[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 197 (Friday, October 13, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Pages 71046-71051]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-22611]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
[Release No. 34-98702; File No. SR-ISE-2023-22]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; Nasdaq ISE, LLC; Notice of Filing
and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change To Amend Its
Complex Order Rules
October 6, 2023
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given that
on October 3, 2023, Nasdaq ISE, LLC (``ISE'' or ``Exchange'') filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission (``Commission'') the
proposed rule change as described in Items I and II below, which Items
have been prepared by the Exchange. The Commission is publishing this
notice to solicit comments on the proposed rule change from interested
persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
\2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange proposes to amend Options 3, Section 11, Auction
Mechanisms, and Options 3, Section 13, Price Improvement Mechanisms for
Crossing Transactions.
The text of the proposed rule change is available on the Exchange's
website at https://listingcenter.nasdaq.com/rulebook/ise/rules, at the
principal office of the Exchange, and at the Commission's Public
Reference Room.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in
sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such
statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
1. Purpose
In connection with a technology migration to an enhanced Nasdaq,
Inc.
[[Page 71047]]
(``Nasdaq'') functionality, the Exchange proposes to amend certain
auction rules \3\ which describe the short sale price test in Rule 201
of Regulation SHO. Specifically, the Exchange proposes to adopt a new
sentence within Options 3, Section 11, Auction Mechanisms, and Options
3, Section 13, Price Improvement Mechanisms for Crossing Transactions,
to add further detail to the recently adopted stock-tied rule text.
This rule change is identical to a rule change filed by Nasdaq MRX, LLC
(``MRX'').\4\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 98066 (August 7,
2023), 88 FR 54672 (SR-ISE-2023-13) (Notice of Filing and Immediate
Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change to Amend ISE Rules Related to
Complex Orders with Respect to a System Migration) (``SR-ISE-2023-
13'').
\4\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 98599 (September 28,
2023) (SR-MRX-2023-18) (Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness
of Proposed Rule Change to Amend its Complex Order Rules) (not yet
published).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Background
Today, ISE Members may trade certain Stock-Option Orders as
described in ISE Options 3, Section 14(a)(2) \5\ and Stock-Complex
Orders as described in ISE Options 3, Section 14(a)(3),\6\ among other
things. ISE recently filed a rule change to amend its stock-tied
functionality in connection with a technology migration.\7\ Among other
things, the proposal added Supplementary Material .08(c) to Options 3,
Section 11 and Supplementary Material .09(c) to Options 3, Section 13
\8\ to address the short sale price test in Rule 201 of Regulation SHO
with respect to Complex PIM Orders,\9\ Complex Facilitation Orders \10\
and Complex SOM Orders.\11\ The rule states that when the short sale
price test in Rule 201 of Regulation SHO is triggered for a covered
security, Nasdaq Execution Services, LLC (``NES''),\12\ will not
execute a short sale order in the underlying covered security component
of a Complex Facilitation Order, Complex SOM Order and/or Response, or
in the underlying security component of a Complex PIM Order and/or
Improvement Order, if the price is equal to or below the current
national best bid.\13\ However, NES will execute a short sale order in
the underlying covered security component of a Complex Facilitation
Order, Complex SOM Order and/or Response, or in the underlying security
component of a Complex PIM Order and/or Improvement Order, if such
order is marked ``short exempt,'' regardless of whether it is at a
price that is equal to or below the current national best bid.\14\
Further, if NES cannot execute the underlying covered security
component of a Complex Facilitation Order, Complex SOM Order and/or
Response, or Complex PIM Order and/or Improvement Order, in accordance
with Rule 201 of Regulation SHO, the Exchange will cancel back the
Complex Facilitation Order, Complex SOM Order and/or Response or
Complex PIM Order and/or Improvement Order to the entering Member.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ The term ``Stock-Option Order'' refers to an order for a
Stock-Option Strategy as defined in Options 3, Section 14(a)(2). A
Stock-Option Strategy is the purchase or sale of a stated number of
units of an underlying stock or a security convertible into the
underlying stock (``convertible security'') coupled with the
purchase or sale of options contract(s) on the opposite side of the
market representing either (A) the same number of units of the
underlying stock or convertible security, or (B) the number of units
of the underlying stock necessary to create a delta neutral
position, but in no case in a ratio greater than eight-to-one
(8.00), where the ratio represents the total number of units of the
underlying stock or convertible security in the option leg to the
total number of units of the underlying stock or convertible
security in the stock leg. See ISE Options 3, Section 14(a)(2).
