[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 125 (Thursday, June 30, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Pages 39074-39079]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-13987]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION


Applications for New Awards; Modeling and Simulation Program

AGENCY: Office of Postsecondary Education, Department of Education.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of Education is issuing a notice inviting 
applications for new awards for fiscal year (FY) 2022 for the Modeling 
and Simulation Program (MSP), Assistance Listing Number 84.116S. This 
notice relates to the approved information collection under OMB control 
number 1894-0006.

DATES: 
    Applications Available: June 30, 2022.
    Deadline for Transmittal of Applications: August 15, 2022.
    Deadline for Intergovernmental Review: October 13, 2022.

ADDRESSES: For the addresses for obtaining and submitting an 
application, please refer to our Common Instructions for Applicants to 
Department of Education Discretionary Grant Programs, published in the 
Federal Register on December 27, 2021 (86 FR 73264) and available at 
www.federalregister.gov/d/2021-27979. Please note that these Common 
Instructions supersede the version published on February 13, 2019, and, 
in part, describe the transition from the requirement to register in 
SAM.gov a Data Universal Numbering System (DUNS) number to the 
implementation of the Unique Entity Identifier (UEI). More information 
on the phase-out of DUNS numbers is available at https://www2.ed.gov/about/offices/list/ofo/docs/unique-entity-identifier-transition-fact-sheet.pdf.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Robin M. Dabney, U.S. Department of 
Education, 400 Maryland Avenue SW, Room 2B117, Washington, DC 20202-
4260. Telephone: (202) 453-7908. Email: [email protected].
    If you are deaf, hard of hearing, or have a speech disability and 
wish to access telecommunications relay services, please dial 7-1-1.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Full Text of Announcement

I. Funding Opportunity Description

    Purpose of Program: The MSP is designed to promote the study of 
modeling and simulation at institutions of higher education (IHEs) by 
promoting the enhancement or development of modeling and simulation 
degree and certificate programs. Additionally, through this program, 
the Department will create a task force that will include successful 
grantees and other content experts to raise awareness and help further 
define the study of modeling and simulation.
    Background: Modeling and simulation programs utilize simulated 
interactive models of real world scenarios to improve experiential 
learning in the classroom. According to House Report 117-96, which 
accompanied the FY 2022 appropriations bill for the Departments of 
Labor, Health and Human Services, Education, and related agencies,

[[Page 39075]]

