[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 103 (Tuesday, June 1, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Pages 29237-29239]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-11387]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

[C-580-879]


Certain Corrosion-Resistant Steel Products From the Republic of 
Korea: Final Results and Partial Rescission of Countervailing Duty 
Administrative Review; 2018

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, 
Department of Commerce.

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (Commerce) determines that 
countervailable subsidies are being provided to producers and exporters 
of certain corrosion-resistant steel products from the Republic of 
Korea. The period of review (POR) is January 1, 2018, through December 
31, 2018. Commerce is also rescinding the review with respect to 
certain companies.

DATES: Applicable June 1, 2021.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Myrna Lobo or Jun Jack Zhao, AD/CVD 
Operations, Office VII, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade 
Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue 
NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-2371 or (202) 482-1396, 
respectively.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background

    Commerce published the Preliminary Results of this review on 
November 23, 2020.\1\ In addition, Commerce issued a post-preliminary 
determination on the electricity for less than adequate remuneration 
allegation on April 26, 2021.\2\ For a description of the events that 
occurred since the Preliminary Results, see the Issues and Decision 
Memorandum.\3\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ See Certain Corrosion-Resistant Steel Products from the 
Republic of Korea: Preliminary Results of Countervailing Duty 
Administrative Review; 2018, 85 FR 74692 (November 23, 2020) 
(Preliminary Results), and accompanying Preliminary Decision 
Memorandum.
    \2\ See Memorandum, ``Countervailing Duty Administrative Review 
of Certain Corrosion-Resistant Steel Products from the Republic of 
Korea: Post-Preliminary Analysis Memorandum of Electricity for Less 
than Adequate Remuneration,'' dated April 26, 2021.
    \3\ See Memorandum, ``Issues and Decision Memorandum for the 
Final Results of the 2018 Administrative Review of the 
Countervailing Duty Order on Certain Corrosion-Resistant Steel 
Products from the Republic of Korea,'' (Issues and Decision 
Memorandum, or IDM), dated concurrently with, and hereby adopted by, 
this notice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    On May 14, 2021, Commerce extended the deadline for the final 
results of this administrative review until May 24, 2021.\4\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ See Memorandum, ``Certain Corrosion-Resistant Steel Products 
from the Republic of Korea: Extension of Deadline for Final Results 
of Countervailing Duty Administrative Review,'' dated Mary 14, 2021.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Scope of the Order

    The products covered by this order are certain corrosion-resistant 
steel products. For a complete description of the scope of this order, 
see the Issues and Decision Memorandum.

Analysis of Comments Received

    All issues raised in interested parties' case briefs are addressed 
in the Issues and Decision Memorandum accompanying this notice. A list 
of the issued raised by parties, and to which Commerce responded in the 
Issues and Decision Memorandum, is provided in Appendix I to this 
notice. The Issues and Decision Memorandum is a public document and is 
on file electronically via Enforcement and Compliance's Antidumping and 
Countervailing Duty

[[Page 29238]]

Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS). ACCESS is available to 
registered users at http://access.trade.gov. In addition, a complete 
version of the Issues and Decision Memorandum can be accessed directly 
at http://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/.

Changes Since the Preliminary Results

    Based on the comments received and record evidence, we made certain 
changes to the Preliminary Results with respect to the net subsidy 
calculated for Dongbu Steel Co., Ltd./Dongbu Incheon Steel Co., Ltd. 
(Dongbu), and for companies not selected for individual review. These 
changes are explained in the Issues and Decision Memorandum.

Partial Rescission of Review

    We received no comments regarding the no shipments claims with 
respect to Nippon Steel Sales Vietnam Co., Ltd. (NSSVC), Hoa Sen Group 
(HSG), and Ton Dong A Corporation (TDA) since the Preliminary Results. 
Further, we have analyzed the questionnaire responses submitted by the 
respondents to Commerce since the Preliminary Results and determined 
that the record contains no information that calls into question a 
finding of no shipments. Therefore, we are rescinding this review with 
respect to NSSVC, HSG, and TDA.

Companies Not Selected for Individual Review

    For the companies not selected for individual review, because the 
rates calculated for Dongbu and Hyundai Steel Company (Hyundai Steel) 
are above de minimis and not based entirely on facts available, we 
applied a subsidy rate based on the weighted-average of the subsidy 
rates calculated for Dongbu and Hyundai Steel using publicly ranged 
sales data submitted by the respondents.\5\ This is consistent with the 
methodology that we would use in an investigation to establish the all-
others rate, pursuant to section 705(c)(5)(A) of the Tariff Act of 
1930, as amended (the Act).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ With two respondents under review, Commerce normally 
calculates: (A) A weighted-average of the estimated subsidy rates 
calculated for the examined respondents; (B) a simple average of the 
estimated subsidy rates calculated for the examined respondents; and 
(C) a weighted-average of the estimated subsidy rates calculated for 
the examined respondents using each company's publicly ranged U.S. 
sales values for the merchandise under consideration. Commerce then 
compares (B) and (C) to (A) and selects the rate closest to (A) as 
the most appropriate rate for all other producers and exporters.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Final Results of Administrative Review

    We determine that, for the period January 1, 2018 through December 
31, 2018, the following total estimated net countervailable subsidy 
rates exist:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                          Subsidy rate
                       Company                            (percent ad
                                                            valorem)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dongbu Steel Co., Ltd./Dongbu Incheon Steel Co., Ltd.               6.83
Hyundai Steel Company................................               0.51
Non-Selected Companies Under Review \6\..............               3.11
------------------------------------------------------------------------

