[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 224 (Wednesday, November 24, 2021)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 66977-66981]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-25649]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

50 CFR Part 648

[Docket No. 211118-0239]
RIN 0648-BK64


Fisheries of the Northeastern United States; Amendment 7 to the 
Atlantic Bluefish Fishery Management Plan

AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and 
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: NMFS approves and implements measures included in Amendment 7 
to the Atlantic Bluefish Fishery Management Plan, as submitted by the 
Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management Council. This amendment revises the 
goals and objectives of the fishery management plan, reallocates quota 
between the commercial and recreational fisheries, reallocates 
commercial quota among the states, implements a rebuilding plan, 
revises the sector quota transfer process, and revises how management 
uncertainty is applied during the specifications process. Amendment 7 
is intended to use the best scientific information available and 
respond to changes in stock health and distribution, while recognizing 
economic need and reliance throughout the management area.

DATES: Effective January 1, 2022.

ADDRESSES: The Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management Council prepared an 
environmental assessment (EA) for Amendment 7 to the Atlantic Bluefish 
Fishery Management Plan that describes the action and other considered 
alternatives. The EA provides a thorough analysis of the biological, 
economic, and social impacts of the measures implemented by this rule 
and the other alternatives considered, a Regulatory Impact Review, and 
economic analysis. Copies of Amendment 7, including the EA, the 
Regulatory Flexibility Act analyses, and other supporting documents for 
this action, are available upon request from Dr. Christopher M. Moore, 
Executive Director, Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management Council, Suite 201, 
800 N State Street, Dover, DE 19901. These documents are also 
accessible via the internet at https://www.mafmc.org/supporting-documents.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Cynthia Ferrio, Fishery Policy 
Analyst, (978) 281-9180.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

    The Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management Council (Council) and the 
Atlantic States Marine Fisheries Commission (Commission) cooperatively 
manage bluefish from Maine to Florida under the Atlantic Bluefish 
Fishery Management Plan (FMP). This joint Bluefish FMP was adopted in 
1990. Since that time, the only substantial changes to management 
measures were made through Amendment 1 to the FMP in 2000, which 
established most measures and regulations currently managing the 
fishery, based on fishery data from 1981-1989. The Council and 
Commission initiated Amendment 7 to the FMP as a joint action in 
December 2017 to respond to changes in the bluefish fishery that have 
occurred over the past several decades while the FMP has remained 
largely unaltered. When first initiated, Amendment 7 was intended to 
address a comprehensive range of management issues, from updating the 
goals and objectives of the FMP to the allocation and transfer of quota 
between the commercial and recreational sectors.
    Following the 2019 operational stock assessment's determination of 
the bluefish stock as overfished, the Council and the Commission's 
Bluefish Management Board (Board) added a rebuilding plan to the list 
of measures in Amendment 7. On June 8, 2021, the Council and Board took 
final action to adopt Amendment 7 in its entirety, with the intent that 
the measures would be effective and be used to set specifications for 
the 2022 fishing year, beginning on January 1, 2022.
    NMFS published a Notification of Availability (NOA) for Amendment 7 
in the Federal Register on September 1, 2021 (86 FR 48968), with a 
comment period ending on November 1, 2021. NMFS published a proposed 
rule for this action in the Federal Register on September 13, 2021 (86 
FR 50866), with a comment period ending on October 13, 2021. See the 
Comments and Responses section for additional detail. The Magnuson-
Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act (Magnuson-Stevens Act) 
allows NMFS as the implementing agency to approve, partially approve, 
or disapprove measures recommended by the Council in a regulatory 
amendment based on whether the measures are consistent with the FMP, 
the Magnuson-Stevens Act and its National Standards, and other 
applicable law. After considering public comment on both the NOA and 
proposed rule, NMFS approved Amendment 7 in its entirety on November 
12, 2021. This rule implements the management measures of Amendment 7.

