[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 82 (Friday, April 28, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Pages 26288-26294]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-08914]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
Applications for New Awards--American History and Civics
Education--Presidential and Congressional Academies for American
History and Civics
AGENCY: Office of Elementary and Secondary Education, Department of
Education.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Department of Education (Department) is issuing a notice
inviting applications for new awards for fiscal year (FY) 2023 for the
Presidential and Congressional Academies for American History and
Civics (Academies) Program, Assistance Listing Number 84.422A. This
notice relates to the approved information collection under OMB control
number 1894-0006.
DATES:
Applications Available: April 28, 2023.
Date of Pre-Application Webinars: The Office of Elementary and
Secondary Education intends to conduct informational webinars designed
to provide technical assistance to interested applicants for grants
under the Academies Program. These informational webinars occur
approximately 2 weeks after the publication of this notice in the
Federal Register at https://oese.ed.gov/offices/office-of-discretionary-grants-support-services/effective-educator-development-programs/american-history-and-civics-academies.
Note: For potential new grantees or for applicants unfamiliar with
grantmaking at the Department, please consult the resources on the
Department's Grants web page: www2.ed.gov/fund/grant/about/discretionary/index.html.
Deadline for Notice of Intent To Apply: May 30, 2023.
Deadline for Transmittal of Applications: July 12, 2023.
Deadline for Intergovernmental Review: September 11, 2023.
ADDRESSES: For the addresses for obtaining and submitting an
application, please refer to our Common Instructions for Applicants to
Department of Education Discretionary Grant Programs, published in the
Federal Register on December 7, 2022 (87 FR 75045), and available at
www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-2022-12-07/pdf/2022-26554.pdf. Please
note that these Common Instructions supersede the version published on
December 27, 2021.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Orman Feres, U.S. Department of
[[Page 26289]]
Education, 400 Maryland Avenue SW, Washington, DC 20202-5960.
Telephone: (202) 453-6921. Email: [email protected].
If you are deaf, hard of hearing, or have a speech disability and
wish to access telecommunications relay services, please dial 7-1-1.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Full Text of Announcement
I. Funding Opportunity Description
Purpose of Program: The Academies Program supports the
establishment of (1) Presidential Academies for the Teaching of
American History and Civics that offer workshops for both veteran and
new teachers to strengthen their knowledge of American history, civics,
and government education (Presidential Academies); and (2)
Congressional Academies for Students of American History and Civics
that provide high school students opportunities to enrich their
understanding of these subjects (Congressional Academies).
Background: The Academies Program supports projects to raise
student achievement in American history and civics by improving
teachers' and students' knowledge, understanding, and engagement with
these subjects, including principles of the Constitution, through
intensive workshops with scholars, master teachers, and curriculum
experts. This program is authorized under section 2232 of the
Elementary and Secondary Act of 1965, as amended (ESEA). The Department
encourages applications to include strong partnerships and active,
ongoing collaboration between eligible entities, local educational
agencies (LEAs), and State educational agencies (SEAs) in their design
and proposed implementation. Project activities should reflect the best
available research and practice in teaching and learning.
This competition includes two absolute priorities, two competitive
preference priorities, and one invitational priority. Consistent with
section 2232 of the ESEA, the absolute priorities address professional
development and instruction in American history and civics for teachers
and students. Applicants are required to address both absolute
priorities. Competitive Preference Priority 1, from section 2232(e)(4)
of the ESEA, encourages applicants to develop programs using the
resources from the National Park Service. Competitive Preference
Priority 2, from the Final Priorities and Definitions--Supplemental
Priorities and Definitions for Discretionary Programs (Supplemental
Priorities), published in the Federal Register on December 10, 2021 (86
FR 70612), encourages applicants to develop programs that promote
equity in student access to educational resources and opportunities.
This work may be accomplished by carefully examining and implementing
responses to the sources of inequity or by establishing, expanding, or
improving efforts intended to engage members of underserved communities
in policy and practice.
The Department recognizes the negative impact that inadequate
access to, and the inequitable distribution of, resources have on the
educational experience of underserved students. Access to educational
resources and opportunities such as rigorous coursework and dual
enrollment can have positive impacts on underserved students. For
example, a December 2020 brief from the National Center for Education
Statistics at the Department's Institute of Education Sciences \1\
revealed that a correlation exists between the percentage of students
who qualify for free or reduced-price lunch in a school and the
likelihood that those students will have access to dual enrollment
opportunities. Specifically, the study showed that schools with a
higher percentage of students who were approved for free or reduced-
price lunch were less likely to offer dual enrollment than schools with
a lower rate of participation in free or reduced-price lunch programs.
