[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 140 (Monday, July 26, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Pages 40097-40101]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-15812]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-92445; File No. SR-CboeEDGX-2021-033]


Self-Regulatory Organizations; Cboe EDGX Exchange, Inc.; Notice 
of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed Rule Change To 
Amend Its Fee Schedule

July 20, 2021.
    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 
(the ``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given 
that on July 13, 2021, Cboe EDGX Exchange, Inc. (``Exchange'' or 
``EDGX'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission 
(``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in Items I, II, 
and III below, which Items have been prepared by the Exchange. The 
Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments on the 
proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance 
of the Proposed Rule Change

    Cboe EDGX Exchange, Inc. (the ``Exchange'' or ``EDGX'' or ``EDGX 
Equities'') proposes to amend its Fee Schedule. The text of the 
proposed rule change is provided in Exhibit 5.
    The text of the proposed rule change is also available on the 
Exchange's website (http://markets.cboe.com/us/options/regulation/rule_filings/edgx/), at the Exchange's Office of the Secretary, and at 
the Commission's Public Reference Room.

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and 
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements 
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and 
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The 
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in 
Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in 
sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such 
statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and 
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    The Exchange proposes to amend its Fee Schedule applicable to its 
equities trading platform (``EDGX Equities'') to (1) modify the 
standard rate for securities priced at or above $1.00 that remove 
liquidity, (2) remove certain fee codes in connection with 
internalization, (3) adopt a new tier under each of the Growth Tiers, 
the Non-Displayed Step-Up Volume Tier, and the Remove Volume Tiers, 
and, as a result, define the term ``Step-Up ADAV'', and (4) eliminate a 
Remove Volume Tier and a Retail Volume Tier.\3\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ The Exchange initially filed the proposed fee changes July 
1, 2021 (SR-CboeEDGX-2021-031). On July 13, 2021 the Exchange 
withdrew that filing and submitted this proposal.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange first notes that it operates in a highly competitive 
market in which market participants can readily direct order flow to 
competing venues if they deem fee levels at a particular venue to be 
excessive or incentives to be insufficient. More specifically, the 
Exchange is only one of 16 registered equities exchanges, as well as a 
number of alternative trading systems and other off-exchange venues 
that do not have similar self-regulatory responsibilities under the 
Exchange Act, to which market participants may direct their order flow. 
Based on publicly available information,\4\ no single registered 
equities exchange has more than 16% of the market share. Thus, in such 
a low-concentrated and highly competitive market, no single equities 
exchange possesses significant pricing power in the execution of order 
flow. The Exchange in particular operates a ``Maker-Taker'' model 
whereby it pays rebates to members that add liquidity and assesses fees 
to those that remove liquidity. The Exchange's Fee Schedule sets forth 
the standard rebates and rates applied per share for orders that 
provide and remove liquidity, respectively. Currently, for orders in 
securities priced at or above $1.00, the Exchange provides a standard 
rebate of $0.00160 per share for orders that add liquidity and assesses 
a fee of $0.00280 per share for orders that remove liquidity. For 
orders in securities priced below $1.00, the Exchange provides a 
standard rebate of $0.00009 per share for orders that add liquidity and 
assesses a fee of 0.30% of total dollar value for orders that remove 
liquidity. Additionally, in response to the competitive environment, 
the Exchange also offers tiered pricing which provides Members 
opportunities to qualify for higher rebates or reduced fees where 
certain volume criteria and thresholds are met. Tiered pricing provides 
an incremental incentive for Members to strive for higher tier levels, 
which provides increasingly higher benefits or discounts for satisfying 
increasingly more stringent criteria.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ See Cboe Global Markets, U.S. Equities Market Volume 
Summary, Month-to-Date (June 23, 2021), available at https://markets.cboe.com/us/equities/market_statistics/.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Standard Rate: Securities at or Above $1.00 That Remove Liquidity
    As stated above, the Exchange currently assesses a standard rate of 
$0.00280 per share for orders that remove liquidity in securities 
priced at $1.00 or more. The Exchange proposes to amend the standard 
rate for orders that remove liquidity in securities priced at $1.00 or 
more from a fee of $0.00280 per share to $0.00285 per share and 
reflects this change in the Fee Codes and Associated Fee where 
applicable (i.e., corresponding to

