[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 174 (Monday, September 13, 2021)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 50866-50870]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-19620]



[[Page 50866]]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

50 CFR Part 648

[Docket No. 210907-0178]
RIN 0648-BK64


Fisheries of the Northeastern United States; Amendment 7 to the 
Atlantic Bluefish Fishery Management Plan

AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and 
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.

ACTION: Proposed rule; request for comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: NMFS proposes to approve and implement measures included in 
Amendment 7 to the Atlantic Bluefish Fishery Management Plan, as 
submitted by the Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management Council. This 
amendment would revise the goals and objectives of the fishery 
management plan, reallocate quota between the commercial and 
recreational fisheries, reallocate commercial quota among the states, 
implement a rebuilding plan using a constant fishing mortality 
strategy, revise the sector quota transfer, and revise how management 
uncertainty is applied during the specifications process. Amendment 7 
is intended to use the best information available to update the 
Bluefish Fishery Management Plan, by responding to changes in stock 
health and distribution, while recognizing economic need and reliance 
throughout the management area.

DATES: Comments must be received by October 13, 2021.

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments on this document, identified by 
NOAA-NMFS-2021-0071, by the following method:
    Electronic Submission: Submit all electronic public comments via 
the Federal e-Rulemaking Portal.
    1. Go to https://www.regulations.gov, and enter ``NOAA-NMFS-2021-
0071'' in the Search box;
    2. Click the ``Comment'' icon, complete the required fields; and
    3. Enter or attach your comments.
    Instructions: Comments sent by any other method, to any other 
address or individual, or received after the end of the comment period, 
may not be considered by NMFS. All comments received are part of the 
public record and will generally be posted for public viewing on 
www.regulations.gov without change. All personal identifying 
information (e.g., name, address, etc.), confidential business 
information, or otherwise sensitive information submitted voluntarily 
by the sender will be publicly accessible. NMFS will accept anonymous 
comments (enter ``N/A'' in the required fields if you wish to remain 
anonymous).
    The Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management Council prepared an 
environmental assessment (EA) for this action that describes the 
proposed measures and other considered alternatives. The EA also 
provides a thorough analysis of the biological, economic, and social 
impacts of the proposed measures and other considered alternatives. 
Copies of Amendment 7, including the EA, the Regulatory Impact Review, 
and the Regulatory Flexibility Act analysis prepared in support of this 
action, are available upon request from: Dr. Christopher M. Moore, 
Executive Director, Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management Council, Suite 201, 
800 North State Street, Dover, DE 19901. These documents are also 
accessible via the internet at https://www.mafmc.org/supporting-documents.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Cynthia Ferrio, Fishery Policy 
Analyst, (978) 281-9180.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

    The Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management Council (Council) and the 
Atlantic States Marine Fisheries Commission (Commission) cooperatively 
manage bluefish from Maine to Florida under the Atlantic Bluefish 
Fishery Management Plan (FMP). This joint Bluefish FMP was adopted over 
30 years ago in 1990. Since that time, the only substantial changes to 
management measures were made through Amendment 1 to the FMP in 2000, 
which established most measures and regulations still managing the 
fishery today, based on fishery data from 1981-1989. The Council and 
Commission initiated Amendment 7 to the FMP as a joint action in 
December 2017 to respond to changes in the bluefish fishery that have 
occurred over the past 30-40 years, while the FMP has remained largely 
unaltered. When first initiated, Amendment 7 was intended to address a 
comprehensive range of management issues, from the goals and objectives 
of the FMP to the allocation and transfer of quota between the 
commercial and recreational sectors.
    In August 2019, an operational stock assessment determined that 
bluefish is overfished but not subject to overfishing. Following this 
determination, the Council and Commission's Bluefish Management Board 
added development of a rebuilding plan to Amendment 7. The Council was 
notified of the overfished stock status determination in November 2019; 
therefore, this amendment must be implemented by the end of November 
2021 to ensure that the rebuilding plan is compliant with the timing 
requirements of section 304(e)(3) of the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery 
Conservation and Management Act (Magnuson-Stevens Act). This timing 
will also allow the other changes proposed in Amendment 7 to be 
effective for the 2022 fishing year, beginning on January 1, 2022. 
Final alternatives for Amendment 7 set forth in a Public Hearing 
Document were approved at the joint meeting of the Council and 
Commission's Bluefish Management Board in February 2021, and public 
hearings on those alternatives were held throughout the spring. On June 
8, 2021, the Council and Board took final action to approve Amendment 
7, with the intent that the measures would be effective for the 2022 
fishing year in January.
    A Notification of Availability (NOA) for Amendment 7 was published 
in the Federal Register on September 1, 2021 (86 FR 48968). The 
Magnuson-Stevens Act allows NMFS as the implementing agency to approve, 
partially approve, or disapprove measures recommended by the Council in 
a regulatory amendment based on whether the measures are consistent 
with the FMP, the Magnuson-Stevens Act and its National Standards, and 
other applicable law. As such, NMFS is soliciting public comments in 
response to the NOA, and the proposed measures described below, on 
whether they are consistent with the Bluefish FMP, the Magnuson-Stevens 
Act, and other applicable law. The comment period on the NOA ends on 
November 1, 2021. All public comments submitted by this date, whether 
specifically directed to the NOA or this proposed rule, will be 
considered in our decision to approve, partially approve, or disapprove 
Amendment 7. Comments on this proposed rule that are received before 
the end of this rule's comment period (see DATES) will be considered in 
the decision to implement measures proposed by the Council. Comments 
received after the end of the NOA comment period will not be considered 
for this action.

