[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 90 (Tuesday, May 10, 2022)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 27917-27923]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-09972]



 ========================================================================
 Rules and Regulations
                                                 Federal Register
 ________________________________________________________________________
 
 This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains regulatory documents 
 having general applicability and legal effect, most of which are keyed 
 to and codified in the Code of Federal Regulations, which is published 
 under 50 titles pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 1510.
 
 The Code of Federal Regulations is sold by the Superintendent of Documents. 
 
 ========================================================================
 

  Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 90 / Tuesday, May 10, 2022 / Rules 
and Regulations  

[[Page 27917]]



FEDERAL RETIREMENT THRIFT INVESTMENT BOARD

5 CFR Part 1601


Mutual Fund Window

AGENCY: Federal Retirement Thrift Investment Board.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Federal Retirement Thrift Investment Board (FRTIB) adopts 
as final, without changes, a proposed rule concerning the Thrift 
Savings Plan (TSP)'s mutual fund window--which we will make available 
to TSP participants beginning in June 2022. This final rule establishes 
a fee designed to guarantee that the availability of the mutual fund 
window will not indirectly increase the share of TSP administrative 
expenses borne by participants who choose not to use the mutual fund 
window. We are also adopting policies to govern fund transfers to and 
from the mutual fund window, including a restriction on the amount that 
a participant may invest through the mutual fund window.

DATES: The effective date is June 1, 2022.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kim Weaver, Office of External 
Affairs, (202) 465-5220 or Laurissa Stokes, Office of General Counsel, 
(202) 308-7707. For more information about when and how TSP 
participants can access the mutual fund window, please visit 
www.tsp.gov/new-tsp-features/.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The FRTIB administers the TSP, which was 
established by the Federal Employees' Retirement System Act of 1986 
(FERSA), Public Law 99 335, 100 Stat. 514. The TSP is a tax-deferred 
retirement savings plan for federal civilian employees and members of 
the uniformed services. The TSP is similar to cash or deferred 
arrangements established for private-sector employees under section 
401(k) of the Internal Revenue Code (26 U.S.C. 401(k)). The provisions 
of FERSA that govern the TSP are codified, as amended, largely at 5 
U.S.C. 8351 and 8401-79.
    FERSA requires the TSP to offer the following individual investment 
funds to TSP participants: (1) A Government Securities Investment Fund 
(G Fund); (2) a Fixed Income Investment Fund (F Fund); (3) a Common 
Stock Index Investment Fund (C Fund); (4) a Small Cap Stock Index 
Investment Fund (S Fund); and (5) an International Stock Index 
Investment Fund (I Fund). 5 U.S.C. 8438(b)(1)(A)-(E).
    In addition to these five individual funds, the TSP is statutorily 
required to offer Lifecycle (L) Funds which are target retirement date 
portfolios comprised of varying proportions of the five individual 
funds. 5 U.S.C. 8438(c)(2). These statutorily mandated investment 
options are referred to as the TSP core funds. The FRTIB does not have 
discretionary authority to increase or change the types of core funds 
offered to TSP participants.

I. Background

A. What is a Mutual Fund?

    A mutual fund is formed when a special type of corporation called a 
fund company pools money from many individuals and invests the pooled 
money in other things such as stocks and bonds. Mutual funds offer 
individuals the ability to invest in hundreds of different holdings 
without having to make hundreds of separate purchases themselves. A 
mutual fund's holdings are picked by a professional money manager--
called an investment adviser--who is hired by the fund company. 
Investors buy shares in mutual funds. Investors (or their brokers) 
purchase mutual fund shares from the fund company itself (or its 
broker)--as opposed to purchasing them from other investors (or their 
brokers) on a secondary market such as the New York Stock Exchange. 
Each share represents an investor's part ownership in the mutual fund 
and the net aggregate returns of the mutual fund's investment holdings.

B. What is a Mutual Fund Window?

    A mutual fund window is a type of brokerage window. A brokerage 
window is a retirement plan feature that allows participants to open a 
brokerage account to put some of their retirement savings in 
investments that are not curated by their retirement plan's 
fiduciaries.
    Some retirement plans call this feature a ``self-directed brokerage 
option''. ``Brokerage window'' and ``self-directed brokerage option'' 
are just two different names for the same feature. This feature is 
often described as ``self-directed'' because it allows participants to 
forego some of the protections afforded by fiduciary oversight of 
investments in exchange for access to a much broader choice of 
investments.
    However, investing through a retirement plan feature is never as 
``self-directed'' as investing through a brokerage account outside of a 
retirement plan. For example, retirement plan participants do not pick 
their own brokerage firm. Usually, one of the retirement plan's service 
providers (for example, its plan administrator or record keeper) 
selects a brokerage firm that will provide brokerage accounts and an 
online trading platform to the retirement plan's participants via a 
subcontract.
    In addition, certain categories of higher-risk trades that can be 
made in brokerage accounts outside of a retirement plan are often 
excluded from brokerage windows. These categories include trading on 
margin and buying put or call options, futures contracts, or 
cryptocurrency. Subject only to categorical exclusions such as these, 
the specific investments available through a retirement plan's 
brokerage window are typically determined by a cluster of agreements 
negotiated among the plan's service provider, a brokerage firm, and 
fund companies.
    For the TSP's brokerage window, Congress has excluded all 
categories of investments except for mutual funds.\1\ That is why it is 
called a mutual fund window. It is a type of brokerage window that is 
limited to mutual funds.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ See Thrift Savings Plan Enhancement Act of 2009, Public Law 
111-31, Division B, Title I, sec. 104 (codified at 5 U.S.C. 
8438(b)(5)(A)).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