[[Page 40098]]

standard fee codes N, W, 6, BB and ZR). The Exchange notes that the 
proposed standard rate is in line with, yet also competitive with, 
rates assessed by other equities exchanges on orders in securities 
priced at $1.00 or more.\5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ See Nasdaq Pricing 7, Section 118(a)(1), which, for example, 
assesses a charge of $0.0030 for member orders that execute against 
resting midpoint liquidity, and that that execute in the Nasdaq 
Market Center generally, in securities priced at $1.00 or more; and 
NYSE American Equities Price List, NYSE American Trading Fees and 
Credits, Section I.A.1.a, Standard Rates, which assesses a standard 
rate of $0.0030 per share (unless member adds ADV of at least 10,000 
shares) for orders in securities priced at or above $1 that remove 
liquidity.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Eliminate Internalization Fee Codes
    The Fee Codes and Associate Fees section of the Fee Schedule lists 
all available fee codes for orders on EDGX. In particular, current fee 
code EA is appended to internalization \6\ orders that add displayed 
liquidity and current fee code ER is appended to internalization orders 
that remove displayed liquidity. Orders that yield fee code EA and ER 
are assessed a fee of $0.0005 per share in securities priced at or 
above $1.00 and 0.15% of the dollar value in securities priced below 
$1.00.\7\ The Exchange now proposes to eliminate these fee codes. The 
Exchange notes that a majority of other equities exchanges do not 
assess different rates for internalization orders, and therefore, in 
order to remain competitive with rates assessed on orders that add or 
remove liquidity on most other equities exchanges, the Exchange wishes 
to also not apply a different rate for such orders that are 
internalized. Internalization orders that add or remove liquidity will 
simply yield the applicable existing fee codes for all other orders 
that add or remove liquidity and receive the same corresponding rates 
that currently apply to all other orders that add or remove liquidity. 
For example, an internalization order that adds liquidity in Tape B 
securities will yield existing fee code B and receive the current 
corresponding rebate of $0.00160 for securities priced at or above 
$1.00 or $0.00009 for securities priced below a $1.00. The Exchange 
also notes that as a result of the proposed deletion of these fee 
codes, the proposed rule change deletes footnote 7 of the Fee Schedule, 
which provides that a Member's rate for internalization (fee codes EA 
or ER) decreases to ``free'' per share per side if a Member adds an ADV 
of at least 10,000,000 shares.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ An internalized trade is a trade where the two orders 
inadvertently match against each other and share the same Market 
Participant Identifier (``MPID'').
    \7\ Additionally, if a Member adds an ADV of at least 10,000,000 
shares, then the Member's rate for internalization (fee codes EA or 
ER) decreases to FREE per share per side, for securities priced at, 
above, or below $1. See EDGX Fee Schedule, Footnote 7.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