Approved Measures

    The purpose of this action is to implement a rebuilding plan for 
bluefish, as required by the Magnuson-Stevens Act, and to update the 
FMP using the best scientific information available to respond to 
changes in the fishery over time. NMFS approved all measures proposed 
in Amendment 7, as approved by the Council and Commission. This action 
implements Amendment 7 to the Bluefish FMP, as described below. For a 
more detailed description of each measure, see the Federal Register 
notice on the proposed rule prepared for this action.

FMP Goals and Objectives

    Amendment 7 revises the bluefish goals and objectives that were 
adopted in 1991 to better reflect the current fishery. The following 
revisions were developed with extensive input from the public to better 
guide management of the bluefish fishery.
     Goal 1: Conserve the bluefish resource through stakeholder 
engagement to maintain sustainable recreational fishing and commercial 
harvest.
    [cir] Objective 1.1: Achieve and maintain a sustainable spawning 
stock biomass and rate of fishing mortality.
    [cir] Objective 1.2: Promote practices that reduce release 
mortality within the recreational and commercial fishery.
    [cir] Objective 1.3: Maintain effective coordination between the 
National Marine Fisheries Service, Council, Commission, and member 
states by promoting compliance and to support the development and 
implementation of management measures.
    [cir] Objective 1.4: Promote compliance and effective enforcement 
of regulations.
    [cir] Objective 1.5: Promote science, monitoring, and data 
collection that support and enhance effective ecosystem-based 
management of the bluefish resource.
     Goal 2: Provide fair and equitable access to the fishery 
across all user groups throughout the management unit.

[[Page 66978]]

    [cir] Objective 2.1: Ensure the implementation of management 
measures provides fair and equitable access to the resource across all 
user groups within the management unit.
    [cir] Objective 2.2: Consider the economic and social needs and 
priorities of all groups that access the bluefish resource in the 
development of new management measures.
    [cir] Objective 2.3: Maintain effective coordination with 
stakeholder groups to ensure optimization of economic and social 
benefits.

Quota Reallocation Between the Commercial and Recreational Fishery 
Sectors

    This action allocates 14 percent of the annual catch limit (ACL) to 
the commercial fishery, and 86 percent to the recreational fishery, 
representing a 3-percentage point shift from the prior split (17 
percent commercial and 83 percent recreational). The initial sector 
allocations were based on landings data from 1981-1989, and these 
revised sector allocations are based on updated landings data from 
2009-2018. Catch data from 1981-2018, and landings data from 2014-2018, 
also resulted in the same allocation percentages.

Commercial Quota Reallocation Among the States

    The coastwide commercial quota for bluefish is allocated annually 
to each state within the management unit from Maine to Florida based on 
a percentage determined in the FMP. Amendment 7 revises these 
commercial quota allocations among the states based on a recent, 
representative 10 years of landings data (2009-2018) for the commercial 
fishery to better capture how the stock and fishing activity have 
shifted over time. These revised allocations also include a 0.1-percent 
minimum default allocation to ensure that no state in the management 
unit is excluded from the commercial fishery entirely. This action will 
also phase in the changes in quota allocation over a period of seven 
years, beginning in 2022.

 Table 1--Comparison of Initial and Revised Commercial Quota Allocations
                        Among the Atlantic States
------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                              Revised
                                          Old commercial    commercial
                  State                        quota           quota
                                          allocation (in  allocation (in
                                             percent)        percent)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Maine...................................            0.67            0.01
New Hampshire...........................            0.41            0.12
Massachusetts...........................            6.72           10.16
Rhode Island............................            6.81            9.64
Connecticut.............................            1.27            1.00
New York................................           10.39           19.94
New Jersey..............................           14.82           13.94
Delaware................................            1.88            0.40
Maryland................................            3.00            1.84
Virginia................................           11.88            5.85
North Carolina..........................           32.06           32.38
South Carolina..........................            0.04            0.00
Georgia.................................            0.01            0.00
Florida.................................           10.06            4.75
------------------------------------------------------------------------

Rebuilding Plan

    The 2019 operational assessment determined that the Atlantic 
bluefish stock is overfished but not subject to overfishing. Amendment 
7 implements a rebuilding plan using a constant fishing mortality model 
(F = 0.154) to rebuild the stock in seven years, beginning in fishing 
year 2022. This rebuilding plan was selected because it allows for the 
least disruption to industry and minimizes negative socio-economic 
impacts, while still rebuilding the stock within the 10-year period 
required by the Magnuson-Stevens Act. This rebuilding will be reviewed 
and revised as necessary every 2 years, as required by section 
304(e)(7) of the Magnuson-Stevens Act. Specifications for the 2022 
fishing year will be included in a separate rulemaking action and will 
be based on this rebuilding plan.