C. Mutual Funds Versus TSP Core Funds: What is the Difference?

    Like mutual funds, the TSP core funds offer investors the ability 
to pool their money with other investors to purchase a share of a 
portfolio containing hundreds of investment holdings. The difference is 
that the TSP core funds are designed specifically for TSP participants. 
Only TSP participants

[[Page 27918]]

can invest in them, and their only goal is to maximize participants' 
retirement savings. Mutual funds, on the other hand, are designed for 
the general public. As such, many different types of mutual funds exist 
to satisfy a wide variety of goals.

II. Historical Context

    For many years, TSP participants have voiced a desire to have more 
investment options. In 2009, Congress passed legislation that 
authorized, but did not require, the FRTIB to offer a mutual fund 
window to TSP participants. Thrift Savings Plan Enhancement Act of 
2009, Public Law 111-31, Division B, Title I, sec. 104 (codified at 5 
U.S.C. 8438(b)(5)(A)).
    In the same year that Congress authorized the FRTIB to offer a 
mutual fund window, the FRTIB's Executive Director initiated 
discussions with the FRTIB Board members and the Employee Thrift 
Advisory Council (ETAC) \2\ about adding a mutual fund window to the 
TSP. In the April 2009 FRTIB Board meeting, the four Board members in 
attendance deadlocked on the decision to adopt a resolution in support 
of the mutual fund window by a vote of two-to-two.\3\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \2\ ETAC is comprised of representatives from Federal and Postal 
unions and management associations, as well as a representative from 
the Department of Defense on behalf of uniformed service members. 
ETAC provides advice on matters relating to TSP investment policies 
and plan administration.
    \3\ See April 2009 FRTIB Board Meeting Minutes, available at 
https://www.frtib.gov/MeetingMinutes/2009/2009Apr.pdf. Links to 
attachments accompanying the minutes are embedded in the PDF of the 
minutes.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    To inform future discussions, the FRTIB assembled a cross-
functional team of subject matter experts from its operations, legal, 
investment, finance, communications, research, and technology offices 
who spent the next several years studying industry practices, 
participant preferences, costs, and operational considerations 
associated with adding a mutual fund window to the TSP. Their research 
was presented to the FRTIB Board members and ETAC during public 
meetings in May 2014, November 2014, and July 2015.\4\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ See May 2014 FRTIB Board Meeting Minutes, available at 
https://www.frtib.gov/MeetingMinutes/2014/2014May.pdf; November 2014 
FRTIB Board Meeting Minutes, available at https://www.frtib.gov/MeetingMinutes/2014/2014Nov.pdf; July 2015 FRTIB Board Meeting 
Minutes, available at https://www.frtib.gov/MeetingMinutes/2015/2015Jul.pdf. Links to attachments accompanying the minutes are 
embedded in the PDFs of the minutes.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In July 2015, the FRTIB Board members voted unanimously in support 
of adding a mutual fund window to the TSP. The FRTIB Executive Director 
committed to including a mutual fund window in the scope of services 
sought the next time the FRTIB recompeted its major service provider 
contract(s). In August 2019, the FRTIB announced the release of a 
request for proposals for various recordkeeping and plan administration 
services, including a mutual fund window. The contract was awarded in 
November 2020. The FRTIB is currently undergoing a transition to its 
new service provider(s).

III. Proposed Rule

    On January 26, 2022, the FRTIB published a proposed rule with 
request for public comments in the Federal Register (87 FR 3940, 
January 26, 2022). We proposed to collect an administrative fee of $55 
annually from mutual fund window users to guarantee that the 
availability of the mutual fund window does not indirectly increase the 
share of TSP administrative expenses borne by participants who choose 
not to use the mutual fund window. The preamble of the proposed rule 
informed the public that TSP mutual fund users will also incur other 
costs such as: (1) An annual maintenance fee of $95, (2) a per trade 
fee of $28.75, and (3) fees and expenses imposed by the specific mutual 
fund(s) in which they invest. We explained that these other costs are 
outside the scope of the proposed rule.
    We also proposed several terms and conditions that would govern 
fund transfers to and from the mutual fund window. For example, the 
proposed rule would require a minimum initial transfer of $10,000 and 
limit investments through the window to no more than 25% of the 
participant's TSP account value. In addition, the proposed rule would 
count transfers to and from the mutual fund window against an existing 
limitation on the number of interfund transfers participants are 
allowed to make per month.
    We received feedback from 100 commenters. Their comments fell into 
ten broad areas of concern, and our response to each concern is 
provided below.

