[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 47 (Thursday, March 10, 2022)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 13648-13663]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-04764]
========================================================================
Proposed Rules
Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains notices to the public of
the proposed issuance of rules and regulations. The purpose of these
notices is to give interested persons an opportunity to participate in
the rule making prior to the adoption of the final rules.
========================================================================
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 47 / Thursday, March 10, 2022 /
Proposed Rules
[[Page 13648]]
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
10 CFR Parts 429 and 430
[EERE-2019-BT-TP-0024]
RIN 1904-AE51
Energy Conservation Program: Test Procedure for Ceiling Fan Light
Kits
AGENCY: Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Department of
Energy.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking and announcement of public
meeting.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of Energy (``DOE'') proposes to amend the
test procedure for ceiling fan light kits (``CFLKs''). DOE proposes to
update references to industry standards to their latest versions and
incorporate industry standards necessary for executing the test; to
allow for the use of a goniophotometer; to revise definitions regarding
CFLKs with solid-state lighting (``SSL'') light sources to clarify the
scope and test methods for CFLKs; and to remove obsolete provisions.
DOE is seeking comment from interested parties on the proposal.
DATES: DOE will accept comments, data, and information regarding this
proposal no later than May 9, 2022. See section V, ``Public
Participation,'' for details. DOE will hold a webinar on Monday, April
11, 2022, from 1:00 p.m. to 2:30 p.m. See section V, ``Public
Participation,'' for webinar registration information, participant
instructions, and information about the capabilities available to
webinar participants. If no participants register for the webinar, it
will be cancelled.
ADDRESSES: Interested persons are encouraged to submit comments using
the Federal eRulemaking Portal at www.regulations.gov, under docket
number EERE-2019-BT- TP-0024. Follow the instructions for submitting
comments. Alternatively, interested persons may submit comments by
email to [email protected]. Include docket number EERE-2019-BT-
TP-0024 in the subject line of the message. No telefacsimiles
(``faxes'') will be accepted. For detailed instructions on submitting
comments and additional information on this process, see section V of
this document.
Although DOE has routinely accepted public comment submissions
through a variety of mechanisms, including postal mail and hand
delivery/courier, the Department has found it necessary to make
temporary modifications to the comment submission process in light of
the ongoing coronavirus 2019 (``COVID-19'') pandemic. DOE is currently
suspending receipt of public comments via postal mail and hand
delivery/courier. If a commenter finds that this change poses an undue
hardship, please contact Appliance Standards Program staff at (202)
586-1445 to discuss the need for alternative arrangements. Once the
COVID-19 pandemic health emergency is resolved, DOE anticipates
resuming all of its regular options for public comment submission,
including postal mail and hand delivery/courier.
Docket: The docket, which includes Federal Register notices, public
meeting attendee lists and transcripts (if a public meeting is held),
comments, and other supporting documents/materials, is available for
review at www.regulations.gov. All documents in the docket are listed
in the www.regulations.gov index. However, some documents listed in the
index, such as those containing information that is exempt from public
disclosure, may not be publicly available.
The docket web page can be found at www.regulations.gov/docket?D=EERE-2019-BT-TP-0024. The docket web page contains
instructions on how to access all documents, including public comments,
in the docket. See section V for information on how to submit comments
through www.regulations.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Dr. Stephanie Johnson, U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Energy
Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Building Technologies Office, EE-2J,
1000 Independence Avenue SW, Washington, DC 20585-0121. Telephone:
(202) 287-1943. Email [email protected].
Ms. Amelia Whiting, U.S. Department of Energy, Office of the General
Counsel, GC-33, 1000 Independence Avenue SW, Washington, DC 20585-0121.
Telephone: (202) 586-2588. Email: [email protected].
For further information on how to submit a comment, review other
public comments and the docket, or participate in a public meeting (if
one is held), contact the Appliance and Equipment Standards Program
staff at (202) 287-1445 or by email:
[email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: DOE proposes to maintain a previously
approved incorporation by reference and to incorporate by reference the
following industry standards into 10 CFR part 430:
ANSI/IES LM-9-20--Approved Method: Electrical and Photometric
Measurement of Fluorescent Lamps, Approved February 7, 2020 (``IES
LM-9-20'').
ANSI/IES LM-54-20--Approved Method: IES Guide to Lamp Seasoning,
Approved February 7, 2020 (``IES LM-54-20'').
IESNA LM-75-01/R12--Goniophotometer Types and Photometric
Coordinates, Approved August 4, 2001.
IES LM-78-17--Approved Method: Total Flux Measurement of Lamps Using
an Integrating Sphere, Approved January 9, 2017.
ANSI/IES LM-78-20--Approved Method: Total Luminous Flux Measurement
of Lamps Using an Integrating Sphere Photometer, Approved February
7, 2020 (``IES LM-78-20'').
ANSI/IES LM-79-19--Approved Method: Optical and Electrical
Measurements of Solid-State Lighting Products, Approved February 28,
2019 (``IES LM-79-19'').
Copies of IES LM-9-20, IES LM-54-20, IESNA LM-75-01/R12, IES LM-78-
17, IES LM-78-20, and IES LM-79-19 can be obtained by going to https://www.ies.org/store.
For a further discussion of these standards, see section IV.M.
Table of Contents
I. Authority and Background
A. Authority
B. Background
C. Deviation From Appendix A
II. Synopsis of the Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
III. Discussion
A. Scope of Applicability
B. Updates to Industry Standards
1. IES LM-9
2. IES LM-79
C. Proposed Amendments to Appendix V1
1. Revising Definitions for CFLKs with SSL Light Sources
2. Photometric Measurements
[[Page 13649]]
D. Proposed Amendments to Appendix V
E. Proposed Amendments to 10 CFR 429.33, 10 CFR 430.23, and 10
CFR 430.32.
F. Reporting
G. Test Procedure Costs and Harmonization
1. Test Procedure Costs and Impact
2. Harmonization
H. Compliance Date
IV. Procedural Issues and Regulatory Review
A. Review Under Executive Order 12866
B. Review Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act
C. Review Under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
D. Review Under the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969
E. Review Under Executive Order 13132
F. Review Under Executive Order 12988
G. Review Under the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
H. Review Under the Treasury and General Government
Appropriations Act, 1999
I. Review Under Executive Order 12630
J. Review Under Treasury and General Government Appropriations
Act, 2001
K. Review Under Executive Order 13211
L. Review Under Section 32 of the Federal Energy Administration
Act of 1974
M. Description of Materials Incorporated by Reference
V. Public Participation
A. Participation in the Webinar
B. Procedure for Submitting Prepared General Statements for
Distribution
C. Conduct of the Webinar
D. Submission of Comments
E. Issues on Which DOE Seeks Comment
VI. Approval of the Office of the Secretary
I. Authority and Background
DOE's energy conservation standards and test procedures for CFLKs
are currently prescribed at title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations
(``CFR''), part 430 section 32(s), 10 CFR part 430, subpart B, appendix
V (``Appendix V''), and 10 CFR part 430, subpart B, appendix V1
(``Appendix V1''). The following sections discuss DOE's authority to
establish test procedures for CFLKs and relevant background information
regarding DOE's consideration of test procedures for this product.
A. Authority
The Energy Policy and Conservation Act, as amended (``EPCA''),\1\
authorizes DOE to regulate the energy efficiency of a number of
consumer products and certain industrial equipment. (42 U.S.C. 6291-
6317) Title III, Part B \2\ of EPCA established the Energy Conservation
Program for Consumer Products Other Than Automobiles, which sets forth
a variety of provisions designed to improve energy efficiency. These
products include CFLKs, the subject of this document. (42 U.S.C.
6291(50), 42 U.S.C. 6293(16)(A)(ii), 42 U.S.C. 6295(ff)(2)-(5))
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ All references to EPCA in this document refer to the statute
as amended through the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act,
Public Law 117-58 (Nov. 15, 2021).
\2\ For editorial reasons, upon codification in the U.S. Code,
Part B was redesignated Part A.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The energy conservation program under EPCA consists essentially of
four parts: (1) Testing, (2) labeling, (3) Federal energy conservation
standards, and (4) certification and enforcement procedures. Relevant
provisions of EPCA specifically include definitions (42 U.S.C. 6291),
test procedures (42 U.S.C. 6293), labeling provisions (42 U.S.C. 6294),
energy conservation standards (42 U.S.C. 6295), and the authority to
require information and reports from manufacturers (42 U.S.C. 6296).
The Federal testing requirements consist of test procedures that
manufacturers of covered products must use as the basis for: (1)
Certifying to DOE that their products comply with the applicable energy
conservation standards adopted pursuant to EPCA (42 U.S.C. 6295(s)),
and (2) making other representations about the efficiency of those
consumer products (42 U.S.C. 6293(c)). Similarly, DOE must use these
test procedures to determine whether the products comply with relevant
standards promulgated under EPCA. (42 U.S.C. 6295(s))
Federal energy efficiency requirements for covered products
established under EPCA generally supersede State laws and regulations
concerning energy conservation testing, labeling, and standards. (42
U.S.C. 6297) DOE may, however, grant waivers of Federal preemption for
particular State laws or regulations, in accordance with the procedures
and other provisions of EPCA. (42 U.S.C. 6297(d))
Under 42 U.S.C. 6293, EPCA sets forth the criteria and procedures
DOE must follow when prescribing or amending test procedures for
covered products. EPCA requires that any test procedures prescribed or
amended under this section be reasonably designed to produce test
results which measure energy efficiency, energy use or estimated annual
operating cost of a covered product during a representative average use
cycle or period of use and not be unduly burdensome to conduct. (42
U.S.C. 6293(b)(3))
EPCA, as codified, directs DOE to establish test procedures for
CFLKs based on the test procedures referenced in the Energy Star
specifications for Residential Light Fixtures and Compact Fluorescent
Light Bulbs, as in effect on August 8, 2005. EPCA also specifies that
once established, DOE may review and revise the test procedures. (42
U.S.C. 6293(b)(16))
EPCA also requires that, at least once every 7 years, DOE evaluate
test procedures for each type of covered product, including CFLKs, to
determine whether amended test procedures would more accurately or
fully comply with the requirements for the test procedures to not be
unduly burdensome to conduct and be reasonably designed to produce test
results that reflect energy efficiency, energy use, and estimated
operating costs during a representative average use cycle or period of
use. (42 U.S.C. 6293(b)(1)(A))
If the Secretary determines, on her own behalf or in response to a
petition by any interested person, that a test procedure should be
prescribed or amended, the Secretary shall promptly publish in the
Federal Register proposed test procedures and afford interested persons
an opportunity to present oral and written data, views, and arguments
with respect to such procedures. The comment period on a proposed rule
to amend a test procedure shall be at least 60 days and may not exceed
270 days. In prescribing or amending a test procedure, the Secretary
shall take into account such information as the Secretary determines
relevant to such procedure, including technological developments
relating to energy use or energy efficiency of the type (or class) of
covered products involved. (42 U.S.C. 6293(b)(2)). If DOE determines
that test procedure revisions are not appropriate, DOE must publish its
determination not to amend the test procedures. (42 U.S.C.
6293(b)(1)(A)(ii))
In addition, EPCA requires that DOE amend its test procedures for
all covered products to integrate measures of standby mode and off mode
energy consumption. (42 U.S.C. 6295(gg)(2)(A)) Standby mode and off
mode energy consumption must be incorporated into the overall energy
efficiency, energy consumption, or other energy descriptor for each
covered product unless the current test procedures already account for
and incorporate standby and off mode energy consumption or such
integration is technically infeasible. If an integrated test procedure
is technically infeasible, DOE must prescribe a separate standby mode
and off mode energy use test procedure for the covered product, if
technically feasible. (42 U.S.C. 6295(gg)(2)(A)(ii)) Any such amendment
must consider the most current versions of the International
Electrotechnical
[[Page 13650]]
Commission (``IEC'') Standard 62301 \3\ and IEC Standard 62087 \4\ as
applicable. (42 U.S.C. 6295(gg)(2)(A))
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ IEC 62301, Household electrical appliances--Measurement of
standby power (Edition 2.0, 2011-01).
