[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 218 (Monday, November 14, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Pages 68157-68158]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-24690]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION

[File No. 202 3151]


Chegg, Inc.; Analysis of Proposed Consent Order To Aid Public 
Comment

AGENCY: Federal Trade Commission.

ACTION: Proposed consent agreement; request for comment.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The consent agreement in this matter settles alleged 
violations of federal law prohibiting unfair or deceptive acts or 
practices. The attached Analysis of Proposed Consent Order to Aid 
Public Comment describes both the allegations in the draft complaint 
and the terms of the consent order--embodied in the consent agreement--
that would settle these allegations.

DATES: Comments must be received on or before December 14, 2022.

ADDRESSES: Interested parties may file comments online or on paper by 
following the instructions in the Request for Comment part of the 
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section below. Please write ``Chegg, Inc.; 
File No. 202 3151'' on your comment and file your comment online at 
https://www.regulations.gov by following the instructions on the web-
based form. If you prefer to file your comment on paper, please mail 
your comment to the following address: Federal Trade Commission, Office 
of the Secretary, 600 Pennsylvania Avenue NW, Suite CC-5610 (Annex D), 
Washington, DC 20580.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Brian Shull (202-326-3734) or 
Genevieve Bonan (202-326-3139), Bureau of Consumer Protection, Federal 
Trade Commission, 600 Pennsylvania Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20580.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant to Section 6(f) of the Federal 
Trade Commission Act, 15 U.S.C. 46(f), and FTC Rule Sec.  2.34, 16 CFR 
2.34, notice is hereby given that the above-captioned consent agreement 
containing a consent order to cease and desist, having been filed with 
and accepted, subject to final approval, by the Commission, has been 
placed on the public record for a period of 30 days. The following 
Analysis to Aid Public Comment describes the terms of the consent 
agreement and the allegations in the complaint. An electronic copy of 
the full text of the consent agreement package can be obtained at 
https://www.ftc.gov/news-events/commission-actions.
    You can file a comment online or on paper. For the Commission to 
consider your comment, we must receive it on or before December 14, 
2022 Write ``Chegg, Inc.; File No. 202 3151'' on your comment. Your 
comment--including your name and your state--will be placed on the 
public record of this proceeding, including, to the extent practicable, 
on the https://www.regulations.gov website.
    Because of heightened security screening, postal mail addressed to 
the Commission will be subject to delay. We strongly encourage you to 
submit your comments online through the https://www.regulations.gov 
website.
    If you prefer to file your comment on paper, write ``Chegg, Inc.; 
File No. 202 3151'' on your comment and on the envelope, and mail your 
comment to the following address: Federal Trade Commission, Office of 
the Secretary, 600 Pennsylvania Avenue NW, Suite CC-5610 (Annex D), 
Washington, DC 20580.
    Because your comment will be placed on the publicly accessible 
website at https://www.regulations.gov, you are solely responsible for 
making sure your comment does not include any sensitive or confidential 
information. In particular, your comment should not include sensitive 
personal information, such as your or anyone else's Social Security 
number; date of birth; driver's license number or other state 
identification number, or foreign country equivalent; passport number; 
financial account number; or credit or debit card number. You are also 
solely responsible for making sure your comment does not include 
sensitive health information, such as medical records or other 
individually identifiable health information. In addition, your comment 
should not include any ``trade secret or any commercial or financial 
information which . . . is privileged or confidential''--as provided by 
Section 6(f) of the FTC Act, 15 U.S.C. 46(f), and FTC Rule Sec.  
4.10(a)(2), 16 CFR 4.10(a)(2)--including competitively sensitive 
information such as costs, sales statistics, inventories, formulas, 
patterns, devices, manufacturing processes, or customer names.
    Comments containing material for which confidential treatment is 
requested must be filed in paper form, must be clearly labeled 
``Confidential,'' and must comply with FTC Rule Sec.  4.9(c). In 
particular, the written request for confidential treatment that 
accompanies the comment must include the factual and legal basis for 
the request, and must identify the specific portions of the comment to 
be withheld from the public record. See FTC Rule Sec.  4.9(c). Your 
comment will be kept confidential only if the General Counsel grants 
your request in accordance with the law and the public interest. Once 
your comment has been posted on the https://www.regulations.gov 
website--as legally required by FTC Rule Sec.  4.9(b)--we cannot redact 
or remove your comment from that website, unless you submit a 
confidentiality request that meets the requirements for such treatment 
under FTC Rule Sec.  4.9(c), and the General Counsel grants that 
request.
    Visit the FTC website at http://www.ftc.gov to read this document 
and the news release describing the proposed settlement. The FTC Act 
and other laws the Commission administers permit the collection of 
public comments to consider and use in this proceeding, as appropriate. 
The Commission will consider all timely and responsive public comments 
it receives on or before December 14, 2022. For information on the 
Commission's privacy policy, including routine uses permitted by the 
Privacy Act, see https://www.ftc.gov/site-information/privacy-policy.

