov).

Bureaus and Offices Within the Department of the Interior

    The following is an overview of some of the major regulatory and 
deregulatory priorities of the Department's Bureaus and Offices.

Bureau of Indian Affairs

    The BIA enhances the quality of life, promotes economic 
opportunity, and protects and improves the trust assets of 
approximately 1.9 million American Indians, Indian Tribes, and Alaska 
Natives. The BIA maintains a government-to-government relationship with 
the 574 Federally Recognized Indian Tribes. The BIA also administers 
and manages 55 million acres of surface land and 57 million acres of 
subsurface minerals held in trust by the United States for American 
Indians and Indian Tribes.
Regulatory and Deregulatory Actions
    In the coming year, BIA will prioritize the following rulemakings:
Procedures for Federal Acknowledgment of Indian Tribes (1076-AF67)
    This proposed rule would respond to recent Federal court decisions 
holding that the Department did not adequately explain its regulations 
prohibiting previously denied petitioners for Federal acknowledgment 
from petitioning again. The Department sought Tribal government input 
through communication under Executive Order 13175 criteria and the 
Department's consultation policy on meaningful communication and 
collaboration with tribal officials. The Department held Consultation 
sessions with federally recognized Indian Tribes and a listening 
session for present, former, and prospective petitioners.
Appeals From Administrative Actions (1076-AF64)
    The proposed rule published on December 1, 2022 (87 FR 73688). This 
final rule will clarify the processes for appeals of actions taken by 
officials in the Office of the Assistant Secretary--Indian Affairs, 
BIA, Bureau of Indian Education, and Office of the Special Trustee for 
American Indians (collectively, Indian Affairs). The rule advances the 
purposes of E.O. 14058 to effectively reduce administrative burdens, 
simplify both public-facing and internal processes to improve 
efficiency, and empower the Federal workforce to solve problems. The 
rule streamlines the process for appeals of Tribal government 
representative decisions, to ensure the continued government-to-
government relations with the appropriate Tribal leadership is not 
unduly interrupted. The Department received Tribal government input 
through two consultation sessions (February 17, 2022, and February 22, 
2022) held under Executive Order 13175 criteria and the Department's 
policy on meaningful communication and collaboration with Tribal 
officials.

[[Page 9404]]

Mining of the Osage Mineral Estate for Oil and Gas (1076-AF59)
    The proposed rule published on January 13, 2023 (88 FR 2430). This 
final rule will revise the regulations in 25 CFR part 226 to strengthen 
the BIA's management of the Osage Mineral Estate and improve accounting 
and production measurement standards; offer consistency in production 
valuation; address inadequate bonding; support the implementation of 
electronic reporting systems; enhance accountability; clarify lessees' 
obligations; prevent waste; promote safe and environmentally sound 
operations; and protect resource values. The Department received Tribal 
government input through consultation sessions held pursuant to 
Executive Order 13175 criteria and the Department's policy on 
meaningful communication and collaboration with Tribal officials.
Land Acquisitions (1076-AF71)
    The proposed rule published on December 5, 2022 (87 FR 74334). This 
final rule will advance the purposes of E.O. 13985 and address the 
Department's jurisdiction to acquire land in trust for certain Tribes, 
streamline acquisitions on existing reservations, clarify Tribal 
jurisdiction, and promote Tribal conservation of lands. The Department 
received Tribal government input through consultations and listening 
sessions held under Executive Order 13175 criteria and the Department's 
policy on meaningful communication and collaboration with Tribal 
officials.
Class III Tribal State Gaming Compact Process (1076-AF68)
    The proposed rule published on December 6, 2022 (87 FR 74916). This 
final rule will provide States and Tribes with a better understanding 
of how the Department reviews their compacts by codifying longstanding 
Departmental policy and interpretations of existing case law. The 
Department received Tribal government input through consultations and 
listening sessions held under Executive Order 13175 criteria and the 
Department's policy on meaningful communication and collaboration with 
Tribal officials.
Agricultural Leasing of Indian Land (1076-AF66)
    This proposed rule would update provisions addressing leasing of 
trust or restricted land (Indian land) for agricultural purposes to 
reflect updates that have been made to business and residential leasing 
provisions and address outdated provisions. The Department received 
Tribal government input through consultations and listening sessions 
held under Executive Order 13175 criteria and the Department's policy 
on meaningful communication and collaboration with Tribal officials.
Indian Arts and Crafts (1076-AF69)
    This proposed rule would modernize the Indian Arts and Crafts Board 
regulations to better meet the objectives of the Indian Arts and Crafts 
Act to promote the economic welfare of the Indian Tribes and Indian 
individuals through the development of Indian arts and crafts and the 
expansion of the market for the products of Indian art and 
craftsmanship. The Department is seeking Tribal government input 
through communication under Executive Order 13175 criteria and the 
Department's policy on meaningful collaboration with Tribal officials.

Bureau of Land Management

    The BLM manages more than 245 million acres of public land, known 
as the National System of Public Lands, primarily located in 12 Western 
States, including Alaska. The BLM also administers 700 million acres of 
sub-surface mineral estate throughout the Nation. The agency's mission 
is to sustain the health, diversity, and productivity of America's 
public lands for the use and enjoyment of present and future 
generations.
Regulatory and Deregulatory Actions
    In the coming year, the BLM will prioritize the following 
rulemaking actions and highlight its efforts under E.O. 14094:
Update of the Communications Uses Program, Right-of-Way Cost Recovery 
Fee Schedules and Section 512 of FLPMA for Rights-of-Way (1004-AE60)
    The BLM published its proposed rule on November 7, 2022 (87 FR 
67306). This final rule will streamline and improve efficiencies in the 
communications uses program, update the cost recovery fee schedules for 
ROW work activities, and include provisions governing the development 
and approval of operating plans and agreements for ROWs for electric 
transmission and distribution facilities. Communications uses, such as 
broadband, are a subset of ROW activities authorized under FLPMA, as 
amended. Cost recovery fees apply to most ROW activities authorized 
under either FLPMA or the Mineral Leasing Act of 1920, as amended. This 
proposed rule would also implement vegetation management requirements 
included in the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2018 (codified at 43 
U.S.C. 1772) to address fire risk from and to powerline ROWs on public 
lands and national forests. The regulatory amendments would also codify 
statutory requirements regarding review and approval of utilities 
maintenance plans, liability limitations, and definitions of hazard 
trees and emergency conditions. The proposed rule was highlighted on 
the BLM's website with links to comment options, FAQs, and direct links 
to the rule. We plan to do the same for the final rule.
Rights-of-Way, Leasing and Operations for Renewable Energy (1004-AE78)
    The BLM published this proposed rule on June 16, 2023 (88 FR 
39726). This final rule will revise BLM's regulations for ROWs, 
leasing, and operations related to all activities associated with 
renewable energy. The Energy Act of 2020 and E.O. 14008 prioritize the 
Department's need to improve permitting activities and processes to 
facilitate increased renewable energy production on public lands. BLM 
held three virtual informational meetings over the course of the 
comment period. Additionally, the rule was highlighted on the BLM's 
website with links to comment options, FAQs, and direct links to the 
rule.
Waste Prevention, Production Subject to Royalties, and Resource 
Conservation (1004-AE79)
    This proposed rule published on November 30, 2022 (87 FR 73588). 
The final rule will update BLM's regulations governing the waste of 
natural gas through venting, flaring, and leaks on onshore Federal and 
Indian oil and gas leases. The proposed rule would address the 
priorities associated with E.O. 14008. The proposed rule was 
highlighted on the BLM's website with links to comment options, FAQs, 
and direct links to the rule. We plan to do the same for the final 
rule.
Fluid Mineral Leases and Leasing Process (1004-AE80)
    This proposed rule published on July 24, 2023 (88 FR 47562). This 
final rule will revise BLM's oil and gas regulations to update the 
fees, rents, royalties, and bonding requirements related to oil and gas 
leasing, development, and production. The final rule will also update 
BLM's process for leasing to ensure the protection and proper 
stewardship of the public lands, including potential climate and other 
impacts associated with oil and gas activities. This rule will 
implement provisions of the IRA regarding oil and gas resources on 
public lands. BLM will

[[Page 9405]]

hold five informational meetings (Two virtual, three in-person) over 
the course of the comment period. Additionally, the rule was 
highlighted on the BLM's website with links to comment options, FAQs, 
and direct links to the rule. We plan to do the same for the final 
rule.
Closure and Restriction Orders (1004-AE89)
    This proposed rule would help BLM to better protect persons, 
property, and public lands and resources by allowing the agency to 
close or restrict the use of public lands in a timelier manner. The 
rule would also make BLM's regulations more consistent with other 
Federal land management agencies' closure and restriction authorities. 
The proposed rule was highlighted on the BLM's website with links to 
comment options, FAQs, and direct links to the rule. We plan to do the 
same for the final rule.
Conservation and Landscape Health (1004-AE92)
    On April 3, 2023, the BLM published a proposed rule (88 FR 19583) 
to clarify and support the principles of multiple use and sustained 
yield in the management of the public lands pursuant to FLPMA and other 
relevant authorities. This final rule will provide an overarching 
framework governing multiple resource areas to ensure land health and 
sustained yield. This rule affirms the important role of restoration 
and conservation actions in building and maintaining sustainable land 
management practices to ensure healthy and productive ecosystems for 
current and future generations. BLM held five informational meetings 
(Two virtual, three in-person) over the course of the comment period. 
Additionally, the rule was highlighted on the BLM's website with links 
to comment options, FAQs, and direct links to the rule.
Management and Protection of the National Petroleum Reserve in Alaska 
(1004-AE95)
    This final rule will assure maximum protection of Special Areas in 
the NPR-A pursuant to and consistent with the provisions of the Naval 
Petroleum Reserves Production Act of 1976 (90 Stat. 303; 42 U.S.C. 6501 
et seq.), Alaska National Interest Lands Conservation Act, and other 
applicable authorities. On September 8, 2023, the BLM published the 
proposed rule ``Management and Protection of the National Petroleum 
Reserve in Alaska'' (88 FR 62025). The proposed rule was highlighted on 
the BLM's website with links to comment options, FAQs, and direct links 
to the rule. Additionally, a number of listening sessions will occur.

Bureau of Ocean Energy Management

    The mission of BOEM is to manage development of U.S. OCS energy and 
mineral resources in an environmentally and economically responsible 
way. In accordance with its statutory mandate under Outer Continental 
Shelf Lands Act (OCSLA), BOEM is committed to implementing its dual 
mission of promoting the expeditious and orderly development of the 
Nation's energy resources while simultaneously protecting the marine, 
human, and coastal environment of the OCS State submerged lands and the 
coastal communities. Consistent with the policy outlined by the Biden-
Harris administration in E.O. 14008, BOEM is reevaluating its programs 
related to the offshore development of energy and mineral resources. 
The BOEM is working with the Department to review options for expanding 
renewable energy production while evaluating alternatives to better 
protect the lands, waters, and biodiversity of species located within 
the U.S. exclusive economic zone.
Regulatory and Deregulatory Actions
    In the coming year, BOEM will prioritize the following rulemaking 
actions:
Renewable Energy Modernization Rule (1010-AE04)
    On January 30, 2023, the BOEM proposed the Renewable Energy 
Modernization Rule (88 FR 5968). As proposed, the rule would facilitate 
development of offshore renewable energy and promotes U.S. energy 
independence in a safe and environmentally sound manner that provides a 
fair return to U.S. taxpayers. This proposed rule contains reforms 
identified by BOEM and recommended by industry, including proposals for 
incremental funding of decommissioning accounts; more flexible 
geophysical and geotechnical survey submission requirements; 
streamlined approval of meteorological buoys; revised project 
verification procedures; and greater clarity regarding safety 
requirements.
Risk Management and Financial Assurance for OCS Lease and Grant 
Obligations (1010-AE14)
    The BOEM has reconsidered the financial assurance policies 
expressed in the joint proposed rule (85 FR 65904) issued with BSEE 
(1082-AA02) and has determined that it would be appropriate to issue a 
new rule that will better protect the American taxpayers from 
shouldering liability for the decommissioning of offshore oil and gas 
facilities. On June 29, 2023, the BOEM published the Risk Management 
and Financial Assurance for OCS Lease and Grant Obligations (88 FR 
42136), which proposed provisions that would ensure that facilities no 
longer needed for oil or gas exploration or development are shut down 
in a safe and environmentally responsible manner. The rule will modify 
the evaluation criteria for determining whether oil, gas and sulfur 
lessees, right-of-use and easement grant holders, and pipeline ROW 
grant holders may be required to provide bonds or other financial 
assurance, above the regulatorily prescribed amounts for base bonds, to 
ensure compliance with their OCS obligations.
Carbon Sequestration (1082-AA04)
    In accordance with the BIL, BOEM and BSEE are working to jointly 
propose regulations governing carbon transportation and geologic 
sequestration aspects of a development, including leasing; siting of 
storage reservoirs; environmental plans and mitigations; facility and 
infrastructure design and installation; injection operations; 
monitoring; incident response; financial assurance; and safety.
Protection of Marine Archaeological Resources (1010-AE11)
    On February 15, 2023, BOEM published a proposed rule (88 FR 9797) 
that would revise when lessees and operators would need to conduct 
archaeological surveys. The proposal put forward provisions that 
clarify when operators would submit an archaeological report with their 
applications and clarify the source and extent of the data utilized.
Fitness To Operate Standards for Oil and Gas Operators and Lessees on 
the Outer Continental Shelf (1010-AE21)
    This proposed rule would enhance the Secretary's stewardship over 
the OCS and offshore waters by providing regulations governing the 
disqualification of operators that have poor environmental or safety 
performance records. If not properly maintained and operated, oil and 
gas operations can cause significant safety hazards and environmental 
harm and prevent other beneficial uses of the OCS (such as fishing and 
future resource development). Additionally, these safety and 
environmental issues potentially place American taxpayers at risk to 
cover future cleanup costs.

Bureau of Safety and Environmental Enforcement

    The BSEE's mission is to promote safety, protect the environment, 
and

[[Page 9406]]

conserve resources offshore through vigorous regulatory oversight and 
enforcement. The BSEE is the lead Federal agency charged with improving 
safety and ensuring environmental protection related to conventional 
and renewable energy activities on the U.S. OCS.
Regulatory and Deregulatory Actions
    In the coming year, BSEE will prioritize the following rulemaking 
actions:
Oil-Spill Response Requirements for Facilities Located Seaward of the 
Coast Line Proposed Rule (1014-AA44)
    The oil spill response requirements regulations found in 30 CFR 
part 254 were last updated over 20 years ago (62 FR 13996, Mar. 25, 
1997). This proposed rule would update existing regulations to 
incorporate the latest advancements in spill response and preparedness 
policies and technologies, as well as lessons learned and 
recommendations from reports related to the Deepwater Horizon explosion 
and subsequent oil spill.
Revisions to Subpart J--Pipelines and Pipeline Rights-of-Way Proposed 
Rule (1014-AA45)
    This proposed rule would revise specific provisions of the current 
pipelines and pipeline ROW regulations under 30 CFR 250 subpart J to 
align with current technology and state-of-the-art safety equipment and 
procedures, primarily through the incorporation of industry standards.
Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act; Operating in High-Pressure and/or 
High-Temperature (HPHT) Environments (1014-AA49)
    Currently, BSEE has no regulations specific to high pressure and/or 
high temperature (HPHT) projects, requiring it to issue multiple 
guidance documents clarifying the specific HPHT information prospective 
operators should submit to BSEE to support the Bureau's programmatic 
reviews and approvals of such projects. This final rule will formally 
codify BSEE's existing process for reviewing and approving projects in 
HPHT environments. BSEE published this proposed rule on May 16, 2022 
(87 FR 29790).
Oil and Gas and Sulfur Operations in the Outer Continental Shelf-
Blowout Preventer Systems and Well Control Revisions (RIN 1014-AA52)
    This final rule will revise BSEE regulations published in the 2019 
final rule ``Oil and Gas and Sulfur Operations in the Outer Continental 
Shelf Blowout Preventer Systems and Well Control Revisions,'' 84 FR 
21908 (May 15, 2019), for drilling, workover, completion, and 
decommissioning operations. BSEE published the proposed rule on 
September 14, 2022 (87 FR 56354).
Revisions to Decommissioning Requirements on the OCS (1014-AA53)
    This proposed rule would address issues relating to: (1) Idle iron 
by adding a definition of this term to clarify that it applies to idle 
wells and structures on active leases; (2) abandonment in place of 
subsea infrastructure by adding regulations addressing when BSEE may 
approve decommissioning-in-place instead of removal of certain subsea 
equipment; and (3) other operational considerations.

Office of the Chief Information Officer

    The Office of the Chief Information Officer (OCIO) provides 
leadership to the Department and its Bureaus in all areas of 
information management and technology (IT). To successfully serve the 
Department's multiple missions, the OCIO applies modern IT tools, 
approaches, systems, and products. Effective and innovative use of 
technology and information resources enables transparency and 
accessibility of information and services to the public.
    In 2023, OCIO finalized the following rule:
Personnel Security Files System of Records (1090-AB16)
    This final rule was published on February 21, 2023 (88 FR 10479) 
and revised the Department's Privacy Act regulations at 43 CFR 2.254 to 
claim exemptions for certain records in the INTERIOR/DOI-45, Personnel 
Security Files, system of records from one or more provisions of the 
Privacy Act of 1974 pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552a(k), because of criminal, 
civil, and administrative law enforcement requirements.
    For the coming year, OCIO will prioritize the following rules:
Network Security System of Records (1090-AB14)
    This proposed rule would revise the Department's Privacy Act 
regulations at 43 CFR 2.254 to claim exemptions for certain records in 
the INTERIOR DOI-49, Network Security, system of records from one or 
more provisions of the Privacy Act of 1974 pursuant to 5 U.S.C 552a(j) 
and (k), because of criminal, civil, and administrative law enforcement 
requirements.
Investigative Records System of Records (1090-AB27)
    A proposed rule was published on July 13, 2023 (88 FR 44748). The 
final rule would revise the Department's Privacy Act regulations at 43 
CFR 2.254 to claim exemptions for certain records in the INTERIOR/OIG-
02, Investigative Records, system of records from one or more 
provisions of the Privacy Act of 1974 pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552a(k), 
because of criminal, civil or administrative law enforcement 
requirements.
DOI Law Enforcement Records Management System (LERMS) System of Records 
(1090-AB28)
    This proposed rule would revise the Department's Privacy Act 
regulations at 43 CFR 2.254 to claim exemptions for certain records in 
the INTERIOR/DOI-10, DOI Law Enforcement Records Management System 
(LERMS), system of records from one or more provisions of the Privacy 
Act of 1974 pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552a(k), because of criminal, civil or 
administrative law enforcement requirements.

Office of Acquisition and Property Management

    The Office of Acquisition and Property Management (PAM) coordinates 
Department-wide implementation of Federal policy and regulations for 
acquisition; and real, personal, and museum property. The PAM also 
directs activities in other essential areas including motor vehicle 
fleet management, space management, energy efficiency, water 
conservation, renewable energy programs, and capital planning for real 
and personal property assets.
    For the coming year, PAM will prioritize the following rules:
Department of the Interior Acquisition Regulation, Governance Titles 
(1090-AB25)
    The PAM proposes changes to the Department of the Interior 
Acquisition Regulation to update its nomenclature to align with recent 
changes to agency procurement governance. The senior GS-1102 
contracting subject matter expert in a Department Bureau or Office 
would be designated as the Head of the Contracting Activity (formerly 
designated as the Bureau Procurement Chief). The Senior Executive who 
is accountable for the contracting activity would be designated as the 
Bureau Procurement Executive (this position was formerly designated as 
the Head of the Contracting Activity). These amendments would enable 
acquisition programs to more efficiently meet the

[[Page 9407]]

Department's mission needs and comply with all applicable law and 
regulations.

Office of Hearings and Appeals

    The Office of Hearings and Appeals (OHA) exercises the delegated 
authority of the Secretary to conduct hearings and decide appeals from 
decisions made by the Bureaus and Offices of the Department. The OHA 
provides an impartial forum for parties who are affected by the 
decisions of the Department's Bureaus and Offices to obtain independent 
review of those decisions. The OHA also handles the probating of Indian 
trust estates, ensuring that individual Indian interests in allotted 
lands, their proceeds, and other trust assets are conveyed to the 
decedents' rightful heirs and beneficiaries.
    For the coming year, OHA will prioritize the following rule:
Office of Hearings and Appeals (OHA) Rule (1094-AA57)
    This proposed rule will update outdated provisions, make process 
improvements, and provide a more modernized hearings and appeals 
process for proceedings before OHA. This is a comprehensive proposal to 
provide a more efficient process for OHA and the parties who appear 
before it, including external stakeholders and Departmental bureaus. 
The rule will build upon the Direct Final Rule to incorporate a new 
electronic filing and docket management system into OHA's processes and 
will update a number of other procedural rules. Included in this 
proposed rule are comprehensive changes to special rules for the 
Interior Board of Land Appeals, Departmental Cases Hearings Division, 
and the Director's office. Other provisions address specific needs of 
the Interior Board of Indian Appeals and the Probate Hearings Division. 
OHA conducted informal outreach and plans to hold Tribal consultation 
sessions.
    In 2023, OHA finalized the following rules:
Practices Before the Department of Interior (1094-AA56)
    On March 16, 2023, OHA's Final Rule became effective to amend 
existing regulations to update office addresses for hearings and 
appeals purposes, to allow the OHA Director to issue interim orders in 
emergency circumstances, and to allow the OHA Director to issue 
standing orders to improve OHA's service to the public and the parties 
by modernizing its processes.
Technical Corrections to Updates to American Indian Probate Regulations 
(1094-AA55)
    On June 20, 2023 (88 FR 39768), OHA published correcting amendments 
in a final rule to update the regulations governing probate of property 
that the United States holds in trust or restricted status for American 
Indians.

Office of Natural Resources Revenue

    The Office of Natural Resources Revenue (ONRR) is responsible for 
collecting, accounting for, and disbursing revenues from Federal and 
Indian energy and mineral leases. The ONRR operates nationwide and is 
primarily responsible for the timely and accurate collection, 
distribution, and accounting of revenues associated with mineral and 
energy production.
    In 2023, ONRR completed the following rules:
Partial Repeal of Consolidated Federal Oil & Gas and Federal & Indian 
Coal Reform Final Rule (1012-AA34)
    On July 21, 2023, ONRR reissued certain regulations for the 
valuation of Federal and Indian coal to implement a court order that 
vacates the coal valuation portions of a 2016 rule. These republished 
regulations implement the court's order by recodifying the regulations 
that were in effect prior to the vacated 2016 rule.
    In the coming year, ONRR will prioritize the following rulemaking 
actions:
ONRR Designation Form for Payment Responsibility (1012-AA33)
    This proposed rule would amend ONRR's regulations and revise its 
form for designating a designee for a Federal oil and gas lease. This 
action would open a 60-day comment period to allow interested parties 
to comment on the proposed rule and its information collection 
requirements.

Office of Restoration and Damage Assessment (ORDA)

    ORDA oversees the Department's Natural Resource Damage Assessment 
and Restoration (NRDAR) Program whose mission is to restore natural 
resources injured as a result of oil spills or hazardous substance 
releases into the environment. In partnership with affected state, 
tribal and Federal trustee agencies, damage assessments are conducted 
which are the first step toward resource restoration and used to 
provide the basis for determining restoration needs that address the 
public's loss and use of natural resources. Once the damages are 
assessed, legal settlements are negotiated, or legal actions are taken 
against the responsible parties for the spill or release. Funds from 
these settlements are then used to restore the injured resources.
Natural Resource Damages for Hazardous Substances--RIN (1090-AB26)
    In January 2023, ORDA issued an Advanced Notice of Proposed 
Rulemaking (ANPRM) to revise part of the CERCLA NRDAR Regulations Type 
A procedures. These procedures allow trustees to use a standardized and 
simplified methodology for performing Injury Determination, 
Quantification and Damage Determination that requires minimal field 
observation. Current Type A procedures are limited to certain 
environments when claims are less than $100,000 and are based on 
outdated computer models and software with extremely limited current 
utility. Revisions would account for modeling advances for different 
environments and to provide methodologies that are not technology 
specific and could be used into the future without additional 
revisions. Public comments were received on this ANPRM in March 2023. 
Based on the comments received, ORDA is proceeding to issue a Notice of 
Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) this fall.
    In the upcoming year, ORDA will review the public comments received 
on the NPRM and then utilizing those comments, will issue a final rule 
revising the Type A procedures which are part of the CERCLA NRDAR 
Regulations.

Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement

    The Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement (OSMRE) 
was created by the Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act of 1977 
(SMCRA). The OSMRE works with States and Tribes to ensure that citizens 
and the environment are protected during coal mining and that the land 
is restored to beneficial use when mining is finished. The OSMRE and 
its partners are also responsible for reclaiming and restoring lands 
and water degraded by mining operations before 1977. The OSMRE focuses 
on overseeing the State programs and developing new tools to help the 
States and Tribes get the job done.
    The OSMRE also works with colleges and universities and other State 
and Federal agencies to further the science of reclaiming mined lands 
and protecting the environment, including initiatives to promote 
planting more trees and restoring much-needed wildlife habitat.

[[Page 9408]]

Regulatory and Deregulatory Actions
    For coming year, OSMRE will prioritize the following regulatory 
actions:
Ten Day Notices (1029-AC81)
    The proposed rule published on April 25, 2023 (88 FR 24944). The 
rule will amend the existing regulations about when OSMRE sends ten-day 
notices to State regulatory authorities regarding possible SMCRA 
violations.
Emergency Preparedness for Impoundments (1029-AC82)
    This rule would incorporate certain aspects of the Federal 
Guidelines for Dam Safety (FGDS) into OSMRE's existing regulations. 
These regulations relate to emergency preparedness for impoundments and 
propose to incorporate the FGDS Emergency Action Plans (EAP) and After-
Action Reports (AAR). Also, OSMRE may add new provisions to the 
regulations to align the classification of impoundments with industry 
and other Government agency standards.

U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service

    The mission of FWS is to work with others to conserve, protect, and 
enhance fish, wildlife, and plants and their habitats for the 
continuing benefit of the American people. FWS provides opportunities 
for Americans to enjoy the outdoors and our shared natural heritage. 
FWS also promotes and encourages the pursuit of recreational activities 
such as hunting and fishing and wildlife observation.
    FWS manages a network of 568 NWRs, with at least 1 refuge in each 
U.S. State and Territory, and with more than 100 refuges close to major 
urban centers. The Refuge System plays an essential role in providing 
outdoor recreation opportunities to the American public with more than 
67 million annual visits to refuges to hunt, fish, observe or 
photograph wildlife, or participate in environmental education or 
interpretation.
    The FWS fulfills its responsibilities through a diverse array of 
programs that:
     Protect and recover endangered and threatened species;
     Monitor and manage migratory birds;
     Restore nationally significant fisheries;
     Enforce Federal wildlife laws and regulate international 
trade;
     Conserve and restore wildlife habitat such as wetlands;
     Manage and distribute over a billion dollars each year to 
States, Territories, and Tribes for fish and wildlife conservation;
     Help foreign governments conserve wildlife through 
international conservation efforts; and
     Fulfill our Federal Tribal trust responsibility.
Regulations Under the Endangered Species Act
    FWS promulgated multiple regulatory actions under the ESA in FY 
2023 to prevent the extinction of and facilitate the recovery of both 
domestic and foreign animal and plant species. These rulemaking actions 
added species to, removed species from, and reclassified species on the 
Lists of Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants and designated 
critical habitat for certain listed species. FWS published these 
rulemaking documents in accordance with the National Listing Workplan. 
The Workplan enables FWS to prioritize workloads based on the needs of 
species that are candidates for regulatory actions under the ESA or 
those for which FWS has received a petition for rulemaking. The 
Workplan represents the conservation priorities of FWS based on its 
review of scientific information and provides greater clarity and 
predictability about the timing of listing determinations to State 
wildlife agencies, nonprofit organizations, and other stakeholders and 
partners. The goal is to encourage proactive conservation so that 
Federal protections are not needed in the first place.
    In FY 2023, FWS published 23 proposed and 28 final rules to list 
species, reclassify their status under the ESA, or designate critical 
habitat; 3 proposed and 4 final rules to remove species from the Lists; 
and 1 proposed and 1 final rule to establish nonessential experimental 
populations of listed species under the ESA. FWS will publish many more 
species-specific rulemaking actions under the ESA in FY2024, as 
described in multiple entries in the Unified Agenda.
    In addition, in FY 2023 FWS completed numerous other rulemaking 
actions, including these:
Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Designation of 
Experimental Populations (1018-BF98)
    On August 2, 2023, final rule (88 FR 42642, July 3, 2023) revised 
the regulations concerning experimental populations of endangered 
species and threatened species under the Endangered Species Act (ESA). 
The rule removed language restricting the introduction of experimental 
populations to only the species' ``historical range'' to allow for the 
introduction of populations into habitat outside of their historical 
range. To provide for the conservation of certain species, establishing 
experimental populations outside of their historical range may be 
increasingly necessary and appropriate if the habitat's ability to 
support one or more life-history stages has been reduced due to threats 
such as climate change or invasive species.
Regulations To Implement the Big Cat Public Safety Act (1018-BH23)
    On June 12, 2023, FWS amended the implementing regulations for the 
Captive Wildlife Safety Act by incorporating the requirements of the 
Big Cat Public Safety Act (BCPSA; signed into law on December 20, 2022) 
(88 FR 38358, June 12, 2023). To further the conservation of certain 
wildlife species (lions, tigers, leopards, snow leopards, clouded 
leopards, jaguars, cheetahs, and cougars, or any hybrids thereof), the 
BCPSA made certain activities with these species unlawful. The BCPSA 
also required certain entities or individuals to register each such 
animal with the Service not later than June 18, 2023, to continue to 
possess these animals.
Regulatory and Deregulatory Actions for FY 2024
    In the coming year, FWS will prioritize the following rulemaking 
actions:
Permits for Incidental Take of Eagles and Eagle Nests, Final Rule 
(1018-BE70)
    On September 30, 2022, FWS proposed revisions to regulations 
authorizing the issuance of permits for eagle incidental take and eagle 
nest take (87 FR 59598). The purpose of these revisions is to increase 
the efficiency and effectiveness of permitting, facilitate and improve 
compliance, and increase the conservation benefit for eagles. FWS 
proposed continuing to authorize specific permits as well as creating 
general permits for certain activities under prescribed conditions: 
qualifying wind-energy generation projects, power line infrastructure, 
activities that may disturb breeding bald eagles, and bald eagle nest 
take.
    During the public comment period, FWS held four information 
sessions in webinar format: two for members of federally recognized 
Native American Tribes and two for the general public. The purpose of 
each of these sessions was to provide the public with a general 
understanding of the background for this proposed rulemaking action, 
activities it would cover, alternative proposals under consideration, 
and the draft environmental documents for the proposed action.

[[Page 9409]]

Migratory Bird Permits; Authorizing the Incidental Take of Migratory 
Birds, Proposed Rule (1018-BF71)
    This proposed rulemaking action would amend FWS regulations by 
providing definitions to terms used in the Migratory Bird Treaty Act, 
as amended (MBTA). The proposed rule would clarify that the MBTA's 
prohibitions on taking and killing migratory birds includes 
foreseeable, direct taking and killing that is incidental to other 
activities. The proposed rule would also establish authorizations for 
otherwise prohibited take of migratory birds.
Regulations for Listing Endangered and Threatened Species and 
Designating Critical Habitat, Final Rule (1018-BF95)
    On June 22, 2023, FWS and the National Marine Fisheries Service 
(NMFS) proposed to revise portions of our regulations that implement 
section 4 of the ESA (88 FR 40764). The proposed revisions clarify, 
interpret, and implement portions of the ESA concerning the procedures 
and criteria used for listing, reclassifying, and delisting species on 
the Lists of Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants and 
designating critical habitat.
    After publication of this proposed rule and the two discussed next 
(RINs 1018-BF96 and 1018-BF88), FWS delivered a series of informational 
sessions to stakeholders including Federal agencies, State agencies, 
federally recognized Tribes, Native Hawaiian community leaders, non-
governmental organizations, conservation partners, industry groups, and 
Pacific Islander community leaders. Frequently asked questions and a 
recording of the presentation can be viewed on the website https://fws.gov/project/endangered-species-act-regulation-revisions.
Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Interagency Cooperation, 
Final Rule (1018-BF96)
    On June 22, 2023, FWS and NMFS proposed to amend portions of our 
regulations that implement section 7 of the ESA (88 FR 40753). The 
Services are proposing these changes to further clarify and improve the 
interagency consultation processes, while continuing to provide for the 
conservation of listed species. See description above under RIN 1018-
BF95 for public engagement efforts.
Regulations Pertaining to Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and 
Plants, Final Rule (1018-BF88)
    On June 22, 2023, FWS proposed to revise our regulations concerning 
protections of endangered species and threatened species under the ESA 
(88 FR 40742). We proposed to reinstate the general application of the 
``blanket rule'' option for protecting newly listed threatened species 
pursuant to section 4(d) of the Act, with the continued option to 
promulgate species-specific rules. We also proposed to extend to 
federally recognized Tribes certain regulatory exceptions currently 
provided to the employees or agents of the Service and other Federal 
and State agencies to aid, salvage, or dispose of threatened species. 
We also requested comments on an additional provision that would extend 
to federally recognized Tribes the exceptions to prohibitions for 
threatened species that the regulations currently provide to employees 
or agents of the Service, NMFS, and State agencies for take associated 
with conservation-related activities. See description above under RIN 
1018-BF95 for public engagement efforts.
Wildlife and Fisheries; Compensatory Mitigation Mechanisms, Proposed 
Rule (1018-BF63)
    FWS will propose to establish regulations covering objectives, 
standards, and criteria for review and approval of compensatory 
mitigation programs and projects intended to offset, or compensate for, 
unavoidable impacts to federally listed, proposed, or at-risk species 
and designated critical habitat pursuant to the ESA. The proposed rule 
will advance the purposes of the ESA by promoting the effective, 
consistent, transparent, and predictable delivery of compensatory 
mitigation.
Endangered Species Act Section 10 Regulations; Enhancement of Survival 
and Incidental Take Permits, Final Rule (1018-BF99)
    On February 9, 2023, FWS proposed to revise the regulations 
concerning the issuance of enhancement of survival and incidental take 
permits under the ESA (88 FR 8380). The purposes were to clarify the 
appropriate use of these permit types; clarify our authority to issue 
these permits for non-listed species without also including a listed 
species; simplify the requirements for enhancement of survival permits 
by combining safe harbor agreements and candidate conservation 
agreements with assurances into one agreement type; and include 
portions of our policies for safe harbor agreements, candidate 
conservation agreements with assurances, and habitat conservation plans 
in the regulations to reduce uncertainty. The proposed regulatory 
changes are intended to reduce costs and time associated with 
developing the application materials. We anticipate that these 
improvements will encourage more engagement in these voluntary 
programs, thereby generating greater conservation results overall.
    The final rule will incorporate and address public comments 
received in response to the proposed rule and informational webinars 
held with State agencies and Tribal nations.
Establishment of a Nonessential Experimental Population of Gray Wolf in 
the State of Colorado, Final Rule (1018-BG79)
    On February 17, 2023, FWS proposed to establish a nonessential 
experimental population (NEP) of the gray wolf (Canis lupus) in 
Colorado, under section 10(j) of the ESA (88 FR 10258). Establishment 
of this NEP will facilitate the State of Colorado's reintroduction of 
gray wolves and provide for allowable legal incidental taking of the 
gray wolf within the NEP area. The best available data indicate that 
reintroduction of the gray wolf into Colorado is biologically feasible 
and will promote the conservation of the species.
    FWS held four public information meetings during a 60-day public 
comment period. The final determination will be based on consideration 
of public comments and peer review received in response to the proposed 
rule.
Revision to the Section 4(d) Rule for the African Elephant, Final Rule 
(1018-BG66)
    On November 17, 2022, FWS proposed to revise the current 
regulations for the African elephant (Loxodonta africana) promulgated 
under section 4(d) of the ESA (87 FR 68975). The purposes of this 
rulemaking action are to: (1) Increase protection for African elephants 
in response to the recent rise in international trade of live African 
elephants from range countries by establishing ESA permit requirements 
and enhancement standards for trade in live African elephants, (2) 
clarify the existing enhancement requirement during our evaluation of 
the application for a permit to import African elephant sport-hunted 
trophies, and (3) incorporate a Party's designation under the 
Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna 
and

[[Page 9410]]

Flora (CITES) National Legislation Project into the decision-making 
process for the import of live African elephants, African elephant 
sport-hunted trophies, and African elephant parts and products.
    FWS conducted a virtual public hearing on January 5, 2023. The 
virtual public hearing was conducted in multiple languages, and several 
foreign countries expressed comments. The comment period for the 
proposed rule was extended due to comments expressed during the virtual 
public hearing. In addition to the public hearing, the agency has 
conducted several calls with foreign countries that have a stake in the 
proposed rulemaking.
Maintaining the Biological Integrity, Diversity, and Environmental 
Health of the National Wildlife Refuge System, Proposed Rule (1018-
BG78)
    FWS will propose to promulgate regulations directing the management 
of the National Wildlife Refuge System (NWRS) to promote the biological 
integrity, diversity, and environmental health of all lands and waters 
under the jurisdiction of the NWRS. These regulations would be based on 
language in the National Wildlife Refuge System Administration Act of 
1966, as amended by the National Wildlife Refuge System Improvement Act 
of 1997, directing the Service to ensure that the biological integrity, 
diversity, and environmental health of the System are maintained for 
the benefit of present and future generations of Americans.
National Wildlife Refuge System; Station-Specific Hunting and Sport 
Fishing Regulations, 2023-24, Final Rule (1018-BG71)
    On June 23, 2023, FWS proposed to make additions and revisions to 
station-specific regulations and expand hunting and sport fishing 
opportunities for the 2023-24 hunting and sport fishing season (88 FR 
41058). This action is part of an annual update for the national 
wildlife refuge system and the national fish hatchery system that 
ensures adequate public notice of openings and changes. These changes 
and openings enhance conservation stewardship and outdoor recreation 
and improve the management of game species and their habitat. FWS 
operates hunting and sport fishing programs on refuges to implement 
congressional directives to facilitate compatible priority wildlife-
dependent recreational opportunities. Although hatcheries are not part 
of the national wildlife refuge system, by regulation, the 
administrative provisions of refuge regulations are applied to national 
fish hatchery areas.
    FWS coordinated closely with the Association of Fish and Wildlife 
Agencies when developing the proposed rule. FWS also engaged with 
stakeholder groups through the Hunting and Wildlife Conservation 
Council for input on hunting and fishing programs on FWS lands and 
waters.

National Park Service

    The NPS preserves the natural and cultural resources and values 
within 425 units of the National Park System encompassing more than 85 
million acres of lands and waters for the enjoyment, education, and 
inspiration of this and future generations. The NPS also cooperates 
with partners to extend the benefits of resource conservation and 
outdoor recreation throughout the United States and the world.
Regulatory and Deregulatory Actions
    In 2023, NPS completed the following rulemakings:
Mount Rainier National Park; Fishing (1024-AE66)
    This final rule which published on January 20, 2023 (88 FR 3659), 
removed from the Code of Federal Regulations special fishing 
regulations for Mount Rainier National Park, including those that 
restrict the take of nonnative species. Instead, the National Park 
Service will publish closures and restrictions related to fishing in 
the Superintendent's Compendium for the park. This action helps 
implement a 2018 Fish Management Plan that aims to conserve native fish 
populations and restore aquatic ecosystems by reducing or eliminating 
nonnative fish.
    In the coming year, NPS will prioritize the following rulemaking 
actions:
Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act Systematic 
Process for Disposition and Repatriation of Native American Human 
Remains, Funerary Objects, Sacred Objects, and Objects of Cultural 
Patrimony (1024-AE19)
    This final rule will revise the NAGPRA implementing regulations. On 
October 18, 2022, the NPS published the proposed rule ``Native American 
Graves Protection and Repatriation Act Systematic Process for 
Disposition and Repatriation of Native American Human Remains, Funerary 
Objects, Sacred Objects, and Objects of Cultural Patrimony,'' (87 FR 
63202). This rule eliminates ambiguities, corrects inaccuracies, 
simplifies excessively burdensome and complicated requirements, 
clarifies timelines, and removes offensive terminology in the existing 
regulations that have inhibited the respectful repatriation of most 
Native American human remains. This rule will simplify and improve the 
regulatory process for repatriation and thereby advance the goals of 
racial justice, equity, and inclusion. The Department received Tribal 
government input through consultations and listening sessions held 
under Executive Order 13175 criteria and the Department's policy on 
meaningful communication and collaboration with Tribal officials.
Alaska; Hunting and Trapping in National Preserves (1024-AE70)
    This rule would amend NPS regulations for sport hunting and 
trapping in national preserves in Alaska. This rule would prohibit 
certain harvest practices, including bear baiting; and prohibit 
predator control or predator reduction on national preserves.

Bureau of Reclamation

    The Bureau of Reclamation's (Reclamation) mission is to manage, 
develop, and protect water and related resources in an environmentally 
and economically sound manner in the interest of the American public. 
To accomplish this mission, Reclamation employs management, 
engineering, and science to achieve effective and environmentally 
sensitive solutions.
    Reclamation's projects provide irrigation water service; municipal 
and industrial water supply; hydroelectric power generation; water 
quality improvement; groundwater management; fish and wildlife 
enhancement; outdoor recreation; flood control; navigation; river 
regulation and control; system optimization; and related uses. In 
addition, Reclamation continues to provide increased security at its 
facilities.
Regulatory and Deregulatory Actions
    In the coming year, Reclamation will prioritize the following 
rulemaking action:
Public Conduct on Bureau of Reclamation Facilities, Lands and 
Waterbodies (1006-AA58)
    The proposed rule published on February 16, 2023 (88 FR 10070). The 
final rule, targeted to publish on or before November 2023, will revise 
existing definitions for the use of aircraft; the possession of 
firearms, update regulations on camping, swimming, and winter 
recreation for the wide range of circumstances found across 
Reclamation; and would clarify the permitting of memorials and

[[Page 9411]]

reburials on Reclamation lands. During the proposed rule stage, 
Reclamation held three tribal consultations in April and May 2022, with 
invites to all 287 western state Tribes, and Tribal comments were 
incorporated into this update.

DOI--OFFICE OF NATURAL RESOURCES REVENUE (ONRR)

Proposed Rule Stage

108. ONRR Designation Form for Payment Responsibility [1012-AA33]

    Priority: Other Significant.
    Legal Authority: 5 U.S.C. 301 et seq.; 30 U.S.C. 181 et seq.; 30 
U.S.C. 351 et seq.; 30 U.S.C. 1001 et seq.; 30 U.S.C. 1701 et seq.; 31 
U.S.C. 3335; 31 U.S.C. 3711; 31 U.S.C. 3716 to 3718; 31 U.S.C. 3720A; 
31 U.S.C. 9701; 43 U.S.C. 1301 et seq.; 43 U.S.C. 1331 et seq.; 43 
U.S.C. 1801 et seq.
    CFR Citation: None.
    Legal Deadline: None.
    Abstract: ONRR proposes to amend its regulations and revise its 
form for designating a designee for a Federal oil and gas lease. This 
action opens a 60-day comment period to allow interested parties to 
comment on the proposed rule and its information collection 
requirements.
    Statement of Need: ONRR proposes to amend its regulations and 
revise its form for designating a designee for a Federal oil and gas 
lease. This action opens a 60-day comment period to allow interested 
parties to comment on the proposed rule and its information collection 
requirements.
    Summary of Legal Basis: 5 U.S.C. 301 et seq., 30 U.S.C. 181 et 
seq., 30 U.S.C. 351 et seq., 30 U.S.C. 1001 et seq., 30 U.S.C. n1701 et 
seq., 31 U.S.C. 3335, 31 U.S.C. 3711, 31 U.S.C. 3716 to 3718, 31 U.S.C. 
3720A, 31 U.S.C. n9701, 43 U.S.C. 1301 et seq., 43 U.S.C. 1331 et seq., 
and 43 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.
    Timetable:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Action                    Date            FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NPRM................................   11/00/23
NPRM Comment Period End.............   01/00/24
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No.
    Small Entities Affected: No.
    Government Levels Affected: None.
    Agency Contact: Luis Aguilar, Regulatory Specialist, Department of 
the Interior, Office of Natural Resources Revenue, Denver Federal 
Center West, 6th Avenue and Kipling Street, Building 85, MS 64400B, 
Denver, CO 80225, Phone: 303 231-3418, Email: [email protected].
    RIN: 1012-AA33

DOI--BUREAU OF SAFETY AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENFORCEMENT (BSEE)

Proposed Rule Stage

109. Oil-Spill Response Requirements for Facilities Located Seaward of 
the Coast Line Proposed Rule [1014-AA44]

    Priority: Other Significant.
    Legal Authority: Federal Water Pollution Control Act, 33 U.S.C. 
1321; Oil Pollution Act of 1990, 33 U.S.C. 2701 et seq.; Outer 
Continental Shelf Lands Act, 42 U.S.C. 1331 et seq.
    CFR Citation: 30 CFR 254 (proposed rewrite of 254).
    Legal Deadline: None.
    Abstract: This proposed rule would identify opportunities for 
updating Oil Spill Response Requirements regulations, in 30 CFR part 
254, last updated 22 years ago (62 FR 13996, Mar. 25, 1997). This 
proposed rule would codify industry best practices, BSEE policy, and 
regulatory guidance for oil spill response planning and operations. 
This proposed rule would also streamline the oil spill response 
planning requirements, clarify equipment and operational capabilities, 
and address requirements from other applicable laws and technological 
advancements to reflect oil spill response best practices and advance 
safety and protection of the environment.
    Statement of Need: This proposed rule would identify opportunities 
for updating Oil Spill Response Requirements regulations, in 30 CFR 
part 254, last updated 22 years ago (62 FR 13996, Mar. 25, 1997). This 
proposed rule would codify industry best practices, BSEE policy, and 
regulatory guidance for oil spill response planning and operations.
    Summary of Legal Basis: Federal Water Pollution Control Act, 33 
U.S.C. 1321, Oil Pollution Act of 1990, 33 U.S.C. 2701 et seq., Outer 
Continental Shelf Lands Act, 42 U.S.C. 1331 et seq.
    Timetable:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Action                    Date            FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NPRM................................   12/00/23
NPRM Comment Period End.............   03/00/24
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No.
    Small Entities Affected: Businesses.
    Government Levels Affected: None.
    Agency Contact: Kirk Malstrom, Chief, Regulations and Standards 
Branch, Department of the Interior, Bureau of Safety and Environmental 
Enforcement, 45600 Woodland Road, Sterling, VA 20166, Phone: 703 787-
1751, Fax: 703 787-1555, Email: [email protected].
    RIN: 1014-AA44

DOI--BSEE

110. Revisions to Subpart J--Pipelines and Pipeline Rights-of-Way 
Proposed Rule [1014-AA45]

    Priority: Other Significant. Major under 5 U.S.C. 801.
    Legal Authority: 43 U.S.C. 1331 to 1356a, Outer Continental Shelf 
Lands Act
    CFR Citation: Not Yet Determined.
    Legal Deadline: None.
    Abstract: This proposed rule would identify opportunities for 
improving safety, environmental protections, and equipment reliability, 
within the Pipelines and Pipeline Rights-of-Way regulations under 30 
CFR 250 subpart J. This rule would incorporate several guidance 
documents and conditions of approval and update industry standards 
incorporated by reference into the regulations. This rulemaking rule 
would result in an up-to-date set of pipeline regulations that reflect 
current industry practices and BSEE policies that address topics such 
as pipeline permitting, design, installation, maintenance, inspections, 
and decommissioning.
    Statement of Need: This proposed rule would identify opportunities 
for improving safety, environmental protections, and equipment 
reliability, within the Pipelines and Pipeline Rights-of-Way 
regulations under 30 CFR 250 subpart J. This rule would incorporate 
several guidance documents and conditions of approval and update 
industry standards incorporated by reference into the regulations. This 
rulemaking rule would result in an up-to-date set of pipeline 
regulations that reflect current industry practices and BSEE policies 
that address topics such as pipeline permitting, design, installation, 
maintenance, inspections, and decommissioning.
    Summary of Legal Basis: 43 U.S.C. 1331 to 1356a, Outer Continental 
Shelf Lands Act.
    Timetable:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Action                    Date            FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NPRM................................   01/00/24
NPRM Comment Period End.............   03/00/24
------------------------------------------------------------------------


[[Page 9412]]

    Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No.
    Small Entities Affected: Businesses.
    Government Levels Affected: None.
    Agency Contact: Kirk Malstrom, Chief, Regulations and Standards 
Branch, Department of the Interior, Bureau of Safety and Environmental 
Enforcement, 45600 Woodland Road, Sterling, VA 20166, Phone: 703 787-
1751, Fax: 703 787-1555, Email: [email protected].
    RIN: 1014-AA45

DOI--BSEE

Final Rule Stage

111. Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act; Operating in High-Pressure and/
or High-Temperature (HPHT) Environments [1014-AA49]

    Priority: Other Significant.
    Legal Authority: Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act (OCSLA), 43 
U.S.C. 1331 to 1356a
    CFR Citation: Not Yet Determined.
    Legal Deadline: None.
    Abstract: This rule will formally codify BSEE's existing process 
for reviewing and approving projects in high pressure and/or high 
temperature (HPHT) environments. Currently, BSEE reviews and approves 
HPHT projects under its existing regulations. Based on these 
regulations, BSEE issued multiple guidance documents clarifying the 
specific HPHT information prospective operators should submit to BSEE 
to support the bureau's programmatic reviews and approvals of such 
projects.
    Statement of Need: This rule will formally codify BSEE's existing 
process for reviewing and approving projects in high pressure and/or 
high temperature (HPHT) environments. Currently, BSEE reviews and 
approves HPHT projects under its existing regulations. Based on these 
regulations, BSEE issued multiple guidance documents clarifying the 
specific HPHT information prospective operators should submit to BSEE 
to support the bureau's programmatic reviews and approvals of such 
projects.
    Summary of Legal Basis: Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act (OCSLA), 
43 U.S.C. 1331 to 1356a.
    Timetable:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Action                    Date            FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NPRM................................   05/16/22  87 FR 29790
NPRM Comment Period End.............   07/01/22
Final Action........................   11/00/23
Final Action Effective..............   01/00/24
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No.
    Small Entities Affected: Businesses.
    Government Levels Affected: None.
    Agency Contact: Kirk Malstrom, Chief, Regulations and Standards 
Branch, Department of the Interior, Bureau of Safety and Environmental 
Enforcement, 45600 Woodland Road, Sterling, VA 20166, Phone: 703 787-
1751, Fax: 703 787-1555, Email: [email protected].
    RIN: 1014-AA49

DOI--ASSISTANT SECRETARY FOR LAND AND MINERALS MANAGEMENT (ASLM)

Proposed Rule Stage

112. Carbon Sequestration [1082-AA04]

    Priority: Section 3(f)(1) Significant. Major status under 5 U.S.C. 
801 is undetermined.
    Legal Authority: Pub. L. 117-58
    CFR Citation: Not Yet Determined.
    Legal Deadline: Final, Statutory, November 15, 2022, Public Law 
117-58.
    The Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act of 2021 (Pub. L. 117-58) 
mandates that a new regulation be published within 12 months from 
enactment of the legislation on November 15, 2021.
    Abstract: The proposed rulemaking would address the transportation 
and geologic sequestration aspects of a development, including leasing; 
siting of storage reservoirs; environmental plans and mitigations; 
facility and infrastructure design and installation; injection 
operations; monitoring; incident response; financial assurance; and 
safety. The Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act of 2021 directed the 
Department to establish regulations intended to initiate OCS activities 
to accomplish carbon sequestration. This proposed joint rulemaking 
between the Bureau of Ocean Energy management (BOEM) and the Bureau of 
Safety and Environmental Enforcement (BSEE) would establish new 
regulations to implement processes in support of safe and 
environmentally responsible carbon sequestration activities on the OCS.
    Statement of Need: The proposed rulemaking would address the 
transportation and geologic sequestration aspects of a development, 
including leasing; siting of storage reservoirs; environmental plans 
and mitigations; facility and infrastructure design and installation; 
injection operations; monitoring; incident response; financial 
assurance; and safety. The Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act of 
2021 directed the Department to establish regulations intended to 
initiate Outer Continental Shelf (OCS) activities to accomplish carbon 
sequestration. This proposed joint rulemaking between the Bureau of 
Ocean Energy management (BOEM) and the Bureau of Safety and 
Environmental Enforcement (BSEE) would establish new regulations to 
implement processes in support of safe and environmentally responsible 
carbon sequestration activities on the OCS.
    Summary of Legal Basis: Public Law 117-58.
    Timetable:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Action                    Date            FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NPRM................................   12/00/23
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Undetermined.
    Small Entities Affected: Businesses.
    Government Levels Affected: Undetermined.
    Federalism: Undetermined.
    Agency Contact: Stacey Noem, Chief, Office of Offshore Regulatory 
Programs, Department of the Interior, Assistant Secretary for Land and 
Minerals Management, 456000 Woodland Road, Sterling, VA 20166, Phone: 
703 787-1222, Email: [email protected].
    Related RIN: Related to 1082-AA04
    RIN: 1082-AA04

DOI--ASSISTANT SECRETARY FOR POLICY, MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET (ASPMB)

Proposed Rule Stage

113. Department of the Interior Acquisition Regulation Governance 
Titles [1090-AB25]

    Priority: Other Significant.
    Legal Authority: 41 U.S.C. 1702
    CFR Citation: 48 CFR 1.301; 48 CFR 1401.301.
    Legal Deadline: None.
    Abstract: The Office of Acquisition and Property Management would 
propose changes to the Department of the Interior Acquisition 
Regulation to update its nomenclature to align with recent changes to 
agency procurement governance. This proposal would enable acquisition 
programs to more efficiently meet the Department's mission needs and 
comply with all applicable law and regulations.
    Statement of Need: This proposed rule would change the Department 
of the Interior Acquisition Regulations to update its nomenclature to 
align with recent changes to agency procurement governance. This 
proposal would enable

[[Page 9413]]

acquisition programs to more efficiently meet the Department's mission 
needs and comply with all applicable law and regulations.
    Summary of Legal Basis: 41 U.S.C. 1702.
    Timetable:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Action                    Date            FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NPRM................................   11/00/23
NPRM Comment Period End.............   01/00/24
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No.
    Small Entities Affected: No.
    Government Levels Affected: None.
    Agency Contact: Antonia Giammo, Senior Procurement Analyst--Office 
of Acquisition and Property Management, Department of the Interior, 
Assistant Secretary for Policy, Management and Budget, 1849 C Street 
NW, Washington, DC 20240, Phone: 202 208-5250, Email: 
[email protected].
    RIN: 1090-AB25

DOI--ASPMB

114. Natural Resource Damages for Hazardous Substances [1090-AB26]

    Priority: Other Significant. Major status under 5 U.S.C. 801 is 
undetermined.
    Legal Authority: 42 U.S.C. secs. 9601 et seq. 104, 107, 111 (i), 
122
    CFR Citation: 40 CFR 300.600; 43 CFR 11.
    Legal Deadline: None.
    Abstract: This proposal would update the existing Type A Rule of 
the CERCLA Natural Resource Damage Assessment and Restoration (NRDAR) 
regulations so it could be used in different environments and include 
methodologies which are not technology specific. Adjustments would also 
be made to the rebuttable presumption for Type A procedures which is 
currently limited to damages of $100,000 or less.
    Statement of Need: This proposed rule would update the existing 
Type A Rule of the CERCLA Natural Resource Damage Assessment and 
Restoration (NRDAR) regulations so it could be used in different 
environments and include methodologies which are not technology 
specific. Adjustments would also be made to the rebuttable presumption 
for Type A procedures which is currently limited to damages of $100,000 
or less.
    Summary of Legal Basis: 42 U.S.C. secs. 9601 et seq., 42 U.S.C. 
104, 42 U.S.C. 107, 42 U.S.C. 111 (i), and 42 U.S.C. 122.
    Timetable:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Action                    Date            FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
ANPRM...............................   01/19/23  88 FR 3373
ANPRM Comment Period End............   03/20/23
NPRM................................   11/00/23
NPRM Comment Period End.............   01/00/24
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No.
    Small Entities Affected: No.
    Government Levels Affected: Federal, Local, State, Tribal.
    Agency Contact: Emily Joseph, Director, Office of Restoration and 
Damage Assessment, Department of the Interior, Assistant Secretary for 
Policy, Management and Budget, 1849 C Street NW, Washington, DC 20240, 
Phone: 202 208-4438, Email: [email protected].
    Related RIN: Related to 1090-AB17
    RIN: 1090-AB26

DOI--ASPMB

115.  Privacy Act Exemption for Interior/DOI-10, DOI Law 
Enforcement Records Management System (LERMS) [1090-AB28]

    Priority: Other Significant.
    Legal Authority: 5 U.S.C 552a(k)
    CFR Citation: 43 CFR 2.254.
    Legal Deadline: None.
    Abstract: This proposed rule would revise the Department's Privacy 
Act regulations at 43 CFR 2.254 to claim exemptions for certain records 
in the INTERIOR/DOI-10, DOI Law Enforcement Records Management System 
(LERMS), system of records from one or more provisions of the Privacy 
Act of 1974 pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552a(k), because of criminal, civil or 
administrative law enforcement requirements.
    Statement of Need: This proposed rule would revise the Department's 
Privacy Act regulations at 43 CFR 2.254 to claim exemptions for certain 
records in the INTERIOR/DOI-10, DOI Law Enforcement Records Management 
System (LERMS), system of records from one or more provisions of the 
Privacy Act of 1974 pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552a(k), because of criminal, 
civil or administrative law enforcement requirements.
    Summary of Legal Basis: 5 U.S.C. 552a(k).
    Timetable:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Action                    Date            FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NPRM................................   12/00/23
NPRM Comment Period End.............   02/00/24
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No.
    Small Entities Affected: No.
    Government Levels Affected: None.
    Agency Contact: Teri Barnett, Departmental Privacy Officer, 
Cybersecurity Division, Department of the Interior, 1849 C Street NW, 
Office of the Chief Information Officer, Room 7112, Washington, DC 
20240, Phone: 202 208-1943, Email: [email protected].
    Related RIN: Related to 1090-AB02
    RIN: 1090-AB28

DOI--ASPMB

Final Rule Stage

116. Privacy Act Exemption for Interior/OIG-02 Investigative Records 
[1090-AB27]

    Priority: Other Significant.
    Legal Authority: 5 U.S.C.552a(k)
    CFR Citation: 43 CFR 2.254.
    Legal Deadline: None.
    Abstract: This proposed rule would amend the DOI Privacy Act 
regulations at 43 CFR 2.254 to exempt certain records in the INTERIOR/
OIG-02, Investigative Records, system of records from one or more 
provisions of the Privacy Act to protect investigatory records pursuant 
to 5 U.S.C. 552a(k). In order to claim the exemptions and meet the 
requirements of the Privacy Act, DOI will publish a Notice of Proposed 
Rulemaking and a Final Rule in the Federal Register.
    Statement of Need: This proposed rule would amend the DOI Privacy 
Act regulations at 43 CFR 2.254 to exempt certain records in the 
INTERIOR/OIG-02, Investigative Records, system of records from one or 
more provisions of the Privacy Act to protect investigatory records 
pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552a(k). In order to claim the exemptions and meet 
the requirements of the Privacy Act, DOI will publish a Notice of 
Proposed Rulemaking and a Final Rule in the Federal Register.
    Summary of Legal Basis: 5 U.S.C.552a(k).
    Timetable:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Action                    Date            FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NPRM................................   07/13/23  88 FR 44748
NPRM Comment Period End.............   09/11/23
Final Action........................   11/00/23
Final Action Effective..............   11/00/23
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No.
    Small Entities Affected: No.
    Government Levels Affected: None.

[[Page 9414]]

    Agency Contact: Teri Barnett, Departmental Privacy Officer, 
Cybersecurity Division, Department of the Interior, 1849 C Street NW, 
Office of the Chief Information Officer, Room 7112, Washington, DC 
20240, Phone: 202 208-1943, Email: [email protected].
    RIN: 1090-AB27

DOI--OFFICE OF HEARINGS AND APPEALS (OHA)

Proposed Rule Stage

117. Office of Hearings And Appeals (OHA) Rule [1094-AA57]

    Priority: Other Significant.
    Legal Authority: 5 U.S.C. 301 (2018); 43 U.S.C. 1457c (2018)
    CFR Citation: 43 CFR 4.
    Legal Deadline: None.
    Abstract: The Office of Hearings and Appeals (OHA) proposes a 
Notice and Comment Rulemaking to modernize and clarify its regulations 
governing hearings and appeals before the Interior Board of Land 
Appeals (IBLA), the Interior Board of Indian Appeals (IBIA), the 
Departmental Cases Hearings Division (DCHD), and the OHA Director. OHA 
is proposes this regulatory action to update outdated provisions, make 
process improvements, and provide a more modernized and logical 
hearings and appeals process.
    Statement of Need: The Office of Hearings and Appeals (OHA) 
proposes a Notice and Comment Rulemaking to modernize and clarify its 
regulations governing hearings and appeals before the Interior Board of 
Land Appeals (IBLA), the Interior Board of Indian Appeals (IBIA), the 
Departmental Cases Hearings Division (DCHD), and the OHA Director. OHA 
proposes this regulatory action to update outdated provisions, make 
process improvements, and provide a more modernized and logical 
hearings and appeals process.
    Summary of Legal Basis: 5 U.S.C. 301 (2018) and 43 U.S.C. 1457c 
(2018).
    Timetable:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Action                    Date            FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NPRM................................   11/00/23
NPRM Comment Period End.............   01/00/24
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No.
    Small Entities Affected: No.
    Government Levels Affected: Federal, Local, State.
    Agency Contact: Rachel Lukens, Counsel to the Director, Department 
of the Interior, Office of Hearings and Appeals, 801 N Quincy Street, 
#300, Arlington, VA 22203, Phone: 703 223-9934, Email: 
[email protected].
    RIN: 1094-AA57

DOI--UNITED STATES FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE (FWS)

Proposed Rule Stage

118. Wildlife and Fisheries; Compensatory Mitigation Mechanisms [1018-
BF63]

    Priority: Other Significant.
    Legal Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.; Pub. L. 116-283
    CFR Citation: 50 CFR 413.
    Legal Deadline: None.
    Abstract: This rulemaking action would address section 329 of the 
National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2021, Objectives, 
Performance Standards, and Criteria for Use of Wildlife Conservation 
Banking Programs (NDAA 2021), which states that, to the maximum extent 
practicable, the regulatory standards and criteria shall maximize 
available credits and opportunities for mitigation, provide flexibility 
for characteristics of various species, and apply equivalent standards 
and criteria to all mitigation banks.
    Statement of Need: This rulemaking action will address section 329 
of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2021, 
Objectives, Performance Standards, and Criteria for Use of Wildlife 
Conservation Banking Programs (NDAA 2021), which states that, to the 
maximum extent practicable, the regulatory standards and criteria shall 
maximize available credits and opportunities for mitigation, provide 
flexibility for characteristics of various species, and apply 
equivalent standards and criteria to all mitigation banks.
    Summary of Legal Basis: 16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq., Pub. L. 116-283.
    Timetable:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Action                    Date            FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
ANPRM...............................   07/27/22  87 FR 45076
ANPRM Comment Period End............   09/26/22
NPRM................................   01/00/24
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No.
    Government Levels Affected: Federal.
    Agency Contact: Craig Aubrey, Chief, Division of Environmental 
Review, Ecological Services Program, Department of the Interior, United 
States Fish and Wildlife Service, 5275 Leesburg Pike, MS: ES, Falls 
Church, VA 22041, Phone: 703 358-2442, Fax: 703 358-1800, Email: 
[email protected].
    RIN: 1018-BF63

DOI--FWS

119. Migratory Bird Permits; Authorizing the Incidental Take of 
Migratory Birds, Proposed Rule [1018-BF71]

    Priority: Section 3(f)(1) Significant.
    Legal Authority: 16 U.S.C. 703 et seq.
    CFR Citation: 50 CFR 21.
    Legal Deadline: None.
    Abstract: This proposed rulemaking action would amend FWS 
regulations by providing definitions to terms used in the Migratory 
Bird Treaty Act, as amended (MBTA). The proposed rule would clarify 
that the MBTA's prohibitions on taking and killing migratory birds 
includes foreseeable, direct taking and killing that is incidental to 
other activities. The proposed rule would also establish authorizations 
for otherwise prohibited take of migratory birds.
    Statement of Need: This proposed rulemaking action would amend FWS 
regulations by providing definitions to terms used in the Migratory 
Bird Treaty Act, as amended (MBTA). The proposed rule would clarify 
that the MBTA's prohibitions on taking and killing migratory birds 
includes foreseeable, direct taking and killing that is incidental to 
other activities. The proposed rule would also establish authorizations 
for otherwise prohibited take of migratory birds.
    Summary of Legal Basis: 16 U.S.C. 703 et seq.
    Timetable:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Action                    Date            FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
ANPRM...............................   10/04/21  86 FR 54667
ANPRM Comment Period End............   12/03/21
NPRM................................   11/00/23
Final Action........................   04/00/24
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No.
    Government Levels Affected: None.
    Agency Contact: Jerome Ford, Assistant Director--Migratory Bird 
Program, Department of the Interior, United States Fish and Wildlife 
Service, 5275 Leesburg Pike, MS-MB, Falls Church, VA 22041-3803, Phone: 
703 358-1050, Email: [email protected].
    RIN: 1018-BF71


[[Page 9415]]



DOI--FWS

120. Maintaining the Biological Integrity, Diversity, and Environmental 
Health of the National Wildlife Refuge System, Proposed Rule [1018-
BG78]

    Priority: Other Significant.
    Legal Authority: 5 U.S.C. 301; 16 U.S.C. 460k; 16 U.S.C. 664; 16 
U.S.C. 668dd-668ee; 16 U.S.C. 715i; Pub. L. 115-20
    CFR Citation: 50 CFR 29.
    Legal Deadline: None.
    Abstract: FWS proposes to promulgate regulations directing the 
management of the National Wildlife Refuge System (NWRS) to promote the 
biological integrity, diversity, and environmental health of all lands 
and waters under the jurisdiction of the NWRS. These regulations would 
be based on language in the National Wildlife Refuge System 
Administration Act of 1966, as amended by the National Wildlife Refuge 
System Improvement Act of 1997, directing the Service to ensure that 
the biological integrity, diversity, and environmental health of the 
System are maintained for the benefit of present and future generations 
of Americans. FWS has intentionally coordinated with State and Tribal 
partners to develop the proposed regulations. FWS solicited comments 
from States through the Association of Fish and Wildlife Agencies 
(AFWA) and held three meetings with AFWA and State leadership to 
discuss the proposed regulations. FWS also held two public webinars for 
Tribal partners across the country to discuss the proposed regulations 
and to gain their feedback.
    Statement of Need: FWS proposes to promulgate regulations directing 
the management of the National Wildlife Refuge System (NWRS) to promote 
the biological integrity, diversity, and environmental health of all 
lands and waters under the jurisdiction of the NWRS. These regulations 
would be based on language in the National Wildlife Refuge System 
Administration Act of 1966, as amended by the National Wildlife Refuge 
System Improvement Act of 1997, directing the Service to ensure that 
the biological integrity, diversity, and environmental health of the 
System are maintained for the benefit of present and future generations 
of Americans.
    Summary of Legal Basis: 5 U.S.C. 301, 16 U.S.C. 460k, 16 U.S.C. 
664, 16 U.S.C. 668dd-668ee, 16 U.S.C. 715i, and Public Law 115-20.
    Timetable:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Action                    Date            FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NPRM................................   11/00/23
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No.
    Government Levels Affected: None.
    Agency Contact: Katherine Harrigan, Sportsmen's Access Coordinator, 
Department of the Interior, United States Fish and Wildlife Service, 
Branch of Conservation Policy and Planning, National Wildlife Refuge 
System, 5275 Leesburg Pike, Falls Church, VA 22041-3803, Phone: 703 
358-2440, Email: [email protected].
    RIN: 1018-BG78

DOI--FWS

Final Rule Stage

121. Permits for Incidental Take of Eagles and Eagle Nests, Final Rule 
[1018-BE70]

    Priority: Other Significant.
    Legal Authority: 16 U.S.C. 668 to 668d
    CFR Citation: 50 CFR 22.
    Legal Deadline: Other, Judicial, September 15, 2021, For submission 
of an advance notice of proposed rulemaking to OFR.
    NPRM, Judicial, September 16, 2022.
    Final, Judicial, January 31, 2024.
    Abstract: FWS will finalize a proposed rule that set forth 
potential approaches for expediting and simplifying the permit process 
authorizing incidental take of eagles. The proposed rule would revise 
the regulations authorizing eagle incidental take and eagle nest take 
permits to increase the efficiency and effectiveness of permitting, 
facilitate and improve compliance, and increase the conservation 
benefit for eagles. The proposed rule would create general eagle 
permits for certain activities under prescribed conditions in addition 
to specific eagle permits authorized under current regulations.
    Statement of Need: FWS will finalize a proposed rule that set forth 
potential approaches for expediting and simplifying the permit process 
authorizing incidental take of eagles. The rule will revise the 
regulations authorizing eagle incidental take and eagle nest take 
permits to increase the efficiency and effectiveness of permitting, 
facilitate and improve compliance, and increase the conservation 
benefit for eagles. The rule will create general eagle permits for 
certain activities under prescribed conditions in addition to specific 
eagle permits authorized under current regulations.
    Summary of Legal Basis: 16 U.S.C. 668 to 668d.
    Timetable:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Action                    Date            FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
ANPRM...............................   09/14/21  86 FR 51094
ANPRM Comment Period End............   10/29/21
NPRM................................   09/30/22  87 FR 59598
NPRM Comment Period Extended........   11/28/22  87 FR 72957
NPRM Comment Period End.............   11/29/22
NPRM Comment Period Extended End....   12/29/22
Final Action........................   01/00/24
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No.
    Government Levels Affected: Local, State, Tribal.
    Agency Contact: Dr. Eric L. Kershner, Chief, Division of 
Conservation, Permits, and Regulations, Department of the Interior, 
United States Fish and Wildlife Service, 5275 Leesburg Pike, MS: MB, 
Falls Church, VA 22041, Phone: 703 358-2376, Fax: 703 358-2217, Email: 
[email protected].
    RIN: 1018-BE70

DOI--FWS

122. Regulations Pertaining to Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and 
Plants [1018-BF88]

    Priority: Other Significant.
    Legal Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.
    CFR Citation: 50 CFR 17.
    Legal Deadline: None.
    Abstract: Per section 2 of the Executive Order on Protecting Public 
Health and the Environment and Restoring Science to Tackle the Climate 
Crisis (E.O.13990), the Department of the Interior (the Department) 
initiated a review of the previous rulemaking action with the title, 
``Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Regulations for 
Prohibitions to Threatened Wildlife and Plants'' (84 FR 44753; August 
27, 2019) that revised portions of the regulations that address 
prohibition and protective regulations regarding the conservation of 
endangered and threatened species of fish, wildlife, and plants. As a 
result of that review, the Department proposed to revise those 
regulations (88 FR 40742, June 22, 2023) and after publication of that 
proposal, delivered a series of informational sessions to stakeholders 
including: Federal agencies, State agencies, federally recognized 
Tribes, Native Hawaiian community leaders, non-governmental 
organizations, conservation partners, industry groups, and Pacific 
Islander community leaders. FAQs and a recording of the presentation 
can be viewed on the

[[Page 9416]]

website https://fws.gov/project/endangered-species-act-regulation-revisions.
    Statement of Need: Per section 2 of the Executive Order on 
Protecting Public Health and the Environment and Restoring Science to 
Tackle the Climate Crisis (E.O.13990), the Department of the Interior 
(the Department) initiated a review of the previous rulemaking action 
with the title, ``Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; 
Regulations for Prohibitions to Threatened Wildlife and Plants (84 FR 
44753; August 27, 2019) that revised portions of the regulations that 
address prohibition and protective regulations regarding the 
conservation of endangered and threatened species of fish, wildlife, 
and plants. As a result of that review, the Department proposed a new 
rulemaking.
    Summary of Legal Basis: 16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.
    Timetable:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Action                    Date            FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NPRM................................   06/22/23  88 FR 40742
NPRM Comment Period End.............   08/21/23
Final Action........................   04/00/24
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No.
    Government Levels Affected: Federal, State.
    Agency Contact: Carey Galst, Chief, Branch of Listing Policy and 
Support, Department of the Interior, United States Fish and Wildlife 
Service, Ecological Services Program, 5275 Leesburg Pike, MS: ES, Falls 
Church, VA 22041-3803, Phone: 703 358-1954, Fax: 703 358-1954, Email: 
[email protected].
    RIN: 1018-BF88

DDOI--FWS

123. Regulations for Listing Endangered and Threatened Species and 
Designating Critical Habitat, Final Rule [1018-BF95]

    Priority: Other Significant.
    Legal Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.
    CFR Citation: 50 CFR 424.
    Legal Deadline: None.
    Abstract: Per section 2 of the Executive Order on Protecting Public 
Health and the Environment and Restoring Science to Tackle the Climate 
Crisis (E.O. 13990), and subsequent Fact Sheet: List of Agency Actions 
for Review, the Departments of Commerce and the Interior (the 
Departments) initiated a review of the previous rulemaking action with 
the title, ``Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Regulations 
for Listing Species and Designating Critical Habitat'' (84 FR 45020; 
August 27, 2019) that revised the regulations for adding and removing 
species from the Lists of Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants 
and clarified procedures for designating critical habitat. As a result 
of that review, the Departments proposed to revise those regulations 
(88 FR 40764, June 22, 2023), and after publication of that proposal, 
delivered a series of informational sessions to stakeholders including: 
Federal agencies, State agencies, federally recognized Tribes, Native 
Hawaiian community leaders, non-governmental organizations, 
conservation partners, industry groups, and Pacific Islander community 
leaders. FAQs and a recording of the presentation can be viewed on the 
website https://fws.gov/project/endangered-species-act-regulation-revisions.
    Statement of Need: Per section 2 of the Executive Order on 
Protecting Public Health and the Environment and Restoring Science to 
Tackle the Climate Crisis (E.O. 13990), and subsequent Fact Sheet: List 
of Agency Actions for Review, the Departments of Commerce and the 
Interior (the Departments) initiated a review of the previous 
rulemaking action with the title, ``Endangered and Threatened Wildlife 
and Plants; Regulations for Listing Species and Designating Critical 
Habitat'' (84 FR 45020; August 27, 2019), that revised the regulations 
for adding and removing species from the Lists of Endangered and 
Threatened Wildlife and Plants and clarified procedures for designating 
critical habitat. As a result of that review, the Departments proposed 
a new rulemaking.
    Summary of Legal Basis: 16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.
    Timetable:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Action                    Date            FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NPRM................................   06/22/23  88 FR 40764
NPRM Comment Period End.............   08/21/23
Final Action........................   04/00/24
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No.
    Small Entities Affected: No.
    Government Levels Affected: Federal, State.
    Agency Contact: Carey Galst, Chief, Branch of Listing Policy and 
Support, Department of the Interior, United States Fish and Wildlife 
Service, Ecological Services Program, 5275 Leesburg Pike, MS: ES, Falls 
Church, VA 22041-3803, Phone: 703 358-1954, Fax: 703 358-1954, Email: 
[email protected].
    Related RIN: Related to 0648-BK47
    RIN: 1018-BF95

DOI--FWS

124. Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Interagency 
Cooperation [1018-BF96]

    Priority: Other Significant.
    Legal Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.
    CFR Citation: 50 CFR 402.
    Legal Deadline: None.
    Abstract: Per section 2 of the Executive Order on Protecting Public 
Health and the Environment and Restoring Science to Tackle the Climate 
Crisis (E.O. 13990), and subsequent Fact Sheet: List of Agency Actions 
for Review, the Departments of Commerce and the Interior (the 
Departments) initiated a review of the previous rulemaking action with 
the title, Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Regulations 
for Interagency Cooperation'' (84 FR 44976; August 27, 2019) that 
revised portions of the regulations that implement section 7 of the 
Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended. As a result of that review, 
the Departments proposed to revise those regulations (88 FR 40753; June 
22, 2023), and after publication of that proposal, delivered a series 
of informational sessions to stakeholders including: Federal agencies, 
State agencies, federally recognized Tribes, Native Hawaiian community 
leaders, non-governmental organizations, conservation partners, 
industry groups, and Pacific Islander community leaders. FAQs and a 
recording of the presentation can be viewed on the website https://fws.gov/project/endangered-species-act-regulation-revisions.
    Statement of Need: Per section 2 of the Executive Order on 
Protecting Public Health and the Environment and Restoring Science to 
Tackle the Climate Crisis (E.O. 13990), and subsequent Fact Sheet: List 
of Agency Actions for Review, the Departments of Commerce and the 
Interior (the Departments) initiated a review of the August 27, 2019, 
final rule (84 FR 44976) that revised portions of the regulations that 
implement section 7 of the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended. 
As a result of that review, the Departments proposed a new rulemaking.
    Summary of Legal Basis: 16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.

[[Page 9417]]

    Timetable:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Action                    Date            FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NPRM................................   06/22/23  88 FR 40753
NPRM Comment Period End.............   08/21/23
Final Action........................   04/00/24
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No.
    Government Levels Affected: Federal.
    Agency Contact: Craig Aubrey, Chief, Division of Environmental 
Review, Ecological Services Program, Department of the Interior, United 
States Fish and Wildlife Service, 5275 Leesburg Pike, MS: ES, Falls 
Church, VA 22041, Phone: 703 358-2442, Fax: 703 358-1800, Email: 
[email protected].
    Related RIN: Related to 0648-BH41, Related to 1018-BC87
    RIN: 1018-BF96

DOI--FWS

125. Endangered Species Act Section 10 Regulations; Enhancement of 
Survival and Incidental Take Permits, Final Rule [1018-BF99]

    Priority: Other Significant.
    Legal Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.
    CFR Citation: 50 CFR 17.
    Legal Deadline: None.
    Abstract: Pursuant to the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (ESA), 
this final rule will revise the regulations at 50 CFR part 17 that 
implement section 10(a)(1)(A) and 10(a)(1)(B) of the ESA. This section 
pertains to, among other things, permit issuance for take of endangered 
and threatened wildlife species. This final rule incorporates and 
addresses public comments received in response to our proposed rule and 
informational webinars held with State agencies and Tribal nations.
    Statement of Need: Pursuant to the Endangered Species Act of 1973 
(ESA), this final rule will revise the regulations at 50 CFR part 17 
that implement section 10 of the ESA. This section pertains to, among 
other things, permit issuance for take of endangered and threatened 
wildlife species.
    Summary of Legal Basis: 16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.
    Timetable:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Action                    Date            FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NPRM................................   02/09/23  88 FR 8380
NPRM Comment Period End.............   04/10/23
Final Action........................   02/00/24
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No.
    Government Levels Affected: Federal.
    Agency Contact: Elizabeth Maclin, Division of Restoration and 
Recovery, Department of the Interior, United States Fish and Wildlife 
Service, Ecological Services, 5275 Leesburg Pike, Falls Church, VA 
22041-3803, Phone: 703 358-2646, Fax: 703 358-1735, Email: 
[email protected].
    RIN: 1018-BF99

DOI--FWS

126. Revision to the Section 4(d) Rule for the African Elephant, Final 
Rule [1018-BG66]

    Priority: Other Significant.
    Legal Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1361 to 1407; 16 U.S.C. 1531 to 1544; 16 
U.S.C. 4201 to 4245
    CFR Citation: 50 CFR 17.40(e).
    Legal Deadline: None.
    Abstract: This rule will revise the current regulations for the 
African elephant (Loxodonta africana) promulgated under section 4(d) of 
the Endangered Species Act (ESA). The purposes are to: (1) Increase 
protection for African elephants in response to the recent rise in 
international trade of live African elephants from range countries by 
establishing ESA permit requirements and enhancement standards for 
trade in live African elephants, (2) clarify the existing enhancement 
requirement during our evaluation of the application for a permit to 
import African elephant sport-hunted trophies, and (3) incorporate a 
Party's designation under the Convention on International Trade in 
Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (CITES) National Legislation 
Project into the decisionmaking process for the import of live African 
elephants, African elephant sport-hunted trophies, and African elephant 
parts and products. FWS conducted a virtual public hearing on January 
5, 2023. The virtual public hearing was conducted in multiple 
languages, and several foreign countries expressed comments. The 
comment period for the proposed rule was extended due to comments 
expressed during the virtual public hearing. In addition to the public 
hearing, the agency has conducted several calls with foreign countries 
that have a stake in the proposed rulemaking.
    Statement of Need: This rule will revise the current regulations 
for the African elephant (Loxodonta africana) promulgated under section 
4(d) of the Endangered Species Act (ESA). The purpose is to: (1) 
Increase protection for African elephants in response to the recent 
rise in international trade of live African elephants from range 
countries by establishing ESA permit requirements and enhancement 
standards for trade in live African elephants, (2) clarify the existing 
enhancement requirement during our evaluation of the application for a 
permit to import African elephant sport-hunted trophies, and (3) 
incorporate a Party's designation under the Convention on International 
Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (CITES) National 
Legislation Project into the decisionmaking process for the import of 
live African elephants, African elephant sport-hunted trophies, and 
African elephant parts and products other than ivory.
    Summary of Legal Basis: 16 U.S.C. 1361 to 1407, 16 U.S.C. 1531 to 
1544, and 16 U.S.C. 4201 to 4245.
    Timetable:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Action                    Date            FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NPRM................................   11/17/22  87 FR 68975
NPRM Comment Period End.............   01/23/23
NPRM Comment Period Extended........   01/17/23  88 FR 2597
NPRM Comment Period Extended End....   03/30/23
Final Action........................   01/00/24
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No.
    Government Levels Affected: None.
    International Impacts: This regulatory action will be likely to 
have international trade and investment effects, or otherwise be of 
international interest.
    Agency Contact: Naimah Aziz, Manager, Division of Management 
Authority, Department of the Interior United States Fish and Wildlife 
Service, International Affairs, 5275 Leesburg Pike MS: IA, Falls 
Church, VA 22041-3808, Phone: 571 218-5019, Email: [email protected].
    RIN: 1018-BG66

DOI--FWS

127. Establishment of a Nonessential Experimental Population of the 
Gray Wolf in the State of Colorado, Final Rule [1018-BG79]

    Priority: Other Significant.
    Legal Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.
    CFR Citation: 50 CFR 17.
    Legal Deadline: None.
    Abstract: FWS will make a final determination on the proposal to 
establish a nonessential experimental population (NEP) of the gray wolf 
(Canis

[[Page 9418]]

lupus) in Colorado, under section 10(j) of the Endangered Species Act 
of 1973, as amended (Act). Establishment of this NEP will facilitate 
the State of Colorado's reintroduction of gray wolves and provide for 
allowable legal incidental taking of the gray wolf within the NEP area. 
The best available data indicate that reintroduction of the gray wolf 
into Colorado is biologically feasible and will promote the 
conservation of the species. We held four public information meetings 
during a 60-day public comment period. This final determination is 
based on consideration of public comments and peer review received in 
response to our proposed rule.
    Statement of Need: FWS will make a final determination on the 
proposal to establish a nonessential experimental population (NEP) of 
the gray wolf (Canis lupus) in Colorado, under section 10(j) of the 
Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended (Act). Establishment of this 
NEP will facilitate the State of Colorado's reintroduction of gray 
wolves and provide for allowable legal incidental taking of the gray 
wolf within the NEP area. The best available data indicate that 
reintroduction of the gray wolf into Colorado is biologically feasible 
and will promote the conservation of the species.
    Summary of Legal Basis: 16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.
    Timetable:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Action                    Date            FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Notification of Intent to Prepare an   07/21/22  87 FR 43489
 EIS.
Comment Period End..................   08/22/22  .......................
NPRM................................   02/17/23  88 FR 10258
NPRM Comment Period End.............   04/18/23  .......................
Notification of Availability of FEIS   09/19/23  88 FR 64399
 and ROD.
Final Action........................   11/00/23  .......................
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No.
    Government Levels Affected: Federal, State.
    Agency Contact: Elizabeth Maclin, Division of Restoration and 
Recovery, Department of the Interior, United States Fish and Wildlife 
Service, Ecological Services, 5275 Leesburg Pike, Falls Church, VA 
22041-3803, Phone: 703 358-2646, Fax: 703 358-1735, Email: 
[email protected].
    RIN: 1018-BG79

DOI--FWS

Completed Actions

128. National Wildlife Refuge System; Station-Specific Hunting and 
Sport Fishing Regulations, 2023-24, Final Rule [1018-BG71]

    Priority: Other Significant.
    Legal Authority: 16 U.S.C. 460k to 460k-4; 16 U.S.C. 668dd to 668ee
    CFR Citation: 50 CFR 32; 50 CFR 71.
    Legal Deadline: None.
    Abstract: This rule revises the FWS station-specific regulations 
and expands hunting and sport fishing opportunities for the 2023-24 
hunting and sport fishing season. This action is part of an annual 
update for the national wildlife refuge system and the national fish 
hatchery system that ensures adequate public notice of openings and 
changes. These changes and openings enhance conservation stewardship 
and outdoor recreation and improve the management of game species and 
their habitat. The FWS operates hunting and sport fishing programs on 
refuges to implement Congressional directives to facilitate compatible 
priority wildlife-dependent recreational opportunities. Although 
hatcheries are not part of the national wildlife refuge system, by 
regulation, the administrative provisions of refuge regulations are 
applied to national fish hatchery areas. The FWS coordinated closely 
with the Association of Fish and Wildlife Agencies when developing the 
rule. The FWS also engaged with stakeholder groups through the Hunting 
and Wildlife Conservation Council for input on hunting and fishing 
programs on FWS lands and waters.
    Statement of Need: This proposed rule would make additions and 
revisions to station-specific regulations and expand hunting and sport 
fishing opportunities for the 2023-24 hunting and sport fishing season. 
This action is part of an annual update for the national wildlife 
refuge system and the national fish hatchery system that ensures 
adequate public notice of openings and changes. These changes and 
openings enhance conservation stewardship and outdoor recreation and 
improve the management of game species and their habitat. The FWS 
operates hunting and sport fishing programs on refuges to implement 
congressional directives to facilitate compatible priority wildlife-
dependent recreational opportunities. Although hatcheries are not part 
of the national wildlife refuge system, by regulation, the 
administrative provisions of refuge regulations are applied to national 
fish hatchery areas.
    Summary of Legal Basis: 16 U.S.C. 460k to 460k-4 and 16 U.S.C. 
668dd to 668ee.
    Timetable:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Action                    Date            FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NPRM................................   06/23/23  88 FR 41058
NPRM Comment Period End.............   08/22/23  .......................
Final Action Effective..............   10/27/23  .......................
Final Action........................   10/30/23  88 FR 74050
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No.
    Government Levels Affected: Federal, Local, State, Tribal.
    Agency Contact: Katherine Harrigan, Sportsmen's Access Coordinator, 
Department of the Interior, United States Fish and Wildlife Service, 
Branch of Conservation Policy and Planning, National Wildlife Refuge 
System, 5275 Leesburg Pike, Falls Church, VA 22041-3803, Phone: 703 
358-2440, Email: [email protected].
    RIN: 1018-BG71

DOI--NATIONAL PARK SERVICE (NPS)

Final Rule Stage

129. Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act Regulations 
[1024-AE19]

    Priority: Other Significant.
    Legal Authority: 25 U.S.C. 3001 et seq.
    CFR Citation: 43 CFR 10.
    Legal Deadline: None.
    Abstract: This final rule revises the Native American Graves 
Protection and Repatriation Act (NAGPRA) implementing regulations. The 
rule eliminates ambiguities, correct inaccuracies, simplifies 
excessively burdensome and complicated requirements, clarifies 
timelines, and removes offensive terminology in the existing 
regulations that have inhibited the respectful repatriation of most 
Native American human remains. This rule simplifies and improves the 
regulatory process for repatriation and thereby advances the goals of 
racial justice, equity, and inclusion. The Department sought Tribal 
government input through communication under Executive Order 13175 
criteria and the Department's consultation policy on meaningful 
communication and collaboration with tribal officials. The Department 
held Consultation sessions with federally recognized Indian Tribes and 
a listening session for present, former, and prospective petitioners.
    Statement of Need: This rule will revise the Native American Graves

[[Page 9419]]

Protection and Repatriation Act (NAGPRA) implementing regulations. The 
rule will eliminate ambiguities, correct inaccuracies, simplify 
excessively burdensome and complicated requirements, clarify timelines, 
and remove offensive terminology in the existing regulations that have 
inhibited the respectful repatriation of most Native American human 
remains. This rule will simplify and improve the regulatory process for 
repatriation and thereby advance the goals of racial justice, equity, 
and inclusion.
    Summary of Legal Basis: 25 U.S.C. 3001 et seq.
    Timetable:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Action                    Date            FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NPRM................................   10/18/22  87 FR 63202
NPRM Comment Period Extended........   01/10/23  88 FR 1344
NPRM Comment Period Extended End....   01/31/23  .......................
Final Rule..........................   12/00/23  .......................
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No.
    Government Levels Affected: Federal.
    Additional Information: Since the passage of NAGPRA in 1990, it has 
been the policy of the United States that human remains of any ancestry 
must always be treated with dignity and respect. Yet in the last 30 
years, less than half of the Native American human remains in 
collections have been repatriated to their traditional caretakers. The 
revisions to the existing regulatory requirements will respect the 
civil rights and sovereignty of Indian Tribes and Native Hawaiians to 
repatriate their ancestors and cultural items. The rule responds to 
regular and repeated requests for regulatory revisions and will reduce 
the regulatory burden on all parties by streamlining requirements in 
accessible language with clear timelines, removing ambiguity, and 
improving efficiency. The rule will likely have a positive net benefit, 
justifying any temporary cost increase.
    URL For More Information: www.nps.gov/nagpra.
    Agency Contact: Melanie O'Brien, National NAGPRA Program Manager, 
Department of the Interior, National Park Service, National NAGPRA 
Program, 1849 C Street NW, Washington, DC 20240, Phone: 202 354-2204, 
Email: melanie_o'[email protected].
    RIN: 1024-AE19

DOI--NPS

130. Alaska; Hunting and Trapping in National Preserves [1024-AE70]

    Priority: Other Significant.
    Legal Authority: 54 U.S.C. 100751
    CFR Citation: 36 CFR 13.
    Legal Deadline: None.
    Abstract: This final rule will amend regulations for sport hunting 
and trapping in national preserves in Alaska. This rule would prohibit 
certain harvest practices, including bear baiting; and prohibit 
predator control or predator reduction on national preserves.
    Statement of Need: This final rule will amend regulations for sport 
hunting and trapping in national preserves in Alaska. This rule would 
prohibit certain harvest practices, including bear baiting; and 
prohibit predator control or predator reduction on national preserves.
    Summary of Legal Basis: 54 U.S.C. 100751.
    Timetable:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Action                    Date            FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NPRM................................   01/09/23  88 FR 1176
NPRM Comment Period End.............   03/10/23  .......................
NPRM Comment Period End Extended....   03/10/23  88 FR 14963
NPRM Comment Period Extended End....   03/27/23  .......................
Final Rule..........................   05/00/24  .......................
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Undetermined.
    Government Levels Affected: Undetermined.
    Agency Contact: Sarah Creachbaum, Alaska Regional Director, 
Department of the Interior, National Park Service, 240 W 5th Avenue, 
Anchorage, AK 99501, Phone: 907 644-3510, Email: 
[email protected].
    RIN: 1024-AE70

DOI--BUREAU OF INDIAN AFFAIRS (BIA)

Proposed Rule Stage

131. Agricultural Leasing of Indian Land [1076-AF66]

    Priority: Other Significant.
    Legal Authority: 25 U.S.C. 380 to 635; 25 U.S.C. 2201 et seq.; 25 
U.S.C. 3701 et seq.; 44 U.S.C. 3101 et seq.
    CFR Citation: 25 CFR 162.
    Legal Deadline: None.
    Abstract: This rule would propose to update provisions addressing 
leasing of trust or restricted land (Indian land) for agricultural 
purposes to reflect updates that have been made to business and 
residential leasing provisions and address outdated provisions.
    Statement of Need: This rule would update provisions addressing 
leasing of trust or restricted land (Indian land) for agricultural 
purposes to reflect updates that have been made to business and 
residential leasing provisions and address outdated provisions.
    Summary of Legal Basis: 25 U.S.C. 380 to 635, 25 U.S.C. 2201 et 
seq., 25 U.S.C. 3701 et seq., and 44 U.S.C. 3101 et seq.
    Timetable:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Action                    Date            FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NPRM................................   03/00/24  .......................
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Undetermined.
    Government Levels Affected: Tribal.
    Agency Contact: Oliver Whaley, Director, Office of Regulatory 
Affairs and Collaborative Action--Indian Affairs, Department of the 
Interior, Bureau of Indian Affairs, 1001 Indian School Road NW, Suite 
229, Albuquerque, NM 87104, Phone: 202 738-6065, Email: 
[email protected].
    RIN: 1076-AF66

DOI--BIA

132. Procedures for Federal Acknowledgment of Indian Tribes [1076-AF67]

    Priority: Other Significant.
    Legal Authority: 5 U.S.C. 301; 25 U.S.C. 2, 9, 479A-1
    CFR Citation: 25 CFR 83.
    Legal Deadline: None.
    Abstract: This proposed rule would respond to recent Federal court 
decisions holding that the Department did not adequately explain its 
regulations prohibiting previously denied petitioners for Federal 
acknowledgment from petitioning again. The Department sought Tribal 
government input through communication under Executive Order 13175 
criteria and the Department's consultation policy on meaningful 
communication and collaboration with tribal officials. The Department 
held Consultation sessions with federally recognized Indian Tribes and 
a listening session for present, former, and prospective petitioners.
    Statement of Need: This final rule will update the regulations in 
response to recent Federal court decisions to address whether 
previously denied petitioners for Federal acknowledgment may petition 
again.