Such examples of inadequate or inequitable access to educational
resources can lead to the students from higher poverty schools having
fewer opportunities for educational enrichment, a lower likelihood that
they will have access to high-quality early learning programs, well-
rounded coursework, and high-quality college and career pathway
programs. This could ultimately limit civic engagement in our
democracy.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ nces.ed.gov/pubsearch/pubsinfo.asp?pubid=2020125.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Effective civics education is a key component in the preservation
of the Nation's democracy. Providing students with a strong foundation
in information literacy skills is especially important in an age of
digital media consumption. A 2019 survey conducted by Common Sense
Media and Survey Monkey \2\ revealed that teens are substantially more
likely to obtain their news from information posted on social media
platforms or shared by celebrities and influencers than from
traditional media outlets. As a result, misinformation can more easily
spread, and effective civics education can be an opportunity to help
students distinguish fact from misinformation by providing them with
the knowledge and skills to critically evaluate the materials they
encounter and develop the skills necessary to meaningfully participate
in our democracy.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ https://www.commonsensemedia.org/about-us/news/press-releases/new-survey-reveals-teens-get-their-news-from-social-media-and-youtube.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Therefore, the invitational priority encourages applicants to
foster critical thinking and promote student engagement in civics
education through professional development and/or student-facing
projects using media literacy, digital citizenship, or other activities
designed to promote student engagement in civics education. Consistent
with the use of invitational priorities across grant competitions,
applicants are not required to respond to the invitational priority,
and applications that meet the invitational priority do not receive a
preference or competitive advantage over other applications.
The Department fully recognizes and respects that curriculum
decisions are made at the State and local levels, not by the Federal
Government, and does not mandate, direct, or control curricula through
this competition. Rather, the Department, through this competition,
seeks to encourage efforts to implement more effective, student-
centered teaching practices and professional development activities
while promoting learning practices among students that reflect the
diversity of identities, histories, contributions, and experiences to
support enriched educational opportunity, equity, and success for all
students.
Priorities: This notice contains two absolute priorities, two
competitive preference priorities, and one invitational priority. In
accordance with 34 CFR 75.105(b)(2)(iv), the absolute priorities are
from section 2232(e)(1) and 2232(f)(1) of the ESEA, 20 U.S.C. 6662.
Competitive Preference Priority 1 is from section 2232(e)(4) of the
ESEA and Competitive Preference Priority 2 is from the Supplemental
Priorities.
Absolute Priorities: For FY 2023 and any subsequent year in which
we make awards from the list of unfunded applications from this
competition, these priorities are absolute priorities. Under 34 CFR
75.105(c)(3), we consider only applications that meet both of these
priorities.
These priorities are:
Absolute Priority 1--Presidential Academies for the Teaching of
American History and Civics.
[[Page 26290]]
Under this priority, an applicant must propose to establish a
Presidential Academy that offers a seminar or institute for teachers of
American history and civics, which--
(a) Provides intensive professional development opportunities for
teachers of American history and civics to strengthen such teachers'
knowledge of the subjects of American history and civics;
(b) Is led by a team of primary scholars and core teachers who are
accomplished in the field of American history and civics;
(c) Is conducted during the summer or other appropriate time; and
(d) Is of not less than 2 weeks and not more than 6 weeks in
duration.
Absolute Priority 2--Congressional Academies for Students of
American History and Civics.
Under this priority, an applicant must propose to establish a
seminar or institute for outstanding students of American history and
civics, which--
(a) Broadens and deepens such students' understanding of American
history and civics;
(b) Is led by a team of primary scholars and core teachers who are
accomplished in the field of American history and civics;
(c) Is conducted during the summer or other appropriate time; and
(d) Is of not less than 2 weeks and not more than 6 weeks in
duration.
Competitive Preference Priorities: For FY 2023 and any subsequent
year in which we make awards from the list of unfunded applications
from this competition, these priorities are competitive preference
priorities. Under 34 CFR 75.105(c)(2)(i) we award up to an additional
10 points to an application, depending on how well the application
meets these priorities.
These priorities are:
Competitive Preference Priority 1--Using the Resources of the
National Parks. (up to 3 points)
Applicants that propose to develop innovative and comprehensive
programs using the resources of the National Parks, including, to the
extent practicable, through coordination or alignment of activities
with the National Park Service National Centennial Parks initiative.
