[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 201 (Wednesday, October 19, 2022)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 63420-63424]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-22666]



[[Page 63420]]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Food Safety and Inspection Service

9 CFR Parts 327, 351, 354, 381, 500, 590 and 592

[Docket No. FSIS 2019-0001]
RIN 0583-AD76


Establishing a Uniform Time Period Requirement and Clarifying 
Related Procedures for the Filing of Appeals of Agency Inspection 
Decisions or Actions

AGENCY: Food Safety and Inspection Service (FSIS), U.S. Department of 
Agriculture (USDA).

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: FSIS is amending its regulations to establish a uniform time 
period requirement for the filing of appeals of certain Agency 
inspection decisions or actions.

DATES: Effective December 19, 2022.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Rachel Edelstein, Assistant 
Administrator, Office of Policy and Program Development, Food Safety 
and Inspection Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture; Telephone: 
(202) 205-0495.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

    On July 15, 2021, FSIS proposed to amend its regulations to 
establish a uniform time period requirement for the filing of appeals 
of certain Agency inspection decisions or actions (86 FR 37251). As 
FSIS explained in the proposed rule, current regulatory requirements 
for appeals of FSIS decisions or actions related to inspection 
activities appear across multiple subsections of the FSIS regulations. 
FSIS regulations also provide varied information about appeals 
requirements and procedures, such as who may file an appeal, where to 
file an appeal, what information may be submitted with the appeal, and 
whether the appellant must bear the cost of the appeal if it is 
determined to be frivolous.
    To clarify and simplify inspection appeals procedures, FSIS 
proposed the following changes to the regulations:
    1. Requiring eligible persons to appeal decisions or actions 
related to inspection activities within 30 calendar days after 
receiving notification, either orally or in writing (via electronic or 
hard copy communication), of the initial decision or action.
    2. Clarifying and simplifying the following Agency requirements and 
procedures concerning such appeals:
    a. Any establishment subject to mandatory Federal inspection or any 
facility receiving voluntary inspection services under the regulations 
that believes it has been adversely affected by an applicable decision 
or action may file an appeal;
    b. Such appeal must be submitted to the immediate supervisor of the 
inspector or other Agency employee who undertook the contested decision 
or action;
    c. The appellant may support the appeal by any argument or evidence 
as to why the appeal should be granted; and
    d. Eliminating the requirement, currently prescribed in several 
subsections of the regulations, that the appellant must bear the cost 
of an appeal of an Agency decision or action if the appeal is 
determined to be frivolous.
    3. Revising several sections of the regulations (9 CFR 
327.10(d)(2), 327.24, 351.21, 354.134, 355.39, 381.35, 381.202(d), 
381.204(f)(2), and 592.400) to state that appeals of relevant Agency 
decisions or actions must be made in accordance with the new Rules of 
Practice subsection, 9 CFR 500.9.
    After considering the comments received on the proposed rule, 
discussed below, FSIS is finalizing the proposed rule with four 
changes. First, in response to public comment, the final rule clarifies 
that the 30-day time period to file an appeal of an applicable Agency 
decision or action will apply to the initial appeal and all subsequent 
appeals for the same issue within the FSIS chain of command.
    Second, in response to public comment, the final rule clarifies 
that the time period to appeal an applicable Agency decision or action 
starts after the appellant receives written (rather than oral) 
notification of the contested inspection decision or action.
    Third, due to an amendment to the FSIS regulations that was made 
after the proposed rule was published, this final rule removes one 
revision concerning appeals of certified pet food decisions or actions. 
On May 20, 2022, FSIS amended its regulations to remove the certified 
pet food provisions from its regulations because they were outdated and 
no companies use the voluntary service (87 FR 30773). Therefore, this 
final rule does not include the proposed change to the removed section 
9 CFR 355.39--Appeals from decisions made under this part.
    Finally, due to a second amendment to the FSIS regulations that was 
made after the proposed rule was published, this final rule includes 
one revision concerning appeals of egg products inspection decisions or 
actions. On October 29, 2020, FSIS amended its regulations to modernize 
egg products inspection under the Egg Products Inspection Act (21 
U.S.C. 1031, et seq.) (85 FR 68640). To align that egg products final 
rule with the new uniform appeals process requirements, this final rule 
revises 9 CFR 590.300 and 9 CFR 590.310 to state that appeals of Agency 
decisions or actions concerning egg products inspections must be filed 
in accordance with 9 CFR 500.9.

