[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 18 (Thursday, January 27, 2022)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 4156-4160]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-01439]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 180
[EPA-HQ-OPP-2020-0417; FRL-9301-01-OCSPP]
Cyprodinil; Pesticide Tolerances
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This regulation establishes tolerances for residues of
cyprodinil in
[[Page 4157]]
or on multiple crops that are referenced later in this document. The
Interregional Project Number 4 (IR-4) requested these tolerances under
section 346a of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA).
DATES: This regulation is effective January 27, 2022. Objections and
requests for hearings must be received on or before March 28, 2022, and
must be filed in accordance with the instructions provided in 40 CFR
part 178 (see also Unit I.C. of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION).
ADDRESSES: The docket for this action, identified by docket
identification (ID) number EPA-HQ-OPP-2020-0417, is available at
https://www.regulations.gov or at the Office of Pesticide Programs
Regulatory Public Docket (OPP Docket) in the Environmental Protection
Agency Docket Center (EPA/DC), West William Jefferson Clinton Bldg.,
Rm. 3334, 1301 Constitution Ave. NW, Washington, DC 20460-0001. The
Public Reading Room is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through
Friday, excluding legal holidays. The telephone number for the Public
Reading Room is (202) 566-1744, and the telephone number for the OPP
Docket is (703) 305-5805.
Due to the public health concerns relating to COVID-19, the EPA
Docket Center (EPA/DC) and Reading Room is closed to visitors with
limited exceptions. The staff continues to provide customer service via
email, phone, and webform. For the latest status information on EPA/DC
services, docket access, visit https://www.epa.gov/dockets.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Marietta Echeverria, Acting Director,
Registration Division (7505P), Office of Pesticide Programs,
Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW, Washington,
DC 20460-0001; main telephone number: (703) 305-7090; email address:
[email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. General Information
A. Does this Action apply to me?
You may be potentially affected by this action if you are an
agricultural producer, food manufacturer, or pesticide manufacturer.
The following list of North American Industrial Classification System
(NAICS) codes is not intended to be exhaustive, but rather provides a
guide to help readers determine whether this document applies to them.
Potentially affected entities may include:
Crop production (NAICS code 111).
Animal production (NAICS code 112).
Food manufacturing (NAICS code 311).
Pesticide manufacturing (NAICS code 32532).
B. How can I get electronic access to other related information?
You may access a frequently updated electronic version of EPA's
tolerance regulations at 40 CFR part 180 through the Office of the
Federal Register's e-CFR site at https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-40.
C. How can I file an objection or hearing request?
Under FFDCA section 408(g), 21 U.S.C. 346a, any person may file an
objection to any aspect of this regulation and may also request a
hearing on those objections. You must file your objection or request a
hearing on this regulation in accordance with the instructions provided
in 40 CFR part 178. To ensure proper receipt by EPA, you must identify
docket ID number EPA-HQ-OPP-2020-0417 in the subject line on the first
page of your submission. All objections and requests for a hearing must
be in writing and must be received by the Hearing Clerk on or before
March 28, 2022. Addresses for mail and hand delivery of objections and
hearing requests are provided in 40 CFR 178.25(b).
In addition to filing an objection or hearing request with the
Hearing Clerk as described in 40 CFR part 178, please submit a copy of
the filing (excluding any Confidential Business Information (CBI)) for
inclusion in the public docket. Information not marked confidential
pursuant to 40 CFR part 2 may be disclosed publicly by EPA without
prior notice. Submit the non-CBI copy of your objection or hearing
request, identified by docket ID number EPA-HQ-OPP-2020-0417, by one of
the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the online instructions for submitting comments. Do not submit
electronically any information you consider to be CBI or other
information whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Mail: OPP Docket, Environmental Protection Agency Docket
Center (EPA/DC), (28221T), 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW, Washington, DC
20460-0001.
Hand Delivery: To make special arrangements for hand
delivery or delivery of boxed information, please follow the
instructions at https://www.epa.gov/dockets/where-send-comments-epa-dockets.
