[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 51 (Thursday, March 16, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Pages 16295-16300]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-05334]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-97106; File No. SR-NYSEARCA-2023-21]


Self-Regulatory Organizations; NYSE Arca, Inc.; Notice of Filing 
and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change To Amend the NYSE 
Arca Equities Fees and Charges

March 10, 2023.
    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 
(``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given that 
on March 1, 2023, NYSE Arca, Inc. (``NYSE Arca'' or the ``Exchange'') 
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (``SEC'' or 
``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in Items I, II, 
and III below, which Items have been prepared by the Exchange. The 
Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments on the 
proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance 
of the Proposed Rule Change

    The Exchange proposes to amend the NYSE Arca Equities Fees and 
Charges (``Fee Schedule'') by (i) lowering the credit applicable to 
Tape B securities for

[[Page 16296]]

Adding Liquidity under Standard Rates; (ii) introducing a new pricing 
tier, Tier 5, under Adding Tiers; (iii) eliminating the BBO Setter 
Tier; and (iv) reformatting the tiers under Tape C Tiers for Adding. 
The Exchange proposes to implement the fee changes effective March 1, 
2023. The proposed rule change is available on the Exchange's website 
at www.nyse.com, at the principal office of the Exchange, and at the 
Commission's Public Reference Room.

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and 
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, the self-regulatory organization 
included statements concerning the purpose of, and basis for, the 
proposed rule change and discussed any comments it received on the 
proposed rule change. The text of those statements may be examined at 
the places specified in Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared 
summaries, set forth in sections A, B, and C below, of the most 
significant parts of such statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and 
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    The Exchange proposes to amend the Fee Schedule by (i) lowering the 
credit applicable to Tape B securities for Adding Liquidity under 
Standard Rates; (ii) introducing a new pricing tier, Tier 5, under 
Adding Tiers; (iii) eliminating the BBO Setter Tier; and (iv) 
reformatting the tiers under Tape C Tiers for Adding. The Exchange 
proposes to implement the fee changes effective March 1, 2023.
Background
    The Exchange operates in a highly competitive market. The 
Commission has repeatedly expressed its preference for competition over 
regulatory intervention in determining prices, products, and services 
in the securities markets. In Regulation NMS, the Commission 
highlighted the importance of market forces in determining prices and 
SRO revenues and, also, recognized that current regulation of the 
market system ``has been remarkably successful in promoting market 
competition in its broader forms that are most important to investors 
and listed companies.'' \3\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 51808 (June 9, 
2005), 70 FR 37496, 37499 (June 29, 2005) (File No. S7-10-04) (Final 
Rule) (``Regulation NMS'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    While Regulation NMS has enhanced competition, it has also fostered 
a ``fragmented'' market structure where trading in a single stock can 
occur across multiple trading centers. When multiple trading centers 
compete for order flow in the same stock, the Commission has recognized 
that ``such competition can lead to the fragmentation of order flow in 
that stock.'' \4\ Indeed, equity trading is currently dispersed across 
16 exchanges,\5\ numerous alternative trading systems,\6\ and broker-
dealer internalizers and wholesalers, all competing for order flow. 
Based on publicly available information, no single exchange currently 
has more than 17% market share.\7\ Therefore, no exchange possesses 
significant pricing power in the execution of equity order flow. More 
