[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 121 (Monday, June 26, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Pages 41386-41388]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-13523]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

[A-570-970]


Multilayered Wood Flooring From the People's Republic of China: 
Notice of Court Decision Not in Harmony With the Results of 2015-2016 
Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; Notice of Amended Final Results

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, 
Department of Commerce.

SUMMARY: On June 9, 2023, the U.S. Court of International Trade (CIT) 
issued its final judgment in Jilin Forest Industry Jinqiao Flooring 
Group Co., Ltd. v. United States, Court no. 18-00191, sustaining the 
Department of Commerce (Commerce)'s second remand results pertaining to 
the administrative review of the antidumping duty (AD) order on 
multilayered wood flooring (MLWF) from the People's Republic of China 
(China) covering the period December 1, 2015, though November 30, 2016. 
Commerce is notifying the public that the CIT's final judgment is not 
in harmony with Commerce's final results of the administrative review, 
and that Commerce is amending the final results with respect to the 
dumping margin assigned to Jilin Forest Industry Jinqiao Flooring Group 
Co., Ltd. (Jilin Forest).

DATES: Applicable June 19, 2023.

[[Page 41387]]


FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Alexis Cherry, AD/CVD Operations, 
Office VIII, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade 
Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue 
NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-0607.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

    On July 26, 2018, Commerce published its Final Results in the 2015-
2016 AD administrative review of MLWF from China.\1\ Commerce 
determined that mandatory respondent Jilin Forest did not qualify for a 
separate rate because it is an entity that is majority-owned by the 
Chinese government and, therefore, had not demonstrated an absence of 
de facto government control. Jilin Forest appealed Commerce's Final 
Results. On April 29, 2021, the CIT remanded the Final Results to 
Commerce.\2\ The CIT held the following: (1) Commerce's determination 
of de facto government control of Jilin Forest, a cooperating mandatory 
respondent, lacks the support of substantial evidence and is not in 
accordance with law; and (2) Commerce failed to explain how the 
application of its non-market-economy (NME) presumption to Jilin Forest 
after the company was selected for individual examination was in 
accordance with law and supported by substantial evidence.\3\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ See Multilayered Wood flooring from the People's Republic of 
China: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 
Final Determination of No Shipments, and Partial Rescission; 2015-
2016, 83 FR 35461 (July 26, 2018), and accompanying Issues and 
Decision Memorandum; and Multilayered Wood Flooring from the 
People's Republic of China: Correction to the Final Results of 
Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2015-2016, 83 FR 45418 
(September 7, 2018) (in which Commerce corrected the misspelling of 
Dalian Guhua Wooden Product Co., Ltd.'s name and included Double F 
Limited among the companies for which this review was rescinded) 
(collectively, Final Results). Commerce referred to the respondent 
Jilin Forest Industry Jinqiao Flooring Group Co., Ltd. as ``Jinqiao 
Flooring'' in the Final Results.
    \2\ See Jilin Forest Industry Jinqiao Flooring Group Co., Ltd. 
v. United States, 519 F. Supp. 3d 1224 (CIT 2021).
    \3\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In its first remand redetermination, issued in November 2021, 
Commerce further explained its determination that Jilin Forest failed 
to rebut the presumption of de facto government control and, therefore, 
was not entitled to an individual weighted-average dumping margin 
separate from the rate established for the China-wide entity.\4\ 
Additionally, Commerce provided an overview of its broad authority 
under the statutory scheme, the purpose of Commerce's NME 
presumption,\5\ and the application of its NME presumption and the 
application of the weighted-average dumping margin established for the 
China-wide entity to Jilin Forest.\6\ We also referenced the U.S. Court 
of Appeals for the Federal Circuit's (Federal Circuit's) decisions that 
have affirmed Commerce's application of the NME presumption and 
recognition of an NME-wide entity as a single exporter for purposes of 
assigning an antidumping duty rate to the individual members of the 
NME-wide entity that have not demonstrated either their de jure or de 
facto independence from government control.\7\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ See Final Results of Redetermination Pursuant to Court 
Remand, Jilin Forest Industry Jinqiao Flooring Group Co., Ltd. v. 
United States, Court No. 18-00191, Slip Op. 21-49 (CIT April 29, 
2021), dated November 15, 2021, at 4-13, 37-42, available at https://access.trade.gov/Resources/remands/21-49.pdf.
    \5\ Id. at 15-22.
    \6\ Id. at 25-28.
    \7\ Id. at 19-21.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The CIT remanded for a second time, finding that Commerce did not 
provide a ``lawful justification for its use of the NME presumption 
with respect to Jilin {Forest{time}  as a cooperative mandatory 
respondent'' and ordered Commerce to calculate an individual weighted-
average dumping margin for Jilin Forest.\8\ The CIT also held 
Commerce's reliance on the China NME Status report for the basis that 
labor unions in China are under state control is substantial evidence 
``to support Commerce's conclusion that Jilin has not rebutted the 
presumption of state control { {time}  because if Jilin's labor union 
is under state control, its appointment of a majority of Jilin's board 
of directors confirms that the state controls the company.'' \9\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ See Jilin Forest Industry Jinqiao Flooring Group Co. Ltd. v. 
United States, 617 F. Supp.3d 1343, 1369 (CIT 2023).
    \9\ Id. at 1350.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In its second remand redetermination, issued in May 2023, Commerce 
calculated a weighted-average dumping margin for Jilin Forest, under 
respectful protest, in accordance with the methodology set out in the 
Preliminary Results.\10\ The CIT sustained Commerce's second remand 
redetermination.\11\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \10\ See Final Results of Redetermination Pursuant to Court 
Remand, Jilin Forest Industry Jinqiao Flooring Group Co., Ltd. v. 
United States, Court No. 18-00191, Slip Op. 23-14 (CIT February 9, 
2023), dated May 3, 2023, at 4-13, 37-42. See also Multilayered Wood 
Flooring from the People's Republic of China: Preliminary Results of 
the Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, Preliminary 
Determination of No Shipments, and Rescission of Review, in Part; 
2015-2016, 83 FR 2137 (January 16, 2018) (Preliminary Results), and 
accompanying Preliminary Decision Memorandum.
    \11\ See Jilin Forest Industry Jinqiao Flooring Group Co., Ltd. 
v. United States, Consol. Court No. 18-00191 (CIT June 9, 2023).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Timken Notice