[[Page 9420]]

    Summary of Legal Basis: 5 U.S.C. 301, 25 U.S.C. 2, 25 U.S.C. 9, and 
25 U.S.C. 479A-1.
    Timetable:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Action                    Date            FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NPRM................................   04/27/22  87 FR 24908
NPRM Comment Period End.............   07/06/22  .......................
Second NPRM.........................   02/00/24  .......................
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No.
    Government Levels Affected: None.
    Agency Contact: Oliver Whaley, Director, Office of Regulatory 
Affairs and Collaborative Action--Indian Affairs, Department of the 
Interior, Bureau of Indian Affairs, 1001 Indian School Road, NW, Suite 
229, Albuquerque, NM 87104, Phone: 202 738-6065, Email: 
[email protected].
    George Patton, Department of the Interior, Bureau of Indian 
Affairs, Indian Affairs--RACA, 1001 Indian School Road NW, Suite 312, 
Albuquerque, NM 87104, Phone: 505 563-3805, Email: 
[email protected].
    RIN: 1076-AF67

DOI--BIA

133. Indian Arts and Crafts [1076-AF69]

    Priority: Other Significant.
    Legal Authority: 5 U.S.C. 301; 25 U.S.C. 2; 25 U.S.C. 9; 25 U.S.C. 
305 et seq.
    CFR Citation: 25 CFR 301; 25 CFR 304; 25 CFR 307 to 310.
    Legal Deadline: None.
    Abstract: This proposed rule would modernize the Indian Arts and 
Crafts Board regulations to better meet the objectives of the Indian 
Arts and Crafts Act to promote the economic welfare of the Indian 
Tribes and Indian individuals through the development of Indian arts 
and crafts and the expansion of the market for the products of Indian 
art and craftsmanship. The Department is seeking Tribal government 
input through communication under Executive Order 13175 criteria and 
the Department's policy on meaningful collaboration with Tribal 
officials.
    Statement of Need: This proposed rule would modernize the Indian 
Arts and Crafts Board regulations to better meet the objectives of the 
Indian Arts and Crafts Act to promote the economic welfare of the 
Indian Tribes and Indian individuals through the development of Indian 
arts and crafts and the expansion of the market for the products of 
Indian art and craftsmanship.
    Summary of Legal Basis: 5 U.S.C. 301, 25 U.S.C. 2, 25 U.S.C. 9, and 
25 U.S.C. 305 et seq.
    Timetable:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Action                    Date            FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NPRM................................   03/00/24  .......................
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Undetermined.
    Government Levels Affected: Tribal.
    Agency Contact: Oliver Whaley, Director, Office of Regulatory 
Affairs and Collaborative Action--Indian Affairs, Department of the 
Interior, Bureau of Indian Affairs, 1001 Indian School Road NW, Suite 
229, Albuquerque, NM 87104, Phone: 202 738-6065, Email: 
[email protected].
    RIN: 1076-AF69

DOI--BIA

Final Rule Stage

134. Mining of the Osage Mineral Estate for Oil and Gas [1076-AF59]

    Priority: Other Significant.
    Legal Authority: Pub. L. 59-321; Pub. L. 66-360; Pub. L. 70-919; 
Pub. L. 75-711
    CFR Citation: 25 CFR 226.
    Legal Deadline: None.
    Abstract: This final rule revises the regulations in 25 CFR part 
226 to strengthen the BIA's management of the Osage Mineral Estate and 
improve accounting and production measurement standards; offer 
consistency in production valuation; address inadequate bonding; 
support the implementation of electronic reporting systems; enhance 
accountability; clarify lessees' obligations; prevent waste; promote 
safe and environmentally sound operations; and protect resource values. 
The Department received Tribal government input through consultation 
sessions held pursuant to Executive Order 13175 criteria and the 
Department's policy on meaningful communication and collaboration with 
Tribal officials.
    Statement of Need: This final rule will revise the regulations in 
25 CFR part 226 to advance the purposes of E.O. 14058; and provide for 
the implementation of electronic royalty and production reporting 
systems, reducing administrative burdens on operators, purchasers, and 
the government, and streamlining accounting and reconciliation 
processes.
    Summary of Legal Basis: Public Law 59-321, Public Law 66-360, 
Public Law 70-919, and Public Law 75-711.
    Timetable:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Action                    Date            FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NPRM................................   01/13/23  88 FR 2430
NPRM Comment Period End.............   03/17/23  .......................
Final Action........................   03/00/24  .......................
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No.
    Government Levels Affected: Federal, State, Tribal.
    Agency Contact: Oliver Whaley, Director, Office of Regulatory 
Affairs and Collaborative Action--Indian Affairs, Department of the 
Interior, Bureau of Indian Affairs, 1001 Indian School Road NW, Suite 
229, Albuquerque, NM 87104, Phone: 202 738-6065, Email: 
[email protected].
    RIN: 1076-AF59

DOI--BIA

135. Class III Tribal State Gaming Compact Process [1076-AF68]

    Priority: Other Significant.
    Legal Authority: 5 U.S.C. 301; 25 U.S.C. 2; 25 U.S.C. 9; 25 U.S.C. 
479a-1
    CFR Citation: 25 CFR 293.
    Legal Deadline: None.
    Abstract: This final rule will update procedures the Secretary of 
the Interior (Secretary) uses for reviewing Class III Tribal State 
Gaming compacts submitted for approval to clarify what law the 
Secretary applies and make the process more transparent. The Department 
received Tribal government input through consultations and listening 
sessions held under Executive Order 13175 criteria and the Department's 
policy on meaningful communication and collaboration with Tribal 
officials.
    Statement of Need: This final rule will improve the tranparency of 
procedures taken by the Secretary of the Interior (Secretary) to review 
Class III Tribal State Gaming compacts submitted for approval.
    Summary of Legal Basis: 5 U.S.C. 301, 25 U.S.C. 2, 25 U.S.C. 9, and 
25 U.S.C. 479a-1.
    Timetable:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Action                    Date            FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NPRM................................   12/06/22  87 FR 74916
NPRM Comment Period End.............   03/01/23  .......................
Final Action........................   02/00/24  .......................
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No.
    Government Levels Affected: State, Tribal.

[[Page 9421]]

    Agency Contact: Oliver Whaley, Director, Office of Regulatory 
Affairs and Collaborative Action--Indian Affairs, Department of the 
Interior, Bureau of Indian Affairs, 1001 Indian School Road NW, Suite 
229, Albuquerque, NM 87104, Phone: 202 738-6065, Email: 
[email protected].
    George Patton, Department of the Interior, Bureau of Indian 
Affairs, Indian Affairs--RACA, 1001 Indian School Road NW, Suite 312, 
Albuquerque, NM 87104, Phone: 505 563-3805, Email: 
[email protected].
    RIN: 1076-AF68

DOI--BIA

136. Land Acquisitions [1076-AF71]

    Priority: Other Significant.
    Legal Authority: R.S. 161, 5 U.S.C. 301; 46 Stat. 1106, as amended; 
46 Stat. 1471, as amended; . . .
    CFR Citation: 25 CFR 151.
    Legal Deadline: None.
    Abstract: This rule will advance the purposes of E.O. 13985 and 
address the Department's jurisdiction to acquire land in trust for 
certain Tribes, streamline acquisitions on existing reservations, 
clarify Tribal jurisdiction, and promote Tribal conservation of lands. 
The Department received Tribal government input through consultations 
and listening sessions held under Executive Order 13175 criteria and 
the Department's policy on meaningful communication and collaboration 
with Tribal officials.
    Statement of Need: This rule will advance the purposes of E.O. 
13985 and address the Department's jurisdiction to acquire land in 
trust for certain Tribes, streamline acquisitions on existing 
reservations, clarify Tribal jurisdiction, and promote Tribal 
conservation of lands.
    Summary of Legal Basis: R.S. 161, 5 U.S.C. 301, 46 Stat. 1106, as 
amended, and 46 Stat. 1471, as amended.
    Timetable:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Action                    Date            FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NPRM................................   12/05/22  87 FR 74334
NPRM Comment Period End.............   03/01/23
Final Action........................   02/00/24
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No.
    Government Levels Affected: Federal, Tribal.
    Agency Contact: Oliver Whaley, Director, Office of Regulatory 
Affairs and Collaborative Action--Indian Affairs, Department of the 
Interior, Bureau of Indian Affairs, 1001 Indian School Road NW, Suite 
229, Albuquerque, NM 87104, Phone: 202 738-6065, Email: 
[email protected].
    George Patton, Department of the Interior, Bureau of Indian 
Affairs, Indian Affairs--RACA, 1001 Indian School Road NW, Suite 312, 
Albuquerque, NM 87104, Phone: 505 563-3805, Email: 
[email protected].
    RIN: 1076-AF71

DOI--BUREAU OF OCEAN ENERGY MANAGEMENT (BOEM)

Proposed Rule Stage

137.  Fitness To Operate Standards for Oil and Gas Operators 
and Lessees on the Outer Continental Shelf [1010-AE21]

    Priority: Other Significant.
    Unfunded Mandates: Undetermined.
    Legal Authority: 43 U.S.C. 1331, OCS Lands Act
    CFR Citation: 30 CFR 550; 30 CFR 556.
    Legal Deadline: None.
    Abstract: In response to Executive Order 14008, Tackling the 
Climate Crisis at Home and Abroad, the Department of the Interior 
prepared Report on the Federal Oil and Gas Leasing Program. The report 
stated that the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management, through a new 
``Fitness to Operate'' standard, would establish safety, environmental, 
and financial responsibilities for companies to meet in order to 
operate on the U.S. Outer Continental Shelf.
    This rule would establish safety, environmental, and financial 
responsibilities for oil and gas companies to meet in order to operate 
on the U.S. Outer Continental Shelf.
    Statement of Need: In response to Executive Order 14008, Tackling 
the Climate Crisis at Home and Abroad, the Department of the Interior 
prepared a report on the Federal Oil and Gas Leasing Program. The 
report stated that the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management, through a new 
``Fitness to Operate'' standard, would establish safety, environmental, 
and financial responsibilities for companies to meet in order to 
operate on the U.S. Outer Continental Shelf.
    This rule would establish safety, environmental, and financial 
responsibilities for oil and gas companies to meet in order to operate 
on the U.S. Outer Continental Shelf.
    Summary of Legal Basis: 43 U.S.C. 1331, OCS Lands Act.
    Timetable:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Action                    Date            FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NPRM................................   09/00/24
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Undetermined.
    Small Entities Affected: Businesses.
    Government Levels Affected: Tribal.
    Federalism: Undetermined.
    Agency Contact: Kelley Spence, Department of the Interior, Bureau 
of Ocean Energy Management, 1849 C Street NW, Washington, DC 20240, 
Phone: 984 298-7345, Email: [email protected].
    RIN: 1010-AE21

DOI--BOEM

Final Rule Stage

138. Renewable Energy Modernization Rule [1010-AE04]

    Priority: Section 3(f)(1) Significant. Major under 5 U.S.C. 801.
    Legal Authority: 43 U.S.C. 1337(p)
    CFR Citation: 30 CFR 585.
    Legal Deadline: None.
    Abstract: This final rule will clarify BOEM's renewable energy 
regulations facilitating offshore renewable energy development in a 
manner that is safe, environmentally sound, and provides fair return to 
U.S. taxpayers. This action also helps meet commitments of Executive 
Order 14008, Tackling the Climate Crisis at Home and Abroad, by 
supporting renewable energy production and in offshore waters.
    BOEM received a range of comments on the NPRM during the public 
comment period. In addition, BOEM held multiple staff-level and 
Government-to-Government Tribal Consultations. This final rule will 
address feedback received from public comment and Tribal Consultations.
    Statement of Need: This final rule will clarify BOEM's renewable 
energy regulations facilitating offshore renewable energy development 
in a manner that is safe, environmentally sound, and provides fair 
return to U.S. taxpayers. This action also helps meet commitments of 
Executive Order 14008, Tackling the Climate Crisis at Home and Abroad 
by supporting renewable energy production and in offshore waters.
    Summary of Legal Basis: 43 U.S.C. 1337(p).
    Timetable:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Action                    Date            FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NPRM................................   01/30/23  88 FR 5968
NPRM Comment Period End.............   03/31/23

[[Page 9422]]

 
NPRM Comment Period Extension.......   04/03/23  88 FR 19578
NPRM Comment Period Extension End...   05/01/23
Final Rule..........................   04/00/24
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Undetermined.
    Government Levels Affected: Tribal.
    Agency Contact: Karen Thundiyil, Chief, Office of Regulations, 
Department of the Interior, Bureau of Ocean Energy Management, 1849 C 
Street NW, Washington, DC 20240, Phone: 202 742-0970, Email: 
[email protected].
    Related RIN: Merged with 1010-AD89, Merged with 1010-AD91
    RIN: 1010-AE04

DOI--BOEM

139. Protection of Marine Archaeological Resources [1010-AE11]

    Priority: Other Significant. Major under 5 U.S.C. 801.
    Legal Authority: NHPA-54 U.S.C. 300101 et seq.
    CFR Citation: 30 CFR 550.
    Legal Deadline: None.
    Abstract: This final rule will revise when lessees and operators 
would need to conduct archaeological surveys. It would clarify when 
operators would submit an archaeological report with their applications 
and clarify the source and extent of the data utilized.
    Statement of Need: This final rule will revise when lessees and 
operators would need to conduct archaeological surveys. It would 
clarify when operators would submit an archaeological report with their 
applications and clarify the source and extent of the data utilized.
    Summary of Legal Basis: 30 CFR 550.
    Timetable:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Action                    Date            FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NPRM................................   02/15/23  88 FR 9797
NPRM Comment Period End.............   04/17/23
Final Rule..........................   05/00/24
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No.
    Small Entities Affected: No.
    Government Levels Affected: None.
    Agency Contact: Peter Meffert, Regulatory Analyst, Department of 
the Interior, Bureau of Ocean Energy Management, 45600 Woodland Road, 
Sterling, VA 20166, Phone: 703 787-1610, Email: [email protected].
    RIN: 1010-AE11

DOI--BOEM

140. Risk Management and Financial Assurance for OCS Lease and Grant 
Obligations [1010-AE14]

    Priority: Section 3(f)(1) Significant. Major under 5 U.S.C. 801.
    Legal Authority: OCSLA-43 U.S.C. 1331 et seq.
    CFR Citation: 30 CFR 550; 30 CFR 556.
    Legal Deadline: None.
    Abstract: This final rule will modify the evaluation criteria for 
determining whether oil, gas and sulfur lessees, right-of-use and 
easement grant holders, and pipeline right-of-way grant holders may be 
required to provide bonds or other financial assurance, above the 
regulatorily prescribed amounts for base bonds, to ensure compliance 
with their Outer Continental Shelf obligations.
    We held a Government-to-Government consultation with the Indian 
Tribal Nation during the development of the NPRM and expect to have 
another consultation on the final rule. This final rule will address 
feedback received from public comment period and Tribal consultations.
    Statement of Need: This rule will modify the evaluation criteria 
for determining whether oil, gas and sulfur lessees, right-of-use and 
easement grant holders, and pipeline right-of-way grant holders may be 
required to provide bonds or other financial assurance, above the 
regulatorily prescribed amounts for base bonds, to ensure compliance 
with their Outer Continental Shelf obligations.
    Summary of Legal Basis: OCSLA--43 U.S.C. 1331 et seq.
    Timetable:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Action                    Date            FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NPRM................................   06/29/23  88 FR 42136
NPRM Comment Period Extension.......   08/25/23  88 FR 58173
NPRM Comment Period End.............   08/28/23
NPRM Comment Period Extension End...   09/07/23
Final Rule..........................   04/00/24
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Undetermined.
    Government Levels Affected: Undetermined.
    Agency Contact: Kelley Spence, Program Analyst, Department of the 
Interior, Bureau of Ocean Energy Management, 1849 C Street NW, 
Washington, DC 20240, Phone: 948 298-7345, Email: 
[email protected].
    Related RIN: Split from 1082-AA02
    RIN: 1010-AE14

DOI--OFFICE OF SURFACE MINING RECLAMATION AND ENFORCEMENT (OSMRE)

Proposed Rule Stage

141. Emergency Preparedness for Impoundments [1029-AC82]

    Priority: Other Significant.
    Legal Authority: 30 U.S.C. 1201
    CFR Citation: 30 CFR 780; 30 CFR 784; 30 CFR 816; 30 CFR 817.
    Legal Deadline: None.
    Abstract: This proposed rule would incorporate certain aspects of 
the Federal Guidelines for Dam Safety (Federal Guidelines) into OSMRE's 
existing regulations. This proposed rule would relate to emergency 
preparedness for impounding structures and propose to include 
provisions for Emergency Action Plans (EAPs) and After-Action Reports 
(AARs) that are consistent with the Federal Guidelines. Also, OSMRE may 
add new provisions to the regulations explaining the EAP and AAR 
requirements and aligning the classification of impoundments with 
industry and other government agency standards.
    Statement of Need: This proposed rule would incorporate certain 
aspects of the Federal Guidelines for Dam Safety (Federal Guidelines) 
into OSMRE's existing regulations. This proposed rule would relate to 
emergency preparedness for impounding structures and propose to include 
provisions for Emergency Action Plans (EAPs) and After-Action Reports 
(AARs) that are consistent with the Federal Guidelines. Also, OSMRE may 
add new provisions to the regulations explaining the EAP and AAR 
requirements and aligning the classification of impoundments with 
industry and other government agency standards.
    Summary of Legal Basis: 30 U.S.C. 1201.
    Timetable:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Action                    Date            FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NPRM................................   01/00/24
NPRM Comment Period End.............   02/00/24
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Undetermined.
    Government Levels Affected: Undetermined.
    Federalism: Undetermined.
    Agency Contact: Khalia Boyd, Regulatory Analyst, Department of the 
Interior, Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement, 1951 
Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20240, Phone: 202 208-2823, 
Email: [email protected].
    RIN: 1029-AC82


[[Page 9423]]



DOI--OSMRE

Final Rule Stage

142. Ten-Day Notices [1029-AC81]

    Priority: Other Significant.
    Legal Authority: Pub. L. 95-87; 30 U.S.C. 1211(c)(2)
    CFR Citation: 30 CFR 733; 30 CFR 842.
    Legal Deadline: None.
    Abstract: The final rule would amend OSMRE's regulations on ten-day 
notices that went into effect on December 24, 2020. The final rule 
would amend the existing rules about when OSMRE sends ten-day notices 
to State regulatory authorities regarding possible SMCRA violations.
    Statement of Need: The final rule would amend OSMRE's regulations 
on ten-day notices that went into effect on December 24, 2020. The 
final rule would amend the existing rules about when OSMRE sends ten-
day notices to State regulatory authorities regarding possible Surface 
Mining Control and Reclamation Act violations.
    Summary of Legal Basis: Public Law 95-87 and 30 U.S.C. 1211(c)(2).
    Timetable:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Action                    Date            FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NPRM................................   04/25/23  88 FR 24944
NPRM Comment Period End.............   06/26/23
Final Action........................   02/00/24
Final Action Effective..............   03/00/24
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No.
    Small Entities Affected: No.
    Government Levels Affected: State.
    Agency Contact: Khalia Boyd, Regulatory Analyst, Department of the 
Interior, Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement, 1951 
Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20240, Phone: 202 208-2823, 
Email: [email protected].
    RIN: 1029-AC81

DOI--BUREAU OF RECLAMATION (RB)

Final Rule Stage

143. Public Conduct on Bureau of Reclamation Facilities, Lands and 
Waterbodies [1006-AA58]

    Priority: Other Significant.
    Legal Authority: 43 U.S.C. 373
    CFR Citation: 43 CFR 423.
    Legal Deadline: None.
    Abstract: The revisions to this rule clarify regulations that 
maintain law and order and protect persons and property on Bureau of 
Reclamation facilities, lands, and waterbodies. The rule revises 
existing definitions for the use of aircraft and the possession of 
firearms; updates regulations on camping, swimming, and winter 
recreation for the wide range of circumstances found across Bureau of 
Reclamation facilities, lands, and waterbodies; and clarifies the 
permitting of memorials and reburials on Bureau of Reclamation lands.
    Statement of Need: This rule will revise existing definitions for 
the use of aircraft and the possession of firearms; update regulations 
on camping, swimming, and winter recreation for the wide range of 
circumstances found across Bureau of Reclamation facilities, lands, and 
waterbodies; and will clarify the permitting of memorials and reburials 
on Bureau of Reclamation lands.
    Summary of Legal Basis: 43 U.S.C. 373.
    Timetable:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Action                    Date            FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NPRM................................   02/16/23  88 FR 10070
NPRM Comment Period End.............   04/17/23
Final Action........................   11/00/23
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No.
    Small Entities Affected: No.
    Government Levels Affected: None.
    Agency Contact: Jill Nagode, Regulatory Contact, Department of the 
Interior, Bureau of Reclamation, Denver Federal Center, P.O. Box 25007, 
Building 67, Denver, CO 80225, Phone: 303 445-2055, Email: 
[email protected]. RIN: 1006-AA58

DOI--BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT (BLM)

Proposed Rule Stage

144. Closure and Restriction Orders [1004-AE89]

    Priority: Other Significant. Major status under 5 U.S.C. 801 is 
undetermined.
    Legal Authority: 43 U.S.C. 1701 et seq.; 43 U.S.C. 315a; 16 U.S.C. 
1281c; 16 U.S.C. 877 et seq.; 16 U.S.C. 4601-6a; 16 U.S.C. 1241 et 
seq.; 16 U.S.C. 7913; 16 U.S.C. 1338; . . .
    CFR Citation: None.
    Legal Deadline: None.
    Abstract: The proposed rule would revise the visitor services 
regulations to enhance the BLM's ability to issue closure and 
restriction orders. The proposed rule would also make BLM's regulations 
more consistent with other Federal land management agencies' closure 
and restriction authorities.
    Statement of Need: This proposed rule would allow the Bureau of 
Land Management (BLM) to better protect persons, property and public 
lands and resources by allowing the agency to close or restrict the use 
of public lands in a more timely manner. The rule would also make the 
BLM's regulations more consistent with other Federal land management 
agencies' closure and restriction authorities.
    Summary of Legal Basis: 43 U.S.C. 1701 et seq., 43 U.S.C. 315a, 16 
U.S.C. 1281c, 16 U.S.C. 877 et seq., 16 U.S.C. 4601-6a, 16 U.S.C. 1241 
et seq., 16 U.S.C. 7913, and 16 U.S.C. 1338.
    Timetable:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Action                    Date            FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NPRM................................   11/00/23
Final Action........................   04/00/24
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No.
    Small Entities Affected: No.
    Government Levels Affected: None.
    Agency Contact: Tom Heinlein, Assistant Director, National 
Landscape Conservation System, Department of the Interior, Bureau of 
Land Management, 760 Horizon Drive, Grand Junction, CO 81506, Phone: 
970 256-4954, Email: blm.gov">theinlein@blm.gov.
    RIN: 1004-AE89

DOI--BLM

145. Management and Protection of the National Petroleum Reserve in 
Alaska (Section 610 Review) [1004-AE95]

    Priority: Other Significant. Major status under 5 U.S.C. 801 is 
undetermined.
    Legal Authority: Naval Petroleum Reserves Production Act of 1976 
(42 U.S.C. 6501 to 6508)
    CFR Citation: 43 CFR subpart 2361.
    Legal Deadline: None.
    Abstract: This proposed rule would assure maximum protection of 
Special Areas in the NPR-A pursuant to and consistent with the 
provisions of the Naval Petroleum Reserves Production Act of 1976 (90 
Stat. 303; 42 U.S.C. 6501 et seq.), Alaska National Interest Lands 
Conservation Act, and other applicable authorities.
    Statement of Need: The final rule will assure maximum protection of 
Special Areas in the NPR-A pursuant to and consistent with the 
provisions of the Naval Petroleum Reserves Production Act of 1976 (90 
Stat. 303; 42 U.S.C. 6501 et seq.), Alaska National Interest Lands

[[Page 9424]]

Conservation Act, and other applicable authorities.
    Summary of Legal Basis: Naval Petroleum Reserves Production Act of 
1976 (42 U.S.C. 6501 to 6508).
    Timetable:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Action                    Date            FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NPRM................................   09/08/23  88 FR 62025
NPRM Comment Period End.............   11/07/23
Final Action........................   03/00/24
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Undetermined.
    Government Levels Affected: Tribal.
    Federalism: This action may have federalism implications as defined 
in E.O. 13132.
    Agency Contact: Kyle W. Moorman, Division Chief for Regulatory 
Affairs and Directives, Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land 
Management, 1849 C Street NW, Washington, DC 20240, Phone: 202 527-
2433, Email: blm.gov">kmoorman@blm.gov.
    RIN: 1004-AE95

DOI--BLM

Final Rule Stage

146. Update of the Communications Uses Program, Right-of-Way Cost 
Recovery Fee Schedules and Section 512 of FLPMA for Rights-of-Way 
[1004-AE60]

    Priority: Other Significant.
    Legal Authority: 30 U.S.C. 185 and 189; 43 U.S.C. 1733; 43 U.S.C. 
1740; 43 U.S.C. 1763
    CFR Citation: 43 CFR 2800; 43 CFR 2860; 43 CFR 2880; 43 CFR 2920.
    Legal Deadline: None.
    Abstract: The BLM is proposing to amend its right-of-way 
regulations to improve access to broadband communications and update 
the cost recovery fee schedules for ROW work activities. Additionally, 
this rule will implement vegetation management requirements to address 
fire risk from and to power line ROWs on public lands and national 
forests.
    Statement of Need: This proposed rule would address issues relating 
to (1) Idle iron by adding a definition of this term to clarify that it 
applies to idle wells and structures on active leases; (2) abandonment 
in place of subsea infrastructure by adding regulations addressing when 
BSEE may approve decommissioning-in-place instead of removal of certain 
subsea equipment; and (3) other operational considerations.
    Summary of Legal Basis: 30 U.S.C. 185 and 189, 43 U.S.C. 1733, 43 
U.S.C. 1740, and 43 U.S.C. 1763.
    Timetable:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Action                    Date            FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NPRM................................   11/07/22  87 FR 67306
NPRM Comment Period End.............   01/06/23
Final Action........................   12/00/23
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No.
    Small Entities Affected: No.
    Government Levels Affected: Federal.
    Agency Contact: Dominica VanKoten, Division Chief, Lands, HQ-35- 
(Lands, Realty, and Cadastral), Department of the Interior, Bureau of 
Land Management, 301 Dinosaur Trail, Santa Fe, NM 87508, Phone: 571 
266-9585, Email: blm.gov">dvankote@blm.gov.
    Related RIN: Merged with 1004-AE69
    RIN: 1004-AE60

DOI--BLM

147. Rights-of-Way, Leasing and Operations for Renewable Energy [1004-
AE78]

    Priority: Other Significant. Major under 5 U.S.C. 801.
    Legal Authority: 30 U.S.C. ch. 23; 43 U.S.C. 1733; 43 U.S.C. 1740; 
43 U.S.C. 1763; 30 U.S.C. 185 and 189; Pub. L. 109-58; Division Z, Pub. 
L. 116-260; E.O. 14008; . . .
    CFR Citation: None.
    Legal Deadline: None.
    Abstract: The proposed rule would revise the BLM's regulations for 
rights-of-way, leasing, and operations related to activities associated 
with solar and wind energy development. The Energy Act of 2020 and 
section 207 of Executive Order 14008 prioritize the Department of the 
Interior's need to improve permitting activities and processes to 
facilitate increased renewable energy permitting and production on 
public lands.
    Statement of Need: The principal purpose of these amendments is to 
facilitate responsible solar and wind energy development on public 
lands managed by the BLM. The rule will adjust acreage rents and 
capacity fees for solar and wind energy, provide the BLM with more 
flexibility in how it processes applications for solar and wind energy 
development inside designated leasing areas, and update agency criteria 
on prioritizing solar and wind applications. The rule will also make 
technical changes, corrections, and clarifications to the existing 
right-of-way regulations.
    Summary of Legal Basis: 30 U.S.C. ch. 23, 43 U.S.C. 1733, 43 U.S.C. 
1740, 43 U.S.C. 1763, 30 U.S.C. 185 and 189, Public Law 109-58 Division 
Z, Public Law 116-260, E.O. 14008.
    Timetable:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Action                    Date            FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NPRM................................   06/16/23  88 FR 39726
NPRM Comment Period End.............   08/15/23
Final Action........................   04/00/24
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No.
    Government Levels Affected: Undetermined.
    Agency Contact: Ben Gruber, Deputy Assistant Director, Energy, 
Minerals, and Realty Mgmt., Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land 
Management, 1849 C Street NW, Washington, DC 20240, Phone: 951 269-
9548, Email: blm.gov">begruber@blm.gov.
    RIN: 1004-AE78

DOI--BLM

148. Waste Prevention, Production Subject to Royalties, and Resource 
Conservation [1004-AE79]

    Priority: Other Significant. Major under 5 U.S.C. 801.
    Legal Authority: 30 U.S.C. 181 et seq.; 30 U.S.C. 1701 et seq.; 43 
U.S.C. 1701 et seq.; 25 U.S.C. 396a et seq.; 25 U.S.C. 2101 et seq.; 25 
U.S.C. 396; E.O. 13990; E.O. 14008; . . .
    CFR Citation: None.
    Legal Deadline: None.
    Abstract: This rule proposes updates to the BLM's existing rules 
governing the venting and flaring of natural gas (methane) from onshore 
Federal and Indian oil and gas leases. The rulemaking will address the 
priorities associated with Executive Order 14008 to address tackling 
the climate crisis. Per Executive Order 13990, the rule will address 
reducing methane emissions in the oil and gas sector.
    Statement of Need: The final rule will ensure that companies do not 
waste valuable Federal mineral resources in their extraction processes 
and would further address the priorities associated with Executive 
Order 14008, ``Tackling the Climate Crisis at Home and Abroad.''
    Summary of Legal Basis: 30 U.S.C. 181 et seq., 30 U.S.C. 1701 et 
seq., 43 U.S.C. 1701 et seq., 25 U.S.C. 396a et seq., 25 U.S.C. 2101 et 
seq., 25 U.S.C. 396, E.O. 13990, and E.O. 14008.
    Timetable:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Action                    Date            FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NPRM................................   11/30/22  87 FR 73588
NPRM Comment Period End.............   01/30/23

[[Page 9425]]

 
Final Action........................   01/00/24
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No.
    Small Entities Affected: Businesses.
    Government Levels Affected: None.
    Agency Contact: Ben Gruber, Deputy Assistant Director, Energy, 
Minerals, and Realty Mgmt., Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land 
Management, 1849 C Street NW, Washington, DC 20240, Phone: 951 269-
9548, Email: blm.gov">begruber@blm.gov.
    RIN: 1004-AE79

DOI--BLM

149. Fluid Mineral Leases and Leasing Process [1004-AE80]

    Priority: Other Significant. Major status under 5 U.S.C. 801 is 
undetermined.
    Legal Authority: 30 U.S.C. 181 et seq.; 30 U.S.C. 351 to 359 et 
seq.; 43 U.S.C. 1701 et seq.; 30 U.S.C. 521 to 531 et seq.; 90 Stat. 
1083 to 1092; 30 U.S.C. 1701 et seq.; 92 Stat. 2073 to 2075; Pub. L. 
102-486; Pub. L. 109-58; 25 U.S.C. 396; 25 U.S.C. 396a-g; 25 U.S.C. 
2101 to 2108; 30 U.S.C. 1201 et seq.; 42 U.S.C. 7101 et seq.; 42 U.S.C. 
4321 et seq.; E.O. 14008; . . .
    CFR Citation: None.
    Legal Deadline: None.
    Abstract: The proposed rule would revise the BLM's oil and gas 
regulations to update fees, rents, royalties, and bonding requirements 
related to oil and gas leasing, development, and production. The 
proposed rule would also update the BLM's process for leasing to ensure 
the protection and proper stewardship of the public lands, including 
addressing impacts associated with fossil fuel activities and ensuring 
a fair return to taxpayers.
    Statement of Need: This rule will revise the BLM's oil and gas 
regulations to update the fees, rents, royalties, and bonding 
requirements related to oil and gas leasing, development, and 
production pursuant to the Inflation Reduction Act (Pub. L. 117-169). 
The rule will also update the BLM's process for leasing to ensure the 
protection and proper stewardship of the public lands, including 
addressing impacts associated with fossil fuel activities and ensuring 
a fair return to taxpayers.
    Summary of Legal Basis: 30 U.S.C. 181 et seq., 30 U.S.C. 351 to 359 
et seq., 43 U.S.C. 1701 et seq., 30 U.S.C. 521 to 531 et seq., 90 Stat. 
1083 to 1092, 30 U.S.C. 1701 et seq., 92 Stat. 2073 to 2075, Public Law 
102-486, Public Law 109-58, 25 U.S.C. 396, 25 U.S.C. 396a-g, 25 U.S.C. 
2101 to 2108, 30 U.S.C. 1201 et seq., 42 U.S.C. 7101 et seq., 42 U.S.C. 
4321 et seq., and E.O. 14008.
    Timetable:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Action                    Date            FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NPRM................................   07/24/23  88 FR 47562
NPRM Comment Period End.............   09/22/23
Final Action........................   04/00/24
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No.
    Small Entities Affected: Businesses.
    Government Levels Affected: None.
    Agency Contact: Nick Douglas, Assistant Director, Energy, Minerals, 
and Realty Management Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land 
Management, 760 Horizon Drive, Grand Junction, CO 81506, Phone: 970 
256-4918, Email: blm.gov">ndouglas@blm.gov.
    Ben Gruber, Deputy Assistant Director, Energy, Minerals, and Realty 
Mgmt., Department of the Interior Bureau of Land Management, 1849 C 
Street NW, Washington, DC 20240, Phone: 951 269-9548, Email: 
blm.gov">begruber@blm.gov.
    RIN: 1004-AE80

DOI--BLM

150. Conservation and Landscape Health (Section 610 Review) [1004-AE92]

    Priority: Other Significant.
    Unfunded Mandates: Undetermined.
    Legal Authority: 43 U.S.C. 1732(a)
    CFR Citation: 43 CFR 6000; 43 CFR 1610.
    Legal Deadline: None.
    Abstract: The proposed rule would clarify and support the 
principles of multiple use and sustained yield in the management of the 
public lands, incorporating climate resiliency and restoration through 
conservation and preservation in the management of the public lands 
pursuant to the Federal Land Policy and Management Act and other 
relevant authorities. The proposed rule is within 43 CFR 6000 and would 
provide an overarching framework that would cover multiple resource 
areas to ensure land health and sustained yield.
    Statement of Need: The principles of multiple use and sustained 
yield management govern the BLM's stewardship of America's public 
lands. This proposed rule interprets and implements a vital component 
of the BLM's multiple use and sustained yield mission: addressing 
landscape resilience and using restoration and conservation as tools to 
ensure sustainable and productive natural resources for future 
generations. Identifying tools, standards, and procedures to 
appropriately achieve sustained yield is particularly important to 
ensure that the BLM can pursue is multiple use mission and maintain 
sustained yield in the face of the challenges posed by climate change, 
drought, fire, land use changes, and other factors impacting the health 
of land, waters, and ecosystems. This proposed rule addresses those 
concerns, defines conservation, and provides an operational definition 
of sustained yield in the context of changing landscapes. This rule 
also provides a framework for decision-making to appropriately 
implement conservation, including by identifying best practices to 
conserve and restore lands and waters to desired conditions based on 
land health standards and best available science. These proposed 
regulations will promote restoration opportunities with significant 
public involvement, honor the Bureau's commitment to work closely with 
Tribes and other governmental entities, and respond more effectively to 
changing resource conditions and increasing demands on public lands and 
waters. Further, this rule will expand Areas of Critical Environmental 
Concern regulations to affirm statutory requirements.
    Summary of Legal Basis: Federal Land Policy and Management Act 
(FLPMA) provides BLM authority for the protection of ecological values 
(section 102(8)), the preservation of certain lands in their natural 
condition (section 102(8)), and the establishment of fish and wildlife 
development and utilization as one of six principal or major uses of 
public lands (section 103(l)). These mandates in FLPMA provide BLM with 
general authority to conserve ecosystems across its 245 million acres 
of public lands. FLPMA section 302(a), provides: The Secretary shall 
manage the public lands under principles of multiple use and sustained 
yield . . . except that where a tract of such public land has been 
dedicated to specific uses according to any other provisions of law it 
shall be managed in accordance with such law 43 U.S.C. 1732(a) 
(emphasis added). The multiple use and sustained yield principles in 
section 102(a)(8) authorizes the BLM to implement the policies set 
forth in this rulemaking effort.
    Alternatives: N/A.
    Anticipated Cost and Benefits: TBD.
    Risks: TBD.

[[Page 9426]]

    Timetable:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Action                    Date            FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NPRM................................   04/03/23  88 FR 19583
NPRM Comment Period End.............   06/20/23
Final Action........................   01/00/24
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Undetermined.
    Government Levels Affected: None.
    Federalism: Undetermined.
    Agency Contact: Brian St. George, Acting Assistant Director, 
Directorate of Resources and Planning, Department of the Interior, 
Bureau of Land Management, 1849 C Street NW, Washington, DC 20240, 
Phone: 202 239-3741, Email: blm.gov">bstgeorge@blm.gov.
    RIN: 1004-AE92

BILLING CODE 4334-63-P

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE (DOJ)--FALL 2023

Statement of Regulatory Priorities

    The mission of the Department of Justice is to uphold the rule of 
law, to keep our country safe, and to protect civil rights. In carrying 
out this mission, the Department is guided by the core values of 
integrity, fairness, and commitment to promoting the impartial 
administration of justice--including for those in historically 
underserved, vulnerable, or marginalized communities. Consistent with 
its mission and values, the Department is prioritizing activities that 
protect the public against foreign and domestic threats, strengthen 
enforcement of civil rights laws, defend against domestic and 
international terrorism, combat gun violence, prevent and control 
crime, and reform criminal justice systems. Because the Department of 
Justice is primarily a law enforcement agency, not a regulatory agency, 
it carries out its principal investigative, prosecutorial, and other 
enforcement activities through means other than the regulatory process.
    Regulatory action is, however, a significant aspect of the law 
enforcement mission of the Department. The regulatory priorities of the 
Department include initiatives in the areas of criminal justice reform, 
immigration, civil rights, and gun violence reduction, and are 
effectuated through rulemaking by the various components of the 
Department. These initiatives, as well as others important to 
components' accomplishing key law enforcement priorities, are 
summarized below.
    In addition to the public participation and outreach efforts of the 
Department described below in the Civil Rights Division section, the 
Abstracts of various Justice rulemakings also include descriptions of 
the Department's efforts in these areas including: 1105-AB69 ``OVW 
Special Tribal Criminal Jurisdiction Reimbursement''; 1105-AB40 
``Telemedicine Prescribing of Controlled Substances When the 
Practitioner and the Patient Have not had a Prior In-Person Medical 
Evaluation''; 1117-AB60 ``Providing Controlled Substances to Ocean 
Vessels''; 1117-AB63 ``Termination of Registration Upon Discontinuation 
of Business or Change of Ownership''; 1117-AB69 ``Operation of 
Automated Dispensing Systems at Long Term Care Facilities by Hospital/
Clinic Pharmacies''; 1117-AB72 ``Changes to a Prescription''; 1120-AB05 
``District of Columbia Educational Good Time Credit''; 1120-AB67 ``Use 
of Chemical Agents or Other Less-Than-Lethal Force in Immediate Use of 
Force Situations''; 1120-AB71 ``Inmate Discipline Program: Disciplinary 
Segregation and Prohibited Act Code Changes''; and 1121-AA89 ``Updating 
Office for Victims of Crime Programs Regulations.''

Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF)

    ATF issues regulations to enforce and implement federal laws 
relating to the manufacture, importation, sale, and other commerce in 
firearms and explosives. Such regulations are designed to promote the 
ATF mission to curb illegal traffic in, and criminal use of, firearms 
and explosives, and to assist state, local, Tribal, territorial, and 
other federal law enforcement agencies in reducing violent crime.
    ATF will continue, as a priority during fiscal year 2024, to seek 
modifications to its regulations governing commerce in firearms and 
explosives in furtherance of these important goals.
    The Department is undertaking a rulemaking to amend ATF's 
regulations to conform with the changes made by Congress in the 
Bipartisan Safer Communities Act (Pub. L. 117-159) and parts of the 
Consolidated Appropriations Act of 2022 (Pub. L. 117-109), which 
included the NICS Denial Notification Act of 2022 (RIN 1140-AA57). The 
Department has also proposed to amend ATF's regulations to further 
clarify what it means for a person to be ``engaged in the business'' of 
dealing in firearms, and to have the intent to ``predominantly earn a 
profit'' from the sale or disposition of firearms (RIN 1140-AA58). ATF 
is undertaking an amendment to 27 CFR part 555 to require that persons 
who store explosive materials annually notify the local authority that 
has jurisdiction for fire safety in the locality in which the explosive 
materials are being stored of the type, quantity, and location of each 
site where the explosive materials are being stored (RIN 1140-AA51).

Bureau of Prisons (BOP)

    BOP issues regulations to enforce the Federal laws relating to its 
mission: to protect public safety by ensuring that federal offenders 
serve their sentences of imprisonment in facilities that are safe, 
humane, cost-efficient, and appropriately secure, and to provide 
reentry programming to ensure their successful return to the community.
    The First Step Act (FSA) of 2018, Public Law 115-391, 132 Stat. 
5194 (2018) has brought a host of regulatory changes for BOP. To date, 
BOP has successfully enacted FSA-related regulations (1) to enable 
eligible inmates to earn Time Credits towards prerelease custody or 
early transfer to supervised release, and (2) to modify the amount of 
Good Time Credit to which eligible inmates are entitled. BOP's next 
FSA-related regulatory measure involves publishing a Notice of Proposed 
Rulemaking (NPRM) titled the Reservation of Funds for Reentry Under the 
First Step Act. This rule proposes to implement a specific FSA 
provision requiring BOP to reserve a portion of the compensation 
inmates would otherwise receive for working to assist these inmates 
with costs associated with release from prison. BOP anticipates the 
NPRM's publication in the Federal Register by the end of 2023.
    Another important BOP regulatory measure involving management of 
inmate funds is the Inmate Financial Responsibility Program (IFRP). On 
January 10, 2023, BOP published an NPRM titled Inmate Financial 
Responsibility Program: Procedures, which proposes to withhold a 
portion of inmate work pay and money received by outside sources in 
order to pay restitution obligations toward victims and satisfy other 
lawful obligations. Specifically, the rule proposes withholding 75% of 
all community-source deposits in inmates' commissary account; 
withholding 50% of pay for inmates in grades 1 through 4 of UNICOR; 
withholding 25% of pay for inmates in grade 5 of UNICOR and inmates 
receiving performance pay for institution work; removing two penalties 
for failure to participate in the program; and adding one penalty for 
an inmate's refusal to participate. BOP

[[Page 9427]]

continues to carefully review and thoughtfully consider the 1,300 
public comments received in response to the NPRM.
    In addition, BOP continues to actively pursue several proposed 
rules to update the inmate discipline program; revise technical 
sections of the regulation regarding filing of tort claims; clarify use 
of force policy for less-than-lethal munitions; and modify clinical 
guidelines related to infectious disease testing for affected inmates. 
Finally, BOP continues to explore procedural avenues to finalize 
interim final rules related to, for example, (1) exceptions to the 
filing requirements for certain administrative remedies, and (2) 
calculation of educational good time credit for eligible District of 
Columbia inmates.

Civil Rights Division (CRT)

    CRT works to uphold the civil and constitutional rights of all 
persons in the United States, particularly some of the most vulnerable 
members of our society. Consistent with this mission, CRT plans to 
engage in five separate rulemakings on disability rights.
    First, CRT plans to adopt technical standards for public entities' 
websites under title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) to 
help public entities meet their existing ADA obligations to ensure 
their websites are accessible to people with disabilities (RIN 1190-
AA79). The Department issued a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking on this 
topic in August 2023. To promote public engagement with the rulemaking, 
the Department also made available a fact sheet providing a plain 
language summary of the proposed rule. The fact sheet is intended to 
help the public get acquainted with the proposal so that the proposed 
rule feels more navigable and so that providing public comments feels 
more approachable. These resources were posted on the Department's 
www.ada.gov website with information about how to submit comments. They 
were also posted on a web page created by HHS's Administration for 
Community Living to track rulemakings implementing non-discrimination 
requirements protecting people with disabilities. CRT also held a 
number of listening sessions to provide an overview of the proposal and 
hear the perspectives of a variety of stakeholders including disability 
groups, State and local government groups, and others. Second, CRT 
plans to amend the current DOJ regulation under section 504 of the 
Rehabilitation Act of 1973, which prohibits discrimination based on 
disability in programs and activities conducted by an executive agency, 
to bring it up to date (RIN 1190-AA73). Third, CRT will propose 
standards that address the accessibility of medical diagnostic 
equipment under title II of the ADA (RIN 1190-AA78). Fourth, CRT 
intends to propose requirements for pedestrian facilities in the public 
right-of-way, such as sidewalks and crosswalks, covered by part A of 
title II of the ADA that are consistent with the Access Board's minimum 
Accessibility Guidelines for Pedestrian Facilities in the Public Right-
of-Way to help public entities meet their existing ADA obligations to 
make those facilities accessible (RIN 1190-AA77). Last, CRT plans to 
publish an advance notice of proposed rulemaking seeking public input 
on possible revisions to its ADA regulations to ensure the 
accessibility of equipment and furniture in public entities and public 
accommodations' programs and services (RIN 1190-AA76).

Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA)

    DEA is the agency primarily responsible for coordinating the drug 
law enforcement activities of the United States and also assisting in 
the implementation of the President's National Drug Control Strategy. 
DEA implements and enforces titles II and III of the Comprehensive Drug 
Abuse Prevention and Control Act of 1970 and the Controlled Substances 
Import and Export Act (21 U.S.C. 801-971), as amended, collectively 
referred to as the Controlled Substances Act (CSA).
    DEA's mission is to enforce the controlled substances laws and 
regulations of the United States and bring to the criminal and civil 
justice system those organizations and individuals involved in the 
growing, manufacture, or distribution of controlled substances and 
listed chemicals appearing in or destined for illicit traffic in the 
United States. The CSA and its implementing regulations are designed to 
prevent, detect, and eliminate the diversion of controlled substances 
and listed chemicals into the illicit market while providing for the 
legitimate medical, scientific, research, and industrial needs of the 
United States.
    Pursuant to its statutory authority, DEA intends to continue with 
the following priority regulation that appeared on the Fall 2022 
Unified Agenda:
    DEA published a Notice of Purposed Rulemaking (NPRM) on 
Telemedicine Prescribing of Controlled Substances when the Practitioner 
and the Patient Have Not Had a Prior In-Person Medical Evaluation, in 
March of 2023, and received a large volume of public comments. DEA then 
published a Temporary Rule on May 10 to extend the pandemic-era 
flexibilities through November 11, 2023. On October 10, 2023, DEA 
published a second Temporary Rule to further extend the pandemic-era 
flexibilities through December 31, 2024. DEA is considering a new NPRM 
to promulgate effective regulations responsive to the general public 
and industry concerns. DEA may propose a regulation that would 
authorize the issuance of registrations for telemedicine, and to 
prescribe the circumstances in which they may be obtained and used (RIN 
1117-AB40).
    DEA also intends to publish a proposed regulation to amend the 
reporting requirements found at 21 CFR 1310.05(b)(2) mandating 
notification to DEA of domestic transactions involving tableting and 
encapsulating machines 15-days before the seller ships the machine. The 
draft regulation also proposes to amend the definitions of a 
``tableting machine'' and an ``encapsulating machine'' to include 
``parts thereof.'' Finally, the draft regulation seeks to modernize 
customer verification requirements for transactions and proposes 
modifications to DEA Form 452 to improve tracking of transactions of 
tableting and encapsulating machines (RIN 1117-AB80).
    In support of its regulatory function, DEA regularly engages with 
the registrant community, stakeholders, and the public at large. DEA 
launched ``Operation Engage'' for its field offices to connect and 
collaborate with the communities they serve through local partnerships 
to implement strategies and activities regarding drug use prevention 
and education as well as bridging public safety and public health 
efforts to help lower drug overdose deaths. DEA also routinely 
interacts and engages with registrants by developing programs and 
presenting topics of interest in webinar sessions, industry meetings, 
and conferences. These outreach events facilitate open dialogues with 
stakeholders and allow DEA an opportunity to better understand new and 
upcoming issues faced by the registrant community.
    DEA also plans on improving and broadening community engagement and 
advancing participation of underserved communities by partnering with 
trusted members and leaders in the community, not-for-profit 
organizations, and patient advocacy groups, and by developing in- 
person and virtual listening sessions.
    Based on the feedback, comments, and industry concerns received 
from registrants, stakeholders, and the public

[[Page 9428]]

during presentations and routine engagement, DEA makes informed 
decisions to evaluate the need to update existing regulations or 
identify new ones that should be proposed. DEA will continue to broaden 
its public engagement to support the development of future regulatory 
actions.

Executive Office for Immigration Review (EOIR)

    EOIR's primary mission is to adjudicate immigration cases by 
fairly, expeditiously, and uniformly interpreting and administering the 
nation's immigration laws. Under delegated authority from the Attorney 
General, EOIR conducts immigration court proceedings and appellate 
reviews. Immigration judges in EOIR's Office of the Chief Immigration 
Judge adjudicate cases to determine whether noncitizens should be 
removed from the United States or whether they are eligible for relief 
from removal. The Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) has nationwide 
jurisdiction over appeals from decisions of immigration judges, as well 
as other matters specified by regulation. In addition, EOIR also 
conducts administrative hearings involving immigration-related 
employment practices, discrimination claims, and document fraud cases. 
Accordingly, the Department of Justice has a significant role in the 
administration of the nation's immigration laws. The Attorney General 
also is responsible for civil litigation and criminal prosecutions 
relating to the immigration laws.
    EOIR is working to revise and update the regulations to increase 
administrative efficiency, while also safeguarding fairness interests. 
Specifically, EOIR has issued a proposed rule that would restore 
longstanding procedures in place before a prior rule (RIN 1125-AA96), 
including administrative closure, and clarify and codify other 
established practices. The rule will promote the efficient and 
expeditious adjudication of cases, afford immigration judges and the 
Board flexibility to efficiently allocate their limited resources, and 
protect due process for parties before immigration judges and the 
Board.
    EOIR and the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) are also 
drafting a joint proposed rule that would provide clarity and 
uniformity to DHS custody procedures and EOIR bond hearing procedures 
(RIN 1125-AB27). The Departments believe this rulemaking will help 
address litigation issues and resolve varying judicial interpretations 
of the existing custody and bond hearing procedures among Federal 
circuit courts.
    Additionally, EOIR is developing several regulations related to the 
asylum system. For example, EOIR and DHS intend to propose joint rules 
to withdraw prior rules that created obstacles to asylum, such as RIN 
1125-AB08, which proposes to rescind a pandemic-era rule that 
categorically barred asylum for individuals fleeing political, 
religious, or other persecution solely based on their passage through a 
country in which a communicable disease is prevalent, regardless of 
whether an individual was exposed to the disease or was vaccinated, and 
RIN 1125-AB22, which proposes to rescind or modify regulatory revisions 
made by a prior rule to procedures for asylum and withholding of 
removal.

Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI)

    The FBI is responsible for protecting and defending the United 
States against terrorist and foreign intelligence threats, upholding 
and enforcing the criminal laws of the United States, and providing 
leadership and criminal justice services to federal, state, local, 
tribal territorial, and international agencies and partners. Only in 
limited contexts does the FBI rely on rulemaking.
    For example, the FBI drafted a proposed rule to establish the 
criteria for use by a designated entity in deciding fitness as 
described under the Child Protection Improvements Act (CPIA), 34 U.S.C. 
40102, Public Law 115-141, div. S. title I, section 101(a)(1), Mar. 23, 
2018, 132 Stat. 1123.
    The CPIA requires that the Attorney General, by rule, establish the 
criteria for use by designated entities in making a determination of 
fitness described in subsection (b)(4) of the Act concerning whether 
the provider has been convicted of, or is under pending indictment for, 
a crime that bears upon the provider's fitness to have responsibility 
for the safety and wellbeing of children, the elderly, or individuals 
with disabilities and shall convey that determination to the qualified 
entity. Such criteria shall be based on the criteria established 
pursuant to section 108(a)(3)(G)(i) of the Prosecutorial Remedies and 
Other Tools to end the Exploitation of Children Today Act of 2003 (34 
U.S.C. 40102 note) and section 658H of the Child Care and Development 
Block Grant Act of 1990 (42 U.S.C. 9858f).
    The FBI is also drafting rules to implement the Bipartisan Safer 
Communities Act of 2022 (BSCA), 28 U.S.C. 534, 34 U.S.C. 40901, and 34 
U.S.C., Subt. IV, ch. 411, Refs. & Annos., Public Law 117-159, div A, 
title II, sections 12001(a) and 12004(h), June 25, 2022, 136 Stat. 1313 
and the National Instant Criminal Background Check System (NICS) Denial 
Notification Act (NDNA) of 2022, 18 U.S.C. 921, 18 U.S.C. 925B through 
925D, Public Law 117-103, div. W, title XI, sections 1101 through 1103, 
March 15, 2022, 136 Stat. 919.
    In accordance with the BSCA, the FBI will propose regulatory 
amendments to include, but not be limited to: authorizing and 
establishing the process for federal firearm licensees (FFLs) to 
receive access to records of stolen firearms maintained in the FBI's 
National Crime Information Center to verify if a firearm offered for 
sale to the FFL has been reported stolen; authorizing, and establishing 
the process for, FFLs to use NICS for the purpose of voluntary 
background checks of certain current and/or prospective employees of 
the FFL; and establishing the process when NICS has been contacted for 
the prospective transfer of a firearm to a person under the age of 21. 
For NICS transactions involving persons under the age of 21, proposed 
regulation amendments will address, but may not be limited to, the BSCA 
provisions regarding: (A) the application of a delay, up to the tenth 
business day, if cause exists to further investigate a possibly 
disqualifying juvenile record; (B) the required collection (and any 
purge/retention) of residential address information submitted by an FFL 
so the FBI may comply with the expanded background checks of such 
persons; and (C) the process for conducting the expanded background 
checks to determine if certain entities where such persons reside (the 
state criminal history repository or juvenile justice information 
system, the state custodian of mental health adjudication records; and 
local law enforcement) have records establishing ``cause'' that such 
persons have possibly disqualifying juvenile records under 18 U.S.C., 
section 922(d).
    The NDNA mandates that, when the FBI denies a firearm transfer 
during a NICS transaction, the Attorney General is to report various 
information about that denial to local law enforcement authorities in 
the state or tribe where a firearm was sought for transfer and, if 
different, the local law enforcement authorities of the state or tribe 
where the person resides. ``Local law enforcement authority'' is 
defined by the NDNA at 18 U.S.C., section 921(a).
    Regulatory amendments will be drafted outlining the process for 
submitting, and the contents of, such denial notifications, including 
language similar to the BSCA, addressing the required collection (and 
purge/

[[Page 9429]]

retention) of a prospective transferee's residential address so the FBI 
may contact the proper local law enforcement authorities should the 
transaction be denied. Regulatory proposals based on the NDNA will also 
address denial notifications being sent to prosecution authorities in 
the jurisdiction where the firearm was sought and circumstances where 
authorities need to be updated that a person who was the subject of a 
denial notification has subsequently been determined to not be 
prohibited. Regulation proposals from the NDNA will also address the 
Attorney General's new, annual report to Congress concerning denial 
notifications, and related statistics, from the previous year.

DOJ--CIVIL RIGHTS DIVISION (CRT)

Proposed Rule Stage

151. Implementation of the ADA Amendments Act of 2008: Federally 
Conducted (Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973) [1190-AA73]

    Priority: Other Significant.
    Legal Authority: Pub. L. 110-325; 29 U.S.C. 794 (sec. 504 of the 
Rehab. Act of 1973); E.O. 12250 (45 FR 72855)
    CFR Citation: 28 CFR 39.
    Legal Deadline: None.
    Abstract: Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended 
(29 U.S.C. 794), prohibits discrimination on the basis of disability in 
programs and activities conducted by an Executive agency. The 
Department plans to revise its 504 Federally conducted regulation at 28 
CFR part 39 to incorporate amendments to the statute, including the 
changes in the meaning and interpretation of the applicable definition 
of disability required by the ADA Amendments Act of 2008, Public Law 
110-325, 122 Stat. 3553 (Sep. 25, 2008); incorporate requirements and 
limitations stemming from judicial decisions; and make other non-
substantive clarifying edits, including updating outdated terminology 
and references.
    Statement of Need: This rule is necessary to bring the Department's 
prior section 504 Federally conducted regulation, which has not been 
updated in three decades, into compliance with judicial decisions 
establishing rights and limitations under section 504, as well as 
statutory amendments to the Rehabilitation Act, including the new 
definition of disability provided by the ADA Amendments Act of 2008, 
which became effective on January 1, 2009. Additionally, following the 
passage of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), amendments to the 
Rehabilitation Act sought to ensure that the same precepts and values 
embedded in the ADA were also reflected in the Rehabilitation Act. To 
ensure the intended parity between the two laws, it is also necessary 
to update the Federally conducted regulation to align it with the 
relevant provisions of title II of the ADA. An updated Federally 
conducted regulation would consolidate the existing section 504 
requirements in one place for easy reference.
    Summary of Legal Basis: The summary of the legal basis of authority 
for this regulation is set forth above in the abstract.
    Alternatives: There are no appropriate alternatives to issuing this 
NPRM since it implements requirements and limitations arising from the 
statute and judicial decisions.
    Anticipated Cost and Benefits: Because the NPRM would incorporate 
existing legal requirements and limitations in the Department's section 
504 Federally conducted regulation, the Department does not anticipate 
any costs from this rule.
    Risks: Failure to update the Department's section 504 Federally 
conducted regulation to conform to legal requirements and limitations 
provided under the statute and judicial decisions will interfere with 
the Department's ability to meet its non-discrimination requirements 
under section 504.
    Timetable:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Action                    Date            FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NPRM................................   10/00/24
NPRM Comment Period End.............   01/00/25
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No.
    Small Entities Affected: No.
    Government Levels Affected: Federal.
    Additional Information: Transferred from RIN 1190-AA60.
    Agency Contact: Rebecca Bond, Chief, Disability Rights Section, 
Department of Justice, Civil Rights Division, 4 Constitution Square, 
150 M Street NE, Washington, DC 20002, Phone: 202 307-0663.
    RIN: 1190-AA73

DOJ--CRT

152. Nondiscrimination on the Basis of Disability by State and Local 
Governments; Public Right-of-Way [1190-AA77]

    Priority: Other Significant. Major status under 5 U.S.C. 801 is 
undetermined.
    Legal Authority: 42 U.S.C. 12134(a); 42 U.S.C. 12134(c)
    CFR Citation: 28 CFR 35.
    Legal Deadline: None.
    Abstract: The Department of Justice anticipates issuing a Notice of 
Proposed Rulemaking that would establish accessibility requirements to 
help public entities meet their existing Americans with Disabilities 
Act (ADA) obligations to ensure that sidewalks and other pedestrian 
facilities in the public right-of-way are accessible to and usable by 
individuals with disabilities. The Architectural and Transportation 
Barriers Compliance Board (Access Board) has issued accessibility 
guidelines for pedestrian facilities in the public right-of-way, and 
the Department of Justice is required under the ADA to promulgate 
regulations that include standards that are consistent with the Access 
Board's minimum guidelines.
    Statement of Need: This rule is necessary to help public entities 
meet their existing ADA obligations to ensure that pedestrian 
facilities in the public right-of-way are accessible to and usable by 
individuals with disabilities. The Access Board intends to issue 
minimum accessibility guidelines for pedestrian facilities in the 
public right-of-way, and the ADA requires the Department of Justice to 
include standards in its regulations implementing part A of title II of 
the ADA that are consistent with the minimum ADA guidelines issued by 
the Access Board. Accordingly, the Department of Justice intends to 
propose requirements for pedestrian facilities covered by part A of 
title II of the ADA that are consistent with the Access Board's minimum 
Accessibility Guidelines for Pedestrian Facilities in the Public Right-
of-Way. These requirements would help ensure that people with 
disabilities have access to sidewalks, curb ramps, pedestrian street 
crossings, and other pedestrian facilities in the public right-of-way.
    Summary of Legal Basis: The summary of the legal basis for this 
regulation is set forth in the above abstract.
    Alternatives: There are no appropriate alternatives to issuing this 
NPRM because the ADA requires the Department of Justice to include 
standards in its regulations implementing part A of title II of the

[[Page 9430]]

ADA that are consistent with the minimum ADA guidelines issued by the 
Access Board. The Access Board's accessibility guidelines will only 
become binding when the Department of Justice adopts them as legally 
enforceable requirements through rulemaking.
    Anticipated Cost and Benefits: The Department anticipates costs to 
State and local governments given that this rule would require that 
pedestrian facilities in the public right-of-way comply with the 
Department's accessibility requirements under part A of title II of the 
ADA. The Department also anticipates significant benefits to people 
with disabilities, who would obtain greater access to sidewalks and 
other pedestrian facilities in the public right-of-way.
    Risks: Failure to adopt requirements for pedestrian facilities 
covered by part A of title II of the ADA that are consistent with the 
Access Board's minimum Accessibility Guidelines for Pedestrian 
Facilities in the Public Right-of-Way would mean that such Access Board 
guidelines would remain nonbinding and unenforceable. It would also 
mean that the Department would not be complying with its obligation to 
ensure that the standards in its regulations are consistent with the 
minimum ADA guidelines issued by the Access Board.
    Timetable:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Action                    Date            FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NPRM................................   10/00/24
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Undetermined.
    Small Entities Affected: Governmental Jurisdictions.
    Government Levels Affected: Local, State.
    Federalism: Undetermined.
    Agency Contact: Rebecca Bond, Chief, Disability Rights Section, 
Department of Justice, Civil Rights Division, 4 Constitution Square, 
150 M Street NE, Washington, DC 20002, Phone: 202 307-0663.
    RIN: 1190-AA77

DOJ--CRT

153. Nondiscrimination on the Basis of Disability by State and Local 
Governments: Medical Diagnostic Equipment [1190-AA78]

    Priority: Other Significant. Major status under 5 U.S.C. 801 is 
undetermined.
    Legal Authority: 42 U.S.C. 12101 et seq.
    CFR Citation: 28 CFR 35.
    Legal Deadline: None.
    Abstract: Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) 
requires State and local governments to provide services, programs, and 
activities in a manner that is accessible to people with disabilities. 
The Department will seek public comment on proposed changes to its 
regulations to adopt the U.S. Architectural and Transportation Barriers 
Compliance Board's (Access Board) Standards for Medical Diagnostic 
Equipment (MDE) to ensure that MDE is accessible to persons with 
disabilities in their participation in or benefit of services, 
programs, and activities provided by public entities. The Department 
previously announced that it intended to issue an ANPRM, titled 
Nondiscrimination on the Basis of Disability by State and Local 
Governments and Places of Public Accommodation; Equipment and Furniture 
(RIN 1190-AA76) addressing possible revisions to its ADA regulations to 
ensure the accessibility of equipment and furniture generally. However, 
given the specialized nature of MDE, the Department has decided to 
publish a separate NPRM that addresses the accessibility of MDE.
    Statement of Need: MDE that is accessible to individuals with 
disabilities is often critical to a public entity's ability to provide 
an individual with a disability with equal access to its health care 
services, programs, and activities. The Department's ADA regulations 
contain the ADA Standards for Accessible Design (the ADA Standards), 
which include accessibility standards for some types of fixed or built-
in equipment and furniture. However, there are no specific provisions 
in the ADA Standards or the ADA regulations explicitly addressing the 
accessibility of MDE. While manufacturers have begun to offer MDE that 
is more accessible to and usable by people with disabilities and the 
Department has sought to ensure people with disabilities have equal 
access to medical care under the ADA's general regulatory provisions 
through enforcement and the issuance of technical assistance, the 
Department recognizes that more specific standards are necessary to 
guarantee full and equal access to health care services, programs, and 
activities. This rule is necessary to ensure that inaccessible MDE does 
not prevent people with disabilities from accessing title II entities' 
services, programs, and activities.
    Summary of Legal Basis: The summary of the legal basis for this 
regulation is set forth in the above abstract.
    Alternatives: There are no appropriate alternatives to issuing this 
NPRM. The Access Board has issued standards on MDE, but these standards 
only become legally enforceable under the ADA when the Department 
adopts them through a rulemaking. Alternatively, the Department could 
create its own technical standards for MDE for which the Access Board 
does not adopt guidelines and implement them through a rulemaking.
    Anticipated Cost and Benefits: The Department anticipates costs to 
covered entities (i.e., State and local governments). Entities may need 
to acquire new MDE to meet technical standards that the Department 
includes in its regulations. The Department also anticipates 
significant benefits to people with disabilities, who may obtain 
greater access to public entities' services, programs, and activities, 
which may improve their health or potentially save their lives.
    Risks: Failure to adopt technical standards to ensure that people 
with disabilities have access to MDE in public entities' programs, 
services, and activities will prevent people with disabilities from 
having the full and equal access to which they are entitled. The health 
of people with disabilities may suffer as a result of unequal access to 
medical care.
    Timetable:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Action                    Date            FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NPRM................................   11/00/23
NPRM Comment Period End.............   12/00/23
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Undetermined.
    Small Entities Affected: Governmental Jurisdictions.
    Government Levels Affected: Local, State.
    Federalism: Undetermined.
    Agency Contact: Rebecca Bond, Chief, Disability Rights Section, 
Department of Justice, Civil Rights Division, 4 Constitution Square, 
150 M Street NE, Washington, DC 20002, Phone: 202 307-0663.
    Related RIN: Split from 1190-AA76
    RIN: 1190-AA78


[[Page 9431]]



DOJ--CRT

Final Rule Stage

154. Nondiscrimination on the Basis of Disability: Accessibility of Web 
Information and Services of State and Local Government Entities [1190-
AA79]

    Priority: Section 3(f)(1) Significant. Major under 5 U.S.C. 801.
    Legal Authority: 42 U.S.C. 12101 et seq.
    CFR Citation: 28 CFR 35.
    Legal Deadline: None.
    Abstract: The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) states that 
``no qualified individual with a disability shall, by reason of such 
disability, be excluded from participation in or be denied the benefits 
of services, programs, or activities of a public entity, or be 
subjected to discrimination by any such entity.'' 42 U.S.C. 12132. 
However, many public entities' (i.e., State and local governments') 
websites and mobile apps fail to incorporate or activate features that 
enable users with disabilities to access the public entity's services, 
programs, and activities. The Department published a Notice of Proposed 
Rulemaking (NPRM) proposing to amend its title II ADA regulation to 
provide technical standards to assist public entities in complying with 
their existing obligations to make their websites and mobile apps 
accessible to individuals with disabilities. The Department is working 
to issue a final regulation on this topic.
    Statement of Need: Just as steps exclude people who use wheelchairs 
from a building, inaccessible websites or mobile apps can exclude 
people with a range of disabilities from accessing critical State and 
local government services, programs, and activities. The Department is 
proposing technical requirements to provide concrete standards to 
public entities on how to fulfill their obligations under title II to 
provide access to all of their services, programs, and activities that 
are offered via the web or mobile apps. The Department believes the 
requirements described in this rule are necessary to ensure the 
equality of opportunity, full participation, independent living, and 
economic self-sufficiency for individuals with disabilities as set 
forth in the ADA. 42 U.S.C. 12101(a)(7). This is particularly necessary 
now that public entities increasingly rely on the web and mobile apps 
to provide their services, programs, and activities.
    Summary of Legal Basis: The summary of the legal basis for this 
regulation is set forth in the above abstract.
    Alternatives: There are no appropriate alternatives to issuing this 
rule. In the NPRM, the Department discussed various regulatory 
proposals that would ensure full access to websites and mobile apps of 
State and local governments and solicited public comments on these 
proposals. The Department will continue to evaluate these proposals as 
it works to issue a final regulation.
    Anticipated Cost and Benefits: The Department anticipates that this 
rule will be economically significant (that is, that the rule will have 
an annual effect on the economy of $200 million or more, or adversely 
affect in a material way the economy, a sector of the economy, the 
environment, public health or safety, or State, local or tribal 
governments or communities). However, the Department believes that 
revising its title II rule to clarify the obligations of State and 
local governments to provide accessible websites and mobile apps will 
significantly increase equal access by providing citizens with 
disabilities the opportunity to participate in, and benefit from, State 
and local government services, programs, and activities. It will also 
ensure that individuals with disabilities have access to important 
services and information that are provided over the web or through 
mobile apps, such as benefits applications and emergency information. 
In drafting its NPRM, the Department attempted to minimize the 
compliance costs to State and local governments while maximizing the 
benefits of compliance to persons with disabilities and the Department 
will consider public comments it received on this issue when 
promulgating its final rule.
    Risks: If the Department does not revise its ADA title II 
regulations to address website and mobile app accessibility, persons 
with disabilities in many communities will continue to be unable to 
access their State and local governments' services, programs, and 
activities in the same manner as citizens without disabilities, and in 
some cases persons with disabilities will not be able to access those 
services at all. Furthermore, State and local governments will not have 
specific information about how to meet their ADA obligations with 
respect to website and mobile app accessibility.
    Timetable:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Action                    Date            FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NPRM................................   08/04/23  88 FR 51948
NPRM Comment Period End.............   10/03/23
Final Action........................   04/00/24
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Yes.
    Small Entities Affected: Governmental Jurisdictions.
    Government Levels Affected: Local, State.
    Agency Contact: Rebecca Bond, Chief, Disability Rights Section, 
Department of Justice, Civil Rights Division, 4 Constitution Square, 
150 M Street NE, Washington, DC 20002, Phone: 202 307-0663.
    RIN: 1190-AA79

DOJ--DRUG ENFORCEMENT ADMINISTRATION (DEA)

Proposed Rule Stage

155. Telemedicine Prescribing of Controlled Substances When the 
Practitioner and the Patient Have Not Had a Prior In-Person Medical 
Evaluation [1117-AB40]

    Priority: Other Significant.
    Legal Authority: 21 U.S.C. 831(h); 21 U.S.C. 802(54); Pub. L. 115-
271, sec. 3232
    CFR Citation: 21 CFR 1301.
    Legal Deadline: Final, Statutory, October 24, 2019.
    Abstract: The Ryan Haight Online Pharmacy Consumer Protection Act 
of 2008 (the Act) (Pub. L. 110-425) was enacted on October 15, 2008, 
and amended the Controlled Substances Act by adding various provisions 
to prevent the illegal distribution and dispensing of controlled 
substances by means of the internet. Among other things, the Act 
required an in-person medical evaluation as a prerequisite to 
prescribing or otherwise dispensing controlled substances by means of 
the internet, except in the case of practitioners engaged in the 
practice of telemedicine. The definition of the ``practice of 
telemedicine'' includes seven distinct categories that involve 
circumstances in which the prescribing practitioner might be unable to 
satisfy the Act's in-person medical evaluation requirement yet 
nonetheless has sufficient medical information to prescribe a 
controlled substance for a legitimate medical purpose in the usual 
course of professional practice. One specific category within the Act's 
definition of the ``practice of telemedicine'' includes ``a 
practitioner who has obtained from the [DEA Administrator] a special 
registration

[[Page 9432]]

under [21 U.S.C. 831(h)].'' 21 U.S.C. 802(54)(E). The Act also 
specifies certain criteria that the DEA must consider when evaluating 
an application for such a registration. However, the Act contemplates 
that the DEA must issue regulations to effectuate this special 
registration provision.
    After publishing an NPRM on March 1, 2023, and in response to the 
large volume of comments received, DEA has since published a Notice of 
Meeting to invite all interested persons, including medical 
practitioners, patients, pharmacy professionals, industry members, law 
enforcement, stakeholders, community leaders, and other third parties, 
to participate in listening sessions held on September 12 and 13, 2023. 
The additional feedback received will assist DEA in potential 
rulemaking.
    Statement of Need: In light of the information and feedback 
received in public comments to the NPRM published on March 1, 2023, DEA 
is considering a new NPRM on Telemedicine Prescribing of Controlled 
Substances when the Practitioner and the Patient Have Not Had a Prior 
In-Person Medical Evaluation in order to promulgate effective 
regulations responsive to the general public and industry concerns.
    Summary of Legal Basis: DEA implements and enforces the CSA and the 
Controlled Substances Import and Export Act, (21 U.S.C. 801-971), as 
amended. DEA publishes the implementing regulations for these statutes 
in 21 CFR parts 1300 to end. These regulations are designed to ensure a 
sufficient supply of controlled substances for medical, scientific, and 
other legitimate purposes, and to deter the diversion of controlled 
substances for illicit purposes.
    As mandated by the CSA, DEA establishes and maintains a closed 
system of control for manufacturing, distribution, and dispensing of 
controlled substances, and requires any person who manufactures, 
distributes, dispenses, imports, exports, or conducts research or 
chemical analysis with controlled substances to register with DEA, 
unless they meet an exemption, pursuant to 21 U.S.C. 822. The CSA 
further authorizes the Administrator to promulgate regulations 
necessary and appropriate to execute the functions of subchapter I 
(Control and Enforcement) and subchapter II (Import and Export) of the 
CSA. 21 U.S.C. 871(b), 958(f).
    Alternatives: DEA is considering various alternatives, particularly 
the proposed requirements outlined in the March 1, 2023 NPRM.
    Anticipated Cost and Benefits: DEA anticipates this rule will not 
be economically significant (that is, that the rule will not have an 
annual effect on the economy of $200 million or more, or adversely 
affect in a material way the economy, a sector of the economy, 
productivity, competition, jobs, the environment, public health or 
safety, or State, local, territorial, or tribal governments or 
communities). DEA believes the rule will reduce the cost of providing 
and receiving medical care, increasing access, particularly for those 
patients where an in- person medical evaluation is difficult, such as 
patients in rural areas and with disabilities.
    Risks: Failing to issue a rule on telemedicine would interfere with 
DEA's mission to prevent, detect, and investigate the diversion of 
controlled pharmaceuticals and listed chemicals from legitimate sources 
while ensuring an adequate and uninterrupted supply for legitimate 
medical, commercial, and scientific needs.
    Timetable:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Action                    Date            FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NPRM................................   03/01/23  88 FR 12875
NPRM Comment Period End.............   03/31/23
Temporary Rule......................   05/10/23  88 FR 30037
Temporary Rule Effective............   05/11/23
Second Temporary Rule...............   10/10/23  88 FR 69879
Second Temporary Rule Effective.....   11/11/23
NPRM................................   12/00/23
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No.
    Government Levels Affected: None.
    Additional Information: DEA Docket number 407.
    URL For More Information: [email protected].
    URL For Public Comments: www.regulations.gov.
    Agency Contact: Scott A. Brinks, Section Chief, Regulatory Drafting 
and Support Section, Diversion Control Division, Department of Justice, 
Drug Enforcement Administration, 8701 Morrissette Drive, Springfield, 
VA 22152, Phone: 571 362-8209, Email: [email protected].
    RIN: 1117-AB40

DOJ--DEA

156. Import/Export and Domestic Transactions of Tableting and 
Encapsulating Machines [1117-AB80]

    Priority: Other Significant.
    Legal Authority: 21 U.S.C. 802; 21 U.S.C. 821; 21 U.S.C. 822; 21 
U.S.C. 827; 21 U.S.C. 830; 21 U.S.C. 871; 21 U.S.C. 951
    CFR Citation: 21 CFR 1300.02; 21 CFR 1310.05(b)(2); 21 CFR 1310.07.
    Legal Deadline: None.
    Abstract: This regulation would amend the reporting requirements 
found at 21 CFR 1310.05(b)(2) mandating notification to DEA of domestic 
transactions involving tableting and encapsulating machines 15-days 
before the seller ships the machine. The draft regulation also would 
amend the definitions of a tableting machine and an encapsulating 
machine to include parts thereof. Finally, the draft regulation seeks 
to modernize customer verification requirements for transactions and 
proposes modifications to DEA Form 452 to improve tracking of 
transactions of tableting and encapsulating machines.
    Statement of Need: In order to combat the opioid epidemic currently 
fueled by counterfeit pills, it is necessary for DEA to amend the 
reporting requirements for all imports, exports and domestic 
transactions involving tableting and encapsulating machines and their 
parts. The proposed amendments to Form 452 are intended to capture more 
details about all transactions to allow DEA to closely monitor these 
machines and parts as they move throughout the United States. 
Additionally, this amended rule proposes to modify the verification 
methods for regulated persons transacting tableting and encapsulating 
machines, to reflect modern technological methods (e.g., internet 
search). The proposed rule amendments will minimize the diversion of 
tableting and encapsulating machines which will reduce the illegal 
manufacturing of illicit drugs.
    Summary of Legal Basis: DEA implements and enforces the CSA and the 
Controlled Substances Import and Export Act, (21 U.S.C. 801-971), as 
amended. DEA publishes the implementing regulations for these statutes 
in 21 CFR parts 1300 to end. These regulations are designed to ensure a 
sufficient supply of controlled substances for medical, scientific, and 
other legitimate purposes, and to deter the diversion of controlled 
substances for illicit purposes.
    As mandated by the CSA, DEA establishes and maintains a closed 
system of control for manufacturing, distribution, and dispensing of 
controlled substances, and requires any person who manufactures, 
distributes, dispenses, imports, exports, or conducts research or 
chemical analysis with controlled substances to register with

[[Page 9433]]

DEA, unless they meet an exemption, pursuant to 21 U.S.C. 822. The CSA 
further authorizes the Administrator to promulgate regulations 
necessary and appropriate to execute the functions of subchapter I 
(Control and Enforcement) and subchapter II (Import and Export) of the 
CSA. 21 U.S.C. 871(b), 958(f).
    Alternatives: There are no appropriate alternatives to issuing this 
NPRM. This NPRM is being issued in accordance with statutory 
requirements.
    Anticipated Cost and Benefits: DEA anticipates this rule will not 
be economically significant (that is, that the rule will not have an 
annual effect on the economy of $200 million or more, or adversely 
affect in a material way the economy, a sector of the economy, 
productivity, competition, jobs, the environment, public health or 
safety, or State, local, territorial, or tribal governments or 
communities). DEA believes the rule will reduce the time necessary to 
properly complete and process the required forms for import and export 
of tabulation and encapsulation machines, reducing delays, while 
increasing the number of submissions. Any change to cost is expected to 
be de minimis.
    Risks: If this rule is not amended, tableting and encapsulating 
machines that enter U.S. ports have a greater chance of being diverted 
and used to illegally manufacture illicit drugs.
    Timetable:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Action                    Date            FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NPRM................................   03/00/24
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No.
    Small Entities Affected: No.
    Government Levels Affected: None.
    Additional Information: DEA Docket number 739.
    URL For More Information: [email protected].
    URL For Public Comments: http://www.regulations.gov.
    Agency Contact: Scott A. Brinks, Section Chief, Regulatory Drafting 
and Support Section, Diversion Control Division, Department of Justice, 
Drug Enforcement Administration, 8701 Morrissette Drive, Springfield, 
VA 22152, Phone: 571 362-8209, Email: [email protected].
    RIN: 1117-AB80

DOJ--EXECUTIVE OFFICE FOR IMMIGRATION REVIEW (EOIR)

Proposed Rule Stage

157. Clarifying Definitions and Analyses for Fair and Efficient Asylum 
and Other Protection Determinations [1125-AB13]

    Priority: Other Significant.
    Legal Authority: 8 U.S.C. 1101(a)(42); 8 U.S.C. 1158; 8 U.S.C. 
1225; 8 U.S.C. 1231 and 1231 note; Executive Order 14010, 86 FR 8267 
(Feb. 2, 2021)
    CFR Citation: 8 CFR 208; 8 CFR 235; 8 CFR 244; 8 CFR 1208; 8 CFR 
1244.
    Legal Deadline: None.
    Abstract: This rule proposes to amend Department of Homeland 
Security (DHS) and Department of Justice (DOJ) (collectively, ``the 
Departments'') regulations that govern eligibility for asylum and 
withholding of removal. The amendments focus on portions of the 
regulations that address the definitions of membership in a particular 
social group and the interpretation of several other elements of 
eligibility for asylum that are often determinative in particular 
social group claims, including the requirements of a failure of State 
protection and determinations about whether persecution is on account 
of a protected ground. The rule will also propose to republish, modify 
or rescind portions of the Procedures for Asylum and Withholding of 
Removal; Credible Fear and Reasonable Fear Review final rule (RINs 
1125-AA94 and 1615-AC42).
    This rule is consistent with Executive Order 14010 of February 2, 
2021, which directs the Departments to promulgate joint regulations, 
consistent with applicable law, addressing the circumstances in which a 
person should be considered a member of a particular social group.
    Statement of Need: This rule provides guidance on a number of key 
interpretive issues of the refugee definition used by adjudicators 
deciding asylum and withholding of removal (withholding) claims. The 
interpretive issues include whether persecution is inflicted on account 
of a protected ground, the requirements for establishing the failure of 
State protection, and the parameters for defining membership in a 
particular social group. This rule will aid in the adjudication of 
claims made by applicants whose claims fall outside of the rubric of 
the protected grounds of race, religion, nationality, or political 
opinion. One example of such claims that often fall within the 
particular social group ground concerns people who have suffered or 
fear domestic violence. This rule is expected to consolidate issues 
raised in a proposed rule in 2000 and to address issues that have 
developed since the publication of the proposed rule. This rule should 
provide greater stability and clarity in this important area of the 
law. This rule will also provide guidance to the following 
adjudicators: USCIS asylum officers, DOJ Executive Office for 
Immigration Review (EOIR) immigration judges, and members of the EOIR 
Board of Immigration Appeals.
    Furthermore, on February 2, 2021, President Biden issued Executive 
Order 14010 that directs DOJ and DHS [to] promulgate joint regulations, 
consistent with applicable law, addressing the circumstances in which a 
person should be considered a member of a ``particular social group,'' 
as that term is used in 8 U.S.C. 1101(a)(42)(A), as derived from the 
1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees and its 1967 
Protocol.
    Summary of Legal Basis: The purpose of this rule is to provide 
guidance on certain issues that have arisen in the context of asylum 
and withholding adjudications. The 1951 Geneva Convention relating to 
the Status of Refugees contains the internationally accepted definition 
of a refugee. United States immigration law incorporates an almost 
identical definition of a refugee as a person outside his or her 
country of origin ``who is unable or unwilling to return to, and is 
unable or unwilling to avail himself or herself of the protection of, 
that country because of persecution or a well-founded fear of 
persecution on account of race, religion, nationality, membership in a 
particular social group, or political opinion.'' Section 101(a)(42) of 
the Immigration and Nationality Act.
    Alternatives: Because this rulemaking is mandated by executive 
order, there are no feasible alternatives at this time.
    Anticipated Cost and Benefits: DOJ and DHS are currently 
considering the specific cost and benefit impacts of the proposed 
provisions.
    Risks: Without this rulemaking, the circumstances by which a person 
is considered a member of a particular social group will continue to be 
subject to judicial and agency interpretation, which may differ by 
circuit.
    Timetable:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Action                    Date            FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NPRM................................   01/00/24
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No.
    Small Entities Affected: No.
    Government Levels Affected: None.
    Additional Information: RIN 1125-AB14 ``Procedures for Asylum and

[[Page 9434]]

Withholding of Removal, Credible Fear and Reasonable Fear Review'' has 
been consolidated into this RIN.
    URL For More Information: http://www.regulations.gov.
    URL For Public Comments: http://www.regulations.gov.
    Agency Contact: Raechel Horowitz, Chief, Immigration Law Division, 
Office of Policy, Department of Justice, Executive Office for 
Immigration Review, 5107 Leesburg Pike, Suite 1800, Falls Church, VA 
22041, Phone: 703 305-0289, Email: [email protected].
    Related RIN: Related to 1125-AA94, Related to 1615-AC65, Related to 
1615-AC42
    RIN: 1125-AB13

DOJ--EOIR

158. Appellate Procedures and Decisional Finality in Immigration 
Proceedings; Administrative Closure [1125-AB18]

    Priority: Other Significant.
    Legal Authority: 5 U.S.C. 301; 6 U.S.C. 521; 8 U.S.C. 1101; 8 
U.S.C. 1103; 8 U.S.C. 1154-1155; 8 U.S.C. 1158; 8 U.S.C. 1182; 8 U.S.C. 
1226; 8 U.S.C. 1229; 8 U.S.C. 1229a; 8 U.S.C. 1229b; 8 U.S.C. 1229c; 8 
U.S.C. 1231; 8 U.S.C. 1254a; 8 U.S.C. 1255; 8 U.S.C. 1324d; 8 U.S.C. 
1330; 8 U.S.C. 1361-1362; 28 U.S.C. 509-510; 28 U.S.C. 1746; sec. 2 
Reorg. Plan No. 2 of 1950, 3 CFR 1949-1953, Comp. p. 1002; sec. 203 of 
Pub. L. 105-100, 111 Stat. 2196-200; secs. 1506 and 1510 of Pub. L. 
106-386, 114 Stat. 1527-29, 1531-32; sec. 1505 of Pub. L. 106-554, 114 
Stat. 2763A-326 to -328
    CFR Citation: 8 CFR 1003; 8 CFR 1239; 8 CFR 1240; . . .
    Legal Deadline: None.
    Abstract: On December 16, 2020, by a rule titled Appellate 
Procedures and Decisional Finality in Immigration Proceedings; 
Administrative Closure (RIN 1125-AA96) the Department of Justice 
(Department) amended its regulations regarding finality of case 
disposition at both the immigration court and appellate levels. The 
Department is planning to modify or rescind those regulations and to 
clarify the authority of immigration judges and the Board of 
Immigration Appeals (BIA) to administratively close, terminate, 
dismiss, and sua sponte reopen and reconsider a case.
    Statement of Need: On December 16, 2020, the Department amended the 
regulations related to processing of appeals and EOIR adjudicator 
authority to administratively close cases. Appellate Procedures and 
Decisional Finality in Immigration Proceedings; Administrative Closure, 
85 FR 81588 (RIN 1125-AA96). The Department has reconsidered its 
position on those matters and proposed to revise the regulations 
accordingly and make other related amendments. This proposed rule will 
clarify immigration judge and the Board authority, including clarifying 
general authority to administratively close, terminate, or dismiss a 
case under certain circumstances and the authority to sua sponte reopen 
and reconsider cases. The proposed rule also revises Board of 
Immigration Appeals standards involving adjudication timelines, 
briefing schedules, self-certification, remands, background checks, 
administrative notice, and voluntary departure. Moreover, the proposed 
rule rescinds the EOIR Director's authority to issue decisions in 
certain cases, rescinds procedures for immigration judges to certify 
cases for quality assurance, and revises procedures for background 
checks, remand procedures for adjudication of voluntary departure, and 
for the forwarding of the record on appeal, as well as other minor 
revisions. The Department believes that this proposed rule is needed to 
provide guidance to EOIR adjudicators about the necessary or 
appropriate exercise of their general authorities to promote fairness 
and efficiency in proceedings.
    Summary of Legal Basis: The Attorney General has general authority 
under 8 U.S.C. 1103(g) to establish regulations related to the 
immigration and naturalization of noncitizens. Thus, this proposed rule 
utilizes such authority to propose revisions to the regulations 
regarding administrative determinations in immigration proceedings and 
the authorities of EOIR adjudicators.
    Alternatives: The December 2020 rule, 85 FR 81588 (Dec. 16, 2020), 
was enjoined nationwide in March 2021. Nat'l Immigrant Just. Ctr. et 
al., v. EOIR et al., 21-CV-0056 (D.D.C. Jan 14, 2021). Unless the 
Department relies on litigation, there are no feasible alternatives to 
revising the regulations. Relying on litigation could be extremely time 
consuming and may introduce confusion as to whether the regulation is 
in effect. Thus, the Department considers this alternative to be an 
inadequate and inadvisable course of action.
    Anticipated Cost and Benefits: The Department is largely 
reinstating the briefing schedules and other appellate procedures that 
the December 2020 rule revised. As stated in the December 2020 rule, 85 
FR at 81650, the basic briefing procedures have remained across rules; 
thus, the Department believes the costs to the public will be 
negligible, if any, given that costs will revert back to those 
established for decades prior to the December 2020 rule. The proposed 
rule imposes no new additional costs, as much of the proposed rule 
involves internal case processing. For those provisions that constitute 
more than simple internal case processing measures, such as the 
amendments to the EOIR adjudicator's administrative closure and 
termination authority, they likewise would not impose significant costs 
to the public. Indeed, such measures would generally reduce costs, as 
they facilitate and reintroduce various mechanisms for fair, efficient 
case processing.
    Risks: Without this rulemaking, the regulations will remain 
enjoined pending litigation (as described in the Alternatives section). 
This is inadvisable, as litigation typically takes an inordinate time 
to conclude. The Department strongly prefers proactively addressing the 
regulations through this proposed rule.
    Timetable:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Action                    Date            FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NPRM................................   09/08/23  88 FR 62242
NPRM Comment Period End.............   11/07/23
Final Action........................   03/00/24
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No.
    Government Levels Affected: None.
    Additional Information: Related to EOIR Docket No. 19-0022.
    URL For More Information: http://www.regulations.gov.
    URL For Public Comments: http://www.regulations.gov.
    Agency Contact: Raechel Horowitz, Chief, Immigration Law Division, 
Office of Policy, Department of Justice, Executive Office for 
Immigration Review, 5107 Leesburg Pike, Suite 1800, Falls Church, VA 
22041, Phone: 703 305-0289, Email: [email protected].
    Related RIN: Related to 1125-AA96
    RIN: 1125-AB18

DOJ--EOIR

159. Hearing Requirements and Application Procedures for Asylum and 
Related Protection [1125-AB22]

    Priority: Other Significant.
    Legal Authority: 8 U.S.C. 1103(g); 8 U.S.C. 1158; 8 U.S.C. 1229a
    CFR Citation: 8 CFR 1208.13; 8 CFR 1208.14; 8 CFR 1240.11.
    Legal Deadline: None.
    Abstract: On December 16, 2020, by the rule titled Procedures for 
Asylum and Withholding of Removal (RIN 1125-

[[Page 9435]]

AA93) the Department of Justice (Department) amended the regulations 
governing the adjudication of applications for asylum and related 
protection before EOIR, including requirements for filing a complete 
application and consequences for filing an incomplete application, 
filing and adjudication timelines for asylum and related protection in 
certain proceedings before EOIR, and amendments related to the 
information an immigration judge may consider when adjudicating 
applications for asylum and related protection. To revise the 
regulations related to EOIR adjudicatory procedures for asylum and 
related protection, the Department initially considered two separate 
rulemakings to generally require immigration judges to hold evidentiary 
hearings for asylum and related protection before adjudicating such 
applications (RIN 1125-AB22) and to reconsider the provisions that 
focus on the filing and adjudication of such applications (RIN 1125-
AB15). After determining that these regulatory actions both relate to 
the procedures for adjudicating applications for asylum and related 
protection, the Department has decided to combine the two regulatory 
actions into a single rulemaking under RIN 1125-AB22 to rescind or 
modify the regulatory revisions made by Procedures for Asylum and 
Withholding of Removal (RIN 1125-AA93) and clarify that immigration 
judges must generally conduct an evidentiary hearing prior to 
adjudicating an application for asylum or related protection, 
consistent with Matter of E-F-H-L-, 26 I&N Dec. 319 (BIA 2014).
    Statement of Need: This proposed rule will revise the regulations 
related to adjudicatory procedures for asylum and withholding of 
removal, including changes to asylum evidentiary hearings and 
pretermission of such applications. On December 16, 2020, the 
Department amended the regulations governing asylum and withholding of 
removal, including changes to what must be included with an application 
for it to be considered complete and the consequences of filing an 
incomplete application, and changes related to the 180-day asylum 
adjudications clock. Procedures for Asylum and Withholding of Removal, 
85 FR 81698 (RIN 1125-AA93). In light of Executive Orders 14010 and 
14012, 86 FR 8267 (Feb. 2, 2021) and 86 FR 8277 (Feb. 2, 2021), the 
Department reconsidered its position on those matters and now issues 
this proposed rule to revise the regulations accordingly.
    Summary of Legal Basis: The Attorney General has general authority 
under 8 U.S.C. 1103(g) to establish regulations related to the 
immigration and naturalization of noncitizens. More specifically, under 
8 U.S.C. 1158(d)(5)(B), the Attorney General has authority to provide 
by regulation additional conditions and limitations consistent with the 
INA for the consideration of asylum applications. Thus, this proposed 
rule utilizes such authority to propose revisions to the regulations 
related to EOIR adjudicatory procedures for asylum and withholding of 
removal pursuant, in part, to 8 U.S.C. 1229a(c)(4)(B).
    Alternatives: The December 2020 rule, 85 FR 81698 (Dec. 16, 2020), 
was enjoined nationwide in January 2021. See Nat'l Immigrant Just. Ctr. 
et al., v. EOIR et al., 21-CV-0056 (D.D.C. Jan 14, 2021). Unless the 
Department relies on litigation, there are no feasible alternatives to 
revising the regulations. Relying on litigation could be extremely time 
consuming and may introduce confusion as to whether the regulation is 
in effect. Additionally, without this proposed rule, the Department 
would have to rely on an uncertain legal and procedural landscape 
related to evidentiary hearings and pretermission. Thus, the Department 
considers this alternative to be an inadequate and inadvisable course 
of action.
    Anticipated Cost and Benefits: The Department believes this 
proposed rule will not be economically significant. This proposed rule 
imposes no new additional costs to the Department or to respondents: 
respondents have always been required to submit complete asylum 
applications in order to have them adjudicated, and immigration judges 
have always maintained the authority to set deadlines. In addition, 
this proposed rule proposes no new fees. Additionally, evidentiary 
hearings for asylum and related protection are generally standard 
practice. Thus, the Department believes that the costs to the public 
will be negligible. Any new minimal cost would be limited to the cost 
of the public familiarizing itself with the proposed rule, although, as 
previously stated, the proposed rule restores most of the regulatory 
language to that which was in effect before the December 2020 rule. 
Further, an immigration judge's ability to set filing deadlines is 
already established by regulation, and filing deadlines for both 
applications and supporting documents are already well-established 
aspects of immigration court proceedings guided by regulations and the 
Office of the Chief Immigration Judge Practice Manual. Thus, the 
Department expects little in the proposed rule to require extensive 
familiarization.
    Risks: Without this rulemaking, the regulations will remain 
enjoined pending litigation (as described in the Alternatives section). 
This is inadvisable, as litigation is unpredictable and often takes a 
long time to conclude. The Department strongly prefers proactively 
addressing the regulations through this proposed rule. Additionally, 
without this rulemaking, there will be a lack of clarity as to whether 
asylum hearings on the merits are a general practice or whether asylum 
applicants are generally entitled to such hearings.
    Timetable:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Action                    Date            FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NPRM................................   11/00/23
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No.
    Government Levels Affected: None.
    Additional Information: Former RIN 1125-AB15 merged into this 
rulemaking.
    URL For More Information: http://regulations.gov.
    URL For Public Comments: http://regulations.gov.
    Agency Contact: Raechel Horowitz, Chief, Immigration Law Division, 
Office of Policy, Department of Justice, Executive Office for 
Immigration Review, 5107 Leesburg Pike, Suite 1800, Falls Church, VA 
22041, Phone: 703 305-0289, Email: [email protected].
    RIN: 1125-AB22

DOJ--EOIR

160. Clarifying and Revising Custody Determination Procedures for 
Noncitizens Subject to Discretionary Detention (INA 236(a)/8 U.S.C. 
1226 Detention) [1125-AB27]

    Priority: Other Significant.
    Legal Authority: 8 U.S.C. 1101; 8 U.S.C. 1103; 8 U.S.C. 1226; . . .
    CFR Citation: 8 CFR 1003.19; 8 CFR 1236.1; 8 CFR 236.1; 8 CFR 
236.7; 8 CFR 1236.7; 8 CFR 1240.10; 8 CFR 1003.8; . . .
    Legal Deadline: None.
    Abstract: The Department of Homeland Security (DHS), U.S. 
Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) and the Department of Justice 
(DOJ) Executive Office for Immigration Review (EOIR) (collectively, the 
Departments) are planning to amend the regulations that govern 
detention and release determinations for noncitizens subject to the 
custody provisions in section 236 of the Immigration and Nationality 
Act (Act), 8 U.S.C. 1226(a). The goal of the proposed regulation

[[Page 9436]]

would be to clarify the scope and applicability of section 236(a) of 
the Act, 8 U.S.C. 1226(a), and address the burden and standard of proof 
for continued detention at initial custody determinations and any 
custody redetermination hearings. This rulemaking is consistent with 
Executive Order 14058, which directs agencies to take actions that 
improve service delivery and customer experience by decreasing 
administrative burdens, enhancing transparency, and improving the 
efficiency and effectiveness of government.
    Statement of Need: The proposed rule is needed to bring clarity and 
uniformity to the procedures governing ICE initial custody decisions 
and IJ bond hearings for noncitizens subject to discretionary detention 
under INA 236(a). This rule will also revise the procedures for 
determining whether a noncitizen is properly subject to INA 236(c) 
detention. Additionally, this rule will clarify the detention authority 
that applies during the petition for review process for certain 
noncitizens seeking judicial review of their removal orders. Lastly, 
the proposed rule will make organizational changes to the structure of 
the EOIR regulations governing custody redetermination hearings and 
address outdated provisions in the Departments' custody and bond 
regulations. The Departments believe this rulemaking will help address 
issues that frequently arise in litigation brought by noncitizens 
challenging the Departments' existing custody and bond hearing 
procedures and it may also help to resolve differing interpretations 
among Federal circuit courts.
    Summary of Legal Basis: The Attorney General has general authority 
under 8 U.S.C. 1103(g) to establish regulations related to the 
immigration and naturalization of noncitizens. More specifically, under 
section 441 of the Homeland Security Act (HSA), the Attorney General 
transferred the authority to oversee broad immigration enforcement 
functions, including detention and removal, to DHS. Additionally, 
pursuant to HSA 1101(a), the Attorney General retains and shares with 
DHS the authority to detain or authorize bond for noncitizens under INA 
236(a).
    Alternatives: Unless the Departments rely on piecemeal litigation 
to resolve the various issues that arise with respect to the existing 
custody and bond hearing procedures, there are no feasible alternatives 
to this rulemaking.
    Anticipated Cost and Benefits: DOJ and DHS are currently 
considering the specific cost and benefit impacts of the proposed 
provisions.
    Risks: Without this rulemaking, the procedures and standards 
governing ICE custody procedures and IJ bond hearings will continue to 
be subject to litigation and judicial interpretation which results in a 
lack of nationwide uniformity. Moreover, the Departments are concerned 
that the current regulatory framework risk allocating ICE's scarce 
detention resources on noncitizens whose flight risk, if any, could be 
managed effectively in the community, rather than on those whose 
detention is necessary. The Departments strongly prefer proactively 
addressing the regulations through this proposed rule.
    Timetable:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Action                    Date            FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NPRM................................   12/00/23
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No.
    Small Entities Affected: No.
    Government Levels Affected: Federal.
    Agency Contact: Raechel Horowitz, Chief, Immigration Law Division, 
Office of Policy, Department of Justice, Executive Office for 
Immigration Review, 5107 Leesburg Pike, Suite 1800, Falls Church, VA 
22041, Phone: 703 305-0289, Email: [email protected].
    RIN: 1125-AB27

BILLING CODE 4410-BP-P

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Fall 2023 Statement of Regulatory Priorities

Introduction

    The Department's Fall 2023 Regulatory Agenda represents Acting 
Secretary Su's commitment to build a worker-centric economy and good 
jobs that change lives. These rules will advance the Department's 
mission to foster, promote, and develop the welfare of the wage 
earners, job seekers, and retirees of the United States; improve 
working conditions; advance opportunities for profitable employment; 
and assure work-related benefits and rights. Under Acting Secretary 
Su's leadership, the Department's rulemaking is focused on centering 
workers and improving job quality, empowering and protecting workers 
and their families, and promoting equity in opportunity and pathways to 
good jobs for all workers.
    Since the start of the Biden Administration, the Department of 
Labor has pursued rulemaking to advance the Administration's 
priorities. To create and sustain good jobs, the Department has focused 
rulemaking on worker health and safety, fair wages, and supporting 
unions and workers who are organizing unions. The Department is 
advancing equity and supporting marginalized communities through 
rulemaking that bolsters protections for workers from discrimination. 
To tackle the climate crisis, the Department is pursuing a rulemaking 
on heat illness prevention in the workplace. Under the Administration's 
priority to improve service delivery, customer experience and reduce 
administrative burdens, the Department continues to regulate employer-
provided retirement security and health care. These include the 
following rulemakings:
     We issued a Final Rule to update the regulations 
implementing Davis-Bacon and Related Acts--the most comprehensive 
review of the regulation in 40 years--to ensure employers on federally 
funded or assisted construction projects pay locally prevailing wages 
to construction workers. The Final Rule will speed up prevailing wage 
updates, creating efficiencies in the current system and ensuring that 
prevailing wages keep up with actual wages. Over time, this would mean 
higher wages for workers, which is especially important given the 
administration's investments under the Investing in America Agenda.
     We finalized the rescission of certain provisions related 
to the religious exemption for federal contractors and subcontractors. 
The rescission returned OFCCP to its longstanding approach of ensuring 
that the religious exemption contained in Executive Order 11246 is 
applied consistently with nondiscrimination principles of Title VII of 
the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended. The rescission reaffirmed 
nondiscrimination protections for employees of federal contractors.
     We finalized the rulemaking to modify the agency's 
procedures for using resources strategically to remove barriers to 
equal employment opportunity. The rule strengthened OFCCP's ability to 
resolve potential employment discrimination at federal contractor 
workplaces, which created hurdles to effective enforcement.
     We issued a Final Rule that requires employers to check a 
box disclosing whether they are federal contractors or subcontractors 
on their ``LM-10'' forms, which are filed if they hire a consultant to 
persuade their workers about labor relations activities or to 
``surveil'' employees or unions involved in a labor dispute.
     We issued a proposed rule to amend the existing standards 
to better

[[Page 9437]]

protect miners against occupational exposure to respirable crystalline 
silica, a carcinogenic hazard, and to improve respiratory protection 
for all airborne hazards.
     We issued a proposed rule to provide guidance that would 
help employers and workers determine whether a worker is an employee or 
an independent contractor under the Fair Labor Standards Act. The 
proposed rule would combat employee misclassification that leads to 
workers being denied their rights and protections under federal labor 
standards.
     Along with the Departments of Treasury and Health and 
Human Services, we issued a Final Rule implementing the No Surprises 
Act, which aims to protect consumers against surprise medical bills. 
The Final Rule makes certain medical claims payment processes more 
transparent for providers and clarifies the process for providers and 
health insurance companies to resolve their disputes.
     Also, with the Departments of Treasury of Health and Human 
Services, we issued proposed rules to better ensure that people seeking 
coverage for mental health and substance use disorder care can access 
treatment as easily as people seeking coverage for medical treatments. 
The proposed rules aim to fully protect the rights of people seeking 
mental health and substance use disorder benefits, under the Mental 
Health Parity and Addition Equity Act, and to provide clear guidance to 
plans and issuers on how to comply with the law's requirements.
    The 2023 Regulatory Plan highlights the Labor Department's most 
noteworthy and significant rulemaking efforts, with each addressing the 
top priorities of its regulatory agencies: Employee Benefits Security 
Administration (EBSA), Employment and Training Administration (ETA), 
Mine Safety and Health Administration (MSHA), Office of Federal 
Contract Compliance Programs (OFCCP), Occupational Safety and Health 
Administration (OSHA), Office of Workers' Compensation Programs (OWCP), 
and Wage and Hour Division (WHD). These regulatory priorities exemplify 
the Acting Secretary's vision to center workers in the economy; protect 
workers' rights, wages and safety on the job; and promote equity, job 
quality, and pathways to good jobs for all workers, especially those 
who have historically been left behind.
    The Department's regulatory priorities also reflect our robust 
engagement process with stakeholders and our strong culture of 
evidence-based decision making. Through regular stakeholder meetings, 
public hearings, Small Business Advocacy Review Panels, and public 
comments on proposed regulations, the Department engages with diverse 
stakeholders to seek input on our regulatory agenda overall or feedback 
on proposed rules. We intentionally seek input from members of the 
public who have not typically participated in the regulatory process, 
including workers with disabilities, union members, small businesses, 
low-paid workers, and immigrant workers, both as a Department and in 
cooperation with federal partners like the SBA Office of Advocacy. 
Among the specific rules described below, we include further details on 
previous stakeholder engagement and future opportunities for 
stakeholder engagement.

