[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 203 (Monday, October 25, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Pages 58965-58969]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-23166]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. IC-34400; File No. 812-15274]


Credit Suisse Asset Management, LLC., et al.; Notice of 
Application and Temporary Order

October 19, 2021.
AGENCY: Securities and Exchange Commission (``Commission'').

ACTION: Temporary order and notice of application for a permanent order 
under section 9(c) of the Investment Company Act of 1940 (``Act'').

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

Summary of Application:  Applicants have received a temporary order 
(``Temporary Order'') exempting them from section 9(a) of the Act, with 
respect to a guilty plea entered on October 19, 2021 (``Guilty Plea''), 
by Credit Suisse Securities (Europe) Limited (the ``Pleading Entity'' 
or ``CSSEL'') in the United States District Court for the Eastern 
District of New York (the ``District Court'') in connection with a plea 
agreement (``Plea Agreement'') between the Pleading Entity and the 
United States Department of Justice (``DOJ''), until the Commission 
takes final action on an application for a permanent order (the 
``Permanent Order,'' and with the Temporary Order, the ``Orders''). 
Applicants also have applied for a Permanent Order.

Applicants:  CSSEL, Credit Suisse Asset Management, LLC (``CSAM''), 
Credit Suisse Asset Management Limited (``CSAML''), Credit Suisse 
Securities (USA) LLC (``CSSU,'' and together with CSSEL, CSAM and 
CSAML, the ``Applicants'') and Credit Suisse Group AG (``CS 
Group'').\1\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ CS Group is a party to the application solely for purposes 
of making the representations and agreeing to the conditions in the 
application that apply to it. For such purpose, it is included in 
the term ``Applicants'' solely with respect to such representations 
and conditions.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Filing Date:  The application was filed on October 19, 2021.

Hearing or Notification of Hearing:  An order granting the requested 
relief will be issued unless the Commission orders a hearing. 
Interested persons may request a hearing by emailing the Commission's 
Secretary at [email protected] and serving applicants with a 
copy of the request, personally or by mail. Hearing requests should be 
received by the Commission by 5:30 p.m. on November 15, 2021 and should 
be accompanied by proof of service on the applicants, in the form of an 
affidavit, or for lawyers, a certificate of service. Pursuant to rule 
0-5 under the Act, hearing requests should state the nature of the 
writer's interest, any facts bearing upon the desirability of a hearing 
on the matter, the reason for the request, and the issues contested. 
Persons who wish to be notified of a hearing may request notification 
by emailing the Commission's Secretary at [email protected].

ADDRESSES:  The Commission: [email protected]. Applicants: 
Roger Machlis, Credit Suisse Asset Management, LLC, Eleven Madison 
Avenue, New York, NY 10010.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:  Kay M. Vobis, Senior Counsel, at 
(202) 551-6728 or Trace W. Rakestraw, Branch Chief, at (202) 551-6821 
(Division of Investment Management, Chief Counsel's Office).

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The following is a temporary order and a 
summary of the application. The complete application may be obtained 
via the Commission's website by searching for the file number, or an 
applicant using the Company name box, at http://www.sec.gov/search/search.htm, or by calling (202) 551-8090.

Applicants' Representations

    1. The Pleading Entity is a limited liability company, incorporated 
in the United Kingdom and authorized under the Financial Services and 
Markets Act 2000, as amended. The Pleading Entity is an indirect 
wholly-owned subsidiary of CSAG (defined below). Its principal activity 
is acting as a broker dealer.
    2. CSAM, a limited liability company formed under Delaware law, is 
registered as an investment adviser under the Investment Advisers Act 
of 1940 (the ``Advisers Act''). CSAM serves as investment adviser 
(either as primary investment adviser or as investment sub-adviser) to 
each Fund \2\ listed in Part 1 of Appendix A of the application.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \2\ The term ``Fund'' as used herein refers to any investment 
company that is registered under the Act (``RIC''), employees' 
securities companies (``ESC''), investment company that has elected 
to be treated as a business development company under the Act 
(``BDC'') for which a Covered Person currently provides Fund 
Servicing Activities, or, subject to the terms and conditions of the 
Orders, may in the future provide Fund Servicing Activities.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    3. CSAML, a corporation formed under the laws of the United 
Kingdom, is registered as an investment adviser under the Advisers Act. 
CSAML serves as investment sub-adviser to the Fund listed in Part 2 of 
Appendix A of the application.
    4. CSSU, a limited liability company formed under Delaware law, is 
registered as a broker-dealer under the Securities Exchange Act of 
1934, as amended (the ``Exchange Act''), and as an investment adviser 
under the Advisers Act. CSSU serves as principal underwriter to each 
Open-End Fund listed in Part 3 of Appendix A of the application.
    5. Each of the above Applicants is either a direct or indirect 
wholly owned subsidiary of CS Group (CS Group, together with its 
wholly-owned subsidiaries and affiliated entities, ``Credit Suisse''). 
Credit Suisse AG (``CSAG'') is a wholly owned subsidiary, and the 
principal operating subsidiary, of CS Group, which operates as a 
holding company. Both CS Group and CSAG are corporations organized 
under the laws of Switzerland.
    6. Currently, CSAM, CSAML and CSSU (together, the ``Fund Servicing 
Applicants''), which are affiliates of the Pleading Entity, 
collectively serve as investment adviser or investment subadviser to 
investment companies