\6\ The term ``Stock-Complex Order'' refers to an order for a
Stock-Complex Strategy as defined in Options 3, Section 14(a)(3). A
Stock-Complex Strategy is the purchase or sale of a stated number of
units of an underlying stock or a security convertible into the
underlying stock (``convertible security'') coupled with the
purchase or sale of a Complex Options Strategy on the opposite side
of the market representing either (A) the same number of units of
the underlying stock or convertible security, or (B) the number of
units of the underlying stock necessary to create a delta neutral
position, but in no case in a ratio greater than eight-to-one
(8.00), where the ratio represents the total number of units of the
underlying stock or convertible security in the option legs to the
total number of units of the underlying stock or convertible
security in the stock leg. Only those Stock-Complex Strategies with
no more than the applicable number of legs, as determined by the
Exchange on a class-by-class basis, are eligible for processing. See
ISE Options 3, Section 14(a)(3).
\7\ See SR-ISE-2023-13.
\8\ Id.
\9\ A Complex PIM Order is an order entered into the Complex
Price Improvement Mechanism as described in Options 3, Section
13(e). See ISE Options 3, Section 14(b)(18).
\10\ A Complex Facilitation Order is an order entered into the
Complex Facilitation Mechanism as described in Options 3, Section
11(c). See ISE Options 3, Section 14(b)(16).
\11\ A Complex SOM Order is an order entered into the Complex
Solicited Order Mechanism as described in Options 3, Section 11(e).
See ISE Options 3, Section 14(b)(17).
\12\ NES is a broker-dealer owned and operated by Nasdaq, Inc.
NES, an affiliate of the Exchange, has been approved by the
Commission to become a Member of the Exchange and perform inbound
routing on behalf of the Exchange.
\13\ See ISE Supplementary Material .08(c) to Options 3, Section
11 and ISE Supplementary Material .09(c) to Options 3, Section 13.
The term ``covered security'' has the same meaning as in Rule
201(a)(1) of Regulation SHO.
\14\ See ISE Supplementary Material .08(c) to Options 3, Section
11 and ISE Supplementary Material .09(c) to Options 3, Section 13.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Proposal
At this time, the Exchange proposes to amend its Complex SOM,
Complex Facilitation, and Complex PIM rules to add a new sentence
within Supplementary Material .08(c) to Options 3, Section 11 and
Supplementary Material .09(c) to Options 3, Section 13 that describes
the manner in which NES would execute a short sale order in the
underlying covered security component of Response, Improvement Complex
Order, or unrelated Limit Complex Order on the Complex Order Book (1)
when the facilitating Electronic Access Member's contra-order, the
solicited contra-side Complex Order, or the Counter-Side Order does not
include a short sale order in the underlying covered security
component; or (2) when the facilitating Electronic Access Member's
contra-order, the solicited contra-side Complex Order, or the Counter-
Side Order includes a short sale order in the underlying security
component. As described more fully below, in the first case NES would
execute the underlying covered security component of the Response,
Improvement Complex Order, or unrelated Limit Complex Order on the
Complex Order Book at its stated limit price. In the second case, NES
would execute the underlying security component of the Response,
Improvement Complex Order, or unrelated Limit Complex Order on the
Complex Order Book at its stated limit price or better.
The proposed rules will make clear to Members who submit auction
responses or Improvement Orders that include a short sale order, or
Members that place orders on the Complex Order Book that include a
short sale order, the manner in which NES will execute the short sale
component of their order when their Response, Improvement Complex
Order, or unrelated Limit Complex Order on the Complex Order Book
executes in the Complex SOM, Complex Facilitation, and Complex PIM
auction, (i.e., their short sale order will execute at its stated limit
price, but not at a better price) if the facilitating Electronic Access
Member's contra-order, the solicited contra-side Complex Order, or the
Counter-Side Order does not include a short sale order. However their
short sale order will execute at its stated limit price or better if
the facilitating Electronic Access Member's contra-order, the solicited
contra-side Complex Order, or the Counter-Side Order includes a short
sale order. Thus, whether a short sale order included in an auction
receives its stated limit price, or potentially receives a better price
[[Page 71048]]
than its limit price, depends on whether the contra-side order
submitted to the auction with an agency order also included a short
sale order. Although the availability of the potential for price
improvement for the responder's short sale order will vary, depending
on whether the contra-order also included a short sale order, ISE notes
that for the reasons described below the alternative would be to
exclude auction orders that include a short sale order from the Complex
SOM, Complex Facilitation, and Complex PIM altogether, which would
decrease competition in the auction and potentially reduce
opportunities for the agency order to receive price improvement in the
auctions. Below are some examples of Complex PIM Auction responses
(``Improvement Orders'') executing within a Complex PIM Auction.\15\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\15\ While the examples utilize the Complex PIM auction, the
same examples apply to a Complex SOM or Complex Facilitation
auction.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Example No. 1--Complex PIM Auction Utilizing Stated Limit Price
ISE BBO for option leg is 0.05 x 0.10.
