[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 212 (Friday, November 5, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Pages 61188-61193]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-24360]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION


Applications for New Awards; Modeling and Simulation Program

AGENCY: Office of Postsecondary Education, Department of Education.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of Education (Department) is issuing a notice 
inviting applications for fiscal year (FY) 2021 for Modeling and 
Simulation Program (MSP), Assistance Listing Number (ALN) 84.116S. This 
notice relates to the approved information collection under OMB control 
number 1894-0006.

DATES: 
    Applications Available: November 5, 2021.
    Deadline for Transmittal of Applications: December 6, 2021.

ADDRESSES: For the addresses for obtaining and submitting an 
application, please refer to our Common Instructions for Applicants to 
Department of Education Discretionary Grant Programs, published in the 
Federal Register on February 13, 2019 (84 FR 3768) and available at 
https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/Fr-2019-02-13/pdf/2019-02206.pdf.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Robin M. Dabney, U.S. Department of 
Education, 400 Maryland Avenue SW, Room 2B117, Washington, DC 20202-
4260. Telephone: (202) 453-7908. Email: [email protected].
    If you use a telecommunications device for the deaf (TDD) or a text 
telephone (TTY), call the Federal Relay Service (FRS), toll-free, at 1-
800-877-8339.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Full Text of Announcement

I. Funding Opportunity Description

    Purpose of Program: The MSP is designed to promote the study of 
modeling and simulation at institutions of higher education by 
promoting the enhancement or development of modeling and simulation 
degree and certificate programs. Additionally, through this program, 
the Department will create a task force that will include the 
successful grantees and other content experts to raise awareness and 
help further define the study of modeling and simulation.
    Background: The FY 2021 Consolidated Appropriations Act includes 
funding for the Modeling and Simulation Program as authorized under 
section 891 of the Higher Education Act of 1965, as amended (HEA). 
Modeling and simulation programs utilize simulated interactive models 
to improve experiential learning in the classroom that represents real-
world scenarios. According to the explanatory statement accompanying 
the FY 2021 Consolidated Appropriations Act, modeling and simulation 
technology has numerous applications for Federal and State governments 
and their partners in the defense, education, gaming, shipbuilding, and 
workforce training sectors, allowing them to

[[Page 61189]]