specifically, the Exchange currently has less than 10% market share of 
executed volume of equities trading.\8\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 61358, 75 FR 3594, 
3597 (January 21, 2010) (File No. S7-02-10) (Concept Release on 
Equity Market Structure).
    \5\ See Cboe U.S Equities Market Volume Summary, available at 
https://markets.cboe.com/us/equities/market_share.
    \6\ See FINRA ATS Transparency Data, available at https://otctransparency.finra.org/otctransparency/AtsIssueData. A list of 
alternative trading systems registered with the Commission is 
available at https://www.sec.gov/foia/docs/atslist.htm.
    \7\ See Cboe Global Markets U.S. Equities Market Volume Summary, 
available at http://markets.cboe.com/us/equities/market_share/.
    \8\ See id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange believes that the ever-shifting market share among the 
exchanges from month to month demonstrates that market participants can 
move order flow, or discontinue or reduce use of certain categories of 
products. While it is not possible to know a firm's reason for shifting 
order flow, the Exchange believes that one such reason is because of 
fee changes at any of the registered exchanges or non-exchange venues 
to which a firm routes order flow. With respect to non-marketable order 
flow that would provide liquidity on an Exchange against which market 
makers can quote, ETP Holders can choose from any one of the 16 
currently operating registered exchanges to route such order flow. 
Accordingly, competitive forces constrain exchange transaction fees 
that relate to orders that would provide liquidity on an exchange.
Proposed Rule Change
Adding Liquidity--Tape B
    The Exchange proposes to lower the credit applicable for Adding 
Liquidity in Tape B securities. Under Section III. Standard Rates--
Transactions, for securities priced at or above $1.00, the Exchange 
currently provides ETP Holders a credit of $0.0020 per share for Adding 
Liquidity in Tape A, Tape B and Tape C securities. The Exchange 
proposes to lower the credit for Adding Liquidity in Tape B securities 
from $0.0020 per share to $0.0016 per share. The purpose of adjusting 
the Tape B credit for Adding Liquidity is for business and competitive 
reasons. The credit applicable for Adding Liquidity in Tape A and Tape 
C securities would remain unchanged.
    The Exchange believes the proposed new credit would continue to 
incentivize ETP holders to direct their liquidity-providing orders in 
Tape B securities to the Exchange. As noted below, the proposed credit 
would continue to be in line with credits provided by the Exchange's 
competitors. The Exchange believes that pricing is just one of the 
factors that ETP Holders consider when determining where to direct 
their order flow. Among other things, factors such as execution 
quality, fill rates, and volatility, are important and deterministic to 
ETP Holders in deciding where to send their order flow. These factors 
are particularly relevant for trading in Tape B securities for which 
the Exchange is the primary market.
Adding Tiers--Tier 5
    The Exchange proposes to introduce a new pricing tier, Tier 5, in 
the Adding Tiers table under Section VII. Tier Rates--Round Lots and 
Odd Lots (Per Share Price $1.00 or Above). As proposed, an ETP Holder 
could qualify for a credit of $0.0022 per share for Adding in Tape A 
and Tape C securities and $0.0020 per share for Adding in Tape B 
securities if the ETP Holder has Adding ADV that is equal to at least 
0.15% of CADV.
    The Exchange believes that the proposed new pricing tier would 
incentivize ETP Holders to route their liquidity-providing order flow 
to the Exchange in order to qualify for the tier, which would provide 
higher credits than those currently available under Standard Rates. 
This in turn would support the quality of price discovery on the 
Exchange and provide additional price improvement opportunities for 
incoming orders. The Exchange believes that by correlating the amount 
of the fee to the level of orders sent by an ETP Holder that add 
liquidity, the Exchange's fee structure would incentivize ETP Holders 
to submit more orders that add liquidity to the Exchange, thereby 
increasing the potential for price improvement to