[[Page 58966]]

registered under the Act or series of such companies and ESCs and as 
principal underwriter to open-end management investment companies 
registered under the Act (``Open-End Funds'') (such activities, 
collectively, ``Fund Servicing Activities'').\3\ Applicants request 
that any relief granted by the Commission pursuant to the application 
also apply to any other existing company, other than CS Group and CSAG, 
of which the Pleading Entity is an Affiliated Person and to any other 
company of which the Pleading Entity may become an Affiliated Person in 
the future (together with the Fund Servicing Applicants, the ``Covered 
Persons'') with respect to any activity contemplated by section 9(a) of 
the Act.\4\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ Other than the Fund Servicing Applicants, no existing 
company of which the Pleading Entity is an ``affiliated person'' 
within the meaning of Section 2(a)(3) of the Act (``Affiliated 
Person'') currently serves as an investment adviser or depositor of 
any RIC, ESC or BDC, or as principal underwriter for any Open-End 
Fund, registered unit investment trust (``UIT''), or registered 
face-amount certificate company (``FACC'').
    \4\ Covered Persons may, if the Order is granted, in the future 
act in any of the capacities contemplated by section 9(a) of the 
Act. Any existing or future entities that may rely on the Orders in 
the future will comply with the terms and conditions of the 
application. CS Group and CSAG do not and will not serve as 
investment adviser, depositor or principal underwriter to any RIC, 
ESC or BDC and are not a Covered Person.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    7. On October 19, 2021, the DOJ filed a criminal information (the 
``Information'') in the District Court charging the Pleading Entity 
with one count of conspiracy to commit wire fraud (18 U.S.C. 1349). 
According to the Statement of Facts that served as the basis for the 
Plea Agreement (the ``Statement of Facts'') the Pleading Entity, 
through its employees, conspired to use U.S. wires and the U.S. 
financial system to defraud U.S. and international investors in 
connection with three financing transactions involving the Pleading 
Entity and Mozambican state-owned enterprises, as further described in 
the application (the ``Financing Transactions'').
    8. In connection with the Plea Agreement, the ultimate parent of 
the Pleading Entity, CS Group, entered into a Deferred Prosecution 
Agreement on October 19, 2021 (the ``DPA'').
    9. Pursuant to the Plea Agreement, the Pleading Entity entered the 
Guilty Plea on October 19, 2021 in the District Court to the charge set 
out in the Information. Applicants state that, according to the Plea 
Agreement, the Pleading Entity agrees, among other things, as follows: 
First, the Pleading Entity shall cooperate fully with the DOJ, Criminal 
Division, Money Laundering and Asset Recovery Section and Fraud 
Section, and the United States Attorney's Office for the Eastern 
District of New York (collectively, the ``Offices'') in any and all 
matters relating to the conduct described in the Plea Agreement and the 
Statement of Facts and other conduct under investigation by the Offices 
or any other component of the DOJ at any time during the term of the 
DPA (the ``Term'') until the later of the date upon which all 
investigations and prosecutions arising out of such conduct are 
concluded or the end of the Term. Second, at the request of the 
Offices, the Pleading Entity shall also cooperate fully with other 
domestic or foreign law enforcement and regulatory authorities and 
agencies, as well as the Multilateral Development Banks in any 
investigation of the Pleading Entity, CS Group, its affiliates, or any 
of its present or former officers, directors, employees, agents, and 
consultants, or any other party, in any and all matters relating to the 
conduct described in the Plea Agreement and the Statement of Facts and 
any other conduct under investigation by the Offices or any other 
component of the DOJ. Third, should the Pleading Entity learn during 
the Term of any evidence or allegations of conduct that may constitute 
a violation of the federal wire fraud statute had the conduct occurred 
within the jurisdiction of the United States, the Pleading Entity shall 
promptly report such evidence or allegation to the Offices. Fourth, the 
Pleading Entity agrees that any fine imposed by the District Court will 
be due and payable as specified in Paragraph 19 of the Plea Agreement, 
and that any restitution imposed by the District Court will be due and 
payable in accordance with the District Court's order. Finally, the 
Pleading Entity agrees to commit no further crimes and to work with 
Credit Suisse in fulfilling the obligations of Credit Suisse's DPA.
    10. The Applicants expect that the District Court will enter a 
judgment against the Pleading Entity (the ``Judgment'') that will 
require remedies that are materially the same as set forth in the Plea 
Agreement.
    11. In the DPA, CS Group agreed to continue to cooperate fully with 
any ongoing DOJ or non-U.S. investigations of the conduct. CS Group 
also agreed to continue to make certain enhancements to its existing 
compliance program, and to make annual reports to the DOJ about those 
enhancements, as set out in Attachment C to the DPA, on an annual basis 
for three years.
    12. On October 19, 2020, the SEC instituted cease-and-desist 
proceedings against GS Group concerning violations of the books and 
records and internal control provisions of the Foreign Corrupt 
Practices Act of 1977 and violations of the antifraud provisions of the 
Securities Act of 1933 and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 in 
connection with the Financing Transactions, as further described in the 
application (the ``SEC Order''). The SEC Order includes findings that 
CS Group violated sections 17(a)(1), (2) and (3) of the Securities Act, 
sections 10(b), 13(b)(2)(A) and 13(b)(2)(B) of the Exchange Act and 
rule 10b-5 thereunder. The SEC Order orders CS Group to cease and 
desist from committing or causing any violations and any future 
violations of those provisions and orders CS Group to pay a civil money 
penalty of $65 million, disgorgement of $26,229,233 and prejudgment 
interest of $7,822,639.
    13. CS Group and its affiliates have entered into settlement 
agreements with other U.S. and non-U.S. regulatory or enforcement 
agencies related to the Financing Transactions. These include an order 
issued by the U.K. Financial Conduct Authority on October 19, 2021 and 
a finding issued by Swiss Financial Market Supervisory Authority on 
October 19, 2021.