Sector Quota Transfer

    This action revises the sector transfer measures within the 
Bluefish FMP to allow quota to be transferred in either direction 
between the fishery sectors (from commercial to recreational or vice 
versa). This amendment also revises the maximum transfer cap to be 10-
percent of the acceptable biological catch, allowing the size of the 
transfer to scale with the biomass of the stock. Sector transfers may 
not occur when the bluefish stock is overfished or subject to 
overfishing.

Management Uncertainty in the Specifications Process

    This amendment revises how management uncertainty is accounted for 
during the specifications process. Previously, the fishery-level ACL 
could be reduced by a buffer to account for sources of management 
uncertainty before quota is allocated to the separate commercial and 
recreational fishery sectors. This action revises the specifications 
process so that quota is allocated to each sector first, and then a 
management uncertainty buffer may be applied separately within each 
sector. This targeted approach provides more management flexibility, 
and allows for the identification of sources of management uncertainty 
that are specific to one sector, but may not be present in the other.

Comments and Responses

    We received 10 comments during the NOA and proposed rule comment 
periods. Three of the comments received were unrelated to the bluefish 
fishery and this action and are not addressed further. Of the comments 
received that were relevant to this action, there was balanced support 
for, and opposition to, this amendment. No changes were made to the 
proposed measures in this final rule as a result of these comments.
    Comment 1: An anonymous commenter strongly supported this

[[Page 66979]]

action, specifically the rebuilding plan, noting the long-term 
biological and economic benefits.
    Response 1: NMFS agrees and is approving Amendment 7 in its 
entirety, including the rebuilding plan.
    Comment 2: Two comments from for-hire recreational head boat 
captains expressed distrust in the data used to develop this action. 
The commenters stated that the recreational fishery is catching more 
bluefish than the commercial gillnet vessels and should be allocated 
more quota. Neither commenter believes that overfishing of bluefish is 
occurring, and both think that the recreational quotas should be 
increased while commercial quotas should be decreased.
    Response 2: The best scientific information available was used to 
develop this action and calculate the percentages of the quota to be 
reallocated to each sector. Additionally, this action used a more 
recent time period as the basis for the recreational and commercial 
allocations to better reflect the current conditions of the stock and 
the fishery. Catch data do indicate that over 85 percent of bluefish 
caught on the Atlantic coast are caught by the recreational sector. As 
a result, Amendment 7 does increase the amount of annual quota 
allocated to the recreational sector and decrease the amount to the 
commercial sector in its sector reallocation; to better reflect the 
needs of the overall fishery. NMFS agrees that overfishing does not 
appear to be occurring at this time.
    Comment 3: A fisheries wholesaler from Florida submitted a comment 
expressing concern about the loss of commercial quota to Florida under 
this action, as well as a lack of confidence in the Marine Recreational 
Information Program (MRIP) data used for the recreational fishery. The 
commenter suggested that the proposed state allocations be reconsidered 
to account for unforeseen bad weather in recent years, which skewed 
landings lower in some states (such as Florida). The commenter also 
suggested that MRIP be improved, especially with regard to accounting 
for dead discards and the difference between private anglers and 
charter/party/head boat catch.
    Response 3: The commercial quota reallocation in this action is 
based on the best scientific data available, and the percentages 
allocated to each state were calculated using landings data from a 10-
year period that should balance out any outlier years due to bad 
weather. The new commercial allocations are intended to be the best 
representation of where the bluefish stock is shifting, and where the 
fishery has been operating in recent years in an effort to minimize the 
need for state-to-state transfers. However, those transfers are still 
available as a tool to prevent a state overage in years of high 
landings. NMFS is also phasing in the implementation of the commercial 
quota reallocation over seven years to allow states and industry to 
adjust to the changes more easily.
    Comment 4: One commenter expressed strong support for the action, 
noting specific approval of the rebuilding plan and the increased 
regulatory flexibility introduced by Amendment 7. This commenter also 
asked what agency regulates the bluefish fishery, and enforces and 
manages the commercial fishery quotas; as well as if any regulations 
are in place to reduce the damaging effects of gillnets.
    Response 4: NMFS agrees and is approving and implementing Amendment 
7. By doing this, and as described in the EA and supporting documents, 
NMFS is the agency responsible for managing the Federal bluefish 
fishery and the measures in this amendment. Further, all of the details 
of the gear requirements and fishery impacts are described in the EA 
for this action and the Bluefish FMP.
    Comment 5: An anonymous college student submitted a comment in 
support of Amendment 7. However, the commenter misunderstood the 
rebuilding plan measures in this action as a plan to stockpile/restock 
rivers and spawning ``bodies of water'' with juvenile bluefish to 
increase the coastal populations, which is inaccurate. The comment also 
includes a few questions about impacts to habitat and other fish 
species.
    Response 5: The rebuilding plan included in this action works 
toward an improved stock status by managing catch limits and minimizing 
fishing mortality of bluefish, not by restocking spawning grounds or 
affecting recruitment. All of the questions about impacts of Amendment 
7 are clearly addressed and described in the EA for the action.
    Comment 6: A commenter from New Jersey wrote that while it is 
important to restrict bluefish catch to rebuild the stock, the 
recreational possession limit for shore anglers and boat fishermen 
should be the same at five fish.
    Response 6: This amendment does not address the recreational 
management measures, such as bag limits. These measures are reviewed 
during the annual specifications process.

