[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 81 (Wednesday, April 27, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Pages 24995-25006]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-09085]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION


Applications for New Awards; Education Innovation and Research 
(EIR) Program--Mid-Phase Grants

AGENCY: Office of Elementary and Secondary Education, Department of 
Education.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of Education (Department) is issuing a notice 
inviting applications for fiscal year (FY) 2022 for the EIR program--
Mid-phase Grants, Assistance Listing Number 84.411B (Mid-phase Grants). 
This notice relates to the approved information collection under OMB 
control number 1894-0006.

DATES: 
    Applications Available: April 29, 2022.
    Deadline for Notice of Intent to Apply: May 27, 2022.
    Deadline for Transmittal of Applications: June 21, 2022.
    Deadline for Intergovernmental Review: August 22, 2022.
    Pre-Application Information: The Department will post additional 
competition information for prospective applicants on the EIR program 
website: https://oese.ed.gov/offices/office-of-discretionary-grants-support-services/innovation-early-learning/education-innovation-and-research-eir/fy-2022-competition/.

ADDRESSES: For the addresses for obtaining and submitting an 
application, please refer to our Common Instructions for Applicants to 
Department of Education Discretionary Grant Programs, published in the 
Federal Register on December 27, 2021 (86 FR 73264) and available at 
www.federalregister.gov/d/2021-27979. Please note that these Common 
Instructions supersede the version published on February 13, 2019, and, 
in part, describe the transition from the requirement to register in 
SAM.gov a Data Universal Numbering System (DUNS) number to the 
implementation of the Unique Entity Identifier (UEI). More information 
on the phaseout of DUNS numbers is available at www2.ed.gov/about/offices/list/ofo/docs/unique-entity-identifier-transition-fact-sheet.pdf.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Yvonne Crockett, U.S. Department of 
Education, 400 Maryland Avenue SW, Room 3E344, Washington, DC 20202-
5900. Telephone: (202) 453-7122. Email: [email protected].
    If you use a telecommunications device for the deaf (TDD) or a text 
telephone (TTY), call the Federal Relay Service (FRS), toll-free, at 1-
800-877-8339.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Full Text of Announcement

I. Funding Opportunity Description

    Purpose of Program: The EIR program, established under section 4611 
of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act, as amended (ESEA), 
provides

[[Page 24996]]

funding to create, develop, implement, replicate, or take to scale 
entrepreneurial, evidence-based, field-initiated innovations to improve 
student achievement and attainment for high-need students; and to 
rigorously evaluate such innovations. The EIR program is designed to 
generate and validate solutions to persistent education challenges and 
to support the expansion of those solutions to serve substantially 
higher numbers of students.
    The central design element of the EIR program is its multi-tier 
structure that links the amount of funding an applicant may receive to 
the quality of the evidence supporting the efficacy of the proposed 
project, with the expectation that projects that build this evidence 
will advance through EIR's grant tiers: ``Early-phase,'' ``Mid-phase,'' 
and ``Expansion.''
    ``Early-phase,'' ``Mid-phase,'' and ``Expansion'' grants differ in 
terms of the level of prior evidence of effectiveness required for 
consideration for funding, the expectations regarding the kind of 
evidence and information funded projects should produce, the level of 
scale funded projects should reach, and, consequently, the amount of 
funding available to support each type of project.
    Mid-phase grants are supported by moderate evidence (as defined in 
this notice). Mid-phase grants provide funding for the implementation 
and rigorous evaluation of a program that has been successfully 
implemented under an Early-phase grant or other effort meeting similar 
criteria, for the purpose of measuring the program's impact and cost-
effectiveness, if possible using existing administrative data.
    This notice invites applications for Mid-phase grants only. The 
notices inviting applications for Early-phase and Expansion grants are 
published elsewhere in this issue of the Federal Register.

Background

    While this notice is for the Mid-phase tier only, the premise of 
the EIR program is that new and innovative educational programs and 
practices can help to overcome the persistent and significant 
challenges to student success, particularly for underserved and high-
need students.
    Note: The EIR program statute refers to ``high-need students'' but 
allows applicants to define the term as it relates to the proposed 
project, population, and setting. In addressing the needs of 
underserved students, the statutory requirement for serving ``high-need 
students'' can also be addressed.
    These innovations need to be evaluated, and, if sufficient evidence 
of effectiveness can be demonstrated, the intent is for these 
innovations to be replicated and tested in new populations and 
settings. EIR is not intended to provide support for practices that are 
already commonly implemented by educators, unless significant 
adaptations of such practices warrant testing to determine if they can 
accelerate achievement or increase the likelihood that the practices 
can be widely, efficiently, and effectively implemented in new 
populations and settings.
    As an EIR project is implemented, grantees are encouraged to learn 
more about how the practices improve student achievement and attainment 
and to develop increasingly rigorous evidence of effectiveness and new 
strategies to efficiently and cost-effectively scale to new school 
districts, regions, and States. We encourage applicants to develop a 
logic model, theory of action, or another conceptual framework that 
includes the goals, objectives, outcomes, and key project components 
(as defined in this notice) of the project that can support systems of 
continuous improvement.
    Note: Logic model (also referred to as a theory of action) means a 
framework that identifies key project components of the proposed 
project (i.e., the active ``ingredients'' that are hypothesized to be 
critical to achieving the relevant outcomes) and describes the 
theoretical and operational relationships.
    All EIR applicants and grantees should also consider how they need 
to develop their organizational capacity, project financing, or 
business plans to sustain their projects and continue implementation 
and adaptation after Federal funding ends. The Department intends to 
provide grantees with technical assistance in their dissemination, 
scaling, and sustainability efforts.
    Mid-phase projects are expected to refine and expand the use of 
practices with prior evidence of effectiveness in order to improve 
outcomes for high-need and underserved students. They are also expected 
to generate important information about an intervention's 
effectiveness, such as for whom and in which contexts a practice is 
most effective, including cost-effectiveness. Mid-phase projects are 
uniquely positioned to help answer critical questions about the process 
of scaling a practice to the regional or national levels (as defined in 
this notice) across geographies. Mid-phase grantees are encouraged to 
consider how the cost structure of a practice can change as the 
intervention scales. Additionally, grantees may want to consider 
multiple ways to facilitate implementation fidelity without making 
scaling too onerous.
    Mid-phase applicants are encouraged to design an evaluation that 
has the potential to meet the strong evidence (as defined in this 
notice) threshold. Mid-phase grantees should measure the cost-
effectiveness of their practices using administrative or other readily 
available data. These types of efforts are critical to sustaining and 
scaling EIR-funded effective practices after the EIR grant period ends, 
assuming that the practice has positive effects on important student 
outcomes. In order to support adoption or replication by other 
entities, the evaluation of a Mid-phase project should identify and 
codify the core elements of the EIR-supported practice that the project 
implements and examine the effectiveness of the project for any new 
populations or settings that are included in the project. The 
Department intends to provide grantees and their independent evaluators 
with evaluation technical assistance. This evaluation technical 
assistance could include grantees and their independent evaluators 
providing to the Department or its contractor updated comprehensive 
evaluation plans in a format as requested by the technical assistance 
provider and using such tools as the Department may request. Grantees 
will be encouraged to update this evaluation plan at least annually to 
reflect any changes to the evaluation, with updates consistent with the 
scope and objectives of the approved application.
    The FY 2022 Mid-phase competition includes four absolute priorities 
and two competitive preference priorities. All Mid-phase applicants 
must address Absolute Priority 1. Mid-phase applicants are also 
required to address one of the other three absolute priorities. 
Applicants have the option of addressing one or both competitive 
preference priorities and may opt to do so regardless of the absolute 
priority they select.
    Absolute Priority 1--Moderate Evidence establishes the evidence 
requirement for this tier of grants. All Mid-phase applicants must 
submit prior evidence of effectiveness that meets the moderate evidence 
standard.
    Absolute Priority 2--Field-Initiated Innovations--General allows 
applicants to propose projects that align with the purpose of the EIR 
program: To create and take to scale entrepreneurial, evidence-based, 
field-initiated

