[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 183 (Thursday, September 22, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Pages 57883-57888]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-20474]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION


Applications for New Awards; Center of Excellence in Spatial 
Computing Grant Program

AGENCY: Office of Postsecondary Education, Department of Education.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of Education (Department) is issuing a notice 
inviting applications for new awards for fiscal year (FY) 2022 for the 
Center of Excellence in Spatial Computing (CESC) grant program, 
Assistance Listing Number 84.116Q. This notice relates to the approved 
information collection under OMB control number 1894-0006.

DATES: 
    Applications Available: September 22, 2022.
    Deadline for Transmittal of Applications: November 7, 2022.
    Deadline for Intergovernmental Review: December 6, 2022.

ADDRESSES: For the addresses for obtaining and submitting an 
application, please refer to our Common Instructions for Applicants to 
Department of Education Discretionary Grant Programs, published in the 
Federal Register on December 27, 2021 (86 FR 73264) and available at 
www.federalregister.gov/d/2021-27979. Please note that these Common 
Instructions supersede the version published on February 13, 2019, and, 
in part, describe the transition from the requirement to register in 
SAM.gov a Data Universal Numbering System (DUNS) number to the 
implementation of the Unique Entity Identifier (UEI). More information 
on the phase-out of DUNS numbers is available at www2.ed.gov/about/offices/list/ofo/docs/unique-entity-identifier-transition-fact-sheet.pdf.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jason Cottrell, U.S. Department of 
Education, 400 Maryland Avenue SW, room 2B127, Washington, DC 20202-
4260. Telephone: (202) 453-7530. Email: [email protected].
    If you are deaf, hard of hearing, or have a speech disability and 
wish to access telecommunications relay services, please dial 7-1-1.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Full Text of Announcement

I. Funding Opportunity Description

    Purpose of Program: The CESC grant program is designed to help 
increase the number of highly qualified Americans available for hire 
within the high-tech labor pool.
    Background: The evolution of computers has changed how we interact

[[Page 57884]]