generate data to help make decisions or predictions about their 
systems.\1\ These programs aid in the development of tools or 
techniques in numerous industries where education and training for 
high-risk or dangerous situations are not realistic. This program seeks 
to fund the development or enhancement of degree programs focused on 
modeling and simulation. Through grant support, we hope to increase the 
availability and capacity of such programs in today's world.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ H. Rept. 116-450 (2020).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In addition, the MSP will include the creation of a task force to 
provide input into the development of curriculum and research on the 
instructional methods and pedagogy needed to further develop modeling 
and simulation programs. Applicants funded under this program will be 
members of the task force, and should include funding requests in their 
budgets for activities associated with task force membership, in 
addition to the amount requested for program implementation. In 
accordance with section 891(b)(1) of the HEA, the activities of the 
task force will include helping to define the study of modeling and 
simulation (including the content of modeling and simulation classes 
and programs); identifying best practices for such study; identifying 
core knowledge and skills that individuals who participate in modeling 
and simulation programs should acquire; and providing recommendations 
to the Secretary. The budget for participation in the task force should 
be included in the budget narrative and should include travel for at 
least two to three grantee representatives for two to three in-person 
meetings and/or site visits to organizations using modeling and 
simulation technologies to help expand awareness. Budgets should also 
include costs related to the development of white papers and/or other 
resources so that grantees can share the knowledge gained through their 
funded programs, as well as other lessons learned from the task force 
convenings.
    Priorities: This notice contains two absolute priorities. 
Applicants may only apply under one of the two absolute priorities.
    We are establishing these priorities for the FY 2021 grant 
competition and any subsequent year in which we make awards from the 
list of unfunded applications from this competition in accordance with 
section 437(d)(1) of the General Education Provisions Act (GEPA), 20 
U.S.C. 1232(d)(1).
    Absolute Priorities: These priorities are absolute priorities. 
Under 34 CFR 75.105(c)(3), we consider only applications that meet one 
of these priorities. Applicants must specify which absolute priority 
they are responding to in their application abstract.
    These priorities are:
    Absolute Priority 1--Enhancing Modeling and Simulation at 
Institutions of Higher Education.
    To be considered for a grant under this absolute priority, an 
eligible institution must include in its application--
    (a) A letter from the president or provost of the eligible 
institution that demonstrates the institution's commitment to the 
enhancement of the modeling and simulation program at the institution 
of higher education;
    (b) An identification of designated faculty responsible for the 
enhancement of the institution's modeling and simulation program;
    (c) A detailed plan for how the grant funds will be used to enhance 
a modeling and simulation program that ensures accessibility for 
students with disabilities;
    (d) A listing of line-item costs associated with task force 
activities, which must include travel for at least two to three annual 
meetings to be held in Washington, DC and costs associated with a white 
paper outlining lessons learned from the enhanced modeling and 
simulation program;
    (e) A commitment of a 25 percent cost match for this program. Each 
eligible institution receiving a grant under this priority must 
provide, from non-Federal sources, in cash or in-kind, an amount equal 
to 25 percent of the amount of the grant to carry out the activities 
supported by the grant; and
    (f) Evidence that the institution has an established modeling and 
simulation degree program, including a major, minor, or career-track 
program; or has an established modeling and simulation certificate or 
concentration program.
    Absolute Priority 2--Establishing Modeling and Simulation Programs.
    To be considered for a grant under this absolute priority, an 
eligible institution must include in its application--
    (a) A letter from the president or provost of the eligible 
institution that demonstrates the institution's commitment to the 
establishment of a modeling and simulation program at the institution 
of higher education;
    (b) A detailed plan for how the grant funds will be used to 
establish a modeling and simulation program that ensures accessibility 
for students with disabilities;
    (c) A description of how the modeling and simulation program 
established under this priority will complement existing programs and 
fit into the institution's current program and course offerings;
    (d) A listing of line-item costs associated with task force 
activities, which must include travel for at least two to three annual 
meetings to be held in Washington, DC, and costs associated with a 
white paper outlining lessons learned from the established modeling and 
simulation program; and
    (e) A commitment of a 25 percent cost match for this program. Each 
eligible institution receiving a grant under this subsection must 
provide, from non-Federal sources, in cash or in-kind, an amount equal 
to 25 percent of the amount of the grant to carry out the activities 
supported by the grant.
    Definitions: We are establishing the definition of ``modeling and 
simulation'' for the FY 2021 grant competition and any subsequent year 
in which we make awards from the list of unfunded applications from 
this competition, in accordance with section 437(d)(1) of GEPA. This 
definition expands upon the definition in section 891 of the HEA to 
provide further clarity consistent with the purpose of the program. The 
remaining definitions are from 34 CFR 77.1.
    Demonstrates a rationale means a key project component included in 
the project's logic model is informed by research or evaluation 
findings that suggest the project component is likely to improve 
relevant outcomes.
    Logic model (also referred to as a theory of action) means a 
framework that identifies key project components of the proposed 
project (i.e., the active ``ingredients'' that are hypothesized to be 
critical to achieving the relevant outcomes) and describes the 
theoretical and operational relationships among the key project 
components and relevant outcomes.
    Note: In developing logic models, applicants may want to use 
resources such as the Regional Educational Laboratory Program's (REL 
Pacific) Education Logic Model Application, available at https://ies.ed.gov/ncee/edlabs/regions/pacific/elm.asp.
    Other sources include: https://ies.ed.gov/ncee/edlabs/regions/pacific/pdf/REL_2014025.pdf, https://ies.ed.gov/ncee/edlabs/regions/pacific/pdf/REL_2014007.pdf, and https://ies.ed.gov/ncee/edlabs/regions/northeast/pdf/REL_2015057.pdf.
    Modeling and simulation means a field of study that is related to 
the application of computer science and mathematics to develop a level 
of understanding of the interaction of the parts of a system and of a 
system as a