Proposed Measures

    This action proposes to implement Amendment 7 to the Bluefish FMP, 
as approved by the Council and Commission. The purpose of this action

[[Page 50867]]

is to implement a rebuilding plan for bluefish, as required by the 
Magnuson-Stevens Act, and to update the FMP using the best scientific 
information available; responding to changes in the overall fishery 
over time.

FMP Goals and Objectives

    The FMP's existing goals and objectives were adopted in 1991 with 
the original FMP, and have remained unchanged since that time. 
Amendment 7 would revise these goals and objectives to better reflect 
the current fishery. While the FMP currently only has one overarching 
goal and a few general objectives, the proposed revisions contain 
multiple goals linked to more specific objectives to better guide 
management. The following proposed revisions were developed with 
extensive input from the public.
     Goal 1: Conserve the bluefish resource through stakeholder 
engagement to maintain sustainable recreational fishing and commercial 
harvest.
    [cir] Objective 1.1: Achieve and maintain a sustainable spawning 
stock biomass and rate of fishing mortality.
    [cir] Objective 1.2: Promote practices that reduce release 
mortality within the recreational and commercial fishery.
    [cir] Objective 1.3: Maintain effective coordination between the 
National Marine Fisheries Service, Council, Commission, and member 
states by promoting compliance and to support the development and 
implementation of management measures.
    [cir] Objective 1.4: Promote compliance and effective enforcement 
of regulations.
    [cir] Objective 1.5: Promote science, monitoring, and data 
collection that support and enhance effective ecosystem-based 
management of the bluefish resource.
     Goal 2: Provide fair and equitable access to the fishery 
across all user groups throughout the management unit.
    [cir] Objective 2.1: Ensure the implementation of management 
measures provides fair and equitable access to the resource across all 
user groups within the management unit.
    [cir] Objective 2.2: Consider the economic and social needs and 
priorities of all groups that access the bluefish resource in the 
development of new management measures.
    [cir] Objective 2.3: Maintain effective coordination with 
stakeholder groups to ensure optimization of economic and social 
benefits.

Quota Reallocation Between the Commercial and Recreational Fishery 
Sectors

    The existing FMP allocated quota between the commercial and 
recreational fishery sectors based on landings data from 1981-1989. 
This action proposes to re-allocate quota between the sectors to better 
represent recent trends in the fishery. Amendment 7 would allocate 14 
percent of the annual catch limit (ACL) to the commercial fishery, and 
86 percent to the recreational fishery, representing a 3-percentage 
point shift from the existing 17/83 split. These revised sector 
allocations are based on updated catch data from 1981-2018, and 
landings data from 2014-2018 and 2009-2018, as all three time series 
resulted in the same allocation.

Commercial Quota Reallocation Among the States

    The coastwide commercial quota for bluefish is allocated annually 
to each state within the management unit from Maine to Florida based on 
a percentage determined in the FMP. As with the sector allocation 
percentages, the existing state-by-state commercial quota allocations 
have not been updated since their implementation as a part of Amendment 
1 (65 FR 45844; July 26, 2000), and are based on landings data from 
1981-1989. Amendment 7 would revise the state-by-state quota 
allocations based on a recent, representative 10 years of landings data 
(2009-2018) for the commercial fishery to better capture how the stock 
and fishing activity have shifted over the years. The proposed 
allocations also include a 0.1-percent minimum default allocation to 
ensure that no state in the management unit is excluded from the 
commercial fishery entirely. To allow industry and state managers to 
adjust more easily to these changes in commercial quota allocation, 
this action proposes to phase in the changes over a period of seven 
years. The percent shift in allocation for each state would be divided 
evenly over the phase-in period, so each state would only experience 1/
7th of the change in allocation each year through 2028.