with the technology in computing systems. Computer technology is no 
longer limited to a static machine. Computational devices are now found 
in our kitchen appliances, cars, and other daily use items.\1\ Spatial 
computing is the digitization and virtualization of the activities and 
interactions between various entities and environments to improve their 
functionality.\2\ Autonomous guided vehicles, smart vacuums, virtual 
and augmented reality, and the cameras in many phones that use light 
detection and ranging are all examples of technologies that use spatial 
computing to operate. Spatial computing has the potential to deeply 
affect how we interact with today's immersive, engaging technology.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ www.uctoday.com/unified-communications/what-is-spatial-computing-the-basics/
    \2\ www.ptc.com/en/blogs/corporate/what-is-spatial-computing
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Given how these technologies impact so much of our day-to-day 
lives, the need to ensure a workforce that can develop, enhance, and 
maintain such systems is critical. Additionally, given the need to have 
a workforce in this field that is representative of the diverse U.S. 
population, it is critical that IHEs recruit and educate 
underrepresented students, as defined in this notice, in these 
technologies. The technology sector, as the fastest growing market in 
the United States, has an increasing need for a spatial computing 
workforce to remain competitive. To this end, the CESC grant program 
allows institutions of higher education (IHEs) the opportunity to apply 
for Federal funding to teach students the necessary skills to succeed 
in an ever-evolving high-tech economy.
    Institutions interested in applying for the CESC grant program are 
expected to teach, improve, and disseminate spatial computing knowledge 
and skills required to increase the number of highly qualified 
Americans available for hire within the high-tech labor pool.
    Priorities: This notice contains one absolute priority and one 
competitive preference priority. We are establishing these priorities 
for the FY 2022 grant competition and any subsequent year in which we 
make awards from the list of unfunded applications from this 
competition, in accordance with section 437(d)(1) of the General 
Education Provisions Act (GEPA), 20 U.S.C. 1232(d)(1).
    Absolute Priority: This priority is an absolute priority. Under 34 
CFR 75.105(c)(3), we consider only applications that meet the priority.
    The priority is:
    To be considered for a grant under this absolute priority, an 
eligible institution must include in its application--
    (a) The member IHEs that constitute the consortium that will 
support the advancement of spatial computing;
    (b) A description of how best practices and curricula will be 
evaluated and shared with computer science and other relevant programs;
    (c) A description of how the consortium will establish leadership 
and competitiveness in spatial computing, including how it will promote 
innovative processes for domestic manufacturing of spatial computing 
technology products;
    (d) A description of how the consortium will create educational and 
work placement opportunity programs to recruit, train, and retain 
underrepresented populations in the technology sector; and
    (e) A description of how the consortium will develop case studies 
and skill-based workforce training and company-based education programs 
in spatial computing.
    Competitive Preference Priority: This priority is a competitive 
preference priority. Under 34 CFR 75.105(c)(2)(i), we award up to an 
additional 10 points to an application, depending on how well the 
application meets the priority.
    The priority is:
    Leveraging Industry Partnerships to Provide Job-Embedded 
Experiences for Students in Spatial Computing Technologies (up to 10 
points).
    Projects that are designed to increase the proportion of 
underrepresented students with the skill sets necessary to meet 
industry demands in spatial computing by providing high-quality, paid, 
job-embedded opportunities that could potentially lead to stackable 
credentials in the field.
    Definitions: In accordance with section 437(d)(1) of GEPA, we are 
establishing definitions for ``Minority-Serving Institutions,'' 
``underrepresented students,'' and ``spatial computing.'' The 
definitions of ``demonstrates a rationale,'' ``logic model,'' ``project 
component,'' and ``relevant outcomes'' are from 34 CFR 77.1.
    Demonstrates a rationale means a key project component included in 
the project's logic model is informed by research or evaluation 
findings that suggest the project component is likely to improve 
relevant outcomes.
    Logic model (also referred to as a theory of action) means a 
framework that identifies key project components of the proposed 
project (i.e., the active ``ingredients'' that are hypothesized to be 
critical to achieving the relevant outcomes) and describes the 
theoretical and operational relationships among the key project 
components and relevant outcomes.

    Note:  In developing logic models, applicants may want to use 
resources such as the Regional Educational Laboratory Program's (REL 
Pacific) Education Logic Model Application, available at https://ies.ed.gov/ncee/edlabs/regions/pacific/elm.asp. Other sources 
include: https://ies.ed.gov/ncee/edlabs/regions/pacific/pdf/REL_2014025.pdf, https://ies.ed.gov/ncee/edlabs/regions/pacific/pdf/REL_2014007.pdf, and https://ies.ed.gov/ncee/edlabs/regions/northeast/pdf/REL_2015057.pdf.

    Minority-Serving Institution (MSI) means an institution that is 
eligible to receive assistance under sections 316 through 320 of part A 
of title III, under part B of title III, or under title V of the Higher 
Education Act of 1965, as amended.
    Project component means an activity, strategy, intervention, 
process, product, practice, or policy included in a project. Evidence 
may pertain to an individual project component or to a combination of 
project components (e.g., training teachers on instructional practices 
for English learners and follow-on coaching for these teachers).
    Relevant outcome means the student outcome(s) or other outcome(s) 
the key project component is designed to improve, consistent with the 
specific goals of the program.
    Spatial computing means the digitization of activities of machines, 
people, objects, and the environments in which they take place to 
enable and optimize actions and interactions.
    Underrepresented students means students enrolled in postsecondary, 
career, or technical education who are in one or more of the following 
subgroups:
    (i) A student who is living in poverty.
    (ii) A student who is American Indian, Alaskan Native, Asian 
American, Black, Hispanic or Latino, Native Hawaiian, and/or Pacific 
Islander.
    (iii) A student who is female.
    (iv) A student who is lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, 
questioning, queer, or intersex (LGBTQI+).
    (v) A student with a disability.
    Waiver of Proposed Rulemaking: Under the Administrative Procedure 
Act (5 U.S.C. 553), the Department generally offers interested parties 
the opportunity to comment on proposed priorities, selection criteria, 
definitions, and other requirements. Section 437(d)(1) of GEPA, 
however, allows the Secretary to exempt from rulemaking requirements 
regulations governing the first grant