Comments and Responses

    FSIS received five comments on the proposed rule. FSIS received 
four comments from trade associations representing the meat and poultry 
industries and one comment from a firm providing consultancy services 
to the meat and poultry industries. A summary of the comments and FSIS' 
responses follows.

Time Period To File an Initial Appeal

    Comment: Four commenters stated that the time period for filing an 
initial appeal should be longer than the proposed 30 calendar days to 
provide appellants sufficient time to access the relevant Agency 
decision or action and decide whether to appeal. Two industry groups 
recommended a time period of at least 90 days. Two other industry 
groups recommended a time period of 120 days.
    Response: FSIS disagrees. Thirty calendar days will provide 
prospective appellants sufficient time to gather necessary information 
and respond to applicable Agency actions and decisions while ensuring 
the regulatory intent to provide for a consolidated, streamlined 
appeals process. Prospective appellants should be able to readily 
access relevant Agency decisions or actions because they are provided 
written notice of such decisions or actions when they are issued. 
Further, each quarter the Agency publishes to the FSIS website a 
summary of the enforcement actions FSIS has taken to ensure that 
products that reach consumers are safe, wholesome, and properly 
labeled.\1\ The 30-day time period requirement will ensure that the 
Agency publishes timely data.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ The Quarterly Enforcement Reports are available at: https://www.fsis.usda.gov/inspection/regulatory-enforcement/quarterly-enforcement-reports.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Time Period To File Subsequent Appeals

    Comment: Three industry groups stated that appellants should be 
provided equal time to file subsequent appeals of a specific Agency 
decision or

[[Page 63421]]

action to the next level in the FSIS chain of command if the initial 
appeal of the underlining decision or action is denied, in order to 
provide appellants sufficient time to prepare such filings and to avoid 
inconsistent or arbitrary time period requirements imposed by FSIS 
personnel.
    Response: FSIS agrees. The scope of this final rule includes the 
30-day time period requirement for the filing of all appeals in the 
FSIS chain of command of an applicable Agency decision or action.

Written Notification of Agency Action or Decision

    Comment: Three industry groups stated that the start of the time 
period for filing an appeal should be based on the appellant's receipt 
of written notification (rather than oral notification) of an 
applicable Agency decision or action.
    Response: FSIS agrees. This final rule clarifies that the appeal 
filing time period will be based on the prospective appellant's receipt 
of written notification of the applicable Agency action or decision.

Waiver of Time Period Requirement

    Comment: One industry group stated that the time period requirement 
for filing appeals should be waived or reopened in certain 
circumstances, such as when the Agency issues a noncompliance record 
(NR) that is directly related to a previous NR. This commenter also 
stated that FSIS should establish a process for waiving or restarting 
the appeals time period under such circumstances.
    Response: FSIS disagrees. The regulations provide persons the 
opportunity to appeal after each applicable Agency decision or action. 
As mentioned above, 30 days should be sufficient time to file an 
appeal. FSIS is not establishing a separate process to waive or reopen 
the time period for appeals.

Time Period Requirements for Agency Appeal Responses and Related 
Procedures

    Comment: Four industry groups stated that FSIS should establish and 
enforce time period requirements for the Agency's responses to appeals 
of its actions and decisions, as well as other procedures related to 
the administration of the appeals process.
    Response: FSIS disagrees. FSIS will issue instructions to personnel 
to ensure the Agency responds to appeals in a timely manner but will 
not codify requirements for FSIS personnel.

``Adversely Affected'' Standard

    Comment: Two industry groups questioned the proposed requirement 
that a person must be ``adversely affected'' by a relevant Agency 
decision or action to file an appeal. The commenters stated that the 
impact on the prospective appellant should not be a determining factor 
concerning whether a person should be able to appeal.
    Response: FSIS disagrees. There is no basis to file an appeal of an 
Agency inspection decision or action that did not adversely affect the 
appellant. When there is no adverse effect involved, industry may 
resolve differences of opinion in FSIS memoranda of interview, in other 
Agency documents, and through discussions with field personnel. The 
requirement that an appellant be adversely affected by the relevant 
Agency action or decision will ensure that persons directly and 
materially impacted by such actions or decisions are able to seek 
relief. This regulatory provision will also facilitate a timely, 
streamlined appeals process, as the Agency will be able to focus its 
resources on reviewing actions and decisions that have tangible, 
consequential impacts on involved persons.