``modeling and simulation technology has numerous applications for 
Federal and State governments and their partners in the defense, 
education, gaming, shipbuilding, and workforce training sectors, 
allowing them to generate data to help make decisions or predictions 
about their systems.'' \1\ These technologies aid in the development of 
tools or techniques in numerous industries where real world education 
and training for high-risk or dangerous situations are not realistic. 
This program seeks to fund the development or enhancement of 
certificate and degree programs focused on modeling and simulation. 
Through grant support, we hope to increase the availability and 
capacity of such certificate and degree programs in the field of 
modeling and simulation. In FY 2021, the Department provided funding to 
five IHEs to develop and enhance degree programs in this field. Given 
the additional funding for this program in FY 2022, the Department will 
fund additional applicants to expand opportunities for students who are 
interested in pursuing this type of degree program.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ H. Rept. 117-96 at p. 303 (2022).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In addition, the MSP includes a task force to provide input into 
the development of curriculum and research on the instructional methods 
and pedagogy needed to further develop modeling and simulation 
programs. Applicants funded under this program will be members of the 
task force and should include funding requests in their budgets for 
activities associated with task force membership, in addition to the 
amount requested for program implementation. In accordance with section 
891(b)(1) of the Higher Education Act of 1965, as amended (HEA), the 
activities of the task force will include helping to define the study 
of modeling and simulation (including the content of modeling and 
simulation classes and programs), identifying best practices for such 
study, identifying core knowledge and skills that individuals who 
participate in modeling and simulation programs should acquire, and 
providing recommendations to the Secretary on these topics and on 
grants distribution. The budget for participation in the task force 
should be included in the budget narrative and should include travel 
for at least two or three grantee representatives for two or three in-
person meetings and/or site visits to organizations using modeling and 
simulation technologies to help expand awareness. Budgets should also 
include costs related to the development of white papers or other 
resources so that grantees can share the knowledge gained through their 
funded programs, as well as other lessons learned from the task force 
convenings.
    Priorities: This notice contains two absolute priorities and one 
competitive preference priority. Applicants may only apply under one of 
the two absolute priorities. In accordance with 34 CFR 75.105(b)(2)(v), 
the absolute priorities are from the authorizing statute (section 891 
of the HEA, 20 U.S.C. 1161v). The competitive preference priority is 
from the Secretary's Supplemental Priorities and Definitions for 
Discretionary Grants Programs, published in the Federal Register on 
December 10, 2021 (86 FR 70612) (Supplemental Priorities).
    Absolute Priorities: These priorities are absolute priorities. 
Under 34 CFR 75.105(c)(3), we consider only applications that meet one 
of these priorities. Applicants must specify which absolute priority 
they are responding to in their application abstract.
    These priorities are:
    Absolute Priority 1--Enhancing Modeling and Simulation at 
Institutions of Higher Education.
    To be considered for a grant under this absolute priority, an 
eligible institution must include in its application--
    (a) A letter from the president or provost of the eligible 
institution that demonstrates the institution's commitment to the 
enhancement of the modeling and simulation program at the institution 
of higher education;
    (b) An identification of designated faculty responsible for the 
enhancement of the institution's modeling and simulation program;
    (c) A detailed plan for how the grant funds will be used to enhance 
a modeling and simulation program of the institution; and
    (d) Evidence that the institution has an established modeling and 
simulation degree program, including a major, minor, or career-track 
program; or has an established modeling and simulation certificate or 
concentration program.
    Absolute Priority 2--Establishing Modeling and Simulation Programs.
    To be considered for a grant under this absolute priority, an 
eligible institution must include in its application--
    (a) A letter from the president or provost of the eligible 
institution that demonstrates the institution's commitment to the 
establishment of a modeling and simulation program at the institution 
of higher education;
    (b) A detailed plan for how the grant funds will be used to 
establish a modeling and simulation program at the institution; and
    (c) A description of how the modeling and simulation program 
established under this priority will complement existing programs and 
fit into the institution's current program and course offerings.
    Competitive Preference Priority: For FY 2022 and any subsequent 
year in which we make awards from the list of unfunded applications 
from this competition, this priority is a competitive preference 
priority. Under 34 CFR 75.105(c)(2)(i), we award up to an additional 3 
points to an application, depending on how well the application meets 
this priority.
    This priority is:
    Competitive Preference Priority--Promoting Equity in Student Access 
to Educational Resources and Opportunities (up to 3 points).
    Under this priority, an application must demonstrate that the 
project will be implemented by or in partnership with one or more of 
the following entities:
    (a) Community colleges (as defined in this notice).
    (b) Historically Black colleges and universities (as defined in 
this notice).
    (c) Tribal Colleges and Universities (as defined in this notice).
    (d) Minority-serving institutions (as defined in this notice).
    Definitions: The definition of ``modeling and simulation'' is from 
section 891 of the HEA. The definitions of ``community college,'' 
``Historically Black colleges and universities,'' ``Minority-serving 
institution,'' and ``Tribal College or University,'' are from the 
Supplemental Priorities. The remaining definitions are from 34 CFR 
77.1.
    Community college means ``junior or community college'' as defined 
in section 312(f) of the HEA.
    Demonstrates a rationale means a key project component included in 
the project's logic model is informed by research or evaluation 
findings that suggest the project component is likely to improve 
relevant outcomes.
    Historically Black colleges and universities means colleges and 
universities that meet the criteria set out in 34 CFR 608.2.
    Logic model (also referred to as a theory of action) means a 
framework that identifies key project components of the proposed 
project (i.e., the active ``ingredients'' that are hypothesized to be 
critical to achieving the relevant outcomes) and describes the 
theoretical and operational relationships among the