[[Page 24997]]

innovations to improve student achievement and attainment.
    Absolute Priority 3--Field-Initiated Innovations--Promoting Equity 
in Student Access to Educational Resources and Opportunities is 
intended to support innovations to improve student achievement and 
attainment in the science, technology, engineering, or mathematics 
(STEM) education field, consistent with efforts to ensure our Nation's 
economic competitiveness by improving and expanding STEM learning and 
engagement.
    In Absolute Priority 3, the Department recognizes the importance of 
funding prekindergarten (Pre-K) through grade 12 STEM education and 
anticipates that projects would expand opportunities for high-need 
students. Within this absolute priority, applicants may focus on 
expanding opportunities in computer science for underrepresented 
students such as students of color, girls, English Learners, students 
with disabilities, youth from rural communities, and youth from 
families living at or below the poverty line, to help reduce the 
enrollment and achievement gaps in a manner consistent with 
nondiscrimination requirements contained in Federal civil rights laws.
    Absolute Priority 4--Field-Initiated Innovations--Meeting Student 
Social, Emotional, and Academic Needs is intended to promote high-
quality social and emotional learning projects. Countless students have 
been exposed to trauma and disruptions in learning and have experienced 
disengagement from school and peers, negatively impacting their mental 
health and wellbeing. It is critical to provide support for students' 
social and emotional needs, not only to benefit students wellbeing, but 
also to support their academic success as student social, emotional, 
and academic development are interconnected.
    Competitive Preference Priority 1 is intended to encourage 
applicants to propose projects that promote equity and adequacy in 
educational opportunity and outcomes.
    Competitive Preference Priority 2 reflects the Administration's 
ongoing commitment to addressing the impact of the novel coronavirus 
2019 (COVID-19) on Pre-K-grade 12 education. COVID-19 has caused 
unprecedented disruption in schools across the country and drawn 
renewed attention to the ongoing challenges for underserved students. 
In response to the pandemic, educators have mobilized and continue to 
work hard to address the needs of all students. Researchers, educators, 
parents, and policymakers are working to understand and address the 
impact of inconsistent access to instruction, enrichment, peers, and 
services and supports, and the impact of other related challenges.
    We also know that for students in underserved communities, 
inequities in educational opportunity and outcomes existed prior to 
COVID-19. Those inequities have only been exacerbated by COVID-19. The 
impact of the COVID-19 pandemic changed the education landscape for the 
foreseeable future, especially as students continue to make up for lost 
classroom instruction. However, it also provides an opportunity to 
redesign how schools approach teaching and learning in ways that both 
address long-standing gaps in educational opportunity and better 
prepare students for college and careers.
    The Department seeks projects that develop and evaluate evidence-
based, field-initiated innovations to remedy the inequities in our 
country's education system. The proposed innovations should be designed 
to better enable students to access the educational opportunities they 
need to succeed in school and reach their future full potential.
    Through these priorities, the Department intends to advance 
innovation, build evidence, and address the learning and achievement of 
underserved and high-need students in Pre-K through grade 12.
    Priorities: This notice includes four absolute priorities and two 
competitive preference priorities. In accordance with 34 CFR 
75.105(b)(2)(ii), Absolute Priority 1 is from 34 CFR 75.226(d)(2). In 
accordance with 34 CFR 75.105(b)(2)(iv), Absolute Priority 2 is from 
section 4611(a)(1)(A) of the ESEA. In accordance with 34 CFR 
75.105(b)(2)(iv), Absolute Priorities 3 and 4 are from section 
4611(a)(1)(A) of the ESEA and the Supplemental Priorities and 
Definitions for Discretionary Grant Programs, published in the Federal 
Register on December 10, 2021 (86 FR 70612) (Supplemental Priorities). 
The competitive preference priorities are from the Supplemental 
Priorities.
    In the Mid-phase grant competition, Absolute Priorities 2, 3, and 4 
constitute their own funding categories. The Secretary intends to award 
grants under each of these absolute priorities provided that 
applications of sufficient quality are submitted. To ensure that 
applicants are considered for the correct type of grant, applicants 
must clearly identify the specific absolute priority that the proposed 
project addresses. If an entity is interested in proposing separate 
projects (e.g., one that addresses Absolute Priority 2 and another that 
addresses Absolute Priority 3), it must submit separate applications.
    Absolute Priorities: For FY 2022 and any subsequent year in which 
we make awards from the list of unfunded applications from this 
competition, these priorities are absolute priorities. Under 34 CFR 
75.105(c)(3), we consider only applications that meet Absolute Priority 
1--Moderate Evidence, and one additional absolute priority (Absolute 
Priority 2, Absolute Priority 3, or Absolute Priority 4).
    These priorities are:
    Absolute Priority 1--Moderate Evidence.
    Projects supported by evidence that meets the conditions in the 
definition of ``moderate evidence.''
    Note: An applicant must identify up to two studies to be reviewed 
against the What Works Clearinghouse (WWC) Handbooks (as defined in 
this notice) for the purposes of meeting the definition of ``moderate 
evidence.'' The studies may have been conducted by the applicant or by 
a third party. An applicant must clearly identify the citations for 
each study in the Evidence form. An applicant must ensure that all 
cited studies are available to the Department from publicly available 
sources and provide links or other guidance indicating where each is 
available. The Department may not review a study that an applicant 
fails to clearly identify for review.
    In addition to including up to two study citations, an applicant 
must provide in the Evidence form the following information: (1) The 
positive student outcomes the applicant intends to replicate under its 
Mid-phase grant and how these outcomes correspond to the positive 
student outcomes in the cited studies; (2) the characteristics of the 
population or setting to be served under its Mid-phase grant and how 
these characteristics correspond to the characteristics of the 
population or setting in the cited studies; and (3) the practice(s) the 
applicant plans to implement under its Mid-phase grant and how the 
practice(s) correspond with the practice(s) in the cited studies.
    If the Department determines that an applicant has provided 
insufficient information, the applicant will not have an opportunity to 
provide additional information. However, if the WWC determines that a 
study does not provide enough information on key aspects of the study 
design, such as sample attrition or equivalence of intervention and 
comparison groups, the WWC may submit a query to the study author(s) to 
gather information for use in determining a study rating.

[[Page 24998]]