Final Rule Effective Date

    Comment: One industry group stated that the effective date of any 
regulatory changes to the appeals process should provide industry 
sufficient time to adjust to the new requirements.
    Response: FSIS agrees. The Agency recognizes the need to provide 
industry time to comply with the regulatory changes to the appeals 
process. Consistent with other FSIS regulations, the requirements 
established by the final rule are effective 60 days after publication 
in the Federal Register, which is December 19, 2022.

Applicability To Recall Decisions

    Comment: One commenter asked whether the time period requirement 
for appeals would apply to recall decisions.
    Response: The requirements established by this final rule, 
including the uniform time period for filing appeals of certain Agency 
actions and decisions, will not apply to FSIS requests for recall of 
meat, poultry, or egg products. As the recall of such product is a 
voluntary decision made by the relevant establishment or facility, 
rather than an Agency decision or action, it is not applicable to this 
final rule. However, if industry decided to appeal any NRs related to 
the recall, those appeals would be subject to this rule.

Executive Orders 12866 and 13563

    Executive Orders (E.O.s) 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess 
all costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if 
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize 
net benefits (including potential economic, environmental, public 
health and safety benefits, distributive impacts, and equity). E.O. 
13563 emphasizes the importance of quantifying both costs and benefits, 
of reducing costs, of harmonizing rules, and of promoting flexibility. 
This final rule has been designated a ``non-significant'' regulatory 
action under section 3(f) of E.O. 12866. Accordingly, the rule has not 
been reviewed by the Office of Management and Budget under E.O. 12866.

Economic Impact Analysis

    The final rule is expected to economically benefit industry by 
providing a harmonized, streamlined appeals process. Consolidating the 
inspection appeals procedures from multiple subsections of the CFR, 
simplifying the process, eliminating charges for frivolous appeals, and 
setting a uniform time period requirement will reduce the regulatory 
burden placed on industry.
    Similarly, clarifying and simplifying Agency inspection appeals 
procedures is expected to benefit the Agency by reducing inefficiencies 
and facilitating better use of Agency personnel and resources. The 
actions will also increase the likelihood that relevant physical 
evidence, as well as directly involved personnel, will be available 
during the appeals process.
    The uniform time period requirement is not expected to increase 
industry's labor or capital costs. Currently, the majority of appeals 
of FSIS decisions or actions related to inspection activities mandated 
under the Federal Meat Inspection Act (FMIA) (21 U.S.C. 601, et seq.), 
the Poultry Products Inspection Act (PPIA)(21 U.S.C. 451, et seq.), and 
the Egg Products Inspection Act (EPIA)(21 U.S.C. 1031, et seq.) are 
filed within several months of the appellant's notification of the 
contested decision or action. For example, between June 2020 and May 
2022, the Agency received 1,499 appeals from official establishments to 
contest NRs issued to address findings of regulatory violations. Of 
these appeals, sixty-nine (69) percent were filed within 30 calendar 
days, twenty-six (26) percent were filed between 31 and 180 calendar 
days, and five (5) percent were filed after 180 calendar days. Further, 
the

[[Page 63422]]

time period requirement will lengthen the amount of time that an appeal 
may be filed for certain types of Agency decisions or actions. 
Therefore, the uniform time period requirement will encourage the 
timely filing of appeals without imposing substantial cost burdens on 
current industry practices.

Regulatory Flexibility Act

    The FSIS Administrator has made a determination that this final 
rule will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial 
number of small entities in the United States, as defined by the 
Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601, et seq.). The final rule is 
not expected to increase costs to the industry. The final rule may 
provide some cost savings to industry related to the uniform filing of 
appeals of certain Agency decisions or actions, but any benefits from 
the final rule would not be significant.

Paperwork Reduction Act

    There are no paperwork or recordkeeping requirements associated 
with this final rule under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 
U.S.C. 3501-3520).

E-Government Act

    FSIS and USDA are committed to achieving the purposes of the E-
Government Act (44 U.S.C. 3601, et seq.) by, among other things, 
promoting the use of the internet and other information technologies 
and providing increased opportunities for citizen access to Government 
information and services, and for other purposes.

Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform

    This final rule has been reviewed under E.O. 12988, Civil Justice 
Reform. Under this rule: (1) All State and local laws and regulations 
that are inconsistent with this rule will be preempted; (2) no 
retroactive effect will be given to this rule; and (3) no 
administrative proceedings will be required before parties may file 
suit in court challenging this rule. However, parties may be required 
to exhaust their administrative remedies, including the appeals process 
established in this rule, before challenging in court any specific 
agency action that is the subject of an appeal pursuant to this rule.