Underlying equity NBBO is 1.05 x 1.10.
Reg SHO short sale price test is triggered in the underlying.
Stock-Option Strategy is created to buy 1 put, buy 100 shares (cBBO
for this strategy is 1.10 x 1.20).
Complex PIM to buy strategy, 100 @1.13 (buy stock @1.08 and options
@0.05); \16\ Counter-Side Order does not include a short sale order.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\16\ The Exchange notes that different combinations of stock and
options prices could determine the strategy prices in this Example 1
as well as Examples 2 and 3. The Exchange is assuming the noted
prices for the examples, however the Exchange notes that multiple
price points could achieve the net prices in these examples. In this
particular case in Example 1, the agency order could buy stock @1.07
and buy options @0.06 in lieu of the prices noted.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Improvement Complex Order1 is a Priority Customer Order to sell,
sell short stock leg, 100 @1.11 (sell stock @1.06 and options @0.05).
Improvement Complex Order2 to sell, sell short stock leg, 100 @1.12
(sell stock @1.07 and options @0.05).
Complex PIM auction timer concludes:
Improvement Complex Order1 trades with Complex PIM Agency Order,
option @0.05 and stock @1.06 for net price of 1.11. The Improvement
Complex Order may not trade the underlying equity at 1.05 because it
cannot execute a short sale order at a price that is equal to the NBB
of the underlying equity.
Example No. 2--Complex PIM Auction Utilizing Stated Limit Price
ISE BBO for option leg is 0.05 x 0.10.
Underlying equity NBBO is 1.05 x 1.10.
Reg SHO short sale price test is triggered in the underlying.
Stock-Option Strategy is created to buy 1 put, buy 100 shares (cBBO
for this strategy is 1.10 x 1.20).
Complex PIM to buy strategy, 100 @1.13 (buy stock @1.08 and options
@0.05); Counter-Side Order does not include a short sale order.
Improvement Complex Order1 is a Priority Customer Order to sell,
sell short stock leg, 100 @1.10 (sell stock @1.05 and options @0.05).
Improvement Complex Order2 to sell, sell short stock leg, 100 @1.12
(sell stock @1.06 and options @0.06).
Complex PIM auction timer concludes:
Improvement Complex Order2 trades with Complex PIM Agency Order,
option @0.06 and stock @1.06 for net price of 1.12. Since the Counter-
Side Order does not include a short sale order, Improvement Complex
Order1 is considered for execution at its stated limit price of 1.10;
since it cannot trade at 1.10 due to Reg SHO, it does not trade with
the Complex PIM Agency Order.
Example No. 3--Complex PIM Auction Where Counter-Side Is Also Short
Selling
ISE BBO for option leg is 0.05 x 0.10.
Underlying equity NBBO is 1.05 x 1.20.
Counter-Side Order includes a short sale order.
Reg SHO short sale price test is triggered in the underlying.
Stock-Option Strategy is created to buy 1 put, buy 100 shares (cBBO
for this strategy is 1.10 x 1.30).
Complex PIM to Buy strategy, 100 @1.13, Counter-Side Order is a
Market Order that is willing to auto-match at any price point within
Reg SHO price restriction bound and has `sell short' stock leg
instructions and therefore cannot trade the stock component at any
price less than or equal to the underlying best bid of $1.05. In this
example, if the Counter-Side Order did not have a ``sell short''
instruction it would not be required to trade at a price that is better
than the NBB for security ($1.05) and could execute at a price equal to
or less than the underlying best bid of $1.05. The price of 1.10 is the
cBB (net of option and underlying NBB).
Improvement Complex Order1 is to sell, sell short stock leg, 100
@1.10 (selling stock at 1.05 and options at 0.05; note it cannot trade
at 1.10 due to Reg SHO).