[[Page 57885]]

competition under a new or substantially revised program authority. 
This is the first grant competition for this program under 20 U.S.C. 
1033a, and therefore qualifies for this exemption. In order to ensure 
timely grant awards, the Secretary has decided to forgo public comment 
on the priorities, definitions, and requirements under section 
437(d)(1) of GEPA. These priorities, definitions, and requirements will 
apply to the FY 2022 grant competition and any subsequent year in which 
we make awards from the list of unfunded applications from this 
competition.
    Program Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1138-1138d; the Explanatory Statement 
accompanying Division H of the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2022 
(Pub. L. 117-103).

    Note:  Projects will be awarded and must be operated in a manner 
consistent with the nondiscrimination requirements contained in 
Federal civil rights laws.

    Applicable Regulations: (a) The Education Department General 
Administrative Regulations in 34 CFR parts 75, 77, 79, 82, 84, 86, 97, 
98, and 99. (b) The Office of Management and Budget Guidelines to 
Agencies on Governmentwide Debarment and Suspension (Nonprocurement) in 
2 CFR part 180, as adopted and amended as regulations of the Department 
in 2 CFR part 3485. (c) The Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost 
Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards in 2 CFR part 
200, as adopted and amended as regulations of the Department in 2 CFR 
part 3474.

II. Award Information

    Type of Award: Discretionary grant.
    Estimated Available Funds: $1,980,000.
    Contingent upon the availability of funds and the quality of 
applications, we may make additional awards in subsequent years from 
the list of unfunded applications from this competition.
    Estimated Range of Awards: $990,000 to $1,980,000.
    Estimated Average Size of Awards: $990,000.
    Maximum Award: We will not make an award exceeding $1,980,000 for 
the entire project period of 36 months.
    Estimated Number of Awards: 1-2.

    Note:  The Department is not bound by any estimates in this 
notice.

    Project Period: Up to 36 months.

III. Eligibility Information

    1. Eligible Applicants: A consortium of public and private 
nonprofit IHEs that includes at least one Historically Black College or 
University (HBCU), Tribally Controlled College and University (TCCU), 
or other Minority-Serving Institution (as defined in this notice).

    Note: In addressing the absolute priority, please identify each 
IHE that is an HBCU, TCCU, or MSI.

    2. a. Cost Sharing or Matching: This competition does not require 
cost sharing or matching.
    b. Indirect Cost Rate Information: This program limits a grantee's 
indirect cost reimbursement to eight percent of a modified total direct 
cost base. We are establishing this indirect cost limit for the FY 2022 
grant competition and any subsequent year in which we make awards from 
the list of unfunded applications from this competition in accordance 
with section 437(d)(1) of GEPA. For more information regarding indirect 
costs, or to obtain a negotiated indirect cost rate, please see 
www2.ed.gov/about/offices/list/ocfo/intro.html.
    c. Administrative Cost Limitation: This program does not include 
any program-specific limitation on administrative expenses. All 
administrative expenses must be reasonable and necessary and conform to 
Cost Principles described in 2 CFR part 200 subpart E of the Uniform 
Guidance.
    3. Subgrantees: A grantee under this competition may not award 
subgrants to entities to directly carry out project activities 
described in its application.

