[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 62 (Friday, March 31, 2023)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 19229-19233]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-06679]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Agricultural Marketing Service
7 CFR Parts 800 and 810
[Doc. No. AMS-FGIS-22-0083]
United States Standards for Soybeans
AGENCY: Agricultural Marketing Service, USDA.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS) proposes to revise
the United States Standards for Soybeans by removing soybeans of other
colors (SBOC) as an official factor. In addition, AMS proposes to
revise the table of Grade Limits and Breakpoints for Soybeans to
reflect this change.
DATES: Comments must be submitted on or before May 1, 2023.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Barry Gomoll, USDA AMS; Telephone:
(202) 720-8286; Email: [email protected]. Copies of the proposed
U.S. Standards for Soybeans are available at https://www.regulations.gov. Copies of the current Standards are available at
https://www.ams.usda/govgrades-standards/grain-standards.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This proposed action, pursuant to 5 U.S.C.
551 et seq., would amend regulations, at 7 CFR part 800 and part 810,
issued under the United States Grain Standards Act (7 U.S.C. 71-87k),
as amended (USGSA). Section 4 of the USGSA (7 U.S.C. 76(a)) grants the
Secretary of Agriculture the authority to establish standards for grain
regarding kind, class, quality, and condition.
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
AMS is issuing this proposed rule in conformance with Executive
Orders 12866 and 13563. Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 direct
agencies to assess all costs and benefits of available regulatory
alternatives and, if regulation is necessary, to select regulatory
approaches that maximize net benefits (including potential economic,
environmental, public health and safety effects, distributive impacts,
and equity). Executive Order 13563 emphasizes the importance of
quantifying both costs and benefits, reducing costs, harmonizing rules,
and promoting flexibility. This proposed action falls within a category
of
[[Page 19230]]
regulatory actions that the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has
exempted from review under Executive Order 12866.
Executive Order 13175
This proposed rule has been reviewed under Executive Order 13175--
Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments, which
requires agencies to consider whether their rulemaking actions would
have tribal implications.
AMS has determined that this proposed rule is unlikely to have
substantial direct effects on one or more Indian tribes, on the
relationship between the Federal Government and Indian tribes, or on
the distribution of power and responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes.
Executive Order 12988
This proposed rule has been reviewed under Executive Order 12988,
Civil Justice Reform. This proposed action is not intended to have
retroactive effect. There are no administrative procedures that must be
exhausted prior to any judicial challenge to the provisions of this
rule.
Background
AMS regularly reviews grain standards to ensure their effectiveness
in meeting the quality requirements of grain moving in the value chain.
Under the current soybean standards, soybeans of other colors (SBOC) is
a grade determining factor in the class Yellow Soybeans. As such, SBOC
content is not typically a factor that determines the numerical grade
for a sample. Damage or foreign material typically has the greatest
impact on the numerical grade of a given soybean shipment.
Until recently, yellow soybeans have shown phenotypic stability in
seedcoat color; however, modern breeding technologies have produced
varieties that have a higher tendency to demonstrate variations in seed
coat color. Industry interactions (with producer groups, exporters,
grain elevators, and grain processors) suggest that these varieties are
gaining popularity with soybean growers and likely will be present in
the value chain for the foreseeable future.
Official inspection data shows a sharp rise in the amount of SBOC
found in soybean samples over the past two years. In 2019 and 2020,
only 0.4% and 0.2%, respectively, of all inspected soybean lots failed
to meet the standard for U.S. No. 1 Yellow Soybeans, as was typical in
the years leading up to 2021. In 2021, 3.1% of all inspected soybean
lots failed to meet the standard for U.S. No. 1 Yellow Soybeans,
followed by 8.8% of lots inspected so far in 2022. The figures for 2022
also show an uneven distribution based on mode of conveyance, with
17.7% of container lot inspections failing to meet the standard versus
5.3% of shiplot inspections.
The increase in SBOC over the past two years has made it more
difficult for shippers of U.S. soybeans to meet contract grade
requirements, based solely on the factor of SBOC. Although research
shows that SBOC do not impact the intrinsic quality of soybeans, such
soybeans, present at certain levels, still influence the final grade of
soybeans because of the current soybean grade standards.