Executive Order 13175

    This rule has been reviewed in accordance with the requirements of 
E.O. 13175, ``Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal 
Governments.'' E.O. 13175 requires Federal agencies to consult and 
coordinate with tribes on a government-to-government basis on policies 
that have tribal implications, including regulations, legislative 
comments or proposed legislation, and other policy statements or 
actions that have substantial direct effects on one or more Indian 
tribes, on the relationship between the Federal Government and Indian 
tribes or on the distribution of power and responsibilities between the 
Federal Government and Indian tribes.
    FSIS has assessed the impact of this rule on Indian tribes and 
determined that this rule does not, to our knowledge, have tribal 
implications that require tribal consultation under E.O. 13175. If a 
tribe requests consultation, FSIS will work with the Office of Tribal 
Relations to ensure meaningful consultation is provided where changes, 
additions, and modifications identified herein are not expressly 
mandated by Congress.

USDA's Non-Discrimination Statement

    In accordance with Federal civil rights law and USDA civil rights 
regulations and policies, USDA, its Mission Areas, agencies, staff 
offices, employees, and institutions participating in or administering 
USDA programs are prohibited from discriminating based on race, color, 
national origin, religion, sex, gender identity (including gender 
expression), sexual orientation, disability, age, marital status, 
family/parental status, income derived from a public assistance 
program, political beliefs, or reprisal or retaliation for prior civil 
rights activity, in any program or activity conducted or funded by USDA 
(not all bases apply to all programs). Remedies and complaint filing 
deadlines vary by program or incident.
    Program information may be made available in languages other than 
English. Persons with disabilities who require alternative means of 
communication to obtain program information (e.g., Braille, large 
print, audiotape, American Sign Language) should contact the 
responsible Mission Area, agency, or staff office; the USDA TARGET 
Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TTY); or the Federal Relay Service 
at (800) 877-8339.
    To file a program discrimination complaint, a complainant should 
complete a Form AD-3027, USDA Program Discrimination Complaint Form, 
which can be obtained online at https://www.ocio.usda.gov/document/ad-3027, from any USDA office, by calling (866) 632-9992, or by writing a 
letter addressed to USDA. The letter must contain the complainant's 
name, address, telephone number, and a written description of the 
alleged discriminatory action in sufficient detail to inform the 
Assistant Secretary for Civil Rights (ASCR) about the nature and date 
of an alleged civil rights violation. The completed AD-3027 form or 
letter must be submitted to USDA by:
    (1) Mail: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Office of the Assistant 
Secretary for Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue SW, Washington, DC 
20250-9410; or
    (2) Fax: (833) 256-1665 or (202) 690-7442; or
    (3) Email: [email protected]
    USDA is an equal opportunity provider, employer, and lender.

Environmental Impact

    Each USDA agency is required to comply with 7 CFR part 1b of the 
Departmental regulations, which supplements the National Environmental 
Policy Act regulations published by the Council on Environmental 
Quality. Under these regulations, actions of certain USDA agencies and 
agency units are categorically excluded from the preparation of an 
Environmental Assessment (EA) or an Environmental Impact Statement 
(EIS) unless the agency head determines that an action may have a 
significant environmental effect (7 CFR 1b.4 (b)). FSIS is among the 
agencies categorically excluded from the preparation of an EA or EIS (7 
CFR 1b.4 (b)(6)).
    FSIS has determined that this final rule, which establishes a 
uniform time period requirement for the filing of appeals of certain 
Agency inspection decisions or actions, and clarifies and simplifies 
appeals procedures generally, will not create any extraordinary 
circumstances that would result in this normally excluded action having 
a significant individual or cumulative effect on the human environment. 
Therefore, this action is appropriately subject to the categorical 
exclusion from the preparation of an environmental assessment or 
environmental impact statement provided under 7 CFR 1b.4(6) of the U.S. 
Department of Agriculture regulations.

Congressional Review Act

    Pursuant to the Congressional Review Act (5 U.S.C. 801, et seq.), 
the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs has determined that 
this rule is not a ``major rule,'' as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).

