[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 53 (Friday, March 18, 2022)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 15335-15339]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-05737]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 180
[EPA-HQ-OPP-2020-0375; FRL-9472-01-OCSPP]
Bicyclopyrone; Pesticide Tolerances
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This regulation establishes tolerances for residues of
bicyclopyrone in or on banana; broccoli; hop, dried cones; horseradish;
onion, bulb; onion, green; papaya; strawberry; sweet potato, tuber;
timothy, forage; timothy, hay and watermelon. Syngenta Crop Protection,
LLC., requested these tolerances under the Federal Food, Drug, and
Cosmetic Act (FFDCA).
DATES: This regulation is effective March 18, 2022. Objections and
requests for hearings must be received on or before May 17, 2022 and
must be filed in accordance with the instructions provided in 40 CFR
part 178 (see also Unit I.C. of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION).
ADDRESSES: The docket for this action, identified by docket
identification (ID) number EPA-HQ-OPP-2020-0375, is available at
https://www.regulations.gov or at the Office of Pesticide Programs
Regulatory Public Docket (OPP Docket) in the Environmental Protection
Agency Docket Center (EPA/DC), West William Jefferson Clinton Bldg.,
Rm. 3334, 1301 Constitution Ave. NW, Washington, DC 20460-0001. The
Public Reading Room is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through
Friday, excluding legal holidays. The telephone number for the Public
Reading Room is (202) 566-1744, and the telephone number for the OPP
Docket is (703) 305-5805.
Due to the public health concerns related to COVID-19, the EPA
Docket Center (EPA/DC) and Reading Room is open to visitors by
appointment only. For the latest status information on EPA/DC services
and access, visit https://www.epa.gov/dockets.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Marietta Echeverria, Registration
Division (7505P), Office of Pesticide Programs, Environmental
Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW, Washington, DC 20460-
0001; main telephone number: (703) 305-7090; email address:
[email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. General Information
A. Does this action apply to me?
You may be potentially affected by this action if you are an
agricultural producer, food manufacturer, or pesticide manufacturer.
The following list of North American Industrial Classification System
(NAICS) codes is not intended to be exhaustive, but rather provides a
guide to help readers determine whether this document applies to them.
Potentially affected entities may include:
Crop production (NAICS code 111).
Animal production (NAICS code 112).
[[Page 15336]]
Food manufacturing (NAICS code 311).
Pesticide manufacturing (NAICS code 32532).
B. How can I get electronic access to other related information?
You may access a frequently updated electronic version of EPA's
tolerance regulations at 40 CFR part 180 through the Office of the
Federal Register's e-CFR site at https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-40.
C. How can I file an objection or hearing request?
Under FFDCA section 408(g), 21 U.S.C. 346a, any person may file an
objection to any aspect of this regulation and may also request a
hearing on those objections. You must file your objection or request a
hearing on this regulation in accordance with the instructions provided
in 40 CFR part 178. To ensure proper receipt by EPA, you must identify
docket ID number EPA-HQ-OPP-2020-0375 in the subject line on the first
page of your submission. All objections and requests for a hearing must
be in writing and must be received by the Hearing Clerk on or before
May 17, 2022. Addresses for mail and hand delivery of objections and
hearing requests are provided in 40 CFR 178.25(b).
In addition to filing an objection or hearing request with the
Hearing Clerk as described in 40 CFR part 178, please submit a copy of
the filing (excluding any Confidential Business Information (CBI)) for
inclusion in the public docket. Information not marked confidential
pursuant to 40 CFR part 2 may be disclosed publicly by EPA without
prior notice. Submit the non-CBI copy of your objection or hearing
request, identified by docket ID number EPA-HQ-OPP-2020-0375, by one of
the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the online instructions for submitting comments. Do not submit
electronically any information you consider to be CBI or other
information whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Mail: OPP Docket, Environmental Protection Agency Docket
Center (EPA/DC), (28221T), 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW, Washington, DC
20460-0001.
Hand Delivery: To make special arrangements for hand
delivery or delivery of boxed information, please follow the
instructions at https://www.epa.gov/dockets/contacts.html.