[[Page 39076]]

key project components and relevant outcomes.
    Note: In developing logic models, applicants may want to use 
resources such as the Regional Educational Laboratory Program's (REL 
Pacific) Education Logic Model Application, available at https://ies.ed.gov/ncee/edlabs/regions/pacific/elm.asp. Other sources include: 
https://ies.ed.gov/ncee/edlabs/regions/pacific/pdf/REL_2014025.pdf, 
https://ies.ed.gov/ncee/edlabs/regions/pacific/pdf/REL_2014007.pdf, and 
https://ies.ed.gov/ncee/edlabs/regions/northeast/pdf/REL_2015057.pdf.
    Minority-serving institution means an institution that is eligible 
to receive assistance under sections 316 through 320 of part A of title 
III, under part B of title III, or under title V of the HEA.
    Modeling and simulation means a field of study related to the 
application of computer science and mathematics to develop a level of 
understanding of the interaction of the parts of a system and of a 
system as a whole.
    Project component means an activity, strategy, intervention, 
process, product, practice, or policy included in a project. Evidence 
may pertain to an individual project component or to a combination of 
project components (e.g., training teachers on instructional practices 
for English learners and follow-on coaching for these teachers).
    Relevant outcome means the student outcome(s) or other outcome(s) 
the key project component is designed to improve, consistent with the 
specific goals of the program.
    Tribal College or University has the meaning ascribed it in section 
316(b)(3) of the HEA.
    Program Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1161v; 20 U.S.C. 1138-1138d; and the 
Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2022 (Pub. L. 117-103).
    Note: Projects will be awarded and must be operated in a manner 
consistent with the nondiscrimination requirements contained in Federal 
civil rights laws.
    Applicable Regulations: (a) The Education Department General 
Administrative Regulations in 34 CFR parts 75, 77, 79, 82, 84, 86, 97, 
98, and 99. (b) The Office of Management and Budget Guidelines to 
Agencies on Governmentwide Debarment and Suspension (Nonprocurement) in 
2 CFR part 180, as adopted and amended as regulations of the Department 
in 2 CFR part 3485. (c) The Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost 
Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards in 2 CFR part 
200, as adopted and amended as regulations of the Department in 2 CFR 
part 3474. (d) The Supplemental Priorities.

II. Award Information

    Type of Award: Discretionary grant.
    Estimated Available Funds: $7,920,000. Approximately 50 percent of 
available funds will be used to fund awards under Absolute Priority 1, 
and approximately 50 percent of available funds will be used to fund 
awards under Absolute Priority 2.
    Contingent upon the availability of funds and the quality of 
applications, we may make additional awards in subsequent years from 
the list of unfunded applications from this competition.
    Estimated Range of Awards: $750,000 to $1,155,000.
    Estimated Average Size of Awards: $866,250.
    Maximum Award: We will not make an award exceeding $1,155,000 for 
the entire project period of 36 months.
    Note: Applicants should set aside sufficient funds to carry out 
activities related to task force participation. A listing of line-item 
costs associated with task force activities must include travel for at 
least two or three grantee representatives for two or three annual 
meetings to be held in Washington, DC, and/or site visits to 
organizations using modeling and simulation technologies to help expand 
awareness, and costs associated with a white paper outlining lessons 
learned from the enhanced or established modeling and simulation 
program.
    Estimated Number of Awards: 6-9.
    Note: The Department is not bound by any estimates in this notice.
    Project Period: Up to 36 months.

III. Eligibility Information

    1. Eligible Applicants: A public or private nonprofit institution 
of higher education, as defined in section 101(a) of the HEA.
    2. a. Cost Sharing or Matching: In accordance with the requirements 
in section 891(c)(1)(D) and (d)(1)(D) of the HEA, each eligible 
institution receiving a grant under this program must provide, from 
non-Federal sources, in cash or in-kind, an amount equal to 25 percent 
of the amount of the grant to carry out the activities supported by the 
grant.
    b. Indirect Cost Rate Information: This program uses an 
unrestricted indirect cost rate. For more information regarding 
indirect costs, or to obtain a negotiated indirect cost rate, please 
see www2.ed.gov/about/offices/list/ocfo/intro.html.
    c. Administrative Cost Limitation: This program does not include 
any program-specific limitation on administrative expenses. All 
administrative expenses must be reasonable and necessary and conform to 
Cost Principles described in 2 CFR part 200 subpart E of the Uniform 
Guidance.
    3. Subgrantees: A grantee under this competition may not award 
subgrants to entities to directly carry out project activities 
described in its application.

