[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 72 (Friday, April 14, 2023)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 22968-22970]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-07856]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 147
[Docket Number USCG-2021-0676]
RIN 1625-AA00
Safety Zone; ARGOS Semisubmersible Floating Production Unit Outer
Continental Shelf Facility, Green Canyon Block 780, Gulf of Mexico
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is proposing to establish a safety zone around
the ARGOS Semisubmersible Floating Production Unit (FPU), located in
Green Canyon Block 780 on the Outer Continental Shelf (OCS) in the Gulf
of Mexico. The purpose of this rule is to protect the facility from all
vessel traffic operating outside the normal shipping channels and
fairways that are not providing service to or working with the
facility. Establishing a safety zone around the facility will
significantly reduce the threat of allisions, collisions, security
breaches, oil spills, releases of natural gas, and thereby protect the
safety of life, property, and the environment.
DATES: Comments and related material must be received by the Coast
Guard on or before May 15, 2023.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments identified by docket number USCG-
2021-0676 using the Federal eRulemaking Portal at https://www.regulations.gov. See the ``Public Participation and Request for
Comments'' portion of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section for further
instructions on submitting comments.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions about this
proposed rulemaking, call or email LCDR David Newcomb, District Eight
OCS, U.S. Coast Guard; telephone 504-671-2106,
[email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Table of Abbreviations
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
FPU Floating Production Unit
NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking
OCS Outer Continental Shelf
Sec. Section
U.S.C. United States Code
[[Page 22969]]
II. Background, Purpose, and Legal Basis
Under the authority provided in 14 U.S.C. 544, 43 U.S.C. 1333, and
Department of Homeland Security Delegation No. 00170.1, Revision No.
01.3, CFR part 147 permits the establishment of safety zones for
facilities located on the OCS for the purpose of protecting life and
property on the facilities. The protections included in a safety zone
established under 33 CFR part 147 are promoting safety of life and
property on the facilities as well as their appurtenances and attending
vessels and also for the adjacent waters located in and around each
facility. Therefore, a safety zone under 33 CFR part 147 may also
include provisions to restrict, prevent, or control certain activities,
including access by vessels or persons to maintain safety of life,
property and the environment. BP Exploration and Production Inc (BP)
Petroleum Corporation requested that the Coast Guard establish a safety
zone around its facility located in the deepwater area of the Gulf of
Mexico on the OCS. Placing a safety zone around this facility will
significantly reduce the threat of allisions, oil spills, and releases
of natural gas, and thereby protect the safety of life, property, and
the environment.
III. Discussion of Proposed Rule
The safety zone proposed by this rulemaking is on the OCS in the
deepwater area of the Gulf of Mexico in Green Canyon 780 at the center
point of Latitude N 27[deg]12'36'', Longitude W 90[deg]22'51.6'' (NAD
83). The safety zone would be permanent. For the purpose of safety
zones established under 33 CFR part 147, the deepwater area is
considered to be waters of 304.8 meters (1,000 feet) or greater depth
extending to the limits of the Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ) contiguous
to the territorial sea of the United States and extending to a distance
up to 200 nautical miles from the baseline from which the breadth of
the sea is measured. Navigation in the vicinity of the safety zone
consists of large commercial shipping vessels, fishing vessels, cruise
ships, tugs with tows and the occasional recreational vessel. The
deepwater area also includes an extensive system of fairways.
Only vessels measuring less than 100 feet in length overall and not
engaged in towing, attending vessels as defined in 33 CFR 147.20, or
those vessels specifically authorized by the Eighth Coast Guard
District Commander or a designated representative are permitted to
enter or remain in the safety zone. Public transit into and through the
safety zone area would be prohibited unless a vessel is specifically
authorized by the District Commander or a designated representative.
Requests for entry into the zone will be considered and reviewed on a
case-by-case basis. These proposed regulations are consistent with the
existing safety zones of other OCS platforms in the Gulf of Mexico.
Persons or vessels requiring authorization to enter the safety zone
must request permission from the Commander, Eighth Coast Guard
District. If permission is granted, all persons and vessels shall
comply with the instructions of the Commander or designated
representative.
IV. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this proposed rule after considering numerous statutes
and executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our
analyses based on a number of these statutes and executive orders, and
we discuss First Amendment rights of protestors.
A. Regulatory Planning and Review
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess the
costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize
net benefits. This NPRM has not been designated a ``significant
regulatory action,'' under Executive Order 12866. Accordingly, the NPRM
has not been reviewed by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB).
Aligning with 33 CFR 147.15, the safety zone established will
extend to a maximum distance off 500 meters around the OCS facility
measured from each point on its outer edge, but may not interfere with
the use of recognized sea lanes essential to navigation. Vessel traffic
would be able to safely transit around the proposed safety zone, which
would impact a small designated area in the Gulf of Mexico, without
significant impediment to their voyage. This safety zone will
significantly reduce the threat of allisions, collisions, security
breaches, oil spills, releases of natural gas, and thereby protect the
safety of life, property, and the environment, in accordance with Coast
Guard maritime safety missions.
B. Impact on Small Entities
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980, 5 U.S.C. 601-612, as
amended, requires Federal agencies to consider the potential impact of
regulations on small entities during rulemaking. The term ``small
entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than
50,000. The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this
proposed rule would not have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
This rule may affect owners or operators of vessels intending to
transit or anchor in Green Canyon 780, some of which might be small
entities.