The Department of Agriculture (USDA) Grain Inspection Advisory
Committee recommended, at its June 2022 meeting in Kansas City, MO,
that the Federal Grain Inspection Service conduct a study to determine
whether the presence of higher SBOC has any impact on the oil and
protein content of soybeans. The results of the study show no
significant correlation between SBOC and protein and oil content.\1\
Additionally, based on visual analysis, the color variation in the
seedcoat does not extend into the cotyledon. Since most commercial
crushing operations remove the hull before crushing, this is not likely
to affect the color of the finished product.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ https://www.ams.usda.gov/sites/default/files/media/FGISSBOCStudy.pdf.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Several producer and exporter groups have reached out to AMS to
request that the soybean standards be reviewed to address the marketing
challenges introduced by the higher presence of SBOC in U.S. soybeans.
The groups requested that consideration be given, and provision be
made, for those soybean processors who may desire soybeans with yellow
seedcoats. In such instances, applicants for service would maintain the
ability to request that soybeans be inspected for SBOC.
This proposed rule would remove SBOC as a criterion for determining
the grade of U.S. Yellow soybeans (e.g., U.S. No. 1, No. 2, No. 3,
etc.). It also would retain SBOC as a class-determining criterion in
the class ``Yellow soybeans.'' Official inspectors would only determine
SBOC if needed to meet the definition of ``Yellow soybeans'' or at the
request of an applicant for service. Accordingly, official certificates
for Yellow soybeans would not show SBOC content unless requested by the
applicant for service. Any sample of soybeans containing more than 10.0
percent of SBOC would continue to be graded as the class Mixed
soybeans.
A 30-day comment period is provided for interested persons to
submit comments on the proposed revised Grade Standards. Copies of the
proposed revised standards are at https://www.regulations.gov.
Implementation Period
The USGSA requires that changes to the grain standards may not be
made effective within one calendar year of their promulgation ``unless
in the judgment of the Secretary, the public health, interest, or
safety require that they become effective sooner'' (7 U.S.C. 76(b)(1)).
This provision was put into place to allow industry participants
adequate time to make adjustments and transition to new standards.
However, in this case, the soybeans that are more likely to exhibit
discolored seedcoats and trigger higher determinations of SBOC in
soybean samples are already present in the supply chain. Additionally,
based on AMS research showing that the color variation does not
materially affect the end use of the soybeans, AMS does not foresee any
deleterious effects to farmers or merchandisers by making the rule
effective sooner. AMS believes that implementing this proposed rule
effective September 1, 2023, would be in service of public interest.
AMS invites all interested parties to comment on whether this change is
necessary to implement effective September 1, 2023.
Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Pursuant to the requirements set forth in the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (RFA) (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.), AMS has considered the
impact of this proposed rule on small entities. Accordingly, AMS has
prepared this initial Regulatory Flexibility analysis. The purpose of
the RFA is to fit regulatory actions to the scale of businesses subject
to such actions in order that small businesses will not be unduly or
disproportionately burdened.
As stated earlier in this proposed rule, modern breeding
technologies have produced varieties that have a higher tendency to
demonstrate variations in seed coat color. Official inspection data
shows a sharp rise in the presence of soybeans that demonstrate these
color variations, as well as impacts to the grade of U.S. soybeans. For
instance, soybean discoloration can cause soybeans to be downgraded,
which can potentially reduce the price of soybeans to producers, or
even cause the soybeans to be rejected by some purchasers.
It is estimated that these modern soybean varieties are being
adopted rapidly and could have market share as
[[Page 19231]]
high as 30 to 50 percent of the soybean seed market according to
industry sources.\2\ This rapid rate of adoption indicates that soybean
producers see benefits exceeding costs in the production of soybean
from this new seed breed. The proposed rule would eliminate color as an
official factor that affects the grade of soybeans.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ Green, Jerry M., ``The rise and future of glyphosate and
glyphosate-resistant crops'', Pest Management Science, 2018, Volume
74, pp. 1035-1039.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The proposed rule has been initiated at the request of industry,
which recognizes the costs associated with lower grades and
discounting. Reduced discounting due to the removal of the color
requirement represents a benefit to producers. Costs of the rule
primarily accrue to the government and would mainly involve the cost to
the federal government for changing the standards electronically and in
printed material.
The 2017 Agricultural Census (Census) reports soybean production,
and classifies producers by income class, acreage, and other factors.
The Small Business Administration (SBA) determines the cutoff level
between large and small firms. The most recent SBA guidance has a size
cutoff of $2.25 million for soybean producers. This classification is
not specified in the Census, however, using current production and
market data in combination with Census data, we can approximate the
proportion of producers affected.