IV. Application and Submission Information

    1. Application Submission Instructions: Applicants are required to 
follow the Common Instructions for Applicants to Department of 
Education Discretionary Grant Programs, published in the Federal 
Register on December 27, 2021 (86 FR 73264) and available at 
www.federalregister.gov/d/2021-27979, which contain requirements and 
information on how to submit an application. Please note that these 
Common Instructions supersede the version published on February 13, 
2019, and, in part, describe the transition from the requirement to 
register in SAM.gov a DUNS number to the implementation of the UEI. 
More information on the phase-out of DUNS numbers is available at 
https://www2.ed.gov/about/offices/list/ofo/docs/unique-entity-identifier-transition-fact-sheet.pdf.
    2. Submission of Proprietary Information: Given the types of 
projects that may be proposed in applications for the Modeling and 
Simulation Program, your application may include business information 
that you consider proprietary. In 34 CFR 5.11 we define ``business 
information'' and describe the process we use in determining whether 
any of that information is proprietary and, thus, protected from 
disclosure under Exemption 4 of the Freedom of Information Act (5 
U.S.C. 552, as amended). Because we plan to make successful 
applications available to the public, you may wish to request 
confidentiality of business information.
    Consistent with Executive Order 12600, please designate in your 
application any information you believe is exempt from disclosure under 
Exemption 4. In the appropriate Appendix section of your application 
under ``Other Attachments Form,'' please list the page number or 
numbers on which we can find this information. For additional 
information please see 34 CFR 5.11(c).
    3. Intergovernmental Review: This competition is subject to 
Executive Order 12372 and the regulations in 34 CFR part 79. 
Information about Intergovernmental Review of Federal

[[Page 39077]]

Programs under Executive Order 12372 is in the application package for 
this competition.
    4. Funding Restrictions: In accordance with section 891(d)(3) of 
the HEA, a grant awarded under Absolute Priority 1, Enhancing Modeling 
and Simulation at IHEs, must be used by an eligible institution to 
enhance modeling and simulation programs at the institution, which may 
include--
    (a) Expanding the multidisciplinary nature of the institution's 
modeling and simulation programs;
    (b) Recruiting students into the field of modeling and simulation 
through the provision of fellowships or assistantships;
    (c) Creating new courses to complement existing courses and reflect 
emerging developments in the modeling and simulation field;
    (d) Conducting research to support new methodologies and techniques 
in modeling and simulation; and
    (e) Purchasing equipment necessary for modeling and simulation 
programs.
    In accordance with section 891(d)(3) of the HEA, a grant awarded 
under Absolute Priority 2, Establishing Modeling and Simulation at 
IHEs, must be used by an eligible institution to establish modeling and 
simulation programs at the institution, which may include--
    (a) Establishing, or working toward the establishment of, a 
modeling and simulation program, including a major, minor, career-
track, certificate, or concentration program at the eligible 
institution;
    (b) Providing adequate staffing to ensure the successful 
establishment of the modeling and simulation program, which may include 
the assignment of full-time dedicated or supportive faculty; and
    (c) Purchasing equipment necessary for modeling and simulation 
programs.
    We reference additional regulations outlining funding restrictions 
in the Applicable Regulations section of this notice.
    5. Recommended Page Limit: The application narrative is where you, 
the applicant, address the selection criteria that reviewers use to 
evaluate your application. We recommend that you (1) limit the 
application narrative to no more than 50 pages and (2) use the 
following standards:
     A ``page'' is 8.5'' x 11'', on one side only, with 1'' 
margins at the top, bottom, and both sides.
     Double-space (no more than three lines per vertical inch) 
all text in the application narrative, including titles, headings, 
footnotes, quotations, references, and captions, as well as all text in 
charts, tables, figures, and graphs.
     Use a font that is either 12 point or larger, and no 
smaller than 10 pitch (characters per inch).
     Use one of the following fonts: Times New Roman, Courier, 
Courier New, or Arial.
    The recommended page limit applies to the application narrative, 
which is your complete response to the selection criteria and any 
response to the competitive preference priority. However, the 
recommended page limit does not apply to the cover sheet; the budget 
section, including the narrative budget justification; the assurances 
and certifications; or the one-page abstract, the resumes, the 
bibliography, or the letters of support.