Authors would be asked to respond to queries within 10 business days. 
Should the author query remain incomplete within 14 days of the initial 
contact to the study author(s), the study may be deemed ineligible 
under the grant competition. After the grant competition closes, the 
WWC will, for purposes of its own curation of studies, continue to 
include responses to author queries and make updates to study reviews 
as necessary. However, no additional information will be considered 
after the competition closes and the initial timeline established for 
response to an author query passes.
    Absolute Priority 2--Field-Initiated Innovations--General.
    Projects that are designed to create, develop, implement, 
replicate, or take to scale entrepreneurial, evidence-based, field-
initiated innovations to improve student achievement and attainment for 
high-need students.
    Absolute Priority 3--Field-Initiated Innovations--Promoting Equity 
in Student Access to Educational Resources and Opportunities: STEM.
    Projects that are designed to--
    (a) Create, develop, implement, replicate, or take to scale 
entrepreneurial, evidence-based, field-initiated innovations to improve 
student achievement and attainment for high-need students; and
    (b) Promote educational equity and adequacy in resources and 
opportunity for underserved students--
    (1) In one or more of the following educational settings:
    (i) Early learning programs.
    (ii) Elementary school.
    (iii) Middle school.
    (iv) High school.
    (v) Career and technical education programs.
    (vi) Out-of-school-time settings.
    (vii) Alternative schools and programs.
    (viii) Juvenile justice system or correctional facilities;
    (2) That examine the sources of inequity and inadequacy and 
implement responses, including rigorous, engaging, and well-rounded 
(e.g., that include music and the arts) approaches to learning that are 
inclusive with regard to race, ethnicity, culture, language, and 
disability status and prepare students for college, career, and civic 
life, including science, technology, engineering, and mathematics 
(STEM), including computer science coursework.
    Absolute Priority 4--Field-Initiated Innovations--Meeting Student 
Social, Emotional, and Academic Needs.
    Projects that are designed to--
    (a) Create, develop, implement, replicate, or take to scale 
entrepreneurial, evidence-based, field-initiated innovations to improve 
student achievement and attainment for high-need students; and
    (b) Improve students' social, emotional, academic, and career 
development, with a focus on underserved students, through one or more 
of the following priority areas:
    (1) Developing and supporting educator and school capacity to 
support social and emotional learning and development that--
    (i) Fosters skills and behaviors that enable academic progress;
    (ii) Identifies and addresses conditions in the learning 
environment, that may negatively impact social and emotional well-being 
for underserved students, including conditions that affect physical 
safety; and
    (iii) Is trauma-informed, such as addressing exposure to community-
based violence and trauma specific to military- or veteran-connected 
students (as defined in this notice).
    (2) Creating education or work-based settings that are supportive, 
positive, identity-safe and inclusive with regard to race, ethnicity, 
culture, language, and disability status, through one or more of the 
following activities:
    (i) Developing trusting relationships between students (including 
underserved students), educators, families, and community partners.
    (ii) Providing high-quality professional development opportunities 
designed to increase engagement and belonging and build asset-based 
mindsets for educators working in and throughout schools.
    (iii) Engaging students (including underserved students), 
educators, families, and community partners from diverse backgrounds 
and representative of the community as partners in school climate 
review and improvement efforts.
    (iv) Developing and implementing inclusive and culturally informed 
discipline policies and addressing disparities in school discipline 
policy by identifying and addressing the root causes of those 
disparities, including by involving educators, students, and families 
in decision-making about discipline procedures and providing training 
and resources to educators.
    (v) Supporting students to engage in real-world, hands-on learning 
that is aligned with classroom instruction and takes place in 
community-based settings, such as apprenticeships, pre-apprenticeships, 
work-based learning, and service learning, and in civic activities, 
that allow students to apply their knowledge and skills, strengthen 
their employability skills, and access career exploration 
opportunities.
    (3) Providing multi-tiered systems of supports that address 
learning barriers both in and out of the classroom, that enable healthy 
development and respond to students' needs and which may include 
evidence-based trauma-informed practices and professional development 
for educators on avoiding deficit-based approaches.
    (4) Developing or implementing policies and practices, consistent 
with applicable Federal law, that prevent or reduce significant 
disproportionality on the basis of race or ethnicity with respect to 
the identification, placement, and disciplining of children or students 
with disabilities (as defined in this notice).
    (5) Providing students equitable access that is inclusive, with 
regard to race, LGBTQI+, ethnicity, culture, language, and disability 
status, to social workers, psychologists, counselors, nurses, or mental 
health professionals and other integrated services and supports, which 
may include in early learning environments.
    (6) Preparing educators to implement project-based or experiential 
learning opportunities for students to strengthen their metacognitive 
skills, self-direction, self-efficacy, competency, or motivation, 
including through instruction that: Connects to students' prior 
knowledge and experience; provides rich, engaging, complex, and 
motivating tasks; and offers opportunities for collaborative learning.
    (7) Creating and implementing comprehensive schoolwide frameworks 
(such as small schools or learning communities, advisory systems, or 
looping educators) that support strong and consistent student and 
educator relationships.
    (8) Fostering partnerships, including across government agencies 
(e.g., housing, human services, employment agencies), local educational 
agencies, community-based organizations, adult learning providers, and 
postsecondary education intuitions, to provide comprehensive services 
to students and families that support students' social, emotional, 
mental health, and academic needs, and that are inclusive with regard 
to race, ethnicity, culture, language, and disability status.
    Competitive Preference Priorities: For FY 2022 and any subsequent 
year in which we make awards from the list of unfunded applications 
from this competition, these priorities are competitive preference 
priorities. Under 34 CFR 75.105(c)(2)(i), we award up to an additional 
6 points to an application, depending on how well the application 
addresses the competitive preference priorities.

[[Page 24999]]

    If an applicant chooses to address one or both competitive 
preference priorities, the applicant must identify in the project 
narrative section of its application its response to the competitive 
preference priorities it chooses to address.
    These priorities are:
    Competitive Preference Priority 1--Promoting Equity in Student 
Access to Educational Resources and Opportunities (up to 3 points).
    Projects designed to promote education equity and adequacy in 
resources and opportunity for underserved students in middle school or 
high school that examine the sources of inequity and inadequacy and 
implement responses, including rigorous, engaging, and well-rounded 
(e.g., that include music and the arts) approaches to learning that are 
inclusive with regard to race, ethnicity, culture, language, and 
disability status and prepare students for college, career, and civic 
life, including one or more of the following:
    (a) Student-centered learning models that may leverage technology 
to address learner variability (e.g., universal design for learning (as 
defined in this notice), K-12 competency-based education (as defined in 
this notice), project-based learning, or hybrid/blended learning) and 
provide high-quality learning content, applications, or tools.
    (b) Middle school courses or projects that prepare students to 
participate in advanced coursework in high school.
    (c) Advanced courses and programs, including dual enrollment and 
early college programs.
    (d) Project-based and experiential learning, including service and 
work-based learning.
    (e) High-quality career and technical education courses, pathways, 
and industry-recognized credentials that are integrated into the 
curriculum.
    Competitive Preference Priority 2--Addressing the Impact of COVID-
19 on Students, Educators, and Faculty (up to 3 points).
    Projects that are designed to address the impacts of the COVID-19 
pandemic, including impacts that extend beyond the duration of the 
pandemic itself, on the students most impacted by the pandemic, with a 
focus on underserved students and the educators who serve them 
through--
    (a) Conducting community asset-mapping and needs assessments that 
may include an assessment of the extent to which students, including 
subgroups of students, have become disengaged from learning, including 
students not participating in in-person or remote instruction, and 
specific strategies for reengaging and supporting students and their 
families; and
    (b) Using evidence-based instructional approaches and supports, 
such as professional development, coaching, ongoing support for 
educators, high quality tutoring, expanded access to rigorous 
coursework and content across K-12, and expanded learning time to 
accelerate learning for students in ways that ensure all students have 
the opportunity to successfully meet challenging academic content 
standards without contributing to tracking or remedial courses.
    Definitions: The definitions of ``baseline,'' ``evidence-based,'' 
``experimental study,'' ``moderate evidence,'' ``national level,'' 
``nonprofit,'' ``performance measure,'' ``performance target,'' 
``project component,'' ``quasi-experimental design study,'' ``regional 
level,'' ``relevant outcome,'' ``strong evidence,'' and ``What Works 
Clearinghouse Handbooks (WWC Handbooks)'' are from 34 CFR 77.1. The 
definitions of ``children or students with disabilities,'' 
``competency-based education,'' ``disconnected youth,'' ``early 
learning,'' ``educator,'' ``English learner,'' ``military- or veteran-
connected student,'' ``underserved students,'' and ``universal design 
for learning'' are from the Supplemental Priorities. The definitions of 
``local educational agency'' and ``State educational agency'' are from 
section 8101 of the ESEA.
    Baseline means the starting point from which performance is 
measured and targets are set.
    Children or students with disabilities means children with 
disabilities as defined in section 602(3) of the Individuals with 
Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) (20 U.S.C. 1401(3)) and 34 CFR 300.8, 
or students with disabilities, as defined in the Rehabilitation Act of 
1973 (29 U.S.C. 705(37), 705(202)(B)).
    Competency-based education (also called proficiency-based or 
mastery-based learning) means learning based on knowledge and skills 
that are transparent and measurable. Progression is based on 
demonstrated mastery of what students are expected to know (knowledge) 
and be able to do (skills), rather than seat time or age.
    Disconnected youth means an individual, between the ages 14 and 24, 
who may be from a low-income background, experiences homelessness, is 
in foster care, is involved in the justice system, or is not working or 
not enrolled in (or at risk of dropping out of) an educational 
institution.
    Early learning means any (a) State-licensed or State-regulated 
program or provider, regardless of setting or funding source, that 
provides early care and education for children from birth to 
kindergarten entry, including, but not limited to, any program operated 
by a child care center or in a family child care home; (b) program 
funded by the Federal Government or State or local educational agencies 
(including any IDEA-funded program); (c) Early Head Start and Head 
Start program; (d) nonrelative child care provider who is not otherwise 
regulated by the State and who regularly cares for two or more 
unrelated children for a fee in a provider setting; and (e) other 
program that may deliver early learning and development services in a 
child's home, such as the Maternal, Infant, and Early Childhood Home 
Visiting Program; Early Head Start; and Part C of IDEA.
    Educator means an individual who is an early learning educator, 
teacher, principal or other school leader, specialized instructional 
support personnel (e.g., school psychologist, counselor, school social 
worker, early intervention service personnel), paraprofessional, or 
faculty.
    English learner means an individual who is an English learner as 
defined in section 8101(20) of the ESEA, or an individual who is an 
English language learner as defined in section 203(7) of the Workforce 
Innovation and Opportunity Act.
    Evidence-based means the proposed project component is supported by 
one or more of strong evidence or moderate evidence.
    Experimental study means a study that is designed to compare 
outcomes between two groups of individuals (such as students) that are 
otherwise equivalent except for their assignment to either a treatment 
group receiving a project component or a control group that does not. 
Randomized controlled trials, regression discontinuity design studies, 
and single-case design studies are the specific types of experimental 
studies that, depending on their design and implementation (e.g., 
sample attrition in randomized controlled trials and regression 
discontinuity design studies), can meet What Works Clearinghouse (WWC) 
standards without reservations as described in the WWC Handbooks (as 
defined in this notice):
    (i) A randomized controlled trial employs random assignment of, for 
example, students, teachers, classrooms, or schools to receive the 
project component being evaluated (the treatment group) or not to 
receive the project component (the control group).
    (ii) A regression discontinuity design study assigns the project 
component being evaluated using a measured