New Growth, Non-Displayed Step-Up Volume, and Remove Volume Tier
    Under footnote 1 of the Fee Schedule the Exchange currently offers 
various Add/Remove Volume Tiers. Specifically, the Exchange offers two 
Growth Tiers that each provide an enhanced rebate for Members' 
qualifying orders yielding fee codes B, V, Y, 3 and 4,\8\ where a 
Member reaches certain add volume-based criteria, including ``growing'' 
its volume over a certain baseline month. For example, Growth Tier 1 
provides an enhanced rebated of $0.0026 per share on qualifying orders 
(i.e., orders yielding fee code B, V, Y, 3 and 4) where a Member (1) 
adds an ADV \9\ of greater than or equal to 0.20% of the TCV,\10\ and 
(2) has a Step-Up Add TCV \11\ from March 2019 that is greater than or 
equal to 0.10%. The Exchange also offers one Non-Displayed Step-Up 
Volume Tiers that provides an enhanced rebate for Members' orders 
yielding fee codes DM, HA, MM, and RP,\12\ where a Member may receive 
an enhanced rebated of $0.0025 per share on qualifying orders (i.e., 
orders yielding fee code DM, HA, MM or RP) where a Member (1) has a 
Step-Up Add TCV from January 2021 greater than or equal to 0.10%, (2) 
adds an ADV greater than or equal to 0.50% of the TCV, and (3) removes 
an ADV greater than or equal to 0.75% of the TCV. Finally, the Exchange 
also currently offers two Remove Volume Tiers. For example, Remove 
Volume Tier 1 currently offers a reduced fee of $0.0027 per share on 
qualifying orders yielding fee codes BB, N and W \13\ in securities 
priced at or above $1.00 and 0.28% of total dollar value on qualifying 
orders in securities process below $1.00, where a Member (1) has an 
ADAV \14\ greater than or equal to 0.25% TCV with displayed orders that 
yield fee codes B, V or Y, or (2) adds Retail Order ADV (i.e., yielding 
fee code ZA) greater than or equal to 0.45% of the TCV.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ B is appended to orders that add liquidity to EDGX in Tape B 
securities, V is appended to order that add liquidity to EDGX in 
Tape A securities, Y is appended to orders that add liquidity to 
EDGX in Tape C securities, 3 is appended to orders that add 
liquidity to EDGX in pre and post market in Tape A or C securities, 
and 4 is appended to orders that add liquidity to EDGX in pre and 
post market in Tape A or C securities. Each is provided the standard 
rebate of $0.00160.
    \9\ ADV means average daily volume calculated as the number of 
shares added to, removed from, or routed by, the Exchange, or any 
combination or subset thereof, per day. ADV is calculated on a 
monthly basis.
    \10\ TCV means total consolidated volume calculated as the 
volume reported by all exchanges and trade reporting facilities to a 
consolidated transaction reporting plan for the month for which the 
fees apply.
    \11\ Step-Up Add TCV means ADAV as a percentage of TCV in the 
relevant baseline month subtracted from current ADAV as a percentage 
of TCV.
    \12\ DM is appended to orders that add liquidity using MidPoint 
Discretionary order within discretionary range; HA is appended to 
non-displayed orders that add liquidity; MM is appended to non-
displayed orders that add liquidity using Mid-Point Peg; and RP is 
appended to non-displayed orders that add liquidity using 
Supplemental Peg. Each is provided a rebate of $0.00100.
    \13\ BB is appended to orders that remove liquidity from EDGX in 
Tape B securities, N is appended to orders that remove liquidity 
from EDGX in Tape C securities, and W is appended to orders that 
remove liquidity from EDGX in Tape A securities. Each, as proposed, 
is assessed a fee of $0.00285.
    \14\ ADAV means average daily added volume calculated as the 
number of shares added per day. ADAV is calculated on a monthly 
basis.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange now proposes to adopt a new Growth Tier 2, a new Non-
Displayed Step-Up Volume Tier 2,\15\ and a new Remove Volume Tier 
1.\16\ Each new tier provides the same set of additional criteria in 
which Members may strive to achieve to receive an enhanced rebate or 
reduced fee, as applicable--a Member must (1) add a Step-Up ADAV from 
June 2021 greater than or equal to 0.10% of the TCV, or add a Step-Up 
ADAV from June 2021 greater than or equal to 8,000,000, (2) and have a 
total remove ADV greater than or equal to 0.70% of the TCV. The 
proposed rule change also adopts a new definition, under the 
definitions section of the Fee Schedule, for the term ``Step-Up ADAV'', 
as referenced in each of the proposed new tiers. Specifically, as 
proposed ``Step-up ADAV'' means ADAV in the relevant baseline month 
subtracted from current ADAV.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \15\ As a result, the proposed rule change updates the name of 
the current Non-Displayed Step-Up Tier to Non-Displayed Step-Up Tier 
1.
    \16\ As a result, the proposed rule change updates the name the 
current Remove Volume Tier 1 to Remove Volume Tier 2. Note that 
current Remove Volume Tier 3 is being deleted as proposed herein.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    For achieving the proposed criteria, a Member will receive a 
proposed enhanced rebate of $0.0027 per share on qualifying orders 
(i.e., yielding fee codes B, V, Y, 3 and 4) pursuant to proposed Growth 
Tier 2, a proposed enhanced rebate of $0.0025 per share on qualifying 
orders (i.e., yielding fee codes DM, HA, MM and RP) pursuant to 
proposed Non-Displayed Step-Up Volume Tier 2, and a proposed reduced 
fee of $0.00275 per share on qualifying orders (i.e., yielding fee 
codes BB, N and W) in securities priced at or above $1.00 and 0.28% of 
total dollar value in