V. Application Review Information

    1. Selection Criteria: The selection criteria for this competition 
are from 34 CFR 75.210. The points assigned to each criterion are 
indicated in parentheses next to the criterion. An application may earn 
up to a total of 100 points based on the selection criteria. 
Applications may receive up to 3 additional points under the 
competitive preference priority, for a total score of up to 103 points. 
All applications will be evaluated based on the selection criteria as 
follows:
    (a) Significance. (Maximum 25 points)
    (1) The Secretary considers the significance of the proposed 
project.
    (2) In determining the significance of the proposed project, the 
Secretary considers the following factors:
    (i) The extent to which the proposed project is likely to yield 
findings that may be utilized by other appropriate agencies and 
organizations. (up to 5 points)
    (ii) The extent to which the proposed project involves the 
development or demonstration of promising new strategies that build on, 
or are alternatives to, existing strategies. (up to 10 points)
    (iii) The extent to which the results of the proposed project are 
to be disseminated in ways that will enable others to use the 
information or strategies. (up to 10 points)
    (b) Quality of the project design. (Maximum 50 points)
    (1) The Secretary considers the quality of the design of the 
proposed project.
    (2) In determining the quality of the design of the proposed 
project, the Secretary considers the following factors:
    (i) The extent to which there is a conceptual framework underlying 
the proposed research or demonstration activities and the quality of 
that framework. (up to 10 points)
    (ii) The extent to which the proposed activities constitute a 
coherent, sustained program of training in the field. (up to 10 points)
    (iii) The extent to which the proposed project is designed to build 
capacity and yield results that will extend beyond the period of 
Federal financial assistance. (up to 10 points)
    (iv) The extent to which the proposed project represents an 
exceptional approach to the priorities established for the competition. 
(up to 10 points)
    (v) The extent to which the proposed project demonstrates a 
rationale (as defined in this notice). (up to 10 points)
    (c) Quality of project personnel. (Maximum 5 points)
    (1) The Secretary considers the quality of the personnel who will 
carry out the proposed project.
    (2) In determining the quality of project personnel, the Secretary 
considers the extent to which the applicant encourages applications for 
employment from persons who are members of groups that have 
traditionally been underrepresented based on race, color, national 
origin, gender, age, or disability. (up to 2 points)
    (3) In addition, the Secretary considers the qualifications, 
including relevant training and experience, of the project director or 
principal investigator. (up to 3 points)
    (d) Adequacy of resources. (Maximum 5 points)
    (1) The Secretary considers the adequacy of the resources for the 
proposed project.
    (2) In determining the adequacy of resources for the proposed 
project, the Secretary considers the adequacy of support, including 
facilities, equipment, supplies, and other resources, from the 
applicant organization or the lead applicant organization.
    (e) Quality of the management plan. (Maximum 5 points)
    (1) The Secretary considers the quality of the management plan for 
the proposed project.
    (2) In determining the quality of the management plan for the 
proposed project, the Secretary considers the extent to which the time 
commitments of the project director and principal investigator and 
other key project personnel are appropriate and adequate to meet the 
objectives of the proposed project.
    (f) Quality of the project evaluation. (Maximum 10 points)
    (1) The Secretary considers the quality of the evaluation to be 
conducted of the proposed project.

[[Page 39078]]