Additional instructions on commenting or visiting the docket, along
with more information about dockets generally, is available at https://www.epa.gov/dockets.
II. Summary of Petitioned-For Tolerance
In the Federal Register of February 25, 2021 (86 FR 11488) (FRL-
10020-47), EPA issued a document pursuant to FFDCA section 408(d)(3),
21 U.S.C. 346a(d)(3), announcing the filing of a pesticide petition (PP
0F8853) by Syngenta Crop Protection, LLC, P.O. Box 18300, Greensboro,
NC 27419-8300. The petition requested that 40 CFR part 180 be amended
by establishing tolerances for residues of the herbicide bicyclopyrone,
4-hydroxy-3-{2-[(2-methoxyethoxy)methyl{time} -6-(trifluoromethyl)-3-
pyridylcarbonyl{time} bicyclo[3.2.1]oct-3-en-2-one, in or on banana at
0.01 parts per million (ppm); broccoli at 0.01 ppm; garlic, bulb at
0.02 ppm, hops, dried cones at 0.04 ppm; horseradish at 0.015 ppm;
onion, bulb at 0.02 ppm; onion, green at 0.05 ppm; papaya at 0.01 ppm;
plantains at 0.01 ppm; strawberry at 0.01 ppm; sweet potato, roots at
0.02 ppm; timothy, forage at 0.9 ppm; timothy, hay at 1.5 ppm; and
watermelon at 0.01 ppm.
That document referenced a summary of the petition prepared by
Syngenta Crop Protection, LLC., the registrant, which is available in
the docket, https://www.regulations.gov. There were no comments
received in response to the notice of filing.
Based upon review of the data supporting the petition, EPA is
establishing several tolerances at different levels than requested by
the petitioner, is not establishing several petitioned for tolerances,
and adjusted several commodity definitions. The reasons for these
changes are explained in Unit IV.C.
III. Aggregate Risk Assessment and Determination of Safety
Section 408(b)(2)(A)(i) of FFDCA allows EPA to establish a
tolerance (the legal limit for a pesticide chemical residue in or on a
food) only if EPA determines that the tolerance is ``safe.'' Section
408(b)(2)(A)(ii) of FFDCA defines ``safe'' to mean that ``there is a
reasonable certainty that no harm will result from aggregate exposure
to the pesticide chemical residue, including all anticipated dietary
exposures and all other exposures for which there is reliable
information.'' This includes exposure through drinking water and in
residential settings but does not include occupational exposure.
Section 408(b)(2)(C) of FFDCA requires EPA to give special
consideration to exposure of infants and children to the pesticide
chemical residue in establishing a tolerance and to ``ensure that there
is a reasonable certainty that no harm will result to infants and
children from aggregate exposure to the pesticide chemical residue. . .
.''
Consistent with FFDCA section 408(b)(2)(D), and the factors
specified in FFDCA section 408(b)(2)(D), EPA has reviewed the available
scientific data and other relevant information in support of this
action. EPA has sufficient data to assess the hazards of and to make a
determination on aggregate exposure for bicyclopyrone including
exposure resulting from the tolerances established by this action.
EPA's assessment of exposures and risks associated with bicyclopyrone
follows.
In an effort to streamline its publications in the Federal
Register, EPA is not reprinting sections of the rule that repeat what
has been previously published in tolerance rulemakings for the same
pesticide chemical. Where scientific information concerning a
particular chemical remains unchanged, the content of those sections
would not vary between tolerance rulemaking and republishing the same
sections is unnecessary and duplicative. EPA considers referral back to
those sections as sufficient to provide an explanation of the
information EPA considered in making its safety determination for the
new rulemaking.
EPA has previously published a number of tolerance rulemakings for
bicyclopyrone, in which EPA concluded, based on the available
information, that there is a reasonable certainty that no harm would
result from aggregate exposure to bicyclopyrone and established
tolerances for residues of that chemical. EPA is incorporating
previously published sections from those rulemakings as described
further in this rulemaking, as they remain unchanged.