[[Page 61190]]

whole and that uses models (e.g., physical, mathematical, or logical 
representations of a system, entity, phenomenon, or process) as a basis 
for simulations to develop data utilized for managerial or technical 
decision making.
    Project component means an activity, strategy, intervention, 
process, product, practice, or policy included in a project. Evidence 
may pertain to an individual project component or to a combination of 
project components (e.g., training teachers on instructional practices 
for English learners and follow-on coaching for these teachers).
    Relevant outcome means the student outcome(s) or other outcome(s) 
the key project component is designed to improve, consistent with the 
specific goals of the program.
    Waiver of Proposed Rulemaking: Under the Administrative Procedure 
Act (5 U.S.C. 553), the Department generally offers interested parties 
the opportunity to comment on proposed priorities, selection criteria, 
definitions, and other requirements. Section 437(d)(1) of GEPA, 
however, allows the Secretary to exempt from rulemaking requirements 
regulations governing the first grant competition under a new or 
substantially revised program authority. This is the first grant 
competition for this program, and therefore qualifies for this 
exemption. In order to ensure timely grant awards, the Secretary has 
decided to forgo public comment on the priorities, definitions, and 
requirements, under section 437(d)(1) of GEPA.
    Program Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1161v; 20 U.S.C. 1138-1138d; 
Departments of Labor, Health and Human Services, and Education and 
Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 2021, H.R. 7614, 116th Congress 
(2020); the explanatory statement accompanying H.R. 133 (Pub. L. 116-
260).
    Note: Projects will be awarded and must be operated in a manner 
consistent with the nondiscrimination requirements contained in Federal 
civil rights laws.
    Applicable Regulations: (a) The Education Department General 
Administrative Regulations in 34 CFR parts 75, 77, 79, 82, 84, 86, 97, 
98, and 99. (b) The Office of Management and Budget Guidelines to 
Agencies on Governmentwide Debarment and Suspension (Nonprocurement) in 
2 CFR part 180, as adopted and amended as regulations of the Department 
in 2 CFR part 3485. (c) The Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost 
Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards in 2 CFR part 
200, as adopted and amended as regulations of the Department in 2 CFR 
part 3474.

II. Award Information

    Type of Award: Discretionary grant.
    Estimated Available Funds: $6,930,000. Approximately fifty percent 
of available funds will be used to fund an award under Absolute 
Priority 1, and approximately 50 percent will be used to fund an award 
under Absolute Priority 2.
    Contingent upon the availability of funds and the quality of 
applications, we may make additional awards in subsequent years from 
the list of unfunded applications from this competition.
    Estimated Range of Awards: $750,000 to $1,155,000 for a performance 
period of 36 months.
    Estimated Average Award Size: $866,250.
    Maximum Award: $1,155,000 for a performance period of 36 months.
    Note: Applicants may include in their award requests up to 10 
percent for activities related to task force participation.
    Estimated Number of Awards: 8.
    Note: The Department is not bound by any estimates in this notice.
    Project Period: Up to 36 months.