[[Page 40099]]

securities priced below $1.00 pursuant to proposed Remove Volume Tier 
1.\17\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \17\ As a result of the five decimal format of the proposed 
reduced fee in proposed Remove Volume Tier 1, the proposed rule 
change also updates the decimal format of the reduced fee that 
currently corresponds to Remove Volume Tier 2 (current Tier 1) in 
order to provide uniformity across the Remove Volume tiers. This 
formatting update does not alter the current reduced fee amount 
offered under Remove Volume Tier 2 (current Tier 1).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Overall, the new Growth, Non-Displayed Step-Up Volume, and Remove 
Volume tiers are designed to provide Members with an additional 
opportunity to receive an enhanced rebate or reduced fee by increasing 
their order flow to the Exchange, which further contributes to a 
deeper, more liquid market and provides even more execution 
opportunities for active market participants. Incentivizing an increase 
in both liquidity adding volume and in liquidity removing volume, 
through additional criteria and enhanced rebate opportunities, 
encourages liquidity adding Members on the Exchange to contribute to a 
deeper, more liquid market, and liquidity executing Members on the 
Exchange to increase transactions and take execution opportunities 
provided by such increased liquidity, together providing for overall 
enhanced price discovery and price improvement opportunities on the 
Exchange. As such, increased overall order flow benefits all Members by 
contributing towards a robust and well-balanced market ecosystem.
Eliminate a Remove Volume Tier and Retail Volume Tier
    Finally, the Exchange proposes to eliminate Remove Volume Tier 2 
and Retail Volume Tier 3. Current Remove Volume Tier 2 provides a 
reduced fee of $0.0026 on qualifying orders (i.e., yielding fee codes 
BB, N and W) in securities priced at or above $1.00 and 0.28% of total 
dollar value in securities priced below $1.00, where a Member (1) has a 
Step-Up Add TCV from January 2021 greater than or equal to 0.15%, (2) 
has an ADAV greater than or equal to 0.08% of the TCV for Non-Displayed 
orders that yield fee codes DM, HA, HI, MM, or RP, and (3) removes an 
ADV greater than or equal to 0.75% of the TCV. Current Retail Volume 
Tier 3 offers an enhanced rebate of $0.0037 per share on qualifying 
orders (i.e., yielding fee code ZA), where a Member (1) has a Retail 
Step-Up Add TCV (i.e., yielding fee code ZA) from May 2020 greater than 
or equal to 0.10%, and (2) removes an ADV greater than or equal to 
0.70% of the TCV. The Exchange proposes to eliminate Remove Volume Tier 
2 and Retail Volume Tier 3 as no Members are currently satisfying the 
criteria under these tiers, nor have satisfied such criteria over the 
last three months. The Exchange no longer wishes to, nor is it required 
to, maintain such tiers. More specifically, the proposed rule change 
removes these tiers as the Exchange would rather redirect future 
resources and funding into other programs and tiers intended to 
incentivize increased order flow.
2. Statutory Basis
    The Exchange believes that the proposed rule change is consistent 
with the objectives of Section 6 of the Act,\18\ in general, and 
furthers the objectives of Section 6(b)(4),\19\ in particular, as it is 
designed to provide for the equitable allocation of reasonable dues, 
fees and other charges among its Members and issuers and other persons 
using its facilities. The Exchange also believes that the proposed rule 
change is consistent with the objectives of Section 6(b)(5) \20\ 
requirements that the rules of an exchange be designed to prevent 
fraudulent and manipulative acts and practices, to promote just and 
equitable principles of trade, to foster cooperation and coordination 
with persons engaged in regulating, clearing, settling, processing 
information with respect to, and facilitating transactions in 
securities, to remove impediments to and perfect the mechanism of a 
free and open market and a national market system, and, in general, to 
protect investors and the public interest, and, particularly, is not 
designed to permit unfair discrimination between customers, issuers, 
brokers, or dealers.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \18\ 15 U.S.C. 78f.
    \19\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4).
    \20\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    As described above, the Exchange operates in a highly competitive 
market in which market participants can readily direct order flow to 
competing venues if they deem fee levels at a particular venue to be 
excessive or incentives to be insufficient. The proposed rule changes 
reflect a competitive pricing structure designed to incentivize market 
participants to direct their order flow to the Exchange, which the 
Exchange believes would enhance market quality to the benefit of all 
Members.
    Regarding the proposed change to the standard rates, the Exchange 
believes that amending the standard rate for orders that remove 
liquidity in securities priced at or above $1.00 is reasonable because, 
as stated above, in order to operate in the highly competitive equities 
markets, the Exchange and its competing exchanges seek to offer similar 
pricing structures, including assessing comparable standard fees for 
orders in securities priced at or above $1.00.\21\ Thus, the Exchange 
believes the proposed standard rate change is reasonable as it is 
generally aligned with and competitive with the amounts assessed for 
the orders in securities at or above $1.00 on other equities exchanges. 
The Exchange also believes that amending this standard rate amount 
represents an equitable allocation of fees and is not unfairly 
discriminatory because they will continue to automatically apply to all 
Members' orders that remove liquidity in securities at or above $1.00 
uniformly.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \21\ See supra note 5.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange also believes the proposed rule change to remove fee 
codes EA and ER is reasonable as the Exchange has observed that a 
majority of other equities exchanges do not assess a different rate for 
internalization orders that add or remove liquidity, and therefore, 
seeks to more competitively align its rates assessed on orders that add 
or remove liquidity with those assessed on other equities exchanges by 
also not applying a different rate for internalized orders. The 
Exchange believes that it is reasonable, equitable and not unfairly 
discriminatory to assess internalization orders that add or remove 
liquidity the same existing corresponding rates currently applied to 
orders that add or remove liquidity that are not internalized. Such 
current rates will apply automatically and uniformly to internalizing 
orders that add or remove liquidity as they do today for all other 
orders that add or remove liquidity.
    Also, as described above, the Exchange notes that relative volume-
based incentives and discounts have been widely adopted by 
exchanges,\22\ including the Exchange,\23\ and are reasonable, 
equitable and non-discriminatory because they are open to all members 
on an equal basis and provide additional benefits or discounts that are 
reasonably related to (i) the value to an exchange's market quality and 
(ii) associated higher levels of market activity, such as higher levels 
of liquidity provision and/or growth patterns. Competing equity 
exchanges offer similar tiered pricing structures, including schedules 
of rebates and fees