Applicants' Legal Analysis

    1. Section 9(a)(1) of the Act provides, in pertinent part, that a 
person may not serve or act as an investment adviser or depositor of 
any registered investment company or as principal underwriter for any 
Open-End Fund, UIT, or FACC, if such person within ten years has been 
convicted of any felony or misdemeanor, including those arising out of 
such person's conduct as a broker, dealer or bank. Section 2(a)(10) of 
the Act defines the term ``convicted'' to include a plea of guilty. 
Section 9(a)(3) of the Act extends the prohibitions of section 9(a)(1) 
to a company, any affiliated person of which has been disqualified 
under the provisions of section 9(a)(1). Section 2(a)(3) of the Act 
defines ``affiliated person'' to include, among others, any person 
directly or indirectly controlling, controlled by, or under common 
control with, the other person. The Pleading Entity is an Affiliated 
Person of each of the other Applicants within the meaning of section 
2(a)(3) of the Act. Therefore, the Applicants state that the Plea 
Agreement would result in a disqualification of each Fund Servicing 
Applicant for ten years under section 9(a)(3) were they to act in any 
of the capacities listed in section 9(a), by effect of a conviction 
described in section 9(a)(1).

[[Page 58967]]

    2. Section 9(c) of the Act provides that: ``[t]he Commission shall 
by order grant [an] application [for relief from the prohibitions of 
subsection 9(a)], either unconditionally or on an appropriate temporary 
or other conditional basis, if it is established [i] that the 
prohibitions of subsection 9(a), as applied to such person, are unduly 
or disproportionately severe or [ii] that the conduct of such person 
has been such as not to make it against the public interest or the 
protection of investors to grant such application.'' Applicants have 
filed an application pursuant to section 9(c) seeking a Temporary Order 
and a Permanent Order exempting the Fund Servicing Applicants and other 
Covered Persons from the disqualification provisions of section 9(a) of 
the Act.
    3. Applicants believe they meet the standards for exemption 
specified in section 9(c). Applicants assert that (i) the conduct that 
served as the basis for the Plea Agreement, the DPA and the SEC Order 
(the ``Conduct'') was limited and did not involve any of the Fund 
Servicing Applicants. The Conduct similarly did not involve any Fund 
with respect to which the Fund Servicing Applicants engage in Fund 
Servicing Activities, and none of such Funds ever participated in the 
offerings or transactions at issue or acquired the subject securities 
or loans in the secondary market; \5\ (ii) application of the statutory 
bar would impose significant hardships on the Funds and their 
shareholders, (iii) the prohibitions of section 9(a), if applied to the 
Fund Servicing Applicants, would be unduly or disproportionately severe 
and (iv) the Conduct did not constitute conduct that would make it 
against the public interest or protection of investors to grant the 
exemption from section 9(a).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ Applicants make no representation in respect of the Funds 
that were not advised or sub-advised by any of the Fund Servicing 
Applicants during the period of the Conduct.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    4. Applicants represent that the Conduct did not involve any of 
Fund Servicing Applicants.\6\ Instead, the Applicants state that the 
Conduct occurred as a result of the actions of three employees who are 
no longer employed by any Credit Suisse affiliate, as well as a number 
of internal control and other failures. The three employees were part 
of a wholly separate legal entity, separate business division, and 
separate supervisory structure from the Fund Servicing Applicants and 
had no connection with or input into the Fund Servicing Applicants' 
business. Further, the internal control and other failures that were 
part of the Conduct did not involve the Funds Servicing Applicants.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ The Pleading Entity does not and will not serve in any of 
the capacities described in section 9(a) of the Act.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    5. Applicants assert that, in light of the limited scope of the 
Conduct, it would be unduly and disproportionately severe to impose a 
section 9(a) disqualification on the Fund Servicing Applicants. 
Applicants assert that the conduct of the Applicants has not been such 
to make it against the public interest or the protection of investors 