Rebuilding Plan

    The 2019 operational stock assessment determined that bluefish is 
overfished but not subject to overfishing. Amendment 7 would implement 
a rebuilding plan that uses a constant fishing mortality model (F = 
0.154) to rebuild the stock in seven years. This rebuilding plan was 
selected because it allows for least disruption to industry and 
minimizes negative socio-economic impacts while still rebuilding within 
the 10-year period required by the Magnuson-Stevens Act. However, 
because this model projects acceptable biological catch (ABC) values 
during rebuilding that are higher than those generated by the Council's 
risk policy (5-year rebuilding alternative), an exemption to the FMP's 
``most restrictive ABC'' requirement needs to be included with this 
amendment. This would allow the Council's Scientific and Statistical 
Committee to recommend higher ABCs than the risk policy would typically 
generate during a rebuilding plan as long as they are consistent with 
the rebuilding plan, and the plan is projected to rebuild within the 
necessary time period. This proposed rebuilding plan has been developed 
to begin in 2022, and would be reviewed and revised as necessary every 
two years, as required by section 304(e)(7) of the Magnuson-Stevens 
Act.

Sector Quota Transfer

    Currently, the FMP allows a quota transfer from the recreational 
sector to the commercial sector up to a maximum final commercial quota 
of 10.5 million lb (4,763 mt) per year if the recreational fishery is 
not expected to attain the full recreational harvest limit in that 
given year. This action proposes to revise the measures regarding this 
sector transfer to allow quota to be transferred in either direction 
(from commercial to recreational or vice versa). This amendment would 
also revise the maximum transfer to be up to 10 percent of the 
acceptable biological catch, allowing the size of the transfer to scale 
with the current biomass of the stock. A restriction would also be 
added to disallow sector transfers when the bluefish stock is 
overfished or subject to overfishing.

Management Uncertainty in the Specifications Process

    This amendment would revise how management uncertainty can be 
accounted for during the specifications process. In the current FMP, 
the fishery-level ACL may be reduced by a buffer to account for sources 
of management uncertainty before quota is allocated to the commercial 
and recreational fishery sectors. This action proposes to revise the 
specifications process so that the management uncertainty buffer is 
applied separately within each sector. This targeted approach would 
provide more management flexibility, and allow for the identification 
of sources of management uncertainty that are specific to one sector 
and are not present in the other.

[[Page 50868]]

Classification

    Pursuant to section 304(b)(1)(A) of the Magnuson-Stevens Act, the 
NMFS Assistant Administrator has determined that this proposed rule is 
consistent with the Atlantic Bluefish FMP, other provisions of the 
Magnuson-Stevens Act, and other applicable law, subject to further 
consideration after public comment.
    The Council reviewed the proposed regulations for this action and 
deemed them necessary and appropriate to implement consistent with 
section 303(c) of the Magnuson-Stevens Act.
    This proposed rule has been determined to be not significant for 
purposes of Executive Order 12866.
    This proposed rule contains no information collection requirements 
under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
    The Mid-Atlantic Council prepared an EA for this action that 
analyzes the impacts of the measures contained in this proposed rule. 
This EA includes an initial regulatory flexibility analysis (IRFA), as 
required by section 603 of the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA), which 
is supplemented by information contained in the preamble of this 
proposed rule. The IRFA describes the economic impact that this 
proposed rule, if adopted, would have on small business entities, as 
well as the comparative possible impacts of the other alternatives 
considered. A copy of the detailed RFA analysis is available from the 
Council (see ADDRESSES). A summary of the Amendment 7 IRFA analysis 
follows.

Description of the Reasons Why Action by the Agency Is Being 
Considered, and the Statement of the Objectives of, and Legal Basis 
for, This Proposed Rule

    This action is taken under the authority of the Magnuson-Stevens 
Act and regulations at 50 CFR part 648. This action proposes a range of 
management measures for the Atlantic bluefish fishery. A complete 
description of the action, why it is being considered, and its legal 
basis, are contained in the EA (see ADDRESSES) and in this rule's 
preamble, and are not repeated here.

