[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 28 (Thursday, February 10, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Pages 7801-7802]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-02856]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

[A-823-815]


Oil Country Tubular Goods From Ukraine: Final Results of 
Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2019-2020

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, 
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (Commerce) determines that the sole 
producer/exporter sold subject merchandise in the United State at 
prices below normal value during the July 10, 2019, through June 30, 
2020, period of review (POR).

DATES: Applicable February 10, 2022.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Toni Page, AD/CVD Operations, Office 
VII, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, 
U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, 
DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-1398.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

    On August 9, 2021, Commerce published the Preliminary Results of 
this administrative review.\1\ We invited interested parties, including 
mandatory respondent Interpipe,\2\ to comment on the Preliminary 
Results. For a description of the events since the Preliminary Results, 
as well as a full discussion of the issues raised by parties for these 
final results, see the Issues and Decision Memorandum.\3\ Commerce 
conducted this review in accordance with section 751(a) of the Tariff 
Act of 1930, as amended (the Act).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ See Oil Country Tubular Goods from Ukraine: Preliminary 
Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2019-2020, 86 FR 
43522 (August 9, 2021) (Preliminary Results), and accompanying 
Preliminary Decision Memorandum (PDM).
    \2\ Commerce has previously determined that Interpipe Europe 
S.A.; Interpipe Ukraine LLC (Interpipe Ukraine); PJSC Interpipe 
Niznedneprovsky Tube Rolling Plant (Interpipe NTRP); and LLC 
Interpipe Niko Tube (Niko Tube) are affiliated and treated as a 
single entity (i.e., Interpipe). See Preliminary Results PDM at 
``Affiliation and Collapsing.''
    \3\ See Memorandum, ``Issues and Decision Memorandum for the 
Final Results of the Antidumping Duty Administrative Review: Oil 
Country Tubular Goods from Ukraine, 2019-2020,'' dated concurrently 
with, and hereby adopted by, this notice (Issues and Decision 
Memorandum).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Scope of the Order 4
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ See Termination of the Suspension Agreement on Certain Oil 
Country Tubular Goods from Ukraine, Rescission of Administrative 
Review, and Issuance of Antidumping Duty Order, 84 FR 33918 (July 
16, 2019) (Order).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The products covered by the Order are certain oil country tubular 
goods (OCTG) from Ukraine. For a full description of the scope, see the 
Issues and Decision Memorandum.

Analysis of Comments Received

    All issues raised in the parties' case and rebuttal briefs are 
addressed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum. A list of these issues 
is attached as an appendix to this notice. The Issues and Decision 
Memorandum is a public document and is on file electronically via 
Enforcement and Compliance's Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 
Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS). ACCESS is available to 
registered users at https://access.trade.gov. In addition, a complete 
version of the Issues and Decision Memorandum can be accessed directly 
at https://access.trade.gov/public/FRNoticesListLayout.aspx.

Changes Since the Preliminary Results

    Based on our analysis of the comments received from interested 
parties regarding our Preliminary Results, we made certain changes to 
the calculation of the preliminary weighted-average dumping margin for 
Interpipe.

Final Results of the Review

    As a result of this administrative review, we determine the 
following weighted-average dumping margin for the period July 10, 2019, 
through June 30, 2020:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                            Weighted-
                                                        average  dumping
                 Exporter or producer                        margin
                                                            (percent)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Interpipe Europe S.A./Interpipe Ukraine LLC/PJSC                   27.80
 Interpipe Niznedneprovsky Tube Rolling Plant (aka
 Interpipe NTRP)/LLC Interpipe Niko Tube..............
------------------------------------------------------------------------


[[Page 7802]]

Disclosure

    We intend to disclose the calculations performed for these final 
results within five days of the date of publication of this notice in 
the Federal Register, in accordance with 19 CFR 351.224(b).