    In its decision in Timken,\12\ as clarified by Diamond 
Sawblades,\13\ the Federal Circuit held that, pursuant to section 
516A(c) and (e) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act), 
Commerce must publish a notice of court decision that is not ``in 
harmony'' with a Commerce determination and must suspend liquidation of 
entries pending a ``conclusive'' court decision. The CIT's June 9, 
2023, judgment constitutes a final decision of the CIT that is not in 
harmony with Commerce's Final Results. Thus, this notice is published 
in fulfillment of the publication requirements of Timken.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \12\ See Timken Co. v. United States, 893 F.2d 337 (Fed. Cir. 
1990) (Timken).
    \13\ See Diamond Sawblades Manufacturers Coalition v. United 
States, 626 F.3d 1374 (Fed. Cir. 2010) (Diamond Sawblades).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Amended Final Results

    Because there is now a final court judgment, Commerce is amending 
its Final Results with respect to Jilin Forest as follows:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                              Margin
                        Exporter                            (percent)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Jilin Forest Industry Jinqiao Flooring Group Co., Ltd..            0.00
------------------------------------------------------------------------

Cash Deposit Requirements

    Because Jilin Forest has a superseding cash deposit rate, i.e., 
there have been final results published in a subsequent administrative 
review, we will not issue revised cash deposit instructions to U.S. 
Customs and Border Protection (CBP). This notice will not affect the 
current cash deposit rate.

Liquidation of Suspended Entries

    At this time, Commerce remains enjoined by CIT order from 
liquidating entries that were exported by Jilin Forest, and were 
entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption during the period 
December 1, 2015, through November 30, 2016.
    In the event the CIT's ruling is not appealed, or, if appealed, 
upheld by a final and conclusive court decision, we will instruct CBP 
to liquidate the appropriate entries without regard to antidumping 
duties.\14\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \14\ See 19 CFR 351.106(c)(2).

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

[[Page 41388]]

Notification to Interested Parties

    This notice is issued and published in accordance with sections 
516A(c) and (e) and 777(i)(1) of the Act.

    Dated: June 20, 2023.
James Maeder,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 
Operations.
[FR Doc. 2023-13523 Filed 6-23-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P