Changes From the Proposed Rule

    There are no changes to the measures from the proposed rule.

Classification

    Pursuant to section 304(b)(3) of the Magnuson-Stevens Act, the NMFS 
Assistant Administrator has determined that Amendment 7 to the Atlantic 
Bluefish FMP is necessary for the conservation and management of the 
Atlantic bluefish fishery, and that it is consistent with the Magnuson-
Stevens Act and other applicable laws.
    The Council reviewed the regulations for this action and deemed 
them necessary and appropriate to implement consistent with section 
303(c) of the Magnuson-Stevens Act.
    This final rule has been determined to be not significant for 
purposes of Executive Order 12866.
    This final rule does not duplicate, conflict, or overlap with any 
existing Federal rules.
    This action contains no information collection requirements under 
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.

Final Regulatory Flexibility Analysis

    A final regulatory flexibility analysis (FRFA) was prepared for 
this action pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 604(a), and is included in this final 
rule. The FRFA incorporates the initial regulatory flexibility analysis 
(IRFA), a summary of the significant issues raised by the public 
comments in response to the IRFA, NMFS' responses to those comments, 
and a summary of the analyses completed to support the action. A public 
copy of the EA containing the IRFA is available from the Council (see 
ADDRESSES). The preamble to the proposed rule included a detailed 
summary of the analyses contained in the IRFA, and that discussion is 
not repeated here.

A Summary of the Significant Issues Raised by the Public in Response to 
the IRFA, a Summary of the Agency's Assessment of Such Issues, and a 
Statement of Any Changes Made in the Final Rule as a Result of Such 
Comments

    NMFS did not receive any comments in response to the IRFA or 
regulatory flexibility analysis (RFA) process. Refer to the Comments 
and Responses section of this rule's preamble for more detail on the 
public comments that were received on this action. No changes to the 
proposed rule were made as a result of public comments.