IV. Response to Public Comments

A. Account Maintenance Fee and Trading Fee

    We received 44 comments from participants who believe the $95 
annual maintenance fee and a $28.75 per trade fee are not competitive 
with prices negotiated by other retirement plans. Before addressing 
these comments, we want to note that the annual maintenance fee and per 
trade fee were negotiated using the procedures of Federal Acquisition 
Regulation (FAR) part 15 and were evaluated for reasonableness in 
accordance with FAR 15.404-1. We also note that this final rule governs 
only the fees determined by the Executive Director in his role of 
setting policy to implement specific Congressional directives. Fees 
negotiated through acquisition procedures are beyond the scope of this 
final rule.
    Nevertheless, we think it is important to address the concerns 
raised by these commenters. The comments indicate that many TSP 
participants are under the impression that other retirement plans 
negotiate free brokerage services. We looked into what have been 
described as ``free'', ``no-transaction-fee'', and ``zero cost'' mutual 
fund trades offered to participants in other retirement plans. We found 
that those prices are often caveated with fine print disclaimers, such 
as this:
    No-Transaction-Fee (NTF) mutual funds are no-load mutual funds for 
which [brokerage firm] does not charge a transaction fee. NTFs, as well 
as other funds, have other continuing fees and expenses described in 
the fund's prospectus. [Brokerage firm] receives remuneration from fund 
companies for record keeping, shareholder and other administrative 
services. The amount of remuneration is based in part on the amount of 
investments in such funds by [brokerage firm] clients.
    The remuneration (i.e., fees) that brokerage firms receive from 
fund companies are treated by the fund companies as fund expenses, 
which are ultimately passed on to the people who have already invested 
in the fund. This type of arrangement between a brokerage firm and a 
fund company is called revenue sharing.
    Revenue sharing is not inherently pernicious. In many industries, 
revenue sharing is like a referral fee that a business owner might pay 
to compensate a person for bringing a new customer to their business. 
For most businesses, revenue sharing is a marketing cost borne by the 
business.
    Fund companies are, of course, businesses also. But fund companies 
are structurally different from other corporations. They typically have 
no employees, no physical assets, and no tangible products. They are 
just a collection of contracts relating to pools of money (i.e., 
funds), and they charge their costs of doing business to the people who 
have invested in the funds, regardless of how well the funds perform. 
Their unique corporate structure has led both Congress and the U.S. 
Supreme Court to conclude that ``the forces of arm's-length bargaining

[[Page 27919]]

do not work in the mutual fund industry in the same manner as they do 
in other sectors of the American economy.'' Jones v. Harris Assocs. 
L.P., 559 U.S. 335, 338 (2010), quoting S. Rep. No. 91-184, at 5 
(1969). This does not mean that there is something sinister about the 
mutual fund industry. It means only that the nature of the product 
makes the usual distinctions between price, cost, revenue, profit, and 
quality less clear than they are in other industries.
    Fund companies are not required to provide individualized 
statements to investors, detailing the exact dollar amount of the 
fund's fees that each investor has indirectly paid. Consequently, 
revenue sharing between retirement plans, record keepers, brokerage 
firms, and fund companies can lead to confusing, opaque fee 
disclosures. Revenue sharing converts explicit fees (e.g., account 
maintenance fees and transaction fees) into less transparent fees 
(e.g., fees embedded in the fund's expense ratio). By including the 
fees in the fund's expense ratio, the return on an investment in that 
fund is reduced. Most participants in private sector plans have no idea 
that revenue sharing exists, much less how much it decreases the return 
of their investments.\5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ See ``401(k) Plans: Increased Educational Outreach and 
Broader Oversight May Help Reduce Plan Fees'', GAO-12-325 (April 24, 
2012), available at https://www.gao.gov/products/gao-12-325; ``GAO: 
How Revenue Sharing Can Work, and Its Potential Impact on 
Participants' Account Balances'', YouTube, U.S. Government 
Accountability Office, 24 April 2012, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PIRGduLn59A; ``401(k) Retirement Plans: Many Participants Do 
Not Understand Fee Information, but DOL Could Take Additional Steps 
to Help Them'', GAO-21-357 (July 27, 2021), available at https://www.gao.gov/products/gao-21-357.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The FRTIB values transparency. We believe TSP participants need, 
and deserve, to see the dollar amount of the fees they pay for their 
mutual funds. Toward that end, TSP participants will pay account 
maintenance fees and certain transaction fees directly rather than 
paying them indirectly through revenue sharing. Furthermore, FRTIB has 
contractually required the TSP record keeper, their trading platform 
provider, their broker-dealer(s), and any of their other affiliates or 
subcontractors to rebate all revenue sharing payments, or any other 
type of indirect compensation, they receive in connection with 
participants' mutual fund window investments. The rebates will be 
credited to participants' mutual fund window accounts. This ensures 
that the dollar amounts of all fees and expenses borne by TSP 
participants for services provided in connection with their mutual fund 
window investments are explicitly disclosed.

B. Concern That Participants Might Be Confused by New Fees

    One commenter expressed concern that participants might 
inadvertently incur fees which can, over time, cause serious damage to 
their retirement savings. We share this concern. Even small differences 
in fees can translate into large differences in returns over time. That 
is why we have chosen to make the fees paid to our service providers 
explicit at the risk of appearing less competitive than plans that 
compensate their service providers through revenue sharing 
arrangements. We intend to provide ongoing communication and education 
to TSP participants about the impact of fees on their retirement goals. 
We will also ensure that participants have convenient access to mutual 
fund prospectuses prior to making investment decisions.\6\ In addition, 
participants will have access to a tool that allows them to sort mutual 
funds by expense ratio, starting with the lowest expense ratios first.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ Mutual funds use a document called a prospectus to disclose 
information about the fund to investors. The U.S. Securities 
Exchange Commission requires mutual funds to include certain 
information about the fund's fees and expenses in the prospectus.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