Improvement Complex Order2 to sell, sell short stock leg, 100 @1.12
(selling stock at 1.06 and options at 0.06).
Complex PIM auction timer concludes:
The Complex PIM Agency Order first executes 40 contracts with the
Counter-Side Market Order, the option leg at 0.05 and stock leg at 1.06
for a net price of 1.11. The remaining 60 contracts from the Complex
Agency Order then execute with Improvement Complex Order1 at the same
price. In this example, both the Complex Counter-Side Order and the
Improvement Complex Order are marked short sale, which permits the
Improvement Complex Order to trade at a price that is better than its
stated limit price.
In this example, the Improvement Complex Order traded at its next
available price in lieu of its stated limit price because both the
Counter-Side Order and the Improvement Complex Order included a short
sale order in the underlying component security. In contrast, if the
Counter-Side Order did not include a short sale order than [sic] the
Counter-Side Order and Improvement Complex Order2 trade with the
Complex PIM Agency Order for [sic] net price of 1.12 (option @0.06 and
stock @1.06).
The Exchange proposes to amend the rule text in Supplementary
Material .08 to Options 3, Section 11 with respect to a SOM and
Facilitation auction to provide:
When a response or an unrelated limit complex order on the
complex order book includes a short sale order in the underlying
covered security, NES will execute such order at (1) its stated
limit price if the facilitating Electronic Access Member's contra
order or contra-side solicited Complex Order does not include a
short sale order in the underlying security; or (2) its stated limit
price or better if the facilitating Electronic Access Member' contra
order or the solicited contra-side Complex Order includes a short
sale order in the underlying covered security.
With respect to a Complex PIM auction, the Exchange proposes to
amend the rule text within Supplementary Material .09 to Options 3,
Section 13 to provide:
When an improvement order or an unrelated limit complex order on
the complex order book includes a short sale order in the underlying
covered security, NES will execute such order at (1) its stated
limit price if the Counter-Side Order does not include a short sale
order in the underlying security; or (2) its stated limit price or
better if the counter-side order includes a short sale order in the
underlying covered security.
In such case where a response or an unrelated limit complex order
on the complex order book includes a short
[[Page 71049]]
sale order in the underlying covered security, NES will execute the
order at its stated limit price if the facilitating Electronic Access
Member's contra order, contra-side solicited Complex Order, or Counter-
Side Order does not include a short sale order in the underlying
covered security because the Exchange desires to foster competition by
including responses that have a short sale order in the underlying
covered security. In this scenario, the Exchange would consider all
prices submitted by responders at which the auction may execute because
the Electronic Access Member's contra order, contra-side solicited
Complex Order, or Counter-Side Order does not need to comply with the
short sale price test in Rule 201 of Regulation SHO because the order
is not short. By using the order's stated limit price in this case, the
Exchange would allow the responder with a short sale order to
participate in the auction and allocate the best price possible to the
agency order while complying with the short sale price test.\17\ The
Exchange believes that including responses with a short sale order in
the underlying covered security may create additional competition in
the Complex SOM, Complex Facilitation and Complex PIM auction while
also providing additional opportunity for potential price improvement
for the agency order.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\17\ For example, utilizing a Complex PIM auction with a BBO of
0.05 x 0.10 and an NBBO for the underlying security component of
1.05 x 1.10, if the Initiating Order submitted an agency order to
buy @1.13 and a contra-order to sell @1.13, with auto-match at any
price point, and Responder1 was long @1.10, and Responder2 was short
@1.10 (in this scenario 1.10 would not comply with the short sale
price test), pursuant to the proposed amendment, the agency order
would receive a price improvement allocation @1.10. In this scenario
the improved price of 1.11 would not be allocated to the responder
with a short sale rather the price improvement would be applied to
the agency order. The Exchange believes it is important to offer
price improvement to the agency order over the responder to the
auction. Of note, the responder that was short @1.10 would be
cancelled.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
When a response, Improvement Order, or an unrelated limit complex
order on the complex order book includes a short sale order in the
underlying covered security, NES will execute the order at its stated
limit price or better if the facilitating Electronic Access Member
contra order, solicited contra-side Complex Order, or Counter-Side
Order includes a short sale order in the underlying security component.