A. Toxicological Profile
For a discussion of the Toxicological Profile of bicyclopyrone, see
Unit III.A. of the December 23, 2021, rulemaking (86-FR-72846) (FRL-
9199-01-OCSPP).
B. Toxicological Points of Departure/Levels of Concern
Once a pesticide's toxicological profile is determined, EPA
identifies toxicological points of departure (POD) and levels of
concern to use in evaluating the risk posed by human exposure to the
pesticide. The PODs and levels of concern have not changed from the
previous rulemaking and EPA incorporates the background information in
the December 23, 2021, rulemaking. A summary of the
[[Page 15337]]
toxicological endpoints for bicyclopyrone used for human risk
assessment can be found in the document titled ``Bicyclopyrone: Human
Health Risk Assessment for the Establishment of Permanent Tolerances
for Residues in/on Bananas, Broccoli, Dry Bulb Onions, Green Onion,
Hops, Horseradish, Papaya, Strawberry, Sweet Potatoes, Timothy Forage,
Timothy Hay, and Watermelon'' (hereinafter ``Bicyclopyrone Human Health
Risk Assessment'') in docket ID number EPA-HQ-OPP-2020-0375 in
regulations.gov.
C. Exposure Assessment
Much of the exposure assessment remains the same although updates
have occurred to accommodate exposures from the petitioned-for
tolerance. These updates are discussed in this section; for a
description of the rest of the EPA approach to and assumptions for the
exposure assessment, please reference Unit III.C. of the December 23,
2021, rulemaking.
EPA's dietary exposure assessments have been updated to include the
additional exposure from the new uses of bicyclopyrone on banana;
broccoli; hop, dried cones; horseradish; onion, bulb; onion, green;
papaya; strawberry; sweet potato, tuber; timothy, forage; timothy, hay;
and watermelon (see Unit IV. C for an explanation of the differences
between this list and the petitioned for tolerances). The assessment
used the same assumptions as the December 23, 2021, final rule
concerning average field trial residues for registered crops, tolerance
levels for the proposed crops and recently added crops, average
empirical processing factors for registered crops, anticipated residues
for livestock commodities, and percent crop treated (PCT) for
registered crops commodities.
D. Anticipated Residue and Percent Crop Treated (PCT) Information
Section 408(b)(2)(E) of FFDCA authorizes EPA to use available data
and information on the anticipated residue levels of pesticide residues
in food and the actual levels of pesticide residues that have been
measured in food. If EPA relies on such information, EPA must require
pursuant to FFDCA section 408(f)(1) that data be provided 5 years after
the tolerance is established, modified, or left in effect,
demonstrating that the levels in food are not above the levels
anticipated. For the present action, EPA will issue such data call-ins
as are required by FFDCA section 408(b)(2)(E) and authorized under
FFDCA section 408(f)(1). Data will be required to be submitted no later
than 5 years from the date of issuance of these tolerances.
Section 408(b)(2)(F) of FFDCA states that the Agency may use data
on the actual percent of food treated for assessing chronic dietary
risk only if:
Condition a: The data used are reliable and provide a
valid basis to show what percentage of the food derived from such crop
is likely to contain the pesticide residue.
Condition b: The exposure estimate does not underestimate
exposure for any significant subpopulation group.
Condition c: Data are available on pesticide use and food
consumption in a particular area, and the exposure estimate does not
understate exposure for the population in such area.
In addition, the Agency must provide for periodic evaluation of any
estimates used. To provide for the periodic evaluation of the estimate
of PCT as required by FFDCA section 408(b)(2)(F), EPA may require
registrants to submit data on PCT.
The chronic dietary assessment incorporated the following average
PCT estimates: Barley, 1%; field corn, 10%; sweet corn, 5%; pop corn,
10% (used the higher of the corn PCT); and wheat, 5% (used spring wheat
PCT which was higher than winter wheat PCTs). An estimate of 100% crop
treated was used for all other commodities. The PCT for livestock
commodities is based on the PCT value for the livestock feed item used
in the dietary burden with the highest percent crop treated (field
corn, 10%).