C. Minimum Core Balance

    We received 29 comments opposed to restricting the amount that a 
participant may invest through the mutual fund window. Under the 
proposed rule, transfers to a mutual fund window account cannot cause a 
participant's mutual fund window account balance to exceed 25% of their 
total TSP balance. In effect, the proposed rule would require 
participants to maintain 75% of their balance in the TSP core funds.
    Some commenters described the minimum core balance as ``punitive'' 
and suggested that it casts doubt on the FRTIB's sincerity in touting 
the mutual fund window as a benefit to TSP participants. Others are 
concerned that this restriction will impede their ability to achieve 
diversification among the funds in their mutual fund window account. We 
believe these commenters misunderstand the intended role of the mutual 
fund window. The mutual fund window enhances the TSP as a supplement 
to, rather than an alternative to, the core fund options.
    Other commenters described the minimum core balance as 
``paternalistic'' and asked the FRTIB to respect their autonomy when it 
comes to making financial decisions. We are sympathetic to these 
requests for more freedom of choice and autonomy. But retirement 
savings is a context in which autonomy is already constrained. 
Retirement plans (whether private or government-sponsored) are tax-
incentivized programs. People who choose to participate in retirement 
plans benefit personally from a large tax subsidy. The law mandates 
some constraints on autonomy to ensure those tax subsidies are 
effective for their intended purpose. Some constraints arise from the 
fact that fiduciaries of retirement plans can be sued by participants 
for exposing participants' retirement savings to too much risk. 
Consequently, we are compelled to balance requests for more freedom of 
choice against the risk of damaging the trust placed in us by the vast 
majority participants who do not have the time it takes to research 
thousands of complex investment choices.
    Several commenters believe that a 40% or 50% minimum core balance 
would be more reasonable. We understand that many private sector 
retirement plans offer brokerage windows with lower minimum core 
balance requirements, and that 50% is very common. However, it is not 
uncommon among the largest of private sector retirement plans to 
require participants to maintain 80% of their total balance in core 
funds.\7\ Given the TSP's size, and the extraordinary amount of trust 
placed in us by more than 6.5 million participants, we believe it is 
appropriate for the FRTIB's minimum core balance to be near the higher 
end of the range of minimum core balances that are common in the 
private sector.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ ``Understanding Brokerage Windows in Self-Directed 
Retirement Plans'', Report to Honorable Martin Walsh, Secretary of 
the Department of Labor, Advisory Council on Employee Welfare and 
Pension Benefit Plans (2021), at 24, available at https://www.dol.gov/sites/dolgov/files/EBSA/about-ebsa/about-us/erisa-advisory-council/2021-understanding-brokerage-windows-in-self-directed-retirement-plans.pdf.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    One commenter suggested tying the minimum core balance amount to 
each individual participant's years of service and gradually decreasing 
it in increments of 5% per year as the participant's years of service 
increase. For example, a participant with two years or less of service 
would be required to maintain a minimum core balance of 75%, a 
participant with 3 years of service would be required to maintain a 
minimum core balance of 70%, a participant with 4 years of service 
would be required to maintain a minimum core balance of 65%, and so on. 
We believe the enormous

[[Page 27920]]

administrative complexity of this approach would outweigh any 
conceivable advantage it could offer.
    One commenter suggested the use of messaging and warning banners 
instead of a minimum core balance requirement to mitigate the potential 
for participants to invest heavily in undiversified funds. In our 
experience, messaging campaigns work best when the message is a rule of 
thumb--simple, universal, and clear. We are concerned that any message 
simple enough to be effective (such as, ``Don't put all your eggs in 
one basket'') would be insufficiently nuanced to be accurate in the 
context of the mutual fund window. Since almost all mutual funds can 
claim to be ``diversified'' in the sense that they have many different 
holdings, a simple message about the importance of diversification 
could be misleading without a host of additional specifications--such 
as the difference between diversifying within an asset class and 
diversifying across asset classes.
    One commenter asked whether a mutual fund window account balance 
that, due to earnings, exceeds the 25% restriction will be adjusted 
(i.e., liquidated) to bring the account to 25% of the participant's 
total TSP balance. Investment earnings that cause a mutual fund window 
account balance to exceed 25% of a participant's total TSP balance will 
be permitted to remain in the mutual fund window account. However, a 
participant will not be permitted to transfer funds from the core funds 
to the mutual fund window if the participant's mutual fund window 
account balance (including earnings) already exceeds the 25% 
restriction or if the transfer would cause the participant's mutual 
fund window account balance (including earnings) to exceed the 25% 
restriction.

