[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 45 (Wednesday, March 8, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Pages 14395-14399]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-04750]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

[Docket Nos. 50-275 and 50-323; NRC-2023-0043]


Pacific Gas and Electric Company; Diablo Canyon Power Plant, 
Units 1 and 2

AGENCY: Nuclear Regulatory Commission.

ACTION: Exemption; issuance.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) has issued an 
exemption in response to an October 31, 2022, request from Pacific Gas 
and Electric Company regarding the submittal of a license renewal 
application for Diablo Canyon Power Plant, Units 1 and 2. Pursuant to 
this exemption, if the licensee submits a license renewal application 
less than 5 years prior to expiration of the existing operating 
licenses but no later than December 31, 2023, and if the NRC staff 
finds it acceptable for docketing, the existing operating licenses will 
be in timely renewal under NRC regulations until the NRC has made a 
final determination on whether to approve the license renewal 
application.

DATES: The exemption was issued on March 2, 2023.

ADDRESSES: Please refer to Docket ID NRC-2023-0043 when contacting the 
NRC about the availability of information regarding this document. You 
may obtain publicly available information related to this document 
using any of the following methods:
     Federal Rulemaking Website: Go to https://www.regulations.gov and search for Docket ID NRC-2023-0043. Address 
questions about Docket IDs in Regulations.gov to Stacy Schumann; 
telephone: 301-415-0624; email: [email protected]. For technical 
questions, contact the individual listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION 
CONTACT section of this document.
     NRC's Agencywide Documents Access and Management System 
(ADAMS): You may obtain publicly available documents online in the 
ADAMS Public Documents collection at https://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html. To begin the search, select ``Begin Web-based ADAMS 
Search.'' For problems with ADAMS, please contact the NRC's Public 
Document Room (PDR) reference staff at 1-800-397-4209, 301-415-4737, or 
by email to [email protected]. The ADAMS accession number for each 
document referenced (if it is available in ADAMS) is provided the first 
time that it is mentioned in this document.
     NRC's PDR: You may examine and purchase copies of public 
documents, by appointment, at the NRC's PDR, Room P1 B35, One White 
Flint North, 11555 Rockville Pike, Rockville, Maryland 20852. To make 
an appointment to visit the PDR, please send an email to 
[email protected] or call 1-800-397-4209 or 301-415-4737, between 8 
a.m. and 4 p.m. eastern time (ET), Monday through Friday, except 
Federal holidays.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Brian K. Harris, Office of Nuclear 
Reactor Regulation, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 
20555-0001, telephone: 301-415-2277, email: [email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The text of the exemption is attached.

    Dated: March 3, 2023.

    For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Lauren K. Gibson,
Chief, License Renewal Projects Branch, Division of New and Renewed 
Licenses, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation.

Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Docket Nos. 50-275 and 50-323; Pacific Gas and Electric Company; Diablo 
Canyon Power Plant, Units 1 and 2; Exemption

I. Background

    Pacific Gas and Electric Company (the licensee, PG&E) is the holder 
of Facility Operating License Nos. DPR-80 and DPR-82, which authorize 
operation of Diablo Canyon Power Plant (DCPP), Units 1 and 2, 
respectively. These units are pressurized water reactors located in San 
Luis Obispo, California. The operating licenses provide, among other 
things, that the facility is subject to all rules, regulations, and 
orders of the U.S.

[[Page 14396]]

Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC, the Commission) now or hereafter in 
effect. The current operating licenses for DCPP Units 1 and 2, expire 
on November 2, 2024, and August 26, 2025, respectively.
    In November 2009, PG&E submitted a license renewal application for 
DCPP, Units 1 and 2 (ADAMS Accession No. ML093340086). The NRC 
conducted a docketing acceptance review of the application, accepted it 
for docketing, and began the necessary safety and environmental reviews 
(75 FR 3493; January 21, 2010). This license renewal application had 
timely renewal protection under 10 CFR 2.109(b) because it was 
submitted more than 5 years before the expiration dates of the 
operating licenses for the units. In April 2011, PG&E requested that 
the NRC delay its decision on the DCPP Units 1 and 2 license renewal 
application (ML111010592). On June 2, 2011, the NRC staff published a 
safety evaluation documenting its safety review of the application to 
that point (ML11153A103). In 2016, PG&E requested that the NRC suspend 
its review of the DCPP Units 1 and 2 license renewal application 
(ML16173A454). By letter dated March 7, 2018 (ML18066A937), PG&E 
requested to withdraw the license renewal application based on 
projected energy demands and other economic factors in the State of 
California. The California Public Utilities Commission approved PG&E's 
resource planning decision to terminate the license renewal application 
review in Decision 18-01-022, dated January 11, 2018.\1\ On April 16, 
2018 (ML18093A115), the NRC granted the withdrawal (83 FR 17688; April 
23, 2018), terminated its review, and closed the docket. PG&E states 
that subsequent to the withdrawal of its license renewal application in 
2018, it ``has been working on decommissioning planning efforts to 
support the transition to active decommissioning upon shutdown of DCPP 
Units 1 and 2 at the expiration of the operating licenses.'' 
(ML22304A691).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ Decision Approving Retirement of Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power 
Plant, Application 16-8-006, https://docs.cpuc.ca.gov/PublishedDocs/Published/G000/M205/K423/205423920.PDF.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    On September 2, 2022, the State of California enacted Senate Bill 
No. 846, which invalidated and reversed the 2018 California Public 
Utilities Commission decision to approve termination of PG&E's license 
renewal application and retirement of DCPP Units 1 and 2.\2\ As a 
result, by letter dated October 31, 2022, PG&E requested that the NRC 
resume its review of the previously submitted and subsequently 
withdrawn DCPP Units 1 and 2 license renewal application; PG&E also 
requested that the NRC confirm that PG&E was (and is again) in timely 
renewal under 10 CFR 2.109(b) (ML22304A691). In support of its request, 
PG&E stated that its previous decision to withdraw the license renewal 
application was based on ``the determination that continued baseload 
operation of the two DCPP units beyond their licensed operating periods 
was not necessary to meet California's projected energy demand 
requirements and the potential costs to bundled customers in light of 
changes in electricity supply in the State.'' In the alternative, PG&E 
requested an exemption from 10 CFR 2.109(b) and timely renewal 
protection that would allow PG&E to submit a license renewal 
application for DCPP Units 1 and 2 by December 31, 2023.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \2\ California Senate Bill No. 846, Diablo Canyon powerplant: 
extension of operations (Sept. 2, 2022) https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billTextClient.xhtml?bill_id=202120220SB846 (SB846).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The NRC staff responded to this request on January 24, 2023 
(ML22343A179). In its response, the NRC staff explained it would not 
resume the review of PG&E's withdrawn application and stated that its 
response to PG&E's exemption request would be provided separately. As 
described more fully below, the staff has completed its evaluation of 
PG&E's exemption request and has determined that pursuant to 10 CFR 
54.15 and 10 CFR 50.12, the requested exemption is authorized by law, 
will not present an undue risk to the public health and safety, and is 
consistent with the common defense and security. The staff has also 
determined that special circumstances, as defined in 10 CFR 
50.12(a)(2), are present.

II. Request/Action

    As an alternative to its request that the NRC staff resume its 
review of the withdrawn DCPP Units 1 and 2 license renewal application, 
PG&E requested an exemption from 10 CFR 2.109(b), which provides that 
if a nuclear power plant licensee files a sufficient license renewal 
application ``at least 5 years before the expiration of the existing 
license, the existing license will not be deemed to have expired until 
the application has been finally determined.'' Specifically, PG&E 
requested timely renewal protection under 10 CFR 2.109(b) if it submits 
a license renewal application for DCPP Units 1 and 2 by December 31, 
2023.
    In its October 31, 2022, letter, the licensee stated that two 
special circumstances apply to its exemption request. The special 
circumstances that the licensee identified are:
    (1) Compliance would result in undue hardship or other costs that 
are significantly in excess of those contemplated when the regulation 
was adopted, or that are significantly in excess of those incurred by 
others similarly situated.
    (2) There is present any other material circumstance not considered 
when the regulation was adopted for which it would be in the public 
interest to grant an exemption.