In most cases, EPA uses available data from the United States
Department of Agriculture/National Agricultural Statistics Service
(USDA/NASS), proprietary market surveys, and the California Department
of Pesticide Regulation (CalDPR) Pesticide Use Reporting (PUR) for the
chemical/crop combination for the most recent 10 years. EPA uses an
average PCT for chronic dietary risk analysis and a maximum PCT for
acute dietary risk analysis. The average PCT figure for each existing
use is derived by combining available public and private market survey
data for that use, averaging across all observations, and rounding to
the nearest 5%, except for those situations in which the average PCT is
less than 1% or less than 2.5%. In those cases, the Agency would use
less than 1% or less than 2.5% as the average PCT value, respectively.
The maximum PCT figure is the highest observed maximum value reported
within the most recent 10 years of available public and private market
survey data for the existing use and rounded up to the nearest multiple
of 5%, except where the maximum PCT is less than 2.5%, in which case,
the Agency uses less than 2.5% as the maximum PCT.
The Agency believes that the three conditions discussed in Unit
III.C.1. iv have been met. With respect to Condition a, PCT estimates
are derived from Federal and private market survey data, which are
reliable and have a valid basis. The Agency is reasonably certain that
the percentage of the food treated is not likely to be an
underestimation. As to Conditions b and c, regional consumption
information and consumption information for significant subpopulations
is taken into account through EPA's computer-based model for evaluating
the exposure of significant subpopulations including several regional
groups. Use of this consumption information in EPA's risk assessment
process ensures that EPA's exposure estimate does not understate
exposure for any significant subpopulation group and allows the Agency
to be reasonably certain that no regional population is exposed to
residue levels higher than those estimated by the Agency. Other than
the data available through national food consumption surveys, EPA does
not have available reliable information on the regional consumption of
food to which bicyclopyrone may be applied in a particular area.
Dietary exposure from drinking water. EPA has revised the
bicyclopyrone Drinking Water Assessment (DWA) since the December 23,
2021, rule. The 2016 DWA for bicyclopyrone (USEPA, 2016, DP Barcode
428614) recommended moving forward with estimated drinking water
concentrations (EDWCs) for a groundwater scenario that occurred in a
wheat and barley growing area and move away from the existing EDWCs
based on a simulation resulting in the highest groundwater EDWC. The
Human Health Risk Assessment (USEPA, 2022, DP Barcode 459563) used the
highest groundwater EDWCs from the previous 2016 DWA. The maximum acute
and chronic/cancer surface water and groundwater EDWCs associated with
bicyclopyrone use were 7.61 parts per billion (ppb) for the maximum
acute and 6.66 ppb, for the maximum chronic/cancer.
Non-occupational exposure. There are no new residential (non-
occupational) exposures associated with the new proposed uses and
bicyclopyrone is not registered for any use patterns that would result
in residential exposure.
Cumulative exposure. For a discussion of the cumulative exposure
assessment of bicyclopyrone, see Unit
[[Page 15338]]
III.C.4 of the December 23, 2021, rulemaking.
Safety factor for infants and children. EPA continues to conclude
that there are reliable data to support the reduction of the Food
Quality Protection Act (FQPA) safety factor. See Unit III.D of the
December 23, 2021 rulemaking for a discussion of the Agency's rationale
for that determination.
Aggregate risks and determination of safety. EPA determines whether
acute and chronic dietary pesticide exposures are safe by comparing
aggregate exposure estimates to the acute population-adjusted dose
(aPAD) and chronic PAD (cPAD). For linear cancer risks, EPA calculates
the lifetime probability of acquiring cancer given the estimated
aggregate exposure. Short-, intermediate-, and chronic-term risks are
evaluated by comparing the estimated aggregate food, water, and
residential exposure to the appropriate points of departure to ensure
that an adequate margin of exposure exists.
An acute dietary exposure assessment was not conducted as
toxicological effects attributable to a single dose were not
identified. Chronic dietary risks are below the Agency's level of
concern of 100% of the cPAD: The population subgroup with the highest
exposure estimate was all infants at 16% of the cPAD. Bicyclopyrone is
classified as ``Suggestive Evidence of Carcinogenic Potential''.