Note: The Department recognizes that the National Park Service
Centennial occurred in 2016, and that consequently it may not be
feasible to coordinate activities with this initiative. However,
applicants can address this priority by proposing to develop innovative
and comprehensive programs using other resources of the National Parks.
Competitive Preference Priority 2--Promoting Equity in Student
Access to Educational Resources and Opportunities. (up to 7 points)
Under this priority, and applicant must demonstrate that the
applicant proposes a project designed to promote educational equity and
adequacy in resources and opportunity for underserved students--
(a) in one or more of the following educational settings:
(1) Early learning programs.
(2) Elementary school.
(3) Middle school.
(4) High school.
(5) Career and technical education programs.
(6) Out-of-schooltime settings.
(7) Alternative schools and programs.
(8) Juvenile justice system or correctional facilities.
(b) That examines the sources of inequity and inadequacy and
implement responses, and that may include one or both of the following:
(1) Rigorous, engaging, and well-rounded (e.g., that include music
and the arts) approaches to learning that are inclusive with regard to
race, ethnicity, culture, language, and disability status and prepare
students for college, career, and civic life, including civics programs
that support students in understanding and engaging in American
democratic practices (up to 3 points).
(2) Establishing, expanding, or improving the engagement of
underserved community members (including underserved students and
families) in informing and making decisions that influence policy and
practice at the school, district, or State level by elevating their
voices, through their participation and their perspectives and
providing them with access to opportunities for leadership (e.g.,
establishing partnerships between civic student government programs and
parent and caregiver leadership initiatives) (up to 4 points).
Invitational Priority: For FY 2023 and any subsequent year in which
we make awards from the list of unfunded applications from this
competition, this priority is an invitational priority. Under 34 CFR
75.105(c)(1) we do not give an application that meets this invitational
priority a competitive or absolute preference over other applications.
This priority is:
Projects that describe how they will foster critical thinking and
promote student engagement in civics education through professional
development and/or student-facing projects involving media literacy,
digital citizenship, or other activities designed to support students
in--
(a) Evaluating sources and evidence using standards of proof;
(b) Understanding their own biases when reviewing information, as
well as uncovering and recognizing bias in primary and secondary
sources;
(c) Synthesizing information into cogent communications; and
(d) Understanding how inaccurate information may be used to
influence individuals and developing strategies to recognize accurate
and inaccurate information.
Note: The National Association for Media Literacy Education defines
media literacy as ``the ability to access, analyze, evaluate, create,
and act using all forms of communication.'' \3\ For the purpose of this
invitational priority, digital citizenship means the safe, ethical,
responsible, and informed use of technology. This concept encompasses a
range of skills and literacies that can include internet safety,
privacy and security, cyberbullying, online reputation management,
communication skills, information literacy, and creative credit and
copyright.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ https://namle.net/resources/media-literacy-defined.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Definitions: The definitions of ``demonstrates a rationale,''
``logic model,'' ``project component,'' and ``relevant outcome'' are
from 34 CFR 77.1. The definitions of ``children or students with
disabilities,'' ``disconnected youth,'' ``early learning,'' ``English
learner,'' ``military- or veteran-connected student,'' and
``underserved student'' are from the Supplemental Priorities.
Children or students with disabilities means children with
disabilities as defined in section 602(3) of the Individuals with
Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) (20 U.S.C. 1401(3)) and 34 CFR 300.8,
or students with disabilities, as defined in the Rehabilitation Act of
1973 (29 U.S.C. 705(37), 705(202) (B)).
Demonstrates a rationale means a key project component included in
the project's logic model is informed by research or evaluation
findings that suggest the project component is likely to improve
relevant outcomes.
Disconnected youth means an individual, between the ages 14 and 24,
who may be from a low-income background, experiences homelessness, is
in foster care, is involved in the justice system, or is not working or
not enrolled in (or at risk of dropping out of) an educational
institution.
Early learning means any (a) State-licensed or State-regulated
program or provider, regardless of setting or funding source, that
provides early care and education for children from birth to
kindergarten entry, including, but not
[[Page 26291]]
limited to, any program operated by a child care center or in a family
child care home; (b) program funded by the Federal Government or State
or local educational agencies (including any Individuals with
Disabilities Education Act (IDEA)-funded program); (c) Early Head Start
and Head Start program; (d) non-relative child care provider who is not
otherwise regulated by the State and who regularly cares for two or
more unrelated children for a fee in a provider setting; and (e) other
program that may deliver early learning and development services in a
child's home, such as the Maternal, Infant, and Early Childhood Home
Visiting Program; Early Head Start; and Part C of IDEA.