Centering Workers and Improving Job Quality

    The Department's regulatory priorities reflect the Acting 
Secretary's focus on centering workers in the economy and improving job 
quality. This means protecting workers right to organize and form a 
union and ensuring the creation of good jobs by upholding strong labor 
and equity standards across every aspect of hiring and employment.
     WHD will finalize updates to the executive, 
administrative, and professional exemption for the Fair Labor Standards 
Act. Updating the salary threshold would ensure that middle class jobs 
pay middle class wages, extending important overtime pay protections to 
millions of workers and raising their pay. Prior to issuing the 
proposed rule, the Department conducted 27 virtual listening sessions 
around the country with more than 2,000 participants to gather 
information and input about possible changes to the overtime 
regulations. In addition to reaching out to national stakeholders, the 
Wage and Hour Division conducted 10 regional listening sessions for 
workers and worker advocates as well as employers and business leaders. 
This was an important and valuable step in the regulatory development 
process.
     WHD will finalize regulations that offer certain employees 
employed under the federal service contracts a right of first refusal 
of employment when contracts change over, thereby promoting the 
retention of skilled workers in the federal services workforce.

Empowering and Protecting Workers and Their Families

    The Department's regulatory priorities reflect the Acting 
Secretary's focus on protecting workers' rights, wages and safety on 
the job and fighting discrimination in the workplace. This means 
leveling the playing field for America's workers by ensuring all 
workers get the wages they've earned, especially those in low-wage and 
historically underserved communities.
     WHD will finalize regulations that address and clarify the 
distinction between employees and independent contractors under the 
Fair Labor Standards Act. This proposed rule also benefited from 
extensive stakeholder engagement prior to its issuance.
     ETA is proposing regulations that will ensure that H-2 
visa programs promote worker voice and worker protections.
    Under this priority, the Department is also focusing on 
safeguarding workers' hard-earned benefits and pensions and ensuring 
access to health benefits, including mental health and substance use 
disorder benefits.
     EBSA will finalize joint rulemaking with the Departments 
of Health and Human Services and Treasury, implementing the Mental 
Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act (MHPAEA) will promote compliance 
and address amendments to the Act from the Consolidated Appropriations 
Act of 2021 to ensure parity of mental health and substance abuse 
disorder benefits so workers can access mental health care as easily as 
other types of care.
     EBSA, along with the Departments of Human and Human 
Services and Treasury, will finalize joint rulemaking regarding 
coverage of certain preventive services under the Affordable Care Act, 
which would establish a new pathway for individuals to obtain 
contraceptive services at no cost.
     EBSA is proposing regulations to reevaluate the criteria 
for a group or association of employers to be able to sponsor a 
multiple employer group health plan.
     EBSA is proposing to update the definition of the term 
``fiduciary'' for a retirement plan to ensure retirement savers get 
sound investment advice free from conflicts of interest.
    The Department's health and safety regulatory proposals are aimed 
at eliminating preventable workplace injuries, illnesses, and 
fatalities. Workplace safety also protects workers' economic security, 
ensuring that illness and injury do not force families into poverty. 
Our efforts will prevent workers from having to choose between their 
lives and their livelihood.
     OSHA will propose an Infectious Diseases rulemaking to 
protect employees in healthcare and other high-risk environments from 
exposure to and

[[Page 9438]]

transmission of persistent and new infectious diseases, ranging from 
ancient scourges such as tuberculosis to newer threats such as Severe 
Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS), the 2019 Novel Coronavirus (COVID-
19), and other diseases.
     OSHA will complete small business consultations as its 
next step in advancing rulemaking on heat illness prevention to protect 
workers from heat hazards in the workplace. Increased temperatures are 
posing a serious threat to workers laboring outdoors and in non-climate 
controlled indoor settings. Exposure to excessive heat is not only a 
hazard in itself, causing heat illness and even death; it is also an 
indirect hazard linked to the loss of cognitive skills which can also 
lead to workplace injuries and worker deaths. Protecting workers will 
help to save lives while we confront the growing threat of climate 
change.
     OSHA will propose regulations that update standards for 
emergency response and preparedness to reflect the full range of 
hazards or concerns currently facing emergency responders and other 
workers providing skilled support and the major changes in performance 
specifications for protective clothing and equipment.
     MSHA will finalize a new silica standard to effectively 
address health hazards and prevent irreversible diseases with a goal of 
ensuring that all miners are safe at their workplaces.
     MSHA will finalize a rule establishing that mine operators 
must develop and implement a written safety program for mobile and 
power haulage equipment used at surface mines and surface areas of 
underground mines, in order to reduce accidents and provide safer 
workplaces for miners.

Promoting Equity in Opportunity and Pathways to Good Jobs for All 
Workers

    The Department's regulatory priorities reflect the Acting 
Secretary's focus on promoting access to good jobs free from 
discrimination and harassment, especially for those who have 
historically been left behind, and growing the workforce that brings in 
all of America, with a focus on expanding opportunities for women and 
people of color.
     ETA will ensure job-seekers can more easily get the 
support they need by issuing final rules updating the Wagner-Peyser 
Employment Service regulations.
     ETA is focused on apprenticeship and is proposing 
regulations for a National Apprenticeship System that is more 
responsive to worker and employer needs. This proposed rule was 
extensively informed by the deliberations of the Department's 
reconstituted Advisory Committee on Apprenticeships.

DOL--WAGE AND HOUR DIVISION (WHD)

Proposed Rule Stage

161. Defining and Delimiting the Exemptions for Executive, 
Administrative, Professional, Outside Sales, and Computer Employees 
[1235-AA39]

    Priority: Section 3(f)(1) Significant. Major under 5 U.S.C. 801.
    Unfunded Mandates: This action may affect the private sector under 
Public Law 104-4.
    Legal Authority: 29 U.S.C. 201 et seq.; 29 U.S.C. 213
    CFR Citation: 29 CFR 541.
    Legal Deadline: None.
    Abstract: The Department of Labor (Department) proposes updating 
and revising the regulations issued under the Fair Labor Standards Act 
implementing the exemptions from minimum wage and overtime pay 
requirements for executive, administrative, professional, outside 
sales, and computer employees. Significant proposed revisions include 
increasing the standard salary level to the 35th percentile of weekly 
earnings of full-time salaried workers in the lowest-wage Census Region 
(currently the South) $1,059 per week ($55,068 annually for a full-year 
worker) and increasing the highly compensated employee total annual 
compensation threshold to the annualized weekly earnings of the 85th 
percentile of full-time salaried workers nationally ($143,988). The 
Department is also proposing to add to the regulations an automatic 
updating mechanism that would allow for the timely and efficient 
updating of all the earnings thresholds. For additional information, 
please see the Department's fall regulatory plan narrative statement.
    Statement of Need: One of the primary goals of this rulemaking is 
to update the salary level requirement of the section 13(a)(1) 
exemption. A salary level test has been part of the regulations since 
1938 and it has been long recognized that the best single test of the 
employer's good faith in attributing importance to the employee's 
services is the amount they pay for those services. In prior 
rulemakings, the Department explained its commitment to update the 
standard salary level and Highly Compensated Employees (HCE) total 
compensation levels more frequently. Regular updates promote greater 
stability, avoid disruptive salary level increases that can result from 
lengthy gaps between updates and provide appropriate wage protection.
    Summary of Legal Basis: Section 13(a)(1) of the FLSA, codified at 
29 U.S.C. 213(a)(1), exempts any employee employed in a bona fide 
executive, administrative, or professional capacity or in the capacity 
of outside salesman (as such terms are defined and delimited from time 
to time by regulations of the Secretary, subject to the provisions of 
the [Administrative Procedure Act.]) The FLSA does not define the terms 
executive, administrative, professional, or outside salesman. However, 
Congress explicitly delegated to the Secretary of Labor the power to 
define and delimit the specific terms of the exemptions through 
regulations. Accordingly, the Department issues regulations at 29 CFR 
part 541 defining the scope of the section 13(a)(1) exemptions.
    Alternatives: The Department considered a range of alternatives 
before selecting its proposed methods for updating the standard salary 
level and the HCE compensation level. The Department proposes to update 
the standard salary level using earnings for the 35th percentile of 
full-time salaried workers in the lowest range Census Region (the 
South), equivalent to $1,059 per week based on current data. 
Alternatives considered for the standard salary level are: (1) 20th 
percentile of earnings of nonhourly full-time workers in the South 
Census region and the retail industry nationally equivalent to $822 per 
week; (2) 10th percentile of earnings of likely exempt workers, 
equivalent to $925 per week; (3) 40th percentile of earnings of 
nonhourly full-time workers in the South Census region, equivalent to 
$1,145 per week; and (4) a methodology based on the historical short 
test salary level, equivalent to $1,378 per week.
    The Department proposes to update the HCE compensation level using 
earnings from the 85th percentile of all full-time salaried workers 
nationally, equivalent to $143,988 per year. The Department also 
considered the following alternative methods to set the HCE 
compensation levels: (1) 80th percentile of nonhourly full-time workers 
nationally, equivalent to $125,268 annually; and (2) 90th percentile of 
nonhourly full-time workers nationally, equivalent to $172,796 
annually.
    The public is invited to provide comments on the proposed revisions 
and possible alternatives.
    Anticipated Cost and Benefits: The Department quantified three 
direct costs

[[Page 9439]]

to employers in this analysis: (1) regulatory familiarization costs; 
(2) adjustment costs; and (3) managerial costs. The Department 
estimated in Year 1, regulatory familiarization costs would be $427.2 
million, adjustment costs would be $240.8 million, and managerial costs 
would be $534.9 million. Total direct employer costs in Year 1 would be 
$1.2 billion. The Department additionally estimated that the proposed 
rule over its first 10 years, would transfer approximately $1.3 billion 
per year from employers to employees in the form of increased wages.
    Risks: This action does not affect public health, safety, or the 
environment.
    Timetable:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Action                    Date            FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NPRM................................   09/08/23  88 FR 62152
NPRM Comment Period End.............   11/07/23
Final Rule..........................   04/00/24
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Yes.
    Small Entities Affected: Businesses, Governmental Jurisdictions, 
Organizations.
    Government Levels Affected: Federal, Local, State, Tribal.
    Agency Contact: Amy DeBisschop, Director of the Division of 
Regulations, Legislation, and Interpretation, Department of Labor, Wage 
and Hour Division, 200 Constitution Avenue NW, FP Building, Room S-
3502, Washington, DC 20210, Phone: 202 693-0406.
    RIN: 1235-AA39

DOL--WHD

Final Rule Stage

162. Nondisplacement of Qualified Workers Under Service Contracts 
[1235-AA42]

    Priority: Section 3(f)(1) Significant. Major under 5 U.S.C. 801.
    Legal Authority: E.O. 14055
    CFR Citation: 29 CFR 9.
    Legal Deadline: None.
    Abstract: On November 18, 2021, President Biden signed Executive 
Order 14055 requiring the Secretary of Labor to issue final regulations 
on the nondisplacement of qualified workers under service contracts. 
Implementation of this Executive Order will promote retention of 
experienced and skilled employees working on federal service contracts. 
Service work supporting federal government functions occurs all over 
the country, from federal building maintenance to services provided on 
military bases to skilled technicians operating and maintaining federal 
equipment. Under this Executive Order, when a federal service contract 
transitions from one contractor to another, the new contractor will be 
required to offer jobs to qualified employees who worked for the 
previous contractor and performed their jobs well. This prevents 
disruptions in federal services, makes it easier for employers to find 
workers who are already trained for the job, and saves taxpayer 
dollars.
    Statement of Need: Executive Order 14055 requires the Secretary of 
Labor to issue regulations on the nondisplacement of qualified workers 
under service contracts.
    Summary of Legal Basis: President Biden issued Executive Order 
14055 pursuant to his authority under ``the Constitution and the laws 
of the United States,'' expressly including the Procurement Act. 86 FR 
66397. The Procurement Act authorizes the President to ``prescribe 
policies and directives that the President considers necessary to carry 
out'' the statutory purposes of ensuring ``economical and efficient'' 
government procurement and administration of government property. 40 
U.S.C. 101.121(a). Executive Order 14055 directs the Secretary to issue 
regulations to ``implement the requirements of this order.'' 86 FR 
66399.
    Alternatives: The Department has discussed a few specific 
provisions in which limited alternatives are possible.
    First, in cases where a prime contract is above the simplified 
acquisition threshold, but their subcontract falls below this 
threshold, the Department could potentially have discretion to exclude 
these subcontracts from the requirements of this proposed rule. 
However, the Department stated in the NPRM that, consistent with the 
language in the Executive Order, where a prime contract is covered by 
the rule, all subcontracts for services, regardless of size, would also 
be covered. Second, the Department has some discretion in defining the 
specific analysis that must be completed by contracting agencies 
regarding location continuity. The Department is considering whether to 
require contracting officers to analyze additional factors when 
determining whether to decline to require location continuity. Any 
requirement of a more in-depth analysis could potentially increase 
costs for contracting agencies.
    Anticipated Cost and Benefits: The rule could result in costs for 
covered contractors and contracting agencies in the form of rule 
familiarization costs, implementation costs, and recordkeeping costs. 
The rule would increase the use of a carryover workforce which would 
reduce disruption in the delivery of services during the period of 
transition between contractors, maintains physical and information 
security, and provides the Federal Government with the benefits of an 
experienced and well-trained workforce that is familiar with the 
Federal Government's personnel, facilities, and requirements.
    The Department estimated both familiarization costs, implementation 
costs and familiarization costs. Costs in Year 1 consists of 
$11,124,370 in rule familiarization costs, $35,471,685 in 
implementation costs ($7,518,342 for contractors and $27,953,342 for 
contracting agencies), and $6,014,674 in recordkeeping costs. 
Therefore, total Year 1 costs are $52,610,728. Costs in the following 
years consist only of implementation and recordkeeping costs and amount 
to $41,486,358. Average annualized costs over 10 years are $43 million 
using a 7 percent discount rate, and $52 million using a 3 percent 
discount rate.
    Risks: This action does not affect the public health, safety, or 
the environment.
    Timetable:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Action                    Date            FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NPRM................................   07/15/22  87 FR 42552
NPRM Comment Period End.............   08/15/22
Final Rule..........................   11/00/23
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No.
    Government Levels Affected: Federal.
    Agency Contact: Amy DeBisschop, Director of the Division of 
Regulations, Legislation, and Interpretation, Department of Labor, Wage 
and Hour Division, 200 Constitution Avenue NW, FP Building, Room S-
3502, Washington, DC 20210, Phone: 202 693-0406.
    RIN: 1235-AA42

DOL--WHD

163. Employee or Independent Contractor Classification Under the Fair 
Labor Standards Act [1235-AA43]

    Priority: Section 3(f)(1) Significant. Major under 5 U.S.C. 801.
    Unfunded Mandates: This action may affect the private sector under 
Public Law 104-4.
    Legal Authority: 52 Stat. 1060, as amended; 29 U.S.C. 201-219

[[Page 9440]]

    CFR Citation: 29 CFR 795; 29 CFR 780; 29 CFR 788.
    Legal Deadline: None.
    Abstract: On January 7, 2021, the Department of Labor (Department) 
published a final rule on independent contractor status under the Fair 
Labor Standards Act (FLSA). See 86 FR 1168 (2021 IC Rule). The 
Department subsequently published final rules to delay and withdraw the 
2021 IC Rule on March 4, 2021, and May 6, 2021, respectively. See 86 FR 
12535 (Delay Rule); 86 FR 24303 (Withdrawal Rule). On March 14, 2022, a 
district court in the Eastern District of Texas vacated the 
Department's Delay and Withdrawal Rules, concluding that the 2021 IC 
Rule became effective as of March 8, 2021. The Department has appealed 
the district court's decision. The Department continues to believe that 
the 2021 IC Rule does not fully comport with the FLSA's text and 
purpose as interpreted by courts and has proposed to rescind the 2021 
IC rule and set forth an analysis for determining employee or 
independent contractor status under the Act that is more consistent 
with existing judicial precedent and the Department's longstanding 
guidance prior to the 2021 IC rule. The Department published an NPRM on 
October 13, 2022. For additional information, please see the 
Department's fall regulatory plan narrative statement.
    Statement of Need: The Department believes it is appropriate to 
consider rescinding the 2021 IC Rule and setting forth an analysis for 
determining employee or independent contractor status under the Act 
that is more consistent with existing judicial precedent and the 
Department's longstanding guidance prior to the 2021 IC Rule.
    Summary of Legal Basis: The Department's authority to interpret the 
analysis for determining whether workers are employees or independent 
contractors under the FLSA comes with its authority to administer and 
enforce the Act. See 29 U.S.C. 201-219; see also Herman v. Fabri-
Centers of Am., Inc., 308 F.3rd 580, 592-93 & n.8 (6th Cir. 2002) 
(noting that ``[t]he Wage and Hour Division of the Department of Labor 
was created to administer the Act'' while agreeing with the 
Department's interpretation of one of the Act's provisions); Dufrene v. 
Browning-Ferris, Inc., 207 F.3rd 264, 267 (5th Cir. 2000) (``By 
granting the Secretary of Labor the power to administer the FLSA, 
Congress implicitly granted him the power to interpret.''); Condo v. 
Sysco Corp., 1 F.3rd 599, 603 (7th Cir. 1993) (same).
    Alternatives: The Department assessed four regulatory alternatives 
in the proposed rule in addition to what it proposed. For the first 
alternative, the Department considered codifying the common law control 
test, which is used to distinguish between employees and independent 
contractors under some other Federal laws, such as the Internal Revenue 
Code. For the second alternative, the Department considered codifying 
an ABC test to determine independent contractor status under the FLSA 
similar to the ABC test recently adopted under California law. For the 
third alternative, the Department considered a proposed rule that would 
not fully rescind the 2021 IC Rule and instead retain some aspects of 
that rule. For the fourth alternative, the Department considered 
rescinding the 2021 IC Rule and providing guidance on employee or 
independent contractor classification through subregulatory guidance 
instead of through new regulations.
    Anticipated Cost and Benefits: The total one-time regulatory 
familiarization costs for establishments, governments, and independent 
contractors are estimated to be $408 million. Regulatory 
familiarization costs in future years were assumed to be de minimis. 
Employers and independent contractors would continue to familiarize 
themselves with the applicable legal framework in the absence of the 
rule, so this rulemaking would not be expected to impose costs after 
the first year. This would amount to a 10-year annualized cost of $56.4 
million at a discount rate of 3 percent or $54.3 million at a discount 
rate of 7 percent.
    Benefits would include increased consistency with existing judicial 
precedent and the Department's longstanding guidance, as well as 
possibly reducing the occurrence of misclassification.
    Risks: This action does not affect public health, safety, or the 
environment.
    Timetable:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Action                    Date            FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NPRM................................   10/13/22  87 FR 62218
NPRM Comment Period Extended........   10/26/22  87 FR 64749
NPRM Comment Period Extended End....   12/13/22
Final Rule..........................   11/00/23
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Yes.
    Small Entities Affected: Businesses, Governmental Jurisdictions, 
Organizations.
    Government Levels Affected: Undetermined.
    Agency Contact: Amy DeBisschop, Director of the Division of 
Regulations, Legislation, and Interpretation, Department of Labor, Wage 
and Hour Division, 200 Constitution Avenue NW, FP Building, Room S-
3502, Washington, DC 20210, Phone: 202 693-0406.
    RIN: 1235-AA43

DOL--EMPLOYMENT AND TRAINING ADMINISTRATION (ETA)

Proposed Rule Stage

164. Improving Protections for Workers in Temporary Agricultural 
Employment in the United States [1205-AC12]

    Priority: Other Significant. Major status under 5 U.S.C. 801 is 
undetermined.
    Legal Authority: 8 U.S.C. 1188; 29 U.S.C. 49 et seq.
    CFR Citation: 29 CFR 501; 20 CFR 651; 20 CFR 653; 20 CFR 654; 20 
CFR 655; 20 CFR 658.
    Legal Deadline: None.
    Abstract: The Department of Labor's (DOL) Employment and Training 
Administration and Wage and Hour Division propose to amend regulations 
to improve working conditions and protections for workers engaged in 
temporary agricultural employment in the United States; and strengthen 
protections in the recruitment, job order clearance, and oversight 
processes. The proposed regulatory changes involve the Employment 
Service and the H-2A non-immigrant visa program at 29 CFR part 501 and 
20 CFR parts 651, 653, 654, 655, and 658.
    The Department has identified a need to strengthen and clarify 
protections for all temporary agricultural workers, including U.S. 
workers and workers employed through the H-2A temporary agricultural 
program. The H-2A temporary agricultural program allows agricultural 
employers to perform agricultural labor or services of a temporary or 
seasonal nature so long as there are not sufficient able, willing, and 
qualified U.S. workers to perform the work and the employment of H-2A 
workers does not adversely affect the wages and working conditions of 
similarly employed workers in the United States. The use of the H-2A 
program has grown substantially in recent years and the Department is 
committed to protecting agricultural workers in light of their 
significant vulnerabilities.
    Statement of Need: The Department will propose revisions to the H-
2A regulations and the Employment Service regulations that will 
strengthen

[[Page 9441]]

protections for agricultural workers and enhance the Department's 
enforcement capabilities against fraud and program violations. The 
Department has determined the proposed revisions will help prevent 
exploitation and abuse of agricultural workers and ensure that 
employers do not gain from their violations or contribute to economic 
and workforce instability by circumventing the law.
    Summary of Legal Basis: The Department's proposals to strengthen 
protections and improve compliance are aimed at ensuring that the 
Department can better fulfill its statutory responsibility at 8 U.S.C. 
1188(a)(1) to certify that: (1) there are not sufficient workers who 
are able, willing, and qualified, and who will be available at the time 
and place needed, to perform the labor or services involved in the 
petition; and (2) the employment of H-2A workers will not adversely 
affect the wages and working conditions of workers in the United States 
similarly employed, and its responsibility under the Wagner-Peyser Act 
at 29 U.S.C. 49b to effectively assist in coordinating the State public 
employment service offices throughout the country.
    Alternatives: The Department has considered alternatives but 
believes that rulemaking to update the H-2A regulations and the 
Employment Service regulations is a reasonable approach to better 
ensure the necessary worker protections are available and enforceable.
    Anticipated Cost and Benefits: The Department estimates that the 
proposed rule would result in costs and transfer payments. As shown in 
Exhibit 1, the proposed rule is expected to have an annualized cost of 
$2.03 million and a total 10-year quantifiable cost of $14.24 million, 
each at a discount rate of 7 percent. The proposed rule is estimated to 
result in annual transfer payments from H-2A employers to H-2A 
employees of $12.81 million and total 10-year transfer payments of 
$89.95 million at a discount rate of 7 percent.
    The benefits are described above and include preventing 
exploitation of vulnerable workers and ensuring that employers do not 
benefit from exploitation.
    Risks: To be determined.
    Timetable:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Action                    Date            FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NPRM................................   09/15/23  88 FR 63750
NPRM Comment Period End.............   11/14/23
Final Rule..........................   04/00/24
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Yes.
    Small Entities Affected: Businesses, Governmental Jurisdictions.
    Government Levels Affected: Local, Tribal.
    Agency Contact: Brian Pasternak, Administrator, Department of 
Labor, Employment and Training Administration, 200 Constitution Avenue 
NW, Office of Foreign Labor Certification, Room N-5311, FP Building, 
Washington, DC 20210, Phone: 202 693-8200, Email: 
[email protected].
    RIN: 1205-AC12

DOL--ETA

165. National Apprenticeship System Enhancements [1205-AC13]

    Priority: Section 3(f)(1) Significant. Major under 5 U.S.C. 801.
    Legal Authority: The National Apprenticeship Act, as amended (50 
Stat. 664) 29 U.S.C. 50
    CFR Citation: 29 CFR 29; 29 CFR 30.
    Legal Deadline: None.
    Abstract: The regulations at 29 CFR part 29 addressing labor 
standards of apprenticeship and the governance of the National 
Apprenticeship System were last updated in October 2008 to increase 
administrative flexibility, ensure program quality, and promote 
registered apprenticeship opportunity. The Department plans to revise 
these regulations to strengthen, expand, modernize, and diversify the 
National Apprenticeship System by enhancing worker protections and 
equity, improving the quality of registered apprenticeships, revising 
the state governance provisions, and more clearly establishing critical 
pipelines to registered apprenticeships such as pre-apprenticeships so 
that the National Apprenticeship System is more responsive to current 
worker and employer needs. The Department will also make technical and 
conforming adjustments to the current text of 29 CFR part 30 (governing 
equal employment opportunity in apprenticeships) as appropriate. For 
additional information, please see the Department's regulatory plan 
narrative statement.
    Statement of Need: The regulations governing the minimum labor 
standards for the registration of apprenticeship programs at Title 29 
of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) part 29 have not been updated 
since 2008. With this action, the Department seeks to ensure that the 
regulatory framework for the Registered Apprenticeship System remains 
current with a range of emerging apprenticeship practices and program 
structures that have developed since that time. The proposed revisions 
will enable the Registered Apprenticeship System to continue its vital 
role in developing a skilled, competitive American workforce.
    Summary of Legal Basis: The National Apprenticeship Act of 1937 
(also known as the Fitzgerald Act), 29 U.S.C. 50, gives the Secretary 
broad power to promote, create, and set standards for apprenticeship 
programs. The Act authorizes and directs the Secretary to formulate and 
promote the furtherance of labor standards necessary to safeguard the 
welfare of apprentices, to extend the application of such standards by 
encouraging the inclusion thereof in contracts of apprenticeship, to 
bring together employers and labor for the formulation of programs of 
apprenticeship, to cooperate with State agencies engaged in the 
formulation and promotion of standards of apprenticeship, and to 
cooperate with the Secretary of Education in accordance with section 17 
of title 20.
    Alternatives: Alternatives are described in the text of the NPRM, 
and the public will be provided an opportunity to comment upon them.
    Anticipated Cost and Benefits: Registered apprenticeships provide 
individuals with valuable training and skill development, and provide 
businesses with a structure for developing a diverse pool of skilled 
workers. Although the Department is unable to quantify the anticipated 
benefits due to data limitations, the proposed rule is expected to 
result in annualized costs of $152 million during the first 10 years 
(2025-2034) at a discount rate of 7 percent based on preliminary 
estimates.
    Risks: This action does not affect public health, safety, or the 
environment.
    Timetable:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Action                    Date            FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NPRM................................   11/00/23
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Yes.
    Small Entities Affected: Businesses, Governmental Jurisdictions, 
Organizations.
    Government Levels Affected: Federal, State.
    Federalism: This action may have federalism implications as defined 
in E.O. 13132.
    Agency Contact: John V. Ladd, Administrator, Office of 
Apprenticeship, Department of Labor, Employment and Training 
Administration, 200 Constitution

[[Page 9442]]

Avenue NW, FP Building, Room C-5311, Washington, DC 20210, Phone: 202 
693-2796, Fax: 202 693-3799, Email: [email protected].
    RIN: 1205-AC13

DOL--ETA

Final Rule Stage

166. Wagner-Peyser Act Staffing [1205-AC02]

    Priority: Other Significant.
    Legal Authority: Wagner-Peyser Act sec. 12 (29 U.S.C. 49k)
    CFR Citation: 20 CFR 651; 20 CFR 652; 20 CFR 653; 20 CFR 658.
    Legal Deadline: None.
    Abstract: The Department proposed to revise the Wagner-Peyser Act 
regulations regarding Employment Services (ES) staffing to require that 
states use state merit staff to provide ES services, including Migrant 
and Seasonal Farmworker (MSFW) services, and to improve service 
delivery.
    Statement of Need: The Department identified areas of the 
regulation that changed to create a uniform standard of ES services 
provision for States.
    Summary of Legal Basis: The Department determined that it is vital 
for the ES to be administered so that States deliver services 
effectively and equitably to unemployment insurance beneficiaries and 
other ES customers.
    Alternatives: Two alternatives will be considered, and the public 
had the opportunity to comment on these alternatives during the comment 
period of the NPRM.
    Anticipated Cost and Benefits: The proposed rule was estimated to 
have one-time rule familiarization costs of $4,205 in 2020 dollars, as 
well as unknown transition costs. The proposed rule also estimated the 
rule to have annual transfer payments of $9.6 million for three of the 
five States that currently have non-State merit staff providing some 
labor exchange services; transfer payments are monetary payments from 
one group to another, such as wages shifting from one employer to 
another, that do not affect total resources available to society. The 
transfer payments for this proposed rule were the estimated wage cost 
increases to the States associated with employee wages and fringe 
benefits. In the NPRM, the Department solicited comments from 
stakeholders and the public on the unknown transition costs, plus 
transfer payments that would be incurred by any States with some non-
State merit staff providing labor exchange services.
    Risks: This action does not affect the public health, safety, or 
the environment.
    Timetable:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Action                    Date            FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NPRM................................   04/20/22  87 FR 23700
NPRM Comment Period End.............   06/21/22
Final Rule..........................   11/00/23
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Undetermined.
    Government Levels Affected: State.
    Agency Contact: Kimberly Vitelli, Administrator, Office of 
Workforce Investment, Department of Labor, Employment and Training 
Administration, 200 Constitution Avenue NW, FP Building, Room C-4526, 
Washington, DC 20210, Phone: 202 693-3980, Email: 
[email protected].
    RIN: 1205-AC02

DOL--EMPLOYEE BENEFITS SECURITY ADMINISTRATION (EBSA)

Proposed Rule Stage

167. Retirement Security Rule: Definition of an Investment Advice 
Fiduciary [1210-AC02]

    Priority: Section 3(f)(1) Significant. Major under 5 U.S.C. 801.
    Unfunded Mandates: This action may affect the private sector under 
Public Law 104-4.
    Legal Authority: 29 U.S.C. 1002; 29 U.S.C. 1135; Reorganization 
Plan No. 4 of 1978, 5 U.S.C. App. 252 (2020)
    CFR Citation: 29 CFR 2510.3-21.
    Legal Deadline: None.
    Abstract: This rulemaking would amend the regulatory definition of 
the term fiduciary set forth at 29 CFR 2510.3-21(c) to more 
appropriately define when persons who render investment advice for a 
fee to employee benefit plans and IRAs are fiduciaries within the 
meaning of section 3(21) of ERISA and section 4975(e)(3) of the 
Internal Revenue Code. The amendment would take into account practices 
of investment advisers, and the expectations of plan officials and 
participants, and IRA owners who receive investment advice, as well as 
developments in the investment marketplace, including in the ways 
advisers are compensated that can subject advisers to harmful conflicts 
of interest. In conjunction with this rulemaking, EBSA also proposed 
amendments to existing prohibited transaction exemptions to ensure 
consistent protection of employee benefit plan and IRA investors.
    Statement of Need: Many protections, duties, and liabilities in 
ERISA hinge on fiduciary status; therefore, the determination of who is 
a fiduciary is of central importance. The Department's existing 
regulatory definition of an investment advice fiduciary, adopted in 
1975, established a five-part test for status as a fiduciary. The 1975 
regulation's five-part test is not founded in the statutory text of 
ERISA, does not take into account the current nature and structure of 
many individual account retirement plans and IRAs, is inconsistent with 
the reasonable expectations of plan officials and participants, and IRA 
owners who receive investment advice, and allows many investment advice 
providers to avoid status as a fiduciary under federal pension laws. 
Under ERISA, fiduciaries must avoid conflicts of interest or comply 
with a prohibited transaction exemption with conditions designed to 
protect retirement investors. A wide and compelling body of evidence 
shows that conflicts of interest and forms of compensation that can 
subject advisers to harmful conflicts of interest, if left unchecked, 
too often result in biased investment advice and resulting harm to 
retirement investors. In conjunction with this rulemaking, EBSA also 
proposed amendments to existing prohibited transaction exemptions to 
ensure consistent protection of employee benefit plan and IRA 
investors.
    Summary of Legal Basis: The Department is proposing the amendment 
to its regulation defining a fiduciary pursuant to authority in ERISA 
section 505 (29 U.S.C. 1135) and section 102 of Reorganization Plan No. 
4 of 1978, 5 U.S.C. App. 252 (2020).
    Alternatives: The Department considered as an alternative leaving 
the 1975 regulation in place without change.
    Anticipated Cost and Benefits: The proposed amendment to the 1975 
regulation would extend the protections associated with fiduciary 
status to more advice arrangements. The proposed regulation and 
associated prohibited transaction exemptions are expected to require 
providers of investment advice to adhere to a best interest standard, 
charge no more than reasonable compensation, eliminate or mitigate 
conflicts of interest, and make important disclosures to their 
customers, among other things. These protections would deliver 
substantial gains for retirement investors and economic benefits that 
more than justify the costs. The costs of the regulation are largely 
expected to stem from compliance with the associated prohibited 
transaction

[[Page 9443]]

exemptions. Estimates of the cost of compliance are reflected in the 
notice of proposed rulemaking.
    Risks: The Department believes that the 1975 regulation must be 
revised to align with retirement investors' reasonable expectations 
regarding their relationships with investment advice providers and to 
reflect developments in the investment advice marketplace since the 
1975 regulation was adopted. Failure to appropriately define an 
investment advice fiduciary under ERISA is likely to expose retirement 
investors to conflicts of interest that will erode retirement savings. 
The risks are especially great with respect to recommendations to roll 
assets out of ERISA-covered plans to IRAs because of the central 
importance of retirement plan savings to workers, the relative size of 
rollover transactions, and the technical requirements of the current 
fiduciary regulation, which have encouraged advisers to argue that 
their advice falls outside the regulation's purview regardless of its 
importance.
    Timetable:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Action                    Date            FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NPRM................................   11/03/23  88 FR 75890
NPRM Comment Period End.............   01/02/24
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Yes.
    Small Entities Affected: Businesses.
    Government Levels Affected: Undetermined.
    Federalism: This action may have federalism implications as defined 
in E.O. 13132.
    Agency Contact: Karen E. Lloyd, Office of Regulations and 
Interpretations, Department of Labor, Employee Benefits Security 
Administration, 200 Constitution Avenue NW, FP Building, Room N-5655, 
Washington, DC 20210, Phone: 202 693-8510.
    RIN: 1210-AC02

DOL--EBSA

168. Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act and the Consolidated 
Appropriations Act, 2021 [1210-AC11]

    Priority: Section 3(f)(1) Significant. Major under 5 U.S.C. 801.
    Unfunded Mandates: This action may affect the private sector under 
Public Law 104-4.
    Legal Authority: Pub. L. 116-260, Division BB, Title II; Pub. L. 
110-343, secs. 511-512
    CFR Citation: Not Yet Determined.
    Legal Deadline: None.
    Abstract: This rule would finalize proposed amendments to the final 
rules implementing the Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act 
(MHPAEA). The amendments clarify plans' and issuers' obligations under 
the law, promote compliance with MHPAEA, and update requirements to 
take into account experience with MHPAEA in the years since the rules 
were finalized. The rule would also finalize new regulations 
implementing amendments to MHPAEA recently enacted as part of the 
Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2021 (CAA, 2021).
    Statement of Need: There have been a number of legislative 
enactments related to MHPAEA since issuance of the 2014 final rules, 
including the 21st Century Cures Act, the Support Act, and the CAA, 
2021. This rule would propose amendments to the final rules and 
incorporate examples and modifications to account for this legislation 
and previously issued guidance and to take into account experience with 
MHPAEA in the years since the rules were finalized. This rule would 
also include new regulations implementing the nonquantitative treatment 
limitation (NQTL) comparative analyses requirements set forth under the 
CAA, 2021.
    Summary of Legal Basis: The Department of Labor regulations would 
be adopted pursuant to the authority contained in 29 U.S.C. 1002, 1135, 
1182, 1185d, 1191a, 1191b, and 1191c; Secretary of Labor's Order 1-
2011, 77 FR 1088 (Jan. 9, 2012).
    Alternatives: The Departments considered various approaches related 
to NQTLs as well as comparative analysis requirements. These 
alternatives included not expressly incorporating the statutory 
requirements that NQTLs be no more restrictive for MH/SUD than M/S and 
requiring plans to include specific data elements in their comparative 
analysis These alternatives will be included in the published final 
rule.
    Anticipated Cost and Benefits: The Departments anticipate that the 
MHPAEA final rules would improve the quality of the comparative 
analyses conducted by plans and issuers, as required by the CAA, 2021, 
help plans and issuers better understand and fulfill their obligations 
under MHPAEA, and promote greater transparency regarding discrepancies 
between mental health and substance use disorder benefits and medical/
surgical benefits. The Departments believe that the amendments could 
cause plans and issuers to revise their policies and remove limitations 
on treatments for mental health and substance use disorders. This will 
provide improved access for participants and beneficiaries seeking MH/
SUD treatments which will result in better health outcomes. These 
expanded protections and clarifications will greatly benefit plans, 
participants and beneficiaries and more than justify the costs. The 
costs of the proposed rule include costs to the plans and issuers 
associated with expanded coverage and utilization, collecting, 
analyzing and documenting data under the revised NQTL comparative 
analyses requirements.
    Risks: Risks and areas of uncertainty regarding potential impacts 
will be included in the final rule.
    Timetable:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Action                    Date            FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NPRM................................   08/03/23  88 FR 51552
NPRM Comment Period Extended........   09/28/23  88 FR 66728
NPRM Comment Period Extended End....   10/17/23
NPRM Analyze Comments...............   11/00/23
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Undetermined.
    Government Levels Affected: Federal, State.
    Federalism: This action may have federalism implications as defined 
in E.O. 13132.
    Agency Contact: Amber Rivers, Director, Office of Health Plan 
Standards and Compliance Assistance, Department of Labor, Employee 
Benefits Security Administration, 200 Constitution Avenue NW, 
Washington, DC 20210, Phone: 202 693-8335, Email: [email protected].
    RIN: 1210-AC11

DOL--EBSA

169. Definition of `Employer' Under Section 3(5) of ERISA-Association 
Health Plans [1210-AC16]

    Priority: Other Significant. Major status under 5 U.S.C. 801 is 
undetermined.
    Unfunded Mandates: Undetermined.
    Legal Authority: 29 U.S.C. 1002; 29 U.S.C. 1135
    CFR Citation: 29 CFR 2510.3-3, -5.
    Legal Deadline: None.
    Abstract: In this rulemaking, the Department of Labor's Employee 
Benefits Security Administration (EBSA) will explore whether to 
withdraw, or withdraw and replace, its regulation at 29 CFR 2510.3-5, 
published as a final rule in 2018, which

[[Page 9444]]

established an alternative set of criteria for determining when an 
employer association may act indirectly in the interest of an employer 
under section 3(5) of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act 
(ERISA) for purposes of establishing a multiple employer group health 
plan. The United States District Court for the District of Columbia 
vacated portions of the final rule in a 2019 decision in New York v. 
United States Department of Labor, 363 F. Supp. 3d 109 (D.D.C. 2019). 
EBSA will reevaluate the criteria for a group or association of 
employers to be able to sponsor a multiple employer group health plan.
    Statement of Need: To be determined.
    Summary of Legal Basis: To be determined.
    Alternatives: To be determined.
    Anticipated Cost and Benefits: To be determined.
    Risks: To be determined.
    Timetable:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Action                    Date            FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NPRM................................   11/00/23
Final Rule..........................   04/00/24
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Undetermined.
    Government Levels Affected: Undetermined.
    Federalism: Undetermined.
    Agency Contact: Jeffrey J. Turner, Deputy Director, Office of 
Regulations and Interpretations, Department of Labor, Employee Benefits 
Security Administration, 200 Constitution Avenue NW, FP Building, Room 
N-5655, Washington, DC 20210, Phone: 202 693-8500.
    RIN: 1210-AC16

DOL--EBSA

Final Rule Stage

170. Coverage of Certain Preventive Services Under the Affordable Care 
Act [1210-AC13]

    Priority: Other Significant. Major status under 5 U.S.C. 801 is 
undetermined.
    Legal Authority: Pub. L. 111-148, sec. 1001
    CFR Citation: Not Yet Determined.
    Legal Deadline: None.
    Abstract: This rule would finalize proposed amendments to the final 
rules regarding religious and moral exemptions and accommodations 
regarding coverage of certain preventive services under Title I of the 
Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act.
    Statement of Need: Previous rules, regulations, and court decisions 
have left many women without contraceptive coverage and access to 
contraceptive services without cost sharing. These rules would seek to 
resolve the long- running litigation with respect to religious 
objections to providing contraceptive coverage by honoring the 
objecting entities' religious objections while also ensuring that women 
enrolled in a group health plan established or maintained, or in health 
insurance covered offered or arranged, by an objecting entity have the 
opportunity to obtain contraceptive services at no cost. These rules 
would also eliminate the exemption for entities and individuals that 
object to contraceptive coverage based on non-religious moral beliefs, 
which prevents access to contraceptive services without cost sharing.
    Summary of Legal Basis: The Department of Labor regulations would 
be adopted pursuant to the authority contained in 29 U.S.C. 1002, 1135, 
1182, 1185d, 1191a, 1191b, and 1191c; Secretary of Labor's Order 1-
2011, 77 FR 1088 (Jan. 9, 2012).
    Alternatives: In developing this rule, the Departments considered 
various alternative approaches. The Departments considered maintaining 
the exemption (along with the existing accommodations and the proposed 
individual contraceptive arrangement) with respect to group health 
plans, health insurance issuers, and institutions of higher education 
that have a non-religious, moral objection to contraceptive coverage. 
With respect to individuals enrolled in coverage through entities that 
have a religious objection to contraceptive coverage, the Departments 
considered an approach under which contraceptive coverage would be 
available through separate individual insurance policies that cover 
only contraceptives and in which participants, beneficiaries, and 
enrollees would have to separately enroll if they desired contraceptive 
coverage. The Departments also considered an approach under which, if 
an objecting entity contracts for a health plan without contraceptive 
coverage, the contraceptive coverage requirement would apply directly 
to the issuer in the case of a fully insured plan, or the third party 
administrator in the case of a self-insured plan. The issuer or third 
party administrator would then be required to fulfill its separate and 
independent obligation to provide contraceptive coverage.
    Anticipated Cost and Benefits: This rule is expected to increase 
access to contraceptive services without cost sharing through the 
individual contraceptive arrangement for eligible individuals and the 
elimination of the exemption for entities and individuals that object 
to contraceptive coverage based on non-religious moral beliefs. This 
rule would increase health equity given the disproportionate burden of 
out-of-pocket spending on contraceptive services currently faced by 
low-income individuals (as those individuals with lower incomes must 
spend a greater percentage of their incomes on contraceptive services). 
This rule would also lead to better health outcomes for eligible 
individuals by increasing access to contraceptive services and reducing 
unintended pregnancies. Participating providers of contraceptive 
services (including clinicians, facilities, and pharmacies) and issuers 
would incur costs associated with entering into signed agreements for 
reimbursement of costs associated with the provision of contraceptive 
services to eligible individuals, including costs of verifying consumer 
eligibility and other associated administrative costs. Eligible 
individuals would incur costs associated with participating in the 
individual contraception arrangement, including confirming eligibility 
to their provider of contraceptive services. HHS estimates the total 
cost to providers of contraceptive services, issuers, and eligible 
individuals to be approximately $30.2 million annually. The rule would 
also lead to a reduction in health care costs for individuals, issuers, 
group health plan sponsors, and states due to reductions in unintended 
pregnancies.
    Risks: Departments do not have information on the number of 
entities and individuals that have claimed a moral exemption to 
providing contraceptive coverage and are therefore uncertain of the 
amount of the potential transfer from plans and issuers to 
participants, beneficiaries, and enrollees due to reduced out-of-pocket 
spending on contraceptive services associated with the proposed 
elimination of the exemption for entities and individuals that object 
to contraceptive coverage based on nonreligious moral beliefs. The 
Departments estimate that the provision of the individual contraceptive 
arrangement could lead to a transfer from the Federal Government to 
individuals (via issuers to providers of contraceptive services) of 
approximately $49.9 million annually. This estimate is uncertain due to 
the limited information available in the 2019 user fee adjustment data. 
The Departments are uncertain as to how the number of participating 
providers might vary (for example, across rural and urban areas) and 
how this variation might affect access to services under the individual

[[Page 9445]]

contraceptive arrangement. Due to the lack of data, the Departments are 
unable to develop a precise estimate of the number of eligible 
individuals who might participate in the individual contraceptive 
arrangement. This overall lack of data leads to uncertainty regarding 
the magnitudes of the total cost savings to eligible individuals and 
any resulting potential cost savings to states (associated with reduced 
spending on State-funded programs that provide contraceptive services 
or a potential reduction in the number of unintended pregnancies that 
would otherwise impose costs to states).
    Timetable:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Action                    Date            FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NPRM................................   02/02/23  88 FR 7236
NPRM Comment Period End.............   04/03/23
Final Rule..........................   08/00/24
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Undetermined.
    Government Levels Affected: Federal, Local, State.
    Federalism: This action may have federalism implications as defined 
in E.O. 13132.
    Agency Contact: Amber Rivers, Director, Office of Health Plan 
Standards and Compliance Assistance, Department of Labor, Employee 
Benefits Security Administration, 200 Constitution Avenue NW, 
Washington, DC 20210, Phone: 202 693-8335, Email: [email protected].
    RIN: 1210-AC13

DOL--MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH ADMINISTRATION (MSHA)

Final Rule Stage

171. Respirable Crystalline Silica [1219-AB36]

    Priority: Section 3(f)(1) Significant. Major status under 5 U.S.C. 
801 is undetermined.
    Legal Authority: 30 U.S.C. 811; 30 U.S.C. 813(h); 30 U.S.C. 957
    CFR Citation: 30 CFR 56; 30 CFR 57; 30 CFR 60; 30 CFR 70; 30 CFR 
71; 30 CFR 72; 30 CFR 75; 30 CFR 90.
    Legal Deadline: None.
    Abstract: Many miners are exposed to respirable crystalline silica 
(RCS) in respirable dust. These miners can develop lung diseases such 
as chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and various forms of 
pneumoconiosis, such as silicosis, progressive massive fibrosis, and 
rapidly progressive pneumoconiosis.
    These diseases are irreversible and may ultimately be fatal. MSHA's 
existing standards limit miners' exposures to RCS. MSHA will publish a 
final rule to address the existing permissible exposure limit of RCS 
for all miners and to update the existing respiratory protection 
standards under 30 CFR 56, 57, and 72.
    Statement of Need: Many miners are exposed to respirable 
crystalline silica (RCS) in respirable dust, which can result in the 
onset of diseases such as silicosis and rapidly progressive 
pneumoconiosis. These lung diseases are irreversible and may ultimately 
be fatal. MSHA is examining the existing limit on miners' exposures to 
RCS to safeguard the health of America's miners. Based on MSHA's 
experience with existing standards and regulations, as well as OSHA's 
RCS standards and NIOSH research, MSHA will develop a rule applicable 
to metal, nonmetal, and coal operations.
    Summary of Legal Basis: Sections 101(a), 103(h), and 508 of the 
Federal Mine Safety and Health Act of 1977 (Mine Act), as amended (30 
U.S.C. 811(a), 813(h), and 957).
    Alternatives: MSHA will examine one or two different levels of 
miners' RCS exposure limit and assess the technological and economic 
feasibility of such option(s).
    Anticipated Cost and Benefits: To be determined.
    Risks: Miners face impairment risk of health and functional 
capacity due to RCS exposures. MSHA will examine the existing RCS 
standard and determine ways to reduce the health risks associate with 
RCS exposure.
    Timetable:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Action                    Date            FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Request for Information (RFI).......   08/29/19  84 FR 45452
RFI Comment Period End..............   10/28/19
NPRM................................   07/13/23  88 FR 44852
NPRM Comment Period Extended........   08/14/23  88 FR 54961
NPRM Comment Period Extended End....   09/11/23
NPRM Notice of Public Hearings......   07/26/23  88 FR 48146
NPRM Public Hearing in Arlington       08/03/23
 Virginia.
NPRM Public Hearing in Beckley, West   08/10/23
 Virginia.
NPRM Public Hearing in Denver,         08/21/23
 Colorado.
Final Rule..........................   04/00/24
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Undetermined.
    Small Entities Affected: Businesses, Governmental Jurisdictions.
    Government Levels Affected: Local, State.
    Agency Contact: S. Aromie Noe, Director, Office of Standards, 
Regulations, and Variances, Department of Labor, Mine Safety and Health 
Administration, 201 12th Street S, Suite 401, Arlington, VA 22202, 
Phone: 202 693-9440, Fax: 202 693-9441.
    RIN: 1219-AB36

DOL--MSHA

172. Safety Program for Surface Mobile Equipment [1219-AB91]

    Priority: Other Significant.
    Legal Authority: 30 U.S.C. 811; 30 U.S.C. 813(h); 30 U.S.C. 957
    CFR Citation: 30 CFR 56; 30 CFR 57; 30 CFR 77.
    Legal Deadline: None.
    Abstract: MSHA would require mine operators to establish a written 
safety program for mobile equipment and powered haulage equipment 
(except belt conveyors) used at surface mines and surface areas of 
underground mines. Under this proposal, mine operators would be 
required to assess hazards and risks and identify actions to reduce 
accidents related to surface mobile equipment. The operators would have 
flexibility to develop and implement a safety program that would work 
best for their mining conditions and operations. This proposed rule 
would reduce fatal and nonfatal injuries involving surface mobile 
equipment used at mines and improve miner safety and health.
    Statement of Need: Although mine accidents are declining, accidents 
involving mobile and powered haulage equipment are still a leading 
cause of fatalities in mining. To reduce fatal and nonfatal injuries 
involving surface mobile equipment used at mines, MSHA is proposing a 
regulation that would require mine operators employing six or more 
miners to develop a written safety program for mobile and powered 
haulage equipment (excluding belt conveyors) at surface mines and 
surface areas of underground mines. The written safety program would 
include actions mine operators would take to identify hazards and risks 
to reduce accidents, injuries, and fatalities related to surface mobile 
equipment.
    Summary of Legal Basis: Sections 101(a), 103(h), and 508 of the 
Federal Mine Safety and Health Act of 1977 (Mine Act), as amended (30 
U.S.C. 811(a), 813(h), and 957).
    Alternatives: MSHA considered requiring all mines, regardless of 
size, to

[[Page 9446]]

develop and implement a written safety program for surface mobile 
equipment. Based on the Agency's experience, MSHA concluded that a mine 
operator with five or fewer miners would generally have a limited 
inventory of surface mobile equipment. These operators would also have 
less complex mining operations, with fewer mobile equipment hazards 
that would necessitate a written safety program. Thus, these mine 
operators are not required to have a written safety program, although 
MSHA would encourage operators with five or fewer miners to have safety 
programs. MSHA will consider comments and suggestions received on 
alternatives or best practices that all mines might use to develop 
safety programs (whether written or not) for surface mobile equipment.
    Anticipated Cost and Benefits: The proposed rule would not be 
economically significant, and it would have some net benefits.
    Risks: Miners operating mobile and powered haulage equipment or 
working nearby face risks of workplace injuries, illnesses, or deaths. 
The proposed rule would allow a flexible approach to reducing hazards 
and risks specific to each mine so that mine operators would be able to 
develop and implement safety programs that work for their operation, 
mining conditions, and miners.
    Timetable:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Action                    Date            FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Request for Information (RFI).......   06/26/18  83 FR 29716
Notice of Public Stakeholder           07/25/18  83 FR 35157
 Meetings.
Stakeholder Meeting--Birmingham, AL.   08/07/18
Stakeholder Meeting--Dallas, TX.....   08/09/18
Stakeholder Meeting (Webinar)--        08/16/18
 Arlington, VA.
Stakeholder Meeting--Reno, NV.......   08/21/18
Stakeholder Meeting--Beckley, WV....   09/11/18
Stakeholder Meeting--Albany, NY.....   09/20/18
Stakeholder Meeting--Arlington, VA..   09/25/18
RFI Comment Period End..............   12/24/18
NPRM................................   09/09/21  86 FR 50496
NPRM Comment Period End.............   11/08/21
NPRM Reopening of the Rulemaking       12/20/21  86 FR 71860
 Record for.
Public Comments.....................
Virtual Public Hearing..............   01/11/22
NPRM Comment Period Reopened End....   02/11/22
Final Rule..........................   11/00/23
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No.
    Small Entities Affected: No.
    Government Levels Affected: None.
    Agency Contact: S. Aromie Noe, Director, Office of Standards, 
Regulations, and Variances, Department of Labor, Mine Safety and Health 
Administration, 201 12th Street S, Suite 401, Arlington, VA 22202, 
Phone: 202 693-9440, Fax: 202 693-9441.
    RIN: 1219-AB91

DOL--OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ADMINISTRATION (OSHA)

Prerule Stage

173. Heat Illness Prevention in Outdoor and Indoor Work Settings [1218-
AD39]

    Priority: Section 3(f)(1) Significant. Major under 5 U.S.C. 801.
    Legal Authority: Not Yet Determined
    CFR Citation: None.
    Legal Deadline: None.
    Abstract: Heat is the leading weather-related killer. Excessive 
heat can cause heat stroke and even death if not treated properly. It 
also exacerbates existing health problems like asthma, kidney failure, 
and heart disease. Workers in agriculture and construction are at 
highest risk, but the problem affects all workers exposed to heat, 
including indoor workers without climate-controlled environments. 
Essential jobs where employees are exposed to high levels of heat are 
disproportionately held by Black and Brown workers.
    Heat stress killed 815 U.S. workers and seriously injured more than 
70,000 workers from 1992 through 2017, according to the Bureau of Labor 
Statistics. However, this is likely a vast underestimate, given that 
injuries and illnesses are under reported in the U.S., especially in 
the sectors employing vulnerable and often undocumented workers. 
Further, heat is not always recognized as a cause of heat-induced 
injuries or deaths and can easily be misclassified, because many of the 
symptoms overlap with other more common diagnoses.
    To date, California, Oregon, Washington, Minnesota, and the US 
military have issued heat protections. OSHA currently relies on the 
general duty clause (OSH Act section 5(a)(1)) to protect workers from 
this hazard. Notably, from 2013 through 2017, California used its heat 
standard to conduct 50 times more inspections resulting in a heat-
related violation than OSHA did nationwide under its general duty 
clause. It is likely to become even more difficult to protect workers 
from heat stress under the general duty clause in light of the 2019 
Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission's decision in 
Secretary of Labor v. A.H. Sturgill Roofing, Inc.
    OSHA was petitioned by Public Citizen for a heat stress standard in 
2011. The Agency denied this petition in 2012, but was once again 
petitioned by Public Citizen, on behalf of approximately 130 
organizations, for a heat stress standard in 2018 and 2019. In 2019 and 
2021, some members of the Senate also urged OSHA to initiate rulemaking 
to address heat stress.
    Given the potentially broad scope of regulatory efforts to protect 
workers from heat hazards, as well as a number of technical issues and 
considerations with regulating this hazard (e.g., heat stress 
thresholds, heat acclimatization planning, exposure monitoring, medical 
monitoring), OSHA published an ANPRM on Heat Injury and Illness 
Prevention in Outdoor and Indoor Work Settings (October 27, 2021) to 
begin a dialogue and engage with stakeholders to explore the potential 
for rulemaking on this topic. For additional information, please see 
the Department's fall regulatory plan narrative statement.
    Statement of Need: Heat stress killed more than 900 US workers, and 
caused serious heat illness in almost 100 times as many, from 1992 
through 2017, according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics. However, 
this is likely a vast underestimate, given that injuries and illnesses 
are underreported in the US, especially in the sectors employing 
vulnerable and often undocumented workers. Further, heat is not always 
recognized as a cause of heat-induced illnesses or deaths, which are 
often misclassified, because many of the symptoms overlap with other 
more common diagnoses.
    Summary of Legal Basis: The Occupational Safety and Health Act of 
1970 authorizes the Secretary of Labor to set mandatory occupational 
safety and health standards to assure safe and healthful working 
conditions for working men and women (29 U.S.C. 651).

[[Page 9447]]

    Alternatives: One alternative to proposed rulemaking would be to 
take no regulatory action and instead rely upon the General Duty Clause 
(OSH Act Section 5(a)(1) for select enforcement activity). As OSHA 
develops more information, it will also make decisions relating to the 
scope of the standard and the requirements it may impose.
    Anticipated Cost and Benefits: The estimates of costs and benefits 
are still under development.
    Risks: Analysis of risks is still under development.
    Timetable:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Action                    Date            FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
ANPRM...............................   10/27/21  86 FR 59309
ANPRM Comment Period Extended.......   12/02/21  86 FR 68594
ANPRM Comment Period Extended End...   01/26/22
Initiate SBREFA.....................   06/02/23
Complete SBREFA.....................   11/00/23
Analyze SBREFA Report...............   01/00/24
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Undetermined.
    Government Levels Affected: Undetermined.
    Agency Contact: Andrew Levinson, Director, Directorate of Standards 
and Guidance, Department of Labor, Occupational Safety and Health 
Administration, 200 Constitution Avenue NW, FP Building, Room N-3718, 
Washington, DC 20210, Phone: 202 693-1950, Email: 
[email protected].
    RIN: 1218-AD39

DOL--OSHA

Proposed Rule Stage

174. Infectious Diseases [1218-AC46]

    Priority: Section 3(f)(1) Significant. Major status under 5 U.S.C. 
801 is undetermined.
    Unfunded Mandates: Undetermined.
    Legal Authority: 5 U.S.C. 533; 29 U.S.C. 657 and 658; 29 U.S.C. 
660; 29 U.S.C. 666; 29 U.S.C. 669; 29 U.S.C. 673
    CFR Citation: 29 CFR 1910.
    Legal Deadline: None.
    Abstract: Employees in health care and other high-risk environments 
face long-standing infectious disease hazards such as tuberculosis 
(TB), varicella disease (chickenpox, shingles), and measles, as well as 
new and emerging infectious disease threats, such as Severe Acute 
Respiratory Syndrome (SARS), the 2019 Novel Coronavirus (COVID-19), and 
pandemic influenza. Health care workers and workers in related 
occupations, or who are exposed in other high-risk environments, are at 
increased risk of contracting TB, SARS, Methicillin-Resistant 
Staphylococcus Aureus (MRSA), COVID-19, and other infectious diseases 
that can be transmitted through a variety of exposure routes. OSHA is 
examining regulatory alternatives for control measures to protect 
employees from infectious disease exposures to pathogens that can cause 
significant disease. Workplaces where such control measures might be 
necessary include: health care, emergency response, correctional 
facilities, homeless shelters, drug treatment programs, and other 
occupational settings where employees can be at increased risk of 
exposure to potentially infectious people. A standard could also apply 
to laboratories, which handle materials that may be a source of 
pathogens, and to pathologists, coroners' offices, medical examiners, 
and mortuaries.
    Statement of Need: Employees in health care and other high-risk 
environments face long-standing infectious disease hazards such as 
tuberculosis (TB), varicella disease (chickenpox, shingles), and 
measles, as well as new and emerging infectious disease threats, such 
as Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS), the 2019 Novel Coronavirus 
(COVID-19), and pandemic influenza. Health care workers and workers in 
related occupations, or who are exposed in other high-risk 
environments, are at increased risk of contracting TB, SARS, 
Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus (MRSA), COVID-19, and other 
infectious diseases that can be transmitted through a variety of 
exposure routes.
    Summary of Legal Basis: The Occupational Safety and Health Act of 
1970 authorizes the Secretary of Labor to set mandatory occupational 
safety and health standards to assure safe and healthful working 
conditions for working men and women (29 U.S.C. 651).
    Alternatives: One alternative is to take no regulatory action. OSHA 
is examining regulatory alternatives for control measures to protect 
employees from infectious disease exposures to pathogens that can cause 
significant disease. In addition to health care, workplaces where SERs 
suggested such control measures might be necessary include: emergency 
response, correctional facilities, homeless shelters, drug treatment 
programs, and other occupational settings where employees can be at 
increased risk of exposure to potentially infectious people.
    A standard could also apply to laboratories, which handle materials 
that may be a source of pathogens, and to pathologists, coroners' 
offices, medical examiners, and mortuaries. OSHA offered several 
alternatives to the SBREFA panel when presenting the proposed 
Infectious Disease (ID) rule. OSHA considered a specification oriented 
rule rather than a performance oriented rule, but has preliminarily 
determined that this type of rule would provide less flexibility and 
would likely fail to anticipate all of the potential hazards and 
necessary controls for every type and every size of facility and would 
under-protect workers. OSHA also considered changing the scope of the 
rule by restricting the ID rule to workers who have occupational 
exposure during the provision of direct patient care in institutional 
settings but based on the evidence thus far analyzed, workers 
performing other covered tasks in both institutional and non- 
institutional settings also face a risk of infection because of their 
occupational exposure.
    Anticipated Cost and Benefits: The estimates of costs and benefits 
are still under development.
    Risks: Analysis of risks is still under development.
    Timetable:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Action                    Date            FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Request for Information (RFI).......   05/06/10  75 FR 24835
RFI Comment Period End..............   08/04/10
Analyze Comments....................   12/30/10
Stakeholder Meetings................   07/05/11  76 FR 39041
Initiate SBREFA.....................   06/04/14
Complete SBREFA.....................   12/22/14
NPRM................................   06/00/24
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Yes.
    Small Entities Affected: Businesses, Governmental Jurisdictions.
    Government Levels Affected: Local, State.
    Federalism: Undetermined.
    Agency Contact: Andrew Levinson, Director, Directorate of Standards 
and Guidance, Department of Labor, Occupational Safety and Health 
Administration, 200 Constitution Avenue NW, FP Building, Room N-3718, 
Washington, DC 20210, Phone: 202 693-1950, Email: 
[email protected].
    RIN: 1218-AC46


[[Page 9448]]



DOL--OSHA

175. Emergency Response [1218-AC91]

    Priority: Section 3(f)(1) Significant. Major under 5 U.S.C. 801.
    Unfunded Mandates: Undetermined.
    Legal Authority: 29 U.S.C. 655(b); 29 U.S.C. 657; 5 U.S.C. 609
    CFR Citation: 29 CFR 1910.
    Legal Deadline: None.
    Abstract: OSHA currently regulates aspects of emergency response 
and preparedness; some of these standards were promulgated decades ago, 
and none were designed as comprehensive emergency response standards. 
Consequently, they do not address the full range of hazards or concerns 
currently facing emergency responders, and other workers providing 
skilled support, nor do they reflect major changes in performance 
specifications for protective clothing and equipment. The agency 
acknowledges that current OSHA standards also do not reflect all the 
major developments in safety and health practices that have already 
been accepted by the emergency response community and incorporated into 
industry consensus standards. OSHA is considering updating these 
standards with information gathered through an RFI and public meetings.
    Statement of Need: Emergency response is a dangerous activity with 
more than 100 responders killed, and hundreds of thousands injured each 
year. OSHA currently regulates aspects of emergency response and 
preparedness; some of these standards were promulgated decades ago, and 
none were designed as comprehensive emergency response standards. 
Consequently, they do not address the full range of hazards or concerns 
currently facing emergency responders, nor do they reflect major 
changes in performance specifications for protective clothing and 
equipment. The agency acknowledges that current OSHA standards also do 
not reflect all the major developments in safety and health practices 
that have already been accepted by the emergency response community and 
incorporated into industry consensus standards. OSHA is developing a 
proposed rule that updates, by replacing, the existing outdated fire 
brigade standard to reflect current consensus standards and industry 
best practices. The agency anticipates that compliance with the updated 
rule would significantly reduce injuries and fatalities.
    Summary of Legal Basis: The Occupational Safety and Health Act of 
1970 authorizes the Secretary of Labor to set mandatory occupational 
safety and health standards to assure safe and healthful working 
conditions for working men and women (29 U.S.C. 651).
    Alternatives: One alternative to proposed rulemaking would be to 
take no regulatory action. As a program standard that is primarily 
performance based, alternatives would depend on each employer's 
individual situation. There are no alternatives proposed in the NPRM 
under development. OSHA intends to seek stakeholder input for 
alternatives that could reduce the burden on small entities, and on 
entities with volunteer emergency responders who are treated as 
employees in some states with OSHA approved state OSH programs and 
would be impacted by a proposed rule.
    Anticipated Cost and Benefits: The estimates of costs and benefits 
are still under development.
    Risks: Analysis of risks is still under development.
    Timetable:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Action                    Date            FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Stakeholder Meetings................   07/30/14
Convene NACOSH Workgroup............   09/09/15
NACOSH Review of Workgroup Report...   12/14/16
Initiate SBREFA.....................   08/02/21
Finalize SBREFA.....................   12/02/21
NPRM................................   11/00/23
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Yes.
    Small Entities Affected: Governmental Jurisdictions.
    Government Levels Affected: Local, State.
    Federalism: Undetermined.
    Agency Contact: Andrew Levinson, Director, Directorate of Standards 
and Guidance, Department of Labor, Occupational Safety and Health 
Administration, 200 Constitution Avenue NW, FP Building, Room N-3718, 
Washington, DC 20210, Phone: 202 693-1950, Email: 
[email protected].
    RIN: 1218-AC91

BILLING CODE 4510-HL-P

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION (DOT)

Introduction: Departmental Mission

    The U.S. Department of Transportation (Department or DOT) has a 
mission to deliver the world's leading transportation system, serving 
the American people and economy through the safe, efficient, 
sustainable, and equitable movement of people and goods.

The Department's Regulatory Philosophy, Initiatives, and Priorities

    DOT issues regulations to make America's transportation the safest 
in the world for the benefit of all who use it, grow an inclusive and 
sustainable economy, reduce inequities across our transportation 
systems and the communities they affect, and help tackle the climate 
crisis. To accomplish this goal, DOT regulates safety in the aviation, 
motor carrier, railroad, motor vehicle, commercial space, transit, and 
pipeline transportation areas. The Department also regulates aviation 
consumer and economic issues and provides financial assistance and 
writes the necessary implementing rules for programs involving 
highways, airports, mass transit, the maritime industry, railroads, 
motor transportation and vehicle safety. DOT also has responsibility 
for developing policies that implement a wide range of regulations that 
govern Departmental programs such as acquisition and grants management, 
access for people with disabilities, environmental protection, energy 
conservation, information technology, occupational safety and health, 
property asset management, seismic safety, security, emergency 
response, and the use of aircraft and vehicles. In addition, DOT writes 
regulations to carry out a variety of statutes ranging from the Air 
Carrier Access Act and the Americans with Disabilities Act to Title VI 
of the Civil Rights Act.
    Safety is our North Star. The DOT Regulatory Plan reflects our 
commitment through a balanced regulatory approach grounded in reducing 
transportation-related fatalities and injuries. Our goals are to manage 
safety risks, reverse recent trends negatively affecting safety, and 
build on the successes that have already been achieved to make our 
transportation system safer than it has ever been. The regulatory plan 
laid out below also reflects a careful balance that emphasizes the 
Department's priorities in responding to the urgent challenges facing 
our nation.
    The safe and efficient movement of goods and passengers requires us 
not just to maintain, but to improve our national transportation 
infrastructure. Accordingly, our Regulatory Plan incorporates 
regulatory actions that increase competition and consumer protection, 
as well as enable the next generation of automation technology for 
commercial motor vehicles.

[[Page 9449]]

    Climate change is one of the most urgent challenges facing our 
Nation. As discussed in the next section, the Department has engaged in 
significant regulatory activities to address this challenge.
    Ensuring that the transportation system equitably benefits 
underserved communities is a top priority. This work is guided by the 
Departmental and interagency work being done pursuant to Executive 
Order 13985, Advancing Racial Equity and Support for Underserved 
Communities Through the Federal Government. As discussed in the next 
section, the Department is working on multiple regulatory changes to 
ensure access to transportation for people with disabilities.
    When developing regulations and establishing our regulatory 
priorities, the Department fosters active participation and engagement 
from members of the public and affected communities. In our Regulatory 
Plan, we detail engagement efforts that have helped to inform our 
priorities to date, as well as future engagement tools we plan to use. 
The Department is ensuring that we hear from members of the public who 
have not typically participated in the regulatory process. To that end, 
in April 2022, the Department issued new ex parte guidance that 
encourages DOT personnel to have meetings or other contacts with 
outside parties during rulemaking and states that DOT personnel 
``should ensure, through appropriate affirmative outreach where 
necessary, that the opportunity to engage in ex parte communications is 
equitable to all parties, including stakeholders who might otherwise be 
less represented in that process.'' \1\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ Guidance on Communication with Parties outside of the 
Federal Executive Branch (Ex Parte Communications) at 5, available 
at: https://www.transportation.gov/sites/dot.gov/files/2022-04/Guidance-on-Communication-with-Parties-outside-of-the-Federal-Executive-Branch-%28Ex-Parte-Communications%29.pdf. See also OIRA 
Memorandum on Broadening Public Participation and Community 
Engagement in the Regulatory Process, available at: https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/Broadening-Public-Participation-and-Community-Engagement-in-the-Regulatory-Process.pdf.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Department carries out its responsibilities through the Office 
of the Secretary (OST) and the following operating administrations 
(OAs): Federal Aviation Administration (FAA); Federal Highway 
Administration (FHWA); Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration 
(FMCSA); Federal Railroad Administration (FRA); Federal Transit 
Administration (FTA); Maritime Administration (MARAD); National Highway 
Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA); Pipeline and Hazardous Materials 
Safety Administration (PHMSA); and Great Lakes St. Lawrence Seaway 
Development Corporation (GLS). Since each OA has its own area of focus, 
we summarize the regulatory priorities of each below. More information 
about each of the rules discussed below can be found in the DOT Unified 
Agenda.

Office of the Secretary of Transportation

    OST oversees the regulatory processes for the Department. OST 
implements the Department's regulatory policies and procedures and is 
responsible for ensuring the involvement of senior officials in 
regulatory decision making. Through the Office of the General Counsel 
(OGC), OST is also responsible for ensuring that the Department 
complies with the Administrative Procedure Act, Executive Orders 12866, 
13563 and 14094, DOT's Regulatory Policies and Procedures, and other 
legal and policy requirements affecting the Department's rulemaking 
activities. In addition, OST has the lead role in matters concerning 
aviation consumer and economic rules, Title VI of the Civil Rights Act, 
the Americans with Disabilities Act, and rules that affect multiple 
elements of the Department.
    OST provides guidance and training regarding compliance with 
regulatory requirements and processes for personnel throughout the 
Department. OST also plays an instrumental role in the Department's 
efforts to improve our economic analyses; risk assessments; regulatory 
flexibility analyses; other related analyses; retrospective reviews of 
rules; and data quality, including peer reviews. OGC is the lead office 
that works with the Office of Management and Budget's (OMB) Office of 
Information and Regulatory Affairs (OIRA) to comply with Executive 
Order 12866 for significant rules, coordinates the Department's 
response to OMB's intergovernmental review of other agencies' 
significant rulemaking documents, and other relevant Administration 
rulemaking directives. OGC also works closely with representatives of 
other agencies, the White House, and congressional staff to provide 
information on how various proposals would affect the ability of the 
Department to perform its safety, infrastructure, and other missions.
    The Department has recently completed a rulemaking to ensure that 
people with disabilities will be able to access lavatories on single-
aisle aircraft. This rule was heavily informed by feedback from persons 
with disabilities, as it was developed as part of a negotiated 
rulemaking. Stakeholders, including numerous disability advocacy 
organizations, directly developed the features of the rule, which DOT 
then implemented through a recently issued final rule. DOT also reached 
out to the U.S. Access Board to develop new safety and accessibility 
standards for on-board wheelchairs. The Department held a joint public 
meeting with the Access Board to solicit further comment on the 
provisions of the rule relating to on-board wheelchairs.
    In addition, the Department is working on: (1) a rulemaking to 
enhance the safety of air travel for individuals with disabilities who 
use wheelchairs; and (2) a rulemaking to ensure that disabled persons 
have equitable access to transit facilities. In the rulemaking to 
enhance air travel safety for wheelchair users, the Department is 
considering, among other things, options to ensure that assistance 
provided to individuals with disabilities be provided in a safe manner 
and that disabled individuals' assistive devices not be mishandled.
    Executive Order 14036 directs the Department to take actions that 
would promote competition and deliver benefits to America's consumers, 
including initiating a rulemaking to ensure that air consumers have 
ancillary fee information, including ``baggage fees,'' ``change fees,'' 
``cancellation fees,'' and fees for seating adjacent to young children 
at the time of ticket purchase. Among a number of steps to further the 
Administration's goals in this area, the Department has initiated a 
rulemaking to enhance consumers' ability to determine the true cost of 
travel, titled ``Enhancing Transparency of Airline Ancillary Service 
Fees.'' This rulemaking is informed by feedback received at three 
different public meetings: two meetings of the Aviation Consumer 
Protection Advisory Committee on December 8, 2022, and January 12, 
2023, and one public hearing on March 30, 2023. All meetings were open 
to the public, and attendees had the option to provide live input at 
the December 8 and March 30 meetings. The docket for this rule was also 
open to public comment submission for approximately 120 days.
    To further enhance consumer protection, the Department is also 
working on a rulemaking that would clarify, under the Department's 
rules requiring airlines to provide prompt refunds, when carriers and 
ticket agents must provide prompt ticket refunds to passengers when a 
carrier cancels or makes a significant change to a flight. This 
rulemaking would also require airlines to refund checked baggage fees 
when they fail to deliver the bags in a timely manner. This rulemaking 
is

[[Page 9450]]

informed by feedback received at four public meetings: three meetings 
of the Aviation Consumer Protection Advisory Committee on August 22, 
2022, December 8, 2022, and January 12, 2023, and one public hearing on 
March 21, 2023. The docket for this rule was also open to public 
comment submission for approximately 130 days.

Federal Aviation Administration

    FAA is charged with safely and efficiently operating and 
maintaining the most complex aviation system in the world. To enhance 
aviation safety, FAA is working on a rulemaking that would require a 
safety management system for certain aircraft, engine, and propeller 
manufacturers; certificate holders conducting common carriage 
operations; and persons conducting certain, specific types of air tour 
operations. This rulemaking is informed by feedback that FAA received 
from an Aviation Rulemaking Committee comprised of members from across 
the aviation industry. In addition, FAA will proceed with a rulemakings 
to enable powered lift operations and to further advance the 
integration of unmanned aircraft systems into the national airspace 
system.

Federal Highway Administration

    FHWA carries out the Federal highway program in partnership with 
State and local agencies to meet the Nation's transportation needs. 
FHWA's mission is to improve the quality and performance of our 
Nation's highway system and its intermodal connectors.
    Consistent with this mission, FHWA has finalized its National 
Electric Vehicle Infrastructure (NEVI) Formula Program regulation as 
required by the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law (enacted as the 
Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act) (Pub. L. 117-58) (Nov. 15, 
2021). This regulation will enable States to implement federally-funded 
charging station projects in a standardized fashion across a national 
Electric Vehicle (EV) charging network that can be utilized by all EVs 
regardless of vehicle brand. Such standards will provide consumers with 
reliable expectations for travel in an EV across and throughout the 
United States and support a national workforce skilled and trained in 
EV supply equipment installation and maintenance. This rule was 
informed by feedback provided through two webinars hosted by FHWA that 
were advertised, in part, to communities interested in alternative 
fuels and sustainable transportation. FHWA is also working on a 
rulemaking that would establish a method for the measurement and 
reporting of greenhouse gas emissions associated with transportation. 
In addition, FHWA is working on a Buy America rulemaking to encourage 
the use of American-manufactured products.

Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration

    The mission of FMCSA is to reduce crashes, injuries, and fatalities 
involving commercial trucks and buses. FMCSA regulations establish 
minimum safety standards for motor carriers, commercial drivers, 
commercial motor vehicles, and State agencies receiving certain motor 
carrier safety grants and issuing commercial drivers' licenses.
    FMCSA will continue to coordinate efforts on the development of 
autonomous vehicle technologies and is currently working on a 
rulemaking to revise existing regulations to identify changes that 
might be needed to ensure that DOT regulations ensure safety and keep 
pace with innovations. This rulemaking is informed by feedback that 
FMCSA received at two separate listening sessions held with 
stakeholders and members of the public.
    Additionally, in support of the NHTSA automatic emergency braking 
(AEB) rulemaking for heavy trucks, FMCSA will seek information and 
comment concerning the maintenance and operation of AEB by motor 
carriers. FMCSA has also been engaged in activities to advance the 
voluntary adoption of AEB for heavy vehicles, primarily through the 
Tech-Celerate Now (TCN) program. This program focuses on accelerating 
the adoption of Advanced Driver Assistance Systems (ADAS), such as AEB, 
by the trucking industry to reduce fatalities and prevent injuries and 
crashes, in addition to realizing substantial return-on-investment 
through reducing costs associated with such crashes for the motor 
carrier. Initiated in September 2019 and completed in February 2022, 
the first phase of this program encompassed research into ADAS 
technology adoption barriers; a national outreach, educational, and 
awareness campaign; and data collection and analysis. Outreach 
accomplishments included development of training materials for fleets, 
drivers, and maintenance personnel related to AEB technology and 
return-on-investment (ROI) guides; educational videos on ADAS braking, 
steering, warning, and monitoring technologies; a web-based TCN ADAS-
specific ROI calculator; four articles on ADAS technologies; and a 
program website to host the training materials. Planning is underway 
for the second phase of the TCN program, which includes an expanded 
national outreach and education campaign, additional research into the 
barriers to ADAS adoption by motor carriers, and evaluation of the 
outreach campaign. FMCSA is also working on a rulemaking that would set 
a maximum speed for certain commercial motor vehicles.

National Highway Traffic Safety Administration

    NHTSA pursues policies that enable safety; establish light-, 
medium-, and heavy-duty vehicle fuel economy and fuel efficiency 
standards; enhance equity; and improve mobility to save lives, prevent 
injuries, and reduce economic and social costs due to roadway crashes. 
The statutory responsibilities of NHTSA relating to motor vehicles 
include reducing the number, and mitigating the effects, of motor 
vehicle crashes and related fatalities and injuries; providing safety-
relevant information to aid prospective purchasers of vehicles, child 
restraints, and tires; and improving fuel economy and fuel efficiency 
standards requirements. NHTSA develops safety standards and other 
regulations driven by data and research. NHTSA's regulatory priorities 
focus on issues related to safety, climate, equity, and vulnerable road 
users.
    Relative to climate and equity, NHTSA plans to propose a rulemaking 
to address the next phase of Fuel Efficiency and Greenhouse Gas 
Standards for Medium- and Heavy-Duty Engines and Vehicles, pursuant to 
Executive Order 14037. Also pursuant to Executive Order 14037, NHTSA 
has proposed the next phase of NHTSA's corporate average fuel economy 
(CAFE) standards for passenger cars and light trucks. To enhance the 
safety of vulnerable road users and vehicle occupants, NHTSA has issued 
a proposal to require automatic emergency braking (AEB) on light 
vehicles, including Pedestrian AEB. For heavy trucks, NHTSA also 
proposed a rulemaking, in coordination with FMCSA, to require AEB. 
NHTSA's rulemakings are informed by the public outreach that it 
regularly engaged in while a rule is in development, including with 
Federal partners; State, local, and tribal governments; and a wide 
range of interested stakeholders--some of whom represent underserved 
communities.

Federal Railroad Administration

    FRA exercises regulatory authority over all areas of railroad 
safety and, where feasible, incorporates flexible performance 
standards. The current FRA regulatory program continues to reflect a 
number of pending proceedings

[[Page 9451]]

to satisfy mandates resulting from the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law 
(2021). These actions support a safe, high-performing passenger rail 
network, protect worker safety, and encourage innovation and the 
adoption of new technology to improve rail safety.
    To further enhance safety, FRA is working on a rulemaking that 
would address the potential safety impact of one-person train 
operations, including appropriate measures to mitigate an accident's 
impact and severity. This rulemaking would address the issue of minimum 
requirements for the size of train crews, depending on the type of 
operations. To inform this rulemaking, FRA conducted outreach on its 
proposed rule that resulted in about 99 percent of the written comments 
submitted to the docket being from individual commenters who were not 
filing their comment officially on behalf of an organization, group, or 
business. FRA also held a public hearing that allowed more than 225 
people to watch live testimony from labor organization leaders, 
railroads, and rail associations, in addition to the approximately 60 
speakers and other physically present attendees.

Federal Transit Administration

    The mission of FTA is to improve public transportation for 
America's communities. To further that end, FTA provides financial and 
technical assistance to local public transit systems, including buses, 
subways, light rail, commuter rail, trolleys, and ferries, oversees 
safety measures, and helps develop next-generation technology research. 
FTA's regulatory activities implement the laws that apply to 
recipients' uses of Federal funding and the terms and conditions of FTA 
grant awards.

Maritime Administration

    MARAD administers Federal laws and programs to improve and 
strengthen the maritime transportation system to meet the economic, 
environmental, and security needs of the Nation. To that end, MARAD's 
efforts are focused upon ensuring a strong American presence in the 
domestic and international trades and to expanding maritime 
opportunities for American businesses and workers.
    MARAD's regulatory objectives and priorities reflect the Agency's 
responsibility for ensuring the availability of water transportation 
services for American shippers and consumers and, in times of war or 
national emergency, for the U.S. armed forces. MARAD will continue its 
work increasing the efficiency of program operations by updating and 
clarifying implementing rules and program administrative procedures.

Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration

    PHMSA has responsibility for rulemaking focused on hazardous 
materials transportation and pipeline safety. In addition, PHMSA 
administers programs under the Federal Water Pollution Control Act, as 
amended by the Oil Pollution Act of 1990.
    PHMSA will continue working on the Gas Pipeline Leak Detection and 
Repair rulemaking, which would amend the Pipeline Safety Regulations to 
enhance requirements for detecting and repairing leaks on new and 
existing natural gas distribution, gas transmission, and gas gathering 
pipelines. PHMSA anticipates that the amendments proposed in this 
rulemaking would reduce methane emissions arising from leaks and 
incidents from natural gas pipelines and address environmental justice 
concerns by improving the safety of natural gas pipelines near 
environmental justice communities and mitigating the risks for those 
communities arising from climate change. This rulemaking is informed by 
feedback that PHMSA received at a virtual public meeting. PHMSA staff 
also attended a Methane Detection Technology Workshop hosted by EPA in 
August 2021. In addition, in November 2023, PHMSA intends to hold a Gas 
Pipeline Advisory Committee meeting to discuss the leak detection 
rulemaking, including the comments received on the NPRM.

DOT--FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION (FAA)

Final Rule Stage

176. Safety Management Systems [2120-AL60]

    Priority: Other Significant. Major under 5 U.S.C. 801.
    Legal Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(f); 49 U.S.C. 44701(a)(5)
    CFR Citation: 14 CFR 135; 14 CFR 21; 14 CFR 91.
    Legal Deadline: None.
    Abstract: This rulemaking would apply the requirements of 14 CFR 
part 5, with appropriate modifications. As a result, this rulemaking 
would require persons engaged in the design and production of aircraft, 
engines, or propellers; certificate holders that conduct common 
carriage operations under part 135; and persons conducting certain, 
specific types of air tour operations under part 91 to implement a 
Safety Management System.
    Statement of Need: Recent incidents and accidents have indicated 
the need for action to improve safety in the National Airspace System 
(NAS). In addition, recommendations from the National Transportation 
Safety Board (NTSB), mandates in the Aircraft Certification Safety and 
Accountability (ACSA) Act (Pub. L. 116-260, December 27, 2020), 
agreements in International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) Annexes 
and Standards and Recommended Practices (SARPs), and recommendations 
from previous Aviation Rulemaking Committees (ARCs) indicate that 
expanded application of SMS is needed. Further, the successful 
implementation of Safety Management Systems (SMS) in part 121 suggests 
the potential benefit to expansion of SMS into other sectors of the 
aviation system. Therefore, the Federal Aviation Administration has 
determined that expanding the application of part 5 is necessary.
    Summary of Legal Basis: The FAA's authority to issue rules on 
aviation safety is found in title 49 of the United States Code 
(U.S.C.). Subtitle I, section 106 describes the authority of the FAA 
Administrator. This rulemaking is promulgated under the authority 
described in 49 U.S.C. 106(f), which establishes the authority of the 
Administrator to promulgate regulations and rules. Subtitle VII, 
Aviation Programs, describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's 
authority. This rulemaking is also promulgated under 49 U.S.C. 
44701(a)(5), 49 U.S.C. 44701(d)(1)(A), 49 U.S.C. 44701(a)(2), 49 U.S.C. 
44707(2), 49 U.S.C. 44702 and 49 U.S.C 44704. In addition, the Airport 
Certification, Safety, and Accountability Act, (the Act), Public Law 
116-260, division V, title I, sec. 102 (December 27, 2020) requires the 
FAA to initiate a rulemaking to require that manufacturers that hold 
both a type certificate and a production certificate issued pursuant to 
49 U.S.C. 44704 have a safety management system consistent with 
standards and recommended practices established by ICAO. This 
rulemaking is within the scope of the aforementioned authorities 
because it requires certain entities to develop and maintain an SMS to 
improve the safety of their operations. The development and 
implementation of SMS ensures safety in air transportation, 
manufacturing, and maintenance by helping certain entities proactively 
identify and mitigate safety hazards, thereby reducing the possibility 
or recurrence of accidents in air transportation.
    Alternatives: The proposed expansion of the applicability of part 5 
furthers the

[[Page 9452]]

Administrator's mission of promoting the safe flight of civil aircraft 
in air commerce and reducing or eliminating the possibility or 
recurrence of accidents in air transportation. The FAA is currently 
exploring several alternatives to determine how the revised 
applicability would extend SMS requirements to parts 21, 91, 135, and 
145.
    Summary of Legal Basis: The FAA is in the process of determining 
the costs and benefits associated with the proposed rule.
    Risks: An SMS is a formalized approach to managing safety by 
developing an organization-wide safety policy, developing formal 
methods of identifying hazards, analyzing and mitigating risk, 
developing methods for ensuring continuous safety improvement, and 
creating organization-wide safety promotion strategies. An SMS provides 
an organization's management with a set of decision-making tools that 
can be used to plan, organize, direct, and control its business 
activities in a manner that enhances safety and ensures compliance with 
regulatory standards. Adherence to standard operating procedures, 
proactive identification and mitigation of hazards and risks, and 
effective communications are crucial to continued operational safety. 
The FAA envisions an SMS would provide those covered by the proposed 
rule with an added layer of safety to help reduce the number of 
incidents, and accidents.
    Timetable:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Action                    Date            FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NPRM................................   01/11/23  88 FR 1932
NPRM Comment Period Extended........   01/30/23  88 FR 5812
NPRM Comment Period End.............   03/13/23
Second NPRM Comment Period End......   04/11/23
Analyzing Comments..................   06/30/23
Final Action........................   07/00/24
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No.
    Small Entities Affected: No.
    Government Levels Affected: None.
    URL For More Information: www.regulations.gov.
    URL For Public Comments: www.regulations.gov.
    Agency Contact: Scott VanBuren, Office of Accident Investigation 
and Prevention, Department of Transportation, Federal Aviation 
Administration, 800 Independence Avenue SW, Washington, DC 20591, 
Phone: 202 494-8417, Email: [email protected].
    RIN: 2120-AL60

BILLING CODE 4910-9X-P

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Statement of Regulatory Priorities

    The primary mission of the Department of the Treasury is to 
maintain a strong economy and create economic and job opportunities by 
promoting the conditions that enable economic growth and stability at 
home and abroad, strengthen national security by combatting threats and 
protecting the integrity of the financial system, and manage the U.S. 
Government's finances and resources effectively.
    Consistent with this mission, regulations of the Department and its 
constituent bureaus are promulgated to interpret and implement the laws 
as enacted by Congress and signed by the President. It is the policy of 
the Department to comply with applicable requirements to issue a Notice 
of Proposed Rulemaking and carefully consider public comments before 
adopting a final rule. Also, the Department invites interested parties 
to submit views on rulemaking projects while a proposed rule is being 
developed.
    To the extent permitted by law, it is the policy of the Department 
to adhere to the regulatory philosophy and principles set forth in 
Executive Orders 12866, 13563, and 13609 and to develop regulations 
that maximize aggregate net benefits to society while minimizing the 
economic and paperwork burdens imposed on persons and businesses 
subject to those regulations.

Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau

    The Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau (TTB) issues 
regulations to implement and enforce Federal laws relating to alcohol, 
tobacco, firearms, and ammunition excise taxes and certain non- tax 
laws relating to alcohol. TTB's mission and regulations are designed 
to:
    (1) Collect the taxes on alcohol, tobacco products, firearms, and 
ammunition;
    (2) Protect the consumer by ensuring the integrity of alcohol 
products;
    (3) Ensure only qualified businesses enter the alcohol and tobacco 
industries; and
    (4) Prevent unfair and unlawful market activity for alcohol and 
tobacco products.
    In FY 2024, TTB will continue its multi-year Regulations 
Modernization effort by prioritizing projects that reduce regulatory 
burdens, streamline and simplify requirements, and improve service to 
regulated businesses. These actions include rulemaking on streamlining 
permit and qualification requirements for distilled spirits plants, 
wineries, and breweries, and completing rulemaking to modernize the 
regulations regarding wine labeling and to authorize additional wine 
treating materials and processes.
    In addition, TTB will also prioritize publishing rulemaking to 
implement recommendations of the Department of the Treasury's February 
2022 report on Competition in the Markets for Beer, Wine, and Spirits, 
which was issued in response to Executive Order 14036, ``Promoting 
Competition in the American Economy.'' These actions focus on 
soliciting public comment on trade practice regulations that prevent 
anticompetitive practices and maintain a ``level playing field'' across 
the alcohol industry, and labeling and advertising regulations that 
would require alcohol beverage labels to include specific, content-
related information on alcohol content, allergens, and other 
ingredients. They also include finalizing rulemaking on proposed new 
approved container sizes (``standards of fill'') for wine and distilled 
spirits.
    The specific projects TTB plans to prioritize in FY 2024 are 
described below:
     Streamlining and Modernizing the Permit Application 
Process (RINs: 1513-AC46, 1513-AC47, and 1513-AC48, Modernization of 
Permit and Registration Application Requirements for Distilled Spirits 
Plants, Permit Applications for Wineries, and Qualification 
Requirements for Brewers, respectively).
    In FY 2022, TTB proposed regulatory changes to eliminate or 
streamline application and qualification requirements for distilled 
spirits plants and breweries. In FY 2024, TTB intends to publish a 
similar proposal for wineries, and to publish final rules to implement 
the changes for distilled spirits plants and breweries. These changes 
are expected to reduce the amount of information industry members must 
submit to TTB in connection with permit and similar applications to 
engage in regulated businesses and reduce the types of operational 
activities that require prior approval, and overall reduce the 
regulatory burden on both new and existing businesses.
     Modernizing the Alcohol Beverage Labeling and Advertising 
Requirements (RIN: 1513-AC67, Modernization of

[[Page 9453]]

Wine Labeling and Advertising Regulations).
    The Federal Alcohol Administration Act requires that alcohol 
beverages introduced in interstate commerce have a label approved under 
regulations prescribed by the Secretary of the Treasury. TTB conducted 
an analysis of its alcohol beverage labeling regulations to identify 
any that might be outmoded, ineffective, insufficient, or excessively 
burdensome, and to modify, streamline, expand, or repeal them in 
accordance with that analysis. These regulations were also reviewed to 
assess their applicability to the modern alcohol beverage marketplace. 
As a result of this review, in FY 2019, TTB proposed revisions to the 
regulations concerning the labeling requirements for wine, distilled 
spirits, and malt beverages. TTB anticipated that these regulatory 
changes would assist industry in voluntary compliance, decrease 
industry burden, and result in the regulated industries being able to 
bring products to market without undue delay. TTB received over 1,100 
comments in response to the notice, which included suggestions for 
further revisions. In FY 2020, TTB published in the Federal Register 
(85 FR 18704) a final rule amending its regulations to make permanent 
certain of the proposed liberalizing and clarifying changes, and to 
provide certainty with regard to certain other proposals that 
commenters generally opposed and that TTB did not intend to adopt. In 
FY 2022, TTB published in the Federal Register (87 FR 7526) a final 
rule that addressed remaining issues related to the labeling of 
distilled spirits and malt beverages and reorganized those regulations 
to make them easier to read and understand, for which industry members 
expressed support. In FY 2024, TTB intends to complete this 
modernization initiative by publishing a final rule to similarly 
reorganize the wine labeling regulations, address the remaining 
labeling issues related to wine, and finalize the regulations related 
to the advertising of wine, distilled spirits, and malt beverages.
     Authorizing the Use of Additional Wine Treating Materials 
and Soliciting Comments on Proposed Changes to the Limits on the Use of 
Wine Treating Materials to Reflect ``Good Manufacturing Practice'' 
(1513-AC75).
    TTB intends to propose to amend its regulations pertaining to the 
production of wine to authorize additional treatments that may be 
applied to wine and to juice from which wine is made. These proposed 
amendments are in response to requests from wine industry members. 
Although TTB may administratively approve such treatments without 
amending the regulations, administrative approval does not guarantee 
acceptance in foreign markets of any wine so treated. Under certain 
international agreements, authorization of wine treatments through 
public notice facilitates the acceptance of exported wine made using 
those treatments in foreign markets. TTB also intends to propose for 
public comment additional changes to the regulations in response to a 
petition to allow more wine treating materials to be used within the 
limitations of ``good manufacturing practice'' rather than within 
specified numerical limits, thereby providing additional flexibility to 
winemakers.
     Consideration of Updates to Trade Practice Regulations 
(RIN: 1513-AC92).
    In FY 2023, TTB issued an advance notice of proposed rulemaking to 
seek public comment on TTB's trade practice regulations related to the 
Federal Alcohol Administration Act's exclusive outlet, tied house, 
commercial bribery, and consignment sales prohibitions. Executive Order 
14036 (``Promoting Competition in the American Economy''), the 
Department of the Treasury's related February 2022 report 
(``Competition in the Markets for Beer, Wine, and Spirits''), and 
public comments related to that report have raised questions about 
whether these regulations could be improved. In FY 2024, TTB intends to 
review and consider the comments received in formulating potential 
proposals to amend the regulations.
     Labeling and Advertising of Alcohol Beverages with Alcohol 
and Nutritional Content, Allergens, and Ingredients (RIN: 1513-AC93, 
Labeling and Advertising of Distilled Spirits, Wines, and Malt 
Beverages With Statements of Alcohol and Nutritional Content; RIN: 
1513-AC94, Major Food Allergen Labeling for Wines, Distilled Spirits, 
and Malt Beverages; and 1513-AC95, Ingredient Labeling of Distilled 
Spirits, Wines, and Malt Beverages).
    TTB intends to request public comment on possible changes to its 
labeling and advertising regulations governing alcohol beverage 
products related to statements of alcohol and nutritional content, 
allergen labeling, and ingredient labeling. The February 2022 report 
issued by the Department of the Treasury (``Competition in the Markets 
for Beer, Wine, and Spirits'') discussed past and potential future 
proposals related to the labeling of alcohol beverage products with 
``serving facts'' information. The report stated that TTB should revive 
or initiate rulemaking proposing mandatory information on alcohol 
content, nutritional content, and appropriate serving sizes for alcohol 
beverage products, as well as ingredient labeling. TTB intends to 
publish two notices of proposed rulemaking (one on alcohol content and 
nutrition facts, and another on allergens) and an advance notice of 
proposed rulemaking on ingredient-labeling.
     Standards of Fill for Wine and Distilled Spirits (RIN: 
1513-AC86).
    TTB plans to publish a final rule to address its proposal published 
May 25, 2022 (87 FR 31787) to amend the regulations governing wine and 
distilled spirits containers. TTB proposed to add 10 additional 
authorized standards of fill for wine in response to requests it has 
received for such standards, and to be consistent with a Side Letter 
included as part of a U.S.-Japan Trade Agreement that addresses issues 
related to market access and, specifically, to alcohol beverage 
standards of fill. TTB also solicited comments on an alternative 
proposal to eliminate all but a minimum standard of fill for wine 
containers and all but a minimum and maximum for distilled spirits.