[[Page 40100]]

that apply based upon members achieving certain volume and/or growth 
thresholds, as well as assess similar fees or rebates for similar types 
of orders, to that of the Exchange.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \22\ See generally NYSE Price List, Transaction Fees; Nasdaq 
Equity 7, Section 118(a)(1), Fees for Execution and Routing of 
Orders in Nasdaq-Listed Securities; and BZX Equities Fee Schedule, 
Footnote 1, Add/Remove Volume Tiers.
    \23\ See EDGX Equities Fee Schedule, Footnote 1, Add/Remove 
Volume Tiers.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In particular, the Exchange believes the proposed new Growth, Non-
Displayed Step-Up Volume, and Remove Volume tiers are reasonable 
because each new tier will be available to all Members, as the existing 
tiers currently are, and provide all Members with an additional 
opportunity to receive an enhanced rebate or reduced fee, as 
applicable. The Exchange further believes the proposed new Growth, Non-
Displayed Step-Up, and Remove Volume tiers are a reasonable means to 
encourage overall growth in Members' overall order flow to the Exchange 
and to incentivize Members to continue to provide liquidity adding and 
liquidity removing to the Exchange by offering them an additional 
opportunity to receive an enhanced rebate or reduced fee on qualifying 
orders than those opportunities currently under the Add/Remove Volume 
Tiers in Footnote 1 of the Fee Schedule. The Exchange believes that the 
proposed tiers will generally benefit all market participants by 
incentivizing continuous liquidity and thus, deeper more liquid markets 
as well as increased execution opportunities. Indeed, the Exchange 
notes that greater add volume order flow may provide for deeper, more 
liquid markets and execution opportunities at improved prices, and 
greater remove volume order flow may increase transactions on the 
Exchange, which the Exchange believes incentivizes liquidity providers 
to submit additional liquidity and execution opportunities. This 
overall increase in activity deepens the Exchange's liquidity pool, 
offers additional cost savings, supports the quality of price 
discovery, promotes market transparency and improves market quality, 
for all investors. The Exchange also believes the proposed rule change 
to define the term ``Step-Up ADAV'' is reasonable as it will clarify 
terminology used in the Fee Schedule, to the benefit of all Members.
    Further, the Exchange believes that the proposed tiers are 
reasonable as they do not represent a significant departure from the 
criteria or corresponding rates currently offered in the Fee Schedule, 
and that the proposed enhanced rebates or enhanced fee, as applicable, 
are commensurate with the new criteria. More specifically, the Exchange 
believes that the proposed criteria, which is the same in each new 
tier, and corresponding rates are commensurate with surrounding tiers; 
in that the proposed criteria in new Growth Tier 2 is incrementally 
more difficult than that of Growth Tier 1 and thus appropriately offers 
a greater incentive, the proposed criteria in new Remove Volume Tier 1 
is incrementally less difficult than that of Remove Volume Tier 2 
(current Tier 1) \24\ and thus appropriately offers a lesser incentive, 
and the proposed criteria in new Non-Displayed Step-Up Volume Tier 2 is 
about the same in difficulty as the current Non-Displayed Step-Up 
Volume Tier and thus appropriately offers the same incentive.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \24\ See supra note 16.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange also believes that the proposal represents an 
equitable allocation of fees and rebates and is not unfairly 
discriminatory because all Members are eligible for the new Growth, 
Non-Displayed Step-Up Volume, and Remove Volume tiers and have the 
opportunity to meet the tiers' criteria and receive the applicable 
enhanced rebate or reduced fee if such criteria is met. Without having 
a view of activity on other markets and off-exchange venues, the 
Exchange has no way of knowing whether this proposed rule change would 
definitely result in any Members qualifying for the proposed tiers. 
While the Exchange has no way of predicting with certainty how the 
proposed tiers will impact Member activity, the Exchange anticipates 
that at least five Members will be able to satisfy the criteria 
proposed under each of the three new tiers. The Exchange also notes 
that proposed tiers will not adversely impact any Member's ability to 
qualify for reduced fees or enhanced rebate offered under other tiers. 
Should a Member not meet the proposed new criteria, the Member will 
merely not receive that corresponding enhanced rebate or reduced fee, 
as applicable.
    Finally, the Exchange believes the proposed rule change to 
eliminate Remove Volume Tier 2 and Retail Volume Tier 3 is reasonable 
because the Exchange is not required to maintain this tier or provide 
Members an opportunity to receive reduced fees or enhanced rebates. The 
Exchange believes the proposal to eliminate these tiers is also 
equitable and not unfairly discriminatory because it applies to all 
Members (i.e., the tier will not be available for any Member). The 
Exchange notes that recently no Members have satisfied the criteria of 
Remove Volume Tier 2 nor the criteria of Retail Volume Tier 3. The 
Exchange also notes that the proposed rule change to remove these two 
tiers merely results in Members not receiving a reduced fee or enhanced 
rebate, as applicable, which as noted above, the Exchange is not 
required to offer or maintain. Furthermore, the proposed rule change to 
eliminate both Remove Volume Tier 2 and Retail Volume Tier 3 enables 
the Exchange to redirect resources and funding into other programs and 
tiers intended to incentivize increased order flow.