III. Discussion

    Under 10 CFR 54.17(a), an application for a renewed license must be 
filed in accordance with subpart A of 10 CFR part 2, which includes 10 
CFR 2.109(b), ``Effect of timely renewal application.'' Section 
2.109(b) states that ``[i]f the licensee of a nuclear power plant 
licensed under 10 CFR 50.21(b) or 50.22 files a sufficient application 
for renewal of either an operating license or a combined license at 
least 5 years before the expiration of the existing license, the 
existing license will not be deemed to have expired until the 
application has been finally determined.''
    As provided in 10 CFR 54.15, exemptions from the requirements of 
Part 54 are governed by 10 CFR 50.12. Pursuant to 10 CFR 50.12, the 
Commission may, upon application by any interested person or upon its 
own initiative, grant exemptions from the requirements of 10 CFR part 
50 when (1) the exemptions are authorized by law, will not present an 
undue risk to public health or safety, and are consistent with the 
common defense and security; and (2) special circumstances are present, 
as defined in 10 CFR 50.12(a)(2).

A. The Exemption Is Authorized by Law

    This exemption would allow the licensee to update its previous 
license renewal application and submit a sufficient license renewal 
application for DCPP Units 1 and 2, by December 31, 2023, and, if it 
does so, receive timely renewal protection under 10 CFR 2.109(b). This 
means that if the licensee submits an updated license renewal 
application by December 31, 2023, and the staff finds it acceptable for 
docketing, the existing licenses for DCPP Units 1 and 2 will not be 
deemed to have expired until the NRC has made a final determination on 
whether to approve the license renewal application.
    The staff has determined that even though less than 5 years remain 
in the terms of each of the licenses for DCPP

[[Page 14397]]

Units 1 and 2, granting this limited, one-time exemption is authorized 
by law. The 5-year time period specified in 10 CFR 2.109(b) is not 
required by the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended, or the 
Administrative Procedure Act. It is the result of a discretionary 
agency rulemaking under Sections 161 and 181 of the Atomic Energy Act 
of 1954, as amended (56 FR 64943; December 13, 1991) that was designed 
to provide the NRC with a reasonable amount of time to review a license 
renewal application and decide whether to approve it. Section 103c. of 
the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended, permits the Commission to 
issue operating licenses, including renewed licenses. Section 2.109 
implements Section 9(b) of the Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C. 
558(c), which states, in part:

    When the licensee has made timely and sufficient application for 
a renewal or a new license in accordance with agency rules, a 
license with reference to an activity of a continuing nature does 
not expire until the application has been finally determined by the 
agency.

    The time period in 10 CFR 2.109(b) is designed to provide a 
reasonable amount of time for the NRC to review a license renewal 
application and reach a decision on whether to approve it. Prior to 
1992, the rules provided that licensees would have received timely 
renewal protection when they submitted their license renewal 
applications 30 days before the expiration of the current license. (56 
FR 64943; December 13, 1991). In 1990, the NRC proposed modifying 10 
CFR 2.109 to provide that applications must be submitted 3 years before 
expiration of the current license to be afforded timely renewal 
protection. (55 FR 29043; July 17, 1990). There is nothing in the 
preamble supporting the proposed rule or final rule revising 10 CFR 
2.109(b) that suggests that applying the timely renewal doctrine to 
license renewal applications submitted 30 days before the expiration of 
the license was not authorized by law. Instead, it appears the 
Commission proposed to revise 10 CFR 2.109(b) from 30 days to 3 years 
before the expiration of the license so that the final determination on 
a license renewal application would typically be made before the 
current operating license expired. In the proposed rule, the Commission 
explained that it did not believe 30 days would provide ``a reasonable 
time to review an application for a renewed operating license'' and 
estimated that the technical review of a license renewal application 
would take approximately 2 years. (55 FR 29043; July 17, 1990). In the 
final rule, the Commission stated that the technical review of the 
application would take approximately 2 years due to the review of many 
complex technical issues and that ``any necessary hearing could likely 
add an additional year or more'' (56 FR 64943; December 13, 1991). 
Ultimately, the Commission concluded in the final rule that timely 
renewal protection would be provided for license renewal applications 
filed 5 years before the operating license expired to promote 
consistency with the requirement that licensees submit decommissioning 
plans and related financial assurance information on or about 5 years 
prior to the expiration of their current operating licenses. Thus, in 
promulgating 10 CFR 2.109(b), the Commission considered that the time 
period needed to reach a final determination may be less than 5 years 
in some cases, but the rule also provides timely renewal protection for 
timely-filed applications to account for situations where the 
resolution of complex technical issues may take more time.
    The exemption constitutes a change to the schedule by which the 
licensee must submit its application for license renewal and is 
administrative in nature; it does not involve any change to the current 
operating license. Under 10 CFR 54.17(a), an application for a renewed 
license must be filed in accordance with subpart A of 10 CFR part 2, 
which includes 10 CFR 2.109(b). However, the NRC may grant exemptions 
from the requirements of 10 CFR part 54 pursuant to 10 CFR 54.15. For 
the reasons stated above, the NRC has determined that granting this 
one-time exemption will not result in a violation of the Atomic Energy 
Act of 1954, as amended, the Administrative Procedure Act, or the NRC's 
regulations. Therefore, the exemption is authorized by law.