Office of the Comptroller of the Currency

    The Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) charters, 
regulates, and supervises all national banks and Federal savings 
associations (FSAs). The agency also supervises the Federal branches 
and agencies of foreign banks. The OCC's mission is to ensure that 
national banks and FSAs operate in a safe and sound manner, provide 
fair access to financial services, treat customers fairly, and comply 
with applicable laws and regulations.
    Regulatory priorities for fiscal year 2024 are described below.
     Regulatory Capital Rule: Amendments Applicable to Large 
Banking Organizations and to Banking Organizations with Significant 
Trading Activity (12 CFR part 3).
    The OCC, the Federal Reserve Board, and the FDIC issued a joint 
notice of proposed rulemaking that would comprehensively revise the 
agencies' risk-based capital rules, including revisions to the current 
standardized and advanced approaches capital rules.
     Capital Requirements for Market Risk; Fundamental Review 
of the Trading Book (12 CFR part 3).
    The OCC, the Federal Reserve Board, and the FDIC issued a joint 
notice of proposed rulemaking to revise their respective capital 
requirements for market risk, which are generally applied to banking 
organizations with substantial trading activity. The OCC

[[Page 9454]]

expects the revisions to be generally consistent with the standards set 
forth in the Fundamental Review of the Trading Book published by the 
Basel Committee on Bank Supervision.
     Long-term Debt Requirements for Large Bank Holding 
Companies, Certain Intermediate Holding Companies of Foreign Banking 
Organizations, and Large Insured Depository Institutions.
    The OCC, the Federal Reserve Board, and the FDIC, plan to issue a 
joint notice of proposed rulemaking that would require certain large 
depository institution holding companies, U.S. intermediate holding 
companies of foreign banking organizations, and certain insured 
depository institutions, to issue and maintain outstanding a minimum 
amount of long-term debt. The proposed rule would improve the 
resolvability of these firms in case of failure, reduce costs to the 
Depository Insurance Fund and mitigate financial stability and 
contagion risks by reducing the risk of loss to uninsured depositors.

Customs Revenue Functions

    The Homeland Security Act of 2002 (the Act) provides that, although 
many functions of the former United States Customs Service were 
transferred to the Department of Homeland Security, the Secretary of 
the Treasury retains sole legal authority over customs revenue 
functions. The Act also authorizes the Secretary of the Treasury to 
delegate any of the retained authority over customs revenue functions 
to the Secretary of Homeland Security. By Treasury Department Order No. 
100-16, the Secretary of the Treasury delegated to the Secretary of 
Homeland Security authority to prescribe regulations pertaining to the 
customs revenue functions subject to certain exceptions, but further 
provided that the Secretary of the Treasury retained the sole authority 
to approve such regulations.
    During fiscal year 2024, CBP and Treasury plan to give priority to 
regulatory matters involving the customs revenue functions which 
streamline CBP procedures, protect the public, or are required by 
either statute or Executive Order. Examples of these efforts are 
described below.
     Investigation of Claims of Evasion of Antidumping and 
Countervailing Duties.
    Treasury and CBP plan to finalize interim regulations (81 FR 56477) 
which amended CBP regulations implementing section 421 of the Trade 
Facilitation and Trade Enforcement Act of 2015, which set forth 
procedures to investigate claims of evasion of antidumping and 
countervailing duty orders.
     Enforcement of Copyrights and the Digital Millennium 
Copyright Act.
    Treasury and CBP plan to finalize proposed amendments to the CBP 
regulations pertaining to importations of merchandise that violate or 
are suspected of violating the copyright laws, including the Digital 
Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA), in accordance with Title III of the 
Trade Facilitation and Trade Enforcement Act of 2015 (TFTEA) and 
Executive Order 13785, ``Establishing Enhanced Collection and 
Enforcement of Anti-dumping and Countervailing Duties and Violations of 
Trade and Customs Laws.''
    The proposed amendments are intended to enhance CBP's enforcement 
efforts against increasingly sophisticated piratical goods, clarify the 
definition of piracy, simplify the detention process relative to goods 
suspected of violating the copyright laws, and prescribe new 
regulations enforcing the DMCA.
     Merchandise Produced by Convict or Forced Labor or 
Indentured Labor under Penal Sanctions.
    Treasury and CBP plan to publish a proposed rule to update, 
modernize, and streamline the process for enforcing the prohibition in 
19 U.S.C. 1307 against the importation of merchandise that has been 
mined, produced, or manufactured, wholly or in part, in any foreign 
country by convict labor, forced labor, or indentured labor under penal 
sanctions. The proposed rule would generally bring the forced labor 
regulations and detention procedures into alignment with other 
statutes, regulations, and procedures that apply to the enforcement of 
restrictions against other types of prohibited merchandise.
     Non-Preferential Origin Determinations for Merchandise 
Imported From Canada or Mexico for Implementation of the Agreement 
Between the United States of America, the United Mexican States, and 
Canada (USMCA).
    Treasury and CBP plan to finalize a proposed rule to harmonize non-
preferential origin determinations for merchandise imported from Canada 
or Mexico. Such determinations would be made using certain tariff-based 
rules of origin to determine when a good imported from Canada or Mexico 
has been substantially transformed resulting in an article with a new 
name, character, or use. Once finalized, the rule is intended to reduce 
administrative burdens and inconsistency for non-preferential origin 
determinations for merchandise imported from Canada or Mexico for 
purposes of the implementation of the USMCA.
     Automated Commercial Environment (ACE) Required for 
Electronic Entry/Entry Summary (Cargo Release and Related Entry) 
Filings.
    Treasury and CBP plan to finalize interim regulations (80 FR 61278) 
which amended CBP regulations to name the Automated Commercial 
Environment (ACE) as a CBP-authorized electronic data interchange (EDI) 
system for the processing of electronic entry and entry summary 
filings.
     Elimination of Paper-Based Bond Applications and the 
Automated Processing of Bond Applications.
    Treasury and CBP plan to publish a proposed rule to replace the 
paper-based bond application and approval process with a streamlined 
electronic process. The proposed rule would implement the successful 
National Customs Automation Program (NCAP) test of the electronic bond 
process.

Financial Crimes Enforcement Network

    As administrator of the Bank Secrecy Act (BSA), the Financial 
Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) is responsible for developing and 
implementing regulations that are the core of the Department's anti-
money laundering (AML) and countering the financing of terrorism (CFT) 
efforts. FinCEN's responsibilities and objectives are linked to, and 
flow from, that role. In fulfilling this role, FinCEN seeks to enhance 
U.S. national security by making the financial system increasingly 
resistant to abuse by money launderers, terrorists and their financial 
supporters, and other perpetrators of crime.
    The Secretary of the Treasury, through FinCEN, is authorized by the 
BSA to issue regulations requiring financial institutions to file 
reports and keep records that are highly useful in criminal, tax, or 
regulatory investigations, risk assessments, or proceedings, or 
intelligence or counter-intelligence activities, including analysis, to 
protect against terrorism. The BSA also authorizes FinCEN to require 
that designated financial institutions establish AML/CFT programs and 
compliance procedures. Recent legislation has given FinCEN the added 
authority and responsibility to develop a system for reporting the 
beneficial owners of certain legal entities in the United States. To 
implement and realize its mission, FinCEN has established regulatory 
objectives and priorities to safeguard the financial system from the 
abuses of financial crime, including terrorist financing, proliferation 
financing, money laundering, and other illicit activity.

[[Page 9455]]

    These objectives and priorities include: (1) issuing, interpreting, 
and enforcing compliance with regulations implementing the BSA; (2) 
supporting, working with, and as appropriate overseeing compliance 
examination functions delegated by FinCEN to other Federal regulators; 
(3) managing the collection, processing, storage, and dissemination of 
data related to the BSA and beneficial ownership; (4) maintaining 
government-wide access services to that same data for authorized users 
with a range of interests; (5) conducting analysis in support of 
policymakers, law enforcement, regulatory and intelligence agencies, 
and (for compliance purposes) the financial sector; and (6) 
coordinating with and collaborating on AML/CFT initiatives with 
domestic law enforcement and intelligence agencies, as well as foreign 
financial intelligence units.
    FinCEN's regulatory priorities for fiscal year 2024 include:
     Beneficial Ownership Information Reporting Deadline 
Extension for Reporting Companies Created or Registered in 2024.
    FinCEN intends to finalize an amendment, proposed on September 28, 
2023, to the beneficial ownership information (BOI) reporting rule 
(Reporting Rule) that FinCEN published on September 30, 2022. The 
amendment will extend the BOI filing deadline for entities created or 
registered on or after January 1, 2024, and before January 1, 2025, 
from 30 days to 90 days. This reporting extension will provide those 
entities with additional time to understand the new BOI reporting 
obligation and collect the necessary information to complete their 
filings. Entities created or registered on or after January 1, 2025, 
will have 30 days to file their BOI reports with FinCEN, as required 
under the original Reporting Rule.
     Beneficial Ownership Information Access and Safeguards.
    FinCEN intends to issue a final rule entitled ``Beneficial 
Ownership Information Access and Safeguards.'' The final rule will 
establish protocols to protect the security and confidentiality of the 
beneficial ownership information (BOI) that will be reported to FinCEN 
pursuant to the Bank Secrecy Act, as amended by Section 6403(a) of the 
Corporate Transparency Act, and will establish the framework for 
authorized recipients' access to the BOI reported.
     Revisions to Customer Due Diligence Requirements for 
Financial Institutions.
    FinCEN intends to issue a notice of proposed rulemaking entitled 
``Revisions to Customer Due Diligence Requirements for Financial 
Institutions,'' relating to Section 6403(d) of the Corporate 
Transparency Act (CTA). Section 6403(d) of the CTA requires FinCEN to 
revise its customer due diligence requirements for financial 
institutions to account for the changes created by the BOI reporting 
and access requirements set out in the CTA.
     Exempting a System of Records from Certain Provisions of 
the Privacy Act of 1974.
    FinCEN intends to issue a final rule amending 31 CFR 1.36 to exempt 
a new system of records, entitled ``FinCEN .004--Beneficial Ownership 
Information System,'' from certain provisions of the Privacy Act of 
1974. The Beneficial Ownership Information (BOI) System is being 
established to implement the BOI reporting and access requirements set 
out in the Bank Secrecy Act (BSA), as amended by the Corporate 
Transparency Act. The exemptions are intended to increase the value of 
the system for law enforcement purposes and to comply with the BSA's 
prohibitions against unauthorized disclosure of certain information.
     Residential Real Estate Transaction Reports and Records.
    FinCEN intends to issue a notice of proposed rulemaking to address 
money laundering threats in the U.S. residential real estate sector.
     Anti-Money Laundering Program and Suspicious Activity 
Report Filing Requirement for Investment Advisers.
    FinCEN intends to issue a notice of proposed rulemaking that would 
prescribe minimum standards for anti-money laundering programs to be 
established by certain investment advisers and to require such 
investment advisers to report suspicious activity to FinCEN pursuant to 
the Bank Secrecy Act.
     Section 6101. Establishment of National Exam and 
Supervision Priorities.
    FinCEN intends to issue a notice of proposed rulemaking as part of 
the establishment of national exam and supervision priorities. The 
proposed rule implements Section 6101(b) of the Anti-Money Laundering 
Act of 2020 that requires the Secretary of the Treasury to issue and 
promulgate rules for financial institutions to carry out the 
government-wide anti-money laundering and countering the financing of 
terrorism priorities (AML/CFT Priorities). The proposed rule: (i) 
incorporates a risk assessment requirement for financial institutions; 
(ii) requires financial institutions to incorporate AML/CFT Priorities 
into risk-based programs; and (iii) provides for certain technical 
changes. Once finalized, this proposed rule will affect all financial 
institutions subject to regulations under the Bank Secrecy Act that 
have AML/CFT program obligations.
     Section 6314. Updating Whistleblower Incentives and 
Protection.
    FinCEN intends to issue a notice of proposed rulemaking to 
establish a whistleblower award program for eligible individuals that 
provide information regarding certain violations of the Bank Secrecy 
Act and U.S. economic sanctions. The proposed regulations would 
implement section 6314 of the Anti- Money Laundering Act of 2020 and 
the Anti-Money Laundering Whistleblower Improvement Act. Pursuant to 
the proposed regulations, potential whistleblowers would voluntarily 
provide information regarding relevant violations to FinCEN, the 
Department of Justice, or a whistleblower's employer. The proposed 
regulations would also govern the award phase of the whistleblower 
program. Potential whistleblowers would apply for an award following 
the successful enforcement of a covered judicial or administrative 
action. FinCEN would adjudicate such award applications pursuant to the 
proposed regulations and would pay awards to eligible whistleblowers 
from the Financial Integrity Fund (Fund). As set forth in 31 U.S.C. 
5323, the structure of the Fund is such that monetary sanctions 
collected by the Secretary or Attorney General in any judicial or 
administrative action under title 31, chapter 35 or section 4305 or 
4312 of title 50, or the Foreign Narcotics Kingpin Designation Act will 
be deposited into the Fund, (or an amount equal to those sanctions will 
be credited to the Fund), unless the balance of the Fund at the time 
the monetary sanction is collected exceeds $300,000,000.
     Commercial Real Estate Transaction Reports and Records.
    FinCEN intends to issue a notice of proposed rulemaking to address 
money laundering threats in the U.S. commercial real estate sector.
     Other Requirements.
    FinCEN also will continue to issue proposed and final rules 
pursuant to section 311 of the USA PATRIOT Act, as appropriate. 
Finally, FinCEN expects that it may propose various technical and other 
regulatory amendments in conjunction with ongoing efforts with respect 
to a comprehensive review of existing regulations to enhance regulatory 
efficiency required by Section 6216 of the Anti-Money Laundering Act of 
2020.

[[Page 9456]]

Bureau of the Fiscal Service

    The Bureau of the Fiscal Service (Fiscal Service) administers 
regulations pertaining to the Government's financial activities, 
including: (1) implementing Treasury's borrowing authority, including 
regulating the sale and issue of Treasury securities; (2) administering 
Government revenue and debt collection; (3) administering government-
wide accounting programs; (4) managing certain Federal investments; (5) 
disbursing the majority of Government electronic and check payments; 
(6) assisting Federal agencies in reducing the number of improper 
payments; and (7) providing administrative and operational support to 
Federal agencies through franchise shared services.
    During fiscal year 2024, Fiscal Service will accord priority to the 
following regulatory projects:
     Revision of the Federal Claims Collection Standards
    Fiscal Service is proposing to amend the Federal Claims Collections 
Standards (FCCS), codified in 31 CFR parts 900-904, which is jointly 
administered by Treasury and the Department of Justice. The FCCS set 
standards for administrative collection, compromise, and suspension or 
termination of collection activity for federal nontax debts. They also 
set standards for referring federal nontax debts to DOJ for litigation. 
The proposed amendments, which have been jointly prepared by Treasury 
and DOJ, include revisions for equity and updates to conform to 
developments since the last publication of the regulations in 2000.
     Amendment of Electronic Payment Regulation
    Fiscal Service will be publishing a final rule to amend 31 CFR part 
208, Management of Federal Agency Disbursements--Fiscal Service's 
regulation that implements a statutory mandate requiring the Federal 
Government to deliver non-tax payments by electronic funds transfer 
(EFT) unless a waiver is available. Among other things, the final rule 
strengthens the EFT requirement by narrowing the scope of existing 
waivers from the EFT mandate or requiring agencies to obtain Fiscal 
Service's approval to invoke certain existing waivers. The use of 
electronic payments has expanded significantly since the waivers from 
the EFT mandate were first published in 1998 and the final rule 
appropriately adjusts the waivers given the broad availability of safe 
and secure electronic payment options currently available.

Internal Revenue Service

    The Internal Revenue Service (IRS), working with Treasury's Office 
of Tax Policy, promulgates regulations that interpret and implement the 
Internal Revenue Code (Code), and other internal revenue laws of the 
United States. The purpose of these regulations is to carry out the tax 
policy determined by Congress in a fair, impartial, and reasonable 
manner, taking into account the intent of Congress, the realities of 
relevant transactions, the need for the Government to administer the 
rules and monitor compliance, and the overall integrity of the Federal 
tax system. The goal is to make the regulations practical and as clear 
and simple as possible, which reduces the burdens on taxpayers and the 
IRS.
    During fiscal year 2024, the priority of the IRS and the Office of 
Tax Policy is to provide guidance, including proposed and final rules 
in certain cases, regarding implementation of key tax provisions of 
several public laws, including Public Law 117-169, known as the 
Inflation Reduction Act of 2022 (IRA), the CHIPS and Science Act of 
2022, Public Law 117-167, the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act, 
Public Law 117-58, the Setting Every Community Up for Retirement 
Enhancement Act of 2019 (SECURE Act), enacted as Division O of the 
Further Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2020, Public Law 116-94, and 
the SECURE 2.0 Act of 2022 (SECURE 2.0 Act), enacted as Division T of 
the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2023, Public Law 117-328.
    With regard to the following key provisions of the Code enacted by 
the IRA, Treasury and the IRS intend to issue guidance, including 
proposed and final rules in certain cases:
     The credit for alternative fuel refueling property under 
Sec.  30C of the Code.
     The consumer vehicle credits under Sec. Sec.  25E and 30D 
of the Code.
     The credit for sustainable aviation fuel under Sec.  40B 
of the Code.
     The prevailing wage rate and apprenticeship requirements 
in Sec.  45(b) as applicable for purposes of Sec. Sec.  30C, 45, 45L, 
45Q, 45U, 45V, 45Y, 48, 48C, 48E, and 179D of the Code.
     The domestic content enhancements for purposes of 
Sec. Sec.  45, 45Y, 48, 48E.
     The energy community enhancements for purposes of 
Sec. Sec.  45, 45Y, 48, 48E.
     The extension and modification of the credit for carbon 
oxide sequestration under Sec.  45Q of the Code.
     The zero-emission nuclear power PTC under Sec.  45U of the 
Code.
     The clean hydrogen PTC under Sec.  45V of the Code.
     The credit for qualified commercial clean vehicles under 
Sec.  45W of the Code.
     The advanced manufacturing PTC under Sec.  45X of the 
Code.
     The clean electricity PTC under Sec.  45Y of the Code.
     The clean fuels production credit under Sec.  45Z of the 
Code.
     The extension and modification of the investment tax 
credit (ITC) for energy property under Sec.  48 of the Code.
     The allocation of amounts of environmental justice solar 
and wind capacity limitation to qualified solar and wind facilities 
under Sec.  48(e) of the Code.
     The qualifying advanced energy project credit under Sec.  
48C of the Code.
     The advanced manufacturing ITC under Sec.  48D of the Code 
as enacted by the CHIPS Act of 2022.
     The corporate alternative minimum tax under Sec. Sec.  53, 
55, 56, and 56A of the Code.
     The energy efficient commercial buildings deduction under 
Sec.  179D of the Code.
     The excise tax on the repurchase of corporate stock under 
Sec.  4501 of the Code.
     The elective payment and transfer of credits for energy 
property & electricity produced from certain renewable resources under 
Sec. Sec.  6417 and 6418 of the Code.
    Consistent with the Administration's goals of equity and fairness 
in tax administration, using new funding provided by the Inflation 
Reduction Act, the IRS will continue to reduce burdens for taxpayers. 
Underpayments by tax evaders shift burdens onto honest, hard-working 
Americans who follow the law as well as onto future generations. The 
funding is being used to help ensure that everyone pays their fair 
share. Pursuant to the Inflation Reduction Act, billions of dollars 
will go toward substantial service improvements for taxpayers as they 
interact with the IRS. The IRS is improving customer service, answering 
more calls, processing returns and refunds faster, updating computer 
systems, and simplifying tax filing. The IRS is also expanding the 
customer callback capability, which gives taxpayers an alternative to 
waiting on hold. This reduces burden and frustration for taxpayers.
    Although taxpayers can still choose to use paper-based processes to 
file returns, the IRS is transitioning to digital platforms, with 
better data tools to make more filings and processes available 
electronically, reducing audits and retiring paper-based processes. IRS 
employees still need to manually

[[Page 9457]]

transcribe millions of paper returns. However, the IRS is automating 
the scanning of millions of individual paper returns into digital 
copies. For taxpayers, this means faster processing and, ultimately, 
faster refunds for paper filers.
    The IRS is expanding the use of issue resolution tools so that 
taxpayers can access their own online account and get the information 
they need without the need of an IRS assistor. The new IRS Online 
Account features make it easier to communicate with the IRS where most 
issues can be resolved online.
    Every year, Treasury and the IRS identify guidance projects that 
are priorities for allocation of resources during the year in the 
Priority Guidance Plan (PGP) (available on irs.gov and 
regulations.gov). The plan represents projects that Treasury and the 
IRS intend to actively work on during the plan year. See, for example, 
the 2022-2023 Priority Guidance Plan (May 5, 2023). To facilitate and 
encourage suggestions, Treasury and the IRS have developed an annual 
process for soliciting public input for guidance projects. The annual 
solicitation is done through the issuance of a notice inviting 
recommendations from the public for items to be included on the PGP for 
the upcoming plan year. See, for example, Notice 2023-36 (May 4, 2023). 
We also invite the public to provide us with their comments and 
suggestions for guidance projects throughout the year.

BILLING CODE 4810-AK-P

DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS (VA)

Statement of Regulatory Priorities

    The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) administers services and 
benefit programs that recognize the important federal obligations to 
those who served this Nation. VA's regulatory responsibility is almost 
solely confined to carrying out mandates of the laws enacted by 
Congress relating to programs for veterans and their families. VA's 
major regulatory objective is to implement these laws with fairness, 
justice, and efficiency.
    Most of the regulations issued by VA involve at least one of three 
VA components: the Veterans Benefits Administration, the Veterans 
Health Administration, and the National Cemetery Administration. The 
primary mission of the Veterans Benefits Administration is to provide 
high-quality and timely nonmedical benefits to eligible veterans and 
their dependents. The primary mission of the Veterans Health 
Administration is to provide high-quality health care on a timely basis 
to eligible veterans through its system of medical centers, nursing 
homes, domiciliaries, and outpatient medical and dental facilities. The 
primary mission of the National Cemetery Administration is to 
memorialize eligible veterans, members of the Reserve components, and 
their dependents in VA National Cemeteries and to maintain those 
cemeteries as national shrines in perpetuity as a final tribute of a 
grateful Nation to commemorate their service and sacrifice to our 
Nation.
    VA's regulatory priorities also reflect our robust engagement 
process with stakeholders and our strong culture of evidence-based 
decision making. Through regular stakeholder meetings, public hearings, 
Small Business Advocacy Review Panels, and public comments on proposed 
regulations, the Department engages with diverse stakeholders to seek 
input on our regulatory agenda overall or feedback on proposed rules. 
When VA publishes a proposed rule, it is current practice to send a 
Plain Language Summary Document (PLSD) to VSOs, Congress and 
Intergovernmental Affairs offices notifying them that a proposed rule 
is open for public comment. We also do this for Final rules and in some 
instances, we send a Press Release document in lieu of the PLSD. A 
Press Release and a PLSD is a summary of the published rule, its 
impacts, why the rule is necessary and who the rule impacts. Among the 
specific rules described below, we include further details on previous 
stakeholder engagement and future opportunities for stakeholder 
engagement. VA's regulatory priority plan consists of thirteen (13) 
priority regulations. The regulations listed below are not in any 
priority order.
BILLING CODE 8320-01-P

[[Page 9458]]

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TP09FE24.000


[[Page 9459]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TP09FE24.001


[[Page 9460]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TP09FE24.002


[[Page 9461]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TP09FE24.003

BILLING CODE 8320-01-C


[[Page 9462]]



VA

Proposed Rule Stage

177. Updating VA Adjudication Regulations for Disability or Death 
Benefit Claims Related to Herbicide Exposure [2900-AR10]

    Priority: Section 3(f)(1) Significant. Major under 5 U.S.C. 801.
    Legal Authority: 38 U.S.C. 1116; 38 U.S.C. 1116A; 38 U.S.C. 1116B; 
38 U.S.C. 1821; 38 U.S.C. 1822
    CFR Citation: 38 CFR 3.30; 38 CFR 3.309; 38 CFR 3.105; 38 CFR 
3.114; 38 CFR 3.313; 38 CFR 3.81.
    Legal Deadline: None.
    Abstract: The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) proposes to amend 
its adjudication regulations relating to exposure to herbicides, such 
as Agent Orange, in order to incorporate the provisions of the Blue 
Water Navy Vietnam Veterans Act of 2019 (the BWN Act). This proposed 
rule would extend the presumed area of exposure to the offshore waters 
of the Republic of Vietnam and expand the date ranges for presumption 
of exposure in the Republic of Vietnam and Korea. This rule would also 
clarify the definition of a Nehmer class member and establish 
entitlement to spina bifida benefits for children of certain veterans 
who served in Thailand. On the basis of VA's general rulemaking 
authority, VA also proposes to establish a presumption of herbicide 
exposure for certain veterans who served in Thailand and also proposes 
to codify longstanding procedures for searching for payees entitled to 
Nehmer class action settlement payments. This proposed rule 
incorporates the provisions contained in VA's RIN 2900-AR45, titled, 
``Diseases Associated with Exposure to Certain Herbicide Agents 
(Bladder Cancer, Parkinsonism, and Hypothyroidism)'' as a result of VA 
withdrawing RIN 2900-AR45 from the Fall 2022 Unified Agenda. A future 
Interim Final Rule will be published to align all of VA's adjudication 
regulations with controlling statute. This future regulation will also 
ensure that eligible Veterans are not denied the benefits they are 
entitled to and will allow VA to correct previous improper denials of 
service connection.
    Statement of Need: The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) is 
proposing to amend its regulations for the following purposes: (1) 
extend the presumption of herbicide exposure to the offshore waters of 
the Republic of Vietnam and to define those boundaries; (2) expand the 
dates for presumption of herbicide exposure for service in the Korean 
Demilitarized Zone; (3) establish entitlement to spina bifida benefits 
for children of certain Veterans who served in Thailand; (4) codify the 
presumption of herbicide exposure for certain locations identified 
where herbicide agents were used, tested, or stored outside of Vietnam; 
(5) codify longstanding procedures for searching for payees entitled to 
class-action settlements under Nehmer v. Department of Veterans 
Affairs; (6) apply the definition of Republic of Vietnam offshore 
waters to presumptive service connection claims for non-Hodgkin's 
lymphoma; (7) add bladder cancer, hypothyroidism, and Parkinsonism as 
presumptive herbicide diseases; and (8) recognize hypertension and 
monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significant as presumptive 
herbicide diseases.
    Summary of Legal Basis: Promulgation of these regulations is 
necessitated by the Blue Water Navy Vietnam Veterans Act of 2019, 
Public Law 116-123; Fiscal Year 2021 National Defense Authorization 
Act; and the Sergeant First Class Heath Robinson Honoring our Promise 
to Address Comprehensive Toxics Act of 2022 (PACT Act), Public Law 117-
168. VA's general rulemaking authority under 38 U.S.C. 501(a) is also 
utilized in effectuating these regulations.
    Alternatives: The comprehensive framework of the enacted laws 
requires VA to issue regulations to ensure that claims processors 
accurately and consistently adjudicate claims pursuant to the intent 
and text of the legislation. The absence of regulations would cause 
confusion amongst adjudicators leading to benefit decision errors, as 
well as incurring significant litigation risk if the only instruction 
concerning application of the aforementioned laws is sub-regulatory 
guidance that did not go through notice-and-comment as required by the 
Administrative Procedures Act.
    Anticipated Cost and Benefits: VA has estimated that there are both 
transfers and costs associated with the provisions of this rulemaking. 
The total transfers are estimated to be $59.9 billion over 10 years. 
Actual transfers and costs will be determined and reflected in this 
section of ROCIS once the Reg is formally sent to OMB for a formal 
Executive Order 12866 review.
    Risks: None.
    Timetable:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Action                    Date            FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NPRM................................   01/00/24
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No.
    Small Entities Affected: No.
    Government Levels Affected: None.
    URL For More Information: www.regulations.gov.
    Agency Contact: Robert Parks, Department of Veterans Affairs, 1800 
G Street NW, Washington, DC 20006, Phone: 202 461-9700, Email: 
[email protected].
    RIN: 2900-AR10

VA

178. Expanding Veterans Cemetery Grant Program (VCGP) Grants To Include 
Training Costs [2900-AR47]

    Priority: Other Significant.
    Legal Authority: 5 U.S.C. 605(b); 2 U.S.C. 1532; 38 U.S.C. 101; 25 
U.S.C. 450b(l)
    CFR Citation: 38 CFR 39.34.
    Legal Deadline: None.
    Abstract: VA proposes to amend its regulations regarding aid for 
the establishment, expansion, and improvement, or operation and 
maintenance of Veterans cemeteries to implement new authorities 
provided in section 2208 of The Veterans Health Care and Benefits 
Improvement Act of 2020. The Act authorizes VA to expand the use of 
Veterans Cemetery Grant Program (VCGP) funds to include training costs 
for State and Tribal cemetery personnel to participate in training 
provided by the National Cemetery Administration (NCA).
    Statement of Need: This rulemaking is needed for the Department of 
Veteran Affairs (VA) to amend its regulations, in accordance with 38 
U.S.C. 501, to implement new authorities enacted in Section 2208 of 
Public Law 116-315, The Veterans Health Care and Benefits Improvement 
Act of 2020. That Public Law amended section 2408 of title 38, United 
States Code (U.S.C.).
    Summary of Legal Basis: VA proposes to amend its regulations 
regarding aid for the establishment, expansion, and improvement, or 
operation and maintenance of Veterans cemeteries to implement new 
authorities provided in section 2208. The Act authorized VA to expand 
the use of Veterans Cemetery Grant Program (VCGP) funds to include 
training costs for State and Tribal cemetery personnel to participate 
in training provided by the National Cemetery Administration (NCA).
    Alternatives: Because VA must implement new grants authority in 
regulation, there are no practical alternatives to rulemaking. Grantees 
can choose to apply for training grant funds or expend their own 
resources to send employees to attend NCA training.

[[Page 9463]]

However, as mentioned above, because many grantees lack sufficient 
fiscal resources for their employees to attend NCA training, VA 
anticipates increased participation from grantee-cemetery employees. 
The proposed approach limits the number of employees the State or 
Tribal Organizations can have attending training and those entities 
will continue to have difficulty meeting the same national shrine 
standards and measures as VA national cemeteries.
    Anticipated Cost and Benefits: The primary benefit of this program 
expansion will assist VA grant-funded State and Tribal Veterans' 
cemeteries in meeting NCA operational standards and measures. This 
includes the appearance in the key cemetery areas of cleanliness, 
height and alignment of headstones and markers, leveling of gravesites, 
and turf conditions. VA estimates transfers of $89,916 for Fiscal Year 
(FY) 2023 and $458,661 for FY 2023-FY 2027.
    Risks: TBD.
    Timetable:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Action                    Date            FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NPRM................................   06/00/24
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No.
    Small Entities Affected: No.
    Government Levels Affected: None.
    URL For More Information: www.regulations.gov.
    Agency Contact: George Eisenbach, Director, Veterans Cemetery 
Grants Program, National Cemetery Administration, Department of 
Veterans Affairs, 810 Vermont Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20420, Phone: 
202 632-7369, Email: [email protected].
    RIN: 2900-AR47

VA

179. Technical Revisions To Expand Health Care for Certain Toxic 
Exposure and Overseas Contingency Service [2900-AR73]

    Priority: Other Significant.
    Legal Authority: 38 U.S.C. 1710; Pub. L. 117-168 sec. 103(a)
    CFR Citation: 38 CFR 17.36; 38 CFR 17.108; 38 CFR 17.110; 38 CFR 
17.111; 38 CFR 51.50.
    Legal Deadline: None.
    Abstract: The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) proposes to amend 
its medical regulations governing eligibility for VA health care and 
copayment requirements to conform to recent statutory changes made by 
section 103 of the Sergeant First Class Heath Robinson Honoring our 
Promise to Address Comprehensive Toxics Act of 2022, Public Law 117-168 
(PACT Act). VA is changing its medical benefits enrollment criteria to 
include toxic-exposed veterans and veterans who supported certain 
overseas contingency operations, to exempt such veterans from 
copayments for certain care, and to provide per diem for nursing home 
care for such veterans.
    Statement of Need: This rulemaking is necessary to implement the 
provisions of section 103(a) of the Honoring our Promise to Address 
Comprehensive Toxics Act of 2022, Public Law 117-168 (PACT Act), which 
expanded the provision of health care and nursing home care to new 
groups of toxic-exposed veterans. This rule would also amend VA's 
medical regulations to exempt such veterans from copayments for certain 
care.
    Summary of Legal Basis: Pursuant to 38 U.S.C. 1710, VA proposes to 
amend its medical regulations and regulations on per diem for nursing 
home care of veterans in State homes. This would conform with changes 
made to 38 U.S.C. 1710 by section 103 of the PACT Act.
    Alternatives: TBD.
    Anticipated Cost and Benefits: TBD.
    Risks: Delayed access to health care for these toxic-exposed 
veterans that would be newly-eligible for VA health care. These 
additional groups of toxic-exposed veterans who are already enrolled in 
VA health care would continue to be charged copayments for care of 
illness related to their toxic exposures until these changes are made.
    Timetable:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Action                    Date            FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NPRM................................   08/00/24
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No.
    Small Entities Affected: No.
    Government Levels Affected: None.
    URL For More Information: www.regulations.gov.
    Agency Contact: Ryan Heiman, Acting Deputy Director, VHA Member 
Services, Department of Veterans Affairs, 3401 SW 21st Street, Building 
9, Topeka, KS 66604, Phone: 785 817-2719, Email: [email protected].
    RIN: 2900-AR73

VA

180. Updating VA Adjudication Regulations for Disability or Death 
Benefits Based on Toxic Exposure [2900-AR75]

    Priority: Other Significant.
    Legal Authority: 38 U.S.C. 1117; 38 U.S.C. 1119; 38 U.S.C. 1120; 38 
U.S.C. 501
    CFR Citation: 38 CFR 3.159; 38 CFR 3.317; 38 CFR 3.320.
    Legal Deadline: None.
    Abstract: The Department of Veterans Affairs is proposing to amend 
its adjudication regulations to implement provisions of the Sergeant 
First Class Heath Robinson Honoring our Promise to Address 
Comprehensive Toxics Act of 2022, Public Law 117-168 (PACT Act). The 
statute amended procedures applicable to claims based on toxic exposure 
and modified or established presumptions of service connection related 
to toxic exposure. Pursuant to the Act, VA is proposing to remove the 
manifestation period requirement and the minimum compensable evaluation 
requirement from Gulf War claims based on undiagnosed illness and 
medically unexplained chronic multi-symptom illnesses. VA is also 
proposing to expand the definition of a Persian Gulf Veteran and update 
the list of locations eligible for a presumption of exposure to toxic 
substances, chemicals, or hazards based on Gulf War service. To 
implement additional provisions of the Act, VA is also proposing to 
codify the procedure for determining when examinations and medical 
nexus opinions are required for claims based on toxic exposure.
    Statement of Need: The Department of Veterans Affairs is proposing 
to amend its adjudication regulations to implement provisions of the 
Sergeant First Class Heath Robinson Honoring our Promise to Address 
Comprehensive Toxics Act of 2022, Public Law 117-168 (PACT Act). The 
statute amended procedures applicable to claims based on toxic exposure 
and modifies or establishes presumptions of service connection related 
to toxic exposure.
    Summary of Legal Basis: The new provisions of regulation are 
authorized by sections 302, 303, 405 and 406 of Public Law 117-168. VA 
must publish regulations to carry out the laws administered by the 
Department as required by 38 U.S.C. 501(a).
    Alternatives: The comprehensive framework of the enacted law 
requires VA to issue regulations to ensure that claims processors 
accurately and consistently adjudicate claims pursuant to the intent 
and text of the legislation. The absence of regulations would cause 
confusion amongst adjudicators leading to benefit decision errors, as 
well as incurring significant litigation risk if the only instruction 
concerning application of the aforementioned law is sub-regulatory 
guidance that did not go through notice-and-comment as

[[Page 9464]]

required by the Administrative Procedures Act.
    Anticipated Cost and Benefits: Actual costs and transfers will be 
determined and reflected in this section of ROCIS once the rule is 
formally sent to OMB for a formal Executive Order 12866 review.
    Risks: None.
    Timetable:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Action                    Date            FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NPRM................................   01/00/24
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No.
    Small Entities Affected: No.
    Government Levels Affected: None.
    URL For More Information: www.regulations.gov.
    Agency Contact: Robert Parks, Department of Veterans Affairs, 1800 
G Street NW, Washington, DC 20006, Phone: 202 461-9700, Email: 
[email protected].
    RIN: 2900-AR75

VA

181. Evidence Requirements for Direct Service Connection of Covered 
Mental Health Conditions Based on In-Service Personal Trauma [2900-
AR91]

    Priority: Other Significant. Major status under 5 U.S.C. 801 is 
undetermined.
    Legal Authority: 38 U.S.C. 501
    CFR Citation: 38 CFR 3.304.
    Legal Deadline: None.
    Abstract: VA is proposing to amend regulations concerning the type 
of evidence that may be used to support a veteran's statement regarding 
the occurrence of an in-service personal trauma. VA is also proposing 
to define key terms relevant to such claims. These amendments will 
provide greater specificity and clarity to the regulatory text and aid 
claims processors who develop and decide claims based on in-service 
personal trauma. The intent of this change is to ease the evidentiary 
requirements for veterans claiming a mental health condition based on 
in-service personal trauma.
    Statement of Need: TBD--The statement of need is still pending but 
will be determined and reflected in this section of ROCIS once the Reg 
is formally sent to OMB for a formal Executive Order 12866 review.
    Summary of Legal Basis: TBD--The legal basis for this Reg is still 
pending but will be determined and reflected in this section of ROCIS 
before the Reg is formally sent to OMB for a formal Executive Order 
12866 review.
    Alternatives: TBD--Alternatives are still pending but will be 
determined and reflected in this section of ROCIS before the Reg is 
formally sent to OMB for a formal Executive Order 12866 review.
    Anticipated Cost and Benefits: TBD--Actual costs and transfers are 
still pending but will be determined and reflected in this section of 
ROCIS before the Reg is formally sent to OMB for a formal Executive 
Order 12866 review.
    Risks: TBD--Risks are still pending but will be determined and 
reflected in this section of ROCIS before the Reg is formally sent to 
OMB for a formal Executive Order 12866 review.
    Timetable:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Action                    Date            FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NPRM................................   02/00/24
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No.
    Small Entities Affected: No.
    Government Levels Affected: None.
    Agency Contact: Robert Parks, Department of Veterans Affairs, 1800 
G Street NW, Washington, DC 20006, Phone: 202 461-9700, Email: 
[email protected].
    RIN: 2900-AR91

VA

182. Amendments to the Caregivers Program [2900-AR96]

    Priority: Section 3(f)(1) Significant. Major status under 5 U.S.C. 
801 is undetermined.
    Legal Authority: 38 U.S.C. 1720G
    CFR Citation: Not Yet Determined.
    Legal Deadline: None.
    Abstract: The rule will propose amendments to the eligibility 
criteria, definitions used, and consider other changes to evaluation 
processes for the Program of Comprehensive Assistance for Family 
Caregivers, which provides services and benefits, including a monthly 
stipend, for eligible caregivers of veterans who sustained a serious 
injury or illness in the line of duty.
    Statement of Need: This rulemaking is necessary to implement 
several changes to VA's Program of Comprehensive Assistance for Family 
Caregivers (PCAFC) and Program of General Caregiver Support Services 
(PGCSS) to improve program operations, update eligibility criteria, and 
expand access to the programs for eligible veterans and servicemembers 
and their caregivers and comply with Executive Order 14095, Increasing 
Access to High-Quality Care and Supporting Caregivers, issued April 18, 
2023, that required the Secretary of Veterans Affairs consider issuing 
a notice of proposed rulemaking by the end of this fiscal year that 
would make any appropriate modifications to eligibility criteria for 
PCAFC. In accordance with Executive Order 14094, VA briefed the 
Veterans Service Organizations (VSO) on June 30th, 2023, during the 
rulemaking process.
    Summary of Legal Basis: Pursuant to its authority in 38 U.S.C. 
1720G, VA proposes to amend its regulations under 38 CFR part 71, which 
governs PCAFC, a program that provides Family Caregivers of eligible 
veterans benefits, such as training, respite care, counseling, 
technical support, beneficiary travel, and for Primary Family 
Caregivers, provides a monthly stipend payment, and access to health 
care; and PGCSS, which is available to caregivers of covered veterans 
of all eras of military service. Proposed amendments would comply with 
the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit decision in Veteran 
Warriors, Inc. v. Sec'y of Veterans Affairs, 29 F.4th 1320 (Fed. Cir. 
2022), which set aside a portion of VA's regulations concerning PCAFC 
eligibility criteria, specifically VA's definition of need for 
supervision, protection, and instruction as that term is used 
throughout 38 CFR part 71. VA proposes to remove conflicting language 
from its regulations.
    Alternatives: There are no acceptable policy alternatives to 
issuing this regulation.
    Anticipated Cost and Benefits: VA is still determining costs but 
anticipates costs to be over $200 million in any given year of the 10-
year estimate; VA anticipates this rule would be a section 3(f)(1) 
significant rule under Executive Order 12866.
    This rulemaking would expand access to caregiver benefits for 
eligible veterans based on proposed changes in eligibility criteria. 
Actual costs will be determined and reflected in this section of ROCIS 
once the Reg is formally sent to OMB for a formal Executive Order 12866 
review.
    Risks: Delayed access to PCAFC for eligible veterans and their 
Family Caregivers.
    Timetable:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Action                    Date            FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NPRM................................   03/00/24
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No.
    Small Entities Affected: No.
    Government Levels Affected: None.
    URL For More Information: www.regulations.gov.
    Agency Contact: Colleen Richardson PsyD, Executive Director, 
Caregiver

[[Page 9465]]

Support Program, Patient Care Services, Veterans Health Administration, 
Department of Veterans Affairs, 810 Vermont Avenue NW, Washington, DC 
20420, Phone: 202 461-7337, Email: [email protected].
    RIN: 2900-AR96

VA

183.  Revision of Veterans Community Care Program (VCCP) Access 
Standards [2900-AS00]

    Priority: Other Significant.
    Legal Authority: 38 U.S.C. 1703; 38 U.S.C. 1703B
    CFR Citation: 38 CFR 17.4040.
    Legal Deadline: None.
    Abstract: VA proposes to revise its designated access standards for 
purposes of the Veterans Community Care Program to consider a veteran's 
preference for telehealth when scheduling appointments. VA additionally 
proposes to consider whether and how to address standards for when a VA 
provider is not available within the existing average drive time 
standards.
    Statement of Need: This rulemaking is needed to implement certain 
provisions of section 125 of Division U of the Consolidated 
Appropriations Act, 2023, the Joseph Maxwell Cleland and Robert Joseph 
Dole Memorial Veterans Benefits and Health Care Improvement Act of 2022 
(hereinafter referred to as the Act).
    Summary of Legal Basis: Pursuant to 38 U.S.C. 1703 and 1703B and 
subject to regulations at 38 CFR 17.4000-17.4040, VA administers the 
Veterans Community Care Program (VCCP) to furnish care in the community 
to covered Veterans at their election and subject to the availability 
of appropriations. Consistent with 38 U.S.C. 1703(d)(1)(D) and 1703B, 
current 38 CFR 17.4010(a)(4) establishes eligibility for the VCCP if a 
covered veteran has contacted VA to request required care or services, 
but VA has determined it is not able to furnish such care or services 
in a manner that complies with VA's designated access standards in 
17.4040. Section 125 of the Act amended section 1703B(f) to require VA 
to meet the access standards established under section 1703B(a) when 
furnishing care through VCCP and ensure that meeting such access 
standards is reflected in the contractual requirements of third-party 
administrators (TPA).
    Alternatives: VA does not interpret that there is an alternative to 
implementing certain provisions of section 125 of the Act. VA does not 
interpret that there is an alternative to a two-stage rulemaking 
because current VCCP regulations do not apply VA access standards to 
eligible entities and providers (non-VA providers) under TPA 
agreements, and to do so requires notice and comment prior to being 
implemented.
    Anticipated Cost and Benefits: VA does not anticipate this 
rulemaking would result in $200 million or more in costs or savings. VA 
anticipates benefits for Veterans as eligible entities and providers 
participating in VCCP would also be subject to measurable access 
standards designed to improve Veteran's access to care. Actual costs 
will be determined and reflected in this section of ROCIS once the Reg 
is formally sent to OMB for a formal Executive Order 12866 review.
    Risks: None identified.
    Timetable:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Action                    Date            FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NPRM................................   04/00/24
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No.
    Small Entities Affected: No.
    Government Levels Affected: None.
    URL For More Information: www.regulations.gov.
    Agency Contact: Joseph Duran, Director of Policy and Planning 
(10D1A1) Department of Veterans Affairs, 3773 Cherry Creek North Drive, 
Denver, CO 80209, Phone: 303 370-1637, Email: [email protected].
    RIN: 2900-AS00

VA

Final Rule Stage

184. Modifying Copayments for Veterans at High Risk for Suicide [2900-
AQ30]

    Priority: Other Significant.
    Legal Authority: 38 U.S.C. 1710(g); 38 U.S.C. 1722A
    CFR Citation: 38 CFR 17.108; 38 CFR 17.110.
    Legal Deadline: None.
    Abstract: The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) is finalizing a 
proposed rule to amend its medical regulations governing copayments for 
VA outpatient medical care and medications (to include outpatient 
medical care and medications provided by VA directly or community care 
obtained by VA through contracts, provider agreements or sharing 
agreements) by eliminating the copayment for outpatient care and 
reducing the copayment for medications dispensed to veterans identified 
by VA as being at high risk for suicide. These copayment changes will 
be applied until VA determines that the veteran is no longer at high 
risk for suicide.
    Statement of Need: This rulemaking is needed because a change in 
the current regulation is called for by the policy outlined in 
Executive Order 13822, which provides that our Government must improve 
mental healthcare and access to suicide prevention resources available 
to veterans. Healthcare research has provided extensive evidence that 
copayments can be barriers to healthcare for vulnerable patients, which 
places the change in line with the goals of the Executive order.
    Summary of Legal Basis: Executive Order 13822.
    Alternatives: The express intent of the rulemaking is to reduce 
barriers to mental health care for Veterans at high risk for suicide. 
To defer implementation of the regulation would be to undermine its 
purpose. However, alternative regulatory approaches were considered. It 
was considered whether VHA national or local policy changes could 
effectively meet the intent of the regulation. It was found that policy 
change is not a viable alternative due to regulatory constraints that 
prevent changes to copayment requirements. The timing of rulemaking was 
considered. There were no potential cost savings or other net benefits 
identified that would lead to a more beneficial option. A phase-in 
period for the regulation was considered. There were no burdens, likely 
failures, or negative comments identified that a phase-in period would 
help mitigate. There were no potential cost savings or other net 
benefits identified that would make phasing in the regulation a more 
beneficial option.
    Anticipated Cost and Benefits: Outpatient medical care and 
medication copayments will be reduced for Veterans determined to be at 
high risk for suicide. VA strongly believes, based on extensive 
empirical evidence, that the provisions of this rulemaking will 
decrease the likelihood of fatal or medically serious overdoses from VA 
prescribed medications among Veterans who are at a high risk of 
suicide. VA also strongly believes, based on the evidence, that the 
provisions of this rulemaking will significantly increase the 
engagement of Veterans who are at a high risk of suicide in outpatient 
health care, which is known to decrease the risk of suicide and other 
adverse outcomes. Actual costs and/or transfers will be determined and 
reflected in this section of ROCIS once the Reg is

[[Page 9466]]

formally sent to OMB for a formal Executive Order 12866 review.
    Risks: None.
    Timetable:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Action                    Date            FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NPRM................................   01/05/22  87 FR 418
NPRM Comment Period End.............   03/07/22
Final Action........................   09/00/24
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No.
    Small Entities Affected: No.
    Government Levels Affected: None.
    URL For More Information: www.regulations.gov.
    Agency Contact: Julie Wildman, Informatics Educator, Department of 
Veterans Affairs, 795 Willow Road, Building 321, Room A124, Menlo Park, 
CA 94304, Phone: 650 493-5000, Email: [email protected].
    RIN: 2900-AQ30

VA

185. Update and Clarify Regulatory Bars to Benefits Based on Character 
of Discharge [2900-AQ95]

    Priority: Section 3(f)(1) Significant. Major under 5 U.S.C. 801.
    Legal Authority: 38 U.S.C. 501
    CFR Citation: 38 CFR 3.12.
    Legal Deadline: None.
    Abstract: The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) is amending its 
regulations regarding character of discharge determinations. The 
amendments will modify the regulatory framework for discharges 
considered ``dishonorable'' for VA benefit eligibility purposes, such 
as discharges due to ``willful and persistent misconduct,'' an 
``offense involving moral turpitude,'' and ``homosexual acts involving 
aggravating circumstances or other factors affecting the performance of 
duty.'' The amendments will also extend a ``compelling circumstances'' 
exception to certain regulatory bars to benefits in order to ensure 
fair character of discharge determinations in light of all pertinent 
factors. VA's amendments will take into consideration the public 
comments received on the published proposed rule (85 FR 41471), 
comments that VA receives from a published Request for Information (86 
FR 50513) and comments received during two scheduled listening 
sessions, which are described in aforementioned Request for 
Information.
    Statement of Need: TBD. In accordance with Executive Order 14094, 
VA published a Request for Information (RFI) on September 9, 2021, 86 
FR 50513 (2021) after the NPRM published. Specifically, the RFI asked 
questions about compelling circumstances, willful and persistent 
misconduct, moral turpitude, benefit eligibility and removing the 
regulatory bars. In addition to and subsequent of the RFI, VA held a 
two-day listening session in October 2021 to receive oral comments on 
the RFI questions.
    Summary of Legal Basis: TBD.
    Alternatives: TBD.
    Anticipated Cost and Benefits: TBD.
    Risks: TBD.
    Timetable:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Action                    Date            FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NPRM................................   07/10/20  85 FR 41471
NPRM Comment Period End.............   09/08/20
Request For Information (RFI).......   09/09/21  86 FR 50513
RFI Comment Period End..............   10/12/21
Final Action........................   01/00/24
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No.
    Small Entities Affected: No.
    Government Levels Affected: None.
    URL For More Information: www.regulations.gov.
    Agency Contact: Olumayowa Famakinwa, Department of Veterans 
Affairs, 810 Vermont Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20420, Phone: 202 461-
9700, Email: [email protected].
    RIN: 2900-AQ95

VA

186. Veteran and Spouse Transitional Assistance Grant Program [2900-
AR68]

    Priority: Other Significant.
    Legal Authority: 5 U.S.C. 601 to 612; 31 U.S.C. 302
    CFR Citation: 38 CFR 63.6309.
    Legal Deadline: None.
    Abstract: VA, as authorized under the Johnny Isakson and David P. 
Roe, M.D. Veterans Health Care and Benefits Improvement Act of 2020, 
amends its regulations to establish the Veteran Transitional Assistance 
Grant Program (VTAGP). VA will establish grant application procedures 
and evaluative criteria for determining whether to issue funding to 
eligible organizations providing transition services to members of the 
Armed Forces who are separated, retired, or discharged, as well as 
their spouses.
    Statement of Need: The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) has 
determined this rulemaking is necessary, in accordance with authority 
established by Public Law (Pub. L.) 116-315 4304 and 38 U.S.C. 501, 512 
to implement Public Law 116315 4304, the Johnny Isakson and David P. 
Roe, M.D. Veterans Health Care and Benefits Improvement Act of 2020 
(January 5, 2021). VA proposes to amend title 38 Pensions, Bonuses, and 
Veterans' Relief by adding part 80 and new sections 80.1 through 80.17 
to the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) to implement this new grant 
authority.
    Summary of Legal Basis: VA proposes regulations to establish the 
Veteran and Spouse Transitional Assistance Grant Program (VSTAGP). VA 
will establish grant application procedures and evaluative criteria for 
determining whether to issue funding to eligible organizations 
providing transition services to members of the Armed Forces who are 
separated, retired, or discharged, as well as their spouses.
    Alternatives: VA discussed how to implement provisions of 4304 of 
Public Law 116-315. A rulemaking is the preferred option as VA grant 
programs have historically been established utilizing the rulemaking 
process. If this regulation were not enacted, VA would struggle to 
implement the mandates put forth in Public Law 116-315 with current 
available resources and therefore, the agency would not be in 
compliance with the law. Alternatively, participants would continue to 
access existing transition services that may limit services to Veterans 
as defined in 38 U.S.C. 101(2). VA also considered an alternative title 
to this rulemaking, however after discussions with external partners it 
was determined to include the term spouse in the title. VSTAGP intends 
to provide transition services to members of the Armed Forces who are 
separated, retired, or discharged from the Armed Forces, and spouses of 
such members, by identifying employment barriers and developing 
individualized employment plans to overcome barriers. The program will 
also link participants to necessary support services. Also, a 
rulemaking will notify the public and interested parties of VA's new 
authority and allow for notice and comment. Public Law 116-315 requires 
grant recipients to provide matching funding from non-Federal sources 
that are at least equal to Federal grant funds awarded by VA.
    Anticipated Cost and Benefits: Each year, approximately 200,000 men 
and women leave the U.S. military service and return to their lives as 
civilians, a process known as the military-to-civilian transition. This 
rulemaking benefits former Service members who are discharged, retired, 
or separated, and their spouses (referred to as

[[Page 9467]]

participants), by establishing a grants program focused on improving 
transition services. Transition services would include resume 
assistance, interview training, job recruitment training and related 
services that would result in a successful transition as determined by 
the Secretary. Related services would include, but are not limited to, 
employment placement services, employment education and/or training and 
employment referrals. VA has determined there are costs and transfers 
associated with this rulemaking. The total regulatory budget impact 
associated with this rulemaking is estimated to be $6.9 million in FY 
2024 and $38.3 million over 5 years as reflected in Table 1 below. 
Costs associated with this rulemaking are estimated at $1.9 million in 
FY 2024 and $13.3 million over 5 years to include an information 
technology (IT) solution to manage grants. The net transfers for the 
creation of VSTAGP are $5 million for FY 2024 and $25 million over 5 
years.
    Risks: None.
    Timetable:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Action                    Date            FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NPRM................................   07/05/23  88 FR 42891
NPRM Comment Period End.............   08/04/23
Final Action........................   11/00/23
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No.
    Small Entities Affected: No.
    Government Levels Affected: None.
    URL For More Information: www.regulations.gov.
    Agency Contact: Kenneth Fenner, Program Analyst, Office of 
Outreach, Transition and Economic Dev., Department of Veterans Affairs, 
1800 G Street SW, Washington, DC 20420, Phone: 800 877-8339, Email: 
[email protected].
    RIN: 2900-AR68

VA

187. Reevaluation of Claims for Dependency and Indemnity Compensation 
Based on Public Law 117-168 [2900-AR76]

    Priority: Section 3(f)(1) Significant. Major under 5 U.S.C. 801.
    Legal Authority: 38 U.S.C. 501; 38 U.S.C. 1305
    CFR Citation: 38 CFR 3.817.
    Legal Deadline: None.
    Abstract: The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) amending its 
adjudication regulations concerning certain awards of Dependency and 
Indemnity Compensation (DIC). Relevant claimants will be eligible to 
elect a reevaluation of certain previously denied DIC determinations 
pursuant to changes that establish or modify a presumption of service-
connection. Any award following reevaluation may be made retroactive to 
the date of a previously denied claim as if the establishment or 
modification of the presumption of service- connection had been in 
effect on the date of the submission of the original claim. With 
respect to new or initial awards of DIC pending before VA on or after 
August 10, 2022, VA will utilize the most advantageous effective date 
amongst 38 CFR 3.114 and 3.400, to potentially grant an award earlier 
than August 10, 2022, if applicable. Lastly, as the PACT Act is silent 
with respect to changes in the accrued or substitution process as it 
relates to the reevaluation of DIC claims, VA will be utilizing the 
regular processes regarding accrued and substitution benefits contained 
in 38 U.S.C. 5121 and 5121A. The amendments within this final 
rulemaking incorporate legislative updates enacted by the Sergeant 
First Class Heath Robinson Honoring our Promise to Address 
Comprehensive Toxics Act of 2022, or the Honoring our PACT Act of 2022 
(Pub. L. 117-168) (PACT Act) and will bring federal regulations into 
conformance with the statutory changes. The amendments in this 
regulation are in accordance with the President's priorities to address 
toxic exposure. Also improve service delivery, customer experience, and 
reduce administrative burdens for those accessing public benefits and 
services.
    Statement of Need: The Department of Veterans Affairs has 
determined the need to amend its regulations, in accordance with 38 
U.S.C. 501, to incorporate legislative updates enacted by Section 204 
of the Sergeant First Class Heath Robinson Honoring our Promise to 
Address Comprehensive Toxics Act of 2022 or the Honoring our PACT Act 
of 2022 (Pub. L. 117-168).
    Summary of Legal Basis: This amendment to the Dependency and 
Indemnity Compensation benefit program is authorized by section 204 of 
Public Law 117-168. VA must publish regulations for matters related to 
benefits as required by 38 U.S.C. 501(d).
    Alternatives: VBA has considered an alternative policy to this 
final rule. VBA could choose not to act at this time and codify a new 
regulation at a later date. However, this would have a negative effect 
on VA's effectiveness in processing benefits claims as the current 
regulations do not align with the updated statutes. This new 
adjudication regulation is needed to appropriately determine 
eligibility to certain VA benefits based on these statutory changes. 
Therefore, the final rule of adding a new adjudication regulation which 
will provide relevant claimants the ability to elect a reevaluation of 
certain previously denied DIC determinations pursuant to changes that 
establish or modify a presumption of service connection to conform with 
the statutory changes within the PACT Act is VA's preferred policy 
approach.
    Anticipated Cost and Benefits: TBD.
    Risks: None.
    Timetable:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Action                    Date            FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NPRM................................   03/22/23  88 FR 17166
NPRM Comment Period End.............   05/22/23
Final Action........................   11/00/23
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No.
    Small Entities Affected: No.
    Government Levels Affected: None.
    URL For More Information: www.regulations.gov.
    Agency Contact: Eric Baltimore, Program Analyst, Pension and 
Fiduciary Service, Veterans Benefits Administration, Department of 
Veterans Affairs, 810 Vermont Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20420, Phone: 
202 632-8863, Email: [email protected].
    RIN: 2900-AR76

VA

Completed Actions

188. Presumptive Service Connection for Respiratory Conditions Due to 
Exposure to Particulate Matter [2900-AR25]

    Priority: Section 3(f)(1) Significant. Major under 5 U.S.C. 801.
    CFR Citation: 38 CFR 3.319 (new).
    Abstract: This rulemaking adopts as final, with changes, an interim 
final rule that amended the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) 
adjudication regulations governing presumptive service connection based 
on presumed exposures to fine particulate matter. The amendment was 
necessary to provide health care, services, and benefits to Gulf War 
Veterans who were exposed to fine particulate matter associated with 
deployment to the Southwest Asia theater of operations, as well as 
Afghanistan, Syria, Djibouti, and Uzbekistan. The amendment eased the 
evidentiary burden of Gulf War Veterans who file claims with VA for 
asthma, rhinitis, and sinusitis, to include rhinosinusitis.

[[Page 9468]]

    Statement of Need: The amendment is necessary, in accordance with 
38 U.S.C. 501(a), to provide health care, services, and benefits to 
Gulf War Veterans who were potentially exposed to fine particulate 
matter associated with deployment to the Southwest Asia theater of 
operations, as well as Afghanistan, Syria, Djibouti, and Uzbekistan.
    Summary of Legal Basis: This rulemaking adopts as final, with 
changes, an interim final rule that amended the Department of Veterans 
Affairs (VA) adjudication regulations governing presumptive service 
connection based on presumed exposures to fine particulate matter. The 
amendment was necessary to provide health care, services, and benefits 
to Gulf War Veterans who were exposed to fine particulate matter 
associated with deployment to the Southwest Asia theater of operations, 
as well as Afghanistan, Syria, Djibouti, and Uzbekistan. The amendment 
eased the evidentiary burden of Gulf War Veterans who file claims with 
VA for asthma, rhinitis, and sinusitis, to include rhinosinusitis.
    Alternatives: None.
    Anticipated Cost and Benefits: The intended effect of this 
amendment is to address the needs and concerns of Gulf War Veterans and 
service members who have served and continue to serve in these 
locations as military operations in the Southwest Asia theater of 
operations have been ongoing from August 1990 until the present time. 
Neither Congress nor the President has established an end date for the 
Gulf War. Therefore, to provide immediate health care, services, and 
benefits to current and future Gulf War Veterans who may be affected by 
particulate matter due to their military service, VA intends to provide 
presumptive service connection for the chronic disabilities of asthma, 
rhinitis, and sinusitis, to include rhinosinusitis, as well as a 
presumption of exposure to fine, particulate matter. This will ease the 
evidentiary burden of Gulf War Veterans who file claims with VA for 
these three conditions, which are among the most commonly claimed 
respiratory conditions. VA has determined that both transfers and costs 
are associated with this final rulemaking. The total budgetary impact 
is estimated to be $1.5 billion in FY 2023, $12.4 billion over five 
years, and $30.4 billion over 10 years, as detailed in Table 1 below. 
Transfers are estimated to be $1.3 billion in 2023, $11.2 billion over 
five years, and $28.5 billion over 10 years.
    Risks: TBD.
    Completed:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Reason                    Date            FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Final Action........................   09/01/23  88 FR 60336
Final Action Effective..............   10/31/23
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No.
    Small Entities Affected: No.
    Government Levels Affected: None.
    Agency Contact: Jane Allen, Policy Analyst, Robert Parks, Chief, 
Part 3 Regulations Staff (211), Department of Veterans Affairs, 
Compensation Service (21C), 810 Vermont Avenue NW, Washington, DC 
20420, Phone: 202 461-9700.
    RIN: 2900-AR25

VA

189. Presumptive Service Connection for Rare Respiratory Cancers Due to 
Exposure to Fine Particulate Matter [2900-AR44]

    Priority: Other Significant.
    CFR Citation: 38 CFR 3.317(e)(2); 38 CFR 3.
    Abstract: This rulemaking adopts as final, without changes, an 
interim final rule amending the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) 
adjudication regulations to establish presumptive service connection 
for nine rare respiratory cancers in association with presumed exposure 
to fine particulate matter. These presumptions apply to Veterans with a 
qualifying period of service, i.e., who served on active military, 
naval, or air service in the Southwest Asia theater of operations 
during the Persian Gulf War (hereinafter Gulf War), from August 2, 
1990, onward, as well as in Afghanistan, Syria, Djibouti, or 
Uzbekistan, on or after September 19, 2001, during the Gulf War. This 
rulemaking implements a decision by the Secretary of Veterans Affairs 
that determined there is sufficient evidence to support these cancers 
as presumptive based on exposure to fine particulate matter during 
service in the Southwest Asia theater of operations, Afghanistan, 
Syria, Djibouti, or Uzbekistan during certain periods and the 
subsequent development of the following rare respiratory cancers: 
squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) of the larynx, SCC of the trachea, 
adenocarcinoma of the trachea, salivary gland-type tumors of the 
trachea, adenosquamous carcinoma of the lung, large cell carcinoma of 
the lung, salivary gland-type tumors of the lung, sarcomatoid carcinoma 
of the lung, and typical and atypical carcinoid of the lung. The 
intended effect of this rulemaking is to ease the evidentiary burden of 
this population of Veterans who file claims with VA for these nine rare 
respiratory cancers.
    Statement of Need: The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) is 
issuing this final rule to amend its adjudication regulations to 
establish presumptive service connection for nine rare respiratory 
cancers in association with presumed exposures to fine particulate 
matter. This amendment is necessary to implement a decision of the 
Secretary of Veterans Affairs that there is a plausible relationship 
between service in the Southwest theater of operations, Afghanistan, 
Syria, Djibouti, or Uzbekistan during certain periods and the 
subsequent development of the following rare respiratory cancers: 
squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) of larynx, SCC of trachea, adenocarcinoma 
of trachea, salivary gland-type tumors of trachea, adenosquamous 
carcinoma of lung, large cell carcinoma of lung, salivary gland-type 
tumors of lung, sarcomatoid carcinoma of lung, and typical and atypical 
carcinoid of the lung. The intended effect of this amendment is to ease 
the evidentiary burden of Gulf War Veterans who file claims with VA for 
these nine rare respiratory cancers.
    Summary of Legal Basis: VA amends its adjudication regulations to 
establish presumptive service connection for nine rare respiratory 
cancers in association with presumed exposures to PM2.5 for 
certain Veterans. This amendment is necessary to implement a decision 
of the Secretary of Veterans Affairs that there is a plausible 
relationship between service in the Southwest Asia theater of 
operations, Afghanistan, Syria, Djibouti, or Uzbekistan during certain 
periods and the subsequent development of the following rare 
respiratory cancers: squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) of the larynx, SCC 
of the trachea, adenocarcinoma of the trachea, salivary gland-type 
tumors of the trachea, adenosquamous carcinoma of the lung, large cell 
carcinoma of the lung, salivary gland-type tumors of the lung, 
sarcomatoid carcinoma of the lung, and typical and atypical carcinoid 
of the lung. The intended effect of this rulemaking is to ease the 
evidentiary burden of this population of Veterans who file claims with 
VA for these nine rare respiratory cancers.
    Alternatives: None.
    Anticipated Cost and Benefits: This rulemaking allows VA to provide 
access to immediate health care services and benefits such as 
disability compensation and life insurance to current and future Gulf 
War Veterans who may be affected by fine particulate matter due to 
their military service, and to ease the

[[Page 9469]]

evidentiary burden of Gulf War Veterans who file claims with VA for 
these nine rare respiratory cancers. This rulemaking will also provide 
access to benefits such as health care, survivor compensation, and 
burial benefits to eligible survivors.
    VA has determined that both transfers and costs are associated with 
this rulemaking. Transfers are estimated to be $54.2 million in 2023, 
$301.1 million over five years, and $704.6 million over ten years. 
Costs are estimated to be $3.9 million in 2023, $16.8 million over five 
years, and $35.2 million over ten years. The total budgetary impact is 
estimated to be $58.1 million in 2023, $317.9 million over five years, 
and $739.9 million over ten years.
    Risks: None.
    Completed:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Reason                    Date            FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Final Rule..........................   11/03/23  88 FR 75498
Final Rule Effective................   11/03/23  .......................
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No.
    Small Entities Affected: No.
    Government Levels Affected: None.
    Agency Contact: Robert Parks, Department of Veterans Affairs, 1800 
G Street NW, Washington, DC 20006, Phone: 202 461-9700, Email: 
[email protected].
    RIN: 2900-AR44

BILLING CODE 8320-01-P

CORPORATION FOR NATIONAL AND COMMUNITY SERVICE (AMERICORPS)

Fall 2023 Statement of Regulatory Priorities

Overview

    The Corporation for National and Community Service, operating as 
AmeriCorps, is the Federal agency for national service and 
volunteerism. AmeriCorps provides opportunities for individuals to 
address some the nation's most pressing challenges, improve lives and 
communities, and strengthen civic engagement. AmeriCorps offers 
individuals and organizations flexible ways to make a local and lasting 
impact through its programs, such as AmeriCorps State and National, 
AmeriCorps VISTA, AmeriCorps NCCC, the Volunteer Generation Fund, and 
AmeriCorps Seniors RSVP, Foster Grandparents, Senior Companions and 
Senior Demonstration programs. AmeriCorps also supports volunteerism 
through the national 9/11 Day of Service and Martin Luther King, Jr., 
Day of Service. AmeriCorps' authorizing statutes and regulations 
provide the necessary legal framework for its programs. AmeriCorps' 
regulatory priorities are guided by its Strategic Plan (available at 
americorps.gov/about/agency-overview/strategic-plan) and Administration 
priorities.

Highlights of Americorps' Regulatory Plan

    This Regulatory Plan provides highlights of AmeriCorps' upcoming 
regulatory actions. Please refer to AmeriCorps' Semiannual Regulatory 
Agenda for the full spectrum of AmeriCorps' upcoming regulatory 
actions.
    Among other objectives, AmeriCorps' Strategic Plan establishes a 
goal of partnering with communities to alleviate poverty and advance 
racial equity. This past year, AmeriCorps finalized updates to its 
AmeriCorps VISTA regulations (3045-AA79) in support of this goal. The 
AmeriCorps VISTA program promotes economic resilience and address 
persistent poverty by encouraging and enabling persons from all walks 
of life to perform volunteer service to assist in the solution of 
poverty and poverty-related problems and secure and increase 
opportunities for self-advancement by persons affected by such 
problems. Recently finalized updates to VISTA's regulations add 
programmatic and grantmaking flexibilities to better reach underserved 
communities, reduce barriers to participation in national service, and 
provide those communities with access to the benefits of service to 
reduce poverty.
    AmeriCorps is planning two proposed regulatory actions in further 
support of partnering with communities to alleviate poverty and advance 
racial equity:
    First, AmeriCorps State and National Updates (3045-AA84) will 
consider additional programmatic and grantmaking flexibilities, 
including waivers and exceptions for individuals who may benefit from 
additional education and training, such as those reentering society 
after a period of incarceration, to participate in national service 
while acquiring skills and knowledge to ease their transition into the 
workplace.
    And second, AmeriCorps Seniors Updates (3045-AA81) will consider 
removing barriers to service for individuals, particularly for low-
income individuals, and increasing flexibility for sponsors to 
determine the best mix of staffing and resources to accomplish project 
goals.

BILLING CODE 6050-28-P

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY (EPA)

Statement of Priorities

Overview

    EPA works to ensure that all Americans are protected from 
significant risks to human health and the environment, including 
climate change, and that overburdened and underserved communities and 
vulnerable individuals--in particular, communities with environmental 
justice concerns--are meaningfully engaged and benefit from focused 
efforts to protect their communities from pollution. EPA acts to ensure 
that all efforts to reduce environmental harms are based on the best 
available scientific information, that federal laws protecting human 
health and the environment are enforced equitably and effectively, and 
that the United States plays a leadership role in working with other 
nations to protect the global environment. EPA is committed to 
environmental protection that builds and supports more diverse, 
equitable, sustainable, resilient, and productive communities and 
ecosystems.
    By taking advantage of the latest science, the newest technologies 
and the most cost-effective and sustainable solutions, EPA and its 
federal, tribal, state, local, and community partners have made 
important progress in addressing pollution where people live, work, 
play, and learn. By cleaning up contaminated waste sites, reducing 
greenhouse gases, lowering emissions of mercury and other air 
pollutants, and investing in water and wastewater treatment, EPA's 
efforts have resulted in tangible benefits to the American public. 
Efforts to reduce air pollution alone have produced hundreds of 
billions of dollars in benefits in the United States, and tremendous 
progress has been made in cleaning up our nation's land and waterways. 
But much more needs to be done to implement the nation's environmental 
statutes and ensure that all individuals and communities benefit from 
EPA's efforts to protect human health and the environment and to 
address the climate crisis.
    EPA will use its regulatory authorities, along with grant- and 
incentive-based programs, technical and compliance assistance, and 
research and educational initiatives, to address the following 
priorities set forth in EPA's Strategic Plan:

 Tackle the Climate Crisis
 Take Decisive Action to Advance Environmental Justice and 
Civil Rights

[[Page 9470]]

 Enforce Environmental Laws and Ensure Compliance
 Ensure Clean and Healthy Air for All Communities
 Ensure Clean and Healthy Water for All Communities
 Safeguard and Revitalize Communities
 Ensure Safety of Chemicals for People and the Environment

    As EPA develops regulations, we seek to increase participation and 
engagement of members of the public affected by our regulations, 
including in the development of our regulatory priorities. In our 
Regulatory Plan we detail engagement efforts that have helped to inform 
our priorities to date, as well as future engagement efforts we have 
planned. Throughout our engagement, EPA would particularly like to hear 
from members of the public who have not typically participated in the 
regulatory process, including families and communities affected by 
climate change, rural workers, and others.
    All this work will be undertaken with a strong commitment to 
scientific integrity, the rule of law and transparency, the health of 
children and other vulnerable populations, and with special focus on 
supporting and achieving environmental justice at federal, tribal, 
state, and local levels.

Highlights of EPA's Regulatory Plan

    This Regulatory Plan highlights our most important upcoming 
regulatory actions. As always, our Semiannual Regulatory Agenda 
contains information on a broader spectrum of EPA's upcoming regulatory 
actions.

Tackle the Climate Crisis

    EPA is taking appropriate regulatory action under existing 
statutory authorities to reduce emissions from our nation's largest 
sources of greenhouse gases (GHG) to respond to the severe and urgent 
threat of climate change. The impacts of climate change are affecting 
people in every region of the country, threatening lives and 
livelihoods and damaging infrastructure, ecosystems, and social 
systems. Overburdened and underserved communities and individuals are 
particularly vulnerable to these impacts, including low-income 
communities and communities of color, children, the elderly, tribes, 
and indigenous people.
    Exercising its authority under the Clean Air Act (CAA), EPA will 
address major sources of GHGs that are driving these impacts by taking 
regulatory action to minimize emissions of methane from new and 
existing sources in the oil and natural gas sector; reduce GHGs from 
new and existing fossil fuel-fired power plants; and limit GHGs from 
new light-duty vehicles and heavy-duty trucks. EPA will also carry out 
the mandates of the American Innovation and Manufacturing (AIM) Act to 
implement, and where appropriate accelerate, a national phasedown in 
the production and consumption of hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs), which are 
highly potent GHGs. Further, these regulatory priorities complement the 
commitment to holistically and aggressively combat damaging climate 
pollution while supporting the creation of good jobs and lowering 
energy costs for families together with implementation of relevant 
climate provisions of the Inflation Reduction Act.
     New Source Performance Standards and Emission Guidelines 
for Crude Oil and Natural Gas Facilities: Climate Review.
    On November 15, 2021, the EPA proposed new source performance 
standards and emission guidelines for crude oil and natural gas 
facilities that would secure major climate and health benefits for all 
Americans by reducing emissions of methane and other harmful air 
pollution from both new and existing sources in the oil and natural gas 
industry. (86 FR 63110). This action was in response to the January 20, 
2021, Executive Order titled `Protecting Public Health and the 
Environment and Restoring Science to Tackle the Climate Crisis.' The 
2021 action proposed to update and strengthen methane and VOC standards 
on the books for new sources, add standards for currently unregulated 
new sources, and establish the first nationwide Emission Guidelines for 
states to regulate existing sources. On December 6, 2022, EPA issued a 
supplemental proposal to update, strengthen and expand its November 
2021 proposal (87 FR 74702). The supplemental proposal would achieve 
more comprehensive emissions reductions from oil and natural gas 
operations by improving standards in the 2021 proposal and adding 
proposed requirements for sources not previously covered. Specific 
proposed requirements include fugitive emissions monitoring and repair 
at well sites, stronger requirements for flares, zero emissions 
standards for pneumatic pumps, new standards for dry seal compressors, 
and a program to allow approved third parties to identify super-
emitting events for prompt mitigation. The supplemental proposal also 
promotes innovation in methane detection technology by allowing for the 
use of advanced methane detection systems. The proposal included 
details for implementing the Emissions Guidelines. EPA received more 
than 515,000 public comments on the 2022 supplemental proposal, in 
addition to 470,000 comments received on the 2021 proposal. EPA held 
multi-day virtual public hearings on both proposals and has conducted 
numerous trainings and webinars for communities, members of Tribal 
Nations, tribal environmental professionals and small businesses. The 
Agency expects to issue a final rule later this year.
     NSPS for GHG Emissions from New, Modified, and 
Reconstructed Fossil Fuel-Fired EGUs; Emission Guidelines for GHG 
Emissions from Existing Fossil Fuel-Fired EGUs; and Repeal of the ACE 
Rule.
    Fossil fuel-fired electric generating units (EGUs) are the nation's 
second largest source of greenhouse gas (GHG) pollution. In May 2023, 
EPA proposed to set limits for new gas-fired combustion turbines, 
existing coal, oil and gas-fired steam generating units, and certain 
existing gas-fired combustion turbines. Consistent with EPA's 
traditional approach to establishing pollution standards for power 
plants under section 111 of the Clean Air Act, the proposed standards 
are based on technologies such as carbon capture and sequestration/
storage (CCS), low-GHG hydrogen co-firing, and natural gas co-firing, 
which can be applied directly to power plants that use fossil fuels to 
generate electricity. As laid out in section 111 of the Clean Air Act, 
the proposed new source performance standards (NSPS) and emission 
guidelines reflect the application of the best system of emission 
reduction (BSER) that, taking into account costs, energy requirements, 
and other statutory factors, is adequately demonstrated for the purpose 
of improving the emissions performance of the covered electric 
generating units. The comment period for the proposed rule concluded on 
August 8, 2023. EPA intends to issue a final rule in spring 2024.
     Management of Certain Hydrofluorocarbons and Substitutes 
under Subsection (h) of the American Innovation and Manufacturing Act 
of 2020.
    This proposed rulemaking would establish requirements for the 
management of certain HFCs and their substitutes under subsection (h) 
of the AIM Act. Specifically, this proposal considers provisions to 
control, where appropriate, practices, processes, or activities 
regarding the servicing, repair, disposal, or installation of 
equipment, for the purposes of maximizing the reclamation and 
minimizing the release

[[Page 9471]]

of certain HFCs from equipment and ensuring the safety of technicians 
and consumers. Among other provisions, EPA is proposing emissions 
reduction requirements for certain equipment containing HFCs and their 
substitutes as well as requirements to increase the reclaiming of HFCs.
     Application-Specific Review and Renewal Rule.
    The AIM Act identifies six applications that are to receive ``the 
full quantity of [HFC] allowances necessary, based on projected, 
current, and historical trends,'' under the allowance allocation 
program through the end of 2025. The six applications are a propellant 
in metered dose inhalers, defense sprays, structural composite 
preformed polyurethane foam for marine use and trailer use, the etching 
of semiconductor material or wafers and the cleaning of chemical vapor 
deposition chambers within the semiconductor manufacturing sector, 
mission-critical military end uses, and onboard aerospace fire 
suppression. EPA can renew this status for up to five years at a time 
based on statutory criteria outlined in the AIM Act. This proposed rule 
will review and consider whether to renew eligibility for each of the 
six applications, consistent with this statutory process under AIM 
subsection (e)(4)(B). Additionally, EPA intends to establish how it 
will review eligibility if petitioned for inclusion of additional 
applications and to consider revisions to existing regulatory 
requirements.
     Greenhouse Gas Emissions Standards for Heavy-Duty Engines 
and Vehicles--Phase 3.
     Transportation is the largest source of GHG emissions in 
the United States and heavy-duty (HD) vehicles are the second-largest 
contributor in the sector. GHG emissions have significant impacts on 
public health and welfare as evidenced by the well-documented 
scientific record and as set forth in EPA's Endangerment and Cause or 
Contribute Findings under section 202(a) of the CAA. GHG reductions 
would benefit all U.S. residents, including populations such as people 
of color, low-income populations, indigenous peoples, and/or children 
that may be especially vulnerable to various forms of damages 
associated with climate change. On April 12, 2023, EPA announced a 
proposal for more stringent standards to reduce greenhouse gas 
emissions from HD vehicles beginning in model year (MY) 2027. The new 
standards would be applicable to HD vocational vehicles (such as 
delivery trucks, refuse haulers, public utility trucks, transit, 
shuttle, school buses, etc.) and tractors (such as day cabs and sleeper 
cabs on tractor-trailer trucks). Specifically, EPA proposed stronger 
CO2 standards for MY 2027 HD vehicles that go beyond the current 
standards that apply under the HD Phase 2 Greenhouse Gas program. EPA 
also proposed an additional set of CO2 standards for HD vehicles that 
would begin to apply in MY 2028, with progressively more stringent 
standards each model year through 2032. This proposed ``Phase 3'' 
greenhouse gas program maintains the flexible structure created in 
EPA's Phase 2 greenhouse gas program, which is designed to reflect the 
diverse nature of the heavy-duty industry. EPA has conducted outreach 
with a wide range of interested stakeholders to gather input which we 
have considered in developing this proposal, and we will continue to 
engage with the public and all interested stakeholders as part of our 
regulatory development process.
     Multi-Pollutant Emissions Standards for Model Years 2027 
and Later Light-Duty and Medium-Duty Vehicles.
    On April 12, 2023, EPA announced a proposal for new, more ambitious 
multipollutant emissions standards to further reduce harmful air 
pollutant emissions from light-duty passenger cars and light trucks and 
Class 2b and 3 vehicles (``medium-duty vehicles'' or MDVs) under its 
authority in section 202(a) of the Clean Air Act (CAA), 42 U.S.C. 
7521(a), starting with model year 2027. The proposal builds upon EPA's 
final standards for federal greenhouse gas emissions standards for 
passenger cars and light trucks for model years 2023 through 2026 and 
leverages advances in clean car technology which would result in 
significant benefits to Americans ranging from reducing climate 
pollution, to improving public health, to saving drivers money through 
reduced fuel and maintenance costs. The proposed standards phased in 
over model years 2027 through 2032. EPA conducted outreach with a wide 
range of interested stakeholders to gather input which was considered 
in developing the proposal and will continue to engage with the public 
and all interested stakeholders as part of our regulatory development 
process as we develop the final rule.

Ensure Clean and Healthy Air for All Communities

     All people regardless of race, ethnicity, national origin, 
or income deserve to breathe clean air. EPA has the responsibility to 
protect the health of vulnerable and sensitive populations, such as 
children, the elderly, and persons overburdened by pollution or 
adversely affected by persistent poverty or inequality. Since enactment 
of the CAA, EPA has made significant progress in reducing harmful air 
pollution even as the U.S. population and economy have grown. Between 
1970 and 2022, the combined emissions of six key pollutants dropped by 
78%, while the U.S. economy remained strong as GDP grew 304% over that 
time period. As required by the CAA, EPA will continue to build on this 
progress and work to ensure clean air for all Americans, including 
those in underserved and overburdened communities. Among other things, 
EPA will take regulatory action to review and implement health-based 
air quality standards for criteria pollutants such as particulate 
matter (PM); limit emissions of harmful air pollution from both 
stationary and mobile sources; address sources of hazardous air 
pollution (HAP), such as ethylene oxide, that disproportionately affect 
communities with environmental justice concerns; and protect downwind 
communities from linked sources of air pollution that cross state 
lines. Along with the full set of CAA actions listed in the regulatory 
agenda, the following high priority actions will allow EPA to continue 
its progress in reducing harmful air pollution.
     National Ambient Air Quality Standards for Particulate 
Matter Reconsideration (PM NAAQS Reconsideration).
    Under the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1977, EPA is required to 
review and if appropriate revise the air quality criteria for the 
primary (health-based) and secondary (welfare-based) national ambient 
air quality standards (NAAQS) every 5 years. On December 18, 2020, the 
EPA published a final decision retaining the NAAQS for particulate 
matter (PM), which was the subject of several petitions for 
reconsideration as well as petitions for judicial review. As directed 
in Executive Order 13990, ``Protecting Public Health and the 
Environment and Restoring Science to Tackle the Climate Crisis,'' 
signed by President Biden on January 20, 2021, EPA is undertaking a 
reconsideration of the December 2020 decision to retain the PM NAAQS 
because the available scientific evidence and technical information 
indicate that the current standards may not be adequate to protect 
public health and welfare, as required by the Clean Air Act. As part of 
this reconsideration, EPA developed a Supplement to the 2019 PM 
Integrated Science Assessment (ISA) and a Policy Assessment to take 
into account the most up-to-date science on public health impacts of PM 
and engaged with the chartered Clean Air Scientific

[[Page 9472]]

Advisory Committee (CASAC) and a newly constituted expert CASAC PM 
panel. The notice of proposed rulemaking was signed on January 5, 2023. 
The EPA proposed to revise the primary annual PM2.5 standard 
from its current level of 12.0 [micro]g/m\3\ to within the range of 9.0 
to 10.0 [micro]g/m\3\, while proposing to retain the primary 24-hour 
PM2.5 standard, the primary 24-hour PM10 
standard, and the secondary PM standards. The EPA also proposed 
revisions to the Air Quality Index (AQI) and to the PM2.5 
monitoring network. The EPA held a public hearing in February 2023, 
where more than 300 individuals provided oral testimony. The EPA also 
received more than 700,000 written public comments from individuals, 
environmental and public health organizations, industries, federal, 
state, and local representatives, and tribes and tribal groups. The EPA 
has also provided other opportunities for public engagement throughout 
the reconsideration, including public meetings of the CASAC, and tribal 
consultation offers and informational meetings. EPA intends to issue a 
final rule in fall 2023.
     Review of the Secondary National Ambient Air Quality 
Standards for Ecological Effects of Oxides of Nitrogen, Oxides of 
Sulfur and Particulate Matter (Ecological Effects of NOX, SOX and PM 
Secondary NAAQS Review).
    Under the Clean Air Act, the EPA is required to review and, if 
appropriate, revise the air quality criteria and national ambient air 
quality standards (NAAQS) every 5 years. On April 3, 2012, the EPA 
published a final rule in which the Agency determined to retain the 
current secondary standards (welfare-based) for nitrogen oxides 
(NOX) and for sulfur oxides (SOX). On January 15, 
2013, the EPA published a final rule in which the Agency retained the 
secondary standards for particulate matter. The current review of the 
air quality criteria and secondary standards for ecological effects of 
SOX, NOX and particulate matter includes the 
preparation of an Integrated Science Assessment and a Policy Assessment 
by the EPA, with opportunities for review by the EPA's Clean Air 
Scientific Advisory Committee (CASAC) and the public. These documents 
will inform the Administrator's proposed decision as to whether to 
retain or revise the standards. The proposed decision would be 
published in the Federal Register with opportunity provided for public 
comment. The Administrator's final decisions would take into 
consideration these documents, CASAC advice, and public comment on the 
proposed decision. Opportunities for public engagement and sharing of 
information concerning this NAAQS review will include public hearings, 
tribal consultation, informational meetings, and through the CASAC 
public meetings.
     NESHAP: Coal-and Oil-Fired Electric Utility Steam 
Generating Units-Review of the Residual Risk and Technology Review.
     On February 16, 2012, EPA promulgated National Emission 
Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants for Coal- and Oil-fired Electric 
Utility Steam Generating Units (77 FR 9304). The rule (40 CFR part 63, 
subpart UUUUU), commonly referred to as the Mercury and Air Toxics 
Standards (MATS), includes standards to control hazardous air pollutant 
(HAP) emissions from new and existing coal- and oil-fired electric 
utility steam generating units (EGUs) located at both major and area 
sources of HAP emissions. There have been several regulatory actions 
regarding MATS since February 2012, including a May 22, 2020, action 
that withdrew EPA's threshold finding that it is appropriate and 
necessary to regulate hazardous air pollution from power plants under 
section 112 of the CAA, and finalized the residual risk and technology 
review (RTR) conducted for the Coal- and Oil-Fired EGU source category 
regulated under MATS (85 FR 31286). As directed by Executive Order 
13990, EPA has reviewed the May 2020 final action. After this review, 
based on the best available science, EPA issued a final action on 
February 15, 2023, that reinstated the Agency's appropriate and 
necessary finding for MATS. Following a review of the RTR portion of 
the May 2020 final action, EPA also proposed to update and strengthen 
the MATS on April 24, 2023 (88 FR 24854). (88 FR 13956). The proposal 
reflects feedback EPA received from representatives from local and 
state governments, industry groups, and environmental organizations. 
Additional public input will inform EPA as the final regulation is 
developed. For example, the Agency held a virtual public hearing on May 
9, 2023, where 93 speakers provided oral testimony. EPA also 
participated in a National Tribal Air Association/EPA Air Policy Update 
Call on May 25, 2023, to inform attendees about the rule and how to 
submit comments to the docket. Written comments were accepted during 
the 60-day comment period until June 23, 2023. EPA intends to issue a 
final rule addressing the RTR in 2024.
     National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants: 
Ethylene Oxide Commercial Sterilization and Fumigation Operations.
    In this action, EPA is conducting the second residual risk and 
technology review for the National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air 
Pollutants for ethylene oxide commercial sterilizers and considering 
potential updates to the rule. The proposed rule was published in April 
2023 (88 FR 22790). If finalized as proposed, the rule would reduce 
ethylene oxide emissions by 80% and would reduce lifetime cancer risk 
in all impacted communities to acceptable levels, many of which have 
environmental justice concerns. Prior to proposal, EPA issued an 
advance notice of proposed rulemaking that solicited comment from 
stakeholders, undertook a Small Business Advocacy Review panel, which 
is needed when there is the potential for significant economic impacts 
to small businesses from any regulatory actions being considered, and 
conducted outreach meetings within the communities affected by the 
highest-risk facilities as well as engagement with state and local 
governments. The comment period for this proposal concluded on June 27, 
2023, and EPA intends to issue a final rule by March 2024.
     Review of Final Rule Reclassification of Major Sources as 
Area Sources Under Section 112 of the Clean Air Act.
    In 2019, EPA issued a proposed rule that would allow major sources 
of hazardous air pollutants (HAP) subject to National Emissions 
Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) to reclassify to area 
source status by taking limits on their potential to emit such that 
they are no longer subject to major source NESHAP. The final rule, 
Reclassification of Major Sources as Area Sources Under section 112 of 
the Clean Air Act (Major MACT to Area- MM2A final rule), was 
promulgated on November 19, 2020. (See 85 FR 73854) The MM2A final rule 
became effective on January 19, 2021. As directed by Executive Order 
13990, ``Protecting Public Health and the Environment and Restoring 
Science to Tackle the Climate Crisis,'' EPA has reviewed the MM2A 
action and published for comment a notice of proposed rulemaking to 
determine whether changes are necessary for sources seeking to 
reclassify from major source status to area source status. This 
proposal reflects engagement with state and local agencies, 
representatives of communities, and other stakeholders.
     Revisions to the Air Emission Reporting Requirements 
(AERR).
    On August 8, 2023 (88 FR 54118), the EPA proposed revisions to the 
Air Emissions Reporting Requirements in 40

[[Page 9473]]

CFR part 51, subpart A. The existing AERR rule was last revised on 
February 19, 2015 (80 FR 8787). EPA is proposing new requirements to 
improve the quality and completeness of HAP emissions data from 
stationary sources and all pollutant emissions from prescribed fires. 
Specifically, the EPA is proposing to require certain sources report 
information regarding emission of hazardous air pollutants (HAP); 
certain sources to report criteria air pollutants, their precursors and 
HAP; and to require State, local, and certain tribal air agencies to 
report prescribed fire data. Further, EPA is considering how best to 
quantify emissions from intermittent sources such as backup generators; 
how to obtain data from permitted facilities in Indian Country when a 
Tribe is not required to report emissions data; and how to address 
known data gaps, streamline processes, and improve data quality, 
documentation, and transparency for nonpoint and mobile sources. The 
proposed revisions also include changes for reporting data on airports, 
rail yards, commercial marine vessels, locomotives, and nonpoint 
sources. This proposed action would allow for EPA to annually collect 
(starting in 2027), hazardous air pollutant (HAP) emissions data for 
point sources in addition to continuing the criteria air pollutant and 
precursor (CAP) collection in place under the existing AERR. The 
proposed amendments would ensure that EPA has sufficient information to 
identify and solve air quality and exposure problems and ensure that 
communities have the data needed to understand significant 
environmental risks that may be impacting them.
     NSPS for the Synthetic Organic Chemical Manufacturing 
Industry and NESHAP for the Synthetic Organic Chemical Manufacturing 
Industry and Group I & II Polymers and Resins Industry.
    This action will address the agency's technology review under Clean 
Air Act (CAA) section 112(d)(6) of the National Emission Standards for 
Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) for four subparts in 40 CFR part 63 
(subparts F, G, H, and I) which are commonly referred to together as 
the Hazardous Organic NESHAP (HON) and that apply to the Synthetic 
Organic Chemical Manufacturing Industry (SOCMI) and to equipment leaks 
from certain non-SOCMI processes. This action will also address the 
agency's technology review of the NESHAP for two subparts in 40 CFR 
part 63 (subparts U and W) that apply to the Group I and Group II 
Polymers and Resins industries. The HON standards were most recently 
updated when the agency conducted a residual risk and technology review 
(RTR) on December 21, 2006. Similarly, the Group I and II Polymers and 
Resins NESHAP were most recently updated when the agency conducted its 
RTR on December 16, 2008, and April 21, 2011. The HON and Group I and 
II Polymers and Resins NESHAP contain maximum achievable control 
technology (MACT) standards for controlling emissions of hazardous air 
pollutants (HAP) from process vents, storage vessels, transfer 
operations, heat exchange systems, wastewater streams, and equipment 
leaks. The HAP emitted from these emission sources include, but are not 
limited to, ethylene oxide, benzene, 1,3-butadiene, vinyl chloride, 
ethylene dichloride, methanol, hexane, toluene, xylenes, and 
chloroprene.
    The agency also plans to consider risks from the SOCMI source 
category and from the Neoprene Production source category in the Group 
I Polymers and Resins NESHAP during its technology review and to ensure 
the standards continue to provide an ample margin of safety to protect 
public health. Lastly, this action will also address the agency's 
review, under CAA section 111(b)(1)(B), of four New Source Performance 
Standards (NSPS) in 40 CFR part 60 (subparts III, NNN, RRR, and VVa) 
for emissions of Volatile Organic Compound (VOC) from SOCMI air 
oxidation unit processes, SOCMI distillation operations, SOCMI reactor 
processes, and equipment leaks located at SOCMI sources. These subparts 
were originally promulgated pursuant to section 111(b) of the CAA on 
June 29,1990 (subparts III and NNN), August 31, 1993 (subpart RRR), and 
November 16, 2007 (subpart VVa). On April 25, 2023, the EPA published a 
proposed rulemaking in the Federal Register (see 88 FR 25080) for this 
action. In addition, the EPA has conducted public outreach activities, 
including hosting an informational webinar on April 13, 2023, and 
holding a public hearing on the proposed rulemaking on May 16, 2023. 
EPA intends to publish the final action by March 2024.