Additional instructions on commenting or visiting the docket, along
with more information about dockets generally, is available at https://www.epa.gov/dockets.
II. Summary of Petitioned-For Tolerance
In the Federal Register of June 28, 2021 (86 FR 33922) (FRL-10025-
08) EPA issued a document pursuant to FFDCA section 408(d)(3), 21
U.S.C. 346a(d)(3), announcing the filing of a pesticide petition (PP
0E8846) by IR-4, North Carolina State University, 1730 Varsity Drive,
Venture IV, Suite 210, Raleigh, NC 27606. The petition requested that
40 CFR 180.532 be amended by establishing tolerances for residues of
Cyprodinil, 4-cyclopropyl-6-methyl-N-phenyl-2- pyrimidinamine, in or on
the raw agricultural commodities: Brassica, leafy greens, subgroup 4-
16B, except watercress at 10 parts per million (ppm); Celtuce at 30
ppm; Fennel, Florence, fresh leaves and stalk at 30 ppm; Kohlrabi at 1
ppm; Leaf petiole vegetable subgroup 22B at 30 ppm; Leafy greens
subgroup 4-16A, except parsley, fresh leaves at 50 ppm; Lemon/lime
subgroup 10-10B at 0.6 ppm; Sugar apple at 4 ppm; Tropical and
subtropical, small fruit, inedible peel, subgroup 24A at 2 ppm; and
Vegetable, Brassica, head and stem, group 5-16 at 1 ppm. The petition
also requested to remove established tolerances for residues of
Cyprodinil, 4-cyclopropyl-6-methyl-N-phenyl-2-pyrimidinamine, in or on
the raw agricultural commodities: Brassica, head and stem, subgroup 5A
at 1.0 ppm; Brassica, leafy greens, subgroup 5B at 10.0 ppm; Leaf
petioles subgroup 4B at 30 ppm; Leafy greens subgroup 4A at 50 ppm;
Lemon at 0.60 ppm; Lime at 0.60 ppm; Longan at 2.0 ppm; Lychee at 2.0
ppm; Spanish lime at 2.0 ppm; and Turnip, greens at 10.0 ppm. That
document referenced a summary of the petition prepared by Syngenta Crop
Protection, the registrant, which is available in the docket, https://www.regulations.gov. There were no comments received in response to the
notice of filing.
Based upon review of the data supporting the petition, EPA has
modified the commodity definition for one of the crop groups. A
discussion of this modification can be found in section IV.C.
III. Aggregate Risk Assessment and Determination of Safety
Section 408(b)(2)(A)(i) of FFDCA allows EPA to establish a
tolerance (the legal limit for a pesticide chemical residue in or on a
food) only if EPA determines that the tolerance is ``safe.''
[[Page 4158]]
Section 408(b)(2)(A)(ii) of FFDCA defines ``safe'' to mean that ``there
is a reasonable certainty that no harm will result from aggregate
exposure to the pesticide chemical residue, including all anticipated
dietary exposures and all other exposures for which there is reliable
information.'' This includes exposure through drinking water and in
residential settings but does not include occupational exposure.
Section 408(b)(2)(C) of FFDCA requires EPA to give special
consideration to exposure of infants and children to the pesticide
chemical residue in establishing a tolerance and to ``ensure that there
is a reasonable certainty that no harm will result to infants and
children from aggregate exposure to the pesticide chemical residue. . .
.''
Consistent with FFDCA section 408(b)(2)(D), and the factors
specified in FFDCA section 408(b)(2)(D), EPA has reviewed the available
scientific data and other relevant information in support of this
action. EPA has sufficient data to assess the hazards of and to make a
determination on aggregate exposure for cyprodinil including exposure
resulting from the tolerances established by this action. EPA's
assessment of exposures and risks associated with cyprodinil follows.
In an effort to streamline its publications in the Federal
Register, EPA is not reprinting sections that repeat what has been
previously published for tolerance rulemaking of the same pesticide
chemical. Where scientific information concerning a particular chemical
remains unchanged, the content of those sections would not vary between
tolerance rulemaking and republishing the same sections is unnecessary.