[[Page 16297]]

incoming marketable orders submitted to the Exchange.
    As noted above, the Exchange operates in a competitive environment, 
particularly as it relates to attracting non-marketable orders, which 
add liquidity to the Exchange. The Exchange does not know how much 
order flow ETP Holders choose to route to other exchanges or to off-
exchange venues. Based on the profile of liquidity-adding firms 
generally, the Exchange believes that a number of ETP Holders could 
qualify for the proposed new pricing tier if they choose to direct 
their order flow to the Exchange. However, without having a view of ETP 
Holders' activity on other exchanges and off-exchange venues, the 
Exchange has no way of knowing whether this proposed rule change would 
result in any additional ETP Holders directing orders to the Exchange 
in order to qualify for the new Tier 5 credits.
BBO Setter Tier
    The Exchange currently provides incremental credits under the BBO 
Setter Tier pricing tier. Specifically, the Exchange currently provides 
an incremental credit of $0.0004 per share for orders that set a new 
NYSE Arca BBO in Tape A and Tape C securities and $0.0002 per share for 
orders that set a new NYSE Arca BBO in Tape B securities.\9\ To qualify 
for the BBO Setter Tier, ETP Holders must execute Adding ADV per month 
of at least 0.70% of CADV, and provided that an ETP ID (associated with 
an ETP Holder) (1) executes Adding ADV per month of at least 0.20% of 
CADV, (2) sets a new NYSE Arca BBO with at least 0.10% of CADV, and (3) 
sets a new NYSE Arca BBO of at least 40% of that ETP ID's Adding 
ADV.\10\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \9\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 83032 (April 11, 
2018), 83 FR 16909 (April 17, 2018) (SR-NYSEArca-2018-20).
    \10\ Footnote (c) under the BBO Setter Tier table provides that 
the BBO Setter Credit is in addition to the ETP Holder's Tiered or 
Basic Rate credit(s), and for Tape B and Tape C, the BBO Setter 
Credit is in addition to any capped credit.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange proposes to eliminate the BBO Setter Tier pricing tier 
and footnote (c) associated with the pricing tier and remove it from 
the Fee Schedule because the pricing tier has been underutilized by ETP 
Holders.\11\ The Exchange has observed that not a single ETP Holder has 
qualified for the pricing tier proposed for elimination in the last 
twelve months. Since the BBO Setter Tier pricing tier has not been 
effective in accomplishing its intended purpose, the Exchange has 
determined to eliminate the pricing tier from the Fee Schedule.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \11\ With the proposed deletion of footnote (c) under the BBO 
Setter Tier table, the Exchange proposes to renumber current 
footnotes (d), (e) and (f) under the Retail Tiers table as footnotes 
(c), (d) and (e) and renumber current footnotes (g) and (h) under 
the Tape B Tiers table as footnotes (f) and (g).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Tape C Tiers
    The Exchange currently provides the following credits to ETP 
Holders that add liquidity in Tape C securities on the Exchange:
     Tier 3 credit of $0.0030 per share for ETP Holders that 
have at least 0.20% Adding ADV as a percentage of CADV;
     Tier 2 credit of $0.0033 per share for ETP Holders that 
have at least 0.35% Adding ADV as a percentage of CADV; and
     Tier 1 credit of $0.0034 per share for ETP Holders that 
have at least 0.40% Adding ADV as a percentage of CADV and a fee of 
$0.0029 per share for removing liquidity.
    With this proposed rule change, the Exchange proposes to reformat 
the credits payable under the Tape C Tier for Adding table such that 
the tier that pays the highest credit would appear at the top of the 
table followed by the tier that pays the second highest credit, then 
the tier that pays the lowest credit. With this proposed rule change, 
the reformatted Tape C Tiers for Adding table would appear on the Fee 
Schedule as follows:

                         Tape C Tiers for Adding
------------------------------------------------------------------------
                              Minimum criteria for
            Tier                  tape C adding             Rate
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Tier 1......................  0.40% of CADV.......  ($0.0034) $0.0029
                                                     fee for Removing
                                                     Liquidity.
Tier 2......................  0.35% of CADV.......  ($0.0033).
Tier 3......................  0.20% of CADV.......  ($0.0030).
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange is not proposing any substantive change to the 
requirements to qualify for Tape C Tiers for Adding pricing tier or the 
level of the credits payable under Tape C Tiers for Adding pricing 
tier.
2. Statutory Basis
    The Exchange believes that the proposed rule change is consistent 
with Section 6(b) of the Act,\12\ in general, and furthers the 
objectives of Sections 6(b)(4) and (5) of the Act,\13\ in particular, 
because it provides for the equitable allocation of reasonable dues, 
fees, and other charges among its members, issuers and other persons 
using its facilities and does not unfairly discriminate between 
customers, issuers, brokers or dealers.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \12\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
    \13\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4) and (5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    As discussed above, the Exchange operates in a highly fragmented 
and competitive market. The Commission has repeatedly expressed its 
preference for competition over regulatory intervention in determining 
prices, products, and services in the securities markets. Specifically, 
in Regulation NMS, the Commission highlighted the importance of market 
forces in determining prices and SRO revenues and, also, recognized 
that current regulation of the market system ``has been remarkably 
successful in promoting market competition in its broader forms that 
are most important to investors and listed companies.'' \14\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \14\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 51808 (June 9, 
2005), 70 FR 37496, 37499 (June 29, 2005).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange believes that the ever-shifting market share among the 
exchanges from month to month demonstrates that market participants can 
shift order flow, or discontinue or reduce use of certain categories of 
products, in response to fee changes. With respect to non-marketable 
orders that provide liquidity on an Exchange, ETP Holders can choose 
from any one of the 16 currently operating registered exchanges to 
route such order flow. Accordingly, competitive forces reasonably 
constrain exchange transaction fees that relate to orders that would 
provide displayed liquidity on an exchange. Stated otherwise, changes 
to exchange transaction fees can have a direct effect on the ability of 
an exchange to compete for order flow.
    Given this competitive environment, the proposal represents a 
reasonable attempt to attract additional order flow to the Exchange.
Adding Liquidity--Tape B
    The Exchange believes that its proposal to lower the credit 
provided for Adding Liquidity in Tape B