Ensure Clean and Healthy Water for All Communities

    The Nation's water resources are the lifeblood of our communities, 
supporting our health, economy, and way of life. Clean and safe water 
is a vital resource that is essential to the protection of human 
health. EPA is committed to ensuring clean and safe water for all, 
including low-income communities and communities of color, children, 
the elderly, tribes, and indigenous people. Since the enactment of the 
Clean Water Act (CWA) and the Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA), EPA and 
its state and tribal partners have made significant progress toward 
improving the quality of our waters and ensuring a safe drinking water 
supply. Along with the full set of water actions listed in the 
regulatory agenda, the regulatory initiatives listed below will help 
ensure that this important progress continues.
     Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the 
Steam Electric Power Generating Point Source Category.
     On March 29, 2023, EPA published a proposed rule to 
potentially strengthen the Steam Electric Effluent Limitations 
Guidelines and Standards (ELGs) (40 CFR 423). EPA previously revised 
the Steam Electric ELGs in 2015 and 2020. The proposed rule would 
establish more stringent ELGs for two wastestreams addressed in the 
2020 ``Steam Electric Reconsideration Rule'' (flue gas desulfurization 
wastewater and bottom ash transport water). In addition, the proposal 
would establish more stringent effluent limitations and standards for 
an additional wastestream (combustion residual leachate) and takes 
comment on potential revisions to limitations and standards for a 
fourth wastestream (legacy wastewater). The first two wastestreams 
mentioned above are the subject of current litigation pending in the 
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. Appalachian Voices, et 
al. v. EPA, No. 20-2187 (4th Cir.). The 2015 limitations for combustion 
residual leachate and legacy wastewater discharged by existing sources 
were vacated by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit in 
Southwestern Electric Power Co., et al. v. EPA, 920 F.3d 999 (5th Cir. 
2019). EPA has conducted outreach with Tribal governments, state 
governments and governmental organizations, and potential communities 
with environmental justice concerns on this rulemaking.
     Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS): 
Perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) and perfluorooctanesulfonic acid (PFOS) 
National Primary Drinking Water Regulation Rulemaking.
     On March 3, 2021, EPA published the Fourth Regulatory 
Determinations (86 FR 12272), including a determination to regulate 
perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) and perfluorooctanesulfonic acid (PFOS) 
in drinking water. EPA is finalizing a National Primary Drinking Water 
Regulation (NPDWR) for PFOA, PFOS, and other PFAS as part of this 
action. EPA proposed the NPDWR for public comment in March 2023. The 
Agency anticipates issuing a final regulation in

[[Page 9474]]

late 2023 after considering public comments on the proposal.
     National Primary Drinking Water Regulations for Lead and 
Copper: Regulatory Revisions.
    EPA promulgated the final Lead and Copper Rule Revision (LCRR) on 
January 15, 2021, (86 FR 4198) and subsequently reviewed those 
revisions to further evaluate whether the LCRR fully protected families 
and communities (86 FR 71574; December 17, 2021) particularly those 
that have been disproportionately impacted by lead in drinking water. 
Through this review, the Agency concluded that there are significant 
opportunities to improve the LCRR. EPA is developing a new proposed 
NPDWR, the Lead and Copper Rule Improvements (LCRI), to strengthen the 
regulatory framework and address lead in drinking water. EPA expects to 
issue the proposed LCRI in Fall 2023. The Agency anticipates issuing a 
final regulation prior to October 16, 2024, after considering public 
comments on the proposal.
     Federal Baseline Water Quality Standards for Indian 
Reservations.
    On April 27, 2023, the EPA Administrator signed a proposed rule to 
establish federal baseline water quality standards (WQS) for waters on 
Indian reservations that do not have WQS under the CWA. This proposed 
rule would help advance President Biden's commitment to strengthening 
the nation-to-nation relationships with Indian country. Fifty years 
after enactment of the CWA, over 80% of Indian reservations do not have 
this foundational protection expected by Congress as laid out in the 
CWA for their waters. Addressing this lack of CWA-effective WQS for the 
waters of more than 250 Indian reservations is a priority for EPA, 
given that WQS are central to implementing the water quality framework 
of the CWA. Promulgating baseline WQS would provide more scientific 
rigor and regulatory certainty to National Pollutant Discharge 
Elimination System (NPDES) permits for discharges to these waters. 
Consistent with EPA's regulations, the baseline WQS include designated 
uses, water quality criteria to protect those uses, and antidegradation 
policies to protect high quality waters. EPA consulted with tribes in 
the summer of 2021 during the pre-proposal phase and in the summer of 
2023, concurrent with the public comment period associated with the 
proposal.
     Water Quality Standards Regulatory Revisions to Protect 
Tribal Reserved Rights.
     Many tribes hold reserved rights to resources on lands and 
waters where states establish WQS, through treaties, statutes, or other 
sources of federal law. The U.S. Constitution defines treaties as the 
supreme law of the land. On November 28, 2022, the EPA Administrator 
signed a proposed rule that would, if finalized, revise the federal WQS 
regulation to ensure that WQS do not impair tribal reserved rights by 
giving clear direction on how to develop WQS where tribes hold reserved 
rights. This proposed rule would help EPA ensure protection of 
resources reserved to tribes in treaties, statutes, or other sources of 
federal law when establishing, revising, and reviewing WQS. The 
development of this rule helps advance President Biden's commitment to 
strengthening the nation-to-nation relationships with tribes. EPA 
consulted with tribes in the summer of 2021 during the pre-proposal 
phase and in the winter of 2023, concurrent with the public comment 
period for the proposed rule. EPA is working to expeditiously finalize 
the proposed rule, taking into account public comments.

Safeguard and Revitalize Communities

    EPA works to improve the health and livelihood of all Americans by 
cleaning up and returning land to productive use, preventing 
contamination, and responding to emergencies. EPA collaborates with 
other federal agencies, industry, states, tribes, and local communities 
to enhance the livability and economic vitality 15 of neighborhoods. 
Challenging and complex environmental problems persist at many 
contaminated properties, including contaminated soil, sediment, surface 
water, and groundwater that can cause human health concerns. EPA acts 
under several different statutory authorities, including the Resource 
Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA), and the Comprehensive 
Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA). EPA's 
regulatory program works to incorporate new technologies and approaches 
to cleaning up land to provide for an environmentally sustainable 
future more efficiently and effectively, as well as to strengthen 
climate resilience and to integrate environmental justice and equitable 
development when returning sites to productive use. Along with the 
other land and emergency management actions in the regulatory agenda, 
EPA will take the following priority actions to address the 
contamination of soil, sediment, surface water, and groundwater.
     PFAS: RCRA Listing and CERCLA Designation.
    Based on public health and environmental protection concerns and in 
response to several petitions which requested EPA to take regulatory 
action on PFAS under RCRA, EPA is evaluating the existing toxicity and 
health effects data on four PFAS constituents to determine if they 
should be listed as RCRA Hazardous Constituents. If the existing data 
for the four PFAS constituents support listing any or all of these 
constituents as RCRA hazardous constituents, EPA will propose to list 
the constituents in a Federal Register notice for public comment. The 
four PFAS chemicals EPA will evaluate are: perfluorooctanoic acid 
(PFOA), perfluorooctane sulfonic acid (PFOS), perfluorobutane sulfonic 
acid (PFBS), hexafluoropropylene oxide dimer acid (HFPO-DA or GenX). 
EPA has communicated with interested stakeholders about this action and 
will do conduct additional outreach with the public, organizations, 
states, tribal groups, and affected parties following publication of a 
proposed rule.
    Under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and 
Liability Act of 1980, as amended (``CERCLA'' or ``Superfund''), the 
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA or the Agency) is moving to 
finalize the designation of perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) and perfluoro 
octane sulfonic acid (PFOS), including their salts and structural 
isomers, as hazardous substances. CERCLA authorizes the Administrator 
to promulgate regulations designating as hazardous substances such 
elements, compounds, mixtures, solutions, and substances which, when 
released into the environment, may present substantial danger to the 
public health or welfare or the environment. Such a designation would 
ultimately facilitate cleanup of contaminated sites and reduce human 
exposure to these ``forever'' chemicals.
     Hazardous and Solid Waste Management System: Addressing 
Coal Combustion Residues from Electric Utilities.
    On April 17, 2015, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA or the 
Agency) promulgated national minimum criteria for existing and new coal 
combustion residuals (CCR) landfills and existing and new CCR surface 
impoundments. On August 21, 2018, the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals 
issued its opinion in the case of Utility Solid Waste Activities Group, 
et al. v. EPA, which vacated and remanded the provision that exempted 
inactive impoundments at inactive facilities from the CCR rule. In May 
2023, EPA proposed regulations to implement this part of the court

[[Page 9475]]

decision for inactive CCR surface impoundments at inactive utilities, 
or ``legacy CCR surface impoundments''. This proposal included adding a 
new definition for legacy CCR surface impoundments. EPA also proposed 
to require such legacy CCR surface impoundments to follow existing 
regulatory requirements for fugitive dust, groundwater monitoring, and 
closure, or other technical requirements. Finally, EPA proposed 
requirements for CCR management units including a facility evaluation 
and to follow existing regulatory requirements for groundwater 
monitoring, corrective action, and closure for all CCR contamination 
(regardless of how or when that CCR was placed) at a regulated 
facility. After reviewing the public comments on the proposed rule, EPA 
will take final action.
     Accidental Release Prevention Requirements: Risk 
Management Programs Under Clean Air Act, as amended; Safer Communities 
by Chemical Accident Prevention.
     On August 31, 2022, the Environmental Protection Agency 
(EPA) published proposed amendments to its Risk Management Program 
(RMP) regulations as a result of Agency review. The proposed revisions 
included several changes and amplifications to the accident prevention 
program requirements, enhancements to the emergency preparedness 
requirements, increased public availability of chemical hazard 
information, and several other changes to certain regulatory 
definitions or points of clarification. Such amendments seek to improve 
chemical process safety; assist in planning, preparedness, and 
responding to RMP-reportable accidents; and improve public awareness of 
chemical hazards at regulated sources. EPA aims to release the final 
rule by the end of 2023.
     Revisions to Standards for the Open Burning/Open 
Detonation of Waste Explosives.
     This rulemaking proposes to revise regulations will 
consider revisions to the regulations that allow for the open burning 
and detonation (OB/OD) of waste explosives. This allowance or 
``variance'' to the prohibition on the open burning of hazardous waste 
was established at a time when there were no alternatives to the safe 
treatment of waste explosives. However, recent findings from the 
National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine and the EPA 
have determined identified that safe alternatives that are potentially 
applicable to many energetic/explosive waste streams. Because there are 
potentially safe alternatives in use today that capture and treat 
emissions prior to release, the EPA is considering revising regulations 
to promote the broader use of these alternatives, where applicable. As 
part of the rule development process, EPA has held two rounds of 
engagement with states, territories, tribes, environmental and 
community groups, and owners/operators of OB/OD units.
     Definition of Hazardous Waste Applicable to Corrective 
Action for Solid Waste Management Units EPA is considering a proposed 
rule that would modify the regulations at 40 CFR part 264 to clarify 
that the definition of hazardous waste found in RCRA section 1004(5) is 
applicable to corrective action for releases from solid waste 
management units. The proposed rule would codify in regulation EPA's 
interpretation of its authority under RCRA section 3004(u) and (v).
     Hazardous Substance Response Worst Case Discharge 
Planning.
    The Clean Water Act (CWA) provides that regulations shall be issued 
``which require an owner or operator of a tank vessel or facility . . . 
to prepare and submit . . . a plan for responding, to the maximum 
extent practicable, to a worst case discharge, and to a substantial 
threat of such a discharge, of . . . a hazardous substance.'' EPA was 
sued for failure to fulfill this mandatory duty imposed by Congress. 
This regulatory action is being conducted under the terms of a consent 
decree entered into on March 12, 2020, which requires that a proposed 
action is signed within 24 months of the final agreement and that a 
final action follow within 30 months of the publication of the proposed 
rule. Subsequently, the Environmental Protection Agency proposed a 
regulatory action to require planning for worst case discharges of CWA 
hazardous substances under section 311(j)(5)(A). EPA plans to 
promulgate a final rule by Spring 2024 meet the terms of the Consent 
Decree.

Ensure Safety of Chemicals for People and the Environment

    EPA is responsible for ensuring the safety of chemicals and 
pesticides for all people at all life stages. Chemicals and pesticides 
released into the environment as a result their manufacture, 
processing, distribution, use, or disposal can threaten human health 
and the environment. EPA gathers and assesses information about the 
risks associated with chemicals and pesticides and acts to minimize 
risks and prevent unreasonable risks to individuals, families, and the 
environment. EPA acts under several different statutory authorities, 
including the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide and Rodenticide Act 
(FIFRA), the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA), the Toxic 
Substances Control Act (TSCA), the Emergency Planning and Community 
Right-to-Know-Act (EPCRA), and the Pollution Prevention Act (PPA). 
Using best available science, the Agency will continue to satisfy its 
overall directives under these authorities and highlights the following 
rulemakings intended for release in FY2024:
     Collecting Data to Better Understand the Environmental and 
Human Health Impacts of Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances (PFAS).
    Building on EPA's completion of actions identified in the PFAS 
Strategic Roadmap that the EPA Administrator announced on October 18, 
2021, the Agency is considering whether to add PFAS chemicals to the 
list of chemicals required to report to the Toxics Release Inventory 
(TRI) Program under EPCRA section 313 in furtherance of section 7321(d) 
of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2020 (NDAA), 
which directs EPA to add any PFAS that EPA determines meet the listing 
criteria by December 2023.
     Improving Procedures for Assessing the Risks of New and 
Existing Chemical Substances under TSCA.
    As amended in 2016, TSCA requires EPA to assess the risks of each 
new chemical substance for which a notice was received under TSCA 
section 5(a)(1) of the law and make an affirmative determination on 
whether such a new chemical substance presents an unreasonable risk to 
human health or the environment under known, intended or reasonably 
foreseen conditions of use before the submitter may commence 
manufacturing or processing of the chemical substance that is the 
subject of the submitted notice, and to take action as required in 
association with the determination. On May 26, 2023, EPA proposed to 
amend the new chemicals procedural regulations in 40 CFR parts 720, 
721, 723, and 725 for the purpose of aligning EPA's processes and 
procedures with the 2016 TSCA amendments and to clarify and improve the 
efficiency of the Agency's review process (RIN 2070-AK65). One of the 
major objectives of the rulemaking is to reduce the need to redo all or 
part of the risk assessment for a new chemical by increasing the 
quality of information initially submitted in new chemicals notices, 
ensuring that the Agency's processes result in the timely, effective 
completion of new chemical risk assessments. Another key objective of 
the rulemaking is to improve the review process for low volume 
exemptions (LVEs) and low release and exposure exemptions (LoREXs), 
which include

[[Page 9476]]

requiring EPA approval of an exemption notice prior to commencement of 
manufacture, making per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) 
categorically ineligible for these exemptions, and providing that 
persistent, bioaccumulative, toxic (PBT) chemical substances are also 
ineligible for these exemptions, consistent with EPA's 1999 PBT policy. 
EPA expects to promulgate final revisions to the new chemicals 
procedural regulations in November 2024.
    In addition, the 2016 TSCA amendments require EPA to evaluate the 
safety of existing chemicals via a three-stage process: prioritization, 
risk evaluation, and risk management. EPA first prioritizes chemicals 
as either high- or low-priority for risk evaluation. EPA then evaluates 
high-priority chemicals for unreasonable risk. As a result of 
litigation challenging the 2017 final rule that established EPA's 
procedural framework for conducting existing chemical risk evaluations 
under TSCA, and in consideration of Executive Order 13990, the Agency 
proposed to amend that framework in order to better align the Agency's 
processes with the statutory text and structure and Congress' intent in 
the 2016 amendments to TSCA (RIN 2070-AK90). Key provisions of the 
proposed rule include clarifications regarding the required scope of 
risk evaluations, considerations related to peer review, the process 
for revisiting a completed risk evaluation, requirements for 
manufacturer-requested risk evaluations and related information-
gathering provisions, provisions addressing violations and penalties, 
and other aspects based on lessons learned in the process of carrying 
out the first 10 TSCA risk evaluations. EPA expects to promulgate final 
revisions in April 2024.
     Addressing the Unreasonable Risk of Existing Chemical 
Substances under TSCA.
     Upon determining that an existing chemical presents an 
unreasonable risk of injury to health or the environment, the Agency 
must immediately initiate an action to apply, by rule, requirements 
under TSCA to eliminate the unreasonable risk. EPA may consider a range 
of risk management options under TSCA in such a rule, including 
labeling, recordkeeping or notice requirements, actions to reduce human 
exposure or environmental release, or a ban of the chemical or of 
certain uses. After determining that the chemical substances present 
unreasonable risk under their conditions of use, the Agency intends to 
propose risk management regulations for addressing the unreasonable 
risks of 1-bromopropane (RIN 2070-AK73) and n- methylpyrrolidone (RIN 
2070-AK85) and promulgate final rules addressing the unreasonable risks 
of chrysotile asbestos (RIN 2070-AK86), methylene chloride (RIN 2070-
AK70), and trichloroethylene (RIN 2070-AK83) by Spring 2024, and to 
issue final risk management regulations addressing the unreasonable 
risks of carbon tetrachloride (RIN 2070-AK82) and perchloroethylene 
(RIN 2070-AK84) in Summer 2024. The Agency has undertaken extensive 
outreach and consultation efforts throughout the development of these 
actions. In addition to stakeholder outreach conducted throughout the 
risk evaluation and risk management rulemaking processes for these 
chemical substances, EPA also consulted with State, local, and Tribal 
government officials, and held public environmental justice 
consultations to further opportunities for underserved and overburdened 
communities to share information and input with the Agency prior to 
proposal. When applicable, EPA also convened Small Business Advocacy 
Review Panels and consulted with small entity representatives as 
required under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601, et seq.) 
to provide advice and recommendations to ensure that EPA carefully 
considers small entity concerns. Further, the Agency has hosted public 
webinars to brief stakeholders on proposed risk management regulations 
that have published in the Federal Register and to receive additional 
public input in addition to written public comments submitted to the 
rulemaking dockets. EPA's chemical risk management efforts reflect the 
feedback we have received from the various stakeholders and government 
officials, and the Agency will continue these practices of sharing 
information and seeking input. For more information about the Agency's 
public involvement efforts, please visit https://www.epa.gov/assessing-and-managing-chemicals-under-tsca/risk-management-existing-chemicals-under-tsca#meetings and https://www.epa.gov/reg-flex/small-business-advocacy-review-sbar-panels.
     Reevaluating Changes to the Dust-Lead Hazard Standards and 
Dust-Lead Post-Abatement Clearance Levels under TSCA.
    The Agency's dust-lead hazard standards (DLHS) provide the basis 
for risk assessors to determine whether dust-lead hazards are present, 
and apply to target housing (i.e., most pre-1978 housing) and child-
occupied facilities (pre-1978 non-residential properties where children 
6 years of age or under spend a significant amount of time such as 
daycare centers and kindergartens). EPA's dust-lead clearance levels 
(DLCL) indicate the amount of lead in dust on a surface following the 
completion of an abatement activity. On July 9, 2019, EPA promulgated a 
final rule to lower the DLHS, and on January 6, 2021, EPA promulgated a 
final rule to lower the DLCL. On May 14, 2021, the United States Court 
of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit issued an opinion to remand without 
vacatur the 2019 DLHS final rule and directed EPA to reconsider the 
2019 DLHS rule in conjunction with a reconsideration of the DLCL. 
Notably, the Court instructed EPA to consider only health factors when 
setting the DLHS while affirming that the Agency is able to consider 
reliability, effectiveness, and safety, including non-health factors 
such as laboratory capabilities/capacity and achievability, when 
setting the DLCL. As part of EPA's efforts to reduce childhood lead 
exposure, and in accordance with the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 
Ninth Circuit 2021 opinion, EPA proposed on August 1, 2023, to lower 
the DLHS from 10 micrograms per square foot ([micro]g/ft\2\) and 100 
[micro]g/ft\2\ for floors and window sills to any reportable level as 
analyzed by a laboratory recognized by EPA's National Lead Laboratory 
Accreditation Program. EPA also proposed to change the DLCL from 10 
[micro]g/ft\2\, 100 [micro]g/ft\2\ and 400 [micro]g/ft\2\ for floors, 
windowsills, and window troughs to 3 [micro]g/ft\2\, 20 [micro]g/ft\2\, 
and 25 [micro]g/ft\2\, respectively. The Agency consulted with State, 
local and Tribal government officials during the rulemaking. EPA 
expects to promulgate final revisions to the DLHS and DLCL (RIN 2070-
AK91) in October 2024 and will continue its efforts to engage its 
partners to ensure the successful implementation of the amended hazard 
standards and clearance levels.

Rules Expected To Affect Small Entities

    By better coordinating small business activities, EPA aims to 
improve its technical assistance and outreach efforts, minimize burdens 
to small businesses in its regulations, and simplify small businesses' 
participation in its voluntary programs. Actions that may affect small 
entities can be tracked on EPA's Regulatory Flexibility website 
(https://www.epa.gov/reg-flex) at any time.


[[Page 9477]]



EPA--OFFICE OF AIR AND RADIATION (OAR)

Proposed Rule Stage

190. Review of the Secondary National Ambient Air Quality Standards for 
Ecological Effects of Oxides of Nitrogen, Oxides of Sulfur and 
Particulate Matter [2060-AS35]

    Priority: Other Significant. Major status under 5 U.S.C. 801 is 
undetermined.
    Legal Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. Clean Air Act
    CFR Citation: 40 CFR 50.
    Legal Deadline: None.
    Abstract: Under the Clean Air Act, the EPA is required to review 
and, if appropriate, revise the air quality criteria and national 
ambient air quality standards (NAAQS) every 5 years. On April 3, 2012, 
the EPA published a final rule in which the Agency determined to retain 
the current secondary standards (welfare-based) for nitrogen oxides 
(NOX) and for sulfur oxides (SOX). On January 15, 
2013, the EPA published a final rule in which the Agency retained the 
secondary standards for particulate matter. The current review of the 
air quality criteria and secondary standards for ecological effects of 
SOX, NOX and particulate matter includes the 
preparation of an Integrated Science Assessment and a Policy Assessment 
by the EPA, with opportunities for review by the EPA's Clean Air 
Scientific Advisory Committee (CASAC) and the public. These documents 
will inform the Administrator's proposed decision as to whether to 
retain or revise the standards. The proposed decision would be 
published in the Federal Register with opportunity provided for public 
comment. The Administrator's final decisions would take into 
consideration these documents, CASAC advice, and public comment on the 
proposed decision. Opportunities for public engagement and sharing of 
information concerning this NAAQS review will include public hearings, 
tribal consultation, informational meetings, and through the CASAC 
public meetings.
    Statement of Need: Under the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1977, EPA 
is required to review and if appropriate revise the air quality 
criteria and national ambient air quality standards (NAAQS) every 5 
years. On April 3, 2012, EPA published a final rule retaining the 
Secondary NAAQS for NO2 and SO2, without 
revision. On August 29, 2013, EPA announced that it is reviewing the 
April 2012 decision on the secondary air quality standards for 
NO2 and SO2. On December 3, 2014, EPA announced 
it is reviewing the secondary air quality standards for particulate 
matter.
    Summary of Legal Basis: Under the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1977, 
EPA is required to review and if appropriate revise the air quality 
criteria and the primary (health-based) and secondary (welfare-based) 
national ambient air quality standards (NAAQS) every 5 years.
    Alternatives: The main alternatives for the Administrator's 
decision on the review of the secondary national ambient air quality 
standards for NOX, SOX and PM include retaining 
or revising the existing standards.
    Anticipated Cost and Benefits: When the Agency proposes revisions 
to the standards, the Agency prepares a Regulatory Impact Analysis 
(RIA) to provide the public with illustrative estimates of the 
potential costs and health and welfare benefits of attaining the 
revised standards. However, the Clean Air Act makes clear that the 
economic and technical feasibility of attaining standards are not to be 
considered in setting or revising the NAAQS, although such factors may 
be considered in the development of state plans to implement the 
standards.
    Risks: The review builds on the review of the NOX and 
SOX NAAQS, completed in 2012, and includes preparation by 
EPA of an Integrated Review Plan, an Integrated Science Assessment, and 
a Policy Assessment, which includes a risk/exposure assessment, with 
opportunities for review by the EPA's Clean Air Scientific Advisory 
Committee (CASAC) and the public. The final versions of these documents 
will inform the Administrator's proposed decisions on whether to revise 
or retain the Secondary NOX SOX and PM NAAQS. The 
Administrator's final decisions on whether to revise or retain the 
Secondary NOX SOX and PM NAAQS will take into 
consideration the scientific evidence and quantitative analyses 
presented in these documents, CASAC advice, and public comment on the 
proposed decision.
    Timetable:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Action                    Date            FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Notice..............................   08/22/18  83 FR 42497
Notice..............................   05/31/23  88 FR 34852
NPRM................................   04/00/24  .......................
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No.
    Small Entities Affected: No.
    Government Levels Affected: Undetermined.
    Additional Information:
    Agency Contact: Ginger Tennant, Environmental Protection Agency, 
Office of Air and Radiation 109 T.W. Alexander Drive, Mail Code C504-
06, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711, Phone: 919 541-4072, Fax: 919 
541-0237, Email: [email protected].
    Karen Wesson, Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Air and 
Radiation, 109 T.W. Alexander Drive, Mail Code C504-06, Research 
Triangle Park, NC 27711, Phone: 919 541-3515, Email: 
[email protected].
    RIN: 2060-AS35

EPA-OAR

191. NSPS for GHG Emissions From New, Modified, and Reconstructed 
Fossil Fuel--Fired EGUS; Emission Guidelines for GHG Emissions From 
Existing Fossil Fuel--Fired EGUS; and Repeal of the ACE RULE [2060-
AV09]

    Priority: Section 3(f)(1) Significant. Major under 5 U.S.C. 801.
    Legal Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7411 Clean Air Act; 42 U.S.C. 7414 and 
7601
    CFR Citation: 40 CFR 60, subpart TTTT; 40 CFR 60 subpart UUUUa.
    Legal Deadline: None.
    Abstract: Fossil fuel-fired electric generating units (EGUs) are 
the nation's second largest source of greenhouse gas (GHG) pollution. 
In May 2023, EPA proposed to set limits for new gas-fired combustion 
turbines, existing coal, oil and gas-fired steam generating units, and 
certain existing gas-fired combustion turbines. Consistent with EPA's 
traditional approach to establishing pollution standards for power 
plants under section 111 of the Clean Air Act, the proposed standards 
are based on technologies such as carbon capture and sequestration/
storage (CCS), low-GHG hydrogen co-firing, and natural gas co-firing, 
which can be applied directly to power plants that use fossil fuels to 
generate electricity. As laid out in section 111 of the Clean Air Act, 
the proposed new source performance standards (NSPS) and emission 
guidelines reflect the application of the best system of emission 
reduction (BSER) that, taking into account costs, energy requirements, 
and other statutory factors, is adequately demonstrated for the purpose 
of improving the emissions performance of the covered electric 
generating units.
    EPA anticipates promulgating final rules by spring 2024.
    Statement of Need: New EGUs are a significant source of GHG 
emissions. This action will evaluate options to reduce those emissions.
    Summary of Legal Basis: Clean Air Act section 111(b) provides the 
legal

[[Page 9478]]

framework for establishing greenhouse gas emission standards for new 
electric generating units.
    Alternatives: EPA evaluated several options for reducing GHG 
emissions from new EGUs including carbon capture and sequestration/
storage (CCS), low-GHG hydrogen co-firing, natural gas co-firing, 
efficient generation, and use of clean fuels.
    Anticipated Cost and Benefits: Undetermined.
    Risks: Undetermined.
    Timetable:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Action                    Date            FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NPRM................................   05/23/23  88 FR 33240
NPRM Comment Period End.............   07/24/23  .......................
Supplemental NPRM...................   11/20/23  88 FR 80682
Supplemental Comment Period End.....   12/20/23  .......................
Final Rule..........................   04/00/24  .......................
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Undetermined.
    Government Levels Affected: Federal, State.
    Federalism: This action may have federalism implications as defined 
in E.O. 13132.
    Energy Effects: Statement of Energy Effects planned as required by 
Executive Order 13211.
    International Impacts: This regulatory action will be likely to 
have international trade and investment effects, or otherwise be of 
international interest.
    Additional Information:
    Sectors Affected: 22111 Electric Power Generation; 221112 Fossil 
Fuel Electric Power Generation.
    URL For More Information: https://www.federalregister.gov/d/2023-10141.
    Agency Contact: Lisa Thompson, Environmental Protection Agency, 
Office of Air and Radiation, 109 T.W. Alexander Drive, Mail Code D243-
01, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711, Phone: 919 541-9775, Email: 
[email protected].
    Nick Hutson, Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Air and 
Radiation, 109 T.W. Alexander Drive, Mail Code D243-01, Research 
Triangle Park, NC 27711, Phone: 919 541-2968, Fax: 919 541-4991, Email: 
[email protected].
    Related RIN: Related to 2060-AT56
    RIN: 2060-AV09

EPA--OAR

192. Review of Final Rule Reclassification of Major Sources as Area 
Sources Under Section 112 of the Clean Air Act [2060-AV20]

    Priority: Other Significant.
    Legal Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. CAA; 42 U.S.C. 7414; 42 
U.S.C. 7601
    CFR Citation: 40 CFR 63.1.
    Legal Deadline: None.
    Abstract: The final rule, Reclassification of Major Sources as Area 
Sources Under Section 112 of the Clean Air Act (Major MACT to Area- 
MM2A final rule), was promulgated on November 19, 2020. (See 85 FR 
73854) The MM2A final rule became effective on January 19, 2021. On 
January 20, 2021, President Biden issued Executive Order 13990 
Protecting Public Health and the Environment and Restoring Science to 
Tackle the Climate Crisis. The EPA has identified the MM2A final rule 
as an action being considered pursuant section (2)(a) of Executive 
Order 13990. Under this review, EPA, as appropriate and consistent with 
the Clean Air Act section 112, published for comment a notice of 
proposed rulemaking reviewing the MM2A final rule. As the Agency 
developed this proposal, we sought to increase participation and 
engagement of members of the public affected by this action. The agency 
held multiple pre-proposal outreach meetings with environmental non-
governmental organizations representing communities as well as 
associations of state/local government agencies.
    Statement of Need: The EPA issued a notice of proposed rulemaking 
of EPA's review of the final rule Reclassification of Major Sources as 
Area Sources Under section 112 of the Clean Air Act (Major MACT to 
Area- MM2A final rule) pursuant Executive Order 13990. Pursuant section 
(2)(a) of Executive Order 13990 Protecting Public Health and the 
Environment and Restoring Science to Tackle the Climate Crisis, the EPA 
is to review the MM2A final rule and as appropriate and consistent with 
the Clean Air Act section 112, to publish for comment a notice of 
proposed rulemaking either suspending, revising, or rescinding the MM2A 
final rule.
    Summary of Legal Basis: The EPA issued a final rulemaking on 
November 19, 2020. The final MM2A rule provides that a major source can 
be reclassified to area source status at any time upon reducing its 
potential to emit (PTE) hazardous air pollutants (HAP) to below the 
major source thresholds (MST) of 10 tons per year (tpy) of any single 
HAP and 25 tpy of any combination of HAP. Pursuant section (2)(a) of 
Executive Order 13990 Protecting Public Health and the Environment and 
Restoring Science to Tackle the Climate Crisis, the EPA is to review 
the MM2A final rule and as appropriate and consistent with the Clean 
Air Act section 112, to publish for comment a notice of proposed 
rulemaking either suspending, revising, or rescinding the MM2A final 
rule.
    Alternatives: The EPA will take comments on the review of the final 
MM2A and EPA's proposed rulemaking either suspending, revising, or 
rescinding the MM2A final rule.
    Anticipated Cost and Benefits: The proposed action does not have 
quantified costs or benefits.
    Risks: The proposed action does not address public health risks.
    Timetable:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Action                    Date            FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NPRM................................   09/27/23  88 FR 66336
NPRM Comment Period End.............   11/13/23  .......................
Final Rule..........................   05/00/24  .......................
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Undetermined.
    Government Levels Affected: Federal, Local, State, Tribal.
    Additional Information:
    Agency Contact: Nathan Topham, Environmental Protection Agency, 
Office of Air and Radiation, 109 T.W. Alexander Drive, Mail Code D243-
02, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711, Phone: 919 541-0483, Fax: 919 
541-4991, Email: [email protected].
    Brian Shrager, Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Air and 
Radiation, E143-01, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711, Phone: 919 541-
7689, Fax: 919 541-5450, Email: [email protected].
    Related RIN: Related to 2060-AM75
    RIN: 2060-AV20

EPA-OAR

193. Phasedown of Hydrofluorocarbons: Management of Certain 
Hydrofluorocarbons and Substitutes Under Subsection (H) of the American 
Innovation and Manufacturing Act of 2020 [2060-AV84]

    Priority: Section 3(f)(1) Significant. Major under 5 U.S.C. 801.
    Unfunded Mandates: This action may affect the private sector under 
Public Law 104-4.
    Legal Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7675
    CFR Citation: 40 CFR 84.
    Legal Deadline: None.

[[Page 9479]]

    Abstract: This proposed rulemaking would establish requirements for 
the management of certain HFCs and their substitutes under subsection 
(h) of the AIM Act. Specifically, this proposal considers provisions to 
control, where appropriate, practices, processes, or activities 
regarding the servicing, repair, disposal, or installation of 
equipment, for the purposes of maximizing the reclamation and 
minimizing the release of certain HFCs from equipment and ensuring the 
safety of technicians and consumers. Among other provisions, EPA is 
proposing emissions reduction requirements for certain equipment 
containing HFCs and their substitutes as well as requirements for the 
reclaiming of HFCs.
    Statement of Need: The EPA issued a notice of proposed rulemaking 
to meet the statutory provisions of subsection (h) of the American 
Innovation and Manufacturing (AIM) Act of 2020.
    Summary of Legal Basis: The American Innovation and Manufacturing 
(AIM) Act, enacted on December 27, 2020, provides EPA new authorities 
to address hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs) in three main areas: phasing down 
the production and consumption of listed HFCs, maximizing reclamation 
and minimizing releases of these HFCs and their substitutes in 
equipment (e.g., refrigerators and air conditioners), and facilitating 
the transition to next-generation technologies by restricting the use 
of HFCs in particular sectors or subsectors. Subsection (h) of the AIM 
Act requires EPA to establish regulations to control, where 
appropriate, practices, processes, or activities regarding the 
servicing, repair, disposal, or installation of equipment, for the 
purpose of maximizing the reclamation and minimizing the release of 
certain HFCs from equipment and ensuring the safety of technicians and 
consumers.
    Alternatives: In the proposed rule, EPA requested comments on 
alternative approaches and compliance dates for the various provisions. 
For example, EPA requested comment on alternative compliance dates for 
the proposed fire suppression requirements.
    Anticipated Cost and Benefits: The Agency prepared a Regulatory 
Impact Analysis (RIA) Addendum. Taking into account both benefits and 
compliance costs over the 2025-2050 time period, it is estimated that 
the proposed rule would result in present value net benefit (benefits 
minus compliance costs), of $6.1 billion (with compliance costs 
discounted at three percent).
    Risks: EPA is still evaluating the scope and risks associated with 
a prospective rule.
    Timetable:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Action                    Date            FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Notice..............................   10/17/22  87 FR 62843
NPRM................................   10/19/23  88 FR 72216
NPRM Comment Period End.............   12/18/23  .......................
                                     -----------------------------------
Final Rule..........................           To Be Determined
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Undetermined.
    Government Levels Affected: Federal.
    International Impacts: This regulatory action will be likely to 
have international trade and investment effects, or otherwise be of 
international interest.
    Agency Contact: Annie Kee, Environmental Protection Agency, Office 
of Air and Radiation, 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue NW, Washington, DC 
20460, Phone: 202 564-2056, Email: [email protected].
    Christian Wisniewski, Environmental Protection Agency, Office of 
Air and Radiation, 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20460, 
Phone: 202 564-0417, Email: [email protected].
    RIN: 2060-AV84

EPA--OAR

194. Phasedown of Hydrofluorocarbons: Review and Renewal of Eligibility 
for Application-Specific Allowances [2060-AV98]

    Priority: Other Significant.
    Legal Authority: American Innovation and Manufacturing (AIM) Act of 
2020 (42 U.S.C. 7675)
    CFR Citation: 40 CFR 84.
    Legal Deadline: None.
    Abstract: The AIM Act identifies six applications that are to 
receive ``the full quantity of [HFC] allowances necessary, based on 
projected, current, and historical trends,'' under the allowance 
allocation program through the end of 2025. The six applications are a 
propellant in metered dose inhalers, defense sprays, structural 
composite preformed polyurethane foam for marine use and trailer use, 
the etching of semiconductor material or wafers and the cleaning of 
chemical vapor deposition chambers within the semiconductor 
manufacturing sector, mission-critical military end uses, and onboard 
aerospace fire suppression. EPA can renew this status for up to five 
years at a time based on statutory criteria outlined in the AIM Act. 
This proposed rule will review and consider whether to renew 
eligibility for each of the six applications, consistent with this 
statutory process under AIM subsection (e)(4)(B). Additionally, EPA 
intends to establish how it will review eligibility if petitioned for 
inclusion of additional applications and to consider revisions to 
existing regulatory requirements.
    Statement of Need: This rule is required to meet the statutory 
provisions of subsection (e) of the AIM Act.
    Summary of Legal Basis: The American Innovation and Manufacturing 
(AIM) Act, enacted on December 27, 2020, provides EPA authority to 
address hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs) in three main areas: phasing down the 
production and consumption of listed HFCs, maximizing reclamation and 
minimizing releases of these HFCs and their substitutes in equipment 
(e.g., refrigerators and air conditioners), and facilitating the 
transition to next- generation technologies by restricting the use of 
HFCs in particular sectors or subsectors. Subsection (e)(iv)(B) 
requires EPA to allocate the full quantity of allowances necessary for 
6 applications. Five years after enactment of the AIM Act, the statute 
requires that EPA review the 6 applications, and, if the statutory 
criteria are met, authorize the production or consumption, as 
applicable, of any regulated substance used in the application for 
renewable periods of not more than 5 years for exclusive use in the 
application.
    Alternatives: The alternatives for establishing a subsection 
(e)(4)(B) rule are, for each application, to either authorize the 
production or consumption, as applicable, of any regulated substance 
used in an application for a renewable period of not more than 5 years 
for exclusive use in that application or to not extend the provisions 
under (e)(4)(B)(iv).
    Anticipated Cost and Benefits: EPA is still evaluating the 
potential costs and benefits of this prospective action, but does not 
expect that this rule will have a significant economic effect.
    Risks: EPA is still evaluating the scope and risks associated with 
a prospective rule.
    Timetable:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Action                    Date            FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NPRM................................   07/00/24  .......................
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No.
    Government Levels Affected: Federal.
    Agency Contact: Nikita Naik, Environmental Protection Agency, 
Office of Air and Radiation,

[[Page 9480]]

Washington, DC 20460, Phone: 202 564-4957, Email: [email protected].
    RIN: 2060-AV98

EAP--OFFICE OF CHEMICAL SAFETY AND POLLUTION PREVENTION (OCSPP)

Proposed Rule Stage

195. 1-Bromopropane (1-BP); Regulation Under the Toxic Substances 
Control Act (TSCA) [2070-AK73]

    Priority: Other Significant. Major status under 5 U.S.C. 801 is 
undetermined.
    Unfunded Mandates: Undetermined.
    Legal Authority: 15 U.S.C. 2605 Toxic Substances Control Act
    CFR Citation: 40 CFR 751.
    Legal Deadline: NPRM, Statutory, August 12, 2021, TSCA section 
6(c).
    Final, Statutory, August 12, 2022, TSCA section 6(c).
    Abstract: This proposed rulemaking will address the unreasonable 
risk of injury to health presented by 1- bromopropane (1-BP). Section 
6(a) of the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) requires EPA address by 
rule any unreasonable risk identified in a TSCA risk evaluation and 
apply requirements to the extent necessary so the chemical no longer 
presents unreasonable risk. The Agency's development of this rule 
incorporates significant stakeholder outreach and public participation, 
including over 40 external meetings as well as required Federalism, 
Tribal, and Environmental Justice consultations and a Small Businesses 
Advocacy Review Panel. EPA's risk evaluation for 1-BP, describing the 
conditions of use, is in docket EPA-HQ-OPPT-2019-0235, with the 2022 
unreasonable risk determination and additional materials in docket EPA-
HQ-OPPT-2016-0741.
    Statement of Need: This rulemaking is needed to address the 
unreasonable risk of 1-bromopropane that were identified following a 
risk evaluation completed under TSCA section 6(b). EPA reviewed the 
exposures and hazards of 1-bromopropane, the magnitude of risk, exposed 
populations, severity of the hazard, uncertainties, and other factors. 
EPA sought input from the public and peer reviewers as required by TSCA 
and associated regulations.
    Summary of Legal Basis: In accordance with TSCA section 6(a), if 
EPA determines in a final risk evaluation completed under TSCA 6(b) 
that the manufacture, processing, distribution in commerce, use, or 
disposal of a chemical substance or mixture, or that any combination of 
such activities, presents an unreasonable risk of injury to health or 
the environment, the Agency must issue regulations requiring one or 
more of the following actions to the extent necessary so that the 
chemical substance no longer presents an unreasonable risk: (1) 
Prohibit or otherwise restrict manufacture, processing, or distribution 
in commerce of the substance, or limit the amount of the substance 
which may be manufactured, processed, or distributed in commerce; (2) 
Prohibit or otherwise restrict manufacture, processing, or distribution 
in commerce of the substance for a particular use or for a particular 
use above a set concentration, or limit the amount of the substance 
which may be manufactured, processed, or distributed in commerce for a 
particular use or for a particular use above a set concentration; (3) 
Require minimum warnings and instructions with respect to use, 
distribution in commerce, or disposal; (4) Require recordkeeping or 
testing by manufacturers or processors; (5) Prohibit or regulate any 
manner or method of commercial use; (6) Prohibit or regulate any manner 
or method of disposal for commercial purposes; and/or (7) Direct 
manufacturers or processors to give notice of the unreasonable risk to 
distributors, other persons, and the public and replace or repurchase 
the substance.
    Alternatives: TSCA section 6(a) requires EPA to address by rule 
chemical substances that the Agency determines present unreasonable 
risk upon completion of a final risk evaluation. As required under TSCA 
section 6(c), EPA will consider one or more primary alternative 
regulatory actions as part of the development of a proposed rule.
    Anticipated Cost and Benefits: EPA will prepare a regulatory impact 
analysis as the Agency develops the proposed rule.
    Risks: The 2020 Risk Evaluation for 1-BP identified potential 
health effects from short- and long-term exposure to 1-BP including 
non-cancer adverse health effects such as liver toxicity, kidney 
toxicity, reproductive toxicity, developmental toxicity, and 
neurotoxicity. Relative to cancer effects, the risk evaluation 
identified cancers hazards from carcinogenicity as well as 
genotoxicity, particularly for skin, intestinal, and lung tumors. For 
acute inhalation and dermal exposure scenarios, EPA identified non-
cancer developmental effects (i.e., decreased live litter size, and 
increases in post implantation loss) as the most sensitive endpoints. 
In the final 2022 Unreasonable Risk Determination, EPA determined that 
1-BP presents an unreasonable risk of injury to health. The 
unreasonable risk determination, based on developmental toxicity and 
cancer, is driven by risks to workers and occupational non-users 
(workers who do not directly handle the chemical but perform work in an 
area where the chemical is present) due to occupational exposures to 1-
BP (i.e., during manufacture, processing, industrial and commercial 
uses, and disposal); and to consumers and bystanders associated with 
consumer uses of 1-BP due to exposures from consumer use of 1-BP and 1-
BP-containing products. EPA must issue risk management requirements so 
that this chemical substance no longer presents an unreasonable risk. 
For more information, visit: https://www.epa.gov/assessing-and-managing-chemicals-under-tsca/risk-management-existing-chemicals-under-tsca.
    Timetable:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Action                    Date            FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NPRM................................   01/00/24
Final Rule..........................   05/00/25
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Yes.
    Small Entities Affected: Businesses.
    Government Levels Affected: Federal, State.
    Federalism: This action may have federalism implications as defined 
in E.O. 13132.
    International Impacts: This regulatory action will be likely to 
have international trade and investment effects, or otherwise be of 
international interest.
    Additional Information: EPA-HQ-OPPT-2020-0471.
    Sectors Affected: 325 Chemical Manufacturing.
    URL For More Information: https://www.epa.gov/assessing-and-managing-chemicals-under-tsca/risk-evaluation-1-bromopropane-1-bp.
    Agency Contact: Amy Shuman, Environmental Protection Agency, Office 
of Chemical Safety and Pollution Prevention, 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue 
NW, Mail Code 7404M, Washington, DC 20460, Phone: 202 564-2978, Email: 
[email protected].
    Joel Wolf, Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Chemical 
Safety and Pollution Prevention, 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue NW, Mail Code 
7404M, Washington, DC 20460, Phone: 202 564-0432, Email: 
[email protected].
    RIN: 2070-AK73


[[Page 9481]]



EPA--OCSPP

196. Trichloroethylene; Regulation Under the Toxic Substances Control 
Act (TSCA) [2070-AK83]

    Priority: Other Significant.
    Unfunded Mandates: Undetermined.
    Legal Authority: 15 U.S.C. 2605 Toxic Substances Control Act
    CFR Citation: 40 CFR 751.
    Legal Deadline: NPRM, Statutory, November 30, 2021, TSCA section 
6(c). Final, Statutory, November 30, 2022, TSCA section 6(c).
    Abstract: On October 31, 2023, the Environmental Protection Agency 
(EPA) proposed to address the unreasonable risk of injury to human 
health presented by trichloroethylene (TCE) under its conditions of use 
as documented in EPA's November 2020 Risk Evaluation for TCE and 
January 2023 revised Unreasonable Risk Determination for TCE pursuant 
to the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA). TCE is widely used as a 
solvent in a variety of industrial, commercial and consumer 
applications including for hydrofluorocarbon (HFC) production, vapor 
and aerosol degreasing, and in lubricants, greases, adhesives, and 
sealants. TSCA requires that when EPA determines a chemical substance 
presents unreasonable risk that EPA address by rule the unreasonable 
risk of injury to health or the environment and apply requirements to 
the extent necessary so the chemical no longer presents unreasonable 
risk. EPA determined that TCE presents an unreasonable risk of injury 
to health due to the significant adverse health effects associated with 
exposure to TCE, including non-cancer effects (liver toxicity, kidney 
toxicity, neurotoxicity, immunotoxicity, reproductive toxicity, and 
developmental toxicity) as well as cancer (liver, kidney, and non-
Hodgkin lymphoma) from chronic inhalation and dermal exposures to TCE. 
TCE is a neurotoxicant and is carcinogenic to humans by all routes of 
exposure. The most sensitive adverse effects of TCE exposure are non-
cancer effects (developmental toxicity and immunosuppression) for acute 
exposures and developmental toxicity and autoimmunity for chronic 
exposures. To address the identified unreasonable risk, EPA proposed 
to: prohibit all manufacture (including import), processing, and 
distribution in commerce of TCE and industrial and commercial use of 
TCE for all uses, with longer compliance timeframes and workplace 
controls for certain processing and industrial and commercial uses 
(including proposed phaseouts and time-limited exemptions); prohibit 
the disposal of TCE to industrial pre-treatment, industrial treatment, 
or publicly owned treatment works, with a time-limited exemption for 
cleanup projects; and establish recordkeeping and downstream 
notification requirements. The Agency's development of this rule 
incorporates significant stakeholder outreach and public participation, 
including over 40 external meetings as well as required Federalism, 
Tribal, and Environmental Justice consultations and a Small Businesses 
Advocacy Review Panel. EPA's risk evaluation for TCE, describing TCE's 
conditions of use is in docket EPA-HQ-OPPT-2019-0500, with the January 
2023 unreasonable risk determination and additional materials in docket 
EPA-HQ-OPPT-2016-0737.55
    Statement of Need: This rulemaking is needed to address the 
unreasonable risk from TCE that was identified following a risk 
evaluation completed under TSCA section 6(b). EPA reviewed the 
exposures and hazards of TCE, the magnitude of risk, exposed 
populations, severity of the hazard, uncertainties, and other factors. 
EPA sought input from the public and peer reviewers as required by TSCA 
and associated regulations.
    Summary of Legal Basis: In accordance with TSCA section 6(a), if 
EPA determines in a final risk evaluation completed under TSCA 6(b) 
that the manufacture, processing, distribution in commerce, use, or 
disposal of a chemical substance or mixture, or that any combination of 
such activities, presents an unreasonable risk of injury to health or 
the environment, the Agency must issue regulations requiring one or 
more of the following actions to the extent necessary so that the 
chemical substance no longer presents an unreasonable risk: (1) 
Prohibit or otherwise restrict manufacture, processing, or distribution 
in commerce of the substance, or limit the amount of the substance 
which may be manufactured, processed, or distributed in commerce; (2) 
Prohibit or otherwise restrict manufacture, processing, or distribution 
in commerce of the substance for a particular use or for a particular 
use above a set concentration, or limit the amount of the substance 
which may be manufactured, processed, or distributed in commerce for a 
particular use or for a particular use above a set concentration; (3) 
Require minimum warnings and instructions with respect to use, 
distribution in commerce, or disposal; (4) Require recordkeeping or 
testing by manufacturers or processors; (5) Prohibit or regulate any 
manner or method of commercial use; (6) Prohibit or regulate any manner 
or method of disposal for commercial purposes; and/or (7) Direct 
manufacturers or processors to give notice of the unreasonable risk to 
distributors, other persons, and the public and replace or repurchase 
the substance if required.
    Alternatives: TSCA section 6(a) requires EPA to address by rule 
chemical substances that the Agency determines present unreasonable 
risk upon completion of a final risk evaluation. TSCA section 6(c) 
requires that EPA consider one or more primary alternative regulatory 
actions as part of the development of a proposed rule under TSCA 
section 6(a). The primary alternative regulatory action would prohibit 
the manufacture (including import) and processing of TCE for all uses; 
prohibit the distribution in commerce and industrial and commercial use 
of TCE, as well as prohibitions on the disposal of TCE to industrial 
pre-treatment, industrial treatment, or publicly owned treatment works. 
The primary alternative regulatory action would involve longer 
timeframes for the prohibition of some industrial and commercial uses 
and for the associated manufacturing (including import) and processing. 
For all manufacturing (including import), processing, and industrial 
and commercial use of TCE that would continue more than one year after 
the publication of the final rule, workplace chemical protection 
program (WCPP) requirements, which would include a requirement to meet 
inhalation exposure concentration limits and exposure monitoring as 
well as requirements to reduce dermal exposures to TCE for certain 
continued conditions of use of TCE would be in effect until the 
respective prohibition compliance dates or, if applicable, expiration 
of the TSCA section 6(g) exemptions. The inhalation exposure 
concentration limits under the primary alternative regulatory action 
would be based on the immunotoxicity endpoint instead of the 
developmental toxicity endpoint as under the proposed regulatory 
action. The primary alternative regulatory action provides certain 
time-limited exemptions from requirements for uses of TCE that are 
critical or essential.
    Anticipated Cost and Benefits: The monetized costs for this 
proposed rule are estimated to range from $33.1 million annualized over 
20 years at a 3% discount rate and $40.5 million annualized over 20 
years at a 7% discount rate. The monetized benefits are estimated to be 
$18.0 to $21.5 million annualized over 20 years at a

[[Page 9482]]

3% discount rate and $8.2 million to $10.3 million annualized over 20 
years at a 7% discount rate. EPA believes that the balance of costs and 
benefits of this proposal cannot be fairly described without 
considering the additional, non-monetized benefits of mitigating the 
non-cancer adverse effects. These effects may include neurotoxicity, 
kidney toxicity, liver toxicity, immunotoxicity effects, reproductive 
effects, and developmental effects.
    Risks: The 2020 Risk Evaluation for TCE identified significant 
adverse health effects associated with short- and long-term exposure to 
TCE, including non-cancer effects (immunosuppression and developmental 
toxicity) from acute inhalation exposures and dermal exposures, and 
non-cancer effects (liver toxicity, kidney toxicity, neurotoxicity, 
autoimmunity, reproductive toxicity, and developmental toxicity) and 
cancer (liver, kidney, and non-Hodgkin lymphoma) from chronic 
inhalation exposures to TCE. In the 2023 Final Unreasonable Risk 
Determination, EPA determined that TCE presents an unreasonable risk of 
injury to health. The unreasonable risk determination, based on 
immunotoxicity and cancer, is driven by risks to workers and ONUs 
(workers who do not directly handle the chemical but perform work in an 
area where the chemical is present) due to occupational exposures to 
TCE (i.e., during manufacture, processing, industrial and commercial 
uses, and disposal); and to consumers and bystanders associated with 
consumer uses of TCE due to exposures from consumer use of TCE and TCE-
containing products. For more information, visit: https://www.epa.gov/assessing-and-managing-chemicals-under-tsca/risk-management-existing-chemicals-under-tsca.
    Timetable:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Action                    Date            FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NPRM................................   10/31/23  88 FR 74712
NPRM Comment Period End.............   12/15/23
Final Rule..........................   04/00/24
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Yes.
    Small Entities Affected: Businesses.
    Government Levels Affected: Federal, State.
    Federalism: This action may have federalism implications as defined 
in E.O. 13132.
    International Impacts: This regulatory action will be likely to 
have international trade and investment effects, or otherwise be of 
international interest.
    Additional Information: EPA-HQ-OPPT-2020-0642.
    Sectors Affected: 325 Chemical Manufacturing.
    URL For More Information: https://www.epa.gov/assessing-and-managing-chemicals-under-tsca/risk-management-trichloroethylene-tce.
    Agency Contact: Gabriela Rossner, Environmental Protection Agency, 
Office of Chemical Safety and Pollution Prevention, 1200 Pennsylvania 
Avenue NW, Mail Code 7404M, Washington, DC 20460, Phone: 202 564-2426, 
Email: [email protected].
    Joel Wolf, Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Chemical 
Safety and Pollution Prevention, 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue NW, Mail Code 
7404M, Washington, DC 20460, Phone: 202 564-0432, Email: 
[email protected].
    RIN: 2070-AK83

EPA--OCSPP

197. N-Methylpyrrolidone (NMP); Regulation Under the Toxic Substances 
Control Act (TSCA) [2070-AK85]

    Priority: Other Significant. Major status under 5 U.S.C. 801 is 
undetermined.
    Unfunded Mandates: Undetermined.
    Legal Authority: 15 U.S.C. 2605 Toxic Substances Control Act
    CFR Citation: 40 CFR 751.
    Legal Deadline: NPRM, Statutory, December 23, 2021, TSCA sec. 6(c).
    Final, Statutory, December 23, 2022, TSCA sec. 6(c).
    Abstract: This proposed rulemaking will address the unreasonable 
risk of injury to health presented by n- methylpyrrolidone (NMP). 
Section 6(a) of the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) requires EPA to 
address by rule any unreasonable risk identified in a TSCA section 6(b) 
risk evaluation by applying requirements to the extent necessary so the 
chemical no longer presents unreasonable risk. The Agency's development 
of this rule incorporates significant stakeholder outreach and public 
participation, including over 40 external meetings as well as required 
Federalism, Tribal, and Environmental Justice consultations and a Small 
Businesses Advocacy Review Panel. EPA's 2020 risk evaluation for NMP, 
describing its conditions of use is in docket EPA-HQ-OPPT-2019-0236, 
with the 2022 revised unreasonable risk determination and additional 
materials in docket EPA-HQ-OPPT-2016-0743.6
    Statement of Need: This rulemaking is needed to address the 
unreasonable risk from NMP that were identified following a risk 
evaluation completed under TSCA section 6(b). EPA reviewed the 
exposures and hazards of NMP, the magnitude of risk, exposed 
populations, severity of the hazard, uncertainties, and other factors. 
EPA sought input from the public and peer reviewers as required by TSCA 
and associated regulations.
    Summary of Legal Basis: In accordance with TSCA section 6(a), if 
EPA determines in a final risk evaluation completed under TSCA 6(b) 
that the manufacture, processing, distribution in commerce, use, or 
disposal of a chemical substance or mixture, or that any combination of 
such activities, presents an unreasonable risk of injury to health or 
the environment, the Agency must issue regulations requiring one or 
more of the following actions to the extent necessary so that the 
chemical substance no longer presents an unreasonable risk: (1) 
Prohibit or otherwise restrict manufacture, processing, or distribution 
in commerce of the substance, or limit the amount of the substance 
which may be manufactured, processed, or distributed in commerce; (2) 
Prohibit or otherwise restrict manufacture, processing, or distribution 
in commerce of the substance for a particular use or for a particular 
use above a set concentration, or limit the amount of the substance 
which may be manufactured, processed, or distributed in commerce for a 
particular use or for a particular use above a set concentration; (3) 
Require minimum warnings and instructions with respect to use, 
distribution in commerce, or disposal; (4) Require recordkeeping or 
testing by manufacturers or processors; (5) Prohibit or regulate any 
manner or method of commercial use; (6) Prohibit or regulate any manner 
or method of disposal for commercial purposes; and/or (7) Direct 
manufacturers or processors to give notice of the unreasonable risk to 
distributors, other persons, and the public and replace or repurchase 
the substance if required.
    Alternatives: TSCA section 6(a) requires EPA to address by rule 
chemical substances that the Agency determines present unreasonable 
risk upon completion of a final risk evaluation. As required under TSCA 
section 6(c), EPA will consider one or more primary alternative 
regulatory actions as part of the development of a proposed rule.
    Anticipated Cost and Benefits: EPA will prepare an economic 
analysis as the Agency develops the proposed rule.
    Risks: The 2020 Risk Evaluation for NMP identified potential health 
effects for NMP including non-cancer adverse health effects such as 
liver toxicity,

[[Page 9483]]

kidney toxicity, immunotoxicity, reproductive toxicity, developmental 
toxicity, neurotoxicity, and irritation and sensitization. In the 2022 
Final Unreasonable Risk Determination, EPA determined that NMP presents 
an unreasonable risk of injury to health. The unreasonable risk 
determination is driven by risks to workers due to occupational 
exposures to NMP (i.e., during manufacture, processing, industrial and 
commercial uses, and disposal); and to consumers due to exposures from 
consumer use of NMP and NMP-containing products. For more information, 
visit: https://www.epa.gov/assessing-and-managing-chemicals-under-tsca/risk-management-existing-chemicals-under-tsca.
    Timetable:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Action                    Date            FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NPRM................................   02/00/24
Final Rule..........................   12/00/24
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Yes.
    Small Entities Affected: Businesses.
    Government Levels Affected: Federal, State, Tribal.
    Federalism: This action may have federalism implications as defined 
in E.O. 13132.
    International Impacts: This regulatory action will be likely to 
have international trade and investment effects, or otherwise be of 
international interest.
    Additional Information: EPA-HQ-OPPT-2020-0744.
    Sectors Affected: 325 Chemical Manufacturing.
    URL For More Information: https://www.epa.gov/assessing-and-managing-chemicals-under-tsca/risk-management-n-methylpyrrolidone-nmp.
    Agency Contact: Clara Hull, Environmental Protection Agency, Office 
of Chemical Safety and Pollution Prevention, 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue 
NW, Mail Code 7404M, Washington, DC 20460, Phone: 202 564-3954, Email: 
[email protected].
    Joel Wolf, Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Chemical 
Safety and Pollution Prevention, 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue NW, Mail Code 
7404M, Washington, DC 20460, Phone: 202 564-0432, Email: 
[email protected].
    RIN: 2070-AK85

EPA--OCSPP

198. Procedures for Chemical Risk Evaluation Under the Toxic Substances 
Control Act (TSCA) [2070-AK90]

    Priority: Other Significant.
    Legal Authority: 15 U.S.C. 2605 Toxic Substances Control Act
    CFR Citation: 40 CFR 702.
    Legal Deadline: None.
    Abstract: As required under section 6(b)(4) of the Toxic Substances 
Control Act (TSCA), EPA published a final rule in 2017 that established 
a process for conducting risk evaluations to determine whether a 
chemical substance presents an unreasonable risk of injury to health or 
the environment, without consideration of costs or other non-risk 
factors, including an unreasonable risk to a potentially exposed or 
susceptible subpopulation, under the conditions of use. This process 
incorporates the science requirements of the amended statute, including 
best available science and weight of the scientific evidence. The final 
rule established the steps of a risk evaluation process including: 
scope, hazard assessment, exposure assessment, risk characterization, 
and risk determination. The Agency has reconsidered the procedural 
framework rule for conducting such risk evaluations and determined that 
certain aspects of that framework should be revised to better align 
with applicable court decisions and the statutory text, to reflect the 
Agency's experience implementing the risk evaluation program following 
enactment of the 2016 TSCA amendments, and to allow for consideration 
of future scientific advances in the risk evaluation process without 
need to further amend the Agency's procedural rule.
    Statement of Need: EPA's 2017 final rule that established a process 
for conducting risk evaluations under TSCA was challenged by several 
non-governmental organizations. In November 2019, the court in Safer 
Chemicals, Healthy Families v. U.S. EPA, 943 F.3d 397 (9th Cir. 2019) 
remanded certain provisions of the rule to EPA. Additionally, the 2017 
rule was identified for review in accordance with Executive Order 
13990, Protecting Public Health and the Environment and Restoring 
Science to Tackle the Climate Crisis (86 FR 7037, January 25, 2021). 
Consistent with the Court's direction and opinion in Safer Chemicals, 
Healthy Families v. U.S. EPA, and incorporating lessons learned in the 
process carrying out the first ten TSCA risk evaluations, the Agency is 
now considering revisions to the procedural framework and will solicit 
public comment on those changes through a notice of proposed 
rulemaking.
    Summary of Legal Basis: TSCA section 6(b)(4) directed EPA to 
establish the process for conducting risk evaluations on chemical 
substances under TSCA to identify any unreasonable risk of injury to 
health or the environment. Agencies have inherent authority to 
reconsider past decisions and to revise, replace, or repeal a decision 
to the extent permitted by law and supported by a reasoned explanation. 
FCC v. Fox Television Stations, Inc., 556 U.S. 502, 515 (2009). EPA is 
now exercising its inherent authority to reconsider past decisions and 
as such is considering revisions to that final rule based on the 
Court's opinion in Safer Chemicals, Healthy Families v. U.S. EPA to 
ensure that TSCA risk evaluations are supported by the best available 
science, aligned with the statutory requirements, and consistent with 
Congress' intent in the 2016 TSCA amendments.
    Alternatives: Alternatives will not be developed as part of the 
development of a proposed rule.
    Anticipated Cost and Benefits: EPA will analyze the incremental 
impacts associated with proposed amendments to requirements for 
manufacturer-requested risk evaluations as part of the development of a 
proposed rule.
    Risks: This is a procedural rule related to risk evaluations and is 
not intended to directly address any particular risk. However, the rule 
would establish procedures by which EPA will evaluate whether a 
chemical substance presents an unreasonable risk of injury to health or 
the environment, including unreasonable risk to a potentially exposed 
or susceptible subpopulation. Rigorous procedures that support accurate 
identification of unreasonable risk are necessary to inform subsequent 
risk management action.
    Timetable:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Action                    Date            FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NPRM................................   10/30/23  88 FR 74292
NPRM Comment Period End.............   12/14/23
Final Rule..........................   04/00/24
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No.
    Government Levels Affected: None.
    Additional Information:
    Sectors Affected: 325 Chemical Manufacturing; 324110 Petroleum 
Refineries.
    URL For More Information: https://www.epa.gov/assessing-and-managing-chemicals-under-tsca.
    Agency Contact: Susanna Blair, Environmental Protection Agency, 
Office of Chemical Safety and Pollution Prevention, 1200 Pennsylvania 
Avenue NW, Mail Code 7401M, Washington, DC 20460, Phone: 202 564-4371, 
Email: [email protected].

[[Page 9484]]

    Ryan Schmit, Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Chemical 
Safety and Pollution Prevention, 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue NW, Mail Code 
7101M, Washington, DC 20460, Phone: 202 564-0610, Fax: 202 566-0471, 
Email: [email protected].
    RIN: 2070-AK90

EPA--OFFICE OF LAND AND EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT (OLEM)

Proposed Rule Stage

199. Revisions to Standards for the Open Burning/Open Detonation of 
Waste Explosives [2050-AH24]

    Priority: Other Significant. Major status under 5 U.S.C. 801 is 
undetermined.
    Unfunded Mandates: Undetermined.
    Legal Authority: 40 CFR 131; 42 U.S.C. 6924
    CFR Citation: 40 CFR 264 and 265.
    Legal Deadline: None.
    Abstract: This rulemaking will consider revisions to the 
regulations that allow for the open burning and detonation (OB/OD) of 
waste explosives. The allowance or ``variance'' to the prohibition on 
the open burning of hazardous waste was established at a time when 
there were no alternatives to the safe treatment of waste explosives. 
However, recent findings from the National Academies of Sciences, 
Engineering, and Medicine and the EPA have identified safe alternatives 
that are potentially available to many energetic/explosive waste 
streams. Because there are potential safe alternatives in use today 
that capture and treat emissions prior to release, the EPA is 
considering revising regulations to promote the broader use of these 
alternatives, where applicable. As part of the rule development 
process, EPA has held two rounds of engagement with states, 
territories, tribes, environmental and community groups, and owners/
operators of OB/OD units.
    Statement of Need: Technological advances have been made since the 
1980 Interim Status regulations were issued that banned the open 
burning of hazardous wastes but created an exception to allow open 
burning/open detonation (OB/OD) of waste explosives due to a lack of 
other safe modes of treatment. In 2019, EPA and the National Academies 
of Science, Engineering, and Medicine published reports documenting 
safe and available alternative treatment technologies that could 
potentially be used in lieu of OB/OD.
    Summary of Legal Basis: The proposed rule would be established 
under the authority of the Solid Waste Disposal Act of 1970, as amended 
by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act of 1976 (RCRA), as 
amended by the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments of 1984 (HWSA).
    Alternatives: Based on recent information regarding availability of 
safe alternatives, we are revising the existing regulation to 
explicitly state how a demonstration of eligibility must be made.
    Anticipated Cost and Benefits: The Agency will evaluate anticipated 
costs and benefits as part of the rule development process.
    Risks: The Agency will evaluate risk reductions and impacts as part 
of the rule development process. It is currently early in the process 
to make such determinations.
    Timetable:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Action                    Date            FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NPRM................................   11/00/23
Final Rule..........................   09/00/24
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No.
    Government Levels Affected: Federal, Local, State.
    Federalism: Undetermined.
    Additional Information:
    Sectors Affected: 325920 Explosives Manufacturing; 562211 Hazardous 
Waste Treatment and Disposal; 926150 Regulation, Licensing, and 
Inspection of Miscellaneous Commercial Sectors; 56291 Remediation 
Services; 562910 Remediation Services; 56221 Waste Treatment and 
Disposal.
    Agency Contact: Paul Diss, Environmental Protection Agency, Office 
of Land and Emergency Management, 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue NW, Mail 
Code 5303T, Washington, DC 20460, Phone: 202 566-0321, Email: 
[email protected].
    Sasha Gerhard, Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Land and 
Emergency Management, 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue NW, Mail Code 5304T, 
Washington, DC 20460, Phone: 202 566-0346, Fax: 703 308-8686, Email: 
[email protected].
    RIN: 2050-AH24

EPA--OLEM

200. Listing of PFOA, PFOS, PFBS, and GenX as Resource Conservation and 
Recovery Act (RCRA) Hazardous Constituents [2050-AH26]

    Priority: Other Significant. Major status under 5 U.S.C. 801 is 
undetermined.
    Legal Authority: 42 U.S.C. 6912 (a); 42 U.S.C. 6921; 42 U.S.C. 6924
    CFR Citation: 40 CFR 261.
    Legal Deadline: None.
    Abstract: Based on public health and environmental protection 
concerns and in response to several petitions which requested EPA to 
take regulatory action on PFAS under RCRA, EPA is evaluating the 
existing toxicity and health effects data on four PFAS constituents to 
determine if they should be listed as RCRA Hazardous Constituents. If 
the existing data for the four PFAS constituents support listing any or 
all of these constituents as RCRA hazardous constituents, EPA will 
propose to list the constituents in a Federal Register notice for 
public comment. The four PFAS chemicals EPA will evaluate are: 
perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA), perfluorooctane sulfonic acid (PFOS), 
perfluorobutane sulfonic acid (PFBS), hexafluoropropylene oxide dimer 
acid (HFPO-DA or GenX). EPA has communicated with interested 
stakeholders about this action and will do conduct additional outreach 
with the public, organizations, states, tribal groups, and affected 
parties following publication of a proposed rule
    Statement of Need: EPA has received three petitions recently 
requesting regulatory action on PFAS under the Resource Conservation 
and Recovery Act (RCRA), including a petition from the Governor of New 
Mexico on June 23, 2021. The New Mexico petition incorporated by 
reference the two other petitions received previously by EPA from 
Public Employees for Environmental Responsibility (PEER) and the 
Environmental Law Clinic at the University of California, Berkeley 
School of Law (et al.). This proposed rulemaking is in response to the 
three petitions and, if finalized, will list specific PFAS as RCRA 
hazardous constituents subject to corrective action requirements at 
hazardous waste treatment, storage, and disposal facilities (TSDFs).
    Summary of Legal Basis: EPA has received three petitions recently 
requesting regulatory action on PFAS under the Resource Conservation 
and Recovery Act (RCRA), including a petition from the Governor of New 
Mexico on June 23, 2021. The New Mexico petition incorporated by 
reference the two other petitions received previously by EPA from 
Public Employees for Environmental Responsibility (PEER) and the 
Environmental Law Clinic at the University of California, Berkeley 
School of Law (et al.). This proposed rulemaking is in response to the 
three petitions and, if finalized, will list specific PFAS as RCRA 
hazardous constituents subject to corrective action

[[Page 9485]]

requirements at hazardous waste treatment, storage, and disposal 
facilities (TSDFs).
    Alternatives: We have reviewed and evaluated the toxicity and 
health effects information for specific PFAS to determine if they 
should be proposed to be listed as RCRA hazardous constituents on 
Appendix VIII, and there are no other alternatives.
    Anticipated Cost and Benefits: The Agency will evaluate anticipated 
costs and benefits as part of the rule development process.
    Risks: The Agency will evaluate risk reductions and impacts as part 
of the rule development process. It is currently too early in the 
process to make such determinations.
    Timetable:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Action                    Date            FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NPRM................................   12/00/23  .......................
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Undetermined.
    Government Levels Affected: State, Federal.
    Agency Contact: Narendra Chaudhari, Environmental Protection 
Agency, Office of Land and Emergency Management, 1200 Pennsylvania 
Avenue NW, Mail Code 5304T, Washington, DC 20460, Phone: 202 566-0495, 
Email: [email protected].
    Daniel Lowrey, Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Land and 
Emergency Management, 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue NW, Mail Code 5304T, 
Washington, DC 20460, Phone: 202 566-1015, Email: 
[email protected].
    RIN: 2050-AH26

EPA--OLEM

201. Definition of Hazardous Waste Applicable to Corrective Action for 
Solid Waste Management Units [2050-AH27]

    Priority: Other Significant.
    Unfunded Mandates: Undetermined.
    Legal Authority: 42 U.S.C. 6921; 42 U.S.C. 6912 (a); 42 U.S.C. 
6938; 42 U.S.C. 6934; 42 U.S.C. 6939g; 42 U.S.C. 6937; 42 U.S.C. 6939; 
42 U.S.C. 6935; 42 U.S.C. 6974; 42 U.S.C. 6924; 42 U.S.C. 6925; 42 
U.S.C. 6927
    CFR Citation: 40 CFR 260; 40 CFR 261; 40 CFR 270.
    Legal Deadline: None.
    Abstract: EPA is considering a proposed rule that would modify the 
regulations at 40 CFR part 260, 261 and 270 to clarify that the 
definition of hazardous waste found in RCRA section 1004(5) is 
applicable to corrective action for releases from solid waste 
management units. The proposed rule would more clearly implement EPA's 
longstanding interpretation of its authority under RCRA section 3004(u) 
and (v).
    Statement of Need: This regulatory modification is necessary so 
that 40 CFR 264.101 appropriately reflects the scope of corrective 
action cleanup requirements for hazardous waste treatment, storage, and 
disposal facilities as required by RCRA section 3004(u) and (v). The 
revision is expected to clarify that releases of hazardous wastes that 
are not regulatory hazardous wastes but meet the definition of 
hazardous waste in RCRA section 1004(5), must be addressed in the same 
manner as regulatory hazardous wastes under the corrective action 
program. This rulemaking is expected to impact the release of certain 
PFAS substances and is included as part of EPA's broader PFAS Strategic 
Roadmap.
    Summary of Legal Basis: The proposed rule would be established 
under the authority of sections 3004(u) and (v) of the Solid Waste 
Disposal Act of 1965, as amended by subsequent enactments including the 
Resource Conservation and Recovery Act of 1976 (RCRA), as amended by 
the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments of 1984 (HWSA).
    Alternatives: We have reviewed the applicable regulations and no 
alternatives have been identified.
    Anticipated Cost and Benefits: The Agency will evaluate anticipated 
costs and benefits as part of the rule development process.
    Risks: The Agency will evaluate risk reductions and impacts as part 
of the rule development process. It is currently too early in the 
process to make such determinations.
    Timetable:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Action                    Date            FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NPRM................................   11/00/23  .......................
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Undetermined.
    Government Levels Affected: Federal, State.
    Agency Contact: Barbara Foster, Environmental Protection Agency, 
Office of Land and Emergency Management, 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue NW, 
Washington, DC 20460, Phone: 202 566-0382, Email: 
[email protected].
    RIN: 2050-AH27

EPA--OFFICE OF WATER (OW)

Proposed Rule Stage

202. National Primary Drinking Water Regulations for Lead and Copper: 
Improvements (LCRI) [2040-AG16]

    Priority: Section 3(f)(1) Significant. Major under 5 U.S.C. 801.
    Unfunded Mandates: This action may affect State, local or tribal 
governments and the private sector.
    Legal Authority: 42 U.S.C. 300f et seq. Safe Drinking Water Act
    CFR Citation: 40 CFR 141; 40 CFR 142.
    Legal Deadline: None.
    Abstract: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) published the 
final Lead and Copper Rule Revision (LCRR) on January 15, 2021. EPA 
reviewed the LCRR and decided to initiate a new rulemaking process to 
improve the rule. This new National Primary Drinking Water Regulation 
is called the Lead and Copper Rule Improvements (LCRI). EPA is 
developing LCRI to strengthen the regulatory framework and address lead 
in drinking water.
    Statement of Need: The EPA promulgated the final Lead and Copper 
Rule Revision (LCRR) on January 15, 2021 (86 FR 4198). Consistent with 
the directives of Executive Order 13990, the EPA is currently 
considering revising this rulemaking. The EPA will complete its review 
of the rule in accordance with those directives and conduct important 
consultations with affected parties. The EPA understands that the 
benefits of clean water are not shared equally by all communities and 
this review of the LCRR will be consistent with the policy aims set 
forth in Executive Order 13985, ``Advancing Racial Equity and Support 
for Underserved Communities through the Federal Government.''
    Summary of Legal Basis: The Safe Drinking Water Act, section 1412, 
National Primary Drinking Water Regulations, authorizes EPA to initiate 
the development of a rulemaking if the agency has determined that the 
action maintains or improves the public health.
    Alternatives: To be determined.
    Anticipated Cost and Benefits: To be determined.
    Risks: To be determined.
    Timetable:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Action                    Date            FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NPRM................................   11/00/23  .......................
Final Rule..........................   10/00/24  .......................
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Undetermined.

[[Page 9486]]

    Government Levels Affected: Federal, Local, State, Tribal.
    Federalism: This action may have federalism implications as defined 
in E.O. 13132.
    Additional Information:
    Sectors Affected: 23711 Water and Sewer Line and Related Structures 
Construction; 2213 Water, Sewage and Other Systems.
    Agency Contact: Michael Goldberg, Environmental Protection Agency, 
Office of Water, 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue NW, 4601M, Washington, DC 
20460, Phone: 202 564-1137, Email: [email protected].
    Related RIN: Related to 2040-AF15
    RIN: 2040-AG16

EPA--OFFICE OF AIR AND RADIATION (OAR)

Final Rule Stage

203. National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants: Ethylene 
Oxide Commercial Sterilization and Fumigation Operations [2060-AU37]

    Priority: Section 3(f)(1) Significant. Major under 5 U.S.C. 801.
    Legal Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7607(d); 42 U.S.C. 7414, 7601
    CFR Citation: 40 CFR 63, subpart O.
    Legal Deadline: None.
    Abstract: In December 1994, pursuant to section 112(d) of the Clean 
Air Act, EPA promulgated the National Emission Standards for Hazardous 
Air Pollutants (NESHAP) for Ethylene Oxide (EtO) Commercial 
Sterilization and Fumigation Operations (59 FR 62585). The NESHAP 
established standards for both major and area sources. EPA completed a 
residual risk and technology review for the NESHAP in 2006 and, at that 
time, concluded that no revisions to the standards were necessary. In 
this action, EPA will conduct the second technology review for the 
NESHAP, as required by law, and consider potential updates to the rule. 
To aid in this effort, EPA issued an advance notice of proposed 
rulemaking that solicited comment from stakeholders, undertook a Small 
Business Advocacy Review panel, which is needed when there is the 
potential for significant economic impacts to small businesses from any 
regulatory actions being considered, and has conducted outreach 
meetings within the communities affected by the highest-risk facilities 
as part of the development of this action. These meetings involved 
informing community members of the risk from EtO emissions and 
explaining how they can be involved in the rule writing process. EPA 
also held a national webinar on this proposal. Accommodations were made 
for Spanish-language speaking communities, which are disproportionately 
affected by these EtO emissions. This proposal also reflects feedback 
EPA has received from representatives from local and state governments. 
For more information, please visit https://www.epa.gov/stationary-sources-air-pollution/ethylene-oxide-emissions-standards-sterilization-facilities.
    Statement of Need: The National Air Toxics Assessment (NATA) 
released in August 2018 identified ethylene oxide (EtO) emissions as a 
potential concern in several areas across the country. The latest NATA 
estimates that EtO significantly contributes to potential elevated 
cancer risks in some census tracts. These elevated risks are largely 
driven by an EPA risk value that was updated in December 2016. Further 
investigation on NATA inputs and results led to the EPA identifying 
commercial sterilization using EtO as a source category contributing to 
some of these risks. Over the past two years, the EPA has been 
gathering additional information to help evaluate opportunities to 
reduce EtO emissions in this source category through potential NESHAP 
revisions. In this rule, EPA will address EtO emissions from commercial 
sterilizers.
    Summary of Legal Basis: CAA section 112, 42 U.S.C. 7412, provides 
the legal framework and basis for regulatory actions addressing 
emissions of hazardous air pollutants from stationary sources. CAA 
section 112(d)(6) requires EPA to review, and revise as necessary, 
emission standards promulgated under CAA section 112(d) at least every 
8 years, considering developments in practices, processes, and control 
technologies.
    Alternatives: EPA is evaluating various options for reducing EtO 
emissions from commercial sterilizers under the NESHAP, such as 
pollution control equipment, reducing fugitive emissions, or 
monitoring.
    Anticipated Cost and Benefits: Based on conversations with 
regulated entities who have been working to reduce emissions, the 
potential costs of controlling some emissions sources could be 
substantial.
    Risks: As part of this rulemaking, EPA has been updating 
information regarding EtO emissions and the specific emission points 
within the source category. Preliminary analyses suggest that fugitive 
emissions from commercial sterilizers may substantially contribute to 
health risks associated with exposure to EtO.
    Timetable:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Action                    Date            FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
ANPRM...............................   12/12/19  84 FR 67889
NPRM................................   04/13/23  88 FR 22790
NPRM Comment Period End.............   06/12/23  .......................
Final Rule..........................   03/00/24  .......................
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Yes.
    Small Entities Affected: Businesses.
    Government Levels Affected: None.
    Additional Information: EPA-HQ-OAR-2019-0178.
    Sectors Affected: 311423 Dried and Dehydrated Food Manufacturing; 
33911 Medical Equipment and Supplies Manufacturing; 561910 Packaging 
and Labeling Services; 325412 Pharmaceutical Preparation Manufacturing; 
311942 Spice and Extract Manufacturing.
    Agency Contact: Jon Witt, Environmental Protection Agency, Office 
of Air and Radiation, 109 T.W. Alexander Drive, Mail Code E143-05, 
Research Triangle Park, NC 27709, Phone: 919 541-5645, Email: 
[email protected].
    Kusondra King, Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Air and 
Radiation, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711, Phone: 919 541-4373, 
Email: [email protected].
    RIN: 2060-AU37

EPA--OAR

204. New Source Performance Standards and Emission Guidelines for Crude 
Oil and Natural Gas Facilities: Climate Review [2060-AV16]

    Priority: Section 3(f)(1) Significant. Major under 5 U.S.C. 801.
    Legal Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7411
    CFR Citation: 40 CFR 60; subpart OOOO, OOOOa, OOOOb, OOOOc, KKK; 
app. K.
    Legal Deadline: None.
    Abstract: On November 15, 2021, the EPA published a proposed rule 
to mitigate climate-destabilizing pollution and protect human health by 
reducing greenhouse gas and VOC emissions from the Crude Oil and 
Natural Gas source category (86 FR 63110). This action was in response 
to the January 20, 2021, Executive Order titled ``Protecting Public 
Health and the Environment and Restoring Science to Tackle the Climate 
Crisis.'' In the November 2021 Proposal, pursuant to CAA section 111 
the EPA proposed new standards of performance for greenhouse gases (in 
the form of methane limitations) and volatile organic compounds 
emissions and

[[Page 9487]]

Emission Guidelines for greenhouse gas emissions (in the form of 
methane limitations) from existing sources. The EPA also proposed 
several related actions stemming from the joint resolution of Congress, 
adopted on June 30, 2021, under the Congressional Review Act 
disapproving the EPA's final rule titled, Oil and Natural Gas Sector: 
``Emission Standards for New, Reconstructed, and Modified Sources 
Review,'' September 14, 2020 (2020 Policy Rule). Lastly, in the 
November 2021 Proposal the EPA proposed a protocol under the general 
provisions for OGI.
    On December 6, 2022, the EPA published a supplemental proposed rule 
that was composed of two main actions (87 FR 74702). First, the EPA 
updated, strengthened, and expanded on the NSPS proposed in November 
2021 under CAA section 111(b) for greenhouse gases (in the form of 
methane limitations) and volatile organic compounds emissions from new, 
modified, and reconstructed facilities. Second, the EPA updated, 
strengthened, and expanded the presumptive standards proposed for the 
Emission Guidelines in the November 2021 Proposal as part of the CAA 
section 111(d) EG for greenhouse gas emissions (in the form of methane 
limitations) from designated facilities. For purposes of the Emission 
Guidelines, the EPA also proposed the implementation requirements for 
states to limit greenhouse gas pollution (in the form of methane 
limitations) from designated facilities in the Crude Oil and Natural 
Gas source category under CAA section 111(d). The Agency expects to 
issue a final rule later in 2023.
    Statement of Need: The final actions stem from the EPA's authority 
and obligation under CAA section 111 to directly regulate categories of 
new stationary sources that cause or contribute to endangerment from 
air pollution and promulgate EG for states to follow in regulating 
existing sources (designated facilities) in the source category.
    Summary of Legal Basis: Clean Air Act section 111(b) provides the 
legal framework for establishing greenhouse gas emission standards (in 
the form of limitations on methane) and volatile organic compounds for 
new oil and natural gas sources. Clean Air Act section 111(d) provides 
the legal framework for establishing greenhouse gas emission standards 
(in the form of limitations on methane) for existing oil and natural 
gas sources.
    Alternatives: The EPA has evaluated several options for new and 
existing sources and will propose and solicit comment on those options.
    Anticipated Cost and Benefits: The EPA's regulatory impact analyses 
for the December 2022 supplemental notice of proposed rulemaking can be 
found at document number EPA-HQ-OAR-2021-0317-1566 of the public docket 
(https://www.regulations.gov/document/EPA-HQ-OAR-2021-0317-1566).
    Risks: The EPA's regulatory impact analyses for the December 2022 
supplemental notice of proposed rulemaking can be found at document 
number EPA-HQ-OAR-2021-0317-1566 of the public docket (https://www.regulations.gov/document/EPA-HQ-OAR-2021-0317-1566).
    Timetable:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Action                    Date            FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NPRM................................   11/15/21  86 FR 63110
Supplemental NPRM...................   12/06/22  87 FR 74702
Final Rule..........................   12/00/23  .......................
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Yes.
    Small Entities Affected: Businesses.
    Government Levels Affected: Federal, Local, State, Tribal.
    Energy Effects: Statement of Energy Effects planned as required by 
Executive Order 13211.
    International Impacts: This regulatory action will be likely to 
have international trade and investment effects, or otherwise be of 
international interest.
    Additional Information: EPA-HQ-OAR-2021-0317. https://www.epa.gov/controlling-air-pollution-oil-and-natural-gas-industry.
    Sectors Affected: 213111 Drilling Oil and Gas Wells; 2111 Oil and 
Gas Extraction; 211 Oil and Gas Extraction; 237120 Oil and Gas Pipeline 
and Related Structures Construction; 23712 Oil and Gas Pipeline and 
Related Structures Construction; 213112 Support Activities for Oil and 
Gas Operations.
    Agency Contact: Amy Hambrick, Environmental Protection Agency, 
Office of Air and Radiation, 109 T.W. Alexander Drive, Mail Code E143-
05, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711, Phone: 919 541-0964, Fax: 919 
541-0516, Email: [email protected].
    RIN: 2060-AV16

EPA--OAR

205. Revisions to the Air Emission Reporting Requirements (AERR) [2060-
AV41]

    Priority: Section 3(f)(1) Significant. Major under 5 U.S.C. 801.
    Legal Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. Clean Air Act
    CFR Citation: 40 CFR 51.
    Legal Deadline: None.
    Abstract: On August 8, 2023 (88 FR 54118), the EPA proposed new 
requirements to improve the quality and completeness of HAP emissions 
data from stationary sources and all pollutant emissions from 
prescribed fires. Specifically, the EPA is proposing to require certain 
sources report information regarding emission of hazardous air 
pollutants (HAP); certain sources to report criteria air pollutants, 
their precursors and HAP; and to require State, local, and certain 
tribal air agencies to report prescribed fire data. Further, EPA is 
considering how best to quantify emissions from intermittent sources 
such as backup generators; how to obtain data from permitted facilities 
in Indian Country when a Tribe is not required to report emissions 
data; and how to address known data gaps, streamline processes, and 
improve data quality, documentation, and transparency for nonpoint and 
mobile sources. The proposed revisions also include changes for 
reporting data on airports, rail yards, commercial marine vessels, 
locomotives, and nonpoint sources. This proposed action would allow for 
EPA to annually collect (starting in 2027), hazardous air pollutant 
(HAP) emissions data for point sources in addition to continuing the 
criteria air pollutant and precursor (CAP) collection in place under 
the existing AERR. The proposed amendments would ensure that EPA has 
sufficient information to identify and solve air quality and exposure 
problems and ensure that communities have the data needed to understand 
significant environmental risks that may be impacting them.
    Statement of Need: Since 2015, many aspects of emissions data 
collection and use have evolved. The EPA has continued to review 
hazardous air pollutant (HAP) emissions levels and associated public 
health risk through the Residual Risk and Technology (RTR) program, 
which in many cases has required Information Collection Requests (ICRs) 
under Section 114 of the Act. Such collection efforts have proven very 
time consuming and limited EPA's ability to act quickly. Furthermore, 
as the EPA gains insight into the risks posed by certain chemicals, 
such as Ethylene Oxide, we have found ourselves limited by the data 
available on emissions sources. New compounds continue to be identified 
as public health threats, such as per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances 
(PFAS), which may be listed as HAPs in the

[[Page 9488]]

future. Currently, States are required to report the emissions from 
sources in their state to EPA. In practice, that has meant emissions 
are reported only for facilities permitted at the state level. 
Facilities permitted at the federal level technically do not fall under 
the reporting requirements, and consequently, some never report 
emissions to the EPA, which does not allow for proper EPA and state 
program implementation. Requiring HAPs for point sources is essential 
to addressing continued public health risks and environmental justice 
issues.
    Summary of Legal Basis: Section 114(a)(1) of the CAA authorizes the 
Administrator to, among other things, require certain persons 
(explained below) on a one-time, periodic, or continuous basis to keep 
records, make reports, undertake monitoring, sample emissions, or 
provide such other information as the Administrator may reasonably 
require. The EPA may require this information of any person who (i) 
owns or operates an emission source, (ii) manufactures control or 
process equipment, (iii) the Administrator believes may have 
information necessary for the purposes set forth in CAA section 114, or 
(iv) is subject to any requirement of the Act (except for manufacturers 
subject to certain Title II requirements). The information may be 
required for the purposes of developing an implementation plan, an 
emission standard under sections 111, 112, or 129, determining if any 
person is in violation of any standard or requirement of an 
implementation plan or emissions standard, or ``carrying out any 
provision' of the Act (except for a provision of Title II with respect 
to manufacturers of new motor vehicles or new motor vehicle engines).
    Alternatives: The EPA is also proposing options and alternatives 
for consideration that may allow the States to report for owners/
operators of regulated facilities.
    Anticipated Cost and Benefits: This action has an associated 
Regulatory Impact Analysis (RIA), which describes the anticipated costs 
and benefits of this proposed action. The RIA is summarized in this 
action and provided in the docket for this action. This action's total 
cost impact is estimated at $117.4 million on average annually from 
2024 to 2026, and then is estimated at $477.9 million in 2027. All of 
these costs are in 2021 dollars. The increase in costs for owners and 
operators of affected sources in 2027 reflects full implementation of 
the proposed rule if finalized for the entire population of affected 
sources.
    Risks: No risks are associated with this action as these are 
proposed reporting requirements.
    Timetable:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Action                    Date            FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NPRM................................   08/09/23  88 FR 54118
NPRM Comment Period Extended........   09/14/23  88 FR 63046
NPRM Comment Period End.............   10/18/23  .......................
Final Rule..........................   07/00/24  .......................
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Yes.
    Small Entities Affected: Businesses, Governmental Jurisdictions.
    Government Levels Affected: Local, State, Tribal.
    Additional Information: EPA-HQ-OAR-2004-0489.
    Agency Contact: Marc Houyoux, Environmental Protection Agency, 
Office of Air and Radiation, C339-02, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711, 
Phone: 919 541-3649, Fax: 919 541-0684, Email: [email protected].
    RIN: 2060-AV41

EPA--OAR

206. Multi-Pollutant Emissions Standards for Model Years 2027 and Later 
Light-Duty and Medium-Duty Vehicles [2060-AV49]

    Priority: Section 3(f)(1) Significant. Major under 5 U.S.C. 801.
    Legal Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 to 7671q
    CFR Citation: 40 CFR 86; 40 CFR 600.
    Legal Deadline: None.
    Abstract: On April 12, 2023, EPA announced a proposal for new 
multipollutant emissions standards to further reduce harmful air 
pollutant emissions from light-duty passenger cars and light trucks and 
Class 2b and 3 vehicles (``medium-duty vehicles'' or MDVs) under its 
authority in section 202(a) of the Clean Air Act (CAA), 42 U.S.C. 
7521(a), starting with model year 2027. The proposal builds upon EPA's 
final standards for federal greenhouse gas emissions standards for 
passenger cars and light trucks for model years 2023 through 2026. The 
proposed standards would result in significant reductions in emissions 
of criteria pollutants, GHGs, and air toxics, resulting in significant 
benefits for public health and welfare. EPA also estimates that the 
proposal would result in reduced vehicle operating costs for consumers. 
The proposed standards would be phased in over model years 2027 through 
2032. EPA conducted outreach with a wide range of interested 
stakeholders to gather input which was considered in developing the 
proposal, and will continue to engage with the public and all 
interested stakeholders as part of our regulatory development process 
as we develop the final rule.
    Statement of Need: This action is consistent with President Biden's 
Executive Order, ``Strengthening American Leadership in Clean Cars and 
Trucks.''
    Summary of Legal Basis: CAA section 202(a).
    Alternatives: EPA requested comment to address alternative options 
in the proposed rule.
    Anticipated Cost and Benefits: EPA analyzed costs and benefits in 
the proposed rule.
    Risks: EPA evaluated the risks of this rulemaking in the proposed 
rule.
    Timetable:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Action                    Date            FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NPRM................................   05/05/23  88 FR 29184
NPRM Comment Period End.............   07/05/23  .......................
Final Rule..........................   03/00/24  .......................
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No.
    Government Levels Affected: Federal.
    Additional Information:
    Sectors Affected: 811198 All Other Automotive Repair and 
Maintenance; 336111 Automobile Manufacturing; 423110 Automobile and 
Other Motor Vehicle Merchant Wholesalers; 811112 Automotive Exhaust 
System Repair; 81111 Automotive Mechanical and Electrical Repair and 
Maintenance; 336112 Light Truck and Utility Vehicle Manufacturing; 
335312 Motor and Generator Manufacturing.
    Agency Contact: Elizabeth Miller, Environmental Protection Agency, 
Office of Air and Radiation, 2565 Plymouth Road, Ann Arbor, MI 48105, 
Phone: 734 214-4703, Email: [email protected].
    Jessica Mroz, Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Air and 
Radiation, 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20460, Phone: 
202 564-1094, Email: [email protected].
    RIN: 2060-AV49

EPA--OAR

207. Greenhouse Gas Emissions Standards for Heavy-Duty Vehicles--Phase 
3 [2060-AV50]

    Priority: Section 3(f)(1) Significant. Major under 5 U.S.C. 801.
    Legal Authority: 21 U.S.C. 346a; 33 U.S.C. 1318; 33 U.S.C. secs. 
1311, 1314,

[[Page 9489]]

1316, 1317, 1318, 1361; 15 U.S.C. 2003; 33 U.S.C. 1326; 42 U.S.C. 300f; 
42 U.S.C. 242b; 33 U.S.C. 1342; 33 U.S.C. 1345; 42 U.S.C. 1857; 42 
U.S.C. 7542; 42 U.S.C. 6901; 42 U.S.C. 9601; 49 U.S.C. 32901 to 32919q, 
Pub. L. 109-58; 33 U.S.C. 1901; 42 U.S.C. 11023; 15 U.S.C. 2601
    CFR Citation: 40 CFR 1037.1.
    Legal Deadline: None.
    Abstract: On April 12, 2023, EPA announced a proposal for more 
stringent standards to reduce greenhouse gas emissions from HD vehicles 
beginning in model year (MY) 2027. The new standards would be 
applicable to HD vocational vehicles (such as delivery trucks, refuse 
haulers, public utility trucks, transit, shuttle, school buses, etc.) 
and tractors (such as day cabs and sleeper cabs on tractor-trailer 
trucks). Specifically, EPA proposed stronger CO2 standards 
for MY 2027 HD vehicles that go beyond the current standards that apply 
under the HD Phase 2 Greenhouse Gas program. EPA also proposed an 
additional set of CO2 standards for HD vehicles that would 
begin to apply in MY 2028, with progressively more stringent standards 
each model year through 2032. This proposed Phase 3'' greenhouse gas 
program maintains the flexible structure created in EPA's Phase 2 
greenhouse gas program, which is designed to reflect the diverse nature 
of the heavy-duty industry. EPA has conducted outreach with a wide 
range of interested stakeholders to gather input which we have 
considered in developing this proposal, and we will continue to engage 
with the public and all interested stakeholders as part of our 
regulatory development process.
    Statement of Need: This action is consistent with President Biden's 
Executive Order, ``Strengthening American Leadership in Clean Cars and 
Trucks.''
    Summary of Legal Basis: CAA section 202(a).
    Alternatives: EPA requested comment to address alternative options 
in the proposed rule.
    Anticipated Cost and Benefits: EPA analyzed costs and benefits in 
the proposed rule.
    Risks: EPA evaluated the risks of this rulemaking in the proposed 
rule.
    Timetable:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Action                    Date            FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NPRM................................   04/27/23  88 FR 25926
NPRM Comment Period End.............   06/16/23
Final Rule..........................   03/00/24  .......................
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Undetermined.
    Government Levels Affected: None.
    Additional Information:
    Sectors Affected: 811198 All Other Automotive Repair and 
Maintenance; 336111 Automobile Manufacturing; 811112 Automotive Exhaust 
System Repair; 336120 Heavy Duty Truck Manufacturing; 336112 Light 
Truck and Utility Vehicle Manufacturing; 333618 Other Engine Equipment 
Manufacturing; 336212 Truck Trailer Manufacturing.
    Agency Contact: Alex Wang, Environmental Protection Agency, Office 
of Air and Radiation, 2000 Traverwood Dr., Ann Arbor, MI 48105, Phone: 
248 462-3947, Email: [email protected].
    Tuana Phillips, Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Air and 
Radiation, 1200 Pennsylvania NW, Washington, DC 20460, Phone: 202 565-
0074, Email: [email protected].
    RIN: 2060-AV50