Additional Public Notification

    Public awareness of all segments of rulemaking and policy 
development is important. Consequently, FSIS will announce this Federal 
Register

[[Page 63423]]

publication on-line through the FSIS web page located at: https://www.fsis.usda.gov/federal-register.
    FSIS will also announce and provide a link through the FSIS 
Constituent Update, which is used to provide information regarding FSIS 
policies, procedures, regulations, Federal Register notices, FSIS 
public meetings, and other types of information that could affect or 
would be of interest to our constituents and stakeholders. The 
Constituent Update is available on the FSIS web page. Through the web 
page, FSIS is able to provide information to a much broader, more 
diverse audience. In addition, FSIS offers an email subscription 
service which provides automatic and customized access to selected food 
safety news and information. This service is available at: https://www.fsis.usda.gov/subscribe. Options range from recalls to export 
information, regulations, directives, and notices. Customers can add or 
delete subscriptions themselves and have the option to password protect 
their accounts.

List of Subjects

9 CFR Part 327

    Imported products.

9 CFR Part 351

    Certification of technical animal fats for export.

9 CFR Part 354

    Voluntary inspection of rabbits and edible products thereof.

9 CFR Part 381

    Poultry products inspection regulations.

9 CFR Part 500

    Rules of practice.

9 CFR Part 590

    Inspection of eggs and egg products (Egg Products Inspection Act).

9 CFR Part 592

    Voluntary inspection of egg products.

    For the reasons set forth in the preamble, FSIS is amending 9 CFR 
parts 327, 351, 354, 381, 500, 590 and 592 as follows:

PART 327--IMPORTED PRODUCTS

0
1. The authority citation for part 327 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  21 U.S.C. 601-695; 7 CFR 2.18, 2.53.

0
2. In Sec.  327.10, revise paragraph (d)(2) to read as follows:


Sec.  327.10   Samples; inspection of consignments; refusal of entry; 
marking.

* * * * *
    (d) * * *
    (2) An official import establishment's controlled pre-stamping 
privilege may be cancelled orally or in writing by the inspector or 
other Agency employee who is supervising its enforcement whenever the 
employee finds that the official import establishment has failed to 
comply with the provisions of this part or any conditions imposed 
pursuant thereto. If the cancellation is oral, the decision or action 
and the reasons therefor will be confirmed in writing, as promptly as 
circumstances allow. Any person whose controlled pre-stamping privilege 
has been cancelled may appeal the decision or action in accordance with 
9 CFR 500.9. The appeal must state all of the facts and reasons upon 
which the person relies to show that the controlled pre-stamping 
privilege was wrongfully cancelled.
* * * * *

0
3. Revise Sec.  327.24 to read as follows:


Sec.  327.24   Appeals; how made.

    Any appeal of a decision or action of any program employee will be 
made to his/her immediate supervisor having responsibility over the 
subject matter of the appeal in accordance with 9 CFR 500.9.

PART 351--CERTIFICATION OF TECHINCAL ANIMAL FATS FOR EXPORT

0
4. The authority citation for part 351 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  7 U.S.C. 1622, 1624; 7 CFR 2.17 (g) and (i), 2.55.

0
5. Revise Sec.  351.21 to read as follows:


Sec.  351.21   Certification of certain animal fat for export.

    Any person receiving inspection service may, if dissatisfied with 
any decision of an inspector relating to any inspection, file an appeal 
from such decision or action in accordance with 9 CFR 500.9.

PART 354--VOLUNTARY INSPECTION OF RABBITS AND EDIBLE PRODUCTS 
THEREOF

0
6. The authority citation for part 354 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  7 U.S.C. 1622, 1624; 7 CFR 2.17 (g) and (i), 2.55.

0
7. Revise Sec.  354.134 to read as follows:


Sec.  354.134   Appeal inspections; how made.

    Any person receiving inspection service may, if dissatisfied with 
any decision of an inspector relating to any inspection, file an appeal 
from such decision or action in accordance with 9 CFR 500.9.

PART 381--POULTRY PRODUCTS INSPECTION REGULATIONS

0
8. The authority citation for part 381 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  7 U.S.C. 1633, 1901-1906; 21 U.S.C. 451-472; 7 CFR 
2.18, 2.53.

0
9. Revise Sec.  381.35 to read as follows:


Sec.  381.35   Appeal inspections; how made.

    Any person receiving inspection service may, if dissatisfied with 
any decision or action of an inspector or other Agency employee 
relating to any inspection, file an appeal from such decision or action 
in accordance with 9 CFR 500.9.

0
10. In Sec.  381.202, revise paragraph (d) to read as follows:


Sec.  381.202   Poultry products offered for entry; reporting of 
findings to customs; handling of articles refused entry; appeals, how 
made; denaturing procedures.