English learner means an individual who is an English learner as
defined in section 8101(20) of the Elementary and Secondary Education
Act of 1965, as amended, or an individual who is an English language
learner as defined in section 203(7) of the Workforce Innovation and
Opportunity Act.
Logic model (also referred to as a theory of action) means a
framework that identifies key project components of the proposed
project (i.e., the active ``ingredients'' that are hypothesized to be
critical to achieving the relevant outcomes) and describes the
theoretical and operational relationships among the key project
components and relevant outcomes.
Military- or veteran-connected student means one or more of the
following:
(a) A child participating in an early learning program, a student
enrolled in preschool through grade 12, or a student enrolled in career
and technical education or postsecondary education who has a parent or
guardian who is a member of the uniformed services (as defined by 37
U.S.C. 101), in the Army, Navy, Air Force, Marine Corps, Coast Guard,
Space Force, National Guard, Reserves, National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration, or Public Health Service or is a veteran of the
uniformed services with an honorable discharge (as defined by 38 U.S.C.
3311).
(b) A student who is a member of the uniformed services, a veteran
of the uniformed services, or the spouse of a service member or
veteran.
(c) A child participating in an early learning program, a student
enrolled in preschool through grade 12, or a student enrolled in career
and technical education or postsecondary education who has a parent or
guardian who is a veteran of the uniformed services (as defined by 37
U.S.C. 101).
Project component means an activity, strategy, intervention,
process, product, practice, or policy included in a project. Evidence
may pertain to an individual project component or to a combination of
project components (e.g., training teachers on instructional practices
for English learners and follow-on coaching for these teachers).
Relevant outcome means the student outcome(s) or other outcome(s)
the key project component is designed to improve, consistent with the
specific goals of the program.
Underserved student means a student (which may include children in
early learning environments, students in K-12 programs, students in
postsecondary education or career and technical education, and adult
learners, as appropriate) in one or more of the following subgroups:
(a) A student who is living in poverty or is served by schools with
high concentrations of students living in poverty.
(b) A student of color.
(c) A student who is a member of a federally recognized Indian
Tribe.
(d) An English learner.
(e) A child or student with a disability.
(f) A disconnected youth.
(g) A technologically unconnected youth.
(h) A migrant student.
(i) A student experiencing homelessness or housing insecurity.
(j) A lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer or questioning, or
intersex (LGBTQI+) student.
(k) A student who is in foster care.
(l) A student without documentation of immigration status.
(m) A pregnant, parenting, or caregiving student.
(n) A student performing significantly below grade level.
(o) A military- or veteran-connected student.
Application Requirements: The following requirements are from
sections 2232(e)(2), 2232(e)(3), 2232(f)(2) and 2232(f)(3) of the ESEA
and apply to all applications submitted under this competition:
(a) Selection of teachers. Each year, each Presidential Academy
shall select between 50 and 300 teachers of American history and civics
from public or private elementary schools and secondary schools to
attend the seminar or institute.
(b) Teacher stipends. Each teacher selected to participate in a
seminar or institute under this competition shall be awarded a fixed
stipend based on the length of the seminar or institute to ensure that
participants do not incur personal costs associated with the teacher's
participation in the seminar or institute.
(c) Selection of students. Each year, each Congressional Academy
shall select between 100 and 300 eligible students to attend the
seminar or institute under this competition.
(d) Eligible students. A student shall be eligible to attend a
seminar or institute offered by a Congressional Academy under this
competition if the student--
(i) Is recommended by the student's secondary school principal or
other school leader to attend the seminar or institute; and
(ii) Will be a secondary school junior or senior in the academic
year following attendance at the seminar or institute.
(e) Student stipends. Each student selected to participate in a
seminar or institute under this competition shall be awarded a fixed
stipend based on the length of the seminar or institute to ensure that
such student does not incur personal costs associated with the
student's participation in the seminar or institute.
Program Authority: Section 2232 of the ESEA (20 U.S.C. 6662).
Note: Projects will be awarded and must be operated in a manner
consistent with the nondiscrimination requirements contained in the
Federal civil rights laws.