[[Page 25000]]

variable (e.g., assigning students reading below a cutoff score to 
tutoring or developmental education classes) and controls for that 
variable in the analysis of outcomes.
    (iii) A single-case design study uses observations of a single case 
(e.g., a student eligible for a behavioral intervention) over time in 
the absence and presence of a controlled treatment manipulation to 
determine whether the outcome is systematically related to the 
treatment.
    Local educational agency (LEA) means:
    (a) In General. A public board of education or other public 
authority legally constituted within a State for either administrative 
control or direction of, or to perform a service function for, public 
elementary schools or secondary schools in a city, county, township, 
school district, or other political subdivision of a State, or of or 
for a combination of school districts or counties that is recognized in 
a State as an administrative agency for its public elementary schools 
or secondary schools.
    (b) Administrative Control and Direction. The term includes any 
other public institution or agency having administrative control and 
direction of a public elementary school or secondary school.
    (c) Bureau of Indian Education Schools. The term includes an 
elementary school or secondary school funded by the Bureau of Indian 
Education but only to the extent that including the school makes the 
school eligible for programs for which specific eligibility is not 
provided to the school in another provision of law and the school does 
not have a student population that is smaller than the student 
population of the LEA receiving assistance under the ESEA with the 
smallest student population, except that the school shall not be 
subject to the jurisdiction of any SEA (as defined in this notice) 
other than the Bureau of Indian Education.
    (d) Educational Service Agencies. The term includes educational 
service agencies and consortia of those agencies.
    (e) State Educational Agency. The term includes the SEA in a State 
in which the SEA is the sole educational agency for all public schools.
    Military- or veteran-connected student means one or more of the 
following:
    (a) A child participating in an early learning program, a student 
enrolled in preschool through grade 12, or a student enrolled in career 
and technical education or postsecondary education who has a parent or 
guardian who is a member of the uniformed services (as defined by 37 
U.S.C. 101), in the Army, Navy, Air Force, Marine Corps, Coast Guard, 
Space Force, National Guard, Reserves, National Oceanic and Atmospheric 
Administration, or Public Health Service or is a veteran of the 
uniformed services with an honorable discharge (as defined by 38 U.S.C. 
3311).
    (b) A student who is a member of the uniformed services, a veteran 
of the uniformed services, or the spouse of a service member or 
veteran.
    (c) A child participating in an early learning program, a student 
enrolled in preschool through grade 12, or a student enrolled in career 
and technical education or postsecondary education who has a parent or 
guardian who is a veteran of the uniformed services (as defined by 37 
U.S.C. 101).
    Moderate evidence means that there is evidence of effectiveness of 
a key project component in improving a relevant outcome for a sample 
that overlaps with the populations or settings proposed to receive that 
component, based on a relevant finding from one of the following:
    (i) A practice guide prepared by the WWC using version 2.1, 3.0, 
4.0, or 4.1 of the WWC Handbooks reporting a ``strong evidence base'' 
or ``moderate evidence base'' for the corresponding practice guide 
recommendation;
    (ii) An intervention report prepared by the WWC using version 2.1, 
3.0, 4.0, or 4.1 of the WWC Handbooks reporting a ``positive effect'' 
or ``potentially positive effect'' on a relevant outcome based on a 
``medium to large'' extent of evidence, with no reporting of a 
``negative effect'' or ``potentially negative effect'' on a relevant 
outcome; or
    (iii) A single experimental study (as defined in this notice) or 
quasi-experimental design study reviewed and reported by the WWC using 
version 2.1, 3.0, 4.0, or 4.1 of the WWC Handbooks, or otherwise 
assessed by the Department using version 4.1 of the WWC Handbook, as 
appropriate, and that--
    (A) Meets WWC standards with or without reservations;
    (B) Includes at least one statistically significant and positive 
(i.e., favorable) effect on a relevant outcome;
    (C) Includes no overriding statistically significant and negative 
effects on relevant outcomes reported in the study or in a 
corresponding WWC intervention report prepared under version 2.1, 3.0, 
4.0, or 4.1 of the WWC Handbooks; and
    (D) Is based on a sample from more than one site (e.g., State, 
county, city, school district, or postsecondary campus) and includes at 
least 350 students or other individuals across sites. Multiple studies 
of the same project component that each meet requirements in paragraphs 
(iii)(A), (B), and (C) of this definition may together satisfy this 
requirement.
    National level describes the level of scope or effectiveness of a 
process, product, strategy, or practice that is able to be effective in 
a wide variety of communities, including rural and urban areas, as well 
as with different groups (e.g., economically disadvantaged, racial and 
ethnic groups, migrant populations, individuals with disabilities, 
English learners, and individuals of each gender).
    Nonprofit, as applied to an agency, organization, or institution, 
means that it is owned and operated by one or more corporations or 
associations whose net earnings do not benefit, and cannot lawfully 
benefit, any private shareholder or entity.
    Performance measure means any quantitative indicator, statistic, or 
metric used to gauge program or project performance.
    Performance target means a level of performance that an applicant 
would seek to meet during the course of a project or as a result of a 
project.
    Project component means an activity, strategy, intervention, 
process, product, practice, or policy included in a project. Evidence 
may pertain to an individual project component or to a combination of 
project components (e.g., training teachers on instructional practices 
for English learners and follow-on coaching for these teachers).
    Quasi-experimental design study means a study using a design that 
attempts to approximate an experimental study by identifying a 
comparison group that is similar to the treatment group in important 
respects. This type of study, depending on design and implementation 
(e.g., establishment of baseline equivalence of the groups being 
compared), can meet WWC standards with reservations, but cannot meet 
WWC standards without reservations, as described in the WWC Handbooks.
    Regional level describes the level of scope or effectiveness of a 
process, product, strategy, or practice that is able to serve a variety 
of communities within a State or multiple States, including rural and 
urban areas, as well as with different groups (e.g., economically 
disadvantaged, racial and ethnic groups, migrant populations, 
individuals with disabilities, English learners, and individuals of 
each gender). For an LEA-based project, to be considered a regional-
level project, a process,