B. The Exemption Presents No Undue Risk to Public Health and Safety

    The requested exemption does not change the manner in which the 
plants operate and maintains public health and safety because the 
exemption from 10 CFR 2.109 does not result in a change to the facility 
or the current operating license, but allows DCPP Units 1 and 2 to 
continue operating under its existing licenses in the event the NRC has 
not reached a final determination of the license renewal application 
prior the expiration of the current operating licenses. Pending final 
action on the license renewal application, the NRC will continue to 
conduct all regulatory activities associated with licensing, 
inspection, and oversight, and will continue to take whatever action 
may be necessary to ensure adequate protection of the public health and 
safety. The existence of this exemption does not affect NRC's 
authority, applicable to all licenses, to modify, suspend, or revoke a 
license for cause, such as a serious safety concern.
    If the licensee submits a license renewal application by December 
31, 2023, there would be approximately 11 months prior to the 
expiration of the current license for Unit 1, and approximately 20 
months prior to the expiration of the current license for Unit 2, for 
the staff to conduct a docketing acceptance review and, if the 
application is accepted for docketing, provide a hearing opportunity 
and conduct the required safety and environmental reviews. Although 11 
months is less than the 18-month generic milestone schedule for the 
staff's review of a license renewal application,\3\ it is sufficient 
time for the NRC staff to determine if any immediate actions need to be 
taken prior to the licensee entering the period of timely renewal. 
Additionally, unlike a situation where an application for license 
renewal is being filed for the first time, here, the licensee 
previously submitted an application that the NRC staff docketed and 
reviewed, issuing a safety evaluation in June 2011 documenting its 
findings to that point. If PG&E submits an updated, sufficient license 
renewal application by December 31, 2023, the NRC staff will be able to 
leverage insights from its partial review of the previously submitted 
and subsequently withdrawn DCPP Units 1 and 2 application to conduct a 
focused, efficient review of the application. Based on the discussion 
in this section, the NRC finds that the action does not cause undue 
risk to public health and safety.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ Generic Milestone Schedules of Requested Activities of the 
Commission, https://www.nrc.gov/about-nrc/generic-schedules.html 
(last updated Sept. 10, 2021).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

C. The Exemption Is Consistent With the Common Defense and Security

    The requested exemption does not alter the design, function, or 
operation of any structures or plant equipment that is necessary to 
maintain safe and secure status of any site security matters. 
Therefore, the NRC finds that the action is consistent with the common 
defense and security.

