[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 183 (Thursday, September 22, 2022)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 57836-57838]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-20137]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[EPA-R09-OAR-2021-0943; FRL-9372-02-R9]


Air Plan Limited Approval and Limited Disapproval; California; 
South Coast Air Quality Management District; Refinery Flares

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is finalizing a 
limited approval and limited disapproval of revisions to the South 
Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) portion of the 
California State Implementation Plan (SIP). These revisions concern 
emissions of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) and oxides of nitrogen 
(NOX) from refinery flares. Under the authority of the Clean 
Air Act (CAA or the Act), this action simultaneously approves a local 
rule that regulates these emission sources and directs California to 
correct rule deficiencies.

DATES: This rule will be effective on October 24, 2022.

ADDRESSES: The EPA has established a docket for this action under 
Docket No. EPA-R09-OAR-2021-0943. All documents in the docket are 
listed on the https://www.regulations.gov website. Although listed in 
the index, some information is not publicly available, e.g., 
Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information whose 
disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain other material, such as 
copyrighted material, is not placed on the internet and will be 
publicly available only in hard copy form. Publicly available docket 
materials are available through https://www.regulations.gov, or please 
contact the person identified in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT 
section for additional availability information. If you need assistance 
in a language other than English or if you are a person with 
disabilities who needs a reasonable accommodation at no cost to you, 
please contact the person identified in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION 
CONTACT section.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Donnique Sherman, EPA Region IX, 75 
Hawthorne St., San Francisco, CA 94105. By phone: (415) 947-4129 or by 
email at [email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document, ``we,'' ``us'' and 
``our'' refer to the EPA.

Table of Contents

I. Proposed Action
II. Public Comments and EPA Responses
III. EPA Action
IV. Incorporation by Reference
V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

I. Proposed Action

    On March 25, 2022 (87 FR 17060), the EPA proposed a limited 
approval and limited disapproval of the following rule that was 
submitted for incorporation into the California SIP.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Local agency                  Rule No.            Rule title             Amended        Submitted
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SCAQMD................................            1118  Control of Emissions          07/07/2017      02/16/2018
                                                         from Refinery Flares.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    SC Rule 1118 is designed to decrease volatile organic compound 
(VOC), sulfur oxide, and nitrogen oxide emissions from industries such 
as petroleum refineries, sulfur recovery plants, and hydrogen 
production plants. The revisions to this rule include adoption of the 
requirements for refinery flares from the final rule of the

[[Page 57837]]

2015 EPA Refinery Rule, updated emission factors based on AP-42 
guidance, and clarified reporting requirements.
    We proposed a limited approval because we determined that this rule 
improves the SIP and is largely consistent with the relevant CAA 
requirements. We simultaneously proposed a limited disapproval because 
Rule 1118 Section (j) does not satisfy the requirements of CAA section 
110 and part D of the Act. As described in our proposal, documents 
submitted for inclusion into the SIP should not include unbounded 
director's discretion that allows the State to approve alternatives to 
the applicable SIP without following the SIP revision process described 
in CAA section 110. Rule 1118 Section (j) provides the Executive 
Officer the authority to approve other American Society for Testing and 
Materials (ASTM) methods other than those currently included in the 
rule. Without further specificity regarding how this authority will be 
exercised, it could functionally allow for a revision of the SIP 
without complying with the process for SIP revisions required by the 
CAA. As a result, this undermines the enforceability of the submission, 
constitutes a SIP deficiency, and conflicts with CAA Section 110.
    Our proposed action contains more information on the basis for this 
rulemaking and on our evaluation of the submittal.

II. Public Comments and EPA Responses

    The EPA's proposed action provided a 30-day public comment period. 
During this period, we received no comments.

III. EPA Action

    No comments were submitted. Therefore, as authorized in sections 
110(k)(3) and 301(a) of the Act, the EPA is finalizing a limited 
approval of the submitted rule. This action incorporates the submitted 
rule into the California SIP, including those provisions identified as 
deficient. As authorized under section 110(k)(3) and 301(a), the EPA is 
simultaneously finalizing a limited disapproval of SCAQMD Rule 1118.
    As a result, the EPA must promulgate a federal implementation plan 
(FIP) under section 110(c) unless we approve subsequent SIP revisions 
that correct the rule deficiencies within 24 months. In addition, the 
offset sanction in CAA section 179(b)(2) will be imposed 18 months 
after the effective date of this action, and the highway funding 
sanction in CAA section 179(b)(1) six months after the offset sanction 
is imposed. A sanction will not be imposed if the EPA determines that a 
subsequent SIP submission corrects the identified deficiencies before 
the applicable deadlines.

IV. Incorporation by Reference

    In this rule, the EPA is finalizing regulatory text that includes 
incorporation by reference. In accordance with requirements of 1 CFR 
51.5, the EPA is finalizing the incorporation by reference of South 
Coast Air Quality Management District Rule 1118 as described in Section 
I of this preamble and set for below in the amendments to 40 CFR part 
52. The EPA has made, and will continue to make, these documents 
available through www.regulations.gov and at the EPA Region IX Office 
(please contact the person identified in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION 
CONTACT section of this preamble for more information).