EPA--OAR

208. Reconsideration of the National Ambient Air Quality Standards for 
Particulate Matter [2060-AV52]

    Priority: Section 3(f)(1) Significant. Major under 5 U.S.C. 801.
    Legal Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. Clean Air Act
    CFR Citation: 40 CFR 50.
    Legal Deadline: None.
    Abstract: Under the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1977, EPA is 
required to review and if appropriate revise the air quality criteria 
for the primary (health-based) and secondary (welfare-based) national 
ambient air quality standards (NAAQS) every 5 years. On December 18, 
2020, the EPA published a final decision retaining the NAAQS for 
particulate matter (PM), which was the subject of several petitions for 
reconsideration as well as petitions for judicial review. As directed 
in Executive Order 13990, ``Protecting Public Health and the 
Environment and Restoring Science to Tackle the Climate Crisis,'' 
signed by President Biden on January 20, 2021, EPA is undertaking a 
reconsideration of the December 2020 decision to retain the PM NAAQS 
because the available scientific evidence and technical information 
indicate that the current standards may not be adequate to protect 
public health and welfare, as required by the Clean Air Act. As part of 
this reconsideration, EPA developed a Supplement to the 2019 PM 
Integrated Science Assessment (ISA) and a Policy Assessment to take 
into account the most up-to-date science on public health impacts of PM 
and engaged with the chartered Clean Air Scientific Advisory Committee 
(CASAC) and a newly-constituted expert CASAC PM panel. The notice of 
proposed rulemaking was signed on January 5, 2023, and a final rule 
will be issued in fall 2023. EPA proposed to revise the level of the 
primary annual PM2.5 standard from its current level of 12 
[mu]g/m3 to within the range of 9-10 [mu]g/m3. EPA proposed to retain 
all other PM NAAQS, including the primary and secondary 24-hour 
PM2.5 standards, the primary and secondary 24-hour 
PM10 standards, and the secondary annual PM2.5 
standard. EPA also proposed revisions to the Air Quality Index (AQI) 
and monitoring network requirements.
    Statement of Need: Under the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1977, EPA 
is required to review and if appropriate revise the air quality 
criteria and national ambient air quality standards (NAAQS) every 5 
years. On December 18, 2020, EPA published a final rule retaining the 
NAAQS for particulate matter, without revision. On June 10, 2021, EPA 
announced that it is reconsidering the December 2020 decision on the 
air quality standards for PM.
    Summary of Legal Basis: Under the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1977, 
EPA is required to review and if appropriate revise the air quality 
criteria and the primary (health-based) and secondary (welfare-based) 
national ambient air quality standards (NAAQS) every 5 years.
    Alternatives: The main alternative for the Administrator's decision 
on the review of the national ambient air quality standards for 
particulate matter is whether to retain or revise the existing 
standards.
    Anticipated Cost and Benefits: When the Agency proposes revisions 
to the standards, the Agency prepares a Regulatory Impact Analysis 
(RIA) to provide the public with illustrative estimates of the 
potential costs and health and welfare benefits of attaining the 
revised standards. However, the Clean Air Act makes clear that the 
economic and technical feasibility of attaining standards are not to be 
considered in setting or revising the NAAQS, although such factors may 
be considered in the development of state plans to implement the 
standards.
    Risks: The reconsideration builds on the review completed in 2020, 
which included the preparation by EPA of an Integrated Review Plan, an 
Integrated Science Assessment, and a Policy Assessment, which includes 
a risk/exposure assessment, with opportunities for review by the EPA's 
Clean Air Scientific Advisory

[[Page 9490]]

Committee (CASAC) and the public. These documents informed the 
Administrator's final decision to retain the PM standards in 2020. As a 
part of the reconsideration, EPA prepared a Supplement to the 2019 PM 
Integrated Science Assessment and a Policy Assessment, which was 
reviewed at a public meeting by the CASAC. These documents informed the 
Administrator's proposed decisions on whether to revise the PM NAAQS, 
and the Administrator's final decisions on whether to revise the PM 
NAAQS will take into consideration these documents, CASAC advice, and 
public comment on the proposed decision.
    Timetable:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Action                    Date            FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NPRM................................   01/27/23  88 FR 5558
NPRM Comment Period End.............   03/28/23  .......................
Final Rule..........................   12/00/23  .......................
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No.
    Government Levels Affected: None.
    Additional Information: EPA-HQ-OAR-2015-0072.
    Agency Contact: Nicole Hagan, Environmental Protection Agency, 
Office of Air and Radiation, 109 T.W. Alexander Drive, Mail Code C504-
06, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709, Phone: 919 541-3153, Email: 
[email protected].
    Karen Wesson, Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Air and 
Radiation, 109 T.W. Alexander Drive, Mail Code C504-06, Research 
Triangle Park, NC 27711, Phone: 919 541-3515, Email: 
[email protected].
    RIN: 2060-AV52

EPA--OAR

209. NESHAP: Coal- and Oil-Fired Electric Utility Steam Generating 
Units--Review of the Residual Risk and Technology Review [2060-AV53]

    Priority: Section 3(f)(1) Significant. Major under 5 U.S.C. 801.
    Legal Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 to 7671q
    CFR Citation: 40 CFR 63, subpart UUUUU.
    Legal Deadline: None.
    Abstract: On February 16, 2012, EPA promulgated National Emission 
Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants for Coal- and Oil-fired Electric 
Utility Steam Generating Units (77 FR 9304). The rule (40 CFR part 63, 
subpart UUUUU), commonly referred to as the Mercury and Air Toxics 
Standards (MATS), includes standards to control hazardous air pollutant 
(HAP) emissions from new and existing coal- and oil-fired electric 
utility steam generating units (EGUs) located at both major and area 
sources of HAP emissions. There have been several regulatory actions 
regarding MATS since February 2012, including a May 22, 2020, action 
that completed a reconsideration of the appropriate and necessary 
finding for MATS and finalized the residual risk and technology review 
(RTR) conducted for the Coal- and Oil-Fired EGU source category 
regulated under MATS (85 FR 31286). The Biden Administration's 
Executive Order 13990, Protecting Public Health and the Environment and 
Restoring Science To Tackle the Climate Crisis, ``directs all executive 
departments and agencies (agencies) to immediately review and, as 
appropriate and consistent with applicable law, take action to address 
the promulgation of Federal regulations and other actions during the 
last 4 years that conflict with these important national objectives, 
and to immediately commence work to confront the climate crisis.'' 
Section 2(a)(iv) of the Executive Order specifically directs that the 
Administrator consider publishing, as appropriate and consistent with 
applicable law, a proposed rule suspending, revising, or rescinding the 
``National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants: Coal- and 
Oil-Fired Electric Utility Steam Generating Units--Reconsideration of 
Supplemental Finding and Residual Risk and Technology Review,'' 85 FR 
31286 (May 22, 2020). As directed by Executive Order 13990, EPA 
reviewed the RTR portion of the May 22, 2020 final action and, proposed 
to update and strengthen the MATS on April 24, 2023 (88 FR 24854). EPA 
finalized the Revocation of the 2020 Reconsideration and Affirmation of 
the Appropriate and Necessary Supplemental Finding on February 15, 2023 
(88 FR 13956).
    Statement of Need: Executive Order 13990, ``Protecting Public 
Health and the Environment and Restoring Science To Tackle the Climate 
Crisis,'' directs EPA to review the May 2020 RTR. EPA will issue the 
results of the review in a notice of proposed rulemaking and will 
solicit comment on the review.
    Summary of Legal Basis: CAA section 112, 42 U.S.C. 7412, provides 
the legal framework and basis for regulatory actions addressing 
emissions of hazardous air pollutants from stationary sources.
    Alternatives: EPA has evaluated several options for reviewing the 
RTR and will take comment on the review.
    Anticipated Cost and Benefits: EPA projects the present value of 
net benefits to be $2.4 billion to $3.0 billion. This includes $1.2 
billion to $1.9 billion in health benefits, $1.4 billion in climate 
benefits, and compliance costs of $230 million to $330 million. EPA 
projects the estimated annualized value net benefits to be $300 million 
to $350 million. This includes $170 million to $220 million in health 
benefits, $170 million in climate benefits, and compliance costs of $33 
million to $38 million. EPA projects that the proposed changes would 
result in the following emission reductions in the year 2035:

 82 pounds of mercury
 800 tons of fine particulate matter (PM2.5)
 8,800 tons of sulfur dioxide
 8,700 tons of nitrogen oxides
 5 million tons of carbon dioxide

    Risks: The results of the 2020 RTR showed that emissions of HAP 
from coal- and oil-fired power plants have been reduced such that 
residual risk is at in acceptable level. EPA reviewed the 2020 residual 
risk assessment and determined the risk review was conducted using 
approaches and methodologies that are consistent with prior risk 
analyses and reviews for other industrial sectors. Although EPA is not 
reopening the 2020 risk review, the proposed standards under the 
technology review would achieve reductions in HAP emissions from power 
plants and likely to reduce HAP exposures to affected populations.
    Timetable:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Action                    Date            FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NPRM................................   04/24/23  88 FR 24854
Final Rule..........................   04/00/24  .......................
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Undetermined.
    Government Levels Affected: Federal, Local, State.
    Additional Information: EPA-HQ-OAR-2018-0794.
    Sectors Affected: 221122 Electric Power Distribution; 221112 Fossil 
Fuel Electric Power Generation.
    URL For More Information: https://www.epa.gov/stationary-sources-air-pollution/mercury-and-air-toxics-standards.
    Agency Contact: Sarah Benish, Environmental Protection Agency, 
Office of Air and Radiation, 109 T.W. Alexander Drive, Triangle Park, 
NC 27711, Phone: 909 541-5620, Email: [email protected].
    Nick Hutson, Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Air and 
Radiation, 109 T.W. Alexander Drive, Mail Code D243-01, Research 
Triangle Park, NC 27711, Phone: 919 541-2968,

[[Page 9491]]

Fax: 919 541-4991, Email: [email protected].
    RIN: 2060-AV53

EPA--OAR

210. NSPS for the Synthetic Organic Chemical Manufacturing Industry and 
NESHAP for the Synthetic Organic Chemical Manufacturing Industry and 
Group I & II Polymers and Resins Industry [2060-AV71]

    Priority: Section 3(f)(1) Significant. Major under 5 U.S.C. 801.
    Legal Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 to 7671q; 42 U.S.C. 7401
    CFR Citation: 40 CFR 63, subpart F; 40 CFR 63, subpart G; 40 CFR 
63, subpart H; 40 CFR 63, subpart I; 40 CFR 63, subpart U; 40 CFR 63, 
subpart W; 40 CFR 60, subpart VVa; 40 CFR 60, subpart III; 40 CFR 60, 
subpart NNN; 40 CFR 60, subpart RRR.
    Legal Deadline: NPRM, Judicial, December 16, 2022, Texas 
Environmental Justice Advocacy Services et al. v. EPA, 1:20-cv-03733-
RJL consent Decree.
    Final, Judicial, March 29, 2024, Texas Environmental Justice 
Advocacy Services et al. v. EPA, 1:20-cv-03733-RJL consent Decree.
    United States District Court for the District of Columbia, Texas 
Environmental Justice Advocacy Services, California Communities Against 
Toxics Environmental Integrity Project, Louisiana Environmental Action 
Network, Ohio Valley Environmental Council, Rise St. James, and Sierra 
Club Plaintiffs, v. United States Environmental Protection Agency, 
Defendant. Civil Action No. 1:20-cv-03733-RJL.
    Abstract: This action will address the agency's technology review 
under Clean Air Act (CAA) section 112(d)(6) of the National Emission 
Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) for four subparts in 40 
CFR part 63 (subparts F, G, H, and I) which are commonly referred to 
together as the Hazardous Organic NESHAP (HON) and that apply to the 
Synthetic Organic Chemical Manufacturing Industry (SOCMI) and to 
equipment leaks from certain non-SOCMI processes. This action will also 
address the agency's technology review of the NESHAP for two subparts 
in 40 CFR part 63 (subparts U and W) that apply to the Group I and 
Group II Polymers and Resins industries. The HON standards were most 
recently updated when the agency conducted a residual risk and 
technology review (RTR) on December 21, 2006. Similarly, the Group I 
and II Polymers and Resins NESHAP were most recently updated when the 
agency conducted its RTR on December 16, 2008, and April 21, 2011. The 
HON and Group I and II Polymers and Resins NESHAP contain maximum 
achievable control technology (MACT) standards for controlling 
emissions of hazardous air pollutants (HAP) from process vents, storage 
vessels, transfer operations, heat exchange systems, wastewater 
streams, and equipment leaks. The HAP emitted from these emission 
sources include, but are not limited to, ethylene oxide, benzene, 1,3-
butadiene, vinyl chloride, ethylene dichloride, methanol, hexane, 
toluene, xylenes, and chloroprene. The agency also plans to consider 
risks from the SOCMI source category and from the Neoprene Production 
source category in the Group I Polymers and Resins NESHAP during its 
technology review and to ensure the standards continue to provide an 
ample margin of safety to protect public health. Lastly, this action 
will also address the agency's review, under CAA section 111(b)(1)(B), 
of four New Source Performance Standards (NSPS) in 40 CFR part 60 
(subparts III, NNN, RRR, and VVa) for emissions of Volatile Organic 
Compound (VOC) from SOCMI air oxidation unit processes, SOCMI 
distillation operations, SOCMI reactor processes, and equipment leaks 
located at SOCMI sources. These subparts were originally promulgated 
pursuant to section 111(b) of the CAA on June 29,1990 (subparts III and 
NNN), August 31, 1993 (subpart RRR), and November 16, 2007 (subpart 
VVa). On April 25, 2023, the EPA published a proposed rulemaking in the 
Federal Register (see 88 FR 25080) for this action. In addition, the 
EPA has conducted public outreach activities, including hosting an 
informational webinar on April 13, 2023, and holding a public hearing 
on the proposed rulemaking on May 16, 2023.
    Statement of Need: The EPA has a mandatory duty under CAA section 
111 to at least every 8 years, review and, if appropriate, revise its 
NSPS governed by this section of the CAA. Similarly, EPA has a 
mandatory duty under CAA section 112 to at least every 8 years, review, 
and revise as necessary (taking into account developments in practices, 
processes, and control technologies), its NESHAP promulgated under this 
section of the CAA. Thus, this action will address EPA's mandatory 
obligations to conduct such reviews for various NSPS (40 CFR part 60, 
subparts III, NNN, RRR, and VVb) and NESHAP (40 CFR part 63, subparts 
F, G, H, I, U and W) that apply to the chemical industry, for which EPA 
is under a consent decree deadline to finalize such actions. The 
proposed rulemaking for this action was previously published in the 
Federal Register on April 25, 2023 (see 88 FR 25080).
    Summary of Legal Basis: EPA has a mandatory duty to conduct reviews 
of its NSPS and NESHAP under CAA sections 111 and 112, respectively, at 
least every 8 years. Pursuant to a consent deadline of March 29, 2024, 
the Administrator of EPA must sign a final rule containing any 
revisions of EPA's review of various chemical sector rules, including 
various NSPS (40 CFR part 60, subpart III, NNN, RRR, and VVb) and 
NESHAP (40 CFR part 63, subparts F, G, H, I, U, and W) that apply to 
the chemical industry.
    Alternatives: None, as EPA has a mandatory duty to conduct its 
review of these rules and is under a consent decree deadline to do so.
    Anticipated Cost and Benefits: The anticipated costs and benefits 
of the final action are to be determined. For the proposed action that 
published in the Federal Register on April 25, 2023 (see 88 FR 25080), 
EPA estimated the costs of implementing the proposed rules at 
approximately $501 million in total capital costs and approximately 
$190 million a year in total annualized costs. For benefits in the 
proposed action, EPA also estimated the value of the health benefits of 
reducing ozone as result of reducing VOC emissions. EPA estimates that 
the value of those benefits would be $6.3 million in 2024 and could be 
as much as $62 million (2021 dollars, 3 percent discount rate).
    Risks: The EPA is conducting a discretionary residual risk 
assessment in this action under CAA section 112(f)(2) to address 
unacceptable risks from ethylene oxide and chloroprene emissions coming 
from HON and Neoprene Production sources covered under the Group I 
Polymers and Resins NESHAP, respectively.
    Timetable:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Action                    Date            FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NPRM................................   04/25/23  88 FR 25080
NPRM Comment Period End.............   06/26/23  .......................
Final Rule..........................   03/00/24  .......................
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No.
    Small Entities Affected: No.
    Government Levels Affected: None.
    Sectors Affected: 3251 Basic Chemical Manufacturing; 325 Chemical 
Manufacturing.
    Agency Contact: Andrew Bouchard, Environmental Protection Agency, 
Office of Air and Radiation, 109 T.W.

[[Page 9492]]

Alexander Drive, Mail Code E143-01, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709, 
Phone: 919 541-4036, Email: [email protected].
    Njeri Moeller, Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Air and 
Radiation, E143-01, 109 T.W. Alexander Drive, Research Triangle Park, 
NC 27711, Phone: 919 541-1380, Email: [email protected].
    RIN: 2060-AV71

EPA--OFFICE OF CHEMICAL SAFETY AND POLLUTION PREVENTION (OCSPP)

Final Rule Stage

211. Methylene Chloride (MC); Regulation Under the Toxic Substances 
Control Act (TSCA) [2070-AK70]

    Priority: Section 3(f)(1) Significant. Major under 5 U.S.C. 801.
    Unfunded Mandates: This action may affect the private sector under 
Public Law 104-4.
    Legal Authority: 15 U.S.C. 2605 Toxic Substances Control Act
    CFR Citation: 40 CFR 751.
    Legal Deadline: NPRM, Statutory, June 24, 2021, TSCA section 6(c). 
Final, Statutory, June 24, 2022, TSCA section 6(c).
    Abstract: On May 5, 2023, EPA proposed a rule under the Toxic 
Substances Control Act (TSCA) to address the unreasonable risk of 
injury to human health from methylene chloride. TSCA requires that EPA 
address by rule any unreasonable risk of injury to health or the 
environment identified in a TSCA risk evaluation and apply requirements 
to the extent necessary so that the chemical no longer presents 
unreasonable risk. Methylene chloride, also known as dichloromethane, 
is acutely lethal, a neurotoxicant, a likely human carcinogen, and 
presents cancer and non-cancer risks following chronic exposures as 
well as acute risks. Central nervous system depressant effects can 
result in loss of consciousness and respiratory depression, resulting 
in irreversible coma, hypoxia, and eventual death, including 85 
documented fatalities from 1980 to 2018, a majority of which were 
occupational fatalities. Nevertheless, methylene chloride is still a 
widely used solvent in a variety of consumer and commercial 
applications including adhesives and sealants, automotive products, and 
paint and coating removers. To address the identified unreasonable 
risk, EPA proposed to: prohibit the manufacture, processing, and 
distribution in commerce of methylene chloride for consumer use; 
prohibit most industrial and commercial uses of methylene chloride; 
require a workplace chemical protection program (WCPP), which would 
include a requirement to meet inhalation exposure concentration limits 
and exposure monitoring for certain continued conditions of use of 
methylene chloride; require recordkeeping and downstream notification 
requirements for several conditions of use of methylene chloride; and 
provide certain time-limited exemptions from requirements for uses of 
methylene chloride that would otherwise significantly disrupt national 
security and critical infrastructure. The Agency's development of this 
rule incorporated significant stakeholder outreach and public 
participation, including public webinars and over 40 external meetings 
as well as required Federalism, Tribal, and Environmental Justice 
consultations and a Small Businesses Advocacy Review Panel. EPA's risk 
evaluation, describing the conditions of use is in docket EPA-HQ-OPPT-
2019-0437, with the 2022 unreasonable risk determination and additional 
materials in docket EPA-HQ-OPPT-2016-0742.
    Statement of Need: This rulemaking is needed to address the 
unreasonable risk from methylene chloride that was identified in a risk 
evaluation completed under TSCA section 6(b). EPA reviewed the 
exposures and hazards of methylene chloride, the magnitude of risk, 
exposed populations, severity of the hazard, uncertainties, and other 
factors. EPA sought input from the public and peer reviewers as 
required by TSCA and associated regulations.
    Summary of Legal Basis: In accordance with TSCA section 6(a), if 
EPA determines in a final risk evaluation completed under TSCA 6(b) 
that the manufacture, processing, distribution in commerce, use, or 
disposal of a chemical substance or mixture, or that any combination of 
such activities, presents an unreasonable risk of injury to health or 
the environment, the Agency must issue regulations requiring one or 
more of the following actions to the extent necessary so that the 
chemical substance no longer presents an unreasonable risk: (1) 
Prohibit or otherwise restrict manufacture, processing, or distribution 
in commerce of the substance, or limit the amount of the substance 
which may be manufactured, processed, or distributed in commerce; (2) 
Prohibit or otherwise restrict manufacture, processing, or distribution 
in commerce of the substance for a particular use or for a particular 
use above a set concentration, or limit the amount of the substance 
which may be manufactured, processed, or distributed in commerce for a 
particular use or for a particular use above a set concentration; (3) 
Require minimum warnings and instructions with respect to use, 
distribution in commerce, or disposal; (4) Require recordkeeping or 
testing by manufacturers or processors; (5) Prohibit or regulate any 
manner or method of commercial use; (6) Prohibit or regulate any manner 
or method of disposal for commercial purposes; and/or (7) Direct 
manufacturers or processors to give notice of the unreasonable risk to 
distributors, other persons and the public and replace or repurchase 
the substance.
    Alternatives: TSCA section 6(a) requires EPA to address by rule 
chemical substances that the Agency determines present unreasonable 
risk upon completion of a final risk evaluation. TSCA section 6(c) 
requires EPA to consider one or more primary alternative regulatory 
actions as part of the development of a proposed rule under TSCA 
section 6(a). The primary alternative regulatory action for this 
rulemaking would, like the proposed action, prohibit the manufacture, 
processing, and distribution in commerce of methylene chloride for 
consumer use; prohibit most industrial and commercial uses of methylene 
chloride; require a workplace chemical protection program (WCPP), which 
would include a requirement to meet inhalation exposure concentration 
limits and exposure monitoring for certain continued conditions of use 
of methylene chloride; require recordkeeping and downstream 
notification requirements for several conditions of use of methylene 
chloride; and provide certain time-limited exemptions from requirements 
for uses of methylene chloride that would otherwise significantly 
disrupt national security and critical infrastructure. This primary 
alternative regulatory action includes longer compliance timeframes and 
additional uses under workplace chemical protection program, in 
comparison to the proposed action.
    Anticipated Cost and Benefits: EPA's analysis of the incremental, 
non-closure-related costs of this proposed rule is estimated to be 
$13.2 million annualized over 20 years at a 3% discount rate and $14.5 
million annualized over 20 years at a 7% discount rate. The proposed 
rule involves health benefits for the American public, some of which 
can be monetized and others that, while tangible and significant, 
cannot be

[[Page 9493]]

monetized. Although some benefits cannot be quantified, they are not 
necessarily less important than the quantified benefits. The monetized 
benefits of this rule are approximately $17.7 to $18.5 million 
annualized over 20 years at a 3% discount rate and $13.4 to $13.9 
million annualized over 20 years at a 7% discount rate.
    Risks: EPA determined that methylene chloride presents an 
unreasonable risk to human health. EPA must issue risk management 
requirements so that this chemical substance no longer presents an 
unreasonable risk. For more information, visit: https://www.epa.gov/assessing-and-managing-chemicals-under-tsca/risk-management-existing-chemicals-under-tsca.
    Timetable:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Action                    Date            FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NPRM................................   05/03/23  88 FR 28284
NPRM Comment Period End.............   07/03/23  .......................
Final Rule..........................   03/00/24  .......................
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Yes.
    Small Entities Affected: Businesses.
    Government Levels Affected: Federal, State, Tribal.
    Federalism: This action may have federalism implications as defined 
in E.O. 13132.
    International Impacts: This regulatory action will be likely to 
have international trade and investment effects, or otherwise be of 
international interest.
    Additional Information: EPA-HQ-OPPT-2020-0465.
    Sectors Affected: 325 Chemical Manufacturing.
    URL For More Information: https://www.epa.gov/assessing-and-managing-chemicals-under-tsca/risk-management-methylene-chloride.
    Agency Contact: Ingrid Feustel, Environmental Protection Agency, 
Office of Chemical Safety and Pollution Prevention, Mail Code 7404M, 
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20460, Phone: 202 564-3199, 
Email: [email protected].
    Joel Wolf, Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Chemical 
Safety and Pollution Prevention, 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue NW, Mail Code 
7404M, Washington, DC 20460, Phone: 202 564-0432, Email: 
[email protected].
    RIN: 2070-AK70

EPA--OCSPP

212. Carbon Tetrachloride (CTC); Regulation Under the Toxic Substances 
Control Act (TSCA) [2070-AK82]

    Priority: Other Significant.
    Legal Authority: 15 U.S.C. 2605 Toxic Substances Control Act
    CFR Citation: 40 CFR 751.
    Legal Deadline: NPRM, Statutory, November 4, 2021, TSCA section 
6(c). Final, Statutory, November 4, 2022, TSCA section 6(c).
    Abstract: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) proposed to 
address the unreasonable risks of injury to health presented by carbon 
tetrachloride (CTC) under its conditions of use as documented in EPA's 
2020 Risk Evaluation for Carbon Tetrachloride and 2022 Revised 
Unreasonable Risk Determination for Carbon Tetrachloride pursuant to 
the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA). CTC is a volatile, organic 
compound that is primarily used as a feedstock (i.e., processed as a 
reactant) in the making of products such as refrigerants, aerosol 
propellants, and foam-blowing agents. TSCA requires that EPA address by 
rule any unreasonable risk of injury to health or the environment 
identified in a TSCA risk evaluation and apply requirements to the 
extent necessary so that the chemical no longer presents unreasonable 
risk. EPA determined that CTC presents an unreasonable risk of injury 
to health due to cancer from chronic inhalation and dermal exposures 
and liver toxicity from chronic inhalation, chronic dermal, and acute 
dermal exposures in the workplace. To address the identified 
unreasonable risk under TSCA, EPA proposed to establish workplace 
safety requirements for most conditions of use, including the condition 
of use related to the making of low Global Warming Potential (GWP) 
hydrofluoroolefins (HFOs), prohibit the manufacture (including import), 
processing, distribution in commerce, and industrial/commercial use of 
CTC for conditions of use where information indicates use of CTC has 
already been phased out, and establish recordkeeping and downstream 
notification requirements. The use of CTC in low GWP HFOs is 
particularly important in the Agency's efforts to support the American 
Innovation and Manufacturing Act of 2020 (AIM Act) and the Kigali 
Amendment to the Montreal Protocol on Substances that Deplete the Ozone 
Layer, which was ratified on October 26, 2022. The Agency's development 
of this rule incorporates significant stakeholder outreach and public 
participation. EPA engaged in discussions with industry, non-
governmental organizations, other government agencies, technical 
experts and users of CTC, and the general public to hear from users, 
academics, manufacturers, and members of the public health community 
about practices related to commercial uses of CTC; public health 
impacts of CTC; the importance of CTC in the various uses subject to 
this proposed rule; frequently-used substitute chemicals or alternative 
methods or lack thereof; engineering controls, administrative controls, 
and personal protective equipment currently in use or feasibly 
adoptable; and other risk-reduction approaches that may have already 
been adopted or considered for industrial and commercial uses. EPA 
conducted Federalism, Tribal, and Environmental Justice consultations 
and a Small Businesses Advocacy Review Panel. EPA's risk evaluation for 
CTC, describing CTC's conditions of use, is in docket EPA-HQ-OPPT-2019-
0499, with the December 2022 unreasonable risk determination and 
additional information in docket EPA-HQ-OPPT-2016-0733.
    Statement of Need: This rulemaking is needed to address the 
unreasonable risks of Carbon Tetrachloride (CTC) that were identified 
in a risk evaluation completed under TSCA section 6(b). EPA reviewed 
the exposures and hazards of Carbon Tetrachloride uses, the magnitude 
of risk, exposed populations, severity of the hazard, uncertainties, 
and other factors. EPA sought input from the public and peer reviewers 
as required by TSCA and associated regulations.
    Summary of Legal Basis: In accordance with TSCA section 6(a), if 
EPA determines in a final risk evaluation completed under TSCA 6(b) 
that the manufacture, processing, distribution in commerce, use, or 
disposal of a chemical substance or mixture, or that any combination of 
such activities, presents an unreasonable risk of injury to health or 
the environment, the Agency must issue regulations requiring one or 
more of the following actions to the extent necessary so that the 
chemical substance no longer presents an unreasonable risk: (1) 
Prohibit or otherwise restrict manufacture, processing, or distribution 
in commerce of the substance, or limit the amount of the substance 
which may be manufactured, processed, or distributed in commerce; (2) 
Prohibit or otherwise restrict manufacture, processing, or distribution 
in commerce for a particular use or for a particular use above a set 
concentration, or limit the amount of the substance which may

[[Page 9494]]

be manufactured, processed, or distributed in commerce for a particular 
use or for a particular use above a set concentration; (3) Require 
minimum warnings and instructions with respect to use, distribution in 
commerce, or disposal; (4) Require recordkeeping or testing by 
manufacturers or processors; (5) Prohibit or regulate any manner or 
method of commercial use; (6) Prohibit or regulate any manner or method 
of disposal for commercial purposes; and/or (7) Direct manufacturers or 
processors to give notice of the unreasonable risk to distributors, 
other persons, and the public and replace or repurchase the substance.
    Alternatives: TSCA section 6(a) requires EPA to address by rule 
chemical substances that the Agency determines present unreasonable 
risk upon completion of a final risk evaluation. TSCA section 6(c) 
requires that EPA consider one or more primary alternative regulatory 
actions as part of the development of a proposed rule under TSCA 
section 6(a). The proposed primary alternative regulatory action would 
implement workplace chemical protection program (WCPP) requirements, 
including requirements to meet an existing chemical exposure limit 
(ECEL) and Direct Dermal Contact Controls (DDCC) to prevent direct 
dermal contact in the workplace by separating, distancing, physically 
removing, or isolating all person(s) from direct handling of CTC or 
from contact with surfaces that may be contaminated with CTC (i.e., 
equipment or materials on which CTC may be present) under routine 
conditions in the workplace, for those conditions of use that would 
otherwise be prohibited under the proposed rule. The primary 
alternative regulatory action would also require compliance with 
prescriptive controls--specifically requirements for respirators and 
dermal PPE--for those conditions of use where an ECEL and DDCC are the 
proposed regulatory action and where PPE may address the unreasonable 
risk. This approach differs from the proposed regulatory action because 
it would not require the use of elimination, substitution, engineering 
controls, and administrative controls, in accordance with the hierarchy 
of controls, to the extent feasible as a means of controlling 
inhalation and dermal exposures. The primary alternative regulatory 
action would apply the same recordkeeping requirements, downstream 
notification requirements, and compliance timeframes as those specified 
in the proposed rule.
    Anticipated Cost and Benefits: EPA's estimate of the incremental 
costs of the proposed rule is $18.8 million per year annualized over 
20-years at a 3% discount rate and $18.5 million per year at a 7% 
discount rate. The costs are estimated as incremental to baseline 
conditions, including current use of personal protective equipment. The 
costs represent a high-end cost estimate because the high estimates for 
the number of entities and workers affected by the regulation were 
used. To the extent that EPA's approach overestimates the number of 
entities subject to the regulation, actual realized costs of this 
action will be lower. The monetized benefits of the proposed rule are 
from avoided cases of adrenal and liver cancers. The estimated 
monetized benefit of the proposed regulatory action ranges from 
approximately $0.09 to $0.1 million per year annualized over 20-years 
at a 3% discount rate and from $0.04 to $0.07 million per year at a 7% 
discount rate. There are also non-monetized benefits due to other 
potential avoided adverse health effects associated with CTC exposure, 
including liver, reproductive, renal, developmental, and central 
nervous system (CNS) toxicity endpoints.
    Risks: As EPA determined in the TSCA section 6(b) risk evaluation, 
Carbon Tetrachloride presents unreasonable risks to human health. EPA 
must issue risk management requirements so that this chemical substance 
no longer presents an unreasonable risk. For more information, visit: 
https://www.epa.gov/assessing-and-managing-chemicals-under-tsca/risk-management-existing-chemicals-under-tsca.
    Timetable:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Action                    Date            FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NPRM................................   07/28/23  88 FR 49180
Final Rule..........................   08/00/24  .......................
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No.
    Government Levels Affected: Federal.
    Federalism: This action may have federalism implications as defined 
in E.O. 13132.
    International Impacts: This regulatory action will be likely to 
have international trade and investment effects, or otherwise be of 
international interest.
    Additional Information: EPA-HQ-OPPT-2020-0592.
    Sectors Affected: 325199 All Other Basic Organic Chemical 
Manufacturing; 325998 All Other Miscellaneous Chemical Product and 
Preparation Manufacturing; 327310 Cement Manufacturing; 325 Chemical 
Manufacturing; 325194 Cyclic Crude, Intermediate, and Gum and Wood 
Chemical Manufacturing; 327992 Ground or Treated Mineral and Earth 
Manufacturing; 562211 Hazardous Waste Treatment and Disposal; 325120 
Industrial Gas Manufacturing; 331410 Nonferrous Metal (except Aluminum) 
Smelting and Refining; 327 Nonmetallic Mineral Product Manufacturing; 
325180 Other Basic Inorganic Chemical Manufacturing; 325320 Pesticide 
and Other Agricultural Chemical Manufacturing; 325110 Petrochemical 
Manufacturing; 325211 Plastics Material and Resin Manufacturing; 331 
Primary Metal Manufacturing; 562213 Solid Waste Combustors and 
Incinerators; 562 Waste Management and Remediation Services.
    URL For More Information: https://www.epa.gov/assessing-and-managing-chemicals-under-tsca/risk-management-carbon-tetrachloride.
    Agency Contact: Claudia Menasche, Environmental Protection Agency, 
Office of Chemical Safety and Pollution Prevention, 1200 Pennsylvania 
Avenue NW, Mail Code 7405M, Washington, DC 20460, Phone: 202 564-3391, 
Email: [email protected].
    Ana Corado, Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Chemical 
Safety and Pollution Prevention, 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue NW, Mail Code 
7404M, Washington, DC 20460, Phone: 202 564-0140, Email: 
[email protected].
    RIN: 2070-AK82

EPA--OCSPP

213. Perchloroethylene (PCE); Regulation Under the Toxic Substances 
Control Act (TSCA) [2070-AK84]

    Priority: Section 3(f)(1) Significant. Major under 5 U.S.C. 801.
    Legal Authority: 15 U.S.C. 2605 Toxic Substances Control Act
    CFR Citation: 40 CFR 751.
    Legal Deadline: NPRM, Statutory, December 28, 2021, TSCA sec. 6(c). 
Final, Statutory, December 28, 2021, TSCA sec. 6(c).
    Abstract: On June 16, 2023, EPA proposed a rule under the Toxic 
Substances Control Act (TSCA) to address the unreasonable risk of 
injury to health from perchloroethylene (PCE). TSCA requires that EPA 
address by rule any unreasonable risk identified in a TSCA risk 
evaluation and apply requirements to the extent necessary so the 
chemical no longer presents unreasonable risk. PCE is a widely used 
solvent in a variety of occupational and consumer applications 
including fluorinated compound production, petroleum manufacturing, dry 
cleaning,

[[Page 9495]]

and aerosol degreasing. EPA determined that PCE presents an 
unreasonable risk of injury to health due to the significant adverse 
health effects associated with exposure to PCE, including neurotoxicity 
effects from acute and chronic inhalation exposures and dermal 
exposures, and cancer from chronic inhalation exposures to PCE. TSCA 
requires that EPA address by rule any unreasonable risk of injury to 
health or the environment identified in a TSCA risk evaluation and 
apply requirements to the extent necessary so the chemical no longer 
presents unreasonable risk. PCE, also known as perc and 
tetrachloroethylene, is a neurotoxicant and a likely human carcinogen. 
Neurotoxicity, in particular impaired visual and cognitive function and 
diminished color discrimination, are the most sensitive adverse effects 
driving the unreasonable risk of PCE, and other adverse effects 
associated with exposure include central nervous system depression, 
kidney and liver effects, immune system toxicity, developmental 
toxicity, and cancer. To address the identified unreasonable risk, EPA 
proposed to prohibit most industrial and commercial uses of PCE; the 
manufacture (including import), processing, and distribution in 
commerce of PCE for the prohibited industrial and commercial uses; the 
manufacture (including import), processing, and distribution in 
commerce of PCE for all consumer use; and, the manufacture (including 
import), processing, distribution in commerce, and use of PCE in dry 
cleaning and related spot cleaning through a 10-year phaseout. For 
certain conditions of use that would not be subject to a prohibition, 
EPA also proposed to require a PCE workplace chemical protection 
program that includes requirements to meet an inhalation exposure 
concentration limit and prevent direct dermal contact. EPA also 
proposed to require prescriptive workplace controls for laboratory use, 
and to establish recordkeeping and downstream notification 
requirements. Additionally, EPA proposed to provide certain time-
limited exemptions from requirements for certain critical or essential 
emergency uses of PCE for which no technically and economically 
feasible safer alternative is available. The Agency's development of 
this rule incorporated significant stakeholder outreach and public 
participation, including public webinars and over 40 external meetings 
as well as required Federalism, Tribal, and Environmental Justice 
consultations and a Small Businesses Advocacy Review Panel. EPA's risk 
evaluation for PCE, describing the conditions of use is in docket EPA-
HQ-OPPT-2019-0502, with the 2022 unreasonable risk determination and 
additional materials in docket EPA-HQ-OPPT-2016-0732.
    Statement of Need: This rulemaking is needed to address the 
unreasonable risk from PCE that was identified in a risk evaluation 
completed under TSCA section 6(b). EPA reviewed the exposures and 
hazards of PCE, the magnitude of risk, exposed populations, severity of 
the hazard, uncertainties, and other factors. EPA sought input from the 
public and peer reviewers as required by TSCA and associated 
regulations.
    Summary of Legal Basis: In accordance with TSCA section 6(a), if 
EPA determines in a final risk evaluation completed under TSCA 6(b) 
that the manufacture, processing, distribution in commerce, use, or 
disposal of a chemical substance or mixture, or that any combination of 
such activities, presents an unreasonable risk of injury to health or 
the environment, the Agency must issue regulations requiring one or 
more of the following actions to the extent necessary so that the 
chemical substance no longer presents an unreasonable risk: (1) 
Prohibit or otherwise restrict manufacture, processing, or distribution 
in commerce of the substance, or limit the amount of the substance 
which may be manufactured, processed, or distributed in commerce; (2) 
Prohibit or otherwise restrict manufacture, processing, or distribution 
in commerce of the substance for a particular use or for a particular 
use above a set concentration, or limit the amount of the substance 
which may be manufactured, processed, or distributed in commerce for a 
particular use or for a particular use above a set concentration; (3) 
Require minimum warnings and instructions with respect to use, 
distribution in commerce, or disposal; (4) Require recordkeeping or 
testing by manufacturers or processors; (5) Prohibit or regulate any 
manner or method of commercial use; (6) Prohibit or regulate any manner 
or method of disposal for commercial purposes; and/or (7) Direct 
manufacturers or processors to give notice of the unreasonable risk to 
distributors, other persons and the public and replace or repurchase 
the substance.
    Alternatives: TSCA section 6(a) requires EPA to address by rule 
chemical substances that the Agency determines present unreasonable 
risk upon completion of a final risk evaluation. TSCA section 6(c) 
requires EPA to consider one or more primary alternative regulatory 
actions as part of the development of a proposed rule under TSCA 
section 6(a). The primary alternative regulatory action for this 
rulemaking includes longer compliance timeframes and prohibits fewer 
uses than the proposed regulatory action. This primary alternative 
regulatory action would prohibit most industrial and commercial uses of 
PCE; prohibit the manufacture (including import), processing, and 
distribution in commerce of PCE for the prohibited industrial and 
commercial uses; prohibit the manufacture (including import), 
processing, and distribution in commerce of PCE for all consumer use; 
prohibit the manufacture (including import), processing, distribution 
in commerce, and use of PCE in dry cleaning and related spot cleaning 
through a 15-year phaseout; require prescriptive workplace controls for 
certain conditions of use; and require a workplace chemical protection 
program for certain conditions of use. The second alternative 
regulatory action for this rulemaking includes shorter compliance 
timeframes and prohibits more uses than the proposed regulatory action. 
This second alternative regulatory action would prohibit most 
industrial and commercial uses of PCE; prohibit the manufacture 
(including import), processing, and distribution in commerce of PCE for 
the prohibited industrial and commercial uses; prohibit the manufacture 
(including import), processing, and distribution in commerce of PCE for 
all consumer use; prohibit the manufacture (including import), 
processing, distribution in commerce, and use of PCE in dry cleaning 
and related spot cleaning through a 5-year phaseout; require a 
workplace chemical protection program that includes requirements to 
meet an inhalation exposure concentration limit and prevent direct 
dermal contact for certain conditions of use; require prescriptive 
workplace controls for laboratory use; and provide certain time-limited 
exemptions from requirements for several conditions of use of PCE that 
would otherwise significantly disrupt national security or critical 
infrastructure.
    Anticipated Cost and Benefits: The monetized costs for this 
proposed rule are estimated to range from $14.0 million annualized over 
20 years at a 3% discount rate and $14.3 million annualized over 20 
years at a 7% discount rate. The monetized benefits are estimated to be 
$10.2 to $46.3 million annualized over 20 years at a 3% discount rate 
and $4.72 million to $29.4 million annualized over 20 years

[[Page 9496]]

at a 7% discount rate. EPA believes that the balance of costs and 
benefits of this proposal cannot be fairly described without 
considering the additional, non-monetized benefits of mitigating the 
non-cancer adverse effects. These effects may include neurotoxicity, 
kidney toxicity, liver toxicity, immunological and hematological 
effects, reproductive effects, and developmental effects.
    Risks: EPA determined that PCE presents an unreasonable risk to 
human health. EPA must issue risk management requirements so that this 
chemical substance no longer presents an unreasonable risk. For more 
information, visit: https://www.epa.gov/assessing-and-managing-chemicals-under-tsca/risk-management-existing-chemicals-under-tsca.
    Timetable:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Action                    Date            FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NPRM................................   06/16/23  88 FR 39652
NPRM Comment Period End.............   08/15/23  .......................
Final Rule..........................   07/00/24  .......................
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Yes.
    Small Entities Affected: Businesses.
    Government Levels Affected: Federal, State.
    Federalism: This action may have federalism implications as defined 
in E.O. 13132.
    International Impacts: This regulatory action will be likely to 
have international trade and investment effects, or otherwise be of 
international interest.
    Additional Information: EPA-HQ-OPPT-2020-0720.
    Sectors Affected: 325 Chemical Manufacturing.
    URL For More Information: https://www.epa.gov/assessing-and-managing-chemicals-under-tsca/risk-management-perchloroethylene.
    Agency Contact: Kelly Summers, Environmental Protection Agency, 
Office of Chemical Safety and Pollution Prevention, 1200 Pennsylvania 
Avenue NW, Mail Code 7405M, Washington, DC 20460, Phone: 202 564-2201, 
Email: [email protected].
    Joel Wolf, Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Chemical 
Safety and Pollution Prevention, 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue NW, Mail Code 
7404M, Washington, DC 20460, Phone: 202 564-0432, Email: 
[email protected].
    RIN: 2070-AK84

EPA--OCSPP

214. Asbestos Part 1 (Chrysotile Asbestos); Regulation of Certain 
Conditions of Use Under the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) [2070-
AK86]

    Priority: Section 3(f)(1) Significant. Major under 5 U.S.C. 801.
    Unfunded Mandates: This action may affect the private sector under 
Public Law 104-4.
    Legal Authority: 15 U.S.C. 2605 Toxic Substances Control Act
    CFR Citation: 40 CFR 751.
    Legal Deadline: NPRM, Statutory, December 28, 2021, TSCA sec. 6(c).
    Final, Statutory, December 28, 2022, TSCA sec. 6(c).
    Abstract: This action will address the unreasonable risk of injury 
to health presented by conditions of use of chrysotile asbestos. 
Section 6(a) of the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) requires that 
EPA address by rule any unreasonable risk identified in a TSCA risk 
evaluation and apply requirements to the extent necessary so that the 
relevant chemical substance no longer presents such risk. Therefore, to 
address the unreasonable risk identified in the TSCA Risk Evaluation 
for Asbestos, Part 1: Chrysotile Asbestos, EPA proposed on April 12, 
2022, to prohibit manufacture (including import), processing, 
distribution in commerce and commercial use of chrysotile asbestos for 
chrysotile asbestos diaphragms for use in the chlor-alkali industry, 
chrysotile asbestos-containing sheet gaskets used in chemical 
production, chrysotile asbestos-containing brake blocks used in the oil 
industry, aftermarket automotive chrysotile asbestos-containing brakes/
linings, other chrysotile asbestos-containing vehicle friction 
products, and other chrysotile asbestos-containing gaskets. EPA also 
proposed to prohibit manufacture (including import), processing, and 
distribution in commerce of aftermarket automotive chrysotile asbestos-
containing brakes/linings for consumer use, and other chrysotile 
asbestos-containing gaskets for consumer use. Finally, EPA also 
proposed disposal and recordkeeping requirements for these conditions 
of use. EPA is reviewing the comments received and intends to develop a 
final rule.) EPA consulted with State, local and Tribal governments, 
and conducted extensive public outreach during the development of this 
rulemaking. EPA held discussions with industry, non-governmental 
organizations, other national governments, asbestos experts, other 
government agencies, users of chrysotile asbestos, and the general 
public on how long industry would need to implement a prohibition. 
These meetings helped to inform the timeline for implementation of a 
prohibition, EPA's understanding of how companies currently protect 
workers and the extent to which each industry uses asbestos-free 
technology. EPA also held a public webinar to provide an overview of 
the TSCA risk management process including the findings in the Part 1 
risk evaluation. In addition, EPA published a notice of data 
availability on March 17, 2023 to solicit public comments on additional 
data received by EPA related to the proposed rule. The additional data 
pertain to chrysotile asbestos diaphragms used in the chlor-alkali 
industry and chrysotile asbestos-containing sheet gaskets used in 
chemical production and may be used by EPA in the development of the 
final rule, including EPA's determination of what constitutes as soon 
as practicable'' with regard to the proposed chrysotile asbestos 
prohibition compliance dates for these uses. EPA is reviewing the 
comments received and intends to develop a final rule.
    Statement of Need: This rulemaking is needed to address the 
unreasonable risk of chrysotile asbestos identified in the Risk 
Evaluation for Asbestos Part I: Chrysotile Asbestos completed under 
TSCA section 6(b). EPA reviewed the exposures and hazards of the 
chrysotile asbestos uses evaluated in the risk evaluation, the 
magnitude of risk, exposed populations, severity of the hazard, 
uncertainties, and other factors. EPA sought input from the public and 
peer reviewers as required by TSCA and associated regulations.
    Summary of Legal Basis: In accordance with TSCA section 6(a), if 
EPA determines in a final risk evaluation completed under TSCA 6(b) 
that the manufacture, processing, distribution in commerce, use, or 
disposal of a chemical substance or mixture, or that any combination of 
such activities, presents an unreasonable risk of injury to health or 
the environment, the Agency must issue regulations requiring one or 
more of the following actions to the extent necessary so that the 
chemical substance no longer presents an unreasonable risk: (1) 
Prohibit or otherwise restrict manufacture, processing, or distribution 
in commerce; (2) Prohibit or otherwise restrict for a particular use or 
above a set concentration; (3) Require minimum warnings and 
instructions with respect to use, distribution in commerce, or 
disposal; (4) Require recordkeeping or testing; (5) Prohibit or 
regulate any manner or method of commercial use; (6) Prohibit or 
regulate any manner or

[[Page 9497]]

method of disposal; and/or (7) Direct manufacturers or processors to 
give notice of the unreasonable risk to distributors and replace or 
repurchase products if required.
    Alternatives: TSCA section 6(a) requires EPA to address by rule 
chemical substances that the Agency determines present unreasonable 
risk upon completion of a final risk evaluation. As required under TSCA 
section 6(c), EPA considered one or more primary alternative regulatory 
actions as part of the development of the proposed rule. The primary 
alternative regulatory action considered by EPA in the proposed rule is 
to: prohibit manufacture (including import), processing, distribution 
in commerce and commercial use of chrysotile asbestos in bulk form or 
as part of: Chrysotile asbestos diaphragms in the chlor-alkali industry 
and for chrysotile asbestos-containing sheet gaskets in chemical 
production (with prohibitions taking effect five years after the 
effective date of the final rule) and require, prior to the prohibition 
taking effect, compliance with an existing chemicals exposure limit 
(ECEL) for the processing and commercial use of chrysotile asbestos for 
these uses; and to prohibit manufacture (including import), processing, 
distribution in commerce, and commercial use of chrysotile asbestos-
containing brake blocks in the oil industry; aftermarket automotive 
chrysotile asbestos-containing brakes/linings; and other vehicle 
friction products (with prohibitions taking effect two years after the 
effective date of the final rule and with additional requirements for 
disposal). The primary alternative regulatory action considered in the 
proposed rule also included prohibitions on manufacture (including 
import), processing, and distribution in commerce of aftermarket 
automotive chrysotile asbestos-containing brakes/linings for consumer 
use and other chrysotile asbestos-containing gaskets for consumer use 
(with prohibitions taking effect two years after the effective date of 
the final rule). The primary alternative regulatory action also would 
require disposal of chrysotile asbestos-containing materials in a 
manner identical to the proposed option, with additional provisions for 
downstream notification and signage and labeling. EPA did not consider 
additional alternative regulatory actions in the proposed rule.
    Anticipated Cost and Benefits: As estimated in the proposed rule, 
converting the asbestos diaphragm cells to membrane cells in response 
to the proposed rule is predicted to require an incremental investment 
of approximately $1.8 billion across all nine plants predicted to be 
using asbestos diaphragms when the rule goes into effect. Compared to 
this baseline trend, the incremental net effect of the proposed rule on 
the chlor-alkali industry over a 20-year period using a 3 percent 
discount rate is estimated to range from an annualized cost of about 
$49 million per year to annualized savings of approximately $35 million 
per year, depending on whether the higher grade of caustic soda 
produced by membrane cells continues to command a premium price. Using 
a 7 percent discount rate, the incremental annualized net effect ranges 
from a cost of $87 million per year to savings of approximately $40,000 
per year, again depending on whether there are revenue gains from the 
caustic soda production. EPA also estimates that approximately 1,800 
sets of automotive brakes or brake linings containing asbestos may be 
imported into the U.S. each year, representing 0.002% of the total U.S. 
market for aftermarket brakes. The cost of a prohibition would be 
minimal due to the ready availability of alternative products that are 
only slightly more expensive (an average cost increase of $4 per 
brake). The proposed rule is estimated to result in total annualized 
costs for aftermarket automotive brakes of approximately $25,000 per 
year using a 3% discount rate and $18,000 per year using a 7% discount 
rate. EPA did not have information to estimate the costs of prohibiting 
asbestos for the remaining uses subject to the proposed rule (sheet 
gaskets used in chemical production, brake blocks in the oil industry, 
other vehicle friction products, or other gaskets), so there are 
additional unquantified costs. EPA believes that the use of these 
asbestos-containing products has declined over time, and that they are 
now used in at most small segments of the industries. EPA's Economic 
Analysis for the proposed rule quantified the benefits from avoided 
cases of lung cancer, mesothelioma, ovarian cancer, and laryngeal 
cancer due to reduced asbestos exposures to workers, occupational non-
users (ONUs), and DIYers related to the rule's requirements for chlor-
alkali diaphragms, sheet gaskets for chemical production, and 
aftermarket brakes. The combined national quantified benefits of 
avoided cancer cases associated with these products are approximately 
$3,100 per year using a 3% discount rate and $1,200 per year using a 7% 
discount rate, based on the cancer risk estimates from the Part 1 risk 
evaluation. EPA did not estimate the aggregate benefits of the 
requirements for oilfield brake blocks, other vehicle friction products 
or other gaskets because the Agency did not have sufficient information 
on the number of individuals likely to be affected by the proposed 
rule. Thus, as proposed, the rule may yield additional unquantified 
benefits from reducing exposures associated with these uses. There 
would also be unquantified benefits due to other avoided adverse health 
effects associated with asbestos exposure including respiratory effects 
(e.g., asbestosis, non-malignant respiratory disease, deficits in 
pulmonary function, diffuse pleural thickening and pleural plaques) and 
immunological and lymphoreticular effects. In addition to the benefits 
of avoided adverse health effects associated with chrysotile asbestos 
exposure, the proposed rule is expected to generate significant 
benefits from reduced air pollution associated with electricity 
generation. Based on a sensitivity screening-level analysis that EPA 
conducted, converting asbestos diaphragm cells to membrane cells could 
yield tens of millions of dollars per year in environmental and health 
benefits from reduced emissions of particulate matter, sulfur dioxide, 
nitrogen oxides, and carbon dioxide.
    Risks: In the TSCA Risk Evaluation for Asbestos, Part 1: Chrysotile 
Asbestos, EPA determined there is unreasonable risk of injury to health 
from conditions of use of chrysotile asbestos. The health endpoint 
driving EPA's determination of unreasonable risk for chrysotile 
asbestos under the conditions of use is cancer from inhalation 
exposure. This unreasonable risk includes the risk of mesothelioma, 
lung cancer, and other cancers from chronic inhalation.
    Timetable:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Action                    Date            FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NPRM................................   04/12/22  87 FR 21706
Notice of Data Availability.........   03/17/23  88 FR 16389
Final Rule..........................   01/00/24  .......................
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No.
    Small Entities Affected: Businesses.
    Government Levels Affected: Federal.
    Federalism: This action may have federalism implications as defined 
in E.O. 13132.
    International Impacts: This regulatory action will be likely to 
have international trade and investment effects, or otherwise be of 
international interest.
    Additional Information: EPA-HQ-OPPT-2021-0057.
    Sectors Affected: 8111 Automotive Repair and Maintenance; 325 
Chemical

[[Page 9498]]

Manufacturing; 332 Fabricated Metal Product Manufacturing; 339991 
Gasket, Packing, and Sealing Device Manufacturing; 4231 Motor Vehicle 
and Motor Vehicle Parts and Supplies Merchant Wholesalers; 441 Motor 
Vehicle and Parts Dealers; 211 Oil and Gas Extraction; 336 
Transportation Equipment Manufacturing.
    URL For More Information: https://www.epa.gov/assessing-and-managing-chemicals-under-tsca/risk-management-asbestos-part-1-chrysotile-asbestos.
    Agency Contact: Peter Gimlin, Environmental Protection Agency, 
Office of Chemical Safety and Pollution Prevention, 1200 Pennsylvania 
Avenue NW, Mail Code 7404M, Washington, DC 20460, Phone: 202 566-0515, 
Fax: 202 566-0473, Email: [email protected].
    Ana Corado, Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Chemical 
Safety and Pollution Prevention, 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue NW, Mail Code 
7404M, Washington, DC 20460, Phone: 202 564-0140, Email: 
[email protected].
    RIN: 2070-AK86

EPA--OCSPP

215. Reconsideration of the Dust-Lead Hazard Standards and Dust-Lead 
Post Abatement Clearance Levels [2070-AK91]

    Priority: Section 3(f)(1) Significant. Major under 5 U.S.C. 801.
    Unfunded Mandates: This action may affect State, local or tribal 
governments and the private sector.
    Legal Authority: 15 U.S.C. 2681; 15 U.S.C. 2682; 15 U.S.C. 2683; 15 
U.S.C. 2684; 15 U.S.C. 2686; 42 U.S.C. 4851b; 42 U.S.C. 4852d
    CFR Citation: 40 CFR 745.
    Legal Deadline: None.
    Abstract: Addressing childhood lead exposure is a priority for the 
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). This rule addresses health 
concerns for all affected communities, including children living in 
communities with environmental justice concerns, who have significantly 
higher blood lead levels (BLLs) than other children. As part of EPA's 
efforts to reduce childhood lead exposure, and in accordance with a 
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit 2021 opinion, EPA proposed 
to lower the dust-lead hazard standards (DLHS) from 10 micrograms per 
square foot ([mu]g/ft2) and 100 [mu]g/ft2 for floors and window sills 
to any reportable level as analyzed by a laboratory recognized by EPA's 
National Lead Laboratory Accreditation Program. This is a non-numeric 
value that the Agency refers to as greater than zero [mu]g/ft2 and may 
vary based on laboratory or test. While EPA's DLHS do not compel 
property owners or occupants to evaluate their property for lead-based 
paint (LBP) hazards nor take control actions (40 CFR 745.61(c)), if an 
LBP activity such as an abatement is performed, then EPA's regulations 
set requirements for doing so (40 CFR 745.220(d)). EPA also proposed to 
change the dust-lead clearance levels (DLCL), which are the values used 
to determine when abatement work can be considered complete, from 10 
[mu]g/ft2, 100 [mu]g/ft2 and 400 [mu]g/ft2 for floors, window sills, 
and window troughs to 3 [mu]g/ft2, 20 [mu]g/ft2, and 25 [mu]g/ft2, 
respectively. Under this proposal, the DLHS for floors and window sills 
would not be the same as the DLCL for floors and window sills (i.e., 
the DLHS and DLCL would be decoupled). Accordingly, dust-lead hazards 
could remain after an abatement due to the different statutory 
direction that Congress provided EPA with respect to the DLCL. 
Additionally, EPA proposed to change the definition of abatement so 
that the recommendation for action applies when dust-lead loadings are 
at or above the DLCL, as well as several other amendments, including 
revising the definition of target housing to conform with the statute. 
The Agency consulted with State, local and Tribal government officials 
during the rulemaking, and held a public webinar in summer of 2023.
    Statement of Need: On July 9, 2019, EPA promulgated a final rule to 
lower the DLHS from 40 micrograms of lead per square foot ([mu]g/ft2) 
to 10 [mu]g/ft2 for floors, and from 250 [mu]g/ft2 to 100 [mu]g/ft2 for 
window sills. EPA's dust-lead clearance levels (DLCL) indicate the 
amount of lead in dust on a surface following the completion of an 
abatement activity. On January 6, 2021, EPA promulgated a final rule to 
lower the DLCL from 40 [mu]g/ft2 to 10 [mu]g/ft2 for floors, and from 
250 [mu]g/ft2 to 100 [mu]g/ft2 for window sills. The Agency began a 
reconsideration of the July 2019 and January 2021 final rules in 
keeping with Executive Order 13990 (addressing the protection of public 
health and the environment and restoring science to tackle the climate 
crisis). In addition, on May 14, 2021, the United States Court of 
Appeals for the Ninth Circuit issued an opinion to remand without 
vacatur the 2019 DLHS final rule and directed EPA to reconsider the 
2019 DLHS rule in conjunction with a reconsideration of the DLCL. EPA 
proposed its reconsideration rule on August 1, 2023.
    Summary of Legal Basis: EPA proposed this rule under the authority 
of sections 401, 402, 403, 404, and 406 of the Toxic Substances Control 
Act (TSCA), 15 U.S.C. 2601 et seq., as amended by Title X of the 
Housing and Community Development Act of 1992 (also known as the 
Residential Lead-Based Paint Hazard Reduction Act of 1992 or ``Title 
X'') (Pub. L. 102-550), and section 237(c) of Title II of Division K of 
the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2017 (Pub. L. 115-31), as well as 
sections 1004 and 1018 of Title X (42 U.S.C. 4851b, 4852d), as amended 
by section 237(b) of Title II of Division K of the Consolidated 
Appropriations Act, 2017.
    Alternatives: EPA considered 2 alternative approaches for revising 
the DLHS and 1 alternative approach for revising the DLCL. One of the 
alternative approaches for revising the DLHS is a numeric standard 
based on the probability of exceedance of one or more IQ or BLL metrics 
as determined by the Agency. The other alternative approach for 
revising the DLHS would use the background dust-lead levels of housing 
built in 1978 and beyond as the DLHS (known as ``post-1977 
background''). For the numeric standard approach, EPA evaluated several 
numeric DLHS candidates that the Agency believed to be appropriate 
given the health and exposure metrics of interest. The numeric DLHS 
candidates were 1/10 [mu]g/ft2 (i.e., 1 [mu]g/ft2 for floors and 10 
[mu]g/ft2 for sills), 2/20 [mu]g/ft2, 3/30 [mu]g/ft2, and 5/40 [mu]g/
ft2 and those values were compared to the specified BLL and IQ metrics 
to estimate the probability of exceeding the BLL or IQ targets. The 
post-1977 background approach would establish the DLHS for target 
housing and COFs using post-1977 background dust-lead levels, and 
address disparities in the dust-lead levels that children in target 
housing may be exposed to and the corresponding disparate health risks. 
This approach would also align with the focus of Title X on lead 
hazards in housing constructed before 1978. Using this approach, DLHS 
would be established at 0.2 [mu]g/ft2 for floors and 0.8 [mu]g/ft2 for 
window sills as the dust-lead levels that would result in adverse human 
health effects. The alternative approach EPA considered for revising 
the DLCL would be to employ the current enforceable levels established 
by the New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene of 5 
[mu]g/ft2 for floors, 40 [mu]g/ft2 for window sills and 100 [mu]g/ft2 
for window troughs.
    Anticipated Cost and Benefits: EPA analyzed the potential 
incremental impacts associated with this rulemaking. The analysis 
focused specifically on the subset of target

[[Page 9499]]

housing and child-occupied facilities affected by this rulemaking. 
Although the DLHS and DLCL do not compel specific actions under the LBP 
Activities Rule to address identified LBP hazards, the DLHS and DLCL 
are directly incorporated by reference into certain requirements 
mandated by HUD in the housing subject to HUD's Lead Safe Housing Rule 
(LSHR). As such, the analysis estimates incremental costs and benefits 
for two categories of events: (1) where dust-wipe testing occurs to 
comply with the LSHR and (2) where dust wipe testing occurs in response 
to blood lead testing that detects a blood lead level (BLL) above state 
or Federal action levels. This rule would result in reduced exposure to 
lead, yielding benefits to residents of pre-1978 housing from avoided 
adverse health effects. For the subset of adverse health effects that 
were quantified (i.e., the effect of avoided IQ decreases on lifetime 
earnings as an indicator of improved cognitive function), the estimated 
monetized and annualized benefits are $1.069 billion to $4.684 billion 
per year using a 3% discount rate, and $231 million to $1.013 billion 
per year using a 7% discount rate. These benefits calculations are 
sensitive to the discount rate used and the range in the estimated 
number of lead hazard reduction events triggered by children with 
tested BLLs above state or Federal action levels. With respect to the 
latter, the wide range is driven largely by uncertainty about the BLLs 
at which action might be taken, since in many states the action level 
is currently higher than the Federal blood lead reference value. 
Additionally, there are unquantified benefits. These additional 
benefits include avoided adverse health effects in children, including 
decreased attention-related behavioral problems, decreased cognitive 
performance, reduced post-natal growth, delayed puberty, and decreased 
kidney function. These additional unquantified benefits also include 
avoided adverse health effects in adults, including cardiovascular 
mortality and impacts on reproductive function and outcomes. This rule 
is estimated to result in quantified costs of $536 million to $784 
million per year using both a 3% and a 7% discount rate. These costs 
are expected to accrue to landlords, owners and operators of child-
occupied facilities, residential remodelers, and abatement firms. Real 
estate agents and brokers may incur negligible costs related to the 
target housing definition amendment. The cost calculations are highly 
sensitive to the range in the estimated number of lead hazard reduction 
events triggered by children with elevated BLLs. In the events affected 
by this rule, incremental costs can be incurred for specialized 
cleaning used to reduce dust-lead loadings (i.e., quantity of lead per 
unit of surface area) to below the clearance levels. In some instances, 
floors will also be sealed, overlaid, or replaced, or window sills will 
be sealed or repainted. Additional costs may result from the retesting 
of lead dust levels. Because of the lower laboratory reporting limits 
necessary for testing lead dust levels under this rule, incremental 
laboratory test costs are likely to increase.
    Risks: This rulemaking addresses the risk of adverse health effects 
associated with dust-lead exposures in children living in pre-1978 
housing and child-occupied facilities, as well as associated potential 
health effects in this subpopulation.
    Timetable:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Action                    Date            FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NPRM................................   08/01/23  88 FR 50444
Final Rule..........................   10/00/24  .......................
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Undetermined.
    Government Levels Affected: Federal, Local, State, Tribal.
    Federalism: This action may have federalism implications as defined 
in E.O. 13132.
    Additional Information: Related to RIN 2070-AK66.
    Sectors Affected: 92511 Administration of Housing Programs; 541350 
Building Inspection Services; 624410 Child Day Care Services; 236 
Construction of Buildings; 611110 Elementary and Secondary Schools; 
541330 Engineering Services; 531110 Lessors of Residential Buildings 
and Dwellings; 92811 National Security; 611519 Other Technical and 
Trade Schools; 531 Real Estate; 562910 Remediation Services; 531311 
Residential Property Managers; 238 Specialty Trade Contractors; 541380 
Testing Laboratories.
    URL For More Information: https://www.epa.gov/lead.
    Agency Contact: Claire Brisse, Office of Chemical Safety and 
Pollution Prevention, Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 
Pennsylvania Avenue NW, Mail Code 7404M, Washington, DC 20460-0001, 
Phone: 202 564-9004, Email: [email protected].
    Marc Edmonds, Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Chemical 
Safety and Pollution Prevention, 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue NW, Mail Code 
7404M, Washington, DC 20460, Phone: 202 566-0758, Email: 
[email protected].
    RIN: 2070-AK91

EPA--OFFICE OF LAND AND EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT (OLEM)

Final Rule Stage

216. Designating PFOA and PFOS as CERCLA Hazardous Substances [2050-
AH09]

    Priority: Section 3(f)(1) Significant. Major status under 5 U.S.C. 
801 is undetermined.
    Legal Authority: 42 U.S.C. 9602
    CFR Citation: 40 CFR 302.
    Legal Deadline: None.
    Abstract: Under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, 
Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980, as amended (``CERCLA'' or 
``Superfund''), the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA or the Agency) 
is moving to finalize the designation of perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) 
and perfluoro octane sulfonic acid (PFOS), including their salts and 
structural isomers, as hazardous substances. CERCLA authorizes the 
Administrator to promulgate regulations designating as hazardous 
substances such elements, compounds, mixtures, solutions, and 
substances which, when released into the environment, may present 
substantial danger to the public health or welfare or the environment. 
Such a designation would ultimately facilitate cleanup of contaminated 
sites and reduce human exposure to these ``forever'' chemicals.
    Statement of Need: Designating PFOA and PFOS as CERCLA hazardous 
substances will require reporting of releases of PFOA and PFOS that 
meet or exceed the reportable quantity assigned to these substances. 
This will enable Federal, State, Tribal and local authorities to 
collect information regarding the location and extent of releases.
    Summary of Legal Basis: No aspect of this action is required by 
statute or court order.
    Alternatives: The Agency identified through the 2019 PFAS Action 
Plan that one of the goals was to designate PFOA and PFOS as hazardous 
substances. EPA determined that we have enough information to propose 
this designation.
    Anticipated Cost and Benefits: The EPA is analyzing the potential 
costs and benefits associated with this action with respect to the 
reporting of any release of the subject hazardous substances to the 
Federal, State, and local authorities. Currently EPA expects to 
estimate lower and upper-bound reporting cost scenarios.

[[Page 9500]]

    Risks: This is a reporting rule and will enable Federal, State, 
Tribal and local authorities to collect information regarding the 
location and extent of releases.
    Timetable:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Action                    Date            FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NPRM................................   09/06/22  87 FR 54415
NPRM Comment Period End.............   11/07/22  .......................
Final Rule..........................   03/00/24  .......................
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No.
    Small Entities Affected: Businesses, Governmental Jurisdictions, 
Organizations.
    Government Levels Affected: Federal, Local, State, Tribal.
    Additional Information:
    Sectors Affected: 325998 All Other Miscellaneous Chemical Product 
and Preparation Manufacturing; 811192 Car Washes; 314110 Carpet and Rug 
Mills; 332813 Electroplating, Plating, Polishing, Anodizing, and 
Coloring; 922160 Fire Protection; 488119 Other Airport Operations; 
325510 Paint and Coating Manufacturing; 322121 Paper (except Newsprint) 
Mills; 322130 Paperboard Mills; 424710 Petroleum Bulk Stations and 
Terminals; 324110 Petroleum Refineries; 325992 Photographic Film, 
Paper, Plate, and Chemical Manufacturing; 562212 Solid Waste Landfill.
    Agency Contact: Linda Strauss, Environmental Protection Agency, 
Office of Land and Emergency Management, 1301 Constitution Ave. NW, 
Washington, DC 20460, Phone: 202 564-0797, Email: 
[email protected].
    Sicy Jacob, Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Land and 
Emergency Management, 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue NW, Mail Code 5104A, 
Washington, DC 20460, Phone: 202 564-8019, Fax: 202 564-2625, Email: 
[email protected].
    RIN: 2050-AH09

EPA--OLEM

217. Hazardous and Solid Waste Management System: Disposal of Coal 
Combustion Residuals From Electric Utilities; Legacy Surface 
Impoundments [2050-AH14]

    Priority: Section 3(f)(1) Significant. Major under 5 U.S.C. 801.
    Legal Authority: 42 U.S.C. 6907(a); 42 U.S.C. 6912(a); 42 U.S.C. 
6944; 42 U.S.C. 6945(a)(d)
    CFR Citation: 40 CFR 257.
    Legal Deadline: None.
    Abstract: On April 17, 2015, the Environmental Protection Agency 
(EPA or the Agency) promulgated national minimum criteria for existing 
and new coal combustion residuals (CCR) landfills and existing and new 
CCR surface impoundments. On August 21, 2018, the D.C. Circuit Court of 
Appeals issued its opinion in the case of Utility Solid Waste 
Activities Group, et al v. EPA, which vacated and remanded the 
provision that exempted inactive impoundments at inactive facilities 
from the CCR rule. In May 2023, EPA proposed regulations to implement 
this part of the court decision for inactive CCR surface impoundments 
at inactive utilities, or ``legacy CCR surface impoundments''. This 
proposal included adding a new definition for legacy CCR surface 
impoundments. EPA also proposed to require such legacy CCR surface 
impoundments to follow existing regulatory requirements for fugitive 
dust, groundwater monitoring, and closure, or other technical 
requirements. Finally, EPA proposed requirements for CCR management 
units including a facility evaluation and to follow existing regulatory 
requirements for groundwater monitoring, corrective action, and closure 
for all CCR contamination (regardless of how or when that CCR was 
placed) at a regulated facility. After reviewing the public comments on 
the proposed rule, EPA will take final action.
    Statement of Need: On April 17, 2015, the EPA finalized national 
regulations to regulate the disposal of Coal Combustion Residuals (CCR) 
as solid waste under subtitle D of the Resource Conservation and 
Recovery Act (RCRA) (2015 CCR final rule). In response to the Utility 
Solid Waste Activities Group v. EPA decision, this proposed rulemaking, 
if finalized, would bring inactive surface impoundments at inactive 
facilities (legacy surface impoundments) into the regulated universe.
    Summary of Legal Basis: No statutory or judicial deadlines apply to 
this rule. The EPA is taking this action in response to an August 21, 
2018, court decision that vacated and remanded the provision that 
exempted inactive impoundments at inactive electric utilities from the 
2015 CCR final rule. The proposed rule would be established under the 
authority of the Solid Waste Disposal Act of 1970, as amended by the 
Resource Conservation and Recovery Act of 1976 (RCRA), as amended by 
the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments of 1984 (HWSA) and the Water 
Infrastructure Improvements for the Nation Act of 2016.
    Alternatives: The Agency issued an advance notice of proposed 
rulemaking (ANPRM) on October 14, 2020 (85 FR 65015), which included 
public notice and opportunity for comment on this effort. We have not 
identified at this time any significant alternatives for analysis.
    Anticipated Cost and Benefits: The Agency will determine 
anticipated costs and benefits later as it is currently too early in 
the process.
    Risks: The Agency will estimate the risk reductions and impacts 
later as it is currently too early in the process.
    Timetable:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Action                    Date            FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
ANPRM...............................   10/14/20  85 FR 65015
NPRM................................   05/18/23  88 FR 31982
NPRM Comment Period End.............   07/17/23  .......................
Final Rule..........................   04/00/24  .......................
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Undetermined.
    Government Levels Affected: Federal, Local, State.
    Additional Information: EPA-HQ-OLEM-2020-0107.
    Sectors Affected: 221112 Fossil Fuel Electric Power Generation.
    URL For More Information: https://www.epa.gov/coalash.
    URL For Public Comments: https://www.regulations.gov/docket/EPA-HQ-OLEM-2020-0107.
    Agency Contact: Michelle Lloyd, Environmental Protection Agency, 
Office of Land and Emergency Management, Mail Code 5304T, 1200 
Pennsylvania Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20460, Phone: 202 566-0560, 
Email: [email protected].
    Frank Behan, Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Land and 
Emergency Management, Mail Code 5304T, 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue NW, 
Washington, DC 20460, Phone: 202 566-1730, Email: [email protected].
    RIN: 2050-AH14

EPA--OLEM

218. Clean Water Act Hazardous Substance Facility Response Plans [2050-
AH17]

    Priority: Other Significant.
    Legal Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1321
    CFR Citation: 40 CFR 142, subpart B.
    Legal Deadline: NPRM, Judicial, March 12, 2022, 19-cv-02516-VM. A 
March 12, 2020, consent decree requires EPA to sign a proposed rule 
within 24 months (by 3/12/2022) and sign a final rule within 30 months 
of publication of the proposed rule.

[[Page 9501]]

    Final, Judicial, September 30, 2024, 19-cv-02516-VM. Requires EPA 
to sign a proposed rule within 24 months (by 3/12/2022) and sign a 
final rule within 30 months of publication of the proposed rule 
(estimating by 9/30/2024).
    Abstract: The Clean Water Act (CWA) provides that regulations shall 
be issued ``which require an owner or operator of a tank vessel or 
facility . . . to prepare and submit . . . a plan for responding, to 
the maximum extent practicable, to a worst-case discharge, and to a 
substantial threat of such a discharge, of . . . a hazardous 
substance.'' EPA was sued for failure to fulfill this mandatory duty 
imposed by Congress. This regulatory action is being conducted under 
the terms of a consent decree entered into on March 12, 2020, which 
requires that a proposed action is signed within 24 months of the final 
agreement and that a final action follow within 30 months of the 
publication of the proposed rule. Subsequently, the Environmental 
Protection Agency proposed a regulatory action to require planning for 
worst case discharges of CWA hazardous substances under section 
311(j)(5)(A). EPA plans to promulgate a final rule by Spring 2024 meet 
the terms of the Consent Decree.
    Statement of Need: Worst case discharges of CWA hazardous 
substances could result in impacts to drinking water; impacts to 
industrial and agricultural water uses; commercial and recreational 
waterway closures; impacts to fish and other aquatic life; impacts to 
ecosystems and the environment; injuries, hospitalizations, and 
fatalities; emergency response costs; transaction costs; direct 
property impacts; property value impacts; costs from sheltering in 
place and evacuations; impacts to sensitive or vulnerable populations; 
and fiscal revenue impacts. The purpose of this regulation would be to 
plan for and mitigate these damages.
    Summary of Legal Basis: CWA Section 311(j)(5) directs the president 
to issue regulations to ``require an owner or operator of a tank vessel 
or facility . . . to prepare and submit . . . a plan for responding, to 
the maximum extent practicable, to a worst case discharge, and to a 
substantial threat of such a discharge, of . . . a hazardous 
substance.'' The EPA was sued for not promulgating the hazardous 
substance worst case planning regulations and entered into a consent 
decree with the plaintiffs that requires the EPA to publish a proposed 
rule by March 12, 2022 and take final action by September 12, 2024.
    Alternatives: The EPA is considering a regulatory program modeled 
on EPA's Facility Response Plan program for worst case discharges of 
oil.
    Anticipated Cost and Benefits: The Agency will determine 
anticipated costs and benefits later as it is currently too early in 
the process.
    Risks: To help determine the risks to be addressed by this 
rulemaking, EPA is reviewing historical data on discharges of CWA 
hazardous substances.
    Timetable:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Action                    Date            FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NPRM................................   03/28/22  87 FR 17890
Final Rule..........................   04/00/24  .......................
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Undetermined.
    Government Levels Affected: Local, Tribal.
    Additional Information:
    Agency Contact: Rebecca Broussard, Environmental Protection Agency, 
Office of Land and Emergency Management, 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue NW, 
Mail Code 5104A, Washington, DC 20460, Phone: 202 564-6706, Email: 
[email protected].
    RIN: 2050-AH17

EPA--OLEM

219. Accidental Release Prevention Requirements: Risk Management 
Program Under the Clean Air Act; Safer Communities by Chemical Accident 
Prevention [2050-AH22]

    Priority: Section 3(f)(1) Significant. Major under 5 U.S.C. 801.
    Unfunded Mandates: Undetermined.
    Legal Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7412
    CFR Citation: 40 CFR 68.
    Legal Deadline: None.
    Abstract: On August 31, 2022, the Environmental Protection Agency 
(EPA) published proposed amendments to its Risk Management Program 
(RMP) regulations as a result of Agency review. The proposed revisions 
included several changes and amplifications to the accident prevention 
program requirements, enhancements to the emergency preparedness 
requirements, increased public availability of chemical hazard 
information, and several other changes to certain regulatory 
definitions or points of clarification. Such amendments seek to improve 
chemical process safety; assist in planning, preparedness, and 
responding to RMP-reportable accidents; and improve public awareness of 
chemical hazards at regulated sources. EPA plans to publish the final 
rule in December 2023.
    Statement of Need: On January 13, 2017, the EPA published a final 
RMP rule (2017 Amendments) to prevent and mitigate the effect of 
accidental releases of hazardous chemicals from facilities that use, 
manufacture, and store them. The 2017 Amendments were a result of 
Executive Order 13650, Improving Chemical Facility Safety and Security, 
which directed EPA (and several other Federal agencies) to, among other 
things, modernize policies, regulations, and standards to enhance 
safety and security in chemical facilities. The 2017 Amendments rule 
contained various new provisions applicable to RMP-regulated facilities 
addressing prevention program elements, emergency coordination with 
local responders, and information availability to the public. EPA 
received three petitions for reconsideration of the 2017 Amendments 
rule under CAA section 307(d)(7)(B). On December 19, 2019, EPA 
promulgated a final RMP rule (2019 Revisions) that acts on the 
reconsideration. The 2019 Revisions rule repealed several major 
provisions of the 2017 Amendments and retained other provisions with 
modifications. On January 20, 2021, Executive Order 13990, Protecting 
Public Health and the Environment and Restoring Science To Tackle the 
Climate Crisis (E.O. 13990), directed federal agencies to review 
existing regulations and take action to address priorities established 
by the new administration including bolstering resilience to the impact 
of climate change and prioritizing environmental justice. The EPA is 
considering developing a regulatory action to revise the current RMP 
regulations. The proposed rule would address the administration's 
priorities and focus on regulatory revisions completed since 2017. The 
proposed rule would also expect to contain a number of proposed 
modifications to the RMP regulations based in part on stakeholder 
feedback received from RMP public listening sessions held on June 16 
and July 8, 2021.
    Summary of Legal Basis: The CAA section 112(r)(7)(A) authorizes the 
EPA Administrator to promulgate accidental release prevention, 
detection, and correction requirements, which may include monitoring, 
record keeping, reporting, training, vapor recovery, secondary 
containment, and other design, equipment, work practice, and 
operational requirements. The CAA section 112(r)(7)(B) authorizes the 
Administrator to promulgate reasonable regulations and appropriate 
guidance to provide, to the greatest extent practicable, for the 
prevention and detection of accidental releases of regulated substances 
and for response to

[[Page 9502]]

such releases by the owners or operators of the sources of such 
releases.
    Alternatives: The EPA currently plans to prepare a notice of 
proposed rulemaking that would provide the public an opportunity to 
comment on the proposal, and any regulatory alternatives that may be 
identified within the preamble to the proposed rulemaking.
    Anticipated Cost and Benefits: Costs may include the burden on 
regulated entities associated with implementing new or revised 
requirements including program implementation, training, equipment 
purchases, and recordkeeping, as applicable. Some costs could also 
accrue to implementing agencies and local governments, due to new or 
revised provisions associated with emergency response. Benefits will 
result from avoiding the harmful accident consequences to communities 
and the environment, such as deaths, injuries, and property damage, 
environmental damage, and from mitigating the effects of releases that 
may occur. Similar benefits will accrue to regulated entities and their 
employees.
    Risks: The proposed action would address the risks associated with 
accidental releases of listed regulated toxic and flammable substances 
to the air from stationary sources. Substances regulated under the RMP 
program include highly toxic and flammable substances that can cause 
deaths, injuries, property and environmental damage, and other on- and 
off-site consequences if accidentally released. The proposed action 
would reduce these risks by potentially making accidental releases less 
likely, and by mitigating the severity of releases that may occur. The 
proposed action would not address the risks of non-accidental chemical 
releases, accidental releases of non-regulated substances, chemicals 
released to other media, and air releases from mobile sources.
    Timetable:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Action                    Date            FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NPRM................................   08/31/22  87 FR 53556
NPRM Comment Period End.............   10/31/22  .......................
Final Rule..........................   12/00/23  .......................
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Undetermined.
    Government Levels Affected: Undetermined.
    Sectors Affected: 325 Chemical Manufacturing; 49313 Farm Product 
Warehousing and Storage; 42491 Farm Supplies Merchant Wholesalers; 
311511 Fluid Milk Manufacturing; 311 Food Manufacturing; 221112 Fossil 
Fuel Electric Power Generation; 311411 Frozen Fruit, Juice, and 
Vegetable Manufacturing; 49311 General Warehousing and Storage; 31152 
Ice Cream and Frozen Dessert Manufacturing; 311612 Meat Processed from 
Carcasses; 211112 Natural Gas Liquid Extraction; 32519 Other Basic 
Organic Chemical Manufacturing; 42469 Other Chemical and Allied 
Products Merchant Wholesalers; 49319 Other Warehousing and Storage; 322 
Paper Manufacturing; 42471 Petroleum Bulk Stations and Terminals; 32411 
Petroleum Refineries; 311615 Poultry Processing; 49312 Refrigerated 
Warehousing and Storage; 22132 Sewage Treatment Facilities; 11511 
Support Activities for Crop Production; 22131 Water Supply and 
Irrigation Systems.
    Agency Contact: Deanne Grant, Environmental Protection Agency, 
Office of Land and Emergency Management, 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue NW, 
Washington, DC 20460, Phone: 202 564-1096, Email: [email protected].
    RIN: 2050-AH22

EPA--OFFICE OF WATER (OW)

Final Rule Stage

220. Federal Baseline Water Quality Standards for Indian Reservations 
[2040-AF62]

    Priority: Other Significant.
    Legal Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1313(c)(4)(B)
    CFR Citation: 40 CFR 131.
    Legal Deadline: None.
    Abstract: On April 27, 2023, the Environmental Protection Agency 
(EPA) Administrator signed a proposed rule to establish water quality 
standards (WQS) for waters on Indian reservations that do not have WQS 
under the Clean Water Act (CWA). This rule will help advance President 
Biden's commitment to strengthening the nation-to-nation relationships 
with Indian country. Fifty years after enactment of the CWA, over 80% 
of Indian reservations do not have this foundational CWA protection for 
their waters. Addressing this lack of CWA-effective WQS for the waters 
of more than 250 Indian reservations is a priority for EPA, given that 
WQS are central to implementing the water quality framework of the CWA. 
Promulgating baseline WQS would provide more scientific rigor and 
regulatory certainty to National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System 
(NPDES) permits for discharges to these waters. Consistent with EPA's 
regulations, the baseline WQS include designated uses, water quality 
criteria to protect those uses, and antidegradation policies to protect 
high quality waters. EPA consulted with tribes in the summer of 2021 
during the pre-proposal phase and in the summer of 2023, concurrent 
with the public comment period associated with the proposal.
    Statement of Need: The Federal government has recognized 574 
tribes. More than 300 of these tribes have reservation lands and are 
eligible to apply for ``treatment in a similar manner as a state'' 
(TAS) to administer a WQS program. Only 84 tribes, out of over 300 
tribes with reservations, currently have such TAS authorization to 
administer a WQS program. Of these 84 tribes, only 47 tribes to date 
have adopted WQS and submitted them to EPA for review and approval 
under the Clean Water Act (CWA). As a result, 50 years after enactment 
of the CWA, over 80% of Indian reservations do not have this 
foundational protection expected by Congress as laid out in the CWA for 
their waters. Addressing this lack of CWA-effective WQS for the waters 
of more than 250 Indian reservations is a priority for EPA, given that 
WQS are central to implementing the water quality framework of the CWA. 
Although it is EPA's preference for tribes to obtain TAS and develop 
WQS tailored to the tribes' individual environmental goals and 
reservation waters, EPA's promulgation of baseline WQS would serve to 
safeguard water quality until tribes obtain TAS and adopt and 
administer CWA WQS themselves.
    Summary of Legal Basis: While CWA section 303 clearly contemplates 
WQS for all waters of the United States, it does not explicitly address 
WQS for Indian country waters where tribes lack CWA-effective WQS. 
Under CWA section 303(a) states were required to adopt WQS for all 
interstate and intrastate waters. Where a state does not establish such 
standards, Congress directed EPA to do so under the CWA section 303(b). 
These provisions are consistent with Congress' design of the CWA as a 
general statute applying to all waters of the United States, including 
those within Indian country. Several provisions of the CWA provide EPA 
with the authority to propose this rule. Section 501(a) of the CWA 
provides that ``[t]he Administrator is authorized to prescribe such 
regulations as are necessary to carry out his functions under this 
chapter.'' Section 303(c)(4)(B) of the CWA provides that ``[t]he 
Administrator shall promptly prepare and publish proposed regulations 
setting forth a revised or new water

[[Page 9503]]

quality standard for the navigable waters involved . . . in any case 
where the Administrator determines that a revised or new standard is 
necessary to meet the requirements of [the Act].'' In 2001 the EPA 
Administrator made an Administrator's Determination that new or revised 
WQS are necessary for certain Indian country waters. Today's action is 
the first step toward fulfilling that outstanding Determination.
    Alternatives: No other alternatives considered.
    Anticipated Cost and Benefits: Total cost estimates range from 
$15.51 million in annualized costs over 20 years at a 3 percent 
discount rate (with $6.1 million in one-time costs) to $30.54 in 
annualized costs over 20 years at a 3 percent discount rate (with $1.23 
million in one-time costs). Using a discount rate of 7 percent over 20 
years, total annualized costs range from $18.94 million (also with $6.1 
million in one-time costs) to $36.45 million (also with $1.23 million 
in one-time costs). Total one-time costs are larger in the low estimate 
than in the high estimate because one-time WQS variance costs are often 
used in lieu of annualized effluent treatment costs for facility-
specific low estimates for certain pollutants.
    Promulgating baseline WQS for Indian reservation waters would 
promote the implementation of pollution control measures and best 
practices to help improve water quality and prevent future degradation 
of Indian reservation waters, as well as potentially providing positive 
water quality benefits to waters in adjacent jurisdictions. Improved 
water quality for Indian reservation waters will benefit Tribes as well 
as anyone who recreates on Indian reservation waters or values 
environmental quality regardless of their current or anticipated uses 
of Indian reservation waters. Although implementation of baseline WQS 
is likely to yield significant benefits, estimating the dollar value of 
these improvements to Tribes may not be feasible. First, Tribes often 
express the difficulty of placing a monetary value on ecosystem 
services, given the belief that these resources are sacred and beyond 
any earthly value. Second, estimating the value of water quality 
improvements to visitors of Indian reservations is challenging due to 
the lack of data on site-specific visitation, use (e.g., recreational 
fishing) and valuation. Therefore, EPA provided a qualitative 
description of benefits categories that may stem from baseline WQS. 
These benefits include those related to human health, ceremonial and 
subsistence harvests of fish and shellfish, recreation, and other 
social welfare improvements. EPA anticipates, however, that the 
abovementioned benefits will ultimately outweigh the potential 
estimated incremental costs associated with promulgation of this rule 
and that this rule will help address the environmental challenges 
Tribes are currently facing.
    Risks: EPA is continuing to evaluate potential risks.
    Timetable:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Action                    Date            FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
ANPRM...............................   09/29/16  81 FR 66900
NPRM................................   05/05/23  88 FR 29496
NPRM Comment Period End.............   08/03/23
Final Rule..........................   04/00/24
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No.
    Small Entities Affected: No.
    Government Levels Affected: State, Tribal, Federal.
    Additional Information:
    URL For More Information: https://www.epa.gov/wqs-tech/promulgation-tribal-baseline-water-quality-standards-under-clean-water-act.
    Agency Contact: James Ray, Environmental Protection Agency Office 
of Water, Mail Code 4305T, 200 Pennsylvania Avenue NW Washington, DC 
20460, Phone: 202 566-1433, Email: [email protected].
    Danielle Anderson, Environmental Protection Agency, Office of 
Water, Mail Code 4305T, 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue NW, Washington, DC 
20460, Phone: 202 564-1631, Email: [email protected].
    RIN: 2040-AF62

EPA--OW

221. Water Quality Standards Regulatory Revisions to Protect Tribal 
Reserved Rights [2040-AG17]

    Priority: Other Significant.
    Legal Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1371
    CFR Citation: 40 CFR 131.
    Legal Deadline: None.
    Abstract: Many tribes hold reserved rights to resources on lands 
and waters where states establish water quality standards, through 
treaties, statutes, or other sources of federal law. The U.S. 
Constitution defines treaties as the supreme law of the land. On 
November 28, 2022, the EPA Administrator signed a proposed rule that 
would revise the federal water quality standards regulation to ensure 
that water quality standards do not impair tribal reserved rights by 
giving clear direction on how to develop water quality standards where 
tribes hold reserved rights. This proposed rule would help EPA ensure 
protection of resources reserved to tribes in treaties, statutes, or 
other sources of federal law when establishing, revising, and reviewing 
water quality standards. The development of this rule helps advance 
President Biden's commitment to strengthening nation-to-nation 
relationships with tribes. EPA consulted with tribes in the summer of 
2021 during the pre-proposal phase and in the winter of 2023, 
concurrent with the public comment period for the proposed rule. EPA is 
working to expeditiously finalize the proposed rule, taking into 
account public comments.
    Statement of Need: This rule would establish a durable and 
transparent national framework outlining how tribal reserved rights to 
aquatic-dependent resources must be protected in water quality 
standards (WQS) for waters in which such rights apply. In 2016 EPA took 
actions in Maine and Washington to protect tribal reserved rights, 
requiring that human health criteria for waters in those states where 
tribes reserved the rights to fish for subsistence be set at more 
stringent levels to protect tribal fish consumers. In 2019 EPA 
disavowed the approach it took to protecting tribal reserved rights in 
the 2016 Maine and Washington actions and concluded that states and EPA 
can always protect tribal reserved rights by simply applying EPA's 
existing regulations and guidance, with no additional consideration of 
such rights. EPA has now reconsidered its past assertions that tribal 
reserved rights do not impose any additional requirements in the WQS 
context. The changes in EPA's position regarding consideration of 
reserved rights in the water quality standards context over the years 
have resulted in confusion for tribes, states, stakeholders and the 
public about how tribal reserved rights must be considered in 
establishment of WQS. In addition, states and industry groups 
criticized EPA for taking its actions in 2016 without first going 
through a national notice and comment rulemaking on its approach.
    Summary of Legal Basis: In exercising its CWA section 303(c) 
authority, EPA has an obligation to ensure that its actions are 
consistent with treaties, statutes, executive orders, and other sources 
of Federal law reflecting tribal reserved rights. EPA's implementing 
regulation at 40 CFR part 131 specifies requirements for states and 
authorized tribes to develop WQS for EPA review that are consistent 
with the Act. EPA is exercising its discretion in implementing CWA 
section 303(c) to establish new regulatory requirements

[[Page 9504]]

to ensure that WQS give effect to rights to aquatic and aquatic-
dependent resources reserved in Federal laws.
    Alternatives: No other options considered.
    Anticipated Cost and Benefits: EPA estimated the potential 
incremental administrative burdens and costs that may be associated 
with the proposed rule, beyond the burden and costs associated with 
implementation of the current WQS regulation. EPA estimated the total, 
one-time costs for the proposed rule to range from $989,112 to 
$4,945,562, with no recurring costs. This rule would not establish any 
requirements directly applicable to regulated entities, such as 
industrial dischargers or municipal wastewater treatment facilities, 
but could ultimately lead to additional compliance costs to meet permit 
limits put in place to comply with new WQS adopted by states. However, 
because of the uncertainty in the specific outcome of application of 
this rule, both in terms of location and pollutants involved, EPA is 
unable to provide estimates of costs to those regulated entities. EPA 
was likewise unable to quantify the estimated benefits of the proposed 
rule. EPA anticipates that the rule would enhance the ability of states 
and tribes to protect their water resources by clarifying and 
prescribing how to protect waters with applicable tribal reserved 
rights and improving coordination between Federal, state, and tribal 
governments.
    Risks: EPA is continuing to evaluate potential risks.
    Timetable:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Action                    Date            FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NPRM................................   12/05/22  87 FR 74361
NPRM Comment Period End.............   03/06/23
Final Rule..........................   03/00/24
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No.
    Government Levels Affected: Federal, State, Tribal.
    Additional Information: OW-2021-0791.
    URL For More Information: https://www.epa.gov/wqs-tech/revising-federal-water-quality-standards-regulations-protect-tribal-reserved-rights.
    URL For Public Comments: https://www.regulations.gov/docket/EPA-HQ-OW-2021-0791.
    Agency Contact: Jennifer Brundage, Environmental Protection Agency, 
Office of Water, 4305T, 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue NW, Washington, DC 
20460, Phone: 202 566-1265, Email: [email protected].
    Erica Fleisig, Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Water, 
4305T, 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20460, Phone: 202 
566-1057, Email: [email protected].
    RIN: 2040-AG17

EPA--OW

222. PFAS National Primary Drinking Water Regulation Rulemaking [2040-
AG18]

    Priority: Section 3(f)(1) Significant. Major status under 5 U.S.C. 
801 is undetermined.
    Unfunded Mandates: Undetermined.
    Legal Authority: 42 U.S.C. 300f et seq. Safe Drinking Water Act
    CFR Citation: 40 CFR 141; 40 CFR 142.
    Legal Deadline: NPRM, Statutory, March 3, 2023, Safe Drinking Water 
Act.
    Final, Statutory, September 3, 2024, Safe Drinking Water Act.
    Abstract: On March 3, 2021, the Environmental Protection Agency 
(EPA) published the Fourth Regulatory Determinations in the Federal 
Register, including a determination to regulate perfluorooctanoic acid 
(PFOA) and perfluorooctanesulfonic acid (PFOS) in drinking water. Per 
the Safe Drinking Water Act, following publication of the Regulatory 
Determination, the Administrator shall propose a maximum contaminant 
level goal (MCLG) and a national primary drinking water regulation 
(NPDWR) not later than 24 months after determination and promulgate a 
NPDWR within 18 months after proposal (the statute authorizes a 9-month 
extension of this promulgation date). EPA issued a proposed national 
primary drinking water regulation for PFOA and PFOS as well as other 
PFAS on March 29, 2023 as part of this action. This action provides a 
key commitment in EPA's ``PFAS Strategic Roadmap: EPA's Commitments to 
Action 2021-2024.''
    Statement of Need: EPA has determined that PFOA and PFOS may have 
adverse health effects; that PFOA and PFOS occur in public water 
systems with a frequency and at levels of public health concern; and 
that, in the sole judgment of the Administrator, regulation of PFOA and 
PFOS presents a meaningful opportunity for health risk reduction for 
persons served by public water systems.
    Summary of Legal Basis: The EPA is developing a PFAS NPDWR under 
the authority of the Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA), including sections 
1412, 1413, 1414, 1417, 1445, and 1450 of the SDWA. Section 1412 
(b)(1)(A) of the SDWA requires that EPA shall publish a maximum 
contaminant level goal and promulgate a NPDWR if the Administrator 
determines that (1) the contaminant may have an adverse effect on the 
health of persons, (2) is known to occur or there is a substantial 
likelihood that the contaminant will occur in public water systems with 
a frequency and at a level of public health concern, and (3) in the 
sole judgment of the Administrator there is a meaningful opportunity 
for health risk reduction for persons served by public water systems. 
EPA published a final determination to regulate PFOA and PFOS on March 
3, 2021 after considering public comment (86 FR 12272). Section 1412 
(b)(1)(E) of the SDWA requires that EPA publish a proposed Maximum 
Contaminant Level Goal and a NPDWR within 24 months of a final 
regulatory determination and that the Agency promulgate a NPDWR within 
18 months of proposal.
    Alternatives: Undetermined.
    Anticipated Cost and Benefits: Undetermined.
    Risks: Studies indicate that exposure to PFOA and/or PFOS above 
certain exposure levels may result in adverse health effects, including 
developmental effects to fetuses during pregnancy or to breast-fed 
infants (e.g., low birth weight, accelerated puberty, skeletal 
variations), cancer (e.g., testicular, kidney), liver effects (e.g., 
tissue damage), immune effects (e.g., antibody production and 
immunity), and other effects (e.g., cholesterol changes). Both PFOA and 
PFOS are known to be transmitted to the fetus via the placenta and to 
the newborn, infant, and child via breast milk. Both compounds were 
also associated with tumors in long-term animal studies.
    Timetable:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Action                    Date            FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Notice..............................   02/09/22  87 FR 7412
NPRM................................   03/29/23  88 FR 18638
NPRM Comment Period End.............   05/30/23
Final Rule..........................   01/00/24
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Yes.
    Small Entities Affected: Governmental Jurisdictions.
    Government Levels Affected: Federal, Local, State, Tribal.
    Federalism: This action may have federalism implications as defined 
in E.O. 13132.
    Additional Information:
    Agency Contact: Alexis Lan, Environmental Protection Agency, Office 
of Water, 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue NW, 4601M, Washington, DC

[[Page 9505]]

20460, Phone: 202 564-0841, Email: [email protected].
    RIN: 2040-AG18

EPA--OW

223. Supplemental Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the 
Steam Electric Power Generating Point Source Category [2040-AG23]

    Priority: Section 3(f)(1) Significant. Major under 5 U.S.C. 801.
    Unfunded Mandates: Undetermined.
    Legal Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1361; 33 U.S.C. 1318; 33 U.S.C. 1317; 33 
U.S.C. 1316; 33 U.S.C. 1311; 33 U.S.C. 1314
    CFR Citation: 40 CFR 423.
    Legal Deadline: None.
    Abstract: On March 29, 2023, EPA published a proposed rule to 
potentially strengthen the Steam Electric Effluent Limitations 
Guidelines and Standards (ELGs) (40 CFR 423). EPA previously revised 
the Steam Electric ELGs in 2015 and 2020. The proposed rule would 
establish more stringent ELGs for two waste streams addressed in the 
2020 ``Steam Electric Reconsideration Rule'' (flue gas desulfurization 
wastewater and bottom ash transport water). In addition, the proposal 
would establish more stringent effluent limitations and standards for 
an additional waste stream (combustion residual leachate) and takes 
comment on potential revisions to limitations and standards for a 
fourth waste stream (legacy wastewater). The first two waste streams 
mentioned above are the subject of current litigation pending in the 
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. Appalachian Voices, et 
al. v. EPA, No. 20-2187 (4th Cir.). The 2015 limitations for combustion 
residual leachate and legacy wastewater discharged by existing sources 
were vacated by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit in 
Southwestern Electric Power Co., et al. v. EPA, 920 F.3d 999 (5th Cir. 
2019).
    Statement of Need: Under Executive Order 13990 on Protecting Public 
Health and the Environment and Restoring Science to Tackle the Climate 
Crisis (January 20, 2021), EPA was directed to review the 2020 Steam 
Electric Reconsideration Rule.
    Summary of Legal Basis: Sections 101; 301; 304(b), (c), (e), and 
(g); 306; 307; 308 and 501, Clean Water Act (Federal Water Pollution 
Control Act Amendments of 1972, as amended; 33 U.S.C. 1251; 1311; 
1314(b), (c), (e), and (g); 1316; 1317; 1318 and 1361).
    Alternatives: EPA considered four regulatory options at the 
proposed rule stage. Three alternatives varied in the stringency of 
limitations for flue gas desulfurization wastewater and bottom ash 
transport water while subcategorizing early adopters while the fourth 
option did not include this new subcategory. All four regulatory 
options removed the existing high flow and low utilization 
subcategories included in the 2020 final rule. For further information, 
visit: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2023/03/29/2023-04984/supplemental-effluent-limitations-guidelines-and-standards-for-the-steam-electric-power-generating.
    Anticipated Cost and Benefits: At proposal, EPA estimated that the 
proposed rule will cost $200 million per year in social costs and 
result in $1,557 million per year in monetized benefits using a three 
percent discount rate and will cost $216 million per year in social 
costs and result in $1,290 million per year in monetized benefits using 
a seven percent discount rate.
    Risks: At proposal, EPA estimated that the rule would reduce risks 
to human health and ecological receptors via multiple pathways 
including via air pollution, surface water contamination, and 
disinfection byproduct formation in drinking water systems.
    Timetable:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Action                    Date            FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Notice..............................   08/03/21  86 FR 41801
NPRM................................   03/29/23  88 FR 18824
NPRM Comment Period End.............   05/30/23
Final Rule..........................   04/00/24
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Undetermined.
    Government Levels Affected: Federal, Local, State.
    Federalism: Undetermined.
    Additional Information: EPA-HQ-OW-2009-0819.
    Sectors Affected: 221112 Fossil Fuel Electric Power Generation.
    Agency Contact: Jesse Pritts, Environmental Protection Agency, 
Office of Water, Mail Code 4303T, 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue NW, 
Washington, DC 20460, Phone: 202 566-1038, Email: [email protected].
    Related RIN: Split from 2040-AG28

    RIN: 2040-AG23

BILLING CODE 6560-50-P

EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION (EEOC)

Statement of Regulatory and Deregulatory Priorities

    The mission of the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC, 
Commission, or Agency) is to ensure equality of opportunity in 
employment by vigorously enforcing and educating the public about the 
following Federal statues: title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 
as amended (prohibits employment discrimination on the basis of race, 
color, sex (including pregnancy, sexual orientation, and gender 
identity), religion, or national origin); the Equal Pay Act of 1963, as 
amended (makes it illegal to pay unequal wages to persons of different 
sexes performing substantially equal work under similar working 
conditions at the same establishment); the Age Discrimination in 
Employment Act of 1967, as amended (prohibits employment discrimination 
based on age of 40 or older); titles I and V of the Americans with 
Disabilities Act, as amended, and sections 501 and 505 of the 
Rehabilitation Act, as amended (prohibits employment discrimination 
based on disability); title II of the Genetic Information 
Nondiscrimination Act (prohibits employment discrimination based on 
genetic information and limits acquisition and disclosure of genetic 
information); section 304 of the Government Employee Rights Act of 1991 
(protects certain previously exempt state and local government 
employees from employment discrimination on the basis of race, color, 
religion, sex, national origin, age, or disability); and the Pregnant 
Workers Fairness Act (requires covered entities to provide reasonable 
accommodation to qualified applicants' and employees' known limitations 
related to, affected by, or arising out of pregnancy, childbirth or 
related medical conditions, unless doing so would cause an undue 
hardship).
    The EEOC has authority to issue legislative regulations under the 
Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA), title I of the Americans 
with Disabilities Act (ADA), title II of the Genetic Information 
Nondiscrimination Act (GINA), and under the Pregnant Workers Fairness 
Act (PWFA). Under title VII of the Civil Rights Act, the EEOC's 
authority to issue legislative regulations is limited to procedural, 
record keeping, and reporting matters.
    Nine pending items are identified in the EEOC's Fall 2023 
Regulatory Agenda, five at the proposed rule stage and four at the 
final rule stage. One of those items is singled out as a key priority 
in this Regulatory Plan: the recently published proposed rule 
implementing the PWFA, for which a final rule will be drafted after 
consideration of public comments received from the full range of EEOC 
stakeholders.
    The PWFA went into effect on June 27, 2023, and it requires 
employers with

[[Page 9506]]

15 or more employees to provide reasonable accommodations to job 
applicants and employees for known limitations related to, affected by, 
or arising out of pregnancy, childbirth or related medical conditions, 
unless doing so would cause an undue hardship for the employer. While 
other laws enforced by the EEOC, including title VII and the ADA, 
provide some protections and accommodations for pregnant workers, the 
PWFA fills gaps in these federal legal protections. Under the ADA, 
unless the individual's pregnancy, childbirth, or related medical 
condition rose to the level of a disability as defined in that statute, 
an employer would not be obligated to provide a reasonable 
accommodation to do the job. Under title VII, the pregnant employee 
would need to show that the employer provided the accommodation to a 
similarly situated worker who was not pregnant in order to get the 
accommodation. The PWFA requires covered entities to provide reasonable 
accommodations to a qualified employee's or applicant's known 
limitation related to, affected by, or arising out of pregnancy, 
childbirth, or related medical conditions, unless the accommodation 
will cause an undue hardship on the operation of the business of the 
covered entity. The PWFA provides some examples of potential reasonable 
accommodations for pregnant employees, such as: a change in the food or 
drink policies to allow the pregnant worker to have a water bottle or 
food; a reduction in lifting requirements; the ability to sit; 
additional breaks to use the bathroom, eat, and rest; being excused 
from activities that involve exposure to compounds unsafe for 
pregnancy; and providing appropriately sized uniforms and safety 
apparel.
    On August 11, 2023, the EEOC issued proposed regulations soliciting 
public input and comment before the PWFA regulations become final. See 
Federal Register: Regulations To Implement the Pregnant Workers 
Fairness Act. The EEOC announced a 60-day public comment period, 
starting on August 11, 2023 and ending on October 10, 2023. 
Additionally, through media exposure, including press interviews, the 
Commission continues to inform the public of these new employee 
protections. The EEOC also conducted trainings so that employers and 
employees better understand their rights and responsibilities under the 
PWFA, and it will continue to do so in the months and years ahead.
    Consistent with Executive Order 12866, as reaffirmed and amended in 
Executive Order 13563, and subsequently reaffirmed and supplemented by 
Executive Order 14094, this statement was reviewed and approved by the 
Chair of the Agency.