III. Eligibility Information

    1. Eligible Applicants: A public or private nonprofit institution 
of higher education, as defined in section 101(a) of the HEA.
    2. a. Cost Sharing or Matching: In accordance with the requirements 
in section 891(c)(1)(D) and (d)(1)(D) of the HEA, each eligible 
institution receiving a grant under this program must provide, from 
non-Federal sources, in cash or in-kind, an amount equal to 25 percent 
of the amount of the grant to carry out the activities supported by the 
grant.
    b. Supplement-Not-Supplant: This competition involves supplement-
not-supplant funding requirements. This program uses the waiver 
authority of section 437(d)(1) of GEPA to establish this as a 
supplement-not-supplant program. Grant funds must be used so that they 
supplement and, to the extent practical, increase the funds that would 
otherwise be available for the activities to be carried out under this 
program.
    c. Indirect Cost Rate Information: For the FY 2021 grant 
competition and any subsequent year in which we make awards from the 
list of unfunded applications from this competition, in accordance with 
section 437(d)(1) of GEPA, a grantee's indirect cost reimbursement is 
limited to eight percent (8%) of a modified total direct cost base. For 
more information regarding indirect costs, or to obtain a negotiated 
indirect cost rate, please see www2.ed.gov/about/offices/list/ocfo/intro.html.
    d. Administrative Cost Limitation: This program does not include 
any program-specific limitation on administrative expenses. All 
administrative expenses must be reasonable and necessary and conform to 
Cost Principles described in 2 CFR part 200 subpart E of the Uniform 
Guidance.
    3. Subgrantees: A grantee under this competition may not award 
subgrants to entities to directly carry out project activities 
described in its application.

IV. Application and Submission Information

    1. Application Submission Instructions: Applicants are required to 
follow the Common Instructions for Applicants to Department of 
Education Discretionary Grant Programs, published in the Federal 
Register on February 13, 2019 (84 FR 3768) and available at 
www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-2019-02-13/pdf/2019-02206.pdf, which 
contain requirements and information on how to submit an application.
    2. Submission of Proprietary Information: Given the types of 
projects that may be proposed in applications for the Modeling and 
Simulation Program, your application may include business information 
that you consider proprietary. In 34 CFR 5.11 we define ``business 
information'' and describe the process we use in determing whether any 
of that information is proprietary and, thus, protected from disclosure 
under Exemption 4 of the Freedom of Information Act (5 U.S.C. 552, as 
amended).
    Because we plan to make successful applications available to the 
public, you may wish to request confidentiality of business 
information.
    Consistent with Executive Order 12600, please designate in your 
application any information you believe is exempt from disclosure under 
Exemption 4. In the appropriate Appendix section of your application 
under ``Other Attachments Form,'' please list the page number or 
numbers on which we can find this information. For additional 
information please see 34 CFR 5.11(c).
    3. Intergovernmental Review: This program is subject to Executive 
Order 12372 and the regulations in 34 CFR part 79. However, under 34 
CFR 79.8(a), we waive intergovernmental review in order to make awards 
by December 31, 2021.
    4. Funding Restrictions: A grant awarded under Absolute Priority 1,

[[Page 61191]]

Enhancing Modeling and Simulation at IHEs, must be used by an eligible 
institution to enhance modeling and simulation programs at the 
institution, which may include--
    (a) Expanding the multidisciplinary nature of the institution's 
modeling and simulation programs;
    (b) Recruiting students into the field of modeling and simulation 
through the provision of fellowships or assistantships;
    (c) Creating new courses to complement existing courses and reflect 
emerging developments in the modeling and simulation field;
    (d) Conducting research to support new methodologies and techniques 
in modeling and simulation; and
    (e) Purchasing equipment necessary for modeling and simulation 
programs.
    A grant awarded under Absolute Priority 2, Establishing Modeling 
and Simulation at IHEs, must be used by an eligible institution to 
enhance modeling and simulation programs at the institution, which may 
include--
    (a) Establishing, or working toward the establishment of, a 
modeling and simulation program, including a major, minor, career-
track, certificate, or concentration program at the eligible 
institution;
    (b) Providing adequate staffing to ensure the successful 
establishment of the modeling and simulation program, which may include 
the assignment of full-time dedicated or supportive faculty; and
    (c) Purchasing equipment necessary for modeling and simulation 
programs.
    We reference regulations outlining additional funding restrictions 
in the Applicable Regulations section of this notice.
    5. Recommended Page Limit: The application narrative is where you, 
the applicant, address the selection criteria that reviewers use to 
evaluate your application. We recommend that you (1) limit the 
application narrative to no more than 50 pages and (2) use the 
following standards:
     A ``page'' is 8.5'' x 11'', on one side only, with 1'' 
margins at the top, bottom, and both sides.
     Double-space (no more than three lines per vertical inch) 
all text in the application narrative, including titles, headings, 
footnotes, quotations, references, and captions, as well as all text in 
charts, tables, figures, and graphs.
     Use a font that is either 12 point or larger, and no 
smaller than 10-pitch (characters per inch).
     Use one of the following fonts: Times New Roman, Courier, 
Courier New, or Arial.
    The recommended page limit does not apply to Part I, the cover 
sheet; Part II, the budget section, including the narrative budget 
justification; Part IV, the assurances and certifications; or the one-
page abstract. However, the recommended page limit does apply to all of 
the application narrative Part III.