D. Fiduciary Oversight

    One commenter suggested that mutual funds offered through the 
window should be ``vetted'' by fiduciaries to ensure that they are 
prudent investments. Another commenter suggested that the FRTIB should 
offer a large variety of funds to ensure that there is no appearance of 
``favoritism'' toward any mutual funds or fund companies.
    TSP participants will have access to approximately 300 mutual fund 
families. A mutual fund family includes all the separate funds offered 
by a single fund company. Since each family consists of multiple funds, 
the total number of funds available to TSP participants will be in the 
thousands.
    We have taken measures toward ensuring that our record keeper and 
brokerage firm are not motivated by conflicts of interest or other 
misaligned incentives that could influence which funds or fund families 
they make available to TSP participants. Many retirement plan record 
keepers also own subsidiaries that are fund companies or that provide 
investment management services to fund companies. It is common for 
these record keepers to design investment menus and exercise influence 
on retirement plan participants in a manner that benefits their 
subsidiaries. We have mitigated such conflicts of interests by hiring a 
record keeper that is not in the business of selling mutual funds.
    We intend to monitor for practices that might intentionally or 
unintentionally nudge participants to choose more expensive funds (or 
share classes) over less expensive funds (or share classes) with 
similar risk/return attributes. Toward that end, we have contractually 
guaranteed ourselves a say in the choice architecture of the digital 
interface through which participants choose mutual funds (e.g., the 
order in which choices are displayed and the language used to frame the 
choices). We will also ensure that if a mutual fund has a share class 
that gives preferential treatment to institutional investors (e.g., 
money managers, insurance companies, investment banks, commercial 
trusts, endowment funds, and hedge funds), those institutional share 
classes will be made available to TSP participants.
    We will not, however, evaluate or monitor any of the mutual funds 
to ensure that they are prudent investments. This mirrors the practice 
of private sector retirement plans.\8\ Fiduciary oversight of thousands 
of funds would place unreasonable cost and resource burdens on the 
FRTIB. Those cost increases could disadvantage TSP participants 
relative to participants of private sector retirement plans--whose 
fiduciaries do not evaluate or monitor investments offered through 
brokerage windows except in extraordinary circumstances. We are also 
concerned that the potential for appearing to favor some fund companies 
over others could raise novel issues under government ethics and 
contracting laws; and could run counter to the spirit of a myriad of 
provisions in the Federal Employees' Retirement System Act that are 
designed to insulate the TSP from political involvement.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ ``Understanding Brokerage Windows in Self-Directed 
Retirement Plans'', Report to Honorable Martin Walsh, Secretary of 
the Department of Labor, Advisory Council on Employee Welfare and 
Pension Benefit Plans (2021), at 47, available at https://www.dol.gov/sites/dolgov/files/EBSA/about-ebsa/about-us/erisa-advisory-council/2021-understanding-brokerage-windows-in-self-directed-retirement-plans.pdf (``Investments accessible through a 
brokerage window are not routinely monitored by plan fiduciaries, 
and most experts conclude that, except perhaps in extraordinary 
circumstances, plan fiduciaries are not obligated to monitor 
brokerage window investments nor do their fiduciary duties apply 
with respect to those investments.'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    We considered the less costly, less complicated alternative of 
implementing a screen whereby the FRTIB would adopt criteria (e.g., 
expense ratio of 1.00% or below) and restrict the window to those 
mutual funds that meet the FRTIB's criteria. But we have decided 
against any screening criteria because we are concerned it would blur 
the distinction between funds that are fully endorsed by fiduciaries 
(i.e, the TSP's core funds) and funds that only meet certain minimum 
thresholds established by fiduciaries. Participants who only want 
simple choices that are fully endorsed by the FRTIB may feel 
overwhelmed or misled if we make it hard to distinguish between the 
level of fiduciary involvement in TSP core funds and the level of 
fiduciary involvement in the funds offered through the mutual fund 
window. In view of this concern, we believe that the vast majority of 
TSP participants will be better served by a clear, frequent, prominent, 
and unequivocal warning that the FRTIB does not provide fiduciary 
oversight of the mutual funds offered through the window.
    Participants who prefer funds that are overseen by FRTIB 
fiduciaries should invest in the TSP core funds.

E. Other Investment Options

    Several commenters suggested that, instead of mutual funds, the 
FRTIB should offer individual stocks, individual bonds, or exchange-
traded funds through the brokerage window. By law, mutual funds are the 
only type of investment the FRTIB is permitted to offer through the 
brokerage window.\9\ Mutual funds offer certain advantages over 
purchasing individual stocks and bonds, such as built-in professional 
management; and they are the most common type of investment in private 
sector 401(k) retirement plans. Although exchange-traded funds offer 
similar advantages, they are not--technically speaking--mutual 
funds.\10\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \9\ See Thrift Savings Plan Enhancement Act of 2009, Public Law 
111-31, Division B, Title I, sec. 104 (codified at 5 U.S.C. 
8438(b)(5)(A)).
    \10\ See ``Mutual Funds and Exchange-Traded Funds (ETFs)--A 
Guide for Investors, U.S. Securities Exchange Commission'', 
available at https://www.sec.gov/reportspubs/investor-publications/investorpubsinwsmfhtm.html.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

[[Page 27921]]