[[Page 25001]]

product, strategy, or practice must serve students in more than one 
LEA, unless the process, product, strategy, or practice is implemented 
in a State in which the SEA is the sole educational agency for all 
schools.
    Relevant outcome means the student outcome(s) or other outcome(s) 
the key project component is designed to improve, consistent with the 
specific goals of the program.
    State educational agency (SEA) means the agency primarily 
responsible for the State supervision of public elementary schools and 
secondary schools.
    Strong evidence means that there is evidence of the effectiveness 
of a key project component in improving a relevant outcome for a sample 
that overlaps with the populations and settings proposed to receive 
that component, based on a relevant finding from one of the following:
    (i) A practice guide prepared by the WWC using version 2.1, 3.0, 
4.0, or 4.1 of the WWC Handbooks reporting a ``strong evidence base'' 
for the corresponding practice guide recommendation;
    (ii) An intervention report prepared by the WWC using version 2.1, 
3.0, 4.0, or 4.1 of the WWC Handbooks reporting a ``positive effect'' 
on a relevant outcome based on a ``medium to large'' extent of 
evidence, with no reporting of a ``negative effect'' or ``potentially 
negative effect'' on a relevant outcome; or
    (iii) A single experimental study reviewed and reported by the WWC 
using version 2.1, 3.0, 4.0, or 4.1 of the WWC Handbooks, or otherwise 
assessed by the Department using version 4.1 of the WWC Handbooks, as 
appropriate, and that--
    (A) Meets WWC standards without reservations;
    (B) Includes at least one statistically significant and positive 
(i.e., favorable) effect on a relevant outcome;
    (C) Includes no overriding statistically significant and negative 
effects on relevant outcomes reported in the study or in a 
corresponding WWC intervention report prepared under version 2.1, 3.0, 
4.0, or 4.1 of the WWC Handbooks; and
    (D) Is based on a sample from more than one site (e.g., State, 
county, city, school district, or postsecondary campus) and includes at 
least 350 students or other individuals across sites. Multiple studies 
of the same project component that each meet requirements in paragraphs 
(iii)(A), (B), and (C) of this definition may together satisfy the 
requirement in this paragraph (iii)(D).
    Underserved student means a student (which may include children in 
early learning environments, students in K-12 programs, and students in 
postsecondary education or career and technical education, as 
appropriate) in one or more of the following subgroups:
    (a) A student who is living in poverty or is served by schools with 
high concentrations of students living in poverty.
    (b) A student of color.
    (c) A student who is a member of a federally recognized Indian 
Tribe.
    (d) An English learner.
    (e) A child or student with a disability.
    (f) A disconnected youth.
    (g) A technologically unconnected youth.
    (h) A migrant student.
    (i) A student experiencing homelessness or housing insecurity.
    (j) A lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer or questioning, or 
intersex (LGBTQI+) student.
    (k) A student who is in foster care.
    (l) A student without documentation of immigration status.
    (m) A pregnant, parenting, or caregiving student.
    (n) A student impacted by the justice system, including a formerly 
incarcerated student.
    (o) A student who is the first in their family to attend 
postsecondary education.
    (p) A student performing significantly below grade level.
    (q) A military- or veteran-connected student.
    Universal design for learning has the meaning ascribed it in 
section 103(24) of the Higher Education Act of 1965, as amended.
    What Works Clearinghouse Handbooks (WWC Handbooks) means the 
standards and procedures set forth in the WWC Standards Handbook, 
Versions 4.0 or 4.1, and WWC Procedures Handbook, Versions 4.0 or 4.1, 
or in the WWC Procedures and Standards Handbook, Version 3.0 or Version 
2.1 (all incorporated by reference, see Sec.  77.2). Study findings 
eligible for review under WWC standards can meet WWC standards without 
reservations, meet WWC standards with reservations, or not meet WWC 
standards. WWC practice guides and intervention reports include 
findings from systematic reviews of evidence as described in the WWC 
Handbooks documentation.
    Note: The What Works Clearinghouse Procedures and Standards 
Handbooks are available at https://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/Handbooks.
    Program Authority: 20 U.S.C. 7261.
    Note: Projects will be awarded and must be operated in a manner 
consistent with the nondiscrimination requirements contained in Federal 
civil rights laws.
    Applicable Regulations: (a) The Education Department General 
Administrative Regulations in 34 CFR parts 75, 77, 79, 81, 82, 84, 86, 
97, 98, and 99. (b) The Office of Management and Budget Guidelines to 
Agencies on Governmentwide Debarment and Suspension (Nonprocurement) in 
2 CFR part 180, as adopted and amended as regulations of the Department 
in 2 CFR part 3485. (c) The Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost 
Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards in 2 CFR part 
200, as adopted and amended as regulations of the Department in 2 CFR 
part 3474. (d) The Supplemental Priorities.
    Note: The regulations in 34 CFR part 86 apply to institutions of 
higher education (IHEs) only.

II. Award Information

    Type of Award: Discretionary grants.
    Estimated Available Funds: $159,400,000.
    These estimated available funds are the total available for new 
awards for all three types of grants under the EIR program (Early-
phase, Mid-phase, and Expansion grants).
    Contingent upon the availability of funds and the quality of 
applications, we may make additional awards in subsequent years from 
the list of unfunded applications from this competition.
    Estimated Average Size of Awards: Up to $8,000,000.
    Maximum Award: We will not make an award exceeding $8,000,000 for a 
project period of 60 months. The Department intends to fund one or more 
projects under each of the EIR competitions, including Expansion 
(84.411A), Mid-phase (84.411B), and Early-phase (84.411C). Entities may 
submit applications for different projects for more than one 
competition (Early-phase, Mid-phase, and Expansion). The maximum new 
award amount a grantee may receive under these three competitions, 
taken together, is $15,000,000. If an entity is within funding range 
for multiple applications, the Department will award the highest 
scoring applications up to $15,000,000.
    Estimated Number of Awards: 5-12.
    Note: The Department is not bound by any estimates in this notice.
    Project Period: Up to 60 months.
    Note: Under section 4611(c) of the ESEA, the Department must use at 
least 25 percent of EIR funds for a fiscal year to make awards to 
applicants serving

[[Page 25002]]

rural areas, contingent on receipt of a sufficient number of 
applications of sufficient quality. For purposes of this competition, 
we will consider an applicant as rural if the applicant meets the 
qualifications for rural applicants as described in the Eligible 
Applicants section and the applicant certifies that it meets those 
qualifications through the application.
    In implementing this statutory provision and program requirement, 
the Department may fund high-quality applications from rural applicants 
out of rank order in the Mid-phase competition.