Assessment Rates

    Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act, and 19 CFR 
351.212(b)(1), Commerce has determined, and U.S. Customs and Border 
Protection (CBP) shall assess, antidumping duties on all appropriate 
entries of subject merchandise in accordance with the final results of 
this review.\5\ In accordance with 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1), Commerce 
calculated an importer-specific ad valorem antidumping assessment rate 
for Interpipe that is not zero or de minimis and will instruct CBP to 
assess antidumping duties on all appropriate entries covered by this 
review.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ See Antidumping Proceeding: Calculation of the Weighted-
Average Dumping Margin and Assessment Rate in Certain Antidumping 
Duty Proceedings; Final Modification, 77 FR 8101 (February 14, 
2012).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Consistent with Commerce's assessment practice, for entries of 
subject merchandise during the POR produced by Interpipe for which it 
did not know that the merchandise was destined for the United States, 
we will instruct CBP to liquidate unreviewed entries at the all-others 
rate if there is no rate for the intermediate company(ies) involved in 
the transaction.\6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ See Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Proceedings: 
Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68 FR 23954 (May 6, 2003).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Commerce intends to issue assessment instructions to CBP no earlier 
than 35 days after the date of publication of the final results of this 
review in the Federal Register. If a timely summons is filed at the 
U.S. Court of International Trade, the assessment instructions will 
direct CBP not to liquidate relevant entries until the time for parties 
to file a request for a statutory injunction has expired (i.e., within 
90 days of publication).

Cash Deposit Requirements

    The following cash deposit requirements will be effective for all 
shipments of the subject merchandise entered, or withdrawn from 
warehouse, for consumption on or after the publication date of the 
final results of this administrative review, as provided by section 
751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) The cash deposit rate for Interpipe will 
be equal to the weighted-average dumping margin established in the 
final results of this administrative review; (2) for previously 
reviewed or investigated companies not listed above, the cash deposit 
rate will continue to be the company-specific rate published for the 
most recently completed segment of this proceeding in which the company 
participated; (3) if the exporter was not a firm covered in this review 
or in the investigation but the producer was covered, the cash deposit 
rate will be the rate established for the most recently completed 
segment of this proceeding for the producer of the merchandise; and (4) 
the cash deposit rate for all other producers or exporters will 
continue to be the all-others rate of 7.47 percent, the all-others rate 
established in the original less-than-fair-value investigation.\7\ 
These cash deposit requirements, when imposed, shall remain in effect 
until further notice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ See Order, 84 FR at 33919.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Notification to Importers

    This notice serves as a final reminder to importers of their 
responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate 
regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation 
of the relevant entries during this review period. Failure to comply 
with this requirement could result in Commerce's presumption that 
reimbursement of antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent 
assessment of double antidumping duties.

Notification Regarding Administrative Protective Order

    This notice serves as the only reminder to parties subject to 
administrative protective order (APO) of their responsibility 
concerning the disposition of proprietary information disclosed under 
APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3), which continues to govern 
business proprietary information in this segment of the proceeding. 
Timely written notification of return/destruction of APO materials or 
conversion to judicial protective order, is hereby requested. Failure 
to comply with the regulations and the terms of an APO is a 
sanctionable violation.

Notification to Interested Parties

    We are issuing and publishing these results of administrative 
review in accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i) of the Act, and 
19 CFR 351.221(b)(5).

    Dated: February 4, 2022.
Lisa W. Wang,
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.

Appendix

List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum

I. Summary
II. Background
III. Changes Since the Preliminary Results
IV. Scope of the Order
V. Discussion of the Issues
    Comment 1: Whether Commerce Incorrectly Added Certain U.S. 
Direct Selling Expenses to Normal Value
    Comment 2: Whether to Grant Interpipe a Constructed Export Price 
(CEP) Offset
    Comment 3: Whether to Treat Section 232 Tariffs as U.S. Customs 
Duties
    Comment 4: Whether Commerce Should Correct the CONNUM Field Used 
as the Basis for the Margin Calculation
    Comment 5: Whether Commerce Should Include Sales of Current 
Assets in the Calculation of General and Administrative (G&A) 
Expenses
    Comment 6: Whether Commerce Should Make an Adjustment to 
Interpipe's Reported Depreciation
    Comment 7: Whether Commerce Should Revise Niko Tube's G&A 
Expense Ratio
VI. Recommendation

[FR Doc. 2022-02856 Filed 2-9-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P