F. Objections to Offering a Mutual Fund Window

    Several commenters objected to the fact that the FRTIB is offering 
a mutual fund window at all. Others believe that the mutual fund window 
should be a lower priority than other possible improvements to the TSP. 
The decision to offer a mutual fund window was made by a vote of the 
FRTIB Board members in July 2015 and, therefore, is not the subject of 
this regulation.
    Nevertheless, we wish to assure these commenters that the FRTIB is 
also adding a host of other new features which are consistent with many 
of the priorities these commenters have articulated. We do not believe 
that satisfying the diverse preferences of the TSP's 6.5 million 
participants must be a zero-sum game. We are confident we can offer a 
mutual fund window for participants who want it at no cost to 
participants who don't, while also offering many other new features 
that participants with other priorities will appreciate. For 
information about other new features, we invite TSP participants to 
view https://www.tsp.gov/new-tsp-features/.
    Some commenters suggested that, instead of offering a mutual fund 
window, the FRTIB should expand the number of its core funds or should 
select indexes that allow for more diversification within its 
individual core funds. The FRTIB does not have the statutory authority 
to expand its core fund options. Only Congress can do that, and 
Congress authorized a mutual fund window instead of adding more funds 
to the TSP's core fund menu. Congress has historically found that 
offering a small core menu of low-cost, passively-managed funds is most 
conducive to promoting the integrity of the Thrift Savings Fund.\11\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \11\ Federal Employees' Retirement System Act of 1986, Public 
Law 99-335, H.R. CONF. REP. 99-606, 1986 U.S.C.C.A.N. 1508 (``Most 
importantly, the three funds authorized in the legislation are 
passively managed funds, not subject to political manipulation. A 
great deal of concern was raised about the possibility of political 
manipulation of large pools of thrift plan money. This legislation 
was designed to preclude that possibility.'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The FRTIB periodically hires professional investment consultants to 
evaluate the diversification of the TSP's core fund menu compared to 
the menus of other retirement plans and to perform benchmark studies of 
the TSP's individual core funds. We invite TSP participants to view 
these studies at https://www.frtib.gov/ReadingRoom/.

G. Administrative Fee

    We received 6 comments relating to the $55 administrative fee. Four 
commenters supported the fee and two commenters objected to it.
    One commenter suggested that a $25-$30 fee would be more 
reasonable. This commenter did not offer a rationale for why $25-$30 
would be more reasonable or suggest an alternative means of deriving an 
appropriate fee amount. Another commenter suggested that all TSP 
participants should share in the cost of the mutual fund window. We 
believe this suggestion would conflict with an explicit Congressional 
directive to ``ensure that any expenses charged for use of the mutual 
fund window are borne solely by participants that use such window.'' 5 
U.S.C. 8438 (b)(5)(B). We are, therefore, adopting the proposed rule as 
final without substantive change.

H. Number of Interfund Transfers

    We received 22 comments objecting to an existing rule that allows 
only two interfund transfers per month. We proposed that the transfer 
from a participant's TSP account to their mutual fund window account, 
or vice versa, will count toward the existing monthly limit on 
interfund transfers. Trading within the mutual fund window will be 
restricted only by fees and rules that may be imposed by the mutual 
funds in which participants choose to invest.
    None of the commenters addressed the application of the FRTIB's 
existing rule to transfers to and from the mutual fund window. Instead, 
the commenters objected, more generally, to the existing rule as it 
currently applies to the TSP's core funds.
    We sought public comments on the existing rule long ago. We 
published it as a final rule in April 2008.\12\ Every comment about 
interfund transfers provided in response to our mutual fund window 
proposed rule was thoroughly addressed in the preamble of the 2008 
final rule. We are not revisiting the existing rule. We, therefore, 
believe these comments are outside the scope of the final rule that we 
are publishing today.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \12\ Participants' Choices of TSP Funds, 73 FR 22049 (April 24, 
2008), available at https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2008/04/24/E8-8957/participants-choices-of-tsp-funds.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The purpose of the existing rule is to prevent a small number of 
TSP participants who pursue ``market timing'' active investment 
strategies from diluting the earnings of other TSP participants and 
adversely affecting the ability of TSP investment managers to replicate 
the performance of selected indexes as required by law. The rationales 
for the existing rule are equally applicable to transfers to and from 
the mutual fund window. We are, therefore, are adopting the proposal as 
final without change.

I. Minimum Initial Transfer

    We received 3 comments objecting to our proposal to require a 
$10,000 minimum initial fund transfer to the mutual fund window. As 
explained in our proposed rule, the combination of the $10,000 initial 
fund transfer requirement and the 75% minimum core balance requirement 
means that an account must have at least $40,000 to be eligible to take 
advantage of the mutual fund window. The purpose of this requirement is 
to ensure that participants have some investment experience before they 
confront additional risks and expenses that may be associated with 
using the mutual fund window.
    Two commenters expressed concern that the minimum initial transfer 
requirement would prohibit new employees from accessing the mutual fund 
window. One commenter pointed out that, with today's highly mobile 
workforce, many new TSP participants may have gained sufficient 
investment experience from retirement assets they have invested 
elsewhere. We note that new employees can roll over money into the TSP 
from other retirement plans to meet the $10,000 minimum initial fund 
transfer requirement. We believe the ability to roll other retirement 
investments into the TSP is sufficient to address the concern that 
experienced investors who are new Federal employees will not be able to 
access the mutual fund window.
    Two commenters stated that the minimum initial fund transfer amount 
is higher than the industry norm. Brokerage firms often impose minimum 
initial fund transfer requirements for the purpose of ensuring that the 
cost of servicing a large number of small investments does not exceed 
the revenue the brokerage firm requires to offer its services. The 
FRTIB's minimum initial fund transfer requirement serves a very 
different purpose, which makes a comparison to industry norms 
inapposite. We are, therefore, adopting the proposed rule as final 
without change.