D. Special Circumstances

    The Commission will not consider granting a specific exemption from 
the requirements in 10 CFR part 50 unless special circumstances are 
present. 10 CFR 50.12(a)(2). ``Special circumstances are present 
whenever . . . there is

[[Page 14398]]

present any other material circumstance not considered when the 
regulation was adopted for which it would be in the public interest to 
grant an exemption.'' \4\ 10 CFR 50.12(a)(2)(vi). The NRC finds that 
PG&E has provided several factors in support of its exemption request 
that demonstrate that special circumstances not considered when the 
Commission promulgated 10 CFR 50.12(a)(2)(vi) are present and that it 
would be in the public interest to grant this limited, one-time 
exemption.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ Consistent with 50.12(a)(2)(vi), the Executive Director for 
Operations consulted with the Commission.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    PG&E submitted an application for license renewal for DCPP Units 1 
and 2 in 2009. PG&E subsequently requested to withdraw this application 
in 2018 based on the determination by the State of California and the 
California Public Utilities Commission that continued baseload 
operation of the two DCPP units beyond their currently approved 
operating periods would not be necessary to meet California's projected 
energy demand requirements (ML18066A937). Since that time, however, 
California's projected energy demands have changed. To respond to those 
changes, the State of California enacted Senate Bill No. 846 (SB 846), 
which invalidated and reversed the 2018 California Public Utilities 
Commission decision to approve termination of PG&E's license renewal 
application and retirement of Diablo Canyon Power Plant, Units 1 and 2. 
SB 846 was signed by the Governor of California on September 2, 2022. 
In its October 31, 2022, letter, PG&E stated that it submitted its 
request to reinstate its previously withdrawn license renewal 
application or obtain an exemption from the 5-year time period 
specified in 10 CFR 2.109(b) so that it could file an updated 
application, ``pursuant to the direction in [California] Senate Bill 
No. (SB) 846.'' The recent efforts by the State of California to keep 
DCPP Units 1 and 2 operating based, in part, on climate change impacts 
and serious electricity reliability challenges, constitute material 
circumstances that were not specifically considered when the NRC 
revised 10 CFR 2.109(b) in 1991.\5\ The NRC finds that the factors PG&E 
have provided in support of its request are compelling and demonstrate 
that the special circumstances required by 10 CFR 50.12(a)(2)(vi) are 
present and that it would be in the public interest to grant this 
exemption.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ See SB 846 Sec.  9 (stating ``the purpose of the extension 
of the Diablo Canyon powerplant operations is to protect the state 
against significant uncertainty in future demand resulting from the 
state's greenhouse-gas-reduction efforts involving electrification 
of transportation and building energy end uses and regional climate-
related weather phenomenon, and to address the risk that currently 
ordered procurement will be insufficient to meet this supply or that 
there may be delays in bringing the ordered resources online on 
schedule.''); Senate Bill 846 Signing Message (Sept. 2, 2022) 
https://www.gov.ca.gov/wp-content/uploads/2022/09/SB-846-Signing-Message.pdf?emrc=9e526b (stating ``[c]limate change is causing 
unprecedented stress on California's energy system'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