Applicable Regulations: (a) The Education Department General
Administrative Regulations in 34 CFR parts 75, 77, 79, 81, 82, 84, 86,
97, 98, and 99. (b) The Office of Management and Budget Guidelines to
Agencies on Governmentwide Debarment and Suspension (Nonprocurement) in
2 CFR part 180, as adopted and amended as regulations of the Department
in 2 CFR part 3485. (c) The Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost
Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards in 2 CFR part
200, as adopted and amended as regulations of the Department in 2 CFR
part 3474. (d) The Supplemental Priorities.
Note: The regulations in 34 CFR part 86 apply to institutions of
higher education only.
II. Award Information
Type of Award: Discretionary grants.
Estimated Available Funds: $2,975,000.
Contingent upon the availability of funds and the quality of
applications, we may make additional awards in subsequent years from
the list of unfunded applications from this competition.
Estimated Range of Awards: $300,000-$1,000,000 per year.
Estimated Average Size of Awards: $650,000 per year.
Estimated Number of Awards: 3-5.
[[Page 26292]]
Maximum Award: We will not make an award exceeding $1,000,000 to
any applicant per 12-month budget period.
Note: The Department is not bound by any estimates in this notice.
Project Period: Up to 60 months.
III. Eligibility Information
1. Eligible Applicants: An institution of higher education or
nonprofit educational organization, museum, library, or research center
with demonstrated expertise in historical methodology or the teaching
of American history and civics; or a consortium of these entities.
In its application, an applicant must submit documentation of its
organization's demonstrated expertise in historical methodology or the
teaching of American history or civics.
Note: Consortium applicants must follow the procedures for group
applications described in 34 CFR 75.127 through 34 CFR 75.129.
Note: If you are a nonprofit organization, under 34 CFR 75.51, you
may demonstrate your nonprofit status by providing: (1) proof that the
Internal Revenue Service currently recognizes the applicant as an
organization to which contributions are tax deductible under section
501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code; (2) a statement from a State
taxing body or the State attorney general certifying that the
organization is a nonprofit organization operating within the State and
that no part of its net earnings may lawfully benefit any private
shareholder or individual; (3) a certified copy of the applicant's
certificate of incorporation or similar document if it clearly
establishes the nonprofit status of the applicant; or (4) any item
described above if that item applies to a State or national parent
organization, together with a statement by the State or parent
organization that the applicant is a local nonprofit affiliate.
2. a. Cost Sharing or Matching: Under section 2232(g)(1) of the
ESEA, each grant recipient must provide, from non-Federal sources, an
amount equal to 100 percent of the amount of the grant, which may be
provided in cash or through in-kind contributions, to carry out the
activities supported by the grant. To meet this requirement, grantees
must provide matching contributions on an annual basis relative to the
amount of Academies Program funds received for a fiscal year.
Under section 2232(g)(2) of the ESEA, the Secretary may waive the
matching requirement for any fiscal year for a grantee if the Secretary
determines that applying the matching requirement would result in
serious hardship or an inability to carry out project activities.
Applicants that wish to apply for a waiver for one or more fiscal years
may include a request in their application that describes how the 100
percent matching requirement would cause serious hardship or an
inability to carry out project activities.
b. Supplement-Not-Supplant: This program involves supplement-not-
supplant funding requirements. In accordance with section 2301 of the
ESEA, funds made available under this program must be used to
supplement, and not supplant, other non-Federal funds that would
otherwise be expended to carry out activities under this program.
c. Indirect Cost Rate Information: This program uses a training
indirect cost rate. This limits indirect cost reimbursement to an
entity's actual indirect costs, as determined in its negotiated
indirect cost rate agreement, or 8 percent of a modified total direct
cost base, whichever amount is less. For more information regarding
training indirect cost rates, see 34 CFR 75.562. For more information
regarding indirect costs, or to obtain a negotiated indirect cost rate,
please see https://www2.ed.gov/about/offices/list/ocfo/intro.html.
d. Administrative Cost Limitation: This program does not include
any program-specific limitation on administrative expenses. All
administrative expenses must be reasonable and necessary and conform to
Cost Principles described in 2 CFR part 200 subpart E of the Uniform
Guidance.
3. Subgrantees: A grantee under this competition may not award
subgrants to entities to directly carry out project activities
described in its application.