[[Page 16298]]

securities is reasonable, equitable and not unfairly discriminatory as 
it would apply uniformly to all similarly situated participants. The 
Exchange believes the proposed change (a $0.0004 decrease from the 
current credit) is reasonable in that it represents a modest decrease 
from the current credit provided under Standard Rates. The Exchange 
believes that the proposed credit, albeit lower than the current level, 
would continue to provide an incentive to ETP Holders to submit 
liquidity providing order flow in Tape B securities to the Exchange. 
The Exchange believes that even with the proposed reduced credit in 
Tape B securities, the Exchange's pricing incentive would remain in 
line with credits provided by the Exchange's competitors.\15\ 
Additionally, the Exchange believes that its proposal is an equitable 
allocation of its fees and credits and is not unfairly discriminatory 
because the Exchange will apply the credit equally to all ETP Holders. 
All similarly situated participants would be subject to the same 
credit, and access to the Exchange is offered on terms that are not 
unfairly discriminatory.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \15\ See e.g., Cboe BZX U.S. Equities Exchange Fee Schedule, 
Standard Rates, which provides a credit of $0.0016 per share in Tape 
A, Tape B and Tape C securities.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Adding Tiers--Tier 5
    The Exchange believes that the proposed new Tier 5 pricing tier is 
reasonable because it is designed to encourage increased trading 
activity on the Exchange. The Exchange believes it is reasonable to 
require ETP Holders to meet the applicable volume threshold as it 
offers liquidity providers an opportunity to receive an enhanced 
rebate. Further, the proposed new pricing tier is reasonable as it 
would provide ETP Holders an additional opportunity to qualify for a 
rebate by meeting lower volume threshold than that required to qualify 
for the current pricing tiers under Adding Tiers. The Exchange believes 
that the proposal represents a reasonable effort to promote price 
improvement and enhanced order execution opportunities for ETP Holders. 
All ETP Holders would benefit from the greater amounts of liquidity on 
the Exchange, which would represent a wider range of execution 
opportunities. The Exchange believes the proposed new Tier 5 pricing 
tier is a reasonable means to encourage ETP Holders to increase their 
liquidity providing orders in Tape A, Tape B and Tape C securities.
    The Exchange believes that the proposed rule change to introduce 
the new pricing tier is equitable and not unfairly discriminatory. The 
Exchange believes that the proposal does not permit unfair 
discrimination because the proposed new pricing tier would be available 
to all similarly situated ETP Holders and all ETP Holders would be 
subject to the same requirement to qualify for the proposed new credit. 
Accordingly, no ETP Holder already operating on the Exchange would be 
disadvantaged by the proposed allocation of fees and credits under the 
proposal. The Exchange further believes that the proposed fee change 
would not permit unfair discrimination among ETP Holders because the 
general and tiered rates are available equally to all ETP Holders. As 
noted above, the Exchange operates in a highly competitive environment, 
particularly for attracting order flow that provides liquidity on an 
exchange. More specifically, the Exchange notes that greater add volume 
order flow may provide for deeper, more liquid markets and execution 
opportunities at improved prices, which the Exchange believes would 
incentivize liquidity providers to submit additional liquidity and 
enhance execution opportunities.
BBO Setter Tier