J. Miscellaneous

    One commenter suggested that the proposed rule relies on outdated 
survey results concerning the preferences of TSP participants. We 
believe this commenter misunderstood the purpose for which we cited 
2008 survey results in the proposed rule. We cited 2008 survey results 
merely to provide

[[Page 27922]]

chronological historical context for the evolution of the legislation 
that authorized the FRTIB to offer a mutual fund window and the FRTIB's 
subsequent decision to exercise that authority. For a thorough account 
of all the research and deliberation behind the FRTIB's 2015 decision 
to offer a mutual fund window, we invite TSP participants to view the 
May 2014, November 2014, and July 2015 Board meeting materials at 
https://www.frtib.gov/MeetingMinutes/.
    One commenter asked if a participant must set up two mutual fund 
window accounts if a participant wants to invest both traditional and 
Roth contributions. Nothing in the proposed rule or this final rule 
requires a participant set up two mutual fund window accounts for this 
purpose. A participant can transfer both traditional and Roth 
contributions into the same mutual fund window account.
    One commenter asked, with respect to the mutual fund window, how 
the FRTIB would address future legislation that might restrict 
investing in certain foreign countries and how the FRTIB would 
implement such legislation. The FRTIB will comply with legislation 
enacted by Congress that applies to the TSP. The manner in which we 
would implement such legislation depends on the specific legislation.
    One commenter considered the process of investing through the 
mutual fund window too cumbersome and suggested we make a money market 
sweep fund available within the TSP so participants would not have to 
invest in a core fund prior to transferring money to the mutual fund 
window. To make the TSP's recordkeeping more efficient and keep costs 
low for all participants, the record keeper, through a brokerage firm, 
will handle all operations of the mutual fund window, including the 
sweep fund that will receive transfers from the core funds. Having the 
TSP operate the sweep fund would negate the efficiency gains that come 
from outsourcing the operation of the mutual fund window to the record 
keeper and brokerage firm.
    One commenter asked why participants cannot invest their employee 
contributions directly into the mutual fund window. Allowing direct 
contributions to the mutual fund window would require creating linkages 
between hundreds of government payroll offices and the mutual fund 
window, which again, would undermine the efficiency gains that come 
from outsourcing the operation of the mutual fund window.
    Many commenters objected to the 12 p.m. eastern time cutoff for 
transferring amounts to and from the mutual fund window. The 12 p.m. 
eastern time cutoff for all TSP transactions is set forth in 5 CFR 
1601.32 and was not a subject of the proposed mutual fund window 
regulation. Therefore, the comments are beyond the scope of this 
regulation. Nevertheless, we will address the concerns.
    Since the TSP went to a daily valuation in 2003, we have required 
that transactions must be requested before 12 p.m. eastern time to post 
on the same day. For transactions requested at or after 12 p.m. eastern 
time, the transaction will post the next business day. The 12 p.m. 
eastern cutoff is necessary to allow the TSP to begin the investment 
transaction cycle which, given the size of the TSP and number of 
transactions it processes each day, is a multipart and complex process. 
Because the transfer into and out of the mutual fund window will 
involve the sale or purchase of TSP funds, such transfers are also 
subject to the 12 p.m. eastern time cutoff. Transactions within the 
mutual fund window (i.e., purchase and sale of mutual funds) are 
generally subject to a 4 p.m. eastern time cutoff. Some mutual funds 
may have earlier purchase cutoff times prior to the 4 p.m. eastern time 
cutoff, which would be disclosed by fund.

V. Final Rule

    For reasons explained above, the FRTIB is adopting the proposed 
rule as final, without any substantive changes. Although the comments 
received did not cause us to make changes to the proposed rule, we did 
carefully consider all comments received. We have appreciated the 
opportunity to review and respond to comments from participants who 
take an active interest in the TSP and wish to offer suggestions. The 
comment process allowed us to address any misunderstandings about the 
mutual fund window, to learn if there are unanticipated legal or policy 
impediments to the proposal, and to hear suggestions about how better 
to implement the mutual fund window.

Regulatory Flexibility Act

    This regulation will not have a significant economic impact on a 
substantial number of small entities. This regulation will primarily 
affect Federal employees, members of the uniformed services who 
participate in the TSP, and beneficiary participants.

Paperwork Reduction Act

    This regulation does not require additional reporting under the 
criteria of the Paperwork Reduction Act.

Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995

    Pursuant to the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995, 2 U.S.C. 602, 
632, 653, and 1501-1571, the effects of this regulation on state, 
local, and tribal governments and the private sector have been 
assessed. This regulation will not compel the expenditure in any one 
year of $100 million or more by state, local, and tribal governments, 
in the aggregate, or by the private sector. Therefore, a statement 
under 2 U.S.C. 1532 is not required.

Submission to Congress and the General Accounting Office

    Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 810(a)(1)(A), the FRTIB submitted a report 
containing this rule and other required information to the U.S. Senate, 
the U.S. House of Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the 
United States before publication of this rule in the Federal Register. 
This rule is not a major rule as defined at 5 U.S.C. 804(2).

List of Subjects in 5 CFR Part 1601

    Government employees, Pensions, Retirement.

Ravindra Deo,
Executive Director, Federal Retirement Thrift Investment Board.
    For the reasons stated in the preamble, the FRTIB amends 5 CFR 
chapter VI as follows:

PART 1601--PARTICIPANTS' CHOICE OF TSP FUNDS

0
1. The authority citation for part 1601 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  5 U.S.C. 8351, 8432d, 8438, 8474(b)(5) and (c)(1).