Description and Estimate of the Number of Small Entities to Which This 
Proposed Rule Would Apply

    This proposed rule affects those small entities engaged in 
commercial fishing operations in the Atlantic bluefish fishery (those 
with commercial bluefish permits), and those with Federal party/charter 
recreational permits for bluefish. Private recreational anglers are not 
considered ``entities'' under the RFA, thus economic impacts on private 
anglers are not considered here. For the purposes of the RFA analysis, 
the ownership entities (or firms), not the individual vessels, are 
considered to be the regulated entities. Ownership entities are defined 
as those entities or firms with common ownership personnel as listed on 
the permit application. Because of this, some vessels with bluefish 
permits may be considered to be part of the same firm because they may 
have the same owners. To identify these small and large firms, vessel 
ownership data from the permit database were grouped according to 
common owners and sorted by size. In terms of RFA, a business primarily 
engaged in commercial fishing is classified as a small business if it 
has combined annual receipts not in excess of $11 million, for all its 
affiliated operations worldwide. A business primarily engaged in for-
hire (party/charter) fishing is classified as small business if it has 
combined annual receipts not in excess of $8 million.
    The current ownership data set used in this analysis is based on 
calendar years 2018-2020 (the most recent and complete data available). 
According to the vessel ownership database, 526 commercial fishing 
affiliate firms landed bluefish during the 2018-2020 period, with 521 
of those entities categorized as small businesses, and 5 categorized as 
large businesses. The three-year average (2018-2020) combined gross 
receipts (all species combined) for all small entities only was 
$197,251,017 and the average bluefish receipts was $899,490; this 
indicates that bluefish revenues contributed approximately 0.46 percent 
of the total gross receipts for these small entities.
    For the recreational for-hire (party/charter) fishery, 361 for-hire 
affiliate firms reported revenue from recreational fishing for various 
species from 2018-2020. All 361 of those firms are categorized as small 
businesses. It is not possible to derive what proportion of the overall 
revenues for these for-hire firms came from fishing activities for an 
individual species. Nevertheless, given the popularity of bluefish as a 
recreational species in the Mid-Atlantic and New England, it is likely 
that revenues generated from bluefish may be somewhat important for 
many of these firms at certain times of the year. The 3-year average 
(2018-2020) combined gross receipts (all for-hire fishing activity 
combined) for these small entities was $49,916,903, ranging from less 
than $10,000 for 105 entities (lowest value $46) to over $1,000,000 for 
8 entities (highest value $3.6 million).

Description of the Projected Reporting, Recordkeeping, and Other 
Compliance Requirements of This Proposed Rule

    There are no new reporting, recordkeeping, or other compliance 
requirements contained in this proposed rule, or any of the 
alternatives considered for this action.

Federal Rules Which May Duplicate, Overlap, or Conflict With This 
Proposed Rule

    NMFS is not aware of any relevant Federal rules that may duplicate, 
overlap, or conflict with this proposed rule.

Description of Significant Alternatives to the Proposed Action Which 
Accomplish the Stated Objectives of Applicable Statutes and Which 
Minimize Any Significant Economic Impact on Small Entities

    The proposed amendment would implement several measures that could 
potentially impact small businesses in both the commercial and 
recreational sectors of the bluefish fishery; most notably the 
reallocation of quota among the sectors and states, the rebuilding 
plan, and the revision of sector transfer of quota. While the revised 
FMP goals and objectives and the sector-specific accounting of 
management uncertainty during the specifications process could have an 
indirect economic impact on businesses, these alternatives are largely 
administrative and not discussed here. On average, bluefish revenues 
contributed approximately 0.46 percent to the total gross receipts for 
the small businesses and 0.02 percent for the large businesses. Due to 
the slightly higher dependence on bluefish for the small businesses 
compared to the large businesses, the small businesses may feel the 
effects of this action to a greater extent than the large businesses. 
Even so, the small businesses did not rely on bluefish for a 
substantial amount of their annual income either; although when 
considered individually, some businesses may be more dependent on this 
species than others.
    Several alternatives were considered for the sector quota 
allocations based on different time series of catch and landings data; 
however, all of these alternatives resulted in quota shifting from the 
commercial sector to the recreational sector by varying degrees. The No 
Action alternative would continue to allocate 83-percent of the 
fishery-level ACL to the recreational fishery, and 17 percent to the 
commercial fishery, while the alternatives considered shift this 
distribution by 1, 3, 4, and 6 percentage