Assessment Rate
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ See Appendix II.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.212(b)(2), Commerce will determine, and U.S. 
Customs and Border Protection (CBP) shall assess, countervailing duties 
on all appropriate entries of subject merchandise in accordance with 
the final results of this review, for the above-listed companies at the 
applicable ad valorem assessment rates listed. Consistent with its 
recent notice,\7\ Commerce intends to issue assessment instructions to 
CBP no earlier than 35 days after the date of publication of the final 
results of this review in the Federal Register. Further, for companies 
for which the review has been rescinded, we intend to instruct CBP to 
liquidate such entries at the cash deposit rate required at the time of 
entry. If a timely summons is filed at the U.S. Court of International 
Trade, the assessment instructions will direct CBP not to liquidate 
relevant entries until the time for parties to file a request for a 
statutory injunction has expired (i.e., within 90 days of publication).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ See Notice of Discontinuation of Policy to Issue Liquidation 
Instructions After 15 Days in Applicable Antidumping and 
Countervailing Duty Administrative Proceedings, 86 FR 3995 (January 
15, 2021).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Cash Deposit Rates

    In accordance with section 751(a)(1) of the Act, Commerce intends 
to instruct CBP to collect cash deposits of estimated countervailing 
duties in the amounts shown for each of the respective companies listed 
above. For all non-reviewed firms, we will instruct CBP to continue to 
collect cash deposits of estimated countervailing duties at the most 
recent company-specific or all-others rate applicable to the company, 
as appropriate. These cash deposits, when imposed, shall remain in 
effect until further notice.

Administrative Protective Order

    This notice also serves as a final reminder to parties subject to 
administrative protective order (APO) of their responsibility 
concerning the return or destruction of proprietary information 
disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely 
written notification of the return/destruction of APO materials or 
conversion to judicial protective order is hereby requested. Failure to 
comply with the regulations and terms of an APO is a sanctionable 
violation.

Disclosure

    Commerce intends to disclose the calculations performed for these 
final results of review within five days of the date of publication of 
this notice in the Federal Register, in accordance with 19 CFR 
351.224(b).
    These final results are issued and published in accordance with 
sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.221(b)(5).

    Dated: May 24, 2021.
Christian Marsh,
Acting Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.

Appendix I

List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum

I. Summary
II. List of Issues
III. Background
IV. Changes Since the Preliminary Results
V. Scope of the Order
VI. Period of Review
VII. Rescission of Administrative Review, in Part
VIII. Subsidies Valuation Information
IX. Analysis of Programs
X. Discussion of Comments
    Comment 1: Whether Electricity for LTAR Confers a Benefit
    Comment 2: Whether Commerce's Determination that Port Usage 
Rights Provides a Countervailable Benefit is Unsupported by Evidence 
and Contrary to Law

[[Page 29239]]

    Comment 3: Whether Commerce Incorrectly Countervailed the 
Reduction for Sewerage Usage Fees
    Comment 4: Whether the Restructuring of Dongbu's Existing Loans 
by GOK-Controlled Banks Provided a Financial Contribution to Dongbu
    Comment 5: Whether the Restructured Loans Provided to Dongbu 
were Specific
    Comment 6: Whether Commerce Should Use the Interest Rates from 
Loans Provided by Commercial Banks Participating in the Creditor 
Bank Committee as Benchmarks
    Comment 7: Whether Dongbu Is Equityworthy and the Debt-to-Equity 
Swaps Should be Countervailed
    Comment 8: Whether Commerce Correctly Calculated the Benefit to 
Dongbu from KDB Short-Term Discounted Loans for Export Receivables 
Program
    Comment 9: Whether Commerce Correctly Calculated the Benefit 
from Dongbu Steel's Short-Term KRW Loans During the POR

XI. Recommendation

Appendix II

List of Non-Selected Companies

1. AJU Steel Co., Ltd.
2. Anjeon Tech
3. Benison Korea Transport
4. Core International
5. CS Global Logistics
6. Dai Yang Metal Co., Ltd.
7. GS Global Corp.
8. Hanwa (Korea) Co., Ltd.
9. Hebei Hongxing Auto Made
10. Integris
11. Jeongwha Polytech
12. Joo Sung Sea And AirCo., Ltd.
13. KC Tech
14. Kima Steel Corporation
15. Korea Clad Tech
16. Kyoungdo Steel Co., Ltd.
17. Market Connect Sales Services
18. Milestone Korea Co., Ltd.
19. POSCO
20. POSCO Coated & Color Steel Co., Ltd.
21. POSCO Daewoo Corporation
22. POSCO International Corporation
23. Qingdao Wangbaoqiang
24. Roser Co., Ltd.
25. Samsung C&T Corporation
26. Sanglim Steel
27. SeAH Steel
28. Sejung Shipping Co., Ltd.
29. Seun Steel
30. Shandongsheng Cao Xian Yalu Mftd.
31. Sung A Steel
32. TCC Steel Co., Ltd.
33. Young Heung Iron and Steel Co., Ltd.
34. Young Steel Korea Co., Ltd.
35. Young Sun Steel Co.
[FR Doc. 2021-11387 Filed 5-28-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P