E. Environmental Considerations

    The NRC has determined that the issuance of the requested exemption 
meets the provisions of the categorical exclusion in 10 CFR 
51.22(c)(25). Under 10 CFR 51.22(c)(25), the granting of an exemption 
from the requirements of any regulation of chapter 10 qualifies as a 
categorical exclusion if (i) there is no significant hazards 
consideration; (ii) there is no significant change in the types or 
significant increase in the amounts of any effluents that may be 
released offsite; (iii) there is no significant increase in individual 
or cumulative public or occupational radiation exposure; (iv) there is 
no significant construction impact; (v) there is no significant 
increase in the potential for or consequences from radiological 
accidents; and (vi) the requirements from which an exemption is sought 
involves one of several matters, including scheduling requirements 
(Sec.  51.22(c)(25)(iv)(G)). The basis for NRC's determination is 
provided in the following evaluation of the requirements in 10 CFR 
51.22(c)(25)(i)-(vi).
Requirements in 10 CFR 51.22(c)(25)(i)
    To qualify for a categorical exclusion under 10 CFR 
51.22(c)(25)(i), the exemption must involve a no significant hazards 
consideration. The criteria for making a no significant hazards 
consideration determination are found in 10 CFR 50.92(c). The NRC has 
determined that the granting of the exemption request involves no 
significant hazards consideration because allowing the submittal of the 
license renewal application less than 5 years before the expiration of 
the existing license and deeming the license in timely renewal under 10 
CFR 2.109(b) does not (1) involve a significant increase in the 
probability or consequences of an accident previously evaluated; or (2) 
create the possibility of a new or different kind of accident from any 
accident previously evaluated; or (3) involve a significant reduction 
in a margin of safety. Therefore, the requirements of 10 CFR 
51.22(c)(25)(i) are met.
Requirements in 10 CFR 51.22(c)(25)(ii) and (iii)
    The exemption constitutes a change to the schedule by which the 
licensee must submit its application for license renewal and still 
place the licenses in timely renewal, which is administrative in 
nature, and does not involve any change in the types or significant 
increase in the amounts of effluents that may be released offsite and 
does not contribute to any significant increase in occupational or 
public radiation exposure.
    Accordingly, there is no significant change in the types or 
significant increase in the amounts of any effluents that may be 
released offsite, and no significant increase in individual or 
cumulative public or occupational radiation exposure. Therefore, the 
requirements of 10 CFR 51.22(c)(25)(ii) and (iii) are met.
Requirements in 10 CFR 51.22(c)(25)(iv)
    The exempted regulation is not associated with construction, and 
the exemption does not propose any changes to the site, alter the site, 
or change the operation of the site. Therefore, the requirements of 10 
CFR 51.22(c)(25)(iv) are met because there is no significant 
construction impact.
Requirements in 10 CFR 51.22(c)(25)(v)
    The exemption constitutes a change to the schedule by which the 
licensee must submit its license renewal application and still place 
the licenses in timely renewal, which is administrative in nature, and 
does not impact the probability or consequences of accidents. Thus, 
there is no significant increase in the potential for, or consequences 
of, a radiological accident. Therefore, the requirements of 10 CFR 
51.22(c)(25)(v) are met.
Requirements in 10 CFR 51.22(c)(25)(vi)
    To qualify for a categorical exclusion under 10 CFR 
51.22(c)(25)(vi)(G), the exemption must involve scheduling 
requirements. The exemption involves scheduling requirements because it 
would allow the licensee to submit an application for license renewal 
for DCPP Units 1 and 2, less than 5 years prior to the expiration of 
the existing licenses, rather than the 5 years specified in 10 CFR 
2.109(b), and still place the licenses in timely renewal under 10 CFR 
2.109(b). Therefore, the requirements of 10 CFR 51.22(c)(25)(vi) are 
met.
    Based on the above, the NRC concludes that the proposed exemption 
meets the eligibility criteria for a categorical exclusion set forth in 
10 CFR 51.22(c)(25). Therefore, pursuant to 10 CFR 51.22(b), no 
environmental impact

[[Page 14399]]

statement or environmental assessment need be prepared in connection 
with the granting of this exemption request.

IV. Conclusion

    Accordingly, the NRC has determined that, pursuant to 10 CFR 54.15 
and 10 CFR 50.12, the requested exemption is authorized by law, will 
not present an undue risk to the public health and safety, and is 
consistent with the common defense and security. Also, special 
circumstances, as defined in 10 CFR 50.12(a)(2), are present. 
Therefore, the NRC hereby grants the licensee a one-time exemption for 
Diablo Canyon Power Plant, Units 1 and 2, from 10 CFR 2.109(b) to allow 
PG&E to submit a license renewal application for the Diablo Canyon 
Power Plant, Units 1 and 2, less than 5 years prior to expiration of 
the operating licenses, but no later than December 31, 2023.
    The decision to issue PG&E an exemption from 10 CFR 2.109(b) does 
not constitute approval of the license renewal application PG&E intends 
to submit by December 31, 2023. Rather, this exemption provides that if 
PG&E submits an application by December 31, 2023, and the application 
is sufficient for docketing, the licensee will receive timely renewal 
protection under 10 CFR 2.109(b) while the NRC evaluates that 
application. Should the application be docketed, the NRC will provide 
an opportunity for the public to seek a hearing and review the 
application using its normal license renewal review processes and 
standards to determine whether the application meets all applicable 
regulatory requirements.
    This exemption is effective upon issuance.

    Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 2nd day of March 2023.

    For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Brian W. Smith,
Director, Division of New and Renewed Licenses, Office of Nuclear 
Reactor Regulation.
[FR Doc. 2023-04750 Filed 3-7-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-P