IV. Application and Submission Information

    1. Application Submission Instructions: Applicants are required to 
follow the Common Instructions for Applicants to Department of 
Education Discretionary Grant Programs, published in the Federal 
Register on December 27, 2021 (86 FR 73264) and available at 
www.federalregister.gov/d/2021-27979, which contain requirements and 
information on how to submit an application. Please note that these 
Common Instructions supersede the version published on February 13, 
2019, and, in part, describe the transition from the requirement to 
register in SAM.gov a DUNS number to the implementation of the UEI. 
More information on the phase-out of DUNS numbers is available at 
https://www2.ed.gov/about/offices/list/ofo/docs/unique-entity-identifier-transition-fact-sheet.pdf.
    2. Submission of Proprietary Information: Given the types of 
projects that may be proposed in applications for the CESC grant 
program, your application may include business information that you 
consider proprietary. In 34 CFR 5.11 we define ``business information'' 
and describe the process we use in determining whether any of that 
information is proprietary and, thus, protected from disclosure under 
Exemption 4 of the Freedom of Information Act (5 U.S.C. 552, as 
amended).
    Because we plan to make successful applications available to the 
public, you may wish to request confidentiality of business 
information.
    Consistent with Executive Order 12600, please designate in your 
application any information you believe is exempt from disclosure under 
Exemption 4. In the appropriate Appendix section of your application 
under ``Other Attachments Form,'' please list the page number or 
numbers on which we can find this information. For additional 
information please see 34 CFR 5.11(c).
    3. Intergovernmental Review: This competition is subject to 
Executive Order 12372 and the regulations in 34 CFR part 79. 
Information about Intergovernmental Review of Federal Programs under 
Executive Order 12372 is in the application package for this 
competition. Information about Intergovernmental Review of Federal 
Programs under Executive Order 12372 is in the application package for 
this program [competition]. Please note that, under 34 CFR 79.8(a), we 
have shortened the standard 60-day intergovernmental review period in 
order to make awards before these funds expire.
    4. Funding Restrictions: We reference additional regulations 
outlining funding restrictions in the Applicable Regulations section of 
this notice.
    5. Recommended Page Limit: The application narrative is where you, 
the applicant, address the selection criteria that reviewers use to 
evaluate your application. We recommend that you (1) limit the 
application narrative to no more than 50 pages and (2) use the 
following standards:
     A ``page'' is 8.5'' x 11'', on one side only, with 1'' 
margins at the top, bottom, and both sides.
     Double-space (no more than three lines per vertical inch) 
all text in the application narrative, including titles, headings, 
footnotes, quotations, references, and captions, as well as all text in 
charts, tables, figures, and graphs.
     Use a font that is either 12 point or larger, and no 
smaller than 10-pitch (characters per inch).
     Use one of the following fonts: Times New Roman, Courier, 
Courier New, or Arial.

[[Page 57886]]

    The recommended page limit does not apply to the cover sheet; the 
budget section, including the narrative budget justification; the 
assurances and certifications; or the one-page abstract, the resumes, 
the bibliography, or the letters of support. However, the recommended 
page limit does apply to all of the application narrative.