EPA considers referral back to those sections as sufficient to provide
an explanation of the information EPA considered in making its safety
determination for the new rulemaking.
EPA has previously published a number of tolerance rulemakings for
cyprodinil in which EPA concluded, based on the available information,
that there is a reasonable certainty that no harm would result from
aggregate exposure to cyprodinil and established tolerances for
residues of that chemical. EPA is incorporating previously published
sections from those rulemakings as described further in this
rulemaking, as they remain unchanged.
Toxicological profile. For a discussion of the Toxicological
Profile of cyprodinil, see Unit III.A. of the July 21, 2016 final
rulemaking (81 FR 47304) (FRL-9948-28).
Toxicological points of departure/Levels of concern. For a summary
of the Toxicological Points of Departure/Levels of Concern for
cyprodinil used for human risk assessment, please reference Unit III.B.
of the August 17, 2012 rulemaking (77 FR 49732) (FRL-9359-7). The table
in the August 17, 2012 rulemaking included an endpoint for inhalation
short-term exposures. However, the Agency has made the assumption in
the current assessment that cyprodinil products are not for homeowner
use, has not conducted a quantitative residential handler assessment as
in previous reviews, and did not use the inhalation endpoint.
Exposure assessment. Much of the exposure assessment remains the
same although updates have occurred to accommodate exposures from the
petitioned-for tolerance and reflect changes to the residential
exposure assessment. These updates are discussed in this section; for a
description of the rest of the EPA approach to and assumptions for the
exposure assessment, please reference Unit III.C. of the July 21, 2016
rulemaking.
EPA's dietary exposure assessments have been updated to include the
additional exposure from the new use of cyprodinil on sugar apple and
the crop group conversions and expansions requested in this action.
Partially refined acute and chronic aggregate dietary (food and
drinking water) exposure and risk assessments were conducted using the
Dietary Exposure Evaluation Model software with the Food Commodity
Intake Database (DEEM-FCID) Version 3.16. The assessments used
established and recommended tolerance-level residues for some
commodities, average field trial residues for the remaining commodities
(chronic only), 100 percent crop treated (PCT), and EPA's 2018 default
processing factors (except for potato granules/flakes, potato flour,
tomato paste, tomato puree, lemon juice, apple juice, dried prune plum,
and grape juice).
Section 408(b)(2)(E) of FFDCA authorizes EPA to use available data
and information on the anticipated residue levels of pesticide residues
in food and the actual levels of pesticide residues that have been
measured in food. If EPA relies on such information, EPA must require
pursuant to FFDCA section 408(f)(1) that data be provided 5 years after
the tolerance is established, modified, or left in effect,
demonstrating that the levels in food are not above the levels
anticipated. For the present action, EPA will issue such data call-ins
as are required by FFDCA section 408(b)(2)(E) and authorized under
FFDCA section 408(f)(1). Data will be required to be submitted no later
than 5 years from the date of issuance of these tolerances.
Drinking water exposure. The new use does not result in an increase
in the estimated residue levels in drinking water, so EPA used the same
estimated drinking water concentrations in the acute and chronic
dietary assessments as identified in the July 2016 rulemaking.
Non-occupational exposure. The previous review included a
residential handler assessment which is no longer applicable. All
registered cyprodinil product labels with residential use sites require
that handlers wear specific clothing (e.g., long sleeve shirt/long
pants) and/or use personal protective equipment (PPE). Therefore, the
Agency has made the assumption that these products are not for
homeowner use and has not conducted a quantitative residential handler
assessment as in previous reviews. A quantitative residential post-
application assessment was also not conducted as incidental oral
exposures are not anticipated and there is no dermal exposure endpoint.
Therefore, no residential exposures are applicable for the aggregate
risk assessment.