This safety zone would not have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities for the following reasons. Vessel
traffic could pass safely around the safety zone using an alternate
route. Use of an alternate route may cause minimal delay in reaching a
final destination, depending on other traffic in the area and vessel
speed. Vessels would be able to request deviation from this rule to
transit through the safety zone. Such requests will be considered on a
case-by-case basis and may be authorized by the Commander, Eighth Coast
Guard District or a designated representative. Therefore, the Coast
Guard expects any impact of this rulemaking establishing a safety zone
around an OCS facilities to be minimal, with no significant economic
impact on small entities.
If you think that your business, organization, or governmental
jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity and that this rule would have
a significant economic impact on it, please submit a comment (see
ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it qualifies and how and to what
degree this rule would economically affect it.
Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small
entities in understanding this proposed rule. If the rule would affect
your small business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction and you
have questions concerning its provisions or options for compliance,
please call or email the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section. The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small
entities that question or complain about this proposed rule or any
policy or action of the Coast Guard.
C. Collection of Information
This proposed rule would not call for a new collection of
information under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-
3520).
D. Federalism and Indian Tribal Governments
A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132
[[Page 22970]]
(Federalism), if it has a substantial direct effect on the States, on
the relationship between the National Government and the States, or on
the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels
of government. We have analyzed this proposed rule under that Order and
have determined that it is consistent with the fundamental federalism
principles and preemption requirements described in Executive Order
13132.
Further, this proposed rule does not have tribal implications under
Executive Order 13175 (Consultation and Coordination With Indian Tribal
Governments) because it would not have a substantial direct effect on
one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes. If
you believe this proposed rule has implications for federalism or
Indian tribes, please call or email the person listed in the FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section.
E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this proposed rule would not
result in such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule
elsewhere in this preamble.
F. Environment
We have analyzed this proposed rule under Department of Homeland
Security Directive 023-01, Rev. 1, associated implementing
instructions, and Environmental Planning COMDTINST 5090.1 (series),
which guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have made
a preliminary determination that this action is one of a category of
actions that do not individually or cumulatively have a significant
effect on the human environment. This proposed rule involves the
establishment of a safety zone around an OCS facility to protect life,
property, and the marine environment. Normally such actions are
categorically excluded from further review under paragraph L60 of
Appendix A, Table 1 of DHS Instruction Manual 023-01-001-01, Rev. 1. A
preliminary Record of Environmental Consideration supporting this
determination is available in the docket. For instructions on locating
the docket, see the ADDRESSES section of this preamble. We seek any
comments or information that may lead to the discovery of a significant
environmental impact from this proposed rule
G. Protest Activities
The Coast Guard respects the First Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to call or email the person listed in the FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section to coordinate protest activities so
that your message can be received without jeopardizing the safety or
security of people, places, or vessels.
V. Public Participation and Request for Comments
We view public participation as essential to effective rulemaking,
and will consider all comments and material received during the comment
period. Your comment can help shape the outcome of this rulemaking. If
you submit a comment, please include the docket number for this
rulemaking, indicate the specific section of this document to which
each comment applies, and provide a reason for each suggestion or
recommendation.
Submitting comments. We encourage you to submit comments through
the Federal Decision Making Portal at https://www.regulations.gov. To
do so, go to https://www.regulations.gov, type USCG-2021-0676 in the
search box and click ``Search.'' Next, look for this document in the
Search Results column, and click on it. Then click on the Comment
option. If you cannot submit your material by using https://www.regulations.gov, call or email the person in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section of this proposed rule for alternate
instructions.
Viewing material in docket. To view documents mentioned in this
proposed rule as being available in the docket, find the docket as
described in the previous paragraph, and then select ``Supporting &
Related Material'' in the Document Type column. Public comments will
also be placed in our online docket and can be viewed by following
instructions on the https://www.regulations.gov Frequently Asked
Questions web page. We review all comments received, but we will only
post comments that address the topic of the proposed rule. We may
choose not to post off-topic, inappropriate, or duplicate comments that
we receive.
Personal information. We accept anonymous comments. Comments we
post to https://www.regulations.gov will include any personal
information you have provided. For more about privacy and submissions
to the docket in response to this document, see DHS's eRulemaking
System of Records notice (85 FR 14226, March 11, 2020).
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 147
Continental shelf, Marine safety, Navigation (water).
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard is
proposing to amend 33 CFR part 147 as follows:
PART 147--SAFETY ZONES
0
1. The authority citation for part 147 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 14 U.S.C. 544; 43 U.S.C. 1333; 33 CFR 1.05-1;
Department of Homeland Security Delegation No. 00170.1, Revision No.
01.3.
0
2. Add Sec. 147.881to read as follows:
Sec. 147.881 Safety Zone, ARGOS Floating Production Unit (FPU), Outer
Continental Shelf Facility, Green Canyon 780, Gulf of Mexico
(a) Description. ARGOS FPU is in the deepwater area of the Gulf of
Mexico at Green Canyon 780. The facility is located at: N
27[deg]12'36'', W 90[deg]22'51.6'' (NAD 83) and the area within 500
meters (1640.4 feet) from each point on the facility structure's outer
edge is a safety zone.
(b) Regulation. No vessel may enter or remain in this safety zone
except for the following:
(1) An attending vessel, as defined in 147.20;
(2) A vessel under 100 feet in length overall not engaged in
towing; or
(3) A vessel authorized by the Commander, Eighth Coast Guard
District or a designated representative.
(c) Requests for Permission. Persons or vessels requiring
authorization to enter the safety zone must request permission from the
Commander, Eighth Coast Guard District or a designated representative.
If permission is granted, all persons and vessels shall comply with the
instructions of the Commander or designated representative.
Dated: April 4, 2023.
Richard Timme,
RADM, U.S. Coast Guard, Commander, Coast Guard District Eight.
[FR Doc. 2023-07856 Filed 4-13-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P