EEOC

Final Rule Stage

224. Regulations To Implement the Pregnant Workers Fairness Act [3046-
AB30]

    Priority: Section 3(f)(1) Significant. Major under 5 U.S.C. 801.
    Legal Authority: Pub. L. 117-328, 136 Stat. 4459, division II
    CFR Citation: 29 CFR 1636.
    Legal Deadline: Final, Statutory, December 29, 2023.
    Abstract: The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) will 
issue a rule to implement the Pregnant Workers Fairness Act, a new law 
that requires covered entities to provide reasonable accommodations to 
a qualified worker's known limitations related to, affected by, or 
arising out of pregnancy, childbirth, or related medical conditions, 
unless the accommodation will cause an undue hardship.
    Statement of Need: The Pregnant Workers Fairness Act (PWFA) is a 
new law. It requires a covered entity to provide reasonable 
accommodations, absent undue hardship, to a qualified employee or 
applicant with a known limitation related to, affected by, or arising 
out of pregnancy, childbirth, or related medical conditions. The PWFA 
requires the EEOC to issue regulations by December 29, 2023. 42 U.S.C. 
2000gg-3(a).
    Summary of Legal Basis: The PWFA requires the EEOC to issue 
regulations by December 29, 2023. 42 U.S.C. 2000gg-3(a).
    Alternatives: The EEOC will consider possible alternatives for its 
regulation. However, the possible alternatives are limited by certain 
provisions in the statute that set out what employers are covered, when 
the statute goes into effect, the procedures for enforcement, and 
require the EEOC to issue regulations.
    Anticipated Cost and Benefits: The EEOC anticipates that the 
regulation will have significant benefits for workers, including 
benefits that are difficult to quantify such as a reduction in 
discrimination and improvements in the economic security and health 
outcomes for pregnant workers. The costs of the regulation and statute 
will be for employers that have to provide reasonable accommodations 
and one-time administrative costs for covered employers to come into 
compliance with the statute and regulation. The EEOC anticipates that 
both of these costs will be low for individual employers.
    Risks: The rule imposes no new or additional risks to employers. 
The rule does not address risks to public safety or the environment.
    Timetable:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Action                    Date            FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NPRM................................   08/11/23  88 FR 54714
NPRM Comment Period End.............   10/10/23
Final Action........................   12/00/23
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Undetermined.
    Small Entities Affected: Businesses, Governmental Jurisdictions, 
Organizations.
    Government Levels Affected: Federal, Local, State.
    Federalism: Undetermined.
    Agency Contact:
    Sharyn A. Tejani, Associate Legal Counsel, Equal Employment 
Opportunity Commission, 131 M Street NE, Washington, DC 20507, Phone: 
202 921-3240, Email: [email protected].
    RIN: 3046-AB30

BILLING CODE 6570-01-P

GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION (GSA)

Regulatory Plan--October 2023

    The U.S. General Services Administration (GSA) delivers value and 
savings in real estate, acquisition, technology, and other mission-
support services across the Federal Government. GSA's acquisition 
solutions supply Federal purchasers with cost-effective, high-quality 
products and services from commercial vendors. GSA provides workplaces 
for Federal employees and oversees the preservation of historic Federal 
properties. GSA helps keep the Nation safe and efficient by providing 
tools, equipment, and non-tactical vehicles to the U.S. military, and 
by providing State and local governments with law enforcement 
equipment, firefighting and rescue equipment, and disaster recovery 
products and services.
    As GSA is developing its regulations, it seeks to increase 
participation and engagement of members of the public affected by its 
regulations, including in the development of its regulatory priorities. 
In its Regulatory Plan, it details engagement efforts that have helped 
to inform its priorities to date, as well as future engagement it has

[[Page 9507]]

planned. In support of Executive Order 14094, GSA is ensuring that it 
hears from members of the public who have not typically participated in 
the regulatory process, including families eligible for assistance, 
communities affected by climate change, and rural workers, among 
others.
    GSA serves the public by delivering products and services directly 
to its Federal customers through the Federal Acquisition Service (FAS), 
the Public Buildings Service (PBS), and the Office of Government-wide 
Policy (OGP). GSA has a continuing commitment to its Federal customers 
and the U.S. taxpayers by providing those products and services in the 
most cost-effective manner possible.

Federal Acquisition Service

    FAS is the lead organization for procurement of products and 
services (other than real property) for the Federal Government. The FAS 
organization leverages the buying power of the Government by 
consolidating Federal agencies' requirements for common goods and 
services. FAS provides a range of high-quality and flexible acquisition 
services to increase overall Government effectiveness and efficiency by 
aligning resources around key functions.

Public Buildings Service

    PBS is the largest public real estate organization in the United 
States. As the landlord for the civilian Federal Government, PBS 
acquires space on behalf of the Federal Government through new 
construction and leasing and acts as a manager for Federal properties 
across the country. PBS is responsible for over 370 million rentable 
square feet of workspace for Federal employees; has jurisdiction, 
custody, and control over more than 1,600 federally owned assets 
totaling over 180 million rentable square feet; and contracts for more 
than 7,000 leased assets, totaling over 180 million rentable square 
feet.
    In fiscal year (FY) 2023, GSA expects to update the existing 
internal guidance and issue a new PBS Order following the release of 
the Implementing Instructions for Executive Order 14057 on Catalyzing 
Clean Energy Industries and Jobs Through Federal Sustainability that 
was issued on December 8, 2021.

Office of Government-Wide Policy

    OGP sets Government-wide policy in the areas of personal and real 
property, mail, travel, motor vehicles, relocation, transportation, 
information technology, regulatory information, and the use of Federal 
advisory committees. OGP also helps direct how all Federal supplies and 
services are acquired, as well as GSA's own acquisition programs. 
Pursuant to Executive Order 12866, ``Regulatory Planning and Review'' 
(September 30, 1993), and Executive Order 13563, ``Improving Regulation 
and Regulatory Review'' (January 18, 2011), the Regulatory Plan and 
Unified Agenda provides notice regarding OGP's regulatory and 
deregulatory actions within the Executive Branch.
    GSA prepared a list of actions in the areas of Climate Risk 
Management, Resilience, and Adaptation; Environmental Justice; 
Greenhouse Gas Reduction; Clean Energy; Energy Reduction; Water 
Reduction; Performance Contracting; Waste Reduction; Sustainable 
Buildings; and Electronics Stewardship and Data Centers. Detailed 
information on actions GSA is considering taking through December 31, 
2025, to implement the Administration's policy set by Executive Orders 
13990 and 14008 were provided in GSA's Executive Order 13990 90-day 
response, the GSA Climate Change Risk Management Plan, and the GSA 2021 
Sustainability Plan. More specifics will be known on the Sustainability 
Plan when feedback is obtained from the Council on Environmental 
Quality and the Office of Management and Budget.

Office of Asset and Transportation Management

    The Office of Asset and Transportation Management and Office of 
Acquisition Policy are prioritizing rulemaking focused on initiatives 
that:
     Promote the country's economic resilience and improve the 
buying power of U.S. citizens;
     Support underserved communities, promoting equity in the 
Federal Government; and
     Support national security efforts, especially safeguarding 
Federal Government information and information technology systems.
    The Fall 2023 Unified Agenda consists of 14 active Office of Asset 
and Transportation Management (MA) agenda items, of which 6 active 
actions are included in the Federal Travel Regulation (FTR) and 8 
active actions are included in the Federal Management Regulation (FMR).
    The FTR enumerates the travel and relocation policy for all title 5 
Executive Agency civilian employees. The Code of Federal Regulations 
(CFR) is available at https://ecfr.federalregister.gov/. The FTR is 
contained in chapters 300 through 304 of title 41 of the CFR, which 
implements statutory requirements and Executive branch policies for 
travel by Federal civilian employees and others authorized to travel at 
Government expense. The FMR is contained in chapter 102 of title 41 of 
the CFR, and establishes policy for Federal aircraft management, mail 
management, transportation, personal property, real property, motor 
vehicles, and committee management.

Past or Ongoing Public or Community Engagement That Informed the 
Development of GSA Rules

    Although focused primarily on agency management and personnel, most 
rules issued by the Office of Asset and Transportation Management are 
preceded by proposed rules to encourage public participation. In FY 
2022, two Federal Management Regulations (Real Estate Acquisition; and 
Replacement of Personal Property Pursuant to the Exchange/Sale 
Authority) and two Federal Travel Regulation proposed rules (Common 
Carrier Transportation; and Constructive Cost) were published. One 
final rule (Federal Management Regulation; Soliciting Union Memberships 
Among Contractors in GSA-Controlled Buildings), was issued as a final 
rule with a 60-day comment period for future rulemaking.
    In FY 2023, two Federal Travel Regulation proposed rules 
(Alternative Fuel Vehicle Usage During Relocations; and Relocation 
Allowance--Temporary Quarters Subsistence Expenses (TQSE)) were 
published. One GSA proposed rule (General Services Administration 
Property Management Regulations (GSPMR) Social Security Number Fraud 
Prevention) and one joint agency proposed rule (Use of Federal Real 
Property To Assist the Homeless: Revisions to Regulations) were 
published. Collectively, the public provided 11 comments on the FY 2023 
proposed rules. This input was used in the formulation of the final 
rules.
    In FY 2024, the Office of Asset and Transportation Management will 
continue to issue proposed rules with a 60-day comment period to obtain 
public feedback. Four proposed rules are anticipated including: FMR 
Case 2018-102-1, Safety and Environmental Management; FMR 2022-01, 
Federal Advisory Committee Management; FTR Case 2022-04, Relocation 
Allowance--Allowance for Miscellaneous Expenses; FTR Case 2020-301-1 E-
Gov Travel Services updates; and Federal Management Regulation; 
Interagency Fleet Management Systems; FMR Case 2019-102-2.

[[Page 9508]]

Rulemaking That Tackles Climate Change

    FTR Case 2022-03, Alternative Fuel Vehicle Usage During 
Relocations, allows greater agency flexibility for authorizing shipment 
of a relocating employee's alternative fuel-based privately owned 
vehicle (POV), as some POVs, primarily electric vehicles, cannot be 
driven more than a short distance without being recharged. Because of 
the topic area being of great public interest in recent years, this 
rule did attract a small number of comments from the public. The 
comments reflected both support of the proposal and dislike of spending 
funds on Federal employee relocation, and caused GSA to think more 
about whether the ideas presented were workable and had merit. While 
ultimately GSA decided some of the ideas had merit, but were not within 
GSA's authority, it was helpful to see the public's perspective.
    FMR Case 2023-102-1, Sustainable Siting, promotes economy and 
efficiency in the planning, acquisition, utilization, and management of 
Federal facilities. The rule will incorporate the concepts of several 
Administration priorities, including sustainability, equity, and 
environmental justice. This rule will help reduce emissions across 
Federal workplaces by requiring that all new construction, 
modernization projects, and leases implement a number of energy 
efficient, sustainable, and climate-resilient building practices for 
Federal facilities.

Rulemaking That Supports Equity and Underserved Communities

    FTR Case 2022-05, Updating the FTR With Diversity, Equity, 
Inclusion, and Accessibility Language, updates the entirety of the FTR 
to ensure that its language reflects inclusivity by replacing gender-
specific pronouns (e.g., he, she, his, her) with non-gendered pronouns 
and other language that reflects inclusivity and equity.
    FMR Case 2022-01, Federal Advisory Committee Management, the 
Federal Advisory Committee Act (FACA) is a transparency statute 
designed to provide Congress, interested stakeholders, and the public 
with information on, and access to, the activities, membership, 
meetings, and costs, of Federal advisory committees established by the 
Executive Branch. Under section 7 of FACA, GSA is responsible for 
preparing regulations for implementing FACA. The proposed rule 
revisions will provide updates and clarification to policies and 
processes, and further incorporate diversity, equity, inclusion, and 
accessibility policies into the Federal advisory committee program 
government-wide, which is an Administration priority.
    FMR Case 2021-01, Use of Federal Real Property to Assist the 
Homeless, will streamline the process by which excess Federal real 
property is screened for potential conveyance to homeless interests.

Rulemaking That Supports National Security

    FMR Case 2021-102-1, ``Real Estate Acquisition,'' will clarify the 
policies for entering into leasing agreements for high security space 
(i.e., space with a Facility Security Level of III, IV, or V) in 
accordance with the Secure Federal LEASEs Act (Pub. L. 116-276).

Office of Acquisition Policy

    The Fall 2023 Unified Agenda consists of 17 active Office of 
Acquisition Policy (MV) agenda items, all of which are for the General 
Services Administration Acquisition Regulation (GSAR).

Office of Acquisition Policy--General Services Administration 
Acquisition Regulation

    GSA's rules and practices on how it buys goods and services from 
its business partners are covered by the GSAR, which implements and 
supplements the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR). The GSAR 
establishes agency acquisition regulations that affect GSA's business 
partners (e.g., prospective offerors and contractors) and acquisition 
of leasehold interests in real property. The latter are established 
under the authority of 40 U.S.C. 121(c) and 585. The GSAR implements 
contract clauses, solicitation provisions, and standard forms that 
control the relationship between GSA and its contractors and 
prospective contractors.

Significant Determinations in Accordance With Executive Order 12866 
Section (f)(1)

    No GSAR rules in the previous Regulatory Plan or this Regulatory 
Plan are anticipated to have a monetary annual effect of $200 million 
or more.

Past or Ongoing Public or Community Engagement That Informed the 
Development of GSAR Cases

     For rules that GSA expects to have significant public 
interest, GSA's Office of Acquisition Policy (OAP) may issue an 
Advanced Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (ANPR) in order to involve the 
public at the earliest stages. For example, an ANPR was issued to 
assist in GSA's formulation of GSAR Case 2022-G517, Single-use Plastic 
Packaging Reduction.
     When issuing proposed rules, OAP regularly requests public 
comment to help in the formulation of the final rule.
     OAP regularly meets with the Council of Defense and Space 
Industry Associations (CODSIA). CODSIA represents member associations 
representing numerous small, medium, and large companies. Examples of 
these member associations include the Professional Services Council 
(PSC), Information Technology Industry Council (ITI), and the 
Associated General Contractors (AGC) to name a few. OAP anticipates 
continuing these meetings into the foreseeable future.
     Future opportunities OAP intends to pursue to increase 
public engagement in the development of regulatory acquisition rules 
includes partnering with GSA's Office of Small and Disadvantaged 
Business Utilization (OSDBU) in their industry outreach events. GSA's 
OSDBU services small and disadvantaged businesses and works with 
advocacy groups, chambers of commerce, and small business coalitions in 
order to bring small businesses to the forefront of federal procurement 
opportunities.

Rulemaking That Tackles the Climate Change Emergency

    GSAR Case 2022-G517, Single-use Plastic Packaging Reduction, 
explores regulation that will reduce single-use plastic consumption by 
the agency. Single-use plastic poses an environmental risk that is 
documented as having the potential to impact biodiversity. The case 
focuses on packaging materials with the overall intent of addressing 
not only the items that the Government intentionally consumes, but 
those products that the Government unintentionally consumes (such as 
packaging) that then have to be disposed of once the item is delivered.

Rulemaking That Advances Equity and Supports Underserved, Vulnerable 
and Marginalized Communities

    GSAR Case 2020-G511, Updated Guidance for Non-Federal Entities 
Access to Federal Supply Schedules, will clarify the requirements for 
use of the FSS by eligible non-Federal entities, such as State and 
local governments. The regulatory changes are intended to increase 
understanding of the existing guidance and expand access to GSA sources 
of supply by eligible non-Federal entities, as authorized by historic 
statutes, including the Federal Supply Schedules Usage Act of 2010.

[[Page 9509]]

Rulemaking That Reflects Actions That Create and Sustain Good Jobs With 
a Free and Fair Choice To Join a Union and Promote Economic Resilience 
in General

    GSAR Case 2021-G530, Labor Requirements for Lease Acquisitions, 
will increase efficiency and cost savings in the work performed for 
leases with the Federal Government by increasing the hourly minimum 
wage paid to those contractors in accordance with Executive Order 
14026, ``Increasing the Minimum Wage for Federal Contractors,'' dated 
April 27, 2021, and U.S. Department of Labor regulations at 29 CFR part 
23.
    GSAR Case 2020-G510, Federal Supply Schedule Economic Price 
Adjustment (EPA), will clarify, update, and incorporate Federal Supply 
Schedule (FSS) program policies and procedures regarding economic price 
adjustment, including updating related prescriptions and clauses. 
Ultimately, the case aims to streamline the EPA process for FSS 
business partners and GSA's acquisition workforce.
    GSAR Case 2021-G530, Extension of Federal Minimum Wage to Lease 
Acquisitions, will increase efficiency and cost savings in the work 
performed for leases with the Federal Government by increasing the 
hourly minimum wage paid to those contractors in accordance with 
Executive Order 14026, ``Increasing the Minimum Wage for Federal 
Contractors,'' dated April 27, 2021, and U.S. Department of Labor 
regulations at 29 CFR part 23.

Rulemaking Reflecting Actions That Improve Service Delivery, Customer 
Experience, and Reduce Administrative Burdens

    GSAR Case 2022-G506, Standardizing the Identification of Deviations 
in the GSAR, standardizes the identification, including number, title, 
date, and deviation label, of any provision or clause listed in the 
General Services Administration Regulation (GSAR) that has an 
authorized deviation. Standardizing this information will add clarity 
and uniformity, therefore reducing burden, for both the GSA acquisition 
workforce and GSA's industry partners.

    Dated: August 15, 2023.

Krystal J. Brumfield,

Associate Administrator, Office of Government-wide Policy.

BILLING CODE 6820-14
BILLING CODE 6820-34-P

NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION (NASA)

Statement of Regulatory Priorities

    The National Aeronautics and Space Administration's (NASA) aim is 
to increase human understanding of the solar system and the universe 
that contains it and to improve American aeronautics ability. NASA's 
basic organization consists of the Headquarters, nine field Centers, 
the Jet Propulsion Laboratory (a federally funded research and 
development center), and several component installations which report 
to Center Directors. Responsibility for overall planning, coordination, 
and control of NASA programs is vested in NASA Headquarters, located in 
Washington, DC.
    NASA continues to implement programs according to its 2022 
Strategic Plan. The Agency's mission is to ``explore the unknown in air 
and space, innovate for the benefit of humanity, and inspire the world 
through discovery.'' The 2022 Strategic Plan (available at 2022 NASA 
Strategic Plan) guides NASA's program activities through a framework of 
the following four strategic goals:
     Strategic Goal 1: Expand human knowledge through new 
scientific discoveries.
     Strategic Goal 2: Extend human presence deeper into space 
and to the Moon for sustainable long-term exploration and utilization.
     Strategic Goal 3: Catalyze economic growth and drive 
innovations to address national challenges.
     Strategic Goal 4: Enhance capabilities and operations to 
catalyze current and future mission success.

NASA's Regulatory Philosophy and Principles

    The Agency's rulemaking program strives to be responsive, 
efficient, and transparent. NASA adheres to the general principles set 
forth in Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review. NASA is 
a signatory to the Federal Acquisition Regulatory (FAR) Council. The 
FAR at 48 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), chapter 1, contains 
procurement regulations that apply to NASA and other Federal agencies. 
Pursuant to 41 United States Code (U.S.C.), section 1302, and FAR 
1.103(b), the FAR is jointly prepared, issued, and maintained by the 
Secretary of Defense, the Administrator of General Services, and the 
Administrator of NASA, under several of their statutory authorities.
    NASA is also mindful of the importance of international regulatory 
cooperation, consistent with domestic law and the United States (U.S.) 
trade policy, as noted in Executive Order 13609, Promoting 
International Regulatory Cooperation. NASA, along with the Departments 
of State, Commerce, and Defense, engage with other countries in the 
Wassenaar Arrangement, Nuclear Suppliers Group, Australia Group, and 
Missile Technology Control Regime through which the international 
community develops a common list of items that should be subject to 
export controls. NASA also has been a key participant in interagency 
efforts to overhaul and streamline the U.S. Munitions List and the 
Commerce Control List. These efforts help facilitate transfers of goods 
and technologies to allies and partners while helping prevent transfers 
to countries of national security and proliferation concerns.

NASA Priority Regulatory Actions

    NASA is highlighting the priorities summarized below in this 
agenda.

Procedures for Implementing the National Environmental Policy Act 
(NEPA)

    NASA is finalizing its regulations for implementing the National 
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 and the Council on Environmental 
Quality regulations. These amendments will update 14 CFR subpart 
1216.3, Procedures for Implementing the NEPA, to incorporate the 
Agency's review of its Categorical Exclusions and streamline the NEPA 
process to better support NASA's evolving mission.

NASA Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) Supplement (NFS)

    NASA is finalizing its regulations in the NFS at 48 CFR, chapter 
18. These amendments will remove the Solicitation Provision and the 
Determination of Compensation Reasonableness to align with FAR 
requirements and changes made in 10 U.S.C. pursuant to a section of the 
William M. (Mac) Thornberry National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) 
for Fiscal Year (FY) 2021 (Pub. L. 116-283). The Agency will also issue 
a proposed rule to amend chapter 18 to align with changes made in the 
FAR that reflects an updated ``commercial item'' definition pursuant to 
a section of the John S. McCain NDAA for FY 2019 (Pub. L. 115-232).

Public Outreach and Engagement

    As NASA develops regulations, we seek to increase public 
participation and community outreach to be better informed of and 
address issues from

[[Page 9510]]

members of the public affected by our regulations. For example, our 
Office of Communications is currently beta testing a revised website to 
enhance NASA's interactions with the public. The revised site will 
include a ``Doing Business With NASA'' page; opportunities and advice 
on providing public comment on NASA regulations, and information on 
forming partnerships with the Agency using NASA's Other Transactional 
Authorities, such as Space Act Agreements.
    NASA uses Federal Register notices, website postings, press 
releases, and social media releases to notify the public of the dates 
and times for input on NASA programs. NASA offices also work to support 
roundtables and similar engagements so stakeholder organizations can 
meet with NASA leaders to discuss and share information about NASA 
policies and programs. Currently, the Agency sponsors 12 Federal 
advisory committee providing NASA the opportunity to engage with 
external subject matter experts on key topics of Agency interest. All 
advisory meetings are announced in the Federal Register, allowing an 
opportunity for the public to obtain information on committee work 
before it leads to recommendations for Agency consideration.
    NASA engages with the public on procurement-related regulations in 
several ways. In addition to publishing abstracts and anticipated 
publication dates for upcoming rules in the biannual Unified Agenda, 
members of the public can track the progress of any open and pending 
NASA regulation upon publication of NASA Federal Acquisition 
Regulations (FAR) Supplement (NFS) rules in the Federal Register (FR).
    NASA also meets with industry associations on a quarterly basis 
both for its own regulations and as a signatory to the FAR. Industry 
associations that regularly participate in these discussions include 
members of Council of Defense and Space Industry Associations (CODSIA). 
CODSIA current member associations include:

 Aerospace Industries Association
 American Council of Engineering Companies
 Associated General Contractors
 Computing Technology Industry Association Federal Procurement 
Council
 Information Technology Industry Council
 National Defense Industrial Association
 Professional Services Council

    During these meetings, NASA often provides information on open FAR 
rules which is publicly accessible in the FAR Case Status Report at 
https://www.acq.osd.mil/dpap/dars/far_case_status.html, and may provide 
an update on companion NFS acquisition rules. Occasionally, while NFS 
or FAR rules are out for public comment, NASA will hold a public 
meeting to allow the public to provide feedback in an open forum. 
Information regarding a public meeting is typically provided the rule 
document upon publication for comment.
    NASA's Acquisition also conveys policy changes through publications 
the following websites:
     Procurement Class Deviations at https://www.hq.nasa.gov/office/procurement/regs/pcd.pdf.
     Procurement Notices (https://www.hq.nasa.gov/office/procurement/regs/pn.pdf).
     Procurement Information Circulars at https://www.hq.nasa.gov/office/procurement/regs/pic.pdf.
    NASA actively engages the public through Federal Register 
publications. For example, two Requests for Information [86 FR 31735 
and 88 FR 21725] were published to gather input on the obstacles and 
difficulties hindering involvement of individuals from underserved 
communities (as defined in Executive Order 13985, Advancing Racial 
Equity and Support for Underserved Communities Through the Federal 
Government, and Executive Order 14091 Further Advancing Racial Equity 
and Support for Underserved Communities Through the Federal Government) 
in NASA's procurement, grants, and cooperative agreements. Currently, 
public responses are being reviewed by the Agency. In the interim, NASA 
has taken action to increase its outreach efforts aimed at reaching 
underserved communities; specifically providing additional virtual 
training seminars and webinars to engage members of underserved 
communities on understanding NASA programs and on how to do business 
with NASA.
    In addition to these program-specific efforts, NASA regularly seeks 
feedback from customers in the form of information collections under 
the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA). The Agency maintains several generic 
PRA clearances allowing the Agency to rapidly engage the public.

2700-0153, Generic Clearance for the Collection of Qualitative Feedback 
on Agency Service Delivery

    This collection of information allows the Agency to engage members 
of the public and stakeholders through quick surveys, small discussion 
or focus groups, and can highlight areas where communication, training, 
or changes in operations which could improve delivery of products or 
services. For example, the Artemis Student Challenges (ASC) provides 
foundational learning opportunities to prepare students to learn and 
engage in Artemis-focused challenges that align with the technological 
needs of the Artemis missions and/or that will provide the Artemis 
generation with new, authentic, high- quality student challenge 
experiences. ASC provides students with the opportunity to design, 
build, and test technologies.

2700-0159, Generic Clearance for the NASA Office of Education 
Performance Measurement and Evaluation (Testing)

    This collection supports NASA's Office of STEM Engagement which 
administers the Agency's national education activities in support of 
the Space Act. This collection allows the Agency to validate the forms 
and instruments used by educators, students and NASA interns for 
program application forms, customer satisfaction questionnaires, focus 
group protocols, and project activity survey instruments.

2700-0181, Generic Clearance for Improving Customer Experience (OMB 
Circular A-11, Section 280 Implementation)

    This information collection is used to garner customer and 
stakeholder feedback in accordance with the Administration's commitment 
to improving customer service delivery as discussed in Section 280 of 
OMB Circular A-11. The Circular established government-wide standards 
for mature customer experience organizations in government to identify 
their highest-impact customer journeys and select touchpoints or 
transactions within those journeys to collect feedback. These results 
will be used to improve the delivery of Federal services and programs 
and will provide government-wide data on customer experience that can 
be displayed on performance.gov to help build transparency and 
accountability of Federal programs.
    NASA's SBIR/STTR team is currently considering how to leverage this 
collection to:
     Develop a user-friendly interface for online applications 
to make it easier for small businesses to navigate the submission 
process.
     Simplify the application process to reduces administrative 
burden.

[[Page 9511]]

     Seek feedback from applicants and stakeholders to identify 
areas for improvement.

BILLING CODE 7510-13-P

NATIONAL ARCHIVES AND RECORDS ADMINISTRATION (NARA)

Statement of Regulatory Priorities

    The National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) primarily 
issues regulations directed to other federal agencies. These 
regulations include records management, information services, and 
information security. For example, records management regulations 
directed to federal agencies concern the proper management and 
disposition of federal records. Through the Information Security 
Oversight Office (ISOO), NARA also issues Government-wide regulations 
concerning information security classification, controlled unclassified 
information (CUI), and declassification programs; through the Office of 
Government Information Services, NARA issues Government-wide 
regulations concerning the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) dispute 
resolution services and FOIA ombudsman functions; and through the 
Office of the Federal Register, NARA issues regulations concerning 
publishing federal documents in the Federal Register, Code of Federal 
Regulations, and other publications.
    NARA regulations directed to the public primarily address access to 
and use of our historically valuable holdings, including archives, 
donated historical materials, Nixon Presidential materials, and other 
Presidential records. NARA also issues regulations relating to the 
National Historical Publications and Records Commission (NHPRC) grant 
programs.

Proposed Changes to Rescheduling Requirements

    In the second quarter of FY 2024, NARA will issue a draft rule with 
changes to 36 CFR 1225.22 regarding requirements for agencies to 
reschedule their records. All rescheduling requirements will be in 
section 1225.22. NARA will remove and reserve sections 1225.24 and 
1225.26 to eliminate the media neutral notification requirement, which 
is no longer relevant.

Enhancing Oversight Requirements for Records Management

    We also propose to amend 36 CFR part 1239. We are removing subpart 
B--Program Assistance, as it is out-of-date and informational, and 
provides no agency requirements. We are proposing to update the 
remaining subparts to provide clarity and specificity to our agency 
oversight requirements. We propose to move unauthorized disposition 
requirements from 36 CFR part 1230 to 36 CFR part 1239 and strengthen 
them.

Streamlining Requirements for Agencies Dealing With General Records 
Schedules and GAO

    We propose updating 36 CFR 1225.20 and removing 1225.12(h) to make 
it easier for agencies applying the General Records Schedules (GRS) by 
minimizing the instances where the General Accounting Office (GAO) must 
be consulted. Now, agencies will only need GAO approval for deviations 
from GRS 1.1, item 010, which relates to accountable officer records. 
They won't need GAO approval for deviations from other parts of the 
GRS. Also, they won't need GAO approval for program records schedules 
that are less than three years old.

New Digitization Standards for Permanent Still Image Film Records

    The next step for digitization standards in NARA's Regulations will 
include technical standards for digitizing various permanent still 
image film records, such as transparencies, negatives, radiographic, 
microfiche, and microfilm. These standards will be added to subpart E 
of 36 CFR part 1236.

Revising Provisions for Digital Photographs

    We propose revising the provisions stated in 36 CFR 1237.28(d), 
which addresses special concerns for digital photographs. This revision 
is essential because the recent publication of subpart E of 36 CFR part 
1236 introduces new and more detailed requirements for digitizing 
photographic prints.

Authorization for Disposing of Digitized Temporary Records

    In June 2023, NARA released GRS Transmittal 34, introducing GRS 4.5 
Digitizing Records. As a result, we propose updating the regulations in 
36 CFR 1236.36 to ensure appropriate authorization for disposing of 
temporary records after they have been digitized. Furthermore, we 
propose aligning the language used throughout 36 CFR subpart D with the 
newly published subpart E of 36 CFR part 1236.

Improving Regulations for Electronic Message Preservation

    On January 1, 2021, the Federal Records Act was amended. The 
updated law now requires the Archivist of the United States to create 
regulations for federal agencies on preserving electronic messages that 
are considered records. In response to this, we are proposing changes 
to our regulations by revising section 1236.22, which covers the 
additional requirements for managing electronic mail records. The aim 
is to clearly outline the records management requirements for 
electronic messages and systems.
    These records management regulatory priorities align with the goals 
and initiatives of our Strategic Plan 2022-2026.

BILLING CODE 7515-01-P

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION

Overview

    The National Science Foundation (NSF) is an independent federal 
agency created by Congress in 1950 ``to promote the progress of 
science; to advance the national health, prosperity, and welfare; to 
secure the national defense . . .'' NSF is vital because we support 
basic research and people to create knowledge that transforms the 
future. This type of support:

 Is a primary driver of the U.S. economy
 Enhances the nation's security
 Advances knowledge to sustain global leadership

    With an annual budget of $9.5 billion (FY 2023), we are the funding 
source for approximately 23% of the total federal budget for basic 
research conducted at U.S. colleges and universities. In many fields 
such as mathematics, computer science and the social sciences, NSF is 
the major source of federal backing.
    We fulfill our mission chiefly by issuing limited-term grants--
currently about 11,200 new awards per year, with an average duration of 
three years--to fund specific research proposals that have been judged 
the most promising by a rigorous and objective merit-review system. 
Most of these awards go to individuals or small groups of 
investigators. Others provide funding for research centers, instruments 
and facilities that allow scientists, engineers, and students to work 
at the outermost frontiers of knowledge.
    NSF's goals--discovery, learning, research infrastructure and 
stewardship--provide an integrated strategy to advance the frontiers of 
knowledge, cultivate a world-class, broadly inclusive science and 
engineering workforce and expand the scientific literacy of all 
citizens, build the nation's research capability through

[[Page 9512]]

investments in advanced instrumentation and facilities, and support 
excellence in science and engineering research and education through a 
capable and responsive organization. We like to say that NSF is ``where 
discoveries begin.''
    NSF is committed to expanding the opportunities in STEM to people 
of all racial, ethnic, geographic, and socioeconomic backgrounds, 
sexual orientations, gender identities and to persons with 
disabilities.
    We value diversity and inclusion, demonstrate integrity and 
excellence in our devotion to public service and prioritize innovation 
and collaboration in our support of the work of the scientific 
community and of each other.
    While broadening participation in STEM is included in NSF's merit 
review criteria, some programs go beyond the standard review criteria. 
These investments--which make up NSF's Broadening Participation in STEM 
Portfolio--use different approaches to build STEM education and 
research capacity, catalyze new areas of STEM research, and develop 
strategic partnerships and alliances.
    Many of the discoveries and technological advances have been truly 
revolutionary. In the past few decades, NSF-funded researchers have won 
some 236 Nobel Prizes as well as other honors too numerous to list. 
These pioneers have included the scientists or teams that discovered 
many of the fundamental particles of matter, analyzed the cosmic 
microwaves left over from the earliest epoch of the universe, developed 
carbon-14 dating of ancient artifacts, decoded the genetics of viruses, 
and created an entirely new state of matter called a Bose-Einstein 
condensate.
    NSF also funds equipment that is needed by scientists and engineers 
but is often too expensive for any one group or researcher to afford. 
Examples of such major research equipment include giant optical and 
radio telescopes, Antarctic research sites, high-end computer 
facilities and ultra-high-speed connections, ships for ocean research, 
sensitive detectors of very subtle physical phenomena and gravitational 
wave observatories.
    Another essential element in NSF's mission is support for science 
and engineering education, from pre-K through graduate school and 
beyond. The research we fund is thoroughly integrated with education to 
help ensure that there will always be plenty of skilled people 
available to work in new and emerging scientific, engineering, and 
technological fields, and plenty of capable teachers to educate the 
next generation.
    No single factor is more important to the intellectual and economic 
progress of society, and to the enhanced well-being of its citizens, 
than the continuous acquisition of new knowledge. NSF is proud to be a 
major part of that process.
    Specifically, the Foundation's organic legislation authorizes us to 
engage in the following activities:
    A. Initiate and support, through grants and contracts, scientific 
and engineering research, and programs to strengthen scientific and 
engineering research potential, and education programs at all levels, 
and appraise the impact of research upon industrial development and the 
general welfare.
    B. Award graduate fellowships in the sciences and in engineering.
    C. Foster the interchange of scientific information among 
scientists and engineers in the United States and foreign countries.
    D. Foster and support the development and use of computers and 
other scientific methods and technologies, primarily for research and 
education in the sciences.
    E. Evaluate the status and needs of the various sciences and 
engineering and take into consideration the results of this evaluation 
in correlating our research and educational programs with other federal 
and non-federal programs.
    F. Provide a central clearinghouse for the collection, 
interpretation, and analysis of data on scientific and technical 
resources in the United States, and provide a source of information for 
policy formulation by other federal agencies.
    G. Determine the total amount of federal money received by 
universities and appropriate organizations for the conduct of 
scientific and engineering research, including both basic and applied, 
and construction of facilities where such research is conducted, but 
excluding development, and report annually thereon to the President and 
the Congress.
    H. Initiate and support specific scientific and engineering 
activities in connection with matters relating to international 
cooperation, national security, and the effects of scientific and 
technological applications upon society.
    I. Initiate and support scientific and engineering research, 
including applied research, at academic and other nonprofit 
institutions and, at the direction of the President, support applied 
research at other organizations.
    J. Recommend and encourage the pursuit of national policies for the 
promotion of basic research and education in the sciences and 
engineering. Strengthen research and education innovation in the 
sciences and engineering, including independent research by 
individuals, throughout the United States.
    K. Support activities designed to increase the participation of 
women and minorities and others underrepresented in science and 
technology. The Louis Stokes Alliances for Minority Participation 
(LSAMP) program is an alliance-based program. The program's theory is 
based on the Tinto model for student retention referenced in the 2005 
LSAMP program evaluation (cleared under 3145-0190 and now covered by 
3145-0226). The overall goal of the program is to assist universities 
and colleges in diversifying the nation's science, technology, 
engineering, and mathematics (STEM) workforce by increasing the number 
of STEM baccalaureate and graduate degrees awarded to populations 
historically underrepresented in these disciplines: African Americans, 
Hispanic Americans, American Indians, Alaska Natives, Native Hawaiians, 
and Native Pacific Islanders. LSAMP's efforts to increase diversity in 
STEM are aligned with the goals of the Federal Government's five-year 
strategic plan for STEM education, Charting a Course for Success: 
America's Strategy for STEM Education.
    With this fall regulatory agenda, NSF highlights the Robert Noyce 
Teacher Scholarship (Noyce) Program (RIN 3145-AA65). This program 
provides funding to institutions of higher education for scholarships 
to STEM major undergraduates and professionals to become effective 
certified K-12 STEM teachers and experienced, exemplary K-12 teachers 
to become master teacher leaders in high-need school districts. 
Undergraduate and post-baccalaureate STEM professionals receiving 
funding must teach two years in a high-need school district for each 
year in which they have received financial support. Post-baccalaureate 
STEM professionals must teach for four years in a high-need school 
district during which time they receive annual salary supplements from 
the grant funds. Experienced, exemplary K-12 teachers of mathematics or 
science in high-need school districts receiving financial support may 
be supported for one year in obtaining a master's degree and then 
receive a salary supplement from grant funds for four years as they 
continue to teach in a high-need school district. Individuals who 
already possess a master's degree can be supported for five years with 
salary supplements from grant funds as they continue to teach in a 
high-need school

[[Page 9513]]

district. NSF, in consultation with the Secretary of Education, plans 
to l propose regulations on the process of treating scholarships as 
Federal unsubsidized student loans for repayment purposes when the 
scholarship recipients fail to meet their required service obligations 
under the Noyce Program.
    Consistent with the President's Executive Order on Modernizing 
Regulatory Review (Apr. 6, 2023), NSF intends to consider a variety of 
methods, beyond publication of the proposed regulation for public 
comment in the Federal Register, to encourage the participation and 
input of potentially affected individuals and entities. These 
additional efforts may include notices, bulletins, emails, phone calls, 
meetings, surveys, ``office hours,'' or other means of communication, 
information gathering, and dialogue with academic institutions that 
receive or have received Noyce scholarship funding, as well as similar 
outreach, by NSF or these institutions, to past and present individual 
Noyce scholarship recipients, to obtain their views.
    In addition, NSF regularly seeks feedback from customers in the 
form of information collections under the Paperwork Reduction Act 
(PRA). NSF maintains three generic PRA clearances allowing the Agency 
to rapidly engage the public: two clearances allow NSF to collect 
customer feedback on service delivery for NSF programs such as 
principal investigator workshops and website redesigns (OMB Control 
Number 3145-0215, Generic Clearance for the Collection of Qualitative 
Feedback on Agency Service Delivery and OMB Control Number 3145-0254, 
Generic Clearance for Improving Customer Experience (OMB Circular A-11, 
Section 280 Implementation)), and a third to allow NSF to collect 
information for evaluation, research, and evidence building in order to 
improve surveys conducted by the National Center for Science, 
Engineering and Statistics programs (OMB Control Number 3145-0174, SRS-
Generic Clearance of Survey Improvement Projects for the Division of 
Science Resources Statistics). Additional information regarding these 
collections--including all background materials--can be found at 
https://www.reginfo.gov/public/do/PRAMain.

BILLING CODE 7555-01-P

U.S. OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT

Statement of Regulatory and Deregulatory Priorities

Fall 2023 Unified Agenda

    The Office of Personnel Management (OPM) serves as the chief human 
resources agency and personnel policy manager for the Federal 
Government. We are champions of talent for the Federal Government, 
leading Federal agencies in workforce policies, programs, and benefits 
in service to the American people. We seek to position the Federal 
Government as a model employer through innovation, inclusivity, and 
leadership, as we build a rewarding culture that empowers the Federal 
workforce to tackle some of our nation's toughest challenges.
    OPM's regulatory agenda is aligned with these core mission areas 
and advances multiple Biden-Harris Administration priorities. Indeed, 
each of OPM's regulations is focused on improving the efficiency and 
effectiveness of government--a key Administration priority. In 
addition, several of OPM's regulations are:
     Actions that empower workers and increase their wages;
     Actions that promote racial and gender equity and LGBTQI+ 
equality and address issues of disability, religious discrimination, 
persistent poverty, and immigration;
     Actions that address pandemic preparedness and access to 
healthcare; and
     Actions that improve access to and delivery of public 
programs and services by reducing administrative burden.
    While OPM is committed to promoting inclusiveness in the regulatory 
process, most of our regulations are focused on organizational and 
personnel matters and, therefore, agency engagement with the general 
public is limited. In cases where OPM regulations do have public 
impact, OPM actively engages with stakeholders who may be affected by 
our regulations directly or indirectly through the social groups they 
represent. Public participation through petitions, job fairs, webinars, 
meetings, and the public comment process have informed the development 
of a few of our rulemakings at the initiation phase of the process and 
are summarized in this Statement, where applicable. Generally, however, 
OPM's engagement in developing its regulatory program focuses on 
engagement with agencies (such as through the Chief Human Capital 
Officers Council) and employee representative groups (such as labor 
unions).
    We will continue to encourage and provide opportunities for 
meaningful participation to inform regulatory planning in the future.

I. Actions That Empower Workers and Increase Their Wages

    OPM is committed to recruiting, retaining, and supporting a world-
class Federal workforce. This means providing pathways to Federal 
service, working to make every Federal job a good job, and 
strengthening Federal labor unions. OPM's regulatory agenda advances 
each of these goals and reflects the inputs received from members of 
the public during different phases of the rulemaking process.

 Pathways Programs (3206-AO25)

    OPM is finalizing modifications to the Pathways Programs to align 
the three constituent programs to better meet the Federal government's 
needs for recruiting and hiring interns and recent graduates. OPM 
proposes to update the regulations for the Pathways Programs to 
facilitate a better applicant experience, to improve developmental 
opportunities for Pathways Program participants, and to streamline 
agencies' ability to hire participants in the Pathways Programs, 
especially those who have successfully completed their Pathways 
requirements and are eligible for conversion to a term or permanent 
position in the competitive service. Robust Pathways Programs with 
appropriate safeguards to promote its use as a supplement to, and not a 
substitute for, the competitive hiring process is essential to boosting 
the Federal government's ability to recruit and retain early career 
talent.
    This rule was informed by feedback from various stakeholders over 
the past decade, including applicants, educational institutions, 
Federal employees, and agencies. Major sources of this feedback include 
outreach events like job fairs and presentations/webinars on the 
Pathways Programs. Email inquiries from applicants and participants 
about how the Programs work provided additional opportunities to 
receive feedback. Based on these inputs, OPM is modifying current 
regulations to allow Recent Graduate and Presidential Management 
Fellows participants to be converted to term or permanent positions in 
any agency, when appropriate. After publishing the proposed rule, OPM 
further engaged stakeholders to ensure awareness and encourage the 
submission of comments that may inform the development of the final 
rule.

[[Page 9514]]

 Time-Limited Promotions [3206-A052]

    The Office of Personnel Management (OPM) is issuing a proposed rule 
to clarify that bargaining- unit employees who are detailed or 
temporarily promoted to higher grade duties of a higher- graded 
position should be paid appropriately for performing these duties, when 
ordered by an arbitrator, administrative body, or court, under a 
collective bargaining agreement and the employees were assigned these 
duties outside of competitive hiring procedures. Similarly, the 
proposed rule clarifies that non-bargaining unit employees should also 
be paid appropriately for performing these duties if ordered by an 
administrative body or court. At present, non-competitive temporary 
promotions and non-competitive details to duties of higher-graded 
positions are limited to no more than 120 days under OPM regulations 
regardless of the bargaining-unit status of the employee. Current 
regulations prohibit employees from being appropriately paid for 
higher- graded duties performed in excess of 120 days and assigned 
without competition. As a result, the principle of equal pay for equal 
work is absent and bargaining unit employees are unable to have 
meaningful recourse through their negotiated collective bargaining 
agreement.
    OPM's decision to issue this proposed rule was informed by 
engagement with the National Treasury Employees Union (NTEU) and the 
National Federation of Federal Employees (NFFE). In 2022, NTEU 
submitted a written petition to OPM seeking the issuance of a rule 
under 5 U.S.C. 553(e). This petition outlined the problem to be 
addressed with recommended changes. In addition, NFFE raised similar 
suggestions in meetings with OPM in late 2022. When the proposed rule 
is issued, OPM anticipates further engagement with national unions and 
other Federal employee groups.

 Upholding Civil Service Protections and Merit System 
Principles [3206-A056]

    OPM plans to finalize a rule to uphold civil service protections 
and merit system principles after consideration of comments on OPM's 
proposal. OPM proposed to clarify that employees who are moved 
involuntarily from the competitive to the excepted service, or from one 
excepted service schedule to another, retain the status and adverse 
action rights they had at the time of movement. OPM's proposal also 
required Federal agencies to follow specific procedures upon moving any 
employees without their consent from the competitive service to the 
excepted service or, if already in the excepted service, to a different 
excepted service schedule. Finally, OPM proposed to define positions of 
a ``confidential, policy-determining, policy-making, or policy- 
advocating character,'' in accordance with legislative history and 
Congressional intent, to mean political appointments.
    In late 2022, the National Treasury Employees Union (NTEU) 
submitted a written petition to OPM outlining their views on regulatory 
changes that would reinform civil service protections and merit system 
principles. Subsequently in early 2023, the Federal Workers Alliance 
(FWA) sent a letter to OPM expressing support for the NTEU petition. 
OPM anticipates engagement with national unions and other Federal 
employee groups during the notice and comment period as part of the 
standard regulatory process.

II. Actions That Promote Racial and Gender Equity and LGBTQI+ Equality 
and Address Issues of Disability, Religious Discrimination, Persistent 
Poverty, and Immigration

    In fact, many of the regulations noted above--in particular, those 
focused on providing pathways into the Federal Government--emphasize 
equity. Additional work in this area focuses on promoting pay equity 
and OPM has made efforts to encourage feedback on the proposals from 
stakeholders.

 Advancing Pay Equity in Governmentwide Pay Systems (3206-AO39)

    OPM is issuing a final rule to advance pay equity in the General 
Schedule (GS) pay system, Prevailing Rate Systems, Administrative 
Appeals Judge (AAJ) pay system, and Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) pay 
system by revising the criteria for making salary determinations based 
on salary history. After the proposed rule was published, OPM shared it 
with more than 990 stakeholders to ensure awareness and encourage the 
submission of comments that may inform the development of the final 
rule.

III. Actions That Address Pandemic Preparedness and Access to 
Healthcare

    OPM has helped to lead the Federal Government throughout the COVID-
19 pandemic--serving as a co-chair of the Safer Federal Workforce Task 
Force, supporting agencies with implementation of a maximum telework 
posture, and providing meaningful benefits to Federal employees. OPM 
will continue this important work through its regulatory agenda.

 Scheduling of Annual Leave for Employees Responding to COVID-
19 (3206-AO04)

    OPM is finalizing regulations to assist agencies and employees 
responding to the National Emergency Concerning the Novel Coronavirus 
Disease (COVID-19) Outbreak and for future national emergencies. The 
regulations provide that employees who would forfeit annual leave in 
excess of the maximum annual leave allowable carryover because of their 
work to support the nation during a national emergency will have their 
excess annual leave deemed to have been scheduled in advance and 
subject to leave restoration.

 Evacuation During a Public Health Emergency (3206-AO34)

    OPM is proposing a new subpart Q within 5 CFR part 550, which would 
amend, expand, and reorganize regulations that currently provide 
agencies with the authority to evacuate employees during a pandemic 
health crisis. The revised regulations will provide agencies with the 
authority to evacuate an employee or groups of employees during either 
a public health emergency declaration or a pandemic health crisis. The 
current authority to evacuate employees during a pandemic health crisis 
is found at 5 CFR 550.409. This revision and reorganization of the 
regulations will enable OPM to capitalize on lessons learned from the 
COVID-19 pandemic.

 Postal Service Health Benefits Program (3206-AO43)

    OPM is finalizing an interim final rule that implemented the Postal 
Service Health Benefits (PSHB) Program within the Federal Employees 
Health Benefits (FEHB) Program pursuant to the Postal Service Reform 
Act of 2022. This regulation will ensure continuity of health insurance 
coverage for Postal Service employees, annuitants, and their family 
members who will no longer be eligible for FEHB in January 2025; enable 
enrollees access to more prescription drug coverage options and 
potential reduction in prescription drug costs for Medicare Part D 
eligible enrollees; reduce the Postal Service's premiums by 
approximately $5.7 billion over 10 years (CBO Analysis) and reduce its 
future liability for retiree health benefits; and enable use of a 
central enrollment portal that will reduce administrative burden for 
enrollment, which will ensure more accurate payment of plans, allow 
more

[[Page 9515]]

frequent sharing of enrollment data with plans, and limit human error.

IV. Actions That Improve Access to and Delivery of Public Programs and 
Services by Reducing Administrative Burden

    OPM's work in this area focuses on improving efficiency and 
providing agencies additional flexibilities in the hiring process.

 Hiring Authority for Post-Secondary Students (3206-AN86)

    OPM is finalizing regulations establishing hiring authorities for 
post-secondary students to positions in the competitive service to 
provide additional flexibility in hiring eligible and qualified 
individuals. These revisions will implement section 1108 of Public Law 
115-232, John S. McCain National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) for 
Fiscal Year (FY) 2019.

 Hiring Authority for College Graduates (3206-AN79)

    OPM is finalizing regulations establishing hiring authorities for 
certain college graduates to positions in the competitive service. This 
rule will provide additional flexibility in hiring eligible and 
qualified individuals by implementing section 1108 of Public Law 115-
232, the NDAA for FY 2019.

 Rule of Many (3206-AN80)

    OPM is finalizing regulations to implement changes--known as the 
``rule of many''--authorized by the NDAA for FY 2019 governing the 
selection of candidates from competitive lists of eligibles. The 
statute eliminates the requirement that an agency select only from the 
top three candidates at any given juncture (the rule of three) in 
numerical rating and ranking and instead authorizes agencies to certify 
and consider a sufficient number of candidates, no fewer than three, 
using a cut-off score or other mechanism established through this 
rulemaking. This change also affects how agencies may make selections 
under 5 CFR part 302, titled ``Employment in the Excepted Service.'' 
These changes will provide expanded flexibility to agencies in the 
selection of candidates.

 Noncompetitive Appointment of Certain Military Spouses (3206-
AO57)

    OPM is issuing interim final regulations to implement section 1111 
of Public Law 117-263, the NDAA for FY 2023. These revisions extend the 
eligibility criteria for any spouse married to an active-duty military 
member through December 31, 2028, and remove the agency reporting 
requirements established under section 573(d) of Public Law 115-232. 
The intended effect of the Authority is to increase the hiring of 
military spouses in the Federal Government.

 Recruitment and Relocation Incentive Waivers (3206-AO36)

    OPM is issuing a proposed rule to expand the authority to approve 
waivers of the normal payment limitations on recruitment and relocation 
incentives, so that agencies have access to higher payment limitations 
based on a critical need without requesting approval from OPM. 
Currently, agencies have the authority to approve a recruitment or 
relocation incentive without OPM approval for payments of up to 25 
percent of an employee's annual rate of basic pay times the number of 
years in a service agreement (not to exceed 4 years or 100 percent of 
annual basic pay). Under a waiver, agencies could approve a recruitment 
or relocation incentive without OPM approval for payments of up to 50 
percent of an employee's annual rate of basic pay times the number of 
years in a service agreement (not to exceed 100 percent of annual basic 
pay).

 Recruitment and Selection Through Competitive Examination 
(3206-AO24)

    OPM is finalizing revisions implementing the Competitive Service 
Act of 2015, Public Law 114-137, to allow an appointing authority 
(i.e., the head of a federal agency or department) to share a 
competitive certificate of eligibles with one or more appointing 
authorities for the purpose of making selections of qualified 
candidates.

 Selective Service Registration (3206-AO37)

    OPM is proposing regulations to enable executive agencies to make 
initial determinations as to whether failure to register with the 
Selective Service System was knowing and willful.

BILLING CODE 3280-F5-P

PENSION BENEFIT GUARANTY CORPORATION (PBGC)

Statement of Regulatory and Deregulatory Priorities

    The Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation (PBGC or Corporation) is a 
federal corporation created under title IV of the Employee Retirement 
Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA) to protect the retirement security 
of over 33 million American workers, retirees, and beneficiaries in 
both single-employer and multiemployer private-sector pension plans. 
PBGC administers two insurance programs--one for single-employer 
defined benefit pension plans and a second for multiemployer defined 
benefit pension plans. In addition, PBGC administers a special 
financial assistance (SFA) program for eligible financially troubled 
multiemployer plans.
     Single-Employer Program. Under the single-employer 
program, when a plan terminates with insufficient assets to cover all 
plan benefits (distress and involuntary terminations), PBGC pays plan 
benefits that are guaranteed under title IV. PBGC also pays 
nonguaranteed plan benefits to the extent funded by plan assets or 
recoveries from employers. In fiscal year (FY) 2022, PBGC paid over 
$7.0 billion in benefits to more than 960,000 participants. Operations 
under the single-employer program are financed by insurance premiums, 
investment income, assets from pension plans trusteed by PBGC, and 
recoveries from the companies formerly responsible for the trusteed 
plans.
     Multiemployer Program. The multiemployer program covers 
collectively bargained plans involving more than one unrelated 
employer. PBGC provides traditional financial assistance (technically 
in the form of a loan, though almost never repaid) to the plan if the 
plan is insolvent and thus unable to pay benefits at the guaranteed 
level. The guarantee is structured differently from, and is generally 
significantly lower than, the single-employer guarantee. In FY2022, 
PBGC provided $217 million in traditional financial assistance to 115 
insolvent multiemployer plans covering 93,525 participants receiving 
guaranteed benefits. Those plans also cover an additional 46,480 
participants entitled to receive benefits in the future. PBGC also 
provided a final payment of $9 million in financial assistance to 
facilitate the merger of two multiemployer plans. Operations under the 
multiemployer program generally are financed by insurance premiums and 
investment income.
     Special Financial Assistance Program. The American Rescue 
Plan (ARP) Act of 2021 added section 4262 of ERISA, which requires PBGC 
to provide SFA to certain financially troubled multiemployer plans upon 
application for assistance. PBGC's SFA Program requires plans to 
demonstrate eligibility for SFA and to calculate the amount of 
assistance pursuant to ARP and PBGC's regulations. This program is 
funded by general tax revenues.

[[Page 9516]]

    For the second year in a row, both PBGC's Multiemployer Program and 
Single-Employer Program have a positive net position at fiscal year-
end. The financial status of the single-employer program improved from 
a positive net financial position of $30.9 billion at the end of FY 
2021 to $36.6 billion at the end of FY 2022. The net financial position 
of the multiemployer program improved from a positive net position of 
$481 million at the end of FY 2021 to $1.1 billion at the end of FY 
2022.
    ARP substantially improves the financial condition and the outlook 
for PBGC's multiemployer program. By forestalling the near-term 
insolvency of the most troubled multiemployer plans, the multiemployer 
program is no longer expected to go insolvent in FY 2026 and can 
accumulate a greater level of reserve assets in its insurance fund in 
the near-term.
    To carry out its statutory functions, PBGC issues regulations on 
such matters as how to pay premiums, when reports are due, what 
benefits are covered by the insurance programs, how to terminate a 
plan, the liability for underfunding, and how withdrawal liability 
works for multiemployer plans. PBGC follows a regulatory approach that 
seeks to encourage the continuation and maintenance of securely-funded 
defined benefit plans. In developing new regulations and reviewing 
existing regulations, PBGC seeks to reduce burdens on plans, employers, 
and participants, and to ease and simplify employer compliance wherever 
possible. PBGC particularly strives to meet the needs of small 
businesses that sponsor defined benefit plans. In all such efforts, 
PBGC's mission is to protect the retirement incomes of plan 
participants.

Regulatory/Deregulatory Objectives and Priorities

    PBGC's regulatory/deregulatory objectives and priorities are 
developed in the context of the Corporation's statutory purposes, 
priorities, and strategic goals.
    Pension plans and the statutory framework in which they are 
maintained and terminated are complex. Despite this complexity, PBGC is 
committed to issuing simple, understandable, flexible, and timely 
regulations to help affected parties. PBGC's regulatory/deregulatory 
objectives and priorities are:
     To enhance the retirement security of workers and 
retirees;
     To implement regulatory actions that ease compliance 
burdens and achieve maximum net benefits while protecting retirement 
security; and
     To simplify existing regulations and reduce burden.
    PBGC endeavors in all its regulatory and deregulatory actions to 
promote clarity and reduce burden on the public.

Small Businesses

    PBGC considers very seriously the impact of its regulations and 
policies on small entities. PBGC attempts to minimize administrative 
burdens on plans and participants, improve transparency, simplify 
filing, and assist plans to comply with applicable requirements. PBGC 
particularly strives to meet the needs of small businesses that sponsor 
defined benefit plans. In all such efforts, PBGC's mission is to 
protect the retirement incomes of plan participants.

Open Government and Public Engagement

    PBGC encourages public participation in the regulatory process. For 
example, PBGC's ``Federal Register Notices Open for Comment'' web page 
highlights when there are opportunities to comment on proposed rules, 
information collections, and other Federal Register notices. PBGC 
encourages comments on an ongoing basis as it continues to look for 
ways to further improve the agency's regulations. PBGC staff also 
actively participate in conferences focused on employee retirement 
benefits and engage with plan participant advocacy groups to understand 
where there may be concerns with PBGC regulations. Efforts to reduce 
regulatory burden in the projects discussed below are in substantial 
part a response to public comments and engagement.

American Rescue Plan

    The American Rescue Plan (ARP) Act of 2021 added a new section 4262 
of ERISA to create a program to provide funding to severely underfunded 
multiemployer pension plans to ensure that millions of America's 
workers, retirees, and their families receive the pension benefits they 
earned through many years of hard work.
    Under new section 4262 of ERISA, PBGC was required within 120 days 
to prescribe in regulations or other guidance the requirements for SFA 
applications. To implement the program, on July 9, 2021, PBGC released 
an interim final rule (RIN 1212-AB53) adding a new part 4262 to its 
regulations, ``Special Financial Assistance by PBGC,'' which was 
published in the Federal Register on July 12, 2021. Part 4262 provides 
guidance to multiemployer pension plan sponsors on eligibility, 
determining the amount of SFA, content of an application for SFA, the 
process of applying, PBGC's review of applications, and restrictions 
and conditions on plans that receive SFA. PBGC received over 100 public 
comments on many provisions of the interim rule including the 
methodology plans must use to calculate the amount of SFA, permissible 
investments of SFA funds, and the conditions imposed on plans that 
receive SFA. PBGC published a final rule on July 8, 2022, that makes 
various changes to part 4262 in response to public comments. The 
provisions of the final rule became effective on August 8. PBGC 
included a 30-day public comment period solely on the change to the 
condition to require a phased recognition of SFA assets for purposes of 
computing employer withdrawal liability. In response to comments 
received, PBGC added an exception process for the withdrawal liability 
conditions that apply to a plan that receives SFA, which was published 
in a final rule that was effective on January 26, 2023.

Multiemployer Plans

    PBGC published a proposed rule on October 14, 2022, that would 
prescribe actuarial assumptions which may be used by a multiemployer 
plan actuary in determining an employer's withdrawal liability (RIN 
1212-AB54). Section 4213(a) of ERISA permits PBGC to prescribe by 
regulation such assumptions.
    Benefit levels in a multiemployer plan are typically set by 
trustees representing contributing employers and unions. Withdrawal 
liability generally represents an employer's share of the plan's 
unfunded vested benefits (UVBs) that the plan may have at the end of 
the plan year immediately preceding the plan year in which the employer 
withdraws. Withdrawal liability is the portion of the UVBs allocable to 
the withdrawing employer and represents a plan's only opportunity to 
require a withdrawing employer to pay its allocated share of the 
unfunded liabilities. When a plan does not collect an adequate amount 
of withdrawal liability from a withdrawing employer or collects an 
amount that is less than a withdrawing employer's allocated share of 
the plan's UVBs, that burden is shifted to the remaining contributing 
employers in the plan. There is a higher likelihood that the plan will 
not be able to pay full accrued benefits, and ultimately, there is an 
increased likelihood that it would not have resources to pay basic 
(PBGC-

[[Page 9517]]

guaranteed) benefits. In that case, a plan may have to cut benefits to 
the PBGC guarantee level and apply to PBGC for financial assistance, 
which shifts costs to plan participants and to others in the 
multiemployer insurance system who fund PBGC via annual premiums.
    The rulemaking is needed to clarify that a plan actuary's use of 
4044 rates represents a valid approach to selecting an interest rate 
assumption to determine withdrawal liability. The rulemaking would 
thereby reduce or eliminate the cost-shifting effects of impediments to 
actuaries' use of 4044 rates. PBGC plans to publish a final rule that 
responds to the public comments received on the proposed rule.
    PBGC also plans to propose a rulemaking that would add a new part 
4022A to PBGC's regulations to provide guidance on determining the 
monthly amount of multiemployer plan benefits guaranteed by PBGC 
(``Multiemployer Plan Guaranteed Benefits,'' RIN 1212-AB37). For 
example, the proposed rule would explain what multiemployer plan 
benefits are eligible for PBGC's guarantee, how to determine credited 
service, how to determine a benefit's accrual rate, and how to 
calculate the guaranteed monthly benefit amount.

Rethinking Existing Regulations

    Most of PBGC's regulatory/deregulatory actions are the result of 
its ongoing retrospective review to identify and correct unintended 
effects, inconsistencies, inaccuracies, and requirements made 
irrelevant over time. For example, PBGC is proposing miscellaneous 
updates, clarifications, and improvements (RIN 1212-AB51) to its 
regulations that are in part a response to frequently asked questions 
and comments received from stakeholders, such as to annual financial 
and actuarial information filings (part 4010) and filings for 
termination of single-employer plans (part 4041). This action also 
addresses SECURE Act changes affecting premium rates (part 4006), 
benefits payable in terminated single-employer plans (part 4022), and 
part 4044 (allocation of assets in single-employer plans). PBGC's 
regulatory review also identified a need to improve PBGC's recoupment 
of benefit overpayment rules (``Improvements to Rules on Recoupment of 
Benefit Overpayments,'' RIN 1212-AB47). Other rulemakings would 
modernize PBGC's regulations and policies by adopting up-to-date 
assumptions and methods that are more consistent with best practices 
within the pension community. For example, PBGC is considering 
modernizing the interest, mortality, and expense load assumptions used 
to determine the present value of benefits under the asset allocation 
regulation (for single-employer plans) and for determining mass 
withdrawal liability payments (for multiemployer plans) (RIN 1212-AA55) 
among other purposes.

PBGC

Final Rule Stage

225. Actuarial Assumptions for Determining an Employer's Withdrawal 
Liability [1212-AB54]

    Priority: Section 3(f)(1) Significant. Major under 5 U.S.C. 801.
    Legal Authority: 29 U.S.C. 1393; 29 U.S.C. 1302(b)(3)
    CFR Citation: 29 CFR 4213.
    Legal Deadline: None.
    Abstract: This final rule responds to public comments received on 
the proposed rule. It would prescribe actuarial assumptions which may 
be used by a multiemployer plan actuary in determining an employer's 
withdrawal liability.
    Statement of Need: Benefit levels in a multiemployer plan are 
typically set by trustees representing contributing employers and 
unions. Withdrawal liability generally represents an employer's share 
of the plan's unfunded vested benefits (UVBs) that the plan may have at 
the end of the plan year immediately preceding the plan year in which 
the employer withdraws. Withdrawal liability is the portion of the UVBs 
allocable to the withdrawing employer and represents a plan's only 
opportunity to require a withdrawing employer to pay its allocated 
share of the unfunded liabilities. When a plan does not collect an 
adequate amount of withdrawal liability from a withdrawing employer or 
collects an amount that is less than a withdrawing employer's allocated 
share of the plan's UVBs, that burden is shifted to the remaining 
contributing employers in the plan. There is a higher likelihood that 
the plan will not be able to pay full accrued benefits, and ultimately, 
there is an increased likelihood that it would not have resources to 
pay basic (PBGC-guaranteed) benefits. In that case, a plan may have to 
cut benefits to the PBGC guarantee level and apply to PBGC for 
financial assistance, which shifts costs to plan participants and to 
others in the multiemployer insurance system who fund PBGC via annual 
premiums.
    This rulemaking is needed to clarify that a plan actuary's use of 
4044 rates represents a valid approach to selecting an interest rate 
assumption to determine withdrawal liability in all circumstances. The 
rulemaking would thereby reduce or eliminate the cost-shifting effects 
of impediments to actuaries' use of 4044 rates.
    Anticipated Cost and Benefits: PBGC estimates that, in the 20 years 
following the final rule's effective date, there will be a nominal 
increase in cumulative withdrawal liability payments ranging between 
$804 million and $2.98 billion. While PBGC expects that the rulemaking 
will deter employer withdrawals, it will do so only at the margin, and 
this impact is difficult to estimate. Accordingly, this analysis does 
not model any change to the rate of employer withdrawals or decrease in 
contributions due to improved plan funding attributable to these 
changes because doing so would be too speculative.
    The major expenses associated with a withdrawal liability dispute 
are attorney fees, arbitration fees (including fees to initiate 
arbitration and fees charged by an arbitrator), and fees charged by 
expert witnesses. Though costs will vary greatly from plan to plan 
based on the plan's benefit formula, size of the plan, attorney and 
expert witness rates, and other factors, PBGC estimates that a 
withdrawal liability arbitration, measuring from a request for plan 
sponsor review of a withdrawal liability determination through the end 
of arbitration would range from $82,500 to $222,000. For lengthy 
litigation, costs can be over $1 million. Assuming some arbitrations 
and litigation would be avoided entirely, and others would be less 
complex because they would not include disputes over interest 
assumptions, PBGC estimates that this rulemaking would result in an 
annual savings of $500,000 to $1 million, split evenly between plans 
and employers.
    Timetable:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Action                    Date            FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NPRM................................   10/14/22  87 FR 62316
NPRM Comment Period End.............   11/14/22
NPRM Comment Period Extended........   11/10/22  87 FR 67853
NPRM Comment Period End.............   12/13/22
Final Rule..........................   11/00/23
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No.
    Government Levels Affected: None.
    Agency Contact: Hilary Duke, Assistant General Counsel for 
Regulatory Affairs, Pension Benefit

[[Page 9518]]

Guaranty Corporation, 445 12th Street SW, Washington, DC 20024, Phone: 
202 229-3839, Email: [email protected].
    RIN: 1212-AB54

BILLING CODE 7709-02-P

U.S. SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

Statement of Regulatory Priorities

Overview

    The mission of the U.S. Small Business Administration (SBA or 
Agency) is to maintain and strengthen the nation's economy by helping 
Americans start, grow, and build resilient businesses and recover after 
disasters. In accomplishing this mission, SBA strives to improve the 
economic environment for small businesses, including those in rural 
areas, those in areas that have significantly higher unemployment and 
lower income levels than the nation's averages, and those in 
traditionally underserved markets.
    SBA has several financial, procurement, and technical assistance 
programs that provide a crucial foundation for Americans starting or 
growing a small business. For example, the Agency serves as a guarantor 
of SBA program loans to small businesses and licenses Small Business 
Investment Companies that make equity and debt investments in 
qualifying small businesses using a combination of privately raised 
capital and SBA guaranteed leverage. SBA also helps small businesses, 
including those owned by women, service-disabled veterans, minorities, 
and other historically underrepresented groups, gain access to federal 
government contracting opportunities. In addition, the Agency funds 
various small business training and mentoring programs and provides 
management and technical assistance to existing or potential small 
business owners through grants, cooperative agreements, and contracts. 
Finally, as an essential part of its purpose, SBA provides direct 
financial assistance to homeowners, renters, and businesses to repair 
or replace their property in the aftermath of a disaster. Beyond 
providing a crucial foundation for business-owners, SBA's assistance to 
small businesses, including access to capital, generates new jobs to 
help create a strong, innovative, and sustainable American economy.

Reducing Burden on Small Businesses

    SBA's regulatory policy reflects a commitment to developing 
regulations that reduce or eliminate the burden on the public, 
particularly the Agency's core constituents--small businesses. SBA's 
regulatory process generally includes an assessment of the costs and 
benefits of the regulations as required by Executive Order No. 12866, 
1993, ``Regulatory Planning and Review''; Executive Order No. 13563, 
2011, ``Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review''; and the 
Regulatory Flexibility Act. SBA's program offices are particularly 
invested in finding ways to reduce the burden imposed on the public by 
the Agency's core activities in its loan, grant, innovation, and 
procurement programs.

Openness and Transparency

    SBA promotes transparency, collaboration, and public participation 
in its rulemaking process. To that end, SBA makes a conscious effort to 
engage those members of the public eligible for SBA programs or 
affected by SBA regulations beyond the standard notice-and-comment 
process. SBA engages in tribal consultations when proposing changes to 
its government contracting regulations and often receives input on 
access and burdens associated with SBA program regulations and 
policies. For example, SBA conducted five tribal consultations or 
listening sessions about a proposal contained within the 8(a) Ownership 
and Control Rule (RIN 3245-AH70) mentioned below, leading to the 
elimination of the proposal in the final rule. For SBA's Small Business 
Innovation Research (SBIR) program, the Agency coordinates a road tour 
around the country, on which SBA and other agencies engage small 
businesses and provide them with information about the application 
process and upcoming SBIR topics for grant or contract awards. The 
Historically Underutilized Business Zones (HUBZones) program office 
regularly provides webinars about the program to prospective and 
current program participants, who are encouraged to provide feedback, 
and holds ``office hours'' twice a week, during which firms are 
encouraged to inquire about the certification process or provide 
feedback. SBA's Office of Government Contracting & Business Development 
(GCBD) and its attorneys routinely attend trade association conferences 
concerning its programs, including the annual conferences hosted by the 
National 8(a) Association and HUBZone Council. SBA's 8(a) Business 
Development (BD) program office periodically uses its monthly Straight 
Talk call to obtain input from external stakeholders. For example, in 
fall 2022, the office invited stakeholders to provide feedback on ways 
to improve the 8(a) application. SBA has also in the past entered 
interagency agreements with the Department of the Interior to conduct 
customer satisfaction surveys to gain a broad understanding of customer 
experience and customer satisfaction with the availability of 
information about SBA programs.
    In addition to these program-specific efforts, SBA regularly seeks 
feedback from customers in the form of information collections under 
the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA). SBA maintains two generic PRA 
clearances that allow the Agency to rapidly engage the public: one 
clearance allows SBA to collect customer feedback on service delivery 
for SBA programs such as GCBD and Boots to Business, and the other 
allows SBA to collect information for evaluation, research, and 
evidence building in order to improve programs like GCBD, Community 
Navigators, and SBA's capital programs.

Regulatory Framework

    SBA's Strategic Plan for fiscal years 2022 through 2026 provides a 
framework for strengthening, streamlining, and simplifying SBA programs 
and leverages collaborative relationships with other agencies and the 
private sector to provide small businesses with the tools they need to 
drive innovation and strengthen the economy through business revenue 
and job growth. The Strategic Plan serves as the foundation for the 
regulations that the Agency will develop during the next twelve to 
twenty-four months.
    SBA developed the Strategic Plan in consultation with multiple 
stakeholder groups through its Strategic Plan Working Group, which 
comprised members at all levels of SBA and across numerous Agency 
programs, allowing the themes revealed during the stakeholder 
engagement process to be incorporated throughout the Agency. SBA also 
partnered with the General Services Administration (GSA) to solicit 
input and feedback from federal employees whose roles support the 
implementation of SBA programs across the government or who work with 
other small business development programs. In addition, the Agency 
conducted community outreach across the country, including by 
conducting listening sessions with community development organizations 
in eight cities, from Portland, Maine, to Portland, Oregon, which 
provided SBA with input from entrepreneurs of all kinds and highlighted 
place-based and sector- specific issues. Finally, SBA solicited 
feedback through the Federal Register, SBA.gov posting, an SBA daily 
newsletter, a social media campaign,

[[Page 9519]]

and outreach to key stakeholder organizations.
    Based on the input received during this stakeholder engagement 
process, SBA identified the following imperatives and integrated them 
into its Strategic Plan: increase collaboration with resource partners 
and stakeholders to amplify SBA's reach and better communicate the 
Agency's products and services, and improve SBA's data transparency so 
that researchers, resource partners, community organizations, and the 
public can better understand how the SBA supports the small business 
and entrepreneurial ecosystem. The Strategic Plan, in turn, sets out 
three strategic goals: (1) ensure equitable and customer-centric design 
and delivery of programs to support small businesses and innovative 
startups; (2) build resilient businesses and a sustainable economy; and 
(3) implement strong stewardship of resources for greater impact.
    The regulations reported in SBA's semi-annual Regulatory Agenda and 
Plan are intended to facilitate achievement of these goals while 
meeting the needs of the members of the public eligible for our 
programs or affected by our regulations. Over the past twelve months, 
SBA developed rulemakings designed to support the Administration's 
Invest in America initiative and advance the country's economic growth 
and resiliency.
    SBA continues to take regulatory action as necessary to adjust and 
adapt requirements for its programs to better support the country's 
economy. In the upcoming twelve to twenty-four months, SBA will focus 
on implementing recently finalized rules that increase competition in 
the market for small business credit, incentivize patient investments 
in innovative startups, and reduce barriers in access to capital for 
underserved communities. The Agency will also focus on advancing 
proposed rules that further remove barriers to credit across its loan 
programs for justice-involved entrepreneurs and make SBA's contracting 
and counseling programs accessible and impactful for a wider range of 
small businesses.

Administration's Priorities

    To the extent possible and consistent with the Agency's statutory 
purpose, SBA will take action to support the Administration's 
priorities highlighted in the Fall 2023 Data Call for the Unified 
Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory Actions (07/19/2023), 
namely: (1) tackling the climate change emergency; (2) advancing equity 
and supporting underserved, vulnerable, and marginalized communities; 
(3) creating and sustaining good jobs with a free and fair choice to 
join a union, and promoting economic resilience in general; and (4) 
improving service delivery and customer experience and reducing 
administrative burdens. In fact, many of the Agency's rulemakings cut 
across multiple priorities. For example, SBA's amendments to Small 
Business Investment Company (SBIC) program regulations (RIN 3245-AH90, 
described below) not only support the Administration's priority to 
advance equity and support underserved communities, but also aim to 
improve SBA response times and enable SBA to focus on customer 
relationships and monitoring funds, efforts that broadly advance the 
Administration's fourth priority. Highlighted below are some of SBA's 
most important regulatory actions arranged by Administration priority, 
including actions SBA has completed since the spring 2023 Unified 
Agenda and actions that SBA plans to take in the upcoming 12-24 months.

Priority (1)--Actions That Tackle the Climate Change Emergency

    Over the past year, SBA has continued to make efforts toward its a 
multi-year priority goal to help prepare and rebuild resilient 
communities by enhancing communication efforts for disaster mitigation. 
Under the Small Business Act, SBA is authorized to make disaster loans 
for efforts to repair, rehabilitate, or replace property damaged or 
destroyed as a result of a disaster. SBA's regulations in 13 CFR part 
123 contain the legal framework for the SBA Disaster Loan program, 
which delivers SBA financing specifically targeted for pre-disaster and 
post-disaster mitigation projects. SBA can also tap into its other 
financing programs for funding to put toward disaster mitigation 
measures. No regulations are necessary to implement either of these 
options. In addition to its regulatory actions, SBA will continue to 
focus its efforts on educating the public on the benefits of investing 
in mitigation and resilience projects and on increasing awareness of 
SBA loan programs that small businesses can take advantage of to 
purchase, renovate, or retrofit buildings and equipment in order to 
reduce greenhouse gas emissions, improve energy efficiency, and enable 
the development of innovative solutions that support the green economy.
i. Disaster Assistance Loan Program Changes to Maximum Loan Amounts and 
Miscellaneous Updates (RIN 3245-AH91)
    SBA continues to develop regulatory actions that enhance and 
modernize its procurement and capital assistance programs in order to 
combat the climate crisis. A direct final rule for the Disaster Loan 
program, effective July 31, 2023, aimed to increase disaster survivors' 
access to much needed funds to repair or replace damaged property by, 
among other things, increasing home loan lending limits, extending the 
deferment period, and expanding mitigation options.
    Specifically, the final rule increased the lending limits on 
amounts for repair and replacement of disaster damaged real and 
personal property, for refinancing, for mitigation, and for contractor 
malfeasance. These were necessary changes as current home loan lending 
limits had not been adjusted since 1994, but inflation, housing prices, 
and construction and labor costs have increased over time. From 2018 
through 2022, approximately 8.5% of borrowers were unable to fully 
restore their real estate and replace their personal property due to 
the current home loan lending limits. In some cases, the numbers were 
even higher; for example, 64.2% of recipients of home loans for damage 
caused by the 2021 Colorado Wildfires and 17.6% of such borrowers from 
Hurricanes Fiona and Ian were unable to fully restore their real estate 
and replace personal property. Before this rule, this shortfall was 
expected only to continue to increase and impact greater numbers of 
disaster survivors in other regions as disasters and disaster recovery 
becomes more frequent, widespread, and expensive. With respect to 
deferment periods, the final rule increased the initial deferment 
period from 5 months to 12 months, reducing the immediate financial 
burden for disaster survivors, a crucial change as repair and 
replacement timelines often extend beyond the prior 5-month deferment 
period. Additionally, the final rule expanded the allowable use of 
disaster loan funds used to protect damaged or destroyed real property 
from possible future ``similar'' disasters to simply all possible 
future disasters. By eliminating the word ``similar,'' SBA has provided 
a disaster loan recipient the flexibility to use loan funds allocated 
for mitigation to protect against any type of disaster and thus better 
protect their property from future disasters. The amended regulations 
also allow the Administrator to increase the maximum loan amounts

[[Page 9520]]

to homeowners and renters under a specific disaster declaration based 
on appropriate economic indicators, such as current building costs, 
regional median home prices, and the Consumer Price Index (CPI) and the 
Producer Price Index (PPI) for the region(s).
    As a direct final rule, the public was invited to comment until 
July 17, 2023. SBA did not receive significant adverse comment, and the 
rule became effective on July 31, 2023.

Priority (2)--Actions That Advance Equity and Support Underserved, 
Vulnerable and Marginalized Communities

    SBA continues to make efforts to improve access of underserved 
communities to capital, federal government procurement and contracting 
opportunities, disaster assistance, and small business services like 
counseling and training. In addition to SBA's actions to promote access 
to its programs--namely addressing language, cultural differences, and 
socio-economic factors, expanding the lending network to groups that 
work with underserved communities, leveraging technology, and 
addressing the digital/technological divide--SBA continues to make 
efforts to identify gaps and develop a more targeted outreach by 
revising information collection instruments and commissioning federal 
statistical agencies to gather demographic data on programs 
participants and service recipients.
    SBA also continues to explore regulatory actions that can 
supplement its Equity Action Plan objectives and support underserved, 
vulnerable, and marginalized communities. For example, SBA is 
prioritizing development of a rulemaking to standardize the regulatory 
requirements that govern its certification programs: the 8(a) BD 
program, HUBZone, the Women-Owned Small Business (WOSB) program, and 
the Veteran Small Business Certification program (VetCert). This is 
consistent with SBA's ongoing efforts to support businesses in 
underserved markets and remove barriers to entry in SBA's small 
business contracting programs. In addition, the final rule for the SBIC 
program (RIN 3245-AH90, discussed below) intends to implement Executive 
Order 13985, Advancing Racial Equity and Support for Underserved 
Communities Through the Federal Government, by reducing financial and 
administrative barriers to participation in the SBIC program and 
modernizing the program's license offerings to align with a more 
diversified set of new funds investing in underserved small businesses.
i. Ownership and Control and Contractual Assistance Requirements for 
the 8(a) Business Development Program (RIN 3245-AH70)
    The 8(a) BD program helps firms owned and controlled by socially 
and economically disadvantaged individuals strengthen their ability to 
compete effectively in the economy by providing training and various 
forms of technical, financial, and procurement assistance. This final 
rule, effective April 27, 2023, made several changes to the program, 
including, among other things, recognizing a process for allowing a 
change of ownership in a former participant that is still performing 
one or more 8(a) contracts. Program regulations previously stated that 
a program participant awarded one or more 8(a) contracts could 
substitute one disadvantaged individual for another disadvantaged 
individual without requiring the termination of those contracts or a 
request for waiver. The rule clarified the regulation's language to 
make clear that, just like current program participants, former 
participants performing 8(a) contract(s) may change ownership, provided 
the new ownership claims a socially and economically disadvantaged 
status, without the requirement for contract termination or a waiver. 
As a result, individual entrepreneurs and entities (i.e., tribes, 
Alaska Native Corporations (ANCs), Native Hawaiian Organizations 
(NHOs), and Community Development Corporations (CDCs)) can acquire an 
existing platform of capabilities and past performance, as well as an 
established contract revenue stream with fewer administrative burdens.
    In addition, the rule clarified that an applicant or participant 
firm that settles its debts with the federal government is not barred 
from participating in the program. Specifically, where a firm or its 
principals can demonstrate that any financial obligations owed have 
been settled and discharged by the federal government, that firm will 
be eligible for the 8(a) BD program. The rule also clarified that a 
business concern can use its successful performance of state, local, or 
federal government contracts to demonstrate its ``potential for 
success,'' a requirement for program eligibility, and expanded the 
means by which tribally-owned businesses can demonstrate potential for 
success, by allowing such applicants to submit financial statements as 
evidence of their potential in lieu of federal income tax returns, 
which not all tribally-owned small businesses file. The rule also made 
several changes relating to 8(a) contracts, including clarifying that a 
contracting officer cannot limit an 8(a) competition to participants 
having more than one certification (e.g., 8(a) and HUBZone), ensuring 
that 8(a) competition remains available to all eligible program 
participants. The rule clarified not only the prohibition against an 
agency requiring one or more other certifications in addition to its 
8(a) certification, but also makes similar clarifications to the 
regulations for the SDVO, HUBZone, and WOSB programs.
    The final rule reflects feedback SBA received during five tribal 
consultations and listening sessions about a proposal to add certain 
reporting and Community Benefits Plan requirements for entities having 
one or more participants in the 8(a) BD program. Based on that 
feedback, SBA eliminated the proposal in the final rule. In addition, 
the rule reflects extensive feedback in the form of over 650 comments 
received from 125 commenters, with most comments supporting the rule's 
substantive changes. SBA adopted suggested changes, made clarifications 
to the rule's language as appropriate, or explained its rationale for 
rejecting suggestions. In addition to accepting feedback on the rule in 
general, SBA sought comments on specific issues, including issues 
relating to 8(a) and Timber Set-Aside program waivers, sole-source 8(a) 
follow-on procurement, and Community Benefits Plans. SBA developed the 
sections of the final rule that were focused on these issues based on 
the feedback received.
ii. Criminal Justice Reviews for the SBA Business Loan Programs and 
Surety Bond Guaranty Program (RIN 3245-AI03)
    SBA is proposing to amend regulations governing SBA's business loan 
programs (the 7(a) Loan program, 504 Loan program, Microloan program, 
Intermediary Lending Pilot (ILP) program, and Surety Bond Guarantee 
(SBG) program) and the Disaster Loan program (except for the COVID 
Economic Injury Disaster Loan (EIDL) program) to modify how SBA 
considers applicants with criminal history. The amendments are designed 
to improve equitable access based on criminal background review of 
applicants seeking to participate in one or more of these programs. 
After conducting a comprehensive study of SBA capital programs' current 
policies on individuals with criminal histories, SBA believes the 
proposed changes honor and incorporate the statutory mandates of 15 
U.S.C. 631 that emphasize both the importance of small business 
development in general and SBA's responsibility to increase 
opportunities

[[Page 9521]]

for certain groups that historically may not have had equitable 
opportunities for small business ownership. Aside from these statutory 
mandates, the rule is based on how state and local governments and the 
private sector have broadened access to business capital and employment 
opportunities and is supported by data and empirical research 
demonstrating the public safety and economic benefits of such broadened 
access. Federal laws have also evolved regarding recidivism and second 
chances for formerly incarcerated individuals. SBA has determined that 
there is a need to update regulations to reduce barriers to 
participation in these programs for equitable support for small 
business entrepreneurs with criminal history records.

Priority (3): Actions That Create and Sustain Good Jobs With a Free and 
Fair Choice To Join a Union and Promote Economic Resilience in General

    Small businesses form the foundation of the U.S. economy. They 
create two-thirds of net new jobs and drive American innovation and 
competitiveness. SBA continues to focus on helping small businesses 
develop economic resilience. SBA's Office of Capital Access has two 
goals: to increase the capital available to start and grow the small 
businesses that would not otherwise be able to access capital through 
conventional sources and to provide disaster assistance in the form of 
home and business loans for disaster survivors. SBA's loan guaranty and 
microloan programs provide credit-worthy small businesses with access 
to capital they would otherwise not receive because they cannot qualify 
for a loan under conventional credit standards. The Agency's disaster 
assistance programs help small businesses prepare for disasters and 
restore small businesses and their communities struck by disaster.
    SBA aims to develop economic resilience not only in small 
businesses, but broadly within the U.S. economy, by helping ensure 
small businesses receive their fair share of federal contracting 
dollars. This is a crucial aspect of the government-wide effort to 
strengthen the federal supply chain. To that end, SBA continues to look 
for regulatory avenues to enhance its contracting assistance programs, 
which help small businesses win federal contracts. As noted, SBA is 
prioritizing development of a rulemaking that will standardize the 
certification requirements and process for SBA's contracting assistance 
programs--the 8(a) BD program, HUBZone, WOSB, and VetCert. The 
streamlined certification regulations and process will eliminate 
unnecessary bureaucratic obstacles for eligible small businesses 
seeking multiple certifications, which will allow federal contracting 
dollars to flow more easily to eligible small businesses. The proposed 
updates will also ensure regulatory consistency among the programs to 
the extent possible. In streamlining the certification regulations and 
process, SBA aims to facilitate federal contracting of eligible small 
businesses, and thereby assist the federal government as a whole more 
effectively diversify its supply chains and strengthen its economic 
resilience. In addition, SBA continues to identify gaps in small 
business investment and develop rules that aim to plug those gaps.
i. Small Business Investment Company Investment Diversification and 
Growth (RIN 3245-AH90)
    A final rule for the SBIC program, effective August 17, 2023, aims 
to significantly reduce barriers to program participation of new SBIC 
fund managers and funds investing in (i) underserved communities and 
geographies, (ii) capital intensive investments, and (iii) technologies 
critical to national security and economic development. SBA believes it 
must reduce barriers to participation and diversify its patient capital 
and long-term loan program to ensure long-term program stability and 
mission effectiveness.
    The rule introduces new types of SBICs, termed Accrual SBICs and 
Reinvestor SBICs, through which SBA will increase program investment 
diversification and patient capital financing for small businesses. It 
also introduces a new Accrual Debenture for issuance by these Accrual 
SBICs. This new structure is intended to attract new investors by 
reducing perceived disadvantages of being an SBIC. The Accrual 
Debenture aligns with cash flows of equity-focused strategies by 
offering an alternative to a semi-annual interest payment Debenture 
structure for all SBIC licensees either (1) not taking a control-
position in small businesses and or (2) with over 75% of capital 
earmarked for long-term equity investment in small businesses to help 
them grow and scale. This alternative structure accommodates a longer 
horizon for investments in small businesses that might require more 
patient capital. In introducing this new structure, SBA aims to 
increase the equity funding available to underserved small business 
owners and unlock equity as a source of funding for many small business 
owners. Importantly, SBA believes it can offer this new structure while 
maintaining a zero-subsidy cost in the program.
    During the rulemaking process, SBA received comments on both the 
rule and the SBIC program generally. SBA incorporated the 
recommendations of many of the comments, even those that were not 
directly within scope of the rulemaking. For example, in response to 
comments urging an expedited SBIC licensing process, SBA elected to 
introduce an expedited subsequent fund licensing process for eligible 
applicants and modify its standard operating procedures to increase 
transparency in the licensing process and decrease potential tail-end 
delays. SBA is also making efforts to implement recommendations that 
the Agency publish the names and dates of licensed SBICs in the Federal 
Register, collect certain data and financial metrics, and modernize 
certain aspects of the program, including the ``reinvestment'' 
restrictions which prohibit Section 301(c) Licensees from investing in 
a fund-of-funds capacity in emerging managers and licensing fees.
    Among changes to the rule itself, after consideration of all public 
comments, SBA modified the final rule to make the Accrual Debenture 
available only to Accrual SBICs and Reinvestor SBICs, to align with the 
types of long-duration growth investing they primarily perform, and to 
exclude Standard SBICs, which may issue only Standard Debentures and 
Discount Debentures. This change limits the Accrual Debenture to SBICs 
that focus on stimulating small businesses. In addition, based on 
public comment, the final rule does not apply the new modified 
distribution waterfall to Standard Debenture Licensees, but instead 
applies it exclusively to the Accrual Debenture instrument. The final 
rule thus separated distribution requirements based on three categories 
of SBICs: (1) Non-leveraged Licensees; (2) Standard Debenture SBICs; 
and (3) Accrual SBICs and Reinvestor SBICs. SBA also decided against 
moving forward with modifications to Examination fees based on public 
comment. In addition, SBA modified the final rule to modify an 
exception to the restriction prohibiting licensees from making 
investments into relenders or reinvestors to permit reinvestors which 
are Accrual SBICs to make equity investments in certain underserved 
reinvestors.