Description and Estimate of Number of Small Entities to Which the Rule 
Would Apply

    This final rule affects those small entities engaged in commercial 
fishing operations in the Atlantic bluefish fishery (those with 
commercial bluefish

[[Page 66980]]

permits), and those with Federal party/charter recreational permits for 
bluefish. Private recreational anglers are not considered ``entities'' 
under the RFA, thus economic impacts on private anglers are not 
considered here. For the purposes of the RFA analysis, the ownership 
entities (or firms), not the individual vessels, are considered to be 
the regulated entities. Ownership entities are defined as those 
entities or firms with common ownership personnel as listed on the 
permit application. Because of this, some vessels with bluefish permits 
may be considered to be part of the same firm because they may have the 
same owners. To identify these small and large firms, vessel ownership 
data from the permit database were grouped according to common owners 
and sorted by size. In terms of RFA, a business primarily engaged in 
commercial fishing is classified as a small business if it has combined 
annual receipts not in excess of $11 million for all its affiliated 
operations worldwide. A business primarily engaged in for-hire (party/
charter) fishing is classified as a small business if it has combined 
annual receipts not in excess of $8 million.
    The current ownership data set used in this analysis is based on 
calendar years 2018-2020 (the most recent and complete data available). 
According to the vessel ownership database, 526 commercial fishing 
affiliate firms landed bluefish during the 2018-2020 period, with 521 
of those entities categorized as small businesses, and 5 categorized as 
large businesses. The 3-year average (2018-2020) combined gross 
receipts (all species combined) for all small entities only was 
$197,251,017 and the average bluefish receipts was $899,490; this 
indicates that bluefish revenues contributed approximately 0.46 percent 
of the total gross receipts for these small entities.
    For the recreational for-hire (party/charter) fishery, 361 for-hire 
affiliate firms reported revenue from recreational fishing for various 
species from 2018-2020. All 361 of those firms are categorized as small 
businesses. It is not possible to derive what proportion of the overall 
revenues for these for-hire firms came from fishing activities for an 
individual species. Nevertheless, given the popularity of bluefish as a 
recreational species in the Mid-Atlantic and New England, it is likely 
that revenues generated from bluefish may be somewhat important for 
many of these firms at certain times of the year. The 3-year average 
(2018-2020) combined gross receipts (all for-hire fishing activity 
combined) for these small entities was $49,916,903, ranging from less 
than $10,000 for 105 entities (lowest value $46) to over $1,000,000 for 
8 entities (highest value $3.6 million).

Description of Projected Reporting, Recordkeeping, and Other Compliance 
Requirements

    There are no new reporting, recordkeeping, or other compliance 
requirements included in this final rule.

Description of the Steps the Agency Has Taken To Minimize the 
Significant Economic Impact on Small Entities Consistent With the 
Stated Objectives of Applicable Statutes