\4\ IEC 62087, Audio, video and related equipment--Methods of
measurement for power consumption (Edition 1.0, Parts 1-6: 2015,
Part 7: 2018). 1-04).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
DOE is publishing this notice of proposed rulemaking (``NOPR'') in
satisfaction of the 7-year review requirement specified in EPCA. (42
U.S.C. 6293(b)(1)(A))
B. Background
DOE's existing test procedure for CFLKs appears at title 10 of the
CFR part 430, subpart B, appendix V (``Uniform Test Method for
Measuring the Energy Consumption of Ceiling Fan Light Kits With Pin-
Based Sockets for Fluorescent Lamps'') and title 10 of the CFR part
430, subpart B, appendix V1 (``Uniform Test Method for Measuring the
Energy Consumption of Ceiling Fan Light Kits Packaged With Other
Fluorescent Lamps (not Compact Fluorescent Lamps or General Service
Fluorescent Lamps), Packaged With Other SSL Lamps (not Integrated LED
[light-emitting diode] Lamps), or With Integrated SSL Circuitry'').
On December 24, 2015, DOE published a final rule (``December 2015
Final Rule'') making two key updates to its CFLK test procedure. 80 FR
80209 (Dec. 24, 2015) First, DOE updated the CFLK test procedure to
require that representations of efficacy, including certifications of
compliance with CFLK standards, be made according to the corresponding
DOE lamp test procedures, where they exist (e.g., for a CFLK with
medium screw base sockets that is packaged with compact fluorescent
lamps (``CFLs''), the CFLK test procedure references the DOE test
procedure for CFLs at 10 CFR 430.23(y)). 80 FR 80209, 80211. Second,
DOE updated the CFLK test procedure by establishing in a separate
appendix, i.e., appendix V1, the test procedure for CFLKs packaged with
inseparable light sources that require luminaire efficacy testing
(e.g., CFLKs with integrated SSL circuitry) and for CFLKs packaged with
lamps for which DOE test procedures did not exist. 80 FR 80209, 80212.
With these changes, the December 2015 Final Rule aligned CFLK
requirements for measuring efficacy of lamps and/or light sources in
CFLKs with current DOE lamp test procedures.
The December 2015 Final Rule also replaced references to superseded
ENERGY STAR requirements with the latest versions of industry standards
in appendix V, the test procedure for measuring system efficacy of the
lamp-and-ballast platform. Additionally, for ease of reference, the
final rule replaced references to ENERGY STAR requirements in existing
CFLK standards contained in 10 CFR 430.32(s) with the specific
requirements. 80 FR 80209, 80211. Further, in that final rule, DOE
determined that it accounts for standby mode energy consumption of
CFLKs under the efficiency metric for ceiling fans rather than under
the CFLK efficiency metric; and therefore, did not specify a standby
mode test procedure for CFLKs. 80 FR 80209, 80212. Representations
regarding CFLKs subject to the January 21, 2020 standards must be based
on the amended test procedure, including appendix V1.\5\ See 80 FR
80209, 80220; 81 FR 580 (January 6, 2016); 83 FR 22587 (May 16, 2018).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ DOE published a final rule that changed the compliance date
from January 7, 2019 to January 21, 2020 to comply with Public Law
115-161, ``Ceiling Fan Energy Conservation Harmonization Act'' (the
``Act''), which was signed into law on April 3, 2018. 83 FR 22587
(May 16, 2018). The Act amended the compliance date for CFLK
standards to establish a single compliance date for the energy
conservation standards for both CFLKs and ceiling fans. Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
On August 6, 2021, DOE published a NOPR amending the certification
requirements for CFLKs (``August 2021 NOPR''). 86 FR 43120 (Aug. 6,
2021) In the August 2021 NOPR, DOE proposed to update the reporting
requirements for CFLKs to address the January 21, 2020 standards and
remove the reporting requirements for the January 1, 2007 standards.
The August 2021 NOPR proposed to align the CFLK certification reporting
requirements at 10 CFR 429.33 with the CFLK energy conservation
standards relating to: (a) Efficacy for light sources in CFLKs; (b)
lumen maintenance, lifetime, and rapid cycle stress testing for medium
screw base CFLs in CFLKs; (c) electronic ballasts for pin-based
fluorescent lamps in CFLKs; (d) test sample size; and (e) kind of lamp.
86 FR 43126, 43128.
EPCA requires DOE to review test procedures for covered products at
least once every 7 years. 42 U.S.C. 6293(b)(1)(A) DOE initiated the
first step in the 7 year review process by publishing a request for
information (``RFI'') document on May 4, 2021 (``May 2021 RFI''), which
identified specific issues on which DOE seeks input to aid in its
analysis of whether an amended test procedure for CFLKs would more
accurately or fully comply with the requirement that the test procedure
produces results that measure energy use during a representative
average use cycle for the product, and not be unduly burdensome to
conduct. 86 FR 23635.
DOE received comments in response to the May 2021 RFI from the
interested parties listed in Table I.1.
Table I.1--List of Commenters With Written Submissions in Response to the May 2021 RFI
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Commenter(s) Reference in this NOPR Commenter type
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
kecaph................................... kecaph...................... Private Citizen.
American Lighting Association............ ALA......................... Trade Association.
California Investor-Owned Utilities...... CA IOUs..................... Utilities.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
A parenthetical reference at the end of a comment quotation or
paraphrase provides the location of the item in the public record.\6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ The parenthetical reference provides a reference for
information located in the docket of DOE's rulemaking to develop
test procedures for CFLKs. (Docket No. EERE-2019-BT-TP-0024, which
is maintained at www.regulations.gov). The references are arranged
as follows: (Commenter name, comment docket ID number at page of
that document).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
C. Deviation From Appendix A
In accordance with section 3(a) of 10 CFR part 430, subpart C,
appendix A (``appendix A''), DOE notes that it is deviating from the
provision in appendix A regarding publication of an additional pre-NOPR
rulemaking document. Section 8(b) of appendix A. DOE is opting to
deviate from this step because, as discussed in the following section
DOE's proposal is limited to updating the referenced version of the
applicable industry standard, proposing certain terminology changes,
and deleting an obsolete reference. DOE has tentatively determined the
proposals do not require consideration of test data or market data that
would typically be requested through an additional pre-
[[Page 13651]]
NOPR rulemaking document, such as an RFI or notice of data
availability.
II. Synopsis of the Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
In this NOPR, DOE proposes to update 10 CFR 430.23(x), appendix V,
and appendix V1 as follows: (1) Update references to industry standards
to their latest versions and incorporate industry standards necessary
for executing the test; (2) modify appendix V1 to allow for the use of
a goniophotometer; (3) revise definitions regarding CFLKs with SSL
light sources in appendix V1 to clarify the scope and test methods for
CFLKs; and (4) remove appendix V, the test procedure that must be used
for CFLKs with pin-based sockets that are manufactured on or after
January 1, 2007, and prior to January 21, 2020 and rename appendix V1
as appendix V.
DOE's proposed actions are summarized in Table II.1 compared to the
current test procedure as well as the reason for the proposed change.
Table II.1--Summary of Changes in Proposed Test Procedure Relative to
Current Test Procedure
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Proposed test
Current DOE test procedure procedure Attribution
------------------------------------------------------------------------
References the 2009 version of Adopts the latest Harmonize with
IES LM-9 for taking electrical version, i.e., updated industry
and photometric measurement of 2020, of the standards.
fluorescent lamps in appendix referenced
V1. industry standard.
References the 2008 version of Adopts the latest Harmonize with
IES LM-79, which provides version, i.e., updated industry
methods for taking electrical 2019, of the standards.
and photometric measurements of referenced
SSL products in appendix V1. industry standard.
Does not incorporate IES LM-54, Adopts IES LM-54 Industry standard
the industry standard for lamp which is addition in test
seasoning, in appendix V1. referenced for procedure.
lamp seasoning in
IES LM-9.
Does not incorporate IES LM-78, Adopts IES LM-78- Industry standard
the industry standard for 20 which is addition in test
measurements in an integrating referenced for procedure.
sphere, in appendix V1. integrating
sphere
measurements in
IES LM-9 and
adopts IES LM-78-
17 which is
referenced for
integrating
sphere
measurements in
IES LM-79.
Defines ``CFLK with integrated Updates the term Clarifies the
SSL circuitry'' and ``other SSL names and categories CFLK
products'' in appendix V1. definitions for products fall
``CFLK with into, and thereby
integrated SSL the test methods
circuitry'' and (i.e., luminaire
``other SSL or lamp efficacy)
products,'' to to which they are
``CFLK with non- subject.
consumer-
replaceable SSL
circuitry'' and
``CFLK with
consumer-
replaceable SSL
circuitry,''
respectively.
Updates the
definitions for
these terms.
References appendix V and Removes appendix V Removes a section
appendix V1. of the test
procedure that is
no longer
applicable.
Does not allow the use of a Allows the use of Allows
goniophotometer. a goniophotometer manufacturers
and adopts IESNA flexibility in
LM-75, which is testing.
referenced for
goniophotometer
measurements in
IES LM-79.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
DOE has tentatively determined that the proposed amendments
described in section III of this NOPR would not alter the measured
efficiency of CFLKs or require retesting or recertification solely as a
result of DOE's adoption of the proposed amendments to the test
procedures, if made final. DOE has tentatively determined that the
proposed amendments described in section III of this NOPR are
reasonably designed to more accurately measure energy efficiency for
CFLKs during a representative average use cycle and are not overly
burdensome to conduct. Additionally, DOE has tentatively determined
that the proposed amendments, if made final, would not increase the
cost of testing. Discussion of DOE's proposed actions are addressed in
detail in section III of this NOPR.
III. Discussion
Although the May 2021 RFI requested comments, information and data
regarding several specific issues, DOE welcomed written comments from
the public on any subject within the scope of the document (including
topics not raised in the RFI). In response to the May 2021 RFI, DOE
received several general comments. Kecaph stated that ceiling fan
lights need to be inspected and that the public is not going to pay for
light fixtures that are not working properly. (kecaph, No. 2 at p. 1)
Regarding early assessment RFIs, the CA IOUs reiterated their recent
comments to DOE's NOPR on Procedures, Interpretations, and Policies for
Consideration in New or Revised Energy Conservation Standards and Test
Procedures for Consumer Products and Commercial/Industrial Equipment
(``Process Rule''). The CA IOUs generally supported DOE's proposal to
remove inactive components of the test procedure and update references
to industry resources, but the CA IOUs believed that early assessment
RFIs are largely unnecessary. Instead, the CA IOUs recommended that DOE
return to the publication of a RFI as the first step of a rulemaking.
(CA IOUs, No. 3 at pp. 1-2)
As stated in section I.A, DOE is publishing this NOPR to satisfy
the 7-year review requirement specified in EPCA to review test
procedures for CFLKs. The scope of this NOPR does not cover inspection
of installed ceiling fan lights, but rather addresses how to measure
their energy efficiency. The scope of this notice also does not cover
changes to the Process Rule. More information regarding updates to the
Process Rule can be found on www.regulations.gov under docket number
EERE-2021-BT-STD-0003-0044.
ALA stated that it strongly supported that all assessments of
standby power continue to be calculated with the ceiling fan's standby
power. (ALA, No. 4 at p. 2) As discussed in section I.B of this
document, DOE determined in the December 2015 Final Rule that standby
mode energy consumption of CFLKs is accounted for under the efficiency
metric for ceiling fans, rather than under the CFLK efficiency metric;
and therefore did not specify a standby mode test procedure for CFLKs.
80 FR 80209, 80212. DOE continues to find this determination valid and
therefore is not proposing a standby mode test procedure for CFLKs in
this NOPR.
[[Page 13652]]
A. Scope of Applicability
This rulemaking addresses the DOE test procedure for CFLKs. DOE
defines CFLKs as follows:
Ceiling fan light kit means equipment designed to provide light
from a ceiling fan that can be--(1) Integral, such that the
equipment is attached to the ceiling fan prior to the time of retail
sale; or (2) Attachable, such that at the time of retail sale the
equipment is not physically attached to the ceiling fan, but may be
included inside the ceiling fan at the time of sale or sold
separately for subsequent attachment to the fan.
10 CFR 430.2
The scope of the test procedure in appendix V1 covers fluorescent
lamps other than compact fluorescent lamps or general service
fluorescent lamps, SSL products other than integrated LED lamps, or
integrated SSL circuitry packaged with CFLKs. To support the test
procedure for CFLKs the following terms are defined in appendix V1:
``CFLK with integrated SSL circuitry,'' ``Covers,'' ``Other (non-CFL
and non-GSFL) fluorescent lamp,'' ``Other SSL products,'' and ``Solid-
State Lighting (SSL).'' In the definitions of ``Other SSL products''
and ``SSL'', DOE cites organic light-emitting diode (``OLEDs'') as an
example of a type of light source that uses SSL technology.
