[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 115 (Thursday, June 17, 2021)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 32241-32243]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-12814]


 ========================================================================
 Proposed Rules
                                                 Federal Register
 ________________________________________________________________________
 
 This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains notices to the public of 
 the proposed issuance of rules and regulations. The purpose of these 
 notices is to give interested persons an opportunity to participate in 
 the rule making prior to the adoption of the final rules.
 
 ========================================================================
 

  Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 115 / Thursday, June 17, 2021 / 
Proposed Rules  

[[Page 32241]]



DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Fish and Wildlife Service

50 CFR Part 17

[FF09E21000 FXES11110900000 212]


Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; 90-Day Findings 
for Two Species

AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior.

ACTION: Notification of petition findings and initiation of status 
reviews.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: We, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service), announce 90-
day findings on two petitions to add species to the List of Endangered 
and Threatened Wildlife under the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as 
amended (Act). Based on our review, we find that the petitions present 
substantial scientific or commercial information indicating that the 
petitioned actions may be warranted. Therefore, with the publication of 
this document, we announce that we plan to initiate status reviews of 
the Temblor legless lizard (Anniella alexanderae) and Santa Ana 
speckled dace (Rhinichthys osculus) to determine whether the petitioned 
actions are warranted. To ensure that the status reviews are 
comprehensive, we are requesting scientific and commercial data and 
other information regarding the species and factors that may affect 
their status. Based on the status reviews, we will issue 12-month 
petition findings, which will address whether or not the petitioned 
actions are warranted, in accordance with the Act.

DATES: These findings were made on June 17, 2021. As we commence our 
status reviews, we seek any new information concerning the status of, 
or threats to, the species or their habitats. Any information we 
receive during the course of our status reviews will be considered.

ADDRESSES: Supporting documents: Summaries of the basis for the 
petition findings contained in this document are available on http://www.regulations.gov under the appropriate docket number (see table 
under SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION). In addition, this supporting 
information is available by contacting the appropriate person, as 
specified in FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT.
    Status reviews: If you have new scientific or commercial data or 
other information concerning the status of, or threats to, the species 
for which we are initiating status reviews, please provide those data 
or information by one of the following methods:
    (1) Electronically: Go to the Federal eRulemaking Portal: http://www.regulations.gov. In the Search box, enter the appropriate docket 
number (see table under SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION). Then, click on the 
``Search'' button. After finding the correct document, you may submit 
information by clicking on ``Comment Now!'' If your information will 
fit in the provided comment box, please use this feature of http://www.regulations.gov, as it is most compatible with our information 
review procedures. If you attach your information as a separate 
document, our preferred file format is Microsoft Word. If you attach 
multiple comments (such as form letters), our preferred format is a 
spreadsheet in Microsoft Excel.
    (2) By hard copy: Submit by U.S. mail to: Public Comments 
Processing, Attn: [Insert appropriate docket number; see table under 
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION], U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, MS: PRB/3W, 
5275 Leesburg Pike, Falls Church, VA 22041-3803.
    We request that you send information only by the methods described 
above. We will post all information we receive on http://www.regulations.gov. This generally means that we will post any 
personal information you provide us (see Request for Information for 
Status Reviews, below, for more information).

------------------------------------------------------------------------
        Species common name                    Contact person
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Temblor legless lizard............  Michael Fris, Project Leader,
                                     Sacramento Fish and Wildlife
                                     Office, 916-414-6700,
                                     [email protected].
Santa Ana speckled dace...........  Scott Sobiech, Field Supervisor,
                                     Carlsbad Fish and Wildlife Office,
                                     760-431-9440,
                                     [email protected].
------------------------------------------------------------------------


FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 
    If you use a telecommunications device for the deaf, please call 
the Federal Relay Service at 800-877-8339.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

    Section 4 of the Act (16 U.S.C. 1533) and its implementing 
regulations in title 50 of the Code of Federal Regulations (50 CFR part 
424) set forth the procedures for adding species to, removing species 
from, or reclassifying species on the Federal Lists of Endangered and 
Threatened Wildlife and Plants (Lists or List) in 50 CFR part 17. 
Section 4(b)(3)(A) of the Act requires that we make a finding on 
whether a petition to add a species to the List (i.e., ``list'' a 
species), remove a species from the List (i.e., ``delist'' a species), 
or change a listed species' status from endangered to threatened or 
from threatened to endangered (i.e., ``reclassify'' a species) presents 
substantial scientific or commercial information indicating that the 
petitioned action may be warranted. To the maximum extent practicable, 
we are to make this finding within 90 days of our receipt of the 
petition and publish the finding promptly in the Federal Register.
    Our regulations establish that substantial scientific or commercial 
information with regard to a 90-day petition finding refers to credible 
scientific or commercial information in support of the petition's 
claims such that a reasonable person conducting an impartial scientific 
review would conclude that the action proposed in the petition may be 
warranted (50 CFR 424.14(h)(1)(i)).
    A species may be determined to be an endangered species or a 
threatened species because of one or more of the

[[Page 32242]]

five factors described in section 4(a)(1) of the Act (16 U.S.C. 
1533(a)(1)). The five factors are:
    (a) The present or threatened destruction, modification, or 
curtailment of its habitat or range (Factor A);
    (b) Overutilization for commercial, recreational, scientific, or 
educational purposes (Factor B);
    (c) Disease or predation (Factor C);
    (d) The inadequacy of existing regulatory mechanisms (Factor D); 
and
    (e) Other natural or manmade factors affecting its continued 
existence (Factor E).