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule changes will 
impose any burden on competition not necessary or appropriate in 
furtherance of the purposes of the Act. Rather, as discussed above, the 
Exchange believes that the proposed change would encourage the 
submission of additional order flow to a public exchange, thereby 
promoting market depth, execution incentives and enhanced execution 
opportunities, as well as price discovery and transparency for all 
Members. As a result, the Exchange believes that the proposed change 
furthers the Commission's goal in adopting Regulation NMS of fostering 
competition among orders, which promotes ``more efficient pricing of 
individual stocks for all types of orders, large and small.''
    The Exchange believes the proposed rule change does not impose any 
burden on intramarket competition that is not necessary or appropriate 
in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. Particularly, the proposed 
rule change to update the standard fee applicable to liquidity removing 
orders in securities priced at or above a $1.00 does not impose any 
burden on intramarket competition because the standard rate will 
continue to apply automatically and uniformly to all liquidity removing 
orders priced at or above $1.00. Similarly, all Members' internalizing 
orders that add or remove liquidity will no longer yield fee codes EA 
or ER, and, instead, will automatically and uniformly be assessed the 
fees already in place for all other orders generally that add or remove 
liquidity. The Exchange also notes that the proposed new Growth, Non-
Displayed Step-Up Volume, Remove Volume tiers applies to all Members 
equally in that all Members are eligible for these tiers, have a 
reasonable opportunity to meet the tiers' criteria and will receive the 
enhanced rebates or reduced fee on their qualifying orders if such 
criteria is met. Additionally, the proposed tiers are designed to 
attract additional order flow to the Exchange. The Exchange believes 
that the new criteria will incentivize market participants to direct 
liquidity adding and removing order flow to the Exchange, providing for 
additional execution opportunities for market