ALA stated that no manufacturers have any plans to use OLEDs in
CFLKs. (ALA, No. 4 at p. 2) DOE has included OLEDs as an example of SSL
technology because it is a type of light source that may be used in
CFLKs, even if it is not at present. Therefore, DOE maintains the use
of OLEDs as examples of an SSL product, to ensure there is an
applicable test procedure for these products.
B. Updates to Industry Standards
The current DOE test procedure for CFLKs in appendix V1 specifies
instructions for measuring the lamp efficacy or luminaire efficacy, as
applicable. Appendix V1 incorporates by reference the 2009 version of
Illuminating Engineering Society (``IES'') Lighting Measurement and
Testing (``LM'')-9 (``IES LM-9-09'' \7\) for testing ``other
fluorescent lamps'' (i.e., not CFLs or general service fluorescent
lamps (``GSFLs'')) and the 2008 version of IES LM-79 (``IES LM-79-08''
\8\) for testing ``other SSL products'' (i.e., not integrated LED
lamps) and CFLKs with integrated SSL circuitry. Appendix V1 references
these industry standards for test conditions and measurements. These
referenced industry test standards have been updated by industry since
DOE last amended its test procedures. IES LM-9-09 has been updated with
a 2020 version \9\ (IES LM-9-20) and IES LM-79-08 has been updated with
a 2019 version \10\ (IES LM-79-19). In addition, DOE is proposing to
incorporate by reference IES LM-54-20,\11\ IESNA LM-75-01/R12,\12\ IES
LM-78-20,\13\ and IES LM-78-17 \14\ for appendix V1. DOE received
several comments on how the changes in the updated versions of these
standards would impact DOE's test procedure for CFLKs.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ Illuminating Engineering Society, IES LM-9-09 IES Approved
Method: Electrical and Photometric Measurement of Fluorescent Lamps.
Approved January 31, 2009.
\8\ Illuminated Engineering Society, IES LM-79-08 Approved
Method: Electrical and Photometric Measurements of Solid-State
Lighting Products. Approved December 31, 2007.
\9\ Illuminating Engineering Society, ANSI/IES LM-9-20 Approved
Method: Electrical and Photometric Measurement of Fluorescent Lamps.
Approved February 7, 2020.
\10\ Illuminating Engineering Society, ANSI/IES LM-79-19
Approved Method: Optical and Electrical Measurements of Solid-State
Lighting Products. Approved February 28, 2019.
\11\ Illuminating Engineering Society, ANSI/IES LM-54-20
Approved Method: IES Guide to Lamp Seasoning, Approved February 7,
2020.
\12\ Illuminated Engineering Society of North America, IESNA LM-
75-01/R12 Goniophotometer Types and Photometric Coordinates.
Approved August 4, 2001.
\13\ Illuminating Engineering Society, ANSI/IES LM-78-20
Approved Method: Total Luminous Flux Measurement of Lamps Using an
Integrating Sphere Photometer. Approved February 7, 2020.
\14\ Illuminating Engineering Society of North America, IES LM-
78-17 IES Approved Method for Total Flux Measurement of Lamps Using
an Integrating Sphere. Approved January 9, 2017.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The CA IOUs suggested, regarding IES LM-9, LM-54, LM-78, LM-79, and
any other lighting industry test procedures referenced in the DOE test
procedure, that DOE communicate directly with the sponsoring bodies to
obtain information regarding the impacts of the proposed changes to the
referenced industry standards. The CA IOUs suggested that, in the
absence of such information, DOE commission testing of CFLKs using
currently referenced industry standards and proposed updates to
referenced industry standards to make an independent determination. (CA
IOUs, No. 3 at p. 2)
ALA stated that all the LM methods identified in the May 2021 RFI
are simply updated American National Standards Institute (``ANSI'')
accredited versions of LMs currently used. ALA further stated that it
typically supports updating standards that are backed by ANSI and have
no initial concerns with making these updates as long as there is no
meaningful difference in the measured value. (ALA, No. 4 at p. 1) ALA
stated that ALA's CFLK manufacturers do not have data to share that
shows the difference between current LMs and updated LMs since their
members focus their testing on what is currently required under
regulations. (ALA, No. 4 at p. 1) ALA stated that their members have
heard from other fixture and light source manufacturers that the
measurable differences are insignificant. ALA stated that if pre-
rulemaking testing proves otherwise and results in excessive retesting,
ALA CFLK manufacturers will oppose updates to the LMs as it will be
costly and time consuming. (ALA, No. 4 at pp. 1-2)
DOE has tentatively concluded that the proposed updates to industry
test standard references do not involve substantive changes to the test
setup and methodology and therefore do not pose additional test burden
and will have no impact on test costs. Further, DOE has tentatively
determined that incorporation by reference of the latest versions will
not change measured values, better aligns DOE test procedures with
industry practice, and further increases the clarity of the test
methods. DOE requests comment on its assessments of the impacts of
incorporating by reference IES LM-9-20, IES LM-54-20, IESNA LM-75-01/
R12, IES LM-79-19, IES LM-78-20, and IES LM-78-17 for appendix V1. Each
proposed industry test standard is discussed in the following sections.
1. IES LM-9
IES LM-9 provides methods for taking electrical and photometric
measurements of fluorescent lamps. DOE's initial review indicates no
major changes in IES LM-9-20 compared to IES LM-9-09, except for
updates to certain relevant references. Firstly, section 6.2 of IES LM-
9-20 updates its reference of IES LM-54, the industry standard for lamp
seasoning, from the 1999 version \15\ (``IESNA LM-54-99'') to the 2020
version (IES LM-54-20). Secondly, section 7.0 of IES LM-9-20 updates
its references of IES LM-78, the industry standard for measurements in
an integrating sphere, from the 2007 version \16\ (``IESNA LM-78-07'')
to the 2020 version (IES LM-78-20). DOE has tentatively concluded that
updates in IES LM-9-20 would not change final measured values and
proposes to update references from the 2009 version of IES LM-9 to the
2020 version in appendix
[[Page 13653]]
V1. These updates are discussed in detail in the following sections.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\15\ Illuminating Engineering Society of North America, LM-54-99
IESNA Guide to Lamp Seasoning, Approved May 10, 1999.
\16\ Illuminating Engineering Society of North America, IESNA
LM-78-07 IESNA Approved Method for Total Luminous Flux Measurement
of Lamps Using an Integrating Sphere Photometer. Approved January
28, 2007.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Because lamp seasoning is a necessary part of testing fluorescent
lamps in CFLKs, DOE is proposing to incorporate by reference IES LM-54-
20 for appendix V1 and to reference it when referencing IES LM-9-20 in
appendix V1. Because an integrating sphere is a method used to make
necessary photometric measurements of fluorescent lamps in CFLKs, DOE
is proposing to incorporate by reference IES LM-78-20 for appendix V1
and to reference it when referencing IES LM-9-20 directly in appendix
V1.
(a) IES LM-54
IES LM-54 is the industry standard for lamp seasoning. Appendix V1
currently references sections of IES LM-9-09, which reference IESNA LM-
54-99. The 2020 version of IES LM-9, proposed for incorporation by
reference for appendix V1 in this notice, updated this reference to IES
LM-54-20. The 2020 version of IES LM-54 adds numerous new sections,
which codify best practices, that labs are likely already following.
Specifically, IES LM-54-20 adds section 4.0 on physical environment
test conditions that covers topics such as keeping labs clean and
within the ambient temperature range; not subjecting lamps to excessive
vibration/shock; and using airflow to cool the seasoning area. IES LM-
54-20 also adds section 5.0 on electrical test conditions, which
includes instructions on frequency, voltage wave shape, and voltage
regulation; basic lamp connection protocols; and setting up an adjacent
ground for fluorescent lamps. Additionally, IES LM-54-20 includes new
section 6.1 on test preparation which addresses how to handle and mark
lamps. Finally, IES LM-54-20 adds a statement in section 6.2.1.1
expressly stating that the orientation of the lamp during seasoning
should be maintained for the entire test.
Based on DOE's knowledge of third party labs, DOE understands that
the added instructions in IES LM-54-20 regarding the appropriate
physical conditions of the lab, test setup for taking electrical
measurements, and marking and handling the lamps physical environment
conditions are basic steps followed by labs when conducting testing.
These basic instructions are also included in most up to date industry
standards. Therefore, DOE has tentatively determined that the additions
in IES LM-54-20 are industry best practices for taking lamp
measurements, and therefore likely are already being followed by
laboratories. DOE has tentatively concluded that the changes in IES LM-
54-20 will allow for further accuracy in testing but will not impact
final measured values of efficacy.
(b) IES LM-78
IES LM-78 is the industry standard for taking measurements in an
integrating sphere. Appendix V1 currently references sections of IES
LM-9-09 which reference IESNA LM-78-07. The 2020 version of IES LM-9,
proposed for incorporation by reference for appendix V1 in this NOPR,
has updated this reference to IES LM-78-20.
DOE identified several changes in the 2020 version of IES LM-78
compared to the 2007 version, including additions in the 2020 version
that are not in 2007 version. The 2020 version includes a discussion of
spectral measurements, in new sections 7.1.2 and 7.2.2, on taking
measurements with a spectroradiometer within a sphere. Section 5.1 and
5.2 of IES LM-78-20 also provides specific sections on 2[pi] and 4[pi]
geometry, respectively. For 4[pi] geometry, the 2020 version adds the
specification that the total surface area of the lamp should be less
than 2 percent of the total area of the sphere wall. Section 5.3 of IES
LM-78-20 adds an explanation on using sphere angular response
distribution function (``SRDF'') to assess sphere responsivity.
Further, in Section 7.2 of IES LM-78-20 the equation to compute
luminous flux now includes subtraction of dark/stray light, a ratio of
spectral mismatch correction factor to self-absorption factor, and the
sphere angular non-uniformity correction factor.
These additions do not change the existing method of taking lumen
measurements with an integrating sphere and only add additional
techniques that manufacturers could use if they choose to do so, such
as using a spectroradiometer, 4[pi] geometry, 2[pi] geometry, or the
SRDF function to determine sphere responsivity. Further, Section 6.2.1
and Section 6.3.2 of IESNA LM-78-07 also directed that stray light and
spectral mismatch correction, respectively should be accounted for in
taking lumen measurements. Section 7.0 of IES LM-78-20 only explicitly
incorporates these factors into the total luminous flux equation. DOE
has tentatively concluded that the additional information in IES LM-78-
20 is reflective of industry learning and making more accurate and
consistent measurements using the integrating sphere, but will not
impact final measured values of efficacy.
DOE also identified updates to specifications in IESNA LM-78-07.
Section 5.1 of IES LM-78-20 states the sphere diameter shall be 1.5
times the length of a linear lamp, whereas it was specified as 2 times
the length in Section 6.3.7 of IESNA LM-78-07. Section 5.6 of IES LM-
78-20 also states for the degree of the spectral match to the
V([lambda]) function, it is preferable that the value of the photometer
be less than 3 percent, whereas it was less than 5 percent in Section
3.5 of IESNA LM-78-07. Throughout IES LM-78-20, the term ``spatial
luminous intensity'' is replaced with ``angular luminous intensity''.
The updated standard has replaced ``spatial'' with ``angular'' to more
clearly describe that light is being measured by angles.\17\ Finally,
in Section 8.0 of IES LM-78-20, the uncertainty analysis section has
been condensed to a list of potential sources of errors and references
to other industry standards for guidance.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\17\ The term ``spatial luminous intensity'' and ``angular
luminous intensity'' have the same meaning in the industry standard.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The change in sphere diameter will have a minimal impact on the
size of the sphere used and subsequently on the test setup inside the
sphere and measurements. The change in the degree of spectral match to
the V([lambda]) function is a minor adjustment to a correction factor
in measurement and as such will result in more accurate testing, but
will not change the final measured value. Finally, the reorganization
of the uncertainty analysis section has minimal impact. DOE has
tentatively concluded that the updates to sphere diameter and spectral
match tolerance will allow for further accuracy in testing and will not
impact final measured values of efficacy.