V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

    Additional information about these statutes and Executive orders 
can be found at http://www.epa.gov/laws-regulations/laws-and-executive-orders.

A. Executive Order 12866: Regulatory Planning and Review and Executive 
Order 13563: Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review

    This action is not a significant regulatory action and was 
therefore not submitted to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) 
for review.

B. Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA)

    This action does not impose an information collection burden under 
the PRA because this action does not impose additional requirements 
beyond those imposed by state law.

C. Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA)

    I certify that this action will not have a significant economic 
impact on a substantial number of small entities under the RFA. This 
action will not impose any requirements on small entities beyond those 
imposed by state law.

D. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act (UMRA)

    This action does not contain any unfunded mandate as described in 
UMRA, 2 U.S.C. 1531-1538, and does not significantly or uniquely affect 
small governments. This action does not impose additional requirements 
beyond those imposed by state law. Accordingly, no additional costs to 
State, local, or tribal governments, or to the private sector, will 
result from this action.

E. Executive Order 13132: Federalism

    This action does not have federalism implications. It will not have 
substantial direct effects on the states, on the relationship between 
the National Government and the states, or on the distribution of power 
and responsibilities among the various levels of government.

F. Executive Order 13175: Coordination With Indian Tribal Governments

    This action does not have tribal implications, as specified in 
Executive Order 13175, because the SIP is not approved to apply on any 
Indian reservation land or in any other area where the EPA or an Indian 
tribe has demonstrated that a tribe has jurisdiction, and will not 
impose substantial direct costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal 
law. Thus, Executive Order 13175 does not apply to this action.

G. Executive Order 13045: Protection of Children From Environmental 
Health Risks and Safety Risks

    The EPA interprets Executive Order 13045 as applying only to those 
regulatory actions that concern environmental health or safety risks 
that the EPA has reason to believe may disproportionately affect 
children, per the definition of ``covered regulatory action'' in 
section 2-202 of the Executive order. This action is not subject to 
Executive Order 13045 because it does not impose additional 
requirements beyond those imposed by state law.

H. Executive Order 13211: Actions That Significantly Affect Energy 
Supply, Distribution, or Use

    This action is not subject to Executive Order 13211, because it is 
not a significant regulatory action under Executive Order 12866.

I. National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act (NTTAA)

    Section 12(d) of the NTTAA directs the EPA to use voluntary 
consensus standards in its regulatory activities unless to do so would 
be inconsistent with applicable law or otherwise impractical. The EPA 
believes that this action is not subject to the requirements of section 
12(d) of the NTTAA because application of those requirements would be 
inconsistent with the CAA.

[[Page 57838]]

J. Executive Order 12898: Federal Actions To Address Environmental 
Justice in Minority Populations and Low-Income Populations

    The state did not evaluate environmental justice considerations as 
part of its SIP submittal. There is no information in the record 
inconsistent with the stated goals of E.O. 12898 of achieving 
environmental justice for people of color, low-income populations, and 
indigenous peoples.

K. Congressional Review Act (CRA)

    This action is subject to the CRA, and the EPA will submit a rule 
report to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of 
the United States. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 
U.S.C. 804(2).

L. Petitions for Judicial Review

    Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean Air Act, petitions for 
judicial review of this action must be filed in the United States Court 
of Appeals for the appropriate circuit by November 21, 2022. Filing a 
petition for reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule 
does not affect the finality of this rule for the purposes of judicial 
review nor does it extend the time within which a petition for judicial 
review may be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such 
rule or action. This action may not be challenged later in proceedings 
to enforce its requirements (see section 307(b)(2)).

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52

    Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by 
reference, Intergovernmental relations, Nitrogen oxides, Ozone, 
Particulate matter, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Volatile 
organic compounds.

    Dated: September 12, 2022.
Martha Guzman Aceves,
Regional Administrator, Region IX.

    For the reasons stated in the preamble, the Environmental 
Protection Agency amends part 52, chapter I, title 40 of the Code of 
Federal Regulations as follows:

PART 52--APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF IMPLEMENTATION PLANS

0
1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.

Subpart F--California

0
2. Section 52.220 is amended by adding paragraphs (c)(347)(i)(B)(3) and 
(c)(586) to read as follows:


Sec.  52.220  Identification of plan-in part.

* * * * *
    (c) * * *
    (347) * * *
    (i) * * *
    (B) * * *
    (3) Previously approved on August 28, 2007, in paragraph 
(c)(347)(i)(B)(1) of this section and now deleted with replacement in 
paragraph (c)(586)(i)(A)(1) of this section, Rule 1118 adopted February 
13, 1998, and amended November 4, 2005.
* * * * *
    (586) An amended regulation for the following agency was submitted 
on February 16, 2018, by the Governor's designee as an attachment to a 
letter dated February 7, 2018.
    (i) Incorporation by reference. (A) South Coast Air Quality 
Management District.
    (1) Rule 1118, ``Control of Emissions from Refinery Flares,'' 
amended on July 7, 2017.
    (2) [Reserved]
    (B) [Reserved]
    (ii) [Reserved]
[FR Doc. 2022-20137 Filed 9-21-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P