    As noted in the proposed rule and the IRFA, this amendment 
implements several measures that could potentially impact small 
businesses in both the commercial and recreational sectors of the 
bluefish fishery; most notably the reallocation of quota among the 
sectors and states, the rebuilding plan, and the revision of the sector 
quota transfer measures. The approved measures (preferred alternatives) 
for these main issues were chosen and developed with the intent to 
minimize negative impacts to small businesses, while still achieving 
the overall purpose and need of the action.
    In the reallocation of quota between the commercial and 
recreational sectors, the 3-percentage point shift to the recreational 
sector is more representative of how the overall fishery currently 
operates based on the most recent catch data. While this may have a 
slight negative impact on commercial businesses, it would comparably 
benefit recreational businesses. There were other alternatives 
considered for this sector reallocation, but the difference in their 
economic impacts were negligible. Revisions to the sector transfer 
measures could also further mitigate any potential negative impacts to 
small businesses from the sector reallocation. The amendment now allows 
quota (in amounts up to 10-percent of the year's acceptable biological 
catch) to be transferred from either sector to the other (from 
commercial to recreational or vice versa) during the specifications 
process. This management tool allows for additional flexibility and 
supplementation of quota to either sector in a year when the assigned 
allocations may not support the business needs of the sector.
    Similar to the sector reallocations, the approved measures for the 
reallocation of commercial quota among the states is based on a recent 
10 years of landings data, and is intended to be a better 
representation of how and where bluefish are already harvested to 
minimize the need for inseason state transfers. Because these 
alternatives do not affect the total amount of quota available in the 
fishery, but rather how it is distributed geographically, it is 
unlikely that they would have a direct economic impact on commercial 
businesses as a whole. However, the alternatives may have a 
disproportionate, indirect impact on some businesses more than others. 
The range of alternatives considered for how to reallocate this quota 
among the states did not have a difference in potential impacts when 
compared to the preferred alternative. To mitigate potential negative 
effects on entities in states that would experience the largest degree 
of change in commercial allocation, all changes in allocation are being 
phased in equally over seven years; making the difference in quota 
allocation that each state experiences each year much smaller (one 
seventh of the total), and thus minimizing the immediate magnitude of 
any potential negative effects as a result.
    In terms of the rebuilding plan, the constant fishing mortality 
rebuilding plan was chosen because it contains more gradual changes to 
the stock with higher allowed quotas; maximizing economic stability and 
minimizing disruption of business operations while still rebuilding the 
stock within the necessary 10 years.
    Overall, NMFS does not anticipate significant economic impacts on 
small entities as a result of implementing the measures of this 
amendment. While most measures have the potential to impact small 
businesses, these impacts are expected to largely be indirect and to 
have minimal direct economic effects. Public input was solicited and 
considered throughout the development of this amendment, and the 
economic impact on small businesses was minimized wherever possible, as 
detailed in the choices noted above.
    Section 212 of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness 
Act of 1996 states that, for each rule or group of related rules for 
which an agency is required to prepare a FRFA, the agency shall publish 
one or more guides to assist small entities in complying with the rule, 
and shall designate such publications as ``small entity compliance 
guides.'' The agency shall explain the actions a small entity is 
required to take to comply with a rule or group of rules. As part of 
this rulemaking process, a letter to permit holders that also serves as 
a small entity compliance guide was prepared and will be sent to all 
holders of Federal permits issued for the bluefish fishery. In 
addition, copies of this final rule and guide (i.e., permit holder 
letter) are

[[Page 66981]]

available from NMFS at the following website: https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/species/bluefish#management.

List of Subjects in 50 CFR Part 648

    Fisheries, Fishing, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.

    Dated: November 19, 2021.
Samuel D. Rauch, III,
Deputy Assistant Administrator for Regulatory Programs, National Marine 
Fisheries Service.

    For the reasons set out in the preamble, 50 CFR part 648 is amended 
as follows:

PART 648--FISHERIES OF THE NORTHEASTERN UNITED STATES

0
1. The authority citation for part 648 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.


0
2. In Sec.  648.21, revise paragraph (c)(1) and add paragraph (c)(3) to 
read as follows:


Sec.  648.21  Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management Council risk policy.

* * * * *
    (c) * * *
    (1) Unless otherwise allowed in paragraph (c)(2) or (3) of this 
section, for instances in which the application of the risk policy 
approaches in paragraph (b) of this section using OFL distribution 
results in a more restrictive ABC recommendation than the calculation 
of ABC derived from the use of FREBUILD at the MAFMC-
specified overfishing risk level as outlined in paragraph (a) of this 
section, the Scientific and Statistical Committee (SSC) shall recommend 
to the MAFMC the lower of the ABC values.
* * * * *
    (3) The SSC may specify higher ABCs for bluefish based on 
FREBUILD, as outlined in paragraph (a) of this section, 
instead of the risk policy approaches in paragraph (b) of this section 
in order to implement a rebuilding program that would rebuild this 
stock by 2028.
* * * * *

0
3. In Sec.  648.161, revise the section heading and paragraph (a) to 
read as follows:


Sec.  648.161  Bluefish Sector ACLs and Annual Catch Targets (ACTs).