2. IES LM-79
IES LM-79 provides methods for taking electrical and photometric
measurements of SSL products. DOE's initial review indicates several
changes in IES LM-79-19 compared to IES LM-79-08. Regarding testing
conditions, Section 4.2.1 of IES LM-79-19 changes the tolerance of
ambient temperature to +/-1.2 degrees Celsius measured not more than
1.5 meters from the test lamp, whereas in IES LM-79-08, it specified +/
-1 degree Celsius measured from not more than 1 meter. DOE has
tentatively concluded that the change in ambient temperature and
distance is minor and will not impact final measured values of
efficacy.
For instrumentation, Section 5.3.3 of IES LM-79-19 adds
specifications that the alternating current (``AC'') power analyzer to
have a frequency range from
[[Page 13654]]
direct current (``DC'') to at least 100 kilohertz (``kHz'') and for
products with high-frequency components a frequency range of at least 1
megahertz (``MHz''). Section 5.1.2 of IES LM-79-19 also adds current
crest factor capability requirements for the AC power supply. Regarding
power supply tolerances, Section 5.1 of IES LM-79-19 adds the
following: (1) The supplied frequency to have a tolerance of +/-2 hertz
(``Hz'') from the prescribed frequency; and (2) the AC voltage
component of the DC regulated voltage to be less than 0.5 percent root
mean square (``RMS'') of the DC regulated voltage.
Additionally, Section 3.2 of IES LM-79-08 required that the
calibration uncertainties of instruments for AC voltage and current be
a minimum of 0.2 percent and for the AC power meter be a minimum of 0.5
percent. Section 5.3 of IES LM-79-19 replaces these specifications with
expanded uncertainty minimums of: (1) 0.4 percent for RMS AC voltage
for 60 Hz sinusoidal waveform measurements; (2) 0.6 percent for RMS AC
current for 0.5 Hz to 1 kHz range and 2 percent for 1 kHz to 100 kHz
range; and (3) 1 percent for active AC power in the 0.5 Hz to 1 kHz
range and 2 percent in the 1 kHz to 100 kHz range. DOE has tentatively
concluded that the additions regarding tolerances of the test
instruments and power supply measurements and updates to calibration
uncertainties will allow for further accuracy in testing, but will not
impact final measured values of efficacy.
For test circuits, Section 5.0 of IES LM-79-19 adds the following
specifications: (1) Use of separate sense leads to avoid voltage drops;
(2) resistance and capacitance of test circuit (excluding power supply)
to be less than respectively 0.5 ohms and 1.5 nanofarads; and (3) the
internal impedance of voltage measurement circuits (excluding the power
meter) to be at least 1 megaohm. DOE has tentatively concluded that the
additions regarding the leads, resistance, capacitance and impedance
will allow for more stable test circuits and will not impact final
measured values of efficacy.
For electrical measurements, Section 5.4 of IES LM-79-19 adds
tolerances intervals of +/-0.5 percent for AC RMS voltage, +/-0.2
percent for DC voltage and current. It also states optical and
electrical waveforms should be analyzed to ensure measurement equipment
is appropriate. Section 5.4 of IES LM-79-19 adds a discussion for
testing low voltage products, stating that measurements can be taken
with a combination of a voltages above and below set value and
interpolated to get the required measurement. Section 5.4 of IES LM-79-
19 also addresses inrush currents, stating that the AC power supply
should begin applying current at zero-phase or, if the product is not
capable of a zero-phase start, the AC voltage should be ramped up from
0 volts over a few seconds.\18\ DOE has tentatively concluded that the
additions regarding the tolerances of voltages and analyzing waveforms
will allow for further accuracy in testing, but will not impact final
measured values of efficacy.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\18\ Some SSL products may experience inrush currents, which are
high instantaneous currents that occur when the power supply is
turned on.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regarding stability, Section 6.4 of IES LM-79-19 states that to
determine stability three readings of light output and electrical power
must be taken at 10-minute intervals over 20 minutes. Section 5.0 of
IES LM-79-08 required three readings taken at 15-minute intervals over
30 minutes. Section 6.4 of IES LM-79-19 also clarifies that it is the
average of the three measurements taken chronologically that should be
used to determine the stabilization threshold. Additionally, unlike IES
LM-79-08, IES LM-79-19 no longer allows the use of alternative
stabilization methods for measurements of a number of products of the
same model. Determining an alternative stabilization method that
results in total lumens being within 0.5 percent of the value when the
normal stabilization method is used would require considerable testing
and may need to be reassessed with each basic model. Therefore, DOE has
tentatively concluded that disallowing an alternative stabilization
method does not change the overall test burden. DOE has tentatively
concluded that the changes to the stabilization method will still
result in a stabilized lamp and will not impact final measured values
of efficacy.
Further, section 7.2 of IES LM-79-19 updates its references of IES
LM-78, the industry standard for measurements in an integrating sphere,
from the 2007 version (``IESNA LM-78-07'') to the 2017 version (IES LM-
78-17). Because an integrating sphere is a method used to make
necessary photometric measurements of light sources used in CFLKs, DOE
is proposing to incorporate by reference IES LM-78-17 for appendix V1
and to reference it when referencing IES LM-79-19 in appendix V1.
Although IES LM-78-17 has been updated to IES LM-78-20, DOE is
proposing to incorporate by reference IES LM-78-17 for appendix V1, as
it is the version directly referenced by IES LM-79-19. DOE has
tentatively determined that updating IESNA LM-78-07 to IES LM-78-20
will not impact final measured values (see section III.B.1). DOE has
also tentatively determined that changes in IES LM-78-20 compared to
IES LM-78-17 are minor and do not impact final measured values.
Therefore, DOE has tentatively concluded that since updating to IESNA
LM-78-07 to IES LM-78-20 does not impact final measured values,
updating IESNA LM-78-07 to IES LM-78-17 will also not impact final
measured values.
Finally, Section 7.2.2 of IES LM-79-19 adds that the
spectroradiometer system have a wavelength uncertainty within 0.5
nanometers. Section 7.3.2 of IES LM-79-19 also adds that for 2[pi]
geometry the total surface area of the test lamp internal to the sphere
should be no more than 1 percent of the total surface area of the
sphere. DOE has tentatively concluded that the additional
specifications regarding the spectroradiometer will allow for further
accuracy in testing, but will not impact final measured values of
efficacy.
In summary, DOE has tentatively concluded that updates in IES LM-
79-19 would not change final measured values and proposes to update
references from the 2008 version of IES LM-79 to the 2019 version in
appendix V1. DOE notes that the sections of IES LM-79-08 were
reorganized in the 2019 version. Currently, appendix V1 references
section 2 through 9.2 of IES LM-79-08, which correspond to sections 4
through 6 and 7.2 of IES LM-79-19. DOE proposes to change the section
references of IES LM-79-19 from section 2 through 9.2 to corresponding
sections 4 through 6 and 7.2. In addition, because DOE is proposing to
allow the use of the goniophotometer method (see section III.C.2 of
this document), DOE is also proposing to reference all of section 7.0
of IES LM-79-19 to include sub-sections addressing the goniophotometer
method. Section 7.2 of IES LM-79-19 references IESNA LM-75-01/R12 for
general recommendations and requirements on making measurements with
goniophotometers. Therefore, DOE is proposing to incorporate by
reference IESNA LM-75-01/R12 for appendix V1 and to reference it when
referencing IES LM-79-19 in appendix V1.
C. Proposed Amendments to Appendix V1
DOE proposes changes to appendix V1 to clarify definitions
regarding CFLKs with SSL light sources and allow for the use of the
goniophotometer method to make photometric
[[Page 13655]]
measurements. DOE also proposes to arrange the definitions in appendix
V1 in alphabetical order. Note that the proposed section references of
industry test standards are based on the version of the standard
proposed for adoption (see section III.B of this document).
1. Revising Definitions for CFLKs With SSL Light Sources
DOE proposes to revise certain existing terms in appendix V1.
Specifically, DOE proposes to replace the terms ``CFLK with integrated
SSL circuitry'' and ``other SSL products'' respectively, with ``CFLK
with non-consumer-replaceable SSL circuitry'' and ``CFLK with consumer-
replaceable SSL circuitry'' throughout appendix V1; and provide further
clarifications in the definitions of these terms.
DOE initiated an analysis of CFLK energy conservation standards by
publishing an RFI on June 4, 2021 (``June 2021 RFI''). 86 FR 29954. In
response to the June 2021 RFI, ALA recommended that DOE revise the two
product classes for standards to align with the current CFLK test
procedure that differentiate between LED lamps with an ANSI approved
base that are tested individually, and a light kit that incorporates an
integrated LED light source that is tested as a complete unit. (ALA,
No. 3 at p. 2 \19\) This comment indicates that it is not clear that
DOE's CFLK test procedure directs CFLKs with consumer replaceable SSL
light sources without ANSI bases to be tested individually using lamp
efficacy, similar to the required efficacy measurement for CFLKs with
ANSI base lamps. Additionally, information collected in manufacturer
interviews as part of the ongoing CFLK standards analysis also
indicated that this part of the test procedure may need further
clarification. DOE tentatively concluded that that the current
definitions for ``CFLK with integrated circuitry'' and ``other SSL
products'' were not clear and could lead to confusion when
manufacturers classify products and determine the required efficacy
measurement.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\19\ This comment is in response to the June 2021 RFI and can be
found on www.regulations.gov under Docket ID: EERE-2019-BT-STD-0040.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Under the current Appendix V1, CFLKs that use SSL circuitry are
separated as either a ``CFLK with integrated SSL circuitry'' or ``other
SSL products,'' and have different methods to measure efficacy. A CFLK
with integrated SSL circuitry is defined as a CFLK that has SSL light
sources, drivers, heat sinks, or intermediate circuitry (such as wiring
between a replaceable driver and a replaceable light source) that are
not consumer replaceable. Section 2.1 of 10 CFR Part 430, Subpart B,
Appendix V1. Because the SSL light source in a CFLK with integrated
circuitry will require cutting of wires or similar methods to remove
and test the light source, it cannot be restored to the same condition
it was prior to testing. Hence, DOE directs manufacturers to test and
report the efficacy with the light source in the CFLK, i.e., luminaire
efficacy. In this NOPR, to further clarify which CFLKs fall into this
category, DOE proposes to change the term ``CFLK with integrated SSL
circuitry'' to ``CFLK with non-consumer-replaceable SSL circuitry.''
Further, DOE proposes to modify the definition by specifying that the
light sources and all necessary components in these CFLKs cannot be
replaced without permanently altering the product; and specifying that
the light sources in these CFLKs do not have an ANSI base. DOE will
continue to require the measurement of luminaire efficacy for these
CFLKs. DOE proposes the following definition for ``CFLK with non-
consumer-replaceable SSL circuitry'':
CFLK with non-consumer-replaceable SSL circuitry means a CFLK
with a non-ANSI-standard base that has an SSL light source, driver,
heat sink, and intermediate circuitry (such as wiring between a
driver and light source), that are not consumer replaceable, i.e., a
consumer cannot replace the light source and all components
necessary for the starting and stable operation of the light source,
without permanently altering the product, and must replace the
entire CFLK upon failure.
Under section 2.4 of 10 CFR part 430, subpart B, Appendix V1,
``other SSL products'' are defined as an integrated unit consisting of
a light source, driver, heat sink, and intermediate circuitry that uses
SSL technology (such as light-emitting diodes or organic light-emitting
diodes) and is consumer replaceable in a CFLK. The term does not
include LED lamps with ANSI-standard bases. Examples of other SSL
products include OLED lamps, LED lamps with non-ANSI-standard bases,
such as Zhaga interfaces, and LED light engines. Hence, the SSL light
source is an integrated unit that can be removed, tested, and placed
back into the CFLK so it is the same product as it was when sold, i.e.,
consumer replaceable. Therefore, DOE directs manufacturers to remove
the SSL light source and test and report its efficacy, i.e., lamp
efficacy. In this NOPR to further clarify which CFLKs fall into this
category, DOE proposes to change the term ``other SSL products'' to
``CFLK with consumer-replaceable SSL circuitry.'' Further, DOE proposes
to modify the definition by specifying that the light sources and all
necessary components in these CFLKs can be replaced without permanently
altering the product; and specifying that the light sources in these
CFLKs do not have an ANSI base. DOE will continue to require the
measurement of lamp efficacy of the light sources in these CFLKs. DOE
proposes the following definition for ``CFLK with consumer-replaceable
SSL circuitry:''
CFLK with consumer-replaceable SSL circuitry means a CFLK with a
non-ANSI-standard base that has an SSL light source, driver, heat
sink, and intermediate circuitry (such as wiring between a driver
and light source) that are consumer replaceable, i.e., a consumer
can replace the light source and all components necessary for the
starting and stable operation of the light source as one integrated
unit, without permanently altering the product. Examples of CFLKs
with consumer-replaceable SSL circuitry include CFLKs that use OLED
lamps with non-ANSI-standard bases, LED lamps with non-ANSI-standard
bases, such as Zhaga interfaces, and LED light engines.