Cumulative exposure. EPA has determined that cyprodinil along with
pyrimethanil form a candidate common mechanism group (CMG). This group
of pesticides is considered a candidate CMG because there is sufficient
toxicological data to suggest a common pathway. The Agency conducted a
screening-level cumulative risk assessment that indicates cumulative
dietary and residential aggregate exposures for cyprodinil and
pyrimethanil are below the agency's levels of concern. For further
information, see the document titled ``Anilinopyrimidines. Cumulative
Screening Risk Assessment'' in docket ID EPA-HQ-OPP-2020-0417. No
further cumulative evaluation is necessary for cyprodinil. For
information regarding EPA's efforts to determine which chemicals have a
common mechanism of toxicity and to evaluate the cumulative effects of
such chemicals, see https://www.epa.gov/pesticide-science-and-assessing-pesticide-risks/pesticide-cumulative-risk-assessment-framework.
Safety factor for infants and children. EPA continues to conclude
that there are reliable data to support the reduction of the Food
Quality Protection Act (FQPA) safety factor. See Unit III.D. of the
July 21, 2016 rulemaking for a discussion of the Agency's rationale for
that determination.
[[Page 4159]]
Aggregate risks and determination of safety. EPA determines whether
acute and chronic dietary pesticide exposures are safe by comparing
aggregate exposure estimates to the acute population adjusted dose
(aPAD) and chronic population adjusted dose (cPAD). Short-,
intermediate-, and chronic-term risks are evaluated by comparing the
estimated aggregate food, water, and residential exposure to the
appropriate points of departure to ensure that an adequate margin of
exposure (MOE) exists. For linear cancer risks, EPA calculates the
lifetime probability of acquiring cancer given the estimated aggregate
exposure.
Acute dietary risks are below the Agency's level of concern of 100%
of the aPAD; they are 7.7% of the aPAD for children 1 to 2 years old,
the group with the highest exposure. Chronic dietary risks are below
the Agency's level of concern of 100% of the cPAD; they are 86% of the
cPAD for children 1 to 2 years old, the group with the highest
exposure. There are no residential exposures expected, so the acute
dietary risk estimate serves as the acute aggregate risk assessment and
the chronic dietary risk estimate serves as the chronic aggregate risk
assessment. Cyprodinil is classified as ``Not likely to be carcinogenic
to humans'', therefore, quantification of cancer risk is not required.
Therefore, based on the risk assessments and information described
above, EPA concludes there is a reasonable certainty that no harm will
result to the general population, or to infants and children, from
aggregate exposure to cyprodinil residues. More detailed information on
this action can be found in the ``Cyprodinil. Human Health Risk
Assessment to Support the Registration of the Proposed New Use on Sugar
Apple; and Crop Group Conversions/Expansions to Brassica, Leafy Greens,
Subgroup 4-16B; Celtuce; Fennel, Florence, Fresh Leaves and Stalk;
Kohlrabi; Leaf Petiole Vegetable Subgroup 22B; Leafy Greens Subgroup 4-
16A, Except Parsley, Fresh Leaves; Lemon/Lime Subgroup 10-10B; Tropical
and Subtropical, Small Fruit, Inedible Peel, Subgroup 24A; and
Vegetable, Brassica, Head and Stem, Group 5-16'' (hereafter ``the
Cyprodinil Human Health Risk Assessment'') in docket ID EPA-HQ-OPP-
2020-0417.
IV. Other Considerations
A. Analytical Enforcement Methodology
For a discussion of the available analytical enforcement method,
see Unit IV.A. of the July 21, 2016 rulemaking.
B. International Residue Limits
In making its tolerance decisions, EPA seeks to harmonize U.S.
tolerances with international standards whenever possible, consistent
with U.S. food safety standards and agricultural practices. EPA
considers the international maximum residue limits (MRLs) established
by the Codex Alimentarius Commission (Codex), as required by FFDCA
section 408(b)(4).
There are no Codex MRLs for residues in/on celtuce, Florence
fennel, kohlrabi, members of the lemon/lime subgroup 10-10B, sugar
apple, or members of the tropical and subtropical, small fruit,
inedible peel, subgroup 24A; therefore, harmonization is not an issue
for these commodities.
The U.S. tolerance for residues in/on crop subgroup 22B is
harmonized with the Codex MRL for residues in/on celery, a member of
crop subgroup 22B.