In this case, each short sale compliant price would be considered in
determining the price at which the auction may execute, which would be
at its stated limit price or better. In this scenario, because the
Electronic Access Member contra order, solicited contra-side Complex
Order, or Counter-Side Order are short, the Exchange will only consider
prices that comply with the short sale price test in Rule 201 of
Regulation SHO. In this case, all prices that are compliant with the
short sale price test are considered when allocating the auction, and
both the agency order and responders may receive a better price. The
auction would allocate at the agency order's stated limited price or
better depending on the prices of the responses. The auction responses
may execute at their stated limited price or better depending on the
final auction price.
This is in contrast to the prior scenario where the Electronic
Access Member's contra order, contra-side solicited Complex Order, or
Counter-Side Order does not need to comply with the short sale price
test. Utilizing the proposed stated limit price or better where a
Member's contra order, contra-side solicited Complex Order, or Counter-
Side Order includes a short sale order allows the Exchange to
potentially provide price improvement opportunity to the agency order.
Implementation
The Exchange intends to begin implementation of the proposed rule
change prior to December 20, 2024. The implementation would commence
with a limited symbol migration and continue to migrate symbols over
several weeks. The Exchange will issue an Options Trader Alert to
Members to provide notification of the symbols that will migrate and
the relevant dates.
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes that its proposal is consistent with Section
6(b) of the Act,\18\ in general, and furthers the objectives of Section
6(b)(5) of the Act,\19\ in particular, in that it is designed to
promote just and equitable principles of trade and to protect investors
and the public interest for the reasons discussed below.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\18\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
\19\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
With respect to short sale regulation, the proposed handling of the
stock/ETF component of a Complex Order under this proposal does not
raise any issues of compliance with the currently operative provisions
of Regulation SHO \20\ and, therefore, the proposal promotes just and
equitable principles of trade. When a Complex Order has a stock/ETF
component, Members must indicate, pursuant to Regulation SHO, whether
that order involves a long or short sale. NES, as a trading center
under Rule 201, will be compliant with the requirements of Regulation
SHO. Of course, broker-dealers, including both NES and the Members
submitting orders to ISE with a stock/ETF component, must comply with
Regulation SHO. NES' compliance team updates, reviews and monitors NES'
policies and procedures including those pertaining to Regulation SHO on
an annual basis.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\20\ 17 CFR 242.200 et seq.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In the case where a response, Improvement Order, or an unrelated
limit complex order includes a short sale order in the underlying
covered security, executing such order at its stated limit price when
the facilitating Electronic Access Member's contra order, contra-side
Complex Order, or Counter-Side Order does not include a short sale
order in the underlying security would protect investors and the public
interest by considering all prices at which the auction could execute.
Under these circumstance, the Response, Improvement Complex Order, or
unrelated Limit Complex Order would be considered for execution at its
stated limit price (provided the limit price is compliant with the
short sale price test in Rule 201 of Regulation SHO) while the
Electronic Access Member's contra order, contra-side solicited Complex
Order, or Counter-Side Order does not need to comply with the short
sale price test in Rule 201 of Regulation SHO because the order is not
short. Utilizing the order's stated limit price in this case allows the
responder with a short sale order to participate in the auction while
the agency order is allocated the best price possible while complying
with the short sale price test. The Exchange believes that this
behavior is consistent with the protection of investors and the public
interest because it attempts to afford price improvement to the agency
order over the responder to the auction. Finally, the Exchange believes
that including responses with a short sale order in the underlying
covered security may create additional competition in the Complex SOM,
Complex Facilitation and Complex PIM auction and provides the agency
order with additional opportunities for potential price improvement.
In contrast, when the facilitating Electronic Access Member's
contra order, contra-side Complex Order, or Counter-Side Order includes
a short sale order in the underlying covered security, the auction must
be allocated at a price that is short sell compliant. In this case,
each short sale compliant price would be considered in determining the
price at which the Complex SOM, Complex Facilitation and Complex PIM
auction may execute
[[Page 71050]]
and, because the Electronic Access Member contra order, solicited
contra-side Complex Order, or Counter-Side Order are short, the
Exchange will only consider prices that comply with the short sale
price test in Rule 201 of Regulation SHO. As a result, the auction may
allocate at the agency order's stated limited price or better depending
on the prices of the responses. Also, the auction responses may execute
at their stated limited price or better depending on the final auction
price. The Exchange believes its proposal is consistent with the Act
and the protection of investors because both the agency order and
responders may receive a better price in this case. This is in contrast
to the prior scenario where the Electronic Access Member's contra
order, contra-side solicited Complex Order, or Counter-Side Order does
not need to comply with the short sale price test. Utilizing the
proposed stated limit price or better where a Member's contra order,
contra-side solicited Complex Order, or Counter-Side Order includes a
short sale order allows the Exchange to potentially provide a price
improvement opportunity to the agency order and to the auction
response. With the proposed amendments, Complex SOM, Complex
Facilitation, and Complex PIM auction responders who submit a response
would be aware of the auction price that would comply with the short
sale price test in Rule 201 of Regulation SHO. The proposed amendment
allows Members to participate in auctions with a short sale response
and such participation facilitates competition in these auctions. This
proposed approach is in lieu of prohibiting Members whose auction
Responses or resting Limit Complex Orders include a short sale order
from responding to these auctions, which would limit competition in the
auction. By allowing additional responses to participate in the
auction, the Exchange believes that the proposal would benefit
investors and the public interest because the additional interest may
increase competition in these auctions, which may lead to better
prices.