DOE proposes to continue to allow the luminaire efficacy of CFLKs
with non-consumer-replaceable SSL circuitry to be measured without a
cover if that cover is consumer replaceable. As such, DOE proposes to
also replace the reference of ``CFLKs with integrated SSL circuitry''
with ``CFLKs with non-consumer-replaceable SSL circuitry'' in the
definition of ``cover.'' Additionally, in the scope section of appendix
V1, DOE proposes to replace the reference of ``SSL products other than
integrated LED lamps'' with ``consumer-replaceable SSL circuitry other
than integrated LED lamps'' and replace the reference of ``integrated
SSL circuitry'' with ``non-consumer-replaceable SSL circuitry.''
As noted previously, to clarify the definitions of CFLKs with SSL
circuitry, DOE is proposing to specify that CFLKs with non-consumer-
replaceable SSL circuitry and CFLKs with consumer-replaceable SSL
circuitry have non-ANSI standard bases. Further, to clarify that other
SSL light sources with ANSI bases (not integrated LED lamps) must be
tested for lamp efficacy, DOE is proposing to specify the efficacy
measurement and referenced test procedure for these lamps in the table
in appendix V1.
DOE is also proposing to reflect these clarifications in the title
of appendix V1. DOE has tentatively concluded that clarifying the
terminology and definitions of CFLKs with SSL light sources will not
require a manufacturer
[[Page 13656]]
to change their method of testing and therefore will have no impact on
test costs. DOE requests comment on the proposed definitions for ``CFLK
with consumer-replaceable SSL circuitry'' and ``CFLK with non-consumer-
replaceable SSL circuitry.''
2. Photometric Measurements
In this NOPR, DOE is proposing to allow for the use of a
goniophotometer to test the lamp efficacy or luminaire efficacy of
CFLKs, as applicable.
ALA stated that informal testing conducted by ALA manufacturers
indicated that the difference in the measured efficacy using a
goniophotometer versus an integrated sphere was inconsequential. ALA
further stated that since efficacy differences are negligible, it
preferred the use of an integrated sphere because of time efficiency
and ease of use. (ALA, No. 4 at p. 2)
DOE has tentatively concluded that difference in measured efficacy
using a goniophotometer versus an integrated sphere is not significant
and allowing both the methods would allow manufacturers flexibility in
testing. Further, allowing manufacturers to test the performance of
CFLKs with either an integrated sphere or goniophotometer aligns the
CFLK test procedure with the DOE test procedures for GSFLs,
incandescent reflector lamps (``IRLs''), and general service
incandescent lamps (``GSILs''). Therefore, DOE is proposing to allow
the use of a goniophotometer in appendix V1. DOE has tentatively
concluded that allowing the use of both integrating sphere and
goniophotometer for photometric measurements will not require a
manufacturer to change their method of testing and therefore will have
no impact on test costs. DOE requests comment on the allowance of both
goniophotometer and integrating sphere methods and any data on the
difference in efficacy measurements when testing the same lamp with
goniophotometer versus integrating sphere.
D. Proposed Amendments to Appendix V
DOE proposes to remove appendix V as it is no longer needed. All
CFLKs manufactured as of January 21, 2020, must be tested according to
current appendix V1. See 80 FR 80209, 80220 and 81 FR 580. Therefore,
appendix V is no longer applicable, and removal of this appendix would
not result in any change to the currently applicable test procedure.
The CA IOUs and ALA both stated their support for removal of
appendix V. (CA IOUs, No. 3 at p.1; ALA, No. 4 at p.1) The CA IOUs
stated that under the current energy conservation standards, all CFLKs
manufactured as of January 21, 2020, must be tested in accordance with
appendix V1, and therefore appendix V is no longer applicable. (CA
IOUs, No. 3 at p. 1) ALA suggested DOE replace the language in appendix
V with the language in appendix V1. ALA stated that DOE could then
eliminate appendix V1 and update any cross references. (ALA, No. 4 at
p. 1) Because appendix V is no longer applicable for the test
procedure, DOE is proposing to remove appendix V. DOE also proposes to
rename appendix V1 as appendix V. DOE has tentatively concluded that
removing an unused appendix will have no impact on test costs.
E. Proposed Amendments to 10 CFR 429.33, 10 CFR 430.23, and 10 CFR
430.32.
As specified in section III.C, in the current appendix V1 (proposed
to be renamed appendix V), DOE is replacing ``other SSL products'' and
``integrated SSL circuitry'' respectively, with ``consumer-replaceable
SSL circuitry'' and ``non-consumer-replaceable SSL circuitry.'' The
terms ``other SSL products'' and ``integrated SSL circuitry'' are used
in 10 CFR 429.33 which specifies the CFLK sampling plan, represented
values, and certification; 10 CFR 430.23(x) which provides references
to DOE test procedures for lamps in CFLKs not within the scope of
appendix V1; and 10 CFR 430.32(s)(6) which specifies CFLK energy
conservation standards. To align with the revised terms in appendix V1,
in 10 CFR 429.33, 10 CFR 430.23(x) and 10 CFR 430.32(s)(6), DOE is
proposing to replace the terms ``other SSL products'' and ``integrated
SSL circuitry'' respectively, with ``consumer-replaceable SSL
circuitry'' and ``non-consumer-replaceable SSL circuitry.'' DOE is also
proposing to explicitly state the term ``other SSL light sources with
ANSI bases (not integrated LED lamps)'' in 10 CFR 429.33 and 10 CFR
430.23(x) to clarify instructions for these lamps.
F. Reporting
Manufacturers, including importers, must use product-specific
certification templates to certify compliance to DOE. For CFLKs, the
certification template reflects the general certification requirements
specified at 10 CFR 429.12 and the product-specific requirements
specified at 10 CFR 429.33. As discussed in the previous paragraphs,
DOE is not proposing to amend the product-specific certification
requirements for these products.
G. Test Procedure Costs and Harmonization
1. Test Procedure Costs and Impact
In this NOPR, DOE proposes to amend the existing test procedure for
CFLKs by (1) updating references to industry standards to their latest
versions and incorporating industry standards necessary for executing
the test; (2) modifying appendix V1 to allow for the use of a
goniophotometer; (3) revising definitions regarding CFLKs with SSL
light sources in appendix V1 to clarify the scope and test methods for
CFLKs; and (4) removing appendix V, the test procedure that must be
used for CFLKs with pin-based sockets that are manufactured on or after
January 1, 2007, and prior to January 21, 2020 and renaming appendix V1
as appendix V.
The proposed updates and incorporation of industry standards do not
change the method of testing CFLKs, but only make minor changes to
certain testing specifications. The changes do not require the purchase
of additional equipment or increase test burden, and subsequently do
not impact testing costs. The proposed change to allow the use a
goniophotometer method is optional and does not require manufacturers
to change their current testing methodology, and therefore does not
impact testing costs. The proposed revision to definitions regarding
CFLKs with SSL light sources only clarifies the scope and test
methodology, and therefore does not impact testing costs. Finally, DOE
is proposing to remove appendix V because it is obsolete and therefore,
its removal does not impact testing costs. DOE has tentatively
determined that the amendments proposed in this NOPR would not impact
testing costs.
2. Harmonization
DOE's established practice is to adopt relevant industry standards
as DOE test procedures, unless such methodology would be unduly
burdensome to conduct or would not produce test results that reflect
the energy efficiency, energy use, water use (as specified in EPCA) or
estimated operating costs of that product during a representative
average use cycle or period of use. Section 8(c) of appendix A of 10
CFR part 430, subpart C. In cases where the industry standard does not
meet EPCA statutory criteria for test procedures, DOE will make
modifications through the rulemaking process to these standards as the
DOE test procedure.
DOE is proposing to update the latest version of several industry
test standards referenced in appendix V1. For the electrical and
photometric
[[Page 13657]]
measurement of CFLKs, DOE is proposing to incorporate by reference IES
LM-9-20 and IES LM-79-19. For seasoning instructions for CFLKs, DOE is
proposing to incorporate IES LM-54-20. For integrated sphere
measurements for CFLKs, DOE is proposing to incorporate IES LM-78-20.
The industry standards DOE proposes to incorporate by reference via
amendments described in this NOPR are discussed in further detail in
section III.B of this document. DOE requests comment on the benefits
and burdens of the proposed updates and additions to industry standards
referenced in the test procedure for CFLKs.
H. Compliance Date
EPCA prescribes that, if DOE amends a test procedure, all
representations of energy efficiency and energy use, including those
made on marketing materials and product labels, must be made in
accordance with that amended test procedure, beginning 180 days after
publication of such a test procedure final rule in the Federal
Register. (42 U.S.C. 6293(c)(2))
If DOE were to publish an amended test procedure EPCA provides an
allowance for individual manufacturers to petition DOE for an extension
of the 180-day period if the manufacturer may experience undue hardship
in meeting the deadline. (42 U.S.C. 6293(c)(3)) To receive such an
extension, petitions must be filed with DOE no later than 60 days
before the end of the 180-day period and must detail how the
manufacturer will experience undue hardship. (Id.)
IV. Procedural Issues and Regulatory Review
A. Review Under Executive Order 12866
The Office of Management and Budget (``OMB'') has determined that
this test procedure rulemaking does not constitute ``significant
regulatory actions'' under section 3(f) of Executive Order (``E.O.'')
12866, Regulatory Planning and Review, 58 FR 51735 (Oct. 4, 1993).
Accordingly, this action was not subject to review under the Executive
order by the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs (``OIRA'') in
OMB.
B. Review Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.) requires
preparation of an initial regulatory flexibility analysis (``IRFA'')
for any rule that by law must be proposed for public comment, unless
the agency certifies that the rule, if promulgated, will not have a
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities.
As required by Executive Order 13272, ``Proper Consideration of Small
Entities in Agency Rulemaking,'' 67 FR 53461 (August 16, 2002), DOE
published procedures and policies on February 19, 2003, to ensure that
the potential impacts of its rules on small entities are properly
considered during the DOE rulemaking process. 68 FR 7990. DOE has made
its procedures and policies available on the Office of the General
Counsel's website: www.energy.gov/gc/office-general-counsel.
For manufacturers of CFLKs, the Small Business Association
(``SBA'') has set a size threshold, which defines those entities
classified as ``small businesses'' for the purposes of the statute. DOE
used the SBA's small business size standards to determine whether any
small entities would be subject to the requirements of the rule. See 13
CFR part 121. The size standards are listed by the North American
Industry Classification System (``NAICS'') code and industry
description and are available at www.sba.gov/document/support--table-size-standards. Manufacturing of CFLKs is classified under NAICS
335210, ``Small Electrical Appliance Manufacturing.'' The SBA sets a
threshold of 1,500 employees or less for an entity to be considered as
a small business for this category.
To estimate the number of companies that could be small businesses
that manufacture CFLKs impacted by this rulemaking, DOE conducted a
survey using information from DOE's Compliance Certification Database
and previous rulemakings. DOE used information from these sources to
create a list of companies that potentially manufacture or sell CFLKs.
DOE screened out companies that do not offer products covered by this
rulemaking, do not meet the definition of a ``small business,'' or are
foreign owned and operated. DOE determined that 31 companies are small
businesses that manufacture CFLKs covered by this rulemaking.
DOE has tentatively concluded that the proposed updates to DOE's
test procedure for CFLKs do not involve substantive changes to the test
setup and methodology and will not pose any additional test burden or
additional test costs for any CFLK manufacturers, large or small.