III. Eligibility Information

    1. Eligible Applicants:
    (a) An LEA;
    (b) An SEA;
    (c) The Bureau of Indian Education (BIE);
    (d) A consortium of SEAs or LEAs;
    (e) A nonprofit organization; and
    (f) An LEA, an SEA, the BIE, or a consortium described in clause 
(d), in partnership with--
    (1) A nonprofit (as defined in this notice) organization;
    (2) A business;
    (3) An educational service agency; or
    (4) An IHE.
    To qualify as a rural applicant under the EIR program, an applicant 
must meet both of the following requirements:
    (a) The applicant is--
    (1) An LEA with an urban-centric district locale code of 32, 33, 
41, 42, or 43, as determined by the Secretary;
    (2) A consortium of such LEAs;
    (3) An educational service agency or a nonprofit organization in 
partnership with such an LEA; or
    (4) A grantee described in clause (1) or (2) in partnership with an 
SEA; and
    (b) A majority of the schools to be served by the program are 
designated with a locale code of 32, 33, 41, 42, or 43, or a 
combination of such codes, as determined by the Secretary.
    Applicants are encouraged to retrieve locale codes from the 
National Center for Education Statistics School District search tool 
(https://nces.ed.gov/ccd/districtsearch/), where districts can be 
looked up individually to retrieve locale codes, and the Public School 
search tool (https://nces.ed.gov/ccd/schoolsearch/), where individual 
schools can be looked up to retrieve locale codes. More information on 
rural applicant eligibility is in the application package.
    Note: If you are a nonprofit organization, under 34 CFR 75.51, you 
may demonstrate your nonprofit status by providing: (1) Proof that the 
Internal Revenue Service currently recognizes the applicant as an 
organization to which contributions are tax deductible under section 
501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code; (2) a statement from a State 
taxing body or the State attorney general certifying that the 
organization is a nonprofit organization operating within the State and 
that no part of its net earnings may lawfully benefit any private 
shareholder or individual; (3) a certified copy of the applicant's 
certificate of incorporation or similar document if it clearly 
establishes the nonprofit status of the applicant; or (4) any item 
described above if that item applies to a State or national parent 
organization, together with a statement by the State or parent 
organization that the applicant is a local nonprofit affiliate.
    In addition, any IHE is eligible to be a partner in an application 
submitted by LEA, SEA, BIE, consortium of SEAs or LEAs, or a nonprofit 
organization. A private IHE that is a nonprofit organization may apply 
for an EIR grant. A nonprofit organization, such as a development 
foundation, that is affiliated with a public IHE may apply for a grant. 
A public IHE that has 501(c)(3) status would also qualify as a 
nonprofit organization and may apply for an EIR grant. A public IHE 
without 501(c)(3) status (even if that entity is tax exempt under 
Section 115 of the Internal Revenue Code or any other State or Federal 
provision), or that could not provide any other documentation of 
nonprofit status described in 34 CFR 75.51(b), however, would not 
qualify as a nonprofit organization, and therefore would not be 
eligible to apply for and receive an EIR grant.
    2.a. Cost Sharing or Matching: Under section 4611(d) of the ESEA, 
each grant recipient must provide, from Federal, State, local, or 
private sources, an amount equal to 10 percent of funds provided under 
the grant, which may be provided in cash or through in-kind 
contributions, to carry out activities supported by the grant. Grantees 
must include a budget showing their matching contributions to the 
budget amount of EIR grant funds and must provide evidence of their 
matching contributions for the first year of the grant in their grant 
applications.
    Section 4611(d) of the ESEA authorizes the Secretary to waive the 
matching requirement on a case-by-case basis, upon a showing of 
exceptional circumstances, such as:
    (i) The difficulty of raising matching funds for a program to serve 
a rural area;
    (ii) The difficulty of raising matching funds in areas with a 
concentration of LEAs or schools with a high percentage of students 
aged 5 through 17--
    (A) Who are in poverty, as counted in the most recent census data 
approved by the Secretary;
    (B) Who are eligible for a free or reduced price lunch under the 
Richard B. Russell National School Lunch Act (42 U.S.C. 1751 et seq.);
    (C) Whose families receive assistance under the State program 
funded under part A of title IV of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 
601 et seq.); or
    (D) Who are eligible to receive medical assistance under the 
Medicaid program; and
    (iii) The difficulty of raising funds on Tribal land.
    Applicants that wish to apply for a waiver must include a request 
in their application that describes why the matching requirement would 
cause serious hardship or an inability to carry out project activities. 
Further information about applying for waivers can be found in the 
application package.
    b. Indirect Cost Rate Information: This program uses an 
unrestricted indirect cost rate. For more information regarding 
indirect costs, or to obtain a negotiated indirect cost rate, please 
see www2.ed.gov/about/offices/list/ocfo/intro.html.
    c. Administrative Cost Limitation: This program does not include 
any program-specific limitation on administrative expenses. All 
administrative expenses must be reasonable and necessary and conform to 
Cost Principles described in 2 CFR part 200 subpart E of the Uniform 
Guidance.
    3. Subgrantees: A grantee under this competition may not award 
subgrants to entities to directly carry out project activities 
described in its application.
    4. Other: a. Funding Categories: An applicant will be considered 
for an award only for the type of EIR grant for which it applies (i.e., 
Mid-phase: Absolute Priority 2, Mid-phase: Absolute Priority 3, or Mid-
phase: Absolute Priority 4). An applicant may not submit an application 
for the same proposed project under more than one type of grant (e.g., 
both an Early-phase grant and Mid-phase grant).
    Note: Each application will be reviewed under the competition it 
was submitted under in the Grants.gov system, and only applications 
that are successfully submitted by the established deadline will be 
peer reviewed. Applicants should be careful that they download the 
intended EIR application package and that they submit their 
applications under the intended EIR competition.
    b. Evaluation: The grantee must conduct an independent evaluation 
of the effectiveness of its project.

[[Page 25003]]

    c. High-need students: The grantee must serve high-need students.

IV. Application and Submission Information

    1. Application Submission Instructions: Applicants are required to 
follow the Common Instructions for Applicants to Department of 
Education Discretionary Grant Programs, published in the Federal 
Register on December 27, 2021 (86 FR 73264) and available at 
www.federalregister.gov/d/2021-27979, which contain requirements and 
information on how to submit an application. Please note that these 
Common Instructions supersede the version published on February 13, 
2019, and, in part, describe the transition from the requirement to 
register in SAM.gov a DUNS number to the implementation of the UEI. 
More information on the phase-out of DUNS numbers is available at 
www2.ed.gov/about/offices/list/ofo/docs/unique-entity-identifier-transition-fact-sheet.pdf.
    2. Submission of Proprietary Information: Given the types of 
projects that may be proposed in applications for Mid-phase grants, 
your application may include business information that you consider 
proprietary. In 34 CFR 5.11 we define ``business information'' and 
describe the process we use in determining whether any of that 
information is proprietary and, thus, protected from disclosure under 
Exemption 4 of the Freedom of Information Act (5 U.S.C. 552, as 
amended).
    Because we plan to make successful applications available to the 
public, you may wish to request confidentiality of business 
information.
    Consistent with Executive Order 12600, please designate in your 
application any information that you believe is exempt from disclosure 
under Exemption 4. In the appropriate Appendix section of your 
application, under ``Other Attachments Form,'' please list the page 
number or numbers on which we can find this information. For additional 
information please see 34 CFR 5.11(c).
    3. Intergovernmental Review: This competition is subject to 
Executive Order 12372 and the regulations in 34 CFR part 79. 
Information about Intergovernmental Review of Federal Programs under 
Executive Order 12372 is in the application package for this 
competition.
    4. Funding Restrictions: We reference regulations outlining funding 
restrictions in the Applicable Regulations section of this notice.
    5. Recommended Page Limit: The application narrative is where you, 
the applicant, address the selection criteria that reviewers use to 
evaluate your application. We recommend that you (1) limit the 
application narrative for a Mid-phase grant to no more than 30 pages 
and (2) use the following standards:
     A ``page'' is 8.5'' x 11'', on one side only, with 1'' 
margins at the top, bottom, and both sides.
     Double space (no more than three lines per vertical inch) 
all text in the application narrative, including titles, headings, 
footnotes, quotations, references, and captions, as well as all text in 
charts, tables, figures, and graphs.
     Use a font that is either 12 point or larger or no smaller 
than 10 pitch (characters per inch).
     Use one of the following fonts: Times New Roman, Courier, 
Courier New, or Arial.
    The recommended page limit does not apply to the cover sheet; the 
budget section, including the narrative budget justification; the 
assurances and certifications; or the one-page abstract, the resumes, 
the bibliography, or the letters of support. However, the recommended 
page limit does apply to all of the application narrative.
    6. Notice of Intent to Apply: The Department will be able to review 
grant applications more efficiently if we know the approximate number 
of applicants that intend to apply. Therefore, we strongly encourage 
each potential applicant to notify us of their intent to submit an 
application. Applicants may access this form using the link available 
on the Notice of Intent to Apply section of the competition website: 
https://oese.ed.gov/offices/office-of-discretionary-grants-support-services/innovation-early-learning/education-innovation-and-research-eir/fy-2022-competition/. Applicants that do not submit a notice of 
intent to apply may still apply for funding; applicants that do submit 
a notice of intent to apply are not bound to apply or bound by the 
information provided.