[[Page 40101]]

participants and improved price transparency. Greater overall order 
flow, trading opportunities, and pricing transparency benefits all 
market participants on the Exchange by enhancing market quality and 
continuing to encourage Members to send orders, thereby contributing 
towards a robust and well-balanced market ecosystem. Finally, the 
Exchange does not believe the proposed rule change to eliminate a 
Remove Volume Tier and Retail Volume Tier will impose any burden on 
intramarket competition because it applies to all Members uniformly, as 
in, the tiers will no longer be available to any Member.
    Next, the Exchange believes the proposed rule change does not 
impose any burden on intermarket competition that is not necessary or 
appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. As previously 
discussed, the Exchange operates in a highly competitive market. 
Members have numerous alternative venues that they may participate on 
and direct their order flow, including other equities exchanges, off-
exchange venues, and alternative trading systems. Additionally, the 
Exchange represents a small percentage of the overall market. Based on 
publicly available information, no single equities exchange has more 
than 16% of the market share.\25\ Therefore, no exchange possesses 
significant pricing power in the execution of order flow. Indeed, 
participants can readily choose to send their orders to other exchange 
and off-exchange venues if they deem fee levels at those other venues 
to be more favorable. Moreover, the Commission has repeatedly expressed 
its preference for competition over regulatory intervention in 
determining prices, products, and services in the securities markets. 
Specifically, in Regulation NMS, the Commission highlighted the 
importance of market forces in determining prices and SRO revenues and, 
also, recognized that current regulation of the market system ``has 
been remarkably successful in promoting market competition in its 
broader forms that are most important to investors and listed 
companies.'' \26\ The fact that this market is competitive has also 
long been recognized by the courts. In NetCoalition v. Securities and 
Exchange Commission, the D.C. Circuit stated as follows: ``[n]o one 
disputes that competition for order flow is `fierce.' . . . As the SEC 
explained, `[i]n the U.S. national market system, buyers and sellers of 
securities, and the broker-dealers that act as their order-routing 
agents, have a wide range of choices of where to route orders for 
execution'; [and] `no exchange can afford to take its market share 
percentages for granted' because `no exchange possesses a monopoly, 
regulatory or otherwise, in the execution of order flow from broker 
dealers' . . . .''.\27\ Accordingly, the Exchange does not believe its 
proposed fee change imposes any burden on competition that is not 
necessary or appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of the Act.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \25\ Supra note 4.
    \26\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 51808 (June 9, 
2005), 70 FR 37496, 37499 (June 29, 2005).
    \27\ NetCoalition v. SEC, 615 F.3d 525, 539 (D.C. Cir. 2010) 
(quoting Securities Exchange Act Release No. 59039 (December 2, 
2008), 73 FR 74770, 74782-83 (December 9, 2008) (SR-NYSEArca-2006-
21)).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed 
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others

    The Exchange neither solicited nor received comments on the 
proposed rule change.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for 
Commission Action

    The foregoing rule change has become effective pursuant to Section 
19(b)(3)(A) of the Act \28\ and paragraph (f) of Rule 19b-4 \29\ 
thereunder. At any time within 60 days of the filing of the proposed 
rule change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule 
change if it appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or 
appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or 
otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. If the Commission 
takes such action, the Commission will institute proceedings to 
determine whether the proposed rule change should be approved or 
disapproved.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \28\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
    \29\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and 
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule 
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of 
the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's internet comment form (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
     Send an email to [email protected]. Please include 
File Number SR-CboeEDGX-2021-033 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities 
and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to File Number SR-CboeEDGX-2021-033. This 
file number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To 
help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently, 
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on 
the Commission's internet website (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). 
Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all written 
statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are filed with 
the Commission, and all written communications relating to the proposed 
rule change between the Commission and any person, other than those 
that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the provisions 
of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for website viewing and printing in 
the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 
20549 on official business days between the hours of 10:00 a.m. and 
3:00 p.m. Copies of the filing also will be available for inspection 
and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All comments 
received will be posted without change. Persons submitting comments are 
cautioned that we do not redact or edit personal identifying 
information from comment submissions. You should submit only 
information that you wish to make available publicly. All submissions 
should refer to File Number SR-CboeEDGX-2021-033, and should be 
submitted on or before August 16, 2021.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets, 
pursuant to delegated authority.\30\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \30\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

J. Matthew DeLesDernier,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2021-15812 Filed 7-23-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P