Therefore, DOE initially concludes that the impacts of the proposed
test procedure amendments proposed in this NOPR would not have a
``significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
entities,'' and that the preparation of an IRFA is not warranted. DOE
will transmit the certification and supporting statement of factual
basis to the Chief Counsel for Advocacy of the Small Business
Administration for review under 5 U.S.C. 605(b).
C. Review Under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
Manufacturers of CFLKs must certify to DOE that their products
comply with any applicable energy conservation standards. To certify
compliance, manufacturers must first obtain test data for their
products according to the DOE test procedures, including any amendments
adopted for those test procedures. DOE has established regulations for
the certification and recordkeeping requirements for all covered
consumer products and commercial equipment, including CFLKs. (See
generally 10 CFR part 429.) The collection-of-information requirement
for the certification and recordkeeping is subject to review and
approval by OMB under the Paperwork Reduction Act (``PRA''). This
requirement has been approved by OMB under OMB control number 1910-
1400. Public reporting burden for the certification is estimated to
average 35 hours per response, including the time for reviewing
instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and
maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the
collection of information.
Notwithstanding any other provision of the law, no person is
required to respond to, nor shall any person be subject to a penalty
for failure to comply with, a collection of information subject to the
requirements of the PRA, unless that collection of information displays
a currently valid OMB Control Number.
D. Review Under the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969
In this NOPR, DOE proposes test procedure amendments that it
expects will be used to develop and implement future energy
conservation standards for CFLKs. DOE has determined that this rule
falls into a class of actions that are categorically excluded from
review under the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C.
4321 et seq.) and DOE's implementing regulations at 10 CFR part 1021.
Specifically, DOE has determined that adopting test procedures for
measuring energy efficiency of consumer products and industrial
equipment is consistent with activities identified in 10 CFR part 1021,
appendix A to subpart D, A5 and A6. Accordingly, neither an
environmental assessment nor an environmental impact statement is
required.
[[Page 13658]]
E. Review Under Executive Order 13132
Executive Order 13132, ``Federalism,'' 64 FR 43255 (Aug. 4, 1999)
imposes certain requirements on agencies formulating and implementing
policies or regulations that preempt State law or that have federalism
implications. The Executive Order requires agencies to examine the
constitutional and statutory authority supporting any action that would
limit the policymaking discretion of the States and to carefully assess
the necessity for such actions. The Executive order also requires
agencies to have an accountable process to ensure meaningful and timely
input by State and local officials in the development of regulatory
policies that have federalism implications. On March 14, 2000, DOE
published a statement of policy describing the intergovernmental
consultation process it will follow in the development of such
regulations. 65 FR 13735. DOE has examined this proposed rule and has
determined that it would not have a substantial direct effect on the
States, on the relationship between the national government and the
States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government. EPCA governs and prescribes Federal
preemption of State regulations as to energy conservation for the
products that are the subject of this proposed rule. States can
petition DOE for exemption from such preemption to the extent, and
based on criteria, set forth in EPCA. (42 U.S.C. 6297(d)) No further
action is required by Executive Order 13132.
F. Review Under Executive Order 12988
Regarding the review of existing regulations and the promulgation
of new regulations, section 3(a) of Executive Order 12988, ``Civil
Justice Reform,'' 61 FR 4729 (Feb. 7, 1996), imposes on Federal
agencies the general duty to adhere to the following requirements: (1)
Eliminate drafting errors and ambiguity, (2) write regulations to
minimize litigation, (3) provide a clear legal standard for affected
conduct rather than a general standard, and (4) promote simplification
and burden reduction. Section 3(b) of Executive Order 12988
specifically requires that Executive agencies make every reasonable
effort to ensure that the regulation (1) clearly specifies the
preemptive effect, if any, (2) clearly specifies any effect on existing
Federal law or regulation, (3) provides a clear legal standard for
affected conduct while promoting simplification and burden reduction,
(4) specifies the retroactive effect, if any, (5) adequately defines
key terms, and (6) addresses other important issues affecting clarity
and general draftsmanship under any guidelines issued by the Attorney
General. Section 3(c) of Executive Order 12988 requires executive
agencies to review regulations in light of applicable standards in
sections 3(a) and 3(b) to determine whether they are met or it is
unreasonable to meet one or more of them. DOE has completed the
required review and determined that, to the extent permitted by law,
the proposed rule meets the relevant standards of Executive Order
12988.
G. Review Under the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
Title II of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (``UMRA'')
requires each Federal agency to assess the effects of Federal
regulatory actions on State, local, and Tribal governments and the
private sector. Public Law 104-4, sec. 201 (codified at 2 U.S.C. 1531).
For a proposed regulatory action likely to result in a rule that may
cause the expenditure by State, local, and Tribal governments, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector of $100 million or more in any one
year (adjusted annually for inflation), section 202 of UMRA requires a
Federal agency to publish a written statement that estimates the
resulting costs, benefits, and other effects on the national economy.
(2 U.S.C. 1532(a), (b)) The UMRA also requires a Federal agency to
develop an effective process to permit timely input by elected officers
of State, local, and Tribal governments on a proposed ``significant
intergovernmental mandate,'' and requires an agency plan for giving
notice and opportunity for timely input to potentially affected small
governments before establishing any requirements that might
significantly or uniquely affect small governments. On March 18, 1997,
DOE published a statement of policy on its process for
intergovernmental consultation under UMRA. 62 FR 12820; also available
at www.energy.gov/gc/office-general-counsel. DOE examined this proposed
rule according to UMRA and its statement of policy and determined that
the rule contains neither an intergovernmental mandate, nor a mandate
that may result in the expenditure of $100 million or more in any year,
so these requirements do not apply.
H. Review Under the Treasury and General Government Appropriations Act,
1999
Section 654 of the Treasury and General Government Appropriations
Act, 1999 (Pub. L. 105-277) requires Federal agencies to issue a Family
Policymaking Assessment for any rule that may affect family well-being.
This proposed rule would not have any impact on the autonomy or
integrity of the family as an institution. Accordingly, DOE has
concluded that it is not necessary to prepare a Family Policymaking
Assessment.
I. Review Under Executive Order 12630
DOE has determined, under Executive Order 12630, ``Governmental
Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected Property
Rights'' 53 FR 8859 (March 18, 1988), that this proposed regulation
would not result in any takings that might require compensation under
the Fifth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.
J. Review Under Treasury and General Government Appropriations Act,
2001
Section 515 of the Treasury and General Government Appropriations
Act, 2001 (44 U.S.C. 3516 note) provides for agencies to review most
disseminations of information to the public under guidelines
established by each agency pursuant to general guidelines issued by
OMB. OMB's guidelines were published at 67 FR 8452 (Feb. 22, 2002), and
DOE's guidelines were published at 67 FR 62446 (Oct. 7, 2002). Pursuant
to OMB Memorandum M-19-15, Improving Implementation of the Information
Quality Act (April 24, 2019), DOE published updated guidelines which
are available at www.energy.gov/sites/prod/files/2019/12/f70/DOE%20Final%20Updated%20IQA%20Guidelines%20Dec%202019.pdf. DOE has
reviewed this proposed rule under the OMB and DOE guidelines and has
concluded that it is consistent with applicable policies in those
guidelines.
K. Review Under Executive Order 13211
Executive Order 13211, ``Actions Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use,'' 66 FR 28355
(May 22, 2001), requires Federal agencies to prepare and submit to OMB,
a Statement of Energy Effects for any proposed significant energy
action. A ``significant energy action'' is defined as any action by an
agency that promulgated or is expected to lead to promulgation of a
final rule, and that (1) is a significant regulatory action under
Executive Order 12866, or any successor order; and (2) is likely to
have a significant adverse effect on the supply, distribution, or use
of energy; or (3) is designated by the Administrator of OIRA as a
significant energy action. For any proposed significant energy action,
the agency must give a detailed
[[Page 13659]]
statement of any adverse effects on energy supply, distribution, or use
should the proposal be implemented, and of reasonable alternatives to
the action and their expected benefits on energy supply, distribution,
and use.
The proposed regulatory action to amend the test procedure for
measuring the energy efficiency of CFLKs is not a significant
regulatory action under Executive Order 12866. Moreover, it would not
have a significant adverse effect on the supply, distribution, or use
of energy, nor has it been designated as a significant energy action by
the Administrator of OIRA. Therefore, it is not a significant energy
action, and, accordingly, DOE has not prepared a Statement of Energy
Effects.
L. Review Under Section 32 of the Federal Energy Administration Act of
1974
Under section 301 of the Department of Energy Organization Act
(Pub. L. 95-91; 42 U.S.C. 7101), DOE must comply with section 32 of the
Federal Energy Administration Act of 1974, as amended by the Federal
Energy Administration Authorization Act of 1977. (15 U.S.C. 788;
``FEAA'') Section 32 essentially provides in relevant part that, where
a proposed rule authorizes or requires use of commercial standards, the
notice of proposed rulemaking must inform the public of the use and
background of such standards. In addition, section 32(c) requires DOE
to consult with the Attorney General and the Chairman of the Federal
Trade Commission (``FTC'') concerning the impact of the commercial or
industry standards on competition.
The proposed modifications to the test procedure for CFLKs would
incorporate testing methods contained in certain sections of the
following commercial standards:
(1) ANSI/IES LM-9-20--Approved Method: Electrical and
Photometric Measurement of Fluorescent Lamps, Approved February 7,
2020;
(2) ANSI/IES LM-54-20--Approved Method: IES Guide to Lamp
Seasoning, Approved February 7, 2020;
(3) IESNA LM-75-01/R12--Goniophotometer Types and Photometric
Coordinates, Approved August 4, 2001;
(4) IES LM-78-17--Approved Method: Total Flux Measurement of
Lamps Using an Integrating Sphere, Approved January 9, 2017;
(5) ANSI/IES LM-78-20--Approved Method: Total Luminous Flux
Measurement of Lamps Using an Integrating Sphere Photometer,
Approved February 7, 2020; and
(6) ANSI/IES LM-79-19--Approved Method: Optical and Electrical
Measurements of Solid-State Lighting Products, Approved February 28,
2019.
DOE has evaluated these standards and is unable to conclude whether
they fully comply with the requirements of section 32(b) of the FEAA
(i.e., whether it was developed in a manner that fully provides for
public participation, comment, and review). DOE will consult with both
the Attorney General and the Chairman of the FTC concerning the impact
of these test procedures on competition, prior to prescribing a final
rule.
M. Description of Materials Incorporated by Reference
In this NOPR, DOE proposes to incorporate by reference the test
standard published by IES, ``ANSI/IES LM-9-20--Approved Method:
Electrical and Photometric Measurement of Fluorescent Lamps. IES LM-9-
20 is an industry accepted standard that describes methods for taking
electrical and photometric measurement of fluorescent lamps. The test
procedure proposed in this NOPR references IES LM-9 for testing the
performance of fluorescent lamps. IES LM-9 is readily available on
IES's website at https://www.ies.org/store.
In this NOPR, DOE proposes to incorporate by reference the test
standard published by IES, ANSI/IES LM-79-19--Approved Method: Optical
and Electrical Measurements of Solid-State Lighting Products. IES LM-
79-19 is an industry accepted standard that describes methods for
taking electrical and photometric measurements of SSL products. The
test procedure proposed in this NOPR references IES LM-79 for testing
of CFLKs with SSL circuitry. IES LM-79 is readily available on IES's
website at https://www.ies.org/store.
In this NOPR, DOE proposes to incorporate by reference the test
standard published by IES, ANSI/IES LM-54-20--Approved Method: IES
Guide to Lamp Seasoning. IES LM-54-20 is an industry accepted test
standard that specifies a method for seasoning lamps. The test
procedure proposed in this NOPR references IES LM-9 for testing the
fluorescent lamps, which in turn references IES LM-54 for seasoning
lamps. IES LM-54 is readily available on IES's website at https://www.ies.org/store.
In this NOPR, DOE proposes to incorporate by reference the test
standard published by IES, IESNA LM-75-01/R12--Goniophotometer Types
and Photometric Coordinates. IESNA LM-75-01/R12 is an industry accepted
test standard that specifies goniophotometer types and photometric
coordinates. The test procedure proposed in this NOPR references IES
LM-79 for testing CFLKs with SSL circuitry, which in turn references
IESNA LM-75-01/R12 for general recommendations and requirements on
making measurement with goniophotometers. IESNA LM-75-01/R12 is
available with the purchase of the lighting library subscription on
IES's website at https://www.ies.org/store.