These factors represent broad categories of natural or human-caused 
actions or conditions that could have an effect on a species' continued 
existence. In evaluating these actions and conditions, we look for 
those that may have a negative effect on individuals of the species, as 
well as other actions or conditions that may ameliorate any negative 
effects or may have positive effects.
    We use the term ``threat'' to refer in general to actions or 
conditions that are known to, or are reasonably likely to, affect 
individuals of a species negatively. The term ``threat'' includes 
actions or conditions that have a direct impact on individuals (direct 
impacts), as well as those that affect individuals through alteration 
of their habitat or required resources (stressors). The term ``threat'' 
may encompass--either together or separately--the source of the action 
or condition, or the action or condition itself. However, the mere 
identification of any threat(s) may not be sufficient to compel a 
finding that the information in the petition is substantial information 
indicating that the petitioned action may be warranted. The information 
presented in the petition must include evidence sufficient to suggest 
that these threats may be affecting the species to the point that the 
species may meet the definition of an endangered species or threatened 
species under the Act.
    If we find that a petition presents such information, our 
subsequent status review will evaluate all identified threats by 
considering the individual-, population-, and species-level effects and 
the expected response by the species. We will evaluate individual 
threats and their expected effects on the species, then analyze the 
cumulative effect of the threats on the species as a whole. We also 
consider the cumulative effect of the threats in light of those actions 
and conditions that are expected to have positive effects on the 
species--such as any existing regulatory mechanisms or conservation 
efforts that may ameliorate threats. It is only after conducting this 
cumulative analysis of threats and the actions that may ameliorate 
them, and the expected effect on the species now and in the foreseeable 
future, that we can determine whether the species meets the definition 
of an endangered species or threatened species under the Act.
    If we find that a petition presents substantial scientific or 
commercial information indicating that the petitioned action may be 
warranted, the Act requires that we promptly commence a review of the 
status of the species, and we will subsequently complete a status 
review in accordance with our prioritization methodology for 12-month 
findings (81 FR 49248; July 27, 2016).

Summaries of Petition Findings

    The petition findings contained in this document are listed in the 
table below, and the basis for each finding, along with supporting 
information, is available on http://www.regulations.gov under the 
appropriate docket number.

                                              Table--Status Reviews
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                  URL to docket on http://
            Common name                            Docket No.                        www.regulations.gov
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Temblor legless lizard.............  FWS-R8-ES-2021-0024                    https://www.regulations.gov/docket/FWS-R8-ES-2021-0024.
Santa Ana speckled dace............  FWS-R8-ES-2021-0023                    https://www.regulations.gov/docket/FWS-R8-ES-2021-0023.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Evaluation of a Petition To List the Temblor Legless Lizard

Species and Range
    Temblor legless lizard (Anniella alexanderae); California.
Petition History
    On October 20, 2020, we received a petition dated the same, from 
the Center for Biological Diversity, requesting that we list the 
Temblor legless lizard as an endangered or threatened species and 
designate critical habitat for this species under the Act. The petition 
clearly identified itself as such and included the requisite 
identification information for the petitioner, required at 50 CFR 
424.14(c). This finding addresses the petition.
Finding
    Based on our review of the petition and sources cited in the 
petition, we find that the petition presents substantial scientific or 
commercial information indicating that the petitioned action may be 
warranted for the Temblor legless lizard due to potential threats 
associated with the following: Oil and gas development, urbanization, 
habitat fragmentation, and industrial solar projects (Factor A); and 
climate change and wildfires (Factor E). The petition also presented 
substantial information that existing regulatory mechanisms and 
conservation measures may be inadequate to address impacts of these 
threats (Factor D).
    The basis for our finding on this petition, and other information 
regarding our review of the petition, can be found as an appendix at 
http://www.regulations.gov under Docket No. FWS-R8-ES-2021-0024 under 
Supporting Documents.