V. Application Review Information

    1. Selection Criteria: The selection criteria for this competition 
are from 34 CFR 75.210. The points assigned to each criterion are 
indicated in the parentheses next to the criterion. An application may 
earn up to a total of 100 points based on the selection criteria. 
Applications may receive up to 10 additional points under the 
competitive preference priority, for a total score of up to 110 points. 
All applications will be evaluated based on the selection criteria as 
follows:
    (a) Significance. (Maximum 25 points)
    (1) The Secretary considers the significance of the proposed 
project.
    (2) In determining the significance of the proposed project, the 
Secretary considers the following factors:
    (i) The extent to which the proposed project is likely to yield 
findings that may be utilized by other appropriate agencies and 
organizations. (up to 5 points)
    (ii) The extent to which the proposed project involves the 
development or demonstration of promising new strategies that build on, 
or are alternatives to, existing strategies. (up to 10 points)
    (iii) The importance or magnitude of the results or outcomes likely 
to be attained by the proposed project, especially improvements in 
teaching and student achievement. (5 points)
    (iv) The extent to which the results of the proposed project are to 
be disseminated in ways that will enable others to use the information 
or strategies. (up to 5 points)
    (b) Quality of the project design. (Maximum 45 points)
    (1) The Secretary considers the quality of the design of the 
proposed project.
    (2) In determining the quality of the design of the proposed 
project, the Secretary considers the following factors:
    (i) The extent to which the proposed project is part of a 
comprehensive effort to improve teaching and learning and support 
rigorous academic standards for students. (up to 10 points)
    (ii) The extent to which the proposed activities constitute a 
coherent, sustained program of training in the field. (up to 10 points)
    (iii) The extent to which the proposed project is designed to build 
capacity and yield results that will extend beyond the period of 
Federal financial assistance. (up to 10 points)
    (iv) The extent to which the proposed project represents an 
exceptional approach to the priority or priorities established for the 
competition. (up to 10 points)
    (v) The extent to which the proposed project demonstrates a 
rationale (as defined in this notice). (up to 5 points)
    (c) Quality of project personnel. (Maximum 10 points)
    (1) The Secretary considers the quality of the personnel who will 
carry out the proposed project.
    (2) In determining the quality of project personnel, the Secretary 
considers the extent to which the applicant encourages applications for 
employment from persons who are members of groups that have 
traditionally been underrepresented based on race, color, national 
origin, gender, age, or disability.
    (d) Adequacy of resources. (Maximum 5 points)
    (1) The Secretary considers the adequacy of the resources for the 
proposed project.
    (2) In determining the adequacy of resources for the proposed 
project, the Secretary considers the adequacy of support, including 
facilities, equipment, supplies, and other resources, from the 
applicant organization or the lead applicant organization.
    (e) Quality of the management plan. (Maximum 5 points)
    (1) The Secretary considers the quality of the management plan for 
the proposed project.
    (2) In determining the quality of the management plan for the 
proposed project, the Secretary considers the extent to which the time 
commitments of the project director and principal investigator and 
other key project personnel are appropriate and adequate to meet the 
objectives of the proposed project.
    (f) Quality of the project evaluation. (Maximum 10 points)
    (1) The Secretary considers the quality of the evaluation to be 
conducted of the proposed project.
    (2) In determining the quality of the evaluation, the Secretary 
considers the following factors:
    (i) The extent to which the methods of evaluation are thorough, 
feasible, and appropriate to the goals, objectives, and outcomes of the 
proposed project. (up to 5 points)
    (ii) The extent to which the methods of evaluation will provide 
performance feedback and permit periodic assessment of progress toward 
achieving intended outcomes. (up to 5 points)
    2. Review and Selection Process: We remind potential applicants 
that in reviewing applications in any discretionary grant competition, 
the Secretary may consider, under 34 CFR 75.217(d)(3), the past 
performance of the applicant in carrying out a previous award, such as 
the applicant's use of funds, achievement of project objectives, and 
compliance with grant conditions. The Secretary may also consider 
whether the applicant failed to submit a timely performance report or 
submitted a report of unacceptable quality.
    In addition, in making a competitive grant award, the Secretary 
requires various assurances, including those applicable to Federal 
civil rights laws that prohibit discrimination in programs or 
activities receiving Federal financial assistance from the Department 
(34 CFR 100.4, 104.5, 106.4, 108.8, and 110.23).
    For this competition, a panel of external reviewers will read, 
prepare a written evaluation of, and score all eligible applications 
using the selection criteria and the competitive preference priority, 
if applicable, provided in this notice. The individual scores of the 
reviewers will be added and the sum divided by the number of reviewers 
to determine the peer review score. The Department may use more than 
one tier of reviews in evaluating grantees. The Department will prepare 
a rank order of applications based solely on the evaluation of their 
quality according to the selection criteria and competitive preference 
priority points.
    In the event there are two or more applications with the same final 
score in the rank order listing, and there are insufficient funds to 
fully support each of these applications, the Department will apply the 
following procedure to determine which application or applications will 
receive an award:
    First Tiebreaker: The first tiebreaker will be the highest average 
score for the selection criterion ``Quality of the Project Design.'' If 
a tie remains, the second tiebreaker will be utilized.
    Second Tiebreaker: The second tiebreaker will be the highest 
average score for the selection criterion ``Significance.'' If a tie 
remains, the third tiebreaker will be utilized.
    Third Tiebreaker: The third tiebreaker will be the highest average 
score for the selection criterion ``Project Evaluation.'' If a tie 
remains, the fourth tiebreaker will be utilized.
    Fourth Tiebreaker: The fourth tiebreaker will be the highest 
average score for the competitive preference