B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition
The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will
impose any burden on competition not necessary or appropriate in
furtherance of the purposes of the Act.
Where a response, Improvement Order, or an unrelated limit complex
order includes a short sale order in the underlying covered security,
executing such order at its stated limit price when the facilitating
Electronic Access Member's contra order, contra-side Complex Order, or
Counter-Side Order does not include a short sale order in the
underlying covered security does not impose an undue burden on intra-
market competition because the Exchange would uniformly consider all
prices submitted by responders in determining the allocation price
because the Electronic Access Member's contra order, contra-side
solicited Complex Order, or Counter-Side Order does not need to comply
with the short sale price test in Rule 201 of Regulation SHO because
the order is not short. Where a response, Improvement Order, or an
unrelated limit complex order includes a short sale order in the
underlying covered security, executing such order at its stated limit
price or better when the facilitating Electronic Access Member's contra
order, contra-side Complex Order, or Counter-Side Order is also a short
sale order in the underlying covered security component does not impose
an undue burden on intra-market competition because the Exchange would
uniformly consider all prices that are compliant with the short sale
price test when allocating the auction.
Where a response, Improvement Order, or an unrelated limit complex
order includes a short sale order in the underlying covered security,
executing such order at its stated limit price when the facilitating
Electronic Access Member's contra order, contra-side Complex Order, or
Counter-Side Order does not include a short sale order in the
underlying covered security and executing such order its stated limit
price or better when the facilitating Electronic Access Member contra-
order, solicited contra-side Complex Order, or Counter-Side Order is
also a short sale order in the underlying covered security component
does not impose an undue burden on inter-market competition because
other options exchanges today may offer a similar process for handling
stock-tied transactions that have a short sale order.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others
No written comments were either solicited or received.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
Because the foregoing proposed rule change does not: (i)
significantly affect the protection of investors or the public
interest; (ii) impose any significant burden on competition; and (iii)
become operative for 30 days from the date on which it was filed, or
such shorter time as the Commission may designate, it has become
effective pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A)(iii) of the Act \21\ and Rule
19b-4(f)(6) thereunder.\22\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\21\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(iii).
\22\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6). In addition, Rule 19b-4(f)(6)
requires the Exchange to give the Commission written notice of its
intent to file the proposed rule change, along with a brief
description and text of the proposed rule change, at least five
business days prior to the date of filing of the proposed rule
change, or such shorter time as designated by the Commission. The
Exchange has satisfied this requirement.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
At any time within 60 days of the filing of the proposed rule
change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule
change if it appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or
appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or
otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
Use the Commission's internet comment form (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
Send an email to [email protected]. Please include
file number SR-ISE-2023-22 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities
and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549-1090.
All submissions should refer to file number SR-ISE-2023-22. This file
number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help
the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's internet website (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all
written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are
filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to
the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other
than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for website viewing and
printing in the Commission's Public
[[Page 71051]]
Reference Room, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549 on official
business days between the hours of 10 a.m. and 3 p.m. Copies of the
filing also will be available for inspection and copying at the
principal office of the Exchange. Do not include personal identifiable
information in submissions; you should submit only information that you
wish to make available publicly. We may redact in part or withhold
entirely from publication submitted material that is obscene or subject
to copyright protection. All submissions should refer to file number
SR-ISE-2023-22 and should be submitted on or before November 3, 2023.
For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\23\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\23\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12), (59).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
J. Lynn Taylor,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2023-22611 Filed 10-12-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P