    (2) In determining the quality of the evaluation, the Secretary 
considers the following factors:
    (i) The extent to which the methods of evaluation are thorough, 
feasible, and appropriate to the goals, objectives, and outcomes of the 
proposed project. (up to 5 points)
    (ii) The extent to which the methods of evaluation will provide 
performance feedback and permit periodic assessment of progress toward 
achieving intended outcomes. (up to 5 points)
    2. Review and Selection Process: We remind potential applicants 
that in reviewing applications in any discretionary grant competition, 
the Secretary may consider, under 34 CFR 75.217(d)(3), the past 
performance of the applicant in carrying out a previous award, such as 
the applicant's use of funds, achievement of project objectives, and 
compliance with grant conditions. The Secretary may also consider 
whether the applicant failed to submit a timely performance report or 
submitted a report of unacceptable quality.
    In addition, in making a competitive grant award, the Secretary 
requires various assurances, including those applicable to Federal 
civil rights laws that prohibit discrimination in programs or 
activities receiving Federal financial assistance from the Department 
(34 CFR 100.4, 104.5, 106.4, 108.8, and 110.23).
    For this competition, a panel of external reviewers will read, 
prepare a written evaluation of, and score all eligible applications 
using the selection criteria and the competitive preference priority, 
if applicable, provided in this notice. The individual scores of the 
reviewers will be added and the sum divided by the number of reviewers 
to determine the peer review score. The Department may use more than 
one tier of reviews in evaluating grantees. The Department will prepare 
a rank order of applications based solely on the evaluation of their 
quality according to the selection criteria and competitive preference 
priority points.
    In the event there are two or more applications with the same final 
score in the rank order listing, and there are insufficient funds to 
fully support each of these applications, the Department will apply the 
following procedure to determine which application or applications will 
receive an award:
    First Tiebreaker: The first tiebreaker will be the highest average 
score for the selection criterion ``Quality of the Project Design.'' If 
a tie remains, the second tiebreaker will be utilized.
    Second Tiebreaker: The second tiebreaker will be the highest 
average score for the selection criterion ``Significance.'' If a tie 
remains, the third tiebreaker will be utilized.
    Third Tiebreaker: The third tiebreaker will be the highest average 
score for the selection criterion ``Project Evaluation.'' If a tie 
remains, the fourth tiebreaker will be utilized.
    Fourth Tiebreaker: The fourth tiebreaker will be the highest 
average score for the competitive preference priority.
    Fifth Tiebreaker: The fifth tiebreaker will be the application that 
proposes to provide the highest non-Federal share percentage, or the 
highest total dollar match if non-Federal share percentages are 
determined to be equal.
    3. Risk Assessment and Specific Conditions: Consistent with 2 CFR 
200.206, before awarding grants under this competition, the Department 
conducts a review of the risks posed by applicants. Under 2 CFR 
200.208, the Secretary may impose specific conditions and, under 2 CFR 
3474.10, in appropriate circumstances, high-risk conditions on a grant 
if the applicant or grantee is not financially stable; has a history of 
unsatisfactory performance; has a financial or other management system 
that does not meet the standards in 2 CFR part 200, subpart D; has not 
fulfilled the conditions of a prior grant; or is otherwise not 
responsible.
    4. Integrity and Performance System: If you are selected under this 
competition to receive an award that over the course of the project 
period may exceed the simplified acquisition threshold (currently 
$250,000), under 2 CFR 200.206(a)(2) we must make a judgement about 
your integrity, business ethics, and record of performance under 
Federal awards--that is, the risk posed by you as an applicant--before 
we make an award. In doing so, we must consider any information about 
you that is in the integrity and performance system (currently referred 
to as the Federal Awardee Performance and Integrity Information System 
(FAPIIS)), accessible through the System for Award Management. You may 
review and comment on any information about yourself that a Federal 
agency previously entered and that is currently in FAPIIS.
    Please note that, if the total value of your currently active 
grants, cooperative agreements, and procurement contracts from the 
Federal Government exceeds $10,000,000, the reporting requirements in 2 
CFR part 200, Appendix XII, require you to report certain integrity 
information to FAPIIS semiannually. Please review the requirements in 2 
CFR part 200, Appendix XII, if this grant plus all the other Federal 
funds you receive exceed $10,000,000.
    5. In General: In accordance with the Office of Management and 
Budget's guidance located at 2 CFR part 200, all applicable Federal 
laws, and relevant Executive guidance, the Department will review and 
consider applications for funding pursuant to this notice inviting 
applications in accordance with:
    (a) Selecting recipients most likely to be successful in delivering 
results based on the program objectives through an objective process of 
evaluating Federal award applications (2 CFR 200.205;
    (b) Prohibiting the purchase of certain telecommunication and video 
surveillance services or equipment in alignment with section 889 of the 
National Defense Authorization Act of 2019 (Pub. L. 115-232) (2 CFR 
200.216);
    (c) Providing a preference, to the extent permitted by law, to 
maximize use of goods, products, and materials produced in the United 
States (2 CFR 200.322); and
    (d) Terminating agreements in whole or in part to the greatest 
extent authorized by law if an award no longer effectuates the program 
goals or agency priorities (2 CFR 200.340).