IV. Application and Submission Information
1. Application Submission Instructions: Applicants are required to
follow the Common Instructions for Applicants to Department of
Education Discretionary Grant Programs, published in the Federal
Register on December 7, 2022 (84 FR 3768), and available at https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2022/12/07/2022-26554/common-instructions-for-applicants-to-department-of-education-discretionary-grant-programs, which contain requirements and information on how to
submit an application.
2. Submission of Proprietary Information: Given the types of
projects that may be proposed in applications for the Academies
competition, your application may include business information that you
consider proprietary. In 34 CFR 5.11 we define ``business information''
and describe the process we use in determining whether any of that
information is proprietary and, thus, protected from disclosure under
Exemption 4 of the Freedom of Information Act (5 U.S.C. 552, as
amended).
Because, consistent with previous Academies competitions, we plan
to post on our website the application narrative sections of all
Academies grants, you may wish to request confidentiality of business
information.
Consistent with Executive Order 12600, please designate in your
application any information that you believe is exempt from disclosure
under Exemption 4. In the appropriate Appendix section of your
application, under ``Other Attachments Form,'' please list the page
number or numbers on which we can find this information.
3. Intergovernmental Review: This program is subject to Executive
Order 12372 and the regulations in 34 CFR part 79. Information about
Intergovernmental Review of Federal Programs under Executive Order
12372 is in the application package for this competition.
4. Funding Restrictions: We specify unallowable costs in 2 CFR 200,
subpart E. We reference additional regulations outlining funding
restrictions in the Applicable Regulations section of this notice.
5. Recommended Page Limit: The application narrative is where you,
the applicant, address the selection criteria that reviewers use to
evaluate your application. We recommend that you (1) limit the
application narrative to no more than 50 pages and (2) use the
following standards:
A ``page'' is 8.5'' x 11'', on one side only, with 1''
margins at the top, bottom, and both sides.
Double-space (no more than three lines per vertical inch)
all text in the application narrative, including titles, headings,
footnotes, quotations, references, and captions, as well as all text in
charts, tables, figures, and graphs.
Use a font that is either 12 point or larger or no smaller
than 10 pitch (characters per inch).
Use one of the following fonts: Times New Roman, Courier,
Courier New, or Arial.
The recommended page limit does not apply to the cover sheet; the
budget section, including the narrative budget justification; the
assurances and certifications; or the one-page abstract, the resumes,
the bibliography, or the letters of support. However, the
[[Page 26293]]
recommended page limit does apply to all of the application narrative.
6. Notice of Intent to Apply: The Department will be able to review
grant applications more efficiently if we know the approximate number
of applicants that intend to apply. Therefore, we strongly encourage
each potential applicant to notify us of their intent to submit an
application. To do so, please email the program contact person listed
under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT with the subject line ``Intent to
Apply,'' and include the applicant's name and a contact person's name
and email address. Applicants that do not submit a notice of intent to
apply may still apply for funding; applicants that do submit a notice
of intent to apply are not bound to apply or bound by the information
provided.
V. Application Review Information
1. Selection Criteria: The selection criteria for this program are
from 34 CFR 75.210. An applicant may earn up to a total of 100 points
based on the selection criteria. The maximum score for addressing each
criterion is indicated in parentheses.
(a) Quality of the project design. (20 points)
(1) The Secretary considers the quality of the design of the
proposed project. In determining the quality of the design of the
proposed project, the Secretary considers the following factors:
(i) The extent to which the proposed project demonstrates a
rationale. (10 points)
(ii) The extent to which the proposed project represents an
exceptional approach to the priority or priorities established for the
competition. (10 points)
(b) Need for project. (25 points)
(1) The Secretary considers the need for the proposed project. In
determining the need for the proposed project, the Secretary considers
the following factors:
(i) The magnitude or severity of the problem to be addressed by the
proposed project. (8 points)
(ii) The extent to which specific gaps or weaknesses in services,
infrastructure, or opportunities have been identified and will be
addressed by the proposed project, including the nature and magnitude
of those gaps or weaknesses. (7 points)
(iii) The extent to which the services to be provided by the
proposed project are focused on those with greatest needs. (10 points)
(c) Quality of the management plan. (25 points)
(1) The Secretary considers the quality of the management plan for
the proposed project. In determining the quality of the management plan
for the proposed project, the Secretary considers the following
factors:
(i) The adequacy of the management plan to achieve the objectives
of the proposed project on time and within budget, including clearly
defined responsibilities, timelines, and milestones for accomplishing
project tasks. (13 points)
(ii) The adequacy of procedures for ensuring feedback and
continuous improvement in the operation of the proposed project. (12
points)
(d) Adequacy of resources. (30 points)
(1) The Secretary considers the adequacy of resources for the
proposed project. In determining the quality of the adequacy of
resources, the Secretary considers the following factors:
(i) The adequacy of support, including facilities, equipment,
supplies, and other resources, from the applicant organization or the
lead applicant organization. (6 points)
(ii) The extent to which the costs are reasonable in relation to
the objectives, design, and potential significance of the proposed
project. (8 points)
(iii) The extent to which the applicant demonstrates that it has
the resources to operate the project beyond the length of the grant,
including a multiyear financial and operating model and accompanying
plan; the demonstrated commitment of any partners; evidence of broad
support from stakeholders (e.g., SEAs, LEAs, teachers' unions) critical
to the project's long-term success; or more than one of these types of
evidence. (8 points)
(iv) The relevance and demonstrated commitment of each partner in
the proposed project to the implementation and success of the project.