However, because the Agency has determined that the chronic reference
dose will be protective of any potential cancer risk and there are no
chronic risks that exceeds the Agency's level of concern, EPA concludes
that there is not a concern for cancer risk from exposure to
bicyclopyrone. There are no registered or new uses of bicyclopyrone
that would result in residential exposure, therefore the aggregate risk
estimates are equivalent to the chronic dietary (food and water) risk
estimates and are not of concern.
Based on these risk assessments and the information described
above, EPA concludes that there is a reasonable certainty that no harm
will result to the general population, or to infants and children from
aggregate exposure to bicyclopyrone residues. More detailed information
about the Agency's analysis can be found in the Bicyclopyrone Human
Health Risk Assessment in docket ID number EPA-HQ-OPP-2020-0373 in
regulations.gov at https://www.regulations.gov.
IV. Other Considerations
A. Analytical Enforcement Methodology
For a discussion of the available analytical enforcement method,
see Unit IV.A of the December 23, 2021, rulemaking.
B. International Residue Limits
In making its tolerance decisions, EPA seeks to harmonize U.S.
tolerances with international standards whenever possible, consistent
with U.S. food safety standards and agricultural practices. EPA
considers the international maximum residue limits (MRLs) established
by the Codex Alimentarius Commission (Codex), as required by FFDCA
section 408(b)(4).
The Codex has not established a MRL for residues of bicyclopyrone
in/on bananas, broccoli, dry bulb onions, timothy forage or hay, green
onion, hops, horseradish, papaya, strawberry, sweet potato, or
watermelon.
C. Revisions to Petitioned-For Tolerances
FFDCA section 408(d)(4)(A)(i) permits the Agency to finalize a
tolerance that varies from that sought by the petition. The petitioner
initially requested to include tolerances for both banana and plantain;
however, a separate tolerance is not required for plantain per 40 CFR
180.1(g). Therefore, the Agency is only finalizing a tolerance for
banana. The petitioner also requested to include tolerances for both
garlic and onion, bulb; however, a separate tolerance is not required
for garlic per 40 CFR 180.1(g). Therefore, the Agency is only
finalizing a tolerance for onion, bulb.
The proposed commodity definitions for hops, dried cones; sweet
potato, roots; have been modified to hop, dried cones; sweet potato,
tuber, respectively, in order be consistent with Agency nomenclature.
The petitioner initially requested a tolerance of 0.9 ppm for
timothy, forage and 1.5 ppm for timothy, hay. The petitioner appears to
have calculated the requested tolerance value using input residue
values from the forage and hay decline trials with a longer preharvest
intervals (PHI), which would underestimate the resulting residues. The
Agency used the residue values from the decline trial that had the
shortest PHI. The Agency deems it appropriate to use the more
conservative (i.e., results with the highest residue value) approach
and as a result produced a recommended tolerance of 1.5 ppm for
timothy, forage and 2 ppm for timothy, hay when entered into the OECD
calculator.
The proposed commodity for horseradish tolerance has also been
modified to be set at the respective limit of quantitation (LOQs), as
there were no residues detected.
V. Conclusion
Therefore, tolerances are established for residues of
bicyclopyrone, 4-hydroxy-3-[[2-[(2-methoxyethoxy)methyl]-6-
(trifluoromethyl)-3-pyridinyl]carbonyl]bicyclo[3.2.1]oct-3-en-2-one,
including its metabolites and degradates in or on banana at 0.01 ppm;
broccoli at 0.01 ppm; hop, dried cones at 0.04 ppm; horseradish at 0.02
ppm; onion, bulb at 0.02 ppm; onion, green at 0.05 ppm; papaya at 0.01
ppm; strawberry at 0.01 ppm; sweet potato, tuber at 0.02 ppm; timothy,
forage at 1.5 ppm; timothy, hay at 2 ppm; and watermelon at 0.01 ppm.