    (a) Sector ACLs and ACTs. As a part of the bluefish specifications 
process, the Bluefish Monitoring Committee shall allocate a specified 
percentage of the fishery-level ACL to the commercial and recreational 
fishery sectors, and identify and review the relevant sources of 
sector-specific management uncertainty to recommend ACTs for each 
sector.
    (1) Sectors. The sum of the commercial and recreational sector-
specific ACLs shall be less than or equal to the fishery level ACL. A 
total of 86 percent of the fishery-level ACL will be allocated to the 
recreational fishery. A total of 14 percent of the fishery-level ACL 
will be allocated to the commercial fishery.
    (2) Management uncertainty. The Bluefish Monitoring Committee shall 
recommend any reduction in catch necessary to address management 
uncertainty and recommend ACTs for each sector, consistent with 
paragraph (a) of this section, after the sector allocation described in 
paragraph (a)(1) of this section. The Bluefish Monitoring Committee 
recommendations shall identify any sector-specific sources of 
management uncertainty affecting the fishery, technical approaches to 
mitigating these sources of uncertainty, and any additional relevant 
information considered in the ACT recommendation and adjustment 
process.
    (3) Periodicity. ACTs may be established on an annual basis for up 
to 3 years at a time, dependent on whether the SSC provides single or 
multiple-year ABC recommendations.
* * * * *

0
4. In Sec.  648.162, revise paragraphs (b), (d), (f), and (g) to read 
as follows:


Sec.  648.162  Bluefish specifications.

* * * * *
    (b) TAL. The Bluefish Monitoring Committee shall recommend sector-
specific TALs less than or equal to the ACTs through the specifications 
process.
    (1) Recreational harvest limit and commercial quota. If research 
quota is specified as described in paragraph (g) of this section, the 
recreational harvest limit and commercial quota will be based on the 
respective sector TALs remaining after the deduction of the applicable 
research quota.
    (2) Sector quota transfer. During the specifications process, the 
Bluefish Monitoring Committee may recommend a transfer of quota from 
the commercial fishery to the recreational fishery or from the 
recreational fishery to the commercial fishery; based on a review and 
comparison of expected landings for each sector and the recreational 
harvest limit and commercial quota. The amount of quota transferred 
between sectors may not exceed 10-percent of the ABC for that fishing 
year. No transfer may occur when the bluefish stock is overfished or 
subject to overfishing.
* * * * *
    (d) Distribution of annual commercial quota. (1) The annual 
commercial quota will be distributed to the states, based upon the 
following percentages; state each followed by its allocation in 
parentheses: ME (0.1091); NH (0.2154); MA (10.1150); RI (9.6079); CT 
(1.0872); NY (19.7582); NJ (13.8454); DE (0.4945); MD (1.9175); VA 
(5.8657); NC (32.0278); SC (0.1034); GA (0.1023); and FL (4.7788). 
Note: The sum of all state allocations does not add to 100 because of 
rounding. This distribution includes a minimum allocation of 0.1 to 
every state in the management unit.
    (2) The allocation percentages in paragraph (d)(1) of this section 
will be phased in over a 7-year period beginning in 2022. The percent 
change in allocation from those prior to 2022 for each state is divided 
equally by seven, and will be applied incrementally each year until the 
final allocations listed in paragraph (d)(1) are in full effect for 
fishing year 2028.
* * * * *
    (f) Revision of state allocation. Based upon any changes in the 
landings data available from the states for the base years 2009-2018, 
the Atlantic States Marine Fisheries Commission (ASMFC) and the MAFMC 
may recommend to the Regional Administrator that the states' shares 
specified in paragraph (d)(1) of this section be revised. The MAFMC's 
and the ASMFC's recommendation must include supporting documentation, 
as appropriate, concerning the environmental and economic impacts of 
the recommendation. The Regional Administrator shall review the 
recommendation of the ASMFC and the MAFMC. After such review, NMFS will 
publish a proposed rule in the Federal Register to implement a revision 
in the state shares. After considering public comment, NMFS will 
publish a final rule in the Federal Register to implement any warranted 
changes in allocation.
    (g) Research quota. See Sec.  648.22(g).

[FR Doc. 2021-25649 Filed 11-23-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-P