[[Page 50869]]

points to the recreational sector, with the preferred alternative being 
the 3-point shift. None of these alternatives affect the total ABC or 
ACL available to harvest each year, rather how opportunity to do so is 
distributed between commercial and recreational entities. The 3-point 
shift to the recreational sector is better representative of how the 
overall fishery operates, and while it may have a slight negative 
impact on commercial businesses, it would comparably benefit 
recreational businesses.
    Some potential negative impact sector allocation from the prior 
proposed measure may be mitigated further by the proposed alternative 
to revise the sector transfer. The proposed sector transfer provisions 
would allow quota (in an amount up to 10-percent of the ABC) to be 
transferred from either sector to the other (from commercial to 
recreational or vice versa). This management tool would allow for 
supplementation of quota to either sector in a year when the assigned 
allocations may not support the business needs of the sector.
    Similar to the sector reallocations, several alternatives were 
considered for the reallocation of commercial quota to the states, 
based on different time series of landings data. Because these 
alternatives do not affect the total amount of quota available in the 
fishery, but rather how it is distributed geographically, it is 
unlikely that they would have a direct economic impact on commercial 
businesses as a whole; however, they may have a disproportionate, 
indirect impact on some businesses more than others. To mitigate 
potential negative effects on entities in states that would experience 
the largest degree of change in commercial allocation, the Council and 
Board proposed to phase in the allocation changes equally over seven 
years. This would make the difference in quota allocation that each 
state would experience each year much smaller, and thus minimize the 
magnitude of any potential negative effects as a result.
    There were three main rebuilding plan strategies considered in this 
amendment: (1) A plan using constant harvest model to rebuild the stock 
in four years; (2) a plan based on the Council's risk policy to rebuild 
the stock in five years; and (3) a plan using a constant fishing 
mortality model to rebuild the stock in seven years. A ``No Action'' 
alternative was not possible because of the Magnuson-Stevens Act 
requirement to rebuild an overfished stock. Even though the constant 
harvest and risk policy plans would rebuild the stock more quickly, the 
constant fishing mortality rebuilding plan was preferred because the 
more gradual changes it proposes provides the most economic stability 
and least disruption of business operations while still rebuilding the 
stock within 10 years.
    All alternatives have the potential to impact businesses in the 
commercial sector; whereas all alternatives except the commercial quota 
allocation to the states may affect recreational businesses, which 
comprise the majority of the fishery overall. However, most of the 
alternatives in this action affect small businesses indirectly and have 
minimal direct economic impacts. For example, they dictate the process 
for developing future landings limits, or shift the distribution of 
quota/effort, but do not change the overall annual amount. That being 
said, public input was solicited and considered throughout the 
development of this amendment, and the economic impact on small 
businesses was minimized wherever possible. Section 7.4 of the EA 
contains a more detailed discussion on the economic impacts of each of 
the alternatives considered in this amendment, and the full RFA 
analysis can be found in section 8.10.

List of Subjects in 50 CFR Part 648

    Fisheries, Fishing, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.

    Dated: September 7, 2021.
Samuel D. Rauch III,
Deputy Assistant Administrator for Regulatory Programs, National Marine 
Fisheries Service.

    For the reasons set out in the preamble, 50 CFR part 648 is 
proposed to be amended as follows:

PART 648--FISHERIES OF THE NORTHEASTERN UNITED STATES

0
1. The authority citation for part 648 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.

0
2. In Sec.  648.21, revise paragraph (c)(1) and add paragraph (c)(3) to 
read as follows:


Sec.  648.21  Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management Council risk policy.

* * * * *
    (c) * * *
    (1) Unless otherwise allowed in paragraph (c)(2) or (3) of this 
section, for instances in which the application of the risk policy 
approaches in paragraph (b) of this section using OFL distribution 
results in a more restrictive ABC recommendation than the calculation 
of ABC derived from the use of FREBUILD at the MAFMC-
specified overfishing risk level as outlined in paragraph (a) of this 
section, the Scientific and Statistical Committee (SSC) shall recommend 
to the MAFMC the lower of the ABC values.
* * * * *
    (3) The SSC may specify higher ABCs for bluefish based on 
FREBUILD, as outlined in paragraph (a) of this section, 
instead of the risk policy approaches in paragraph (b) of this section 
in order to implement a rebuilding program that would rebuild this 
stock by 2028.
* * * * *
0
3. In Sec.  648.161, revise the section heading and paragraph (a) to 
read as follows:


Sec.  648.161  Bluefish Sector ACLs and Annual Catch Targets (ACTs).