to grant the exemption from section 9(a).
    6. Applicants assert that neither the protection of investors nor 
the public interest would be served by permitting the section 9(a) 
disqualifications to apply to the Fund Servicing Applicants because 
those disqualifications would deprive the Funds they serve of the 
advisory or sub-advisory and underwriting services that shareholders 
expected the Funds would receive when they decided to invest in the 
Funds. Applicants also assert that the prohibitions of section 9(a) 
could operate to the financial detriment of the Funds and their 
shareholders, including by causing the Funds to spend time and 
resources to engage substitute advisers, subadvisers, and principal 
underwriters, which would be an unduly and disproportionately severe 
consequence particularly given that no Fund Servicing Applicants and 
none of their employees were involved in the Conduct and that the 
Conduct did not involve any of the Funds or Fund Servicing Activities.
    7. Applicants assert that if the Fund Servicing Applicants were 
barred under section 9(a) from providing investment advisory and 
underwriting services to the Funds and were unable to obtain the 
requested exemption, the effect on their businesses and employees would 
be severe. Applicants state that the Fund Servicing Applicants have 
committed substantial capital and other resources to establishing 
expertise in advising and sub-advising Funds with a view to continuing 
and expanding this business. Similarly, Applicants represent that if 
CSSU were barred under section 9(a) from continuing to provide 
underwriting services to the Funds and were unable to obtain the 
requested exemption, the effect on its current business and employees 
would be significant. CSSU has committed substantial resources to 
establish expertise in underwriting the securities of the Funds that 
are Open-End Funds and to establish distribution arrangements for Open-
End Fund shares. Applicants further state that prohibiting the Fund 
Servicing Applicants from engaging in Fund Servicing Activities would 
not only adversely affect their business, but would also adversely 
affect their employees who are involved in these activities.
    8. Applicants represent that: (i) None of the current or former 
directors, officers or employees of Applicants (other than certain 
former personnel of the Pleading Entity who were not involved in any of 
the Fund Servicing Applicants' Fund Servicing Activities) engaged in 
the Conduct; (ii) no current or former director, officer, or employee 
of the Pleading Entity or any Covered Person who previously has been or 
who subsequently may be identified by the Pleading Entity or any U.S. 
or non-U.S. regulatory or enforcement agencies as having been 
responsible for the Conduct will be an officer, director, or employee 
of any Applicant, CS Group, CSAG, and of any Covered Person; (iii) such 
directors, officers, and employees and any other person who otherwise 
participated in the Conduct have had no, and will not have any future, 
involvement in the Covered Persons' activities in any capacity 
described in section 9(a) of the Act; and (iv) because the directors, 
officers and employees of Applicants (other than certain former 
personnel of the Pleading Entity who were not involved in any of the 
Fund Servicing Applicants' Fund Servicing Activities) did not engage in 
the Conduct, shareholders of the Funds were not affected any 
differently than if those Funds had received services from any other 
non-affiliated investment adviser or principal underwriter.
    9. Applicants have agreed that none of CS Group, CSAG, the 
Applicants or any of the other Covered Persons will employ the former 
employees of the Pleading Entity or any other person who subsequently 
may be identified by the Pleading Entity or any U.S. or non-U.S. 
regulatory or enforcement agencies as having been responsible for the 
Conduct in any capacity without first making a further application to 
the Commission pursuant to section 9(c).
    10. Applicants have also agreed that each of CS Group, CSAG, 
Applicants, and the Covered Persons will adopt and implement policies 
and procedures reasonably designed to ensure that it will comply with 
the terms and conditions of the Orders granted under section 9(c).
    11. In addition, each of CS Group, CSAG, Applicants and the Covered 
Persons will comply in all material respects with the material terms 
and conditions of the Plea Agreement, the DPA and with the material 
terms of the SEC Order, and any other orders issued by, or settlements 
with, regulatory or