The Economic Research Service (ERS) reports that in 2021 soybean
prices were $13.25 per bushel, and the per acre production was 51.4
bushels per acre. Therefore, the per acre revenue is $681. To be
considered a large soybean producer, it would take $2,250,000/$681 or
3,304 acres. According to the Census, there were a total of 303,191
soybean producers, 1,624 of which were farms exceeding 3,000 acres.
Thus, 0.5 percent of all soybean farms could be considered large.
However, to determine the impact of the rule on small farms, we
must look at production of producers with less than 3,000 acres. Again
from the Census, a total of 4.356 billion bushels were produced, with
0.332 billion bushels produced on farms of 3,000 or more acres, or 7.6
percent of production. Therefore, 92.4 percent of total production in
2017 came from small farms, according to the SBA definition.
The ERS reports that in 2021, 4.435 billion bushels of soybeans
were produced in the U.S., with a carryover inventory of 0.257 billion
bushels, for a total of 4.692 billion bushels available. Assuming the
same production proportions between small and large farms as in the
2017 Census would yield a total of 4.334 billion bushels produced by
farms of less than 3,000 acres.
AMS has data on the share of soybeans that are graded based on
color for each of the four grade categories. Table 1 shows the
distribution for an average over the 2010-2020 period. Individual
years' data varies little from the overall average. However, data from
2022 shows a sharp decline in the share of soybeans with the highest
grade, and an increase in the lower grade levels. The last line in the
table shows the difference between the two, indicating a significant
change in grading based on color since the introduction of the new
seeds.
Table 1--Share of Soybeans Graded Based on Color by Grade Level *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Category % #1 SBOC % #2 SBOC % #3 SBOC % #4 SBOC
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2010-2020 Average............................... 99.60 0.24 0.11 0.05
2022............................................ 83.12 11.42 4.98 0.48
Difference...................................... 16.48 11.18 4.87 0.43
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* SBOC = Soybeans of other colors.
The price impact on graded soybeans is less significant than Table
1 might suggest, as there is typically little price difference between
grades #1 and #2. However, grades #3 and #4 are discounted by 1.5 cents
and 3.5 cents, respectively. The total impact on small farm revenues is
shown in Table 2.
Table 2--Calculation of Discounts for SBOC Under Current Grade Standards
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Share Discount
Grade (percent) Production (Bu.) Affected bushels (per Bu.) Total discount
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
#3............................ 4.87 4,334,091,811 211,018,410 $0.015 $3,165,276
#4............................ 0.43 4,334,091,811 18,587,862 0.035 650,575
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total..................... ........... .................. 229,606,272 ........... 3,815,851
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Using the difference in grading shares between the 2010-2020
average, and applying the share to production by small farms, shows
that a total of nearly 230 million bushels of soybeans we discounted in
2022, and the total discount was $3.8 million. While we do not know the
exact market share of the genetically modified soybeans in 2022, if we
assume it was 30 percent, then an increase in market share of each
additional 10 percent would be approximately $1,272,000.
The total value of discounts due to color represents a benefit to
small producers from removing the color standard. Given that the
majority of producers are considered small entities and the majority of
production comes from small farms, AMS believes the impacts of the
proposed changes to the standards would not be disproportionate or
unduly burdensome to small producers.
Inspection Plan Tolerances
To reflect the removal of SBOC as an official factor, AMS proposes
to revise the tables pertaining to soybean grade limits in section
800.86 of the regulations. Shiplots and unit trains are inspected in
accordance with a statistically based inspection plan (55 FR 24030;
June 13, 1990). Inspection
[[Page 19232]]
tolerances, commonly referred to as breakpoints, are used to determine
acceptable quality. AMS's proposal to remove SBOC as an official factor
necessitates removing soybean SBOC breakpoints from the Grade Limits
and Breakpoints for Soybeans table. However, because SBOC would still
be used to determine class in Yellow soybeans, the Breakpoints for
Soybean Special Grades and Factors table will remain unchanged. Under
this proposal, that breakpoint would only apply to determining the
class of a sample of soybeans. Inspection plan breakpoints would not
apply to SBOC when an applicant requests that it be inspected on an
official criteria basis.
Proposed AMS Action
AMS proposes to revise 7 CFR 810, Subpart J, United States
Standards for Soybeans. It is proposed that SBOC be eliminated as a
grading factor but be retained in the standards as part of the
definition of the class Yellow soybeans. AMS also proposes to revise 7
CFR 800.86, Inspection of shiplot, unit train, and lash barge grain in
single lots, paragraph (c)(2) by removing SBOC from table 17.