    (a) Sector ACLs and ACTs. As a part of the bluefish specifications 
process, the Bluefish Monitoring Committee shall allocate a specified 
percentage of the fishery-level ACL to the commercial and recreational 
fishery sectors, and identify and review the relevant sources of 
sector-specific management uncertainty to recommend ACTs for each 
sector.
    (1) Sectors. The sum of the commercial and recreational sector-
specific ACLs shall be less than or equal to the fishery level ACL. A 
total of 86 percent of the fishery-level ACL will be allocated to the 
recreational fishery. A total of 14 percent of the fishery-level ACL 
will be allocated to the commercial fishery.
    (2) Management uncertainty. The Bluefish Monitoring Committee shall 
recommend any reduction in catch necessary to address management 
uncertainty and recommend ACTs for each sector, consistent with 
paragraph (a) of this section, after the sector allocation described in 
paragraph (a)(1) of this section. The Bluefish Monitoring Committee 
recommendations shall identify any sector-specific sources of 
management uncertainty affecting the fishery, technical approaches to 
mitigating these sources of uncertainty, and any additional relevant 
information considered in the ACT recommendation and adjustment 
process.
    (3) Periodicity. ACTs may be established on an annual basis for up 
to 3 years at a time, dependent on whether the SSC provides single or 
multiple-year ABC recommendations.
* * * * *
0
4. In Sec.  648.162, revise paragraphs (b), (d), (f), and (g) to read 
as follows:


Sec.  648.162  Bluefish specifications.

* * * * *
    (b) TAL. The Bluefish Monitoring Committee shall recommend sector-
specific TALs less than or equal to the

[[Page 50870]]

ACTs through the specifications process.
    (1) Recreational harvest limit and commercial quota. If research 
quota is specified as described in paragraph (g) of this section, the 
recreational harvest limit and commercial quota will be based on the 
respective sector TALs remaining after the deduction of the applicable 
research quota.
    (2) Sector quota transfer. During the specifications process, the 
Bluefish Monitoring Committee may recommend a transfer of quota from 
the commercial fishery to the recreational fishery or from the 
recreational fishery to the commercial fishery; based on a review and 
comparison of expected landings for each sector and the recreational 
harvest limit and commercial quota. The amount of quota transferred 
between sectors may not exceed 10-percent of the ABC for that fishing 
year. No transfer may occur when the bluefish stock is overfished or 
subject to overfishing.
* * * * *
    (d) Distribution of annual commercial quota. (1) The annual 
commercial quota will be distributed to the states, based upon the 
following percentages; state each followed by its allocation in 
parentheses: ME (0.1091); NH (0.2154); MA (10.1150); RI (9.6079); CT 
(1.0872); NY (19.7582); NJ (13.8454); DE (0.4945); MD (1.9175); VA 
(5.8657); NC (32.0278); SC (0.1034); GA (0.1023); and FL (4.7788). 
Note: The sum of all state allocations does not add to 100 because of 
rounding. This distribution includes a minimum allocation of 0.1 to 
every state in the management unit.
    (2) The allocation percentages in paragraph (d)(1) of this section 
will be phased in over a 7-year period beginning in 2022. The percent 
change in allocation from those prior to 2022 for each state is divided 
equally by seven, and will be applied incrementally each year until the 
final allocations listed in paragraph (d)(1) are in full effect for 
fishing year 2028.
* * * * *
    (f) Revision of state allocation. Based upon any changes in the 
landings data available from the states for the base years 2009-2018, 
the Atlantic States Marine Fisheries Commission (ASMFC) and the MAFMC 
may recommend to the Regional Administrator that the states' shares 
specified in paragraph (d)(1) of this section be revised. The MAFMC's 
and the ASMFC's recommendation must include supporting documentation, 
as appropriate, concerning the environmental and economic impacts of 
the recommendation. The Regional Administrator shall review the 
recommendation of the ASMFC and the MAFMC. After such review, NMFS will 
publish a proposed rule in the Federal Register to implement a revision 
in the state shares. After considering public comment, NMFS will 
publish a final rule in the Federal Register to implement any warranted 
changes in allocation.
    (g) Research quota. See Sec.  648.22(g).

[FR Doc. 2021-19620 Filed 9-10-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-P