V. Application Review Information

    1. Selection Criteria: The selection criteria for the Mid-phase 
competition are from 34 CFR 75.210. The points assigned to each 
criterion are indicated in the parentheses next to the criterion. An 
applicant may earn up to a total of 100 points based on the selection 
criteria for the application.
    A. Significance (up to 15 points).
    The Secretary considers the significance of the proposed project. 
In determining the significance of the proposed project, the Secretary 
considers the following factors:
    (1) The national significance of the proposed project. (5 points)
    (2) The extent to which the proposed project involves the 
development or demonstration of promising new strategies that build on, 
or are alternatives to, existing strategies. (5 points)
    (3) The potential contribution of the proposed project to increased 
knowledge or understanding of educational problems, issues, or 
effective strategies. (5 points)
    B. Strategy to Scale (up to 35 points).
    The Secretary considers the applicant's strategy to scale the 
proposed project. In determining the applicant's capacity to scale the 
proposed project, the Secretary considers the following factors:
    (1) The extent to which the applicant identifies a specific 
strategy or strategies that address a particular barrier or barriers 
that prevented the applicant, in the past, from reaching the level of 
scale that is proposed in the application. (10 points)
    (2) The adequacy of the management plan to achieve the objectives 
of the proposed project on time and within budget, including clearly 
defined responsibilities, timelines, and milestones for accomplishing 
project tasks. (5 points)
    (3) The applicant's capacity (e.g., in terms of qualified 
personnel, financial resources, or management capacity) to bring the 
proposed project to scale on a national or regional level (as defined 
in 34 CFR 77.1(c)) working directly, or through partners, during the 
grant period. (10 points)
    (4) The mechanisms the applicant will use to broadly disseminate 
information on its project so as to support further development or 
replication. (10 points)
    C. Quality of the Project Design (up to 15 points).
    The Secretary considers the quality of the design of the proposed 
project. In determining the quality of the design of the proposed 
project, the Secretary considers the following factors:
    (1) The extent to which there is a conceptual framework underlying 
the proposed research or demonstration activities and the quality of 
that framework. (5 points)
    (2) The extent to which the goals, objectives, and outcomes to be 
achieved by the proposed project are clearly specified and measurable. 
(5 points)
    (3) The extent to which the design of the proposed project is 
appropriate to, and will successfully address, the needs

[[Page 25004]]

of the target population or other identified needs. (5 points)
    D. Quality of the Project Evaluation (up to 35 points).
    The Secretary considers the quality of the evaluation to be 
conducted of the proposed project. In determining the quality of the 
evaluation, the Secretary considers the following factors:
    (1) The extent to which the methods of evaluation will, if well 
implemented, produce evidence about the project's effectiveness that 
would meet the What Works Clearinghouse standards without reservations 
as described in the What Works Clearinghouse Handbook (as defined in 34 
CFR 77.1(c)). (20 points)
    (2) The extent to which the evaluation will provide guidance about 
effective strategies suitable for replication or testing in other 
settings. (5 points)
    (3) The extent to which the evaluation plan clearly articulates the 
key project components, mediators, and outcomes, as well as a 
measurable threshold for acceptable implementation. (5 points)
    (4) The extent to which the methods of evaluation will provide 
performance feedback and permit periodic assessment of progress toward 
achieving intended outcomes. (5 points)
    Note: Applicants may wish to review the following technical 
assistance resources on evaluation: (1) WWC Procedures and Standards 
Handbooks: https://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/Handbooks; (2) ``Technical 
Assistance Materials for Conducting Rigorous Impact Evaluations'': 
http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/projects/evaluationTA.asp; and (3) IES/NCEE 
Technical Methods papers: http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/tech_methods/. In 
addition, applicants may view an optional webinar recording that was 
hosted by the Institute of Education Sciences. The webinar focused on 
more rigorous evaluation designs, discussing strategies for designing 
and executing experimental studies that meet WWC evidence standards 
without reservations. This webinar is available at: https://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/Multimedia/18.
    2. Review and Selection Process: We remind potential applicants 
that in reviewing applications in any discretionary grant competition, 
the Secretary may consider, under 34 CFR 75.217(d)(3), the past 
performance of the applicant in carrying out a previous award, such as 
the applicant's use of funds, achievement of project objectives, and 
compliance with grant conditions. The Secretary may also consider 
whether the applicant failed to submit a timely performance report or 
submitted a report of unacceptable quality.
    In addition, in making a competitive grant award, the Secretary 
requires various assurances, including those applicable to Federal 
civil rights laws that prohibit discrimination in programs or 
activities receiving Federal financial assistance from the Department 
(34 CFR 100.4, 104.5, 106.4, 108.8, and 110.23).
    Before making awards, we will screen applications submitted in 
accordance with the requirements in this notice to determine whether 
applications have met eligibility and other requirements. This 
screening process may occur at various stages of the process; 
applicants that are determined to be ineligible will not receive a 
grant, regardless of peer reviewer scores or comments.
    Peer reviewers will read, prepare a written evaluation of, and 
score the assigned applications, using the selection criteria provided 
in this notice.
    3. Risk Assessment and Specific Conditions: Consistent with 2 CFR 
200.206, before awarding grants under this competition the Department 
conducts a review of the risks posed by applicants. Under 2 CFR 
200.208, the Secretary may impose specific conditions and, under 2 CFR 
3474.10, in appropriate circumstances, high-risk conditions on a grant 
if the applicant or grantee is not financially stable; has a history of 
unsatisfactory performance; has a financial or other management system 
that does not meet the standards in 2 CFR part 200, subpart D; has not 
fulfilled the conditions of a prior grant; or is otherwise not 
responsible.
    4. Integrity and Performance System: If you are selected under this 
competition to receive an award that over the course of the project 
period may exceed the simplified acquisition threshold (currently 
$250,000), under 2 CFR 200.206(a)(2), we must make a judgment about 
your integrity, business ethics, and record of performance under 
Federal awards--that is, the risk posed by you as an applicant--before 
we make an award. In doing so, we must consider any information about 
you that is in the integrity and performance system (currently referred 
to as the Federal Awardee Performance and Integrity Information System 
(FAPIIS)), accessible through the System for Award Management. You may 
review and comment on any information about yourself that a Federal 
agency previously entered and that is currently in FAPIIS.
    Please note that, if the total value of your currently active 
grants, cooperative agreements, and procurement contracts from the 
Federal Government exceeds $10,000,000, the reporting requirements in 2 
CFR part 200, Appendix XII, require you to report certain integrity 
information to FAPIIS semiannually. Please review the requirements in 2 
CFR part 200, Appendix XII, if this grant plus all the other Federal 
funds you receive exceed $10,000,000.
    5. In General: In accordance with the Office of Management and 
Budget's guidance located at 2 CFR part 200, all applicable Federal 
laws, and relevant Executive guidance, the Department will review and 
consider applications for funding pursuant to this notice inviting 
applications in accordance with:
    (a) Selecting recipients most likely to be successful in delivering 
results based on the program objectives through an objective process of 
evaluating Federal award applications (2 CFR 200.205);
    (b) Prohibiting the purchase of certain telecommunication and video 
surveillance services or equipment in alignment with section 889 of the 
National Defense Authorization Act of 2019 (Pub. L. 115-232) (2 CFR 
200.216);
    (c) Providing a preference, to the extent permitted by law, to 
maximize use of goods, products, and materials produced in the United 
States (2 CFR 200.322); and
    (d) Terminating agreements in whole or in part to the greatest 
extent authorized by law if an award no longer effectuates the program 
goals or agency priorities (2 CFR 200.340).