0
2. Add subpart F to read as follows:

Subpart F--Mutual Fund Window

Sec.
1601.51 Applicability.
1601.52 Fund transfers.
1601.53 Fees.


Sec.  1601.51   Applicability.

    This subpart applies only to the transfer of amounts between the 
TSP core funds and the mutual fund window; it does not apply to the 
investment of future deposits, which is covered in subpart B of this 
part, or fund reallocations or fund transfers among the TSP core funds, 
which is covered in subpart C of this part.


Sec.  1601.52   Fund transfers.

    (a) Fund transfers into mutual fund window. A participant may elect 
to make one or more fund transfers to the mutual fund window from the 
portion

[[Page 27923]]

of his or her TSP balance invested in the TSP core funds, subject to 
the following rules:
    (1) The participant must establish a mutual fund window account 
that is separate from his or her TSP account. A participant with more 
than one TSP account may establish a separate mutual fund window 
account for each TSP account, and the limitations and fees described in 
subpart will apply separately to each account;
    (2) If the participant does not have an acknowledgment of risk on 
file as of the date of his or her initial fund transfer request to the 
mutual fund window, the participant must complete an acknowledgment of 
risk for the fund transfer to be processed;
    (3) Fund transfers must be made in whole dollar increments 
(percentages are not permitted);
    (4) The following limitations must be satisfied:
    (i) A participant's initial fund transfer into his or her mutual 
fund window account must be at least $10,000 and may not exceed 25 
percent of the participant's TSP account balance, as of the date of 
such transfer; and
    (ii) Subsequent fund transfers into a participant's mutual fund 
window account may not cause the balance in the participant's mutual 
fund window account to exceed 25 percent of the participant's total TSP 
balance, as of the date of any such transfer;
    (5) Each fund transfer into the mutual fund window counts toward 
the monthly limit set forth in Sec.  1601.32(b);
    (6) Amounts transferred to a participant's mutual fund window 
account will initially be invested in a sweep money market fund. 
Subsequently, the participant may direct the investment of the 
transferred amounts into any mutual fund(s) that are available through 
the mutual fund window;
    (7) Fund transfers are subject to the fees set forth in Sec.  
1601.53; and
    (8) A participant may not withdraw funds directly from his or her 
mutual fund window account. To make a withdrawal, the participant must 
elect a fund transfer back to the TSP core funds as described in 
paragraph (b) of this section. Upon completion of such fund transfer, 
the participant may make a withdrawal in accordance with 5 CFR part 
1650.
    (b) Fund transfers back to TSP core funds. A participant may elect 
to make a fund transfer to the TSP core funds from amounts invested in 
his or her mutual fund window account, subject to the following rules:
    (1) Fund transfers must be made in whole dollar increments 
(percentages are not permitted);
    (2) Amounts to be transferred from a participant's mutual fund 
window account to the TSP core funds must first be transferred to the 
sweep money market fund. Subsequently, the participant may direct the 
investment of the transferred amounts into the TSP core funds;
    (3) Each fund transfer back to the TSP core funds from the mutual 
fund window account counts toward the monthly limit set forth in Sec.  
1601.32(b); except, however, that a participant may always elect a fund 
transfer from the mutual fund window account to the G Fund; and
    (4) Fund transfers are subject to the fees set forth in Sec.  
1601.53.
    (c) Forced transfers. The TSP record keeper will force a transfer 
from the participant's mutual fund window account to the TSP core funds 
in the following situations, and subject to the following rules:
    (1) A forced transfer may occur if the balance invested in the TSP 
core funds is insufficient to cover:
    (i) Amounts necessary to comply with a court order, legal process, 
or levy described in 5 CFR part 1653;
    (ii) A beneficiary asset transfer;
    (iii) A required minimum distribution;
    (iv) An automatic cash out distribution; or
    (v) Any other payment or transfer that the Board is required by law 
to make from the participant's TSP account balance;
    (2) The amount of the forced transfer shall be equal to the amount 
of the insufficiency described in paragraph (c)(1) of this section, 
plus $1,000; except, however, that if the participant's mutual fund 
window account balance is less than $25,000, the entire mutual fund 
window account balance shall be transferred to the TSP core funds;
    (3) Forced transfers shall be liquidated from the participant's 
mutual fund window account first from amounts held in the sweep money 
market fund; and then from amounts invested in mutual funds, beginning 
with the position with the highest balance;
    (4) Forced transfers from a participant's mutual fund window 
account to the TSP core funds shall be invested according to the 
participant's existing contribution allocation; and
    (5) The participant shall be responsible for any fees incurred as a 
result of the forced transfer.


Sec.  1601.53   Fees.

    (a) The Board will allocate a portion of the TSP's administrative 
expenses to mutual fund users by charging an administrative fee of 
$55.00 annually. The amount of this fee will be redetermined once every 
three years by multiplying the average mutual fund window account 
balance by the TSP administrative expense ratio, as of the date of 
redetermination.
    (b) The fee described in paragraph (a) of this section is in 
addition to any mutual fund window account maintenance fees, trading 
fees, and fees and expenses associated with the specific mutual fund(s) 
in which the participant chooses to invest.

[FR Doc. 2022-09972 Filed 5-9-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6760-01-P