Analysis of Proposed Consent Order To Aid Public Comment

    The Federal Trade Commission (``Commission'') has accepted, subject 
to final approval, an agreement containing a consent order from Chegg, 
Inc. (``Respondent''). The proposed consent order (``Proposed Order'') 
has been placed on the public record for 30 days for receipt of public 
comments from interested persons. Comments received during this period 
will become part of the public record. After 30 days, the Commission 
will again review the agreement, along with the comments received, and 
will decide whether it should make final the Proposed Order or withdraw 
from the agreement and take appropriate action.
    Respondent is a Delaware corporation with its principal place of 
business in California. Respondent offers an online platform through 
which consumers utilize Respondent's subscription-based study aids, 
which have included tutoring, writing assistance, math-problem solvers, 
and answers to

[[Page 68158]]

common textbook questions. Respondent also has helped consumers search 
for potential scholarship opportunities. While using its services, 
Respondent's tens of millions of users have provided the company with 
their email addresses, first and last names, and passwords. Users of 
the scholarship search service have also provided Respondent with their 
religious denominations, heritages, dates of birth, parents' income 
ranges, sexual orientations, and disabilities. In addition, Respondent 
collects Social Security numbers, financial account information, and 
other personal information from its employees.
    Despite representing to consumers that it would keep their 
sensitive information safe, Respondent failed to utilize reasonable 
information security measures to do so. As a result of Respondent's 
inadequate information security practices, hackers infiltrated 
Respondent's networks and accessed consumers' personal information on 
multiple occasions over the course of several years.
    The Commission's proposed two-count complaint alleges Respondent 
violated Section 5(a) of the FTC Act by (1) failing to employ 
reasonable information security practices to protect consumers' 
personal information, and (2) misrepresenting to consumers that it took 
reasonable steps to protect their personal information. With respect to 
the first count, the proposed complaint alleges Respondent:
     failed to implement reasonable access controls to 
safeguard users' personal information by failing to (1) require 
employees and third-party contractors to use distinct access keys to 
databases containing users' personal information, instead allowing them 
to use a single access key with full administrative privileges, (2) 
restrict access to systems based on employees' or contractors' job 
functions, (3) require multi-factor authentication for employee and 
contractor account access to users' personal information, and (4) 
rotate access keys to databases containing users' personal information;
     stored users' and employees' personal information on its 
network and databases in plain text, rather than encrypting the 
information;
     used outdated and unsecure cryptographic hash functions to 
protect users' passwords;
     failed to develop, implement, or maintain adequate written 
organizational information security standards, policies, procedures, or 
practices;
     failed to provide adequate guidance or training for 
employees or contractors regarding information security and 
safeguarding consumers' personal information;
     failed to have a policy, process, or procedure for 
inventorying and deleting users' and employees' personal information 
stored on Respondent's network after that information was no longer 
needed; and
     failed to adequately monitor its networks and systems for 
unauthorized attempts to transfer or exfiltrate users' and employees' 
personal information outside of Respondent's network boundaries.
    The proposed complaint alleges Respondent could have addressed each 
of these failures by implementing readily available and relatively low-
cost security measures. It also alleges Respondent's failures caused, 
or are likely to cause, substantial injury to consumers that is not 
outweighed by countervailing benefits to consumers or competition and 
is not reasonably avoidable by consumers themselves. Such practices 
constitute unfair acts or practices under Section 5 of the FTC Act.
    With respect to the second count, the proposed complaint alleges 
that, at various times, Respondent claimed it used reasonable measures 
to protect personal information of consumers. The proposed complaint 
alleges in reality, and as noted above, Respondent failed to implement 
reasonable measures to protect consumers' personal information. Such 
representations were, therefore, deceptive under Section 5 of the FTC 
Act.

Summary of Proposed Order With Respondent

    The Proposed Order contains injunctive relief designed to prevent 
Respondent from engaging in the same or similar acts or practices in 
the future. Part I prohibits Respondent from misrepresenting the extent 
to which it (1) collects, maintains, uses, discloses, deletes, or 
permits or denies access to consumers' personal information, and (2) 
protects the privacy, security, availability, confidentiality, or 
integrity of consumers' personal information. Part II requires that 
Respondent (1) document and adhere to a retention schedule for the 
personal information it collects from consumers, including the purposes 
for which it collects such information and the timeframe for its 
deletion, and (2) provide an opportunity for consumers to request 
access to, and/or deletion of, their personal information.
    Part III requires that Respondent provide multi-factor 
authentication methods as an option for users of its services. Part IV 
requires that Respondent provide notice to any consumer whose Social 
Security number, financial information, date of birth, user account 
credentials, or medical information was exposed in a breach identified 
in the proposed complaint, provided the consumer has not previously 
received such notice.
    Part V requires Respondent to establish and implement, and 
thereafter maintain, a comprehensive information security program that 
protects the security, availability, confidentiality, and integrity of 
consumers' personal information. Part VI requires Respondent to obtain 
initial and biennial information security assessments by an 
independent, third-party professional for 20 years. Part VII requires 
Respondent to disclose all material facts to the assessor required by 
Part VI and prohibits Respondent from misrepresenting any fact material 
to the assessments required by Part V.
    Part VIII requires Respondent to submit an annual certification 
from a senior corporate manager (or senior officer responsible for its 
information security program) that the company has implemented the 
requirements of the Order and is not aware of any material 
noncompliance that has not been corrected or disclosed to the 
Commission. Part IX requires Respondent to notify the Commission any 
time it notifies a federal, state, or local government that consumer 
personal information was, or is reasonably believed to have been, 
accessed, acquired, or publicly exposed without authorization.
    Parts X-XIII are reporting and compliance provisions, which include 
recordkeeping requirements and provisions requiring Respondent to 
provide information or documents necessary for the Commission to 
monitor compliance. Part XIV states the Proposed Order will remain in 
effect for 20 years, with certain exceptions.
    The purpose of this analysis is to facilitate public comment on the 
Proposed Order, and it is not intended to constitute an official 
interpretation of the complaint or Proposed Order, or to modify the 
Proposed Order's terms in any way.

    By direction of the Commission.
April J. Tabor,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2022-24690 Filed 11-10-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6750-01-P