VI. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
This action establishes tolerances under FFDCA section 408(d) in
response to a petition submitted to the Agency. The Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) has exempted these types of actions from
review under Executive Order 12866, entitled ``Regulatory Planning and
Review'' (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993). Because this action has been
exempted from review under Executive Order 12866, this action is not
subject to Executive Order 13211, entitled ``Actions Concerning
Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution, or
Use'' (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001) or Executive Order 13045, entitled
``Protection of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety
Risks'' (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997). This action does not contain any
information collections subject to OMB approval under the Paperwork
Reduction Act (PRA) (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), nor does it require any
special considerations under Executive Order 12898, entitled ``Federal
Actions to Address Environmental Justice in Minority Populations and
Low-Income Populations'' (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
Since tolerances and exemptions that are established on the basis
of a petition under FFDCA section 408(d), such as the tolerance in this
final rule, do not require the issuance of a proposed rule, the
requirements of the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) (5 U.S.C. 601 et
seq.), do not apply.
This action directly regulates growers, food processors, food
handlers, and food retailers, not States or Tribes, nor does this
action alter the relationships or distribution of power and
responsibilities established by Congress in the preemption provisions
of FFDCA section 408(n)(4). As such, the Agency has determined that
this action will not
[[Page 15339]]
have a substantial direct effect on States or Tribal Governments, on
the relationship between the National Government and the States or
Tribal Governments, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various levels of government or between the
Federal Government and Indian Tribes. Thus, the Agency has determined
that Executive Order 13132, entitled ``Federalism'' (64 FR 43255,
August 10, 1999) and Executive Order 13175, entitled ``Consultation and
Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments'' (65 FR 67249, November 9,
2000) do not apply to this action. In addition, this action does not
impose any enforceable duty or contain any unfunded mandate as
described under Title II of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act (UMRA) (2
U.S.C. 1501 et seq.).
This action does not involve any technical standards that would
require Agency consideration of voluntary consensus standards pursuant
to section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act (NTTAA) (15 U.S.C. 272 note).
VII. Congressional Review Act
Pursuant to the Congressional Review Act (5 U.S.C. 801 et seq.),
EPA will submit a report containing this rule and other required
information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of Representatives, and
the Comptroller General of the United States prior to publication of
the rule in the Federal Register. This action is not a ``major rule''
as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 180
Environmental protection, Administrative practice and procedure,
Agricultural commodities, Pesticides and pests, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
Dated: March 9, 2022.
Marietta Echeverria,
Acting Director, Registration Division, Office of Pesticide Programs.
Therefore, for the reasons stated in the preamble, EPA is amending
40 CFR chapter I as follows:
PART 180--TOLERANCES AND EXEMPTIONS FOR PESTICIDE CHEMICAL RESIDUES
IN FOOD
0
1. The authority citation for part 180 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 21 U.S.C. 321(q), 346a and 371.
0
2. In Sec. 180.682 amend Table 1 to Paragraph (a) (1) by adding in
alphabetical order the entries ``Banana''; ``Broccoli''; ``Hop, dried
cones''; ``Horseradish''; ``Onion, bulb''; ``Onion, green'';
``Papaya''; ``Strawberry''; ``Sweet potato, tuber''; ``Timothy,
forage''; Timothy, hay''; and ``Watermelon'' to read as follows:
Sec. 180.682 Bicyclopyrone; tolerances for residues.
(a) * * *
(1) * * *
Table 1 to Paragraph (a)(1)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Parts per
Commodity million
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Banana...................................................... 0.01
* * * * *
Broccoli.................................................... 0.01
* * * * *
Hop, dried cones............................................ 0.04
* * * * *
Horseradish................................................. 0.02
* * * * *
Onion, bulb................................................. 0.02
Onion, green................................................ 0.05
Papaya...................................................... 0.01
* * * * *
Strawberry.................................................. 0.01
* * * * *
Sweet potato, tuber......................................... 0.02
Timothy, forage............................................. 1.5
Timothy, hay................................................ 2
* * * * *
Watermelon.................................................. 0.01
* * * * *
------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * *
[FR Doc. 2022-05737 Filed 3-17-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P