Evaluation of a Petition To List the Santa Ana Speckled Dace

Species and Range
    Speckled dace (Rhinichthys osculus); Southern California.
Petition History
    On May 11, 2020, we received a petition dated the same, from the 
Center for Biological Diversity, requesting that we list the Southern 
California population of the speckled dace (Santa Ana speckled dace), 
either as a taxonomically defined species or as a distinct population 
segment under our Policy Regarding the Recognition of Distinct 
Vertebrate Population Segments Under the Endangered Species Act (61 FR 
4722; February 7, 1996), as an endangered or threatened species and 
designate critical habitat for this species under the Act. The petition 
clearly identified itself as such and included the requisite 
identification information for the petitioner, required at 50 CFR 
424.14(c). This finding addresses the petition.
Finding
    Based on our review of the petition and sources cited in the 
petition, we find that the petition presents substantial scientific or 
commercial

[[Page 32243]]

information indicating the petitioned entity (Santa Ana speckled dace) 
may be a distinct population segment (DPS) and that the petitioned 
action may be warranted due to potential threats associated with the 
following: Dams, reservoirs, and water diversions; barriers to 
migration and movement; roads; pollution; mining; concentrated 
recreational use; and off-road vehicle use (Factor A); predation 
(Factor C); and drought, wildfires and flooding, introduced species, 
climate change, and population fragmentation (Factor E). We further 
find that the petition presents substantial scientific or commercial 
information indicating that existing regulatory mechanisms may be 
inadequate to fully ameliorate the identified threats (Factor D), 
although there is also information indicating that these regulatory 
mechanisms and other conservation efforts provide some protection to 
the Santa Ana speckled dace.
    The basis for our finding on this petition, and other information 
regarding our review of the petition, can be found as an appendix at 
http://www.regulations.gov under Docket No. FWS-R8-ES-2021-0023 under 
the Supporting Documents section.

Conclusion

    On the basis of our evaluation of the information presented in the 
petitions under sections 4(b)(3)(A) and 4(b)(3)(D)(i) of the Act, we 
have determined that the petitions summarized above for the Temblor 
legless lizard and Santa Ana speckled dace present substantial 
scientific or commercial information indicating that the petitioned 
actions may be warranted. We are, therefore, initiating status reviews 
of these species to determine whether the actions are warranted under 
the Act. At the conclusion of the status reviews, we will issue 
findings, in accordance with section 4(b)(3)(B) of the Act, as to 
whether the petitioned actions are not warranted, warranted, or 
warranted but precluded by pending proposals to determine whether any 
species is an endangered species or a threatened species.

Request for Information for Status Reviews

    When we make a finding that a petition presents substantial 
information indicating that listing, delisting, or reclassification of 
a species may be warranted, we are required to review the status of the 
species (a status review). For the status review to be complete and 
based on the best available scientific and commercial information, we 
request information on the species from governmental agencies, Native 
American Tribes, the scientific community, industry, and any other 
interested parties. We seek information on:
    (1) The species' biology, range, and population trends, including:
    (a) Habitat requirements;
    (b) Genetics and taxonomy;
    (c) Historical and current range, including distribution patterns; 
and
    (d) Historical and current population levels and current and 
projected trends.
    (2) The five factors described in section 4(a)(1) of the Act (see 
Background, above) that are the basis for making a listing, delisting, 
or reclassification determination for a species under section 4(a) of 
the Act, including past and ongoing conservation measures that could 
decrease the extent to which one or more of the factors affect the 
species, its habitat, or both.
    (3) The potential effects of climate change on the species and its 
habitat, and the extent to which it affects the habitat or range of the 
species.
    Submissions merely stating support for or opposition to the actions 
under consideration without providing supporting information, although 
noted, will not be considered in making a determination. Section 
4(b)(1)(A) of the Act directs that determinations as to whether any 
species is an endangered or threatened species must be made ``solely on 
the basis of the best scientific and commercial data available.''
    You may submit your information concerning the status review by one 
of the methods listed in ADDRESSES. If you submit information via 
http://www.regulations.gov, your entire submission--including any 
personal identifying information--will be posted on the website. If you 
submit a hardcopy that includes personal identifying information, you 
may request at the top of your document that we withhold this personal 
identifying information from public review. However, we cannot 
guarantee that we will be able to do so. We will post all hardcopy 
submissions on http://www.regulations.gov.
    It is important to note that the standard for a 90-day finding 
differs from the Act's standard that applies to a status review to 
determine whether a petitioned action is warranted. In making a 90-day 
finding, we consider information in the petition and sources cited in 
the petition, as well as information that is readily available, and we 
evaluate merely whether that information constitutes ``substantial 
information'' indicating that the petitioned action ``may be 
warranted.'' In a 12-month finding, we must complete a thorough status 
review of the species and evaluate the ``best scientific and commercial 
data available'' to determine whether a petitioned action ``is 
warranted.'' Because the Act's standards for 90-day and 12-month 
findings are different, a substantial 90-day finding does not mean that 
the 12-month finding will result in a ``warranted'' finding.

Authors

    The primary authors of this document are staff members of the 
Ecological Services Program, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.

Authority

    The authority for these actions is the Endangered Species Act of 
1973, as amended (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.).

Martha Williams,
Principal Deputy Director, Exercising the Delegated Authority of the 
Director, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
[FR Doc. 2021-12814 Filed 6-16-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4333-15-P