[[Page 58968]]

enforcement agencies addressing the Conduct, in each case as such terms 
and conditions are applicable to it. In addition, within 30 days of 
each anniversary of the Permanent Order (until and including the third 
such anniversary), CS Group will submit a certification signed by its 
chief executive officer and its chief compliance officer, confirming 
that (i) the Pleading Entity has complied with the terms and conditions 
of the Plea Agreement in all material respects; (ii) CS Group has 
complied with the terms and conditions of the DPA in all material 
respects; and (iii) CS Group, CSAG, Applicants and the Covered Persons 
have complied with the terms and conditions of the Orders in all 
material respects.
    12. Applicants further state that Credit Suisse has undertaken 
certain other remedial measures, as described in greater detail in the 
application. These include three types of remedial measures in response 
to, or that bear on, this matter: (i) Those directly related to the 
Conduct or would have applied to the transactions in question; (ii) 
those implicating the broader risk management systems and controls 
surrounding the relevant business as a whole; and (iii) industry-wide 
and multilateral reforms designed to address one or the root causes of 
the issues that arose in connection with these transactions. In 
connection with the remedial measures, CS Group will submit to 
Commission staff (i) a remediation report as described in Section IV.F. 
of the application (the ``Remediation Report'') and (ii) a multilateral 
remedies report, as described in Section IV.F. of the application (the 
``Multilateral Remedies Report'') within 30 days of each anniversary of 
the Permanent Order (until and including the third such anniversary).
    13. As a result of the foregoing, the Applicants submit that absent 
relief, the prohibitions of section 9(a) would be unduly or 
disproportionately severe, and that the Conduct did not constitute 
conduct that would make it against the public interest or protection of 
investors to grant the exemption.
    14. To provide further assurance that the exemptive relief being 
requested in the application would be consistent with the public 
interest and the protection of the investors, the Applicants agree that 
they will, as soon as reasonably practical, with respect to each of the 
Funds for which a Fund Servicing Applicant is the primary adviser, 
distribute to the boards of directors or trustees of the Funds 
(``Board'') written materials describing the circumstances that led to 
the Plea Agreement, as well as any effects on the Funds and the 
application.
    15. The written materials will include an offer to discuss the 
materials at an in-person meeting with each Board for which Fund 
Servicing Applicants provide Fund Servicing Activities, including the 
directors who are not ``interested persons'' of the Funds as defined in 
section 2(a)(19) of the Act and their independent legal counsel as 
defined in rule 0-1(a)(6) under the Act, if any. With respect to each 
of the Funds for which a Fund Servicing Applicant is not the primary 
investment adviser, the relevant Fund Servicing Applicant will provide 
such materials to the Fund's primary investment adviser and offer to 
discuss the materials with such primary investment adviser. The 
Applicants undertake to provide the Boards with all information 
concerning the Plea Agreement and the application as necessary for 
those Funds to fulfill their disclosure and other obligations under the 
U.S. federal securities laws and will provide them a copy of the 
Judgment as entered by the District Court.
    16. Certain of the Applicants and their affiliates have previously 
applied for exemptive orders under section 9(c) of the Act, as 
described in greater detail in the application.