[[Page 57887]]

priority. If a tie remains, the fifth tiebreaker will be utilized.
    Fifth Tiebreaker: The fifth tiebreaker will be the consortium with 
the highest percentage of Pell Grant students enrolled at the time of 
application.
    3. Risk Assessment and Specific Conditions: Consistent with 2 CFR 
200.206, before awarding grants under this competition, the Department 
conducts a review of the risks posed by applicants. Under 2 CFR 
200.208, the Secretary may impose specific conditions and, under 2 CFR 
3474.10, in appropriate circumstances, high-risk conditions on a grant 
if the applicant or grantee is not financially stable; has a history of 
unsatisfactory performance; has a financial or other management system 
that does not meet the standards in 2 CFR part 200, subpart D; has not 
fulfilled the conditions of a prior grant; or is otherwise not 
responsible.
    4. Integrity and Performance System: If you are selected under this 
competition to receive an award that over the course of the project 
period may exceed the simplified acquisition threshold (currently 
$250,000), under 2 CFR 200.206(a)(2) we must make a judgement about 
your integrity, business ethics, and record of performance under 
Federal awards--that is, the risk posed by you as an applicant--before 
we make an award. In doing so, we must consider any information about 
you that is in the integrity and performance system (currently referred 
to as the Federal Awardee Performance and Integrity Information System 
(FAPIIS)), accessible through the System for Award Management. You may 
review and comment on any information about yourself that a Federal 
agency previously entered and that is currently in FAPIIS.
    Please note that, if the total value of your currently active 
grants, cooperative agreements, and procurement contracts from the 
Federal Government exceeds $10,000,000, the reporting requirements in 2 
CFR part 200, appendix XII, require you to report certain integrity 
information to FAPIIS semiannually. Please review the requirements in 2 
CFR part 200, appendix XII, if this grant plus all the other Federal 
funds you receive exceed $10,000,000.
    5. In General: In accordance with the Office of Management and 
Budget's guidance located at 2 CFR part 200, all applicable Federal 
laws, and relevant Executive guidance, the Department will review and 
consider applications for funding pursuant to this notice inviting 
applications in accordance with:
    (a) Selecting recipients most likely to be successful in delivering 
results based on the program objectives through an objective process of 
evaluating Federal award applications (2 CFR 200.205);
    (b) Prohibiting the purchase of certain telecommunication and video 
surveillance services or equipment in alignment with section 889 of the 
National Defense Authorization Act of 2019 (Pub. L. 115-232) (2 CFR 
200.216);
    (c) Providing a preference, to the extent permitted by law, to 
maximize use of goods, products, and materials produced in the United 
States (2 CFR 200.322); and
    (d) Terminating agreements in whole or in part to the greatest 
extent authorized by law if an award no longer effectuates the program 
goals or agency priorities (2 CFR 200.340).