In this NOPR, DOE proposes to incorporate by reference the test
standard published by IES, ANSI/IES LM-78-20--Approved Method: Total
Luminous Flux Measurement of Lamps Using an Integrating Sphere
Photometer. IES LM-78-20 is an industry accepted test standard that
specifies a method for measuring lumen output in an integrating sphere.
The test procedure proposed in this NOPR references IES LM-9 for
testing the performance of fluorescent lamps, which in turn references
IES LM-78-20 for integrating sphere photometer calibration and
measurements. IES LM-78-20 is readily available on IES's website at
https://www.ies.org/store.
In this NOPR, DOE proposes to incorporate by reference the test
standard published by IES, IES LM-78-17--Approved Method: Total Flux
Measurement of Lamps Using an Integrating Sphere. IES LM-78-17 is an
industry accepted test standard that specifies a method for measuring
lumen output in an integrating sphere. The test procedure proposed in
this NOPR references IES LM-79 for testing CFLKs with SSL circuitry,
which in turn references IES LM-78-17 for integrating sphere photometer
calibration and measurements. IES LM-78-17 is readily available on
IES's website at https://www.ies.org/store.
V. Public Participation
A. Participation in the Webinar
The time and date of the webinar meeting are listed in the DATES
section at the beginning of this document. Webinar registration
information, participant instructions, and information about the
capabilities available to webinar participants will be published on
DOE's website: www1.eere.energy.gov/buildings/appliance_standards/standards.aspx?productid=10. Participants are responsible for ensuring
their systems are compatible with the webinar software.
B. Procedure for Submitting Prepared General Statements for
Distribution
Any person who has an interest in the topics addressed in this
document, or who is representative of a group or class of persons that
has an interest in these issues, may request an opportunity to
[[Page 13660]]
make an oral presentation at the webinar. Such persons may submit to
[email protected]. Persons who wish to speak
should include with their request a computer file in WordPerfect,
Microsoft Word, PDF, or text (ASCII) file format that briefly describes
the nature of their interest in this rulemaking and the topics they
wish to discuss. Such persons should also provide a daytime telephone
number where they can be reached.
Persons requesting to speak should briefly describe the nature of
their interest in this rulemaking and provide a telephone number for
contact. DOE requests persons selected to make an oral presentation to
submit an advance copy of their statements at least two weeks before
the webinar. At its discretion, DOE may permit persons who cannot
supply an advance copy of their statement to participate, if those
persons have made advance alternative arrangements with the Building
Technologies Office. As necessary, requests to give an oral
presentation should ask for such alternative arrangements.
C. Conduct of the Webinar
DOE will designate a DOE official to preside at the webinar/public
meeting and may also use a professional facilitator to aid discussion.
The meeting will not be a judicial or evidentiary-type public hearing,
but DOE will conduct it in accordance with section 336 of EPCA (42
U.S.C. 6306). A court reporter will be present to record the
proceedings and prepare a transcript. DOE reserves the right to
schedule the order of presentations and to establish the procedures
governing the conduct of the webinar/public meeting. There shall not be
discussion of proprietary information, costs or prices, market share,
or other commercial matters regulated by U.S. anti-trust laws. After
the webinar/public meeting and until the end of the comment period,
interested parties may submit further comments on the proceedings and
any aspect of the rulemaking.
The webinar/public meeting will be conducted in an informal,
conference style. DOE will present summaries of comments received
before the webinar/public meeting, allow time for prepared general
statements by participants, and encourage all interested parties to
share their views on issues affecting this rulemaking. Each participant
will be allowed to make a general statement (within time limits
determined by DOE), before the discussion of specific topics. DOE will
permit, as time permits, other participants to comment briefly on any
general statements.
At the end of all prepared statements on a topic, DOE will permit
participants to clarify their statements briefly. Participants should
be prepared to answer questions by DOE and by other participants
concerning these issues. DOE representatives may also ask questions of
participants concerning other matters relevant to this rulemaking. The
official conducting the webinar/public meeting will accept additional
comments or questions from those attending, as time permits. The
presiding official will announce any further procedural rules or
modification of the above procedures that may be needed for the proper
conduct of the webinar/public meeting.
A transcript of the webinar/public meeting will be included in the
docket, which can be viewed as described in the Docket section at the
beginning of this document. In addition, any person may buy a copy of
the transcript from the transcribing reporter.
D. Submission of Comments
DOE will accept comments, data, and information regarding this
proposed rule no later than the date provided in the DATES section at
the beginning of this proposed rule.\20\ Interested parties may submit
comments using any of the methods described in the ADDRESSES section at
the beginning of this document.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\20\ DOE has historically provided a 75-day comment period for
test procedure NOPRs pursuant to the North American Free Trade
Agreement, U.S.-Canada-Mexico (``NAFTA''), Dec. 17, 1992, 32 I.L.M.
289 (1993); the North American Free Trade Agreement Implementation
Act, Public Law 103-182, 107 Stat. 2057 (1993) (codified as amended
at 10 U.S.C.A. Sec. 2576) (1993) (``NAFTA Implementation Act'');
and Executive Order 12889, ``Implementation of the North American
Free Trade Agreement,'' 58 FR 69681 (Dec. 30, 1993). However, on
July 1, 2020, the Agreement between the United States of America,
the United Mexican States, and the United Canadian States
(``USMCA''), Nov. 30, 2018, 134 Stat. 11 (i.e., the successor to
NAFTA), went into effect, and Congress's action in replacing NAFTA
through the USMCA Implementation Act, 19 U.S.C. 4501 et seq. (2020),
implies the repeal of E.O. 12889 and its 75-day comment period
requirement for technical regulations. Thus, the controlling laws
are EPCA and the USMCA Implementation Act. Consistent with EPCA's
public comment period requirements for consumer products, the USMCA
only requires a minimum comment period of 60 days. Consequently, DOE
now provides a 60-day public comment period for test procedure
NOPRs.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Submitting comments via www.regulations.gov. The
www.regulations.gov web page will require you to provide your name and
contact information. Your contact information will be viewable to DOE
Building Technologies staff only. Your contact information will not be
publicly viewable except for your first and last names, organization
name (if any), and submitter representative name (if any). If your
comment is not processed properly because of technical difficulties,
DOE will use this information to contact you. If DOE cannot read your
comment due to technical difficulties and cannot contact you for
clarification, DOE may not be able to consider your comment.
However, your contact information will be publicly viewable if you
include it in the comment or in any documents attached to your comment.
Any information that you do not want to be publicly viewable should not
be included in your comment, nor in any document attached to your
comment. Persons viewing comments will see only first and last names,
organization names, correspondence containing comments, and any
documents submitted with the comments.
Do not submit to www.regulations.gov information for which
disclosure is restricted by statute, such as trade secrets and
commercial or financial information (hereinafter referred to as
Confidential Business Information (``CBI'')). Comments submitted
through www.regulations.gov cannot be claimed as CBI. Comments received
through the website will waive any CBI claims for the information
submitted. For information on submitting CBI, see the Confidential
Business Information section.
DOE processes submissions made through www.regulations.gov before
posting. Normally, comments will be posted within a few days of being
submitted. However, if large volumes of comments are being processed
simultaneously, your comment may not be viewable for up to several
weeks. Please keep the comment tracking number that www.regulations.gov
provides after you have successfully uploaded your comment.
Submitting comments via email. Comments and documents submitted via
email also will be posted to www.regulations.gov. If you do not want
your personal contact information to be publicly viewable, do not
include it in your comment or any accompanying documents. Instead,
provide your contact information on a cover letter. Include your first
and last names, email address, telephone number, and optional mailing
address. The cover letter will not be publicly viewable as long as it
does not include any comments
Include contact information each time you submit comments, data,
documents, and other information to DOE. No faxes will be accepted.
[[Page 13661]]
Comments, data, and other information submitted to DOE
electronically should be provided in PDF (preferred), Microsoft Word or
Excel, WordPerfect, or text (ASCII) file format. Provide documents that
are not secured, written in English and free of any defects or viruses.
Documents should not contain special characters or any form of
encryption and, if possible, they should carry the electronic signature
of the author.
Campaign form letters. Please submit campaign form letters by the
originating organization in batches of between 50 to 500 form letters
per PDF or as one form letter with a list of supporters' names compiled
into one or more PDFs. This reduces comment processing and posting
time.
Confidential Business Information. Pursuant to 10 CFR 1004.11, any
person submitting information that he or she believes to be
confidential and exempt by law from public disclosure should submit via
email two well-marked copies: One copy of the document marked
confidential including all the information believed to be confidential,
and one copy of the document marked non-confidential with the
information believed to be confidential deleted. DOE will make its own
determination about the confidential status of the information and
treat it according to its determination.
It is DOE's policy that all comments may be included in the public
docket, without change and as received, including any personal
information provided in the comments (except information deemed to be
exempt from public disclosure).
E. Issues on Which DOE Seeks Comment
Although DOE welcomes comments on any aspect of this proposal, DOE
is particularly interested in receiving comments and views of
interested parties concerning the following issues:
(1) DOE requests comment on its assessments of the impacts of
incorporating by reference IES LM-9-20, IES LM-54-20, IESNA LM-75-
01/R12, IES LM-79-19, IES LM-78-20, and IES LM-78-17 for appendix
V1. See section III.B of this document.
(2) DOE requests comment on the proposed definitions for ``CFLK
with consumer-replaceable SSL circuitry'' and ``CFLK with non-
consumer-replaceable SSL circuitry.'' See section III.C.1 of this
document.
(3) DOE requests comment on the allowance of both
goniophotometer and integrating sphere methods and any data on the
difference in efficacy measurements when testing the same lamp with
a goniophotometer versus an integrating sphere. See section III.C.2
of this document.
(4) DOE requests comment on the benefits and burdens of the
proposed updates and additions to industry standards referenced in
the test procedure for CFLKs. See section III.G of this document.
VI. Approval of the Office of the Secretary
The Secretary of Energy has approved publication of this notice of
proposed rulemaking and announcement of public meeting.
List of Subjects
10 CFR Part 429
Administrative practice and procedure, Confidential business
information, Energy conservation, Household appliances, Imports,
Intergovernmental relations, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements,
Small businesses.
10 CFR Part 430
Administrative practice and procedure, Confidential business
information, Energy conservation, Household appliances, Imports,
Incorporation by reference, Intergovernmental relations, Small
businesses.
Signing Authority
This document of the Department of Energy was signed on March 1,
2022, by Kelly J. Speakes-Backman, Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary
for Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, pursuant to delegated
authority from the Secretary of Energy. That document with the original
signature and date is maintained by DOE. For administrative purposes
only, and in compliance with requirements of the Office of the Federal
Register, the undersigned DOE Federal Register Liaison Officer has been
authorized to sign and submit the document in electronic format for
publication, as an official document of the Department of Energy. This
administrative process in no way alters the legal effect of this
document upon publication in the Federal Register.
Signed in Washington, DC, on March 2, 2022.
Treena V. Garrett,
Federal Register Liaison Officer, U.S. Department of Energy.
For the reasons stated in the preamble, DOE is proposing to amend
parts 429 and 430 of chapter II of title 10, Code of Federal
Regulations as set forth below:
PART 429--CERTIFICATION, COMPLIANCE, AND ENFORCEMENT FOR CONSUMER
PRODUCTS AND COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL EQUIPMENT
0
1. The authority citation for part 429 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 6291-6317; 28 U.S.C. 2461 note.
Sec. 429.33 [Amended]
0
2. Amend Sec. 429.33 by:
0
a. Removing ``other SSL lamps (not integrated LED lamps)'' and adding
in its place ``consumer-replaceable SSL circuitry (not integrated LED
lamps) and other SSL lamps that have an ANSI standard base and are not
integrated LED lamps'' in paragraph (a)(3)(i)(F); and
0
b. Removing ``integrated SSL circuitry'' and adding in its place ``non-
consumer-replaceable SSL circuitry'' in paragraph (a)(3)(ii).
PART 430--ENERGY CONSERVATION PROGRAM FOR CONSUMER PRODUCTS
0
3. The authority citation for part 430 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 6291-6309; 28 U.S.C. 2461 note.