VI. Award Administration Information

    1. Award Notices: If your application is successful, we notify your 
U.S. Representative and U.S. Senators and send you a Grant Award 
Notification (GAN); or we may send you an email containing a link to 
access an electronic version of your GAN. We may notify you informally, 
also.
    If your application is not evaluated or not selected for funding, 
we notify you.
    2. Administrative and National Policy Requirements: We identify 
administrative and national policy requirements in the application 
package and reference these and other requirements in the Applicable 
Regulations section of this notice.
    We reference the regulations outlining the terms and conditions of 
an award in the Applicable Regulations section of this notice and 
include these and other specific conditions in the GAN. The GAN also 
incorporates your approved application as part of your binding 
commitments under the grant.
    3. Open Licensing Requirements: Unless an exception applies, if you 
are awarded a grant under this competition, you will be required to 
openly license to the public grant deliverables created in whole, or in 
part, with Department grant funds. When the deliverable consists of 
modifications to pre-existing works, the license extends only to those 
modifications that can be separately

[[Page 39079]]

identified and only to the extent that open licensing is permitted 
under the terms of any licenses or other legal restrictions on the use 
of pre-existing works. Additionally, a grantee or subgrantee that is 
awarded competitive grant funds must have a plan to disseminate these 
public grant deliverables. This dissemination plan can be developed and 
submitted after your application has been reviewed and selected for 
funding. For additional information on the open licensing requirements 
please refer to 2 CFR 3474.20.
    4. Reporting: (a) If you apply for a grant under this competition, 
you must ensure that you have in place the necessary processes and 
systems to comply with the reporting requirements in 2 CFR part 170 
should you receive funding under the competition. This does not apply 
if you have an exception under 2 CFR 170.110(b).
    (b) At the end of your project period, you must submit a final 
performance report, including financial information, as directed by the 
Secretary. If you receive a multiyear award, you must submit an annual 
performance report that provides the most current performance and 
financial expenditure information as directed by the Secretary under 34 
CFR 75.118. The Secretary may also require more frequent performance 
reports under 34 CFR 75.720(c). For specific requirements on reporting, 
please go to www.ed.gov/fund/grant/apply/appforms/appforms.html.
    5. Performance Measures: For purposes of Department reporting under 
CFR 75.110, the Department will use the following performance measures 
to evaluate the success of the MSP:
    (a) The number of students enrolled in the established and enhanced 
modeling and simulation programs, including major, minor, career-track, 
certificate, and concentration programs.
    (b) The number of new modeling and simulation courses in 
established and enhanced programs developed under the MSP that reflect 
emerging developments in the modeling and simulation field.
    6. Continuation Awards: In making a continuation award under 34 CFR 
75.253, the Secretary considers, among other things: whether a grantee 
has made substantial progress in achieving the goals and objectives of 
the project; whether the grantee has expended funds in a manner that is 
consistent with its approved application and budget; and, if the 
Secretary has established performance measurement requirements, whether 
the grantee has made substantial progress in achieving the performance 
targets in the grantee's approved application.
    In making a continuation award, the Secretary also considers 
whether the grantee is operating in compliance with the assurances in 
its approved application, including those applicable to Federal civil 
rights laws that prohibit discrimination in programs or activities 
receiving Federal financial assistance from the Department (34 CFR 
100.4, 104.5, 106.4, 108.8, and 110.23).

VII. Other Information

    Accessible Format: On request to the program contact person listed 
under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT, individuals with disabilities 
can obtain this document and a copy of the application package in an 
accessible format. The Department will provide the requestor with an 
accessible format that may include Rich Text Format (RTF) or text 
format (txt), a thumb drive, an MP3 file, braille, large print, 
audiotape, or compact disc, or other accessible format.
    Electronic Access to This Document: The official version of this 
document is the document published in the Federal Register. You may 
access the official edition of the Federal Register and the Code of 
Federal Regulations at www.govinfo.gov. At this site you can view this 
document, as well as all other documents of this Department published 
in the Federal Register, in text or Portable Document Format (PDF). To 
use PDF you must have Adobe Acrobat Reader, which is available free at 
the site.
    You may also access documents of the Department published in the 
Federal Register by using the article search feature at 
www.federalregister.gov. Specifically, through the advanced search 
feature at this site, you can limit your search to documents published 
by the Department.

Michelle Asha Cooper,
Acting Assistant Secretary for Postsecondary Education.
[FR Doc. 2022-13987 Filed 6-29-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4000-01-P