Applicants' Conditions

    Applicants agree that any order granted by the Commission pursuant 
to the application will be subject to the following conditions:
    1. Any temporary exemption granted pursuant to the application will 
be without prejudice to, and will not limit the Commission's rights in 
any manner with respect to, any Commission investigation of, or 
administrative proceedings involving or against, Covered Persons, 
including, without limitation, the consideration by the Commission of a 
permanent exemption from section 9(a) of the Act requested pursuant to 
the application or the revocation or removal of any temporary 
exemptions granted under the Act in connection with the application.
    2. None of CS Group, CSAG, Applicants or any of the Covered Persons 
will employ the former employees of the Pleading Entity or any other 
person who subsequently may be identified by the Pleading Entity or any 
U.S. or non-U.S. regulatory or enforcement agencies as having been 
responsible for the Conduct in any capacity without first making a 
further application to the Commission pursuant to section 9(c).
    3. Each of CS Group, CSAG, Applicants, and the Covered Persons will 
adopt and implement policies and procedures reasonably designed to 
ensure that it will comply with the terms and conditions of the Orders 
applicable to it within 60 days of the date of the Permanent Order, or 
with respect to condition four immediately below, such later date or 
dates as may be contemplated by the Plea Agreement, the DPA, the SEC 
Order, or any other orders issued by regulatory or enforcement agencies 
addressing the Conduct.
    4. Each of CS Group, CSAG, Applicants and the Covered Persons will 
comply in all material respects with the material terms and conditions 
of the Plea Agreement, the DPA, with the material terms of the SEC 
Order, and any other orders issued by, or settlements with, regulatory 
or enforcement agencies addressing the Conduct, in each case as such 
terms and conditions are applicable to it. In addition, within 30 days 
of each anniversary of the Permanent Order (until and including the 
third such anniversary), CS Group will submit a certification signed by 
its chief executive officer and its chief compliance officer, 
confirming that (i) the Pleading Entity has complied with the terms and 
conditions of the Plea Agreement in all material respects; (ii) CS 
Group has complied with the terms and conditions of the DPA in all 
material respects; and (iii) CS Group, CSAG, Applicants and the Covered 
Persons have complied with the terms and conditions of the Orders in 
all material respects. Each such certification will be submitted to the 
Chief Counsel of the Commission's Division of Investment Management 
with a copy to the Chief Counsel of the Commission's Division of 
Enforcement;
    5. Applicants will provide written notification to the Chief 
Counsel of the Commission's Division of Investment Management with a 
copy to the Chief Counsel of the Commission's Division of Enforcement 
of a material violation of the terms and conditions of the Orders 
within 30 days of discovery of the material violation. In addition, CS 
Group will submit to the Chief Counsel of the Commission's Division of 
Investment Management, with a copy to the Chief Counsel of the 
Commission's Division of Enforcement, (i) the Remediation Report and 
(ii) the Multilateral Remedies Report within 30 days of each 
anniversary of the Permanent Order (until and including the third such 
anniversary). CS Group's first of each such report will be signed by 
its chief executive officer and chief compliance officer.

[[Page 58969]]

Temporary Order

    The Commission has considered the matter and finds that Applicants 
have made the necessary showing to justify granting a temporary 
exemption.
    Accordingly,
    It is hereby ordered, pursuant to section 9(c) of the Act, that the 
Covered Persons are granted a temporary exemption from the provisions 
of section 9(a), effective as the date of the Guilty Plea, solely with 
respect to the Guilty Plea entered into pursuant to the Plea Agreement, 
subject to the representations and conditions in the application, until 
the Commission takes final action on their application for a permanent 
order.

    By the Commission.
J. Matthew DeLesDernier,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2021-23166 Filed 10-22-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P