List of Subjects
7 CFR Part 800
Administrative practice and procedure, Conflict of interests,
Exports, Freedom of information, Grains, Intergovernmental relations,
Penalties, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.
7 CFR Part 810
Exports, Grain.
For reasons set forth in the preamble, the Agricultural Marketing
Service proposes to amend 7 CFR parts 800 and 810 as follows:
PART 800--GENERAL REGULATIONS
0
1. The authority citation for part 800 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 71-87k.
0
2. Amend Sec. 800.86 by revising Table 17 to paragraph (c)(2) to read
as follows:
Sec. 800.86 Inspection of shiplot, unit train, and lash barge grain
in single lots.
* * * * *
(c) * * *
(2) * * *
Table 17 to Paragraph (c)(2)--Grade Limits (GL) and Breakpoints (BP) for Soybeans
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Maximum limits of--
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Damaged kernels Foreign material Splits (percent)
------------------------------------ (percent) -----------------
Grade Heat damaged Total (percent) ------------------
(percent) ------------------
------------------ GL BP GL BP
GL BP GL BP
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
U.S. No. 1.............................. 0.2 0.2 2.0 0.8 1.0 0.2 10.0 1.6
U.S. No. 2.............................. 0.5 0.3 3.0 0.9 2.0 0.3 20.0 2.2
U.S. No. 3 \1\.......................... 1.0 0.5 5.0 1.2 3.0 0.4 30.0 2.5
U.S. No. 4 \2\.......................... 3.0 0.9 8.0 1.5 5.0 0.5 40.0 2.7
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Soybeans which are purple mottled or stained shall be graded not higher than U.S. No. 3.
\2\ Soybeans which are materially weathered shall be graded not higher than U.S. No. 4.
* * * * *
PART 810--OFFICIAL UNITED STATES STANDARDS FOR GRAIN
0
3. The authority citation for part 810 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 71-87k.
0
4. Amend Sec. 810.1602 by revising paragraph (a)(1) and removing
paragraph (g). The revisions read as follows.
Sec. 810.1602 Definition of other terms.
(a) * * *
(1) Yellow soybeans. Soybeans that have yellow or green seed coats
and which, in cross section, are yellow or have a yellow tinge, and may
include not more than 10.0 percent of soybeans of other colors.
Soybeans of other colors are soybeans that have black or bicolored
seedcoats, as well as soybeans that have green seedcoats and are green
in cross section. Bicolored soybeans will have seed coats of two
colors, one of which is brown or black, and the brown or black color
covers 50 percent of the seed coats. The hilum of a soybean is not
considered a part of the seed coat for this determination.
* * * * *
0
5. Revise Sec. 810.1603 to read as follows:
Sec. 810.1603 Basis of determination.
Each determination of class, heat-damaged kernels, damaged kernels,
and splits is made on the basis of the grain when free from foreign
material. Other determinations not specifically provided for under the
general provisions are made on the basis of the grain as a whole.
0
6. Revise Sec. 810.1604 to read as follows:
Sec. 810.1604 Grades and grade requirements for soybeans.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Grades U.S. Nos.
Grading factors ---------------------------------------------------------------
1 2 3 4
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Maximum percent limits of:
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Damaged kernels:
Heat (part of total)........................ 0.2 0.5 1.0 3.0
Total................................... 2.0 3.0 5.0 8.0
Foreign material................................ 1.0 2.0 3.0 5.0
Splits.......................................... 10.0 20.0 30.0 40.0
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 19233]]
Maximum count limits of:
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Other materials:
Animal filth................................ 9 9 9 9
Castor beans................................ 1 1 1 1
Crotalaria seeds............................ 2 2 2 2
Glass....................................... 0 0 0 0
Stones \1\.................................. 3 3 3 3
Unknown foreign substance................... 3 3 3 3
---------------------------------------------------------------
Total \2\............................... 10 10 10 10
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
U.S. Sample grade are soybeans that:
(a) Do not meet the requirements for U.S. Nos. 1, 2, 3, or 4; or
(b) Have a musty, sour, or commercially objectionable foreign odor (except garlic odor); or
(c) Are heating or otherwise of distinctly low quality.
\1\ In addition to the maximum count limit, stones must exceed 0.1 percent of the sample weight.
\2\ Includes any combination of animal filth, castor beans, crotalaria seeds, glass, stones, and unknown foreign
substances. The weight of stones is not applicable for total other material.
* * * * *
Melissa Bailey,
Associate Administrator, Agricultural Marketing Service.
[FR Doc. 2023-06679 Filed 3-30-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P