(8 points)
2. Review and Selection Process: We remind potential applicants
that in reviewing applications in any discretionary grant competition,
the Secretary may consider, under 34 CFR 75.217(d)(3), the past
performance of the applicant in carrying out a previous award, such as
the applicant's use of funds, achievement of project objectives, and
compliance with grant conditions. The Secretary may also consider
whether the applicant failed to submit a timely performance report or
submitted a report of unacceptable quality.
In addition, in making a competitive grant award, the Secretary
requires various assurances, including those applicable to Federal
civil rights laws that prohibit discrimination in programs or
activities receiving Federal financial assistance from the Department
(34 CFR 100.4, 104.5, 106.4, 108.8, and 110.23).
3. Risk Assessment and Specific Conditions: Consistent with 2 CFR
200.206, before awarding grants under this competition the Department
conducts a review of the risks posed by applicants. Under 2 CFR
200.208, the Secretary may impose specific conditions and, under 2 CFR
3474.10, in appropriate circumstances, high-risk conditions on a grant
if the applicant or grantee is not financially stable; has a history of
unsatisfactory performance; has a financial or other management system
that does not meet the standards in 2 CFR part 200, subpart D; has not
fulfilled the conditions of a prior grant; or is otherwise not
responsible.
4. Integrity and Performance System: If you are selected under this
competition to receive an award that over the course of the project
period may exceed the simplified acquisition threshold (currently
$250,000), under 2 CFR 200.206(a)(2) we must make a judgment about your
integrity, business ethics, and record of performance under Federal
awards--that is, the risk posed by you as an applicant--before we make
an award. In doing so, we must consider any information about you that
is in the integrity and performance system (currently referred to as
the Federal Awardee Performance and Integrity Information System
(FAPIIS)), accessible through the System for Award Management. You may
review and comment on any information about yourself that a Federal
agency previously entered and that is currently in FAPIIS.
Please note that, if the total value of your currently active
grants, cooperative agreements, and procurement contracts from the
Federal Government exceeds $10,000,000, the reporting requirements in 2
CFR part 200, Appendix XII, require you to report certain integrity
information to FAPIIS semiannually. Please review the requirements in 2
CFR part 200, Appendix XII, if this grant plus all the other Federal
funds you receive exceed $10,000,000.
5. In General: In accordance with OMB's guidance located at 2 CFR
part 200, all applicable Federal laws, and relevant Executive guidance,
the Department will review and consider applications for funding
pursuant to this notice inviting applications in accordance with--
(a) Selecting recipients most likely to be successful in delivering
results based on the program objectives through an objective process of
evaluating Federal award applications (2 CFR 200.205);
(b) Prohibiting the purchase of certain telecommunication and video
[[Page 26294]]
surveillance services or equipment in alignment with section 889 of the
National Defense Authorization Act of 2019 (Pub. L. 115-232) (2 CFR
200.216);
(c) Providing a preference, to the extent permitted by law, to
maximize use of goods, products, and materials produced in the United
States (2 CFR 200.322); and
(d) Terminating agreements in whole or in part to the greatest
extent authorized by law if an award no longer effectuates the program
goals or agency priorities (2 CFR 200.340).
VI. Award Administration Information
1. Award Notices: If your application is successful, we notify your
U.S. Representative and U.S. Senators and send you a Grant Award
Notification (GAN); or we may send you an email containing a link to
access an electronic version of your GAN. We may notify you informally,
also.