VI. Award Administration Information

    1. Award Notices: If your application is successful, we notify your 
U.S. Representative and U.S. Senators and send you a Grant Award 
Notification (GAN); or we may send you an email containing a link to 
access an electronic version of your GAN. We may notify you informally, 
also.
    If your application is not evaluated or not selected for funding, 
we notify you.
    2. Administrative and National Policy Requirements: We identify 
administrative and national policy requirements in the application 
package and reference these and other requirements in the Applicable 
Regulations section of this notice.
    We reference the regulations outlining the terms and conditions of 
an award in the Applicable Regulations section of this notice and 
include these and other specific conditions in the GAN. The GAN also 
incorporates your approved application as part of your binding 
commitments under the grant.
    3. Open Licensing Requirements: Unless an exception applies, if you 
are awarded a grant under this competition, you will be required to 
openly license to the public grant deliverables created in whole, or in 
part, with Department grant funds. When the deliverable consists of 
modifications to pre-existing works, the license extends only to those 
modifications that can be separately identified and only to the extent 
that open licensing is permitted under the terms of any licenses or 
other legal restrictions on the use of pre-existing works. 
Additionally, a grantee or subgrantee that is awarded competitive grant 
funds must have a plan to disseminate these public grant deliverables. 
This dissemination plan can be developed and submitted after your 
application has been reviewed and selected for funding. For additional 
information on the open licensing requirements please refer to 2 CFR 
3474.20.
    4. Reporting: (a) If you apply for a grant under this competition, 
you must ensure that you have in place the necessary processes and 
systems to comply with the reporting requirements in 2 CFR part 170 
should you receive funding under the competition. This does not apply 
if you have an exception under 2 CFR 170.110(b).
    (b) At the end of your project period, you must submit a final 
performance report, including financial information, as directed by the 
Secretary. If you receive a multiyear award, you must submit an annual 
performance report that provides the most current performance and 
financial expenditure information as directed by the Secretary under 34 
CFR 75.118. The Secretary may also require more frequent performance 
reports under 34 CFR 75.720(c). For specific requirements on reporting, 
please go to www.ed.gov/fund/grant/apply/appforms/appforms.html.
    5. Performance Measures: For purposes of Department reporting under 
34 CFR 75.110, the Department will use the following performance 
measures to evaluate the success of the CESC grant program:
    (a) The number and percentage of underrepresented students served 
by the project.
    (b) The number and percentage of students placed in paid job-
embedded experiences in the spatial computing sector.
    6. Continuation Awards: In making a continuation award under 34 CFR 
75.253, the Secretary considers, among other things: whether a grantee 
has made substantial progress in achieving the goals and objectives of 
the project; whether the grantee has expended funds in a manner that is 
consistent with its approved application and budget; and, if the 
Secretary has established performance measurement requirements, whether 
the grantee has made substantial progress in achieving the performance 
targets in the grantee's approved application.
    In making a continuation award, the Secretary also considers 
whether the grantee is operating in compliance with the assurances in 
its approved application, including those applicable to Federal civil 
rights laws that prohibit discrimination in programs or activities 
receiving Federal financial assistance from the Department (34 CFR 
100.4, 104.5, 106.4, 108.8, and 110.23).

[[Page 57888]]

VII. Other Information

    Accessible Format: On request to the program contact person listed 
under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT, individuals with disabilities 
can obtain this document and a copy of the application package in an 
accessible format. The Department will provide the requestor with an 
accessible format that may include Rich Text Format (RTF) or text 
format (txt), a thumb drive, an MP3 file, braille, large print, 
audiotape, or compact disc, or other accessible format.
    Electronic Access to This Document: The official version of this 
document is the document published in the Federal Register. You may 
access the official edition of the Federal Register and the Code of 
Federal Regulations at www.govinfo.gov. At this site you can view this 
document, as well as all other documents of this Department published 
in the Federal Register, in text or Portable Document Format (PDF). To 
use PDF you must have Adobe Acrobat Reader, which is available free at 
the site.
    You may also access documents of the Department published in the 
Federal Register by using the article search feature at 
www.federalregister.gov. Specifically, through the advanced search 
feature at this site, you can limit your search to documents published 
by the Department.

Nasser H. Paydar,
Assistant Secretary for Postsecondary Education.
[FR Doc. 2022-20474 Filed 9-21-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4000-01-P