Codex has established various MRLs for residues in/on crop groups
and crop subgroups with overlapping commodities included in crop
subgroup 4-16B and crop group 5-16. EPA is not harmonizing the
tolerances for residues in/on crop subgroup 4-16B and group 5-16 with
the Codex MRLs because the petitioner has requested harmonization with
Canadian MRLs rather than Codex MRLs since Canada is a major trading
partner for U.S. growers of those commodities.
Codex has established MRLs for residues in/on leafy vegetables
(except Brassica leafy vegetables) and herbs, which include commodities
included in crop subgroup 4-16A, at different levels. The U.S.
tolerance for residues in/on leafy greens subgroup 4-16A, except
parsley, fresh leaves, is harmonized with the Codex MRL for residues
in/on leafy vegetables (except Brassica leafy vegetables), which
includes lettuce and spinach (the representative commodities for crop
subgroup 4-16A) and some other leafy vegetables. The subgroup
tolerances are supported by available residue data on the
representative commodities and the consistency of labeled use patterns
for commodities within subgroup 4-16A; therefore, EPA is leaving the
subgroup intact rather than pull individual commodities out to
harmonize with Codex.
C. Revisions to Petitioned-For Tolerances
Although the petitioner requested a tolerance for Brassica, leafy
greens, subgroup 4-16B, except watercress, EPA is establishing the
subgroup 4-16B tolerance without the exception. While EPA agrees that a
separate tolerance on watercress is appropriate due to the difference
in use patterns for Brassica, leafy greens and watercress, the existing
separate tolerance for watercress will cover the residues in watercress
resulting from use as directed on the label. Because that tolerance is
already higher, it will cover residues and there is no need to exclude
watercress from the subgroup.
V. Conclusion
Therefore, tolerances are established for residues of cyprodinil in
or on Brassica, leafy greens, subgroup 4-16B at 10 ppm; Celtuce at 30
ppm; Fennel, Florence, fresh leaves and stalk at 30 ppm; Kohlrabi at 1
ppm; Leaf petiole vegetable subgroup 22B at 30 ppm; Leafy greens
subgroup 4-16A, except parsley, fresh leaves at 50 ppm; Lemon/lime
subgroup 10-10B at 0.6 ppm; Sugar apple at 4 ppm; Tropical and
subtropical, small fruit, inedible peel, subgroup 24A at 2 ppm; and
Vegetable, Brassica, head and stem, group 5-16 at 1 ppm. Additionally,
the following existing tolerances are removed as unnecessary due to the
establishment of the above tolerances: Brassica, head and stem,
subgroup 5A; Brassica, leafy greens, subgroup 5B; Leaf petioles
subgroup 4B; Leafy greens subgroup 4A; Lemon; Lime; Longan; Lychee;
Spanish lime; and Turnip, greens.
VI. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
This action establishes tolerances under FFDCA section 408(d) in
response to a petition submitted to the Agency. The Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) has exempted these types of actions from
review under Executive Order 12866, entitled ``Regulatory Planning and
Review'' (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993). Because this action has been
exempted from review under Executive Order 12866, this action is not
subject to Executive Order 13211, entitled ``Actions Concerning
Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution, or
Use'' (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001), or to Executive Order 13045,
entitled ``Protection of Children from Environmental Health Risks and
Safety Risks'' (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997). This action does not
contain any information collections subject to OMB approval under the
Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), nor does it
require any special considerations under Executive Order 12898,
entitled ``Federal Actions to Address Environmental Justice in Minority
Populations and Low-Income Populations'' (59 FR 7629, February 16,
1994).
[[Page 4160]]
Since tolerances and exemptions that are established on the basis
of a petition under FFDCA section 408(d), such as the tolerances in
this final rule, do not require the issuance of a proposed rule, the
requirements of the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) (5 U.S.C. 601 et
seq.), do not apply.