    The Exchange believes that the proposed rule change to eliminate 
the BBO Setter Tier is reasonable because the pricing tier has been 
underutilized and has not incentivized ETP Holders to bring liquidity 
and increase trading on the Exchange. No ETP Holder has availed itself 
of the pricing tier in the last twelve months. The Exchange does not 
anticipate any ETP Holder in the near future to qualify for the BBO 
Setter Tier. The Exchange believes it is reasonable to eliminate 
requirements and credits, and even entire pricing tiers, when such 
incentives become underutilized. The Exchange believes eliminating 
underutilized incentive programs would also simplify the Fee Schedule. 
The Exchange further believes that removing reference to the pricing 
tier that the Exchange proposes to eliminate from the Fee Schedule 
would also add clarity to the Fee Schedule. The Exchange believes that 
eliminating requirements and credits, and even entire pricing tiers, 
from the Fee Schedule when such incentives become ineffective is 
equitable and not unfairly discriminatory because the requirements, and 
credits, and even entire pricing tiers, would be eliminated in their 
entirety and would no longer be available to any ETP Holder. All ETP 
Holders would continue to be subject to the same fee structure, and 
access to the Exchange's market would continue to be offered on fair 
and non-discriminatory terms. The Exchange also believes that the 
proposed change would protect investors and the public interest because 
the deletion of the underutilized pricing tier would make the Fee 
Schedule more accessible and transparent and facilitate market 
participants' understanding of the fees charged for services currently 
offered by the Exchange.
Tape C Tiers
    The Exchange believes that the proposed change to the Tape C Tiers 
for Adding pricing tier is reasonable and equitable because the 
proposed changes are non-substantive, and the Exchange is not changing 
any current fees or credits that apply to trading activity on the 
Exchange. Further, the changes are designed to make the Fee Schedule 
easier to read and make it more user-friendly to better display the 
allocation of fees and credits among Exchange members. The Exchange 
believes that this proposed format will provide additional transparency 
of Exchange fees and credits. The Exchange also believes that the 
proposal is non-discriminatory because it would apply uniformly to all 
ETP Holders. The Exchange also believes that the proposed change would 
protect investors and the public interest because the reformatted 
pricing tier would make the Fee Schedule more accessible and 
transparent and facilitate market participants' understanding of the 
rates applicable for services currently offered by the Exchange. 
Finally, the Exchange believes that the reformatted pricing tier, as 
proposed herein, will be clearer and less confusing for investors and 
will eliminate potential investor confusion, thereby removing 
impediments to and perfecting the mechanism of a free and open market 
and a national market system, and, in general, protecting investors and 
the public interest. The Exchange believes that the proposed 
reformatted pricing tier is equitable and not unfairly discriminatory 
because the resulting streamlined Fee Schedule would continue to apply 
to ETP Holders as it does currently because the Exchange is not 
adopting any new fees or credits or removing any current fees or 
credits from the Fee Schedule that impact ETP Holders. All ETP Holders 
would continue to be subject to the same fees and credits that 
currently apply to them under the current pricing tier.
    In the prevailing competitive environment, ETP Holders are free to 
disfavor the Exchange's pricing if they believe that alternatives offer 
them