If your application is not evaluated or not selected for funding,
we notify you.
2. Administrative and National Policy Requirements: We identify
administrative and national policy requirements in the application
package and reference these and other requirements in the Applicable
Regulations section of this notice.
We reference the regulations outlining the terms and conditions of
an award in the Applicable Regulations section of this notice and
include these and other specific conditions in the GAN. The GAN also
incorporates your approved application as part of your binding
commitments under the grant.
3. Open Licensing Requirements: Unless an exception applies, if you
are awarded a grant under this competition, you will be required to
openly license to the public grant deliverables created in whole, or in
part, with Department grant funds. When the deliverable consists of
modifications to pre-existing works, the license extends only to those
modifications that can be separately identified and only to the extent
that open licensing is permitted under the terms of any licenses or
other legal restrictions on the use of pre-existing works.
Additionally, a grantee or subgrantee that is awarded competitive grant
funds must have a plan to disseminate these public grant deliverables.
This dissemination plan can be developed and submitted after your
application has been reviewed and selected for funding. For additional
information on the open licensing requirements please refer to 2 CFR
3474.20.
4. Reporting: (a) If you apply for a grant under this competition,
you must ensure that you have in place the necessary processes and
systems to comply with the reporting requirements in 2 CFR part 170
should you receive funding under the competition. This does not apply
if you have an exception under 2 CFR 170.110(b).
(b) At the end of your project period, you must submit a final
performance report, including financial information, as directed by the
Secretary. If you receive a multiyear award, you must submit an annual
performance report that provides the most current performance and
financial expenditure information as directed by the Secretary under 34
CFR 75.118. The Secretary may also require more frequent performance
reports under 34 CFR 75.720(c). For specific requirements on reporting,
please go to www.ed.gov/fund/grant/apply/appforms/appforms.html.
5. Performance Measures: For the purposes of Department reporting
under 34 CFR 75.110, we have established the following performance
objective for the Academies Program:
Participants will demonstrate through pre- and post-assessments an
increased understanding of American history and civics that can be
linked to their participation in the Presidential or Congressional
Academy.
For purposes of Department reporting under 34 CFR 75.110, we will
track performance on this objective through the following measures:
Presidential Academies: The average percentage gain on an
assessment after participation in the Presidential Academy.
Congressional Academies: The average percentage gain on an
assessment after participation in the Congressional Academy.
We advise applicants for grants under this program to give careful
consideration to these measures in conceptualizing the approach and
evaluation of a proposed project. Each grantee will be required to
provide, in its annual and final performance reports, data about its
performance with respect to these measures.
6. Continuation Awards: In making a continuation award under 34 CFR
75.253, the Secretary considers, among other things: whether a grantee
has made substantial progress in achieving the goals and objectives of
the project; whether the grantee has expended funds in a manner that is
consistent with its approved application and budget; and, if the
Secretary has established performance measurement requirements, whether
the grantee has made substantial progress in achieving the performance
targets in the grantee's approved application.
In making a continuation award, the Secretary also considers
whether the grantee is operating in compliance with the assurances in
its approved application, including those applicable to Federal civil
rights laws that prohibit discrimination in programs or activities
receiving Federal financial assistance from the Department (34 CFR
100.4, 104.5, 106.4, 108.8, and 110.23).
VII. Other Information
Accessible Format: On request to the program contact person listed
under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT, individuals with disabilities
can obtain this document and a copy of the application package in an
accessible format. The Department will provide the requestor with an
accessible format that may include Rich Text Format (RTF) or text
format (txt), a thumb drive, an MP3 file, braille, large print,
audiotape, or compact disc, or other accessible format.
Electronic Access to This Document: The official version of this
document is the document published in the Federal Register. You may
access the official edition of the Federal Register and the Code of
Federal Regulations at www.govinfo.gov. At this site you can view this
document, as well as all other documents of this Department published
in the Federal Register, in text or Portable Document Format (PDF). To
use PDF you must have Adobe Acrobat Reader, which is available free at
the site.
You may also access documents of the Department published in the
Federal Register by using the article search feature at
www.federalregister.gov. Specifically, through the advanced search
feature at this site, you can limit your search to documents published
by the Department.
James F. Lane,
Senior Advisor, Office of the Secretary, Delegated the Authority to
Perform the Functions and Duties of the Assistant Secretary Office
Elementary and Secondary Education.
[FR Doc. 2023-08914 Filed 4-27-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4000-01-P