V. Application Review Information

    1. Selection Criteria: The selection criteria for this competition 
are from 34 CFR 75.210. The points assigned to each criterion are 
indicated in the parentheses next to the criterion. An application may 
earn up to a total of 100 points based on the selection criteria. All 
applications will be evaluated based on the selection criteria as 
follows:
    (a) Significance. (Maximum 25 points)
    (1) The Secretary considers the significance of the proposed 
project.
    (2) In determining the significance of the proposed project, the 
Secretary considers the following factors:
    (i) The extent to which the proposed project is likely to yield 
findings that may be utilized by other appropriate agencies and 
organizations. (up to 5 points)
    (ii) The extent to which the proposed project involves the 
development or demonstration of promising new strategies that build on, 
or are alternatives to, existing strategies. (up to 10 points)
    (iii) The extent to which the results of the proposed project are 
to be disseminated in ways that will enable others to use the 
information or strategies. (up to 10 points)
    (b) Quality of the project design. (Maximum 50 points)
    (1) The Secretary considers the quality of the design of the 
proposed project.
    (2) In determining the quality of the design of the proposed 
project, the Secretary considers the following factors:
    (i) The extent to which there is a conceptual framework underlying 
the proposed research or demonstration activities and the quality of 
that framework. (up to 10 points)
    (ii) The extent to which the proposed activities constitute a 
coherent, sustained program of training in the field. (up to 10 points)
    (iii) The extent to which the proposed project is designed to build 
capacity and yield results that will extend beyond the period of 
Federal financial assistance. (up to 10 points)
    (iv) The extent to which the proposed project represents an 
exceptional approach to the priorities established for the competition. 
(up to 10 points)
    (v) The extent to which the proposed project demonstrates a 
rationale (as defined in this notice). (up to 10 points)
    (c) Quality of project personnel. (Maximum 5 points)
    (1) The Secretary considers the quality of the personnel who will 
carry out the proposed project.
    (2) In determining the quality of project personnel, the Secretary 
considers the extent to which the applicant encourages applications for 
employment from persons who are members of groups that have 
traditionally been underrepresented based on race, color, national 
origin, gender, age, or disability. (up to 2 points)
    (3) In addition, the Secretary considers the qualifications, 
including relevant training and experience, of the project director or 
principal investigator. (up to 3 points)
    (d) Adequacy of resources. (Maximum 5 points)
    (1) The Secretary considers the adequacy of the resources for the 
proposed project.
    (2) In determining the adequacy of resources for the proposed 
project, the Secretary considers the adequacy of support, including 
facilities, equipment, supplies, and other resources, from the 
applicant organization or the lead applicant organization.
    (e) Quality of the management plan. (Maximum 5 points)
    (1) The Secretary considers the quality of the management plan for 
the proposed project.
    (2) In determining the quality of the management plan for the 
proposed project, the Secretary considers the extent to which the time 
commitments of the project director and principal investigator and 
other key project personnel are appropriate and adequate to meet the 
objectives of the proposed project.
    (f) Quality of the project evaluation. (Maximum 10 points)
    (1) The Secretary considers the quality of the evaluation to be 
conducted of the proposed project.
    (2) In determining the quality of the evaluation, the Secretary 
considers the following factors:
    (i) The extent to which the methods of evaluation are thorough, 
feasible, and appropriate to the goals, objectives, and outcomes of the 
proposed project. (up to 5 points)
    (ii) The extent to which the methods of evaluation will provide 
performance feedback and permit periodic assessment of progress toward 
achieving intended outcomes. (up to 5 points)
    2. Review and Selection Process: We remind potential aplicants that 
in