This action directly regulates growers, food processors, food
handlers, and food retailers, not States or Tribes, nor does this
action alter the relationships or distribution of power and
responsibilities established by Congress in the preemption provisions
of FFDCA section 408(n)(4). As such, the Agency has determined that
this action will not have a substantial direct effect on States or
Tribal Governments, on the relationship between the National Government
and the States or Tribal Governments, or on the distribution of power
and responsibilities among the various levels of government or between
the Federal Government and Indian Tribes. Thus, the Agency has
determined that Executive Order 13132, entitled ``Federalism'' (64 FR
43255, August 10, 1999) and Executive Order 13175, entitled
``Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments'' (65 FR
67249, November 9, 2000) do not apply to this action. In addition, this
action does not impose any enforceable duty or contain any unfunded
mandate as described under Title II of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
(UMRA) (2 U.S.C. 1501 et seq.).
This action does not involve any technical standards that would
require Agency consideration of voluntary consensus standards pursuant
to section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act (NTTAA) (15 U.S.C. 272 note).
VII. Congressional Review Act
Pursuant to the Congressional Review Act (5 U.S.C. 801 et seq.),
EPA will submit a report containing this rule and other required
information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of Representatives, and
the Comptroller General of the United States prior to publication of
the rule in the Federal Register. This action is not a ``major rule''
as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 180
Environmental protection, Administrative practice and procedure,
Agricultural commodities, Pesticides, and pests, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
Dated: January 20, 2022.
Marietta Echeverria,
Acting Director, Registration Division, Office of Pesticide Programs.
Therefore, for the reasons stated in the preamble, EPA is amending
40 CFR chapter 1 as follows:
PART 180--TOLERANCES AND EXEMPTIONS FOR PESTICIDE CHEMICAL RESIDUES
IN FOOD
0
1. The authority citation for part 180 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 21 U.S.C. 321(q), 346a and 371.
0
2. In Sec. 180.532, amend the table in paragraph (a)(1) by:
0
a. Designating the table as Table 1;
0
b. Removing the entry for ``Brassica, head and stem, subgroup 5A''.
0
c. Adding in alphabetical order the entry ``Brassica, leafy greens,
subgroup 4-16B''.
0
d. Removing the entry for ``Brassica, leafy greens, subgroup 5B''.
0
e. Adding in alphabetical order the entries ``Celtuce''; ``Fennel,
Florence, fresh leaves and stalk'' and ``Kohlrabi''.
0
f. Removing the entry for ``Leaf petioles subgroup 4B''.
0
g. Adding in alphabetical order the entry ``Leaf petiole vegetable
subgroup 22B''.
0
h. Removing the entry for ``Leafy greens subgroup 4A''.
0
i. Adding in alphabetical order the entry ``Leafy greens subgroup 4-
16A, except parsley, fresh leaves''.
0
j. Removing the entries for ``Lemon'' and ``Lime''.
0
k. Adding in alphabetical order the entry ``Lemon/lime subgroup 10-
10B''.
0
l. Removing the entries for ``Longan''; ``Lychee''; and ``Spanish
lime''.
0
m. Adding in alphabetical order the entries ``Sugar apple''; and
``Tropical and subtropical, small fruit, inedible peel, subgroup 24A''.
0
n. Removing the entry for ``Turnip, greens''.
0
o. Adding in alphabetical order the entry ``Vegetable, Brassica, head
and stem, group 5-16''.
The additions read as follows:
Sec. 180.532 Cyprodinil; tolerances for residues.
(a) * * *
(1) * * *
Table 1 to Paragraph (a)(1)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Parts
Commodity per
million
------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * *
Brassica, leafy greens, subgroup 4-16B........................ 10
* * * * *
Celtuce....................................................... 30
* * * * *
Fennel, Florence, fresh leaves and stalk...................... 30
* * * * *
Kohlrabi...................................................... 1
Leaf petiole vegetable subgroup 22B........................... 30
Leafy greens subgroup 4-16A, except parsley, fresh leaves..... 50
Lemon/lime subgroup 10-10B.................................... 0.6
* * * * *
Sugar apple................................................... 4
Tropical and subtropical, small fruit, inedible peel, subgroup 2
24A..........................................................
Vegetable, Brassica, head and stem, group 5-16................ 1
* * * * *
------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * *
[FR Doc. 2022-01439 Filed 1-26-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P