[[Page 16299]]

better value. Moreover, this proposed rule change neither targets nor 
will it have a disparate impact on any particular category of market 
participant. The Exchange believes that this proposal does not permit 
unfair discrimination because the changes described in this proposal 
would be applied uniformly to all similarly situated ETP Holders and 
all ETP Holders would be subject to the same requirements. Accordingly, 
no ETP Holder already operating on the Exchange would be disadvantaged 
by the proposed allocation of fees.
    Finally, the submission of orders to the Exchange is optional for 
ETP Holders in that they could choose whether to submit orders to the 
Exchange and, if they do, the extent of its activity in this regard. 
The Exchange believes that it is subject to significant competitive 
forces, as described below in the Exchange's statement regarding the 
burden on competition.
    For the foregoing reasons, the Exchange believes that the proposal 
is consistent with the Act.

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    In accordance with Section 6(b)(8) of the Act,\16\ the Exchange 
believes that the proposed rule change would not impose any burden on 
competition that is not necessary or appropriate in furtherance of the 
purposes of the Act. Instead, as discussed above, the Exchange believes 
that the proposed changes would encourage the submission of additional 
liquidity to a public exchange, thereby promoting market depth, price 
discovery and transparency and enhancing order execution opportunities 
for ETP Holders. As a result, the Exchange believes that the proposed 
change furthers the Commission's goal in adopting Regulation NMS of 
fostering integrated competition among orders, which promotes ``more 
efficient pricing of individual stocks for all types of orders, large 
and small.'' \17\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \16\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(8).
    \17\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 51808, 70 FR 37495, 
37498-99 (June 29, 2005) (S7-10-04) (Final Rule).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Intramarket Competition. The Exchange believes the proposed 
amendments to its Fee Schedule would not impose any burden on 
competition that is not necessary or appropriate in furtherance of the 
purposes of the Act. The Exchange does not believe that the proposed 
change represents a significant departure from previous pricing offered 
by the Exchange or its competitors. The proposed changes are designed 
to attract additional order flow to the Exchange. In this proposed rule 
change, the Exchange is adopting a new pricing tier. Thus, the proposed 
change provides another opportunity for ETP Holders to receive a credit 
based on their market-improving behavior and is reflective of the 
highly competitive market in which the Exchange operates. The new 
pricing tier may attract greater order flow to the Exchange, which 
would benefit all market participants trading on the Exchange. The 
proposed reduced credit is reflective of the need to periodically 
calibrate the criteria required to receive credits. The Exchange has 
limited resources with which to apply to credits. Given the competitive 
environment among exchanges and other trading venues, the Exchange must 
ensure that it is requiring the most beneficial market activity for a 
credit that is permitted in the competitive landscape for order flow. 
In this regard, the Exchange notes that other market venues are free to 
adopt the same or similar credits and incentives as a competitive 
response to this proposed change. Moreover, if the changes proposed 
herein are unattractive to market participants, it is likely that the 
Exchange will lose market share as a result and, conversely, if the 
proposal is successful at attracting greater volume to the Exchange 
other market venues are free to make similar changes as a competitive 
response. Greater overall order flow, trading opportunities, and 
pricing transparency benefits all market participants on the Exchange 
by enhancing market quality and continuing to encourage ETP Holders to 
send orders, thereby contributing towards a robust and well-balanced 
market ecosystem. The Exchange also does not believe the proposed rule 
change to eliminate an underutilized pricing tier and reformatting an 
existing pricing tier will impose any burden on intramarket competition 
because the proposed change would impact all ETP Holders uniformly. 
Accordingly, the Exchange does not believe that the proposed changes 
will impair the ability of ETP Holders or competing order execution 
venues to maintain their competitive standing in the financial markets.
    Intermarket Competition. The Exchange operates in a highly 
competitive market in which market participants can readily choose to 
send their orders to other exchange and off-exchange venues if they 
deem fee levels at those other venues to be more favorable. As noted 
above, the Exchange's market share of intraday trading (i.e., excluding 
auctions) is currently less than 10%. In such an environment, the 
Exchange must continually adjust its fees and rebates to remain 
competitive with other exchanges and with off-exchange venues. Because 
competitors are free to modify their own fees and credits in response, 
and because market participants may readily adjust their order routing 
practices, the Exchange does not believe its proposed fee change can 
impose any burden on intermarket competition.
    The Exchange believes that the proposed changes could promote 
competition between the Exchange and other execution venues, including 
those that currently offer similar order types and comparable 
transaction pricing, by encouraging additional orders to be sent to the 
Exchange for execution.

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed 
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others

    No written comments were solicited or received with respect to the 
proposed rule change.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for 
Commission Action

    The foregoing rule change has become effective upon filing pursuant 
to Section 19(b)(3)(A) \18\ of the Act and paragraph (f) thereunder. At 
any time within 60 days of the filing of the proposed rule change, the 
Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule change if it 
appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or appropriate 
in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or otherwise 
in furtherance of the purposes of the Act.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \18\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and 
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule 
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of 
the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's internet comment form (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
     Send an email to [email protected]. Please include 
File Number SR-NYSEARCA-2023-21 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities 
and Exchange

[[Page 16300]]

Commission, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to File Number SR-NYSEARCA-2023-21. This 
file number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To 
help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently, 
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on 
the Commission's internet website (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). 
Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all written 
statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are filed with 
the Commission, and all written communications relating to the proposed 
rule change between the Commission and any person, other than those 
that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the provisions 
of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for website viewing and printing in 
the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 
20549 on official business days between the hours of 10:00 a.m. and 
3:00 p.m. Copies of the filing also will be available for inspection 
and copying at the principal offices of the Exchange. All comments 
received will be posted without change. Persons submitting comments are 
cautioned that we do not redact or edit personal identifying 
information from comment submissions. You should submit only 
information that you wish to make available publicly. All submissions 
should refer to File Number SR-NYSEARCA-2023-21, and should be 
submitted on or before April 6, 2023.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets, 
pursuant to delegated authority.\19\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \19\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

J. Matthew DeLesDernier,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2023-05334 Filed 3-15-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P