[[Page 61192]]

reviewing applications in any discretionary grant competition, the 
Secretary may consider, under 34 CFR 75.217(d)(3), the past performance 
of the applicant in carrying out a previous award, such as the 
applicant's use of funds, achievement of project objectives, and 
compliance with grant conditions. The Secretary may also consider 
whether the applicant failed to submit a timely performance report or 
submitted a report of unacceptable quality.
    In addition, in making a competitive grant award, the Secretary 
requires various assurances, including those applicable to Federal 
civil rights laws that prohibit discrimination in programs or 
activities receiving Federal financial assistance from the Department 
(34 CRF 100.4, 104.5, 106.4, 108.8, and 110.23).
    A panel of up to three non-Federal reviewers will review and score 
each application in accordance with the selection criteria. Award(s) 
will be made in rank order according to the average score received from 
the peer review for each absolute priority.
    Tiebreaker. If there is more than one application with the same 
score and insufficient funds to fund all the applications with the same 
ranking, the first tiebreaker will be to select the applicant with the 
highest average score under the selection criterion Quality of Project 
Design. If a second tiebreaker is required, we will select the 
applicant with the highest average score under Adequacy of Resources. 
If a third tiebreaker is required, we will select the applicant with 
the highest average score under Significance.
    3. Risk Assessment and Specific Conditions: Consistent with 2 CFR 
200.206, before awarding grants under this competition, the Department 
conducts a review of the risks posed by applicants. Under 2 CFR 
200.208, the Secretary may impose specific conditions and, under 2 CFR 
3474.10, in appropriate circumstances, high-risk conditions on a grant 
if the applicant or grantee is not financially stable; has a history of 
unsatisfactory performance; has a financial or other management system 
that does not meet the standards in 2 CFR part 200, subpart D; has not 
fulfilled the conditions of a prior grant; or is otherwise not 
responsible.
    4. Integrity and Performance System: If you are selected under this 
competition to receive an award that over the course of the project 
period may exceed the simplified acquisition threshold (currently 
$250,000), under 2 CFR 200.206(a)(2) we must make a judgement about 
your integrity, business ethics, and record of performance under 
Federal awards--that is, the risk posed by you as an applicant--before 
we make an award. In doing so, we must consider any information about 
you that is in the integrity and performance system (currently referred 
to as the Federal Awardee Performance and Integrity Information System 
(FAPIIS)), accessible through the System for Award Management. You may 
review and comment on any information about yourself that a Federal 
agency previously entered and that is currently in FAPIIS.
    Please note that, if the total value of your currently active 
grants, cooperative agreements, and procurement contracts from the 
Federal Government exceeds $10,000,000, the reporting requirements in 2 
CFR part 200, Appendix XII to Part 200, require you to report certain 
integrity information to FAPIIS semiannually. Please review the 
requirements in 2 CFR part 200, Appendix XII to Part 200, if this grant 
plus all the other Federal funds you receive exceed $10,000,000.
    5. In General: In accordance with the Office of Management and 
Budget's guidance located at 2 CFR part 200, all applicable Federal 
laws, and relevant Executive guidance, the Department will review and 
consider applications for funding pursuant to this notice inviting 
applications in accordance with--
    (a) Selecting recipients most likely to be successful in delivering 
results based on the program objectives through an objective process of 
evaluating Federal award applications (2 CFR 200.205);
    (b) Prohibiting the purchase of certain telecommunication and video 
surveillance services or equipment in alignment with section 889 of the 
National Defense Authorization Act of 2019 (Pub. L. 115-232) (2 CFR 
200.216);
    (c) Providing a preference, to the extent permitted by law, to 
maximize use of goods, products, and materials produced in the United 
States (2 CFR 200.322); and
    (d) Terminating agreements in whole or in part to the greatest 
extent authorized by law if an award no longer effectuates the program 
goals or agency priorities (2 CFR 200.340).