* * * * *
    (d) Any person receiving inspection service may, if dissatisfied 
with any decision or action of an inspector or other Agency employee 
relating to any inspection, file an appeal from such decision or action 
in accordance with 9 CFR 500.9. The poultry or poultry products 
involved in any appeal must be identified by U.S. retained tags and 
segregated in a manner approved by the inspector or other Agency 
employee pending completion of an appeal inspection.
* * * * *

0
11. In Sec.  381.204, revise paragraph (f)(2) to read as follows:


Sec.  381.204   Marking of poultry products offered for entry; official 
import inspection marks and devices.

* * * * *
    (f) * * *
    (2) An official import establishment's controlled pre-stamping 
privilege may be cancelled orally or in writing by the inspector or 
other Agency employee who is supervising its enforcement whenever the 
employee finds that the official import establishment has failed to 
comply with the provisions of this part or any conditions imposed 
pursuant thereto. If the cancellation is oral, the decision or action 
and the reasons therefor will be confirmed in writing, as promptly as 
circumstances allow. Any person whose controlled pre-stamping privilege 
has been cancelled may appeal the decision or action in accordance with 
9 CFR 500.9.

[[Page 63424]]

The appeal must state all of the facts and reasons upon which the 
person relies to show that the controlled pre-stamping privilege was 
wrongfully cancelled.
* * * * *

PART 500--RULES OF PRACTICE

0
12. The authority citation for part 500 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  21 U.S.C. 451-470, 601-695, 1031-1056; 7 U.S.C. 450, 
1901-1906; (33 U.S.C. 1251 et seq.); 7 CFR 2.18, 2.53.

0
13. In Sec.  500.1, revise paragraph (c) to read as follows:


Sec.  500.1   Definitions.

* * * * *
    (c) A ``suspension'' is an interruption in the assignment of 
program employees to all or part of an establishment; and (d) An 
establishment subject to Federal inspection or facility receiving 
voluntary inspection services under the regulations is ``adversely 
affected'' when that person has a legally cognizable interest, and the 
decision or action has caused or is substantially likely to cause 
injury to that interest.

0
14. Add Sec.  500.9 to read as follows:


Sec.  500.9   Procedures for the filing of appeals.

    (a) Any establishment subject to Federal inspection or facility 
under voluntary inspection and adversely affected by a decision or 
action of an inspector or other Agency employee related to an 
inspection activity mandated under the FMIA, PPIA, or EPIA or related 
to voluntary reimbursable inspection services allowed under the AMA may 
appeal the decision or action. Initial appeals of an applicable 
decision or action, as well as subsequent appeals of denied appeals 
through final Agency action, must be made within 30 calendar days after 
receipt of written notification of the contested decision or action. 
Appeals may be supported by any argument or evidence that the appellant 
may wish to offer as to why the contested decision or action should be 
reconsidered.
    (b) Any initial appeal of a decision or action of an inspector or 
other Agency employee must be made to his/her immediate supervisor 
having jurisdiction over the subject matter of the appeal.

PART 590--INSPECTION OF EGGS AND EGG PRODUCTS (EGG PRODUCTS 
INSPECTION ACT)

0
15. The authority citation for part 590 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 21 U.S.C. 1031-1056; 7 CFR 2.18, 2.53.


0
16. Revise Sec.  590.300 to read as follows:


Sec.  590.300   Appeal inspections.

    Any person receiving inspection service may, if dissatisfied with 
any decision or action of an inspector or other Agency employee 
relating to any inspection, file an appeal from such decision or action 
in accordance with 9 CFR 500.9.

0
17. Revise Sec.  590.310 to read as follows:


Sec.  590.310   Appeal inspections; how made.

    Any appeal from the inspection decision by inspection program 
personnel must be made to the immediate supervisor having jurisdiction 
over the subject matter of the appeal in accordance with 9 CFR 500.9.

PART 592--VOLUNTARY INSPECTION OF EGG PRODUCTS

0
18. The authority citation for part 592 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  7 U.S.C. 1621-1627.


0
19. Revise Sec.  592.400 to read as follows:


Sec.  592.400   How to file an appeal.

    Any person receiving inspection service may, if dissatisfied with 
any decision or action of an inspector or other Agency employee 
relating to any inspection, file an appeal from such decision or action 
in accordance with 9 CFR 500.9.


Sec. Sec.  592.410, 592.420, 592.430, and 592.440   [Removed]

0
20. Remove Sec. Sec.  592.410, 592.420, 592.430, and 592.440.

    Done in Washington, DC.
Paul Kiecker,
Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2022-22666 Filed 10-18-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-DM-P