VI. Award Administration Information

    1. Award Notices: If your application is successful, we notify your 
U.S. Representative and U.S. Senators and send you a Grant Award 
Notification (GAN); or we may send you an email containing a link to 
access an electronic version of your GAN. We may notify you informally, 
also.
    If your application is not evaluated or not selected for funding, 
we notify you.
    2. Administrative and National Policy Requirements: We identify 
administrative and national policy requirements in the application 
package and reference these and other requirements in the Applicable 
Regulations section of this notice.
    We reference the regulations outlining the terms and conditions of 
an award in the Applicable Regulations section of this notice and 
include these and other specific conditions in the GAN. The GAN also 
incorporates your approved application as part of your binding 
commitments under the grant.
    3. Open Licensing Requirements: Unless an exception applies, if you 
are awarded a grant under this competition, you will be required to 
openly license to the public grant deliverables created in whole, or in 
part, with Department

[[Page 25005]]

grant funds. When the deliverable consists of modifications to pre-
existing works, the license extends only to those modifications that 
can be separately identified and only to the extent that open licensing 
is permitted under the terms of any licenses or other legal 
restrictions on the use of pre-existing works. Additionally, a grantee 
or subgrantee that is awarded competitive grant funds must have a plan 
to disseminate these public grant deliverables. This dissemination plan 
can be developed and submitted after your application has been reviewed 
and selected for funding. For additional information on the open 
licensing requirements please refer to 2 CFR 3474.20.
    Note: The evaluation report is a specific deliverable under a Mid-
phase grant that grantees must make available to the public. 
Additionally, EIR grantees are encouraged to submit final studies 
resulting from research supported in whole or in part by EIR to the 
Educational Resources Information Center (http://eric.ed.gov).
    4. Reporting: (a) If you apply for a grant under this competition, 
you must ensure that you have in place the necessary processes and 
systems to comply with the reporting requirements in 2 CFR part 170 
should you receive funding under the competition. This does not apply 
if you have an exception under 2 CFR 170.110(b).
    (b) At the end of your project period, you must submit a final 
performance report, including financial information, as directed by the 
Secretary. If you receive a multiyear award, you must submit an annual 
performance report that provides the most current performance and 
financial expenditure information as directed by the Secretary under 34 
CFR 75.118. The Secretary may also require more frequent performance 
reports under 34 CFR 75.720(c). For specific requirements on reporting, 
please go to www.ed.gov/fund/grant/apply/appforms/appforms.html.
    (c) Under 34 CFR 75.250(b), the Secretary may provide a grantee 
with additional funding for data collection analysis and reporting. In 
this case the Secretary establishes a data collection period.
    5. Performance Measures: For the purpose of Department reporting 
under 34 CFR 75.110, the Department has established a set of 
performance measures (as defined in this notice) for the Mid-phase 
grants.
    Annual performance measures: (1) The percentage of grantees that 
reach their annual target number of students as specified in the 
application; (2) the percentage of grantees that reach their annual 
target number of high-need students as specified in the application; 
(3) the percentage of grantees with ongoing well-designed and 
independent evaluations that will provide evidence of their 
effectiveness at improving student outcomes in multiple contexts; (4) 
the percentage of grantees that implement an evaluation that provides 
information about the key practices and the approach of the project so 
as to facilitate replication; (5) the percentage of grantees that 
implement an evaluation that provides information on the cost-
effectiveness of the key practices to identify potential obstacles and 
success factors to scaling; and (6) the cost per student served by the 
grant.
    Cumulative performance measures: (1) The percentage of grantees 
that reach the targeted number of students specified in the 
application; (2) the percentage of grantees that reach the targeted 
number of high-need students specified in the application; (3) the 
percentage of grantees that implement a completed, well-designed, well-
implemented, and independent evaluation that provides evidence of their 
effectiveness at improving student outcomes at scale; (4) the 
percentage of grantees with a completed well-designed, well-
implemented, and independent evaluation that provides information about 
the key elements and the approach of the project so as to facilitate 
replication or testing in other settings; (5) the percentage of 
grantees with a completed evaluation that provided information on the 
cost-effectiveness of the key practices to identify potential obstacles 
and success factors to scaling; and (6) the cost per student served by 
the grant.
    Project-Specific Performance Measures: Applicants must propose 
project-specific performance measures and performance targets (as 
defined in this notice) consistent with the objectives of the proposed 
project. Applications must provide the following information as 
directed under 34 CFR 75.110(b) and (c):
    (1) Performance measures. How each proposed performance measure 
would accurately measure the performance of the project and how the 
proposed performance measure would be consistent with the performance 
measures established for the program funding the competition.
    (2) Baseline (as defined in this notice) data. (i) Why each 
proposed baseline is valid; or (ii) if the applicant has determined 
that there are no established baseline data for a particular 
performance measure, an explanation of why there is no established 
baseline and of how and when, during the project period, the applicant 
would establish a valid baseline for the performance measure.
    (3) Performance targets. Why each proposed performance target is 
ambitious yet achievable compared to the baseline for the performance 
measure and when, during the project period, the applicant would meet 
the performance target(s).
    (4) Data collection and reporting. (i) The data collection and 
reporting methods the applicant would use and why those methods are 
likely to yield reliable, valid, and meaningful performance data; and 
(ii) the applicant's capacity to collect and report reliable, valid, 
and meaningful performance data, as evidenced by high-quality data 
collection, analysis, and reporting in other projects or research.
    All grantees must submit an annual performance report with 
information that is responsive to these performance measures.
    6. Continuation Awards: In making a continuation award under 34 CFR 
75.253, the Secretary considers, among other things, whether a grantee 
has made substantial progress in achieving the goals and objectives of 
the project; whether the grantee has expended funds in a manner that is 
consistent with its approved application and budget; and, if the 
Secretary has established performance measurement requirements, whether 
the grantee has made substantial progress in achieving the performance 
targets in the grantee's approved application.
    In making a continuation award, the Secretary also considers 
whether the grantee is operating in compliance with the assurances in 
its approved application, including those applicable to Federal civil 
rights laws that prohibit discrimination in programs or activities 
receiving Federal financial assistance from the Department (34 CFR 
100.4, 104.5, 106.4, 108.8, and 110.23).

VII. Other Information

    Accessible Format: On request to the program contact person listed 
under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT, individuals with disabilities 
can obtain this document and a copy of the application package in an 
accessible format. The Department will provide the requestor with an 
accessible format that may include Rich Text Format (RTF) or text 
format (txt), a thumb drive, an MP3 file, braille, large print, 
audiotape, or compact disc, or other accessible format.
    Electronic Access to This Document: The official version of this 
document is the document published in the Federal Register. You may 
access the official

[[Page 25006]]

edition of the Federal Register and the Code of Federal Regulations at 
www.govinfo.gov. At this site you can view this document, as well as 
all other documents of this Department published in the Federal 
Register, in text or Portable Document Format (PDF). To use PDF you 
must have Adobe Acrobat Reader, which is available free at the site.
    You may also access documents of the Department published in the 
Federal Register by using the article search feature at 
www.federalregister.gov. Specifically, through the advanced search 
feature at this site, you can limit your search to documents published 
by the Department.

Ruth E. Ryder,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy and Programs, Office of 
Elementary and Secondary Education.
[FR Doc. 2022-09085 Filed 4-26-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4000-01-P