[[Page 9522]]

Priority (4): Actions That Improve Service Delivery, Customer 
Experience, and Reduce Administrative Burdens

    SBA continues to make efforts to improve service delivery and 
customer experience and reduce administrative burdens wherever 
possible. In fact, many of the rules already mentioned under other 
priorities aim to support this priority. For example, SBA's amendments 
to the Disaster Loan program (RIN 3245-AH91) removed a business loan 
limit on amounts for landscaping or recreational facilities. Prior to 
the removal, SBA would make exceptions to the limit based on documented 
functional need on a case-by-case basis. The change provides 
consistency with home loans, removes the need for administrative 
exceptions, and reduces administrative burden on the disaster survivor 
and SBA in securing resources to repair or replace damaged property. 
SBA's amendments to the 8(a) BD program (RIN 3245-AH70) advance this 
priority in several ways, including by making SBA's approval of a 
participant's business plan part of that participant's eligibility 
determination in certain situations, by streamlining the reapplication 
process for small businesses whose application was denied solely due to 
size that was later found to be small in connection with a formal size 
determination, providing that such applicants shall be immediately 
certified as eligible for the program, and by making it easier to meet 
the bona fide place of business requirement for 8(a) construction 
contracts (when imposed), which commenters noted would reduce overhead 
costs and provide needed flexibility to meet client needs more 
efficiently at a lower cost. And, as previously mentioned, SBA's 
amendments to the SBIC program (RIN 3245-AH90) include streamlined 
regulatory filing and reductions in duplicative data collections and 
bureaucratic processes to improve its response times and enable a 
greater focus on customer relationships and fund monitoring. For 
example, the rule allows approval to be granted at licensing of an 
SBIC's Total Intended Leverage Commitment, creates safe harbors for 
certain conflicts of interest that eliminate the need for explicit SBA 
approval, and allows automatic approval of GAAP-compliant valuations 
for non-leveraged licensees, changes which SBA believes will decrease 
the time and cost associated with applying for an SBIC license. In 
addition, SBA is prioritizing a rulemaking designed to standardize the 
regulatory requirements that govern its certification programs: the 
8(a) BD program, HUBZone, the WOSB program, and VetCert.
    Following revisions to the requirements in SBA's 8(a) BD program 
and Service-Disabled Veteran-Owned Small Business (SDVOSB) programs, 
SBA is issuing conforming revisions to its affiliation rules that 
govern all small business procurement programs and to the WOSB
    program. These revisions will ensure consistent requirements for 
ownership and control across SBA's procurement programs.
i. Affiliation in Small Business Procurement Program (RIN 3245-AH97)
    SBA is proposing to amend its regulations on affiliation to expand 
access to credit and capital for small businesses, particularly those 
involved in government contracting. The proposed rule will address an 
inconsistency between SBA's affiliation rule and the rule on ownership 
and control in the SDVOSB program. On November 29, 2022, SBA published 
a final rule on procedures for certifying Veteran-Owned Small Business 
(VOSB) concerns and SDVOSB concerns. 87 FR 73400 (Nov. 29, 2022). That 
rule included changes to SBA's ownership and control rules for service-
disabled veteran-owned small business concerns. In particular, SBA's 
rules allow a non-veteran to participate in certain extraordinary 
corporate decisions without causing the business to lose its veteran-
owned status. SBA listed such extraordinary circumstances as: (1) the 
company's addition of a new equity stakeholder; (2) the dissolution of 
the company; (3) the sale of the company or all assets of the company; 
(4) the merger of the company; and (5) the company's declaration of 
bankruptcy. See also 83 FR 48908 (Sept. 28, 2018). Under that provision 
in the SDVOSB program, a non-veteran could have authority to do any of 
those five extraordinary actions, but SBA's affiliation rule still 
could cause the non- veteran's authority to be deemed ineligible as a 
small business concern under the negative control provision in 13 CFR 
121.103(a)(3). Accordingly, this proposed rule makes the negative- 
control rule in SBA's affiliation rule consistent with ownership-and-
control rules in the SDVOSB program. The proposal also would better 
define what stock holdings and merger agreements lead to affiliation.
ii. WOSB Program Updates and Clarifications (RIN 3245-AI04)
    The WOSB regulations were updated in 2020 to implement a 
certification program as mandated by Congress. Certified WOSB program 
participants are required to re-certify as to their eligibility every 
three years, which means the first group of firms will begin the re- 
certification process in October of 2023. In conjunction with this 
anniversary, SBA is updating the regulations for clarity and ease of 
use. After three years of feedback from applicants, program 
participants, contracting officers, advocacy groups, Congressional 
staffers, and the Small Business Procurement Advisory Council, among 
others, SBA looks forward to refining the regulations to provide clear, 
accessible guidance for all stakeholders.
    SBA also plans to align WOSB regulations with SBA's other 
government contracting programs, such as VetCert and 8(a), where 
appropriate. Such changes are especially important because the WOSB 
program has certification reciprocity with both programs. The 8(a) 
regulations were significantly revised earlier this year, and the 
VetCert regulations are also new as of January, so the WOSB proposed 
updates will ensure regulatory consistency to the extent possible.
iii. Small Business Development Center Program Revisions (RIN 3245-
AE05)
    SBA plans to issue a final rule to update its regulations for the 
Small Business Development Centers (SBDC) program. The program links 
the resources of federal, state and local governments with the 
resources of the educational community and the private sector to 
provide assistance to the small business community. In partnership with 
SBA's Office of Small Business Development Centers (OSBDC) and District 
Offices, SBDCs develop business counseling and training programs, 
informational tools, and other services that enhance the economic 
development goals and objectives of SBA in their respective service 
areas and local funding partners. Although Congress has amended the 
statute authorizing the SBDC program at least 17 times, SBDC 
regulations have not been comprehensively updated since 1995. This 
final rule will incorporate updates to the Uniform Guidance, i.e., the 
administrative requirements, cost principles, and audit requirements 
for federal awards. It will also align SBDC regulations with current 
SBA policy and guidance as well as modernize and clarify the 
regulations to be more efficient, effective, and transparent. Among 
other changes, the rule clarifies the role of the District Office 
regarding oversight activities, defines and clarifies the various 
roles, procedures, documents, and categories of funding,

[[Page 9523]]

and codifies the current Lead Center Director selection process used by 
SBDCs.
    The intent of the changes is to make program operations less 
onerous for recipient organizations. Current program policies and 
requirements are set forth in the annual notice of funding opportunity 
and the SBDC cooperative agreements, in addition to the agency- and 
government-wide guidance, including the Uniform Guidance. The above 
changes will simplify these governing documents by moving select policy 
language to the regulations. In addition, by consolidating programmatic 
guidance, the rule will ensure consistency in program administration 
and enhance program oversight. The rule will also include policy and 
procedural changes identified by the Agency as necessary to preserve 
the integrity and legislative intent of the program.
    Pursuant to the Small Business Act's requirement that SBA consult 
with the recognized association of SBDCs in any SBDC rulemaking action, 
SBA shared the draft proposed rule and subsequently met with America's 
SBDC in March 2022 to incorporate the association's feedback as 
appropriate and briefed the nationwide network during its Annual 
Conference and Spring Leadership meeting. SBA also participated in 
three tribal consultations that addressed the SBDC program, including 
the regulations. In addition, SBA considered the more than 400 comments 
on the proposed rule it received during the notice-and-comment process 
and is incorporating many of the suggestions in its revisions to the 
proposed rule. Nearly ten percent of the comments related to the 
ability of the networks to partner with local organizations to deliver 
services to small businesses. SBA intends to adopt the comments and 
expand and allow the SBDC Lead Center to partner not only with the 
institutions of higher education, but also with other community 
organizations, such as Chambers of Commerce.

Conclusion

    Through these and other regulatory actions, SBA aims to better help 
Americans start, grow, and build resilient businesses and recover after 
disasters and thereby strengthen the American economy. In developing 
its rules, the Agency will continue to advance the Administration's 
priorities to tackle the climate change emergency; advance equity and 
support underserved, vulnerable, and marginalized communities; create 
and sustain good jobs with a free and fair choice to join a union and 
promote economic resilience in general; and improve service delivery 
and customer experience while reducing administrative burdens.

BILLING CODE 8026-03-P

SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION (SSA)

I. Statement of Regulatory Priorities

    We administer the Retirement, Survivors, and Disability Insurance 
programs under title II of the Social Security Act (Act), the 
Supplemental Security Income (SSI) program under title XVI of the Act, 
and the Special Veterans Benefits program under title VIII of the Act. 
As directed by Congress, we also assist in administering portions of 
the Medicare program under title XVIII of the Act. Our regulations 
codify the requirements for eligibility and entitlement to benefits and 
our procedures for administering these programs. Generally, our 
regulations do not impose burdens on the private sector or on State or 
local governments, except for the States' Disability Determination 
Services. However, our regulations can impose burdens on the private 
sector in the course of evaluating a claimant's initial or continued 
eligibility. We fully fund the Disability Determination Services in 
advance or via reimbursement for necessary costs in making disability 
determinations.
    As we are developing our regulations, we seek to increase 
participation and engagement with members of the public affected by our 
regulations, including in the development of our regulatory priorities. 
In this Regulatory Plan, we note engagement efforts that have helped to 
inform our priorities to date. We seek to hear from members of the 
public who have not typically participated in the regulatory process.
    The entries in our regulatory plan represent issues of major 
importance to the Agency. Through our regulatory plan, we intend to:
    A. Simplify a specific policy within the SSI program by no longer 
considering food in In-Kind Support and Maintenance (ISM) calculations 
(RIN 0960-AI60);
    B. Expand the definition of a Public Assistance (PA) Household to 
include an additional means- tested assistance program (RIN 0960-AI81);
    C. Expand the rental subsidy exception beyond the seven states to 
which it already applies so that it applies nationwide (RIN 0960-AI82); 
and
    D. Revise the disability adjudication process regarding how we 
consider past work to reduce the application time burden on claimants 
and expedite the disability application and determination process (RIN 
0960-AI83).

II. Regulations in the Proposed Rule Stage

    We are not including any of our regulations in the proposed rule 
stage in this statement of regulatory priorities.

III. Regulations in the Final Rule Stage

    Our final regulations would expand the definition of a PA household 
for purposes of our programs to include the Supplemental Nutrition 
Assistance Program (SNAP) as an additional means-tested public income 
maintenance (PIM) program, decreasing the amount of income we would be 
required to deem to SSI applicants. This proposal reflects feedback we 
received from advocacy groups representing claimants and beneficiaries 
during listening sessions conducted under the authority of Executive 
Order (E.O.) 12866. These listening sessions took place in Fall 2022, 
during the development of the omitting food from the ISM calculations 
proposed rule. During the public comment period for the omitting food 
ISM proposed rule, several of these advocacy groups also submitted 
comments relating to the definition of PA household. Across both the 
listening session and the public comment submission, these groups 
expressed that the expansion of the definition of a PA household should 
include additional means-tested programs to help underserved families 
more easily access benefits. Advocates conveyed this was a top priority 
for them. (RIN 0960-AI81).
    Our final regulations would also apply nationwide the ISM rental 
subsidy exception that is currently in place for SSI applicants and 
recipients residing in seven States, by recognizing that a ``business 
arrangement'' exists when the amount of required monthly rent equals or 
exceeds the presumed maximum value. This proposal would bring 
nationwide uniformity to our rules and improve equality in the 
application of the rental subsidy policy. This proposed rule was also 
informed by the Executive Order 12866 listening sessions conducted 
during the development of the omitting food from the ISM calculations 
regulation. (RIN 0960-AI82).
    Our final regulations revise the period that we consider when 
determining whether an individual's past work is relevant for purposes 
of making disability determinations and decisions,

[[Page 9524]]

which would reduce the reporting burden for individuals seeking 
disability benefits and decrease the time associated with the overall 
disability application and decision process. The development of this 
proposed rule was informed by a listening session conducted by our 
Office of Communications with advocacy groups representing claimants 
and beneficiaries. (RIN 0960-AI83).
    Lastly, our final regulations target changes to the ISM policy in 
our SSI program, including this regulation on food provided by others. 
The changes would simplify a specific policy within the SSI program by 
no longer considering food in the calculation of ISM. In Fall 2022, we 
heard from advocacy groups representing claimants and beneficiaries 
during two Executive Order 12866 listening sessions. We incorporated 
our listening session notes in the rulemaking record via 
www.regulations.gov, under docket SSA-2021-0014. (RIN 0960-AI60).

Retrospective Review of Existing Regulations

    Pursuant to section 6 of Executive Order 13563, ``Improving 
Regulation and Regulatory Review'' (January 18, 2011), SSA regularly 
engages in retrospective review and analysis for multiple existing 
regulatory initiatives. These initiatives may be proposed or completed 
actions, and they do not necessarily appear in The Regulatory Plan. You 
can find more information on these completed rulemakings in past 
publications of the Unified Agenda at www.reginfo.gov in the 
``Completed Actions'' section for the Social Security Administration.

SSA

Final Rule Stage

226. Omitting Food From In-Kind Support and Maintenance Calculations 
[0960-AI60]

    Priority: Other Significant. Major under 5 U.S.C. 801.
    Legal Authority: 42 U.S.C. 902(a)(5); 42 U.S.C. 1381a; 42 
U.S.C.1382; 42 U.S.C. 1382a; 42 U.S.C. 1382b; 42 U.S.C. 1382c(f); 42 
U.S.C. 1382j; 42 U.S.C. 1383; 42 U.S.C. 1382 note; . . .
    CFR Citation: 20 CFR 416.1102; 20 CFR 416.1130; 20 CFR 416.1131; 20 
CFR 416.1103; 20 CFR 416.1104; 20 CFR 416.1121; 20 CFR 416.1124; 20 CFR 
416.1132; 20 CFR 416.1133; 20 CFR 416.1140; 20 CFR 416.1147; 20 CFR 
416.1148; 20 CFR 416.1149; 20 CFR 416.1157; . . .
    Legal Deadline: None.
    Abstract: This final rule removes food from the calculation of In-
Kind Support and Maintenance (ISM). Accordingly, we would calculate ISM 
based only on shelter expenses (i.e., costs associated with room, rent, 
mortgage payments, real property taxes, heating fuel, gas, electricity, 
water, sewerage, and garbage collection services). The changes simplify 
our policy and promote equity by not disadvantaging an already 
vulnerable population when they receive food assistance.
    In the Fall of 2022, we heard from advocacy groups representing 
claimants and beneficiaries during two E.O. 12866 listening sessions. 
We incorporated our notes in the rulemaking record via 
www.regulations.gov, under docket SSA-2021-0014.
    Statement of Need: This change would remove food costs when we 
calculate ISM. By doing so, it streamlines the ISM policy and resulting 
SSI program complexity.
    Summary of Legal Basis: We are removing food from our ISM 
calculations. This will streamline the policy and reduce the program 
complexity of ISM.
    Alternatives: The current proposal streamlines the SSI process.
    Anticipated Cost and Benefits: We estimate that implementation of 
this proposed rule for all eligibility and payment determinations 
effective April 1, 2023 and later will result in an increase in Federal 
SSI payments of a total of about $1.5 billion over the period of fiscal 
years 2023 through 2032.
    Risks: We do not anticipate risk to the integrity of our program.
    Timetable:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Action                    Date            FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NPRM................................   02/15/23  88 FR 9779
Final Action........................   03/00/24
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No.
    Small Entities Affected: No.
    Government Levels Affected: None.
    Agency Contact: Scott Logan, Social Insurance Specialist, Social 
Security Administration, Office of Income Security Programs, 6401 
Security Boulevard, Baltimore, MD 21235-6401, Phone: 410 966-5927, 
Email: [email protected].
    RIN: 0960-AI60

SSA

227. Expand the Definition of a Public Assistance (PA) Household [0960-
AI81]

    Priority: Section 3(f)(1) Significant. Major under 5 U.S.C. 801.
    Legal Authority: 42 U.S.C. 405(a)
    CFR Citation: 20 CFR 416.1142; 416.1161; 416.1163; 416.1165.
    Legal Deadline: None.
    Abstract: We propose expanding the definition of a Public 
Assistance (PA) Household to include additional means- tested 
assistance programs. This will decrease the number of applicants and 
recipients charged in-kind support and maintenance, which will simplify 
living arrangement development within the Supplemental Security Income 
(SSI) program.
    This proposal reflects feedback we received from advocacy groups 
representing claimants and beneficiaries during listening sessions 
conducted under the authority of Executive Order (E.O.) 12866. These 
listening sessions took place during the development of the omitting 
food from the ISM calculations regulation in Fall 2022. We also 
received public comments submitted by these advocacy groups during the 
public comment period associated with the omitting food from ISM 
calculations NPRM. The Agency heard from these advocacy groups that the 
expansion of the definition of a PA household to include additional 
means-tested programs could help underserved families more easily 
access benefits and that this was a top priority.
    Statement of Need: This change, adding SNAP to our regulatory 
definition of a public assistance household, would decrease the number 
of SSI applicants and recipients charged with in-kind support and 
maintenance (ISM). By doing so, it streamlines the ISM policy and 
resulting SSI program complexity, which supports the economic security 
of households who receive nutrition assistance.
    Summary of Legal Basis: We are adding SNAP as a means-tested public 
income maintenance program to our regulatory definition of a public 
assistance household. This will streamline the policy and reduce the 
program complexity of ISM.
    Alternatives: The current proposal streamlines the SSI process.
    Anticipated Cost and Benefits: We estimate that implementation of 
this proposed rule would result in a total increase in Federal SSI 
payments of $14.8 billion over fiscal years 2024 through 2033, assuming 
implementation of this rule on May 15, 2024.
    Risks: We do not anticipate risk to the integrity of our program.

[[Page 9525]]

    Timetable:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Action                    Date            FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NPRM................................   09/29/23  88 FR 67148
NPRM Comment Period End.............   11/28/23
Final Action........................   04/00/24
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No.
    Small Entities Affected: No.
    Government Levels Affected: None.
    Agency Contact: Tamara Levingston, Analyst, Social Security 
Administration, 6401 Security Boulevard, Baltimore, MD 21235, Phone: 
410 966-7384, Email: [email protected].
    RIN: 0960-AI81

SSA

228. Nationwide Expansion of the Rental Subsidy Policy for SSI 
Recipients [0960-AI82]

    Priority: Other Significant.
    Legal Authority: 42 U.S.C. 405(a)
    CFR Citation: 20 CFR 416.1130(b).
    Legal Deadline: None.
    Abstract: We propose expanding the rental subsidy exception beyond 
the 7 states to which it already applies so that it applies nationwide. 
Accordingly, our nationwide policy would be that a business arrangement 
exists when the amount of monthly rent required to be paid equals or 
exceeds the presumed maximum value or the current market value, 
whichever is less. We expect that the proposed change would improve 
service delivery by making our policy uniform throughout the country 
and reducing administrative burdens for individuals seeking access to 
the Supplemental Security Income (SSI) program.
    This was informed in part by the Executive Order 12866 listening 
sessions conducted during the development of the omitting food from the 
ISM calculations regulation.
    Statement of Need: This proposal streamlines the agency's policy on 
In-Kind Support and Maintenance (ISM) and reduces SSI program 
complexity.
    Summary of Legal Basis: Social Security Administration general 
rulemaking authority 42 U.S.C. 405(a); 42 U.S.C. 1383(d)(1).
    Alternatives: The current proposal streamlines the SSI process.
    Anticipated Cost and Benefits: We estimate that implementation of 
this proposed rule would result in a total increase in Federal SSI 
payments of $971 million over fiscal years 2024 through 2033, assuming 
implementation of this rule on April 29, 2024.
    Risks: We do not anticipate risk to the integrity of our program.
    Timetable:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Action                    Date            FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NPRM................................   08/24/23  88 FR 57910
NPRM Comment Period End.............   10/23/23
Final Action........................   04/00/24
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No.
    Small Entities Affected: No.
    Government Levels Affected: None.
    Agency Contact: Tamara Levingston, Analyst, Social Security 
Administration, 6401 Security Boulevard, Baltimore, MD 21235, Phone: 
410 966-7384, Email: [email protected].
    RIN: 0960-AI82

SSA

229. Intermediate Improvement to the Disability Adjudication Process, 
Including How We Consider Past Work [0960-AI83]

    Priority: Section 3(f)(1) Significant. Major status under 5 U.S.C. 
801 is undetermined.
    Legal Authority: 42 U.S.C. 405(a); 42 U.S.C. 1383(d)(1)
    CFR Citation: 20 CFR 404 Subpart P; 20 CFR 416 Subpart I; 20 CFR 
404.1560(b); 20 CFR 416.960(b).
    Legal Deadline: None.
    Abstract: We propose to develop intermediate improvements to reduce 
the burden in our current disability adjudication process as a step 
towards longer-term reforms to ensure our disability program remains 
current and supports equitable outcomes. Actions could include 
decreasing the years of past work we consider when making a disability 
determination, as well as other potential regulatory changes.
    The development of this regulation was informed by a listening 
session conducted by our Office of Communications with advocacy groups 
representing claimants and beneficiaries.
    Statement of Need: Reducing the reporting requirements for prior 
work to a 5-year period instead of 15 years will reduce the burden on 
individuals seeking disability benefits while still providing us with 
enough relevant information to make accurate disability determinations 
and decisions.
    Summary of Legal Basis: Social Security Administration general 
rulemaking authority 42 U.S.C. 405(a); 42 U.S.C. 1383(d)(1).
    Alternatives: We make disability determinations consistent with 
statutes and our current regulations. Taking actions such as exploring 
revising the definition of past relevant work would reduce the burden 
on individuals and improve customer service.
    Anticipated Cost and Benefits: We estimate that implementation of 
the proposed rule would result in an increase in scheduled SSDI 
benefits of $22.9 billion, a net reduction in scheduled old-age and 
survivors insurance (OASI) benefits of $6.5 billion, and an increase in 
Federal SSI payments of $3.9 billion in total over fiscal years 2024 
through 2033, assuming implementation for all decisions made on or 
after May 6, 2024.
    Risks: Risks not yet identified.
    Timetable:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Action                    Date            FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NPRM................................   09/29/23  88 FR 67135
NPRM Comment Period End.............   11/28/23
Final Action........................   04/00/24
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No.
    Small Entities Affected: No.
    Government Levels Affected: None.
    Agency Contact: Mary Quatroche, Director, Social Security 
Administration, 6401 Security Boulevard, Baltimore, MD 21235-6401, 
Phone: 410 966-4794, Email: [email protected].
    RIN: 0960-AI83

BILLING CODE 4191-02-P

FEDERAL ACQUISITION REGULATION (FAR)

    The Secretary of Defense, the Administrator of General Services, 
and the Administrator of National Aeronautics and Space are members of 
the Federal Acquisition Regulatory Council (FAR Council), and jointly 
issue and maintain a single Government-wide procurement regulation 
known as the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR). The FAR provides 
uniform policies and procedures for the acquisition of supplies and 
services by executive agencies. The FAR Council, which is chaired by 
the Administrator of Federal Procurement Policy, assists in the 
direction and coordination of Government-wide procurement policies to 
be implemented in the FAR.

Public Engagement

    The FAR Council engages with the public on rules that will affect 
the FAR in several ways. First, in addition to publishing abstracts of 
and anticipated publication dates for upcoming

[[Page 9526]]

rulemakings in the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs 
biannual Unified Agenda, members of the public can track the progress 
of any open and pending FAR rule via the ``Open FAR Cases'' report, 
which is publicly available at https://www.acq.osd.mil/dpap/dars/far_case_status.html. The report is updated on a weekly basis and 
includes the following information: a case number, title, FAR parts 
anticipated to be impacted by the rule, a summary of the basis for the 
rule, and the rule status. Members of the public who are interested in 
a particular FAR case are encouraged to monitor the Open FAR Cases 
Report to track where a particular rule is in the rulemaking process.
    In addition to the Open FAR Cases report, the Department of Defense 
(DoD), General Services Administration (GSA), and National Aeronautics 
and Space Administration (NASA) independently engage with several 
industry associations on a quarterly basis including, but not limited 
to, the Aerospace Industries Association, the National Defense 
Industrial Association, and the Professional Services Council. During 
these meetings, DoD, GSA, and NASA often provide updates on open FAR 
cases and association representatives are able to provide feedback from 
their various members or member groups on upcoming rulemakings.
    While developing certain FAR rules, DoD, GSA, and NASA may seek 
input from the public by publishing in the Federal Register an advance 
notice of proposed rulemaking (ANPR) or a general request for 
information (RFI). Such notices normally include a summary of the 
overarching policy objectives of the rule and a list of questions 
seeking input that will help the Government develop a proposed rule. 
Information on whether DoD, GSA, and NASA plan on publishing an ANPR or 
RFI is included in both the Open FAR Cases Report and OIRA's biannual 
Unified Agenda.
    Occasionally, while a proposed or interim FAR rule is out for 
public comment, DoD, GSA, and NASA may hold a public meeting to provide 
an overview of the rule and allow the public to provide feedback to the 
Government in an open forum. Information about whether DoD, GSA, and 
NASA plan on holding a public meeting on a rule is normally included in 
the proposed or interim rule when it is published for public comment. 
Presentations made during the public meeting are included in the rule 
docket and made publicly available. Information provided during the 
public meeting is also considered during development of the final rule.
    DoD, GSA, and NASA are also rethinking the types of supporting 
documentation that should be published with proposed or interim rules 
to facilitate public understanding of the rule. For example, for FAR 
Case 2022-006, Sustainable Procurement (RIN: 9000-AO43), DoD, GSA, and 
NASA included, as a supporting document in the rule docket at 
www.regulations.gov, a slide show that illustrates the overarching 
restructuring of existing content in FAR part 23, a visual aid intended 
to make clear the extensive edits presented in the amendatory language 
of the rule.
    Finally, DoD, GSA, and NASA independently conduct outreach to 
industry regarding upcoming rulemakings. For example, the GSA Federal 
Acquisition Service (FAS) holds webinars with its industry partners to 
provide an update on the current policy landscape, including summaries 
of upcoming FAR rules expected to have a significant impact on 
industry. As part of these webinars, which are available to the public 
at https://buy.gsa.gov/interact/community/11/activity-feed, GSA FAS 
includes information on the rulemaking process, how to monitor FAR and 
GSA FAR supplement rules, and best practices for submitting public 
comments.

Rulemaking Priorities

    Pursuant to Executive Order 12866, ``Regulatory Planning and 
Review'' (September 30, 1993), as reaffirmed and amended in Executive 
Order 13563, ``Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review'' (January 
18, 2011), and Executive Order 14094, ``Modernizing Regulatory Review'' 
(April 6, 2023), the Regulatory Plan and Unified Agenda provide public 
notice about the FAR Council's proposed regulatory and deregulatory 
actions within the Executive Branch. The Fall 2023 Unified Agenda 
consists of 56 active agenda items.
    The FAR Council is required to amend the Federal Acquisition 
Regulation to implement statutory and policy initiatives. The FAR 
Council prioritization is focused on initiatives that:
     Tackle the climate change emergency,
     Advance equity and support underserved, vulnerable and 
marginalized communities,
     Promote economic resilience,
     Improve service delivery, customer experience, and reduce 
administrative burdens, and
     Support national security efforts, especially safeguarding 
Federal Government information and information technology systems.

Rulemaking That Tackles Climate Change

    FAR Case 2022-006, ``Sustainable Procurement,'' will implement 
requirements for the procurement of sustainable products and services 
per Executive Order 14057, Catalyzing Clean Energy Industries and Jobs 
Through Federal Sustainability, and Office of Management and Budget 
Memorandum M-22-06. The rule will also reorganize FAR part 23 for 
consistency and clarity.
    FAR Case 2021-015, ``Disclosure of Greenhouse Gas Emissions and 
Climate-Related Financial Risk,'' will require major Federal suppliers 
to publicly disclose greenhouse gas emissions and climate-related 
financial risk, and to set science-based reductions targets per section 
5(b)(i) of Executive Order 14030, ``Climate-Related Financial Risk.''
    FAR Case 2021-016, ``Minimizing the Risk of Climate Change in 
Federal Acquisitions,'' will ensure agencies minimize the risk of 
climate change and consider the social cost of greenhouse gas emissions 
in major procurements per section 5(b)(ii) of Executive Order 14030, 
``Climate-Related Financial Risk.'' An advance notice of proposed 
rulemaking was published in October of 2021 seeking input from the 
public on ways in which the Government could consider greenhouse gas 
emissions and climate risks in Federal procurement. The feedback is 
being considered in the development of the proposed rule.

Rulemaking That Advances Equity and Supports Underserved Communities

    FAR Case 2022-009, ``Certification of Service-Disabled Veteran-
Owned Small Businesses,'' will clarify the certification requirements 
for service-disabled veteran-owned small businesses (SDVOSB) concerns 
to be eligible for the award of a sole source or set-aside SDVOSB 
contract.
    FAR Case 2021-011, ``Past Performance Ratings for Small Business 
Joint Venture Members and Small Business First-Tier Subcontractors,'' 
will permit small business first-tier subcontractors and joint venture 
members, in certain situations, to submit the past performance and 
experience they gained under these arrangements with their offers on 
Federal contracts. Contracting officers will be required to consider 
the capabilities and past performance provided by first-tier 
subcontractors and

[[Page 9527]]

joint venture members in certain situations.
    FAR Case 2023-011, ``Small Business Participation on Certain 
Multiple Award Contract,'' will update and clarify market research, 
acquisition planning, small business coordination, and the use of set-
asides during the placement of orders against certain multiple award 
contracts to increase small business participation in certain multiple 
award contracts.

Rulemaking That Promotes Economic Resilience

    FAR Case 2022-004, ``Enhanced Price Preference for Critical 
Items,'' will add a list of critical items, along with their associated 
enhanced price preference, that will apply to acquisitions subject to 
the Buy American statute. This rule completes the framework added to 
the FAR as part of implementation of section 8 of Executive Order 
14005, Ensuring the Future Is Made in All of America by All of 
America's Workers.
    FAR Case 2020-009, ``List of Domestically Nonavailable Articles,'' 
will amend the list of domestically nonavailable articles under the Buy 
American Act and the protocols to update the list. An advance notice of 
proposed rulemaking was published in May of 2020 seeking input from the 
public to assist in identifying domestic capabilities and for 
evaluating whether some articles on the list at FAR 25.104(a) should be 
removed because they are now mined, produced, or manufactured in the 
United States in sufficient and reasonably available commercial 
quantities and of a satisfactory quality. The feedback is being 
considered in the development of the proposed rule.
    FAR Case 2022-011, ``Nondisplacement of Qualified Workers Under 
Service Contracts,'' will require contractors and subcontractors to 
offer qualified employees employed under predecessor contracts a right 
of first refusal of employment under successor contracts in accordance 
with Executive Order 14055, Nondisplacement of Qualified Workers Under 
Service Contracts and the associated Department of Labor regulations at 
29 CFR part 9.
    FAR Case 2022-003, ``Use of Project Labor Agreement for Federal 
Construction Projects,'' will require the use of project labor 
agreements for large-scale construction projects with a total estimated 
value of $35 million or more in accordance with Executive Order 14063, 
Use of Project Labor Agreements for Federal Construction Projects. 
Project labor agreements are often effective in preventing labor-
related disruptions on projects by using dispute-resolution processes 
to resolve worksite disputes and by prohibiting work stoppages, 
including strikes and lockouts.

Rulemakings That Improve Service Delivery and Customer Experience

    FAR Case 2019-015, ``Improving Consistency Between Procurement & 
Non-Procurement Procedures on Suspension and Debarment,'' will bring 
the procedures on suspension and debarment in the FAR into closer 
alignment with the Nonprocurement Common Rule (NCR) procedures, 
creating a more consistent experience for industry.
    FAR Case 2021-001, ``Increased Efficiencies with Regard to 
Certified Mail, In-person Business, Mail, Notarization, Original 
Documents, Seals, and Signatures,'' will streamline certain essential 
contracting procedures by increasing flexibilities and efficiencies 
with regards to certified mail, in-person business, mail, notarization, 
original documents, seals, and signatures using digital and virtual 
technology. This rule makes permanent policy flexibilities introduced 
during the pandemic.

Rulemakings That Support National Security

    FAR Case 2021-017, ``Cyber Threat and Incident Reporting and 
Information Sharing,'' will increase the sharing of information about 
cyber threats and incident information and require certain contractors 
to report cyber incidents to the Federal Government to facilitate 
effective cyber incident response and remediation pursuant to sections 
2(b), (c), (g)(i) and 8(b) of Executive Order 14028, ``Improving the 
Nation's Cybersecurity.''
    FAR Case 2021-019, ``Standardizing Cybersecurity Requirements for 
Unclassified Information Systems,'' will standardize cybersecurity 
contractual requirements across Federal agencies for unclassified 
information systems pursuant to sections 2(i) and 8(b) of Executive 
Order 14028, Improving the Nation's Cybersecurity.
    FAR Case 2023-002, ``Supply Chain Software Security,'' will require 
suppliers of software available for purchase by Federal agencies to 
comply with, and attest to complying with, applicable secure software 
development practices pursuant to section 4(n) and 4(k) of Executive 
Order 14028, Improving the Nation's Cybersecurity, and Office of 
Management and Budget Memorandum 22-18 and 23-16.

William F. Clark,

Director, Office of Government-wide Acquisition Policy, Office of 
Acquisition Policy, Office of Government-wide Policy.

BILLING CODE 6820-EP-P

CONSUMER PRODUCT SAFETY COMMISSION (CPSC)

Statement of Regulatory Priorities

    The U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission is charged with 
protecting the public from unreasonable risks of death and injury 
associated with consumer products. To achieve this goal, CPSC, among 
other things:
     develops mandatory product safety standards or bans to 
address safety hazards, including where required by statute;
     obtains repairs, replacements, or refunds for defective 
products that present a substantial product hazard;
     develops information and education campaigns about the 
safety of consumer products;
     participates in the development or revision of voluntary 
product safety standards; and
     follows other statutory mandates.
    Unless otherwise directed by congressional mandate, when deciding 
which of these approaches to take in any specific case, CPSC gathers 
and analyzes data about the nature and extent of the risk presented by 
the product. The Commission's rules at 16 CFR 1009.8 require the 
Commission to consider the following criteria, among other factors, 
when deciding the level of priority for any particular project:
     the frequency and severity of injuries;
     the causality of injuries;
     chronic illness and future injuries;
     costs and benefits of Commission action;
     the unforeseen nature of the risk;
     the vulnerability of the population at risk;
     the probability of exposure to the hazard; and
     additional criteria that warrant Commission attention.

Significant Regulatory Actions

    Currently, the Commission is considering acting in the next 12 
months on three rules--Regulatory Options for Table Saws (RIN 3041-
AC31); Portable Generators (RIN 3041-AC36); and Gas Appliance Carbon 
Monoxide Sensors (RIN 3041-AD70)--which would constitute ``significant 
regulatory actions'' under the definition of that term in Executive 
Order 12866, although the Commission's rulemaking is not subject to 
E.O. 12866 review.

[[Page 9528]]

    These priority levels are included to provide an analogous 
criterion through which the Commission can provide this information to 
the public.

CPSC

Proposed Rule Stage

230. Regulatory Options for Table Saws [3041-AC31]

    Priority: Section 3(f)(1) Significant. Major under 5 U.S.C. 801.
    Legal Authority: 5 U.S.C. 553(e); 15 U.S.C. 2056; 15 U.S.C. 2058
    CFR Citation: 16 CFR 1245.
    Legal Deadline: None.
    Abstract: In 2006, the Commission granted a petition asking that 
the Commission issue a rule to prescribe performance standards for an 
active injury mitigation (AIM) system to reduce or prevent injuries 
from contacting the blade of a table saw. The Commission subsequently 
issued a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) that would establish a 
performance standard requiring table saws to limit the depth of cut to 
3.5 millimeters when a test probe, acting as a surrogate for a human 
body/finger, contacts the table saw's spinning blade. Staff has 
conducted several studies to provide information for the rulemaking. 
Staff is assigned to submit a final rule briefing package to the 
Commission in fiscal year 2023.
    Statement of Need: In the NPRM, the Commission preliminarily 
determined that there is an unreasonable risk associated with blade-
contact injuries on table saws. Based on injury data reviewed in 2015, 
there were an estimated 33,400 table saw, emergency department treated 
injuries. Of these, staff estimated that 30,800 (92 percent) are likely 
related to the victim making contact with the saw blade. Of the 30,800 
ED treated blade-contact injuries, an estimated 28,900 injuries (93.8 
percent) involved the finger, with 4,700 amputations (15.2 percent).
    Summary of Legal Basis: Table saws are consumer products that can 
be regulated by the Commission under the authority of the CPSA. See 15 
U.S.C. 2052(a). Section 7 of the CPSA authorizes the Commission to 
promulgate a mandatory consumer product safety standard that sets forth 
performance requirements for a consumer product or that sets forth 
requirements that a product be marked or accompanied by clear and 
adequate warnings or instructions. 15 U.S.C. 20512084. Section 7(a) of 
the CPSA authorizes the Commission to promulgate a mandatory consumer 
product safety standard that sets forth performance or labeling 
requirements for a consumer product if such requirements are reasonably 
necessary to prevent or reduce an unreasonable risk of injury. 15 
U.S.C. 2056(a). Section 9 of the CPSA specifies the procedure that the 
Commission must follow to issue a consumer product safety standard 
under section 7 of the CPSA.
    Alternatives: The Commission could (1) pursue table saw voluntary 
standard activities; (2) extend the effective dates of a possible rule; 
(3) exempt certain categories of table saws from the draft proposed 
rule; (4) limit the applicability of the performance requirements to 
some, but not all, tables saws; or (5) pursue an information and 
education campaign to inform the public of the hazards of blade contact 
and the benefits of the AIM technology.
    Anticipated Cost and Benefits: The expected gross benefits range 
from about $970 million to $2.45 billion over the product life of 1 
year of sales. The expected costs of the draft proposed rule will range 
from about $168 million to about $345 million annually. Based on 
staff's benefit and cost estimates, net benefits (i.e., benefits minus 
costs) for the market were estimated to amount to about $625 million to 
$2.3 billion over the product life of 1 year of table saw sales.
    Risks: The CPSC has determined preliminarily that there may be an 
unreasonable risk of blade-contact injuries associated with table saws. 
Each year, approximately 30,000 table saw blade contact injuries are 
treated in emergency room departments. The most common diagnoses in 
blade-contact injuries were lacerations (60 percent), fractures (20 
percent), and amputations (10 percent).
    Timetable:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Action                    Date            FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Commission Decision to Grant           07/11/06
 Petition.
ANPRM...............................   10/11/11  76 FR 62678
Notice of Extension of Time for        12/02/11  76 FR 75504
 Comments.
Comment Period End..................   02/10/12
Notice to Reopen Comment Period.....   02/15/12  77 FR 8751
Reopened Comment Period End.........   03/16/12
Staff Sent NPRM Briefing Package to    01/17/17
 Commission.
Commission Decision.................   04/27/17
NPRM................................   05/12/17  82 FR 22190
NPRM Comment Period End.............   07/26/17
Public Hearing......................   08/09/17  82 FR 31035
Staff Sent 2016 NEISS Table Saw Type   08/15/17
 Study Status Report to Commission.
Staff Sent 2017 NEISS Table Saw        11/13/18
 Special Study to Commission.
Notice of Availability of 2017 NEISS   12/04/18  83 FR 62561
 Table Saw Special Study.
Staff Sends a Status Briefing          08/28/19
 Package on Table Saws to Commission.
Commission Decision.................   09/10/19
Staff Sends SNPRM Briefing Package     09/21/23
 to Commission.
Commission Decision.................   11/00/23
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Yes.
    Small Entities Affected: Businesses.
    Government Levels Affected: Undetermined.
    Federalism: Undetermined.
    International Impacts: This regulatory action will be likely to 
have international trade and investment effects, or otherwise be of 
international interest.
    Agency Contact: Caroleene Paul, Project Manager, Directorate for 
Engineering Sciences, Consumer Product Safety Commission, National 
Product Testing and Evaluation Center, 5 Research Place, Rockville, MD 
20850, Phone: 301 987-2225, Email: [email protected].
    RIN: 3041-AC31

CPSC

231. Safety Standard for Residential Gas Furnaces and Boilers [3041-
AD70]

    Priority: Other Significant. Major status under 5 U.S.C. 801 is 
undetermined.
    Legal Authority: 15 U.S.C. 2056; 15 U.S.C 2058
    CFR Citation: None.
    Legal Deadline: None.
    Abstract: Over several years, staff has conducted research and 
worked with voluntary standards organizations

[[Page 9529]]

concerning the risk of injury and death associated with carbon monoxide 
(CO) production and leakage from residential gas furnaces and boilers. 
This proposed rule would establish a performance requirement, under 
which gas furnaces or boilers would be required to shut off or modulate 
when CO levels reach a specified level for a specified duration of 
time. In 2019, the Commission issued an advance notice of proposed 
rulemaking (ANPRM) to initiate rulemaking under the Consumer Product 
Safety Act and requested comments on the risk of injury and alternative 
approaches to address the risk. On September 24, 2021, the Commission 
voted to change the fiscal year 2022 deliverable from a notice of 
proposed rulemaking (NPRM) to Data Analysis and/or Technical Review 
(DA/TR). On February 9, 2022, staff provided a summary and status 
update in a public briefing to the Commission. Staff continues to 
investigate sensing technology to automatically adjust or shut off 
major gas appliances, such as furnaces and boilers, in response to 
dangerous operating levels of carbon monoxide in their combustion 
products and will share its findings with the relevant voluntary 
standards organizations. Staff is finalizing an NPRM briefing package 
and will submit it to the Commission in fiscal year 2023.
    Statement of Need: From 2014 through 2018, there were 108 deaths 
from CO poisoning from gas furnaces and boilers, with 30,587 nonfatal 
injuries in the same time period.
    Summary of Legal Basis: This notice of proposed rulemaking is 
authorized by the CPSA. 15 U.S.C. 2051-2084. Section 7(a) of the CPSA 
authorizes the Commission to promulgate a mandatory consumer product 
safety standard that sets forth performance or labeling requirements 
for a consumer product if such requirements are reasonably necessary to 
prevent or reduce an unreasonable risk of injury. 15 U.S.C. 2056(a). 
Section 9 of the CPSA specifies the procedure that the Commission must 
follow to issue a consumer product safety standard under section 7 of 
the CPSA.
    Alternatives: The Commission could: (1) continue to work and 
advocate for change through the voluntary standards process; (2) rely 
on the use of residential CO alarms; (3) continue to conduct education 
and information campaigns; and (4) take no action.
    Anticipated Cost and Benefits: The proposed rule is estimated to 
avert 576 deaths (19.20 deaths per year) and 126,387 injuries (roughly 
5,357 injuries per year) over 30 years. Overall, the draft proposed 
rule has total annualized benefits of $356.52 million, discounted at 3 
percent, and for every $1 in direct cost to consumers and 
manufacturers, the draft proposed rule generates $0.59 in benefits from 
mitigated deaths and injuries.
    Risks: For the 20-year period, 2000 through 2019, these products 
were associated with a total of 539 CO deaths.
    Timetable:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Action                    Date            FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Staff Sent ANPRM Briefing Package to   07/31/19
 Commission.
Commission Voted to Publish ANPRM...   08/07/19
ANPR Published in FR................   08/19/19  84 FR 42847
ANPRM Comment Period End............   10/18/19
Staff Sent FR Notice to Commission     10/23/19
 to Reopen Comment Period.
Commission Voted to Reopen Comment     11/01/19
 Period.
Notice to Reopen Comment Period        11/07/19  84 FR 60010
 Published in FR.
ANPRM Comment Period End............   01/06/20
Commission Vote to Change              09/24/21
 Deliverable from NPRM to DA/TR.
Public Briefing to Commission.......   02/09/22
Staff Sends NPRM Briefing Package to   09/25/23
 Commission.
Commission Decision.................   11/00/23
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No.
    Small Entities Affected: No.
    Government Levels Affected: None.
    Agency Contact: Ronald Jordan, Project Manager, Directorate for 
Engineering Sciences, Consumer Product Safety Commission, National 
Product Testing and Evaluation Center, 5 Research Place, Rockville, MD 
20850, Phone: 301 987-2219, Email: [email protected].
    RIN: 3041-AD70

CPSC

Final Rule Stage

232. Portable Generators [3041-AC36]

    Priority: Section 3(f)(1) Significant. Major under 5 U.S.C. 801.
    Legal Authority: 15 U.S.C. 2056; 15 U.S.C 2058
    CFR Citation: Not Yet Determined.
    Legal Deadline: None.
    Abstract: In 2006, the Commission issued an advance notice of 
proposed rulemaking (ANPRM) under the Consumer Product Safety Act 
(CPSA) concerning portable generators. The ANPRM discussed regulatory 
options that could reduce deaths and injuries related to portable 
generators, particularly those involving carbon monoxide (CO) 
poisoning. In fiscal year 2006, staff awarded a contract to develop a 
prototype generator engine with reduced CO in the exhaust. Also, in 
fiscal year 2006, staff entered into an interagency agreement (IAG) 
with the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) to 
conduct tests with a generator, in both off-the-shelf and prototype 
configurations, operating in the garage attached to NIST's test house. 
In fiscal year 2009, staff entered into a second IAG with NIST with the 
goal of developing CO emission performance requirements for a possible 
proposed regulation that would be based on health effects criteria. 
After additional staff and contractor work, the Commission issued a 
notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) in 2016, proposing a performance 
standard that would limit the CO emission rates from operating portable 
generators. In 2018, two voluntary standards, UL 2201 and PGMA G300, 
adopted different CO-mitigation requirements intended to address the CO 
poisoning hazard associated with portable generators. Staff developed a 
simulation and analysis plan to evaluate the effectiveness of those 
voluntary standards' requirements. In 2019, the Commission sought 
public comments on staff's plan. In August 2020, staff submitted to the 
Commission a draft notice of availability of the modified plan, based 
on staff's review and consideration of the comments, for evaluating the 
voluntary standards; the Commission published the notice of 
availability in August 2020. In February 2022, staff delivered a 
briefing package to the Commission with the results of the 
effectiveness analysis and information on the availability of compliant 
generators in the marketplace. Staff concluded that the CO hazard-
mitigation requirements of one standard are more effective than the

[[Page 9530]]

other, but conformance to either standard is low. Staff provided a 
supplemental NPRM (SNPRM) on portable generators to the Commission on 
March 8, 2023. The Commission published the SNPRM on April 20, 2023. 
The comment period closed on June 20, 2023. A final rule briefing 
package is scheduled to be sent to the Commission in fiscal year 2023.
    Statement of Need: From 2004 through 2021, there were an annual 
average of 74 consumer CO poisoning deaths and an estimated 4,314 
medically-attended consumer CO poisoning injuries caused by generators 
over this 18-year period. The Commission expects that the proposed rule 
would be highly effective in avoiding generator-related CO incidents, 
producing benefits that far exceed the estimated costs. For every $1 in 
estimated direct cost to consumers and manufacturers, the proposed rule 
generates more than $7 in benefits from mitigated deaths and injuries.
    Summary of Legal Basis: This supplemental notice of proposed 
rulemaking is authorized by the CPSA. 15 U.S.C. 2051-2084. Section 7(a) 
of the CPSA authorizes the Commission to promulgate a mandatory 
consumer product safety standard that sets forth performance or 
labeling requirements for a consumer product if such requirements are 
reasonably necessary to prevent or reduce an unreasonable risk of 
injury. 15 U.S.C. 2056(a). Section 9 of the CPSA specifies the 
procedure that the Commission must follow to issue a consumer product 
safety standard under section 7 of the CPSA.
    Alternatives: The Commission could (1) implement the draft proposed 
rule with the exception of the CO emission requirements and CO 
concentrations for shutoff included in voluntary standard UL 2201; (2) 
rely on voluntary standard stakeholders to adopt the requirements 
included in the draft proposed rule into either existing voluntary 
standard, UL 2201 or PGMA G300; (3) require portable generators to 
comply with either UL 2201 (2nd Edition; 2019) or PGMA G300-2018; or 
(4) rely on continued education and information campaigns.
    Anticipated Cost and Benefits: The proposed rule is estimated to 
avert 2,148 deaths (nearly 72 deaths per year) and 126,387 injuries 
(roughly 4,213 injuries per year) over 30 years. Overall, the draft 
proposed rule has net benefits (benefits over and above costs) of 
$897.06 million on an annualized basis at a 3 percent discount rate, 
and for every $1 in direct cost to consumers and manufacturers, the 
draft proposed rule generates $7.02 in benefits from mitigated deaths 
and injuries.
    Risks: As of May 10, 2022, CPSC databases contained reports of at 
least 770 generator-related consumer CO- poisoning deaths resulting 
from 588 incidents that occurred from 2011 through 2021.
    Timetable:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Action                    Date            FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Staff Sent ANPRM to Commission......   07/06/06
Staff Sent Supplemental Material to    10/12/06
 Commission.
Commission Decision.................   10/26/06
Staff Sent Draft ANPRM to Commission   11/21/06
ANPRM...............................   12/12/06  71 FR 74472
ANPRM Comment Period End............   02/12/07
Staff Releases Research Report for     10/10/12
 Comment.
NPRM................................   11/21/16  81 FR 83556
NPRM Comment Period Extended........   12/13/16  81 FR 89888
Public Hearing for Oral Comments....   03/08/17  82 FR 8907
NPRM Comment Period End.............   04/24/17
Staff Sends Notice of Availability     06/26/19
 to the Commission.
Commission Decision.................   07/02/19
Notice of Availability..............   07/09/19  84 FR 32729
Staff Sends Notice of Availability     08/12/20
 to Commission.
Commission Decision.................   08/19/20
Notice of Availability..............   08/24/20  85 FR 52096
Staff Report on Effectiveness          02/16/22
 Evaluation of Voluntary Standards.
Staff Sends (S)NPRM Briefing Package   03/08/23
 to Commission.
Commission Decision.................   04/05/23
NPRM................................   04/20/23  88 FR 24346
NPRM Comment Period End.............   06/20/23
Staffs Sends Briefing Package to       11/00/23
 Commission.
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Yes.
    Small Entities Affected: Businesses.
    Government Levels Affected: Undetermined.
    Federalism: Undetermined.
    International Impacts: This regulatory action will be likely to 
have international trade and investment effects, or otherwise be of 
international interest.
    Agency Contact: Janet L. Buyer, Project Manager, Directorate for 
Engineering Sciences, Consumer Product Safety Commission, National 
Product Testing and Evaluation Center, 5 Research Place, Rockville, MD 
20850, Phone: 301 987-2293, Email: [email protected].
    RIN: 3041-AC36

BILLING CODE 6355-01-P

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION (FTC)

Statement of Regulatory Priorities (2023)

    The Federal Trade Commission is an independent agency charged with 
rooting out unfair methods of competition and unfair or deceptive acts 
or practices. Its mission is vital to the national interest because, 
when markets are fair and competitive, honest businesses and the public 
all benefit. The Commission also protects people who cannot protect 
themselves--from powerful corporate interests looking to squeeze out, 
trick, erode the wealth of, or otherwise undermine the economic 
autonomy of consumers. The Commission works to ensure well-functioning 
markets that protect people's economic freedom, choice, and liberty. 
The agency's vision is of ``a vibrant economy fueled by fair 
competition and an empowered, informed public.'' \1\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ Fed. Trade Comm'n, Strategic Plan for Fiscal Years 2022-
2026, at 13 (Aug. 26, 2022), https://www.ftc.gov/system/files/ftc_gov/pdf/fy-2022-2026-ftc-strategic-plan.pdf.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Commission has a unique set of tools to carry out its mission, 
such as its market study tool, as well as traditions like public 
workshops and open comment dockets, to receive a wide breadth of 
information about a topic on which it is considering making policy.\2\ 
Another tool is its ability to issue rules.\3\ The Commission is 
committed to deploying all its tools, including issuing

[[Page 9531]]

new rules and updating old ones, to achieve its mission.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \2\ See 5 U.S.C. 46(b); see also Fed. Trade Comm'n, A Brief 
Overview of the Federal Trade Commission's Investigative, Law 
Enforcement, and Rulemaking Authority (May 2021), https://www.ftc.gov/about-ftc/mission/enforcement-authority.
    \3\ See 5 U.S.C. 46(g).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. The Commission Is Using All Available Tools To Advance Its Missions

a. Rulemakings

    The Administrative Procedure Act rulemaking process creates 
significant opportunity for public participation to ensure that the 
agency is making well-considered policy decisions.\4\ The rulemaking 
process for rules issued under section 18 of the FTC Act creates 
additional procedures to ensure participation.\5\ Pursuant to these 
statutes, the Commission has been actively engaging members of the 
public to solicit their input in the Commission's means of pursuing its 
mission to ensure fair and competitive markets. Accordingly, the 
Commission and its staff continue to study the problems that rules can 
address, publish rulemaking documents, and engage with stakeholders and 
the public.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ Fed. Trade Comm'n, Public Participation in the Rulemaking 
Process, https://www.ftc.gov/enforcement/rulemaking/public-participation-rulemaking-process.
    \5\ See id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    As to newly proposed consumer-protection rulemakings or rulemaking 
proceedings, in December 2021, the Commission published an ANPR 
(advance notice of proposed rulemaking) focused on the impersonation of 
government and businesses.\6\ None of the public comments submitted in 
response to the ANPR opposed proceeding with the rulemaking. The 
Commission subsequently issued a proposed rule in October 2022.\7\ This 
NPRM (notice of proposed rulemaking) would make it unlawful for persons 
to misrepresent that they are or are affiliated with a government or 
government officer or a business or business officer.\8\ It also would 
make it unlawful to provide the means and instrumentalities for 
violations set out in this proposed rule.\9\ This NPRM offered 
interested parties the opportunity to request an informal hearing, if 
they wished to present their position orally.\10\ The opportunity to 
make an oral statement at an informal hearing is afforded by section 18 
of the Federal Trade Commission Act and implemented in the Commission's 
Rules of Practice. The Commission received a timely request for an 
informal hearing. The hearing was held on May 4, 2023.\11\ The 
Commission is reviewing comments submitted as part of the informal 
hearing along with those submitted in response to the Commission's 
NPRM.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ 87 FR 72901 (Dec. 23, 2021).
    \7\ 87 FR 62741 (Oct. 17, 2022).
    \8\ 87 FR at 62746, 62747.
    \9\ Id.
    \10\ Id. at 62741.
    \11\ 88 FR 19024-25 (Mar. 30, 2023).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    On October 20, 2022, the Commission extended the comment period on 
another ANPR focused on issues concerning commercial surveillance and 
data security.\12\ This ANPR described how Americans must routinely 
surrender their personal information to participate in basic aspects of 
modern life.\13\ It canvassed the Commission's decades-long effort to 
protect Americans' privacy through case-by-case enforcement, policy 
work, and implementation of sectoral privacy laws, concluding that 
rulemaking could be a useful addition to the effort to protect 
individuals' personal privacy. The ANPR requested comment on 95 
questions to ascertain whether unfair or deceptive practices relating 
to commercial surveillance and data security are prevalent and whether 
proceeding with one or more proposed rules is worthwhile.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \12\ 87 FR 63738 (Oct. 20, 2022).
    \13\ 87 FR 51273 (Aug. 22, 2022).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Updating existing rules to meet new challenges is another important 
part of the Commission's rulemaking work. For example, as part of its 
regular review cycle, the Commission issued a NPRM proposing to revise 
its Health Breach Notification Rule to, among other things, clarify its 
scope, including its coverage of developers of many health 
applications; revise certain definitions; clarify what it means for a 
vendor of personal health records to draw PHR (personal health records) 
identifiable health information from multiple sources; modernize notice 
and expand the content of the notice.\14\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \14\ 88 FR 37819 (June 9, 2023).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    As part of the Eyeglass Rule regulatory review, the Commission 
hosted a public workshop \15\ to explore information relating to the 
Rule changes proposed in its NPRM.\16\ This workshop covered several 
topics, such as the costs and benefits related to the proposals set out 
in the NPRM. Staff is reviewing the 47 comments it received in response 
to this workshop.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \15\ 88 FR 18266 (Mar. 28, 2023).
    \16\ 88 FR 248 (Jan. 3, 2023).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Commission also continues its general consumer protection work. 
For example, problematic negative option practices continue to be a 
source of consumer harm. These practices, among other things, saddle 
shoppers with recurring payments for products and services they never 
intended to purchase or did not want to continue buying. To address 
these ongoing problems, the Commission proposed amending the current 
Negative Option Rule with the objective of setting clear, enforceable 
performance-based requirements for all negative option features in all 
media.\17\ These proposed changes are designed to ensure consumers 
understand what they are purchasing, to allow them to cancel their 
participation without undue burden or complication, and to address the 
most important issues related to negative option marketing, including 
misrepresentations, disclosures, consent, and cancellation.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \17\ 88 FR 24716, 24726 (Apr. 24, 2023).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    As for its competition mission, the Commission continues to explore 
whether new rules that specify ``unfair methods of competition'' 
prohibited by section 5 of the FTC Act would help achieve the agency's 
mission. In its most recent strategic plan, the Commission observed 
that ``[r]ules . . . inform businesses and their legal advisers about 
antitrust risks and can deter anticompetitive mergers and business 
practices'' and that promoting competition can benefit all market 
participants, including workers.\18\ In January 2023, the Commission 
proposed a rule addressing non-compete clauses in the labor market.\19\ 
The Commission's proposal discusses the startling prevalence of non-
compete clauses in states where they are unenforceable, which can have 
a chilling effect on competitive conditions--just as enforceable 
clauses do. Clear rules that are easily understood help to clear up 
these misconceptions and achieve the desired results--in this case, 
more optimal job switching and matching. During the comment period for 
this NPRM, some commenters requested that this comment period be 
extended to give them additional time to respond; other commenters 
opposed such an extension and any potential delay. The Commission 
reviewed the extension requests and agreed to allow the public 
additional time to prepare and file comments. Thus, the comment period 
was extended until April 19, 2023, to provide commenters a total of 104 
days from the public release of the NPRM.\20\ To additionally ensure 
that all viewpoints were heard during the

[[Page 9532]]

public comment period before determining how to proceed, the Commission 
also hosted a public forum on February 16, 2023, which examined this 
proposed rule and provided an opportunity for interested parties to 
directly share their experiences with non-compete clauses. In the 
months since proposing this rule, the Commission received more than 
21,000 public comments, including from nurses, doctors, fast food 
workers, and hairdressers. Staff is reviewing the comments.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \18\ Fed. Trade Comm'n, FTC Strategic Plan for Fiscal Years 2022 
to 2026, at 16 (Aug. 26, 2022), https://www.ftc.gov/system/files/ftc_gov/pdf/fy-2022-2026-ftc-strategic-plan.pdf. Other competition 
problems could also be addressed by new rules. Cf. Exec. Order No. 
14036, section 5(h)(i)-(vii) (July 9, 2021), https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/presidential-actions/2021/07/09/executive-order-on-promoting-competition-in-the-american-economy/.
    \19\ 88 FR 3482 (Jan. 19, 2023).
    \20\ 88 FR 20441 (Apr. 6, 2023).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Also in furtherance of its competition mission, the Commission has 
been working for the past year with the Department of Justice (DOJ) to 
examine how the agencies can more readily detect potentially 
problematic mergers and acquisitions. Pursuant to the Hart-Scott-Rodino 
(HSR) Antitrust Improvements Act of 1976, the Commission, with the 
concurrence of the DOJ Assistant Attorney General, issues rules to 
ensure that the agencies receive the information needed to identify 
anticompetitive mergers and investigate them fully to determine whether 
to seek to block any the effect of which may be substantially to lessen 
competition or to tend to create a monopoly. After conducting a 
comprehensive review of the information that market participants 
currently submit in premerger notification filings, the Commission 
initiated a rulemaking to propose the collection of additional 
information that the agencies need to more effectively and efficiently 
identify transactions that warrant deeper investigation.\21\ This 
proposed rule would also implement provisions of the Merger Filing Fee 
Modernization Act of 2022, which requires companies to disclose 
information in their HSR filings about subsidies received from certain 
foreign governments and entities.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \21\ 88 FR 42178 (June 29, 2023).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

b. Service Delivery

    The Commission also takes actions that improve service delivery and 
customer experience and that reduce administrative burdens for the 
public. For example, the Commission plans to issue a final rule by 
early 2024 to update the filing system for Hart-Scott-Rodino Form and 
Instructions to the new cloud- based e-filing system, which will 
eliminate paper filings. As part of this process, FTC staff engaged 
with internal and external customers, including usability testing of 
beta software processes for submitting electronic HSR filings.
    In sum, the Commission continues seeking public input and learning 
from its law-enforcement, consumer-education, market-monitoring, and 
other work to identify additional opportunities for new or improved 
rules to complement its other tools and the vital work of partner 
agencies and the states. Meaningful public engagement in rulemakings or 
for improvements to service delivery can deliver important benefits to 
the public and honest businesses, so the Commission will continue to 
seek the views of all affected communities.

II. Updates on Other Ongoing Rulemakings

a. Periodic Regulatory Review Program

    In 1992, the Commission implemented a program to review its rules 
and guides on a regular basis. The Commission's review program is 
patterned after provisions in the Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 
601-612, and complies with the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement 
Fairness Act of 1996. The Commission's review program is also 
consistent with section 5(a) of Executive Order 12866, which directs 
executive branch agencies to reevaluate periodically all their 
significant regulations.\22\ Under the Commission's program, rules and 
guides are typically reviewed on a ten-year schedule that results in 
more frequent reviews than are generally required by the Regulatory 
Flexibility Act. The public can obtain information on rules and guides 
under review and the Commission's regulatory review program generally 
at https://www.ftc.gov/enforcement/rules/retrospective-review-ftc-rules-guides.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \22\ Exec. Order No. 12866, 58 FR 51735 (Sept. 30, 1993).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The program provides an ongoing, systematic approach for obtaining 
information about the costs and benefits of rules and guides and 
whether there are changes that could minimize any adverse economic 
effects, not just a ``significant economic impact upon a substantial 
number of small entities.'' \23\ As part of each review, the Commission 
requests public comment on, among other things, the economic impact and 
benefits of the rule; possible conflict between the rule and state, 
local, or other federal laws or regulations; and the effect on the rule 
of any technological, economic, or other industry changes. Reviews may 
lead to the revision or rescission of rules and guides to ensure that 
the Commission's consumer protection and competition goals are achieved 
efficiently. Pursuant to this program, the Commission has rescinded 40 
rules and guides promulgated under the FTC's general authority and 
updated dozens of other rules and guides since the program's inception.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \23\ 5 U.S.C. 610(a).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

(1) Newly Initiated and Upcoming Periodic Reviews of Rules and Guides
    During Fall 2023, the Commission plans to issue an updated ten-year 
review schedule. The Commission has initiated or announced plans to 
initiate periodic reviews of the following rules and guides:
    Alternative Fuels Rule, 16 CFR part 309. On October 26, 2023, as 
part of the systematic review of all Commission rules, the Commission 
initiated a periodic review of the Alternative Fuels Rule (formally 
``Labeling Requirements for Alternative Fuels and Alternative-Fueled 
Vehicles'') by publishing a notice seeking public comments on the 
effectiveness and impact of the Rule. 88 FR 73549 (Oct. 26, 2023). The 
public comment period will close on December 26, 2023.
    Cooling-Off Rule, 16 CFR part 429. By the end of 2023, as part of 
the systematic review of all Commission rules, the Commission plans to 
initiate a periodic review of the Cooling-Off Rule (formally ``Trade 
Regulation Rule Concerning Cooling-Off Period for Sales Made at Homes 
or at Certain Other Locations'') by publishing a notice seeking public 
comments on the effectiveness and impact of the Rule.
    Most recently, on January 9, 2015, the Commission amended the 
Cooling-Off Rule by increasing the exclusionary limit for all door-to-
door sales at locations other than a buyer's residence from $25 up to 
$130.\24\ Under that final rule, the revised definition of door-to-door 
sale now distinguishes between sales at a buyer's residence and those 
at other locations. The revised definition retained coverage for sales 
made at a buyer's residence that have a purchase price of $25 or more. 
The final rule amendment was effective on March 13, 2015.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \24\ 80 FR 1329 (Jan. 9, 2015).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Rules. During 2024, the Commission plans to initiate periodic 
review of Rules and Regulations under the Wool Products Labeling Act of 
1939, 16 CFR part 300, Rules and Regulations under Fur Products 
Labeling Act, 16 CFR part 301, Rules and Regulations under the Textile 
Fiber Products Identification Act, 16 CFR part 303, the Mail, internet, 
or Telephone Order Merchandise Rule, 16 CFR part 435, and Retail Food 
Store Advertising and Marketing Practices (Unavailability Rule), 16 CFR 
part 424.

[[Page 9533]]

    Guides. During 2024, the Commission plans to initiate periodic 
review of the Guides for the Rebuilt, Reconditioned, and Other Used 
Automobile Parts Industry, 16 CFR part 20, and the Guides for 
Advertising Allowances and Other Merchandising Payments and Services 
(Fred Meyer Guides), 16 CFR part 240.
(2) Ongoing Periodic Reviews of Rules and Guides
    The following proceedings for the retrospective review of 
Commission rules and guides described in the 2022 Regulatory Plan are 
ongoing:
    Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act Coverage, Exemption, 
and Transmittal Rules, 16 CFR parts 801-803. On December 1, 2020, the 
Commission initiated the periodic review of the Hart- Scott-Rodino 
Antitrust Improvements Act's Coverage, Exemption, and Transmittal Rules 
(HSR Rules) as part of the Commission's systematic review of all 
current Commission rules and guides.\25\ The comment period closed on 
February 1, 2021. The HSR Rules and the Antitrust Improvements Act 
Notification and Report Form (HSR Form) was adopted pursuant to section 
7A of the Clayton Act, which requires firms of a certain size 
contemplating mergers, acquisitions, or other transactions of a 
specified size to file notification with the FTC and the DOJ and to 
wait a designated period of time before consummating the transaction. 
On June 29, 2023, the Commission issued a notice of proposed rulemaking 
on substantive HSR Form changes, including implementing congressionally 
mandated reporting requirements on foreign subsidies.\26\ The extended 
public comment period closed on September 27, 2023.\27\ Staff is 
reviewing the public comments. By February 2024, staff anticipates that 
the Commission will issue a final rule to transition the HSR Form and 
Instructions to the new cloud-based e-filing system.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \25\ 85 FR 77042 (Dec. 1, 2020).
    \26\ 88 FR 42178 (June 29, 2023).
    \27\ 88 FR 54256 (Aug. 10, 2023).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Business Opportunity Rule, 16 CFR part 437. On November 25, 2022, 
the Commission initiated a periodic review of the Business Opportunity 
Rule.\28\ The Commission sought comments on, among other things, the 
economic impact, and benefits of this rule; possible conflict between 
the rule and State, local, or other Federal laws or regulations; and 
the effect on the rule of any technological, economic, or other 
industry changes. The comment period as extended closed on January 31, 
2023. Staff is currently reviewing the public comments. Effective in 
2012, the Rule requires business-opportunity sellers to furnish 
prospective purchasers with a disclosure document that provides 
information regarding the seller, the seller's business, and the nature 
of the proposed business opportunity, as well as additional information 
to substantiate any claims about actual or potential sales, income, or 
profits for a prospective business-opportunity purchaser. The seller 
must also preserve information that forms a reasonable basis for such 
claims.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \28\ 87 FR 72428 (Nov. 25, 2022).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Children's Online Privacy Protection Rule, 16 CFR part 312. On July 
25, 2019, the Commission issued a request for public comment on its 
Children's Online Privacy Protection Rule (``COPPA Rule'').\29\ 
Although the Commission's last COPPA Rule review ended in 2013, the 
Commission initiated this review early in light of changes in the 
marketplace. Following an extension, the public comment period closed 
on December 9, 2019.\30\ The FTC sought comment on all major provisions 
of the COPPA Rule, including its definitions, notice and parental-
consent requirements, exceptions to verifiable parental consent, and 
safe-harbor provision. The FTC hosted a public workshop to address 
issues raised during the review of the COPPA Rule on October 7, 2019. 
Staff is analyzing and reviewing public comments.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \29\ 84 FR 35842 (July 25, 2019).
    \30\ 84 FR 56391 (Oct. 22, 2019).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Eyeglass Rule, 16 CFR part 456. As part of the systematic review 
process, the Commission sought public comments about the Trade 
Regulation Rule on Ophthalmic Practice Rules (Eyeglass Rule) on 
September 3, 2015,\31\ and the comment period closed on October 26, 
2015. Commission staff completed review of the 868 comments received 
from consumers, eye care professionals, industry members, trade 
associations, and consumer advocates. The Eyeglass Rule requires that 
an optometrist or ophthalmologist give the patient, at no extra cost, a 
copy of the eyeglass prescription immediately after the examination is 
completed. The Rule also prohibits optometrists and ophthalmologists 
from conditioning the availability of an eye examination, as defined by 
the Rule, on a requirement that the patient agree to purchase 
ophthalmic goods from the optometrist or ophthalmologist. On January 3, 
2023, the Commission issued a notice of proposed rulemaking that would 
require ophthalmologists and optometrists to provide patients with a 
copy of their prescription immediately after the completion of a 
refractive eye exam, get a signed statement from the patient confirming 
that they have received their prescription, and keep a record of that 
confirmation for at least three years.\32\ The comment period closed on 
March 6, 2023, and staff is reviewing the comments. The Commission held 
a public workshop on May 18, 2023, and staff is reviewing the 
comments.\33\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \31\ 80 FR 53274 (Sept. 3, 2015).
    \32\ 88 FR 248 (Jan. 3, 2023).
    \33\ 88 FR 18266 (Mar. 28, 2023).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Franchise Rule, 16 CFR part 436. On March 15, 2019, the Commission 
initiated a periodic review of the Franchise Rule (formally 
``Disclosure Requirements and Prohibitions Concerning 
Franchising'').\34\ The comment period closed on April 21, 2019. The 
Commission then held a public workshop on November 10, 2020. The 
closing date for written comments related to the issues discussed at 
the workshop was December 17, 2020.\35\ Staff continues to evaluate the 
record and review the public comments. The Rule is intended to give 
prospective purchasers of franchises the material information they need 
to weigh the risks and benefits of such an investment. The Rule 
requires franchisors to provide all potential franchisees with a 
disclosure document containing 23 specific items of information about 
the offered franchise, its officers, and other franchisees. Required 
disclosure topics include, for example, the franchise's litigation 
history; past and current franchisees and their contact information; 
any exclusive territory that comes with the franchise; assistance the 
franchisor provides franchisees; and the cost of purchasing and 
starting up a franchise.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \34\ 84 FR 9051 (Mar. 13, 2019).
    \35\ 85 FR 55850 (Sept. 10, 2020).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Health Breach Notification Rule, 16 CFR part 318. On May 22, 2020, 
the Commission initiated a periodic review of the Health Breach 
Notification Rule.\36\ The comment period closed on August 20, 2020. On 
June 9, 2023, the Commission proposed to amend the Rule in seven ways 
and requested comment on the proposed changes.\37\ The comment period 
closed on August 8, 2023, and staff is reviewing the comments. The Rule 
requires vendors of personal health records (PHR) and PHR-related 
entities to provide: (1) notice to consumers whose unsecured personally 
identifiable health information has been breached; and (2) notice to 
the

[[Page 9534]]

Commission. Under the Rule, vendors must notify both the FTC and 
affected consumers whose information has been affected by a breach 
``without unreasonable delay and in no case later than 60 calendar 
days'' after discovery of a data breach. Among other information, the 
notices must provide consumers with steps they can take to protect 
themselves from harm.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \36\ 85 FR 31085 (May 22, 2020).
    \37\ 88 FR 37819 (June 9, 2023).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Identity Theft Rules, 16 CFR part 681. In December 2018, the 
Commission initiated a periodic review of the Identity Theft Rules, 
which include the Red Flags Rule and the Card Issuer Rule.\38\ FTC 
staff is reviewing the comments received. The Red Flags Rule requires 
financial institutions and creditors to develop and implement a written 
identity theft prevention program (a ``Red Flags Program''). By 
identifying red flags for identity theft in advance, businesses can be 
better equipped to spot suspicious patterns that may arise and take 
steps to prevent potential problems from escalating into a costly 
episode of identity theft. The Card Issuer Rule requires credit and 
debit card issuers to implement reasonable policies and procedures to 
assess the validity of a change of address if they receive notification 
of a change of address for a consumer's debit or credit card account 
and, within a short period of time afterwards, also receive a request 
for an additional or replacement card for the same account.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \38\ 83 FR 63604 (Dec. 11, 2018).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Leather Guides, 16 CFR part 24. On March 6, 2019, the Commission 
initiated a periodic review of the Leather Guides, formally known as 
the Guides for Select Leather and Imitation Leather Products.\39\ The 
comment period closed on April 22, 2019. The Leather Guides apply to 
the manufacture, sale, distribution, marketing, or advertising of 
leather or simulated leather purses, luggage, wallets, footwear, and 
other similar products. The Guides address misrepresentations regarding 
the composition and characteristics of specific leather and imitation 
leather products.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \39\ 84 FR 8045 (Mar. 6, 2019).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Negative Option Rule, 16 CFR part 310. On October 2, 2019, the 
Commission issued an advance notice of proposed rulemaking seeking 
public comment on the effectiveness and impact of the Trade Regulation 
Rule on Use of Prenotification Negative Option Plans (Negative Option 
Rule).\40\ On April 24, 2023, the Commission published a notice of 
proposed rulemaking to amend the existing Rule to implement new 
requirements to provide important information to consumers, obtain 
consumers' express informed consent, and ensure consumers can easily 
cancel these programs when they choose.\41\ The comment period closed 
on June 23, 2023. Staff is currently reviewing the public comments.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \40\ 84 FR 52393 (Oct. 2, 2019).
    \41\ 88 FR 24716 (Apr. 24, 2023).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

b. Proposed Rules

    Since the publication of the 2022 Regulatory Plan, the Commission 
has initiated or plans to take further steps as described below in the 
following rulemaking proceedings:
    Energy Labeling Rule, 16 CFR part 305. The Energy Labeling Rule 
requires energy labeling for major home appliances and other consumer 
products to help consumers compare the energy usage and costs of 
competing models. On October 25, 2022, the Commission issued an advance 
notice of proposed rulemaking that sought public comment on potential 
amendments to the Rule, including energy labels for several new 
consumer product categories, other possible amendments to improve the 
Rule's effectiveness, and reducing unnecessary burdens.\42\ The comment 
period as extended closed on January 31, 2023.\43\ Staff is currently 
reviewing the public comments.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \42\ 87 FR 64399 (Oct. 25, 2022).
    \43\ 88 FR 4796 (Jan. 25, 2023).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Power Output Claims for Amplifiers Utilized in Home Entertainment 
Products, 16 CFR part 432. On December 18, 2020, the Commission 
initiated a periodic review of the Amplifier Rule (formally ``Power 
Output Claims for Amplifiers Utilized in Home Entertainment Products 
Rule'').\44\ The Commission sought comments on, among other things, the 
economic impact, and benefits of this Rule; possible conflict between 
the Rule and State, local, or other Federal laws or regulations; and 
the effect on the Rule of any technological, economic, or other 
industry changes. The Amplifier Rule establishes uniform test standards 
and disclosures so that consumers can make more meaningful comparisons 
of amplifier-equipment performance attributes. On July 27, 2022, the 
Commission sought public comment on a proposal to amend the Rule to 
require sellers making power-related claims to calculate power output 
using uniform testing methods to allow consumers to easily compare 
amplifier sound quality.\45\ Additionally, for multichannel home 
theater amplifiers the Commission sought comment about how to set test 
conditions to reflect typical consumer use. The comment period closed 
on September 26, 2022. On August 21, 2023, the Commission issued a 
supplemental notice of proposed rulemaking.\46\ The comment period 
closed on October 23, 2023.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \44\ 85 FR 82391 (Dec. 18, 2020).
    \45\ 87 FR 45047 (July 27, 2022).
    \46\ 88 FR 56780 (Aug. 21, 2023).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Telemarketing Sales Rule, 16 CFR part 310. On August 11, 2014, the 
Commission initiated a periodic review of the Telemarketing Sales Rule 
(TSR).\47\ The comment period as extended closed on November 13, 
2014.\48\ On June 3, 2022, the Commission issued a notice of proposed 
rulemaking seeking public comment on proposed amendments to the 
TSR.\49\ The proposed amendments would require telemarketers and 
sellers to maintain additional records of their telemarketing 
transactions, prohibit material misrepresentations and false or 
misleading statements in business-to-business telemarketing 
transactions, and add a new definition for the term ``previous donor.'' 
The comment period closed on August 2, 2022, and the Commission has 
received 25 comments to date. Also on June 3, 2022, the Commission 
issued an advance notice of proposed rulemaking seeking public comment 
on whether the TSR should continue to exempt telemarketing calls to 
businesses, whether the TSR should require a notice and cancellation 
mechanism with negative option sales, and whether to extend the TSR to 
apply to telemarketing calls that consumers initiate to a telemarketer 
(i.e., inbound telemarketing calls) regarding computer technical 
support services.\50\ The comment period closed on August 2, 2022. 
Staff is reviewing the comments.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \47\ 79 FR 46732 (Aug. 11, 2014).
    \48\ 79 FR 61267 (Oct. 10, 2014).
    \49\ 87 FR 33677 (June 3, 2022).
    \50\ 87 FR 33662 (June 3, 2022).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Non-Compete Clause Rule, proposed to be codified at 16 CFR part 
901. On January 19, 2023, the Commission proposed the Non-Compete 
Clause Rule.\51\ The proposed rule would, among other things, provide 
that it is an unfair method of competition for an employer to enter 
into or attempt to enter into a non-compete clause with a worker; to 
maintain with a worker a non-compete clause; or, under certain 
circumstances, to represent to a worker that the worker is subject to a 
non-compete clause. On February 16, 2023, the Commission hosted a 
public forum that examined the FTC's proposed rule and provided an 
opportunity for interested parties to directly share their experiences 
with non-compete clauses.

[[Page 9535]]

The comment period as extended closed on April 19, 2023. Staff is 
reviewing the comments.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \51\ 88 FR 3482 (Jan. 19, 2023).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Motor Vehicle Dealers Trade Regulation Rule, proposed to be 
codified at 16 CFR part 463. On July 13, 2022, the Commission issued a 
notice of proposed rulemaking soliciting public comment on a proposed 
Rule regarding unfair or deceptive acts or practices under its 
authority with respect to motor vehicle dealers described in section 
1029(d) of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection 
Act.\52\ The proposed rule would prohibit motor vehicle dealers from 
making certain misrepresentations in the course of selling, leasing, or 
arranging financing for motor vehicles; require accurate pricing 
disclosures in dealers' advertising and sales discussions; require 
dealers to obtain consumers' express, informed consent for charges; 
prohibit the sale of any add-on product or service that confers no 
benefit to the consumer; and require dealers to keep records of 
advertisements and customer transactions. The public comment period 
closed on September 12, 2022. Staff is reviewing the public comments.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \52\ 87 FR 42012 (July 13, 2022).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Trade Regulation Rule on Impersonation of Government and 
Businesses, proposed to be codified at 16 CFR part 461. On October 17, 
2022, the Commission issued a notice of proposed rulemaking to address 
certain deceptive or unfair acts or practices of impersonation of 
government and business officials.\53\ The public comment period closed 
on December 16, 2022. An informal hearing was held on May 4, 2023, at 
which oral testimony \54\ was provided and additional written testimony 
was accepted. Staff is reviewing the comments.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \53\ 87 FR 62741 (Oct. 17, 2022).
    \54\ See Fed. Trade Comm'n, Transcript of Informal Hearing 
Before the Administrative Law Judge on Government and Business 
Impersonation Rule (May 4, 2023), https://www.ftc.gov/system/files/ftc_gov/pdf/impersonationruleinformalhearingtranscript.pdf.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Earnings Claims Trade Regulation Rule, proposed to be codified at 
16 CFR part 462. On March 11, 2022, the Commission issued an advance 
notice of proposed rulemaking seeking public comment about a potential 
rule to address deceptive or unfair marketing using earnings 
claims.\55\ The comment period closed on May 10, 2022. Staff is 
reviewing the comments.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \55\ 87 FR 13951 (Mar. 11, 2022).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Trade Regulation Rule on Commercial Surveillance, 16 CFR part 
undetermined. On August 22, 2022, the Commission issued an advance 
notice of proposed rulemaking under section 18 of the FTC Act to limit 
privacy abuses, curb lax security practices, and ensure that 
algorithmic decision-making does not result in unlawful 
discrimination.\56\ The Commission sought public comment on whether new 
rules are needed to protect people's privacy and information in the 
commercial surveillance economy. On September 8, 2022, the Commission 
hosted a public forum regarding its ANPR on commercial surveillance and 
data security practices that harm consumers and competition. The public 
forum included panel discussions and members of the public provided 
remarks. The ANPR's extended public comment period closed on November 
21, 2022.\57\ Staff is reviewing the public comments.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \56\ 87 FR 51273 (Aug. 22, 2022).
    \57\ FR 63738 (Oct. 20, 2022).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Funeral Rule, 16 CFR part 453. On February 14, 2020, the Commission 
initiated a periodic review of the Funeral Industry Practices Rule 
(Funeral Rule).\58\ The comment period as extended closed on June 15, 
2020.\59\ The Funeral Rule, which became effective in 1984, requires 
sellers of funeral goods and services to give price lists to consumers 
who visit or call a funeral home. On November 2, 2022, the Commission 
issued an advance notice of proposed rulemaking seeking comment on 
potential updates to modernize the Funeral Rule, including improvements 
to the public accessibility of funeral home price information.\60\ The 
comment period closed on January 3, 2023. The Commission also issued a 
staff report that summarizes the results of staff's review of almost 
200 funeral provider websites.\61\ The Commission held a public 
workshop on September 7, 2023.\62\ The workshop explored issues 
relating to the Funeral Rule's General Price List requirements, 
including whether and how funeral providers should be required to 
provide price lists electronically or online, and other issues raised 
in the comments received in response to the 2022 ANPR. The comment 
period for any written comments related to the issues discussed at the 
workshop closed on October 10, 2023. Staff is reviewing the public 
comments.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \58\ 85 FR 8490 (Feb. 14, 2020).
    \59\ 85 FR 20453(Apr. 13, 2020).
    \60\ 87 FR 66096 (Nov. 2, 2022).
    \61\ See Fed. Trade Comm'n, FTC Seeks to Improve the American 
Public's Access to Funeral Service Prices Online (Oct. 20, 2022), 
https://www.ftc.gov/news-events/news/press-releases/2022/10/ftc-seeks-improve-american-publics-access-funeral-service-prices-online.
    \62\ 88 FR 33011 (May 23, 2023).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Unfair or Deceptive Fees Trade Regulation Rule, proposed to be 
codified at 16 CFR part 464. On November 8, 2022, the Commission issued 
an advance notice of proposed rulemaking to address certain deceptive 
or unfair acts or practices related to fees.\63\ The public comment 
period closed on January 9, 2023. On October 11, 2023, the Commission 
announced that it was publishing a notice of proposed rulemaking to 
promulgate a trade regulation rule entitled ``Rule on Unfair or 
Deceptive Fees,'' which would prohibit unfair or deceptive practices 
relating to fees for goods or services, specifically, misrepresenting 
the total costs of goods and services by omitting mandatory fees from 
advertised prices and misrepresenting the nature and purpose of fees. 
The public comment period will close 60 days after publication in the 
Federal Register.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \63\ 87 FR 67413 (Nov. 8, 2022); see also Fed. Trade Comm'n, 
Federal Trade Commission Explores Rule Cracking Down on Junk Fees 
(Oct. 20, 2022), https://www.ftc.gov/news-events/news/press-releases/2022/10/federal-trade-commission-explores-rule-cracking-down-junk-fees.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Trade Regulation Rule on the Use of Reviews and Endorsements, 
proposed to be codified at 16 CFR part 465. On November 8, 2022, the 
Commission issued an advance notice of proposed rulemaking to address 
certain deceptive or unfair acts or practices concerning reviews and 
endorsements.\64\ The public comment period closed on January 9, 2023. 
On July 31, 2023, the Commission issued a notice of proposed rulemaking 
seeking public comments concerning the utility and scope of the 
proposed trade regulation rule to prohibit the specified unfair or 
deceptive acts or practices.\65\ The comment period closed on September 
29, 2023, and staff is reviewing the comments.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \64\ 87 FR 67424 (Nov. 8, 2022); see also Fed. Trade Comm'n, 
Federal Trade Commission to Explore Rulemaking to Combat Fake 
Reviews and Other Deceptive Endorsements (Oct. 20, 2022), https://www.ftc.gov/news-events/news/press-releases/2022/10/ftc-explore-rulemaking-combat-fake-reviews-other-deceptive-endorsements.
    \65\ 88 FR 49364 (July 31, 2023).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

c. Final Actions

    Since the publication of the 2022 Regulatory Plan, the Commission 
has issued the following final agency actions in rulemaking and guide 
proceedings:
    Endorsement Guides, 16 CFR part 255. On July 26, 2023, the 
Commission adopted revised Endorsement Guides to reflect the ways 
advertisers now reach consumers to promote products and services, 
including through social media

[[Page 9536]]

and reviews.\66\ The Guides provide agency guidance to businesses and 
others to ensure that advertising using reviews or endorsements is 
truthful. The final revised Guides took the public comments received 
into consideration and make a number of revisions including: (1) 
articulating a new principle regarding procuring, suppressing, 
boosting, organizing, publishing, upvoting, downvoting, or editing 
consumer reviews so as to distort what consumers think of a product; 
(2) addressing incentivized reviews, reviews by employees, and fake 
negative reviews of a competitor; (3) adding a definition of ``clear 
and conspicuous'' and saying that a platform's built-in disclosure tool 
might not be an adequate disclosure; (4) changing the definition of 
``endorsements'' to clarify the extent to which it includes fake 
reviews, virtual influencers, and tags in social media; (5) better 
explaining the potential liability of advertisers, endorsers, and 
intermediaries; and (6) highlighting that child-directed advertising is 
of special concern. In many instances the revisions responded to 
comments by adding to or modifying the hypothetical examples that 
illustrate the principles of the Guides. For example, within section 
255.2 concerning consumer endorsements, staff modified Example 8 to 
clarify that a particular seller must display reviews about its own 
customer service but need not display reviews about the customer 
service of a different seller.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \66\ 88 FR 48092 (July 26, 2023).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Safeguards Rule (Standards for Safeguarding Customer Information), 
16 CFR part 314. On December 9, 2021, the Commission issued a 
supplemental notice of proposed rulemaking that proposes to amend the 
Safeguards Rule to require financial institutions to report to the 
Commission any security event where the financial institutions have 
determined misuse of customer information has occurred or is reasonably 
likely and that at least 1,000 consumers have been affected or 
reasonably may be affected.\67\ The comment period closed on February 
7, 2022. On October 27, 2023, the Commission announced a final rule 
amendment that requires covered financial institutions to notify the 
FTC as soon as possible, and no later than 30 days after discovery, of 
a security breach involving the information of at least 500 consumers. 
Such an event requires notification if unencrypted customer information 
has been acquired without the authorization of the individual to which 
the information pertains. The notice to the FTC must include certain 
information about the event, such as the number of consumers affected 
or potentially affected. The breach notification requirement becomes 
effective 180 days after publication of the rule in the Federal 
Register.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \67\ 86 FR 70062 (Dec. 9, 2021).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

d. Significant Regulatory Actions

    The Commission has three proposed rules that would be a 
``significant regulatory action'' under the definition in section 3(f) 
of Executive Order 12866: the proposed Motor Vehicle Dealers Trade 
Regulation Rule, to be codified at 16 CFR part 463, the proposed Non-
Compete Clause Rule to be codified at 16 CFR 910,and the proposed 
substantive HSR form changes under the Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust 
Improvements Act Coverage, Exemption, and Transmittal Rules, 16 CFR 
parts 801-803.
    The Commission has no proposed rule that would have significant 
international impacts or any international regulatory cooperation 
activities that are reasonably anticipated to lead to significant 
regulations, as defined in Executive Order 13609.

Summary

    The actions under consideration advance the Commission's mission by 
informing and protecting consumers while minimizing burdens on honest 
businesses. The Commission continues to identify and weigh the costs 
and benefits of proposed regulatory actions and possible alternative 
actions.

BILLING CODE 6750-01-P

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Statement of Regulatory Priorities for Fiscal Year 2024

I. Introduction

    Under the authority of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended, 
and the Energy Reorganization Act of 1974, as amended, the U.S. Nuclear 
Regulatory Commission (NRC) regulates the possession and use of source, 
byproduct, and special nuclear material. Our regulatory mission is to 
license and regulate the Nation's civilian use of byproduct, source, 
and special nuclear materials to ensure the adequate protection of 
public health and safety and promote the common defense and security. 
As part of our mission, we regulate the operation of nuclear power 
plants and fuel cycle facilities; the safeguarding of nuclear materials 
from theft and sabotage; the safe transport, storage, and disposal of 
radioactive materials and wastes; the decommissioning and safe release 
for other uses of licensed facilities that are no longer in operation; 
and the medical, industrial, and research applications of nuclear 
material. In addition, we license the import and export of radioactive 
materials.
    As part of our regulatory process, we routinely conduct 
comprehensive regulatory analyses that examine the costs and benefits 
of contemplated regulations. We have developed internal procedures and 
programs to ensure that we impose only necessary requirements on our 
licensees and we review existing regulations to determine whether the 
requirements imposed are still necessary.
    Our regulatory priorities for fiscal year (FY) 2024 reflect our 
safety and security mission and will enable us to achieve our three 
strategic goals described in NUREG-1614, Volume 8, ``Strategic Plan: 
Fiscal Years 2022-2026,'' issued April 2022 (https://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/nuregs/staff/sr1614/v8/index.html): (1) 
ensure the safe and secure use of radioactive materials, (2) continue 
to foster a healthy organization, and (3) inspire stakeholder 
confidence in the NRC.

II. Regulatory Priorities

    This section contains information on some of our most important and 
significant regulatory actions that we are considering issuing in 
proposed or final form during FY 2024. This report does not include the 
NRC's high-priority rulemakings titled ``American Society of Mechanical 
Engineers 2021-2022 Code Editions'' (RIN 3150-AK21; NRC-2018-0289), 
``American Society of Mechanical Engineers Code Cases and Update 
Frequency'' (RIN 3150-AK23; NRC-2018-0291), ``Risk-Informed, 
Technology-Inclusive Regulatory Framework for Advanced Reactors'' (RIN 
3150-AK31; NRC-2019-0062), ``Advanced Nuclear Reactor Generic 
Environmental Impact Statement'' (RIN 3150-AK55; NRC 2020-0101), and 
``Reporting Nuclear Medicine Injection Extravasations as Medical 
Events'' (RIN 3150-AK91; NRC-2022-0218) as the timeframe for reporting 
is only through FY 2024; the agency expects to publish the final rules 
during FY 2025. The agency's portion of the Unified Agenda of 
Regulatory and Deregulatory Actions contains additional information on 
NRC rulemaking activities and a broader spectrum of our upcoming 
regulatory actions. We also provide additional information on planned 
rulemakings and petition for rulemaking activities,

[[Page 9537]]

including priority and schedule, on our website at https://www.nrc.gov/about-nrc/regulatory/rulemaking/rules-petitions.html.

A. NRC Priority Rulemakings

Proposed Rules
    Integrated Low-Level Radioactive Waste Disposal (RIN 3150-AI92; 
NRC-2011-0012): This rulemaking would amend the NRC's regulations in 
Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations Part 61, ``Licensing 
Requirements for Land Disposal of Radioactive Waste,'' to revise the 
licensing requirements for low-level radioactive waste disposal and 
address requirements for disposal of greater-than-Class C and 
transuranic waste.
Final Rules
    Alignment of Licensing Processes and Lessons Learned from New 
Reactor Licensing (RIN 3150-AI66; NRC-2009-0196): This rulemaking would 
amend the NRC's regulations for the licensing of new reactors. The rule 
would align requirements between the two licensing processes provided 
in the NRC's regulations to ensure that all new reactor applications 
conform to the NRC's policies and requirements, regardless of the 
selected licensing approach. The rule would address lessons learned 
from NRC reviews conducted for combined licenses, design 
certifications, early site permits, and operating licenses.
    Regulatory Improvements for Production and Utilization Facilities 
Transitioning to Decommissioning (RIN 3150-AJ59; NRC-2015-0070): This 
rulemaking would amend the NRC's regulations to provide an appropriate 
regulatory framework for nuclear power reactors transitioning from 
operations to decommissioning.
    Cyber Security for Fuel Facilities (RIN 3150-AJ64; NRC-2015-0179): 
This rulemaking would amend the NRC's regulations to require certain 
fuel cycle facilities to establish, implement, and maintain a cyber 
security program that is designed to protect public health and safety 
and the common defense and security.
    Renewing Nuclear Power Plant Operating Licenses--Environmental 
Review (RIN 3150-AK32; NRC-2018-0296): This rulemaking would amend the 
NRC's environmental protection regulations by updating the 
environmental effect findings of renewing the operating license of a 
nuclear power plant. These findings would be based on a programmatic 
analysis under the National Environmental Policy Act. The rule will 
affect operating power reactor licensees that seek an initial or 
subsequent renewed operating license.
    Radioactive Source Security and Accountability (RIN 3150-AK83; NRC-
2022-0103): The NRC is amending its regulations to require safety and 
security equipment to be in place before the agency grants a license 
for possession and use of radioactive materials. This rule also would 
require a licensee transferring category 3 quantities of radioactive 
material to verify that the recipient's license authorizes the receipt 
of the type, form, and quantity of radioactive material to be 
transferred, and that such verification be conducted through the 
License Verification System or by contacting the license-issuing 
authority. Lastly, the NRC would implement a more stringent license 
verification method for licensees relying upon an oral certification to 
process an emergency shipment of radioactive material and remove an 
obsolete verification method for obtaining sources of information. This 
rulemaking would affect applicants for a radioactive material license 
and licensees that transfer category 3 quantities of radioactive 
material.

B. Significant Final Rules

    The rulemaking activity below meets the requirements of a 
significant regulatory action in Executive Order 12866, ``Regulatory 
Planning and Review,'' signed September 30, 1993, because it is likely 
to have an annual effect on the economy of $100 million or more.
    Revision of Fee Schedules: Fee Recovery for FY 2024 (RIN 3150-AK74; 
NRC-2022-0046): This rule amends the NRC's fee schedules for licensing, 
inspection, and annual fees charged to agency applicants and licensees.

BILLING CODE 7590-01-P

[FR Doc. 2024-00476 Filed 2-8-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6820-27-P