0
4. Amend Sec. 430.3 by:
0
a. Revising paragraph (a);
0
b. In paragraph (p)(2), removing the text ``appendices R, V, and V1''
and adding in its place, ``appendix R'';
0
c. Removing paragraph (p)(13);
0
d. Redesignating paragraphs (p)(4) through (20) as follows:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Old New
------------------------------------------------------------------------
paragraphs (p)(4) through (10)............ paragraphs (p)(5) through
(11).
paragraphs (p)(11) and (12)............... paragraphs (p)(13) and (14).
paragraph (p)(14)......................... paragraph (p)(15).
paragraph (p)(15)......................... paragraph (p)(17).
paragraph (p)(16)......................... paragraph (p)(20).
paragraph (p)(17)......................... paragraph (p)(21).
paragraphs (p)(18) through (20)........... paragraphs (p)(23) through
(25).
------------------------------------------------------------------------
0
e. Adding new paragraphs (p)(4), (12), (16), (18), and (19);
0
f. In newly redesignated paragraph (p)(20), removing the text
``appendices V1 and BB'' and adding, in its place, ``appendix BB''; and
0
g. Adding new paragraph (p)(22).
The revision and additions read as follows:
Sec. 430.3 Materials incorporated by reference.
(a) Certain material is incorporated by reference into this part
with the
[[Page 13662]]
approval of the Director of the Federal Register in accordance with 5
U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51. To enforce any edition other than that
specified in this section, the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) must
publish a document in the Federal Register and the material must be
available to the public. All approved material is available for
inspection at the DOE and at the National Archives and Records
Administration (NARA). Contact DOE at: The U.S. Department of Energy,
Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Building Technologies
Program, Sixth Floor, 950 L'Enfant Plaza SW, Washington, DC 20024,
(202) 586-9127, [email protected], https://www.energy.gov/eere/buildings/appliance-and-equipment-standards-program. For information on
the availability of this material at NARA, email:
[email protected], or go to: www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations.html. The material may be obtained from the sources
in the following paragraphs of this section.
* * * * *
(p) * * *
(4) ANSI/IES LM-9-20 (``IES LM-9-20''), Approved Method: Electrical
and Photometric Measurements of Fluorescent Lamps, approved February 7,
2020; IBR approved for appendix V to subpart B.
* * * * *
(12) ANSI/IES LM-54-20 (``IES LM-54-20''), Approved Method: IES
Guide to Lamp Seasoning, approved February 7, 2020; IBR approved for
appendix V to subpart B.
* * * * *
(16) IESNA LM-75-2001/R12, Goniophotometer Types and Photometric
Coordinates, approved August 4, 2001; IBR approved for appendix V to
subpart B.
* * * * *
(18) IES LM-78-17, Approved Method: Total Flux Measurement of Lamps
Using an Integrating Sphere,'' approved January 9, 2017; IBR approved
for appendix V to subpart B.
(19) ANSI/IES LM-78-20 (``IES LM-78-20''), Approved Method: Total
Luminous Flux Measurement of Lamps Using an Integrating Sphere
Photometer, approved February 7, 2020; IBR approved for appendix V to
subpart B.
* * * * *
(22) ANSI/IES LM-79-019 (``IES LM-79-19''), Approved Method:
Optical and Electrical Measurements of Solid-State Lighting Products,
approved February 28, 2019; IBR approved for appendix V to subpart B.
* * * * *
0
5. Amend Sec. 430.23 by:
0
a. Removing paragraph (x)(1);
0
b. Redesignating paragraph (x)(2) as paragraph (x)(1);
0
c. Revising newly designated paragraph (x)(1)(v); and
0
d. Reserving paragraph (x)(2).
The revision reads as follows:
Sec. 430.23 Test procedures for the measurement of energy and water
consumption.
* * * * *
(x) * * *
(1) * * *
(v) For a ceiling fan light kit packaged with other fluorescent
lamps (not compact fluorescent lamps or general service fluorescent
lamps), packaged with consumer-replaceable SSL circuitry (not
integrated LED lamps), packaged with non-consumer-replaceable SSL
circuitry, or packaged with other SSL lamps that have an ANSI standard
base (not integrated LED lamps), measure efficacy in accordance with
section 3 of appendix V of this subpart for each lamp basic model,
consumer-replaceable SSL circuitry basic model, or non-consumer-
replaceable SSL circuitry basic model.
* * * * *
Appendix V to Subpart B of Part 430 [Removed]
0
6. Remove appendix V to subpart B of part 430.
Appendix V1 to Subpart B of Part 430 [Redesignated]
0
7. Redesignate appendix V1 to subpart B of part 430 as appendix V to
subpart B of part 430.
0
8. Revise newly redesignated appendix V to subpart B of part 430 to
read as follows:
Appendix V to Subpart B of Part 430--Uniform Test Method for Measuring
the Energy Consumption of Ceiling Fan Light Kits Packaged With Other
Fluorescent Lamps (not Compact Fluorescent Lamps or General Service
Fluorescent Lamps), Packaged With Consumer-Replaceable SSL Circuitry
(not Integrated LED Lamps), Packaged With Non-Consumer-Replaceable SSL
Circuitry, or Packaged With Other SSL Lamps That Have an ANSI Standard
Base (not Integrated LED Lamps)
Any representations about the energy use or efficiency of any
ceiling fan light kit packaged with fluorescent lamps other than
compact fluorescent lamps or general service fluorescent lamps,
packaged with consumer-replaceable SSL circuitry other than
integrated LED lamps, or packaged with non-consumer-replaceable SSL
circuitry, or packaged with SSL lamps that have an ANSI standard
base (not integrated LED lamps) made on or after the compliance date
of any amended energy conservation standards must be based on
testing pursuant to this appendix. Manufacturers may make
representations based on testing in accordance with this appendix
prior to the compliance date of any amended energy conservation
standards, provided that such representations demonstrate compliance
with the amended energy conservation standards.
0. Incorporation by Reference. DOE incorporated by reference in
Sec. 430.3, the entire standard for: IES LM-9-20, IES LM-54-20, IES
LM-75-01/R12, IES LM-78-17, IES LM-78-20, and IES LM-79-19; however,
only enumerated provisions of IES LM-9-20 and IES LM-79-19 are
applicable to this appendix as follows:
(1) IES LM-9-20 as referenced by section 3 of this appendix
(i) Section 4.0 ``Ambient and Physical Conditions''.
(ii) Section 5.0 ``Electrical Conditions''.
(iii) Section 6.0 ``Lamp Test Procedures''.
(iv) Section 7.0 ``Photometric Test Procedures''.
(2) IES LM-79-19 as referenced by section 3 of this appendix
(i) Section 4.0 ``Physical and Environmental Test Conditions''.
(ii) Section 5.0 ``Electrical Test Conditions''.
(iii) Section 6.0 ``Test Preparation''.
(iv) Section 7.0 ``Total Luminous Flux and Integrated Optical
Measurements''.
1. Scope: This appendix establishes the test requirements to
measure the energy efficiency of all ceiling fan light kits (CFLKs)
packaged with fluorescent lamps other than compact fluorescent lamps
(CFLs) or general service fluorescent lamps (GSFLs), packaged with
consumer-replaceable solid-state lighting (SSL) circuitry (not
integrated light-emitting diode [LED] lamps), packaged with non-
consumer-replaceable SSL circuitry, or packaged with SSL lamps that
have an American National Standards Institute (ANSI) standard base
(not integrated LED lamps).
2. Definitions
2.1. CFLK with non-consumer-replaceable SSL circuitry means a
CFLK with a non-ANSI-standard base that has an SSL light source,
driver, heat sink, and intermediate circuitry (such as wiring
between a driver and light source), that are not consumer
replaceable, i.e., a consumer cannot replace the light source and
all components necessary for the starting and stable operation of
the light source, without permanently altering the product, and must
replace the entire CFLK upon failure.
2.2. CFLK with consumer-replaceable SSL circuitry means a CFLK
with a non-ANSI-standard base that has an SSL light source, driver,
heat sink, and intermediate circuitry (such as wiring between a
driver and light source) that are consumer replaceable, i.e., a
consumer can replace the light source and all components necessary
for the starting and stable operation of the light source as one
integrated unit, without permanently altering the product. Examples
of CFLKs with consumer-replaceable SSL circuitry include CFLKs that
use OLED lamps with non-ANSI-standard bases, LED lamps with non-
ANSI-
[[Page 13663]]
standard bases, such as Zhaga interfaces, and LED light engines.
2.3. Covers means materials used to diffuse or redirect light
produced by an SSL light source in CFLKs with non-consumer-
replaceable SSL circuitry.
2.4. Other (non-CFL and non-GSFL) fluorescent lamp means a low-
pressure mercury electric-discharge lamp in which a fluorescing
coating transforms some of the ultraviolet energy generated by the
mercury discharge into light, including but not limited to circline
fluorescent lamps, and excluding any compact fluorescent lamp and
any general service fluorescent lamp.
2.5. Solid-State Lighting (SSL) means technology where light is
emitted from a solid object--a block of semiconductor--rather than
from a filament or plasma, as in the case of incandescent and
fluorescent lighting. This includes inorganic light-emitting diodes
(LEDs) and organic light-emitting diodes (OLEDs).
3. Test Conditions and Measurements
For any CFLK that utilizes consumer replaceable lamps or
consumer-replaceable SSL circuitry, measure the lamp efficacy of
each basic model of lamp or SSL light source packaged with the CFLK.
For any CFLK only with non-consumer-replaceable SSL circuitry,
measure the luminaire efficacy of the CFLK. For any CFLK that
includes consumer replaceable lamps or consumer-replaceable SSL
circuitry and non-consumer-replaceable SSL circuitry, measure both
the lamp efficacy of each basic model of lamp or consumer-
replaceable SSL light source packaged with the CFLK and the
luminaire efficacy of the CFLK with all consumer replaceable lamps
or consumer-replaceable SSL light sources removed. Take measurements
at full light output. For each test, use the test procedures in the
table in this section. CFLKs with non-consumer-replaceable SSL
circuitry and consumer replaceable covers may be measured with their
covers removed but must otherwise be measured according to the table
in this section.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Lamp or luminaire
Lighting technology efficacy Referenced test
measured procedure
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Other (non-CFL and non-GSFL) Lamp Efficacy.... IES LM-9-20, sections
fluorescent lamps. 4-7 and
corresponding
subsections
including references
to IES LM-54-20
(lamp seasoning);
IES-LM-78-20
(integrating sphere
measurements).
CFLKs with consumer- Lamp Efficacy.... IES LM-79-19,
replaceable SSL circuitry. sections 4-7 and
corresponding
subsections
including references
to IES-LM-78-17
(integrating sphere
measurements); IES
LM-75-01/R12
(goniophotometer
measurements).
CFLKs with non-consumer- Luminaire IES LM-79-19,
replaceable SSL circuitry. Efficacy. sections 4-7 and
corresponding
subsections
including references
to IES-LM-78-17
(integrating sphere
measurements); IES
LM-75-01/R12
(goniophotometer
measurements).
Other SSL lamps that have an Lamp Efficacy.... IES LM-79-19,
ANSI standard base and are sections 4-7 and
not integrated LED lamps. corresponding
subsections
including references
to IES-LM-78-17
(integrating sphere
measurements); IES
LM-75-01/R12
(goniophotometer
measurements).
------------------------------------------------------------------------
0
9. Amend Sec. 430.32 by revising paragraph (s)(6).
Sec. 430.32 Energy and water conservation standards and their
compliance dates.
* * * * *
(s) * * *
(6) Ceiling fan light kits manufactured on or after January 21,
2020 must be packaged with lamps to fill all sockets, and each basic
model of lamp packaged with the basic model of CFLK, each basic model
of consumer-replaceable SSL circuitry packaged with the basic model of
CFLK, and each basic model of non-consumer-replaceable SSL circuitry in
the CFLK basic model shall meet the requirements shown in paragraphs
(s)(6)(i) and (ii) of this section:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Lumens \1\ Minimum required efficacy (lm/W)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
(i) <120........................... 50.
(ii) >=120......................... (74.0-29.42 x 0.9983\lumens\).
------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Use the lumen output for each basic model of lamp packaged with the
basic model of CFLK, each basic model of consumer-replaceable SSL
circuitry packaged with the basic model of CFLK, or each basic model
of non-consumer-replaceable SSL in the CFLK basic model to determine
the applicable standard.
* * * * *
[FR Doc. 2022-04764 Filed 3-9-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450-01-P