VI. Award Administration Information

    1. Award Notices: If your application is successful, we notify your 
U.S. Representative and U.S. Senators and send you a Grant Award 
Notification (GAN); or we may send you an email containing a link to 
access an electronic version of your GAN. We may notify you informally, 
also.
    If your application is not evaluated or not selected for funding, 
we notify you.
    2. Administrative and National Policy Requirements: We identify 
administrative and national policy requirements in the application 
package and reference these and other requirements in the Applicable 
Regulations section of this notice.
    We reference the regulations outlining the terms and conditions of 
an award in the Applicable Regulations section of this notice and 
include these and other specific conditions in the GAN. The GAN also 
incorporates your approved application as part of your binding 
commitments under the grant.
    3. Open Licensing Requirements: Unless an exception applies, if you 
are awarded a grant under this competition, you will be required to 
openly license to the public grant deliverables created in whole, or in 
part, with Department grant funds. When the deliverable consists of 
modifications to pre-existing works, the license extends only to those 
modifications that can be separately identified and only to the extent 
that open licensing is permitted under the terms of any licenses or 
other legal restrictions on the use of pre-existing works. 
Additionally, a grantee or subgrantee that is awarded competitive grant 
funds must have a plan to disseminate these public grant deliverables. 
This dissemination plan can be developed and submitted after your 
application has been reviewed and selected for funding. For additional 
information on the open licensing requirements please refer to 2 CFR 
3474.20.
    4. Reporting: (a) If you apply for a grant under this competition, 
you must ensure that you have in place the necessary processes and 
systems to comply with the reporting requirements in 2 CFR part 170 
should you receive funding under the competition. This does not apply 
if you have an exception under 2 CFR 170.110(b).
    (b) At the end of your project period, you must submit a final 
performance report, including financial information, as directed by the 
Secretary. If you receive a multiyear award, you must submit an annual 
performance report that provides the most current performance and 
financial expenditure information as directed by the Secretary under 34 
CFR 75.118. The Secretary may also require more frequent performance 
reports under 34 CFR 75.720(c). For specific requirements on reporting, 
please go to www.ed.gov/fund/grant/apply/appforms/appforms.html.
    5. Performance Measures: Under the Government Performance and 
Results Act of 1993 and for purposes of Department reporting under CFR

[[Page 61193]]

75.110, the Department will use the following performance measures to 
evaluate the success of the MSP:
    (a) The number of students enrolled in the established modeling and 
simulation programs, including major, minor, career-track, certificate, 
and concentration programs.
    (b) The number of new modeling and simulation courses developed 
under the MSP that reflect emerging developments in the modeling and 
simulation field.

VII. Other Information

    Accessible Format: On request to the program contact person listed 
under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT, individuals with disabilities 
can obtain this document and a copy of the application package in an 
accessible format.
    The Department will provide the requestor with an accessible format 
that may include Rich Text Format (RTF) or text format (txt), a thumb 
drive, an MP3 file, braille, large print, audiotape, or compact disc, 
or other accessible format.
    Electronic Access to This Document: The official version of this 
document is the document published in the Federal Register. You may 
access the official edition of the Federal Register and the Code of 
Federal Regulations at www.govinfo.gov. At this site you can view this 
document, as well as all other documents of this Department published 
in the Federal Register, in text or Portable Document Format (PDF). To 
use PDF you must have Adobe Acrobat Reader, which is available free at 
the site.
    You may also access documents of the Department published in the 
Federal Register by using the article search feature at 
www.federalregister.gov. Specifically, through the advanced search 
feature at this site, you can limit your search to documents published 
by the Department.

Michelle Asha Cooper,
Acting Assistant Secretary for Postsecondary Education.
[FR Doc. 2021-24360 Filed 11-4-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4000-01-P